Slashdot Mirror


TiVo To Brick All Remaining UK PVRs On June 1

handelaar writes "Perhaps in order to 'encourage' existing users of UK Tivo units to change their TV service to Virgin Media, pay £149 for a new 'Virgin TiVo' that they won't actually own, plus £34.50 per month in service charges, Tivo is to cancel all EPG data service to all the Tivos still in use in the country — and existing units will become basically nonfunctional at that time. The faithful aren't amused, having stuck by the company for several years, and mostly paying £120 per annum for service until now. 50% of UK residents aren't able to avail of this generous upgrade offer even if they want to — the cable company in question only covers about half the country."

286 comments

  1. For those who like this sort of thing, this is the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    tivo must not like having customers

  2. MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

    It might cost more up front, but in the long run it's much cheaper, and you get to control the recordings.

    Although the BBC has been applying to be able to encrypt it's EPG data for HD channels - there was a large fuss made about it at the time but I've heard nothing since, so I presume they are sneaking it in the back door quietly.

    1. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This doesn't sound like the BBC I know and love! This isn't what I'm not paying my license fee for.
      What's next, canceling the BBC World Service? But how else will the rest of the world know that we're better than them!

    2. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by TenMinJoe · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that what's been reported as "encryption" is in fact compression, obfuscated by withholding the Huffman tables. The BBC can then say to STB manufacturers "You must restrict copying of HD content, or we will not give you the Huffman decoding table". The BBC need this so that they can say to (American) studios "Give us your HD content to broadcast, it will be protected".

      In the mean time, Linux devs have reverse-engineered the Huffman tables anyway.

    3. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Malc · · Score: 1

      Seeing as everything from the Beeb is on iPlayer, why bother?

      I've been VCR/PVR freee for a few years now, and I really don't miss it. Catch-up TV via my PS3 (or now Freesat box) has been good enough. Sure, some of the features and video quality are missing, but then I guess I'm just not bothered enough by TV.

      I got my first Tivo about 2001 when I was living in Canada. Tivo weren't offering service in Canada at the time, with some BS excuse about having to translate everything in to French and that being too much work for them (I think their general slowness to develop or adapt to the market changes is what's held them back, incidentally). So there was a strong community in Canada around hacking these Tivos to make them work in a place with no service. It was pretty cool, and required some application called Simplicity to emulate the Tivo servers to provide the EPG, etc. Maybe there's some future in this in the UK, which would certainly save having to deal with the far less appealing prospect of a MythTV box.

    4. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by DrXym · · Score: 2

      There isn't much that the BBC can do to encrypt anything. They might be able to scramble the EPG but the variety of different data sources, e.g. DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S2 means the data will leak out. BBC HD on satellite is going to be virtually identical to BBC HD on Freeview except for its program number. The crypto key would also have to be divulged to STBs anyway, probably in firmware so it's going to be there to find. I doubt the BBC really cares much about doing it except to tick a box. They might also be able to mandate crypto for HD broadcast over DVB-T2 but without a CAM or bidirectional comms between STB and network provider, the crypto WILL get broken. And there is no CAM and DVB-T2 is not bidirectional. Even if crypto were implemented correctly it is a big expense and particular problematic for PVRs since it can really screw with trickplay functionality (solving this is a huge topic in itself) which would hamper hardware development. The other crypto found in Freesat/view compliant PVRs is they encrypt HD content as it's saved to disk. I imagine this is done with hardware AES and a unique key per box. Not much can be done about this except don't use logo compliant PVRs. I suppose someone might find a box which is sloppy with the way it saves content (e.g. prepending the key to the front of the content or in metadata or using the same key for every box) to enable a classbreak.

    5. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by N+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Seeing as everything from the Beeb is on iPlayer, why bother?

      AFAICS, this was in reference to the Freeview HD broadcasts where the BBC will also transmit quite a lot of content from non-Beeb sources.

      I don't think external content tends to appear on iPlayer for very long (if at all) and, correct me if I'm wrong, not typically at HD resolution.

    6. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      In the U.S. we have the same functionality in the "DTVpal". It is both a myth-style DVR and two FreeTV tuners built into a ~$250 box. Does the UK have anything like that?

      Also it sounds like the BBC is as evil as the RIAA/MPAA? Encoding video so you can't record it off the air? In the US the FCC ruled that illegal, saying that the airwaves belong to the People for their use, and encryption interferes with that.

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    7. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Malc · · Score: 1

      The bitrate of the iPlayer content isn't sufficient for SD resolution, so the HD resolution issue is rather moot. I watch it all at 1080p anyway :) Then again, my partner doesn't notice the artefacts and macro-blocking, and she isn't bothered when it degrades to a lower bitrate stream due to network congestion. For most people, it's simply not important to worry about.

      I can't say I've missed anything because it wasn't made available, although I have when it wasn't available for long enough. Again, that's moot. When I had Tivo I found if I didn't watch things quickly then it all just backed up and I'd end up deleting unwatched anyway.

      If I could get Freeview, I still wouldn't get the PS3 PVR add-on. I'm definitely not putting another computer in the living room to run MythTV. In a few years, most TVs in the UK will come with services live RoxioNow or UltraViolet built-in in to them, if not domestic catch-up TV services like the iPlayer. In the US, that service already carries TV programming. Hooray for the cloud and less crap cluttering our homes.

    8. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      We have Freeview+, Freesat+, Sky+, and whatever Virgin Media call their DVR (I'm one of the unlucky sods living in the half of the country without cable). TalkTalk TV also has the option of a DVR box, although I'm not sure that service is open to new customers at the moment.

      The Sky, Virgin and TalkTalk boxes are supplied by the service provider, but there are loads of Freeview and Freesat DVRs available on general sale. TiVo isn't even a blip on the UK DVR market, and I'm not surprised that they're risking the wrath of their existing users, all five of them, by cancelling the service.

    9. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

      The BBC is not being evil, its the evil MPAA saying "do this or we wont let you broadcast our content".

      The BBC does the bare minimum they are required to by their deals with the big content producers.

      Of course what is needed is for the big content producers stop thinking that DRM (especially DRM on free TV broadcasts) will ever stop their content from being pirated (or even do much to slow it down). But there is as much chance of that happening as there is of George Lucas deciding to give Star Wars away for free and uploading copies to YouTube.

    10. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 1

      What does Justin Bieber have to do with this, is he on iPlayer?

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    11. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by sonnejw0 · · Score: 1

      If you can see/hear it, you can copy it. Heck, isn't that what the education system is all about?

      How many people held up a recorder to an old mono-boombox back in the day? It wasn't too long ago that everyone recorded TV shows on their VCRs and watched them whenever simply by hooking up an inline video feed with a recording timer. As signals become higher and higher quality, the same recording equipment become available to the consumer at lower and lower cost ... why even bother recording? Hook a vinyl recorder up to the speaker leads and have a 99.9999% perfect copy made for you.

      I don't understand what the fascination is. It's just because everyone and their nephew has a computer at home ... but only one person has to make a recording and post it on the internet to produce the same amount of 'damage' as there being no copy-protection on media at all.

    12. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The non-evil thing to do is to quit broadcasting the MPAA content.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bitrate of the iPlayer content isn't sufficient for SD resolution, so the HD resolution issue is rather moot.

      So download via get_iplayer and watch the resulting .mp4 at your leisure? Doesn't solve the "computer in the living rool" problem, though.

    14. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Or just scrape the BBC website's listings.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Terrestrial HD EPG data IS encrypted, however if you have a DVB-T2 compatible unit, the manufacturer has applied and implemented the algorithm. There is no charge for the algorithm, providing you are a registered DTG/Freeview Supplier. This is a simple way to slow the cheepo Chinese re-manufacturers from flooding the market with crap T2 boxes.

    16. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there is as much chance of that happening as there is of George Lucas deciding to give Star Wars away for free and uploading copies to YouTube.

      So uh, in this remastered YouTube version does the bartender shoot first?

    17. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Malc · · Score: 1

      Not worth the effort. I could just download to a laptop and hook it up to the TV for less effort.

    18. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      DRM actually creates new problems. It annoys the people who pay for the product (unskippable ads, incompatibility etc) and makes them want to pirate it.

      Hook a vinyl recorder up to the speaker leads and have a 99.9999% perfect copy made for you.

      Those things are very expensive, but you can use a tape deck for that. Even now, blank cassette tapes are made and are not expensive but have quite high quality. New reel to reel tapes are very expensive, but NOS are cheaper and reel tapes have really high quality.

  3. Brick? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What? Something is bricked because it is no longer served programming info now?

    This is bad, TIVO sucks, their lifetime subscription doesn't cover the lifetime of the device, etc.

    But stop fucking using the term brick unless the device is incapable of powering on.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Brick? by Spad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't get this, surely it's not hard.

      Something is bricked when it is, to all intents and purposes, interchangeable with a brick. Not simply when it doesn't work properly any more or has less functionality.

    2. Re:Brick? by stms · · Score: 0

      But stop fucking using the term brick unless the device is incapable of powering on.

      Ahem... incapable of running *any* software this includes bios level stuff.

    3. Re:Brick? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Informative

      But stop fucking using the term brick unless the device is incapable of powering on.

      You, sir, are correct. From the link in the summary:

      Without the program guide data provided by the TiVo service, Series1 boxes will have limited - if any - functionality. They can still be used to view previously recorded programs and, under certain circumstances, may be used to record programs manually.

      So they are stopping the service used by the device, limiting it's functionality. It's like owning an intelligent radio, and your favorite station goes off the air. They are do not doing anything to brick the device.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Brick? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 5, Informative

      But stop fucking using the term brick unless the device is incapable of powering on.

      There are plenty of ways of bricking something and not being able to even power something on is only one of those. Like for example a gaming console: if you hit the power button and it goes on, but nothing else happens, then it clearly is bricked.

      Basically bricked means the device no longer useable for the purposes it was actually originally made for and getting it to functional state requires tools not even a regular geek has at his or her disposal. It is not bricked if returning it to functional state is sufficiently doable, or if it doesn't do what you want it to do but still serves the purposes it was sold under.

    5. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can still record. It can still play back. It isn't bricked in any sense of the term.

      While we're here, what do people expect? The Series 1 hasn't been sold for nearly nine years. Many of them still use dial-up to retrieve the EPG data! What's next, VCR owners complaining when Sony stop making 90 minute cassettes?

    6. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Bricking means total non-recoverable failure. Tools or no tools.

      Please stop misusing this word, or it will become diluted, like 'hacker' and we will all be poorer for it.

    7. Re:Brick? by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      I think they already did that; they only make 180 and 240 minute versions now.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    8. Re:Brick? by Ragzouken · · Score: 0

      Please stop pretending that the meaning of "bricked" remaining static adds any value to our lives.

    9. Re:Brick? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Bricking means total non-recoverable failure. Tools or no tools.

      Define "non-recoverable". You can brick some devices by screwing up a custom ROM installation and having no way of recovering it yourself, but the original manufacturer would still be able to sort it (for a price), either by their own software tools, or simply replacing the affected PROM or whatever with a fresh one.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Brick? by vadim_t · · Score: 2

      Sure it does. The point of language is to communicate. If you start arbitrarily changing the meaning of words people stop understanding what you mean.

      "Bricked" is a very precise metaphor. It means the device is as good as an actual brick -- inert and devoid of functionality other than the physical shape of the thing.

    11. Re:Brick? by anomaly256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. Like how all those users who call their system cases 'hard drives', 'modems' and 'monitors' diluting the meaning of all the terms involved don't in any way cause confusion and misunderstanding amongst support staff and other savvy users by misusing them as such.

      I'm sorry but a dynamic meaning is different to outright misuse. And as it stands, something still being usable albeit in a limited fashion is NOT bricked. Bricked can have many shades of meaning but even in the most liberal form, it is misused here plain and clear.

    12. Re:Brick? by robably · · Score: 1

      I bricked about this happening to "meme" [slashdot.org] a couple years ago, then bricked the solution, [slashdot.org] so I'd like to brick some words of encouragement to anyone who feels bricked by the loss: brick your vengeance. If you can't brick "brick," then nobody can.

      Heretofore, "to brick" can brick anything. You can brick a beer; you can brick a pizza. You can brick a computer; and you can brick your girlfriend. You can brick your hat, except in Soviet Russia, where hat bricks you.

      Go brick something, and then brick somebody about it in the hopes that they'll brick someone else. Brick the word, so the whole world will brick that they bricked "brick." Hopefully after that, maybe they will have bricked that some words are better off left unbricked.

      From http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=423338&cid=22102564

    13. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > It means the device is as good as an actual brick

      So, it is usable in construction projects?

      Please stop diluting the term "brick" by comparing plastic-cased retail electronic devices to useful baked-clay load-bearing mouldings.

