Slashdot Mirror


Translator Puts Us Closer To Dolphin Communication

LordStormes sent in a link to an article about a new device that may allow dolphins to finally thank us for all the fish. Denise Herzing, founder of the Wild Dolphin Project and Thad Starner, an artificial intelligence researcher at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, have been working on a project called Cetacean Hearing and Telemetry or CHAT. The pair hope that CHAT will allow them to "co-create" a language with wild dolphins, allowing the two species to communicate. From the article: "Herzing and Starner will start testing the system on wild Atlantic spotted dolphins (Stenella frontalis) in the middle of this year. At first, divers will play back one of eight 'words' coined by the team to mean 'seaweed' or 'bow wave ride,' for example. The software will listen to see if the dolphins mimic them. Once the system can recognize these mimicked words, the idea is to use it to crack a much harder problem: listening to natural dolphin sounds and pulling out salient features that may be the 'fundamental units' of dolphin communication."

179 comments

  1. First Dolphin Post by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    So long, and thanks for all the fish!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:First Dolphin Post by masterwit · · Score: 2

      So sad it should come to this...we tried to warn you all but oh dear!

      Ah this translator seems much more useful than I previously had thought at first glance... maybe this didn't belong in idle after all?

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
    2. Re:First Dolphin Post by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 4, Informative

      Douglas Adams died ten years ago today.

      *insert Twilight Zone music*

      --
      +0 Meh
    3. Re:First Dolphin Post by swanzilla · · Score: 1

      That sounds improbable.

    4. Re:First Dolphin Post by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      So long, and thanks for all the fish!

      ... poisoned with mercury

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    5. Re:First Dolphin Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first line in the summary already made this joke - mod redundant

    6. Re:First Dolphin Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ch ch ch ch ch eck ch ch click?

      ach!

    7. Re:First Dolphin Post by Adambomb · · Score: 2

      Ahhh, Mercury.

      Sweetest of the transition metals.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    8. Re:First Dolphin Post by lennier · · Score: 1

      *insert Twilight Zone music*

      I think perhaps you meant "insert 1978 era Doctor Who music"?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    9. Re:First Dolphin Post by nytes · · Score: 1

      What if we find out all they ever say is "Swim swim hungry, swim swim hungry"?

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    10. Re:First Dolphin Post by ppanon · · Score: 1

      I thought lead was what the Romans used as a sweetener?

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    11. Re:First Dolphin Post by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Only because they'd not developed antifreeze.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    12. Re:First Dolphin Post by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

      Why is this in idle?


      Wow I think that's the first time I've ever asked that question.

    13. Re:First Dolphin Post by masterwit · · Score: 1

      Wow I think that's the first time I've ever asked that question.

      It is common practice at Slashdot to place stories and whatnot in the wrong section. Lemme go get my tin foil hat and ill show ya!

      cheers!

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
  2. English? by Grindalf · · Score: 0

    I thought dolphins speak English! What's that matter, can't you take the notion and concept of talking mammals? :0)

    --
    The purpose of existence is to make money.
    1. Re:English? by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Given the number of Americans who can't manage to speak proper English either...

    2. Re:English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I assume the researchers are much smarter than the blurb summery makes them out to be. Some human languages have different basic sounds than others. Some even use clicks and other sounds vastly different than what we are used to. Assuming a bunch of random groups of wild dolphins will speak the same 'language' or even have the same "'fundamental units' of dolphin communication" is a stretch.

    3. Re:English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finish your sentence!

    4. Re:English? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Forget clicks and whistles, lots of languages lack the dental fricative we use for the th sound in English.

    5. Re:English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of native English speakers also lake the dental fricative, resulting in 'Free' sounding exactly like 'Three'.
      Yet somehow we still manage to communicate.

  3. if the dolphins are smart... by notgm · · Score: 2

    if the dolphins are smart enough to understand us, they'll play dumb.

    1. Re:if the dolphins are smart... by Moryath · · Score: 1

      “Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” - Calvin & Hobbes.

    2. Re:if the dolphins are smart... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      if the dolphins are smart enough to understand us, they'll play dumb.

      Agreed. I'm sure they see no advantage to meaningful communication with a bunch of bald apes. They're probably afraid we'll try to make them pay property taxes on the ocean they live in, or some other stupid idea.

    3. Re:if the dolphins are smart... by O-Deka-K · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Man has always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much... the wheel, New York, wars and so on... while all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man... for precisely the same reason." -- Douglas Adams

      Dolphins probably think we're the dumb ones because we don't understand anything they say.

    4. Re:if the dolphins are smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much - the wheel, New York, wars and so on - whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man - for precisely the same reasons.

  4. Obligatory Far Side by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're getting another one of those aw-blah esspanyol sounds!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Obligatory Far Side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awesome reference dkleinsc!

    2. Re:Obligatory Far Side by zebs · · Score: 1

      Never did get that particular Far Side.

    3. Re:Obligatory Far Side by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Never got the far side full stop. Or period, if you will.

    4. Re:Obligatory Far Side by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Never did get that particular Far Side.

      The joke is that dolphin speech is actually quite simple - it's spanish - and the scientists are over thinking the problem so much they don't recognize what should be a simple code. It's another twist on the old "time is money; look at the clock!" followed by "get that bird to shut up!" bit.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    5. Re:Obligatory Far Side by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Habla Espanol

    6. Re:Obligatory Far Side by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      It's Non Sequitur, what's not to get.

