Slashdot Mirror


The 'Adventure' In Self-Publishing an IT Book

An anonymous reader writes "Author Keir Thomas has blogged about his experiences self-publishing a computing book. Quoting: 'I knew that publicizing the book would be difficult so I hit upon an idea: Why not give away the eBook (PDF) version? I could use Amazon S3 for hosting the file, so it would cost me just a few dollars per month. Sure enough, giving the eBook away generated a lot of publicity. ... Since going on sale at the start of 2009, the book has made me $9,000. ... I’ve had worse salaries in my life, and I’m very grateful, but I know total royalties would probably have been higher had I gone through the traditional route of working with a mainstream publisher. I estimate I have to give away 446 copies of the eBook for every sale of the print edition.'"

156 comments

  1. Yep by viablos · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Many times you see pro-piracy guys on slashdot suggesting, or might I say demanding publishers to use alternative ways to get money. Or just do it for the fun. Well, here again we see that those guys cannot see things clearly from both sides. They just want free stuff.

    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, here again we see that those guys cannot see things clearly from both sides. They just want free stuff.

      You mean like free advertising of your ebooks and blog on Slashdot?

    2. Re:Yep by smelch · · Score: 2, Funny

      They may not have paid for it, but they are adding value to slashdot with their information. What value are you adding to Knight Rider by watching it?

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    3. Re:Yep by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      "and I’m very grateful, but I know total royalties would probably have been higher had I gone through the traditional route of working with a mainstream publisher"

      He has no basis for comparison... He'd need to publish the same book at the same time without the giving away to know if or if not the royalties would have been greater. In addition what would be the outcome for later books, given he would now have some kind of reputation as an author.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:Yep by SQLGuru · · Score: 2

      Future sales of Knight Rider movie merchandise? Yeah, probably not. They'll just pirate that stuff, too.

    5. Re:Yep by linuxwolf69 · · Score: 1
      Personally, I started reading books by an author (Brandon Sanderson) specifically BECAUSE he put some of his work online. At the time it was only 3 chapters of his book Mistborn: The Final Empire, but since then he's put an entire book (Warbreaker, which I have the .pdf of) online.

      To this day, I personally own all 12 of his released books 8 of which are in hardcover. I respect a move like this and am willing to support who I think is a great author. If I didn't like his work, I would not have bought the book and that would have been the end. The same applies here. I'd get the book and if it's good, and/or highly beneficial, I'd order a copy for my book shelves. Maybe I'm the exception because I like to have collections and prefer physical books to e-materials every time.

    6. Re:Yep by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I'm not following? This is an author posting a success story. His assertion about possibly making more through traditional publishers isn't really accurate. Feel free to ask an IT author going that route. First time authors generally get far less from a book.

      Not only has he made more money but from the quote below we've determined that about 450 times as many people are able to enjoy the content. Sounds like a win for everyone.

      "I have to give away 446 copies of the eBook for every sale of the print edition"

    7. Re:Yep by shaitand · · Score: 2

      "What value are you adding to Knight Rider by watching it?"

      The same value slashdot is adding to their ebooks and blog. Advertising. By watching Knight Rider I am exposing those around me to the show and the brand. This provides them more opportunities for sales.

    8. Re:Yep by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Many times you see pro-piracy guys on slashdot suggesting, or might I say demanding publishers to use alternative ways to get money. Or just do it for the fun. Well, here again we see that those guys cannot see things clearly from both sides. They just want free stuff.

      How many times do you see the anti-piracy guys on slashdot suggesting, or might I say demanding that every free copy of something is a guaranteed lost sale? Or just producing a product is guaranteed financial success? Well, here again we see that those guys cannot see things clearly from both sides. They just expect money.

      See? I can do that too.

    9. Re:Yep by No2Gates · · Score: 0

      Excellent point. Bottom line is that publishers of (insert media choice here) need to make money. They deserve money for producing the products.
      This guy is doing it right. If someone can't afford (or doesn't want to) spend money on the book, they can download the PDF file.
      If you like it and prefer hardcopy, then purchasing the printed version is a great way to pay him for his work. Or the other way is the Donate button so you can give him at least a token of your appreciation for his work for the PDF version.

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    10. Re:Yep by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Read the article. His own conclusion is that he would have made more had it been traditionally published. More importantly, he's not a first time author; he has other published books and regularly writes for magazine, which means he has a better understanding of the industry and more experience writing and editing. Maybe you like your books to read like a slashdot post, but I prefer books with good typesetting, proper spelling, proper grammar, and maybe even some fact checking thrown in.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    11. Re:Yep by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      That works for "collections" and is echoed by what I see on Amazon a lot lately. Instead of publishing a self-contained book of novel length, you get something broken into as many as 10 parts each being about being a short novel. The first book is free with the remaining 3, 6 or 9 being $10.

      I think this comes partly from an author just not being able to get it done in novel-length and going on and on. And on and on and on. No publisher was going to publish a 2,000 page paperback no matter what and in 1990 it would have been edited down to a single novel. Instead today it is split into 10 volumes.

      The good news for the rather verbose author is that what might have sold for $7 in 1990 as a single book now nets more like $40 from the sale of four books and one free one - assuming most people don't buy all 10 volumes but give up somewhere along the line. The publisher probably likes this a lot better as well. But I don't think it is any measure of quality. In general, an author that can't trim it down is not spewing quality just quantity.

    12. Re:Yep by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      They may not have paid for it, but they are adding value to slashdot with their information. What value are you adding to Knight Rider by watching it?

      If David Hasselhoff overacts in a forest, and no-one is around to see him (or they're watching Airwolf on the other channel), does Knight Rider exist?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:Yep by Evets · · Score: 1

      I think the assumption is that he'd have more sales if it was sold by a publisher. Sure, he would have. But he shopped the idea and it was rejected. Even if his sales quadrupled, it probably wouldn't have been a book that traditional publishers would have been looking to publish.

      Selling 1800+ copies of a book no publisher would touch is an achievement, and not an easy one to reproduce.

      If you can come up with a really good idea 4 times a year and follow through to completion within a reasonable deadline you're only looking at a $36k income. That's not very good as a full time job. However - if you can do that in the evenings it's a heck of a side income, and the more you can consistently perform, the more you'll sell.

      There's also the question of investment. Amazon's options are zero or minimal investment. Spend a little bit of money and have 100 or 1000 copies printed at a time and handle the delivery yourself and you can double your profits - plus you have the capability of handing over copies to local booksellers to see if they'll sell in store.

      For every person looking to go down this path, there are a lot of paths you can go down. The easiest path and most potentially successful is a publisher. They have marketing plans, distribution contracts, and above all else - talent on hand who are pretty good at determining the sell-ability of a given book. They aren't the only answer, though. 2000 copies sold is nothing to a publisher, but for an individual it can be huge. Personally, I think that before writing anything you have to determine your target market and how to communicate with them.

    14. Re:Yep by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Of course everybody wants free stuff. That's why giving stuff away works. Cory Doctorow gives all his books away for free in dozens of formats at craphound.com, and he credits his status as a New York Times best seller to this.

      One publisher last year wanted to know how much he was losing to sales in piracy, so he commissioned a study to look at sales figures. Pirated books take a few weeks to be scanned and hit the net, and the publisher was astounded to learn that rather than a dropoff in sales wjhen the book hits the net, there was actually a spike in sales.

      Face it, there's little chance of being on Opera Winfrey, especially with a nerd book. Nobody's going to buy a book from an author they've never read. Had it not been for the public libraries, I'd never have bought an Asimov book, and there are now a couple dozen of his titles on my shelf.

      Free sells.

      Speaking of Asimov, I've been rereading the Foundation series. In Foundation and Earth he writes that the Hugo Award winning trilogy was first published by Gnome Press, who was cash-strapped and couldn't market it properly. Asimov didn't make a dime on it until Doubleday bought the rights ten years later.

      In light of this. $9,000 for a niche book with no publicity except an Amazon account is testament to the fact that IT WORKED, and a very strong indication that your views on the matter are faulty.

      BTW, The Paxil Diaries is (so far) only available on BitTorrent; I haven't published a paper version yet. I hope I'm as lucky as the submitter when I finally do get around to it. Anybody know a good publisher?