    14. Re:Brick? by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>Series 1 hasn't been sold for nearly nine years. Many of them still use dial-up to retrieve the EPG data!

      You are prejudiced against dialup users?
      Are they now considered pariahs?
      Is my Dialup Dreamcast now not good enough for you?
      I'll have you know that 30% of users are still stuck on dialup, and they have minority rights damnit!
      (Please note I'm just joking.)

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    15. Re:Brick? by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>a gaming console: if you hit the power button and it goes on, but nothing else happens, then it clearly is bricked

      That's what happened to my PSP after Sony updated it with new software. Turned-on, but did nothing else. It had no useful function except as a doorstop or paperweight, hence it was equivalent to a brick. - Bricked.

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    16. Re:Brick? by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      Precisely. I remember lUsers once called 3.5 inch floppies "hard disks" which caused all kinds of confusion in casual conversation. You'd tell them to try typing dir c: or dir dh0: and of course nothing happened. Then they'd say something like, "I removed the hard disk from the computer," and you'd think they just destroyed their hard drive, when they really meant they removed the floppy.

      Don't use terms incorrectly. Learn the proper names for things, so you can communicate properly with other persons.

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    17. Re:Brick? by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basically bricked means the device no longer useable for the purposes it was actually originally made for and getting it to functional state requires tools not even a regular geek has at his or her disposal.

      No, I don't agree. I understand that the device will continue to function exactly as if you disconnected its data cable. Bricked would mean that it functions about as well as if you had disconnected its power cable.

      The company discontinued a service, this does not mean that people can't switch the device on and use all of its offline functionality, ie it is *not* bricked. If they issued a remote update which erased all firmware with no possibility of recovery, now that would be bricking.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    18. Re:Brick? by redelm · · Score: 1
      Agreed. As read in the summary, it appeared TiVo was sending out some sort of patch/signal that would render the device inoperable. A malicious attack, a felony in most countries. The reality is they are stopping sending data that helps the device function. Not a felony or tort, but perhaps a breech of contract.

      The summary writer deliberately exaggerated to arouse an audience. Deceit. Equal opportunity, editurds can be trolling slashtards too! Live down to the lowest of the audience and you will lose many.

    19. Re:Brick? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      They* know how much using the term "brick" incorrectly incenses us and use it to motivate comments and generate content.

      *The dark evil forces that lurk behind innaccurate and misleading story submissions.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    20. Re:Brick? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Languages change over time. If you want proof, go read The Canterbury Tales.

      If, OTOH, you want a language which hasn't changed over time, I suggest you learn Latin and communicate in nothing else for the rest of your life.

    21. Re:Brick? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      There are some perfectly good alternative words. Gimped, neutered, hobbled.

      I kind of like "Tivo plans to gimp their boxes in the UK".

    22. Re:Brick? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      i propose that "bork" be interchangeable with all words, as words retaining their meaning adds no value to our lives.

      Bork bork bork, bork bork bork bork bork bork. Understand? No, I didn't think so. Bricked = interchangeable with a brick. What these TiVo units will be is "with reduced functionality, but fully capable of playing pre-recorded shows" and not bricked at all.

      Let me put it to you this way; If you would were faced with the situation of throwing $brickeddevice or a brick through someone's window, if you don't choose $brickeddevice it is not bricked.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    23. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tivo isn't bricked, as you can still use it to watch recorded shows, and apparently even for recording manually (i.e. about as useful as a VCR was 20 years ago).

      We had a HP server that failed with HP network cards (it was delivered with Intel network cards, but the company was all-HP). HP support refused to do anything about it until we had tried the usual trouble shooting procedure. "Have you tried updating the BIOS?".

      Ok, so we downloaded the BIOS update to a floppy disk (that was in the PII days), and started the update. Half way through flashing the BIOS, the update utility stopped with disk read error.

      *That* is a bricked server. Turned on fine, but unable to do anything else.

      On the bright side, that solved our problem. "Well, you'll need to return the server then". The replacement server didn't have the network card problem.

    24. Re:Brick? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I was always under the impression from the less technically literate around me that the hard drive is the big box under the monitor that you put CDs and floppies into.

    25. Re:Brick? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Sure it does. The point of language is to communicate. If you start arbitrarily changing the meaning of words people stop understanding what you mean.

      Yeah, we wouldn't want to do something like add a new meaning to the word "brick". After all, everyone knows that "to brick" means to construct something out of bricks, such as a wall or a fireplace. It's not like "to brick" has anything to do with electronics.

      Or did you mean that we shouldn't add new meanings to words after some arbitrary date of YOUR choice?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    26. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so when the dvd player on my Wii died, the Wii was bricked? it no longer is usable for the purposes it was actually orignally made for, and getting it to functional state requires tools not even a regular geek has at his or her disposal.

      So according to your definition, my Wii is bricked. But it's not, it just has a defective optical drive. So fix your definition.

    27. Re:Brick? by hey! · · Score: 0

      But stop fucking using the term brick unless the device is incapable of powering on.

      In that case no devices are *ever* bricked. The typical bricking scenario is that the user does something the vendor doesn't want him to do, and the vendor's software refuses to operate. The software can't detect that condition *unless* the devices is powered on.

      "Brick" in this instance is a very unusual metaphor. Usually metaphors like "It was an oven in there," describe one thing in terms of the essential properties of another. "Brick" arose to describe mobile devices that are incapacitated by software. The idea is that you might as well be carrying around a brick. A brick, of course, is quite useful when you want to build a wall or pave a walk; those are its *essential* properties. It's not so useful if you want to make a phone call. What is peculiar about the "brick" metaphor is that it is evoking the essential *non-properties* of a brick, i.e. you can't make a phone call with it. If you had a brick you could make a phone call with, you probably wouldn't call it a brick.

      There ought to be a special term for that kind of negative metaphor, but there isn't as far as I know.

      Whether a device is "bricked" is in the eye of the beholder. A mobile phone being "bricked" doesn't mean it can't be put to other uses. You could use it as a coaster, or as a tray to serve wasabi next to your sushi platter. In some cases you could use it as a flashlight. What you *can't* use it for is what you bought it for: making phone calls. A bricked phone has lost its *essential* utility.

      What is the essential utility of a TiVo? For most people it is to timeshift broadcast television. I suspect for most users the ability to manually record shows or to playback prerecorded shows would not justify the space the device takes up, much less the purchase cost. Therefore most people would reasonably regard a TiVo without the ability to schedule future recording as "bricked". You may be different. You might still find considerable utility in the device. The point is that for most people, they might as well have a brick sitting next to the TV as a TiVo that can't schedule future recording.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    28. Re:Brick? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A brick is a device that the user gets no response from when it is plugged in. It might be doing stuff all the while but it doesn't appear to be doing anything. Heating an ethernet port doesn't count, either. A Tivo which no longer gets programming is NOT a brick. It is, however, an excellent reason to never give Tivo any more money. Anyone who would do this to you does not deserve any.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:Brick? by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Latin isn't changing much any more, as it's what is called a "dead language" nowadays, but it has changed a lot over time. The Latin of a few hundred years B.C. is not the same as that spoken and written a thousand or even two thousand years later.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    30. Re:Brick? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would say that your definiton of "bricked" is close. My definition of "bricked" is "the unit in question has the functionality of a brick." It may turn on, but it does nothing useful. If you can recover it without opening the case, you should not use the term "bricked". If someone else can recover it, you may use the term "bricked", but they should not.
      In the case of this story on this board, the term "bricked" is completely inappropiate. It seems that you will still be able to manually program these to record programs, you just will no longer receive scheduling data which will allow the unit to automatically record shows for you. Not only that, but I would think that a good portion of slashdot readers would be able to hack one of these to obtain programming data from an alternate source (I'm not familiar enough with Tivos to know how difficult that might be, it may be more difficult than I imagine).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    31. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is there anything stopping people from watching recorded shows on their tivos after this? No?

      Not. Bricked.

      Crippled, but not bricked.

    32. Re:Brick? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Value is added by not requiring the addition of "brick bricked" to mean what the old "bricked" meant.

      Look at "literally". Without some context you don't know if it is literal literally or figurative literally (or figurative literally or literal literally if you're of the reversed meaning crowd).

    33. Re:Brick? by delinear · · Score: 1

      If you start arbitrarily changing the meaning of words people stop understanding what you mean.

      English has been evolving for centuries. Even the term "bricked" is an evolution of the language (and a very recent one at that). Expecting language at this point in time to suddenly become immutable in order to make communication easier in the future is a nice dream but it will never happen. Spend the day speaking Chaucerian English and let us know how you get on communicating with others.

    34. Re:Brick? by vadim_t · · Score: 2

      I'm in favor of change, but not arbitrary change for no good reason.

      "Brick" as in to make a device completely non-functional is an useful change, as it creates a way of describing an interesting state that might have formerly taken an entire sentence to explain.

      "Brick" as in whatever meaning being used in this article (not very clear to me, but which seems to be "make a device less functional") creates confusion as to what is actually going on.

      Bricking normally refers to the device itself. Losing AC power doesn't brick your TV, it will still work if power is restored. Neither does shutting down the analog signal, it will still work if a signal is provided. Installing a firmware update that makes it unable to power on or accept the right firmware would do it though.

      According to me:

      Creating new words and new meanings for words that condense complex states and meanings in one word, creating more precision in language: good

      Giving words meanings that make it hard to determine which exact state is meant, reducing precision in language, making a specialized word mean the same thing as general one: bad

      Dates have nothing to do with it.

    35. Re:Brick? by delinear · · Score: 1

      You're confusing hard drive and hard disk. GP is correct - non-technical users often referred to 3.5" disks as hard disks (probably fairly understandably, since the case they were enclosed in was much more inflexible than the previous 5.25" incarnation), while the box under the monitor is often the "hard drive".

    36. Re:Brick? by twidarkling · · Score: 2

      He said "arbitrarily" changing. Linguistical shift over time is natural as language evolves. But simply using a word to mean something other than what it means, when there are other words which already mean that which you are trying to convey is not helpful. It is, in fact, doubleplusungood.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    37. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the problem: In the US, TiVo units become useless when they run out of program guide data. I'm unsure if this is how they work in the UK, but I'm pretty confident it's the same way. On my newer-model HD Tivo, without guide data you cannot record, or even watch, live television from any video source. There is also no way to download any type of open/free guide data from another service. All you can do is watch recordings you already have.
      In my mind, that makes the TiVo about as useful as a brick with noisy fans.

    38. Re:Brick? by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      That's pretty funny. I almost wonder if they didn't do it on purpose, knowing it was the easiest way to get your problem fixed.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    39. Re:Brick? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      No, brick has a very specific meaning in electronics jargon. You can refer to a router as bricked if the only recourse is to jtag it; you may not correctly refer to it as bricked if you forgot the password. Again-- a surge which fries the flash chip would be a bricking; losing your internet connection and being unable to use the router, not so much.

      You wouldnt call your TV "bricked" if your provider cut you off, because the device still functions. These TiVOs will still function, and are therefore NOT interchangeable with bricks even under your definition.

    40. Re:Brick? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      In that case no devices are *ever* bricked.

      Take a linksys router. Hook the power terminal directly (sans transformer) to a 220v source. Grats, you just bricked your router.

    41. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's kind of like saying a car with no engine isn't "bricked" because you can still sit on the seats. If you only want the car for sitting then that might work, if you want it for driving then clearly for your pusposes it's bricked, it's not an objective description and has to bear some reference to the intended purpose.

    42. Re:Brick? by digitalaudiorock · · Score: 1

      But stop fucking using the term brick unless the device is incapable of powering on.

      Indeed..in fact the situation described in TFA barely warrants "tits on a bull" status...

    43. Re:Brick? by violasvegas · · Score: 1

      In that case no devices are *ever* bricked.

      Take a linksys router. Hook the power terminal directly (sans transformer) to a 220v source. Grats, you just bricked your router.

      Holy moses! All of the interesting issues to discuss - who controls information and content? What do you actually get when you pay for a device? What rights do customers have in a situation like this? And yet, the most heated debate is over the use of a made up word. Good job folks, way to stay relevant.

    44. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on the Tivo model, all except the very oldest do not allow manual programming or any use without the program data. So, you data will last for about two weeks from the last download (which is why it works between updates and when the cable is removed). When it runs out of that data, it will simply show an obnoxious logo and allow your cable to pass through it. No recording. You could watch already recorded shows. I guess not entirely a brick, but 90% there - it's about the value of a couple DVDs of whatever random shows were recorded last.

    45. Re:Brick? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      It becomes relevant when we can no longer trust that the summaries have any basis in reality, or that they will be free from gross innacurate hyperbole.

      A headline indicating "TiVO to cancel service" would have been sufficient, and would not have sparked this discussion. A headline indicating "TiVO to come out and physically break all of your crap" is irresponsible and inexcusable, and this discussion is because a good number of us think that using the word "brick" is analogous to such a headline.

