Slashdot Mirror


Mystery Air Crash Black Box Found Sans Memory Part

coondoggie writes "The ongoing undersea search of the Air France Flight 447 wreckage had yielded one of the key items investigators were looking for this week: the flight data recorder. Unfortunately, their hopes for more information about the crash were set back, as the robot subs scouring the ocean floor retrieved the box only to find its memory part missing."

148 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Missing by Widowwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry i need to upgrade for Diablo 3 coming out soon

    --
    ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
  2. Memory Part? by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

    Memory Part? Is that a technical term? Also is a missing 'memory part' all that common or uncommon? Could there have been any sort of sabotage?

    1. Re:Memory Part? by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is a technical term for it, but basically it's the actual box on the recorder chasis which stores the data; I'm not sure whether it's magnetic storage or flash memory in this case.

      And separation is certainly not unknown, there was a crash a few years back where it also separated and was later found. Odds are this one will be too, but that could take some time if it's buried under other debris.

    2. Re:Memory Part? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Could there have been any sort of sabotage?"

      Mischievous squids?

    3. Re:Memory Part? by aBaldrich · · Score: 1

      No, how on earth can the "memory part" go missing? They clearly don't want everybody to know what was on that memory. If, after close examination, they find out it is nothing that could remotely incriminate a politician, then it will magically "appear".

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    4. Re:Memory Part? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      From the article, it sounds like the flight data recorder has basically been smashed to pieces. This is usually what happens to them; they're really only useful in relatively low-speed accidents.

    5. Re:Memory Part? by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From the picture I've seen, it looks like the chassis was bent by the impact and that probably caused the memory unit's mounting to break. So the memory unit itself is probably still intact somewhere.

    6. Re:Memory Part? by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

      "Could there have been any sort of sabotage?"

      Mischievous squids?

      I smiled.

      Our family has a cottage in the middle of nowhere and all the neighbours are nice, but that doesn't stop my urban dwelling brother from obsessively locking his car. I keep asking him if he's worried about the raccoons taking midnight joyrides.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    7. Re:Memory Part? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      It is perhaps a sign of the times that I cannot tell if you are being sarcastic, trolling, or sincerely believe what you posted.

    8. Re:Memory Part? by cmdahler · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the article, it sounds like the flight data recorder has basically been smashed to pieces. This is usually what happens to them; they're really only useful in relatively low-speed accidents.

      That's not the case at all. FDRs commonly survive catastrophic high speed accidents. For example, USAir 427 in 1994 crashed in a near vertical nose-down attitude, and pretty much all that was left of that accident was small bits and pieces. The FDR was recovered and was usable. They rolled and went nose down from 6,000 feet, and the last data on the recorder indicated an airspeed of 261 knots (300 mph, or about 135 meters per second), at a 80 nose-down attitude, virtually straight into the ground. If an FDR can survive that, it can survive damn near anything.

    9. Re:Memory Part? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Our family has a cottage in the middle of nowhere and all the neighbours are nice, but that doesn't stop my urban dwelling brother from obsessively locking his car. I keep asking him if he's worried about the raccoons taking midnight joyrides.

      Haven't you seen raccoons washing their hands in a stream? It's not about being sanitary, it's a guilty conscience combined with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:Memory Part? by bughunter · · Score: 2

      Is that a technical term?

      TFA is Michael Cooney's Layer 8 blog. I'll give Cooney the benefit of the doubt and assume he did the 30 seconds of research necessary to find out the correct term and just assume he misplaced a key memory part.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    11. Re:Memory Part? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No. Impact direction, spin and position are all factors as well.

      Many are damaged. Hey, I say a guy survive a 150MPH impacts once, so I guess anyone can?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Memory Part? by gknoy · · Score: 2

      Habits are most effective when maintained, and insurance companies are less likely to reimburse you if your car wasn't locked.

    13. Re:Memory Part? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing, so I look at some of his other posts..and I STILL don't know.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Memory Part? by jamesh · · Score: 2

      Our family has a cottage in the middle of nowhere and all the neighbours are nice, but that doesn't stop my urban dwelling brother from obsessively locking his car. I keep asking him if he's worried about the raccoons taking midnight joyrides.

      I always lock my car too. I basically promised the insurance company I would, so I do. Your neighbors might be nice, and your neighbors teenage kids might be nice too, but even nice teenage kids with a bit of booze in them can suddenly think that taking an unlocked car for a joy ride is a good idea. And most crimes would be done by non-locals anyway... your nice neighbors might notice them and take a description so you can catch them later, but that doesn't necessarily get your car back. Your brother might just be a creature of habit too - I know I am. If I have to think about locking the car in the city, but not locking it at home, I'll just end up forgetting.

    15. Re:Memory Part? by cmdahler · · Score: 1

      Yes. These devices are made to withstand very high forces. You clearly have zero knowledge of anything related to aviation. There are very few aviation accidents, no matter how catastrophic, in which the FDR and CVR do not contain usable data.

    16. Re:Memory Part? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      The same thing happened for the crash of Ethiopian flight 409. The memory was found 6 days later, only partially damaged. From avherald.com:

      The cockpit voice recorder was recovered from the sea on Feb 10th 2010 however the memory part was missing. The memory was recovered on Feb 16th 2010, however one of the 16 memory chips was found cracked resulting in about 10 seconds of recordings missing every 4 minutes. The chip is likely to be unreadable, however additional attempts to restore the chip's contents are underway.

