Slashdot Mirror


The Nintendo 3DS, Headaches, and Bad Journalism

brumgrunt writes "A British paper is claiming that the Nintendo 3DS poses some kind of health risk. The claim sounds interesting, until you see how that conclusion was reached. 'On the 6th of April, the paper conducted a scientific experiment in which a 22-year-old member of the staff had his blood pressure and pulse taken after playing the 3DS in different situations – at rest, while walking, or while taking a ride in a car. The Sun came to the startling conclusion that the man’s pulse and blood pressure were higher while walking than while sitting down, yet concluded, apropos of nothing, “Children should not be left to play on it for hours.” The article neglects to point out that a raised blood pressure and pulse is perfectly normal, and you’re as likely to experience such a physical response while walking and reading a book as you are when playing the 3DS.'" Pocket Gamer posted a humorous follow-up, using the Sun's own methods against it.

132 comments

  1. Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please stop calling The Sun a newspaper or it's contents journalism.
    It's stories (when not just crap about celebs) are written so that the brit sheeples can feel 'informed'.
    They believe anything written in there because its the best selling rag and it leaves them a few more brain cells free to update twittle or facebook pages.

    1. Re:Omg..... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please stop calling The Sun a newspaper or it's contents journalism.
      It's stories (when not just crap about celebs) are written so that the brit sheeples can feel 'informed'.
      They believe anything written in there because its the best selling rag and it leaves them a few more brain cells free to update twittle or facebook pages.

      To be fare, the summary called it "A British paper" and also referred to it as "the paper". I didn't notice any mention of "newspaper".

      Now this line is a little more troubling to me, "On the 6th of April, the paper conducted a scientific experiment"

    2. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When shit like this actually makes it to the front page, I feel like there should be a voting option where it can be taken down if 98% of readers feel like it is complete crap.

    3. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fare

      Hey that's weird, I was just playing Crazy Taxi last night.

    4. Re:Omg..... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      To be fare

      Hey that's weird, I was just playing Crazy Taxi last night.

      Oops. I guess that qualifies me to be a journalist at the Sun. ;-)

    5. Re:Omg..... by click2005 · · Score: 2

      Not really, you're able to think for yourself and use long words.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    6. Re:Omg..... by DrXym · · Score: 2, Funny

      People who say "sheep" / "sheeple" instantly lose whatever point they were trying to make. Think of it like a wooly Godwin's law.

    7. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying sheeples instantly gives you the intelligence of a grape.

      Also, at least it isn't Fox.

    8. Re:Omg..... by hedwards · · Score: 2

      Not really, however, people who make ad hominem attacks like you do in fact lose instantly.

      Additionally, "sheeple" is a perfectly cromulent malamanteau.

    9. Re:Omg..... by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding?! Fox ranks far higher than the Sun -- at least its 'journalists' have IQs higher than their shoe sizes. Sun journalists are about as smart as toadstools (or even toad stools!).

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    10. Re:Omg..... by jitterman · · Score: 1

      What was that? I stopped reading when I hit the fourth word. :)

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
    11. Re:Omg..... by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Not really, however, people who make ad hominem attacks like you do in fact lose instantly.

      I like how you invoked your own law to instantly dismantle your own point.

      His point, although not a truth, was a valid observation that referring to other people as sheep or sheeple will cause many people to downgrade their opinion of you, thus diminishing ability to make your case.

    12. Re:Omg..... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 0

      People who say "sheep" / "sheeple" instantly lose whatever point they were trying to make. Think of it like a wooly Godwin's law.

      Wool comes from sheep ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    13. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fare

      Hey that's weird, I was just playing Crazy Taxi last night.

      Oops. I guess that qualifies me to be a journalist at the Sun. ;-)

      No, it qualifies you to be a Slashdot editor. Make lots of money without getting basic things right.

    14. Re:Omg..... by causality · · Score: 1

      Not really, however, people who make ad hominem attacks like you do in fact lose instantly.

      I like how you invoked your own law to instantly dismantle your own point.

      His point, although not a truth, was a valid observation that referring to other people as sheep or sheeple will cause many people to downgrade their opinion of you, thus diminishing ability to make your case.

      Sounds like an efficient filter to me. The people who cannot separate the point being made from their personal tastes, preferences, and feelings about how the point is made weren't likely to contribute anything deep and meaningful anyway. They're too busy getting offended and worrying about things they can't control. The people who deal with the same distaste by providing an example of what they believe to be the better way, those are the ones I'd like to hear from.

      Like it or not (and I really, really don't like it) there are a lot of people who don't think for themselves. I personally believe they are capable of thinking for themselves but for various reasons, they don't. They are easy targets for various political and marketing forces that end up shaping society to cater to this mindset, very much against the wishes of the rest of us. That network effect is the only reason anyone is concerned about them, otherwise there'd be no reason to care if they want to be that way. "Sheeple" is as good a word for them as any. It's only insulting if you highly value the ability to think for yourself, and if you do, then it wouldn't apply to you.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    15. Re:Omg..... by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      Agree. Sheeple does not mean anything meaningful in any conversation which does not involve apple.

    16. Re:Omg..... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Please stop calling The Sun a newspaper or it's contents journalism.

      Why? The Sun represents journalism and the media industry in its purest form.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    17. Re:Omg..... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Not really, however, people who make ad hominem attacks like you do in fact lose instantly.

      I like how you invoked your own law to instantly dismantle your own point.

      Um, no, just no.

