Slashdot Mirror


China Building City For Cloud Computing

CWmike writes "First it was China's 'big hole' sighting that brought us the supercomputing race. Now China is building a city-sized cloud computing and office complex that will include a mega data center, one of the projects fueling that country's double-digit growth in IT spending. The entire complex will cover some 6.2 million square feet, with the initial data center space accounting for approximately 646,000 square feet, says IBM, which is collaborating with a Chinese company to build it. A Sputnik moment? Patrick Thibodeau reports that these big projects, whether supercomputers or sprawling software development office parks, can garner a lot of attention. But China's overall level of IT spending, while growing rapidly, is only one-fifth that of the US."

142 comments

  1. How convient by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey look, I can store all my data on Chinese government owned computing equipment where they can read it at will and the government can then threaten to cut me off from said data unless I pay them a bribe! I can get all this for slightly less than I'm paying now! I'd be a fool not to!

    1. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How convenient also that there is only one, centralized target to take out in order to wipe out a huge portion of communication infrastructure.

      How convenient also that there is only one, centralized target to take over in order to initiate the robot uprising.

    2. Re:How convient by arivanov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Almost spot on.

      You forgot the regular bribe to the party official in charge of the facility so he does not sell access to your data to your competitor as well as bribes for everyone and everything under him for this same reason.

      It is quite funny when people call China communist. It is capitalism taken to the ultimate limit where anything and everything is for sale with very few of the moral restrictions which the West has inherited from the 20 centuries of its "Sunday school" upbringing.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have altered the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.

    4. Re:How convient by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey look, I can store all my data on Chinese government owned computing equipment where they can read it at will and...

      ...my encrypted data still won't make a lick of sense to anyone but me!
      "I'd be a fool not to" use encryption.

    5. Re:How convient by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

      Except for the fact that they still own the physical hardware, a lot of papers have been published that pretty much state that it's actually not very difficult to get the encryption keys to a running system if you have control of the hardware. So yeah, encryption isn't nearly as useful in this situation as you would think.

    6. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the slightest sign of hard takeoff vaporize it!

      On a second thought nuke it even earlier - it's the only way to be sure. I wouldn't like to live in an Asian dystopia.

    7. Re:How convient by Lazareth · · Score: 2

      Depends really on how you're handling the encryption. If the encrypted data at all times is stored in an encrypted state on site and a remote computer only ever requests encrypted parts of the data, only decrypting and handling it locally, it suddenly becomes a whole lot harder for the owner of the datacenter to fuck you over.

      Sure, if you're just doing a l33t SSH tunnel to a linux based remote system, log into and decrypt your protected home folder, then you're pretty much decrypting it for those who has access to the hardware.

    8. Re:How convient by xnpu · · Score: 1

      Until Goldman Sachs takes over the Chinese government like it has the US government, yes, stuff will be owned by the Chinese government directly. What's your point?

    9. Re:How convient by andre1s · · Score: 1

      Y this is So different from US were service providers will not provide access to my data without warrant (oh wait they will) :)

    10. Re:How convient by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      You forgot the regular bribe to the party official

      It's not a bribe. Consider it a "facilitation fee." My father worked for a company that was looking to win a big contract in Southeast Asia. It is illegal for US companies to pay bribes abroad. So they hired a local "consultant" to help them win the contract. He got paid $1 million for his "services." What he did with the money, was his business. The company won the contract. How much of the money stayed in the "consultant's" pocket, and how much landed in the pockets of other folks, nobody wanted to know.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    11. Re:How convient by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 2

      Why do you think that this new cloud system has anything to do with you, or that they would try to appeal to you? Chinese networks and Chinese websites rarely have English equivalents, or attempt to provide them. It seems a bit self-centered and presumptuous to think that this "cloud" is an overblown trap aimed squarely at you. We don't even know if its services will be open to the Chinese public, much less foreigners.

      --
      Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
    12. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government has a lot of resources. If they wanted to dedicate to decrypting your data, they can do it. Albeit it would take a long time, but still.

    13. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the NSA and CIA who co-opt google etc don't do the same....spooks run the world...lol

    14. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I too love being woken in the middle of the night repeatedly by automated pages stating all of my critical services are down until I remote in and enter a passphrase to restart all the servers/services needing access to that data, after verifying I am actually logged into my own machines and not redirected to some keylogging honeynet...

      But they told me encryption will solve all my problems, so I'd be a fool not to!

    15. Re:How convient by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that is EXACTLY how some business people will see it.

      For me, it would be a matter of trust. Today's business people do not care about that -- just the short-term bottom line. We will need to see more egregious acts by the Chinese government before anyone will sit up and take notice. And I predict there will be and the victims will be the customers of the business that trusts China with too much data. The decision makers will get away with it as they always have until there is a law which says it is illegal.

    16. Re:How convient by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Not if he encrypts the data before sending it to them. Then they don't have the key. They just have a random series of bytes.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    17. Re:How convient by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Nope. Especially if you you use a one time pad, the government will never, ever be able to decrypt your data. What they can do, however, is seize your computer equipment and get the key from there, since I doubt anyone is going to be carrying around a multi-megabyte sequence of numbers in their heads.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    18. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whats the difference ?, you get the RIAA after you butt, while a chineese simply gets disconnected without paying RIAA.