      You dont think the inability to trust that the news youre getting has a basis in reality is significant?

    46. Re:Brick? by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      If you only want the car for sitting then that might work, if you want it for driving then clearly for your pusposes it's bricked, it's not an objective description and has to bear some reference to the intended purpose.

      The thread pertains to the misuse of the term "bricking" in the title case. To continue the inappropriate car analogy: saying that those TiVos will be bricked is like saying that your transmission is shot when you've really run out of gas. Bricking has a quite specific meaning when it comes to elecronics.

      In the strictest sense of the term, bricking must imply that software error has rendered the device completely unrecoverable without some hardware replacement. However, it is common to use the term for a problem which can be rectified but only by a complex and difficult procedure, often requiring additional software.

      Loss of funcionality simply isn't what the term means. An example: If you destroy the bootloader on an Android phone, it's bricked because you can't get it to boot without doing some serious magic way over of the capabilities of most people. If your phone turns on, but can't make calls because it has very poor reception due to some other problem, it's not bricked even if it's practically unusable for its primary purpose.

      If you contact a phone hacker about your phone and tell him that it is bricked he'll be confused, and probably eventually be annoyed at you for wasting his time by misleading him. It's like referring to your whole PC case as the "hard drive" or the "CPU" - lots of people do, but it's simply the wrong term, and knowledgeable people will shake their heads and laugh at you. The term has a specific meaning even if you're not aware of it, no matter how many people call the PC case a "hard drive" the hard drive remains an internal component in your box.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    47. Re:Brick? by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      I have a series 1 tivo that they bricked. It still powers on, still records, but has reduced functionality. I can't create, edit, or delete recording schedules. I can't look at the guide. I can't really do anything but watch live tv, and let it record the schedules that were programed into it over a year and a half ago. Maybe we need a new phrase like mushy brick? Or maybe a new dvr like MythTV. I did a few weeks ago and couldn't be happier.

    48. Re:Brick? by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      It's not like you disconnect the data cable. A lot of the functionality stops when you stop making your call back. It shuts down your ability to schedule recordings, edit schedules, and a lot of the other functionality as well. I can't remember exactly what it shuts down, my series one hasn't made a call back in close to two years and it's pretty much a brick at this point. I recently built a MythTV box and couldn't be happier that the tivolution has come to an end.

    49. Re:Brick? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In that case no devices are *ever* bricked.

      Take a linksys router. Hook the power terminal directly (sans transformer) to a 220v source. Grats, you just bricked your router.

      Holy moses! All of the interesting issues to discuss - who controls information and content? What do you actually get when you pay for a device? What rights do customers have in a situation like this? And yet, the most heated debate is over the use of a made up word. Good job folks, way to stay relevant.

      Let's just go back to grunting, eating, shitting and fucking in caves, life was so much simpler then.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    50. Re:Brick? by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      Only rare Tivo models with Tivo Basic features, and original Series 1 Tivos, are capable of recording without guide data. If you have the most common type of Series 2 or 3 Tivo, and there is no guide data, you cannot manually record anything. The device is effectively useless, and "bricked" is quite appropriate to describe the resulting worthless box.

      As for using alternate sources of data, that exact subject--running a Tivo without service--has always been the line the Tivo hacking community didn't publicly cross. I've hacked in as root on my older Tivo and installed a web server and other goodies on it. That was easy; swapping the guide data out, that's really hard.

    51. Re:Brick? by yurtinus · · Score: 2

      "Disabled." I know it's more syllables than we're used to having to utter, but for the sake of maintaining a reasonably accurate and descriptive language, let's just bite the bullet and say it.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    52. Re:Brick? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Only rare Tivo models with Tivo Basic features, and original Series 1 Tivos, are capable of recording without guide data. If you have the most common type of Series 2 or 3 Tivo, and there is no guide data, you cannot manually record anything. The device is effectively useless, and "bricked" is quite appropriate to describe the resulting worthless box.

      As for using alternate sources of data, that exact subject--running a Tivo without service--has always been the line the Tivo hacking community didn't publicly cross. I've hacked in as root on my older Tivo and installed a web server and other goodies on it. That was easy; swapping the guide data out, that's really hard.

      Not really.

      First of all, TiVo pulled out of the UK in 2003, so the UK TiVos were all series 1 boxes - there were no series 2 TiVos sold in the UK.

      A 7-year run even on Lifetime is well worth it (at the cheapest rates, Lifetime pays off around 4-5 years).

      And people have put in alternate guide data for years - when TiVo wasn't available in Canada, for example. (Now that it is, the group shut down, but in the meantime they had a stunningly simple alternate guide data set. They promised TiVo that as long as Canada wasn't supported, they'd have their app around).

      That app is still around - after all, until very recently Australia didn't have TiVo either.

      You will probably need ot google for "simplicity.exe".

    53. Re:Brick? by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      It's not completely disabled, just semi-disabled. You know, like a squishy brick :P~

    54. Re:Brick? by MaerD · · Score: 1

      It may be capable of powering on, but it is essentially useless without program data. I believe the older ones could record 30 mins at a time, rendering it the equivalent of a dumb vcr. Not what people paid for.
      If your smartphone was no longer able to do anything except call 911, you'd consider it bricked as well.

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    55. Re:Brick? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No no. That's the "modem"

    56. Re:Brick? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      You can use a longer tape in the VCR just as well, and nowadays the shorter tapes are not that cheaper. also, I can buy VHS tapes from other manufacturers, not just Sony (actually, in my experience, current Sony tapes are too expensive for their quality - there are cheaper tapes that have the same video quality).

    57. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you don't understand. After they shutdown the EPG service, they're planning to go around, door-to-door, swapping the TiVOs for actual bricks. Then they're planning to wreck up your house, like Nixon does.

  4. Hmm... by lennier1 · · Score: 2

    How exactly is punishing your loyal (and still paying) customers a good business move?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Jamu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When they'll remain loyal and pay more than enough to compensate for the ones that leave.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    2. Re:Hmm... by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 1

      You reckon Apple will be ballsy enough to try this tactic?

    3. Re:Hmm... by hughbar · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a numbers game not an ethics game. If there are a few of them and they're not likely to be noisy, then **** 'em.

      Incidentally, this is why [apart from being old] I prefer my books as books and not digital artifacts controlled by Amazon etc. etc.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    4. Re:Hmm... by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      Shame that isn't the case...

      I'm one of the loyal UK Tivo customers... I currently have cable service from VM. I was considering updating purely so I could get HD channels, however since they announced the termination of the old service not only am I going to stick with my SD box, I'm going to downgrade my TV package to the 'free with other services' one, and actively discourage people I know from getting the VM Tivo. Since I'm the 'tech guy' amongst my group of friends/co-workers I guarantee Tivo/VM will lose out on some sales... and I guarantee that most other UK Tivo owners are in a similar situation.

      There are already issues with the cable service as they only have a fraction of the *good* channels available from satellite and how they have treated the series 1 customers is just one more reason to switch...

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    5. Re:Hmm... by EMN13 · · Score: 2

      Note that the customers are not still paying - assuming TiVo isn't lying anyhow. They say customers have not been billed since November and that service until June 2011 will be free. For a device last sold in 2002, that doesn't sound unreasonable. Sure it's annoying, and the hassle and price-bump may cost em goodwill, but it's hardly an extreme step.

    6. Re:Hmm... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Because they've changed market. TiVo no longer cares what direct-sales customers think, because they no longer want to sell to individuals. They want to sell to companies that place orders in the tens or hundreds of thousands. This move makes customers in a market that they don't care about unhappy, but makes Virgin Media happy, which is likely to give them more sales.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Hmm... by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Especially for those of us who don't get Virgin (49% of the UK), and wouldn't want their crappy service anyway (my parents used to have it - I'd go almost anywhere else based on their experience).

      I was a long time TiVo advocate, but no more. I will be recommending the Humax Foxsat + Freesat to everyone from now on. EPG is in the Freesat signal, so there's no way that you can get shafted like this again.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    8. Re:Hmm... by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I paid for a lifetime subscription. I *already* paid. TiVo are not mentioning that anywhere, or justifying their definition of 'lifetime'. I think I've been robbed.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    9. Re:Hmm... by Mike+Mentalist · · Score: 1

      What does the initial contract say about it?

      --
      I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
    10. Re:Hmm... by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      A lot of the UK Tivo users were sold a 'lifetime' subscription which, costing more than the box itself, entitled the user to 'program information for the life of your Tivo' (from the original documentation). The original service agreement was worded significantly different from the current one but was changed bit by bit over the years.

      That was YOUR Tivo and not what it was later twisted into 'as long as we can be bothered and don't want to use it as a stick to force you to sign up to a cable company service plan for a box you won't own'.

      The 'subscription free' part is meaningless when you don't pay the subscription.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    11. Re:Hmm... by beaviz · · Score: 1

      I paid for a lifetime subscription. I *already* paid. TiVo are not mentioning that anywhere, or justifying their definition of 'lifetime'. I think I've been robbed.

      Or maybe your life is coming to an end? :)

    12. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it is the case. You're in the minority. Most people will just pay up because they want the service.

    13. Re:Hmm... by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      From a fellow series one owner (in the us not uk), I recently built a MythTV box and couldn't be happier. The only thing missing is the suggestions, and there is a plug in for that. The HD tuners are nice :)

    14. Re:Hmm... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      That may be, but for product last sold 9 years ago, when the Average cost of the "Lifetime" worked out to about 2-3 years means they at least got their moneys worth.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  5. £149? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not sure where you get that from, the Virgin V+ HD box is free (well, a once off £50 activation charge) for new customers, and as an existing customer I can get one for £70 including the activation charge.

    Plus the "£34.50 per month" includes TV, phone (line rental and a fairly decent call package) and 10MB broadband.

    Not saying that what Tivo are doing is acceptable (although they never promised eternal service in the UK, or did they? Since people are paying an annual service charge, I would guess not), but at least get stuff correct before ranting.

    1. Re:£149? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      and 10MB broadband.

      Slipped a decimal point or three?

    2. Re:£149? by Spad · · Score: 1

      Well, technically they offer 10Mb, 30Mb, 50Mb & 100Mb (In some areas, they're still rolling that one out), so in places they do offer 10MB+ broadband.

    3. Re:£149? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Nope, if you ring the Virgin Media call center when signing up, you can get bumped up to their 100Mbit service for nothing extra. Thats roughly 10MB.

    4. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speedtest.net this morning tells me I get 19.42Mb/s down, which is spot on as my modem tells me it is synced at just a shade over 20Mb/s

      So, no.

    5. Re:£149? by bamf · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you get that from, the Virgin V+ HD box is free (well, a once off £50 activation charge) for new customers, and as an existing customer I can get one for £70 including the activation charge.

      We're not talking about the V+ box though, this is the new Virginmedia Tivo box.

    6. Re:£149? by some_guy_88 · · Score: 2

      I just recently moved from Australia to the UK and that's one of the interesting things I noticed. In the UK you pay for the speed of your connection rather than how much you can download. So as others are saying, the 10Mb is referring to a 10Mbit connection speed. You can download as much as you want.

      In Australia, the speed is basically always "ADSL2+" which means a theoretical maximum of about 20Mbit but in practice is highly dependant on how far away you live from the telephone exchange and the quality of the lines in your house etc. I never got speeds anything like 20Mbit and I lived close to the center of town in Melbourne (~3.5mil population). When you go over your download limit (typically 10-50gb), the speed is "shaped" or "capped" to something near dialup modem speeds.

    7. Re:£149? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I bought a "lifetime" subscription. TiVo are now defining that as nine years, no argument, tough.

      I am extremely unimpressed, and won't be buying a new TiVo. Not that I can get Virgin - or would want Virgin - anyway. They seem to have given up making good kit and selling it themselves, and instead got into bed with first Sky, then Virgin, two of the greediest and crappiest providers around.

      Anyway, there will be homebrew, so the box won't be bricked, and even failing that I should still be able to use it to rip&store DVDs, which I mostly do because I DIDN'T NICK THE FUCKING DVD, I FUCKING RENTED IT, SO STOP NAGGING ME NOT TO FUCKING NICK IT.

      Sorry. Personal bugbear.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    8. Re:£149? by agentgonzo · · Score: 1

      the Virgin V+ HD box is free (well, a once off £50 activation charge)

      So not really free then.

