Slashdot Mirror


How Your Username May Betray You

An anonymous reader writes "By creating a distinctive username—and reusing it on multiple websites—you may be giving online marketers and scammers a simple way to track you. Four researchers from the French National Institute of Computer Science (INRIA) studied over 10 million usernames—collected from public Google profiles, eBay accounts, and several other sources. They found that about half of the usernames used on one site could be linked to another online profile, potentially allowing marketers and scammers to build a more complex picture the users."

308 comments

  1. Uh... by Anrego · · Score: 4, Informative

    Couldn't they already do this with cookies?

    In other news.. the gentleman wielding the running chainsaw could probably kick you really hard with those steel toe bootsand maybe even poke you in the eye!

    1. Re:Uh... by Canazza · · Score: 2

      yes, but for those who activley disable cookies, this is potentially another way of tracking that few people would have thought about.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:Uh... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they already do this with cookies?

      Wait, is that true? Can, for example, Slashdot see that I've been visiting eBay? I

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Uh... by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Also, those who use one service from one machine, and a different service from a different machine, in which case cookies won't track you.

    4. Re:Uh... by by+(1706743) · · Score: 3, Informative

      There was an article on Slashdot a while back about a clever project to track your browser regardless of cookie settings / IP address. Neat stuff.

    5. Re:Uh... by Desler · · Score: 3, Informative

      this is potentially another way of tracking that few people would have thought about.

      Sure, if you're braindead. Did you really think that if you use a non-unique identifier across multiple sites that it couldn't be used to track you? That's about as 'duh' as it gets.

    6. Re:Uh... by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      slashdot could see if you were visiting ebay by exploiting the browser a bit -- they could make an invisible link to ebay, then pass back which color your browser made it. red link means you were there before. i dunno if they fixed this somehow, yet.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    7. Re:Uh... by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      I change my username from time-to-time.

      For sites where I could care less, I have kept the same "handle" since the 80s, but elsewhere I change my name periodically to avoid being tracked. For example someone looking at my Usenet posts would have to know all ~20 IDs I've used over the last ~20 years to form any kind of profile.

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    8. Re:Uh... by drb226 · · Score: 2

      Can, for example, Slashdot see that I've been visiting eBay?

      If it couldn't before, it can now >xD

    9. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I change my username from time-to-time.

      To what?

    10. Re:Uh... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I'm pretty disappointed at the histrionics here too. I'm not l33t enough to triple-route honeypot links shielded by a clandestine shadow router batched through a clandestine ISP installed behind the volcano damaged area of Monserrat and hooked through 7 false-positive generating mirrored proxies. (Your pointy headed bs may vary.) So I settled for a simple two level shield enough to stop the worst spam which has worked well enough for 7 years.

      But having a single net identity also lets fans follow my "net brand" across services. For the next x years that's more valuable than the farther-back risk of ad tracking. I am pretty tame. I garner I have under ten rated-R posts across a thousand on the brand.

      But 12-ish years from now (+/- 3 or something) we'll all be at Minority Report anyway and once that level kicks in you'll never get rid of it.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    11. Re:Uh... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      slashdot could see if you were visiting ebay by exploiting the browser a bit -- they could make an invisible link to ebay, then pass back which color your browser made it. red link means you were there before. i dunno if they fixed this somehow, yet.

      Okay... Leaving browser exploits out of it for the moment, though, isn't cookie access restricted to the domain that set it?

      I mean, the whole point of the story is that people use the same username all over the place. This makes them trackable without any sort of exploit, and not in a way that has anything to do with cookies.

      Now, if that's just pointless fearmongering, well I understand that. But I did, however, stop using my more identifiable nickname on Slashdot because I didn't want my professional colleagues finding my petty (yet epic) squabbles here on Slashdot. Seems to me that there is some wisdom in the idea of using different names on different sites.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your username start with "comodore". You are clever as the "michael kristopeit" troll.

    13. Re:Uh... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes.

      Now, I have different usernames for a lot of different websites and IRL I don't have a beard. (I shaved it off in 2004.)

      I was looking for a yoga mat; the "community" ones at the gym were a little more... used that I preferred for an item that I touch with my face. I am using IE7 since that's what corporate IT imposes. I was getting ads on /. for yoga classes and cheap yoga equipment. I volunteer at the YMCA and look up the schedule so I know what classes are on on a given day. I got ads for meeting "fitness singles".

      I also, due to my work, look up a lot of military things. I was getting ads for martial arts training and "how to handle a handgun" and other things like that.

      Apparently the ads computers think that yoga + military + YMCA = gay. I was getting ads for "meet local singles" with pictures of men. It was really weird until I realized that the ad servers think that I'm a fan of sausage. Or maybe they think I'm a woman; I look up vegan and vegetarian recipes and I'll look at knitting patterns to give my wife feedback. Oh, yeah, that makes more sense. They think I'm a woman.

      (An ugly one...)

      I've also got a quirk whereby the computers at work all go through the servers back east, so it also thinks that I live on the West Coast but work on the East coast; a 7000 mile trip can be covered in 30 minutes with ease.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    14. Re:Uh... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've been using the same login name since I got into BBS'ing on my Ti-99/4A back in the early 80's. Oh noes, I can be tracked!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    15. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't they already do this with cookies?

      Yes, for different values of "they."

      This is something I can do even if you never send cookies to me. I can scrape Slashdot and MidgetPornReviews, see what a user named Anrego says on both sites, and combine them to get a bigger picture of Anrego, even though I have nothing to do with either of these sites.

      For example, people who categorize content by one key (a subdirectory name inside of another a directory) rather than, say, tagging things with any of multiple keys from a related table, have a tendency to prefer looking at actual midgets as opposed to dwarves. Now I can pull my dwarf porn ads from running on the ZFS-FUSE site, replacing those with ads that feature more "normal" proportioned midgets (except for on the RPM download page) -- but still run my dwarf porn ads on Postgresql's site. All this, without receiving your Slashdot or MidgetPornReviews cookies.

    16. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What GP was pointing to was not a browser exploit. It is a 'feature' supported by every browser.

    17. Re:Uh... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Okay... Leaving browser exploits out of it for the moment, though, isn't cookie access restricted to the domain that set it?

      Yes. But it's easy to circumvent by websites referencing a common 3rd party url for an image. (EG: a banner ad)

      Referencing a 3rd party URL in an image allows cookies to be set for that domain regardless of what URL you typed in and gives that 3rd party knowledge of the website the request originated from. (EG: what URL you typed in)

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    18. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even different browsers.

    19. Re:Uh... by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      Looks like this time he changed it to commodore6502.

    20. Re:Uh... by patjhal · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Did you know know allot of retailers track you through your given name? Duh. I don't want to use different names on every net thing. I do like to lie on my profiles. The trick is to remember the lies so that you can keep some consistency and mess up their records. So consistently use the same wrong birthday and such.

    21. Re:Uh... by Arccot · · Score: 1

      Okay... Leaving browser exploits out of it for the moment, though, isn't cookie access restricted to the domain that set it?

      Yes and no. Yes, standard browser settings restrict a cookie to be read by a single domain. But most advertising networks put the cookie on the root domain of the network. So if EBay and Slashdot have the same advertising network, Ebay can pass what you bought to the ad network and through a hidden iframe or various other techniques load a page at the ad network. Which then sets the cookie on your computer from the ad network. Next time you visit Slashdot, it loads a hidden iframe with a page at the ad network, which loads the cookie, and passes the data on to Slashdot.

      I'm sure there's probably even easier techniques than the one I came up with as a "can I do this" exercise one rainy day.

    22. Re:Uh... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I at least translated my old BBS name into Japanese. That'll keep me safe... lol

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    23. Re:Uh... by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Maybe. I've had some user names that I thought were fairly unique but that other people registered on site I wanted to use. Which leaves me wondering how do they know for sure if the usernames on different sites belong to the same person. My guess is that they don't.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    24. Re:Uh... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      ...IRL I don't have a beard. (I shaved it off in 2004.)

      Your username is a lie! You should change it. :p

      (In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that I am not, in fact, a cat.)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    25. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to thank you for the informative answer.

      MobileTatsu-NJG.

    26. Re:Uh... by treeves · · Score: 2

      No, no. From "time-" to "-time". Not a big change, but maybe enough to throw off the trackers.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    27. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STORE VOICE: Dan Burton... Mr Burton, you look tired, stressed. Need a holiday? Here at Veridian Dynamics we want you to be happy. Your happiness, our profit.

    28. Re:Uh... by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      IDIOMS:

      "from time to time - If something happens or is done from time to time, it happens or is done sometimes, but not regularly." - Cambridge Idioms Dictionary, 2nd ed. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    29. Re:Uh... by kwark · · Score: 1

      Not the most obvious translation, but aedict gives the following possible translation:
      osu: male
      neko: 1 cat
                        2 shamisen (made from cats ;)
                        3 geisha (because they play the shamisen?)
                        4 wheelbarrow
                        5 clay bed-warmer
                        6 submissive partner in a homosexual relation

      I only knew the first for neko, but you went for which translation?

    30. Re:Uh... by radtea · · Score: 1

      this is potentially another way of tracking that few people would have thought about.

      Right, because the idea of tracking people by name has escaped everyone's notice!

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    31. Re:Uh... by squeegee_boy · · Score: 1

      [Cat-like typing detected]

    32. Re:Uh... by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      I shaved.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    33. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicely volleyed, sir.

    34. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And given that they both quote by using >>>, he probably changed it from commodore64_love

    35. Re:Uh... by Drgnkght · · Score: 1

      Just a guess but I'd say his BBS login name was probably "tomcat".

    36. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Anrego is saying is, your user name being a bread crumb trail is obvious already, and not even a good one too boot. This is why cookies were made, when we have had user names for years before.