      I've read the reason to have it be possible to separate is so that the box bears the brunt of the impact and the memory can decelerate.

    17. Re:Memory Part? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Where do you get this? I can't think of hardly any cases where the recording was completely unusable, except a few times where the recording was later overwritten.

    18. Re:Memory Part? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Many are damaged. I can't think of more than maybe one case where the data wasn't still extremely helpful.

    19. Re:Memory Part? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Beyond that -- if someone wants your car, locked doors are not going to stop them. I lock it to keep mischief out/keep people from taking shit that's not worth breaking in for (though I have had my cassette adapter stolen via broken windows -- I guess when you want one, you want one).

    20. Re:Memory Part? by ryanov · · Score: 2

      Nonsense. The crash was not even likely to be their fault.

    21. Re:Memory Part? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not sure if this is relevant but I once worked on a recording device for FA/18s. The module which stores the data plugs into a slot in the aircraft or an external reader. It is approximately 80*80*30mm and grooved so it can only slide into its slot one way. On the 30*80mm side which sits flush with the surface of the reader there is a hinged lever and a locking catch. To insert the cartridge you push it say 60mm into the slot, then engage the lever with a bar on the reader surface and use leverage to push it the rest of the way. On the opposite side of the cartridge from the lever there is a 25 pin D plug which mates with a socket on the reader (or aircraft). The recording mechanism is hidden though at the time I did this work it must have been streaming tape like a TK50.

      I could imagine a cartridge like this popping out of the box which writes the data to it on impact. The cartridge is extremely robust and will be probably sitting on the bottom around there somewhere. Of course the system on the airbus could be totally different from the one I saw.

    22. Re:Memory Part? by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 2

      "Our family has a cottage in the middle of nowhere and all the neighbours are nice, but that doesn't stop my urban dwelling brother from obsessively locking his car. I keep asking him if he's worried about the raccoons taking midnight joyrides."

      Habits die hard. And I'd rather be in the habit of always locking my car, than getting into the habit of leaving it unlocked, and someday having it bite me in the ass when I move back into an urban setting.

      Yes, door locks won't prevent a dedicated thief from entering. Same way a lock on an apartment door in a big city won't prevent it. But it will keep the casual assholes out, and that's most people.

    23. Re:Memory Part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the sixties, in the small town in which I grew up, our neighbour-three-doors-over left the keys for his car in the ignition. When my father asked him why, he said that someone might need to use it in an emergency, when he wasn’t around. When my father asked if wasn’t afraid that it would be stolen, he answered, “Nobody would do that.” Turns out that he was right.

    24. Re:Memory Part? by hubie · · Score: 2

      You mean it was the scare mongering media who broke into my car and stole my wallet? All these years I figured it was some teenaged punk.

    25. Re:Memory Part? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      that doesn't stop my urban dwelling brother from obsessively locking his car

      It's a good habit to be in and a bad habit to have lost, once you're back in the big smoke. Moreover, if you want to prevent opportunistic searches during traffic stops ("you don't mind if I search your car? You don't have anything to hide, do you?") Locking your doors once you get out is a great way to short circuit the officers smoothly choreographed and often practiced routine. He has to ask for your key or ask you to unlock the car at which point refusing to consent to the search is a lot simpler than trying to interrupt a cop who is already halfway into your car.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    26. Re:Memory Part? by Bureaucromancer · · Score: 1

      The main ones I can think of are a few cases of heat damage, where fires have been allowed to burn in more or less direct contact with them for several hours (one of the recorders on Comair had this happen, and there have been a few others).

    27. Re:Memory Part? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Maybe next time they should put some protection around these black boxes, just so they don't get damaged as a result of crashes.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    28. Re:Memory Part? by mikelieman · · Score: 3, Informative

      From: http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/documents/Flight_Data_Recorder_(SSFDR).pdf

      The SSFDR's crash survivable memory unit (CSMU) provides for complete data recovery when subjected
      to the crash conditions stipulated in ED-55 and ED-56a:

      Impact Shock 3400G, 6.5 milliseconds
      Penetration Resistance 500 lb. weight from 10 feet
      Static Crush 5000 lbs., 5 minutes
      High Temperature Fire 1100C, 30 minutes
      Low Temperature Fire 260C, 10 hours (per ED-56a)
      Deep Sea Pressure and Sea Water/Fluids Immersion 20,000 feet, 30 days

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    29. Re:Memory Part? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2

      Haven't you seen raccoons washing their hands in a stream? It's not about being sanitary, it's a guilty conscience combined with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

      Aren't they just washing the grease off their hands so they won't leave any fingerprints?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    30. Re:Memory Part? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      f your not careful about locking your doors in the country, you might just come back and find it stuffed with someones excess zucchini.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    31. Re:Memory Part? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Maybe it wasn't there in the first place. Cheap SOB's saving a few dollars by leaving out an expensive part.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    32. Re:Memory Part? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Deep Sea Pressure and Sea Water/Fluids Immersion 20,000 feet, 30 days

      Still. They could be lucky. Its not too hard to build a storage device to survive longer times and higher pressure.

    33. Re:Memory Part? by igny · · Score: 1

      If an FDR can survive that, it can survive damn near anything.

      But can it survive millennia under water?

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    34. Re:Memory Part? by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      They do! It's called an airplane...

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    35. Re:Memory Part? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could pack a few more passengers around it, just to cushion it a bit more?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    36. Re:Memory Part? by Ironpoint · · Score: 1

      >From the article, it sounds like the flight data recorder has basically been smashed to pieces

      Then why don't they make the whole FDR out of black box materi.... oh...