    15. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Success story?! Only as much as you'd consider a bimbo telling you that she had to give it up to 446 guys before she could find one who'd actually marry her as being a success story.

      This idiot author allowed himself to be gang-raped by the greedy, free-loading, unethical majority of people. (Where Slashdotters are just a cross-section of the exact same.) While he got something out of it and is overall glad he tried, he's feeling like his dignity's been ravaged by a thousand pricks. Because it has.

    16. Re:Yep by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

      And I disagree. At least as fiction goes, I want interesting content and -lots- of it. A 2000 page book - provided it had plenty of plot to fill the space - is fine by me. I really hate these dinky 100-page-or-so paperbacks - I can get through them in a couple of days and am left wanting more.

      That being said, this is why I'm happy with online works and oddball authors - You can -find- some guy's interesting book that's many hundred pages long, and as there's no publishing costs, it doesn't have to be cut short.
      I mean, look at some of this guy's work: http://www.weavespinner.net/Worlds_of_Fel.htm
      It's not all 'perfect', and occasionally there's wording/grmmar errors where the spellchecker messed up(I.e. hasn't been throughly checked), but there's enough content there to keep me busy for a month or two! (I once calculated that a single book of his was about 435,000 words - Not that much shorter than war and peace, and a heck of a lot more interesting)

    17. Re:Yep by linuxwolf69 · · Score: 1

      The majority of the books I get are in the 500+ page ranges. The latest book by Brandon Sanderson that I read was 1001 pages and a great read. He is the one finishing Jordan's Wheel of Time and a great author in his own right. He's written 2 stand alone books, 1 trilogy, 4 books in a youth series, finishing the last 3 of Wheel of Time, and has written his first book in his own epic fantasy (The Stormlight Archives... Book 1 is The Way of Kings). Other than the youth books, no short books here.

    18. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. There are those of us who would just like to see the public's domain respected. Just because someone authored, or created something, doesn't entitle them to a free ride forever after. We all take from the commons, we all need to contribute back to it. None of us would be where we are without taking advantage of all that's been created by others before us. When some people take more of this than a reasonable share, others will get less than a reasonable share. Taking more than a fair share is wrong, no matter how it is justified. Greed is destructive.

  2. That wasn't smart. by lwsimon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The guy missed out - he could have made a fortune by charging a couple of bucks for it.

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
    1. Re:That wasn't smart. by LordStormes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed - Should have given the first 3 chapters free as an Ebook, then charged $5 for the full Ebook or $X for the print version.

    2. Re:That wasn't smart. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      The guy missed out - he could have made a fortune by charging a couple of bucks for it.

      Even .99 cents would have been more profitable.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:That wasn't smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming any of those 446 would have paid for it. Chances are, one of the 446 would have broken the DRM on the E-book, and the other 445 would have stolen it.

      His net loss by providing it for free: $0

    4. Re:That wasn't smart. by More_Cowbell · · Score: 1

      This is what I came here to say. even $0.99 would be better than nothing. My bet is most of the 446 people that got it free would have been happy to pay some small sum.

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    5. Re:That wasn't smart. by nametaken · · Score: 3, Informative

      He does this for at least two of his other books. He sells .99 kindle ebook versions. I just bought one of them.

    6. Re:That wasn't smart. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe the mentality goes like this:

      "I'm not sure I'd really want a $0.99 'tech' book. However, something free is worth at least looking at - hey this is pretty good I'll tell my tech friends." And some of them buy it.

      There was just a guy who lowered his published his fictional eBook from $2.99 to $0.99 and made more money due to higher sales - linky. I think the difference is spending a dollar on recreation is fine for people, but if it's for 'work', I'm going to want to spend a decent amount to make sure I'm getting a quality product. The 'free' stuff gets noticed but the 'super cheap' stuff is still viewed as being lower quality.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    7. Re:That wasn't smart. by Suki+I · · Score: 1

      The guy missed out - he could have made a fortune by charging a couple of bucks for it.

      Even .99 cents would have been more profitable.

      That depends on if the same amount of people would have bought the eBook for $0.99 vs. free. After that recent $0.99 story went up, I told my friend who I helped with some books and he hosts my only eBook on his account. He reduced the price of almost everything to $0.99 and the only effect (as of yesterday anyway) the only sales increase was the paperbacks in bookstores and none of us think that is related. His free stories are popular and one does okay as a re-edited pay version on Kindle. I don't know enough about marketing world to make sense of it.

    8. Re:That wasn't smart. by Govno · · Score: 1

      I've purchased books for $0.99 just to check them out. In one case, the author's writing style was crap (imo .. who the heck writes fiction in present-tense?!?) so I won't buy any of his (much higher priced) sequels, but I'm not sweating the dollar it cost to find out I didn't like the author .. and the others I've purchased for .99 were good reads.

    9. Re:That wasn't smart. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      well sell the electronic version cheap and the one you can stick on a shelf at a higher price and only in hard back.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    10. Re:That wasn't smart. by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      So... your idea is to sell at a loss, and make it up with the increased volume?

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    11. Re:That wasn't smart. by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Actually, if one person bought the $.99 ebook, he'd be ahead. I didn't see any correlation between book sales and ebook distribution proven in the article.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    12. Re:That wasn't smart. by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming a nonzero number of those people would have been willing to pay $.99.

      His loss depends entirely upon opportunity cost. It wouldn't have been 446 - the article (I know, it's /.) says he saw at least 500,000 downloads. If 1% of those had paid a buck, that's $5,000... over half of the realized profit for the book. For what it's worth, it is reasonable to estimate that 4% of hits would have converted at $.99.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    13. Re:That wasn't smart. by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      That's 446 *for every print copy sold*. Over a half million downloads.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    14. Re:That wasn't smart. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly my point. I'm willing to spend a buck on my recreational reading. For work? not so much, I'll look for something higher quality.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    15. Re:That wasn't smart. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly what the author did...just instead of 'cheap' he chose 'free'.

      But getting back to my point. You think people would buy a $0.99 technical reference? or would they buy something from O'Reilly that has demonstrated experience? Or go find something free like google books?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    16. Re:That wasn't smart. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Um, yes. If a certain percentage of your views result in sales, giving it away in an unlimited and free format can drive sales of your limited physical good.

      The greater the number of views, the more sales. And he didn't have to pay a publisher a cut of his revenue.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    17. Re:That wasn't smart. by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      Quality = Price, in you mind?

      HAHAHAHA, I guess it is true a sucker is born every minute.

    18. Re:That wasn't smart. by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      And yet he provided no basis for his belief that the ebook drove sales of the printed copy. An assertion like that should be backed up with data - money is, after all, Serious Business.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    19. Re:That wasn't smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even a quarter. If he's selling at $13 a copy (which he says on his website) and he's made $9k from book sales, with 446 ebooks given away for every copy sold, that's ~309,000 copies downloaded for free. Assume he sold them for a quarter apiece, and if even 50% of people who downloaded the free copy would've paid the quarter to get it, that'd be ~$39,000... Although you might have to charge more just because I don't know of a micropayment system set up for sub-$1 increments, off the top of my head.

    20. Re:That wasn't smart. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If he gave away the first 3 chapters? Sure.
      If it had good reviews? Hell yes.

      $0.99 is a reasonable price for an ebook. They are low value items as they cannot be resold, and don't look impressive on my shelves. When you cut out the middlemen and have very low distribution costs, why should it cost anymore? Paying more than a few dollars for one is madness.

    21. Re:That wasn't smart. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      well, it's nice to see more than one side to an argument or more than one way of doing stuff if you want to write good software.

      Now let's say 1/4 of the people who pay for books (at some point) may also buy one at .99c to see if the author is any good and worth paying for,

      And they find that his stuff is as good as or better than, or even just a bit of a different angle to the stuff they usually buy.

      Next time they may buy his book instead... and then it adds more to the word of mouth... And that build over time and may in the long run generate much more income than going a classical publication route.

