Slashdot Mirror


Creator of China's Great Firewall Pelted With Shoes

Hugh Pickens writes "The Guardian reports that Chinese police are seeking a man who said he threw eggs and shoes at the architect of China's 'great firewall', the world's most sophisticated and extensive online censorship system as his claims were cheered by many internet users, in a reflection of growing anger among them about increasingly stringent controls. The office of Fang Binxing, known as the father of the great firewall, denied the attack had happened, but Associated Press said police were sent to the university to investigate a shoe-throwing incident targeting Fang, citing an officer at the Luojiashan public security bureau. The Twitter user who claimed to have pelted him, who posts under the pseudonym @hanunyi, wrote: 'The egg missed the target. The first shoe hit the target. The second shoe was blocked by a man and a woman.' Earlier this year Fang closed a microblog within days of opening it after thousands of Chinese internet users left comments, almost all of them deriding him as 'a running dog for the government' and 'the enemy of netizens'. Meanwhile admirers of the shoe attacker showered the anonymous young man with promises of everything from Nike trainers to replace his lost footwear, to iPads, sex and jobs."

220 comments

  1. Americans are worse by bleble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least the Chinese do something about it. Unlike Americans who sit down watching tv and drinking beer and bitching on slashdot (and never doing anything about it) while their government not only censors their internet connections, but the whole worlds.

    This is why Americans are so fucking hypocrites. Do whatever you want on your own land, but leave rest of the world alone. We don't want your bullshit around here in Europe, and the rest of the world.

    1. Re:Americans are worse by bleble · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yeah, this poker censor too, as well as wikileaks and countless of others. And here you guys are saying how bad Chinese are...

    2. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's quite a blanket of hatred - two whole continents!

    3. Re:Americans are worse by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think copyright laws are an abomination, but I wouldn't put them in the same category of evil as the censorship going on in China. It's annoying to have the MPAA shutting down websites and suing legitimate video websites, sure, but that's a far cry from blocking political discussions.

      Aside from just a question of taste, I also think you make those of us opposed to the MPAA's actions look like loons by equating the two, to say nothing of the pointless American bashing. Yes, we like beer and TV and complaining on slashdot, and yes, we are a little too apathetic about some things. Still, pointing it out as you have though is counterproductive, unless you're doing some sort of counter-astroturfing for the MPAA. You can catch more flies with honey than vinegar as the saying goes, even if it isn't literally true.

      Either way, after reading your post, my gut impulse was to grab a beer and write the MPAA and tell them I'm okay with them rewriting the law in whatever country "bleble" lives in.

    4. Re:Americans are worse by Sierran · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At least the Chinese do something about it. Unlike Americans who sit down watching tv and drinking beer and bitching on slashdot (and never doing anything about it) while their government not only censors their internet connections, but the whole worlds.

      This is why Americans are so fucking hypocrites. Do whatever you want on your own land, but leave rest of the world alone. We don't want your bullshit around here in Europe, and the rest of the world.

      Now don't get me wrong, I don't approve of censoring the internet for any reason. Nor do I approve of the U.S. government's record on IP-related enforcement *or* electronic freedoms. However, I should note that your angry objection is overwhelmingly colored by the fact that all of your links seem to point to a single source - torrentfreak.com - and all seem to involve actions taken during IP related seizures and enforcement. I realize that in your anger, you won't be able to separate me from the IP apologists, but I appeal to your cooler-headed colleagues of the copyleft movement and its ilk. Understand that a clumsy and self-centered attempt at comparison like this - IP enforcement to the Great Firewall - just makes you and your cause (which I mostly agree with) look...um...selfish, self-centered, and not too bright.

      Not to put too fine a point on it, it sounds like you're comparing the effects of the Great Firewall on the citizens/netizens of China to the effects on you, somewhere (as you say) other than America, because...you can't download bittorrents.

      That demeans the struggle that the Chinese are undertaking.

      Suck it up.

      --
      A hero is someone who knows when to run away. I am a hero. -Trent the Uncatchable
    5. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's see. I can visit the piratebay, wikileaks, al jazera, and any other government disliked site I like without worry and without issue. Blocking dissident speech is a lot worse than blocking streaming sports and such.

      In other words, your argument is shit.

    6. Re:Americans are worse by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 2
    7. Re:Americans are worse by khallow · · Score: 0

      At least the Chinese do something about it.

      Another useless "America" bashing. I'm starting to think this is just some shell script posting under a bunch of aliases without even a speck of intelligence. And I love the followup:

      This is why Americans are so fucking hypocrites. Do whatever you want on your own land, but leave rest of the world alone. We don't want your bullshit around here in Europe, and the rest of the world.

      At least the US does something about it. Unlike the Europeans who sit down watching tv and drinking beer and bitching on slashdot (and never doing anything about it). There's no hypocrisy like European hypocrisy. Except that American hypocrisy is better, of course.

    8. Re:Americans are worse by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your point would have more bite if there wasn't a bunch of CCTV recordings of your daily life.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like the Euro-trash you are.

    10. Re:Americans are worse by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Informative

      The torrentfreak crowd have often noted that measures designed to crack down on filesharing also have serious ramifications for privacy and free speech. While their goals may be somewhat selfish, they are also looking out for all internet users, even those who don't pirate.

    11. Re:Americans are worse by eyenot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow
      Yeah

      Well if sex and ipods are in the offering tell you what: i captured gadafi and i put him on trial; safely isolated fukushima's nuclear pile; put specs on Arnie and a condom in his hand; opened area 51 to Julian Assange; well i didn't stop there i cured AIDS and cancer, too; took out everybody's trash and cleane up all of the zoos; let out all the animals and chopped off their heads; served em with a side of beans to all America's unfed; if you don't think i did those things well get this; i threw myself at it but hell -- i missed!

      Alright!
      Pussy and ipads, just get ahold me in email

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    12. Re:Americans are worse by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Our (U.S.) government and our industry is hypocritical. We should not be importing so much as a grain of rice from China. I say fuck 'em. Their shoddy crap has cost us far more than we own them in dollars. Shut the doors and let them fester in their corrupt, overpopulated communist stench.

    13. Re:Americans are worse by bleble · · Score: 0

      Where I live (sweden) that would be illegal. In fact, every store that has security cameras must also have a clear note about it outside the door.

      Maybe you're talking about the UK.. Yeah, they're same lunatics as Americans too.

    14. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's cool. I hope you have money in your budget to pay for your own military, because we're pretty tired of paying to augment it.

    15. Re:Americans are worse by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      This is why Americans are so fucking hypocrites. Do whatever you want on your own land, but leave rest of the world alone. We don't want your bullshit around here in Europe, and the rest of the world.

      As an American, I have to admit that your argument does have some merit, but please don't mistake the actions of the US politicians for the desires of the citizens. Politicians in this country tend to be wealthy, stuck-up, elitist bastards who pretend to listen to the wishes of the people around election time but otherwise follow their own agenda (which is primarily the agenda of the corporate interests who employ lobbyists) while giving away various entitlements and pork to keep their favorite voting blocs happy. For some reason they believe that it is their mandate to run every aspect of our lives and dictate what is best for us. For this they deserve to be punished most severely, but who is going to step up and do it? The corrupt love the current status quo and will do anything to prevent real change.

      I feel like this country should have been up in arms about this 20-30 years ago, but the fact is that people here have gone soft and weak. Yes, we have the second amendment, but unless someone strong enough to lead and organize a revolution comes forward, it won't really do us much good to be able to keep and bear arms. Any chaotic revolt that may occur without strategy and planning is doomed. Most of the people I walk past every day are hopelessly materialistic and only care about their immediate lives. They have never had to struggle to obtain freedom, so it means nothing to them. They care more about American Idol than they do about American politics. Can these people be saved? Do they deserve to be saved? I say no.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    16. Re:Americans are worse by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      And yet I'm sure you still want to watch our TV programs, movies, listen to our music and install our software.