    9. Re:£149? by stupid_is · · Score: 1

      In the UK it actually is the same (although mostly without the technical terms such as "ADSL2+" which would confuse the poor ignorant masses), although you will also be shaped depending on traffic class during "peak" hours (that typically last for much of the day) with a lot of the major ISPs - check out your Fair Usage and Traffic Management policies that are required to be easily findable on your ISPs website. If you are fortunate enough to live near an unbundled exchange, then you have a better choice of ISPs and so may be able to find one that offers an unshaped, unlimited (without the *) contract. These contracts are either not very cheap or not very common. Buy cheap broadband and expect to be heavily throttled and have caps put in place

      --
      -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
    10. Re:£149? by agentgonzo · · Score: 1

      I just recently moved from Australia to the UK and that's one of the interesting things I noticed. In the UK you pay for the speed of your connection rather than how much you can download. ... You can download as much as you want.

      You must be new here. They all advertise that it's 'unlimited' but then massively throttle how much you download if you go over their secret hidden limits.

    11. Re:£149? by some_guy_88 · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. They all advertise that it's 'unlimited' but then massively throttle how much you download if you go over their secret hidden limits.

      Well, yeah. I am new here (to this country) :). What are these secret hidden limits though? In Aus, the limit is low but clearly marked. The limit is often split over peak and off-peak periods too. So for example, you might have 25gb to use during on-peak and say 30gb to use during off-peak. Off-peak is usually from about 1am to 7am (certainly not half the day) so you've really only got 25gb to use unless you leave your pc on overnight downloading or whatever. I haven't been here long but I haven't run into any limits yet although to be honest I'm not a heavy downloader.

    12. Re:£149? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Ah it means speed, not volume. I am in Australia so 10MB seemed strangely low, not impossible.

    13. Re:£149? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Not entirely sure where your numbers come from, but I've seen ADSL2+ devices synched at 46mbit at work. Admittedly, the cabling distance from the DSLAM was about 20m (we have several DSLAMs one floor below my department, in the VIC lab... the 46mbit was on a Lucent Stinger), but I've seen customers in the field with attainables in the 30-40mbit range on an ADSL2+ connection.

      Perhaps you mean that they won't sell you a connection faster than 20mbit on an ADSL2+? That, I would find completely believable... we won't sell a customer a connection over 16mbit on ADSL2+... for any faster connections, we switch the customer over to VDSL2. But the ADSL2 modems and DSLAMs are perfectly capable of synching higher than 16mbit. In fact, the attenuation isn't anywhere near as bad on an ADSL2+ connection as opposed to VDSL2, and ADSL2+ is capable of pushing higher bandwidth at a distance of about 1.5-2km and above.

    14. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently got upgraded to 30Mb/s and the new superhub (it does multichannel so can do over 20Mb), and it is solid during all times of the day. I also get 3Mb/s upload speed!

      Virgins traffic management policy:

      http://shop.virginmedia.com/help/traffic-management/traffic-management-policy.html

      Which seems reasonable. If I download over 10GB in a 24 hour period (or 5GB at peak evening times) I get throttled to 75% of my max speed for 5 hours.

      The top tier package has no cap apparently.

    15. Re:£149? by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      Virgin Media's TiVo offering is distinct from V+. it will, presumably, eventually supersede V+, but they are not the same thing.

      http://tivo.virginmedia.com/

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    16. Re:£149? by Caetel · · Score: 1

      Virgin Media are pretty open with their limits; they've got a whole page here which details the limits, after which they reduce your speed by 75% - the highest end connection is uncapped. In my experience though, what it doesn't list on that page that it seems to screw with the latency after you've been capped, I've had ping times all over the place.

      In terms of 'unlimited' connections, Virgin Media are the most transparent with their limits, most other providers resort to a fair use policy without any hard numbers given.

    17. Re:£149? by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>>>10MB broadband.
      >>
      >
      >
      >Ah it means speed, not volume. I am in Australia so 10MB seemed strangely low [data cap]
      .

      This is funny. Up above we had a discussion about how diluting terms like "brick" can cause confusion in communcation, and now here we see an example of that.

      It's not 10 MB broadband. It's 10 MB per second or 10 MB/s broadband. One is volume; the other is rate or speed. If this was college, the professors would take half a point off for having an incorrect answer.

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    18. Re:£149? by agentgonzo · · Score: 1

      Some ISPs list what their policies are on the details of the packages. The cheap policies normally list 10, 20, or 40GB transfer limits. The more expensive ones normally state that it's unlimited but a 'fair usage policy' applies but don't list what this policy is, meaning they can just throttle whenever they like.

    19. Re:£149? by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      >>>>>10MB broadband.
      >>
      >>Ah it means speed, not volume. I am in Australia so 10MB seemed strangely low [data cap]
      .

      This is funny. Up above we had a discussion about how diluting terms like "brick" can cause confusion when speaking to other people, and now here we see an example of that.

      It's not 10 MB broadband. It's 10 MB per second or 10 MB/s broadband. The former is not correct, but the latter is - volume versus speed. (If this was college, the professors would take half a point off for having an incorrect answer.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    20. Re:£149? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "the Virgin V+ HD box is free (well, a once off £50 activation charge) for new customers"

      If 50 pounds is now virtually free, then the value of sterling must have dropped quite a bit. Tell you what, you send me a 50 pound note, and I will send you $10US back to cover the cost of postage.

    21. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem

      A 'once off' fee is what you pay for the device, bozo. 'Activating' a Tivo is like 'activating' a bar of soap.

      On the other hand, how would you like this 'free' iPhone? Only a single $600 'activation' fee.

    22. Re:£149? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      I bought a "lifetime" subscription. TiVo are now defining that as nine years, no argument, tough.

      Don't worry. TiVo will be dispatching someone to your house in the middle of the night to end your lifetime subscription.

    23. Re:£149? by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      Currently many countries do not have requirements that advertising of services for the internets give a cap. They just say unlimited and you can DIAF when you go past the point of some arbitrary cap on unlimited. AFAIK, this is changing in the US for at least the fine print.

      Some services (AT&T) cap the data and bill you immediately for over use. Others cap the data then terminate the service (hard cap). Still others cap the data then drastically throttle the speed for data past the cap but never disconnect or overcharge (soft cap, T-Mobile),

      And all of them may allow your neighbor, same node, same data plan, same "hub", to use 200GB+/mo with no issues and cap your data at 25GB/mo.

    24. Re:£149? by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      I bought a "lifetime" subscription. TiVo are now defining that as nine years, no argument, tough.

      I am extremely unimpressed, and won't be buying a new TiVo.

      I DIDN'T NICK THE FUCKING DVD, I FUCKING RENTED IT, SO STOP NAGGING ME NOT TO FUCKING NICK IT.

      YOU DIDN'T FUCKING BUY A TiVo IN THE LAST NINE YEARS! YOU HAVEN'T GIVEN THEM A FUCKING SHILLING IN NINE YEARS. WHY THE FUCK YOU ANYONE EXPECT YOU TO NOW?!

    25. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this were college, I'd hope that professors would take off some points for your grammatical atrocities.

    26. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment was posted twice, once on each account?

    27. Re:£149? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You can't download as much as you want on most packages. Virgin has two 10mb offerings, one with a 750mb limit and the other with a 1500mb limit between 4pm and 9pm. Go over and your connection is retarded to less than 1/5th its normal speed for 5 hours.

      Don't beloved the "unlimited" lie.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, there will be homebrew, so the box won't be bricked, and even failing that I should still be able to use it to rip&store DVDs, which I mostly do because I DIDN'T NICK THE FUCKING DVD, I FUCKING RENTED IT, SO STOP NAGGING ME NOT TO FUCKING NICK IT.

      Your license to view the content on the DVD is only valid while the DVD is in your possession. If you sell the DVD, or return the rental, your backup is now an unauthorized copy, theft. Stop trying to argue away your criminal activities using caps and colorful metaphors.

      So yes, YOU NICKED THE FUCKING DVD.

    29. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some companies do clearly mark their limit (im with Eclipse who not only marks the limit, but gives you a real-time meter with graphs for usage and allows you to extend it for a given £/Gb amount - which is extortionate but at least you have the choice) - others like to pretend that they offer Unlimited services so that their customers will believe it and sell their product to friends and family for them (yes I am being constantly told by tech-illiterate parents that I should swap - but that strangely they need a new router every month because they wear out and 'slow their packages down' :S).

         

    30. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is £50 free?

      can I say that my macbook is free (ok - well, a £1000 once off purchasing charge)

    31. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in Australia so 10MB seemed strangely low, not impossible.

      Really? I'm in America, and 10 MByte / sec would be blindingly fast.

      Here, broadband speed is always measure in Mbits / second. In my Neighborhood, I can get 5 Mbits / sec for about $60 per month or 20 Mbits / second for about $100 from my cable company (I'm in an affluent high-density neighborhood in a major American metropolitan area.)

      So, the offer is five times times faster than I can get in America at about half the price (and in America I get only the cable.)

    32. Re:£149? by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      I'm a very satisfied customer of Virgin's 50MB service. I get spot on 50MB all of the time. Service has been flawless.

    33. Re:£149? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      WHY THE FUCK YOU ANYONE EXPECT YOU TO NOW?!

      I'm charitably assuming English is not your first language. So perhaps you should look up 'lifetime'.

      Anyway, I gave them a *lot* of money nine years ago for a service to last a long time. Your pathetic logic is like say "you bought your house ten years ago, do you still expect to own it now?"

      Justin

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    34. Re:£149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say it is reasonable to expect a lifetime subscription to be at least 20 years. Get in touch with Tivo and try to get a refund, if they don't offer you at least 50% of what you paid then I think you should take them to the small claims court. I could be wrong but I think you need to make a reasonable effort to get a refund from Tivo before taking them to the small claims court, but I would think it was worth doing.

      Oh and you're right about renting a DVD and copying it isn't stealing, it's copyright infringement so stop infringing copyright you dirty pirate. ;)

    35. Re:£149? by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      Except that houses can have mortgages that averages 30 years. TiVos cannot (min finance charge, $1 monthly)

      And there's no ambiguity between "lifetime of service" and "lifetime of device".

    36. Re:£149? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Fuck's sake, take a critical thinking class. Yes, houses can have mortgages. So what? That's an entirely separate arrangement to the purchase of the house from the previous owner. A better criticism would have been that one is buying a service, the other is buying a physical object. Do I have to criticise my own analogies now?

      My point is: if they were selling 'lifetime of service' then privately defining lifetime as 'till we get tired of providing it, heh, heh', then they are a bunch of bastards from whom nobody should purchase anything. I'm very sad to say this, as the original TiVo company was absolutely brilliant, with great tech support and a great product. I doubt the people from whom I bought a lifetime service intended nine years as the lifetime of the service, and I very much doubt that any of them are still there.

      No, I am not saying the current owners did anything legally wrong.

      Yes, I am saying the current owners did something morally wrong.

      Yes I am saying that it is extremely bad PR.

      Yes I do suspect it was part of a deal with Virgin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  6. Learning experience by lexcyber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they learned from a successful business model from cupertino. Where you lock in, treat everyone like crap and make them pay a premium price is the winning ticket to huge stock price increase.

    - Sent from my Iphone

    --
    - To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion -
    1. Re:Learning experience by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      But they are missing one KEY tactic. That they make damn sure that everyone with their product thinks they are completely fucking cool.

      --
      Balderdash!
  7. Not Bricked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What a horrible sensationalists headlineto many ‘bricked’, means kill. They are not bricking TiVo’s – they are just going to be cutting off the EPG data in 3.5 months. I gave up my TiVo’s last year when I moved from the US to the UAE, and man do I miss ‘em. In the UK, TiVo pulled out years ago - so it was nice of them to keep it going as long as they did. Hell, you'd thing in that amount of time (what, 9 years?) since they stopped selling them in the UK there would be something else, comparable or better on the market...but nope.

  8. IT'S GOOD TO BE BRITISH !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tivo is dead !! Long live the tivo !!

    God save the queen !! And somebody, quick, build her a new castle !!

    1. Re:IT'S GOOD TO BE BRITISH !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're "'avin' a larf", but in two and a half months time that post will look positively understated, when some muppet is getting married.

  9. I'm glad by present_arms · · Score: 2

    That I switched from Virgin Media to Sky, although the broadband was better on cable, the rest is junk, and Virgins customer service sucks (well it did for me), as for tivo, I've never used one, I've always had mythtv, and sky+ so i'm not short of recording from TV options, just my 2 pence worth :D

    --
    http://chimpbox.us
    1. Re:I'm glad by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      I certainly agree that Skys TV service is significantly better, but their tactics leave a lot to be desired.

      In 2009 Virgin launched their own version of Sky One, called Virgin One. In 2010, Sky bought an owning share in Virgin One and renamed it Channel One. At the end of 2010, Sky discontinued Channel One, so once again we are left without a competitor to Sky One.

      If I could get Sky without having to have a dish stuck to the side of the house, I would switch, but I cant.

    2. Re:I'm glad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to look at it another way... you are now feeding at the great satan's teat, another contributor to News International's tax avoided profits.