    37. Re:Memory Part? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Honest people are nice and all, but in reality, does anyone ever not get reimbursed for this reason? I mean, who blurts out 'well, I left my car unlocked, and it got stolen', rather than just 'my car got stolen'.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    38. Re:Memory Part? by Surt · · Score: 1

      It probably was. Almost nothing bad actually happens in the world, it's only slow news days that cause crime.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    39. Re:Memory Part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From the picture of the data recorder it looks like the memory module is not meant to stay attached to the recorder...
      http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/vol.af.447/images/chassis.fdr.fr.jpg

    40. Re:Memory Part? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that it is not this deep. The other thing about that number is that that was the test. Ditto on the pingers lasting for 30 days (they ordinarily last longer but they must last at least 30).

    41. Re:Memory Part? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      How did they know your wallet was in the car? All bets are off if you leave shit in plain sight.

    42. Re:Memory Part? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good deal to me.

    43. Re:Memory Part? by jd · · Score: 1

      It's hard to tell whether that's a freak case or not. The hard drive that survived the Columbia space shuttle explosion, ploughed into the ground at speeds definitely higher than its warranty permitted and yet was readable is probably more a testament to the sheer randomness of life than to good manufacturing practices. Having said that, FDRs are padded multiple times over and it would not surprise anyone if it had survived just fine. Certainly the salvage people are saying the shedding of the outer casing means very little.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    44. Re:Memory Part? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      If an FDR can survive that, it can survive damn near anything.

      But can it survive millennia under water?

      After millennia under water, probably nobody will still know how to read it out anyway.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    45. Re:Memory Part? by mangu · · Score: 1

      Sure, planes back into mountains all the time.

      You can hit tail-first without backing up. Try a 90 degrees change in pitch or yaw.

      After all, no plane would ever crash if it were on a perfectly controlled flight. One of the reasons for a plane crash is if it suffers, for any reason, a big change in orientation ("attitude" in aeronautical terms).

    46. Re:Memory Part? by jittles · · Score: 1

      Not sure if this is relevant but I once worked on a recording device for FA/18s.

      The communists have now won. What were you thinking telling the whole world the size and shape of the FA-18 flight recorder?

    47. Re:Memory Part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hear you want to put your blackbox in a blackbox to keep your blackbox from being wrecked

    48. Re:Memory Part? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I love how you start with uncertainty, then immediately turn that into total certainty by involving a paranoid plot. You should see a doctor.

    49. Re:Memory Part? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Breaking a window is faster than opening an unlocked door?

    50. Re:Memory Part? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      There was no such recommendation. In fact, when Air France asked the question (several months before the accident), Airbus officially confirmed that there was no reason to change the pitots. However, quite a few other companies dedided not to wait for an official recommendation and replaced the pitots on their own after a few incidents.

    51. Re:Memory Part? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's not. If the impact is low enough, it will stay attached - but above a certain point it's actually better for it to detach and expend the energy that way, instead of expending it by squashing against whatever the recorder smacked.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    52. Re:Memory Part? by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      It's faster than trying to open the door, finding out that (as in most cases) it is in fact locked, then having to smash the window anyway.

    53. Re:Memory Part? by hubie · · Score: 1

      Wasn't in plain sight. It was under the seat. A series of cars were systematically broken into to steal what they could find in them.

  3. They did not pay the 20$ fee? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh, no! They forgot to pay the 20$ extra fee to install memory card in the flight data recorder? Bummer!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:They did not pay the 20$ fee? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I guess the French are not used to bargaining. Normally, when you buy an airplane, you can usually get the sales person to throw in an extra memory card.

  4. Look for the island by RafaelGCPP · · Score: 1

    Widmore knows!! They're alive!! Linus told me!

    --
    "There is always an easy solution to every human problem -- neat, plausible, and wrong."
    H. L. Mencken
  5. Re:Because by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like someone forgot to post anonymously. Given your low UID, is it possible that you are the Methusalah of trolls? Traveling from one era to the next, trusty bag of tired memes in one hand, bucket of spam in the other?

    I'm sure damaged blackboxes happen all the time—for those who don't feel like RTFAing, it looks pretty beaten up in the photo, and they've got submersibles scouring a rather large region for more pieces still. (The summary's habit of using the word "part" is kind of adorable, in a Simple English Wikipedia sort of way. What is a memory part, anyway? Is this specialized manufacturing jargon (i.e. part numbers) or just weird writing?)

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  6. The True Story by cosm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously, Barack Obama's birth certificate stating he was born in Kenya was on this plane. When the Jooz realized this, they called up the Illuminati and had them have Gaddafi plant a bomb on the plane. This was a Majestic-12 orchestrated conspiracy to get us involved with Libya to protect our rebellious young people interest, something which has been declining in the past decades because of rainbows in sprinklers and the chem-trails in the sky.

    The missing memory chip only confirms that the Greys were there to teleport the chip to their holographic dimension before the passengers disappeared in the Bermuda triangle, only to be transported to Layer-7 in Dulce.

    This then confirms that Kennedy was shot by the mafia to protect the Illuminati-Majestic-12 conspiracy. Also, the chip had the location of the nuclear weapons in Iraq.

    Obviously.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:The True Story by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Oh, c'mon. Certainly Gaddafi would have outsourced the bomb part. What kind of fools do you take us for?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:The True Story by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Geez, I was just about to fill in everyone about this, but there's always some wise ass who beats me to it. What a compleat downer, dood!