      I've certainly had benefits from work from doing stuff for free and giving it away that I don't think I would have had otherwise.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    22. Re:That wasn't smart. by Suki+I · · Score: 1

      Actually, if one person bought the $.99 ebook, he'd be ahead. I didn't see any correlation between book sales and ebook distribution proven in the article.

      Yes, that is a true point. $0.99 is more than $0 for the eBooks. From the post it sounds like it cost him money to have the eBooks up, so he would be "less behind" if he had made something to offset what he paid out.

    23. Re:That wasn't smart. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You suck at math.

      One buyer at $0.99, he strips the DRM and gives it to 445 of his closest friends.

      His net profit for charging $0.99: $0.99

    24. Re:That wasn't smart. by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      He made between $2.25 and $4.50 per copy, depending on where it was sold, and he gave away over 500,000 ebooks direct from his site. It's in teh article, which is of course why no one on /. knows this :)

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    25. Re:That wasn't smart. by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Quality = Price, in you mind?

      In my experience of looking for free reading material for my ebook reader, yes, for modern works, price is a good indicator of the chance of quality. Not a direct relationship, but I've found most of the time that the "free" ebooks from current authors are not worth the time and effort of downloading them.

      Not always, but most of the time. Removing the barrier to publishing a quality book means more crap gets published.

      I'm already suspicious of the quality of the book being talked about here, since the author of the book is an alleged IT professional and the link he provides to the book website is wrong. He's got ubuntupocketguide.org, it's really a .com.

    26. Re:That wasn't smart. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      He documented what he did in pretty good detail. What sort of 'proof' are you looking for?

      He 'self-published'. What more then putting it on Amazon for free did he do? He described decent traffic to his online version. From which he sold the physical copies. It wasn't available unless people asked for it because he self published. It was publish on demand.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    27. Re:That wasn't smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, if you believe that benefiting lots of other people has exactly zero value. There are, however, other ways of looking at it. Given the fact that the Internet exists, I would not advise anyone to intentionally make a career out of selling information. I have personally been careful not to make a career out doing that so I could make it give it away as a hobby. It hasn't made me rich, but I have added a lot of value to the world, and that has a lot of value to me. (Incidentally, I'm also making your career slightly harder by spending all of my free time generating useful information and giving it away. Do I care? Naw, people who want every last $0.99 to fall in their own pockets deserve to have hard careers.)

    28. Re:That wasn't smart. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      "$0.99 is a reasonable price for an ebook"

      I would say that depends greatly on what the book's content/purpose is. Trashy romance novel? sure. How to correctly wire your house panel? I think I want something more definitive than $0.99.

      My point was the subject matter and purpose have an effect on what people are willing to pay.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    29. Re:That wasn't smart. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "I didn't see any correlation between book sales and ebook distribution proven in the article."

      Correction, there is a correlation between ebook distribution and $9000 worth of sales. What isn't proven is causation. There is no proof that any form of advertising increases sales.

      A first time author having very high (i.e. $4500 net for two years and counting) sales with no other advertisement is certainly better evidence than you will get from any advertising firm and it is greater success than the average first time author gets with the advertising provided by publishers.

    30. Re:That wasn't smart. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      It isn't reasonable to assume he would have had 500,000 hits if the book weren't free in the first place so no percentage of that number is a valid conversion estimate. Giving the ebooks away reasonably resulted in a 500% increase in hits which in turned converted at about 1.12% into print sales.

    31. Re:That wasn't smart. by HuckleCom · · Score: 1

      Well let's see... He claims $9000 in income. He's selling it for $12.99 on amazon.com (Let's assume $10/copy, I dont know what amazon's cut is)

      If he sold 1 per 446, and made ~$9000 at ~$10/copy: ~900 were sold.

      ~401,400 were downloaded (Unique)?

      Iet's say the fact that he charged $0.99 for the ebook version, sales would have been lower, I think 66% LOWER is a pretty conservative number:

      ~401,400 - (~401,400*0.66) = ~136476 'sold' ebooks.

      ~136476 * 0.99 = ~$135,110

      Yea. prolly screwed himself :P

    32. Re:That wasn't smart. by HuckleCom · · Score: 1

      According to another post "He made between $2.25 and $4.50 per copy".

      Which basically means that the $135,110 would be ~2-4 TIMES that.

    33. Re:That wasn't smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking for a job at the RIAA, I see.

    34. Re:That wasn't smart. by danbuter · · Score: 1

      There have been numerous studies showing that people trust products that cost more more than they trust cheap or free products. It's some strange psychology, but it's true. Most marketing majors are very aware of this.

    35. Re:That wasn't smart. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I don't see how price has an impact on the definitiveness of a work. Much of the worlds best literature is available for free, does this mean we should all stop reading those works?

    36. Re:That wasn't smart. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Like I said, a sucker born every minute.

    37. Re:That wasn't smart. by Dasuraga · · Score: 0

      99 cents won't make someone have a decent salary. Tech books are rarely million sellers. And tech books are usually the kinds of books that have the most man-hours put into it

    38. Re:That wasn't smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > He reduced the price of almost everything to $0.99

      Couldn't he have picked $1 as the price point? Selling at $0.99 to me says "I have no pricing policy other than to follow what other people charge".

      What is this US obsession with .99 prices anyway?

    39. Re:That wasn't smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I'm going to want to spend a decent amount to make sure I'm getting a quality product.

      You and my fiancée would get along marvellously. She also is under the delusion that because something has a higher price tag it just has to be better. And yet her expensive clothes, furniture and even toilet brushes wear out just as quickly as the "cheap Chinese" products. In the end they all come out of the same factory, or one just down the road from it, just with a different label stuck on it to provide the "brand".

    40. Re:That wasn't smart. by pmontra · · Score: 1

      66% lower is very conservative indeed but maybe not in the way you think. I assume he wouldn't sell more copies if he had no free downloads. There are other authors that are selling and giving away the same book at the same time (e.g. Cory Doctorow, Peter Watts). They seem to believe that if they stop giving away ebooks the sales of the dead-tree copies would suffer, they wouldn't be as renowned and that would affect their income (e.g. Doctorow tours and gets paid to lecture). Those are proven and successful businesses so if I were starting a career as book author I'd follow their steps: almost no advertising costs, a lot of readers, a fair amount of money, sounds good.

      But I'm digressing. Let's back my position with some facts. This is an excerpt from http://www.locusmag.com/Features/2007/09/cory-doctorow-freekonomic-e-books.html (Sept 2007.)

      Speaking of Tim O'Reilly, he has just published a detailed, quantitative study of the effect of free downloads on a single title. O'Reilly Media published Asterisk: The Future of Telephony, in November 2005, simultaneously releasing the book as a free download. By March 2007, they had a pretty detailed picture of the sales-cycle of this book — and, thanks to industry standard metrics like those provided by Bookscan, they could compare it, apples-to-apples style, against the performance of competing books treating with the same subject. O'Reilly's conclusion: downloads didn't cause a decline in sales, and appears to have resulted in a lift in sales. This is particularly noteworthy because the book in question is a technical reference work, exclusively consumed by computer programmers who are by definition disposed to read off screens. Also, this is a reference work and therefore is more likely to be useful in electronic form, where it can be easily searched.

      That's why I believe that our author actually benefited from giving away all those copies for free.

      By the way, I clicked on the link to download the book and discovered it is about Ubuntu 8.10. It's terribly outdated so it's not something somebody would buy nowadays but be sure that I wouldn't have bought it even two years ago when I switched from Win XP to Ubuntu 8.10. I'd be counted as one of those 445 free downloads per actual sales but I would have just deleted the file after having browsed through the pages. Downloading costs nothing so people just download, look, delete.

    41. Re:That wasn't smart. by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      (imo .. who the heck writes fiction in present-tense?!?)

      One section of Jeff Vandermeer's "Veniss Underground" was written in second person present tense, but he's a genius.

  3. IT books are dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are always out of date before you can buy them, they are of variable quality compared to what you get from the olde dayes with fully documented reference and user guides that took up several meters of shelf space. And unlike yesteryear, developers learn as they go, often filling in the blanks when they get there. As such, there's invariably someone that has had the same problem, bad functionality, bug, wrong docs, that's asked in a forum, mailing list, usenet et al.