      From the wikipedia

      An ad hominem (Latin: "to the man"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to link the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise. The ad hominem is a classic logical fallacy, but it is not always fallacious; in some instances, questions of personal conduct, character, motives, etc., are legitimate and relevant to the issue

      In other words, because he made an ad hominem argument, I was perfectly fine calling attention to the fact that those that do so, him being one example, do instantly lose their argument because it is insufficient a nail to hang an argument on.

    18. Re:Omg..... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1
    19. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed - I'm visiting slashdot because most of the mainstream media is moronic. Why has this sewage seeped through?

    20. Re:Omg..... by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Oh, do they? You better concede your own point as well, since apparently it's become recursive.

      After all, you've turned an observation of rhetorical sleaze into yet another instrument of rhetorical sleaze. Well done.

    21. Re:Omg..... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Let's see: Who's got more at stake here, the newspaper or Nintendo?

      I'm going to need to see more than a summary on Slashdot or a story on "denofgeek.com" before I know who to believe.

      I have a 3DS that I couldn't play more than 10 minutes or so before getting a headache. My kid, who's 22 has no problem with it and I figure she's old enough to not have to worry about the 3DS stunting the development of her eyes.

      I swapped her the 3DS for her PSP and it's good all around now. I'm an old, old man, so for all I know my headaches had nothing to do with the 3D technology that messes with focal lengths and your brain and all. Maybe that's all good and I'm defective. I got headaches seeing Avatar at the Navy Pier googleplex too, so maybe phony 3D just ain't for me.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    22. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop confusing it's and its.

    23. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also please stop calling Fox news, CNN, MSNBC, reuters, and associated press journalism also.

      Real journalism has been dead now for a very long time, and The Sun is in the same category as all of the listed above.

    24. Re:Omg..... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      People who say "sheep" / "sheeple" instantly lose whatever point they were trying to make. Think of it like a wooly Godwin's law.

      I don't know if they lose the point, but it is certainly true that no message that I have ever seen that referred to people as "sheep/sheeple" has ever had anything remotely intelligent (or even vaguely interesting) to say. It's so reliable that these days I don't bother to read anything more beyond that.

    25. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His point, although not a truth, was a valid observation that referring to other people as sheep or sheeple will cause many people to downgrade their opinion of you, thus diminishing ability to make your case.

      Can't stress this enough. Referring derogatorily to "Sheeple", "Joe Sixpack", the "Ignorant Masses", or "Red/Blue States" is a clear indication that you're hopelessly biased, and probably arrogantly insecure.

    26. Re:Omg..... by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, The Sun is equivalent to The National Inquirer. Are we going to see "bat boy" stories on /. now?

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    27. Re:Omg..... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then what word should one use to mean "people who elect whomever the movie studios tell them to elect through their co-owned TV news channels"?

    28. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now this line is a little more troubling to me, "On the 6th of April, the paper conducted a scientific experiment"

      Yes, it should have read: "A scientific experiment was conducted and on the 6th of April a paper was published." If his colleagues looked over his notes, it's peer-reviewed, too.

    29. Re:Omg..... by mrrudge · · Score: 1

      The problem is that 'sheeple' is a meme, it's a good example of what it describes, quick judgement without evidence or thought.

      There's too much to read already. Someone who uses the term sheeple is likely to be going to waste the next two paragraphs and minutes of my life in an ill considered attempt to distinguish themselves by repeating a basic observation in the name of ego.

      Most people are less intelligent than someone with above average intelligence.

      Well done.

    30. Re:Omg..... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      You could say just that, but that would only make it less obvious, if less offensive. However, overall, I've found that people who believe that people with different tastes are simply choosing "whomever the movie studios tell them to elect through their co-owned TV news channels" almost never have anything remotely perceptive or interesting to say. I suspect this is because people who make comments of this sort (particularly when they employ a contemptuous term that equates other human beings with farm animals) are so consumed by their need to feel themselves superior to the "common herd" that they are completely unable to conceive of the possibility that another person could genuinely have different tastes, much less offer any useful insights as to the nature of those tastes or the possible appeal of the product in question.

    31. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Other people".

    32. Re:Omg..... by DaveGod · · Score: 1

      It's stories (when not just crap about celebs) are written so that the brit sheeples can feel 'informed'.

      Just from "reading" The Sun, this is a conclusion easily drawn.

      From conversations with Sun readers however, every single one of them has been fully aware of the standards of "journalism", reading it not to feel informed but rather entertained.

      It's easy to condemn ignorance and apathy, but one should not feel superior for having full knowledge whilst still doing nothing.

      (Bizarrely, a minority of Daily Mail readers did show signs of having some faith in it however. The Mail does have some pretences at being a paper but is rather less consistent, occasionally having some decent articles but at least as many where I'm almost certain the editor is trolling, too bad even to qualify as a parody).

    33. Re:Omg..... by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      In other words, because he made an ad hominem argument, I was perfectly fine calling attention to the fact that those that do so, him being one example, do instantly lose their argument because it is insufficient a nail to hang an argument on.

      Ad hominem is insufficient, yes, but it could be accompanied by another argument that is sufficient. Similarly, use of the word "sheeple" is insufficient. In fact, use of the word sheeple is, itself, ad hominem. I'll leave you to connect the dots.

    34. Re:Omg..... by tepples · · Score: 1

      I've found that people who believe that people with different tastes are simply choosing "whomever the movie studios tell them to elect through their co-owned TV news channels" almost never have anything remotely perceptive or interesting to say.

