Slashdot Mirror


Tiny Transistors Could Be Used To Track Cash

disco_tracy writes "Banks have long considered placing silicon transistors on currency for security purposes, but the technology was too chunky and intensive for paper bills. Now, tiny low-power organic transistors developed by German scientists could make it possible to really follow the money."

175 comments

  1. Damn by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There goes one of the last mediums of semi-anonymous financial transactions.

    1. Re:Damn by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "There goes one of the last mediums of semi-anonymous financial transactions."

      Back to the barter system anyone??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell an opportunity... anyone else read The Great Simoleon Caper by Neal Stephenson?

    3. Re:Damn by aztektum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Toss your bills in the microwave.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    4. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://bitcoin.org/

    5. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The protesters in the middle east could be seen as criminals. Anonymity is important because it can protect dissenters from retribution from those in power. It may mean that there will be people that buy drugs or whatever, but I fear tyrants more than I fear crime.

    6. Re:Damn by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your ignorance on the importance of anonymity astounds me. Try living next to some nosey, judgmental, zealous neighbors sometime and tell me how much you like the idea of all of your actions, transactions, and movements tracked.

    7. Re:Damn by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Shame on you for even saying it even in jest, because some people will no doubt think it. The attitude that just because something is secret or private it must be a tool of crime is just wrong. There should exist a right to privacy, being able to make purchases in anonymity at least of things we have not specifically classified as controlled is a pretty basic part of that.

         

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re:Damn by indyogb · · Score: 1

      No kidding. First chips in credit/debit cards, now cash. I guess I better start panning for some gold.

    9. Re:Damn by molo · · Score: 3, Funny

      And then don't forget to launder them.

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    10. Re:Damn by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Then they'll no longer be accepted as genuine.

    11. Re:Damn by icebike · · Score: 1

      O, I don't know. Seems like 12 seconds in the microwave, or under a steam iron, or maybe thru the delicate cycle in the washer would pretty much render these inoperable.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    12. Re:Damn by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Might not even work very well.

      I can see this technology doing one thing:
      People afraid rightfully so for their anonymity will spend more money on it. Only now, doing so will be one massive black hole of spending.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    13. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yeah, not like those serial numbers on the bills are unique or anything.

    14. Re:Damn by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      How about an industrial strength press?
      At worst, several tons of pressure might make vending machines a bit unhappy about accepting your dollars.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    15. Re:Damn by dargaud · · Score: 2

      I always though that the dollar bill, as opposed to just any money in the world, was made on purpose easy to counterfeit so that it would be used as the de facto worldwide currency. I mean it's only 2 colors (green and black) and the security measures on it are ridiculous (some hair in the paper, are you serious?). The paper is too similar to basic paper for the average Joe to tell (it indeed dissolves if you forget it in your pants while using the washing mashine). If you take most other moneys, like the Euro, you have 20 things on it that make it very hard to counterfeit.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    16. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was going to post.

      In fact this is no different than that except it's easier to automate. Normally stores, banks, whatever, don't keep track of bills that pass through them, this technology would allow that. Every transaction could easily be automatically tracked.

      In theory you can do the same thing with serial numbers but nobody does. In fact, I wonder why they need this transistor technology at all, why not just install some sort of automated OCR to grab serial numbers? Seems about the same amount of effort by vendors and a whole lot less effort for the bills themselves because they won't need to have these transistors installed.

    17. Re:Damn by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      The money dissolves? I have washed US paper money often. Not on purpose, but a lot. The currency was sill usable after word. This includes $20, $10, $5, and $1 dollar bills. I have washed $50 and $100 as well. Th bills were never flat. they were folded in a pocket. If the bill got lose it was usually shredded by the washing machine itself. Maybe you did actually have counterfeit bills?

    18. Re:Damn by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I always though that the dollar bill, as opposed to just any money in the world, was made on purpose easy to counterfeit so that it would be used as the de facto worldwide currency.

      I doubt it. Massive counterfeiting can easily make your currency worthless. The US gained worldwide currency status not by being easy to counterfeit, but by having a huge economy and a relatively stable currency.

      Many of the security measures are just very old, and they've been conservative in introducing new ones.

    19. Re:Damn by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Way ahead of you. We've already accepted manure, services, and pot for our work. Everybody's happy.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    20. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you, sir must not actually have ever washed American money, it does not dissolve. It does stain you other clothes red from the blood on it though.

    21. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because it's so hard to design a frequency-specific current shunt which makes it unlikely to be harmed by a microwave while leaving you thinking that it's now harmless.

    22. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And doing drugs shouldn't be a crime.

    23. Re:Damn by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I'm not in the middle east. If you're hiding money from my government, you're a criminal here.

    24. Re:Damn by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Depends on the drugs. Depends on what else you're doing with them. Depends on who you're getting them from. Depends on why you're doing them and how much your addiction is costing everyone else.

    25. Re:Damn by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I can deal with nosy people.

      I can't deal with criminals who are hiding their transactions using money that I paid to have printed and that has value only because the system of laws that I pay for knows the difference between tyrannical transgressions against human rights and simple methods of preventing crime.

    26. Re:Damn by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Well, mostly harmless.

    27. Re:Damn by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      But it sounds like the banks, and I presume Government, would be the ones actually interested in tracking the money.

      7-Eleven (for example) doesn't care whose dollars are going into their registers. Of course they might start to care if banks refuse deposits without a data file representing the serial numbers they think they have. But without such drastic measures you're never going to get small businesses to take on the expense/headache of tracking their currency.

    28. Re:Damn by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Shame on you for being so illogical.

      I didn't say that things that are private are crimes.

      I said that someone who makes a lot of noise about keeping his transactions private is so likely to be doing something that the police should know about that I am safe in assuming so.

      If you're making transactions with your cash that you wouldn't willingly make with a credit card, then you're doing exactly what I'm talking about.

    29. Re:Damn by blair1q · · Score: 0

      Why should "finance" be anonymous?

      You're using the government's own printed scrip, backed by the government's health and stability, all of which is costly to all of us.