      You know those political systems are not that much different, your have been told by your government that your system works.
      But so are people in other systems; and only the smart people understand that both systems suck.

    19. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH wouldn't spooks love to have a few servers on the other side of the Great Firewall "just in case."

    20. Re:How convient by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Anyone entertaining cloud computing without having some way of doing end-to-end encryption AND having a way to guarantee you have physical control over your backups is putting a huge amount of trust in their provider, regardless of who it is.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    21. Re:How convient by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't like to live in an Asian dystopia.

      Really? I think the food would improve.

    22. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, then the Ministry of Culture says you must be hiding immoral content there and cuts off your access until you provide the encryption key and pay a fine. At which point you've either lost the data, or your using a non-Chinese backup. If the later why the frack are you bothering with the Chinese dataceter anyway?

    23. Re:How convient by somegeekynick · · Score: 1

      It is illegal for US companies to pay bribes abroad.

      I wasn't aware that it was O.K. for US companies to be involved in bribery locally.

    24. Re:How convient by LS · · Score: 2

      Hey look, I can store all my data on Chinese government owned computing equipment where they can read it at will and the government can then threaten to cut me off from said data unless I pay them a bribe! I can get all this for slightly less than I'm paying now! I'd be a fool not to!

      Do you seriously think that other data centers in China are not directly accessible by the government?

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    25. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, don't be talking about papers until you learn the very basics.

    26. Re:How convient by WATist · · Score: 1

      Of course this this would negate allot of or more than the advantages because of higher bandwidth usages and decryption and encryption times and hardware usage.

    27. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXACTLY. I don't think that people realize this kind of things. China could survive without us. We couldn't without them.

    28. Re:How convient by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Hey look, I can store all my data on Chinese government owned computing equipment where they can read it at will and the government can then threaten to cut me off from said data unless I pay them a bribe! I can get all this for slightly less than I'm paying now! I'd be a fool not to!

      Did anybody say it will be available for foreigners at all?

      Apart from that, why would a Chinese business be more or less likely than, say, an American business to look into your data? Or do as you suggest: blackmail you? If they make this available to people outside China, it will be because they want to make business, and you can't run a business that way.

      And why would they want to look at anybody's data? I mean, would anybody seriously consider putting highly sensitive business secrets out in a cloud?

      Being paranoid is all very well, but try to take yourself serious.

    29. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the normal practice.

      It is routine for almost anyone doing business in China, India, Russia, the Middle-East, and other places.

      "Fixers" do their things and things gets done. "Fixers" are commonly not controlled. They can be representatives of organized crime, family members of officials, mercenaries, or normal business people with "good local skills".

    30. Re:How convient by slim · · Score: 1

      Not if he encrypts the data before sending it to them. Then they don't have the key. They just have a random series of bytes.

      The argument goes, they have the "random" series of bytes right there, where they can do all the cryptanalysis and brute-forcing they like.

      This as opposed to having it somewhere you can physically secure yourself, behind mechanisms that detect suspicious access patterns.

    31. Re:How convient by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Yes, how fortunate we are to have churchy people to show us how to behave....~

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    32. Re:How convient by getNewNickName · · Score: 1

      Funny, and you think the Chinese government will let you use any encryption you like. Sorry, but only dissidents use strong encryption...

    33. Re:How convient by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      If you encrypted properly with, say, a one time pad, then no amount of brute forcing will ever help them. It cannot be broken. Of course you would have to keep your several megabyte/gigabyte key somewhere safe if you every want to see your data again.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    34. Re:How convient by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Do you like churchy people or not is irrelevant.

      The morals and the law code of western society is distinctly Christian till this day (with some medieval legal code thrown into the mix). A lot of dos and don'ts in Western culture originate from Christian religion and societies which have developed in a different religious context have a very different set of dos and don'ts. We may find some of their dos and don'ts abhorent, others disgusting. They do not. Similarly they do not understand some of our obsessions.

      This is simply the way the world is.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    35. Re:How convient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encryption of today is so easy to break tomorrow.

      Egads, my human verification word is "Corrupts"

    36. Re:How convient by Lazareth · · Score: 1

      "Very well Ministry of Culture, I'll go elsewhere. Enjoy your bad PR."

      China is more capitalist than you think. Sure, it wouldn't hurt them if a wave of dissatisfied customers left abruptly, but they wouldn't be happy about it.

    37. Re:How convient by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      It is illegal for US companies to pay bribes abroad.

      I wasn't aware that it was O.K. for US companies to be involved in bribery locally.

      I thought that was called a "campaign contribution" in the USA (or at least thats the gist I get from reading this site).

  2. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome our new chinese world overlords.

    This isn't a joke. They're going to be the next world empire. Again.
    Because the rest of us are going to be living in idiocracy and 1984.

  3. In Soviet Russia ... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    someone will make a retarded joke about data owning you or something ...

    in 3

    2

    1

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...retarded joke is you.