      So you appear to dispute the effectiveness of MPAA-owned news outlets framing the issues. Is there a better way to explain why A. nobody proposing real change makes it past the primaries, and B. Ron Paul wasn't allowed to get a word in edgewise in the 2008 presidential debates, and C. both relevant U.S. political parties agree on expansion of the scope of copyright?

      ObTopic: One of the articles comes from a source accused of pandering to people vulnerable to framing. The comparison between people vulnerable to framing and farm animals has been challenged. Productive discussion can't continue until participants agree on a better term for people vulnerable to framing.

    35. Re:Omg..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All people are vulnerable to framing. Imagining yourself above the human condition is the contempt he's talking about.

    36. Re:Omg..... by causality · · Score: 1

      The problem is that 'sheeple' is a meme, it's a good example of what it describes, quick judgement without evidence or thought.

      By that definition the word "meme" is a meme.

      There's no judgment involved in acknowledging that people fitting the definition of this word exist and that their actions have consequences. Now if I pointed to a particular individual and called him a "sheeple" that would be making a judgment. Then it would be valid to question whether I have evidence that this individual fails to think for himself and therefore fits the definition. That's the crucial difference. It's sort of like the world "criminals" -- they certainly do exist, they certainly affect others, but anyone pointing to someone and saying "he's a criminal!" better have evidence to back that up.

      If you want a word stricken from the dictionary because it bothers you so much, launch a campaign. Until you succeed in doing that, the word is valid, it has a known definition, and some people fit that definition.

      I'm sorry that these facts didn't consult you and obtain your approval before becoming facts. They didn't, so now it's time for some good ol' blame the messenger. So now you feel some emotional need to "put that guy in his place" for recognizing an unpleasant reality. Since you're talking to me about ego, you may as well learn more about how it functions. If you're sharp you'll see that it always seems justified in its own eyes, always because of what the other guy did, never because of what kind of standard you'd like to uphold no matter what the other guy does. The effect is that your (re)actions and your well-being are controlled by what others do and that, sir, is slavery.

      There's too much to read already. Someone who uses the term sheeple is likely to be going to waste the next two paragraphs and minutes of my life in an ill considered attempt to distinguish themselves by repeating a basic observation in the name of ego.

      No one who writes a few paragraphs can waste your time without your consent. Therefore, it's useless to complain to anyone other than your image in the mirror about this. You want to relieve yourself of that personal responsibility by blaming me for using a word, or can you see the error in that?

      "Distinguishing yourself" in this context would depend first on whether you care about impressing random strangers on Slashdot. I for one don't, though if I did I imagine I would always say things that everyone always likes to hear so I can obtain their approval. You want to talk about things done in the name of ego, that's one in which I am happy not to engage.

      I'd rather associate with people who don't need to agree with me or approve of my views in order to get along and enjoy genuine mutual respect. They'll find me happy to reciprocate. The rest tend to identify themselves rather quickly by looking for some way to belittle or to show me their self-importance, which they are often eager to do. Of course that's somehow my fault, right?

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    37. Re:Omg..... by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's shear lunacy!

    38. Re:Omg..... by mrrudge · · Score: 1

      I dislike it, especially when used by intelligent people, as it attempts to construct a hierarchy, ranking multi-faceted people by one characteristic. That characteristic being one the author finds or thinks themselves gifted.

      It's like the archetypical 'jock' figure ranking everyone by how much they can bench press, and finding everyone else lacking. They're right, it's true, it's just really not that useful or interesting as nearly anyone can do it if they pick the right scale.

      Grouping and naming people for something they do not have is a cruelty.

      I have no control over you using whatever words you like, but I stop reading at 'sheeple'.

    39. Re:Omg..... by causality · · Score: 1

      I dislike it, especially when used by intelligent people, as it attempts to construct a hierarchy, ranking multi-faceted people by one characteristic. That characteristic being one the author finds or thinks themselves gifted.

      I think that's the crux of the matter and I believe it can be resolved.

      The key is when I said that I personally think such people could choose to think for themselves. I just believe that for various reasons that boil down to forms of conditioning, they don't. The fact that they could, that they have the capability means that in my heart I believe people are inherently and fundamentally equal. It is the priorities and goals and their decision-making that can make them unequal.

      Some decisions are better than others. You are free to make a good decision or a bad decision, and so am I. That's why there is no hierarchy even though it's possible that you might make a great decision and I might make a self-defeating decision or vice-versa. There's no hierarchy because neither of us should have to bow down to the other over this. The only thing we should be prepared to do is live with our decision-making and not take the escapist path of finding ways to blame someone else.

      Many people make decisions without a full awareness of the entirety of their implications. This is obvious. If this never happened, there would never be such things as heroin addicts or violent criminals. It's just that those are extreme examples and it is easy to see that something is wrong with those choices. It's more subtle when someone is far too easily influenced and does not derive their important decisions from a solid set of principles. But without a doubt this tendency is a major component of why we have the particular society, political institutions, and educational system that we have today.

      "Sheeple" and any contempt associated with the word is easy to understand. It comes from the fact that such people exist in great numbers. What they want and the bad decisions they make often affect others very much against thier will. When it comes down to it, I recognize your right as an adult to do whatever you like with your own life, so long as you don't make it my problem or expect me to bear your consequences. Due to network effects the sheeple are failing that standard and the rest of us don't want to inherit the unsustainable world they are building.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    40. Re:Omg..... by Edam · · Score: 1

      I think by "paper", they probably meant newspaper. Unless they were just referring to a sheet of British A4 they found somewhere.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master." -Pravin Lal
    41. Re:Omg..... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Sun is the Beano for grown-ups. Celebrities are the equivalent of Dennis the Menace and co.