      If you want to conduct anonymous transactions, print your own money. It's just paper. But good luck getting anyone to trust its worth.

    30. Re:Damn by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      US money certainly does not dissolve in the wash as I can personally attest to - I have mistakenly washed bills on several occasions before and the color fades a bit, but other than that there is no discernible degradation of the paper itself. The paper used in US currency has some linen fibers woven into it to make it strong. As a matter of fact, most counterfeiters will run their fake money through the wash a few times themselves to make it appear to have been in circulation for a while. Also, you should take a look at recent US currency. There are more than just the red/blue fibers to prevent counterfeiting. There is a watermark, a strip that runs through the bill that tells it's denomination, the ink is slightly magnetized, etc. so reproducing good looking fakes is not such an easy task as you think.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    31. Re:Damn by blackdropbear · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the gold standard

    32. Re:Damn by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Your description of the anti-counterfeiting measures is over 2 decades old, current bills have much more publically known measures and a few lesser known ones. And bills survive washing just fine with only a slight fading and fraying of the linen fibers, still quite usable.

    33. Re:Damn by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      I can deal with nosy people.

      How about nosy people that employ well-armed and coordinated forces able to track you down, imprison, and/or kill you if you make them unhappy?

      There's a big difference between the power over your life and freedom held by some random busybody vs that of a government.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    34. Re:Damn by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      I have great news for you, the banking cartel whose debt notes you use operates outside the laws of your land, financing genocide, transgressions against human rights, arms dealing to criminals and despots, financing both sides of wars, and even profits from both sides of the "war on drugs". Moreover with the recent bailouts across the globe, your descendants have been saddled with an unpayable debt load to their benefit.

    35. Re:Damn by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Informative

      by strange coincidence, gold and silver transactions over $600 are now required to be tracked by the IRS

    36. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History fail. The dollar gained worldwide currency status by getting OPEC to force trade in oil to be denominated in USD.

    37. Re:Damn by It+took+my+meds · · Score: 1

      I find the US currency to be one of the worst I have ever seen. All the bills are the same size and colour and are made out of paper. The Australian currency uses a plastic technology that is being adopted by many other countries around the world. It's incredibly difficult to counterfeit, it lasts for a very long time, has a distinctive texture, and all the denominations are different sizes and colours. Perhaps the US should move away from easily counterfeit-able and short lasting paper money to a better technology without tracking its citizens. If you don't think the US currency is counterfeit-able check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdollar

    38. Re:Damn by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      We've already accepted manure...

      Take nothing but the best, Peruvian Guano... though the Jamaican shit ain't too bad

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    39. Re:Damn by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're using the government's own printed scrip, backed by the government's health and stability, all of which is costly to all of us.

      Exactly, it's costly to us. It's not the government's scrip. It's our scrip. We pay for it. And we simply trust the government to print it in a responsible manner. That means, logically, that we should be able to, as citizens, do whatever the hell we want with our scrip without oversight from our government overlords. We, the citizenry, are supposed to be tracking and monitoring our government, and all of their powers, to keep them in check. Our government is not supposed to be tracking and monitoring we citizens to keep us in check. The government is little more than a necessary evil to help manage and contend with the more unpredictable, shitty portions of being a human being living on this planet (like dealing with sociopathic criminals and such). The government is not supposed to be, and should never be, an overbearing social entity that regulates all citizens' lives to protect them from themselves.

      My government should answer to me. I fund it. I contribute to it. I take time out of my busy damn life to help it function (jury duty, voting, registering my vehicle with DMV, smog checks, etc. etc. etc.). That means that the government is mine (more appropriately ours) to oversee and monitor. Not the other way around. The fact that I purchase legal tender from the government via my taxes and contributions to society does not mean that I am purchasing government oversight of my life. It means that I am entering into a social contract with the government that says, "I'll give you a portion of my earnings to help support the society that helps support me. In return, I expect access to the legal tender we (the citizenry) grant you (the government) the power to print that I may partake in whatever social transactions I see fit." What is not included in that contract, and what should never be included in that contract, is a clause that says, "I expect access to the legal tender only for goods and services that the government approves of." Money is not under the control of the Executive branch, it is under control of the Legislative branch. Money is not intended to be used as crime prevention tool. It is intended to be used as a social contract between two individuals partaking in a private transaction in a common society. To conflate those two roles is a violation of the principle of the Separation of Powers and is downright fucking stupid.

      The government is not explicitly granted the power to track my private financial transactions in the Constitution of the United States of America. And, until we citizens get together and vote to amend that document and, thus, yield that power to the government that we hold a social contract with, it never has the right, responsibility, or duty to do so. Just because you wish the government has that power, does not give the government that power. Learning and understanding that principle could actually help you grow into the informed citizen that you are supposed to be in this society. Good day sir.

    40. Re:Damn by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      The US gained worldwide currency status...

      by destroying Europe's and Japan's economy and filling in the vacuum...

      ...not by being easy to counterfeit, but by having a huge economy and a relatively stable currency.

      And don't forget the really big stick

      It's not the "US" economy. It's the "Citi" economy. The borders that we can't can't cross mean nothing to them.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    41. Re:Damn by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 2

      They'll probably change them to a polymer based note (like here in Australia and much of the rest of the world), so the microwave will destroy the note. I am sure there will be other ways though. High voltage spark from one of those firelighters perhaps?

    42. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "after word"? Seriously? This is worst than its/it's, than/then/could care less mistakes and similar.

      care less

      lol

    43. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm, services. I love me a good services.

    44. Re:Damn by rhook · · Score: 1

      Counterfeiting any currency is trivial when you have a government backing you.

    45. Re:Damn by blair1q · · Score: 0

      Right. We are the government. So when you hide your "private financial transactions" that are only feasible using public money, you're committing an offense against all of us.