      Never mind, you get to record TV, and that's what matters.

  10. voiding my warranty by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    so does this mean nobody will mind if i install linux on it?

    1. Re:voiding my warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Tivo boxes already do run on Linux...

    2. Re:voiding my warranty by present_arms · · Score: 1

      I thought that Linux was already installed on it :P but I know what you mean :), as far as I remember MS has a major share in Virgin Media, but what amazed me was that Amstrad Sky HD+ boxes use linux ;) you can get the source from sky for it :D

      --
      http://chimpbox.us
    3. Re:voiding my warranty by mlush · · Score: 1

      This is a good point... there is going to be a lot of free/very cheap TiVo Boxes coming onto the market in 4 months time there is inevitably a hacking community ... I'm not sure how useful a hacked TiVo is though http://www.keegan.org/jeff/tivo/hackingtivo.html http://tivo.stevejenkins.com/

    4. Re:voiding my warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of retard would do such a thing? Linux is teh suck.

  11. To be specific... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    The monthly fee for the EPG service is £5/month if you're on the lower two TV packages, and free if you're on largest. Assuming they apply the same price when they switch to TiVo, it'll be half the price TiVo currently charges.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  12. Subscription model is flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was already cautious about buying products that depend on a subscription for their continued operation. So many of the companies behind them seem to be ones that nobody has ever heard of, which could go out of business, or decide to obsolete the product at the drop of a hat. I had thought that TiVo were beyond that stage, but clearly not. This makes me even less likely to buy such products in future. As for so-called lifetime guarantees, they've never been worth the paper they were written on.

  13. To add some context by bamf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tivo haven't actively sold the boxes in the UK for about 8-9 years now. This isn't a modern service being canned, it's effectively a legacy system.

    1. Re:To add some context by aug24 · · Score: 2

      Legacy, maybe, but I paid for a 'lifetime subscription', and most of the boxes are still in perfect working order. Do you really think 9 years is acceptable?

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:To add some context by Spad · · Score: 1

      Lifetime of the service, not of the box or your lifetime.

    3. Re:To add some context by DMiax · · Score: 1

      No one forced you to live more than 9 years... Should they pay only because you exceeded that? Please!

    4. Re:To add some context by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      You may have seen the words "lifetime subscription" in there, but what did the rest of the contract actually say? That's the important bit, not just the bit you remember from the advertising blurb. It's a bit like "unlimited broadband" in that respect. If you really think that you've got a legal case, engage messrs Sue, Grabbit, and Runne.

    5. Re:To add some context by TenMinJoe · · Score: 1

      The contract actually says that they can cancel the service with 30 days' notice "for any reason or no reason".

    6. Re:To add some context by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      And since (according to the link from the summary) they haven't been charging at all since last year, there's not much to complain about then, is there?

    7. Re:To add some context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they should be legally prevented from using a phrase like "lifetime subscription" unless the terms in the rest of the contract reasonably conform with the expectation that most people would have of that phrase. If companies can set whatever terms they like then we'll have situations where "lifetime subscription" equates to 2 months of service and a $1 off coupon for the new service when the old one is terminated.

    8. Re:To add some context by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      so the question is whether to sue for breach of contract or sue for false and misleading advertising

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    9. Re:To add some context by aug24 · · Score: 1

      So the service runs until it doesn't, and they could have canned it the day after they took my cash? Do you actually think that's reasonable, or do you work in marketing/legal?

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    10. Re:To add some context by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting they won't have covered themselves legally. I'm suggesting they are a bunch of crooks.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    11. Re:To add some context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      back in 2001 tivo made a big deal out of their claims that the "lifetime service" was *only* for the "lifetime of the hardware" and not for the lifetime of the tivo company. I hear the UK has truth-in-advertising agencies with genuine enforcement teeth so maybe tivo will feel their bite

    12. Re:To add some context by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      Feel free - it's your money you'd be spending.

    13. Re:To add some context by Mike+Mentalist · · Score: 1

      So the service runs until it doesn't, and they could have canned it the day after they took my cash? Do you actually think that's reasonable, or do you work in marketing/legal?

      They didn't actually do that though so this is irrelevant.

      --
      I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
    14. Re:To add some context by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately "covered themselves legally" implies "not a bunch of crooks", whether they're doing something that you like or not.

      There are already consumer protection laws in the UK that protect people from misselling. You already have an extended period in which to cancel contracts going forward. These days you have extra protection if you buy online ("distance selling"). Even advertising standards (though enforced by the industry) are surprisingly strictly enforced.

      However, if you're signing a contract (which according to an earlier poster gives either side 30 days right to cancel) and you don't read that contract, and you complain AFTER 9 YEARS that a clause in that contract that you didn't notice, you're a muppet.

      Do you really think that they should be obliged to provide a service essentially forever? Would you think it reasonable that someone who bought a telegraph machine in the 1800s would still be able to use it now, despite there being more sensible ways of doing the same thing? Off-the shelf PVRs with Freeview / Freesat EPGs are cheap as chips. Sure, that service won't last forever (like analogue TV it'll be replaced by something else at some point in the future) but it's something that does all your existing box does and more, for no monthly fee. What's not to like?

    15. Re:To add some context by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      Or take the American route and sue for breach of contract, false advertising, emotional distress, pain and suffering, lost wages and lawyer fees and just see what sticks.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    16. Re:To add some context by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Fucking slashdot. I wrote a long reply to this and it wouldn't preview and just vanished.

      Nope. Lifetime of the BOX. See their terms below.

      Anyway I have 2 Tivos, a series 1 (running practically non stop for 9+ years) and a series 2. Both dial up (the series 2 has unsecured network connectivity but I don't have a network connection nearby) . I bought these because of the lifetime subscription. In the US, if they try to pull this, I would be pissed off. And I suspect many others too.

      From their contract (current version on the US site):
      Product Lifetime Subscription includes a subscription to the TiVo service for the useable life of the TiVo DVR you buy – not the life of the subscriber – and may not be transferred to another TiVo DVR. A Product Lifetime Subscription accompanies the TiVo DVR it is associated with in case of ownership transfer of that TiVo DVR. For more information on Product Lifetime Subscriptions, please refer to the TiVo Service Agreement. Of course, hardware products don't last forever and their lifespan will vary. TiVo makes no warranties or representations as to the expected lifetime of the TiVo DVR (aside from the manufacturer's Limited Warranty).

      Now, Tivo uses the words 'useable life' , and I guess they could use that phrase to wiggle out and say 'we mean 'useable' to mean until we decide we don't want to support it anymore', but all their advertising says/implies that it will be supported for the lifetime of the unit.

      If my boxes become as useful as bricks to me (actually less useful, they'd make poor building materials) then I will be very angry at Tivo. Of course, they might not give a shit about people like me who bought lifetime licenses for less than $200 and expect them to be valid for 10 years, but then they shouldn't have offered the deal in the first place in that case. And in practice I won't have a legal recourse because I am just a man in the street and no legal department.

    17. Re:To add some context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lifetime subscription to the service. You will have service from the time you subscribed until the service stops, in other words, for the lifetime of the service. What don't you understand?

    18. Re:To add some context by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      They didn't actually do that though so this is irrelevant.

      On the contrary, it's your red herring above- i.e. what they "actually" did- that's irrelevant here, not what he said. We were discussing the nature of the original agreement and what was possible by your (and possibly their) supposed definition of the word "lifetime".

      If we use the "lifetime of the service" definition for "lifetime subscription", then technically they *could* have shut it off after a day. That was the point he was making- that they did or didn't do that is neither here nor there.

      If "lifetime" referred to the lifetime of the box, or of the person, then the fact that they kept it running for ten years is irrelevant- it's not a lifetime subscription by that definition.

      I don't know what the original agreement said, so I can't argue it further than that. I do know that *if* they used that definition of "lifetime", but deliberately didn't make it prominent, then (IANAL) a court might rest more heavily on the interpretation that an average person would take from the promotional and agreement material. Obviously a number of "ifs" there though.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    19. Re:To add some context by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      That is NOT what the agreement said.

      Not defending the guy, but do you actually know for a fact what the original (UK) agreement said?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    20. Re:To add some context by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I dislike redefining words in the contract. I dislike it a lot. Contracts should not be able to redefine "Lifetime" to mean "up to thirty days" no matter what. Similarly "Unlimited" should not be redefined to "Limited, at our discretion" by the mere use of an asterisk and some small print.

      I agree they probably haven't broken the law. I expect they are very confident of that. I do think they are being a bunch of bastards (if you don't like bunch of crooks).

      I imagine that if this affected you - perhaps if your yearly subscription to Radio Times or Private Eye were cancelled without returning you money pro rata because the word 'year' was redefined in small print - you would be similarly cross.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    21. Re:To add some context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monthly fee was £10. "Lifetime" fee was £120.

      You can argue with the linguistics, but if you've paid £120 for £1,080 "worth" of service, you really haven't done bad.

  14. So you don't schedule recordings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you don't schedule recordings? This is something you don't need to do, like when you are going to be away for a holiday or a meal out and you want to record your favourite program but won't be there to actually press the remote control? You don't need to do that and anyone who does can just find a way to stay home?

    You think that a video recorder should not be able to record while you're not there?

    Really?

    wow. you REALLY like being buttfucked.

    1. Re:So you don't schedule recordings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It has lost functionality. It's other functions still, in fact, function. It is not bricked.

    2. Re:So you don't schedule recordings? by beaviz · · Score: 0

      It has lost functionality. It's other functions still, in fact, function. It is not bricked.

      This discussion is so interesting and insightful. I can feel my life getting better for every word I read. Please keep it going.

    3. Re:So you don't schedule recordings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word that should be used is crippled. "TiVo To Cripple All Remaining UK PVRs On June 1" still isn't a bad headline.

    4. Re:So you don't schedule recordings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see... PS3s bricked when OtherOS was removed? Nope..

      My Xbox360 bricked when game discs were always launched with as DVD movies? Nope.

      Broken, sure. Bricked, not even close.

  15. Boat Anchor Mode by Dredd13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When TiVo was first coming out on the scene, there was talk that there was, hidden deep in the code, a "boat-anchor" mode, which Tivo assured the faithful (which at the time were typically bleeding-edge technology hounds) that if TiVo ever went belly-up, their boxes wouldn't be useless, that there was a mode which they could push to all the units that essentially said "We're going off the air now, open yourself up for use however the owner wants", and that it would offer up some alternative options for shoving EPG data into it gathered from other sources.

    It seems that maybe this is what TiVo should be doing with these UK Series1 units, even if they're not technically "going off the air".

    1. Re:Boat Anchor Mode by Adrian+Harvey · · Score: 4, Informative

      See Oztivo where they've hacked the series 1 frimware to get it's updates over the Internet from a community run guide service. I'm in NZ and using the New Zealand variant on an English Series 1 TiVo (the kind we're discussing here) to good effect. TiVo have resisted people doing this in countries where they're selling the guide service - perhaps now is the time for the community to have a go?

    2. Re:Boat Anchor Mode by unitron · · Score: 1

      If they did this for UK Series 1 machines it would take approximately the speed of light crossing the Atlantic for U.S. S1 hackers to put it to use over here.

      If this wouldn't make it any easier to open up Series 2 and up, TiVo might even welcome this as a way to get rid of their S1 subscribers, who by now must mostly be people with Lifetimed units that don't make Tivo any money and qualify the owners for discounts on service for later models.

      But I suspect that opening S1s would make it possible to figure out how to open later models, which would reduce TiVo to only making money off of the kind of people who have cable modems but are still paying AOL for dialup.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:Boat Anchor Mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it will be done for UK Series 1 owners just like it was done in Oz/NZ, Canada, Mexico and South Africa. But, the tricks used to provide guide data for the Series 1 and early Series 2 (with original firmware) won't work with later Series 2 and current TiVos.

      The groups who have the technology try to restrict it to their own geography, and have been (AFAIK) successful in not letting it spread to the US.

    4. Re:Boat Anchor Mode by unitron · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it will be done for UK Series 1 owners just like it was done in Oz/NZ, Canada, Mexico and South Africa. But, the tricks used to provide guide data for the Series 1 and early Series 2 (with original firmware) won't work with later Series 2 and current TiVos.

      The groups who have the technology try to restrict it to their own geography, and have been (AFAIK) successful in not letting it spread to the US.

      That was when everyone was feeling protective of Tivo.

      Now that they've given UK Lifetimers a big F.U., maybe not so much.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  16. DIY replacement data? by TenMinJoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is the TiVo guide data format understood? The BBC offer free XML listings data for all UK channels (not just BBC channels) - it seems like it should be possible for motivated developers to convert this into usable TiVo format data.

  17. Illegal. by unity100 · · Score: 0

    doesnt matter how it was written in tos. doesnt matter whether the customer agreed to it.

    destroying a product that you sold to a customer, is illegal. this shit is going on because we are letting them on with this.