      Now, if only they make it mandatory for those governors of the states (Texas, Georgia, Alabama, et al.) requesting emergency federal aid to fork over THEIR birth certificates.

      Of course, I'm sure Donald Trump has already forged an American birth certificate for his hairpiece, who recently announced it, too, is running for the presidency (should be some serious competition for Bachmannmeister).

    3. Re:The True Story by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

      You've got it all wrong. They sent in the North Korean sub to retrieve the "memory part". You know, the sub that torpedoed the Deepwater Horizon.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    4. Re:The True Story by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      Geez, I was just about to fill in everyone about this, but there's always some wise ass who beats me to it. What a compleat downer, dood!

      Now, if only they make it mandatory for those governors of the states (Texas, Georgia, Alabama, et al.) requesting emergency federal aid to fork over THEIR birth certificates.

      Of course, I'm sure Donald Trump has already forged an American birth certificate for his hairpiece, who recently announced it, too, is running for the presidency (should be some serious competition for Bachmannmeister).

      forgive me if I'm wrong, but there is no law that says you have to be born a us citizen to be a governator. As much as I would love to think that Obama is Kenyan I find it pretty hard to believe that not even the donald has turned up proof otherwise. I mean if we can elect a Kenyan to president, then austria can't be far behind.

      Though the thought of "I'll be back" as a presidential slogan scares the bajesus out of me. That would be proof that the machines are coming and I don't like that thought a whole lot.

    5. Re:The True Story by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Aaaah, but does Trump have an up to date Rabies vaccination for the thing that hides in his hairpiece? Enquiring minds want to know!

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  7. Re:Because by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Troll

    If you want to troll, it is style-less to do so under a secondary pseudonym.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  8. Re:Because by cosm · · Score: 1

    the jews got there first.

    Good sir, I believe you intended to say: "derp DA jOOZ did 911 da mOOn LAnding was a Soundstage on marz"

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  9. Re:Because by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

    The summary's habit of using the word "part" is kind of adorable, in a Simple English Wikipedia sort of way. What is a memory part, anyway? Is this specialized manufacturing jargon (i.e. part numbers) or just weird writing?)

    Surely they refer to a SSD, which would then be "storage", not "memory". But it's usually the OEM at fault for this sort of silliness. "Storage" and "memory" get used interchangeably in a surprising amount of ads and brichures.

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
  10. Re:Because by santax · · Score: 1

    Oh man, don't get me started, last time I was diving one of them Deep Sea Jews shot me in the leg with a head-mounted laser.

  11. X-files by bvimo · · Score: 1

    Is this a job for Mulder and Scully?

    --
    In either case, here at Microsoft, we feel standards are important. And we have fun, too. Doug Mahugh, Microsoft
    1. Re:X-files by dominious · · Score: 1

      uh... this is 2010..maybe you mean Bishop and Dunham.

    2. Re:X-files by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Last I checked it was 2011, but the rest of the post still stands

    3. Re:X-files by folderol · · Score: 1

      For a moment I read that as The Bishop of Durham - obviously working too late!

    4. Re:X-files by geekoid · · Score: 1

      HAHAHahaha.. man There needs to be a youtube Fring Spoof called "The Bishop of Durham"

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:X-files by dominious · · Score: 1

      oh you know how these teleportation devices work! sometimes you miss a year or two :-)

  12. Re:Because by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

    Pull my finger...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  13. very bad summary by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was going to create some conspiracy theory about how the UN, who is pushed the Obama Presidency on the America people to subjugate the good and wholesome light of legitimate americans to the international jewish conspiracy, crashed the plane because people on board were in possession of personal knowledge of the illegitimacy of his presidency, and subsequently had to push a secret meeting to disintegrate the data from the black box using well known but secret technology that was stolen from the allien space ship that crashed in Tunguska in 1947.

    But that all went away when it the article made it clear that all that found was the chasis for the data recorder, and none of the actual black boxes, i.e. crash survivable memory units, have in fact been seen or recovered.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  14. The Robot found it missing? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    I'm confused. Was the flight data recorder was found, brought to the surface, opened and the memory module was missing (ie not installed), or was the memory module a separate piece of equipment that connects to the flight data recorder and could simply be covered up by other wreckage in the debris field. If the memory module is contained within the flight data recorder, how is this not flagged by the avionics as a problem? If it is a separate piece of equipment, then what is the point of the flight data recorder. It's obviously not recording any flight data.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:The Robot found it missing? by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      I'm confused. Was the flight data recorder was found, brought to the surface, opened and the memory module was missing (ie not installed), or was the memory module a separate piece of equipment that connects to the flight data recorder and could simply be covered up by other wreckage in the debris field.

      The memory module is a unit mounted in the flight recorder and it's clearly missing in the pictures sent back from the sea bed. As I mentioned above, the flight data recorder chassis looks to have bent enough to break the memory unit away from its mounting points, mostly likely when the plane hit the sea. In that case it should be somewhere in the debris field, but probably some distance from the rest of the unit due to differences in shape and density.

      I believe it's basically an orange cylinder, so it should show up against the sea bed if it isn't lying under another piece of debris.

    2. Re:The Robot found it missing? by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      What if the seabed is orange too?

      Then you may be screwed :).

      In normal circumstances you'd find it using the pinger signal, but that wasn't detected during the initial search and the battery died a long time ago (it was later detected in an offline analysis of the acoustic data recorded during that search, but that couldn't give an accurate position).