      The rest of your rant simply confuses what it means to live in a society. You help make the rules. You don't get to make them yourself, and you don't get to ignore them just because you have the means to. As for what the Constitution says or doesn't say, the Legislature is allowed to extend it as it sees fit and the Judiciary is allowed to interpret it as it sees fit; again, you only get to vote on who's in your segment of the legislature, and they get to vote on the people the President says should be in the Judiciary.

      If you want your transactions to be private, don't do them using paper that's only got "value" because of the public.

      You act like you're entitled by some "right" to store your wealth in foldable form that you can bury in a shoebox instead of a pile of treasure that you have to sit guard over night and day.

      You don't. You also don't have a right to drive a car or practice medicine. That's how things go. Government is going to govern where democracy deems government should govern. Even the Constitution is amendable.

    46. Re:Damn by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Pretty much this. The last guy who thought aloud about trading his oil for Euros was hung for ... umm... for what exactly did we hang Hussein? I mean, officially?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    47. Re:Damn by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Didn't you get the memo? When the government does it (with "it" being anything), it's not illegal.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    48. Re:Damn by blair1q · · Score: 1

      If you have evidence that banks are committing crimes, bring them up to my Attorney General. His job is to stop that even if it's the Fed that's doing it.

      As for my being saddled with debt, I don't vote Republican, so I count myself blameless in that.

    49. Re:Damn by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      A nice idea in theory, a horrible one in practice.

      So a bill with a faulty chip isn't legal tender anymore. Who's gonna notice? The mom'n'pop shop where you buy your ice cream with that fiver you just fried? Hardly. They won't even have the facilities to test every bill that they get. Worse, how about shops with a huge number of customers buying penny items (like newspaper stands)? You think they'll be even able to test the bills, even provided that they had the facilities? It's a time issue.

      What would happen? Well, there's two possible results. First, if the bank does not accept the bill for being "broken", will they throw it away? YOU KIDDING? They'll go to the next shop and try to slap it on the next shop owner. That bill will stay in circulation. Forever.

      The worst possible outcome would be an economy with "legal" and "not-quite-but-still" legal tender. You'll end up with a lot of "counterfeit" currency that people have no qualms using, after all it IS (or was, before someone fried it) legal tender.

      And we're not even talking about accidental damage. And I guess we all know just how roughly money gets handled sometimes and how fragile chips are.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    50. Re:Damn by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      What is a crime? Well, everything a government declares as such.

      I have a friend in Libya. You might want to discuss the question with him...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    51. Re:Damn by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      In other words, if I don't want the government (or some companies that pay enough for the data) to know what I spend my money on, I'm a criminal?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    52. Re:Damn by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I tend to like the look of the recent redesigns, however slowly they're being rolled out (partially hindered by an epic screwup in printing the first batch of next-generation $100s). They certainly do address the color issue, although I'd like to see the denominations remain the same size. New "paper" might be a good idea...

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    53. Re:Damn by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I'm mostly afraid of what's to come.

      First of all, how should I be sure that what I, a law abiding citizen, do will not be criminalised in the future? You might buy a service or an item that will be outlawed in the future. Did you stop using it? And even if, you wanted to use it in the past, did you stop just because it was outlawed?

      Or how about our "war on cigarettes"? Let's go on and do more for the public health, let's monitor how often people go to eat fast food. Let's track their eating behaviour and require them to eat healthy at least 5 days a week. You spend too much money at the burger joint? Watch your health insurance skyrocket! Or how about losing it altogether?

      You didn't spend any money on motor oil lately either, so we won't cover your next engine breakdown while we're at it.

      Should I go on?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    54. Re:Damn by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd kinda consider it quite hard to track money that way.

      Think about it: Yes, 7/11 and Wallmart might be able to establish the kind of equipment necessary to track. But let's watch a bill on its way and tell me what this will tell you about me.

      I withdraw money from the ATM. ATM will know that I now am the "legal" holder of that bill. On my way to the bus, I buy a newspaper. I highly doubt that the person there that is barely able to speak my language, let alone have a "real" store (he pretty much offers his newspapers on the ground there in front of the bus station), is able to track it. So according to the trackers, I still have that bill, even though it is already in the hands of that newspaper handler. He in turn pays his next delivery with that bill, again, no tracking (or do you expect the newspaper delivery people who pretty much have their Minivan and NOTHING else to have the tracking equipment?). That bill again changes hands as change with the next newspaper retailer half a town away. And again as some person buys his newspaper with a bigger bill and gets "my" bill as change.

      So now a bill that the ATM pegged me as the holder changed hands three times and is now in the hands of some other person that I never met and never traded with. And it's by no means a given that he will eventually hand it to someone who will return it to a "tracking" station like a store big enough to be part of the tracking cycle.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    55. Re:Damn by c0lo · · Score: 1
      TFA

      tiny low-power organic transistors

      Me thinks that no matter what, they are going to be fried.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    56. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "we" you mean Americans, then "we" didn't. The Iraqis did.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein

    57. Re:Damn by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1
      Paste the text of whatever law passed by Congress or whatever Constitutional amendment exists that states explicitly that the government has the power to use my financial transactions to track my behavior. Go ahead and take your time. I will wait.

      ...you're committing an offense against all of us.

      Until you show me the text of the law I am breaching by keeping my transactions private I will consider that little more than a wish on your part.

      Hell, if you're so convinced of your argument, how's about you post your own financial history (complete financial history, including all relevant numbers and data which can and should be used to track your transactions) right up here for all of us to see. In fact, why don't you put it in a torrent file and host it up on rapidshare so we can all go through it in finicky detail.

      What's that? You don't want the public knowing your complete financial history? But that history was conducted with our scrip! Paid for using our tax dollars! It's our right to know! If you want to participate in our society, you have to reveal all of your transactions. You don't have anything to hide right?

      Or am I wrong? Are you willing to put your entire financial history online? I'm calling your bluff. Put up the text of the law I am violating by keeping my transactions private and/or anonymous. Put up your entire financial history (or whatever portion of it involved public scrip) on the internet for all the public to see. Or sit down and shut up. I won't take seriously anyone who won't apply their own ludicrous standards to themselves.

    58. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      care less

      Word.