    1. Re:IT books are dead by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Yep. I do a lot of "coding through Google" because that's where the most current / most relevant information is.

    2. Re:IT books are dead by wardred · · Score: 2

      As a reference guide to newer and fast changing languages, maybe.

      For more in depth studies on theory, language fundamentals, algorithms, and more complex topics and / or well written primers? Not so much.

      I also find that it's still easier to browse a reference tome - much the way one browses a dictionary - than it is an electronic reference. It's not quicker to get to a specific topic, but it's easier to find new topics.

  4. I wonder by Haedrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I noticed a donate button on that website.

    I wonder how many people just donated, compared to the % of people who bought. I'll be taking a look at this book, it looks interesting and rather useful.

    1. Re:I wonder by wygit · · Score: 2

      I do that quite a bit... I'm quite happy to kick in for a book I liked, fiction or non-fiction.
      I don't WANT the dead-tree copy, and there are quite a few authors who are doing 'donate' or 'pay what you want' for their work.

      What I won't do is pay a stupid (to me) price for a book I can read on one device, for as long as the publisher deigns to allow me to read it on that one device.

      I won't pay hardback prices for a limited license to read a book.

    2. Re:I wonder by Desler · · Score: 1

      What I won't do is pay a stupid (to me) price for a book I can read on one device, for as long as the publisher deigns to allow me to read it on that one device.

      And what e-book format can only be read on one device? Pretty much all e-book formats (PDF, e-pub, even Amazon's) can be read on e-readers, computers, phones, etc. All of them can also be decrypted if you want and you can then convert them however you want. The only way you would be restricted is by your own ignorance.

    3. Re:I wonder by HungryHobo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      " The only way you would be restricted is by your own ignorance."

      as long as you're outside america.
      Inside you'd also be restricted by the laws which make it illegal to circumvent copyright restrictions.

    4. Re:I wonder by alostpacket · · Score: 1

      I think copyright restrictions are only part of the problem. I feel like the ability for companies to designate the selling of products, (either tangible or digital) as license grants is just as serious an issue. How did we let it get so bad? I don't think the right to engage in contract would not be infringed by designating that goods sold to consumers for long term use must have the first sale doctrine applied and must be "sold" outright. And I dont think the "well just buy from someone who doesn't make the sale a license" really work either when effectively all media and products are being treated this way by all companies. The consumer here is at a clear disadvantage and this is something market forces seem unable to work out.

      Clearly it might be somewhat difficult to define such products, but shouldn't be impossible to discern a service from a product.

      It's one thing to say, "you may only sell the quantity which you purchased and may not resell or redisribute massive quantities of this."

      Quite another to say "you may only use this as we specify."

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    5. Re:I wonder by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Laws that are unjust, immoral and you can break with impunity in the comfort of your own home. There is nothing wrong with breaking DRM so long as you never distribute copies.

    6. Re:I wonder by matrim99 · · Score: 1

      The only way you would be restricted is by your own ignorance.

      Or if you don't want to commit a crime by decrypting the document that you purchased.
      Frequently Asked Questions (and Answers) about Anticircumvention (DMCA)

      --
      Right. No, your other right. No, the other other right.
    7. Re:I wonder by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Did someone already break iBooks ePub DRM?

    8. Re:I wonder by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The problem is that with digital goods there is no "sale" that doesn't include redistribution rights.

      If I sell you a license for a software product I can put all kinds of terms into it. However, if I sell you "software" itself there are many things that will prevent any additional terms on the sale. There certainly would be no restriction on your selling your "possession" and/or redistributing it. Similarly, most software is sold under terms that disallow certain types of usage, such as reverse engineering or use in life-critical situations. In a simple sale these conditions could generally not be imposed.

      Now it might be better for everyone if some type of sale could be constructed and agreed upon by all of the various legal entities that regulate commerce - but that isn't how things grew. Sometime around 1955 or so some folks noticed that selling commercial software to companies had to follow certain rules and doing other things would really mess things up. This led to an entire generation of business managers, accountants and lawyers that heard about this and pretty much followed what others had done. Hence what we have today.

      There has been very little change in the selling of digital goods since then. The basic forms were set down a long time ago, far earlier than the first PC or cell phone. And what we have today came in a pretty straight line.

      So, in all likelyhood unless a publisher wants to sell you redistribution rights all they can sell you is a license for a book. Regular paper books come with redistribution rights, after all - you are free to pass the book around to friends and sell it. The difference is that redistribution means something different with digital goods.

    9. Re:I wonder by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Doctorow gives his ebooks away for free, and won't accept donations. He'd rather you buy a dead tree copy and donate it to your local library.

      Personally, I like dead tree books. Get off my lawn?

    10. Re:I wonder by wygit · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Timothy Vernon. He was selling the retail packages of Autocad, second-hand, in violation of Autodesk's "license"

      "A software company has won the right to stop a man from re-selling second hand copies of software because the programs are licensed to users and not owned by them.

      A US appeal court ruled in favour of software company Autodesk follows a long running dispute with Timothy Vernon who sells products on Ebay. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said software producers who clearly impose restrictions on buyers and make it clear that buyers are only licensing material rather than owning it outright do have the right to restrict second hand sales of the material."

      http://goo.gl/1ODKZ [goo.gl]

  5. WTG Soulskill by LordStormes · · Score: 1

    Love the "department" - rockin' the old school Zelda ;)

  6. It's more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pro-piracy frame would see every publisher backed into a corner, gnawing its own limbs off. And I suppose they think the next step would be that they get to feed on the bloated carcass.

    The only problem is, once that meat is gone, that will be it. All that will remain is the slow trickle of feed from Mr. $4500 a year and his like, and many of the niche offerings will be created no longer.

    1. Re:It's more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once that meat is gone, we can finally start paying people to create stuff instead of paying a middleman to do it on our behalf for an inordinately huge fee.

      Publishing no longer needs publishers. Let the audience pay the author's advance.

    2. Re:It's more than that by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Mr. $4500 a year is the bread and butter of the publishing industry. That is far more than most authors see on their first book. If most of that is from the first year they would stop printing the book about now and the content would basically disappear.

      Instead, he is probably still selling the material and even if he weren't the PDF content will continue to be available as long as anyone wants it.

    3. Re:It's more than that by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Not a problem for an accomplished writer. Look at things like kickstarter for a good example of something similar already in action. No new author gets much of an advance anyway.

    4. Re:It's more than that by oatworm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The trouble, as this guy learned, is that middlemen do add value. Why is his eBook only sold at Amazon US? Because he didn't have a middleman that he could go through to negotiate contracts with Barnes & Noble, Powell's, Borders/Waldenbooks, or overseas bookstores. To his credit, he did a decent job of doing his own marketing, hitting his target audience quite nicely, but, since it didn't have a cute animal on the front and a brand that sounds like "Oh really?", a lot of people might have taken a pass on his book because they didn't think it came from a trusted source of quality technical publications. This sort of dynamic holds true in the music and film industry, too.

      Making stuff is easy. Getting stuff into people's hands is hard.

      Now, are some middlemen overpaid? Could they use some real competition, instead of the cozy oligopoly they've been able to maintain thus far? Almost certainly. I'd love to see media distribution become commoditized because, when things become commodities, they become cheap and fungible, which is good for consumers of that product. Since artists are the consumers of media distribution networks (we're the product), I definitely can understand why this is an exciting moment for them.

    5. Re:It's more than that by somersault · · Score: 1

      I think this guy made a mistake in releasing for free. Even releasing at 99c or so would have been a good idea. Just look at the app store. 99c is a price that people are willing to gamble on, especially for a whole damn book..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:It's more than that by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      One problem remains - finding the stuff that's worth reading in the ocean of crap.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:It's more than that by deadline · · Score: 2

      That is the point of the free version. How else do you get people to read and talk about your book in the sea of crap. If it is worth reading it will get noticed because there is no cost barrier. Those, like me that want bound versions of good books will pay for the paper.

      --
      HPC for Primates. Read Cluster Monkey
    8. Re:It's more than that by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, the mistake was releasing the whole thing for free. If an artist wants to market a new CD, he or she gives away one or two tracks for free, not the entire CD.