    7. Re:Obligatory Far Side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke is that the dolphins are speaking Spanish, and the researchers don't understand it, leading them to just categorise it as a series of noises.

      Basically this for another age.

    8. Re:Obligatory Far Side by somersault · · Score: 1

      It's not non sequitur..? It makes sense if the researchers have never heard Spanish.

      Unlikely? Yes. Non sequitur? Bananas.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:Obligatory Far Side by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I never got it either, can you explain it to me too?

  5. Meh, already done by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    As Stan Smith showed, he taught Steve how to communicate with dolphins and all they, the dolphins, want to talk about is mackerel.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  6. What was the series... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I remember when I was a kid I used to watch some sci-fi series that had a dolphin with a translator device on it, all the people talked to it like another human. Can't remember what it was now.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:What was the series... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was seaQuest DSV. People made fun of the talking dolphin in the '90s. Looks like the producers and writers of that show had more foresight than they were given credit.

    2. Re:What was the series... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seaquest DSV, dolphins name was Darwin.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaQuest_DSV

    3. Re:What was the series... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seaquest, DSV

    4. Re:What was the series... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was seaquest

    5. Re:What was the series... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Or they and these researchers are smoking the same brand of ganja weed.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:What was the series... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      I remember when I was a kid I used to watch some sci-fi series that had a dolphin with a translator device on it, all the people talked to it like another human. Can't remember what it was now.

      I'm sure it was not the first to do so but SeaQuest seems likely.
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106126/

      Now a closer theatrical match to this research may be Day of the Dolphin.
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069946/

    7. Re:What was the series... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Ah yes that was it.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:What was the series... by YesDinosaursDidExist · · Score: 1

      SeaQuest DSV - the dolphin's name was Darwin.

      --
      Individuals must choose, decide their "essential" nature rather than having it given from some transcendent source.
    9. Re:What was the series... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yep it was SeaQuest.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    10. Re:What was the series... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Flipper? Wait a second... that's not a translation device, that's a penis!

    11. Re:What was the series... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Because the talking dolphin idea was one of those obvious gimmicks to make the show appeal to a larger audience you combined that with him being friends with the local kid genius. Having random kids and/or talking animals in plots where they are supposed to be in danger is quite stupid but they do it for ratings. As for the most part the adults will just ignore them and the kids would like them.
       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    12. Re:What was the series... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      It was seaQuest DSV. People made fun of the talking dolphin in the '90s. Looks like the producers and writers of that show had more foresight than they were given credit.

      Well, I watched some SeaQuest, and what I always made fun of was that the translator made the dolphin talk like a 1950s robot. Or Talking Moose.

      Why on earth would you do that? I mean if you were building an actual dolphin translator, not making a TV show. It's not like you just take dolphin noises, pass them through some analog filters like they're an electric guitar, and what comes out is English but with a "dolphin accent". You'd use a dictionary of dolphin 'words'. And it's not like Talking Moose or Stephen Hawking's chair, where the dolphin could type out words that aren't in the dictionary. So, just have a dictionary of recorded words and have the dolphin sound normal.

      In any case it was just stupid to have the advanced technology on display, but have the voice synthesis technology be stuck in the 80s.

      I still loved the talking dolphin character though. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    13. Re:What was the series... by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      The above are wrong... it was Sealab 2021... see: Dolphin Boy.

    14. Re:What was the series... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, all 6 "Flippers" were female dolphins. When they first tried to do it with a male, they got some problems with a... translation device.

  7. Rosetta Stone by perpenso · · Score: 2

    My inner historian is sad that no one mentioned the Rosetta Stone as inspiraton.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosetta_Stone

  8. Ha! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    "We were all for communicating with you land-dwelling monkeys, but then we saw that Ralph Macchio was put on Dancing With The Stars, and we decided our time would be better spent rubbing our genitals against each other. Now please do fuck off."

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Ha! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the quote (what dolphins have cable TV?), but if you think about it, the general premise is probably right.

          Why would any wild animals want to be more like us? We build and grow, leaving massive destruction in the path. We toil away constantly at some goal of wealth and happiness, which drives us from birth to death.

          Dolphins live happily in the ocean. They are free to eat, sleep, and reproduce. Occasionally, they take advantage of humans by riding on their mechanically produced waves (i.e., bow wave).

          Why would they want to get any closer to us than they need to? We're already terrorists, killing dolphins, polluting their environment, and kidnapping their own for human entertainment. Nope, rather than wanting to be friendly, chat with us, and take treats from us, they'd likely want to get their revenge.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:Ha! by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      In all seriousness, I'm wondering what we're supposed to do if we find out that dolphins are sentient creatures. We have, whether we always honor it or not, created an array of international accords on human rights. Do we open that up to them? Does that mean that we would have to demand Japan and other nations that have killed them pay compensation? What kind of compensation would a dolphin want? What about territorial issues?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Ha! by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      > they'd likely want to get their revenge.
      And what better way than to have our military-industrial complex spend us to deat? All they'd have to do is feed the CIA false intelligence about terrorists having sharks with frickin' lasers.

    4. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whatever, avatard.

      Toiling away at wealth and happiness is a vast improvement over toiling away at staying alive. If you disagree, go run off and live in the jungle, and spare us of your foolishness.