    59. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe rhook is referring to OTHER countries counterfeiting bills. For example, Asian and South American false US bills.

      Having worked in banking and financial security, there's a few common types of counterfeits. There's DIY jobs which are easily recognized by a halfway competent teller with only casual inspection, passable but imperfect copies made by criminal organizations (harder, but still possible to spot, an experienced teller will recognize them 95% of the time), and perfect replicas made by or with assistance from foreign governments, which you probably can't identify if you're not working with the secret service and/or treasury. This last kind will be made to the same manufacturing standards as the US mint, and only cross-checking serial numbers, dates, etc (or occasionally forensic evidence) will reveal them. But without government backing, you're simply not going to get past a well-trained teller. And they aren't even looking at things like watermarks or UV reactive colored strips unless they already have doubt.

    60. Re:Damn by igreaterthanu · · Score: 1

      You do know that every single bitcoin transaction is recorded publicly in the block chain, right? Wonderful solution that.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    61. Re:Damn by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And I'm pretty sure that none of these governments think their actions deserve being arrested. After all, if US foreign politics told me anything, then that everything's ok if it's for the good of the country.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    62. Re:Damn by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And the roman catholic church never burned anyone, the secular powers did.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    63. Re:Damn by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Two words:

      Google DMEMPR.

    64. Re:Damn by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      If you've RTFA, it was just an idea that a German scientist came up with as an application of his organic thin film transistors. First of all, it requires trace amounts of gold, and gold is damn expensive. Second of all, it is very unlikely that electronic circuits will survive in currency for any reasonable amount of time. Currency has to survive a lot of abuse. If this is implemented at all, it would only be used for anti-counterfeiting measures. If this worries you, you should be already worried that currency already has unique serial numbers. In principal, the government could force scanners to read and report the numbers at every cash register.

    65. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "care less" was part of "could care less" in his post, moron.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om7O0MFkmpw

    66. Re:Damn by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      This is worst than

      This is worse than

      --
      I come here for the love
    67. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toss your bills in the microwave.

      I guess it will become illegal to do so and to use banknotes without markings.

    68. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't bother with the washer. I've washed flash drives many times (and a phone battery a couple of times) to no ill effect.

  2. Where's George? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not just use "Where's George" stamps?

    1. Re:Where's George? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I love that site; thing is, it's entirely voluntary and the input is unvalidated. (the webmaster is constantly trying to keep bad data out of the system)

      Using that site has made it clear that many "common people" don't pay much attention to the details of their physical monetary objects, partially evidenced by the low response rate

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    2. Re:Where's George? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're way off. Here's how it works in the real world, at branch level.

      A teller drawer is functionally identical in many respects to a retail cash register. You make a cash deposit? The bills go into the drawer. You make a cash withdrawal? The same bills come out out of the drawer. If an individual teller's cash in drawer gets too high or too low, money is moved to or from the vault. This same vault supply is drawn on for all teller drawers. If the vault balance gets too high or low, a shipment is done via armored car.

      That $20 you handed your teller is probably going to end up in the hands of the next person who wants one. There is no tracking by the bill. Perhaps once it leaves the branch (which I doubt) but at that point it is long past impossible to identify which bills came from who. Five minutes after you've left is usually too late to tell anymore, and the bills you gave us may not even be in our hands anymore by then anyway if the person in line behind you was making a withdrawal or making/breaking change or whatever.

      Tellers are trained to identify potential counterfeits, etc, primarily in the act of counting money. They are trained to recognize the feel of genuine bills, and how to spot common counterfeiting techniques. If the secret service knows that an operation has released bad bills in an area, they notify local banks and tell them what kind of bills are being faked and any known identifying characteristics or tells so they can keep an eye out for those as well.

      Now if we were talking about CHECKS, that's a whole different game when it comes to security, as would be expected. But currency? Your account gets noted with something along the lines of "$20 cash deposit." In some banks, it may be "$50 cash deposit: 1 $20, 3 $10 bills" but that has more to do with identifying the cause of teller drawer overages/shortages and I don't think actually gets noted to your account itself anywhere, just the cash station's log.

  3. DO NOT WANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All your currency are belong to us"

    Sincerely,

    Your government.

    1. Re:DO NOT WANT by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Who did you think it belonged to? Do you think the world wants a personal unsecured IOU from you?

    2. Re:DO NOT WANT by couchslug · · Score: 1

      ""All your currency are belong to us"

      Sincerely,

      Your government."

      "I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let's try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well."
                                                                                        Joe Stack

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  4. Microwave? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

    So is your currency invalid if you microwave it?

    1. Re:Microwave? by zill · · Score: 1

      Depending on the organic compound, it could end up quite delicious after you microwave it.

    2. Re:Microwave? by Tmack · · Score: 4, Funny

      So is your currency invalid if you microwave it?

      Yes, because only a terrorist would do that, so you would be arrested on the spot if you tried to use it!! Yeh, sure your "friend" gave it to you, or you got it from selling stuff at a "yard sale", thats just terrorist speak for fellow terrorist and Arms Sale!

      -tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    3. Re:Microwave? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but they might fine you for defacing government property...

      "U.S. Code Title 18 includes several specific sections that govern U.S. currency.
      Section 333 covers paper currency. It states that it is illegal to cut, deface, mutilate, disfigure, perforate or rejoin bills. Section 333 also pertains to any other activity that is intended to make a bill 'unfit to be reissued and remain in circulation'."

    4. Re:Microwave? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not. At least, my cash has not been rendered invalid when I've pulled out the security ribbons. I've never had ribbon-free cash rejected in the US, even by machines. I have had it refused in foreign countries, particular at banks that use ribbon checking machines to count currency.

    5. Re:Microwave? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      So remember folks, it's illegal to buy beer for Bill. It makes him unfit for driving.

    6. Re:Microwave? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the microchip catch fire if you do? Legit question: How much can a US banknote be defaced before it becomes invalid? Certainly in Australia if you take two halve of a bank note to the bank they can replace it for you, but would that still be allowed if there was a hole burnt through where the chip was?