    1. Re:Illegal. by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Are you unable to read? They are stopping the subscription service that gave the Tivo guide data. The box will still power on, will still play your old recordings, will still act "vcr-style" for manual recordings (record wednesday from 5-6pm, etc), and will work 100% if you have an alternate method of getting guide data.

      Commenting without reading the summary, let alone the article, and reacting based on a headline should be illegal.

    2. Re:Illegal. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      From TFS:

      and existing units will become basically nonfunctional at that time

      The OP did read the summary before commenting. (Note that I have not RTFA and make no claim as to the accuracy of that line)

    3. Re:Illegal. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      commenting without reading the summary or understanding another's post, let alone the article, and reacting like a moron out of ignorance, should be illegal.

      this was what you have done. those units, will be only as good as bricks.

    4. Re:Illegal. by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      What was the alternative? The TiVo box relies on the TiVo service, which surely the customers must have been aware of. If the service is shut down, then the boxes no longer operate. The only alternative is to never shut the service down, ever, until the end of time, which is patently ridiculous.

    5. Re:Illegal. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The only alternative is to never shut the service down, ever, until the end of time, which is patently ridiculous.

      Of course it's ridiculous- even if they were to meet their promises to every Tivo owner, the boxes won't last forever. And anyway, past a certain point, they could probably afford to refund the very few remaining owners their subscription fees (and possibly the cost of the box) in full. I doubt any court- or indeed reasonable person- would consider Tivo obliged to do any more than that, at most.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  18. Analogue Shutdown by paedobear · · Score: 2

    Analogue TV is currently being shut down in the UK - last region(s) in about a year, so complaining that an analogue TV recorder is no longer usable is a little weird surely? May as well have a moan about the government turning off your TV while you're at it!

    1. Re:Analogue Shutdown by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Well I know a number of people who have 3 or more analogue only TVs in their houses including portables and let me tell you , they're NOT happy about having to buy a digital set top box for them all if they don't want a useless brick sitting in the corner.

    2. Re:Analogue Shutdown by Raydome777 · · Score: 1

      Tivo works fine without analogue, it'll drive various digital tv set top boxes. (sends IR commands to change channel etc)

    3. Re:Analogue Shutdown by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      I love/hate how people don't get it.

      Most people DON'T use them to record crappy analogue broadcast TV, it wouldn't be worth it for just 5 channels. We use them to record TV from Cable and Satellite set top boxes via scart cables as the Tivo has a built in system to change channels on the STB. Even ignoring the ability to record the Tivo EPG was years ahead of the cable/satelite versions (and is STILL better than the Virgin Media EPG 8 years on as well as being better than most 'new' Digital TV PVRs).

      It's also now possible (with a little hacking) to use series 1 Tivos with (specific) Freeview STB so they are far from obsolete due to the analogue switch off.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    4. Re:Analogue Shutdown by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Well I know a number of people who have 3 or more analogue only TVs in their houses including portables and let me tell you , they're NOT happy about having to buy a digital set top box for them all if they don't want a useless brick sitting in the corner.

      They could just throw it out instead. I live in Britain and I don't own a TV - It's not hard.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    5. Re:Analogue Shutdown by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      We survived here in the US. Some lucky folks even got a $50 coupon from the government to use towards buying a converter box. Surely with all those TV licensing fees the UK charges citizens to watch TV they can scrap up a few pounds to help people upgrade to digital. Otherwise they will lose out on continued licensing fees for those bricks sitting in the corner.

    6. Re:Analogue Shutdown by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 1

      They will get over it. There was a great deal of media coverage here in the US about the impending doom of converting to all-digital when we shut down analog broadcasts too. Lots of people griping about losing their analog TV's, much gnashing of teeth over having to buy converters. Hundreds of thousands of elderly left in the dark when their TV's suddenly stopped working. Fear!

      Fast forward to now, a few years later; nary a peep. As with all change, people complain. Then they get over it and get on with their lives.

    7. Re:Analogue Shutdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish! You can use a TiVo with a digital set top box or a sky dish -- we have no analogue tv service and do just this. Why should I be forced to replace perfectly good equipment just because a company decides it is no longer going to honour its 'lifetime subscription' agreement?

    8. Re:Analogue Shutdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? They are paying £145 a year for a TV licence (they are paying for their TV licence right?) and complaining about paying a one time purchase of ~50 quid* to get 3 converter boxes to use their TVs. Maybe it is annoying for them, but either they care enough about watching TV to buy the digital STBs or they can save themselves £145 a year by giving them up. It really isn't that big a deal.

      *If they head on over to eBuyer they can pick up three of these, which not only work as a digital STB, but also give you the option to add USB storage to record TV and play back video/audio files and view pictures on them, and when you buy 3, you are spending enough to qualify for free super saver delivery which makes the total cost a little over 50 pounds. And in case you are wondering I'm not trying to shill for eBuyer or the manufacturer of this product, I just found it doing a quick search, there are other options which may be even cheaper if you don't want the media/recording functionality.

  19. Re:YOU can't install Linux on it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Say what now?

    English, motherfucker. Do you speak it?

  20. Corporations and their "very own dictionary." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another example of "Lifetime" meaning anything the manufacturer wants it to mean.

    When a customer is sold on a product with term such as lifetime I'm sure Tivo know exactly how the customer will perceive that yet their happy to craft their terms of use in the fine print to give them an out.

    Typical.

    1. Re:Corporations and their "very own dictionary." by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      When a customer is sold on a product with term such as lifetime I'm sure Tivo know exactly how the customer will perceive that yet their happy to craft their terms of use in the fine print to give them an out.

      The Tivo is primarily a consumer item, and the UK consumer laws are reasonably strong. IANAL, but from what I vaguely(!!) recollect, if that were true and (e.g.) they relied on that definition being obscurely and unintelligibly hidden away while they prominently sold the service on being "LIFETIME!" (knowing full well how most consumers would interpret that) the court may rule based on what an average person's reasonable interpretation of the deal presented was- i.e. lifetime of the box- taking this into account.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  21. Not exactly a drama by Goffee71 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is like Microsoft withdrawing support for Windows 98 or Internet Explorer 5 for home users... these things are a decade old and while they were unique back then, there are FreeSAT, Freeview, PVRs and other options now if the S1 owners aren't in Virgin areas. Most of the forum posters have said or suspected this was coming... no tea cups were rattled by this announcement - especially as most users have workarounds planned.

    --
    If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    1. Re:Not exactly a drama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when did Microsoft offer a lifetime of support for those O/S's?

    2. Re:Not exactly a drama by Goffee71 · · Score: 1

      Please a company can use the word lifetime to mean anything it likes... there is no firm definition its the same as full-flavor or low-fat, it just means TiVo goes from being a good-guy company to another corporate-drone-type company in the view of its users http://goffee-freelance.blogspot.com/2011/02/virgin-tivos-causing-ruckus.html

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    3. Re:Not exactly a drama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a company uses the word lifetime to a potential customer is it not clear what the expectation of the customer would be?

      If said company doesn't really mean lifetime they shouldn't use the term.

      If Tivo says, "Pay us this one off fee and we'll provide this functionality for a lifetime," it seems reasonable for a customer, while they're considering a particular devices benefits against those of competing devices, to consider lifetime to mean lifetime. If the company producing the goods doesn't intend to provide a lifetime service for a given fee paid, they should use a different term.

      I also don't agree with telcos using the term unlimited when they don't provide an unlimited service. I don't demand they provide an unlimited service where it's not economically feasible to do so, but I do demand they not use the term unlimited where they don't intend to provide an unlimited service. Framing a product as one thing and delivering another shouldn't be tolerated.

    4. Re:Not exactly a drama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      there are FreeSAT, Freeview, PVRs and other options now if the S1 owners aren't in Virgin areas.

      There are alternatives, sure, but nothing does what my Tivo box does. I could get Sky+, but as far as I understand it, it doesn't have some of the Tivo features that I love, e.g. wishlists, proper season passes (where I can tell my Tivo once and for all that I like a particular program on a specific channel, and it will *always* record it for me, season after season), and automatic recording of programs it thinks I might like.

      I'm hoping I can get a Virgin Media service with the new Tivo box, but last time I spoke to VM I was told I couldn't get their cable service, despite my neighbours having it.

      I'm thoroughly annoyed by Tivo - I paid for a "lifetime" subscription (whatever that's supposed to mean, but I would have thought it was more than 10 years) and my Tivo box is in perfect working order.

  22. whether right or wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. I'm still bloody sad about it.

    I'd always assumed that one day my 'lifetime subscription' would end, but assumed that there would be something else I can get to replace it. Virgin Media have no cable in my area (I'm on London FFS!) so I can't even spend my way out of the problem. Paying the T.V license will really really hurt without it.

  23. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TiVo likes having customers, but they've changed their mind as to who their customers are. They no longer focus on direct sales. Instead, they sell boxes to cable and satellite companies, who rebadge them and sell them on. This cuts their supply chain overhead and guarantees large number of sales, so it's more profitable.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  24. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Sockatume · · Score: 2

    Given that their UK customer base is microscopic, perhaps they do. They're positioning the Virgin movie as the official UK launch of TiVo, a product which actually hit the shelves about half a decade ago. That should give you some indication of the number of subscribers they have.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  25. PR fail for very little money. by aug24 · · Score: 2

    What a total PR fail. TiVo used to have such a good reputation.

    Presumably Virgin made this a condition of the contract and TiVo rolled over. Shame on both of you, avaricious, nasty, money-grubbers.

    Remember folks (UK and US): don't buy a TiVo product, or a Virgin Media one, they will take your cash and then let you down.

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    1. Re:PR fail for very little money. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Why would Virgin have to impose a condition like that? TiVo only sold about 35,000 units in the UK before they ended production back in 2002, so it's not like the old service was a competitor. More likely this gave TiVo an excuse to drop a legacy customer base that numbered in the hundreds of users.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:PR fail for very little money. by aug24 · · Score: 2

      The EGP service costs them almost nothing (and they made money on it with monthly subscriptions). Why would they drop it and piss off a rabidly loyal fan base?

      TiVo customers since 2001 have been asking when the new Series 2 onward TiVos will be available in the UK. I would have jumped at the chance to buy one. However, TiVo UK got into bed with Sky and now Virgin and seem to have decided that their best advocates can fuck off. Hence I think it's a PR fail to save very little cash, or more likely, Virgin wants to pull in the series one owners (if they live in a Virgin area).

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  26. Lifetime EPG - actually, they did by chrb · · Score: 1

    Not saying that what Tivo are doing is acceptable (although they never promised eternal service in the UK, or did they?

    Actually they did. You could pay a monthly fee, or pay a single fee of £250 for "lifetime updates". I expect the people who paid that are going to be a bit annoyed.

    However, there was an unofficial "gentleman's agreement" that hackers wouldn't release any code that screenscrapes or otherwise downloads the EPG data over the net (using the ethernet card addon), and if anyone did that, then talk of it on the forums was banned. That agreement is now null and void, so there's a good chance that someone will finally release free code, if anyone still cares.

  27. Re:Brick? Yes, between your ears by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    If I buy something to do X and it doesn't do X it's a brick. It don't give a shit if it wins an Olympic gold at Y and gets a Nobel prize for Z - if I'm not interested in them it's as much use to me as a brick.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  28. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by commodore6502 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Two thoughts:

    (1) This isn't "bricking" the Tivo. When ReplayTV stopped supplying guide data to my DVR, it still worked just fine but more like a VCR where you manually set everything. It sounds like Tivo is the same.

    (2) How is this legal in the consumer-friendly EU? I would have thought purposely damaging consumer products is a criminal offense, just as Sony got in trouble for removing the "Install other OS" option in PS3.

    --
    Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
  29. Merchantability clause kicks in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Merchantability clause kicks in. 9 years is not a lifetime of such a device. You could argue that 20 years would be, but think on this: they still have the money but no longer provide the service. So they should give the £250 back.

  30. Fucked by cable TV? Who could have predicted? by gig · · Score: 2

    Canceling cable TV was one of the best things I ever did. It takes a while to adjust, but pretty soon you enjoy TV more, and life more, because you only watch stuff you really like, and you watch it whenever you like. You have to seek out shows and movies a little more because they're not being shoveled onto you, and you find the ones that you end up really cherishing. If you have a TiVo, you already admitted cable TV is broken. Just get off the pipe.

    1. Re:Fucked by cable TV? Who could have predicted? by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear.

      My partner and I dumped cable TV when it was clear we were only watching a few shows on the hundred-or-so channels we had access to. 95% of the content was repetitious junk, with the same amount of annoying ads and infomercials as terrestrial broadcast. At least we don't have to pay to pull in HD OTA content, aside from the $45 for the secondhand indoor antenna I bought[0]. Between that and Netflix, we're set. I've thought about slapping together a MythTV box from time to time for recording purposes.