      What worries me is that it isn't just The Sun or the British who go in for this kind of bullshit. A few years back they printed that obviously made-up story about Japanese women buying sheep sheared to look like poodles (which was the start of the ruin of the British reputation in Japan, only partly restored by our assistance with the recent tsunami), and despite its obvious lack of factual basis several other newspapers around the world and even the BBC picked it up.

      If a 10 year old told you half the stuff they print you wouldn't believe it, but apparently because it is a "newspaper" The Sun is taken seriously by many of its mentally deficient readers.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Newspaper...The Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't wipe my arse with it.

    1. Re:Newspaper...The Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course..You'd end up with newsprint Page 3 boobs smeared on your cheeks.

  3. It's the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nothing to see here, it's just The Sun, another celebrity and scandal obsessed tabloid paper, full of yellow journalism at its worst.

    1. Re:It's the Sun by slim · · Score: 2

      "Just another" tabloid -- except that it's hugely influential as the biggest selling British newspaper, having almost 50% greater circulation than its nearest competitor, The Mail, and more than 4 times the circulation of the bestselling "proper" paper, the Telegraph.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation

      So, as crappy as it is, it's an opinion-former in the UK, which is why the parties Murdoch likes tend to do well in elections...

    2. Re:It's the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble is when you say that, people think "well that describes all papers, doesn't it?"

      No, people. The Sun is indescribably bad. You have to see it to understand.

    3. Re:It's the Sun by c0lo · · Score: 1

      What I don't get it... how come somebody needs 2 hours to "read" it?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:It's the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your point? Hitler getting elected didn't make him a good leader.
      (Yes, I intentionally Godwinned)

    5. Re:It's the Sun by slim · · Score: 1

      It did make his pronouncements worthy of comment and analysis though. Same as the Sun. Since it has so much power over what a huge slice of British people think, we shouldn't just ignore it.

  4. and in other news by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 3, Funny

    this just in. climbing stairs will raise your heartbeat and bloodpressure. Also just in. Breathing uses up calories.

    1. Re:and in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding? I'm gonna start breathing faster then! It's the sort of thing I can do at my desk while fraggin' noobs and eating Cheetos. Should keep me fit for the ladies.

  5. Needs a control subject by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    This study requires a double blind where half the participants are given a 3DS with Street Fighter 4 and the other half a dummy store demo with no battery charge to account for the placebo effect.

    1. Re:Needs a control subject by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      I get the feeling the control group will notice that their units don't work when the experimenters ask them to play while walking.

  6. Wow, really springing for a huge sample group, huh by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    a 22-year-old member of the staff

    I recently did a similar study, using my girlfriend as my sample, to prove that 100% of humans have a vagina.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  7. The conclusion was correct by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Look, of course you are "likely to experience such a physical response while walking and reading a book" - because if you think about it, both ALSO involve looking at 3-D objects, just as with the 3DS!!

    So in fact if you are concerned about your child's health, you should in fact make sure that instead of interacting with 3D objects they are safely positioned in front of a flat 2D screen. 3D glasses should be hidden (even the Red-Blue kind) and just to be safe, you should make sire that at least four hours of the day are spent playing 2D platformers.

    If you have any reluctance in following this plan, remember - it's for the children.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The conclusion was correct by nman64 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:The conclusion was correct by aeoo · · Score: 1

      Simulated 3D is different from the real 3D though.

  8. Bad health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. And here I am playing my 3DS.... all the while I'm at risk of a heart attack and didn't know it. I'll stop playing as of today. I'll also stop walking, running or doing anything else to help me loose weig... oh hang on.. accelerates my heart rate? Hey, this thing could be doing me some good...

    1. Re:Bad health by delinear · · Score: 2

      I think their argument is that, compared to taking exercise, it's your resting heart beat that's elevated while playing the game. I still think the article (and the "newspaper") is utter garbage - at the very least they could have tested a larger sample of people and a larger sample of entertainment devices to give this some meaning. But it's the Sun, they don't care about meaning, they just care about fear mongering the latest must have gadget.

  9. Scientific, my arse. by ledow · · Score: 2

    "On the 6th of April, the paper conducted a scientific experiment"

    No it didn't. There was nothing scientific and any idiot knows that because it has The Sun written across the top in big letters.

    And Nintendo have already complained in the press how much crap all these articles are.

    1. Re:Scientific, my arse. by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 4, Funny

      There was nothing scientific and any idiot knows that because it has The Sun written across the top in big letters.

      If it had been done by the Weekly World News instead of The Sun, the test subject would have been Bat Boy and the conclusion would have been that the 3DS helps Satan in escaping hell to take over South America or somesuch. And it would have been an hilarious read.

    2. Re:Scientific, my arse. by click2005 · · Score: 1

      I've not played it yet. Next time please use Spoiler tags when you're going to ruin the ending.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  10. Heck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I sit in the back of a CAR i get get dizzy and feel like puking.. so I guess we shouldn't allow kids to sit in back at all even if that's the safest place for a child seat

    1. Re:Heck by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The irony in your statement is that studies that show the back seat is the safest place for children to sit are about as good as this one on the 3DS. They all look at what the results are AFTER a crash instead of looking at what caused the crash. Not one of those studies I have seen test for an INCREASE in accidents due to children sitting in the back seat. Most parents keep an eye on their kids. Particularly infants. If they are not watching them to see why the kid is making a particular noise, they are looking to see why they are being quite.