  5. Deutschland fur Immer by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    Ah I love German scientists 3 Always coming up with great things!

  6. What happens when... by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

    What happens when I launder the bills in my pocket?

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    1. Re:What happens when... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      They shred. Only now they do it in a futuramic way.

    2. Re:What happens when... by killkillkill · · Score: 1

      I think part of the idea here is to make laundering the bills harder to accomplish.

    3. Re:What happens when... by tgeller · · Score: 1

      American bills are made of a linen/cotton blend -- that's why they don't shred in the wash.

      --
      Tom Geller
    4. Re:What happens when... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      They shred in the wash if they're in your pocket when your pants are washed. The linen fibers makes them a little more sturdy than other papers but they're not like handkercheifs.

  7. No, it's not fake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was to say, microwave my bills (completely by accident)...would that make them worthless?

    Just as long as these chips are not the default method for identifying counterfeits, I could not care less.

    1. Re:No, it's not fake! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Maybe.

      How about if you microwave your head by accident?

      Shouldn't it be more robust than your money?

  8. End result? by trollertron3000 · · Score: 1

    The found conclusively that It almost always ends up at strip clubs.

    --
    Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
    1. Re:End result? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      That is a good reminder any cash you handle likely spent time stuffed in a diseased stripper's g-string. It also probably has mucous and blood from multiple noses when it was used to snort drugs.

    2. Re:End result? by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      I forget where I read this, so I lack the citation to back it up, but I recall reading a report finding that more than 90% of US currency in circulation has traces of cocaine. Either from direct contact or proximity to other cocaine tainted bills.

  9. Thanks, science! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Wow, you mean up until this point it simply wasn't feasible to track cash? And now science has provided a way? Thanks, amoral German scientists! This is the best gift you've given the world since mustard gas!

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Thanks, science! by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Agreed. There is already a perfectly good way of tracking valuable slips of paper.

      Recently I had in my hand a slip of paper worth over $600. I presented it to a guy, he held it under a blinking light for a moment, and something went "ding" and a light turned green. Then he let me on the plane.

      If we needed to track every last hundred dollar bill, we could already be doing it. There are perfectly good ways already. The reason we're not is because it would require expensive new equipment being rolled out nationwide and finding some way to get people's money to pass through it so it can be tracked, and although the technology to put electronics on banknotes may be fascinating I don't see that it changes any of those things.

  10. barcodes? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    No? Too simple? Or can OCR software simply not read the serial numbers printed on the notes?

    Ah wait. They want to be able to do it clandestinely... I see...

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:barcodes? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      My thought exactly. Simple OCR and lookups can validate bills. If each bill gets scanned and location data, timecode, and (unique, already printed) S/N, you could know for certain if there was a duplicate somewhere. You could add other data, too. It's not like they don't already get individually counted when they're deposited at a bank.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  11. Even more ways to get in trouble. by Conrthomas · · Score: 2

    Most of our coinage is already worth more than its denomination in raw materials.....so are we proposing to give (low denomination) paper money the same treatment? I can already see black market micro-transistor harvesting businesses. Either that, or hackers and DIYers are going to start modifying them to make the company whose job it is to track such money miserable. This could almost be fun! If it weren't so 1984-esque.... Oh wait, I forgot, we already have "Where's George?", the voluntary version of this...which is basically a toy, and has no real practical use.

  12. Don't Worry. This is never going to happen. by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    Do you really think Congress would pass a law that would allow cash tracking?
    Think of the mayhem such a law would create with the current "system" of campaign financing and "political contributions."
    Get real. This will never happen.

  13. why not just get rid of cash by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    and put the chip in people's right hand or forehead...

    it might upset a few people though (mostly christians)

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:why not just get rid of cash by thestudio_bob · · Score: 1

      and put the chip in people's right hand...

      They tried that in Logan's Run, but then they started using the chip to kill off all the old people.

      --
      The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
    2. Re:why not just get rid of cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And before that, there was that awesome fantasy novel where that guy had that vision about using the chips to rip out people's souls and cast them into a lake of fire forever.

  14. X-Files was right by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    Didn't the Lone Gunmen demonstrate this in one episode?

    1. Re:X-Files was right by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      More or less. They extracted the denomination strip from a bill and claimed that it was used for remote tracking purposes.

  15. Re:Don't Worry. This is never going to happen. by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    I highly doubt political contributions and campaign financing are enacted via cash very often.

  16. But will it run by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    linux ?

    --
    Nullius in verba
  17. taking back our hearts, minds, ability to thrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never a better time. see you there? remarkable signs we're surviving/winning might be such as spontaneous outbreaks of caring for one another/our young. dissolution of weaponized empires (recycling) might be another. babies without borders et al? track that.

  18. Yes, it will. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really think Congress would pass a law that would allow cash tracking?
    Think of the mayhem such a law would create with the current "system" of campaign financing and "political contributions."
    Get real. This will never happen.

    Absolutely!

    This is why: they don't want to be soft on terror, drugs, crime, and most importantly child molesters. Because we all know that criminals need cash to do their business.

    And as far as campaign contributions are concerned, they've been getting around that for decades.

    Get real indeed.

  19. Plausible deniability by zenaida_valdez · · Score: 1

    Plausible deniability: Foil lined wallet. Microwave your cash every night. Wear a floppy brimmed hat and stoop when you buy the newspaper with a $20 at 7-11. They may scan the bill, but the cameras can't see your face. Your change is off the map. Purchase items of value (guns, jewelry) from private sellers with this cash. Sell the same way. Money laundering is a continuum, from a Cayman Islands corporation to painting a friend's house for cash.

  20. Re:Don't Worry. This is never going to happen. by Eudial · · Score: 1

    Oh I don't know. Surely there's some way to spin cash-tracking as stopping pedophiles.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  21. Sigh by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

    ...could make it possible to really follow the money

    Every day I find myself wanting a personal EMP generator more and more.

  22. Pa-dum-tish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was possible 5 years ago. RFIDs, anyone?

  23. what about old and beat up bills? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    what about old and beat up bills?

