Slashdot Mirror


Man Unknowingly Tweets the Osama Raid

Sohaib Athar, a.k.a. @ReallyVirtual, had no idea the helicopters he was complaining about on twitter were part of the top secret mission that killed Osama bin Laden Sunday night. 10 hours before bin Laden's death was announced Athar posted: "Helicopter hovering above Abbottabad at 1AM (is a rare event).” From the article: "During the raid, Athar speculates that he was two or three kilometers away from the shooting that took place. Once news broke that bin Laden had been killed in Abbottabad, Athar tweeted, 'Uh oh, now I’m the guy who liveblogged the Osama raid without knowing it.'”

354 comments

  1. This is good to know by ls671 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is good to know. Otherwise his tweet might have ended up on some conspiracy theorist sites with a "black helicopters" tag or something...

    A very interesting point is that it is said one of the 4 choppers was hit by enemy fire which I haven't heard about yet. President Obama said "no Americans were injured" so I would assume it was only a minor hit.

    On another topic, CNN just announced a few minutes ago that there is a DNA match confirming the body was indeed Osama. They also announced that the FBI has updated its most wanted list, it makes sense I guess...

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:This is good to know by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The rumors were that it was a Pakinstani helicopter that went down. If that's the case, I can understand why it hasn't been played up, as the Pakistanis have been playing both sides on these issues for a long time now, and don't like to publicize it when they help the U.S.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:This is good to know by rwven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nah, it was a US helicopter that went down, but it was a minor incident. The "window shaking bang" was when the seals blew up the chopper on the way out (since it apparently couldn't fly). There's been a lot of news coverage on that topic. :-P

    3. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard that Paskastani helicopters may have been invovled, so I wondered if one of them was hit. If so, I would like to know if any of them were injuried. I'm grateful Americans were, but if Pakastani were helping us and injuried that's important to know too.

    4. Re:This is good to know by moco · · Score: 5, Funny

      one of the 4 choppers was hit by enemy fire

      sources said that it was hit by a giant swatter

      --
      moi
    5. Re:This is good to know by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://stocksthatpay.com/?p=16697 with a pic "U.S. helicopter, which was destroyed to protect intelligence"

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:This is good to know by Alarash · · Score: 1

      I really, really doubt that US Special Forces would have a helicopter hovering about the area of the raid TEN HOURS before the raid actually took place. The guy didn't escape the Americans and half of the Western countries intelligence agencies by letting that kind of hints go unnoticed.

    7. Re:This is good to know by kdogg73 · · Score: 2

      I wish I had mod points for you.

      --
      Let's face it, most of us are scoffers. But moments before zero hour, it does not pay to take chances.
    8. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Read carefully. He tweeted 10 hours before his death was *announced* by Obama. In that 10 hours, the raid took place, OBL was killed, the body was brought to Afghanistan, positively ID'd and perhaps even already given a seamans grave.

    9. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Think about it, they killed him in the middle of the night, not the middle of the day. It just took 10 hours before they announced it to the public.

    10. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Navy and Marines. They don't say "chopper." That's Army. They say "helio."

    11. Re:This is good to know by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought Marines were only capable of grunts.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:This is good to know by similar_name · · Score: 4, Funny

      But where is the death certificate?

    13. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, and on the anniversary of the Mission Accomplished too ! What luck !

      Just amazing, really. I mean, it is sort of like taking out three towers with two planes. The odds !

      USA USA USA

    14. Re:This is good to know by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Donald Trump is hard at work on this.

      --

      Long signatures suck.
    15. Re:This is good to know by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      But where is the death certificate?

      Damned good question! And it better be the long form, too, by golly.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    16. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about? You are an ignorant fool. Go climb back in your cave before your nonsensical bullsh1t spreads. The Seal teams are some of the most highly trained in the world and they dont normally put innocent lives at risk doing any op they conduct.

    17. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The announcement was 10 hours later, not the attack. The attack occurred at the same time as this man's Twitter comments.

    18. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      New at the top of the FBI's most wanted list is the guy that tweeted about the helicopters.

    19. Re:This is good to know by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Oops. I guess I was the first to tweet about the tornados in Alabama, because I tweeted I saw some clouds in the sky.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    20. Re:This is good to know by lennier1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Force Recon Marines have been observed to speak up to a dozen words. Guess that's what makes them the elite of their branch.

    21. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was 10 hours before the death was ANNOUNCED...

    22. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they did the dna match right there on the ship, or if they flew the dna home to do a test. How long does a dna test normally take?

    23. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? His joke was lame as shit.

    24. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaaah, the joys of not RTFA...

    25. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh.. I'm still not reading it, but your response implies that the there is a reason the joke was modded +5. My apologies to the OP or GP whatever the fuck you guys call it.

    26. Re:This is good to know by sorak · · Score: 4, Funny

      But where is the death certificate?

      Damned good question! And it better be the long form, too, by golly.

      But if it says this went down in Hawaii, I'm calling bullshit!

    27. Re:This is good to know by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      President Obama said "no Americans were injured" so I would assume it was only a minor hit.

      Given his occupation, you should assume President Obama was lying.

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    28. Re:This is good to know by steelfood · · Score: 1

      If only you could be modded up even further...

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    29. Re:This is good to know by turbidostato · · Score: 2

      "But where is the death certificate?"

      Ehuhh... I think it's enough if Netcraft confirms it.

    30. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      a seamans grave.

      Is that kind of like a bukkake?

    31. Re:This is good to know by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Donald Trump is hard at work on this.

      Sure, but will that be the short form or the official long form?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    32. Re:This is good to know by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 2

      There, I fixed your typo, teabagger. 'Conservative thought' has almost become indistinguishable from trolling.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    33. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another case of a man of color profiled and killed DWB. (Driving While binLaden)

    34. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donald Trump was woken up with the news that US special forces got Osama. Great he replied , we finally got the bastard !..... Oh never mind I thought you said Obama ..

      ( He is now waiting for the long form death certificate to be releaaed )

    35. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
      Strawman

      Sure, I did troll you for your thinly veiled racism, but that doesn't mean I was projecting.

    36. Re:This is good to know by moppop · · Score: 1

      Heck, I can take out 10 pins with one ball half the time....

    37. Re:This is good to know by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming by "scum" you're referring to the radicals. The reports are that one used a woman as a human shield, so I'd tend to agree with you.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    38. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But where is the death certificate?

      I need the LOOONG form death certificate!

    39. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done!

    40. Re:This is good to know by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      Unless you shitbags pull some talking dogs or cats out, I'd really like to know which other race you're referencing. There's only one human race. Ignorant doucebag.

    41. Re:This is good to know by chispito · · Score: 1

      I just meant that terrorists like to hide behind women and children. I'm not sure what you read into my comment.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    42. Re:This is good to know by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      "I did troll you for your thinly veiled racism"

      But, the thing is, you can't understand that you FAILED. Black, white, liberal, conservative, gay, straight, male, female - the vast majority of each of those groups are well aware that you can tell when a politician is lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying. If his lips are not moving, he's hiding something. So, your troll failed, because the original post was denigrating Obama for being a politician, not for being black.

      In short, you read into the post what you wanted/expected to hear, which means the psychological projection link was right for you.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    43. Re:This is good to know by chispito · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes that is what I meant. Poorly worded on my part. Scum = islamists. Its family = women and children they hide behind. I was looking at diagrams and images of the compound and trying to figure out where this helicopter might have been blown up.

      Given the nature of how details emerge, it seems possible to me they landed in an adjacent or nearby field and stormed walls. The pictures released from today don't show any damage I can see.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    44. Re:This is good to know by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      President Obama said "no Americans were injured" so I would assume it was only a minor hit.

      Given his occupation, you should assume President Obama was lying.

      Common misunderstanding by people who think they know what "skepticism" means, but actually don't. Believing a particular statement is false is every bit as non-skeptical an attitude as believing it is true. A skeptic does not believe either. Pardon me from being pedantic, but I'm always annoyed by the legions of incredibly gullible people who call themselves skeptical because of all their unfounded beliefs (this is false, that is false, yada yada).

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    45. Re:This is good to know by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      He will only be happy with the LONG FORM death certificate, then he will be very proud of himself.

    46. Re:This is good to know by makomk · · Score: 1

      The reports are that one used a woman as a human shield

      The reports by the US military, which is trying to justify why they shot and killed her, say she was used as a human shield. Of course, it's not like the US military has ever lied to us, and it's certainly not like they ever lied in order to use our cultural abhorrence to women being mistreated or harmed during warfare as a PR weapon. That would never happen!

    47. Re:This is good to know by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      That would all be well and good if I was trying to make my point as a skeptic one. But I am actually indulging in the quite diametrically opposed position of my bias towards politicians.

      It is my personal belief that politicians are naturally selected as the biggest liars, so, to make it to president, you gotta be a professional whopper delivery guy. :-)

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    48. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Conservatives' seeming like so much to tell others that they are wrong. However, I knew what he meant, but saying it twice doesn't make something true, even if from two different talk radio shows.

      Modern conservationism is mean and ugly. Somehow America so far hasn't well noticed six quarters of decent growth, but according you'all hell is right around the corner. Its what the carnival barkers tell you all day long, in all fairness they have hours of radio time to fill and it's easy to fall into the same patterns. People like yourself sometime acknowledge their distance from the truth, but claim that people like Rush Limbaugh 'have the gist of it', when in reality you're only drinking some of kool-aid.

      In short, saying something twice doesn't make it true.

    49. Re:This is good to know by Majutsushi · · Score: 1

      Must have been a SWAT team then.

    50. Re:This is good to know by chajath · · Score: 0

      "But where is the death certificate?"

      Ehuhh... I think it's enough if Netcraft confirms it.

      They are yet to confirm it

    51. Re:This is good to know by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's the Twitter update in the screenshot that reads "Go away helicopter - before I take out my giant swatter :-/"...

    52. Re:This is good to know by sznupi · · Score: 1

      In other words, even not RTFS...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    53. Re:This is good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had heard that several copters were damaged and then destroyed by the US (presumably so they wouldn't end up in ememy hands).

    54. Re:This is good to know by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      This should be AR, not AC. Anonymous Retard.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  2. Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    This man's story seems to directly contradict the story the news is telling everyone. Should I be surprised or should I be expected to be more cynical by now?

    1. Re:Huh. by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      This is indeed a WTF story. If it's a joke story, the sarcasm should've been made more obvious in the summary. Far too lazy to RTFA for this idleness.

    2. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This man's story seems to directly contradict the story the news is telling everyone. Should I be surprised or should I be expected to be more cynical by now?

      How so? The reports I've been hearing all morning pretty much match up exactly with this, except now we have an actual time that it happened (as opposed to Slashdot's speculation that the events happened a week ago).

    3. Re:Huh. by NotAGoodNickname · · Score: 4

      Directly contradict how? The man says a helicopter, a big bang. How does that contradict anything?

    4. Re:Huh. by fermion · · Score: 2

      Now we not only have MS shills, Apple shills, GOATSE shills, but also Fox news shills. When will it all end.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Huh. by Gravitron+5000 · · Score: 2

      I'm sure there are plenty of creationists out there that will try to refute the big bang part.

    6. Re:Huh. by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      /. is the official home of the conspiracy theory... I'm sure plenty of them feel this isn't real anyhow.

    7. Re:Huh. by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      /. is the official home of the conspiracy theory

      That's just what they want you to think...

    8. Re:Huh. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      When someone posts a pic of the goatee guy's anus transparencied out and there's Glenn Beck with an iPad playing on a kinect.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    9. Re:Huh. by snl2587 · · Score: 0

      So Fox News is "the news" now? I thought it was where rage and intolerance went to fester.

    10. Re:Huh. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      No, you should be expected to:
      A: learn to read
      B: learn about time zones
      C: learn how to take multiple witness account and correlate them together
      D: understand that you're not the sharpest tool in the shed

      Those tweets are not the only first hand witness accounts of the action taking place. Everything that I've read supports the US government version of events pretty closely. The differences only help to support the story. I mean, if everyone gave out the identical same version of events, I'd be very suspicious!!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had him weeks ago, and staged this raid once they had verified that it was indeed Osama.... Duh!

    12. Re:Huh. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Quite telling, regarding their brainfarts. The modern theory of big bang was kick-started by a priest (also a mathematician and astronomer; though such hypothesis was also very convenient for somebody who dedicated large chunk of his life to Abrahamic mythology), no problems there... (likewise with evolution, even to a "truth cannot contradict truth" degree - if tl;dr, at least check 3 sentences starting with "How do the conclusions", 2 with "It is necessary to determine", and 3 with "Today, almost half")

      Of course, for most of the creationists you are probably most likely to stumble upon, they are not even protestant generally speaking, they just like calling themselves like that (just because they are not catholic, I guess? And what about that "christian" label...). Protestants do not interpret the bible literally, if you do that you are a heretic. Of course most of the heretics found their faith ridiculed in the old world and migrated to the new, but being illiterate fools, they forget they weren't even really protestant, and that they in their teachings defied the words of Martin Luther... And now, given the degree of orthodox ignorance that's required to feel in any way at home in many of the churches... (nvm how people somehow think primitive uncivilized societies of superstitious illiterates were capable of securely maintaining even proper records, short of burying stone tablets and forgetting them because of the illiterate part)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  3. I can't find it by nbauman · · Score: 2
    1. Re:I can't find it by mayko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Awww... No street view?