  11. No-one takes The Sun seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only had to finish reading the first sentence of TFS to know that the paper was The Sun. Everyone in Britain with any intelligence knows that everything they write is complete bullshit.

  12. It's news. It doesn't have to be accurate. by GnomieHomie · · Score: 1

    Let's all jump on the "popular topics" bandwagon.

  13. The Sun Don't Know Shizz.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sun newspaper is famed for its bull sh**.. I wouldnt read too much into it.

  14. On the bright side... by haydensdaddy · · Score: 1

    ...it's nice to know that it isn't just the american media that can't find someone of reasonable intelligence to write their articles.

  15. Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good excuse by grapeape · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That entire piece is crap...anything which raises adrenaline will increase heartbeat and blood pressure. Gaming is an activity that some people really get into so of course its going to have that effect. Show me a gamer playing a fps or racing game that doesn't get higher blood pressure and pulse and I'll show you a gamer who's doing it wrong.

    That said, sadly this is the first generation I have completely skipped a handheld release with no real intention of getting one at all. While I think the 3d thing is interesting and fairly innovative, I've been spoiled by iOS and Android and just cant see paying $40 for a game again. The counter to that is generally an uneducated response that android and ios games lack the depth of the Sony and Nintendo offerings but they are there if you look for them even in the RPG genre that Nintendo is famous for. I really do think Nintendo is going to be a world of hurt when it comes to handhelds, the price model myth has been disproven, look at World of Goo and Plants vs Zombies and its easy to see high quality games can sell and be very lucrative even at a lower price. Never underestimate the power of discreet gaming, you can carry around a phone or handheld as an adult and get in a few minutes of gaming here and there without so much as a glance, but employers tend to frown on adults bringing their DS or PSP to work with them.

  16. Sun Headline today: "Is Britney really a man?" by Fibe-Piper · · Score: 3, Informative

    See my post's title.

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/

    Newspaper! Riiiiiiight

    --
    I went to battle M.C. Escher, but drew a blank.
    1. Re:Sun Headline today: "Is Britney really a man?" by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Seems legit to me. See, they even reported on the important Russian lingerie calendar -> http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3516859/Activists-strip-off-for-calendar.html.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    2. Re:Sun Headline today: "Is Britney really a man?" by snookiex · · Score: 1

      Apparently they had conducted further experiments related to this 32D thing.

      --
      Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  17. Related: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This video is very relevant now. What I can't get is why newspapers feel the need to blatantly mislead their readers like this.

  18. It's The Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.

  19. The Sun? Journalism? by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

    Reading the Sun also raises the heartrate and blood pressure of anyone with half a brain.

  20. It must be true then, by vorlich · · Score: 1

    it's in The Sun. I remember when it used to funny but since it transformed itself into the world's leading scientific journal, Mystic Meg went off to work at the LHC and Zoe McConnell went from in front of the lens to behind the lens - its just never been quite the same.

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
  21. anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Nintendo 3DS is well protected against piracy. The 3D effect doesn't work if you wear an eyepatch.

    1. Re:anti-piracy by Dakman · · Score: 1

      For the love of all that is holy, somebody mod this guy up.

  22. "Newspaper"? by spamuell · · Score: 1

    This is The Sun of:

    UFO Hits Wind Turbine

    Haunted Hospital Calls in Exorcist

    and famously of course from the 1980s:

    Freddie Starr Ate My Hamster Puh-lease!

    1. Re:"Newspaper"? by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      The scary thing is that the last one is real!

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    2. Re:"Newspaper"? by andrewa · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget the sh*t they wrote about Liverpool FC fans....
      I have the sun website blocked on my router in case I inadvertently click on some link....

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
  23. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who buy the sun aren't interested in following an issue - they want something shocking to tut and shake their heads at before repeating the process again the next day with some other startling inaccuracy or misrepresentation.

    That follow-up might as well be printed out and stuck to the back of a public lavatory door in Armenia - it would be seen by about as many sun readers in such a case.

  24. Scientific experiment? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Did The Onion buy out The Sun on april 1st?

    1. Re:Scientific experiment? by chriseyre2000 · · Score: 2

      Would anyone notice the difference?

    2. Re:Scientific experiment? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Onion has fewer boobs per page.

    3. Re:Scientific experiment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And is less devastating to society. The Sun has a major impact, much like Fox News in the US. A complete parade of lies designed to create feelings of victimisation and oppression in the majority so that they can be manipulated. The more the middle class hate one another and the poor, the less they hate the rich who are raping them daily.

      Although Fox still wins the award for sheer ridiculousness: complaints of liberal bias in the mainstream media, despite BEING the mainstream media - it's the most popular. Also hilarious because there is no 'liberal' in US politics. The political spectrum is right-leaning centrist to fascist.

  25. 3Damage by Forget4it · · Score: 1

    IRC the problem for any 3D screen-based system is the fact that
    your eyes need to both

    1) focus on the screen while simultaneously

    2) converging (right and left eyes pointing) to a locus behind (or of the screen).

    This is an unnatural thing to do - a bit like crossing your eyes without noticing.
    If you do it for a long time it has a lasting aftereffect where you can't see real world distances properly for some hours afterwards.