      Similarly, if an author wants to market a book, he or she should give away the first couple of chapters, ending with a teaser that says, "You'll be able to buy the entire book at Amazon.com on [insert date here]."

      After the release, the author should then sell both paper and electronic copies for normal book prices.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:It's more than that by camperdave · · Score: 2

      No, that doesn't solve the problem. You now have an ocean of free crap from which you need to find the stuff that's worth reading. Furthermore, if this trend takes hold, every Tom, Dick, and Harriet is going to think they can write, which would make the ocean of free crap out there now look like a puddle in the wide, wide world of craptasticness.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:It's more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh ... no, if it wasn't offered for free, it would flop, just like many cheap books do!

      Is sharing really all that complicate? I guess it is, for the greedy and selfish.

    11. Re:It's more than that by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Is sharing really all that complicate? I guess it is, for the greedy and selfish.

      Does sharing pay the bills to keep the roof over your head, the food in your belly or the comms and power on so you can use the internet to whine and bitch on Slashdot? No, I didn't think so. You've got to earn money to pay for all that stuff.

  7. Say what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ' Since going on sale at the start of 2009, the book has made me $9,000. ... I’ve had worse salaries in my life,"

    That amounts to, what, $2.25 an hour? Sorry, even when I was in high school back in the 80s, minimum wage in MA was $3.55 and hour.

    1. Re:Say what?! by b0bby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It took him 3 months to write, so he considers that he has so far made $3k/month. Better than minimum wage.

    2. Re:Say what?! by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      depends how long writing the book took him.

    3. Re:Say what?! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      In WA state, minimum wage is something like $10.80 an hour. 40 hours a week ... $560 a week .... $2240 a month say ... Not that much more than what someone at Burger King makes.

      Assuming it was only 40 hours.

      Lawyers make a lot of money, but they work very long hours, and thus make less per hour than a decent IT worker who bills at 70 to 100 an hour.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Say what?! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      If he has the knowledge to write a technical book at an expert level, and considers $800/week good pay, then he's never been paid anything near the value of expert technical work.

      Which in this shitty economy where the corporate executives hold all the cards and have their foot on the necks of the workers, is not improbable.

    5. Re:Say what?! by b0bby · · Score: 1

      He doesn't consider it good pay, he says he's had worse salaries. He concludes that self publishing isn't really worth it.

    6. Re:Say what?! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      $41,600 is not a great wage, but I know people who could write books on what they do in IT and make that or less.

      You last statement could not be more true.

    7. Re:Say what?! by Sectoid_Dev · · Score: 1

      The time it took him to write the book is a sunk cost and can only be compared against what other opportunity costs he might had incurred if had he chosen to spend his time doing something else. I didn't RTFA, but if this wasn't his primary income, then this is a good way to set up a passive income stream, aside from whatever marketing he needs to do. If he is good enough to write a passable book, then he should be working in the industry to pay his bills. There is something to be said for knowing you will bring home $X,XXX every week.
          It certainly is a better use of time than sitting around pounding your pud to Christie Allie on DTWS and not getting paid. It also opens the door to other opportunities or a better selling next book.

  8. Your next book? by Bilbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's another angle that's hard to quantify: What happens if you decide to publish another book? The fact that you've distributed all those free copies along side of the pay-for editions means you've got a *LOT* of people who know your name. This fact alone should give your next book a big head-start if you ever decide to publish again, either through a "vanity press" or through a more conventional channel.

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
    1. Re:Your next book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you've distributed all those free copies along side of the pay-for editions means you've got a *LOT* of people who know your name.

      Not to mention the fact that you're now on the front page of Slashdot.

    2. Re:Your next book? by artor3 · · Score: 1

      The fact that you've distributed all those free copies along side of the pay-for editions means you've got a *LOT* of people who know your name.

      Does it? I've read plenty of free Kindle books and blogs and online news articles over the past few years. I'd be hard pressed to remember the names of any authors except those that I read frequently. If one comes out with another book, odds are I won't even notice. Maybe if I happen to see something on Amazon's storefront saying "from the author of XXX", but even then it's likely to be only a glimmer of recognition. The reason is simple - from a marketing viewpoint, you might think of customers purely as customers. In reality, they're complex individuals with lots of stuff going on in their lives, of which your book plays only a minuscule role.

      Of the people who downloaded this guy's book, how many actually read it through? Of those, how many enjoyed it enough that they would seek out another title? Of those, how many will still remember by the time the next title comes out? Of those, how many will notice when the next title comes out? He's not going to have a "big head start" for his next book. He might have a few hundred dedicated fans, but that's about it.

    3. Re:Your next book? by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Baen's has free online reading copies of some of the stuff they publish.

      Here's their view of the Baen's Free Library. I quote:

      Jim Baen and I set up the Free Library about a year and half ago. Leaving aside the various political and philosophical issues, which I've addressed elsewhere, the premise behind the Library had a practical component as well. In brief, that in relative terms an author will gain, not lose, by having titles in the Library. What I mean by "relative" is simply this: overall, an author is far more likely to increase sales than to lose them. Or, to put it more accurately, exposure in the Library will generate more sales than it will lose.

      As a practical proposition, the theory behind the Free Library is that, certainly in the long run, it benefits an author to have a certain number of free or cheap titles of theirs readily available to the public. By far the main enemy any author faces, except a handful of ones who are famous to the public at large, is simply obscurity. Even well-known SF authors are only read by a small percentage of the potential SF audience. Most readers, even ones who have heard of the author, simply pass them up.

      Why? In most cases, simply because they don't really know anything about the writer and aren't willing to spend $7 to $28 just to experiment. So, they keep buying those authors they are familiar with.

      ...

      Making one or a few titles of an author's writings available for free electronically in the Free Library seems to have no other impact, certainly over time, than to increase that author's general audience recognition-and thereby, indirectly if not directly, the sales of his or her books.

      It's worth reading the full article, btw.

  9. Re:Who Says authors are supposed to be rich? by Desler · · Score: 1

    Also there's the opposite example of the man who earned ~$10 million by selling his books for just one dollar each.

    And that guy would be? It's amazing that this opposite example comes with absolutely no citation!

  10. I'm a bit puzzled... by b0bby · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit puzzled - in TFA he says that publishers weren't interested:
    "Nobody was interested. The profit margin is too low on cheap books, they said."
    He then concludes:
    "I’ve had worse salaries in my life, and I’m very grateful, but I know total royalties would probably have been higher had I gone through the traditional route of working with a mainstream publisher."
    The publishers weren't interested, so it seems that he'd have saved the 3 months and not written the book. Once you start thinking that a book, had it been the sort of high profit book the publishers are looking for, would have made more money than the actual, low profit book you self published, you're off on a tangent. IMHO, of course.

    1. Re:I'm a bit puzzled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a bit puzzled - in TFA he says that publishers weren't interested: "Nobody was interested. The profit margin is too low on cheap books, they said."

      Well, it is two versions behind the current release of a free linux distro. Maybe he'd have had more luck writing about a current paid-for distro like RHEL?

  11. again: download != actually reading a book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Niche book.

    2) Gave away copies, instead of charging a buck or two.

    3) Seems to equate the amount of people who'd download it for nothing (many of whom will probably never even read it) to people who spent money on it in print. Repeat after me: DOWNLOADING A FILE FOR FREE COSTS NOTHING, SO EVERYONE DOES IT EVEN IF THEY ARE ONLY SORT OF INTERESTED. IT HAS NO BEARING ON THE ACTUAL 'POPULARITY' OF YOUR BOOK.

  12. Re:Who Says authors are supposed to be rich? by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1

    Obviously you've never written a book.

  13. Re:Who Says authors are supposed to be rich? by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

    ya, I heard the story about the guy who was making money at a rate that projected to about half a million a year if he kept selling books but 10 million? nonsense.

  14. Fewer books, more cards by Animats · · Score: 1

    Something I'd like to see more of are those stiff plastic cards that provide a quick reference for something. You see those for "Algebra I" in most bookstores. Ones for programming languages and programs would be useful.

    Writing one of those cards is a useful exercise for designers. If you can't cram the essential instructions onto one card, the interface probably needs a redesign or something needs to be automated.