      There's some neat stuff happening in OTA broadcasting post-analog shutdown. Some NBC affiliates carry Universal Sports on a subchannel, and some other stations carry things like Retro Television Network (cheesy old TV!), music video channels, and in the case of my area an extra news/educational channel on the PBS feed. Once Canada switches off the analog TV spectrum[1], I expect to see a few more neato things on the air.

      [0] We have an unusually good view in the direction of signal sources around here, so costs would probably run into the low hundreds for a proper roof/mast antenna, rotor, preamp, and coax for most suburbanites. It's still worth it, IMHO.

      [1] This assumes the telecom/media cartel up here doesn't cook up an excuse to delay the digital switch even farther into the future. The switchover was supposed to be August of this year, though I half-remember rumours that they may push it back to 2013 or beyond. Part of the problem is that most private OTA stations are owned by media conglomerates that also own cable/satellite/IPTV operations, and they're much more interested in squeezing money out of subscribers. Go ahead, ask me about the kabuki fee-for-carriage "debate" that took place here last year. I'm still brassed off at how everyone in this country fell for it.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  31. Re:YOU can't install Linux on it. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    YOU can't install Linux on it. THIS is the point that the GPL3 is made for, the REASON why the FSF made the change and the POINT of telling Torvalds and the other narcissistic arseholes who value being important and recognised over the freedoms of the people who use the products that they are, in point of fact, COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY WRONG on their insistence that the Tivo clause isn't necessary and that what Tivo et al want to do is perfectly fine and cannot affect GPL freedoms.

    Maybe you should spend your time creating your own GPLv3 OS instead of telling other people what to do with their works. It would be far more helpful.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  32. Re:Brick? Yes, between your ears by Drethon · · Score: 1

    So since my netbook wont play BLOPs it is bricked and I will ask for a manufacturer replacement of a device capable of what I think it should do.

  33. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by jimicus · · Score: 2

    Well, with Tivo you didn't buy their EPG. You bought the box but in order for it to be any use you subscribed to the EPG. Which might mean they'd get away with it - were it not for the fact that they offered one-off lifetime subscriptions for £120.

    Having said all that, they're a business. And almost all business decisions can be boiled down to money.

    Were I in Tivo's shoes, I'd have worked the arithmetic something like this:

    Worst case scenario: Customer(s) take us to court, win, we're obliged to refund some proportion of their lifetime subscription. This isn't the US where you can sue for the loss at £120 then the "hurt feelings" at £1,000,000.

    The only customers who are likely to make a fuss are those still using a lifetime subscription.

    So, how many people with lifetime subscriptions are still using them? Should be easy enough to figure out, the boxes phone home every night to download their EPG. Which means there must be some means of authenticating the box or how else would you know that it was associated with a lifetime sub? Once you've worked out this number, let's call it N

    Multiply N by the cost of the subscription (£120) and you've got an idea of the worst-case you'd be paying out - excluding legal fees. I would be astonished if that number is much more than, say, £120,000 - Tivo pulled out of the UK years ago, the only boxes which are affected are going to be getting on a bit now.

    Okay, so how much does it cost to maintain the EPG service - including a pool of dialin modems, the servers and the software? This would be a service which every other PVR in the country is getting straight from Freeview/Cable/Satellite system and so the cost of running it is exclusive to your old product. I bet you anything you like it's expensive enough that even with the worst-case payout, it's still cheaper within three years to cancel the service.

  34. In a word: proprietary by macraig · · Score: 1

    I'm having a hard time drumming up an excess of sympathy for people who bought TIVOs. They are and have always been a highly proprietary device... AND subscription service to boot. There is nothing open, standardized, modular, or off-the-shelf about them, and that was quite intentional. It is a closed device precisely because that was intended to maximize corporate profits. As such they are open to whatever manner of megalomaniacal mischief [say that fast seven times] that corporation feels it can manage to inflict on its vict... err, customers... without inciting a full riot/boycott.

    Sounds like they're certainly inviting that riot with this tactic, but the victims of it were most certainly amply warned, and chose the convenience-store solution anyway. They got exactly what they paid for.

    1. Re:In a word: proprietary by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      What was the appeal of TiVo in the first place, that justified the £10 a month subscription? There are plenty of DVRs with EPGs available, where the only cost is the up-front cost of the box.

    2. Re:In a word: proprietary by macraig · · Score: 1

      Didn't the original promise have to do with predictive recording and some other software features, mostly?

    3. Re:In a word: proprietary by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      Tivo's EPG is vastly better than Sky+, which is amazing considering how old Tivo is compared with Sky+.

      For example, Sky+'s EPG lets you search for a program by its first letter only (!)... then you have to spend 10 minutes paging (very slowly too) through the list to find the program you are looking for. It has a "series link" feature, but it forgets about a series you are following if there's a break, or if you miss an episode that could be recorded from a different or sister channel. So after a break in a series, you usually miss an episode or two before you realise it's started up again. And it only knows about the next 24 hours of programming, so you have to check every single day, can't schedule ahead.

      Whereas Tivo pretty much make sense. If you subscribe to a show, it'll search all the channels continuously for that show, all the time, until you unsubscribe. You can see what it's planning weeks in advance. You can go away on a trip and arrange all your recordings for when you get back. You can search for shows by their name - you don't have to know the "genre".

      Basically Tivo is usable by itself and has a good, common sense interface, which for the most part just works, whereas Sky+ pretty much requires you to use a separate PC browsing the net to actually find programs, find when they are on etc. and then enter the data.

      I haven't seen the other PVRs in the UK to compare.

    4. Re:In a word: proprietary by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      What was the appeal of TiVo in the first place, that justified the £10 a month subscription? There are plenty of DVRs with EPGs available, where the only cost is the up-front cost of the box.

      I agree that £10/month sounds pretty steep. That said, remember that the UK boxes in question were sold around a decade ago, and things have moved on a lot since then. DVRs weren't common at all (don't remember any competitors to Tivo at the time), terrestrial TV (which was all analogue) didn't have a fancy EPG, even Sky+ wasn't even around then (IIRC didn't Sky basically exploit and stiff Tivo to benefit Sky+?), and even if Sky had an EPG, how do you get your Tivo to use the information in it automatically?

      Plus half the supposed benefit of Tivo was that it was meant to be "smart" and recommend stuff based on your preferences and viewing habits. Maybe not such a big deal nowadays, but it's easy to forget what we didn't have ten years ago.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  35. Jailbreaking? by bcmm · · Score: 1

    Can they be jailbroken? Can one do anything interesting with the very cheap mini-computers that are about to flood the market?

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:Jailbreaking? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Reportedly, they only sold 35000 units. Even assuming every one of them survived the past decade without breaking down, I'm not sure that's a flood.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Jailbreaking? by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      Very cheap mini-computers with a PowerPC CPU running at 50MHz and all of 16MB of RAM. Damn, my Palm Tungsten has about 10x more processing power than that.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    3. Re:Jailbreaking? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Reportedly, they only sold 35000 units. Even assuming every one of them survived the past decade without breaking down, I'm not sure that's a flood.

      I can also guarantee that a consumer device from *ten* years ago will be exceptionally low-powered by modern standards.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  36. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Wierd. I know of two lifetime replay TV units that are still getting data. I need to ask my friends how that are doing that.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  37. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Tivo service contracts list "lifetime" as the lifetime of the unit. and they can end the lifetime of a unit at any time.

    Only a fool ever paid for the lifetime service with Tivo, they could and had a history of screwing over people that paid for lifetime subscriptions.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  38. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

    >>>loss at £120 then the "hurt feelings" at £1,000,000.

    That's not quite how it works. The courts sue the company the value of the product PLUS a multi-million dollar punishment to discourage the corporations from acting like assholes in the future.

    AKA punitive damage. I'm surprised the UK doesn't have a similar way of punishing corporations, else they'd just keep screwing the citizens again and again.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  39. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

    They have cable and still receive cable updates. But when freeTV Analog was turned-off, replayTV stopped supplying the data to those users.

    Of course RTV could still supply freeTV digital, but they simply choose not to. Instead the screen comes-up with just one lowpower analog station, and none of the digital channels. (I get about 50 of them.)

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  40. No, what would be more useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, what would be more useful is if people who complained about the GPL3 and how it would damage adoption look here at what Tivo has done to adoption of Linux and stop calling RMS and the FSF zealots because the see that this sort of thing CAN happen and that just because it hasn't happened YET doesn't mean they're zealots.

    What would be EVEN MORE useful is going to GPL3.

    PS yes, I've put code in the Linux kernel. Linus didn't write it all, you know.

    1. Re:No, what would be more useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS yes, I've put code in the Linux kernel. Linus didn't write it all, you know.

      So your CODING SKILLS ARE LEET!!! and you're a narcissistic arsehole?

  41. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Cypheros · · Score: 1

    I used to work for TiVo, and while most of the company is very serious about taking care of existing customers and improving the TiVo device and service, its the big decision makers that are the problem. It isn't the current subscriber that they care about, but the potential one. In the eyes of a few execs at TiVo, losing "a few petulant customers" is perfectly acceptable if it means they can lure in a handful of new customers. The problem is, those "few petulant customers" usually ends up being a pretty big group, and TiVo isn't able to bring in enough new customers to make up for those lost. Not only that, but TiVo is more interested in *cooperating* with everyone, and refuses to realize that the companies they are playing nice with are the *competition*, and those companies are NOT playing nice with TiVo. But look at TiVo's earnings reports. The only quarter they have ever been in the black was the quarter they won that lawsuit against Dish Network--every other quarter in 10 years has been as red as it gets.

  42. Re:Brick? Yes, between your ears by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    The only thing that's stopped is the EPG service, if I read it correctly. Grab another EPG type service, convert if necessary to the format the Tivo needs, and point the Tivo to your new service and voila - you should be ready to go. If you need authentication/keys, sniff the current stream and you may have to do a little more work depending on what's there. I'm actually considering this for another service I'm using as I don't particularly like the one it wants me to use.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  43. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're positioning the Virgin movie as the official UK launch of TiVo

    So how many virgins are in this movie?

  44. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by MattSausage · · Score: 1

    I agree with pretty much everything you said, but I know at least with Satellite DVRs you still are encouraged to let them phone home in order to, I assume, send your viewing habits back to the company. If the box can't phone home it will definitely bug you about it, and I've heard there may even be a charge.

  45. Bummer by jackhererUK · · Score: 1

    This must be a real bummer for all 7 people in the UK that own a TiVo rather than the one of the many different other PVRs that don't charge you a fee to use the device that you have paid for and own.

  46. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by xaxa · · Score: 1

    (2) How is this legal in the consumer-friendly EU? I would have thought purposely damaging consumer products is a criminal offense, just as Sony got in trouble for removing the "Install other OS" option in PS3.

    The boxes haven't been on sale for nine years. Any argument would probably depend on what a normal person thought "lifetime" means in this context, and how you paid for the service (do you buy the box, or buy the subscription, or both?).

    IANAL.

  47. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the UK has a decent raft of consumer laws that are meant to stop companies screwing people over in the first place. Where that falls down is that laws obviously can't cover every situation and, particularly with new technology, there's room for abuse and, other than the threat of onerous new legislation, little to stop companies getting away with it.

  48. There is some hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA: "They can still be used to view previously recorded programs and, under certain circumstances, may be used to record programs manually."

    So I suspect that they will go into failsafe mode where they no longer access the TiVo service, but can be used to manually record.

    After a decade of use, these boxes have little physical life remaining. I had a working Series 1 with lifetime service that just had the P/S go bad; the modem went bad years ago, so I used the hack to get Internet updates.

  49. Very Very old hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Basically, the Series 1 boxes are 9-10 years old and have DIAL UP modems. Most likely what happened was there where not enough paying customers left for Tivo to justify the cost for a bank of dialup modems. They are allowing current users FREE dialup access to the programing guild until the cutoff date. In addition they are not (as of yet) releasing a update that completely bricks the box or removes say the ability to record shows (which can still be done manually after the cut off date.) I am sure someone from the Tivo UK community will be releasing an alternative way to get programming data on these boxes.

  50. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by OshMan · · Score: 2

    As one of the "fools" who paid for lifetime service I'd like to inject some facts here. I paid something like $300 for lifetime, and used that service for almost ten years before the box failed from hardware issues. Had I not purchased the lifetime service I would have paid somewhere around $1200 for that service during the same time. In fact I could still repair the box and keep using it if I chose. So please explain to me where it was foolish to pay $300 rather than $1200?