      Look, I'm all against egregious uses of government against innocent people. But Torrent Freaks is 99.9% designed to facilitate piracy. And unless you have a plan for a business model where you can still get $80m projects developed and executed for you then I'm not going to bemoan on principle someone wanting to profit from their efforts. IP while being free to copy isn't free to produce. There are real tangible costs to producing art--often very high costs when you're talking about media. A kickstarter page and $50k isn't going to create an episode of Game of Thrones.

      Whether these websites actually hosted material might make a legal distinction but let's be real fucking honest for a moment, when I got KickassTorrents or PirateBay, I'm doing so with the intent to break the law. Now I think the law should punish you like a parking ticket or speeding--both of which I also do--but I don't take some high and mighty bullshit immature whining fest because The Man impeded my freedom to speed. If I was speeding... I was speeding. I'm going to try and avoid cops and do everything my power to avoid getting a ticket but I'm not going to say the US Government Pol Pot for enforcing a principle which I do actually agree with. I agree in principle that the city needs to charge for parking. And I've crossed my fingers before and ran into a store because I didn't want to bother walking back to the meter to feed it.

      We'll happily stop censoring the world when the world pays for all of our products that they use.

    17. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you really just imply Torrent Freak has anything to do with facilitating piracy? It's a news site moron.

    18. Re:Americans are worse by Posting=!Working · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're right, you don't want American bullshit in Europe.

      You apparently want China's bullshit in Europe, since the EU's Law Enforcement Work Party just proposed a version of the great firewall for Europe.

      http://techweek.org/71481alarm-over-proposal-of-eu-great-firewall.html

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    19. Re:Americans are worse by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Yes I did. My brain did string substitution for KickAssTorrents. They use a similar font and styling for their banner.

      Ok so TorrentFreak doesn't facilitate piracy. But my point is that 99.9% of torrent search engine traffic is piracy.

    20. Re:Americans are worse by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Aside from just a question of taste, I also think you make those of us opposed to the MPAA's actions look like loons by equating the two

      Fraudulent DMCA notices are being used to suppress unpopular speech, so no, you are a loon if you don't see the parallel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Americans are worse by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's the bill sir. I'm afraid your reality cheque bounced.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    22. Re:Americans are worse by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Just because the easy and convenient links were about one topic doesn't mean that the US government hasn't undertaken illegal actions against Wikileaks or other sites that the US government believes should be censored for non-IP reasons.

    23. Re:Americans are worse by Cryacin · · Score: 0

      Um... how much sex do you need?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    24. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    25. Re:Americans are worse by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can we stop fighting and agree that most first world countries are losing their rights at citizen level?

      By the way, third wold countries worry too much about security, poverty, corruption and more to be able to do think much about freedom of speech yay or nay, they mainly move by inertia.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    26. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the Chinese do something about it. Unlike Americans who sit down watching tv and drinking beer and bitching on slashdot (and never doing anything about it) while their government not only censors their internet connections, but the whole worlds.

      This is why Americans are so fucking hypocrites. Do whatever you want on your own land, but leave rest of the world alone. We don't want your bullshit around here in Europe, and the rest of the world.

      Wow, you're so right. A guy threw his shoes one of the guys behind the "Great Firewall" and some people online said, "Yay, you." Clearly the Chinese are standing up en masse against tyranny. Remember when someone threw his shoes at Bush a few years back? Check out youtube for the video and the comments. Same damn thing. So what? I highly doubt either event will change anything. Begone troll.

    27. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest, after
      - seeing with my own eyes, that the "orange revolution" in the Ukraine was 100% fake (both sides were),
      - the W.T.F. operation,
      - this,
      - the CIA being undoubtedly a bleeding-edge social engineering and top-notch intelligence agency,
      - and the US setting up pro-US governments at will (that I personally checked, by looking at where those government people came from, and what they did previously, plus myself having some inside information),

      I am at a point, where I can believe just as well, that this whole thing is a CIA operation. (Which, in this rare case, I would cheer for.)

      Luckily, since I don't believe, but only really trust my own senses (and even those can be misleading), all I know, is that a couple of minutes ago, a text appeared on my screen, that when clicked, displayed some other text (what you'd call TFA).
      That's all I can really say.
      I might assume I trust my computer (biiiig assumption), and say that a packed containing a request of a page from a server called "Slashdot" from a certain IP, was answered with a packet containing that text.
      I might even assume that the whole chain of display, computer, all network nodes to the Slashdot server (or whatever is considered ToriginalFA), the server, all network nodes to the submitter, and the submitter are trustworthy (completely batshit insane assumption) and it actually happened like that, and for that reason too.

      But in the end, I know it's all bullshit that I can very likely never prove.
      So unless I have some actual proof... I don't give a shit.
      Why do you?

    28. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're not losing shit.
      They're willfully and deliberately giving it away.
      Biiiig difference.
      (But we still can agree, I think. :)

      Meanwhile, in the US, people rise up, because the government created a system so they will NOT be screwed by big pharma and insurance companies. Apparently they, while only being a subset of the population, not only give it away, but demand being screwed even harder.

      If that is not high-tech social engineering by opinion makers, I really don't know what is.

    29. Re:Americans are worse by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You must be kidding. I'm not sure we actually "could" produce a computer now. That's not to mention all the other things we get from China. Let China alone and the problem will take care of itself. Sooner or later the Chinese people will do something about their government. The biggest threat to any government is it's own people and the biggest threat to any people is it's own government.

    30. Re:Americans are worse by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 0

      Fine don't use American developed technology, so no Internet, no GPS, no computer mice, no GUI on a computer. Don't buy anything American made or American developed, but don't preach morals, the Swedes happily sold the Nazis whatever they could while Europe burned.

    31. Re:Americans are worse by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

      Then you don't ever use lighting rods. And paper. And rockets.

      You know that Chinese had them long before you, don't you?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    32. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but unless someone strong enough to lead and organize a revolution comes forward, it won't really do us much good to be able to keep and bear arms. Any chaotic revolt that may occur without strategy and planning is doomed. Most of the people I walk past every day are hopelessly materialistic and only care about their immediate lives. They have never had to struggle to obtain freedom, so it means nothing to them. They care more about American Idol than they do about American politics. Can these people be saved? Do they deserve to be saved? I say no.

      Paging John Connor... Mr. John Connor... please pick up a white courtesy phone... Paging John Connor...

    33. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard getting enough critical mass to overthrow that bloated mass of a government, and salting the earth such that nothing like it ever grows in its place again.

    34. Re:Americans are worse by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      there will never exist a government, now or in the future, that won't block access to something. for example, child pornography

      so you gauge governments not by the fact they block (they all do, and always will, and if you don't understand that, stop commenting on a subject matter you don't want to have a realistic grasp on), but by WHAT they block

      so what makes places like china genuinely worse the usa, morally and logically genuinely much worse the usa, is that they block political speech. they reserve the right to harshly punish those who speak things the government does not like. and they frequently do this

      compared to this, the intellectual property shenanigans that goes on in the west is evil, but a much smaller, much less worse evil, than what goes on in china, by any moral or logical measure of proportionality you wish to employ

      if you do not understand that what china does with censorship on the web is indeed clearly worse than in the west, i openly question your intellectual capacities and your grasp of the concepts you comment on

      it's called false equivalency, and it merely announces a deficit in your logical coherence that you don't understand something like censoring political speech is much, much worse than any kind of censorship happening in the west. that really is the truth. understand why it is so much worse, or you are simply announcing your irrelevancy to the subject matter

      stop it with the blatantly ignorant false equivalencies please, silly teenagers (at least, for your sake, i hope you are a teenager. then you have a valid excuse for your ignorance. for if you are not chronologically a teenager, you certainly are intellectually a teenager)

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    35. Re:Americans are worse by gilbert644 · · Score: 1

      Their goals are completely selfish and if you care about free speech you should fight people who try to convolute anti free speech and copyright to further their agent. This is just another version of "OMG PEDOPHILES/TERRORIST, AGREE WITH US OR YOU ARE ONE OF THEM!" except in this case you must agree that torrenting American TV show and movies should be legal or you are an anti free speech fascist.