    1. Re:what about old and beat up bills? by Rizimar · · Score: 1

      New Money will now have an expiration date. This is an effort to not only track your cash through the transistors, but to further encourage spending. Goodbye, national deficit!

    2. Re:what about old and beat up bills? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Increasing spending increases the national deficit - it's not like people are going to buy locally produced stuff when there's cheaper stuff from China sitting on the shelf.

    3. Re:what about old and beat up bills? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      New money already has an expiration date. The Fed already updates their money on a regular basis. Among other things, it helps flush out black market cash back into circulation.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:what about old and beat up bills? by BBTaeKwonDo · · Score: 1

      New money already has an expiration date.

      Wrong. From moneyfactory.gov:

      Will there be a recall or devaluation of the older-series notes?
      There will be no recall or devaluation of the older-series notes, which will be removed from circulation as they wear out. Older worn notes will be replaced with the new notes.

      Which is not nearly the same as an expiration date.

    5. Re:what about old and beat up bills? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Slashdot, where you're never more than few minutes away from a authentic pedant.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    6. Re:what about old and beat up bills? by mhelander · · Score: 1

      An authentic pedant.

    7. Re:what about old and beat up bills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Partly that ambiguity but also folks can (and will) start using some other currency. It's called, wait for it, supply and demand. Raise the cost of something and substitutes are found.

      Not in the US perhaps but counterfeiting isn't primarily occurring in the US. Overseas it's more common and much easier to use other currencies. Strictly the US Dollar's world reserve status isn't long for this world any more as it is.

  24. Another stupid materials science article by Animats · · Score: 1

    Somebody makes a modest advance in materials science, and it's hyped into an application. Again. The Discovery crowd is notorious for these.

    The usual subjects for this class of hype are batteries, displays, and memory devices.

    1. Re:Another stupid materials science article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then all the slashdot luddites rally against violation of their "privacy". Face it slashdotters - no-one cares about your life.

  25. Re:taking back our hearts, minds, ability to thriv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only does that not make sense, it actually creates some sort of anti-sense that renders previously understood concepts incomprehensible. I could do algebra before reading your comment, but not anymore.

  26. Re:Don't Worry. This is never going to happen. by kent_eh · · Score: 1

    How about less than a decade ago, and in a modern democratic country by the Prime Minister

    Or were you being sarcastic, and I missed it?

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  27. I can see how this will work out. by orsty3001 · · Score: 1

    You're going to see a lot of conspiracy theory nut jobs microwaving their money.

    1. Re:I can see how this will work out. by snookerhog · · Score: 1
      you mean you don't already microwave yours?

      it kills all the nasty germs that the isopropyl bath misses.

  28. Where's George? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    The web sight and voluntary tracking are no doubt a toy.

    However it is a thought provoking toy. I bet all bills get scanned at the bank every time they are deposited. Adding OCR for serial numbers has been computationally trivial for at least a decade, standard fonts and all. There is even a valid reason as many batches of counterfeit cash share serial numbers.

    Anybody want to bet the bill counting machines are network connected?

    Who works at a bank? Clandestine traffic analysis? If they are tracking the bills it's got to generate a decent amount of traffic, especially by the standards of 10 or so years ago. I bet just looking for it is a fire-able offense. You'd need a reason to be looking at the traffic on the segment, then just forget to turn it off for a week or so.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  29. (-4, incorrect troll template) by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    the proper form is :

    if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide

    most effective in the line for the free TSA prostate exam

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:(-4, incorrect troll template) by blair1q · · Score: 1

      No, the proper form is:

      If you want to a vehicle of fungible value that the government printed and protects, then you'll have to abide by the rules that prevent crimes from being done with that vehicle.

      "if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide" is not justification for a search of your person or your home; but spending money, like driving the freeway, is the use of a public infrastructure and no longer a private act.

      If you want to keep your crimes secret, barter. I'm not paying for a treasury and a rule of law and a stable business climate so you can have dollar-for-dollar value for your criminally transacted dollars any more.

    2. Re:(-4, incorrect troll template) by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      I'm not paying for a treasury and a rule of law and a stable business climate

      hilarious!
      But you're only receiving one of those three things you're paying for. 33% is failure just about any way you look at it.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:(-4, incorrect troll template) by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      You're going to have a hard time keeping the CIA/FBI/DEA in business with that attitude. And be careful how you define "criminal". You might find yourself to be an accomplice.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    4. Re:(-4, incorrect troll template) by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The perfect reply to this is that I have not done anything wrong... but is that enough?

      In the current terror craze, buying the wrong stuff at the wrong time can easily put you in the focus of some witchhunters. You recently bought a microcontroller kit and 2 months later something like this is used in an attack? And you bought a few chemicals (to etch your own PCBs)? You even have a technical background (duh, else, why buy that crap?)? Leave the door unlocked, it costs more to replace the lock if they first have to kick your door in.

      But even aside of such scenarios, how can you be certain that you, a law abiding citizen, will still be law abiding in the future? What you do today may be outlawed tomorrow. And even if you stop doing whatever is illegal now... did you really?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. US Dollar backed by Gold? by Chessucat · · Score: 1

    Manufactured with minute amounts of aluminum and gold using a special dry process, each flexible 250-nanometer-thick array only needs three volts to operate.

    This is FED attempt at being funny, 'eh?

    --
    "I'm a dirty white tomcat, enter my world..."
    1. Re:US Dollar backed by Gold? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      So it only needs 3 volts, eh? Cool, we can talk to it with Arduinos!

    2. Re:US Dollar backed by Gold? by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Or with the proper amount of thought, you can "talk" to it with a system of any voltage. Alternately, you can "talk" to a system of any voltage using Arduinos. Of course, if you're depending on someone else to do the hardware, then you might just be out of luck. If you care enough, well, building interfaces to deal with different voltages isn't all that hard.