  15. Re:Because by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Troll

    The fact that "style" can be elevated to the level of having "principles" is exactly what's wrong in the world.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  16. Obvious answer: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    The space aliens that shot it down got to it first.

    1. Re:Obvious answer: by tsa · · Score: 1

      They weren't shot down, they crashed into the alien's flying saucer. Because the aliens didn't want their presence to be known they pried the memory thingy out of the black box. The saucer was unharmed BTW.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  17. Upgrade! by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    I've wondered for some time why planes don't decentralise this a bit.
    For example, stick a 1cc little cube with an accelerometer, gyro, and some flash memory into all of the electrically operated emergency lights.
    All it does issit there and log accelleration, gyro readings, and temperature to flash, and rewrites after a few weeks.
    This nowadays takes truly modest amounts of power and volume.
    Engines generally survive - stick a few dozen in there.

    1. Re:Upgrade! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Better yet, why don't they just stream the information continuously to a satellite... yeah it costs money - now how much does an Airbus at the bottom of the ocean cost again?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Upgrade! by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

      Better yet, why don't they just stream the information continuously to a satellite... yeah it costs money - now how much does an Airbus at the bottom of the ocean cost again?

      It isn't just the cost. It is:

      Cost(of crash) x Probability(of crash) + Value(of crash data) x Probability(of crash)
      + Cost(of normal Ops) x (1-Probability(of crash)) + Value(of normal data) x (1-Probability(of crash))

      That is almost certainly a negative number most of the time. Airlines hate to lose money therefore it isn't done

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    3. Re:Upgrade! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Flight Data Recorders have to do a lot more than what you are proposing.

      EUROCAE, which the FAA takes it's specifications from, specifies that a recorder must be able to withstand an acceleration of 3400 g (33 km/s) for 6.5 milliseconds. This is roughly equivalent to an impact velocity of 270 knots (310 mph) and a deceleration or crushing distance of 450 cm. Additionally, there are requirements for penetration resistance, static crush, high and low temperature fires, deep sea pressure, sea water immersion, and fluid immersion.

      http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgTSO.nsf/0/CDFB8415D43E695786256DAC0061EC73?OpenDocument

      They record significant flight parameters, including the control and actuator positions, engine information and time of day. There are 88 parameters required as a minimum under current U.S. federal regulations.

      Most modern units self eject, they have to be big enough to show up on sonar and have an acoustic and visual beacon for 30 days.

    4. Re:Upgrade! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Where are you going to get the satellite bandwidth of all of that?

      5300 odd commercial aircraft operating per day over the US, about 9,000 worldwide.

    5. Re:Upgrade! by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite meaning make it a proper flight recorder, just a basic system.

      Acceleration is easy - on a small object, a 2 gram flight recorder has a 'weight' of 7Kg or so.
      The idea would be that these would be pretty much scattered throughout the structure in known places.

      For example - it's rare that none of the engines ever get found, so scatter a dozen in each engine, ...

    6. Re:Upgrade! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting if they could add a system that start send all data vie satellite when an emergency is detected.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Upgrade! by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Pilots want not to be killed while flying a plane. Most I know would prefer to know about a lurking flaw or situation that could kill them. One in particular flies the A330. Aircraft manufactures don't like to have their planes go down and have people reject their product. The reason it hasn't been done is because it's expensive -- that's it.

    8. Re:Upgrade! by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Engines survive because they aren't composed of soft materials, like a bunch of 1cc cubes of electronic devices. Also, the engines are made of resistant materials because one of them disintegrating in-flight would be a major hazard.

      But you could choose another part of the plane to put those sensors. I guess the reasons they aren't used are historical (electronics was expensive just a while ago) and because you can deduce the acceleration and temperature of most of the debris of an accident just by looking at them and where they landed. Now, if you make they store instrument data...

    9. Re:Upgrade! by ryanov · · Score: 1

      What purpose would that serve?

    10. Re:Upgrade! by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just make a system with data communications between all airplanes, making a giant worldwide p2p network of distributed storage and transmission? Mandatory, just like black boxes are now, so the system will actually work. If an Air France plane crashed in the middle of the ocean, its flight recorder data could be retreived from the Lufthansa 50 miles behind him or the Delta 60 miles ahead. Encoded, of course. Or the data could just hop from plane to plane until it reaches Paris, where it is stored on Air France computers. Who needs satellites if you've got planes in the sky pretty much everywhere? And the system need only cost the price of the on board units, no need to pay for expensive data links with ground based or satellite receivers since the planes are creating the network between themselves. And apart from flight data recorder data, it could also be used for all sorts of other messages, weather data, etc... Pilots would love to have access to wind and turbulence readings from other aircraft along the route, for example. The possibilities are endless! Why on earth would anyone still rely on a metal box to store flight recorder data in the event of a crash? What century is this?

    11. Re:Upgrade! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      or the Delta 60 miles ahead.

      You mean instead of carrier pigeons, carrier RATS? Couldn't resist, considering a recent story about Delta.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  18. Re:Because by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone forgot to post anonymously. Given your low UID, is it possible that you are the Methusalah of trolls? Traveling from one era to the next, trusty bag of tired memes in one hand, bucket of spam in the other?

    You know, I don't get many opportunities on this site to do this, but.... NERD!!

