Slashdot Mirror
Episode I 3D Release Date Announced
TheBrakShow writes 'Lucasfilm Ltd. and Twentieth Century Fox announced today that the 3D theatrical launch of Star Wars: Episode I The Phantom Menace now has an official release date — February 10, 2012!' Are enough fans interested in watching the weakest films of the trilogy again just to experience them in 3D?"
I for one am looking forward to a new and improved Jar Jar experience.
I for one am looking forward to a new and improved Jar Jar experience.
It would be an interesting debate to have on what is the WORST part of The Phantom Menace. Jar Jar? That little kid who couldn't act and was thrown into laughably implausible situations (like a bad straight-to-DVD Disney movie where NASCAR lets an 8-year old join the circuit just because the movie's called "The NASCAR Kid")? The introduction of Mitaclorians, which pretty much undermined everything Yoda taught Luke in Empire? The creepy child molester vibe Queen Amadalia was giving off talking to the aforementioned non-acting little kid?
I'm going to go with the fact that they brought Ewan McGregor, Liam Neeson, and Samuel Jackson into this godawful shitfest--actual talented actors with long resumes of much better films. It was like watching your favorite aunt get raped for 2 hours. No amount of overpriced popcorn could make that any better.
But now I get to see her raped in 3D, and pay twice as much for the privilege. Look Aunt Wanda, we get to keep the glasses! Awesome.
SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
Meesa call moneygrab!
...lack of disturbance in the force, as if millions of people yawned in disinterest.
Too bad technology can't improve acting and dialog, because that's the real reason Star Wars I, II and III are forever stuck in the second dimension.
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
Who wants to see one dimensional characters in 3D?
Go fuck yourself George.
poking out one eye just so I CAN'T EVER see that in 3D!
I've never heard of this "Phantom Menace" thing before. I'm sure if George Lucas was behind it, it must be humorous, entertaining and dramatic, with characters we can identify with for generations to come, just like the Star Wars trilogy we all loved as kids!
I'm so glad that somebody with the integrity of George Lucas is responsible for shepherding this loveable trilogy through the years. That way I can introduce these movies to my own children without having to worry about somebody coming along and pooping all over the memories of my childhood. You know, the temptation to edit or re-issue movies to capitalize on their enduring success might be quite extreme, but George is one of those guys who knows when to say "it was good enough 30 years ago, let's not mess with a good thing".
A lesser man might have, for example, decided to edit away some of the age-inappropriate roguishness of Han Solo in an effort to merchandize schlocky toys to kids. But not George, no.
I'm not really sure what this whole 3d thing is about though. I'm sure it's a sincere effort to make a genuine artistic statement that just happens to be set in that Star Wars universe we all know and love.
Thank god for George Lucas.
I'm enjoying a new and improved Jar Jar experience right now by not watching episodes 1-3.
OK, I am going to kill whatever goodwill (and karma) I may have had with these statements:
* I actually liked Jar Jar Binks -- he was the not so bright, but well-meaning, comic sidekick
* I think Jake Lloyd performed much better than Hayden Christensen
* I think the chemistry between Natalie Portman and Hayden Christensen was as hot as the chemistry between gold and nitrogen at 0 Kelvin
* I do not think that Anakin's shift from good to evil is very convincing
But no matter what, the movies are not worth another ticket to me, 3D or not.
Is a 3-dimensional projection of a 2-dimensional movie with 1-dimensional acting.
mmmm, can't wait....
To put a witty saying into 120 characters, jst rmv ll th vwls.
And the first one is Episode IV.
They are gonna keep trying to bleed those films dry as long as the return is positive. It's kinda fun to see how far they'll take it as long as you don't spend any of your own money on it. I predict that the final release before they put this to bed will be the uber-enhanced ultra-digital 3D edition with unseen footage, enhanced audio, product placement (the Jawas will be selling droids with a marlboro red hanging off their lower lip, eating cheetos and wearing Nikes), and a special audio commentary by Jar Jar across all 6 episodes.