    2. Re:I can't find it by milgram · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why didn't we just search Google for his location? It is even marked! ;)

    3. Re:I can't find it by StormReaver · · Score: 4, Funny

      U.S. Intelligence really sucks for not being able to find this place. Google Maps clearly labels it, "Osama bin Laden's Compound", yet the U.S. still couldn't find it?

    4. Re:I can't find it by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2

      DUH! Just type "Osama Bin Laden" into Google maps and up it pops! I wonder why nobody thought to try this before now? I'm gonna try "Waldo" and "Carmen Sandiego" next!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    5. Re:I can't find it by jank1887 · · Score: 4, Funny

      the reviews for that place are awesome:

      - Free HBO, but "death to America! " chants were getting old. Better options nearby.

      - Cold and drafty at night, walls full of holes.

      - I heard that this place is now available (prior residents left suddenly and unexpectedly).

    6. Re:I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      carmen Sandiego comes up in New South Whales.. better fly to Australia and find her!

    7. Re:I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No--but there's driving directions. It's funny to me that this is about a 2 hour drive from Islamabad.

    8. Re:I can't find it by djtachyon · · Score: 1
      --
      "What's the use of a good quotation if you can't change it?" - Doctor Who
    9. Re:I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, that doesn't make sense. I've seen a few locations guessed wrong (including on CNN, who just zoomed in on downtown Abbottabad). None of those locations in the thread are right so far.

      It's been described as a 3-story building with a walled balcony on one side and a high wall around it, fitting what is seen in the ground photos in the news stories. Location-wise, yes, it is near Abbottabad, but is described as being in the outskirts, and only a few hundred metres from the local military school -- that places it on the east or northeast side of Abbottabad. The neighborhood has also been described in the media, and a BBC article showed a box around the relevant area on the map, between Abbottabad and Kakul. Within that area, this building and walled compound is noticeably bigger and has a higher wall than most other buildings in the area, has a bunker on one side of the roof as seen in the ground photos (at the N side of the roof), and a walled balcony on the opposite side (the S side). It closely matches the appearance of the building in the ground photos. Ah, just as I was about to add in the BBC link, I discovered that they've already updated their map with a more precise location: that is the right spot.

    10. Re:I can't find it by treeves · · Score: 1

      It's very unclear to me from looking at the Google map where the border of Pakistan is to the north and east. Was OBL closer to India, China, or Afghanistan? I would have guessed the latter based on what we heard after 9/11, but it looks like he was closer to the border with India or China.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    11. Re:I can't find it by Conditioner · · Score: 0

      My favorite was "BOOM HEAD SHOT!!!!". You know, because they shot him twice in the head after resisting...

    12. Re:I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that location is accurate... why does it not surprise me that it is only a block or two away from a hospital? There were rumors that he needed dialysis. Of course, everyone denies that, but every lie has a hint of truth.

    13. Re:I can't find it by guruevi · · Score: 5, Funny

      The US Military went over it's bandwidth cap with AT&T and was confined to 56k for all their web traffic.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    14. Re:I can't find it by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The Ogle Earth blog has the best coverage I've seen so far - deducing the location from various clues. Finding it turns out to be a medium difficult problem because of the age of the imagery.

    15. Re:I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here it is http://maps.google.com/maps?q=osama+bin+laden+&hl=en&view=map&mcsrc=google_reviews&num=10&ie=UTF8&start=20&cid=11196890339658103699&t=h&ll=34.184471,73.246193&spn=0.010331,0.01929&z=16&iwloc=A

      Not according to the BBC, who place it slightly further east: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=osama%27s+hideout&ie=UTF8&hq=osama%27s+hideout&hnear=&cid=11926225655530825281&ll=34.169377,73.242888&spn=0.00348,0.006968&t=h&z=18&iwloc=A

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13257330

    16. Re:I can't find it by jsvendsen · · Score: 1

      Did you consider the possibility that he might, at different points of time during the last 10 years, have visited more than one location?

    17. Re:I can't find it by Kenneth+Stephen · · Score: 1

      This location makes more sense. According to other sources, the intersection of Awami road and Kakul road (the spot where it says "PMA Kakul") is approximately where the helicopter went down. This would make it in the flight path to / from the Afghan border, rather than the swing-around-and attack from the South implied by the other location.

      --

      There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.

    18. Re:I can't find it by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Cool! I'll be playing with my plastic helicopter and toy soldiers on this all day.

    19. Re:I can't find it by TheScreenIsnt · · Score: 1

      Now you can.. and it's already got 35 reviews (mixed).

    20. Re:I can't find it by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      This isn't the compound, it doesn't match the pictures the SOC has released. I think you're very close, though.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    21. Re:I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not according to the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13257330

    22. Re:I can't find it by careysub · · Score: 1

      Notice that the map shows Bin Laden's compound and Kakul - the Pakistan Military Academy (PMA). As you travel down Awami Road the distance from the corner of the walled Bin Laden compound to the apparent corner of the PMA grounds you traverse no more than mere 600 meters (2000 feet)! This compound was specially built in 2005. It is impossible for me to believe that the Pakistani military was not protecting this man.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    23. Re:I can't find it by shermo · · Score: 1

      There's even a conveniently located cricket pitch next door. I wonder if he watched the world cup semi?

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    24. Re:I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know who those "experts" are, but all the links that have been moderated up so far are wrong. That building complex is on the opposite side of Abbottabad from the area reported in the news, and the satellite picture looks nothing like the photos of the Bin Laden's building from the ground.

      It's here in Bilal Town, between Abbottabad and the Pakistan Military Academy on the northeast side of the city according to the BBC.

    25. Re:I can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets pretty bad reviews:
      http://maps.google.com/maps/place?cid=9294138184493326603&q=Osama+Bin+Laden%27s+Hideout+Compound&hl=en&view=feature&mcsrc=google_reviews&num=10&start=0&ie=UTF8&ll=34.170562,73.240029&spn=0,0&t=h&z=18

    26. Re:I can't find it by Dragon_Punch · · Score: 0

      Woah, If this works with "Waldo" and "Carmen Sandiego" next, we will have to try with some missing persons.

      --
      Pylons?
  4. disarming referendums legislation world wide event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's the spirit. no further need for manufactured death, or constant deception. that takes care of that? still be ready to run for cover in case any one is not on board with the joyus world wide disarmament proceedings.

  5. All the reports say it was one week ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that they had to confirm the identity (using DNA testing) before announcing it (rather obvious, announce he's dead and having him send out another video would be embarrassing). Don't people writing the news also read the news?

    1. Re:All the reports say it was one week ago... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      No, you've heard wrong. The raid was yesterday.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:All the reports say it was one week ago... by Tsiangkun · · Score: 0
      +1

      They got him on Mission Accomplished Day !
      We are all safer now that he is dead.
      Osama was one of the few people who could mastermind the destruction of three towers with just two planes.

    3. Re:All the reports say it was one week ago... by snl2587 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember that the 24-hour news channels rarely fact-check anything, preferring instead to report "breaking news". This has the nasty side-effect of turning hearsay into well-reported "facts", which then stick around and confuse people.

    4. Re:All the reports say it was one week ago... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Osama was one of the few people who could mastermind the destruction of three towers with just two planes.

      More on that...

      NIST NCSTAR 1A: Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:All the reports say it was one week ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, all official stories are true.

      Asymmetric damage causes symmetric collapse of buildings. It happened three times in one day, it has to be the truth.

    6. Re:All the reports say it was one week ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow a truther.

    7. Re:All the reports say it was one week ago... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Yes, all official stories are true.

      Because all conspiracy theories are true?

      Asymmetric damage causes symmetric collapse of buildings. It happened three times in one day, it has to be the truth.

      I once had an Industrial Arts instructor question my class on what would be a better situation if the building was on fire - that it was framed in wood, or steel. The correct answer is wood, since wood retains practically all of its structural strength until it is consumed by fire, unlike steel, which loses its strength very quickly when exposed to high temperature. So here we come to the heart of the issue - a Roman blacksmith from 2,000 years ago would make a more useful investigator of the building collapse than most "truthers" since he understands the fundamental fact that metals soften and can be reshaped when heated (by the blacksmith's hammer, or the weight of 10 building floors above) - no melting required. When the sprinkler system either doesn't come to the rescue, or is overwhelmed, it's over. For all of the fancy computers, the internet, and leadership of English majors and Philosophy professors, the "truthers" fail to grasp that simple fact. They are baffled by things a blacksmith knows. Because of this they are forced to invent ever more improbable and elaborate explanations that fail the common sense test - "the building was secretly rigged to implode"..... even though when done commercially it requires weeks of work by teams of people, drilling into the beams, stripping away insulation and structural materials, etc., etc. .... all unnoticed. Trapped by the absurdity of it, the escape routes range from magic thermite mixtures to space aliens. All of this, as part of a conspiracy that killed 3,000 Americans, has somehow been kept secret despite the fact that the US wasn't able to keep secret the waterboarding of a total of three people in 10 years without multiple leaks and widespread howls of outrage that the US bordered on being as bad as the worst criminal states ever, worse than even Germany which attempted genocide and killed millions. Ya, it must be "true". My guess is, whatever they're selling, you're buying.

      Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report

      NIST NCSTAR 1A: Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  6. Call me Crazy... by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But why would they take the body, promptly bury it at sea, then tell the world? I understand that they would want to minimize the impact in the islamic world by not defiling his body in any way which was recorded, but it seems like this would be something you show on television, that it's REALLY him. Who knows, maybe they made a deal with him and he's now in South America to live out his days in (even more) luxury. But that's the George Noory in me.

    And I'm also quite mystified why so many people are celebrating this. It took almost 10 years, trillions of dollars, the invasion of two countries (neither of which he was found in), and an untold number of lives lost to find a 6 foot 6 inch multi-millionaire (with diabetes!) living in a private luxury compound (in a well populated city) which was at least eight times larger then anything nearby. I don't think there is too much to celebrate here.

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    1. Re:Call me Crazy... by corbettw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The statement I saw was that they dumped him in the ocean to deny his followers a crypt they could go to to revere him. And since both the ISI and al Qaeda have confirmed he was killed, I don't think the deathers are gonna get a lot of followers on this latest conspiracy theory (but then again, there are a lot of crazy and stupid people out there, so I could be wrong).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:Call me Crazy... by mspohr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So why did we invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan? It seems to me that all we needed were a good investigation and a team of crack Navy Seals.

      Can we stop killing people now?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    3. Re:Call me Crazy... by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2

      It is puzzling. The best explanation I've heard is that burial at sea within 24 hours of death fulfills Islamic tradition, but does not leave a shrine for terrorists to flock to.

      The only way this works politically, however, is if they took lots of pictures and video of the corpse as proof of identity. I expect those to come out before long.

      It took an outrageous fortune, and celebrating death is never a good thing, but this man was hated so much by so many that you can't begrudge them their celebration. No one mourns the wicked.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    4. Re:Call me Crazy... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I read one report that no country would really accept his remains for burial and therefore the only way to respect Islamic tradition and law was to bury him at sea promptly after his death. That does make sense, but of course it's impossible to know for certain whether ulterior motives were involved and even more impossible to silence conspiracy theorists.

    5. Re:Call me Crazy... by RingDev · · Score: 2, Informative

      We invaded Afghanistan because we demanded that they turn over Osama bin Laden, and they demanded we follow an extradition process.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    6. Re:Call me Crazy... by vlm · · Score: 2

      Who knows, maybe they made a deal with him and he's now in South America to live out his days in (even more) luxury.

      More likely gitmo, spilling da beans about everyone else in his org whom are still (temporarily) alive? Later to be buried at sea in the gulf of mexico? Like anyone is ever gonna know. I suppose if the back pages report about 20 times as many people of interest have been captured this month than normal, then we'll "know".

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Call me Crazy... by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Re And I'm also quite mystified why so many people are celebrating this.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Minutes_Hate

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:Call me Crazy... by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      > I'm also quite mystified why so many people are celebrating this

      We find a sort of closure and a degree of satisfaction when the bad guy gets his due. It's a justice thing.

      As to the expense, I agree - the money, carnage and innocent deaths have been too high a price. But perhaps you'll still allow us a moment to celebrate the Reckoning.

    9. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are we concerning ourselves over whether he gets a proper burial?

      Hell... if you ask me, we should be doing the opposite. Dear terrorists of the world - if you murder Americans, you're going to rot in hell. And not just in my version of hell... let's ensure that you'll be rotting in your version of hell too, if that's possible. No virgins for you.

    10. Re:Call me Crazy... by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And I'm also quite mystified why so many people are celebrating this. It took almost 10 years, trillions of dollars, the invasion of two countries (neither of which he was found in), and an untold number of lives lost to find a 6 foot 6 inch multi-millionaire (with diabetes!) living in a private luxury compound (in a well populated city) which was at least eight times larger then anything nearby. I don't think there is too much to celebrate here.