  31. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds acceptably effective. do the math; you+me=(:->-+-

  32. Silly Big Brother by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Before such tainted cash even hits the streets, you will be able to buy a shielded billfold, or an inexpensive device that fries the tracking chip.

    That, or the smart ones among us will make a concerted effort to displace tainted cash with a new money system. Maybe something like the funny money some communities have started using for local businesses.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  33. WHY??? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    If you truly need to follow all significant money movements, simply stop printing paper money. Force everyone to use credit cards and checks. I mean really. We don't do that because it is an invasion of privacy. There is no need to come up with a NEW way to invade our privacy, we already have enough old ways.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  34. Herp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin?

  35. RFID? by mazesc · · Score: 1

    Privacy problems aside: So basically these "tiny transistors" are RFID chips?

    From TFA:

    These low-voltage transistors could one day provide added security or tracking by transmitting information wirelessly to a scanner.

    Security for whom btw? For the banks I assume?

  36. neatly solves the SS & medical crisises, too! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    kill off all the old people.

    You say that like it's a bad thing. Obviously you've never been to South Florida.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  37. and how long will it take to roll this out? 10 yea by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    and how long will it take to roll this out? 10 years when there lot's of old bill with out this?

    and what about install scanners all over the place?

  38. equation tuncated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    finishes as ++, conversely; you+-+-,,me+-+-=+-+-,,,

  39. What we really need is a digital paper trail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is where bitcoin comes in.

  40. question is - who would want that? by kubitus · · Score: 1
    the cheque is invented, so is the bill of exchange.

    the advantage of banknotes is their anonymity, the abstraction to the underlying transaction of real goods and services.

  41. Re:Don't Worry. This is never going to happen. by Raenex · · Score: 1

    Do you really think Congress would pass a law that would allow cash tracking?
    Think of the mayhem such a law would create with the current "system" of campaign financing and "political contributions."
    Get real. This will never happen.

    They'll just exempt themselves from the law by finding a "legitimate" need for such an exception.

  42. Re: inoperable by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Only terrorists use inoperable cash!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  43. Thieves will know who to rob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thieves will hang around in areas with high pedestrian traffic waiting for someone with a lot of money to come along then follow them waiting for a good opportunity to rob them (i.e. somewhere with fewer people around).

  44. Don't we already have this? by diskofish · · Score: 1

    Don't all bills have a unique serial number? So they can already be tracked, just scan the number. What difference does it make if it is electronic or not? The only time it's going to be tracked is when it's scanned.

  45. Skip the bank for clean cash. by Adam+Appel · · Score: 1

    See after I rob a bank I spend the next few weeks going from crap-shack to crap-shack buyin something cheap and loading anon visa cards with the larger bills. Pick carefully, dont pattern and don't be lazy. Easy if somewhat time consuming way to launder money.

    --
    They come in the dark, only in the darkest.
  46. Re:Don't Worry. This is never going to happen. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Don't these guys need money to buy candy to lure the kids?

    It's quite obvious what we should do: ban candy!

  47. Trackable cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is a trackable chip in the cash, how long until someone can count how much cash you are carrying as you walk past. $20 in your wallet, another $300 in your money belt - hmmm good target.

  48. Not that easy by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I always though that the dollar bill, as opposed to just any money in the world, was made on purpose easy to counterfeit so that it would be used as the de facto worldwide currency.

    Yeah, I'm sure the facts that the US economy is by far the largest economy of any single country in the world by a wide margin and the fact that most money is not printed plays no role at all in the dollar being the world's reserve currency. [/sarcasm] The US maintains about $800 billion in circulation at any given time. This amount while large is dwarfed by the amount of money in circulation that is not printed currency. The US GDP is somewhere around $14 Trillion by comparison.

    I mean it's only 2 colors (green and black) and the security measures on it are ridiculous (some hair in the paper, are you serious?).

    It's not two colors and hasn't been for a very long time if it ever was. Some of the security measures are easy to see so that people can easily weed out the bad quality counterfeits. Others are less obvious to weed out the better counterfeits. If you seriously believe what you are saying you have basically announced your ignorance to the world. There is no bill that can't be counterfeited. The dollar may be easier than some but it's not nearly as easy as you make it out to be. It's estimated that there are about $70 million in counterfeit US bills in circulation at any given time. Compare $70 million with $800 billion.

    it indeed dissolves if you forget it in your pants while using the washing mashine

    You've never actually washed a dollar have you? They are remarkably durable and are designed to withstand washing. I've accidentally washed bills on numerous occasions and they have invariably come out just fine. A little beat up but fine.

    1. Re:Not that easy by the_womble · · Score: 1

      You are correct about counterfeiting (experienced bank cashiers can often tell a note is wrong immediately), and the notes are reasonably durable.

      Comparing notes and coins in circulation to GDP is not comparing like to like. Money changes hands several times a year so GDP is much bigger than money supply. You should be comparing dollar notes and coins in circulation globally to M3 less foreign currency deposits in the US plus supply of dollars outside the US.

  49. Same solution as passports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A nice smooth face hammer should do the trick. I believe that was the solution when they started sticking RFIDs in US passports.

  50. Paranoia by sjbe · · Score: 1

    O, I don't know. Seems like 12 seconds in the microwave, or under a steam iron, or maybe thru the delicate cycle in the washer would pretty much render these inoperable.

    Terrific. And then when you try to pass these inoperable bills at Walmart they'll run them by a scanner to see if they are real and then refuse to accept them as valid currency. Congratulations! You just literally threw away perfectly good money in a fit of paranoia.

    1. Re:Paranoia by icebike · · Score: 1

      Terrific. And then when you try to pass these inoperable bills at Walmart they'll run them by a scanner to see if they are real and then refuse to accept them as valid currency. Congratulations! You just literally threw away perfectly good money in a fit of paranoia.

      Nope.

      Money is legal tender even if degraded.

      That Crinkled, defaced, partially torn dollar is still a dollar. If it was valid the day it was issued its valid until destroyed. Even partially burned bills are still valid if they have enough characteristics intact to prove that they were valid when issued.