    36. Re:Americans are worse by creat3d · · Score: 0

      If you're gonna go that route, do some research on who else was being friendly with the Nazis while officially at war with them... hint: it's a lot closer to home than you'd think! Where do I start, IBM or Prescott Bush (Bush Jr.'s good ole grandpa)? GE or Ford? Mind you this continued well after it had been made illegal to do business with those Nazis the terrible Swedes sold things to.

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    37. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your signature doesn't work without the sid: 1699040.

    38. Re:Americans are worse by creat3d · · Score: 0

      I agree that China is much, much worse for exactly those reasons... But while not entirely censored, political speech in the US is still marginalized if contrary to the "acceptable" norm. The government doesn't even need to make much effort either, the population has been raised to do it for them now.

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    39. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may be hypocrites, but why don't you tell us what YOU have done besides write angry posts, you big blubbering vagina?

    40. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most if not all of those websites are outside the usa where they have little jurisdiction outside of bundling them into one of those DOJ/DHS/ICE mass takedowns, and if they blocked piratebay or wikileaks then everyone would catch on comcast even helped piratebay with some routing issues so it's clear that nobody has any intention of touching the major websites regardless of how "bad" they are it's the little voices that get squelched

    41. Re:Americans are worse by infurnus · · Score: 1

      "torrent search engine traffic = piracy"

      thought crimes???

      I search torrents all the time to see if what systems some obscure game was released on if I can't find much info about it
      among other things that don't result with me downloading anything

    42. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped reading at the point I saw the acronym "IP".

      (BTW, re. subject, annd this from Europe: Europeans are no better!)

    43. Re:Americans are worse by cavreader · · Score: 1

      "I'm not sure we actually "could" produce a computer now" Then you should look into the situation a little more and you will realize how uninformed you are on this point. By the way the US is still the number 1 manufacturer on the planet. The US got a head start on most countries that resulted in establishing a disproportionate percentage of the markets. It's only to be expected that other countries will work towards organizing themselves to compete on the international level and the US numbers will slowly go down until a new equilibrium is established.

    44. Re:Americans are worse by Elviswind · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight . . . some douche European argues that Americans are worse at something compared to someone else because we haven't adequately lobbied our government to protect his ability to illegally download American movies, television, and music. Hmmm.... if he doesn't want American bullshit in Europe, he could probably start with not consuming American media.

      To those that decides such things: can this be the new definition of irony?

    45. Re:Americans are worse by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I think there IS a significant difference in scope, efficiency, and actor that still makes the chinese situation worse. It seems like there are far more examples of the great firewall censoring than assholes misusing the DMCA here. There are certainly far more topics censored via great firewall as opposed to DMCA. Second, bleble appeared to be referring only to his ability to download movies, not suppression of free speech.

      Last, however true or false the parallel is, saying they're basically the same will make fewer Americans take our side seriously, not more. It's kind of like godwining an argument: even if you feel there are strong parallels between someone you're talking about and Hitler, it's best to avoid making that comparison, unless you're just trying to get attention at all costs.

    46. Re:Americans are worse by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      Keep on perpetuating the myth and burying your head in the sand. Go look round a typical US city and you'll see plenty of CCTV cameras.

    47. Re:Americans are worse by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 0

      Given that your participation in WWII was more about making money than killing off Facism, you can shove your moral indignation right where the sun doesn't shine.

    48. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way, after reading your post, my gut impulse was to grab a beer and write the MPAA and tell them I'm okay with them rewriting the law in whatever country "bleble" lives in.

      Please don't. How do you know he's not an American pretending to be a stuck-up European?

      After all:

      Unlike Americans who sit down watching tv and drinking beer and bitching on slashdot (and never doing anything about it)

      He certainly fits the stereotype.

      He also fits the stereotype of the spoiled American complaining how tough it is with the gov. censorship all the while he sits at home bitching about whatever he wants to the internet...

    49. Re:Americans are worse by BancBoy · · Score: 1

      Um... how much sex do you need?

      Careful there, Craigslist got in trouble for this sort of posting...

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    50. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look...um...selfish, self-centered, and not too bright.

      Attack the source. That's what I've been told in this thread certain people do after all (since you can't argue with his content). Not too bright yourself there.

      Who cares what things look like? Shallow people.

      How about we call it what it is.

      Not to put too fine a point on it, it sounds like you're comparing the effects of the Great Firewall on the citizens/netizens of China to the effects on you, somewhere (as you say) other than America, because...you can't download bittorrents.

      It sounds like one form of censorship is OK, and another not. At least have the balls to admit it instead of making a strawman. Censorship is censorship.

      That demeans the struggle that the Chinese are undertaking.

      How about letting ... I don't know....a Chinese person speak on that subject? Pot...kettle....mirror....

      Why are you wasting time on the internet? You are demeaning all the poor people without internet access, sitting at your fancy computer with your hi-tech monitor.

      Not to put too fine a point on it, it sounds like you're comparing the effects of the Great Firewall on the citizens/netizens of China to the effects on you, somewhere (as you say) other than America, because...you can't download bittorrents.

      Do you know anything about what people might use bittorent for? Why is bittorent all of a sudden a dirty word? Or did you stereotype?

      Oh look, someone didn't like a domain name, so they didn't even bother to argue against the content. What a convincing argument! That man is a genius I tell you!

      I don't approve of censoring the internet for any reason

      Apparently you think bittorent is not worth fighting for since your wee little mind can't handle it being used for anything of value.

      Assuming you are telling the truth that you don't approve of censorship for any reason, then you just get off belittling people who hold your same view.

      That, or you are a liar.

      Wouldn't people being censored, I don't know, like one more protocol that is not censored? How is that a bad thing? Suck on that.

    51. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right!~ Stop the import and watch the related service and retail industries die. When everyone is out of job, perhaps someone can find the time to figure out how to improve the infrastructure and control the cost to make USA competitive again.

    52. Re:Americans are worse by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Last, however true or false the parallel is, saying they're basically the same will make fewer Americans take our side seriously, not more.

      I only give a damn about reaching those people who will and thus can be reached. Those people who are playing the role of all three monkeys at once (hearing, seeing, and speaking no evil) are part of the problem. If you'd like to work on them through other means, though, that's your prerogative. I don't claim to be a part of any group.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    53. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've just got one thing to say:

      I would rather have chinese style internet censorship if I could trade it for doing away with IP laws.

    54. Re:Americans are worse by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I didn't say we don't have any manufacturing. Read what I said. Hi tech consumer electronics are not made in the US. When did you last buy a hard drive made in the US? Motherboard? Ram? How about a monitor? TV? Stereo? I haven't looked inside any military equipment since I got out of the Air Force back in 88 but even in the mid 80's I remember seeing almost all the chips in our gear were made in Indonesia, Japan, Taiwan and other Asian countries and I'm sure that hasn't gotten better in the last 20 years. If we get in a real war it had better not last more than a few weeks or we'll run out of parts.