    5. Re:Ha! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, I'm wondering what we're supposed to do if we find out that dolphins are sentient creatures. We have, whether we always honor it or not, created an array of international accords on human rights. Do we open that up to them? Does that mean that we would have to demand Japan and other nations that have killed them pay compensation? What kind of compensation would a dolphin want? What about territorial issues?

      They probably ARE sentient (depends on your definition). This issue has been a problem for mankind for a long time. The more we know about biology, the more we realize that we're not all that different from Everything Else. The big problem, IMHO, is that treating dolphins or whales (or dogs, cats, politicians) like humans doesn't get them all that far. We're pretty ill behaved critters towards everything and everybody, sentience be damned.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Ha! by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      We are the most successful species on this planet. We have so much food we have an obesity problem. We have more sex than most other creatures on the planet. We are so successful that we can spend time worrying about concepts like "wealth" and it's relationship to happiness, or how our activities are affecting the planet....or we can sit on the couch and watch TV.

      OTOH, dolphins live relatively short lives and have to spend a lot of time hunting for food. They have no concept of "medical care", so an injury is a rather unpleasant experience, and parasites common. Then there's the other creatures in the sea that might eat them.

      Human life is pretty damn kick-ass.

    7. Re:Ha! by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

          I would if I could, but there isn't anywhere in the world to get far enough away from people like you. You do make an excellent case for postpartum abortions though. If they pass the law to allow it, I'm sure you'll be the poster child.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:Ha! by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

          I think you're a bit confused.. The most "successful" under what terms?

          The most abundant creatures on earth are copepods or prokaryote SAR11. I'll leave it to a zoologist to give the correct answer.

          The healthiest are sharks, with no known illnesses.

          Humans aren't the most prolific. That would probably go to one of the first category. We're only fertile less than 25% of the time, and not every attempt causes reproduction. Even once we do manage to fertilize an egg, there's about a 10 month period before you can hope to start the process again. Our young spawn are not able to then reproduce for over a decade. The window of reproduction is generally about 40 years, but it is generally considered humans must be over 18, and doctors strongly suggest against reproduction over 35. So, a 17 year window of acceptability for reproduction. That's a very short period.

          Our lifespan is trivial compared to some. The Arctica islandica can live over 400 years. Genus Hydra and Turritopsis nutricula are considered biologically immortal, due to the way they reproduce.

          Wealth (as any monetary system) was a human invention, just as religion.

          When's the last time you had a chance to lay out in the grass and enjoy the sunshine, before hunting for dinner, and never had to consider going "to work" for a "paycheck" to pay "rent", "mortgage", "taxes", or other "bills"?

          We may have had it pretty good. We've have done a great job of screwing up a perfectly good thing. But we're humans, and that's what we do best.

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Ha! by witch-doktor · · Score: 1

      I see from this website that sharks do have illnesses.

    10. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that sure is a cogent rejoinder! What are you going to do next, call me a poopy-face and put worms in my hair? Sorry if you're butt-hurt about having a high standard of living. Remember, suicide is always a valid alternative.

    11. Re:Ha! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      cogent rejoinder

      Well, there's a phrase you don't hear every day. Congratulations.

      Remember, suicide is always a valid alternative.

      Yes, it sure is. If you aren't feeling up to the task, we can have some folks come over to assist you. But, if you feel the solitary way is best, I'm sure we can dig up a copy of "Suicide for Dummies" and send it over.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    12. Re:Ha! by ppanon · · Score: 1

      I think it's more fair to say that it's not a good idea to plan on doing your reproducing after 35 because a) fertility goes down (for both men and women), b) the odds of birth defects go up (although that risk increases most seriously after 40), c) the stress of pregnancy and childbirth is harder on older mothers that aren't in good physical condition (cardio, body mass, and nutrition), and d) there may be some implications regarding breast and uterine cancer from having those organs go through typical pregnancy growth after an extra decade or more of slow DNA degradation (so extra vigilance is necessary in the long term). However it's still quite possible if you're in good physical condition and you don't have religious or personal hangups about aborting a pregnancy if early screening shows genetic problems with the fetus. The fertility part is still a crapshoot, though one which my wife and I appear to have beaten twice, and which my parents also beat twice. However I have known others who have not been so lucky, so it's not an approach I would recommend taking lightly.

      Nevertheless, I can't remember our doctor recommending against pregnancy after 35 (let alone strongly recommending against it). I don't believe our doctor has any religious hangups regarding abortions of fetuses with trisomy or other serious genetic impairments. Maybe that's more of an issue in the USA where a high proportion of the population (presumably including doctors) have strong fundamentalist religious beliefs?

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    13. Re:Ha! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I was always told by doctors that having a baby after over 35 was dangerous to the mother. That's from several American doctors, who were our OB/GYN's for my 3 children. My mother also said she was told the same concerns when she was carrying my sister and I. They won't say "no, go abort it", but they strongly suggest against it, if you are planning to have a child. I don't believe it had anything to do with religious beliefs, but these days I wouldn't doubt it. None expressed religious beliefs to us, and we never did to them, which I appreciated. I want a doctor who understands the science he is practicing. I don't want a faith healer.

          Any OB/GYN's in the crowd to confirm or clarify?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    14. Re:Ha! by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I was always told by doctors that having a baby after over 35 was dangerous to the mother. That's from several American doctors, who were our OB/GYN's for my 3 children.