  4. Forget Death Rays by dmomo · · Score: 2

    Who needs one when you can build a City-sized DOS cannon.

    1. Re:Forget Death Rays by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Or take out the entire "cloud" (condensed maybe?) by just taking out this one city. I thought the cloud was supposed to be diffuse, not centralized.

    2. Re:Forget Death Rays by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      In today's world of curated computing, "cloud" computing is centralized, and empowers the vendor instead of you.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  5. 1/5 of spending? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who cares about the absolute figure, anyway, it's the bang for the buck that's important. Soviet space program was cheaper than US one as well.

    1. Re:1/5 of spending? by c0lo · · Score: 2

      Who cares about the absolute figure, anyway, it's the bang for the buck that's important. Soviet space program was cheaper than US one as well.

      That's right. Not the cost is important, but the profit.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:1/5 of spending? by Organic_Info · · Score: 1

      It might be "only one-fifth that of the US" right now but I would imagine that is going to grow pretty quickly as China develops.

      Investment for the future and all that...

      --
      "Things that you own end up owning you" - Tyler Durden (via Diogenes of Sinope).
    3. Re:1/5 of spending? by symes · · Score: 1

      I like to dabble in stocks and shares occasionally and would like to jump on the China growth curve. But every time I get anywhere near to deciding a strategy I get cold feet. The main reason being Chinese contracts just seem like Chinese lanterns, so ephemeral. How anything gets done in that country is beyond me - yet we keep seeing these monumental projects. I think it is all smoke and mirrors... and I for one don't know how real any of this Chinese IT stuff is.

    4. Re:1/5 of spending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Plus the cost of programmers in China is way cheaper than in US and that is part of the overall IT spending.

    5. Re:1/5 of spending? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The main reason being Chinese contracts just seem like Chinese lanterns, so ephemeral.

      I know exactly what you mean. But there's a way to deal with risk. Make small investments and don't be greedy. Worst that can happen is you lose your investment - but if it wasn't that much to begin with, who cares. If you go all in though, you are a fool and deserve to be parted from your money.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:1/5 of spending? by arisvega · · Score: 1

      it's the bang for the buck that's important. Soviet space program was cheaper than US one as well.

      Very good point- I'm pretty sure that this "one fifth" buys a whole lot more that fivefold in China that it does in the US of A

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    7. Re:1/5 of spending? by timeOday · · Score: 1
  6. then it's so efficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one-fifth the cost, dealing with four times the population

    1. Re:then it's so efficient by c0lo · · Score: 1

      one-fifth the cost, dealing with four times the population

      Let me point out that, with the deprecation rate we are seeing now for computers, once they finish building it, they'll need to start the upgrade cycle. And keep cycling: over a certain size, maintenance becomes a nightmare.

      How many people you need to lift, solely by their arms power, 1 cubic meter of lead?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:then it's so efficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people you need to lift, solely by their arms power, 1 cubic meter of lead?

      One. It's called leverage.

    3. Re:then it's so efficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people you need to lift, solely by their arms power, 1 cubic meter of lead?

      One. It's called leverage.

      And a huge pile of fools to buy the derivatives

  7. Awesome by ZirconCode · · Score: 3, Funny

    And in two years it will be just as obsolete as square feet.

    1. Re:Awesome by c0lo · · Score: 1

      And in two years it will be just as obsolete as square feet.

      Does it mean "never"?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  8. A Sputnik moment? by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Or a Dubai Tower moment?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:A Sputnik moment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Sputnik moment? Bah! The very fact that Obama was able to inject this sorry catch-phrase into the public consciousness is a sad joke. The best Obammy can muster these days is to conjure up images from their glory days to try to keep his sheep from realizing that their empire is crumbling around them. If Obammy was serious about competing, he'd give teachers' unions the boot and concentrate on REAL education reform, not just throwing more gobs of cash that is the current sinkhole known as the U.S. Dept. of Education.

    2. Re:A Sputnik moment? by burnin1965 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I just can't resist feeding the trolls. :)

      The best Obammy can muster these days is to conjure up images from their glory days to try to keep his sheep from realizing that their empire is crumbling around them.

      It seems your incurable fear and loathing of an elected leader who doesn't look like you has severely impeded any possibility of higher level sentient reasoning or logic, or your simply dumb as a box of rocks. So I'll help you out here with your mental deficiency.

      The Sputnik moment was a realization that the United States as a nation was losing focus on the importance and value of investing in scientific pursuits. The Sputnik moment drove home this fact and put the nation in gear to invest in an area of science that has resulted in what I suspect has been the greatest expansion in economic diversity in history. The results of the space program are so intertwined with so many areas of industry and education in the United States that many people now question whether their was any value at all in the space program.

      And as you noted in your boring statement there is a crumbling of an empire taking place. Over the past decade or two there have been a continuous flow of Sputnik moments slapping us in the face, the Super Collider was cancelled and the future of particle physics is slowly moving out of the United States, the most powerful super computer in the world no longer resides in the United States, this year will be the end of manned space flight capability in the United States, the United States has lost any lead it ever had in math and science education and skills, etc.