    55. Re:Americans are worse by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      One man's copyright is another man's politics. Especially in a world where we produce fewer and fewer "real" goods and rely more and more on virtual ones because we outsource every other kind of production, copyright gets a matter of politics.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    56. Re:Americans are worse by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Indeed. In China, the government does the filtering. In the free world, nobody holds your hand, they only provide you the laws but you have to misuse them yourself!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    57. Re:Americans are worse by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Censorship only happens in the west when it matters. Since nobody listens to anyone, there's no need to limit free speech on the internet.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    58. Re:Americans are worse by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You'll receive your pussy and iPads in the next email. Emails, actually, once the Spam starts, it's hard to stop...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    59. Re:Americans are worse by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why so surprised about thought crimes? Happens every day! In a world where information is treated as a weapon, don't be surprised to be considered an outlaw for wanting to know something.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    60. Re:Americans are worse by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's the same all over the world. People are stupid and easy to manipulate. Do you think any person able to think for themselves wants that internet filter crap? You should see the stunning amount of scaremongering thrown our way in Europe to make sure people think that internet filtering is a Good Thing. Without your terrrrrist neighbor can look up how to build a bomb and that pedo across the street gets his hands on your Little Billy. But the big wall shall protect you and make you sleep well at night, it will even tuck you in and give you a kiss.

      It's the same bullshitting all over the world. And what really bothers me about it is that people are so fucking STUPID to even swallow the shit!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    61. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there will never exist a government, now or in the future, that won't block access to something. for example, child pornography

      On that note, there never will be a gov. that won't grab power (however righteous the cause may be) and let go.

      so you gauge governments not by the fact they block (they all do, and always will, and if you don't understand that, stop commenting on a subject matter you don't want to have a realistic grasp on), but by WHAT they block

      What is blocked today is just to get people to sign on. What is blocked tomorrow once the infrastructure is in place is the easy part.

      so what makes places like china genuinely worse the usa, morally and logically genuinely much worse the usa, is that they block political speech. they reserve the right to harshly punish those who speak things the government does not like. and they frequently do this

      Who is the great decider of what is and isn't political speech?

      compared to this, the intellectual property shenanigans that goes on in the west is evil, but a much smaller, much less worse evil, than what goes on in china, by any moral or logical measure of proportionality you wish to employ

      One man's copyright violation is another man's political speech.

      if you do not understand that what china does with censorship on the web is indeed clearly worse than in the west, i openly question your intellectual capacities and your grasp of the concepts you comment on

      I maintain it is the same people in the same world. Things are more interconnected now than ever. Evil will sneak in however it can, under whatever pretenses are available. The rest of the world is obviously OK with China doing what it does.

      it's called false equivalency

      I see you are familiar with it.

      and it merely announces a deficit in your logical coherence that you don't understand something like censoring political speech is much, much worse than any kind of censorship happening in the west.

      Pretending one group of people is different than another is quite naive.

      that really is the truth. understand why it is so much worse, or you are simply announcing your irrelevancy to the subject matter

      The truth is you either believe in censorship or you don't. The Freenet FAQ is right. I don't know what I believe, or what is right, but I see how silly it is to pretend it could be any other way.

      stop it with the blatantly ignorant false equivalencies please, silly teenagers (at least, for your sake, i hope you are a teenager. then you have a valid excuse for your ignorance. for if you are not chronologically a teenager, you certainly are intellectually a teenager)

      Governments never let go of power. That is the chronological record.

    62. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone ever tell you... you're an asshat?

      Where are all these righteous Europeans boycotting that American media? Yeah... didn't think so. Clean up your own house before you bitch about the stink in ours.

    63. Re:Americans are worse by cavebison · · Score: 1

      I don't approve of censoring the internet for any reason.

      No reason at all? Not kiddy porn? Snuff? Calls to violence and killing of individuals? If that is your stance, doesn't it seem to be the opposite and equally nonsensical extreme to heavy-handed censorship? What is your reasoning for no censorship at all?

    64. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we haven't adequately lobbied our government to protect his ability to illegally

      Laws vary across the globe. Or did you think it was your globe? You are proving his point.

      To those that decides such things: can this be the new definition of irony?

      I see one example.

    65. Re:Americans are worse by value · · Score: 1

      Not to put too fine a point on it, it sounds like you're comparing the effects of the Great Firewall on the citizens/netizens of China to the effects on you, somewhere (as you say) other than America, because...you can't download bittorrents.

      The purpose of the Great Firewall is to block information on political issues (and other things). Of course there are "more important" topics that are being suppressed with the Great Firewall, but copyright is a completely legitimate political issue. An important aspect of "democracy" is that people don't necessarily agree on issues, or even on which issues are important.

    66. Re:Americans are worse by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      "Strawman = Burned"

      I didn't say Search Engine Traffic = Piracy. I said 99.9% of search engine traffic is piracy. Congratulations you're the .1% nice to meet you.

      (I also use EZTV to check if a TV show is airing tonight, so I'm certainly guilty of not pirating something every time I visit myself.) But only because I'm so... uhhh... familiar with EZTV's interface? :P

    67. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i get tired of ungrateful euro trash who forget whos army dies for them all over the world, how long do you think europe would last without the US. Go pay for your own defence and offensive wishes and leave us alone.

      randy

    68. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Understand that a clumsy and self-centered attempt at comparison like this - IP enforcement to the Great Firewall - just makes you and your cause (which I mostly agree with) look...um...selfish, self-centered, and not too bright."

      That's funny, because I see any source as valid, so long as it's true. Perhaps the bias is YOURS.

    69. Re:Americans are worse by xnpu · · Score: 2

      In terms of pure censorship you're absolutely right. It's a package deal though. E.g. the US has far superior propaganda system. Corporate funded politicians, Hollywood, the "free press and the glue we call PR agencies are unparalleled in their joint effectiveness. It will be another 100 years before the Chinese reach that level of sophisticated control.

    70. Re:Americans are worse by xnpu · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This is what most Chinese people will tell you. (I live there.) They very well know what they want to are pushing things in the right direction. What they don't appreciate however is foreign interference. They're rather nationalistic in this regard. They'll defend their government before they'll agree with you, even if they really do.

    71. Re:Americans are worse by xnpu · · Score: 2

      Torrentfreak is there to facilitate piracy as much as most mainstream media is their to aid their corporate owners. That may make their stories biased but it doesn't mean there's not a point to them that needs to be taken seriously.

    72. Re:Americans are worse by Synonymous+Homonym · · Score: 0
      As far as I understood,

      China censors the internet in China,
      Europe censors the internet in Europe,
      and America censors the internet for the world.

      Chinese can protest against Chinese censorship,
      Europeans can vote against European censorship,
      and neither can stop American censorship.

      How wrong am I?

    73. Re:Americans are worse by arisvega · · Score: 1

      .. and write the MPAA and tell them I'm okay with them rewriting the law in whatever country "bleble" lives in.

      Oh but they are trying to- they are really doing their best, as they do in the USA. And so does Microsoft and Apple. But they keep missing the fact that Sweden is a sovereign nation, and not an American state, and that it is rather immune to that kind of lobbying mainly because its population is being encouraged to think for themselves from an early age.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    74. Re:Americans are worse by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      "But while not entirely censored, political speech in the US is still marginalized if contrary to the "acceptable" norm. "

      so what you are saying is that unpopular opinions are unpopular? pffffft. i really don't understand what you are getting at. every crackpot theory deserves to be treated with equal time and deferential respect?