      The problem with listening to American doctors about child birth is that they aren't the most knoledgeable on the subject. America has pretty bad infant mortality rates for a "1st world nation". They treat child birth as an operation and push way too many Cesarean Sections. I watched a very interesting documentary a little while ago called "The Business of Being Born". It's available on Netflix Instant Streaming. I would recomend it to anyone.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    15. Re:Ha! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I guess we've always had good doctors. With them, they were clear that c-sections were a last resort measure. Of everyone I've known, they've had a 100% survival rate through infancy, except for one early miscarriage. That was easily attributed to lifestyle (heavy illegal drug use).

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  9. That means... by iLoveLamp · · Score: 2

    they must be one step closer to translating ponies! Very exciting times we live in! Oh my!!

  10. Ooloorie Eckickeck P'Wheet by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    Ooloorie Eckickeck P'Wheet will be pleased!

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    1. Re:Ooloorie Eckickeck P'Wheet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure?, I mean I don't see how the calorific value of chicken is of much use to dolphins.

  11. Next Whales by softWare3ngineer · · Score: 1

    ...so a starship caption can come back in time and save the world from an ambiguous dark-matter like blob from space.

    1. Re:Next Whales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so a starship caption can come back in time and save the world from an ambiguous dark-matter like blob from space.

      Subtitles from the future!
      What interesting times we live in.

    2. Re:Next Whales by softWare3ngineer · · Score: 1

      or captain. kinda loses its comedic punch with a misspelling.

    3. Re:Next Whales by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      ...so a starship caption can come back in time and save the world from an ambiguous dark-matter like blob from space.

      Gracie is pregnant.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:Next Whales by LordStormes · · Score: 1

      Not ambiguous at all. In the original Star Trek 4 (fixed on the VHS release) you could see the Budweiser logo on the cylindrical probe if you watched it in frame-by-frame. It was a beer can.

  12. Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new dolphin overlords.

  13. Somehow fitting by Cryolithic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the 10th anniversary of Douglas Adam's death.

    1. Re:Somehow fitting by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Whose Douglas Adam?

    2. Re:Somehow fitting by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      Mine? Or anyone who enjoyed his work.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    3. Re:Somehow fitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whose Douglas Adam?

      Persnickety answer: Mine. Yes, I own him. I own you too.
      Less persnickety answer: You too can know things if you use the power of the Internets.

    4. Re:Somehow fitting by type40 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I swear I just read, "I want to die a horrible painful death for not knowing who one of the most creative members of my species was."
      But then I realized you were making a punctuation joke, so I'll scratch your name off the shotgun shells.

      --
      "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
    5. Re:Somehow fitting by Cryolithic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I transposed the s and the apostrophe. For shame. s/Adam's/Adams'/g

  14. "co-create" a language? by Syncerus · · Score: 1

    Some forms of communication are designed to transfer information; but others are designed to obscure or refract it. Phony terms like "co-create" do nothing to generate confidence in the legitimacy of this project.

    --
    "Man is nothing without the works of man" -- Helvetius
    1. Re:"co-create" a language? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What they're getting at is basically a feedback loop, introduce a few 'words' to the Dolphins so that we have something to start with, then try to learn a few 'words' that the Dolphins already use amongst themselves and then use those words to 'speak' back to the dolphins, maybe adding a few more of our own invention to help with structure.

      Honestly though, research has shown that Dolphins can keep track of at least 100 different words... compare that to a great ape which is capable of up to a couple thousand... then compare that to a human which is capable of tens of thousands. Someone up above made the joke that they got the system working and all the dolphins wanted to talk about was mackerel, I suspect that the joke isn't too far from the truth. If dolphins communicate with each other in a significant way, they're going to be communicating things that dolphins care about; where the food is, the dolphin that just joined the group, where the predators are, and, quite frankly, who is having sex with whom. It's fascinating from a linguistics and animal intelligence perspective, but the dialog isn't going to be anything earth shattering or amazing.

    2. Re:"co-create" a language? by Syncerus · · Score: 1

      A very nice and thoughtful comment. Sometimes I come across more negative than I prefer, but a pet peeve of mine is speech designed to fold, spindle and mutilate the simple truth. Had the authors of the study chosen to use terms similar to your own, I would cheer them onward. Jokes about "dolphin sausage" aside, who can help but smile when around the animals?

      Perhaps I mean to say that I like dolphins but dislike bunny huggers? Especially academic bunny huggers out to exploit public affection for the animals.

      --
      "Man is nothing without the works of man" -- Helvetius
    3. Re:"co-create" a language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, using "co-create" implied humans working together with the dolphins in an iterative process to develop a language suitable for communication between our two species. I thought it had a reasonably clear meaning.

    4. Re:"co-create" a language? by agrif · · Score: 1

      A very nice and thoughtful comment. Sometimes I come across more negative than I prefer, but a pet peeve of mine is speech designed to fold, spindle and mutilate the simple truth.

      You might like this, then. From Neal Stephenson's Anathem:

      Bulshytt: (1) In Fluccish of the late Praxic Age and early Reconstitution, a derogatory term for false speech in general, esp. knowing and deliberate falsehood or obfuscation. (2) In Orth, a more technical and clinical term denoting speech (typically but not necessarily commercial or political) that employs euphemism, convenient vagueness, numbing repetition, and other such rhetorical subterfuges to create the impression that something has been said.