      That their electronic device failed in service is not your fault, (even when it is your fault). There is no statute that enables them to track every bill, and declare your money invalid when that tracking device fails.

      Don't shop at Walmart.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  51. Not really, no by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Don't all bills have a unique serial number?

    Yes but that is relatively easy to copy and relatively difficult to read. It does get read but few organizations have the equipment to do so with any amount of efficiency. Furthermore a serial number is useless without a database to compare it too. A chip could carry actual data beyond simply a serial number.

    So they can already be tracked, just scan the number.

    Possible in theory but not really in practice for private enterprise. OCR systems are still quite complicated and expensive. Plus having a chip in the currency allows you to do other things besides simply track where the money is without having to have access to a centralized database.

    What difference does it make if it is electronic or not?

    Efficiency, plain and simple. The goal is to reduce the cost of tracking. Whether the tracking is a good thing or not is another matter..

  52. I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how exactly will this work? Don't bills already have serial numbers? How will embedded transistors be any improvement? Unless these German scientists plan on making flexible GPS receivers with flexible batteries. I don't understand how anything like this could have a negative impact on the anonymity of cash transactions unless it is accompanied by legislation requiring individuals to scan/record the "digital serial number" of any bills exchanged. Which would be truly absurd, and could already be done with the already-existing serial numbers.

  53. This is going to help ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... the Where's George folks out.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  54. Cut it out by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

    What stops me from cutting out a piece of the transistors. or simply cutting through them? From the picture in TFA looks like it could be easily cut without fucking the money up.

  55. Re:Don't Worry. This is never going to happen. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Do you really think Congress would pass a law that would allow cash tracking?

    Yes, in a heartbeat.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  56. Reminded of a hobby... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Wheres George? (www.wheresgeorge.com) is a game I play that revolves around user input of serial numbers (and denomination/date to form a unique key)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  57. Already obsolete by older extant technology: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    The technology is called OCR. You just optically read the serial number off the bill as it's processed. This is hardly a new thing.

    I was under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that this is already done when bills go back to reserve banks for the purpose of detecting counterfeiting.

    37 bills all with the same serial number would be a touch suspicious.

  58. They don't mind tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Politicians don't mind tracking money... after operation Lost Trust in SC while things got a little less open about taking bribes, the amount of it didn't go down. We've setup a system where other organizations campaign on behalf of a politician... other organizations with no cap on how much money they can receive. What they'll do is make tracking their money illegal, while leaving it legal to do so for anyone else.

  59. Re:Don't Worry. This is never going to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, that never happens...

  60. Beeeep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microwave your money!!

  61. Q&D solution by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Microwave your money for 10 seconds and it's done.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  62. And One More Thing About Rights by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    You act like you're entitled by some "right" to store your wealth in foldable form ... You don't.

    Actually, I do. And that seems to be the thing that folks like you forget these days. The Bill of Rights was not drafted as a piece of legal paperwork to delineate what rights we Americans have. It was drafted to delineate what rights the Federal government has the power to regulate. Anything not given to the Federal government is left to the States and citizens by default.

    That means that I do have the right to carry some foldable form of wealth in my pocket unless it is written somewhere that I do not have that right. That means that I have that right and all other rights, left naturally to me by being a human being, unless they are restricted via a legal document somewhere else (like the right to operate a motor vehicle or practice medicine). So unless there is a law that says, "This and this authority are hereby granted the power to limit the types of wealth that can be carried by an individual, as well as which transactions can be carried out with that wealth..." I have they right to do exactly that which you claim I don't. That's why they are called natural human rights. They exist by default, and we contract with the government to limit them as is necessary to keep society functioning properly. That is all the power the government has.

    Rights are naturally endowed at the creation of a human being. Oh, and one more thing:

    You act like you're entitled by some "right"....

    To quote a fellow 'dotter: Rights are not entitlements.

  63. Its called a gaddamn serial number by Jookey · · Score: 1

    I heard of this idea of attaching a unique hash value to each bill. This technology would use a suspended polymer with an affinity for cellulose. When applied to the bill this would allow unique tracking of the bill by altering its properties.

  64. Its called a serial number by Jookey · · Score: 1

    I heard of this idea of attaching a unique hash value to each bill. This technology would use a suspended polymer with an affinity for cellulose. When applied to the bill this would allow unique tracking of the bill by altering its optical properties. I don't see how this makes it any easier to track money than using ocr.

  65. Common sense anti-tracking for the paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "hey mister, can you break a twenty?"

    Oh hey, now you're spending different bills than the ones from the bank, AND so is the other random guy. And since the publicly stated point of bill tracking is to kill counterfeit and burglary, you know the random guy YOU initiated a bill swap with is exceptionally unlikely to have hot money to hand you. (It's already exceptionally unlikely now, anyway.) You've broken no laws, AND the bills are still as protected against counterfeit and burglary as they were before.

    This works best if a lot of people do it, of course (because then at a high level, the data makes no sense). And even better if everyone still makes the completely innocuous purchases with their 'original' (bank-issued, IDs attached to yours) cash - because then a lot of the tracking numbers become outright impossible unless a chunk of the population are teleporting. You can even go out of your way to instigate false teleports by always doing your trades at one end of your commute and your 'legitimate' transactions at the other end.

    And of course, if anyone asks a 'teleporter' why their money is so spread out... "oh, someone asked to me to break a twenty for them." "oh, monthly poker night" "I lost my wallet" "I found a bill on the floor" "paid the neighbor's kid to mow the lawn" and so on. Notice these things in the list are already commonplace to begin with? Your own shennanigans will blend into the crowd.

    This is far more paranoid a technique than I would probably end up regularly using myself, but it's a gaping flaw in the system that is probably enough to outright prevent tracking individuals through their cash from even being attempted.

  66. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been stated long ago. The Globalist want to be able to track each individual with a microchip. When you make a transaction your dollars will be tracked by the cash register. The movie Freedom to Fascism speaks about this very invention. Wake up people this is old news. Our dollars probably already have this technology installed. Go to infowars.com and do your homework.