      "The government doesn't even need to make much effort either, the population has been raised to do it for them now."

      in every society, that ever existed, and ever will exist, less popular opinions will be less popular and will be dismissed out of hand. this has nothing to do with the government. it has to do with simple human social existence

      if such opinions are actually the correct ones- and every opinion that is popular was at one time unpopular, then such opinions need to fight their way to acceptance. that's NORMAL, nor do i understand the idea that it should ever be any other way

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    75. Re:Americans are worse by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you have some really malformed ideas about the role and function of government

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    76. Re:Americans are worse by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

      The Emperor Su Sung's had a celestial clock built in 1090, well before the West had one, but when a new Emperor declared the old Emperor's calendar invalid in 1094, it was scavenged for bronze. Similarly, the massive and advanced navy they had built was left to rot when a new emperor closed China's borders. The Mongols (not Chinese, I know, but they ruled China at the time) were poised to invade and most likely take over Europe when they had to retreat to choose a new leader.

      So the Chinese historically can invent and achieve great things, but their politicians eventually screw up any advantage it would give them. Their most pervasive invention seems to be idiotic management. No matter how great the employees' work is, it's ignored so they can fill out TPS reports.

      The great firewall is another continuation of this tradition.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    77. Re:Americans are worse by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Thank you, sir. :)

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    78. Re:Americans are worse by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      So the Chinese historically can invent and achieve great things, but their politicians eventually screw up any advantage it would give them.

      Guess which other country comes to mind as a modern example?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    79. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just what are you doing to make the world a better place? Posting flamebait on /.?

    80. Re:Americans are worse by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I believe the plan is to drop wages to something like 2 or 3 dollars a day. Is that competitive enough for you?

      I'm in a really bad mood today.

    81. Re:Americans are worse by somersault · · Score: 1

      There's a massive difference between watching and censoring. I don't mind if a Policeman watches me walk down the street, but if he obstructs me for no reason, I'm not going to be happy.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    82. Re:Americans are worse by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what county you're referring to, but I can't think of any great, history changing inventions that I can no longer get or use due to US government bans.

      Illegal downloading of copyrighted works doesn't count as great, history changing or an invention.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    83. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself. While YOU sit around drinking beer and bitching on slashdot, those of us who care write letters, spend time talking to law makers and work on cracking DRM software.

    84. Re:Americans are worse by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Industrial infrastructure? Railroad network? Public transit? Public schools (at any usable level of quality)? Construction of nuclear power plants? Affordable healthcare? Use of video and audio recording to collect evidence of crimes against you (police brutality, corruption, etc. though not in all states)?

      And, of course, "illegal downloading" now also covers things like playing blu-ray movies and receiving cable TV on non-Microsoft computers.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    85. Re:Americans are worse by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

      Industrial infrastructure? There's tons in the US. Are you insane? How would the government ban that?

      Railroad network? We have 140,000 miles of railroad. It currently handles 38% of US freight, compared to 8% in Europe.

      Transportation? We have absolutely tons of transportation available. That's the important one, but you had to limit it to public Transit. We have plenty of that in the US. Some cities have subway/elevated systems, all of them have bus lines. None of them are banned by the government.

      Schools? Again, absolutely tons, including some of the best in the world. Public schools? Some of them are really good, some not. But again, that's a funding issue, they are definitely not banned by the government.

      Nuclear power? 65 plants with 104 total reactors. Construction of NP? Watts Bar plant #2 is set to open next year. Most applied for plants have funding problems, not regulatory. Not banned by the US government.

      Healthcare? Probably the best in the world, if you can afford it. Again, you're talking about money, the government has not banned anything.

      Video and audio equipment? Available anywhere. It's even on the phone. Not banned by the government. Some states have specific uses banned, but that is not the same as the equipment being banned. I doubt those cases will survive extensive judicial review.

      Movies? Are you serious? You can get them at thousands of places along with the players, you can stream them to any device that can handle Netflix. I can't play them on my toaster, either, but that's not the same as the government banning them.

      You didn't even come close to understanding the point of the discussion.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    86. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to stick up for your country you typical slash dot Pu$$y. Even if you agree be a fuckin man

    87. Re:Americans are worse by infurnus · · Score: 1
    88. Re:Americans are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relative to how much he currently gets?

    89. Re:Americans are worse by cavreader · · Score: 1

      US high tech manufacturing is one of the sectors showing growth over the past 2 quarters. Companies like AMD and Intel are increasing their US manufacturing rates. Most of the big chip foundries and component assembly plants are located in the far east because companies are basically taking advantage of slave labor rates. However that advantage is slowly going away. China is showing some vulnerability because competitors in other low wage countries are starting to undercut their prices. China actually reported a trade deficit in the 1st quarter after years of trade surpluses. Their government is also struggling high inflation rates which is making their exports cost more. They will only be able to tweak their currency rates so far to try an remain as price competitive as they have in the past . More competitive international markets are good for everyone.

    90. Re:Americans are worse by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      afaik most stores here in the US also have signs for the cameras. They are rather hard to see though, and I don't think they are required by law.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    91. Re:Americans are worse by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      How does American censor the internet for the world? Maybe this is obvious to everyone else, but I don't see it.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    92. Re:Americans are worse by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Please re-read what exactly you have asked, and what I have answered. I have listed things that became inaccessible, impossible or greatly diminished from their former state. If you want to compare to China, it's not like Chinese suddenly forgot how to build ships.

      And, of course, you seem to be completely unaware about the condition of restrictions forced on users who do not wish to buy software from a single "blessed" vendor of DRM'ed music players on PC architecture -- Microsoft.

      Not that it is in any way relevant to the subject of this discussion -- my response to a ridiculous, retarded claim that Chinese are somehow obligated to treat some technology as exclusive property of some foreign nation.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    93. Re:Americans are worse by Synonymous+Homonym · · Score: 0

      With all DNS root servers under US jurisdiction,
      any domain can be modified by the US.
      The system can not reliably determine automatically if a domain or hostname was revoked/redirected because of cencorship or anything else, and the changes affect the entire net per default.

      In addition, most web content is hosted in the US, and therefore subject to US law as well as the users' local law(s). Most people that post on Facebook or have a site at Yahoo (in their own native language) don't realize that. When such content is taken offline at US discretion (which may be perfectly legal), people might perceive this as cencorship by a foreign power.

    94. Re:Americans are worse by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

      Not a single thing you listed is impossible, you can't back up any of them. None of them are greatly diminished from government, some of them became too expensive, but that is not the government's fault or problem. The only inaccessible one is the movies on non-windows PC, which is not even a technology, but a specific use case so narrow it's

      China DID forget how to make ships. They had a highly advanced navy back in the early 1400's, when they closed their borders, the ships were left to rot, the technology they had was lost. They still had fishing junks, but those pale in comparison to the 450 foot, 9 masted treasure ships (much larger than the long range ships the west had at the time), not to mention all the other types of large vessels in their fleet.

      We did NOT lose the technology to watch movies, you want to watch it on a non-windows PC, I want to watch it on my toaster. I also can't run Mac software on a PC, that doesn't mean that Mac software doesn't work anymore. We both can get any one of dozens of players at a store. Calling that a lost or banned technology is ridiculous.

      my response to a ridiculous, retarded claim that Chinese are somehow obligated to treat some technology as exclusive property of some foreign nation.

      I don't know who's post you're referring to, but I never mentioned, implied or referenced anything of the sort.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    95. Re:Americans are worse by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Oh, for fuck sake! China stopped building warships because it adopted isolationist policy and therefore had no use for giant navy, not because suddenly every Chinese forgot some seekrit technology. It was a political decision -- and likely a very good one, considering what was going on in adjacent regions and how China needed to resolve its own conflicts and pull its shit together over that time.