      Some of the guys I work with were all high five-ing and cheering, and I'm like "dude, you know we lost, right?" ... wake me when I can fly on an airplane without my wife and daughter being molested by govt agents, when we've got at least some of our civil rights back, when my tax dollars aren't paying for a concentration camp, etc. So the leader of the guys who won, is now dead. Who cares, as if its going to improve anything for us.

      Roosevelt died right around the end of WWII ... were any of the Germans dumb enough to celebrate, despite their obvious loss? Yeah we're totally screwed here, uh huh, but the boss of the other guys is dead, so lets party like its 1935 again?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    11. Re:Call me Crazy... by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      No pictures released because by most reports it was at least one, possibly two, shots to the head with an assault rifle. There are several reasons that you wouldn't want to show that picture. First, it wouldn't prove anything, because he almost certainly wouldn't be recognizable. Second, you'll just piss off his allies even more. Third, it's just plain gory, they want to let people celebrate the guy is gone, not be reminded just how violent an end he came to (not that there aren't many, many people around the world who would be happy about that).

    12. Re:Call me Crazy... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Throwing him into the ocean assures that he never has a "shrine" gravesite.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:Call me Crazy... by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

      It took .. trillions of dollars [to kill him]

      That expense is spread over many other goals. Trillions of dollars weren't spent to kill Bin Laden (but probably a few million were). Trillions of dollars were spent to overthrow the governments of Afghanistan and Iraq, suppress Al Quaida, make profit for contractors who have friends in government, etc. Killing a particular person is only part of that overall objective.

      I understand that they would want to minimize the impact in the islamic world by not defiling his body in any way which was recorded

      IMHO even that was a mistake, but I'm no diplomat. I would have thought the best PR would be to treat him as a non-muslim, to emphasize (i.e. assert) that Bin Laden's decisions were contrary to any sort of mainstream Islamic teachings. But maybe thinking that is one of the many reasons I'm not president.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    14. Re:Call me Crazy... by WSOGMM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So why did we invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan? It seems to me that all we needed were a good investigation and a team of crack Navy Seals.

      Can we stop killing people now?

      I really like your use of "we" in this post, because we really are the ones killing people. People seem to think we are separate from our government.

    15. Re:Call me Crazy... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To be completely fair to the US, it's fairly reasonable that if someone commits an act of war from inside your country, you wash your hands of them immediately, otherwise there's a kind of tacit acknlowedgement that said act of war falls within your jurisdiction. Not the best excuse ever, but better than the excuse Iraq got.

    16. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why would they take the body, promptly bury it at sea, then tell the world? I understand that they would want to minimize the impact in the islamic world by not defiling his body in any way which was recorded, but it seems like this would be something you show on television, that it's REALLY him. Who knows, maybe they made a deal with him and he's now in South America to live out his days in (even more) luxury. But that's the George Noory in me.

      From the story, he was killed by a headshot. There'd be nothing of his face that was recognizable.In any event, do you really want a press conference with a moldering corpse?

      I'm sure they took photos that they'll release before too long.

    17. Re:Call me Crazy... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Because human beings are quite vicious and horrible, and bin Laden was at least a few milli-hitlers of evil. I refuse to celebrate human beings dying, even if it really does protect other people in the future.

    18. Re:Call me Crazy... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      living in a private luxury compound (right outside the main military Academy on the outskirts of Pakistan's capital) which was at least eight times larger then anything nearby.

      Well, to be fair, I don't think most people would ever have suspected that was where he was. I mean, that's some _legendary_ hiding in plain sight, reverse psychology concealment right there. To get more audacious, he'd have to holed up in like, Washington D.C., or New York or something.

      This tops Radovan Karadzic's disguise by a long shot.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    19. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the news images out of DC, NYC, and even State College, PA, they all look like drunk college kids. They were 9 years old during the 11 Sept. attacks. They're just celebrating an excuse to keep drinking and skip class.

    20. Re:Call me Crazy... by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      "Good investigation" was the hard part. After 50 years of safety investigations, airplanes still had open cockpits on 9/11. The bin Laden problem may have been solved in record time, but you can't expect this whole thing to be wrapped up in less than 250 years.

    21. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      celebrating death is never a good thing

      You're obviously not Irish

    22. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was shot twice in the face - there wouldn't be much recognizing going on if they showed the body.

    23. Re:Call me Crazy... by LS · · Score: 1

      ISI and al Qaeda have confirmed he was killed

      Do you have a direct source? Please provide us with the link.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    24. Re:Call me Crazy... by mspohr · · Score: 2

      Are you referring to the Nov 2004 Fallujah offensive? What about the 75,000 who have died since then (iraqbodycount.org)? Or the additional 15,000 civilians who have died (disclosed in Wikileaks)?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    25. Re:Call me Crazy... by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Keep your eyes on Wikileaks....

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    26. Re:Call me Crazy... by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      I admit feeling guilty in taking pleasure at the death of another human being, but then i recall the mans' words (ive read his fatwas) and realize that 'justice is done'. From statements from his own mouth he declared WAR on us. I dont hate the middle east, I dont hate muslims or arabs or anyone. But I do HATE those that tell me to my face that they want me to not exist.

      --
      Good-bye
    27. Re:Call me Crazy... by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Clearly we should just be barbarians too. Why don't we smack some civilian planes into their buildings why we are at it.

      Your kind are why we have these problems. If petty folks like yourself would grow up on both sides we would not have these issues.

    28. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No pics? No time to torture him a little to extract information (we all know that's effective, right?)

      Seriously, his not going to Guantanamo is the most bizarre part of this for me. Seems like a logical choice.

    29. Re:Call me Crazy... by VickiM · · Score: 0

      I saw on the BBC live feed that one of the reporters heard from the Pentagon that there are pictures, but they are generally considered too bloody to be released to the general public. I'm sure they will be all over the place in a few days; hopefully behind a warning on the more reputable websites. When I think about the violent hatred that permeates this country, let alone those who joined the military in the hopes of being the one to shoot Osama, I'm not surprised that American soldiers would hand over remains that would require a DNA test to be recognizable.

    30. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chances of a bomb being onboard a plane are remarkably small. The chances of TWO bombs being onboard are astronomical. That's why I always carry a bomb with me when I fly.

    31. Re:Call me Crazy... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Why hate them? No point in wasting your time on that.
      Recognize them for what they are, mentally ill. I don't hate rabid dogs nor do I celebrate when one is euthanized.

    32. Re:Call me Crazy... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      The fact that both Hitler and OSL died on the nearly the same day should keep the conspiracy theorists going for decades.

      Hitler 4/30/1945
      OSL 5/2/2011

       

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    33. Re:Call me Crazy... by denyingbelial · · Score: 2

      Only problem with that is the dead don't talk.

      From what I understood, capturing him alive wasn't an option because it turned into a fullout firefight.

    34. Re:Call me Crazy... by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Him being shot in the face kind of makes any further torture a bit moot.

    35. Re:Call me Crazy... by Khyber · · Score: 0

      You're wrong, son.

      In October, right after 9/11, the Taliban themselves offered to surrender OBL to us.

      Bush REFUSED.

      My how our memory spans shorten.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    36. Re:Call me Crazy... by treeves · · Score: 1

      Of course, the Germans had no foreknowledge of it, but we (meaning the US) turned around after WWII and helped Germany rebuild. Does the analogy between the US from Germany's perspective after WWII and al Qaeda today from the US perspective really work?
      Besides, do you really even think that all Germans wanted to "win" the war - meaning Hitler stays in power? I doubt it.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    37. Re:Call me Crazy... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone at any point since 9-11 has had any notion that bin Laden would ever let himself stand trial. If the US and/or its allies ever caught up with him, I'm sure he had ever intention of going down in a hail of bullets. Which is, apparently, what happened.

      Wonder when they'll release the photos. Apparently it's pretty gruesome, a big hole above the left eye with lots of blood and brains, and normally the media doesn't release untouched death photos like this, but I think bin Laden should be an exception.

      Besides, a few hundred years ago, a guy like bin Laden would have had his corpse paraded around the country side until the flesh was rotting off and then the head would stuck on a spike in some prominent place.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    38. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah like you AREN'T going to play Duke Nukem Forever when it comes out. It took more than 10 years to make.

    39. Re:Call me Crazy... by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

      so what do you do when the rabid dog is chewing on your throat or leg?

      you assume wrongly that a blithe sort of untouchability is a possible reaction, nevermind a proper reaction, to someone who is intent on making you dead

      "I don't hate rabid dogs nor do I celebrate when one is euthanized"

      maybe you'd locate the impulse after they euthanized the dog that ripped your daughter's throat out

      the point is, you deliver your blase opinions from this ivory tower devoid of sense or meaning to the rest of the world and its problems, as if osama bin laden never represented a threat to your well-being or the well-being of your beliefs. he did. that you don't know that simply represents that you are out of touch with reality

      sitting in that ivory tower and delivering judgments from the point of view of false untouchability simply tells us you are unaware that you are part of this world. i'm glad some clueless teenaged twits are so comfortable in their western luxuries they feel so untouchable. i think marie antoinette felt the same way

      you are part of this world, and touched by its events. don't forget that when you form your opinions, at your own peril

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    40. Re:Call me Crazy... by PPH · · Score: 0

      To get more audacious, he'd have to holed up in like, Washington D.C.

      Like shave the beard off, cut his hair, forge a Hawaiian passport......

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    41. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it means we can forget about the distraction of trying to find him, and set about rebuilding the civil society we've been tearing down ourselves for the last several years on his behalf? A pyrrhic victory for sure, if we let things stand the way they are.

    42. Re:Call me Crazy... by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Rabid dogs usually find it difficult to commit mass murder and inspire others to do the same.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    43. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until there is such thing as a "free" war with no monetary or life lost, nobody will ever win a war with that definition/attitude. However, this wasn't about winning or losing to begin with, it was about satisfying our bloodlust for vengeance.

    44. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admit feeling guilty in taking pleasure at the death of another human being, but then i recall the mans' words (ive read his fatwas) and realize that 'justice is done'. From statements from his own mouth he declared WAR on us. I dont hate the middle east, I dont hate muslims or arabs or anyone. But I do HATE those that tell me to my face that they want me to not exist.

      Life is hard, and the world is dangerous. Osama "declaring war" on America is one thing that made life more dangerous for us.

      Yet, we should not celebrate his death. We should mourn -- as we should always do when someone is killed. The point of executing dangerous criminals is not to glory in their death, for that makes us more like the dangerous criminals. Instead, remember that we must sometimes kill in order to protect ourselves.

      We kill because we must, not because killing is good.

    45. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're wrong, son. Afganistan only offered *after* the invasion had begun.
       
      Nice revisionist history though...

    46. Re:Call me Crazy... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      If it was chewing on me I would get rid of it myself. I still would not celebrate that. He did not pose much of a threat to me or you, statistically lightning is more likely to kill me than any terrorist. My car is orders of magnitude more likely to kill me. I am not clueless nor teenage, I am merely rational. To waste so much effort on something so unlikely to kill us is insane. Cars, Heart disease, Cancer those are the things to really be worried about.

      Also, your keyboard seems broken. A proper one would have a shift key.

    47. Re:Call me Crazy... by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      it is of course a sign of unintelligent obsession that so many can't bring themselves to view the world except through the lens of one mildly amusing piece of orwell fiction. i liked that book, "1984." i actually like "animal farm" better. but in either case, i didn't feel the need to form a religious cult around it and alter my entire perception of reality around the stupid book's themes

      it is especially ironic to see orwell cited under this story, a story about a guy using twitter to tell the world what the government is doing. which is the ultimate expression of LITTLE BROTHER

      the state can't abuse you in today's world without someone taking a cellphone picture or tweeting about it. and yet so many fools persist with the delusion that orwell is prescient about the reality we live in today, when he's OBVIOUSLY NOT

      1984 is a just a piece of entertaining science fiction that lost its relevancy to reality sometime in 1970s. jesus fucking christ: the video of rodney king being beaten in 1991, 20 years ago, shows how technology has empowered LITTLE BROTHER, not big brother

      really, some of you fucking morons and your quasi-religious cult surrounding "1984" really need to grow some brain cells and lose your obsession. it's not relevant anymore, by decades. your mind is ossified into irrelevancy with ideas outmoded well into the last century

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    48. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you *exactly* why. Since a close friend of mine was in all those secret no-foreigners-allowed places in Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc, and interviewed people for a documentary. (And nearly was killed in the process.)

      The problem is twofold.
      First, those Pakistanis, just like the Afghans that now oppose the US, were also supported with US money. The US gave it to Pakistan to "fight terrorists". The problem is, that from a Pakistani standpoint, the US are the terrorists, and the terror camps are "freedom fighters". So in essence, the US paid the terrorists. ^^
      Second, Bin Laden is basically irrelevant, since he had to hide and was sick. The real uber-terrorist is the ex-boss of the Pakistani secret service, who has a lot of power and access. A deeply fundamentalist and paranoid man, who was the one ordering and controlling the construction of Pakistan's nuclear weapons. He basically has all the codes. (Interesting bit: He laughs his ass of because of the TSA. His statement: "What gives them the idea that we would need to *land*?? Put a nuke in a passenger plane, and off you go!"