      Whether you like Obama or not his statement is on the mark. Whether he has the answers to solve the problems that ail the nation I don't know and I personally am dissatisfied with many of his actions to date as the President. But I also realise that part of the problem for the nation are numb nuts like you who not only have no solutions but are part of the problem with your boorish cry baby whining because you don't like the color of his skin.

      Enjoy the troll food, hopefully a bright spot in your pathetic simpleton world.

    3. Re:A Sputnik moment? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Seriously.

      "Q: How can you tell when it is a real Sputnik moment?
      A: Because everyone knows it without being told"

      China building a datacenter is not really that exciting. They have a lot of net users, I would expect them to need a lot of infrastructure. What's next, 'China has more miles of paved roads than the US, it is a Sputnik moment for the paving industry.' I doubt it.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:A Sputnik moment? by HiMorons · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like he had a solution (even if you don't like it and don't have a solution of your own) and I see that he also didn't mention race (unlike you.) Maybe if you weren't such a racist, arrogant jackass with no solutions, you'd have noticed that. Who's the troll now?

    5. Re:A Sputnik moment? by burnin1965 · · Score: 1

      "The best Obammy can muster"

      At that point it is obvious where the issue lies for the coward. I don't see your logic in calling me a racist for pointing out that the root of the cowards rant is race based.

      "give teachers' unions the boot"

      You are correct, he proposed a solution, remove teachers bargaining power for wages and benefits because, you know, they're making too much and have it too easy, or perhaps its the tenure issue, he sees the union as a barrier to firing all the teachers because there are more capable people banging on the doors to join the field of education. Yep, he has a solution, a phoenix will rise from the ashes or something.

      Looks fairly obvious that the issue for the coward is not education, its the racial make up of the current president and unions, he could not care less about the educational system, so, troll.

  9. The Empire Strikes Back by hpa · · Score: 1

    ... at Cloud City.

    1. Re:The Empire Strikes Back by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      ... at Cloud City.

      Wrong number; this is Crowd City.

  10. Or mega firewall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sure this isn't some giant cloud based firewall that does deep-level packet inspection for all in-bound and out-bound traffic? Authority demand power in all its forms, naturally.

  11. Cloud City? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oblig. to try and see if they will agree to call it Bespin.

    1. Re:Cloud City? by BearRanger · · Score: 1

      No, they will call it Stratos. It predates Bespin, and it's residents are clearly outnumbered by the billions of Troglytes doing all the real work.

  12. Just muscle politics by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Software is more important than hardware today. The whole cloud computing movement shows that in many cases hardware is just a cheap commodity. This datacenter is some politicians building themselves a monument and pretending to be ahead or at least on the same level with the west. This is just a lot of hot air, but otherwise quite irrelevant. Building a large datacenter is pretty easy, once you have the cash, and does not show any level of technological sophistication.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Just muscle politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your post shows perfectly why iPhone app developers shouldn't be consulted with for advice on commercial infrastructure.

    2. Re:Just muscle politics by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Software is more important than hardware today. The whole cloud computing movement shows that in many cases hardware is just a cheap commodity. This datacenter is some politicians building themselves a monument and pretending to be ahead or at least on the same level with the west. This is just a lot of hot air, but otherwise quite irrelevant. Building a large datacenter is pretty easy, once you have the cash, and does not show any level of technological sophistication.

      You have ah, interesting, definitions of 'cheap' and 'easy'. Are you, by some chance, in management?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Just muscle politics by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I am a PhD-Level engineer. And, yes, I know what I am talking about.

      This is a political stunt. It is expensive, but easy to do, which is why the Chinese are doing it. They currently have a lot of money, but money does not come with sophistication. Having a large data-center is nothing special today and does not show that you are on the forefront of any technology.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Just muscle politics by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting I am an iPhone app developer? You are pretty far from the truth. In fact my interest in the hype that is the iPhone is exactly zero.

      You are right however that what they are building is commercial infrastructure. In fact it is generic commercial infrastructure and as such not impressive at all.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Just muscle politics by Clsid · · Score: 1

      So if somebody builds thousands of miles of highways it's not impressive either, since it's just infrastructure? The Chinese have done exactly that and for a fraction of the cost here in the US. Dude, wake up, building facilities like this allows a myriad of services available for business, government, etc. Judging by your comment about the iPhone, you seem to be either a smartass or in total disconnect of reality. An iPhone represents smartphones as whole and that along cloud computing, is driving most of the investments in a lot of industries, like video game companies, or even Netflix. Look at the tech job offers they have, they all are related to cloud computing and data in one way or another.

    6. Re:Just muscle politics by Clsid · · Score: 1

      This is the reason why most people won't hire PhD's for engineering jobs. They have spent way too much time in academia to understand the market. Step down from that position you put yourself into and understand that cloud computing is not about the hardware per se, but the software that can be build on top of it. We are witnessing the promise of a Beowulf cluster and you say that building the largest facility in the planet is irrelevant?

    7. Re:Just muscle politics by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I stand by my statement. Incidentally your Ad Hominem argument (attacking my qualification instead of my statement, as sign of a weak mind) goes completely amiss. Engineering PhDs are highly sought after for evaluation, architectural and design work. Hiring a non-engineering PhD for engineering work is a mistake, though.