      If someone is actively disabling cookies in order to not be tracked, they probably are very cautious about what websites they're signing into and which aliases they're using. If they're not, they're doing it wrong.

      In other news.. the gentleman wielding the running chainsaw could probably kick you really hard with those steel toe bootsand maybe even poke you in the eye!

      I propose cookies are more of a high powered precision rifle where user names are more along the lines of a shotgun at distant range. Marketers aren't going to employ this method of tracking people simply because the accuracy is going to be horrible. If you're worried about other entities tracking you and you're using a single user name, well again.. you're doing it wrong.

    37. Re:Uh... by flowwolf · · Score: 1

      This was me. Forgot to sign in sorry.

    38. Re:Uh... by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      I absolutely cannot imagine that the people who actively care about being tracked - enough to disable cookies - would not have thought of this on their own.

      So far as i know, the two user names i use the most are always me. I have never had one of them be already in use, and the other it happens only rarely.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    39. Re:Uh... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      , this is potentially another way of tracking that few people would have thought about.

      If you didn't think about the fact that the name you use on several sites identifies you, you aren't thinking much. That's why I use this inane name here and others on different sites; on friendly local sites I use a variation of my real name, but not here.

    40. Re:Uh... by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they are. But the thing is, a *huge* fraction of top sites use either statistics, or ads, or integrate into FB or some such.

      Thus *slashdot* cannot just like that see if you visit Ebay or not.

      But, for example, Facebook sees every visit you make on every site that has one of them Facebook "your friends who like this" thingamajiggies. And Google sees all the sites you vist that use analytics. The same for dozens of ad-networks etc etc.

    41. Re:Uh... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm not l33t enough to triple-route honeypot links shielded by a clandestine shadow router batched through a clandestine ISP installed behind the volcano damaged area of Monserrat and hooked through 7 false-positive generating mirrored proxies.

      noob

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    42. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll keep you safe from getting laid, as well, not that that's likely to be a problem for you.

    43. Re:Uh... by Alarash · · Score: 1

      No they can't do this with cookies. Well, not in the same way - but for the same purpose and with the same end-result. If you base your stats on cookies, you obviously need access to the cookies (which is possible, don't get me wrong). With the method in TFA you can simply send robots crawl websites that give access to public profiles and cross-reference them. Even if you disable cookies, your profile is crawlable. Now of course, it's only a matter of allowing user to block their profile publicly so their username don't show.

    44. Re:Uh... by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      They also share this information. I once found out because some company had my name with a typo in it . Then i suddenly got advertisements with the exact same typo in it.

    45. Re:Uh... by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      Okay... Leaving browser exploits out of it for the moment, though, isn't cookie access restricted to the domain that set it?

      The ads may be placed on different pages , but they themselves are from the same domain ( for example an image in the page , or an iframe ).
      When you visit the ad url , a cookie is created . Then , when you visit another ad ( from the same domain ) , the browser will send the cookie that was created earlier . This can be received at server side, so in the second ad , it's possible to know that the first ad was visited.

    46. Re:Uh... by Supurcell · · Score: 1

      I was hoping it would be Catman.

    47. Re:Uh... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      this is potentially another way of tracking that few people would have thought about.

      Speak for yourself. I've been using this username on Slashdot for over a decade now (I can't remember when Slashdot started, it was so long ago) and deliberately re-using the user name on other services since. And yes, it was obvious what I was doing, and yes, I did think about it.

      I may have made a choice different to what you'd have done, but that doesn't make me necessarily wrong.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    48. Re:Uh... by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      on friendly local sites I use a variation of my real name, but not here.

      This is a local site for local people. There's nothing for you here...

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
  2. Pretty sure by by+(1706743) · · Score: 4, Funny

    that my username won't betray me...

    1. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My username is "12345"

      Nobody has been able to track me.

    2. Re:Pretty sure by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Funny

      My username on every other site is hunter2, so it just comes up as asterisks anyway.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:Pretty sure by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What a coincidence -- that's the combination on my luggage!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Pretty sure by bytethese · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, that's the same combination as my luggage!

    5. Re:Pretty sure by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1
      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    6. Re:Pretty sure by TeXMaster · · Score: 1

      My username on every other site is hunter2, so it just comes up as asterisks anyway.

      I wonder how many caught the reference

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    7. Re:Pretty sure by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My username on every other site is hunter2, so it just comes up as asterisks anyway.

      Now thats an amazing throw back

    9. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there.

    10. Re:Pretty sure by dziban303 · · Score: 1

      This is why I always use CmdrTaco as my username.

    11. Re:Pretty sure by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      {Probably almost everyone. That one comes up almost every day.}

    12. Re:Pretty sure by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Probably everyone. It's not like bash is some obscure thing no /.er has ever heard of.

    13. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course ******* comes up as asterisks. Hey, that's strange, when I type asterisks they change to show my password?!?!

    14. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone did.

    15. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of a username is *******?

    16. Re:Pretty sure by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      You'd think ... but whoosh moments still happen on even the most common jokes:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1779630&cid=33499654

    17. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My username is AnonymousCoward

      Nobody has been able to track me

    18. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crap - they're gonna know all my comments on slashdot, as well as what games I play?

    19. Re:Pretty sure by Lr4t*o0QIKj8 · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I use a random character generator to generate a new user name for every site.

    20. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shine on, you AzureDiamond!

    21. Re:Pretty sure by babywhiz · · Score: 1

      But will your dark magic?

    22. Re:Pretty sure by gnapster · · Score: 1

      I can see you are proud of that one! I agree, that should definitely be an achievement.

    23. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My username on every other site is hunter2, so it just comes up as asterisks anyway.

      Shine on you AzureDiamond!

    24. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why I use CmdrTaco on all other sites except this. Someone already has it here.

    25. Re:Pretty sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesnt look like stars to me

  3. Slow news day much? by Toksyuryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought this was the whole point of using a unique username. If I didn't want a unique identity, I wouldn't have created one for myself.

    1. Re:Slow news day much? by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 1

      Film at eleven: Identifiers identify entities. I'm SHOCKED!

    2. Re:Slow news day much? by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. Maybe this is just setup for their next story: When you create a profile on a site, that site can tell when you're logged in or not :-o

    3. Re:Slow news day much? by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      I thought this was the whole point of using a unique username. If I didn't want a unique identity, I wouldn't have created one for myself.

      Yup. That's the whole reason why I picked a fairly unique name, and why I've re-used it all over the place. If you see that name, it's probably me.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:Slow news day much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it's a pain in the ass to create a unique username on every web site you frequent. Usually there is a social aspect involved where other people will recognise you (at least on that site) by your username, so the tendency is to make your username something that relates to you in some way.

      Trying to come up with a new username that isn't just identical to one of my old ones is a rather difficult process. Same goes for creating a new e-mail address, MSN/Live address, gamertag, MMORPG character name, etc.

      It's actually easiest when I don't care about the site: fakenamegenerator to the rescue. When I do care about it, though, I want the username to be something that I can personally identify with as "me". That gets tough if I don't want to be tracked by the same username across a bunch of different websites and/or online games or instant messengers.

    5. Re:Slow news day much? by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      7 articles from CmdrTaco
      What's going on?

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    6. Re:Slow news day much? by unholy1 · · Score: 1

      and Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!

    7. Re:Slow news day much? by gnapster · · Score: 1

      No, the story is that, while a pan-Internet identity is a good thing, good things can be abused.

      Not that that is any more newsworthy.

  4. That's just what I want them to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And when they find me, how will I resist their clever and informative advertising?

    Oh that's right, I'll just ignore it like I always do.

    1. Re:That's just what I want them to think by tudsworth · · Score: 2

      Or you don't see the advertisements in the first place because you use a proper browser with decent advertisement blocking. Either way, in this day and age, you can avoid pretty much every scam or advertisement with a little bit of common sense.

    2. Re:That's just what I want them to think by mangu · · Score: 2

      And when they find me, how will I resist their clever and informative advertising?
      I'm sure there must be plenty of marketeers scratching their heads trying to understand what's this "Anonymous Coward" guy's preferences.

    3. Re:That's just what I want them to think by Handover+Phist · · Score: 1

      I've been using the same username for well over a decade now. I've also, in that time realized that common sense is surprisingly uncommon. I use noscript and adblock plus and erase cookies when I close my browser. I also have to do a bunch of upkeep on my spam filter. The folks who dont have the "common sense" to use these things are my bread and butter.

      Some of them also make a big whackload more on their pay than I do.

    4. Re:That's just what I want them to think by SudoGhost · · Score: 1

      Well, what we know for sure he that he's ballsy, and makes comments that other people are afraid to make. Also, don't offer any Apple products to him, or he'll go on a rampage.

  5. Duh. by morari · · Score: 1

    That's why I have several aliases I use online, and will never use anything relating to my real name. The one you see here is for fairly anonymous forums. I have one that's used strictly for gaming and game related material. I have one that I use for throw-away accounts (spam e-mail, etc). Then I have a few super generic ones that I use for...shall we say... less honorable activities? ;)

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    1. Re:Duh. by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      less honorable activities

      Marketing?

    2. Re:Duh. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      "John Doe's Peener"
      Not really that generic.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is... no one cares. Why do you have some weird fanatasy about people trying to track you? You think you're that cool?

    4. Re:Duh. by morari · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, marketing firms *do* care.

      I really hope that I can go by unnoticed, but you never know in today's climate. One dissenting comment on a message board and next thing you know, the FBI is surrounding your house. :P

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  6. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While this is no doubt true, it is virtually meaningless. How many companies are really going to spend the time, effort and cost to put these things together, on the vague hope that it will somehow magically increase sales?

  7. No Shit by lordandmaker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, that's almost precisely why I've the same username all over place (amusingly, almost except /.) - so that people who know me on one might recognise me on another.