    1. Re:Fewer books, more cards by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      Actually, there are plastic cards for Java, C, C++, C#, and many other languages. Check out most university or college bookstores.

      My fave is the one for Perl.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Fewer books, more cards by blair1q · · Score: 1

      My fave is the one for Perl.

      http://www.cpan.org/

    3. Re:Fewer books, more cards by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      I used to have a reference shirt like that. I think it was for something shitty, though, like ColdFusion.

    4. Re:Fewer books, more cards by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of them out there.

      You can also write your own. :)

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  15. Why do you hate Trees so? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    No, seriously, why?

    If you were a decent writer, you'd write an iPad eBook or a crippled version for the Droid.

    Let me guess, you included lots of glossy pictures too, right?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Why do you hate Trees so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Make that "Why do you hate Trees in America?" Then we can skewer this guy from both the right and the left.

    2. Re:Why do you hate Trees so? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Make that "Why do you hate Trees in America?" Then we can skewer this guy from both the right and the left.

      Yes, but then he'll just use paper made from Japanese destroyed paper hanging lanterns and call himself Green. And then glow in the dark too!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:Why do you hate Trees so? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      There's nothing made of wood in your house? You use no paper towels or toilet paper or napkins?

      Why do you hate real books? I can see where a lack of storage space may be a problem for some, but hate?

      I have books that are more than likely older than you. My copy of the Foundation trilogy is forty years old, my copy of LOTR is even older (yes, I'm a geezer). I have no digital media that's lasted nearly that long and still been readable.

      My preference would be an e-book AND a dead tree version, preferably at the same purchase price (or, with Cory Doctorow, a free ebook and a paid for real book).

    4. Re:Why do you hate Trees so? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Actually, I grew up on 40+ acre tree farms until I was fairly old. My carbon debt (where I walk or bus 1-2 miles to work) is infinitismal next to yours.

      And I tend to reuse paper. I have a first edition of ERB Tarzan and the Ant Men that makes your Foundation Trilogy look like a coloring book.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:Why do you hate Trees so? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      If you were a decent writer, you'd write an iPad eBook or a crippled version for the Droid.

      Sigh. They didn't even have iPads two years ago and Android only had its first public release near the end of 2008.

    6. Re:Why do you hate Trees so? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      My carbon debt (where I walk or bus 1-2 miles to work) is infinitismal next to yours.

      Probably, even though my carbon debt is mostly the co2 bubbles in all that beer I drink, followed by the methane from my farting. I do very little driving.

  16. My own experience, on the other side by jfengel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I published a computing book through a conventional publisher (Addison Wesley), and the amounts of money we made were roughly comparable. It's considerably sub minimum wage, given the years I put into writing it (including months full-time, away from a paying job writing software at a wage substantially higher than minimum.)

    Which was, in fact, the point. It wasn't going to make me rich; it was going to make me famous. (You've heard of me and my book Programming for the Java Virtual Machine, right? Right?) I wanted to write a book, so I did. The publisher put it in a lot of bookstores and even translated it into Korean. (I've always wanted to lay my hands on a copy of the Korean translation.) It helped that this was a major Java publisher; my book is shelved next to big-name authors, some of whom were involved in reviewing it. That's a kind of expertise I couldn't have purchased.

    At the time, it wasn't really practical to self-publish on the web; the print-on-demand services didn't exist and a real printing run had a high overhead. There's literally something buried in my contract about buying the printing plates once it went out of print, but it's still in print, and they send me a small but welcome check twice year.

    My book had a limited target market, and even if I kept 100% of the gross it would still have been less money than I would have made at the job. But it's proving useful as an introduction: I'm now working on a different book in a completely unrelated field and can tell potential interview subjects that I wrote a book when I cold-call them.

    They do care: if they're going to take the time to talk with me, they want to know that the book is likely to be published. They'd be even happier if I had a contract, but it's getting me into doors I need so that I can write the submission. Some of them might have turned me down if I told them I was going to self-publish.

    That may change. The fame-producing aspects of a major publisher are less and less relevant. The money won't get any better, and may get worse, but if you're in it for the money you really should go back to writing code anyway.

    1. Re:My own experience, on the other side by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You've heard of me and my book Programming for the Java Virtual Machine, right?

      I have now, and it's actually something I would buy - but do you have an eBook version? I see that it is on O'Reilly Safari BOL, which is good, but how about a PDF or ePub?

      On a side note, it's kinda sad that googling for the title of the book gives a bunch of "download free PDF!" links and such on the very first results page.

    2. Re:My own experience, on the other side by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      What all this is really saying is that our systems aren't working. If it's any good at all, less than $10K for a book is horrible. I think everyone agrees valuable works are, or ought to be, worth more than that. But you can't get more, whether you self publish and ask for donations, experiment with print on demand, or try to interest a traditional publisher. The fact that authors do them for the reputation and similar not so tangible benefits is telling. Also telling is that hundreds of thousands of people were at least interested enough to download a copy. Our systems are not compensating the authors with what these works are really worth.

      There are very, very few technical books I have found worth owning. And quite a few that ended up wasting space on my shelf. Any more, on the rare occasions I set foot in a physical bookstore, I don't even look at that section. Don't spend much time looking online either. Too much crap to wade through. You know a book is terrible when you flip to a random page, and see blatant errors that could have been uncovered with about 10 seconds of testing. I'd love to have good reference manuals, but they simply don't exist. Maybe if authors could earn a bit more from their efforts, we'd have them. And we wouldn't have hastily thrown together untested garbage filling the pages. When the source code is the best reference, that's bad. Doxygen, bleh. We don't yet have programming languages that are so awesome that nothing more needs to be said.

      ps. Sorry, haven't heard of you or your book.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    3. Re:My own experience, on the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not only have I heard of your book, I'ved owned (from new) it since 2003/2004 when I was an impoverished undergraduate, best investment evar! In fact I have it in my bedside locker right now and I referenced it substantially in my honours degree dissertation (6 - 7 years ago now), and made use of your JVM assembler to test all sorts of things. I feel honoured to be able to be able to thank you personally, I went on to be awarded a first class honours degree, thanks in no small part to the knowledge imparted in that kickass book you wrote. Of course since then I've basically wasted my life in corporate mofo IT that doesn't give a flying f*** but oh well :-)

  17. and another factor .... by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    If it took him 3 months to write, you have to weigh that against the time to write a longer book. 9 months? 12 months?

    I don't know what book royalties work out to be, but if it's 1/4 the time to write for 1/2 or 1/3 the paycheck, it's not bad ... he just needs to find another cheap book to write to fill the rest of the time.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  18. Re:Who Says authors are supposed to be rich? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    >>>Obviously you've never written a book.

    I have not.

    But Isaac Asimov did: 500+. Even if he only made $9000 per book, that's about 7 per year, or $63,000. He'd be doing "better than a guy at McDonalds or Walmart". Approximately $30 an hour.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  19. Childrens book, but maybe not a tech book by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

    This idea is great for something like a childrens book. Nobody wants to read to their kids from a laptop or e-book reader. You kill the experience and look like a douche. So you release the book as an E-book so the parent can read the story before buying a nicely bound book you can read with your child.

    On the other hand, IT books are probably the WORST to do this with. Your target crowd knows better than most how to pirate your book and are perfectly happy referring to the PDF, which is searchable, over a dead-tree which you have to put sticky notes in to have any sort of indexing past the TOC.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Childrens book, but maybe not a tech book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This idea is great for something like a childrens book. Nobody wants to read to their kids from a laptop or e-book reader. You kill the experience and look like a douche. So you release the book as an E-book so the parent can read the story before buying a nicely bound book you can read with your child.

      On the other hand, IT books are probably the WORST to do this with. Your target crowd knows better than most how to pirate your book and are perfectly happy referring to the PDF, which is searchable, over a dead-tree which you have to put sticky notes in to have any sort of indexing past the TOC.

      That's two things I like about my Nook Color. "Read Along" and bookmarks.

    2. Re:Childrens book, but maybe not a tech book by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Did you just say I look like a douche?

      My kids loved it when I would break out the laptop and read books online there are many children books online, my local library gives me access to tumble books.