  51. Third Party Guides and Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So to the cloud we go:

    "TiVoWebPlus – This third party application requires the TiVo to have been hacked. Hacking will void any warranty and may be grounds for TiVo to cancel a service contract without remuneration, so it should be done with care. For a correctly hacked TiVo, this application turns the TiVo into a web server. In addition to the standard functions of all web servers, this allow users to program the TiVo over the internet, a useful feature that does not currently exist on the TiVo, despite the fact that most TiVos are fully internet integrated."

  52. Re:Brick? Yes, between your ears by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    No, because your netbook was never advertised to play BLOPs and you'd have to be really, really misinformed (or yes, dumb) to seriously think so.

  53. Assholes by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    I had service with TiVo for a little over a year. When I finally canceled, they double charged me the cancellation fee. I called and made them aware of this fact. When they finally returned my money they gave me everything back minus $8 for taxes. I know it was only $8, but it was the principle behind the issue and I explained to them that since it was THEIR fault that I was double charged that THEY should be the ones out $8. The guy I spoke to on the phone about this was a complete prick about it and basically told me that I had to talk to the state tax department if I wanted my $8.

    Now I tell everyone who mentions TiVo about this story hoping to cause them a lot more than $8 in damage to their image. If they had only given me a measly $8 out of their own pocket then this all could have been avoided.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  54. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    why are you posting from BOTH of your accounts in the same story? Or is one of the commodore accounts an impersonator?

  55. Wrong price.... V+ is £50. by djsmiley · · Score: 1

    V+ is £50 for the box, plus £30 setup if you have to pay it.... at least it was for me. Or does Tivo do something else I'#m not aware of?

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  56. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    You could have bought a copy of SageTV for $90, installed in on a PC that cost $500 complete with dual TV Tuners, and not had to pay for a subscription to EPG data, because it comes for free with the service.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  57. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by OshMan · · Score: 2

    10 years ago when I bought the Tivo, SageTV if it was even available yet was in its infancy. Regardless I believe I paid less than $300 dollars for the Tivo box so your $590 solution wouldn't have been much of a savings if any. Also, I've got to say that myTivo has far outlasted any PC I've ever owned. It took almost 10 years to fail, and I think the only problem is with the modem. But I've moved on to Roku rather than repair it.

  58. Open Tivo Alternative by sorak · · Score: 1

    anybody remember VCRs? Those were awesome in their own way. You buy one, and it belongs to you. You don't need anybody's permission to record*, you don't have to pay a subscription fee, and the total package costs less than a low-end PC. (Granted, you can have a cheap Tivo with a subscription fee, or an expensive one without).

    So why is homebrewed mythTV the only open Tivo alternative available now?

    * MPAA, I can't hear you...NA NA NA!

    1. Re:Open Tivo Alternative by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Because the FCC rolled over on firewire. A simple requirement that fire wire output for all channels / formats contracted for in an open format and we would have a sane way to connect all of our media components. They rolled over on it and made it useless so now we have HDMI HDCP etc mess. I got TIVO 12 + years ago because it was the only loss less (direct tivo) DVR. Digital cable has matured (and chose quantity over quality), DVB never went anywhere in the states, the sat providers are proprietary and the cable cards are a lock in nightmare. Content providers like locked down sell it to you over and over again systems, only legal requirements will change that.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    2. Re:Open Tivo Alternative by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      anybody remember VCRs?

      Yes. The dominant format had really poor quality.

      You buy one, and it belongs to you. You don't need anybody's permission to record*

      Tivo without a sub has pretty much the same functionality as a VCR. You can program a time and channel.

  59. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    (1) This isn't "bricking" the Tivo. When ReplayTV stopped supplying guide data to my DVR, it still worked just fine but more like a VCR where you manually set everything. It sounds like Tivo is the same.

    You must have been paying month to month? My lifetime ReplayTV is still going strong, and is still being supposed by schedule data from ReplayTV. Though I think you can work around it these days (Schedules Direct via WiRNS).

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  60. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    I can't even lecture you on the time-value of money, because you would have had to earn over 40% or so on that $300 in order to be better off investing it.

    Of course, that makes you wonder what sort of beverage the TiVo financial guys were ingesting when they came up with the "lifetime" plan...

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  61. It's not Bricked by fast+turtle · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry folks but I have to put my 0.02c in on this thread. Simply put, I'm all against using the term Bricked for something that's beyond repair because it does not convey the correct information. If it's non-functional, then it's broke and call be called a Paperweight or Doorstop, which conveys the information that the device is damaged beyond your ability or desire to repair.

    Brick refers to a specific building material, usually made from a virtuous clay material baked/fired in an oven/kiln. It does not refer to an item that no longer functions as designed, either through damage or modification.

    You can Brick a device but you need to actually beat it with a Brick to Brick it. Otherwise it's broke

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    1. Re:It's not Bricked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I'm sick of the recent spate of endless, tedious and ultimately pointless discussions about what "bricked" mean, like it was ever a sodding dictionary definition in the first place. Your post is just as bad as the rest. :-6

    2. Re:It's not Bricked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's non-functional, then it's broke

      If it's non-functional then it has no money?

  62. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Exactly, as a UK resident I have only ever heard of Tivo on places like slashdot, I don't recall ever seeing it advertised for sale here.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  63. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Has ReplayTV stopped supplying guide data? I disconnected my ReplayTV last April when I cancellede my Satellite service. At that time they were still supplying the EPG.

  64. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moreover, Virgin Media will have required TiVo to do this as part of their contract with them. The existing TiVo userbase is a (small) competitor to the new Virgin TiVo box and will deliver many of the same features. The TiVo brand will be greatly bolstered with this Virgin deal and the last thing Virgin want is to become a springboard for Freeview TiVo in the UK. An exclusivity requirement was inevitable.

    TiVO have done this because they *like* money.

  65. Re:Brick? Yes, between your ears by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

    It seems to be very hard to do that. Tivo has been very good at keeping the hackers off when it comes to guide data. Tivo and their communities seem to think it is theft of service to use non-tivo guide data.

  66. This is a shame.. by gadders · · Score: 1

    ..I recently upgraded to Sky HD+, but other than that my Tivo was still perfectly usable (and very, very useful) after about 10 years of usage. Very, very rarely crashed - less than once per year and a much better UI than my new Sky box.

    TBH, it's one of the most reliable pieces of hardware I've ever owned. I wish my PC, Phone, etc could be as reliable.

  67. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

    Or you could pay a premium price for a premium product that Just Fucking Works.

    I tried building a DVR back in the early days. What a mess. The software sucked in ways that were so bad that it felt like the suckage must have been intentional because they couldn't have made it that bad by accident. After about a week of dicking around trying to make it somewhat functional, I gave up and bought a Tivo. No dicking around. No crappy, unreliable software. It just worked. It did everything that was promised and it did those things well. PC-based products are starting to catch up but it's taken nearly a decade and the new Tivos can be had for as little as $100. And how are you going to deal with cablecards and SDV with your Sage system? Good luck with that. Sure, you pay $13-20/month for the Tivo service but most cable companies charge $15/month for DVRs that are terrible.

    Some folks would rather pay a bit more to get a product and service that isn't aggravating.

  68. Original Tivo UK userbase negligible by now? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    The existing TiVo userbase is a (small) competitor to the new Virgin TiVo box

    "Small" is putting it mildly. There were *very* few Tivo units sold in the UK in the first place (35,000 over the 18 months it was sold here according to Wikipedia, it was a pretty big flop). And it was withdrawn from the market 9 years ago.

    AFAIK, those boxes only worked directly with analogue transmissions (*) which have already been discontinued in many areas and are due for imminent discontinuation in the rest of the UK, and only ever gave 5 channels in the vast majority of cases.

    And I suspect that a large proportion of them will have broken down by now (hard drive most likely), or not be in use. Of the remainder, anyone interested in what Virgin could offer probably would have moved on by now. In short, the number of potential customers Virgin/Tivo might get by pressurising the existing Tivo userbase is probably negligible. In fact, it's just as likely that Tivo doesn't want to have to support a technologically obsolete service for the sake of a very small number of remaining users.

    (*) I don't know if and how it worked with satellite services like (e.g.) Sky, IIRC there was some slightly convoluted way of recording Sky by connecting the Tivo to the Sky digibox's analogue output. And the current UK terrestrial standard, DVB-T, wasn't even used for freely-available transmissions at the time Tivo was being sold, only for the flop "ITV Digital" pay service that went bankrupt, so I doubt it supported that- and hence current "Freeview" DVB-T transmissions- directly.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Original Tivo UK userbase negligible by now? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      With a set top box, you simply record from the analogue output of the STB, and the device had a remote control emitter that you connect to the STB. You could do this with series 1 US Tivo as well.

      Not really convoluted. Throw out the STB remote and control everything via Tivo. The on screen guide is better than most STBs mini-guide anyway. Everything in Europe uses SCART and Tivo had a SCART connection for the VCR, one for the STB and one for the TV, so handles widescreen switching, spooling to VCR, and switches automatically on the VCR switch signal.

  69. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Less by the end of the movie.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  70. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

    My Panasonic RTV2000 gets updates on a regular basis. The listings could be more accurate (it usually cuts the last 30 seconds or so of each program) but they're still going strong. AFAIK DirecTV owns what's left of RTV now.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  71. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by kryliss · · Score: 1

    From what I remember with Dish Network, if you don't have a phone line hooked up, it will eventually send/receive updates/viewing habits through the satellite feed and they will charge you $5.00 to do so.

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  72. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Only a fool ever paid for the lifetime service with Tivo, they could and had a history of screwing over people that paid for lifetime subscriptions.

    I'm not aware of this storied history of their screwing lifetime subscription holders. The break-even point is usually a few years or so.

    Seems like a good deal to me.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  73. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Any argument would probably depend on what a normal person thought "lifetime" means in this context, and how you paid for the service (do you buy the box, or buy the subscription, or both?).

    IANAL.

    Why? "Lifetime" is defined in the contract as the life of the TiVO hardware. Who gives a shit what a reasonable person thought "lifetime" meant?

    I haven't read their US contract, and certainly not their UK contract, but it probably gives them some type of way out. Maybe they owe remaining users a some money.
    Maybe not. Anyhow, that's what "lifetime" means in this context.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  74. Lifetime Subscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about all the users like me who purchased a Lifetime Subscription? Lifetime means Lifetime! My TiVo is an original, over 10 years old and still working. I do not live in an area served by crappy Virgin Media cable, so I do not even have an upgrade path available. This decision has alienated all of TiVo's UK customers at a stroke.Way to go!

    I don't think it costs a great deal to keep the service running. I just cannot see the rationale for this decision.

    Looks like if they don't reverse this decision I'll be looking at hacking it and getting my guide data from the Internet.

  75. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Well, these were customers a decade ago. Not any more. Most of them paid for the lifetime subscription. Tivo isn't making any money from them.

  76. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    do you buy the box, or buy the subscription, or both?

    Both. The box was available with or without the subscription and a lifetime subscription available afterwards.

  77. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Punitive damages are really a bit of a nasty patch. Sure, it makes sense that fundamentally anti-social behaviour should be punished, but if we're going to punish rather than balance, then shouldn't the standard be beyond reasonable doubt? And why should the victim get more than restoration (assuming that includes covering the cost and inconvenience of having to file a lawsuit)?

  78. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

    What kind of math is that?

    I calculate that $300 invested over 10 years at 15% is $1,213.67, which is close to the $1,200 that the grandparent poster said he would have had to pay. Where do you get your 40%?

  79. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 1

    That is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard.
    They are still customers, They paid for LIFETIME memberships. To say that just because they are not currently send TIVO money makes them NOT customers, is like saying When you go to Mcdonalds and order food and pay for it your a customer, But if you pull away from the drive thru your not.
    They paid for LIFETIME service, they are customers who should be getting what they paid for , for the duration that was decided by both parties at the time of the sale.

  80. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Where do you get your 40%?

    Because you have to pull 10/mo out of the 300 principle :)

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  81. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    In that case, why would they like having customers? The customers are just a cost these days.

  82. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    And I just use my VCR. Tapes are quite cheap and I can use a tape more than once if I do not want to keep what I have recorded. I also do not have to pay any monthly subscription fee.

  83. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

    >>>I know of two lifetime replay TV units that are still getting data

    They have cable and still receive cable updates. But when freeTV Analog was turned-off, replayTV stopped supplying the data to those users.

    Of course RTV could still supply FreeTV digital, but they simply choose not to. Instead the screen comes-up blank as if no over-the-air stations exist.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  84. If you sit under an elephant's arse... by dugeen · · Score: 1

    ..you're going to get shat on. I regret all occasions on which people are ripped off by media companies, but imo they stepped over the line by voluntarily having anything to do with pay TV in the first place.

  85. PetitionRetain or open source theUKTiVOSeries1EPGs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.petitiononline.co.uk/petition/retain-or-open-source-the-uk-tivo-series-1-epg-service/2463