    I'd imagine that anyone with a desire to not let anyone know where else they go on the net already gets all their usernames out of pwgen or something.

    1. Re:No Shit by yuhong · · Score: 1

      I even use my real name almost everywhere. In fact, I am thinking of collecting things like Reddit AMAs into an acid test that sees if an organization can tolerate it when made non-anonymous.

    2. Re:No Shit by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Seriously, that's almost precisely why I've the same username all over place (amusingly, almost except /.) - so that people who know me on one might recognise me on another.

      Indeed. If this is news then geesh, world's average IQ must have suddenly had a massive drop!

    3. Re:No Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not very wise.. Anyone could easily tell that olFO0#OcPh{ and O=+w%f!0rU\} are the same person. After all I don't think that many people have such creative usernames. And besides, if the owners of the site don't know about Bobby Tables, then TWXIM)]'uN(4 might not be able to login at all.

    4. Re:No Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously, that's almost precisely why I've the same username all over place (amusingly, almost except /.) - so that people who know me on one might recognise me on another.

      Lordan D. Maker?!?

      Is that you???

    5. Re:No Shit by Deefburger · · Score: 1

      Same here. And when forum ops rewrite my posts, it becomes painfully obvious to everyone else that that is what was done! (fu ABC news!)

      --
      Most people are mostly good most of the time.
  8. Who cares? by Berkyjay · · Score: 2

    I mean, we have to accept at some point that we are all in a public place. I for one don't want to have to live life online like a fugitive. Constantly changing my identity and browsing habits just to throw off marketers. And if you are smart you can easily avoid scammers by being more vigilant with your important information.

    1. Re:Who cares? by sulfur · · Score: 2

      I also don't bother hiding my real identity online; anyone with enough time on their hands and nothing better to do could correlate my accounts across different sites. It's much easier to assume that everything that you post online can be linked to you (similar to an assumption that everything you post on facebook is public). Just don't post anything that you don't want your boss to know, and you'll be fine. Maybe there will be fewer trolls on the Internet this way. Now, of course it is important to be able to post anonymously once in a while, but it shouldn't be a habit.

    2. Re:Who cares? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yup. And factor in gov't related employment since I went in the military after high school and they know what kind of underwear I'm going to put on before I do.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:Who cares? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Constantly changing my identity and browsing habits just to throw off marketers.

      Marketers are the least of our worries. The problems come from those who would use the marketers' databases for purposes other than marketing. Things like blackmail - such as a "straight" married politician who frequents a lot of gay websites. Or barratry (which is generally not illegal) such as Sony trying to subpoena youtube's records of everybody who has viewed a video on how to crack the PS3. Or the police state gone awry where they use the data from those gps services that record your position to back-fit cases to people who have done nothing more suspicious than be within a few blocks of a crime.

      The list of potential abuses of this sort of information is practically infinite - you may never be personally bothered by it, but then again relatively few people are ever assaulted or robbed or had their car stolen, but we still take precautions against all of those too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Who cares? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I also don't bother hiding my real identity online; anyone with enough time on their hands and nothing better to do could correlate my accounts across different sites.

      There is a significant difference between an individual being manually singled out as a subject of nefarious designs and the automated population of a database of personally identifiable information. In the former, it takes a lot of legwork for minimal payback, in the later all the legwork is automated and abuse now becomes a simple crime of opportunity - just put together a few searches with the right criteria and you can pull hundreds or even thousands of potential targets.

      We will never be able to prevent one-off events, but we can stop systemic abuse by preventing the development of systems that enable it.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Who cares? by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      I mean, we have to accept at some point that we are all in a public place.

      No we don't. We don't have to be lazy, defeatist or sell outs. Don't project your apathy onto everybody.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
  9. Do you really want to track by Ranger · · Score: 4, Funny

    someone down named Analintruder?

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Do you really want to track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been for years. So far, no luck.

    2. Re:Do you really want to track by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Funny

      It shouldn't be that difficult. How many Analin Truders could there possibly be?

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:Do you really want to track by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you're into, doesn't it?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Do you really want to track by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      my name is Analin Truder you insensitive clod!

    5. Re:Do you really want to track by canmoreman · · Score: 1

      If you can read a little swedish, meet Analin... :)

      http://sv-se.facebook.com/people/Analin-Truder/100001182994373

  10. No problem by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    As long as they can't link my username to my real name, I don't care. They can collect information about "some dude who goes by GameboyRMH" all they like.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:No problem by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that Ronald?

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    2. Re:No problem by georgesdev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about: they start creating a fake account with your user name on facebook, become friend with some of your linkedin contacts, post on your new friends walls a scam using distorted extracts of what you posted on slashdot. Ok, you did a decent job of hiding your true name with that GameboyRMH ID, but still, if you use the same ID on lots of sites, you're still vulnerable to the kind of scenario I mention above. Personally, any online account that is indexed by search engines, I use a fake ID, and move to another one every 2 years, and it's not the same as my email address, etc ...

    3. Re:No problem by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Haha nice try.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more places you use the same name, the harder it is to stay anonymous. Some sites you don't want to be anonymous, etc.

      I have your name, address and phone number right here.

      Monastery... area code 902xxxxxx8, correct?

    5. Re:No problem by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Nope totally wrong...

      I don't use any sites where I don't want to be anonymous, it's that simple. There are some where I talk with people I know IRL but we call each other by our pseudonyms online.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they can't link my username to my real name, I don't care. They can collect information about "some dude who goes by GameboyRMH" all they like.

      Pfft. Until they link ONE of your accounts to your real info, then ALL your accounts are linked to your real info. It's a good idea to change user names every time you change address. That way no matter what happens to one set of data, they're never linked together. Or, just use something rather common.

    7. Re:No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I could find was you are from Canada, moved to Bridgetown, Barbados with your father when you were young, drive a black AE92 with license plate T4378, enjoy grassroots motorsport, Nokia N900s, and were in school around 2005 which puts you around age 25 now.

    8. Re:No problem by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Monastery... area code 902xxxxxx8, correct?
      Nope totally wrong...

      Clearly. The area code in Barbados is 246.

      I don't use any sites where I don't want to be anonymous, it's that simple. There are some where I talk with people I know IRL but we call each other by our pseudonyms online.

      A government agency/police force type would probably already have your name and address if he wanted it based on the vehicles alone. An AE92 and a Samurai... shouldn't be hard to track down on an island.

      I'm also willing to bet that the gameboyrmh account and one the related gameboyrmh (hotmail/gmail/yahoo email addresses got used at some point for an online purchase... whether it was for a book from amazon, a purchase for some gadget or other, or that N900 stylus you were trying to find... at which point your real name and shipping address got attached together in a marketing database. Whether that database is being shared and re-sold is a separate question.

      And within a few short years, joe public can quite probably feed those images of the Suzuki (which appear to have where you live in the background) into a search and get the address back...

    9. Re:No problem by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Nice work, my hat's off to you. I knew I put my car info etc online, but I guess I gotta watch what I post on GRM a little more carefully ;)

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    10. Re:No problem by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Who says I'm still in Barbados ;)

      But yes you make a good point. The cops there are well-acquainted with the Toyota you see on GRM (the building behind the Samurai was an apartment block under construction IIRC). I also plan to split the email address I use for shopping accounts to a separate one in the future for the same reason you pointed out.

      I don't expect my username to protect me from law enforcement in any way, just random people and companies on the Internet.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    11. Re:No problem by twakar · · Score: 1

      Well, by mentioning that you're a 'dude', you've already done half the work for them. Now instead of 7 billion possibilities, there are only 3.5 billion possibilities. Way to go Einstein.

      --
      Progress is man's ability to complicate simplicity!
    12. Re:No problem by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Well I'm not trying to hide from the NSA or anything. I knowingly post online that I'm male, a Gen Y'er, and I sometimes post things that will tell you where I am or in which country I live.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    13. Re:No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure your username will NEVER be linked to your real identity?

      Are you positive?

      By the way there's at least one case of an admin on Wikipedia whose enem(ies) are creating pages on other social networks with the same ID, indicating he's into child pornography.

      It's all innocent fun until the police ram your door down.

    14. Re:No problem by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      The trick is to live in China, so they can only narrow it down to 750 million. India might be second best, 550 million.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  11. Johnny Mnemonic says... by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    Build a username which uses Acrostics or Chunking of the place you are going.

    My Yahoo account is GPLDANJCYS, which stands for me + Jesus Christ Yahoo Sucks.

    Then, you know exactly who is leaking and linking your information, and how you feel about them to begin with.

    1. Re:Johnny Mnemonic says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a domain whose sole purpose is to dish out unique e-mail addresses for me. I request a new e-mail, and jot down a note of who I'm providing the e-mail to. Then, if the site in question sells my address, I can see the spam come in and trace it back to who I originally gave it to. The only companies that sold my e-mail have been Sham-Wow and Teleflora.com. All others (hundreds of them) have not been spammed. I am actually quite impressed.

    2. Re:Johnny Mnemonic says... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Sham-Wow?

      Really?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:Johnny Mnemonic says... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      But personally I don't really care who is leaking and linking my information, as my general username is one associated with my online persona... a persona which keeps its javascript disabled, flash disabled, cookies trashed for the most part, and also does not buy anything.

      That last bit is the most important. Marketers have almost nothing to gain from my general-use persona. It's not linked to the real world, nor to anything that could make money for a third party -- it doesn't even click on ads.

      If I want to follow an ad, I bookmark the site (not the uri, as those have tracking info) and browse/google it later. When they need information about me, I can then decide exactly how much, and what type of information they should get.

  12. Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey slashdot, why don't you be ahead of the curve on this and let posters change their username associated with their comments once every few years. Also, being able to delete an occasional comment would be thoughtful too. It's not 1995 anymore on both accounts.