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  19. Wow, I think you've nailed it, big guy! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
    Nobody was monitoring the robot (externally, that is) to see whether or not IT had something to do with the removal of the "memory part" (not to be confused with those other parts??)? This is truly thought-provoking....I mean, could the 'bots be in on this, or something????

    On a more serious note, though, recall that it was malware which brought down a Spanish airliner around that same timeframe. The malware interfered with the diagostic warning systems of the avionics systems (occupired same memory vectors, disrupting warning signals from emitting).

  20. Re:Because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I always thought it was an anagram of Corum Jhaelen Irsei.

  21. Re:What about the 9/11 black boxes... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    What about them?

    According to the 9/11 Commission Report, both black boxes from Flight 77 and both black boxes from Flight 93 were recovered. However, the CVR from Flight 77 was said to be too damaged to yield any data. On April 18, 2002, the FBI allowed the families of victims from Flight 93 to listen to the voice recordings. In April 2006, a transcript of the CVR was released as part of the Zacarias Moussaoui trial.

    http://articles.cnn.com/2002-04-18/us/rec.flight.93_1_family-members-deena-burnett-flight-attendants?_s=PM:US

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/apr/13/usa.september11

    As for Kapparot and Brit milah, they are legal because its a damned religious issue.

    The First Amendment prohibits the federal government from making a law "respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" This provision was later expanded to state and local governments, through the Incorporation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

    Outlaw Brit milah and Mohels and you violate the First Amendment.

  22. Re:Because by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    I get that all the time. Compare this SGU episode with this DS9 episode.

    To be fair, though, TOS was in the business of ripping off things already. Consider Balance of Terror, which proudly combines a classic WW2 U-boat terror movie with the Roman Empire... IN SPACE!

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  23. They only found the "chassis" of the FDR by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To answer everyone's question, all they found is the chassis housing the FDR. It connects to the plane's avionics and does the actual flight data recording, which it then writes to flash memory in a separate memory module. It is only important before the crash. The memory module plugs into this chassis and screws on (you can see the 4 screws on the chassis and the screw holes on the memory module's feet if you click on the pic in the link). During the crash, the two got separated. The memory module itself is the part that's designed to be crash/fire/water-proof, and the locater beacon they were listening for immediately after the crash is attached to the memory module.

  24. To The Cloud! by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

    All flight data should be backed up on Cloud Storage.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    1. Re:To The Cloud! by Tiger4 · · Score: 1
      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    2. Re:To The Cloud! by JamesP · · Score: 1
      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  25. Re:Because by bughunter · · Score: 2

    With a UID that low, if he was going to Troll, you'd be left wondering what the hell hominy porridge has to do with ex-vegan stars of melodramatic ballet movies...

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  26. So a sea creature...? by macraig · · Score: 1

    So some sea critter ate the memory chips, specifically? This reminds me of a story about the fish kids in ocean schools: "I can't turn in my homework... I put it on a memory stick and the octopus ate it!"

    1. Re:So a sea creature...? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      The thought is that it is too large/sturdy to be of interest. It also sounds like it must be pretty heavy.

    2. Re:So a sea creature...? by JamesP · · Score: 1

      It's not chips, it's crisps!

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  27. Re:Because by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Were you trolling, or making fun of conspiracy nutters? Making fun of those wackos was my first assumption.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. Re:What about the 9/11 black boxes... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    Logically: ignorant african immigrants should also be allowed to mutilate their daughters. Same shit, really.

  29. Re:Because by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Troll

    Or... a pathology.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  30. Re:Because by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

    Making fun!

    Just because they control the world's reserve currencies through banking, forced income taxes on the people of all developed nations and manipulate the markets of the world, doesn't mean they lurk behind every unexplained phenomenon!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  31. Re:Because by ryanov · · Score: 3, Informative
  32. Re:Stop Outsourcing! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Because the FDR is just part of the unit:
    http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45996000/gif/_45996239_black_box_loc_v2_466_v2.gif

    Also, a floating FDR would be a nightmare. In the event of an ocean crash do you *really* want the FDR to drift off on the currents? It could end up anywhere - oceans are vast, even with a locator beacon broadcasting its position it's hard enough to find in a reasonably well defined debris field on the seabed.

  33. Re:What about the 9/11 black boxes... by ryanov · · Score: 1

    I dislike the Israel thing as much as anyone, but that's like equating Christians with the USA. The USA is not a Christian nation and not all of the USA is Christian. While that is less true of Israel, it is certainly true that all Jews are not Israeli and don't all necessarily approve of their actions. I know you're trolling, but perhaps someone else hasn't thought this through also.

  34. but that's his point: the FAA design is stupid by r00t · · Score: 1

    an acceleration of 3400 g (33 km/s) for 6.5 milliseconds. This is roughly equivalent to an impact velocity of 270 knots (310 mph) and a deceleration or crushing distance of 450 cm. Additionally, there are requirements for penetration resistance, static crush, high and low temperature fires, deep sea pressure, sea water immersion, and fluid immersion. [...] big enough to show up on sonar and have an acoustic and visual beacon for 30 days.

    This is why the system is so bulky/heavy/expensive that it wasn't practical to embed one in every major aircraft component. The vertical tail piece was found days after the crash, floating on the ocean, but didn't contain any data. FAIL. We've now found the a main landing gear part, big enough to hold data in the support tube and very likely to be separated from any fire, but again it doesn't contain anything.

    If the FAA was designing Google's datacenter, they'd use one supercomputer. They'd load it up with expensive components in a futile attempt to prevent it from ever failing. They'd have just one data center, under a concrete dome designed to stop an M-9 earthquake.