      The thing is: The CIA KNOWS this. For years they knew. How do I know that? Well, that guy is close friends to the CIA. My friend caught CIA agents sitting next to that guy... drinking tea, talking, exchanging jokes. There is photographic proof. And my guess that that is that big bombshell that Wikileaks is still not releasing. (Now you can guess why I'm using multiple levels of anonymity to post this.)

      But there will be a movie coming out about it when production is done. Because my friend is too stupid to realize the danger he puts himself in... *again*. :-/

    49. Re:Call me Crazy... by Reapman · · Score: 1

      1935? Really? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say that was a typo..

      Ya, the USA in 2011 is just like Germany in 1945, except in every possible way. Because TSA's dumb laws totally are the same as the living conditions back then. Stop insulting those that have actually had to live through that.

    50. Re:Call me Crazy... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I did not say he was rabid, merely mentally defective. Mental defectives have been recruiting others since the beginning of time.

    51. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the photo has already been released/leaked. i saw it last night on 4chan.

    52. Re:Call me Crazy... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      false alarmism is a problem in this world, people hysterically overreacting in proportion to the nature of the threat

      equally a problem, is exhibit A above: false complacency. unperceptive people underreacting in proportion to the nature of the threat

      but don't worry my friend. you are completely untouchable and terrorism has absolutely no meaning in your life. don't worry your pretty little head about it. put your head back in the cloud, because we all know you are above it all

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    53. Re:Call me Crazy... by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      So why did we invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan?

      The success of the Iraq mission is an open question...we will not know for a few decades. Certainly it was very poorly executed, with a shortage of necessary troops that resulted in many years of chaos. As to the Afghan situation, it is obvious why we are there. Pakistan has nuclear weapons. That is it. Period. Let me explain:

      Pakistan has a very strange government and political situation. There are forces that tend to be very anti-western and tend to a more fundamentalist religious bent. And there are forces that are more pro-western, Benazir Bhutto being a prime example. Their intelligence services have some strong anti-western members. Pakistan walks a tightrope, being pulled both ways by these forces. AND THEY HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS. The fear, probably justified, is that if the Afghan government falls, and the Taliban comes in to fill the power vacuum, this will strengthen the anti-western forces in Pakistan, possibly resulting in a fundamentalist anti-western government with access to nuclear weapons. Since fundamentalists tend to view the world in more absolutist black and white terms, it would seem more likely that they would actually use their nuclear weapons, either against nuclear armed India, or against American targets.

      You can debate about the strength of the above argument, but I think it is reasonably certain that this is the type of thinking that is keeping us in Afghanistan.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    54. Re:Call me Crazy... by lasinge · · Score: 1

      I would think a crypt where followers go to revere him would be an intelligence asset, I mean think about it - rather than having to find the perpetrators the U.S. government are looking for they would all go to one place, easily photographed and tracked. Of course that's exactly what any Islamic government wouldn't want to have anything to do with. I don't think he was buried at sea, simply returned to his family in Saudi Arabia (that would be the truly respectful thing to do) and bury him in a private family plot not accessible to the public. If there's a coverup that's where I would bet my money, his body was flown on an Air Force jet straight to the Saudi family and buried properly there. Whether or not he was real, his death was faked, he's dead, he's alive kicking it in South America blah blah blah, one thing is sure - no one will ever hear from the man known as Osama (Usama?) Bin Laden ever again. Cue the Who's "Baba O'Reilly" now...

      --
      you are in a twisty maze of different passages.
    55. Re:Call me Crazy... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard that photo is a fake.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    56. Re:Call me Crazy... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Go look up the numbers. Check what is killing Americans, terrorists are below farm animals on that list. You are chicken little and I must say the sky is not falling. We waste trillions on something that in decades kills less people than die on our highways in a month.

      While you are at it get a working keyboard, please test its shift function before posting again.

    57. Re:Call me Crazy... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      right. you establish your mastery of the subject matter by saying its a braindead numbers game. of course, absolutely no other factors matter. naaaaah

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    58. Re:Call me Crazy... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "No pictures released"

      http://imgur.com/im0ur.jpg

      Say what? Perhaps you should watch TMZ a little more often.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    59. Re:Call me Crazy... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Please mention these other factors.

      The rational view would be to do what we do with everything else, dollars/life saved. If you have another objective metric feel free to weigh in. If you insist on being chicken little then come back when you are ready to talk to the big boys.

      Also, this is my last reply to you if you cannot get a working keyboard. Have a little bit of fucking decency and at least capitalize the beginning of sentences.

    60. Re:Call me Crazy... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You do realize most rifles tend to leave clean holes?

      Unless he got popped with something .40 or larger he's still going to be recognizable.

      http://imgur.com/im0ur.jpg

      Like that.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    61. Re:Call me Crazy... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      where do i start?

      how about INTENT. a cancer is a mindless growth. a car accident is a mistake. a human being with the intent, promise, willpower, means, desire and opportunity to kill you... in your mind, same thing. oh wow, i see your genius now

      al qaeda obviously intended the deaths of as many as they could get away with. the african embassy bombings, the uss cole, 9/11... notice a trajectory? what would al qaeda do with nukes? am i scaremongering? maybe you're falsely complacent. maybe you engage in false equivalency

      oh but right, more people die of bladder cancer. therefore i don't have to worry about al qaeda. you actually think like this?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    62. Re:Call me Crazy... by zeroshade · · Score: 1

      However I ask of you, what changes by the death of this one man? Has our level of safety changed at all? Most likely not, there are just as many terrorists as there were before, who may or may not end up killing people. Perhaps they are more motivated now due to our killing of someone of importance to them, but irrelevant.

      The important part here is what to do next. We should not celebrate his death but we should move on from it. If he was the "face of terrorism" perhaps we can stop this foolish "war on terror" that we have. Maybe people will realize that our own fear and ignorance along with starting multiple wars and hundreds of thousands dead is the definition of allowing terrorists to win. Their purpose is to instill terror which they did. Perhaps we can look at what is going on and step back from our own implosion. Can we stop this "war on terror"? Can we eliminate the breaches of liberty and freedom? Remove the Patriot Act, stop the breaches of privacy by the TSA, etc. I doubt it'll happen, but I can hope.

    63. Re:Call me Crazy... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I will not reply I have already explained why. When you grow up and learn to use a keyboard maybe you will have better luck.

    64. Re:Call me Crazy... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      this man was invested with meaning to many of his followers. kill him and you hurt their morale and resolve

      of course killing bin laden doesn't win the war, no one thinks that. but it's a major battle that is won in the war. very much a significant thing you celebrate

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    65. Re:Call me Crazy... by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I know you didn't. I was saying it's natural to have a different response when a rabid dog gets put down vs. the death of someone responsible for the deaths of thousands of people.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    66. Re:Call me Crazy... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      yes, it is sad that a guy who can't use the shift key is schooling you on a subject matter you comment on from a position of ignorance, false complacency, and false equivalency

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    67. Re:Call me Crazy... by wintercolby · · Score: 2

      We can't choose not to. All we can do is blog or tweet about our dissatisfaction, and vote for the people that say they'll finish the wars. I'd rather fund the reconstruction, but something has to be done about the corruption first. We can't blame it on the fact that they're developing countries, or the false idea that they have some lower moral standard than we do in the US, we started off on the wrong foot with no-bid contracts to Halliburton.

      --
      Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    68. Re:Call me Crazy... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I honestly doubt Hitler was some record holder for being evil. He is simply the record holder for being successful at acting on his evil nature. I'm sure there are at least dozens of millions of people in the world who'd happily slaughter hundreds of millions of other humans if they had the means and thought they'd get away with it.

    69. Re:Call me Crazy... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No, it is sad that one as foolish and unlearned as you is allowed on the computer to begin with. Your position is nothing but ignorance, false alarmist and emotional appeals. Have a nice day, when you grow up maybe I will speak to you again.

      PS: won't be soon

    70. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I felt it was surreal at first to see people enthusiastically chanting USA! at the report of his death, but then I realized it's not about his death. He could have been captured and people would still be acting like this. It's not some morbid glee at watching someone being torn apart by the lions, it's because the enemy has been thrown down. The bogey man hanging over our heads for so long has finally been removed.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm sure some people are cheering precisely because he's dead, but I feel confidant that the mass cheering is not about his death and about a perceived victory. His death is oddly circumstantial in that regard.

      Oddly enough the captcha was "corrects". Hmm.

    71. Re:Call me Crazy... by egburr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      49% of us *are* separate from our government. It only takes 51% to vote our leaders in.

      Ok, so that's not exactly true, but in spirit it's close enough. Many of us disagree with a lot of things the government does, but we're effectively powerless to change it. We can vote, but only the majority gets represented. We can revolt, but who has the better weapons, funds, and infrastructure? Until a vast majority of people are ready to revolt, it won't really matter; and, by then they really could just vote the leaders out instead.

      So, although our government is theoretically "the people", most of "the people" really have no say in what goes on.

      Maybe if our government were more open and kept us better informed about what was happening and why things are done the way thy are done, there may be more agreement that those things are necessary. As it is now, though, we are generally treated like kids asking "why" and getting just "because I said so" as the answer. Is it really surprising that so many people don't trust our government?

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    72. Re:Call me Crazy... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you generally have to have more substance in your comment than simply reversing and reflecting someone's accusations back at them to make an impression. "no, you!" hasn't been a useful rhetorical turn of phrase since elementary school

      i hope i have helped educate you to some extent as to the precariousness of your thinking about our world, and that you will find the time to reflect and grow intellectually. good luck kid

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    73. Re:Call me Crazy... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Recognize them for what they are, mentally ill. I don't hate rabid dogs nor do I celebrate when one is euthanized.

      You clearly never had to get animal control to get rid of a (possibly) rabid raccoon. When it's gone forever, you celebrate.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    74. Re:Call me Crazy... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      That is some fine trolling there.

    75. Re:Call me Crazy... by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      And I'm also quite mystified why so many people are celebrating this

      Me too. It's not like it's going to end terrorism by Islamists. I'm sure that Al Queda, like any other paramilitary organization, has already replaced him in the command structure. If it's done anything, it's removed Osama's funding from Al Queda--but if you have most of the Western world looking for you, you have a certain expectation of being caught and killed, and you've made contingency arrangements in the event of your demise.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    76. Re:Call me Crazy... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Compelling counter argument, outstanding stuff, A+++++++ (see i can write mindless tripe too!)

      --
      Good-bye
    77. Re:Call me Crazy... by g8oz · · Score: 1

      No doubt thats true, but its worth pointing out that his preferred Salafist/Wahabbi school of Islam condemns people who go to graves to revere anyone. Too close to idol worship. The Wahabbi government of Saudi Arabia has systematically destroyed graves and historical sites linked to the Prophet, his family and early followers for that reason. Al Qaida and its allies routinely murder Muslims who visit the crypts of saints.

    78. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Osama was given a proper burial because that is the kind of country we live in. We even give our enemies a burial in accordance with their beliefs. This is part of what makes us a great nation.

    79. Re:Call me Crazy... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      if someone commits an act of war

      So how long before downloading a song in Canada is re-defined as an act of war, so you can invade if we don't turn the suspect over so he can be tried (er... disappeared into a secret prison and tortured).

      I'm being facetious of course, but I genuinely do view "terrorists" as criminals, and terrorist suspects as criminal suspects with all the rights accorded to them.

      Oh hurrah, lets celebrate because the great united states murdered somebody halfway around the world.

      This whole fiasco just martyrs the guy.

    80. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the crazy nutjob sand people stop blowing people up because they disagree on issues?

      Recent to ancient history suggests that... no... no they won't...

      All historical evidence suggests nothing will change. they'll be back killing in no time. which will require a severe response. again.

    81. Re:Call me Crazy... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      ...

      And I'm also quite mystified why so many people are celebrating this. It took almost 10 years, trillions of dollars, the invasion of two countries (neither of which he was found in), and an untold number of lives lost to find a 6 foot 6 inch multi-millionaire (with diabetes!) living in a private luxury compound (in a well populated city) which was at least eight times larger then anything nearby. I don't think there is too much to celebrate here.

      Oh, that's easy. People think this is going to bring change.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    82. Re:Call me Crazy... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      So why did we invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan? It seems to me that all we needed were a good investigation and a team of crack Navy Seals.

      Can we stop killing people now?

      The Corporate Overlords will let you know when it's time to stop killing people.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    83. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree fully on this. I remember a poster from an Apple story a few days back; he seemed to think that he was divorced from the company's actions somehow, as a customer. The truth is, he's exactly as much a stakeholder in everything the company does as the degree as to which he is an enabler of the company. Not a lot, but, take the $500, and it certainly is a larger lever of harm than a smaller amount such as zero.

      I can't claim to be perfect on this, especially given the hodge-podge of people's feelings, the reality of what effects action (or lack of it), and whatever alternatives there may be. In one way, I may feel that it's enough to claim responsibility for the system. I am willing to go into a slaughterhouse and "pay" the weight of my love of beef by killing it myself with the stunner. But I think there's a real potential for change to come out of this attitude of integration, as well.

