Slashdot Mirror


Is Your Electricity Meter Spying On You?

lee1 writes "If you have a 'smart meter,' it is collecting data that can reveal when you wake up, when you leave for work and come home, when you go on vacation and when you take a shower. This data is commercially valuable and, if sold to third parties, can lead to privacy invasion on a massive scale. The California Public Utility Commission is reacting to the gas and electric company's mass installation of these meters with new proposals for strong privacy protections."

34 of 405 comments (clear)

  1. But.... by Haffner · · Score: 5, Funny

    These are what keep us SAFE because it lets power companies notify law enforcement when our neighbors are growing marijuana! We NEED these to keep us SAFE!

    --
    "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    1. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your smart meter data shows you were in the shower at 09:30 this morning and not stuck in traffic! Don't bother coming into work tomorrow Haffner - you're fired!

    2. Re:But.... by whovian · · Score: 3, Funny

      One man's 600 W marijuana farm is another man's compute cluster.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    3. Re:But.... by Haffner · · Score: 2

      Clearly, all customers who consume electricity more than one standard deviation above the norm should be eligible for a warrantless search of their house.

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    4. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You say that jokingly, and yet, that is the SOLE piece of evidence that has been used at least three times in my county alone (three that I personally know of, probably has been more) to justify breaking down someone's door at 3AM on a drug raid. Granted, one time out of those three the person actually WAS growing pot, but the other two times? And no, the people were not compensated in any way, including for the damage to their property and possessions.

    5. Re:But.... by kqs · · Score: 2

      Without conservation efforts, power costs wouldn't be excessively high? That seems optimistic.

    6. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      LEDs my friend, LEDs ;)

    7. Re:But.... by HungryHobo · · Score: 2

      Girlfriend works for an electricity supply company: apparently a good tactic to improve your profit margin- people rent somewhere, use an arseload of power to run their grow house and then disappear without ever paying their bill.

    8. Re:But.... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2

      Well, that wouldn't be enough. They probably couldn't filter out someone with just a couple of plants anyway. But if you have say 3kW of growing lamps going on and off at the same second every day then maybe, if added to other suspicious activity it could warrant some form of action.

      I've been told that this is one way police look for marijuana farms here in sweden.. whether there's any truth to that I do not know.

      Hence the problem. I have 3kW of 2 tons worth of servers and UPS, and rack and misc equipment always running in a garage-converted-to-office. There's a very decent (ie: noticeably large) variance, at roughly the same times every day, caused by the AC cycling from fan to cool. And my only drug is Iron Maiden, which AFAIK, isn't illegal in this state.

      Being a night person (and programmer/designer), I am in and out at odd hours of the night. I've got customers who come in during the afternoons and evenings to drop off computer repairs - which creates certain appearances for the casual observer, since they run in, drop off a machine, give us some info and run out (with similar appearances for pickups).

      So, the only thing they will be noting is (a) I repair computers from a legitimate business, (b) I run the Star Trek Phase 2 websites and production servers (and a few other sites) and (c) I like programming late evening into the night, when it's quieter (less interruptions, AC cycling from fan to cool a lot less).

      I am sure I am not the only one with similar "incriminating" scenarios (at least a few of my friends fit under similar scenarios).

      Such actions without additional solid basis, are simply fishing expeditions.

    9. Re:But.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Then it should not be billed by the unit. They should have a cost of service fee and a very low per unit cost.

    10. Re:But.... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That seems backwards. During a drought they should just increase the price of water, until usage goes down as much as they need.

      Leaving ordinary people unable to afford to flush their toilets, and rich people with lush, green lawns.

      The market doesn't solve problems like this very well, contrary to what people seem to believe.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:But.... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Leaving ordinary people unable to afford to flush their toilets, and rich people with lush, green lawns.

      The market doesn't solve problems like this very well, contrary to what people seem to believe.

      The solution is to have ordinary people deficate/urinate on rich peoples' lawns.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    12. Re:But.... by Ichijo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      During a drought they should just increase the price of water, until usage goes down as much as they need.

      Leaving ordinary people unable to afford to flush their toilets, and rich people with lush, green lawns.

      If ordinary people can't afford to flush their toilets for every number one, they'll be a little more selective when they flush, or they'll buy water-conserving toilets, or they'll save their bath and laundry water to fill the toilet, or they'll move to a place where water is more abundant. All of these are good things for sustainable living.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  2. Privacy by Renraku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People need to realize that any device that can collect and transmit data will probably be used to collect more data than they should. That data will PROBABLY end up being sold, simply because people are willing to pay for it. Since it is our data, why can't we demand a cut of the profits?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  3. Also reveals schedules to thieves by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2

    If they aren't protected with strong security, and thieves can extract the information, it's as good as people posting all that information on Facebook or similar.

  4. Of all the people that can access my data by ncttrnl · · Score: 2

    I seem to be the only person not allowed to collect data from the smart meter on my house. I have allow Google to collect the data for me or I can't access it at all.

  5. Tin Foil Hat Time! by LordStormes · · Score: 2

    This is getting ridiculous. Half the posts on /. are "Oh noes, companies can find out when I X!" If companies want that information, they'll just look at your Facebook account, where you posted pictures of your office, your cat, check-in data at the porn store up on the corner, and links to your YouTube video of your marijuana plants for all the world to see. We cannot simultaneously be a society that wants to share everything and keep everything secret.

    1. Re:Tin Foil Hat Time! by chemicaldave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The flaw in your logic is that not everyone uses facebook. Facebook is voluntary, the electric meter is not.

  6. Re:yea and my toaster by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

    is signalling the CIA

    We told you not to go and load Debian on it, but would you listen? No, of course not.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. The lesson by Toe,+The · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The lesson here: any data that is collectable will be collected. Any data that is usable will be used.