    BTW, deep sea pressure is no big deal for a silicon chip. As long as the surrounding stuff doesn't cause bending that leads to a crack, silicon will laugh at the Marinaras trench. It's crystal, similar to diamond.

    1. Re:but that's his point: the FAA design is stupid by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Surely you realize the FAA doesn't design aircraft or data recorders, yes?

    2. Re:but that's his point: the FAA design is stupid by r00t · · Score: 1

      The FAA designs requirements that have to be met. All aircraft must meet the requirements, but there is little incentive to go beyond.

      I suppose you could argue that "campaign contributions" (bribes) allow industry to supply the designs. Aside from that though, the FAA does more-or-less design aircraft and data recorders. It's indirect, via the mandated requirements that must be met.

      The FAA does not demand data recorder redundancy. They do demand various durability features. They get what they demand, seldom more and never less.

    3. Re:but that's his point: the FAA design is stupid by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Several less-durable data recorders might all be destroyed. For some time, the innards of these recorders also were not small. Also bear in mind that wherever these recorders are, they must be gotten out of there to be serviced/replaced/pulled from time to time. ALSO bear in mind that the Quick Access Recorder is also present in most aircraft. I would bet it is ordinarily destroyed.

    4. Re:but that's his point: the FAA design is stupid by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Beyond this -- I'm curious -- what are your credentials in this field?

  35. Re:Because by lul_wat · · Score: 1

    I like this guy.

    --
    Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
  36. Re:Because by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    Shame about SGU, I liked this particular two parter, even with its kludges.

  37. Re:Stop Outsourcing! by PPH · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the memory module by itself floats. The chassis sank (because its a metal box that can fill with water). But if the module remains watertight, it could be washing up on a New Jersey beach as we speak.

    No Snookie. Its not a bottle of booze. Please don't open it.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  38. Re:Because by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        It seems the Airbus A330 uses either a SSD or tape for storage. They also have a "Quick Access Recorder".

        I only found this, because I was under the impression that most aircraft used two FDRs, once in the front, one in the rear, to help assure survival of the data in the event of a nasty catastrophic incident (i.e., very hot fire on part of an aircraft that has broken up upon intersection of the flight path and the surrounding terrain). It appears that is a mistaken belief.

        Now all I can say is the missing data is a conspiracy. It must be the undersea aliens. :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  39. Re:Because by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    a large part is a bit like big portion, well that's what she said.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  40. Re:Because by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Oh come on man, everyone know that the Egyptians infiltrated the Jewish 'escape' from tyranny with one of their own who runs all the scams.

    I got there first and he approved.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  41. Re:Because by TheDigitalOne · · Score: 1

    Given your low UID

    #35980182 is considered a low UID these days?

  42. Re:Because by TheDigitalOne · · Score: 1

    Ugh, strike that, read message threads as UID

  43. Re:Because by Surt · · Score: 1

    Genius. I feel like we could be witnessing the return of Meept here.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  44. Re:Because by ryanov · · Score: 1

    Nope. Two, yes, but one is the CVR and one is the FDR. Both are at the rear if I'm not mistaken. That is ordinarily the best place for them. Fire does not appear to ordinarily be that big of a problem. The QAR I believe is optional -- don't really know -- but I do know that it is not crash proof.

  45. Hello, Ahmed! by mangu · · Score: 1

    Say, how many petrodollars did the 137 Slashdot ID cost?

  46. Re:What about the 9/11 black boxes... by Rakishi · · Score: 1

    Same shit, really.

    No it's not.

  47. Well, part of it is by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    While probably meant as a joke, this is a work in progress and this flight in fact as far as I know did send some messages home before the crash.

    But we are forgetting that aircraft are VERY old things. Some of the aircraft you fly in are themselves older then the modern internet and might well have been designed before even the foundations of the internet were laid down.

    Even so called modern aircraft are quite old and the aviation industry is not for one for rapid chance. See McDonald Douglas building the DC-10 with OUTWARD opening doors, an aircraft almost crashing because of it, then the same thing happening again because the aircraft company preferred profits over peoples lives. Boeing and Airbus are exactly the same. All aircraft companies have ignored safety advice from air crashes for the sake of more crash.

    So, while an aircraft could nowaways be in constant communication with the ground entirely independent from the rest of the aircraft, it won't happen for a long time because they just don't care. Each safety feature introduced requires state intervention and you know how Americans hate that.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  48. Re:Because by equex · · Score: 1

    I see your appreciation of UID 137 and raise you that I personally know the guy who has UID 42! (btw people trade low UID's on Ebay, so don't always assume you know who's behind them.)

    --
    Can I light a sig ?
  49. So they found the black box without the memory.... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    So for those of us who are not aircraft crash investigators wtf does that mean?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  50. Re:What about the 9/11 black boxes... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    It differs on the (usual) extent of the damage. Otherwise, yes it is.

  51. Re:Because by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Damn! The old 'eaten by a shark' trick.. Should've known The locator beacon probably acted like a dog whistle to them

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  52. This is a non story of a non story by JamesP · · Score: 1

    They didn't found the 'black box', they found its interface to the plane.

    Long story short: At first it was an entire block. An it was not solid state memory, but tape recorders for voice (or worse).

    Plane crashed, forces distorted the black box and with it the fire/water/etc protection became innefective.