    1. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is far ahead of the curve, and always has been. Slashdot allows anonymous comments. Thank you, Slashdot.

    2. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that's my name, too!

    3. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^ Everything this guy posts is a lie!

    4. Re:Ummm by martin-boundary · · Score: 2
      Actually deleting comments is a bad idea, because it destroys the meaning of threads, ie the replies that follow a deleted comment don't make sense.

      However, a good way of allowing users to "delete" their past comments would be to convert them to being anonymous. Of course that's far from foolproof, but it can be surprisingly effective for preventing casual searching by others.

  13. Only your username? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    It does not help when you write something that implicitly also utilises your handwriting too!
    I get the feeling from a privacy POV, my user name fairly low on my priorities ;)
    http://liqbase.net/liq.20110208_002.liqbook.on.meego.ideapad.jpg

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  14. This should be on MSN/AOL homepages, not here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely this should be posted onto the MSN homepage or the AOL homepage for the rest of us: I am sure my mum does not realise how easy her online ID can be tracked from her favourite shopping sites. Although the reception here is 'D'oh!' most people haven't cottoned on to this yet. It is also appalling what passwords people actually use...

  15. Oh, and then there are the cookies by Palestrina · · Score: 5, Informative

    And the installed fonts, and the screen resolution and color depth and the dozens of other factors that combined allow you to be tracked.

    Try this web site for an idea of how these factors can (in combination) uniquely identify you:

    https://panopticlick.eff.org/

    I see that my browser is unique among the 1.4 million tested, with 20 bits of identifying information. Knowing my user name isn't going to compromise my privacy all that much more, especially compared to how Facebook screws your privacy every day.

    1. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

      Fortunately NoScript protects me from those scumbags at eff.org.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could go to the effort of installing/uninstalling a few plugins and/or fonts daily, or run NoScript to make sure that (other than sites you specifically trust) most of these tests won't work.

      I prefer both.

      Somewhat less effective, but easier: run a User Agent switcher and toggle that around (or even get one that rotates randomly).

    3. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by Eevee · · Score: 1

      And the installed fonts

      So you need a collection of fonts you don't like and a script to randomly add/remove them to your system.

    4. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NoScript: no javascript. 1 in 3.89 has this
      CookieMonster: Are Cookies Enabled? No. 1 in 4.42 has this

      Final score:

      Within our dataset of several million visitors, only one in 712,702 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

      To the marketers, I say, good luck to you.

    5. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like adding little bits of silliness to the user-agent string ( >:3 for GNU Icecat, AppleAreABunchOfFilthyThieves to Konqueror, etc.) - does this make it significantly easier to track me?

    6. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      For me it was about 1 in 3000. I'm anonymous, from my browser settings, anyway. Anyone on /. who really wanted to could probably find me in a day if they tried.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    7. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. At least 20.44 bits for me. And...private browsing gets me to 19.44. I'm screwed... Oh, wait. Out of 1.4 million? Nevermind. I thought it was based on percentage rather than actual values. I think I'm good.

    8. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      That and FlashBlock. I had to enable flash from their site before they could tell my fonts (which are, apparently, unique in their combination, unlike my plugins, which were shared by two other people [but who apparently had other differences, making my signature unique even before I enabled Flash for them]).

      Interesting factoid: Apparently less than 1% of web surfers these days have 1600x1200 resolution screens (which came up as 1 in 106). I knew widescreen formats had become the norm, but that surprises me. (I have nothing against widescreen, but until ones with vertical dimensions of over 1200 become affordable... I see no reason to pay to downgrade or sidegrade -- I'll wait until it's an actual upgrade.)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    9. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Regarding your final score, it's all about percentages --take what you believe to be a "good" decimal score with a galon of salt. For all you know, your 1 in 700k can mean "only ten others like you, but let's pretend 1/700,000 makes it all better" for a case of 7mil total in their data. Anyway, better numbers mean 1 in 60k, so that you're one a better "one in ten." With the anti-Anonymous-Wikileaks FBI chase, it's clear why being 1 in 10 masked men not as useful as 10,000 in 100,000 --you're still a single person and sheer volume helps drown out your particular masked individuality. Remember that they say "out of several million" and have a dataset only a year old, and make it ambiguous how many millions or dozens of millions, or hundreds of millions have been reviewed.

      You'll stand out a lot more when you go to a mom-and-pop site than out at the paranoia-filled-audience seeing the EFF. Besides, the EFF is not a top-ten Facebook favorite. Stats at Panopticlick, therefore, lean HEAVILY toward cookie blocker types, and people blocking all scripts using non-IE browsers (lots of EFF checks are impossible to block in IE since public IE plugins are non-existent that uniformly make it look like your IE setup resembles other anons')

      I played around refreshing after setting the user string to "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6" Lying about my OS since Linux will stand out the second I go elsewhere with a smaller user set less likely to have my build. I spend a couple hours recently trimming Gecko, Firefox, the U, the language and the rv substrings, but that seemed to randomly make me lots more unique. Empty strings and "Mozilla/5.0" are still too unique for my taste, giving numbers like your 1 in 700k. The best bet is Flash disabled with Noscript, cookies ON (stick out otherwise). If scripts are on, your resolution is best set as 1024x768 or 1280x800 resolution (laptops). Flash on is what kills us, since it gives away our fonts (and maybe plugin fingerprint IIRC)

    10. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by radtea · · Score: 1

      I see that my browser is unique among the 1.4 million tested, with 20 bits of identifying information.

      Yeah, so is mine, despite it being part of corporate install that is copied across tens or hundreds of thousands of computers within this company, so I'm kind of doubting that it's as unique as all that.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    11. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by Warll · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. While some of the tests rely on javascript, others don't. In my case both my user agent and HTTP_ACCEPT Headers are unique. Now I am far from a typical user, what with Ubuntu, nightly firefox builds, and japanese enabled. A more typical user, say Win7 and latest stable Firefox would of course be much more common. So yes, noscript is very helpful, but YMMV.

    12. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Same here.

      In fact, I just did it with 2 corporate computers here, they both were identified as Unique and the information displayed was also identical.

      So, I wouldn't believe that page much.

    13. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by macshit · · Score: 1

      And the installed fonts, and the screen resolution and color depth and the dozens of other factors that combined allow you to be tracked.

      Try this web site for an idea of how these factors can (in combination) uniquely identify you:

      https://panopticlick.eff.org/

      I see that my browser is unique among the 1.4 million tested, with 20 bits of identifying information. Knowing my user name isn't going to compromise my privacy all that much more, especially compared to how Facebook screws your privacy every day.

      Cute ... but of course all you have to do to change your identity is install a new font!

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    14. Re:Oh, and then there are the cookies by SynthaxError · · Score: 1

      With my Chrome browser at work:

      Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,431,099 tested so far.

      Yeah! I'm unique! Oh wait...

      With Firefox and noScript, no info about Plugins, Timezone, Fonts etc:

      Within our dataset of several million visitors, only one in 95,407 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

      --
      "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."
  16. . . . common sensical, it seems to me. by Ethereal.Visage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Umm . . . obvious, per chance? It seems to me that this is sort of . . . common sensical. Many people (myself included among that set) use a common username across multiple sites for that very reason mentioned in the article. To enable others to track us via our username. Of course, the intended audience is not the scammers -- oh, sorry, "marketers" -- but rather fellow hackers. But it's a double-edged sword. Perform an action, and the consequences will arrive, knocking on the door in the middle of the night. Welcome to the world, people.

    --
    Transparent.
    1. Re:. . . common sensical, it seems to me. by AnttiV · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Like the saying goes: "If you don't want the public to know something - don't do it."

    2. Re:. . . common sensical, it seems to me. by bazorg · · Score: 1

      yeah that 's all fine but I did not know in 1994 that there would be something like search engines, able to gather every little thing I have ever written under my kind of anonymous aliases. Let me add that while google gets a lot of press, the results for my nicknames on duckduckgo are of an accuracy that is plain scary.

    3. Re:. . . common sensical, it seems to me. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Biggest problem is being impersonated on some site you might have an account but never bothered. Could cause some mischief. If you are l33t you can defend yourself, otherwise you have to beg ignorance and play the victim card pretty heavy.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:. . . common sensical, it seems to me. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Hm... username can indeed betray hackers.

      But then again... different sites are not linked together anyways.. so how can you really establish that different people really are the same person?

      You cannot.

      The sites are different, so the same username is not authentically the same across multiple sites, not ever. On IRC networks, the same handle or nickname can be used by hundreds or thousands of different people, even different ones on different places. So there is no probable association based on just username, at least not automatically.

      The prospect you, I, or any random teenager could go to some random forum and signup with username CmdrTaco or BillGates, and post something that inadvertently gets people knocking on someone else's door at midnight is kind of scary.

  17. Depends what you're selling. by Denny · · Score: 1

    One sales droid's abject terror is another sales droid's golden opportunity.

    --
    Police State UK - news and
    1. Re:Depends what you're selling. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      One sales droid's abject terror is another sales droid's golden opportunity.

      Or golden shower.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  18. Strong Usernames should - by genghisjahn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be at least 8 characters long. Have at least one upper and one lower case letter, a number, a symbol and an RGB code for your favorite color. Oh and change it every 6 months too.

    --
    Sorry about the mess.
    1. Re:Strong Usernames should - by Rolaulten · · Score: 1

      And if we want to get really twitchy we can shift every character x characters to the left or the right... OR you know, just set up your web browser to block adds, and use throw away email accounts (thank god for gmail)...Hell this is the Internet, most major websites keep their services for free by selling add space...

    2. Re:Strong Usernames should - by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      Ah man! I don't want to change my favorite color every 6 months! How will I ever remeber it?