      Incidentally, nobody that follows the technology calls them Beowulf clusters anymore, as that tool-set is way outdated and only rarely seen in practice today.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Just muscle politics by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You mistake my statement. It is not impressive as an advanced technological feat. It is impressive as a business achievement. What is wrong in the evaluation of this data-center in the press, is that it is interpreted as a sign the builders are at the forefront of technology. It does not signify that at all.

      The iPhone is a nice gadget, with almost zero technological value. In fact the current generation is not even a good phone. Its main selling-point is design, not engineering, although Apple tries hard to cover up that fact. Many people fall for that propaganda willingly. You seem to be among them.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  13. So typical for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of looking at the trend and extrapolate this to the next 10 years they say: "oh, but it's only one-fifth of what we are spending."
    Maybe there is 5 times less pocket filling as their main motivation is not profit (yet) but innovation.

  14. "One Fifth" may not be as small as it looks.. by ikejam · · Score: 2

    One fifth of the US IT spending may buy a lot more in China.... both in labour and in material...

    1. Re:"One Fifth" may not be as small as it looks.. by value_added · · Score: 1

      One fifth of the US IT spending may buy a lot more in China.... both in labour and in material...

      Agreed, but the problem with that argument is that an hour later you're hungry for ... and you wind spending ... ah, nevermind.

  15. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were a country leader who didn't like china. I'd know the 1st spot to place a missile.

    1. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would said spot be your own country five times over? At least that would be the response to an attack on a PR project like this.

  16. Sounds good but... by susanpinky · · Score: 1

    Looks like a massive project. But the question is... is it going to benefit us at all...

  17. IT spending 1/5th but actual costs 1/300th? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But China's overall level of IT spending, while growing rapidly, is only one-fifth that of the US."

    But it's what they get for that one-fifth given that their costs are so much lower. I've heard a number like 1/300th of the cost relative to the US but as I can't remember where I heard it feel free to ignore this statistic.

    Same concept applies when they state that Chinese military spending is less than the US...maybe in actual USD but not in what they get for that money.

  18. IBM didn't help the Soviets gain the know how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another example of American companies selling their souls and technology to the chinese. In 5 years time the Chinese be competing with IBM to setup these services, and everyone will wonder why we let it happen. It already happened with bullet trains.

    1. Re:IBM didn't help the Soviets gain the know how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, because before the 1970s American high speed rail was the best in the world.

    2. Re:IBM didn't help the Soviets gain the know how by jrumney · · Score: 1

      American companies aren't the only ones selling their know-how to China, obviously. In 2007, high speed rail in China was non-existent. Now they have more miles of high speed track than all of Europe, and by year end they will have more than the rest of the world put together, and be well on the way to designing their own high speed trains based on the tech sold to them by Japan, Germany and France. If you ever want to do more than talk about building a high speed rail network in the US, you know who to call. Other development is happening at a similar pace, there are plans to build, from scratch, 15 new cities the size of New York in China by 2020.

    3. Re:IBM didn't help the Soviets gain the know how by burnin1965 · · Score: 1

      HSR had a good start in the United States but was pretty much killed off for strange reasons.

      The Red Devil, Electroliner, and Bullet were on par with anything else available at the time. The Bullet design was used as inspiration for the Japanese HSR. But it seems HSR in the states was continually coming into conflict with automotive traffic, i.e. the Electroliners were forced to reduce their speeds because the distance between crossing gates and the switches that triggered them was too short and the Electroliner would reach the crossing before the gates were closed when cruising at speed.

  19. One fifth by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    But China's overall level of IT spending, while growing rapidly, is only one-fifth that of the US.

    How much does the US spend on software (Which the chinese will get for free) and labour (which is much cheaper in china)?
    Spending is not an absolute guide, the chinese have significantly lower costs in some areas than the US does.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:One fifth by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      How much does the US spend on software (Which the chinese will get for free)

      Now, if only there was such a thing as free software in America.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  20. 6 million square feet... by jpapon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My buddy is a commercial real estate agent in the Palo Alto/Menlo Park/Sunnyvale (so, Silicon Valley) area, and let me tell you, there's ALOT more than 6 million square feet of office space available to rent. The number may sound impressive, but it's nothing compared to what they have in Northern California alone. I mean, the Oracle campus in Redwood City is over 4 million square feet all by itself.

    Of course, it's not about the space, but what you do with it...

    --
    -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    1. Re:6 million square feet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      6 million square feet of data center is no small amount, though of course not a huge increase in world capacity. Put it in a little perspective, on a city scale that's 3 or 4 big skyscrapers, or a few blocks of mid-rise buildings. It's a little over two of these: http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/12/03/wsj-google-has-bought-111-8th-avenue/

  21. The Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're so brilliant. They just whisk flawless environmental impact statements through their streamlined and efficient environmental bureaucracy, each one a model of corporate citizenship and ethics. Plus, they power their giant data centers with love, not dirty coal like us stupid westerners. The Chinese would never tolerate the pollution and contamination inherent with coal, unlike we overweight corporate consumer-droids.

    If only we were so smart...