      The rest of your post argues with a massive army of strawmen.

      I don't know who's post you're referring to, but I never mentioned, implied or referenced anything of the sort.

      The one upper in the thread -- before you jumped in with your brand of patriotic nonsense.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    96. Re:Americans are worse by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

      China stopped building warships because it adopted isolationist policy and therefore had no use for giant navy, not because suddenly every Chinese forgot some seekrit technology. It was a political decision

      THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT MY FIRST POST WAS ABOUT. You are using the entire point of my original argument to discredit what I'm saying? I'm wrong because I'm right? You're suffering from a complete comprehension failure.

      From my original post:
      "So the Chinese historically can invent and achieve great things, but their politicians eventually screw up any advantage it would give them."

      Patriotic nonsense? What, where I smashed every example of bullshit that you brought up? That's not patriotism, that's just refuting brain-dead claims that aren't even close to true.

      You made a list and claimed that those things were "inaccessible, impossible or greatly diminished," I've explained why they aren't, you've backed none of those claims up, and are now complaining that I'm arguing with strawmen, ignoring the fact that you were the one who brought them up.

      There was no mention of any Chinese respecting/disrespecting intellectual property laws in any of the parent posts until you brought it up.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    97. Re:Americans are worse by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      There is a fundamental difference between refusing to keep a giant navy and not being able to build a ship whenever it happens to be necessary. Most sane people most of the time would shudder at a thought of having a use for a warship.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    98. Re:Americans are worse by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

      It wasn't about warships, the fleets in the early 1400's were for exploration, not expansion. The treasure ships brought gifts to the places they visited as tribute. They may have been the largest wooden ships ever built. The official records were discarded. The anti-exploratory trend continued until it became a capital offense to build a seagoing junk with more than two masts.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
  2. Unfortunate... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    While I applaud the spirit of the shoe thrower, his target got off far too lightly. Some people really just need to trip and hit their head on a bullet.

    1. Re:Unfortunate... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there's a huge number of Chinese citizens that don't see anything wrong with the various government crack downs. I'm sure that there are also a huge number that are scared to do anything about it, but in a country as large as China, the loyalists are going to have significant numbers as well. You're not going to overthrow a nation like that by shooting civil servants.

    2. Re:Unfortunate... by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      Justified or not, that is useless. There is no individual, or even number of individuals, whose death would help foster Chinese democracy.

    3. Re:Unfortunate... by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      Ah yes; assassination: the tried and true method for conflict resolution. What could possibly go wrong?

    4. Re:Unfortunate... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I would classify assassinating civil servants(particularly high-level architect/leadership guys) who work on evil projects as similar to punishing criminals: you don't do it because you have any realistic expectation that bagging a suit or jailing some perp is going to overthrow the government or put an end to crime, you do it just because they deserve it.

    5. Re:Unfortunate... by networkzombie · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is very unfortunate that anyone would advocate violence for any reason at all. It is even more unfortunate that someone agreed enough to mod you up.

    6. Re:Unfortunate... by Cryacin · · Score: 2

      Well said armchair general.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    7. Re:Unfortunate... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      It's a bit early to tell, but which revolution would you prefer to be a part of: Egypt or Libya?

      You know the 4 boxes: soap, ballot, jury and ammo. Use them in that order. Well, even though China makes it hard to use the Soap Box, they're doing this in the right order. I applaud the bravery of the shoe-thrower. I don't think much of trigger-happy people who are probably sitting comfortably in some country that doesn't have as big a problem.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    8. Re:Unfortunate... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      See the US at various times. We've put Japanese in concentration camps (though they don't like to call them that any more after the implications from the German camps). We've shot non-violent protesters on numerous occasions going back over a hundred years. The Chinese, like the US, generally believe in their country. And, as happens in the US, that results in seeing what their government and society is doing through rose colored glasses. The main reason the US is the supreme world power isn't that there's anything inherently better about us. It's just that the major world powers fought two wars in about 20 years on the home soil of those major world powers, with only the US spared any damage to infrastructure or industry. But it's been long enough that the US has lost the "lead" it had and that people have believed that it's something we are inherently that gives us the advantage, and not the fact that Germany, England, Japan, etc. were bombed and bled for two wars in rapid secession, giving the upstart Americans a lead in industrialization (and a firm boost out of the Great Depression).

    9. Re:Unfortunate... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Many that live deserve death. And some die that deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then be not too eager to deal out death in the name of justice, fearing for your own safety. Even the wise cannot see all ends.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Unfortunate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... An insightful and realist comment from an American on their position in the world. Hard to believe. May I put you under a globe? You seem a unique specimen.

    11. Re:Unfortunate... by hedwards · · Score: 2

      I wish people would stop unfairly singling the Japanese-Americans out, they weren't the only American citizens to be treated like that. List of concentration and internment camps: Japanese-, German- and Italian-Americans

      To date, neither the German-American community nor the Italian-American community has received so much as an apology. And none as far as I know have been offered any sort of reparations for property illegally seized.

    12. Re:Unfortunate... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      A concentration camp is one thing, a prisoner of war camp is technically a concentration camp, and don't single out the Japanese Americans, we put Alaska Natives, Germans and Italians in concentration camps during the Second World War, as did the Canadians.

      The Nazis had Hostage camps (or death camps), Labor camps, POW camps, Camps for rehabilitation and re-education of Poles, Transit and collection camps and Extermination camps.

      I had a German relative in Fort Lincoln North Dakota for a year and eight months in WW2 and four Polish relatives die at Majdanek (a Labor camp). Theres a big difference between what the US did and what the Germans did.

    13. Re:Unfortunate... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Theres a big difference between what the US did and what the Germans did.

      I even indicated as much. No slight on anyone else put into a concentration camp in the US, but the Japanese are the best known, so they were the ones I referred to specifically. I was intending to note a few peaceful strikes in the 1800s and any of a large number of events in the 1960s for further examples, but decided that brevity was better, not that I was singling out any group for extra attention.

      Any location where people are rounded up because of who they are or what they are (as opposed to what they did) and not allowed to leave is a concentration camp. Whether that's POWs, ethnicities, religions, sexual orientations, is irrelevant. Though now people associate death camps with concentration camps (because the Germans had the habit of concentrating then exterminating), so I was qualifying my statement to the definition and usage of concentration camp, and again, not singling out any one group of anything for recognition or derision.

    14. Re:Unfortunate... by nneonneo · · Score: 1

      The soap box is censored, the ballot box is a sham, and the jury box is rigged. Maybe then you see why some would resort to force?

    15. Re:Unfortunate... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, but I can make a few see their end. That's good enough for me.

      Seriously, there are only two reasons why I refrain from solving some problems with ammunition. First, not worth the jail time. Second, it doesn't matter, for every idiot you cap, another idiot will take his place. And if history told me one thing, then that it just doesn't get better.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Unfortunate... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      We're still talking about China?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:Unfortunate... by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      True enough, but I also fear that such reasoning leads to complacence, which is also not good. Maybe we need the occasional lunatic on both sides to keep things working.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    18. Re:Unfortunate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unortunately, an immortal like Gandalf may not need an immune system, but both individual humans and bodies politic do. And that is precisely what a death penalty is, whether official or not. Otherwise, outside bacteria and internal cancer cells will kill a country as surely as an immune system removed by AIDS. Can the immune system mistarget? Certainly. But it is far worse not to have it.

  3. Amusing... by __Paul__ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...why not do the same to the people who have been restricting all their other freedoms, too?