    If your eyes are still learning to make sense of the world (like children's) they can be fooled in learning wrong things about the world - such as it is normal to focus at one depth and converge at another - thus doing permanent damage

    As first commented by me here:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jan/20/nintendo-3ds-could-harm-child-eyes-claim?commentpage=1#comment-9235640

    --
    Artificial intelligence is the study of how to make real computers act like the ones in the movies.
  26. DUH. Ragland's Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your blood pressure IS supposed to be higher standing than sitting.

    It's basic physiology.

    Laying down BP sitting BP standing BP moving around BP

    There's a test called Ragland's test that measures how well your Adrenal Glands are working. The test is performed with you laying down, sitting, standing. If your blood pressure is HIGHER laying down than standing, then you test POSITIVE for this test and more tests are needed to see if your Adrenal Glands are in dysfunction..

  27. Not for me by Stumbles · · Score: 1

    I had the opportunity to try one out a couple of weeks ago at a local Game Stop. After about 30 seconds I had to put it down; it made my eyes hurt and kicked off a headache. I will not let my daughter have one.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  28. Pulse rate increases during activity by pclminion · · Score: 1

    A person's pulse rate and blood pressure increase when active. Man, I can wait to see what these guys decide to study next. Maybe they'll answer that big open question that's been bugging humanity for centuries -- just what temperature DOES water boil at?

  29. /. Gives Me Headaches by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    For the record, I was reading /. on a bumpy country road, and I was the driver. I hit my head on the steering wheel, the roof, and the side window. I personally blame /. for the addiction to read it while driving and for the excessive use of bright white backgounds. I'll be contacting my lawyer just as soon as I post this through my mobile and merge onto the freeway.

    --
    I8-D
  30. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by hedwards · · Score: 1

    Not really, I use my GBA to relax, basically I focus on playing the game without elevating my pulse, blood pressure or getting stressed. When I'm really playing well, there is not impact whatsoever on any of those things.

  31. Health concerns? No, but stability... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    The health concerns might all be bunk, but the stability concerns aren't. The 3DS is notoriously unstable, with widespread reports of frequent crashing. I have personally had my 3DS crash four times while playing a game.

    1. Re:Health concerns? No, but stability... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the game you're crashing on is ghost recon, try turning off wifi during the game. that should solve it.

    2. Re:Health concerns? No, but stability... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Have you connected it to the internet and got an update for your 3DS?
      2) Is the crashing occurring with a specific game, say, "Ghost Recon: Shadow Wars"?

      Not sure what all games are having problems, but GR:SW has been one I've ready that has been having issues. The update is supposed to fix some of this.

      No clue on whether it's a goof on the API / Documentation of Nintendo, or if UbiSoft just did shoddy code and Nintendo put out a patch just to fix the damn thing because they're the ones that get blamed regardless.

    3. Re:Health concerns? No, but stability... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Yes on all counts.

    4. Re:Health concerns? No, but stability... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      That doesn't solve it, it works around it. It doesn't actually fix the problem, because now I need to remember to be turning wifi on and off all the time.

    5. Re:Health concerns? No, but stability... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok fine. hopefully they'll release a software update that fixes it.

    6. Re:Health concerns? No, but stability... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Also, Ghost Recon crashed again on my last night while wifi was off :P

  32. Re:Wow, really springing for a huge sample group, by Abstrackt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I recently did a similar study, using my girlfriend as my sample, to prove that 100% of humans have a vagina.

    Fascinating. They also appear to be inflatable.

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  33. In further news of the obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Playing "Wii Fit" will also increase your heart rate while you are running... Which apparently would mean that nobody ought to be allowed to play Wii Fit, right?

  34. Re:Wow, really springing for a huge sample group, by burisch_research · · Score: 1

    Therefore either you are non-human, or you have a vagina?

    --
    char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
  35. 3D would suit The Sun by Geeky · · Score: 1

    I'd have thought The Sun would be all in favour of 3D. It would improve page 3...

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  36. Re:Wow, really springing for a huge sample group, by muckracer · · Score: 1

    > I recently did a similar study, using my girlfriend as my sample, to
    > prove that 100% of humans have a vagina.

    Hmm...where do you meet those....humans?

  37. Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in from The Sun's crack science team! Deceased man's blood pressure found to be unhealthily low! More research needed, no conclusion available.

  38. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by twidarkling · · Score: 2

    If you call Plants vs. Zombies "High Quality," there's no arguing with you. It's fun, but it's a game that would take about a day to program, and then art asset creation takes however long you feel like. It's made by Pop Cap. They thrive on cheap impulse buy games that cost nearly nothing to produce. Plants vs. Zombies is completely undeep, and is basically glorified rock-paper-scissors. World of Goo is a better example, but still is an entire game built around applying the same mechanic in slightly different ways, or padded ways. If you want your argument completely blown out of the water, there's Pilotwings Resort. It's a glorified tech demo, and still has more *actual* depth than 99% of what you'll see on iOS and Android. Multiple vehicles that all act and control completely differently, each with a different set of missions, multiple ranks of missions, and a free-flight mode with hundreds of collectables. It's a game that's easy for anyone to pick up and do decently on, but still with enough depth and precision that you can feel like you're improving if you practice. Am I denying that it's possible to have deep games at cheap price points? No. But games for iOS and Android are pretty much designed around only having those few minutes to play, so they rarely get deep. PSP/3DS games are designed around having a larger chunk of time, not to mention having dedicated controls, so it's possible to do more complex things more easily. The price point is also hampered by the need for physical media since the games are so much larger.