    84. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      equally a problem, is exhibit A above: false complacency. [U]nperceptive people under[-]reacting in proportion to the nature of the threat

      Give it up, Circle. The threat of terrorism just isn't that big of a deal. The reaction to 9/11 was ludicrously overblown compared to the damage. Yeah. A lot of people died and a lot of wealth was destroyed. It was a horrible thing. But calm down and think about it a little. Hundreds of thousands of people died in Iraq after we invaded. Is that transgression 100 times worse? The biggest threat of terrorism is people being terrified of it. And it looks like you're succumbing to it hook line and sinker. The media frenzy certainly didn't help.

      Although I'm not entirely sure about the "proportion to the nature of the threat of terrorism". I'm not sure how the nature of a threat can have a proportion. I think perhaps you were just rambling on.

      but don't worry my friend. you are completely untouchable and terrorism has absolutely no meaning in your life. don't worry your pretty little head about it. put your head back in the cloud, because we all know you are above it all

      That's really not the case you condescending twit. There IS INDEED a risk of being killed by rabid terrorists. There's also a risk of being killed by a meteor. And you can do something about it. You can live in a bunker and never go outside, saving yourself from the risk of smaller meteorites. But doing so is idiotic. Likewise, all this shit we've done to fight terrorism is kinda bullshit. We could have spent far less in dollars and blood if we just wanted to disrupt Al-Queada and get Osama.

    85. Re:Call me Crazy... by transami · · Score: 1

      5/1/11

      --
      :T:R:A:N:S:
    86. Re:Call me Crazy... by timothyf · · Score: 1

      Why would the US want to claim he's dead if they weren't sure of it? It seems like it'd be a pretty huge, demoralizing slap in the face if a video of him alive and debunking his supposed death surfaced after the fact.

    87. Re:Call me Crazy... by transami · · Score: 1

      That a picture is at least a week old (I saw it then) and looks like it may be photoshoped. Of course, they may be lying to us and actually killed him a week ago and decided to wait til May Day to announce it in order to over-shadow May Day, which is celebrated around the world by workers.

      --
      :T:R:A:N:S:
    88. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMERICA FUCK YEAH

    89. Re:Call me Crazy... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      yes, i am familiar with this argument that risk is simply a numbers game. car accidents, cancer, etc. kill more

      this argument just means i'm dealing with someone who is not too bright. you can't apparently understand more factors in ascribing risk, some of those factors ridiculously obvious, like intent. there's not much intent in cancer or a car accident, for example. but there is with al qaeda, which would gladly nuke a major city if they got their hands on a nuke. and of course, for saying that, i'm an alarmist in your eyes. a falsely complacent person would view someone more alarmed with a more rational lock on the nature of a threat would indeed just scoff. its this same false complacency that allowed 9/11: al qaida wouldn't do anything so audacious, they're just attacking the uss cole and african embassies. you're not listening to what they are promising to do and their persistence, logistics, motivation, support, perseverance, etc.

      but i'm wasting my time. if you can't understand the obvious point that there are many factors in ascribing risk, that a simple number tally isn't even remotely valid, all there is to say is you're not too bright and move on

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    90. Re:Call me Crazy... by paintballer1087 · · Score: 2

      http://www.alqaeda.com/obituaries/

      Fool me once, shame on you.

      http://www.isi.com/boardofdirectors/

      Fool me twice, shame on me.
      I had to look at the 2nd link, just to make sure... Just like when you're 99% sure it's a Rick Roll or a goatse link, there's that 1% that says "what if it's not"... Fail...

    91. Re:Call me Crazy... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Well said indeed sir!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    92. Re:Call me Crazy... by corbettw · · Score: 2

      http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2011/05/201152141416432205.html

      Article contains comments from a "senior al-Qaeda" member as well as a Taliban spokesman. Both are clamoring for revenge for bin Laden's death, rather than claiming it to be false and that their sheik/imam/whatever is still alive.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    93. Re:Call me Crazy... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Ha! I'm not checking that first link at work. Nice try, smart guy.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    94. Re:Call me Crazy... by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      Yes, only off by 66 years! That will seem like nothing to conspiracy theorists in 26302 AD!

    95. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Nazis actually won WWII, even though Germany lost, by the exact same logic as the idea that bin Laden won this one. Germany was defeated, but the entirety of Europe adopted the core Nazi platform after the end of the war - with fewer mass sing-alongs and not *quite* so much Jew killing.

      The Soviets also won the Cold War. Whose system of government do we operate under by default in the US? Hint: It's not the American one.

    96. Re:Call me Crazy... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      You clicked those links? I kinda just assumed they'd be more of this...

    97. Re:Call me Crazy... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      66 years that is two thirds the numerals for the beast of 666. 2 beastsgone only one numeral remains.

      Of course conspiracy theorists will latch onto anything like the 9th inning tied 1-1 of the mets/phillies (ny/pa) game.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    98. Re:Call me Crazy... by Xentan · · Score: 0

      It's my speculation that they gave him a proper muslim burial to show that they indeed are not wageing a war against muslims. From what i've read http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/soldaten-kande-igen-bin-ladin-innan-han-skot (swedish) they asked several countries if they would accept the body but they all denied taking him, among others the saudies.

    99. Re:Call me Crazy... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      You can no more win a war than you can win an earthquake.

    100. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The statement I saw was that they dumped him in the ocean to deny his followers a crypt they could go to to revive him.

      Fixed that for you

    101. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trillions of dollars weren't spent to kill Bin Laden (but probably a few million were).

      I'd wager they spent at least 25 million dollars.

    102. Re:Call me Crazy... by dave562 · · Score: 1

      The success of the Iraq mission is an open question...we will not know for a few decades.

      It has already been acknowledged as a failure. The purpose of the Iraq mission was to establish a counter-balance to Iran. That has not happened. It is doubtful that it will ever happen.

    103. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you were just trying to be funny but that pic is a well-known fake that's been circulating since 2009.

    104. Re:Call me Crazy... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Heh, don't blame me buddy. I just like the nice smell I get from cleaning my gun with bacon grease.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    105. Re:Call me Crazy... by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      this is the type of thinking that is keeping us in Afghanistan.

      But the question was about the type of thinking that *got us into* Afghanistan in the first place. Before 9/11, the scary elements of the Pakistani government were pretty enthusiastic about destroying India and controlling Afghanistan, but I don't think they gave a damn about the U.S. so long as the military aid checks kept rolling in every year.

      *Now*, after we shot their Afghan allies and blew things up inside Pakistan, they care about us enough to be a threat. But in 2000, they only threatened to their neighbors.

    106. Re:Call me Crazy... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I hear some of those people buried under the Twin Towers got ripped up pretty badly, too.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    107. Re:Call me Crazy... by losfromla · · Score: 1

      you're a tea-bagger, aren't you?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    108. Re:Call me Crazy... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      They've got that one covered already. The reports are that they took the time to remove hard drives from computers on the compound.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    109. Re:Call me Crazy... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It was quick and painless. I'm sure any neurologist can back that up. If anything, his death was swift with no suffering.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    110. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you sure are a downer.

    111. Re:Call me Crazy... by dwye · · Score: 1

      The diabetes story has been generally dismissed by more serious sources as disinformation from al Qaeda.

      And punishing him, personally, has no more been the main goal of the Global War on Terror than was punishing Pierre Beauregard (who commanded the bombardment of Ft. Sumter) the goal of the US Civil War.

      Finally, would you rather that we had to spend a few more billion and take a few more years to find him?

    112. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      celebrating death is never a good thing

      A belated Happy Easter to you!

    113. Re:Call me Crazy... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Roosevelt died right around the end of WWII ... were any of the Germans dumb enough to celebrate, despite their obvious loss?

      Yes, the Nazi leadership was ecstatic. Hitler thought that "providence" was seeing him through once again, and his astrologers had told him "something big" was about to happen. Of course, that's a generic claim that will always come true.

    114. Re:Call me Crazy... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It looks like it's photoshopped from an old photo of (live) Osama combined with a photo of some other dead guy.

    115. Re:Call me Crazy... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You do realize most rifles tend to leave clean holes?

      Unless he got popped with something .40 or larger he's still going to be recognizable.

      Not necessarily - it depends on how close the shot has been. Rifle bullets (esp. FMJ) are small in diameter, yes, but that much kinetic energy can produce very nasty effects.

      For example, here is a photo of Chinese execution (back when they did it via bullet to the head), and here (graphic, NSFW!) is the aftermath. As you can see, it pretty much blew off the top of the skull. This was done with a military (i.e. FMJ) 7.62x39mm bullet, which is a far cry from ".40 or larger".

      Here is a guy who shot himself in the head from an AK-74 (5.45x39mm). Less impressive - heck, he actually lived - but look at the size of the entry and exit wounds.

      As noted above, the pic to which you link is most likely photoshopped.

    116. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      49% of us *are* separate from our government. It only takes 51% to vote our leaders in.

      Nope. In the US, you do not require a majority of votes to win. In most elections, you just require more votes than anyone else got, even if that's, say, only 39% of the votes (with the remaining 61% split between multiple other candidates). In US presidential elections, you don't even need that, since US presidents aren't elected by popular vote. (A popular vote is held, but the results are meaningless, or Gore would have been president in 2001, as the man who won the popular vote.) US presidents just need more votes than anyone else from members of the Electoral College.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    117. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      The purpose of the Iraq mission was to establish a counter-balance to Iran.

      Sorry, which week was that?

      (For those with short memory spans, or just weren't around at the time, there were about a dozen weeks around the time we invaded Iraq during which, each week, the President or a member of his administration articulated a new and distinctly different reason for the Iraq invasion from the previous week's line. Eventually they settled on the one that polled the best...)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    118. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Really, most of the people in the middle east didn't give a damn about the US, until Osama bin Laden hatched a plan to get the US to invade a middle east country so he could rally people against them. We have this on tape, by the way. Of course, we're not gullible enough to do exact what the enemy wants us to do, right? /eyeroll

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    119. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      The only way this works politically, however, is if they took lots of pictures and video of the corpse as proof of identity. I expect those to come out before long.

      Um, why? Do you really think rumors of his continued survival, robbing him of any martyr status, would hurt rather than help US interests? The best possible result the US could hope for is for him to actually be dead, but no one actually believes it.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    120. Re:Call me Crazy... by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      The success of the Iraq mission is an open question...we will not know for a few decades.

      It has already been acknowledged as a failure. The purpose of the Iraq mission was to establish a counter-balance to Iran. That has not happened. It is doubtful that it will ever happen.

      Yes, perhaps. But there is no despot in power now. My initial worries about the Iraq war still apply. Iraq was set up with a Sunni minority in power over a Shiite majority. I suppose it was implicit in this arrangement that that minority would exert a forceful influence on the majority it ruled. The risk of shattering this system was civil war from the tensions built up under the old regime. Still, Saddam was truly a despot. Where Iraq goes from here is I believe still up in the air. They have experienced the forceful hand of a dictator and the chaotic results of his absence. They likely understand now the need for a strong government to bring order and stability.

      You make the (very terse) argument that "the purpose of the Iraq mission was to counter-balance Iran". Bringing a form of democracy to a society where the majority is Shiite would seem likely to bring the Shiite factions more power. Since Iranians are also mainly Shiite, this would seem to be counterproductive in limiting the power of Iran, so you do have a point. Still, I don't think the matter is anywhere near as simple as this. It remains to be seen what will happen in Iran in the next twenty to thirty years, let alone what happens in Iraq. Younger Iranians are different from their parents, and will probably not put up with the religious tyranny that they live under now. Which is why I think we will not understand the full implications of the Iraqi invasion for a long time.

      Still, I believe this was all a very reckless gamble on the part of the Bush administration. They didn't really seem to comprehend the forces that they were unleashing. They seemed to have the cult-like expectation that free markets would unleash a wave of prosperity and peace. One can see this from the fact that they devoted so few troops to the endeavor, and seemed to have done almost no planning as to how to "keep the peace" after the dust settled. In some sense even worse were their fallacious justifications for going to war; they were almost comedically false. They say the first casualty of war is truth, but this war went much farther I believe than past wars. Seeing American troops vainly searching for mobile chemical weapons factories brings to mind images of a malevolent Don Quixote.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    121. Re:Call me Crazy... by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I don't care what the media was told. The strategic reason for putting American boots on the ground in Iraq was always to counter-balance Iran. The hope was that a pro-American government could be propped up long enough to stand on their own. That has not happened and does not appear to be a likely outcome. The Iranians and their Shiite proxies have too much influence over the government.

    122. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Hitler was no more evil than some of the people I've met in life, he just happened to head one of the most hard working and wondrously efficient nations in history. Germany, Japan, the US... there are certain nations you just don't want anyone evil at the head of, given their capabilities, resources, and sheer industriousness. Not that you want anyone evil at the head of any nation, mind you, but it's much less a problem for everyone if its Elbonia (well, everyone except for the Elbonians, of course).

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    123. Re:Call me Crazy... by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      *Now*, after we shot their Afghan allies and blew things up inside Pakistan, they care about us enough to be a threat. But in 2000, they only threatened to (sic) their neighbors.