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    3. Re:Strong Usernames should - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That gives away your favorite color. Every 6 months.

    4. Re:Strong Usernames should - by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      You'll remember it because it's your favorite color.

      How many times have you heard this conversation:

      Q: What's you're favorite color?
      A: I don't remember.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    5. Re:Strong Usernames should - by gnapster · · Score: 1

      And I suppose I should use a different one on every site I register with. I guess I'll just write these down on the back of the slip of paper where I keep my list of secure passwords.

    6. Re:Strong Usernames should - by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      What is my favorite color? 0x0000ff! No, 0xffff00! Aaaaaaaaaa........!

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    7. Re:Strong Usernames should - by mysidia · · Score: 1

      a symbol and an RGB code for your favorite color

      No... bad idea, because that reveals the security answer to the bank account which is more important (my favorite color is Gold, by the way, particularly when associated with large quantities of a periodic table element by the same name)

    8. Re:Strong Usernames should - by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Ah man! I don't want to change my favorite color every 6 months! How will I ever remeber it?

      Have your computer generate a random list of 'candidate colors' every 6 months and choose your favorite from the generated list.

      "What was your favorite color from last month's color candidates list?"

    9. Re:Strong Usernames should - by mysidia · · Score: 1

      That gives away your favorite color. Every 6 months.

      Not if you XOR it by your favorite number or you XOR it by the current timestamp at time of pw change in UTC seconds.

    10. Re:Strong Usernames should - by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Pick one that other people won't:

      <hipster>My favorite color is infrared. It's pretty obscure.</hipster>

    11. Re:Strong Usernames should - by cOldhandle · · Score: 1

      I think we should get away from the term "usernames" and replace it with "userphrases" instead to emphasize the importance of choosing a good username...

  19. How did they get the usernames? by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

    Are we looking at a sever breach here if researchers have access to username on Google and Ebay? And what security do they have to keep those lists out of others hands. Probably the student in the University will keep all that information secure...

    Yah right.

    1. Re:How did they get the usernames? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      And Slashdot is violating your privacy too! Your username is right there at the top of your comment! How dare they allow anyone who reads your comments to see the username that you created to identify yourself to those reading your comments!

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:How did they get the usernames? by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      That is true John. But we are looking at what appears to be a data dump of all usernames. To strip usernames is possible in any public site but I suspect they get a feed from those vendors. I could be wrong but the numbers they are looking for and things like google usernames would be harder to find than say Ebay names that could be screen scraped more easily, but then you still have a limited population.

      If they have user-names did they have other information to verify they had a match across systems? Open questions.

  20. Are we still beatin' that horse? by Ray · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Give it up. Privacy is gone.

    1. Re:Are we still beatin' that horse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can run on down to the prison showers and grab your ankles if you want to. If there is no privacy, then we are but creatures on display at the zoo. Time to tell business and government loudly that we won't tolerate it. Otherwise your just bending over and grabbing your ankles.

      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, Give me Liberty, or give me Death!"--Patrick Henry

    2. Re:Are we still beatin' that horse? by izomiac · · Score: 1

      If privacy were gone then everyone would know everything about everyone. That's not the case, so privacy is alive and well. If you don't want it, that's fine, but why should I surrender as much of it as people will take?

  21. Cowboy Neal by aapold · · Score: 1

    So does this mean that Cowboy Neal is screwed?

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:Cowboy Neal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every night.

    2. Re:Cowboy Neal by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      By whom?!?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Cowboy Neal by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris... it's the only way to be sure.

    4. Re:Cowboy Neal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does this mean that Cowboy Neal is screwed?

      Cowboy Neal will never be screwed...

  22. I realised this a few years back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When my former high school friends started Googling my alias to spy on me on various websites. From then on, I've used different names on every site I join, and the names themselves are always common enough to be untraceable.

  23. well I know how marketers work by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    plenty of bullshit.

    always nice to mess with the data.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  24. Identifiers may be used to identify you! by kwerle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could we just move tautologies to idle? Or maybe we need a /. section called duh...

    1. Re:Identifiers may be used to identify you! by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      Duh! +1 (Sorry, I'm out of mod points)

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    2. Re:Identifiers may be used to identify you! by sconeu · · Score: 2

      No, you have to be a member of Tautology Club to do that.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Identifiers may be used to identify you! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I'm the exception to the rule.

  25. Oh damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use my slashdot nick on every site I visit.

    I'm screwed.

    1. Re:Oh damn! by youn · · Score: 1

      I've been tracking all of your posts my friend and let me tell you, you've been busy!! :)

      my advice to you, take a break once in a while :)

      --
      Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  26. I use unique usernames for background checks... by kamelkev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work for a growing software company and I have basically used this technique for doing basic background checks on job applicants.

    Back in about 2006 we had someone apply who had a distinctive username that returned a handful of results via a careful google search. Almost all of them were to "alt.drugs.bongmaking" or something similar.

    I didn't care whether the guy/girl had used drugs, but about the complete lack of discretion in the posts. He had actually used his full name and detailed personal information that positively identified him as our applicant. Really sad, and not the only time something like that has happened.

    1. Re:I use unique usernames for background checks... by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      I agree WRT the lack of discretion. I know I have started removing friends from various social sites because of their lack of discretion in certain things (drugs, sexual lives, etc). If somebody googles my handle and finds my likes of mountain biking, computers and nature photography, I'm not exactly worried. If they find my friend's likes of LSD, child porn and Hitler, that's a problem.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    2. Re:I use unique usernames for background checks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make software for growing now? I'll have to check alt.drugs.bongmaking for a copy!

    3. Re:I use unique usernames for background checks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why I rarely use my real name on the Internet. Even an innocent comment might get misinterpreted by someone.

    4. Re:I use unique usernames for background checks... by radtea · · Score: 2

      That is why I rarely use my real name on the Internet

      Unfortunately there are a half a dozen other people using your real name. Better hope none of them is into stuff your prospective employers or whatever don't like!

      My last name is unexceptionable but not common and there are at least one or two people I can find on google with exact matches, including middle name. One of them is even in a vaguely-related technical field, albeit in a different country. A sufficiently lazy search--and really, what other kind is there likely to be, what with automated processing of results and all--could easily conflate us.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    5. Re:I use unique usernames for background checks... by PitaBred · · Score: 2

      Sounds like the lesson should be that companies are overzealous in their "no drugs" stance. Because all they're ending up doing is only hiring the people that are better at hiding it and really... do you want to only hire the people that are good at hiding their discretions? Think that'll never end up biting you?

    6. Re:I use unique usernames for background checks... by gnapster · · Score: 1

      Maybe the three of you should start a union to combat hypothetical discrimination from your disparate employers.

    7. Re:I use unique usernames for background checks... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Actually yes, I'd much rather hire someone who can hide their indiscretions. Essentially that is the meaning of the word. Indescretions are things you were not discreet about, you got caught or bragged about them, etc. If you are smart enough not to get caught and still come off as a cool person (as opposed to a BS artist), good enough for me.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    8. Re:I use unique usernames for background checks... by geggo98 · · Score: 1

      How sure are you, that you have really tracked doen the correct person? Can you quantify your confidence or are you solely relying on your "gut feeling"? Because if you are relying on your gut feeling, you are usually wrng, because your guts are not very good at statistics.

      There might be someone with the same name of your applicant located in the same city or perhaps even in the same street. They even might happen to be at a similar age. This don't happens very often, but it happens often enough.

      You should give your apllicant the benefit of the doubt, especially when you even can't quatify how sure you are about your "gut feeling".

    9. Re:I use unique usernames for background checks... by kamelkev · · Score: 1

      The alt.drugs post that the username search linked back to contained his exact email address, along with additional personal details.

      It was a 100% match, the applicant didn't recognize the need for discretion at all.

      I'd feel terribly guilty if we excluded someone based on shaky evidence, and in other cases we've given the benefit of the doubt your talking about - but only when there is reasonable doubt.

  27. Isn't that the point? by trollertron3000 · · Score: 1

    That's the point dumb asses. So you market to this useless account that you think you have nailed demographically. Can't sneak nothing past you guys.. And yes I would like a subscription to O magazine because as an older woman I love Oprah.. fucking morons.

    --
    Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
  28. If you don't want your actions tracked... by gstrickler · · Score: 2

    ...don't get online. Don't post more info about yourself than you want to have distributed. Don't assume your username or password gives you any anonymity. If you're concerned about tracking, use a password manager and use a unique username/password for every site. If you're not that concerned, use 3-5 different user names with different passwords, they may be able to link some of your info, but not all of it.

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    1. Re:If you don't want your actions tracked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be easier to develop MPD, you use a different username for each type of website. For webgames, you use one kind, for shopping books you use another, downloading torrents another and so on. I also use different email addresses in some cases, since I know some websites will spam me to hell and back. Putting the torrent and game profiles to link to one mail address, and the others more serious ones to another, it makes life a lot easier.

    2. Re:If you don't want your actions tracked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't want your actions tracked... don't get online.

      Thanks, Captain Helpful. Got any more suggestions, perhaps? How about singlehandedly solving fatal traffic accidents? (Don't want to die on the road? Never leave the house!)

    3. Re:If you don't want your actions tracked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep it simple. I have one username that I don't care if they can find info on and one that I do all of the things I don't want tracked back to me and I never allow the two to come in contact with each other. Also, the one I don't want tracked back to me never has my real name or any of my primary email addresses or other contact info.

    4. Re:If you don't want your actions tracked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am anon in alot of places, like here.

      I have different (semi random)user names for various forums.

      All the throw away stuff is registered from throw away email addresses.

      I thought it was common sense not to use the same / similar username everywhere. Funnily enough, I had to tell a friend to use a non identifying username in a porn forum. It seems he was always using a username which had his name partially everywhere.