    --
    Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  39. It's been proven by sjonke · · Score: 1

    Not only are there no health risks, but the 3DS cameras enhance erectile function!

    --
    --- What?
  40. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Indeed, sports tends to increase your blood pressure quite a bit. Sports is dangerous for your kids! :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  41. cromulent malamanteau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Additionally, "sheeple" is a perfectly cromulent malamanteau."

    this tickled my brain.

  42. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Saying "The counter to that is generally an uneducated response" before saying something that is obviously and completely wrong doesn't make you right. There is no reason that in depth games cannot be made for phones, but by and large, the games on dedicated hand helds are far more in depth. There is no reason grander games could not be made for the phones. The market just isn't there at this time though. I blame the controls. The touch screen is fine for certain games, but for most it just sucks. Maybe Sony will change the trend with their new experia, but until proper controllers are available for the phone, it will always be what you use when you don't have access to a good gaming system.

  43. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Your chances of dieing if you play high school football are noticeably higher than your chances of dieing from not getting the chickenpox vaccine. Of course, that might be more of a commentary on the the vaccine than football, so, nevermind.

  44. Apple much?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Please stop calling Apple a technology company or it's contents innovation.
    >> It's gadgets (??) are created so that the itard sheeples can feel 'cool'.
    >> They believe anything from apple because they are the best selling toys and it leaves them a few more brain cells free to update twittle or facebook pages.

    FTFY

  45. It's the Sun for pete's sake... by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 1

    ...a red-top tabloid which publishes crap like this every day. It's readership are one step up from an amoeba. There's not much more to expect than this.

    --
    "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
  46. Re:Wow, really springing for a huge sample group, by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Must be true. My study proved it.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  47. Sun == Full of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sun is a worthless rag that prints bullshit and lies and anyone with more than 2 brain cells to rub together wouldn't even use it to wipe their own arse. It also features some tits on page 3, celebrity gossip and the rear half is devoted to sport. It's pretty much equivalent to the US's National Enquirer in terms of content and reading age, except from the fact that over here in the USSK for some unfathomable reason it's the best selling mainstream newspaper. If you ever find yourself in the unfortunate position of reading a copy, you can actually feel your brain cells undergoing autolysis.

    It's also published by Rupert Murdoch. That alone says all you need to know.

    Fortunately, here in the UK we have a "code" for newspapers. If the paper's title is in white text on a red background (a.k.a "Red Top") those in the know automatically know it's going to be full of shit.

    Top trivia: To this day, Scousers refuse to read the Sun because of a single story it published 22 years ago about the Hillsborough disaster. This refusal to read The Sun is single-handedly responsible for Liverpool dragging itself out of the gutter it found itself in in the 80s and becoming a great city of well-educated people.

  48. My 3DS *HELPS* my vision! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have faulty depth perception. The best way I can explain it is that the "overlap" of vision between my two eyes that is usually used to generate depth perception doesn't work for me. Instead, my brain just discards one eye's worth of overlap. I *CAN* spend time and effort to "re-pair" my eyes, and make my depth perception work, but it takes effort, and generates a slight headache in the process. (I have to focus my eyes on something very close to me, "working" to merge the two eyes' views.) When I go through the effort of "re-pair"ing, it lasts about half an hour before is starts fading, and I need to "re-pair" again. Usually not worth the effort. I have learned to judge distances through other means.

    What that means is that most 3D things don't work on me. The old red/blue glasses? I see one color only, or I see 'flickering' between the two colors as my brain switches dominant eyes. But no 3D effect. None of the "cross your eyes" things works. Nope, can't see the "static stereograms" (Also called "Magic Eye" pictures) at all. 3D LCD shutter flicker-glasses work a little, but not reliably. Circular polarized 3D work the best, for some unknown reason, but not perfectly. I didn't have much hope for the 3DS.

    Well, a few days ago I went to the store and played with one. The 3DS works incredibly well for me. I don't know why, but it does. Of course, I bought one on the spot.

    Even more amazing, after about 15-20 minutes of play (the bus ride home after work,) my depth perception was working! No headache inducing "re-pair" procedure needed. Just like my manual "re-pair" procedure, it lasts 20-30 minutes before starting to fade, but my head doesn't hurt. This is absolutely incredible. I may not be able to let my daughter play due to health concerns, but it REALLY helps me.

  49. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by FrostDust · · Score: 1

    That said, sadly this is the first generation I have completely skipped a handheld release with no real intention of getting one at all.

    If you're saying these iOS and Android devices have high-quality, high-selling games, then I don't see how you can say they aren't handheld gaming devices, at least by your usage.

    The counter to that is generally an uneducated response that android and ios games lack the depth of the Sony and Nintendo offerings but they are there if you look for them even in the RPG genre that Nintendo is famous for.

    Well, I have an unused iPod Touch that I could use some recommendations for. Since you specifically mention RPGs, is there anything similar to Golden Sun or Dissidia that I'd be interested in? I'm not a platform "fanboy" by any means; if it's a good game, I'll play it.

    Also, I wouldn't be surprised with people saying mobile games lack depth if you give PvZ or WoG as an example of what the platform has to offer (which both are, by the way, also available for consoles and PC).

  50. 3D slider? by Ambvai · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the 3DS basically have a "depth" slider which, at the lowest setting, entirely turns off the 3D effect and can also give increased battery life/refresh rate? Everybody concerned could just turn it off.

  51. Conduct the same test with page 3 by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    ...or pictures of Samantha Fox in her prime.