  20. I have done this as well by cjonslashdot · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have also self-published a book: my most recent book, Value-Driven IT (http://ValueDrivenIT.com). Prior to that I had published three books through traditional publishers (Prentice Hall, Addison-Wesley). I will note that the term "self-publish" is a little ambiguous, since anyone who gets an ISBN number and publishes a book with that number is a publisher, by definition.

    I also "gave away" the content, by putting it on a wiki, and also making hard- and soft-cover versions available from Amazon.

    Unlike many who self-publish, I went through all of the steps that I would have had to go through had I published the traditional way. These included extensive review by subject matter experts, extensive editorial feedback and revision, professional layout (including an index, legal permission for graphics used, etc.), forewords by industry luminaries, and pre-publication commentary (known as "advance praise") by industry experts.

    Some of the things I learned from the self-publishing experience are:

    1. Amazon puts one's book near the bottom of the list when you search for it: they put their "partner's" books at the top (the publishers who pay them, it seems). Thus, if one searches for my book on Amazon, by the book's exact title, one finds all kinds of irrelevant things first, and then my book shows up on about page five of the search results - if lucky.
    2. The above is true for many things. The marketing of books and other content are essentially a pay-to-play environment. Getting noticed because something is good is difficult unless someone who is very well known latches onto it and talks about it.
    3. Publishers don't add a-lot of value over self-publishing, unless they think that your book is going to be a hit. (My first book was a big hit.)

    Also, books that are "cross-over" books - i.e., interdisciplinary - are very hard to market, whether one uses an established publisher or self-publishes. This is because people generally read IT books when they want to learn about something that they heard about, and if something doesn't fit into an established niche, then one will not have heard about it. My most recent two books (High-Assurance Design and Value-Driven IT) are both cross-over books and therefore are hard to market.

    There is also a misconception that people who write technical books do it for money, and that their motivation is book sales. My first book was a big hit (sold about 30,000 copies: that is a-lot for a technical book). However, if I calculate the money I made on an hourly basis given the amount of time it took to write the book, I earned at the rate of about $30/hour. Not very good, especially considering that I earn about five times that in the other work that I do. The reasons for writing a book (for me) have always been that (1) a book establishes one as a recognized thought leader in the industry, it (2) helps one to organize one's thoughts about something, and (3) it serves as a "calling card" when one does consulting (which I do). Royalties are not a very good reason for writing a technical book.

    1. Re:I have done this as well by mwolfam · · Score: 1

      Very interesting post, thanks

    2. Re:I have done this as well by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Please tell me, how do you get a book published by a name like Addison Wesley? Of course, the one I've written isn't a tech book, but its contents have been well received by slashdotters, who nag me to publish.

    3. Re:I have done this as well by cjonslashdot · · Score: 2

      The answer is kind of simple: you have to convince them that the sales will be large.

      Of course, this is not necessarily easy.

      One mistake lots of people make is that they put a-lot of effort into creating a book proposal or other collateral. That is not necessary, and I think it is actually counter-productive: it makes it look like you are trying to convince them.

      For my first book (the one that sold really well), my "proposal" was a one-line email to a senior acquisition editor at Prentice Hall. She replied saying she was interested, and then we had an international phone call (I was in Singapore at the time) and made a deal after five minutes of discussion. That's all it took because I had some credibility: I was the author of a popular column on Java (in Dr. Dobbs Journal) and was CTO of Digital Focus, a Java company that had established some footprint in that market. The proposed book was about Java, and would be the first book on "enterprise Java". They knew that the market for Java books was strong and growing, so it was a no brainer for them.

      Things have changed considerably today because tech books in general don't sell very well: IT people are now accustomed to getting all of their information for free on the Internet. So publishers are now very skeptical about tech book proposals. It costs them at least $100K to prepare a book for publication and so they don't want to make that investment unless they are sure that the book will sell well. As a result one sees lots of books on pop topics that are expected to sell well. One sees few books on thoughtful topics because the market for that is smaller: only a small part of the market wants to think or read unconventional things. A tech book that would have sole 10,000 copies 20 years ago will only sell 1000 today because people look online first to see what they can get for free. Publishing has become like fast food and the lowest common denominator material sells a larger volume.

      If your book is already written and you have been selling it, then you have data on the sales volume. That's all they care about: sales. However, if you are already selling it you have to ask yourself why you want an independent publisher to publish it: they will merely take a large percent of the revenue and give little in return - unless they think that the volume will be very large in which case they might invest a little in marketing. Generally speaking, for most books, "marketing" consists of putting in in their catalog for book stores, and that's it. A very few percent of books get real marketing: those that are the superstars, just like the few Olympic athletes who win gold medals get lots of endorsement deals but all the rest get few if any.

      One publisher that is somewhat more adventurous than others for tech books is Elsevier. They have an interest in web-based publishing as well as print.

    4. Re:I have done this as well by UBfusion · · Score: 1

      (1) a book establishes one as a recognized thought leader in the industry, it (2) helps one to organize one's thoughts about something, and (3) it serves as a "calling card" when one does consulting

      I'd agree with reasons 2 and 3, but IMHO (1) requires your book has been published by a major house like Springer, Elsevier, CRC etc. Everybody can publish himself and unfortunately the general audience won't be easily convinced such a book is "trustworthy" (mainly in the sense of "correctness"). For example, if someone buys your book and finds one mistake, he'll probably think to himself "what'd you expect from a freelance publisher?" It's the same line of thought used to discredit Wikipedia.

    5. Re:I have done this as well by cjonslashdot · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is true.

      I fretted over the credibility issue a-lot before trying the self-publishing experiment. Since I had already published three books through major publishers I felt that I had the credibility to pull it off. I find that I am constantly mentioning that "I have published books through major publishers" whenever I mention my self-published book.

    6. Re:I have done this as well by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. It isn't a tech book, it's a collection "The Paxil Diaries"; folks have been nagging me to publish them for years. I think you've convinced me to self-publish.

  21. Downloading = reviewing book in book store by data64 · · Score: 2

    I have downloaded a lot of pdf and other files, only to delete them after 5 minutes because it was not what I was looking for or I did not like the style. Think of a download like someone picking up a book in a book store and looking through it. Sometimes it results in a sale, but usually not (at least in my case). One thing missing from comments is how good is the book that the author gave away for free. Can someone who has read it comment on this ? Just because a book has been written does not mean it automatically has to make money.

  22. Self Publication done here as well by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    My company, a large IT_Company has their own publisher for employees to author books. However, this process would well over a year and would require me to submit my draft in msword, instead of Framemaker which is what I was writing it in. The publisher would then convert it from word into framemaker for use with their templates... I dealt with 4 different editors and decided to go the self-publishing route.

    I used lulu.com, a 'on-demand' printing/publishing company. They charge a bit for each physical copy to cover printing/shipping/handling etc.. I was able to easily get an ISBN number, and then set a price for the book, which my profits get automatically deposited into a paypal account every month.

    The book is listed on Amazon/BarnesnNoble/Borders/GoogleBooks etc...

    The whole lulu.com effort took about 3 weeks, which most involved waiting for my proof copies to arrive (i didn't want to pay for expedited printing/shipping).

    My next book isn't going through my companies publishing company either. I really have no interest in justifying when I think my 1500th copy will be sold.

    Especially since I give away the .pdf for free and only charge for hard copies.

  23. Technical books rarely earn large royalties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd be lucky to make that $9k in the traditional publishing world. Your book would have to do very well. Most technical books are only printed in runs of 1 or 2 thousand at a time because overall demand is not that high and the relevancy of the book declines over time meaning shelf supply becomes dead weight, unlike other (non-technical) works which can maintain relevancy for decades.