    5. Re:"co-create" a language? by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      ... then compare that to a human which is capable of tens of thousands>

      I'm not so sure about (most) humans being able to keep track of tens of thousands of words. Look at all the references to rouge nations instead of rogue nations, or mixing up
      they're | their | there,
      rain | reign | rein
      lose | loose
      ask | ax
      effect | affect
      principal | principle
      presence | presents
      root | route
      spade | spayed
      to | too | two
      vain | vein | vane
      which | witch
      weather | whether

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    6. Re:"co-create" a language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've confused speech with writing.

    7. Re:"co-create" a language? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Honestly though, research has shown that Dolphins can keep track of at least 100 different words... compare that to a great ape which is capable of up to a couple thousand... then compare that to a human which is capable of tens of thousands.

      Humans raised in society are capable of keeping track of tens of thousands of words. Humans raised in linguistic isolation (google "feral children") are pretty comparable to the apes or dolphins.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  15. Another project I remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... was a project that used a huge grid of objects that dolphins used to communicate Wants to humans, and humans equally could activate these.
    Not sure what happened to this project though, it was pretty interesting.
    It sounded like possibly one of the easiest ways to develop a bridging language between 2 species.
    A common representation between the 2 species, they both eventually learn to make the sensory events associated with them so they can each learn them, and after a period of time, there'd be a pretty comprehensive database of both languages between the species.
    Of course, dolphins in this case would need to learn each other what we are talking about since the ocean barred them from developing tools and limbs required for complex note-taking.

    Good luck to this project and any other interspecies communication projects.

    They always say that the first message from aliens would be the biggest thing ever.
    But there are aliens right in front of us, waiting to be heard, but we ignore them because they are not like us.
    Communicating with other intelligent animals on Earth is something we should be doing.
    Many of them are very socially intelligent, some even use nature to their advantage.
    We were just the lucky ones this time. We got the right conditions and right external influences that led to our intelligence developing the way it did, that allowed us to think beyond the environment we see.
    Dolphins, monkeys, even canines, all show pretty decent intelligence, some equal to that of young, developing humans.
    I look forward to the day where I can interact with other species of this world directly. Seems like a nice thought.

    1. Re:Another project I remember... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Communicating with other intelligent animals on Earth is something we should be doing.

      First you need to find some intelligent animals that have a concept of communication and something interesting to say. I'm far from convinced that dolphins will ever say much more than 'Mmm, fish. Tasty fish.'

    2. Re:Another project I remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But there are aliens right in front of us, waiting to be heard, but we ignore them because they are not like us."

      ya... those guys speak something called "Spanish".

    3. Re:Another project I remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First you need to find some intelligent animals that have a concept of communication and something interesting to say. I'm far from convinced that dolphins will ever say much more than 'Mmm, fish. Tasty fish.'

      How about animals that give themselves names and use them to identify themselves and to call for a particular other one? Dolphins do. Now, what would they need names for if they didn't have something to talk about? "Mmm, fish. Tasty fish" doesn't require a self-identification, or a direction to a particular other dolphin.

  16. Fa Loves Pa! by scubamage · · Score: 1
    Awesome! Now we can tell them that if we take the awesome jackets we're putting on them to boats of interest, they get free fish.

    Let's see who gets the reference.

    1. Re:Fa Loves Pa! by hiryuu · · Score: 1

      72 fish, to be exact?

      --
      Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    2. Re:Fa Loves Pa! by hiryuu · · Score: 1

      D'oh! I lose. In my effort to be funny, I completely missed the subject line and the reference therein (until memory was jogged by a comment further down). Oops. :)

      --
      Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    3. Re:Fa Loves Pa! by hldn · · Score: 1

      day of the dolphin. i just watched it the other day!

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  17. home hydrogen fuel plant; several 100$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course one needs a properly equipped vehicle. hopefully one that also floats & flies, under droid power, like the citizen hunting drones, used by our rulers, instead of being honest, about anything, ever.

  18. Meh ... by lennier1 · · Score: 1

    Do a version for sharks and you'll start a quantum leap in laser warfare.

    1. Re:Meh ... by lennier · · Score: 1

      Do a version for sharks and you'll start a quantum leap in laser warfare.

      "Theorising that oneshark could time travel within his own lifetime, Dr. Bloodfin Dolphinbane stepped into the Quantum Leap accelerator... and vanished! He finds himself leaping from lifeocean to lifeocean, striving to put right what once accursed dolphinkind had put wrong, and hoping each time that the next leap... will destroy those chittering seatraitors forever!"

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  19. I'm really sick... by FlipperPA · · Score: 1

    ...of these freeloaders coming to our shores from the ocean who don't even speak English! They don't pay any taxes either!

  20. Not sure this is a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What happens when they start asking questions like "Have you seen my father? He was hanging out with some tuna a while back. One of your boats came by and we haven't seen him since". And of course "Why are you dumping all that crap in the Ocean?"

    Awkward!

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    With any luck, the dolphin words we'll "make up" will already have the meaning of "your mother is a goat", and they will simply be offended.

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  23. More like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hey assholes! Stop crapping up the oceans!

    1. Re:More like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Hey assholes! Stop crapping up the oceans!

      Just reading your comment (maybe reading the parent first could shed some doubts), I imagined some researchers saying that to the dolphins. Because the shit in the sea (I assume).

      Then I realized you probably meant it the other way around...

  24. Pffft. by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 2

    If dolphins are so smart, how come they haven't built a translator to communicate with us yet?