    Same results. BAN PAGE 3! You could have a heart attack.

    Idiocy in its purest form.

  52. Mind you, slashdot talking about bad journalism... by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    All we need now is for the Sun to do an article on the bad journalism of Slashdot and we don't have to wait for 2012 for the world to be sucked into a black hole created the LHC.

    Journalism, its dead has not been exaggerated.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  53. Just another deadly Danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have found that parents are systematically subjecting their kids to danger. This is just one more thing in the long list of danger that kids are being unecessarily exposed to. I have said it before, and I will say it again, if you can not provide a safe and nuturing environment for kids, you should not be having kids.

    I just looked it up on Wolfram Alpha, and found that there is no group of kids from any country in the world anywhere, where kids can reasonably be expected to be around past the year 2250. That is right the mortality rate is 100% by that time. That means that EVERY single kid born today will DIE. Parents should forgo procreating untill they can raise their offspring in an environment free from danger. If they can't do this they are clearly acting irresponsibly.

    -Unless you have a body like Justin Bieber, you are a faggoty ass bitch!
    -Wolf Blitzer talking about the changing gender roles in the world today.

  54. Its the Sun, a Murdoch paper....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you expect truthful journalism?

    *shiver*

    Look at the latest escapade of its Sunday bedmate, the "News of the World"

  55. Skyward Sword? by TheEnigmaticToad · · Score: 1

    Hmph..maybe this will make them release Skyward Sword faster...

  56. Doctor! Doctor! by tgibbs · · Score: 2

    I've played it for two or three hours at a stretch (ignoring Nintendo's "our lawyers made us say this" warning to take a break every half hour). I can sort of tell that my eyes are doing something different, probably because of the convergence/focus disparity; it feels a bit like looking at one of those "Magic Eye" pictures, but it certainly doesn't hurt or give me a headache. In any case, there is a control, and you can adjust the 3D effect to whatever level is comfortable, or even none at all (I generally have it at max).

    "Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this!"
    "Then don't do that!"

  57. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Sorry should have clarified...my statement about depth was more in regards to things like Zenonia (1 and 2), Sacred Odyssey, Aralon, Neuroshima Hex, etc. But as for casual gaming i would put things like Espgaluda II, Pix ‘n Love Rush, Touch Grind, Contract Killer, Castle Warriors, Real Racing or Samurai 2 against most anything on the the other handhelds. Then there are games that started on other platforms but made a great transition...GTA Chinatown Wars, Street Fighter IV, Dead Space, Chaos Rings, Phoenix Wright, etc. While I agree the PSP was mainly designed for long gaming sessions (Which imho is why it came in last) the DS was highly slanted towards pick up and play type games. As for the physical media part...psp minis (many of which have actually been ported from ios) has shown they just dont get it...fieldrunners for instance is priced at 2x that of the ios version. Peggle on the DS was $30 on ios $2.99 and could have easily been a DS downloadable game. Size is a bit of a myth as well...the largest DS game was 512mb, the largest i have seen on the ipad was over a gig (Rage and Dead Space). 90% of PSP games have been well under 1gig as well.

    I have no desire to see Sony or Nintendo fail, I just think the game is changing and dedicated handhelds are going to be harder sell to the masses, as a parent I can buy an ipod touch for $50-$75 less than a 3ds and its likely NGP will have an even bigger price gap, couple that with an average game price of a buck or two and its not hard to see ios making a severe dent in the market.

  58. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by grapeape · · Score: 1

    My point was that there are games with depth if you look for them, most handheld gamers simply point to angry birds and claim everything on the iphone and ipad is a casual game without even bothering to see whats actually available (thats what I mean by uneducated). IMHO the proper controls argument is a bit like the people who dismissed the Wii with the same argument...in the end it didn't matter mainly because there are far more casual gamers than hardcore ones to cater to. That said, I've found that if done well "virtual controls" can work great...take SF IV for the iphone...for virtual controls they are fantastic but do take some practice to get used to, most "hardcore" gamers rather than feel like a "newb" choose to dismiss it as crap. There are also bluetooth based controllers finally starting to emerge, icade for instance will be out in around 8 weeks, though who knows how much support it will get because again the real money is in the masses.

  59. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Sure how about zenonia 1 and 2, Rimelands, Across Age DX, Hybrid Eternal Whisper and Hybrid 2 are great for JRPG style RPG's. Ravensword or Aralon are great for western rpg style. For hack and slash diablo'ish games there are things like Solomon's Keep, Dungeon Hunter and Sacred Odyssey. And then of course there are the Square games like FF and Chaos Rings.

    My examples of PvZ and WoG were simply about quality and polish...

  60. Re:Sensationalism but it gives nintendo a good exc by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    They are few and far between because the touch screen is really quite limited. You may want to believe that the problem is lack of familiearty, but the actual problem is that the screens have no tactile feedback, so it is too easy to remove your fingers from the 'buttons' if you are playing a button style game, and you fingers are covering the screen for other types of games. This works fine for checkers, chess and most physics games but for any kind of arcade game it stinks.

    Bluetooth based controllers are here today. On Android search for WiiMoteController. It lets you use the WiiMote as a controller. It also support the Wii Classic controller. It works great.

  61. I dont see how? by skybluesam1 · · Score: 1

    What? i do not see how it can increase your blood pressure at all lol it is just a game at the end of the day and that is all you have to remember :D.You can always chill out from gaming at http://www.ro2.biz/register.php?ref=skybluesam1