  24. Giving it away by mwolfam · · Score: 1

    For an unknown author like me, I can attest that a combination of free and sales is a great strategy. Making 9k isn't bad for a book. I've been doing something similar with my novel, Betrayal. I am releasing the whole book, a chapter at a time, with a link to Smashwords.com, where I have it for sale ($.99). Before I started giving the book away, I had less than 10 sales. On Smashwords, the first 20% was available for free, but I still didn't see the sales. However, once I started posting more free chapters, I've had 50 sales a week! Not sure how sales will hold up once I finish releasing the whole thing, but I am hoping for a result similar to this guys experience. With a .99 sale price, I have been getting enough reviews and sales to make it onto the sales charts at Smashwords. The main point is that without giving it away for free, no one would have ever heard of me. I would have made fewer sales by only giving away a small portion, than I am by giving away the whole book. https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/37846

  25. Flaws of Traditional Publishing by chromatic · · Score: 1

    I do something similar with the book Modern Perl. Electronic versions are free and freely redistributable. Download numbers are at least 10 or 20 times the number of sales of the printed version, but I've made more in royalties than I'd ever see from a so-called "traditional" publisher, as I earn at least eight times as much per copy sold than I would.

    If you can find a reputable publisher who won't give you the awful 10-15% of wholesale, or if you can find a credible editor and copyeditor to look over your work, self-publishing or small-press publishing is a much, much better way to make money writing books, even if you give away electronic versions.

    1. Re:Flaws of Traditional Publishing by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Interesting book. I'm reading through the electronic version at the moment and am leaning towards buying it - as with many people here I like the Dead Tree editions to line my shelves, but use the electronic versions as searchable references.

      Just noticed a book bug on pp.43 - the last comma creates an undef problem:

      my %addresses =
      (
      Leonardo => '1123 Fib Place',
      Utako => 'Cantor Hotel, Room 1',
      );

    2. Re:Flaws of Traditional Publishing by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Never mind... it's crap in the clipboard from copy-pasting out of the pdf (damn you, evince!)

    3. Re:Flaws of Traditional Publishing by chromatic · · Score: 1

      Perl allows trailing commas at the ends of lists to make maintenance easier. I often wish for such a feature in other languages.

    4. Re:Flaws of Traditional Publishing by scdeimos · · Score: 1
      Yup, knew that one. One of the problems with copying-and-pasting out of PDFs is that the text stream doesn't always match the visual layout. I don't know whether this is a problem with the PDF writers or with the reader applications themselves, but it's not totally uncommon and I get it in Windows using Acrobat Reader as well. For example, if you use Evince to copy-and-paste the Rock Paper Scissors example on pp.34, this is what you get:

      my @options = ( \&rock, \&paper, \&scissors );
      do
      {
      say "Rock, Paper, Scissors! Pick one: ";
      chomp( my $user = <STDIN> );
      my $computer_match = $options[ rand @options ];
      $computer_match->( lc( $user ) );
      } until (eof);
      sub rock
      {
      print "I chose rock.
      given (shift)
      {
      when (/paper/)
      when (/rock/)
      when (/scissors/)
      default
      }
      ";
      {
      {
      {
      {
      say
      say
      say
      say
      'You win!' };
      'We tie!' };
      'I win!'
      };
      "I don't understand your move" };
      }
      ...

      I've had to truncate the example here due to these awful line length and poster compression filters imposed upon us by our Mighty Slashdot Overlords, but hopefully you get the idea.

  26. Re:Who Says authors are supposed to be rich? by artor3 · · Score: 1

    So in order to make ends meet, authors should be required to match the pace of one of the most prolific authors in history? Some one like Asimov deserves to be a millionaire, not merely "better than a guy at McDonalds".

  27. Does not follow. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Well, here again we see that those guys cannot see things clearly from both sides. They just want free stuff.

    Suppose the pro-piracy guys are wrong, and cannot see things clearly from both sides. It does not follow that they just want free stuff.

    Not every case of someone being wrong is because of an ulterior motive.

    I don't even concede that much, by the way. I demand that publishers use alternative ways to get money simply because piracy is not going away, and the cost of fighting piracy is too high for society in general. DRM is a burden on everyone. But I also don't think giving it away is the only other option here.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  28. Self Publication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had published two books and sold them as consignment to computer retail stores with huge success. I also used them in my teaching classes and thus kept all the profit to my self. I wrote these books because no book I had used showed me to crawl, walk and then run. That is, the author assume lots of thinks that is not stated explicitly. Thus, almost all books(text books too) tell us how the writer did something say, in a programming languages, rather than go into all missing details necessary for an average person to go through all the intermediate steps to complete a learning assignment.So, if you need an instructor to explain the material in a text book, you don't need that book or if the book is very clearly written you don't need a teacher. I have completed a few more books and will be publishing them through my company . Web publishing with a reasonable purchase price will be the way to go.

  29. Maybe the book just wasn't worth buying??? by Excelcia · · Score: 1

    There's never been any question I've had about Ubuntu that couldn't be answered with about thirty seconds worth of grepping around the internet. That is, unless it was so esoteric that no pocket guide would have the answer anyway. The reality is, pocket guides like this just aren't relevant in today's environment. Certainly not in a paper-print format. Searchable PDF is far more useful to begin with. I would definitely question the assertion he would have made more money with a traditional publisher. More likely you'd have seen the books lining the ninety-nine cent bargain bins in liquidation marts - that is if they weren't being trucked to recyclers sans covers.

    There are more forums, wikis, blogs, and articles on Ubuntu than I could possibly read in a century. A pocket book on Ubuntu failing to make the author rich is newsworthy like a chocolate factory startup failing in Hershey Pennsylvania. My advice to the author is take the nine grand and run. I think he made out like a bandit on this.

  30. A modified strategy by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

    Perhaps a more lucrative way to sell more copies of the printed version would be to make freely available a limited version as an eBook, one that has the table of contents and enough useful chapters to be interesting and to motivate readers to want more after they find the first material useful. It's like what used to be a social norm: a girl who gives it all up right away doesn't always generate the motivation for a guy to marry her, so while some back-seat grappling was okay, some withholding was in order until the ring was on the hand. And there you have the engine that fueled the 1950s drive-in movie industry.

  31. Bingo : Author as a Brand by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Literature, even non-fiction, is highly subjective in nature. Whereas one person may like a bit of sarcastic wit, another might find it boring.

    Given this, establishing a brand is highly important. Giving out copies of a book just establishes your brand... the next book will leverage on the brand, while you still may get royalties for the first book.

    The basic method, as with any entrepreneurial endeavor, is to invest lots of time into building the company/brand, release something, then keep doing it over and over with successive releases, allowing experience to guide you to better works/products.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  32. Free hosting by luk3Z · · Score: 0

    "I could use Amazon S3 for hosting the file, so it would cost me just a few dollars per month." You can use free rapidshare or hotfile instead. Anyway on hotfile you can meet copyright problems even if you are an author ;)

    --
    Recipes for USA bankrupt - http://tinypaste.com/0d66f dd = dollar deluge (printed in the infinity)
  33. Some publishing numbers by benwiggy · · Score: 1
    Here's some numbers about publishing that might help in any Slashdot discussion about dead tree vs. PDF and evil academic presses:

    50% of the retail price goes to the book seller. The seller can of course discount the price to stimulate interest, out of this.
    The other half goes to the publisher, who must pay:
    Print and Production costs (on a 500-page, casebound, colour-illustrated book on a short print run, this can be high)
    Distribution (shipping, warehousing, delivery).
    Overheads of running the business: staff, rent, heating, lighting, advertising, etc
    8%-12% goes to the author.

    So a book that has projected sales of under 5,000 copies is not a safe bet for a publisher.

    If you self-publish, you get a larger share of the retail price -- but then you also have to pay for the costs yourself. It's also worth pointing that even the most erudite author benefits from a good editor.

  34. Nice page size for a phone screen by Fencepost · · Score: 1

    I like that the PDF is laid out in such a way that it's still readable in full page view on my phone - that right there makes it much more likely that I'll use and refer to it.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  35. http://www.buylouisvuittonoutlet.org by hieuwhf · · Score: 0

    Louis Vuitton outlet store markets its products as a top luxury brand and provides luxury trunks, leather goods, shoes, watches, jewellery, accessories, sunglasses, and books. Louis Vuitton outlet pays more attention to quality of its products and you can enjoy a high-class service.We expect you visit our website to buy Louis Vuitton.

  36. easily sell book on facebook by grantkelly111 · · Score: 1

    I know someone who has sold 1200 copies of his software book in 1 week using facebook.

    --
    http://www.mudroombenches.info