  29. I'm not sure that's what 'Betray' means. by Minwee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You see, that's really THE WHOLE POINT of using the same username in multiple venues. In fact, it's the whole point of having a publicly visible username at all.

    It's there to promote continuity between your various posts. It builds a "brand identity", if that's a phrase that you can use without wanting to punch yourself. If that wasn't what you were trying to do then you shouldn't have registered a user name in the first place.

    1. Re:I'm not sure that's what 'Betray' means. by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      That is a very good point.

      And yes, I can say brand identity without punching myself.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
  30. More shocked they haven't done this for email by PickyH3D · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people use the same username as their email address.

    Honestly, who thinks it would be that hard to go through and scan the internet for usernames, and then append every popular domain name after them.

    Add to that the profiles that could be scanned, and combined, along the way, and you can probably find pretty good, targeted ads in a very automatable way.

    1. Re:More shocked they haven't done this for email by maxume · · Score: 1

      You don't want effective targeted advertising?

      I dream of it, advertisers knowing I am a miserly crank, not directing resources at me at all.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:More shocked they haven't done this for email by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Advertisers, I could care less about those guys.

      The ones who worry me are the insurance companies: "I see you've been to such and such a club, since that's not a non-smoking establishment, you're going to set your rates as a tobacco user. that will be $100/month extra"

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    3. Re:More shocked they haven't done this for email by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'd rather just have single payer than spend all my time worrying about whether or not my insurance company was effective in its attempts to correctly estimate the risks of doing business with me.

      I always end up thinking about information restriction being a way of advocating that costs be socialized inside of that insurance pool.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  31. Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spies should be tried and convicted, then lined up against the wall, offered a cigarette and a blindfold and then executed, regardless if they work for a business or a/the government. Such tracking of people by either type of entity is an endangerment to the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness. Anything recorded can be acquired and abused.

  32. What's the big deal? by DavidinAla · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I don't care. I don't want government to have the power to track me, but if a marketer figures out in his database that the same person who posts on Slashdot also posts on a filmmaker site and a college football site, well, who cares? If I happen to want to do something where nobody can know who it is, yeah, I'll create another identity. But for the vast majority of what I do today, I've taken to using my real name as my user name. I can't figure out why people think a user name "betrays" you because it connects you to something you've said elsewhere. In real life, I already have something like that. It's called my name. So more and more, I'm using it online except in the VERY rare cases I want to protect my identity. This is not rocket science, IMO.

  33. DUH by jdharm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its called 'online presence' and it kind of the point isn't it?

  34. Sounds iffy by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I've used "Cro Magnon" several places, so one could assume it's the same person (especially if I make a referrence to one of the other sites). However, on at least one site, "Cro Magnon" is used by someone else, and my username is something entirely different.

    Also, I'm on plenty of sites with totally different usernames.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  35. In other news, the sun rises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who has ever tried to stalk a hot girl online - i.e., everyone reading this - has known the username trick for ever. It's so self-evident that I hesitate to even call it a trick.

    1. Re:In other news, the sun rises by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself... my wife kinda objects to my stalking hot girls online, so I don't do it.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:In other news, the sun rises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's a favourite 4chan method of backtracing someone who posts an e-mail address, instant messenger ID, etc. I've used it a number of times with good results.

    3. Re:In other news, the sun rises by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      Stalk your wife online instead. Flattering for her, informative for you!

  36. Why would you care about marketers tracking you? by tetromino · · Score: 0

    I do not understand the bizarre European obsession about online marketers tracking people. Sure, there are some things that a reasonable person would wish to keep private (for instance, medical history, finances, and for those living in repressive societies, political and religious affiliation), but why would anyone wish to hide what brand of jeans they like to wear? I for one would very much prefer that marketers and ad networks had a good picture of my product preferences so that instead of ads for mortgage refinancing and painfully unfunny t-shirts, I would get advertisements for things that I might actually be interested in.

  37. Oh p-lease! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    WHO CARES! Should we all just unplug our computers and go cower in a corner, afraid some advertisers might profile us, or a scammer might track us? Oh my. YA KNow.... isn't the solution just a little obvious? Why did this subject even make it to /.???

  38. So let them....! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    If someone sees that I buy a lot of stuff from bestbuy, and that I am a programmer because I have accounts on sqlserver.com and vb.net mag .com and also see i post a lot about tech stuff on /., etc...etc... guess what , they wont bother sending me spam about viagra, they will send me spam about the latest tech stuff for sale, which is just fine by me....allows less spam making it's way into my mailbox....

    1. Re:So let them....! by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Don't look now but you just admitted to being a VB programmer on /.

      Prepare yourself for heaps of abuse.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:So let them....! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they found out you were a programmer they would probably still send you ads for Viagra.

    3. Re:So let them....! by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 1

      I prefer to get things done, and VB -> Visual Studio -> less time spent monkeying with the IDE and more time putting out code.

    4. Re:So let them....! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our vs M$ laiden overlords....in the end it also makes you more valuable as more possitions are available to you, then say an advanced shell and perl programmer for running cron jobs on a linux server running 7.2...because they just cant afford to pay you.

  39. Re:This should be on MSN/AOL homepages, not here.. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Wait until your are done explaining it to her, and some smart ass comes behind you and point out to her that, since marketers are using her username from different sites to link them and track them as the same person, ANYONE could create an account on any porn site on the internet, and user her AOL/MSN name for their account, thus linking her to any activity they do on the porn site. They could be extra helpful by explaining to her that the only way to stop them from using her username on those sites is for her to register it first.

    Just wait until you get the call from her explaining that she made a typo, and wants you to help correct her username on 'iwantmyhorseporn.com'.

  40. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crap, they're on to me...

  41. Says you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You see, that's really THE WHOLE POINT of using the same username in multiple venues. In fact, it's the whole point of having a publicly visible username at all.

    It's there to promote continuity between your various posts. It builds a "brand identity", if that's a phrase that you can use without wanting to punch yourself. If that wasn't what you were trying to do then you shouldn't have registered a user name in the first place.

    The whole point of having a registered user name is to distinguish yourself on one particular site. What's the purpose of building a "brand identity" when the people following your "brand" on site A don't go to the other sites you post at? The whole point of using the same username in multiple venues is mere simplicity of not having to remember multiple usernames.

    1. Re:Says you. by Minwee · · Score: 1

      The whole point of using the same username in multiple venues is mere simplicity of not having to remember multiple usernames.

      That goes both ways. You're making it simpler for everyone else in the world to not remember or learn your multiple usernames. And the notion that you are the only unique snowflake in the whole world who visits one particular pair of sites is hopelessly naive.

  42. Easily avoidable by Virtex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This kind of tracking is easy to avoid. Just do like me and never post on discussion forums like this one.

    --
    For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    1. Re:Easily avoidable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't lose the game if you never play it!

  43. ORLY? by senorpoco · · Score: 1

    This may shock you but I am neither mexican nor little

    1. Re:ORLY? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      And I am neither an annoying Indian pop singer, nor a Japanese goddess.

    2. Re:ORLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, OTOH, have been posting under this pseudonym everywhere I can..

  44. Or it could show sites betraying /. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    i googled my /. username and found more than one site duping /. articles:

    http://jetlib.com/news/tag/earth/page/20/
    http://pubsub.com/Puck-Daddy-Mini-Doc-Talking-2010-NHL-Draft-and-dream-cars-with-Taylor-Hall-Tyler-Seguin-and-Cam-Fowler-Sunny-the-Sun-n-cpTsvVWHWnSS

    plus a lot of other stuff i knew would be found if anyone did that. so i don't feel betrayed at all.

  45. Not new by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    Same problem also exists with people. I don't necessarily want people to track me down all over the web. Easy fix though:

    $ cat /etc/mail/aliases | grep -i $USER | sort | uniq | wc -l
    154

    Randomly generated password for each.

  46. Re:Why would you care about marketers tracking you by hax4bux · · Score: 1

    It isn't just Europe.

    The WSJ ran an entire series of articles about scary analytics and their evil quant masters. NPR "Fresh Air" then ran an hour long episode quoting the WSJ. The horror! I was shopping for shoes and then shoe adverts started popping up! Dammit, they know EVERYTHING!

  47. Re:Why would you care about marketers tracking you by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why would anyone wish to hide what brand of jeans they like to wear?

    Because it's none of their business?

    I for one would very much prefer that marketers and ad networks had a good picture of my product preferences so that instead of ads for mortgage refinancing and painfully unfunny t-shirts, I would get advertisements for things that I might actually be interested in.

    There are ads on the Internet?

  48. Re:Why would you care about marketers tracking you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The EU has strong data protection laws. If you cannot comprehend why, that's your problem.

  49. My name is Lee... by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    Thats right, that Lee :)

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  50. what about advantages? by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

    My reputation is too important for me to want to change my nick just to avoid marketing. It's useful for recruiters or prospective employers to be able to do a quick search and find out more about me. It's like an implicit and well-earnt LinkedIn.

  51. That's why I always use by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    a unique username on every site:

    head /dev/urandom | md5sum

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:That's why I always use by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      What are the odds of that outputting 'Compaqt'?

    2. Re:That's why I always use by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      Exactly the same as it putting out 'MaskedS'. Or '1234567'. Or 'b5c2502'.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  52. I am Spartacus by retroworks · · Score: 1

    I cover my tracks by using my username everywhere, registering for places I don't go, subscribing to magazines I don't read, and I buy everything, from ladies slacks to chain mail. I join groups I disagree with, donate money randomly, buy clothing that won't fit me, bid on items I don't really want, all to confuse the heck out of these people who want to know about me. A person who comes from everywhere comes from nowhere at all. If everyone got cookies from every website, we'd ALL be Spartacus. That's my plan anyway, if I wasn't so lazy.