    Then they had an idea, let's put the memory in a SOLID CYLINDER of thick metal and with a very thick thermal and shock insulation. Upon impact, that cylinder 'pops off' if the chassis is subject to forces that cause it to distort (really, the cylinder is attached by 4 bolts, it has to be a big shock for it to come off)

    Problem is, a cylinder is much easier to get missing, bury itself, and more difficult to recognize among debris, etc, then a big L shaped piece of metal (the chassis)

    Personally, mabe it's time for them to get back to the drawing bord. Maybe attach the cylinder t to the chassis using a flexible material as well (so that it stays attached even if it pops off and slow its separation)

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  53. Re:What about the 9/11 black boxes... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    And Rastafarians should be allowed to use Cannabis as they see fit...

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  54. Re:What about the 9/11 black boxes... by solios · · Score: 1

    The USA is not a Christian nation

    God's on our money. And pretty much everywhere else. This country is about as secular as it is communist.

  55. Re:Because by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    To make it simple for the rest of them - Michael Moorcock is a prolific English author of SF and Fantasy, creator of such classic characters as Elric of Melnebone. While much of his fantasy and SF is intended to be adventure oriented works and relies on a formula of having something exciting hapen every six pages like clockwork, He wrote a litterarily more ambitious work titled "Behold the Man", about a time traveller substituting for Jesus at the crucifixion so history would come out right, and uses characters with the initials J.C. frequently, some would say constantly, in his works. Jeremiah Cornelius is a character from a series of works set in the modern era, and is the sole character Moorcock actually loaned out with his blessing to any other artist that wanted to use him, so there are works by at least a dozen other well established authors featuring him, including a comic strip in Heavy Metal (The Airtight Garage of Jerry Cornelius), and even a film (The Final Programme - AKA The Last Days of Man on Earth)),

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  56. Re:What about the 9/11 black boxes... by ryanov · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, there are other religions that have a god, and it is perfectly possible to live your life here in a secular fashion.

  57. Re:Because by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

    If I remember right, my mistaken belief on the location of the FDR(s) was from a few 1980's news reports... So, a bit dated. Back then, the news was filled with them, and they always had "experts" who would babble on about anything, to fill the airtime.

      When I fly, I remember the statistics that I have gathered from flights I've been on. 75% take off on time. 98% have the expected flight duration, and 100% have landed in one piece. Screw the FDR, I want the plane to land in one piece (*AND* get to the gate in one piece). I was just flying a couple days ago. We were at the gate, but the jet bridge had not bee completely put in place. I thought about the above video, as I reached for my seatbelt. "Hmmmm, maybe I should leave my seatbelt on."

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  58. Re:Because by ryanov · · Score: 1

    Exactly! And that's one of the reasons that it bothers me so much when I see people bitching and moaning about the rules on the aircraft. Some of them (the electronic devices thing) don't really make much sense, and some of them only make sense in the context of an emergency (which is something no one can predict and no one wants to spend much time talking about on board). One example is making sure all of your stuff fits under your seat -- that's so when everyone is trying to escape the burning plane, your shoulder strap doesn't trip and kill someone who then takes 5 more seconds to get out. Instead though, you see all of these big-balls types that say "I'm not going to follow their stupid rule" and then end up causing problems. Some of these types end up passing through the ceiling panels when they refuse to wear a seatbelt while seated at cruise with the fasten seat-belt sign on.

    Ah well, that's people for you!

  59. Re:Stop Outsourcing! by ray-auch · · Score: 1

    No, it won't

    The memory chipas are surrounded with a large chunk thermal mass insulator and a thick steel outer covering for imapact & pressure resistance

    The whole thing will sink like a brick

  60. Re:Because by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      One of my favorite quotes is...

    "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity."
    - Robert A. Heinlein

        When flying, I do pay attention to where the exits are. I also go beyond that, and look at where my "assets" are in the event of an emergency. Who looks strong and can follow instructions. It doesn't matter if it's a hijacking, or a plane crash, you will likely need those assets. And ya, the guy who feels it's appropriate to put his laptop on his lap, and bag at his feet, it's still wrong.

        I was berated by a flight attendant for having "luggage" on my feet. Turned out it was just my jacket, while I was buckling my seatbelt. Once she saw that's all it was, she was fine with it. I was in snow country, so if we had a failed aborted takeoff (i.e., plane runs off the runway), having my jacket in hand would be nice. I learned in boot camp, sleeping in your underwear may be comfortable until they call a fire drill in the middle of the night when it's around freezing outside. I fell for it once. From then on, I slept dressed. Oddly enough, I was one of few who figured it out. About 2% of the platoon prepared. The rest froze their asses off.

        My seatbelt stays buckled from before we push off, until after the jet bridge is in place. My cell is firmly on my hip, and my ID is in my pocket. The only time it comes off is if I have to use the restroom, which I usually take care of before boarding.

        I plan ahead. Most don't. Oddly enough, in a disaster, people look to a leader, and in something like an aircraft incident, the implied leaders (flight crew) may not be available. The front of an aircraft may be the least survivable location, depending on the incident. I don't want to be the leader, but a group of survivors will need one or there will be chaos.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  61. Re:Because by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    I have "always" been 137. Was also 167 on Technocrat.

    I used to reload /. many times a day - before the introduction of a commenting system - just to see what had been released for Windowmaker and Enlightenment DR09.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  62. Memory unit found today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They've now found and recovered the missing memory unit:

    http://www.bea.aero/en/enquetes/flight.af.447/info01may2011.en.php