    It would be entirely naive to think that law enforcement would restrain themselves from using data that is right there for the taking. All it takes is a little strong-arming of the company in charge of the data.

    That includes consumption of electricity, water, gas, internet, cable-tv, UPS-deliveries, and anything else someone else pumps into your house.

    1. Re:The lesson by Stormthirst · · Score: 2

      Better yet use a commercially available "leisure battery", which are designed to hold more power, but release it more slowly than a car battery. And pay for it with cash so they don't spot what you're doing on your credit card.

      Personally I think this is a little crazy and tin foil hat, but there is a serious point here. The power grid would be more efficient if you could even out a lot of the power spikes that occur. I still remember when I was a small child visiting a small lake that was at the top of a mountain (I think in Wales), which was discharged through some turbines when the commercial breaks came on the TV in the local area to cope with thousands of people turning their kettles on to boil water for tea. After the water was discharged, and the power grid had returned to a more normal state the water would be pumped back up the mountain ready for the next commercial break.

  8. Re:Classic TEMPEST by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, attitudes on privacy aren't diverging. You're just misrepresenting them.

    I post on Facebook what I choose to post. Therefore, Facebook posts are not a privacy violation (unless they ignore my privacy settings) because the act of making those posts was an act of explicit consent to share that information with the people I chose to share it with. Yes, stupid people will post stupid things that allow others to invade their privacy, but you can't legislate away stupidity.

    By contrast, I don't choose what information my water meter collects. Therefore, the water company should not be allowed to disclose any information that it collects. Similarly, Facebook should not be allowed to disclose anything that I don't explicitly allow them to disclose. And so on.

    Disclosure of private information should require explicit consent. The deeper you hide that consent in some service agreement, the bigger the privacy violation you're committing. Simple as that.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  9. Didn't the state government promote these? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    I may be remembering incorrectly, but it seems to me that I remember the California Public Utilities Commission pushing the utilities to install these. If that is correct, why did they wait until now to investigate the privacy implications? Wouldn't the correct time to have investigated the privacy implications been before you pushed the utilities to install these all over the place? I do know that when these were first introduced there were a lot of people asking these very questions.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  10. Paranoia run rampant? by GeekMarine72 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've worked for a firm that collects this data. The technology, as it's exists now, is incapable of the level of analysis described. The data is flow is massive and only summation for billing is viable. Even then, "sanitization" of data is common practices. While protective legislation and guidance is encouraged before it goes too far, there are far greater violations including IP address mapping between logins on identifying solutions (gmail, yahoo mail) and apparent "anonymous" sites. Flash Persisted Objects being one aspect, IP + browser fingerprinting, and collaboration between marketing organizations and online retailers are bigger risks. The part that sucks is we can't opt out of smart metering. Security is quite solid but if I had any advice to the PUCs it would be to mandate truck roles for power turn off / turn down. The current broadcast model on smart meters combined with the potential to brute force the master key for broadcasting means someone with a bit of knowledge and desire could inject into the meshed network a flag to shut down broad swaths of power consumers, which in turn could lead to a surge back into the grid causing other catastrophic outages. GM72

  11. Re:Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by Bergs007 · · Score: 2

    It's actually pretty easy to generate an appliance profile for a house and figure out which appliances are on at any given time, even for loads as low as 10W. Considering the time delays between running around to every device in your house, it's also possible to figure out in what order the appliances were turned on! Relevant papers: http://seclab.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BergmanJJTGW11.pdf http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/MPRV.2010.71

  12. google power by iiii · · Score: 2

    I hear google is starting a new service where you get your electricity for free, but they get to keep all the usage data and do whatever they want with it. As a first test of the utility of this they are modeling when people are home and when they are not, then door-to-door sales organizations get to participate in an auction to buy time segments of people at home. Rumor has it that the Girl Scouts and the Jehovah's Witnesses were having a bidding war for your house at 6:45-7:15 PM next tuesday. Next they will target your computer with ads for porn when you are using the laptop after 11PM and the wife has set her alarm earlier than 7AM and turned off the upstairs lights. Other applications to follow.

    Ok, ok, i just made that up.

    --
    Light cup, beer drink, thin so chain, neck turtle fat, man I won't say it again
  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Re:Still.... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

    it's the unscrupulous folks who claim they're from the electric co. to read your meter

    The meter is outside... And any modern utility has long since put distance readable meters so the techs don't even need to be in your yard...

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  15. Re:Just curious by lee1 · · Score: 2

    Why would your employer want to keep track of you at home?

    In the U.S. your employer probably pays most of your health insurance premium. Maybe he can get a better deal with the insurance company if he fires people whose personal habits match a profile that leads to higher health insurance claims.

  16. Re:Just curious by Plunky · · Score: 2

    Do you envision that all this data is just for sale for any random stranger ?

    Yes.

    Sorry, did you envision that all this data is just for sale to 'Trusted Persons' ? They won't be strangers, they will be customers!

  17. Re:What? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Smart metering should reduce power costs and consumption, not increase it.

    Welcome to the exponential part of the population growth curve, where it doesn't matter what you do, there are no longer enough resources to go around.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  18. Re:What? by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 2

    There are more than enough resources to go around. It simply isn't economical to go after most of them right now, but it will become so.

  19. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Like odors, IR leaking into the public domain needs no warrant."

    Nope. An infrared scan constitutes a search. They would have to get a warrant, first, in order to do the thermal imaging.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States

  20. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by DarkVader · · Score: 2

    I don't know why you would expect that.

    These are drug warrants we're talking about. The cops like to use their fancy SWAT toys, and they love no-knock warrants.

    You're not going to get a polite detective knocking, you're going to get 20 cops breaking down your door at 3 am, trashing your house and your beowulf cluster looking for your grow operation.