    --
    Gently reply
  53. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This anonymous fellow sure is busy. Reviewing stuff, taking on big government, and trolling on slashdot.

  54. So what! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, why is this a bad thing? Anyone who doesn't know that everything you do online is public hasn't been paying attention ;-)
    Waiting is...

  55. I'm pretty much pwned already.. big woop by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Trying to hide from the marketers is almost a Hobson's choice. If I want to obscure my identity, I must:

    - Use multiple identities. Complexity and failure due to other means of tracking me make this fairly pointless.

    - Stop using cloud-based services. There goes Gmail and a bunch of other stuff. So I should be running my own webmail gizmo?

    - Opt-out of all marketing opportunities. Sure, and opting out is actually respected by how many? ESPN keeps turning video autoplay back on when I go there, as if they are going to respect my opting out of newsletters, sharing with other entities that have 'items of interest' to me.

    - Unsubscribe from services when I'm done with the business at hand. And re-enroll two weeks later. Nice, I get to play whack-a-userID as much as I do the thing I actually wanted to do.

    So I don't bother. I'm fairly immune to the sidebar ads I get, I never respond to spam ads, and I am now tending to avoid retailers that obviously use deceptive means to target me. Screw 'em.

    As an example of hilarity; I looked into getting a used shipping container a few months ago to use for storage. Turns out even old beatup ones are pretty expensive. For weeks after that, I would see sidebar ads for shipping containers 'everywhere'. Even today I coudl get one if I go to the 'wrong' site. I was never seriously in the market for containers, but it's a competitive market, and they are persistent.

    Another example; I made the rare mistake of going to a buy.com (or was it nextag.com?) link for an item. Aw, crap. Now I get those ads all the time. But I recognize them schlepping me ads for 'djebme strap' and ignore them.

    A final example; How often have I actually clicked a link to nextag.com to look for something specific, as a last resort, and find that they actually don't have ANY sources, but 'check back real soon'! Argh. And you can be sure I'll be peppered with ads for that item for a while. Grrr.

    It's a lot like old fashioned junk mail, except I don't even need to carry it to the dumpster. It could be worse.

    And it probably is. My only fear is that I will eventually get categorized, and red-lined so that I never see ads for what I actually want, but I see ads that are shoveling me something I don't want, but 'they' are trying to steer me to. This is entirely illegal in financing, but not quite yet in retailing. We'll see if it should be or not.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:I'm pretty much pwned already.. big woop by TheReaperD · · Score: 2

      See, I'm the kind of person marketers hate. I never click on any ads... ever. If I see something I want, I manually go to the web site and look it up, bypassing the ad entirely.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    2. Re:I'm pretty much pwned already.. big woop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I searched for a car on google.... and everyother website i visit after that.... shows me ads from ONLY that auto company i had initially googled for..... nothing is safe anymore.

    3. Re:I'm pretty much pwned already.. big woop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am one hated most. If I am really annoyed I just keep clicking any ad I could lay my hands on.

    4. Re:I'm pretty much pwned already.. big woop by trawg · · Score: 1

      As an example of hilarity; I looked into getting a used shipping container a few months ago to use for storage. Turns out even old beatup ones are pretty expensive. For weeks after that, I would see sidebar ads for shipping containers 'everywhere'. Even today I coudl get one if I go to the 'wrong' site. I was never seriously in the market for containers, but it's a competitive market, and they are persistent.

      That, to me, sounds like a very pro-advertising story (almost - the fact that it went on for weeks after that is probably indicative of a broken algorithm somewhere; if you hadn't made a purchase it probably should have given up).

      Imagine if you were looking seriously and one of those ads that came up on some site /was/ for a shipping container that met your needs? There would have been little reason for you NOT to click, other than petulance.

      I think we're in a weird spot at the moment but more targeted advertising is smarter advertising - it means there's less wasted space trying to sell you things you will never ever need (like feminine hygiene products, if you're a bloke), or have proven repeatedly you don't want (eg, if you buy a lot of books but they're all science fiction, there's no point in showing you ads from the teen vampire romance section).

    5. Re:I'm pretty much pwned already.. big woop by Niggle · · Score: 1

      Let me get this right...
      You're saying there are ads on the internet? I thought they all vanished years ago. Round about the time Adblock+ came out.

      --
      - Blah blah blah, missing scientist. Blah blah blah, atomic bomb. -
    6. Re:I'm pretty much pwned already.. big woop by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I determined after very little research that shipping containers didn't meet my needs. Their incessant ads were wasted, and my original need, a storage shed, never showed up in an ad.

      I bet buying scifi books gets you LOTS of offers for fantasy books, maybe not so many for political biographies. My concern is that one day 'they' will decide to market to you what 'they' think you want, and little else. I might never know about deals on used metal sheds because they think I want something more expensive.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  56. Re:Reverse Identity Problem by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

    Sure, if some jerk has it out for you and you get stuck in one of these nets you'll never escape.

    Big Picture, we're thrashing through a ton of social change with this here Net thingie.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  57. Suddenly everything makes sense by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

    The marketers/spammers must have traced my username around the web and revealed my interest in sex. Apparently they worked out my email address too, because my inbox has been full of porn and viagra ads for years. And all this time, I thought _everybody_ got those kinds of emails. I can't believe this!

  58. Once again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And knowing that much of the users are using same pass for every login, and knowing that often passwords are very silly.. finish the story yourself.

  59. security through commonality by jp102235 · · Score: 1

    ok, so obscurity isn't working... time for something different.
    Use a username that is a slight modification of a VERY common person. bradpitt, obama, billgates, sjobs, stevejobs, ibm, microsoft, etc etc.
    then, when some marketing puke googles that : the s/n ratio blows their little analytics apart.
    -- john smith

    --
    jp
    1. Re:security through commonality by Drgnkght · · Score: 1

      Might I suggest common unix commands? Any results from Google will be buried in the pages of results.

  60. Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wow, this Anonymous Coward guy really likes slashdot!"

  61. Thats kinda the whole point really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using the same online "handle" since I was 15 in the 90's on BBS's. Its called an online identity for a reason. Yes if someone really wants to figure out who "DarthVain" is, it would probably be pretty trivial at this point (though I did see that some douche that likes Star Wars dolls stole my name at some point).

    If I want a secret name, I'll just use a random throwaway every time. If it is a name that I was to use for illicit cred, it will be something that I only use for that and nothing else (not that I need illicit cred). Besides regardless of what user name you choose, its a lot less "anonymous" than most people think. If you really want to keep it secret, you actually have to be quite careful.

    As for hackers and scammers tracking me, well I'm not really worth it so why bother. If I am targeted for anything it will be spammed at which point I am pretty confident I can protect myself.

    I think I will sign this AC just for fun... :)

    1. Re:Thats kinda the whole point really... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Oops. :)

  62. Re:Why would you care about marketers tracking you by Homburg · · Score: 1

    I think this is related to the way in which brands don't just sell us products, they sell us identities. So the underlying worry is that, if our consumption habits are really just data that marketers can aggregate, then the brand of jeans we buy and the music we listen to and the films we watch don't actually make us the special snowflake we would like to imagine.

  63. Happened to Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kind of username tracking actually happened to me in real life. I had posted to a message board (not this one) about how I was athiest but my parents didn't know it. Someone (still have no idea who) used my user name to find an email address from another board, my email address to find my real name (used on a Linux mailing list), my real name to find my parents address, and then printed out the thread and snail-mailed it to my parents home address. This is the curse of having a unique last name.

    The person only ever made two posts. One post saying they had done this, and then another a few days later saying that they were sorry but they were just "trying to save me". Sigh... religion...

  64. 411 by DocZayus · · Score: 1

    If you get my real name, you can easily find me through canada411.com, and I'm pretty sure they have these online "phone books" in every developed country. So, technically, even if you're not online, your name is still an easy way to track you. Marketers have been tracking people since the phone book has been invented. And even if they don't know my usernames and don't track me, I will still be getting full mailboxes of Medicine ads, bodily inflation ads or cheap garbage for sale ads. Thanks to the adblock folks, and to a couple of other add-on scripts for firefox, most of the ads are gone.

    --
    -- http://www.doczayus.com/
  65. Virtue of the story by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    Don't be an internet celebrity if you plan on applying for any job. Same thing vice versa. This economy punish creativity totally.

    Unless, of course you are living off from a trust fund, then you can afford to act in a civilized manner like Lindsey Lohan.

  66. I'm.. by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

    Not sanguine about this.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  67. interestingly... by RingDev · · Score: 1

    IE9 crashes hard on that page.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  68. Communication? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    Why does everybody act surprised when there is a news story telling us that using a communication as ubiquitous and publicly accessible as the Internet allows people to find us? That's kind of the point, isn't it? My tin foil hat is every bit as shiny as anyone else's here on /., but seriously, this kind of seems like a "Meh..." story to me. If you don't already realize that using the same user name on multiple web sites will allow someone to correlate your on-line activity, then you probably shouldn't be allowed outside alone. Just sayin'

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  69. OK, they can. I wish they would by houghi · · Score: 1

    For marketeers is is NOT a tool that will be used. Say you are on 2 technical sites and one social one, the marketeers won't say "We will send him technical ads." The will say "We will send him technical ads, social ads and some unrelated ones just to be sure."

    Just like saying "NO" to a marketeer means to him that he has not explained it well or often enough and if you say YES, it means it will work again.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  70. So? by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

    Please Mr Marketer, read the history of everything I've posted, know my likes and dislikes, and cater the marketplace to me.

    How is this a bad thing?

  71. A Primer on Cookies and Their Shenenigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cookies were intended to be restricted to the domain you're visiting. Which they technically are.