    1. Re:Pffft. by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      Because they don't have fingers and opposable thumbs.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    2. Re:Pffft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You try to build something only gripping things in your mouth...

    3. Re:Pffft. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      Excuses, excuses.

    4. Re:Pffft. by xero314 · · Score: 1

      If dolphins are so smart, how come they haven't built a translator to communicate with us yet?

      For the same reason we aren't trying this with Dogs. You only attempt to communicate with beings that are smarter than you.

    5. Re:Pffft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they consider humans too dumb, not worthy of their time.

    6. Re:Pffft. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Oblg.:

      "For instance, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so muchâ"the wheel, New York, wars and so onâ"whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than manâ"for precisely the same reasons."

      --
      You can either view life as: A series of [old] problems, or as [new] opportunities. The _circumstances_ don't matter, only your _perspective_ does.

    7. Re:Pffft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lack hands?

  25. Origins of the Universal Translator? by gstrickler · · Score: 1

    This may be the beginning of the Star Trek universal translator. But, only if it actually works.

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
  26. Re:can't trust 'em! by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Well at least now they can chat you up first.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  27. Good as long as you... by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

    Don't put in curse words! Just what we don't want to listen to, how we "f**king humans" f**ked up their waters ... blah,blah,blah.

  28. Dolphin secrets by proggoddess · · Score: 1

    I heard on the Rush Limbaugh show that it'll be good when we learn what dolphins know until they leak the location of Osama bin Laden's grave.

    --
    --The Programming goddess from Gorflaz
  29. Does that mean... by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    ... Seaquest has finally launched?

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  30. Didn't Penn & Teller do an episode on this? by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    I remember an episode of Bullshit where they dealt with the "dolphins are as smart as humans" junk and basically showed how the whole idea went back to some Timothy-Leary-esque "researcher" (John Lilly) who spent his off days dropping acid and spouting nonsense about how the dolphins could heal us too.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Didn't Penn & Teller do an episode on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I remember an episode of Bullshit where they dealt with the "dolphins are as smart as humans" junk

      Man, let me second that, I can't stand anymore these fallacious out-of-nowhere affirmations. Come on!

      Everybody, even dolphins, know they're a lot smarter than humans. DUH!

    2. Re:Didn't Penn & Teller do an episode on this? by mr_gorkajuice · · Score: 1

      And we all know that Penn & Teller are the epitome of unbiased, fair, objective journalism.

      Oh, wait...

    3. Re:Didn't Penn & Teller do an episode on this? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that John Lilly wasn't a preeminent dolphin researcher who influence several generations of dolphin researchers afterward? Are you saying that there were researchers before him who advanced the idea that dolphins have advanced communication skills? Are you saying that he didn't hang with Timothy Leary and drop obscene amounts of acid (even giving the dolphins acid in some of his "testing")? Are you saying there aren't numerous videos of him in the 60's and 70's spouting new age horseshit about communing with dolphins?

      Or are you just talking out of your ass and dismissing Penn & Teller because you believe that no layman has the right to dare critique the commonly-held view that dolphins are the goddamned geniuses of the sea?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Didn't Penn & Teller do an episode on this? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Well, they did get us to give them our fish.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  31. First Message by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    "Freee Meeee!"

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  32. Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by viking80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    dolphins use sonar to geolocate and find food. The sonar pattern used also depends on whether they are navigating, searching for prey or attacking. When a dolphin "tells" where to go to find fish, it will play back a stylised summary of the sonar imagery from navigating past the steep cliff, to "seeing" the school of 1kg macrel, to the successful attack.

    This 3D communication is efficient and fast, and connects directly to the visual part of the brain. Powerful and emotional imagery can be communicated well.

    Humans 1D voice communication compared is inefficient, indirect and lack precision and descriptive elements.

    "Riding a bow wave" is a 1D sequence of sound that has very little info or precision compared to the sonar echo of actually riding the wave.

    Humans should probably try to speak sonar, rather than try to dumb down a dolphin to speak human

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Interesting proposition. Got a source for that?

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just give him a second to bend over

      captcha: fancily

    3. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Humans should probably try to speak sonar, rather than try to dumb down a dolphin to speak human

      We do speak 2D and even 3D. They're called movies, holograms, etc. We have far more ways of communicating than just 1D sequences of sounds. This is where the term "A picture is worth a thousand words" comes from. However, if Dolphins are limited to only speaking sonar by recalling past experiences, one wonders if they are able to invent experiences. How would you say "Go over there" unless you've been there if all you can do is say "Go where I've been". It will be interesting to see if they can communicate unexperienced ideas as well as recall past experiences with their native language.

    4. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But dumbing down is all we have left as a strategy! MS-Clippy the shit out of each other and call smart people "elitist dicks" (that you can insult at will) while it's a complete taboo to call drooling retards (e.g. those that watch most TV shows, and have the loudest "opinions" [based on what?? on what they were told!]) drooling retards.

      Face it, we made it so that supporting the failures in our society is called "being social" and seen as a virtue, while actually trying to be successful (while still knowing how useful other people can be [well, the drooling retards not so much...]) is hated. Probably because we don't let them abuse us by forcing us to support them... instead of those who actually are worth the support.

      Humanity is going down the shitter, and it's uncool to not accelerate that. Society FAIL!

    5. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The idea is to get some to "speak human" so we can ask them to explain how to "speak dolphin".