    Not to worry; we're still #1. They're only spending half as much as us, see? A dollar doesn't buy any more labor or energy in China than it does here. That dollar is just as heavily taxed in China, too. So obviously we're still way ahead.

    Good luck getting your kid out of the house before 35.

    1. Re:The Chinese by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      They just whisk flawless environmental impact statements through their streamlined and efficient environmental bureaucracy,

      Kinda like oil companies do in the US when people start being concerned about the seals and polar bears in the Gulf of Mexico, huh.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  22. Words from the wise by FreeAsInFreedoooooom · · Score: 1

    "The term “cloud computing” is a marketing buzzword with no clear meaning. It is used for a range of different activities whose only common characteristic is that they use the Internet for something beyond transmitting files. Thus, the term is a nexus of confusion. If you base your thinking on it, your thinking will be vague.

    When thinking about or responding to a statement someone else has made using this term, the first step is to clarify the topic. Which kind of activity is the statement really about, and what is a good, clear term for that activity? Once the topic is clear, the discussion can head for a useful conclusion. " - Richard Stallman

    "One reason you should not use web applications to do your computing is that you lose control," he said. "It's just as bad as using a proprietary program. Do your own computing on your own computer with your copy of a freedom-respecting program. If you use a proprietary program or somebody else's web server, you're defenceless. You're putty in the hands of whoever developed that software."

    1. Re:Words from the wise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, that second part is really out of place... As if all companies and/or people have the kind of money, skills and experience needed to provide their own computing power and to develop/maintain their own local software solution.

      The Software as a Service model allows the use of certain software at really low prices. Building your own open-source based software (or deploying an already fitting software package) and hosting it locally will often cost quite a bit more than buying the services of a SaaS company. Yes, you lose control and yes, you're depending on a medium that is not guaranteed (the internet), but you often get a much bigger return on investment than by doing everything yourself...
      Throwing away things like SaaS and IaaS off-hand without a second thought only clearly illustrates that either Stallman was misquoted, he oversimplified, or that he has no understanding whatsoever of business realities. All three options are distinct possibilities, but a combination of all three is quite likely.

    2. Re:Words from the wise by Clsid · · Score: 1

      You need to read more about cloud computing before making such strange comments. Cloud computing is like a Beowulf cluster on steroids and if you think it's just the latest fad, go to the Amazon Web Services site and see if you can build that kind of stuff with a traditional setup. The cloud is creating so many changes that even SQL databases will be going the way of the dodo. Go look at the Netflix tech blogs to understand the kind of abilities that companies will need from engineers 5 years from now on.

  23. Why the scare-mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let me get this right, we're panicking that China might be taking over us technologically because they're planning to build a humongous data-center using...chips from American companies like IBM, Intel, AMD and Nvidia. Despite being multinational companies, these companies are all headquartered in the US, with a substantial portion of their staff (especially the execs and higher-skilled ones) based in the US.

    A Sputnik moment would be if China build a world-class data-center using its own chips, designed and manufactured wholly within China that was also better than the ones in US.

    This story is an absolute coup for American technology. China is going to give us a bucket-load of money for these chips (CPU/GPU etc). And as long as they're spending money buying these chips, they're not spending that same money improving their ability to design/manufacture their own chips and they'll always be behind as they're effectively buying commodity technology (rather than bleeding edge).

    1. Re:Why the scare-mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake up.

      Indigenously-designed "Godson" CPUs are produced in China by a French conglomerate called ST Microelectronics.

      The latest Godson-3 has x86 emulation.

      Not a cent need go to Intel or AMD.

    2. Re:Why the scare-mongering? by Clsid · · Score: 1

      The Russians thought the same with their advanced military technology until they discovered the Chinese are pretty clever at copying stuff, so they decided to to stop those sales before being left in the dust.

  24. Chinese don't need bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese are known to use what they have efficiently, and it's not necessary to be big as American fallacy. Look at their population.

  25. Chinese don't have square feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6.2 million square feet is about 600000 m^2.
    646000 square feet is about 60000 m^2.

  26. watch your spamfilter go up in smoke by stiller · · Score: 1

    This is going to be even better than when Nigeria got internet connectivity. I can't wait for even fasters ways of getting Google Translate'd business proposals.

  27. Data-Alien by JoeThoughtful · · Score: 1

    The data-alien is touching down all over the planet! Oh what fun! Data and computation and evolutionary principles grow into conscious-like clouds of swirling people posts and product purchases. There really are no countries anymore; just money looking for fine places to grow. Who would have thought that money has a mind of its own? Luckily we humans need our money plants and the data-alien just like we need our laws and list of friends. Oh the poetry of our modern times. There is no east versus west, only money doing its thing where it finds itself. The world is just a bunch of people coexisting with money and data - just fine I think.

  28. ...and the USA is building wind farms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ``China Building City For Cloud Computing'' -- scientific progress, business development etc., vs. ``US To Fire Up Big Offshore Wind Energy Projects'' -- populism towards tree-hugging hippies, and not even cost-effective at that. Guess which action will pay back better in the longer run?