I thought Attack of the Clones was by far the weakest:
ESB
...
...
RotJ
SW
TPM
RotS
Care Bears the Movie
Sex and the City
AotC
I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
I'm so freaking excited about this! I'm actually giddy just thinking about the day this comes out! I cannot wait to stay home and completely ignore it!
A train wreck in 3D is still a train wreck... it just looks more like you're going to get hit by the caboose.
Loved Ep. 4, 5, 6. Deeply despised 1. Still haven't seen 2 and 3, as by all indications Lucas still hasn't learned that clowns do not belong on the battlefield (and, in fact, trivialize any sense of heriosm or sacrifice or tragedy present in the non-clowns), Western audiences don't like the idea that galactic domination is genetic, a bad movie with eye candy is still a bad movie, and that sullen teenaged angst is only entertaining to sullen teenagers.
Will not buy or download.
Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
The only way I'll watch this is if Natalie Portman reaches out of the screen and gives me a hand job.
To say Phantom was the worst implies the other two were any better.
Kwisatz Haderach
Sell the spice to CHOAM
This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
The quality of Episode 1 has been discussed so many times its nearly boring as the film. Lets discuss how bad 3D technology is! I'll start. 30% less colour, ruined focal length and shot clarity. Illusionary pointy things in your face. Headaches. Its bad.
So this will be the day people will rise up and take power, where we all agree to a little bit less, so everyone can have some and we tear down the walls of our manufactured lives, cause let's be honest: What The Fuck.
That's if you want to do it right, but since Lucas didn't get anything right with the prequels to begin with, he might as well do it in 3d wrong.
There's another way to make a movie shot in 2d into a 3d movie. It doesn't work very well and it looks like crap because a movie actually shot with a 3d camera (which is essentially 2 cameras stuck together at a specific distance) has each camera seeing a slightly different angle of the scene. It's that parallax that makes actual 3d look. . well. . not good, but better than fake 3d, in which they essentially just drag a copy of elements of the scene slightly to the right and then project it through the right-eye filter (either polarized or color depending on what tech they're using). You end up with something that looks almost, but not quite, entirely unlike real life.
"I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=free%20hat%20southpark&hl=en&meta=
Free Hat (you NEED to see the episode if you like Star Wars or Indiana Jones)
"Free Hat" is episode 88 of the animated series South Park. It originally aired on July 10, 2002. The episode ridicules Lucasfilm's digital altering of George Lucas' original Star Wars trilogy and Steven Spielberg's E.T.. The episode also shows huge criticism towards remake movies.
We've got to be only a year or two from realizing that RealD is a dumb gimmick...
RealD Cinema, the technology used in all of these films, uses alternating frequencies of light which get filtered differently by each polarized lens of the glasses it requires. This gives up to two planes of vision at a time, which can move relative to each other. For whatever reason, we are calling this 3D (I'll use the term "biplanar" for the rest of this post). Disclaimer: this is a simplification and I'm sure it's more complicated than that, but I think it hits the point.
All this biplanar vision is good for is superimposing a flat view of something in front of (or behind) the main action. That's it. I saw Avatar and was impressed by a few scenes (specifically, the captions used in the diary entries ... which were 2D), but it was almost wholly a gimmick; neat trick, but a novelty that faded before the movie finished. Captions and other flat items can add to things, but (in their current state) they do not justify the extra cost or the need to wear sunglasses in a dark theater.