    --
    worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    1. Re:Amusing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in China right now so I can tell you, from what i observe here, that Chinese people in general do not really feel the oppression in their daily lives, until they actually get online and notice some sites are blocked etc. I am therefore not surprised about the fact they are more upset about the internet than anything else. Most people dont actually even KNOW what's going on, the censorship in all medias working so well...

    2. Re:Amusing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people in China are completely unaware of the oppression going on. Mainstream medias do a great job of covering things up and the usual citizen think they live quite freely. The internet however is a little bit more obvious, since they often want to go to some site and realize it has suddenly been blocked... That's why I think people in China are mostly focusing on protesting of the Internet freedoms. They can't really protest against anything anyway, as they know the consequences of doing so...

    3. Re:Amusing... by ikeman32 · · Score: 1

      ...why not do the same to the people who have been restricting all their other freedoms, too?

      Because they are afraid of those people. The memory of June 4th 1989, probably is still quite strong.

    4. Re:Amusing... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Refreshing to see that people are people, no matter where they live, no matter what country they call home, we're all the same.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Amusing... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      7.62mm > Nike

  4. Massively Ironic by sackvillian · · Score: 5, Funny
    Apparently the official, Fang Binxing, and the police chastised the university administration for not preventing the 'attack' despite it being announced beforehand on Twitter.

    The administrator's defense: The university could not access twitter from behind the firewall!

    --
    Hey mate, spare a sig?
    1. Re:Massively Ironic by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the joys of censorship and when they backfire. Lovely.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Nothing to see here, move along. by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

    We have your best interests at heart, since you are unable to think for or defend yourselves. We love you and are protecting you... from yourself. And those that might would want to do you harm, like yourself.

    It isn't about us, it's about you. Without you, we'd be nothing, and then what would we do? So we just make it impossible as much as we can to have a free, err we mean wrong thought.

    --
    Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
    1. Re:Nothing to see here, move along. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just so I file this correctly, is that speech for the Chinese or the US government?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Hindsight 20/20 by Lanteran · · Score: 1

    should have thrown knives...

    --
    "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  7. He seems to be doing fine so far by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    He seems to be doing fine so far

    By the way, the subject line should not be the exact same thing as the comment. Maybe elaborate a little in the comment, and or trim down the subject line.

  8. Solidarity begins at home. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    All big governments (no exception) are always tempted to "protect the citizens against the bad influences", one way or another. How we're doing on the home front? Not so good, I guess.

  9. Go China! by pasv · · Score: 1

    This is great. I have no problem with the citizens of China (I actually have a particular fondness for Eastern philosophy and the martial arts like wushu) but I have MANY issues with their government. Any aggression they can show against their suppressors is a good thing in my book, violent or otherwise. Sometimes peaceful protest just _doesn't work_. Gandhi would've "dissappeared" in modern China. Be pissed China! Go overthrow your government one shoe at a time until they can't possibly cover the information/press from the revolt! Only when the idea of liberty spreads that it can manifest into a powerful force against its enemies.

  10. Western Press Rarely Accurate on This by retroworks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Guardian and others are in a tough spot, as print journals have less and less income and are trying to cover bigger and bigger stories (like... China). While the event posted here may or may not have happened, a blogger I read regularly, Adam Minter (www.shanghaiscrap.com) has made mincemeat of almost every such story I've read in the western media during the past two years (latest case, that China censored Bob Dylan's concert there - apparently not, but the story was reprinted extensively). I've travelled a lot in China, often with officials, and would say that most Chinese government officials are as far from the source of censorship itch as we are here on /. I don't know if the answer is for the West to stop reporting on "twitter posts" by people who claim to have "thrown shoes" at "firewalls", and I personally know the Chinese government "command and control" is awful and stupid and a painful thing to watch... Still, having read dozens of these stories, I think we need to expose that (a) the Western Press often does not know what it is talking about and (b) is just as often making it up as it goes along.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Western Press Rarely Accurate on This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Suzhou, China (30 minutes west of Shanghai by train). I first heard about this story by a Chinese friend who read it on a Chinese blog... his details of the happenings are spot on with this story. I can't say either way because I can't read Chinese.

      I think you are right about the Western Press, but I believe this story to be legit.

    2. Re:Western Press Rarely Accurate on This by mdragan · · Score: 2

      I've travelled a lot in China, often with officials

      Aaa, ok. You should have started with that.

    3. Re:Western Press Rarely Accurate on This by assertation · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. Given Tianamen Square, my expectation would be anyone who would do something like the shoe throwing thing in China would end up with their life ruined or ended really fast.

    4. Re:Western Press Rarely Accurate on This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have friends and family in China. People with a real interest in their society. They love talking politics and discussing policies, but they do NOT do anything at all outside a closed circus of friends they do trust with their lives.

      One middle aged party member was discussing with his close friend as usual. His close friend was complaining as usual. The middle aged man became fed up and asked his friend to write a book about it. It is was so important for him then he should do that. The friend just answered "Liu Xiaobo" and stopped the discussion.

      It was first some years later that the middle aged man realised why his friend answered Liu Xiaobo. He knew his family would be attacked, suppressed, and potentially killed if he wrote a book with his ideas. Both of them have lost friends and family to the party before. Both of them are long time party members afraid of their own party.

      The middle aged Chinese I talk to do not know much about the life outside China. The young Chinese I talk to do now know much about their parents past. The lack of information in China is very real.

  11. One question needs to be answered... by Flipstylee · · Score: 1

    Were they nikes, or more like steel-toe workboots?

  12. Honestly, Who Throws a Shoe?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Austin Powers, anyone? - www.awkwardengineer.com

  13. Great Porn Wall of China. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile admirers of the shoe attacker showered the anonymous young man with promises of everything from Nike trainers to replace his lost footwear, to iPads, sex and jobs."

    So all one has to do to get free sex in China is build a Great Firewall?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Great Porn Wall of China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you have to throw shoes at your oppressor.

      Meanwhile admirers of the shoe attacker

      not

      Meanwhile admirers of the shoe attacked

    2. Re:Great Porn Wall of China. by xnpu · · Score: 1

      If you're non-Asian, all you have to do is show up.

    3. Re:Great Porn Wall of China. by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Or tweet that you've thrown a shoe at someone extremely unpopular on the net, whose claims it never happened will be considered censorship.

  14. Viewpoint from an American in China by ddewey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm an American who has lived in China for 7 years.

    Most ordinary people in China believe the firewall is only for blocking pornography and dangerous information from terrorists. They don't believe political discussion is being blocked. In fact, there are many blogs and social networking sites in China full of political discussion, which are of course censored, but it is only a few sensitive topics that will be removed, so most users will never notice the censorship.

    From the comments in this thread, it seems like most US internet users (even the savvy users on Slashdot) likewise believe that US web censorship is only for blocking IP infringement, and never for censoring political discussion.

    So it would seem that Chinese and US internet users are equally misinformed and complacent about their own governments' internet censorship.

    1. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by mosb1000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The main difference is the way censorship is theoretically justified. In China, the government is allowed to block content based on the message, while in the US, the government is allowed to block content based on the source. Of course, you'd be an idiot to believe such power is not abused, regardless of how it is done.

      I think most slashdotters are aware that such abuses exist, since you see articles about them posted on the main page every so often. I also believe that most Chinese who concern themselves with such matters are also aware of the problem (hence this news article).

      Perhaps one area of confusion is that in the US much censorship is done by psuedo-governmental organizations like the RIAA, or telecoms, or facebook, etc. . . which are not, in name, a part of the government but in reality have deep government ties.

    2. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Cant+use+a+slash+wtf · · Score: 1

      I know this is slightly off-topic. But does anyone happen to know whether /. is blocked in China?