    1. Re:...and the USA is building wind farms by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      ``China Building City For Cloud Computing'' -- scientific progress, business development etc., vs. ``US To Fire Up Big Offshore Wind Energy Projects'' -- populism towards tree-hugging hippies, and not even cost-effective at that. Guess which action will pay back better in the longer run?

      I don't think you really got a representative example of US activities. Rather compare money spent for renewable energy sources (which are a good thing, even if not effective in the short run) with military expenses and oil-related costs.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  29. I seem to recall.. by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    IBM just complaining that China was over taking the US in the computer arms race and that the US would be behind when something is not done right away.
    I guess, by something needs to be done, they meant that they should build a giant Chinese data center to dwarf anything else in the world. USA! USA! USA!

    I have no doubt that IBM's rationale was, hey, if we don't do it, another company will. We may as well get the cash.
    Of course, China walks away with the unearned know-how.

    1. Re:I seem to recall.. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It would appear that IBM's actual message was "The US would fall behind if a large contract with IBM were not signed right away"...

      It's not as though multinational corporations deliver press release warnings out of patriotic sentiment and an undying love of their natal land; but purely as a tactical or strategic measure for advancing their interests.

  30. Cloud City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In my RSS feed, my eyes read "China Building Cloud City." What a let down.

    1. Re:Cloud City by ddd0004 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was the original plan, but Billy Dee Williams was busy with a Colt 45 commercial so they went with plan B

  31. Partnering with IBM to build it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, I put that one through the sub textural analyser and got this:

    "Chinese men in white coats will document every step of the way so that next time round they China will be able to do it themselves without the help of IBM thank you very much."

    I love the way that the west has exported all of its skills, work, and lastly, money to regimes it claims not to admire. It's obvious which, out of democracy and totalitarianism, our politicians prefer.

  32. Data centers getting obsolete by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Would not these huge data centers get obsolete if hard disks grow in capacity and processors in power 1000 times once again?

    I mean couldn't the whole data-center then be placed on one server? Imagine a hard disk of 1000 TB and in addition - solid state, no energy for spinning.

    Employees certainly could use all the space for fancy offices and the real data center would be somewhere in a corner.

    1. Re:Data centers getting obsolete by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      All of Bletchley Park was less than a thousandth as powerful as the PDA I had 7 years ago (and certainly the one I have now), yet you couldn't host Facebook, or Amazon, or Slashdot, or run a modern climate simulation on any PDA. Can you see why there will always be data centers?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Data centers getting obsolete by Max_W · · Score: 1

      I still remember how I had to change lamps in the computer. I can quite well see how a device of a PDA size with a new generation 3d processor and SSHD inside can comprise a data center.

    3. Re:Data centers getting obsolete by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You totally missed the point, by that time we'll need more space, more processing power and more bandwidth. Same reason that from WW2 to today we've always needed data centers. Unless software suddenly stagnates that's not going to happen.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Data centers getting obsolete by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I/O is a much bigger problem than processor power or storage.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:Data centers getting obsolete by Max_W · · Score: 1

      My point was that a growing demand for computing power can be saturated completely. Say, a PDA size device with an optical cable connection can cover the whole demand for computing of the planet for decades to come.

      Software can also be a part of it. For example, when a human see a photo of another human, the brain can compute in a fraction of a second if this face is known or not. It is obvious that some sort of an undiscovered yet parallel computing is going on.

    6. Re:Data centers getting obsolete by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I believe 1000 TB is 1 Petabyte, and 1000 Petabytes is 1 Exabyte. With solid state hard drives emerging, the Exabyte data drive could be very useful for day to day processing while I eek out a living selling Hot Dogs on a corner.

  33. One Fifth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe they spend one-fifth because they aren't paying Microsoft the other four-fifths?

  34. inappropriate yakov smirnov joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In America, lazy hipster run program from city on cloud computer;
    In State Capitalist China, cloud computer run program on lazy hipster from city!

  35. How curious... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    I thought that the whole point of "cloud" was to (within the limitations of bandwidth and latency) abstract away the details of location and configuration of the server iron so that the specialist datacenter guys could do their thing as efficiently as possible, and everybody else could be served up idealized abstractions corresponding to their requirements, whether that be idealized VMs that migrate around ugly physical hardware failures, or idealized email hosts that don't involve looking at the dirty details of the mailserver daemon and storage mechanism...

    Wouldn't you just build the datacenter(s) wherever land and power are cheap, and then make sure that the places where the bright techies already are(university towns, etc.) have decent internet connectivity so that the developers and startups and so forth can talk to your fancy new cloud datacenters right from the coffeeshop where they already are?

    Am I missing something about how "cloud" works, or is this something of a holdover of the classic command-and-control-white-elephant model of "Hey, let's build an entire city dedicated to activity X!"?

    1. Re:How curious... by bjk002 · · Score: 1

      They want the biggest cloud in the sky. That's all. Feel free to float about on your mini-clouds hoping it does not rain.

      --
      Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
  36. Bespin? by frozentier · · Score: 1

    Although it was inferred in another post (and I didn't look through the hidden ones), am I really the first person to ask if they are going to call this new cloud city "Bespin"?