That's not to say we've exhausted the limits of what biplanar movies can do; I expect explosions and other instantaneous effects can benefit greatly from this; each frame of the explosion moves slightly closer to the audience on the Z-axis, and since it emits like a wave, there is no need to continue to display previous frames in their own dedicated Z coordinate. The same goes for anything opaque that's coming right at you, so long as it has no component that requires a different depth (so a car --or spaceship-- is out because the windshield is farther from you than the fender; turn your head and the perspective shows a 2D image). In fact, the only things I can think of that fit this bill are explosions and other things that move so fast the you don't have time to move and see their flatness plus anything that is so flat it has no depth, like maybe a propeller-driven device whose propeller is so big you can't see anything else, or a wall that the first-person perspective is driving into head-first (though those two examples are pretty lame and limited).
Re-releasing old hits (a generous term for the Star Wars prequels) won't do much unless you have a fanbase that will buy anything you make (in which you might as well stick with snorting commentary tracks and back-patting featurettes).
Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
I understood The Phantom Menace to be made for a new generation and therefore had little to do with Star Wars or the sequels. I dutifully went to see them, and the disappointment was less the story than the fact that throwing money at a slew of well known actors would solve the problem. It did not solve any problem in The Empire Strikes Back. The f/x was good, but again they can only go so far. In Return of the Jedi it seemed that there was a new appreciation of a combination of practical and special effects. Not more.
I think the the fact the prequels are pretty much animated stories with a bit of live acting thrown in will make them a very good 3D experience. Star Wars and the sequels will be less so because of the human element. It will certainly allow the kids who enjoyed the prequels to see them as adults and reflect on the story.
"She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
I might consider seeing a 2 1/4 hr. condensed version of the first 3 films in 3D. That's 45 minutes per movie, should be more than enough. All dialouge edited out as well. Yoda could do a narrative past tense voice-over as if filling in Luke during his training. "A great pod race he won. Giant fish they did escape. Killed by Darth Maul Gaugin Jin was. Clones they did create. Begun the clone war had. By the emporer betrayed they were. Like a coward ran I hid here until now I have. Train you I shall". Yeah, I'ld see that.
I think he's HUMPING the dead horse... Really George, what have you done LATELY?
ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
You haters are missing the point here. Jar Jar in 3D will be awesome! It will give you the opportunity you've been waiting for since Episode 1 first came out. Just bring a knife with you to the theater, and when Jar Jar appears it 3D, you can finally stab him in the face!
Might want to make sure no one's sitting in front of you, because if they are, you'll have to explain. I mean, they'll completely understand and forgive you, but since it won't look the same from their perspective, they'll probably be mad until you tell them.
This sentence no verb.
It's not just Jar Jar and the wooden acting, it's the complete and utter lack of proper storytelling and cinematography, caused by a director obsessed with green-screens and special effects. Note that from the old movies only A New Hope was directed and written solely by George Lucas (though allegedly his former wife also had a big influence as editor).
Watch the RedLetterMedia reviews for a detailed and hilarious analysis of all three movies.
The ultimate bad guy was Vader. That was made clear. Vader was evil. I say was since after watching I, II, and II we find out he was a winy bastard, Vader does not seem so evil and bad anymore. Vader is pathetic. There I said it.
It's not 'biplanar', it's stereoscopic. I suppose they could use something like what you describe to reconstruct a stereoscopic view of a 2d film, but in practice they are more sophisticated than that. I know you're trying to simplify things, but calling it biplanar is selling it way short.
Don't get me wrong, I hate just about everything about this 3D fad, I just think you are confused about the implementation.
It was Cologne Wars, because he knew they would stink.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
Color and 3D in Casablanca would be a tragedy, but as for "super hi-def"...
I've seen Casablanca projected on 35mm film (three times in different theaters including at the George Eastman House), and I've seen it on Blu-Ray on a big screen at 1080p. The job they've done on restoring the film elements is astounding (as you'd hope for such an important film), and it's already "super hi-def" as even film in the 40's is capable of extremely high resolution. It looks astonishingly good.
You can certainly appreciate the cinematography on a small screen just watching the DVD or seeing it broadcast on TV or whatever, but that doesn't mean that seeing it as it was meant to be seen originally (film resolution and on a big screen) doesn't make it better :)