    6. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      viking80 doesn't need source, she is a dolphin.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by danhaas · · Score: 1

      An animated hologram is actually a 4D communication. One could argue that color also adds dimensions, but that would humiliate dolphins too much.

    8. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by khallow · · Score: 1

      This 3D communication is efficient and fast, and connects directly to the visual part of the brain. Powerful and emotional imagery can be communicated well.

      Humans 1D voice communication compared is inefficient, indirect and lack precision and descriptive elements.

      "Riding a bow wave" is a 1D sequence of sound that has very little info or precision compared to the sonar echo of actually riding the wave.

      And if the "1D" communication is any good, we'll probably see it spread in the wild. Human language, while it has considerable flexibility in the spoken form, is still very powerful as written language, which has stripped virtually all opportunity for nuance away. And a simple but useful "1-dimensional" language, which isn't dependent on stirring powerful and emotional imagery directly in a fellow sapient with incompatible sonar systems (who knows how the "accents" from being of different species affects how species of dolphins and porpoises interact with each other?), could become a lingua franca among cetaceans.

    9. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      deep man, deep

    10. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by musicalmicah · · Score: 1

      Humans 1D voice communication compared is inefficient, indirect and lack precision and descriptive elements.

      Human *language* is inefficient, indirect, and generally lacks precision when used. Human *voice*, however, contains an amazing smorgasbord of information that you process in far more ways than you may be aware of. Every subconscious adjustment in pitch, timbre, and rhythm lets us communicate our feelings about the situation at hand without having to pick the perfect word. It's just there. We are still "discovering" all the meanings that we otherwise automatically interpret from these voices.

    11. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by ghostdoc · · Score: 1

      which is where I think we'll always fail at communicating with another species. So much of our communication is non-verbal and based on shared experiences of being human that I doubt we can ever get that across to another species.

      Human-dog or human-horse communication is about as good as it can get, I think. If the dog could talk, a lot of what it would say would be meaningless to us because we're not dogs.

      --
      Business/App ideas are like arseholes: everyone's got one, they're mostly shit, but very rarely they contain a diamond
    12. Re:Dolphons speak 3D sonar. by mijelh · · Score: 1

      Different frequencies can be used by sonar in the same way light frequencies are used in images, so there's no much "humiliation" in that. Only advantage I see is speed: Light travels at 299,700,400 m/s on air, while speed of sound in water is only 1400 m/s.

  33. First Message From The Dolphins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Keep your stinking paws off us, you damn dirty apes!"

  34. Language? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2

    Are we really even sure there's a language at use here? A computer can either search for system, syntax and grammar, or just do a frequency analysis on soundbites. If dolphins are using the former then they might have a chance, but if it's the latter the best they can hope for is a dictionary - which sounds much the same, but it's the comparison is akin to a well written program versus a two element CSV file.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    1. Re:Language? by PRMan · · Score: 2

      My dog (an extremely smart basset hound) seriously understood about 100 words and even said 3 with some degree of regularity: "hungry", "outside" and "walk". Despite us being able to communicate very well (as compared to most human/dog relationships), there is absolutely no way that I could have asked my dog what she was thinking or had any sort of abstract communications with her, like they think they are going to get with the dolphins. At best, she could communicate about a single topic that affected both of us at that moment. I suspect the dolphins will be very similar. Sure they can tell you a game they want to play or a type of food, maybe, but that's about it.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the dolphins will be very similar

      Why?

    3. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dolphins orders of magnitude smarter than dogs however.

  35. Not mine, certainly. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    My Douglas Adam is alive and well, thank you very much.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  36. Chimpanzees by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    Chimpanzees want to be more like us. "Retired" chimpanzees given the choice between a "wild" setting and a apartment setting chose to split thier time between the two. They like laying on a sofa and watching TV. Tarzan's Chimp like to lay around and watch reruns of himself. or, as Mencken said "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public.” This may well be true for the rest of the animal kindgom.

    1. Re:Chimpanzees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do the chimpanzees have to pay for rent/mortgage, food, water, electricity for the TV, and (of course) taxes? It's easy to say living like a human is so great if you only talk about the perks and not the obligations.

    2. Re:Chimpanzees by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Their retired. They have acted in movies, circuses, etc. putting in a lot of hard work. And if we go any futher we are going to wind up in a odd PETA type conversation.

    3. Re:Chimpanzees by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          It seems he was saying that they enjoy the human lifestyle, where they aren't paying for it.

          They weren't paid anything during their "career". Retired, they may like the house. Then again, they've been trained to like the human lifestyle. Since they're given the lifestyle and don't have to fight to get their retirement fund, social security, or hold down whatever jobs they can get for the rest of their lives, it's pretty easy.

          We've seen this in humans too. Young offenders, who are later repeat offenders, sometimes see prison as the place that they belong, and they will commit new crimes just to end up back in prison. If it weren't for the shanking and shower rapes, it doesn't really seem so bad. You get 3 meals a day, a bed to sleep in, clothes to wear, and security 24/7 to protect you. You can watch TV, read books, play board games, etc.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  37. I see a use for this by billsayswow · · Score: 1

    Forget quantum computing... I want a dolphin-powered computer.

  38. Shouldn't they start with the universal greeting? by goltzc · · Score: 1

    Bah-weep-Graaaaagnah wheep ni ni bong.

    --
    Our bugs are smarter than your test scripts.
  39. Oh ya? by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

    Well ka gi gi gi chip chirp to you too.