      That is a gross oversimplification. First off, it IS in our interests to prevent nuclear war between Pakistan and India. Setting the precedent of a modern nuclear shooting war would be very dangerous to world stability. Secondly, you seem to ignore the complex nature of the Pakistani government and power structure. If Afghanistan was to again come under the sway of the Taliban, it would help to give those "scary elements" of the Pakistani power structure more power and influence. There are moderates in Pakistan, but they have a tenuous grasp on power. If the balance tips too far towards extremists, the results could be dangerous. Do you really want a fundamentalist government in charge of nuclear weapons? They could send one of those weapons in a cargo ship to an American city very easily. If they are sufficiently fundamentalist and irrational, then the usual calculus of deterrents will not occur to them.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    124. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      but don't worry my friend. you are completely untouchable and terrorism has absolutely no meaning in your life. don't worry your pretty little head about it. put your head back in the cloud, because we all know you are above it all

      The truly disturbing thing here is that there are so many people like you who assume you must either have an absurdly overblown view against something, or an absurdly overblown view in the opposite direction. There's no room for a rational opinion here in your mind. If someone doesn't share your irrational levels of hated, you assume they must have the absurd opinions you're lampooning here. But you're arguing with a straw-man. He never said he's untouchable, that terrorism isn't a problem, has no meaning, is nothing to worry about, or that he's above it all. Your own absurd levels of irrationality become obvious when you assume anyone who doesn't over-blow the situation must think it doesn't exist at all. To you, everyone must be an extremist. If they don't agree with your extreme, they must be extreme in the other direction. No don't even believe someone can have a rational, balanced viewpoint, that it even exists.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    125. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      You clearly never had to get animal control to get rid of a (possibly) rabid raccoon. When it's gone forever, you celebrate.

      I never celebrate the death of a wild animal, especially when I'm the one responsible for it, as I have been, on multiple occasions. Believe it or not, you are not the center of the universe. Just because someone does not react to an experience the way you did does not mean they've never experienced it.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    126. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      The Soviets also won the Cold War. Whose system of government do we operate under by default in the US? Hint: It's not the American one.

      lol... I can't tell if you're a troll or just really that stupid.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    127. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I think you're repeating the oft-made mistake here of thinking the operation in Iraq had something to do with the "War on Terror". Fact of the matter is, most of the "trillions" being quoted was spent on the war in Iraq when it would have been much better spent one something at least somewhat related to the war with Al-Qaeda, rather than furthering their goals (Osama thought Saddam was about as evil as people come -- regime change in Baghdad was on both the US and Al-Qaeda's wish lists).

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    128. Re:Call me Crazy... by makomk · · Score: 1

      I don't hate rabid dogs nor do I celebrate when one is euthanized.

      I see you've got the dehumanization down pat. It's certainly a handy tool; it means you don't have to worry about such details as whether the person or group has a reason, or whether they're that different from those you support, or what your own attitudes say about you. They're inhuman, Other, not like us - case closed, nothing more to worry about. A powerful way of thinking.

      Also, in the end, kind of self-defeating - because you end up buying into it, as no doubt did the military analysts in charge of finding Osama bin Laden, and then you have no way of actually analyzing your enemy's actions or predicting their next move.

    129. Re:Call me Crazy... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      This tops Radovan Karadzic's disguise by a long shot.

      In audacity, perhaps, but not in style.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    130. Re:Call me Crazy... by makomk · · Score: 1

      Not just that. I live in the UK. US politicians have been supporting terrorist groups trying to blow me and other UK civilians up for decades. In fact, the US congressman kicking up most of the fuss about Islamic radicalisation in the US and most loudly insisting that US Muslims are responsible for Islamic terrorism - Peter King - has publicly and unapologetically stated his support for terrorist attacks on UK civilians, and reiterated that he believes them to be justified.

    131. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So why did we invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan?"

      Where do you think we got the people to interrogate for the info that led us to the location?

    132. Re:Call me Crazy... by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      A friend linked me to this article last night.

      The article is 2 years old, but seems to fit with some of the strange nuances of the events we've seen over the last few days. It claims Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 due to liver failure. An interesting read, and a lot more believable than a lot of the other conspiracy theories going around regarding 9/11 and related events.

      Some of the points they bring up are:
      - Osama Bin Laden while applauding the 9/11 attacks, claimed he was not involved in them at all. Until 'after' this article claimed he died, then the USA received the 'video tapes' claiming responsibility.
      - Experts have claimed there's differences in the Osama's talking in the tapes, and the real one. Such as wearing a ring (which apparently goes against Wahhabi tradition), facial structure differences, language, writing with his non-preferred hand, etc.

    133. Re:Call me Crazy... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      So why did we invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan?

      Diversionary tactic.

      And to share some largesse with DoD contractors.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    134. Re:Call me Crazy... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      celebrating death is never a good thing

      A belated Happy Easter to you!

      Troll.

      Easter is a celebration of zombie-Jesus coming back to life. At worst, it's a celebration of undeath.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    135. Re:Call me Crazy... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the average Japanese-American would prefer the TSA to their 1945 condition.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    136. Re:Call me Crazy... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      One thing to remember: They wanted to respect Islamic custom regarding the burial of the body. Which means that it has to be done within 24 hours.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    137. Re:Call me Crazy... by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      And I'm also quite mystified why so many people are celebrating this.

      A man who mass-murdered 3000 people and still wanted to murder every remaining non-Muslim on the planet has been found and stopped - and you claim to be "mystified" why people are celebrating? Really? Really really? Yeah right.

    138. Re:Call me Crazy... by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Afghanistan was because Osama was operating from and working with the Taliban at the time of the 9/11 attacks (he wasn't in Abbottabad the entire time you know ;), and I thought Iraq was to secure oil for cronies.

    139. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun fact, it often takes less than a majority to vote in a leader.

      Check the percent of popular vote that presidents have won with.

    140. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may only take 51% of votes 'cast' to make the decisions but that is just that. 51% of ~54% of the total population of America who voted does not make it an exact figure to go by by any means. Any possible number of swings may have happened had the remainder attended the booths (I can't believe some of the backward ass voting systems that some states use, seriously wtf!). Y'all could have been eating McCains for breakfast every morning it was really that close. At the end of the day though its the lesser of two evils in this system of douche bags. America needed something to stop our OZ dollar from smashing their already broken lives further. Conspiracy? :)

    141. Re:Call me Crazy... by Kagura · · Score: 1

      if someone commits an act of war

      So how long before downloading a song in Canada is re-defined as an act of war, so you can invade if we don't turn the suspect over so he can be tried (er... disappeared into a secret prison and tortured).

      I'm being facetious of course, but I genuinely do view "terrorists" as criminals, and terrorist suspects as criminal suspects with all the rights accorded to them.

      Oh hurrah, lets celebrate because the great united states murdered somebody halfway around the world.

      This whole fiasco just martyrs the guy.

      You were being facetious? You compared someone downloading a copyrighted song with someone who blew up two U.S. embassies in Africa killing hundreds, blew up the basement of a World Trade Center building, masterminded a plot that ended up killing more than three-thousand innocent civilians who were going about their day-to-day life...

      No, that's not being facetious, that's just being a moron. Moral relativism is for chumps, and you sir are a chump.

    142. Re:Call me Crazy... by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

    143. Re:Call me Crazy... by Kagura · · Score: 1

      h4rr4r, you're an idiot.

    144. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you remain silent after you cast your vote, and the 51% contradicted your wishes? Did you denounce the actions of your government to your fellow voters? Did you stand up and let the world know that your government was not acting in your name? If not, your silence was acquiescence and you are hiding behind the ballot box.

    145. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With regard to Iraq, since when is failing to abide by the terms of a ceasefire is not grounds for a renewal of hostilities? There was never a formal peace treaty at the end of the first Gulf War and the terms of the ceasefire were regularly violated by Saddam's regime.

    146. Re:Call me Crazy... by WSOGMM · · Score: 1

      Yes, sometimes our government seems corrupt. Yes, sometimes it can seem that many people are absolutely powerless to disagreeable events. But how often, really, are we active about things we think we cannot change? Almost never. Contrary to popular belief, there are effective things that we can do to spread our concern. Blogging about it and sending letters and emails to the government are just some little things. If you're passionate about it, gather people, start a protest. Send word out. Be active. I'm sure you can think of something; you're a slashdotter, smarter than many others have the privilege to be. You have an obligation to the country and to the world to represent America in the way you see fit. Saying, "I'm helpless" and calling it a day makes you just as useless as you think you are.

    147. Re:Call me Crazy... by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Some people just need killing. No need to feel guilty about it.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    148. Re:Call me Crazy... by thehodapp · · Score: 1

      true (and true to some of the other responses to this post). It was perhaps one of the biggest decisions of our founding fathers to effectively create a "winner-takes-all" political system. In some other Democratic countries, you get represented more evenly by the actual percentages of population vote.

    149. Re:Call me Crazy... by cynicist · · Score: 1

      That's absurd. I haven't killed anyone, nor have I voted to have anyone killed. In fact, I try to participate in the political process as little as possible. You might feel an urge to say that I'm "a part of the problem", but do try and remember that the vote of citizens in the US isn't generally how things are decided here.

      (how did we get into Iraq in the first place? Afghanistan? The only vote I remember is the one that allowed George W. Bush the power to do anything he wanted to kill all dem terrerists using whatever means necessary, and I wasn't asked for my opinion on that one)

    150. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea for completely irrelevant 1984 reference! I love 1984, and some of its insights into human psychology are rather disturbingly close to what we have in modern society, but the Two Minutes Hate is really not relevant to this. If you had sighted the parading captured enemies in front of the masses, OK, I would accept some marginal relevance, but the Two Minutes Hate, no.

      Like many other elements of 1984, the Two Minutes Hate was an example of how institutionalizing something within society case cause otherwise rational people to accept it, or related concepts, without question. Celebrating the death of a very specific, individual adversary, at a single moment in time, is a very different thing. One may question the morality of taking any sort of pleasure in the death of another, no matter how "evil" the person was, but this was not one of the themes of 1984. One may point out how the "war on terror" has institutionalized things (e.g. search without warrants, indefinite detention, military tribunals) that would otherwise be rejected by society at large, but these things were accepted well before the death of bin Laden. One could even point out how our obsession with bin Laden is someone related to the Two Minutes Hate, but to say that celebrating the death of a single death at a single moment of time is related to The Two Minutes Hates shows a complete misunderstanding of 1984.

      In a bit of irony, one of the sad aspects of the war of terror is that many like to make 1984 references at the drop of a hat. In other words, they make 1984 references in a manner that would be fitting for inclusion in 1984.

      So here is my advice:
      1) Read 1984
      2) You don't know shit; read it again.
      3) Wait 1 year
      4) Read it a 3rd time

      You are now marginally qualified to cite the 1984 masterwork in arguments.

    151. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... some of you fucking morons...really need to grow some brain cells and lose your obsession...

      You appear to be the moronic obsessive one here. The novel in question was not referenced by any apparent religious cult, and the act being referenced is indeed relevant. One action from the novel was referenced, not the entire narrative and its implications. You need to learn how to use logic and reasoning (along with proper English) to gain support; this pitiful attempt of yours to verbally assault an audience only weakens your argument.

    152. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree with you that, unfortunately, 1984 is oft mis-cited. However, I would claim that its insights into human psychology are still relevant today. Control of the media was only one small aspect of 1984. And indeed, if it were not for Winston's occupation, it could have played a much more minor role or have been eliminated all together. More important were the institutionalizing of otherwise irrational propositions and the constant monitoring of the populace. The latter of which has started to take hold to a much greater extend in the past decade due to advances in technology. The former has been present in society for quite some time, perhaps for all of human history.

    153. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, to be completely fair to the US - the Afghani's should've asked why the US was harbouring the most infamous South American terrorist in Florida, allowing him to live out his life in peace, despite being personally responsible for thousands of deaths, even blowing up a passenger plane? All of this despite numerous extradition requests that the US has ignored or refused.

      Yet they blow a fucking gasket when somebody asks that they provide evidence for one of their extradition requests?!

      Or does that 'tacit acknowledgment that said act of war falls within your jurisdiction' not apply on US soil?

    154. Re:Call me Crazy... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      someone who blew up two U.S. embassies in Africa killing hundreds, blew up the basement of a World Trade Center building, masterminded a plot that ended up killing more than three-thousand innocent civilians who were going about their day-to-day life

      Would it be any different if I had used a sadistic serial killer pedophile rapist instead of a music downloader?

      It would -still- be a criminal police matter not an "act of war" justifying an invasion.

    155. Re:Call me Crazy... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      hi AC, read the line "the current enemy superstate." If you enjoyed 1984 try Burmese Days. Down and Out in Paris and London might be helpful as some currencies fail.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    156. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok - hows this for moral objectivism? The US has been harboring a convicted terrorist, responsible for blowing up a civilian plane and bombing a number of night-clubs etc. for years now.

      Luis Posada Carriles is the name of the man who is directly equatable to Osama. He is a mass-murderer who needs to be brought to justice on an international scale - and he has been repeatedly protected by the US - purely because his terrorist actions were carried out in the name of US interests.

      There we go - I'm comparing terrorism to terrorism - thousands of deaths to thousands of deaths. Now get off your high horse and realise that your hands are as dirty as the rest of the worlds - that you're back yard has as much excrement as ours, and you're fucking responsible for allowing a prolific terrorist to live in peace, because he was killing for your benefit.

      Hypocrisy is for Arseholes and you sir, are an Arsehole.