  37. Double-digit growth by Bromskloss · · Score: 0

    double-digit growth

    What is that supposed to mean? You are talking like an economist! Firstly, you're making something of a dimensionality error by not specifying the time during which this growth is taking place. Secondly, you are not specifying the base in which this growth rate becomes "double-digit". Furthermore, even if the reader can guess your choice of base correctly, it conveys a rather arbitrary piece of information about the growth rate of China. I expect better from a technically-minded person. If it was actually coming from an economist, I would have just smiled, filled in the missing bits and gone on to be an appreciated colleague in that workplace, but with you, I still have my hopes that salvation is within reach and that's why I'm picking on it. Repent! Good luck!

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Double-digit growth by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      .... You are talking like an economist!

      Keep it clean, guy. This isn't /b/

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  38. Disaster? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Is China not a place that like...has a lot of earthquakes, or not?
    I thought there was enough earthquakes to not build with too heavy materials or avoid too many sky scrapers....or maybe it was
    just lack of money to do so, until government stepped up....any input would be welcomed.

    1. Re:Disaster? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Is China not a place that like...has a lot of earthquakes, or not?

      China is a very big place. Some parts of it are more geologically stable than others.
      The US has a lot of earthquakes but North Dakota doesn't.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Disaster? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      It's more than a disaster issue: if that city is where a larger part of the cloud computing services are located, it would be a VERY inviting target for a first strike by a single nuclear warhead if general war breaks out between China and the USA. Don't be surprised that the Chinese military puts in a lot of defensive missile positions using the licensed version of the Russian S-300PMU-1 missile so it could even defend this complex even against ICBM attack.

    3. Re:Disaster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way, it is one nice big target to anyone that cares to cause disruption.

    4. Re:Disaster? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      It's more than a disaster issue: if that city is where a larger part of the cloud computing services are located, it would be a VERY inviting target for a first strike by a single nuclear warhead if general war breaks out between China and the USA. Don't be surprised that the Chinese military puts in a lot of defensive missile positions using the licensed version of the Russian S-300PMU-1 missile so it could even defend this complex even against ICBM attack.

      Why bother with an expensive missile and nuke warhead? USB drives are cheap. Just sprinkle them around the parking lot. Use Chinese USB drives for the ironic win. Less mess to clean up later.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  39. Is it located in one of their "ghost cities"? by jbarr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Obviously off-topic, but interesting and wonderful fodder for the tin-foil hat crowd

    It appears that China has built several cities meant to house millions of people, yet they remain completely empty:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1339536/Ghost-towns-China-Satellite-images-cities-lying-completely-deserted.html
    http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_340_30137.php

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Second rebranding in months by Suki+I · · Score: 1

    They already have a cloud city featured in the movie Avatar. Now it is going to be 'cloud computing city'. What is next? 3D cloud computing city?*

    *Stupid /. will not let me write in Chinese!

  42. mega projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I do detect a tinge of jealousy in the tone of some writings ('impressive...BUT...').
    You got to like mega projects though, regardless whether the American or the Chinese are the main players.

  43. Sputnik moment? Um, no. by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    The current political atmosphere in America is so virulently anti-intellectual that of the relatively small proportion of the population that can even understand the original article, most of them will just scoff at the Chinese and their "pointy-headed academics", step on the gas in their SUVs, and go back to plotting against foodstamp recipients. There are no "Sputnik moments" for a country where the majority of the population actively rejects the foundations of both the physical and biological sciences because they conflict with their bronze age superstitions.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  44. Single point of failure! by msantosn · · Score: 1

    Okay, let's say that I am enemy of organization X which host everything in that big-fat-oversized datacenter, just do something really stupid like [set/fly/throw] a [bomb/explosive/ddos/plane] [in/on/into/over] the datacenter and everything is gone... What? I hear someone yelling "DR and backups"? Nah!! the bad publicity will make the rest. The thing is that as bigger the datacenter is, the complex to manage will be and could be easy target because it is OVERSIZED.

  45. Big Money Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "one of the projects fueling that country's double-digit growth in IT spending."

    So what. Just because they're spending a lot of money doesn't mean they're getting results or doing anything useful. Boring.

  46. City-sized?? Not in China anyway by nobodie · · Score: 1

    I live in a Chinese village (Suzhou) with 6.5 Million inhabitants. You probably have never heard of it because it is just a village not a real city like Beijing or Shanghai. When I lived in the US at one time I lived in a "city" of 70,000 people. The district of Suzhou I live in has 10 times as many people as that and is just a district of a village in the ex-urbs of a city (Shanghai). City-sized means nothing.

    To get the proper size words in the the article needed to consider the existing cloud data center sizes and use multiples of that, maybe that would be amazing maybe not. If not then we would know that this is just a... troll?.. a way to incite fear of the dread Chinese again? Or is it really something stupendous? therefore cool?

    What I mean is "watch your language", don't be sucked in by inflammatory, fear producing language that really has little meaning. For a primer on this I suggest Doris Lessing's "Documents Relating to the Sentimental Agents in the Volyen Empire" a Space fiction approach (Lessing's terms) to the question of language usage to affect emotions.

    --
    Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.