  40. Whales by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't be TOO difficult. They already figured out what the whales are saying...

    --
    SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
  41. Is this a rule now? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    Is it now a rule that every post containing a grammatical correction must also contain grammatical error?

  42. Re:Shouldn't they start with the universal greetin by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

    +1... Thanks for the memories!

    --
    SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
  43. Waste of time by PPH · · Score: 0

    Build one that understands my wife.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  44. Suckee, suckee, Solja boyee! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    Suckee dick fiee doraah!

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    1. Re:Suckee, suckee, Solja boyee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suckee dick fiee doraah!

      You can always try diee biaan

  45. A more serious comment by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    With the dolphins there is a small problem of different speaking and hearing tonal ranges. We have other cousins in the animal kingdom where this is not such a handicap. I've been fascinated for decades with the work with Koko and others. I've been working on similar research with our wolf friends. We have a pack who works on our farm (the wolf guarding the sheep... and pigs...) so I have gotten to work with them from birth for many of their generations. I don't need a fancy AI to crack their code - I'm the I. Since we have the same vocal range and about the same visual range we can communicate. We have about 300 signs and vocalizations that we use. Recently I've introduced sign backs with the latest generation. Part of what is exciting about this sort of work is that there is on the one hand the language they have that is seemingly universal and then there is what they have learned and are teaching their pups. That's culture.

  46. i am a dumbace acting like a smartace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) claude shannon information theory says smallest piece of information is the bit. i think it extends to dolphin theory too. the smallest form of anything from a dolphin is the click sound which should be treated as a bit marker. or maybe the time between clicks is what matters. or or or. give me some equipment and i'll do this research for you. They clearly have a code: we just have to break it.

    2) three species are listed. human, dolphin, and of course our robot overlords

  47. Forget dolphins... by kehren77 · · Score: 1

    I want something to translate cat. Then I can finally find out why the little bastards are peeing right in front of the box instead of in it.

  48. This is what they have to say. by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    It's already been established.

    "Nietzsche writes that happiness comes from power. For me, happiness comes from the tender meat of Atlantic mackerel."

  49. What's that, Flipper? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Timmy's in the well?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  50. It's all about context by BlueCoder · · Score: 2

    In the least I'm sure they communicate through caressing each other with sonar but that is a very subtle and private communication. You have to actually be being caressed with the sonar to get the full meaning of it; it might not lend well to listening in. For instance I'm sure they would have a way to do the equivalent of tapping each other on the shoulder and pointing in a direction to look. It would lend itself more readily to a communication of emotion.

    It will be interesting if they can learn a human language and grammar adapted to their vocal abilities. It would be the equivalent of teaching great apes sign language but much more natural.

  51. English, do you speak it? by Chicken_Kickers · · Score: 1

    "Powerful and emotional imagery can be communicated well."

    Huh? How the hell did you figured this out? Did you talked to the dolphins yourself? The human language had allowed us to advance from cave dwellers all the way to the moon. It conveys knowledge, information, wisdom, horror, comedy, tragedy, drama etc. well. Your argument sounds fishy to me (hah!). It is like you are saying birds are superior to man because they have wings.

  52. Cultural poisoning by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    So you want to introduce new human-created words into dolphin language and then see how much they talk about it? Why not introduce the new words for new things, like a ball or a hamburger? You're just poisoning the minds of the dolphin youth!

  53. Last Dolphin Post by flyingkillerrobots · · Score: 1

    So long, and thanks for all the fish!

    There, fixed that for you.

    --
    "It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations..." -Winston Churchill
  54. It's easy by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    Eek = Yes, Ook = No

    Yes, Dolphins are nature's most indecisive creatures.

  55. Re:dolphins are smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for most, they actually do but make exceptions for little children. also, putting a different language inbetween makes the whole point of understanding dolphins moot.

  56. Alternate translator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try using a babel fish.

  57. i guess Coulton was right by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    It's gonna be the future soon. Next up, end world hunger.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  58. Leafy Seadragon open source: sourceforge proj. c2h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can come up with your own intermediate dolphin-human language by using Leafy Seadragon software from the c2h project on sourceforge.net. US citizens may need a special permit from the feds.

  59. 1D is practical by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Humans 1D voice communication compared is inefficient, indirect and lack precision and descriptive elements.

    But on the other hand, a 1D string of words is just damn easy to store in written form, damn easy to transmit over incredibly long distance while switching medium on the way (dolphins can only transmit their speech in water over short range. We could already convert our data to electrical and radio carrier since long time), damn easy to keep for a long time, damn easy to duplicate.

    Thus the whole knowledge of humanity is damn easy to transmit and propagate, even without requiring much premiliminary technology to develop it. Thus we managed to achieve lot of stuff even if our communication system is primitive... exactly *because* it is primitive and easy to share.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  60. So what? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Ok, so now what, you can hear what the dolphin is saying to his friends, and then you interupt to say what you have to say, the dolphin stops and listens, then he responds, ....etc....
    In the end, did we establish anything other then ..."I just wanted to see if it could be done"?
    Seriously, even if they are intelligent to some level, and we can communicate with them, are we going to set up trading, or even get them jobs underwater doing dolphin things that humans need done???

    I want to know if we can set up a real live translator for any language in the world, so that as you speak we can hear it in our preferred language, this would remove our limitations when traveling abroad.