    157. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      51%? You're thinking of a Democracy. The US is a Republic. But we don't have anywhere near 100% turnout and that whole electoral college thing most people seem to hate without understanding messes with everything as well. The 2008 election got a 63% turnout of eligible voters. The 2010 Census puts the US at 308.7mil people and 69.5mil chose our current President. Since Presidents are treated like kings by the masses until they're caught getting a blow job, 22.5% of the US's overall population decided what would happen for everyone else. Their decision will likely last 8 years instead of just 4 because the opposing party with power could probably pick better primary candidates with some phone books and a handful of darts. Just saying things are even worse than you made them appear. :) It almost makes me wish for a direct democracy with quorum requirements that would prevent anything new from passing.

    158. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why not bury him in US soil and set up a nice registration form for terrorists to flock to the location? Prefer the enemy you know to the enemy you don't, right?

    159. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      49% of us *are* separate from our government. It only takes 51% to vote our leaders in.

      Actually it not even true that the majority of us are represented by our government. Since red states have much smaller populations than blue states yet still get 2 Senators for their states, a minority effectively controls the co-equal branch of government called the Congress whenever a Republican "majority" is voted in.

      That pretty well explains our lack of action on everything from renewables to public infrastructure to global warming to regulation of the financial markets to education.

      It's a joke of a system, and if you throw in FEC v Citizen's United, you can see why America is 37 in health care behind Cypress and Costa Rica
      http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html

      and more Americans believe in angels
      http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=5833399&page=1

      than evolution
      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/22/opinion/polls/main965223.shtml

      and nearly 40% ( that would be 100% of the Republican base) does not believe in global warming.
      http://www.gallup.com/poll/116590/increased-number-think-global-warming-exaggerated.aspx

    160. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're mystified? I take it then that you are in support of flying planes into buildings?

    161. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure the birthers are going to demand a death certificate (and maybe even a birth certificate).

    162. Re:Call me Crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      egburr said:
      "Maybe if our government were more open and kept us better informed about what was happening and why things are done the way thy are done, there may be more agreement that those things are necessary. As it is now, though, we are generally treated like kids asking "why" and getting just "because I said so" as the answer. Is it really surprising that so many people don't trust our government?"

      I would like to suggest that the government is so big that they could not possibly keep us informed on every issue. *EVEN* if they did it would be lost in the Britanica set every day and no one could possibly digest it and come up with any reasonable question to ask (and answered). Face it we are now in information overload and the additional information you are suggesting would be impossible to comprehend. Ohyes and the timeliness of information is at times just as important as the information.

  7. Wasn't it a week ago...? by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    I thought I read somewhere that Osama was killed a week ago, not on Sunday. They were waiting for official confirmation before releasing the information that he was killed....

    Did I mis-read? Was I mis-informed?

    Or is this tweet mis-matched to the event?

    1. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 0

      You were mis-informed.

      Possibly by some outfit connected to an ex-Australian.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    2. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by t33jster · · Score: 2

      I thought I read somewhere that Osama was killed a week ago, not on Sunday. They were waiting for official confirmation before releasing the information that he was killed....

      I think the confusion here is that the operation was authorized a week ago. It didn't happen immediately. I believe I saw/heard a report that there was a rehearsal done by the team before the actual op.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
    3. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      I heard that Osama had been killed a week ago on MSNBC. Most were saying it was this morning/late last night but there have been a few conflicting reports.

    4. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly by some outfit connected to an ex-Australian.

      You mean Slashdot?

    5. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Yup, many reports of rehearsals being performed by Team 6 ahead of time after a long period of surveillance and planning.

      Also, a few of the major news outlets repeatedly botched facts about it. Also /. still has a bogus update posted in the summary as of Monday, 11:30 CST. Still says he was killed by a bomb a week ago. O_o

    6. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      They were probably waiting for "Mission Accomplished Day" to come around before giving the news. Everything is scripted for the best theatre.

    7. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I heard that Osama had been killed a week ago on MSNBC.

      Osama was killed on MSNBC? Do they have the video?

      ;-)

      Seriously; I've read about his death nearly every month for the past decade. It wouldn't be surprising if a news service covered the story of his death last week. And we'll probably still be reading stories saying he's just been killed for at least another decade.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    8. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      First link at the article you point to:

      http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/05/01/usama-bin-laden-dead-say-sources/

      (Fox article updated to match reported facts. Amazing).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    9. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point being that the Slashdot summary says "The reports say that Bin Laden was actually killed about a week ago by a bomb in Pakistan", even if you don't read any of the links at all.

    10. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      You were misinformed. A source I read said that Obama gave the 'go' order to the special ops guys during the Royal wedding.

      That brings up an interesting image. Bin Laden, lounging in his chair watching TV with tears of joys in his eyes as William puts the ring on Kate's finger...and then gunfire erupts around him.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    11. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Sounds reasonable. They've had intel. on the location since August. They've been collecting more over time, generating plans and probably rehearsing alternate scenarios for weeks (months?).

      The raid happened as it was reported (TFA Twitter evidence backs this up). And I doubt there was much delay between the final go-ahead and the operation, as that produces opportunities for leaks.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    12. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "reports of rehearsals being performed by Team 6"

      Team 6 is Presidential detail. They wouldn't be going overseas at all unless the President himself did.
      This was likely Team 5 - Counter-Terrorist group.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Lol. Thanks for pointing out the vagueness of the syntactic structure of my sentence. Yeah, that could have been phrased better. :) It's like the old joke: "One night I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas, I don't know!"

    14. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I heard that Osama had been killed a week ago on MSNBC.

      Yes, MSNBC, like most other major news sources these days, live in fear of being last to the party during important events. They report rumors and unsubstantiated events so they can get the breaking news instead of giving it the time needed to find out just what happened.

    15. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      "reports of rehearsals being performed by Team 6"

      Team 6 is Presidential detail. They wouldn't be going overseas at all unless the President himself did.

      Wait, so now you're saying Obama was leading the mission in person? Did he fire the kill shot himself?

    16. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1
    17. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seal Team 6 generally refers to the tier one Special Forces unit of the Navy Seals. The original name was "Seal Team 6" and although it is no long the official name it is still unofficially referred to as "Seal Team 6".

    18. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      The point being that the Slashdot summary was a summary of the rubbish that the "major news organisations" pulled out of there arses.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    19. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group (NSWDG), commonly known as DEVGRU and informally by its former name SEAL Team Six (ST6),[1][2] is one of the United States' two secretive Tier One counter-terrorism and Special Mission Units (SMUs); the other such group is 1st SFOD-D (Delta Force)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Team_6

    20. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wrong: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/SEAL_Team_6

    21. Re:Wasn't it a week ago...? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Team 6 was disbanded in 1987. I think you better go back to your history books.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  8. We need to go back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and take him out too.

  9. How they finally found Osama by Old97 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Osama had an iPhone and it kept track of his location. Good job, Steve!

    --
    Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    1. Re:How they finally found Osama by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Nope, we all know Osama was a PS3 owner. He'd never touch something as dirty as an American XBox.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:How they finally found Osama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't have used it to record his videos!

  10. Dude on vacation by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I read about this dude, he's on vacation, "trying to get away from it all" and after all this breaks he's complaining that he can't get away from it all.

    Dude, your problem is your idea of "getting away from it all" is warped, in that you're twittering every 30 minutes when you see a F-ing airplane. Give your cellphone a burial at sea, then chill on a lawn chair (they have those in pakistan, right?) with a religiously appropriate mood enhancing substance and enjoy the solitude.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Dude on vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your internet comment criticizing people who comment about things on the internet is fascinating!

    2. Re:Dude on vacation by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Dude, your problem is your idea of "getting away from it all" is warped, in that you're twittering every 30 minutes when you see a F-ing airplane. Give your cellphone a burial at sea, then chill on a lawn chair (they have those in pakistan, right?) with a religiously appropriate mood enhancing substance and enjoy the solitude.

      And if your religion doesn't approve of mood enhancing substances, it's time to find a better religion. ;)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:Dude on vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a retard. That's what you get for using twitter

  11. Well, Osama's compound had no internet by caywen · · Score: 1

    Well, Osama's compound had no internet, anyways, so it's not like he could have gotten any early warning.

    1. Re:Well, Osama's compound had no internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the giant, loud helicopter that triggered the tweet in the first place was enough of a tip off

  12. Oblig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, let's move out!

    *blam blam blam*

    Counter Terrorists Win!

  13. Never thought I'd join this chorus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but how the hell is this news or news for nerds or stuff that matters?

  14. The real location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ie=UTF8&ll=34.169293,73.242615&spn=0.00324,0.008256&t=h&z=18

  15. OMG YOU LEMMINGS!! by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 0

    Anagrams of Sohaib Athar include "A Sahib Poker" , "A Sharia Both" and "Aha Rash Obit". Now Sahib in arabic means owner, and OBL was most surely owned in the raid. Sharia is the code of conduct, and the "aha rash obit" anagram could stand for a quickly developing obituary as in "spur of the moment...rash". Yeah. Also if anyone care to read all tweets this guy makes there are some strange tweets made over the last few months including, "Still stuck in Abbotobad working on secret project", some quotation of the author Gibran, who happened to author "The Prophet". He also mentions Chakotay (Star Trek), and stated in one tweet. "when I grow up I want to be diplomat".. Now you go to Google and read about Chakatay, and Gibran, and go read *all* of his tweet stream. It doesn't add up. This fellow is planted to obfuscate the timeline with his tweets.

    Now, this guy, whoever he is, was put there to tweets out so we all believe the raid happened yesterday. Plain and simple. We already know they have been watching OBL for months now, and the government surely wouldn't have already killed, DNA tested, and buried him with 24 hours. They have likely had his body for weeks now, and picked a good time to leak the story, made all the more believable with this IT guy in Abbotabad supplying tweets that make it seem like it went down yesterday. We may never know...

    1. Re:OMG YOU LEMMINGS!! by acohen1 · · Score: 1

      Are you serious are is this a joke?

    2. Re:OMG YOU LEMMINGS!! by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty darn serious about it. Look deeper. Just a week or so ago Panetta f was named for Secretary of Defense, and Petraeus to the CIA......

      They say timing is everything. It is funny that we held Saddam's sons bodies for 11 days, but decided to bury OBL at sea withing 24 hours, even though he is/was the highest priority target we had...

    3. Re:OMG YOU LEMMINGS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty darn serious about it. Look deeper. Just a week or so ago Panetta f was named for Secretary of Defense, and Petraeus to the CIA......

      They say timing is everything. It is funny that we held Saddam's sons bodies for 11 days, but decided to bury OBL at sea withing 24 hours, even though he is/was the highest priority target we had...

      Probably has something to do with it being the Iraqis who held Saddam's sons, not us.

    4. Re:OMG YOU LEMMINGS!! by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      They say timing is everything. It is funny that we held Saddam's sons bodies for 11 days, but decided to bury OBL at sea withing 24 hours, even though he is/was the highest priority target we had...

      Actually, it's not. You're not thinking very hard if you can't think of at least two very good reasons why we wouldn't want to hang on to the body that long, or why these two situations are very different from each other (I hang on to old cheese for months, but that isn't relevant here, either).

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    5. Re:OMG YOU LEMMINGS!! by baerm · · Score: 1

      Um, how in the world is an IT guy making a Star Trek reference surprising? Why would an educated Arab making a comment referencing one of the most famous Arab poets (Kahlil Gibran) be surprising? (I've read through 'The Prophet', it's a poetry book that has as much to do with Muslim extremism as Shakespeare). I think you might need to take the aluminium hat off and/or come out from under the bridge and relax a little bit.

      Surely, in the big scheme of things, Osama's death really doesn't matter that much. Don't take the mediatainment as seriously as it thinks you should.

    6. Re:OMG YOU LEMMINGS!! by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 1

      *Adjusts tinfoil hat*

      Chakotay --wikipedia-- "subsequently resigned from Starfleet and joined a rogue group known as the Maquis. During his time as a renegade fighter against the Cardassians, Chakotay inducted into his Maquis cell the half-Klingon woman B'Elanna Torres who became his chief engineer. He also invited a Bajoran named Seska and the two became involved in a romantic relationship for a time. However, unknown to Chakotay, Seska was actually a Cardassian spy who had been surgically altered to infiltrate the Maquis."

  16. history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I wonder if that twitter post will end up in our history books?

  17. not what I asked by treeves · · Score: 1

    Of course. But that has nothing to do with my question, which is about the border of Pakistan and which bordering country OBL was closest to. Do you have knowledge of that? Or did you just want to post a conjecture about how narrow minded you think I am?

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    1. Re:not what I asked by jsvendsen · · Score: 1

      Sorry, just being a little flippant :) No offense intended.

      If you mean at the time of his demise, Abbottabad is located very close to Kashmir, where the state of national borders is muddled to say the least. It's definitely closer to Indian-administered Kashmir than to Afghanistan, though. The Wikipedia page has a pretty good map.

      Now, If you mean where was he since the invasion, my impression is that the best available answer is that nobody really knows. It seems to be commonly accepted as fact that he was present (and nearly captured) during the battle of Tora Bora in late 2001. Since then, reports on his whereabouts are a mishmash of obituaries, wishful thinking and he's-definitely-anywhere-but-here-dear-god-stop-killing-us pleas. Here's a summary. MSNBC is running a story that indicates he might have been holed up in Abbottabad for a while, (Possibly since 2005) but I can't verify any of that.