    But, now consider that almost every site has banner ads. Those come from another domain, and what's more, the same domain for every site that displays that banner (or other banners from the same ad company). So, they can really set a cookie on Slashdot and read it back on eBay, for example.

    1. Re:A Primer on Cookies and Their Shenenigans by Nick0000000 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing this is why firefox has a "accept third-party cookies" checkbox.

  72. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I go by Anonymous Coward. They come to /. and think "Holy crap this guy posts a lot". And I do.

  73. vonskippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    grumpy ass cranky, opinionated, childish mother fucker.

    what's who vonskippy is.

  74. Wow, just like real life by howardd21 · · Score: 2

    So my online user name may identify in multiple places just like my real name allows people to know who I am? Who would have imagined that?

    --
    no comment
  75. Good luck with that! by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

    I use Yvan256 for Slashdot, Yvan257 for Twitter, Yvan258 for Facebook, etc. No criminal mastermind could ever crack my username pattern!

    1. Re:Good luck with that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it a Fibonacci sequence?

  76. lastpass by apocal · · Score: 1

    Well, since using lastpass, It's been much easier for me to create various usernames and I have been doing so. I no longer care to have a complicated username that's unique just so I can remember it everywhere. I just pick whatever comes to mind. Thanks lastpass

  77. Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's some good news to read on a site where you won't be read if you're an AC or worse, you can't even post if you don't want to be port scanned (what the heck is this for? are ACs automatically guilty of plotting something?)

  78. Real Men Browse The Internets by joeszilagyi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A Real Man who wants to visit websites will load each site in a separate browser instance with a unique agent string and a different browser vendor and build each time with all cookies and scripts (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 87th party, etc.) hard-blocked, and only from within a series of totally unique VM environments of no less than Windows XP (Home and Pro), Vista (all 4,556 varieties), Win 7 (all varieties) and no less than 1,396 versions and flavors of Linux or Unix derived operating systems, and each randomly selected for each site visit, which are only done from a Tor onion connection running inside of the VM, which is in turn routed through a Tor onion connection running from the top-level main desktop that you're doing all this from, and each VM is promptly rolled back to pre-website status after your visit is done--and that's for EVERY SINGLE VISIT. ANYTHING LESS THAN THIS LETS THE INTERNET RAYS PENETRATE YOUR TINFOIL THINKING CAP.

    --
    Dude, where's my packet?
    1. Re:Real Men Browse The Internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Real Man who wants to visit websites will load each site in a separate browser instance with a unique agent string and a different browser vendor and build each time with all cookies and scripts (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 87th party, etc.) hard-blocked, and only from within a series of totally unique VM environments of no less than Windows XP (Home and Pro), Vista (all 4,556 varieties), Win 7 (all varieties) and no less than 1,396 versions and flavors of Linux or Unix derived operating systems, and each randomly selected for each site visit, which are only done from a Tor onion connection running inside of the VM, which is in turn routed through a Tor onion connection running from the top-level main desktop that you're doing all this from, and each VM is promptly rolled back to pre-website status after your visit is done--and that's for EVERY SINGLE VISIT. ANYTHING LESS THAN THIS LETS THE INTERNET RAYS PENETRATE YOUR TINFOIL THINKING CAP.

      I still vote for VPN and knowing your sysadmin. (Frequent data removals and several customers create enough obfuscation for it to be Very Hard to connect into you with minimal effort on your behalf.)

    2. Re:Real Men Browse The Internets by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Er, you know that most virtual machines have a "snapshot" function, right? You can just reboot with a brand-spanking new machine every time. That way all they can narrow you down to is anyone with a fresh install of whatever OS/browser you happen to be using.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Real Men Browse The Internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real men don't care about contracting spyware. They have the antibody in their blood.

    4. Re:Real Men Browse The Internets by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately at that point I just need to isolate the noise from the signal and I have a really accurate profile of the paranoid geeks who think they can't be profiled. No pattern is a pattern.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    5. Re:Real Men Browse The Internets by geggo98 · · Score: 1

      A Real Man who wants to visit websites will load each site in a separate browser instance with a unique agent string and a different browser vendor and build each time with all cookies and scripts (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 87th party, etc.) hard-blocked, and only from within a series of totally unique VM environments of no less than Windows XP (Home and Pro), Vista (all 4,556 varieties), Win 7 (all varieties) and no less than 1,396 versions and flavors of Linux or Unix derived operating systems, [...]

      I know you are joking. But I just checked myself on panopticlick. Looks like if you you know either my plugins or my fonts this is enough to uniquely identify my computer and hence its sole user. Unfortunateley my browsers transmit this information even in anonymous mode. And the list is nearly the same between different browsers. So cleaning the cookies won't help, TOR won't help, NoScript won't help and using different browsers' won't help to hide me from user tracking on the internet. The funny thing is that a fingerprint based on that information will work well between different internet sites.

    6. Re:Real Men Browse The Internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the point of the different VMs for the truly paranoid.

  79. I fooled them! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    I could be a kid, who lives on a polygamous ranch . . . or a polygamous kid, who lives on a ranch . . . "Mom, I need more huevos rancheros here down in the basement! Yes, I know that the magic word is 'please'"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  80. /. stole my username by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now I have to use sniveling coward.

  81. Obvious is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always saw this. Doesn't everyone else.

  82. Damn you all! by guybrush3pwood · · Score: 1

    I'm fucking tired of all this "THEY ARE AFTER YOU!!!" so-called research. When I walk down the street, I don't constantly look around me to check if someone is following me, or typing down my movements to design a marketing campaing and slip a note under my door. My crazyass, paranoid, neighbour is, though. Let me be, motherfuckers. They're NOT out to get me.

    --
    Perhaps I'm trolling, perhaps I'm not.
  83. That's why my username changes by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I'm Opportunist. Here. Nowhere else. To use this opportunity, and even be on topic with it, NO, the Opportunist you saw in $other_board was certainly NOT me. I can say that with quite a bit of certainty.

    For the same reason, I do not reuse passwords. So, in case you find my password here, all you get is one combination of characters you need not try on any other account of me.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  84. Whoosh!: Slashdot idiom for idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoosh!

  85. O rly? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    you may be giving online marketers and scammers a simple way to track you.

    Not to mention PETA...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  86. Funny, mine's just the opposite... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

    In my case, a Google search of this username comes up with a completely different meaning of the name than I intended (I work in IT, and am not... whatever "the 'it' girl" is supposed to mean). Also, my real name is the same as that of a porn star, so anybody who started looking for me would get distracted long before they found me. I'm safe!

    --
    10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
    20 DRINK COFFEE
    30 GOTO 10
  87. In other news by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Using your real name at different places in Real Life(tm) can betray the pattern of places you visit.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  88. Dang! by Nethead · · Score: 1

    Now I'll need to get rid of nethead.com, nethead.org, nethead.us and nethead.org.uk.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  89. Good Luck with than then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have two 'public' usernames, both in use since the early '90s, and which are my old passwords on the first DEC-20 I ever had the joy of code-hacking on.

    First one, well, you might get my musical tastes (or lack of, depending on your tastes) my nationality and possibly my political position, but then again, maybe you wont, as magically it appears that I'm also from a completely different country..also magically, it looks from the search results as if t'other user is the 'main' user.

    Second One, well, after a bit of digging (2nd page of Google results, you get my first name..and nothing else.)

    Both these usernames are associated with 'free' email accounts, now, if you had access to the server logs, you would be able to track back to my real name and
    usual email address, maybe...

    Searching on any other usernames I use, not surprisingly the one I've been using for 17 years as 'personal' tag will give you a fair bit of information about me, though amusingly, the noise levels are on the increase as other people adopt that particular username thanks to some D&D thing doing a bit cultural plundering...

    Doing a search on a number of long defunct usernames I have used yields no results - though interestingly, a couple of years back, Google used to return some old posts I'd made under them, pity they're not available, there were some amusing flames amongst them

    Even with Slashdot, this is my third user account here (the other two are defunct, email addresses associated with them no longer exist in this universe)

    At this point, just thinking about this, I've used five 'public' aliases over the past couple of decades, and have had approx 15 different (mostly work related) email addresses that no longer exist, and I still juggle something like 9 active email accounts,

    I'd love to see the code that could datamine all that lot and come up with me. (so long as the code was written in something interesting, that is, not bloody C++)

  90. Damnation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting under Anonymous Coward I didn't realize I'd be tied so closely to all of my other accounts.

  91. What!!...You mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my Anonymous Coward user name is not secure anymore!

  92. Hi... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    ...I'm Stealth Finger, feel free to advertise to me, I still won't buy it.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  93. Go ahead and track by MoeDumb · · Score: 2

    So what if spammers track and profile me? I'm not buying their erection pills anyway.

    --
    Mod Me Up. You'll make a grown man cry.
  94. ORLY? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    "Four researchers from the French National Institute of Computer Science" ...worked out what any single regular person with an ounce of common sense already knew. Well done, researchers.

  95. neminem by neminem · · Score: 2

    I'm neminem here, there and everywhere (unless that name contains capitalization in a location where capitalization isn't forced, in which case I'm not. I'm not, for instance, NemineM.) Marketers: go ahead and do what you like, I'm ignoring you anyway. Why should I care?

  96. This hapend years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On eBay Australia (not sure about other regions) this happened where scammers were sending fake emails to bidders who didn't win an item.

    For example if your eBay name was jhonsmith they would send emails to jhonsmith@gmail.com, jhonsmith@hotmail.com and any other popular mail service.

    The funny thing is my eBay username unique as it is, is the same as one of my email addresses with a popular service but I've always used a totally different email address for eBay and PayPal so getting these bogus emails were quite funny until eBay stopped showing bidders names.

    BTW posting AC because I don't have a slashdot account, I just mostly read here when at work.