    2. Re:not what I asked by treeves · · Score: 1

      Thanks.
      I've seen, since I posted earlier, more clear maps, and you're right: he was closer to Kashmir/India than any other border.
      It's a little hard to believe, to say the least, that the Pakistani government/military weren't complicit in keeping him hidden at some point if not all along.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:not what I asked by jsvendsen · · Score: 1

      True, although I personally find it even harder to accept that not a single one of these government/military representatives would have been willing to sell him out for 25 million bucks.

  18. Wouldn't it have been far better... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    To have him buried (as in "in the ground") - and then cover the entire area with cameras to monitor who comes to "revere him"?
    Maybe even arrest some of them?

    I mean... the entire thing sounds like something out of Pulp Fiction.
    Best trained special forces in the world infiltrate a foreign country to get one sick old guy they haven't been able to catch for... what... 13 years?
    In the process they manage to crash a helicopter. Or they've failed to maintain it properly so it crashed due to mechanical failure. Can't really say which option is more embarrassing.
    Then these super-soldiers fail to capture him and instead shoot him in the head - so there goes visual identification.
    So, a helicopter short, they haul his ass on foot, extract him back to their ship, supposedly identify him by his DNA - and then they dump the body overboard.

    Cause, you know... that is supposed to be according to Muslim beliefs and so his followers wouldn't have a grave-site to visit and pay their respects.
    I suppose they also had an imam on board, so it would be a proper Muslim burial?
    I mean... they were obviously paying more attention to his religious beliefs than capturing the man they've spent billions of dollars chasing - for over a decade.

    I'm not saying that it was all some conspiracy and that the whole thing was staged or something, but they are REALLY stretching the limits of "what can be adequately explained by incompetence" there.
    All they managed to do is simply make him an even shadier figure now - by destroying evidence of his death.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Wouldn't it have been far better... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I suppose they also had an imam on board, so it would be a proper Muslim burial?

      Hmm. 5000 men on board, yeah, it's not unlikely they had someone able to perform Islamic rites.

      (even ignoring the fact that I could perform Islamic rites; I don't even know Arabic but frankly shitting on a dog has as much real connection with Allah as anything in the Koran, on account of him not fucking existing)

    2. Re:Wouldn't it have been far better... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      What the helicopter failure during the Iran hostage rescue attempt also suspicious? Honestly, the more I hear about these kinds of operations, the most I'm starting to think it would be suspicious if a helicopter didn't break! These things apparently fall out of the sky right and left!

      As for failing to capture him alive, understand that capturing something alive is virtually impossible without their cooperation. They're soldiers, not gods, and this isn't some Hollywood action flick where the heroes can just do anything the script writer thinks would be cool. If someone would rather die that be captured, your odds of capturing them are effectively zilch, I don't care who you are, how well trained you are, or what equipment you have.

      They didn't haul him back on foot, they had multiple helicopters. (They do that, since, you know, helicopters have a bad habit of failing...) They may very well have had a Muslim chaplain on the ship -- they're rarer than Christian chaplains but not unheard of. And if people choose to believe he's not dead, this serves US interests far better than making a martyr out of him.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:Wouldn't it have been far better... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Honestly, the more I hear about these kinds of operations, the most I'm starting to think it would be suspicious if a helicopter didn't break! These things apparently fall out of the sky right and left!

      Here's an idea. Why don't they use those civilian helicopters instead? They don't keep falling out of the sky. Just paint them black and use them as "secret-copters".

      As for failing to capture him alive, understand that capturing something alive is virtually impossible without their cooperation. They're soldiers, not gods, and this isn't some Hollywood action flick where the heroes can just do anything the script writer thinks would be cool. If someone would rather die that be captured, your odds of capturing them are effectively zilch, I don't care who you are, how well trained you are, or what equipment you have.

      Yeah, sure. So just to make sure he doesn't decide to die rather than be captured, make sure you shoot him in the head. It
      might be trickier than shooting him in some other, bigger, part of the body that would still allow for visual identification but hey - shot in the head stops him deciding in an instant.

      They didn't haul him back on foot, they had multiple helicopters. (They do that, since, you know, helicopters have a bad habit of failing...)

      There was a report that claimed they had to haul him out of there on foot. Couldn't really bother finding it.
      It's not like I was trying to be "journalistically correct" (HA!) - I was making fun of their apparent incompetence.

      And again, if helicopters keep falling from the sky all the time - why does the military use them at all? Seems like a really expensive way of killing and injuring your own men, when the enemy is offering to do that for free.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    4. Re:Wouldn't it have been far better... by RussellSHarris · · Score: 1

      Here's an idea. Why don't they use those civilian helicopters instead? They don't keep falling out of the sky. Just paint them black and use them as "secret-copters".

      The failure rate does seem startling enough to demand a good explanation. So, after lengthy consideration of all the correlating facts in such cases, I've narrowed it down to two possibilities. Either it's the highly-trained pilots, or it's the guys on the ground shooting at them.

    5. Re:Wouldn't it have been far better... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it that they fall out of the sky almost every time that they take off.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  19. DNA Test, really? by transami · · Score: 1

    Last I read a DNA test took at least three days to complete. Amazing they were able to pull it off in just a few hours of dumping the body. And what DNA did they compare it too, btw?

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
    1. Re:DNA Test, really? by haderytn · · Score: 1

      Last I read a DNA test took at least three days to complete.

      Really?

    2. Re:DNA Test, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing "last you read" was in the early nineties?

    3. Re:DNA Test, really? by spectrokid · · Score: 1

      + A DNA test takes 3 days if you are paying for it and Mss Noodlepoops first needs to fill out some paperwork straight after her coffee break.
      + You can take some blood, dump the body and analyze afterwards

      --

      10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    4. Re:DNA Test, really? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I'd heard that they'd compared it to his sister, who died of cancer in New York. Not sure if you could be positive from that though... This will certainly shape u pto be interesting.

    5. Re:DNA Test, really? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      If you decide to send your DNA sample to a professional lab for testing, it will take your three to five business days to get your result, yes. But I'm assuming the US government has the equipment and expertise to do the testing themselves, rather than drop a sample off with FedEx and wait a few days like the rest of us schmucks.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    6. Re:DNA Test, really? by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 1

      Who knew the USS Carl Vinson had a DNA lab on board? Those crazy Navy types.

    7. Re:DNA Test, really? by Hahnsoo · · Score: 1

      Last I read a DNA test took at least three days to complete. Amazing they were able to pull it off in just a few hours of dumping the body. And what DNA did they compare it too, btw?

      In this day and age, not only is the cost of DNA sequencing beating Moore's Law, but the turn-around time is around 45 minutes to an hour for the actual analysis. For the University of California system, you get your results by e-mail by the next day at the latest, and that's assuming that the day was busy for them. The "3 days" thing is typically the time it takes to mail a package or similarly courier the physical end-product. There are handheld DNA testing portable labs about the size of an AED or first aid kit nowadays, too.

    8. Re:DNA Test, really? by Hahnsoo · · Score: 1

      You can have one in your briefcase, if you had the cash. http://www.nec.co.jp/press/en/0710/1501.html

    9. Re:DNA Test, really? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      A DNA test takes 3 days to complete in the same way that it takes 5 days to ship a package across the US or in the way that you leave your car with a dealer for four hours to get an oil change, or in the way that you stand in line for 30 minutes at the grocery store to buy a pack of gum. That is how fast it is typically done for those who care more about cost than speed, but very little of that duration is spent actually doing anything.

      There are a number of different kinds of DNA analyses, but most involve probably 20 minutes of enzymatic treatment, and running the resulting fragments out on a gel or capillary, and maybe visualizing the results. You can probably get results in an hour or two cheap if you put the sample at the head of the line for testing.

      I'm sure more exotic technologies can get results even faster.

      If they were planning a raid for some period of time no doubt they'd have expected this possible result and would have had test equipment nearby. Figure that the body would be taken straight for testing, and they'd probably be swabbing his cheek before the rotor blades even stopped turning. The military is VERY efficient when there is a plan, and if this was priority one you can bet that everything was ready to go minus the sample when it arrived...

  20. Yeah, but he wants the long form by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    He needs to put his hands pierced in the side of the long form before hewill believe.

  21. Escape Tunnel by transami · · Score: 1

    I wonder why the most wanted man in the world didn't have an escape tunnel? And decided instead to go down fighting after hiding out for ten years.

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
    1. Re:Escape Tunnel by dcollins · · Score: 1
      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  22. Doesn't matter. by moxley · · Score: 1

    It's not like it matters...

    They have a new bogeyman...and he is the people.

  23. Re:The really odds by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    You do know I assume that there's a meta-conspiracy to take out conspiracy theorists just because they're so damned annoying.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  24. Or better yet by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    Create the crypt but put a high intensity gamma source in it.

  25. When people say "we will not know for decades" by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    It means that everyone knows it was a cluster f**k, but if I can distract people long enough, I'll be dead and won't have to man up and admit it.

  26. This is an 'The Onion'-like hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there are going to be some redfaces when all is revealed.

    Some college kid just hit the jackpot, as far as 1n74rw3bz hoax-cred goes.

  27. Bin Laden/Eichmann analogy by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I recall reading during a previous trip to Wikipedia that the Israelis buried Adolf Eichmann at sea to keep supporters from having a grave/shrine for _him_

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  28. Don't call me crazy!! by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

    I think you're repeating the oft-made mistake here of thinking the operation in Iraq had something to do with the "War on Terror".

    (Did you read my post?) No, I'm thinking that whatever money was spent on the Iraq war, can't be counted toward the cost of killing Bin Laden. MonsterTrimble tried to make it sounds like trillions of dollars were spent to kill Bin Laden. I have heard a lot of whackjob conspiracy theories and I have heard some very plausible explanations for why the Iraq war happened, but so far nobody has suggested that Iraq was invaded as part of Bush's brilliant round-about way of gathering intell about Bin Laden's address or guard-changing schedule.

    Just my luck, it'll turn out to be true. Next month we'll read a story that someone in Pakistan knew where Bin Laden was and was willing to cough up the info. But instead of settling for the half-million dollar reward, he said he'd only reveal the coordinates if the US government could make his dream come true of running a profitable ice cream store in Bagdad. But Saddam Hussein hated ice cream and would never let it happen. After much negotiating, Bush reluctantly agreed to invade Iraq.

    Some turmoil followed, but was eventually sorted out. The informant was finally able to enter Iraq in 2005 and open the store, but the economy was shit and the store didn't make a profit. After filing Chapter 7 in 2008, the informant tried again and opened a yogurt store and it worked and he made it into a good business. Then in October 2010 he got an idea to use the success of this yogurt business to subsidize the building of a new ice cream campaign. At first it didn't work, but then in mid-April he was going over the 1st quarter 2011 results and realized he made a slight profit on ice cream itself if you ignored the start up costs, and his accountant explained that he had to, since those were written off in 4th quarter 2010. So he called the White House to make good on the deal, got the runaround since the person who answered the phone thought it was a prank call when he asked for President Bush, but it eventually got ironed out and he spoke to President Obama on April 23 and gave him Bin Laden's address. The hit squad sprang into action.

    That's believable, but is it true? Maybe, maybe not. If it is, then MonsterTrimble's claim that trillions of dollars were spent to kill Bin Laden will be validated and everyone can say I'm a damn fool for arguing with him. But I submit to you that we don't really have any evidence that Saddam Hussein hated ice cream. So how do you explain that?!

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  29. Incorrect! Here's the correct Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=34.169284,73.242663&z=19

  30. You're missing the point. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    It's not that it is silly to pay attention to religious conventions when any sane, intelligent and educated person knows that there is no such thing as god(s).
    It's silly that they are supposedly adhering to religious conventions of someone they just shot in the head.
    Someone whom they present as a reason for waging a war or two.
    And it is even sillier if they actually prepared for such an occasion in advance by making sure that they have an imam on board, while apparently failing to bring along a skilled helicopter technician.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:You're missing the point. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      My point was that they likely have muslim sailors and so would already be servicing their spiritual needs. They wouldn't need to import a new Imam just to bury a dead enemy.

      I also think that it would be silly not to respect the person you're at war with. A lack of respect invariably leads to behaviours modern civilisations frowns upon - rape & pillage is illegal in most armies across the world, why should desecration of the dead be any different?

      I recall much US anguish about Somalians parading corpses of dead US soldiers; this is comparable, and it's great that the US took a responsible approach here.

      Indeed, I think the US military have portrayed themselves superbly here. Controlled, proportionate, justified, mature, highly skilled and capable and sufficiently brave, with entirely appropriate levels of respect for someone with whom they unfortunately found themselves in conflict.

      It's the American public shooting off fireworks that have shown their ignorance and irrationality.

      Regarding the downed Helo, I'm not sure a tech would've helped any, and abandoning a single helicopter with no loss of life and without compromising the mission is actually impressive and militarily a great success.

  31. Luis Carriles by John+Bayko · · Score: 1

    I'm replying to this because I'm out of mod points, and it's a legitimate point made here.