    3. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by ddewey · · Score: 4, Informative

      I live in China and access Slashdot frequently. I've never seen it blocked. Most foreign news sites are rarely blocked in China, and even negative articles about China's government are usually accessible. The exception is news sites with a lot of articles in Chinese, those are often blocked. And around certain important dates some news sites like the BBC may be inaccessible for several days.

    4. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To compare US and Chinese internet censorship as being alike is frankly absurd.

      I also live in China.

      I have colleagues who've had blog posts automatically removed because they mentioned the nobel piece prize. A major online technical computer discussion forum getting taken offline, because someone posted how to make a proxy on it. A blanket ban on searches for temperature (same as wen jiabao's name). A singificant number of taiwanese goverment agencies are blocked, including the statistics bureaux, national museums, etc. You need a VPN to make the internet usable and a significant number of native non-technical chinese users use them. Since the troubles in the middle east, international traffic has been appalling to the extent of unusable.

      Companies are now getting forced to register their IP addresses for VPN connections, due to fear of the Jasmine revolution. Even mentioning that word can get you in bother.

      The censorship in China significantly affects people's lives. As much as I'm sure some political internet censorship exists in the US and other western countries, the degree is far less significant, and in general the effects can be openly discussed.

    5. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by creat3d · · Score: 0

      Important dates... let me guess, Tiananmen Square anniversary is one of them? :(

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    6. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps one area of confusion is that in the US much censorship is done by psuedo-governmental organizations like the RIAA, or telecoms, or facebook, etc. . . which are not, in name, a part of the government but in reality have deep government ties.

      RIAA, telecoms ok. Got any citations regarding facebook?

    7. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

      Gah, I wonder as an American living in America what instances of political censorship on the web I've missed? It would be wonderful if there was a central resource that catalogued, by country, instances of political censorship. Such a tool would be marvelously useful.

    8. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by cavreader · · Score: 1

      When has the government censored the political discussion? How in the hell does a government even succeed in censoring political discussion. There are just too many other ways to obtain the information. And no matter how hard the Chinese government tries to censor the information some of information does get around their imposed restrictions.

    9. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      >From the comments in this thread, it seems like most US internet users (even the savvy users on Slashdot) likewise believe that US web censorship is only for blocking IP infringement, and never for censoring political discussion.

      So what political discussion or topic is it that's being censored in the US?

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    10. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by obscuro · · Score: 1

      ... it seems like most US internet users (even the savvy users on Slashdot) likewise believe that US web censorship is only for blocking IP infringement, and never for censoring political discussion.

      So it would seem that Chinese and US internet users are equally misinformed and complacent about their own governments' internet censorship.

      The Sovereignty Movement gets blocked constantly. It used to be limited to tax avoidance information. Now it's more. The materials can still be found online but they eventually get shut down. They're a great bell weather because their political speech often constitutes a real threat to the US status quo rather than the typical Democratic, Republican or even Communist viewpoints which is comfortably within that boundary.

      --
      Every rule has more than one consequence.
    11. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Well, wikileaks says they work with the government, though it's really just a suspicion so I don't know if you's regard that is credible. Here is an article about the IRS using facebook to catch tax cheats, and we've all heard about local law enforcement using it to catch criminals. There have also been cases of school districts expelling students over comments made on Facebook. None of this proves that Facebook is in on it, but they certainly haven't done anything to stop it, likely they know it would lead to problems for them if they weren't willing to cooperate with these government agencies. In this past, if the government were obtaining information like this it would have been a scandal. Now it's more or less accepted under the "well they shouldn't have been criminals in the first place" thinking. Basically, the courts have decided that this kind of communication, while nominally private, it open to free inspection by government agencies. Facebook doesn't really have to be in on it for it to be a freedom of speech problem at that point.

    12. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what political discussion or topic is it that's being censored in the US?

      Try starting a forum to discuss whether the US military presence in Muslim countries should be forced out by violence. For bonus points, add a forum to discuss the best means of ending the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

      On second thoughts, don't, because having your website shut down will be the smallest of the many repercussions on your life of that little bit of political discussion...

    13. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      most of those cases are of people being fast and loose with their (incriminating) information. no government intervention required.

      there's the rumours of backdoors for the NSA that supposedly everyone needs to include so they can snoop... but so far if that goes on it hasn't hit the news. censored i guess, or lost in the flood of other twitter/facebook stories in the media that involve people being completely stupid and "friending" people who really have no business reading about what they get up to.

    14. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no legitimate black and white distinction between the two countries. You say that the US doesn't block based on the message, but in reality they arrested the pedophile who wrote the book on grooming children. Let's not forget the long history of obscenity charges.

      You may think that topic is exceptional in some way but I would argue that under a communist culture such as China, criticism of the government is borderline sedition against your countryman, and is equally offensive to the sensibilities in that country as Pedophilia and Abortion would be in the puritan culture of the United States.

    15. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by xnpu · · Score: 1

      Common question on Chinese forums as well. Hmm..

    16. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Raumkraut · · Score: 1

      How in the hell does a government even succeed in censoring political discussion. There are just too many other ways to obtain the information.

      Other ways, such as TV, radio, newspapers? All run by those huge media corporations which we all know and love for their universally apolitical stances, and absolute lack of ties with any governmental or political entity?

    17. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by scotjam · · Score: 2

      I would have thought that calling corporations "pseudo-government" was a bit of paranoia showing through what is (whether correct or not) an otherwise relatively rational argument, but with the Wikileaks fiasco (and in particular, the "voluntary" embargoes enforced by Amazon, Paypal/eBay, Visa, Mastercard and others) perhaps it is me being naive rather than you being paranoid...

    18. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Jarryd98 · · Score: 1

      It may not be a direct link, but there's definitely cooperation between the two parties. Weren't DHS planning on using Facebook as the distribution medium for a revised emergency warning/notification system?

    19. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      America's finest news source reports:CIA's 'Facebook' Program Dramatically Cut Agency's Costs .

      But more seriously, there are some tenuous public associations at one remove - early Facebook investor Breyer served on the board of the National Venture Capital Association with Gilman Louie from In-Q-Tel, which is the (or at least the least secret) VC arm of the CIA. This is a very weak link but it seems to be the best anybody's been able to find so far. Google has much stronger links with In-Q-Tel, having bought Keyhole from them. (Facebook, the CIA, and You

      While the intelligence agencies may not have started Facebook, there is no reasonable doubt that they use it for data mining.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    20. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by somersault · · Score: 1

      I don't think you have to friend anyone for your Twitter updates to be readable. The whole point is that you can search through what everyone is saying (I think? I really don't get Twitter) .

      --
      which is totally what she said
    21. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      Censorship in an absolute sense isn't generally how it's done - it's more of a statistical, dynamic way of working. Some stories are marginalized, others are pushed. The science and art of public opinion manipulation has so many techniques that it would require several books to describe. Virtually anything or anyone that is on the national news is there for the purpose of influencing the public, and this is coordinated by a fairly small number of informally associated people. Go to the Project Censored Top 25 list for some of the marginalized stories.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    22. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who's been to China, let me say as to WHY they're often blocked. Technical errors. The local ISPs are notorious for double-NATing networks and use obsolete DNS forwarders (they're often offline).

      Put it another way. The network inside China is technically FUCKED! It's needs a major engineering overhaul.

    23. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      I'm not claiming that there's an actual conspiracy, so much as I'm saying that this is realistically the state of affairs. Large corporations need to be associated with the government for a number of reasons. First of all, they need to actively work to prevent legislation that would be damaging to their business. Secondly, they need to seek out tax breakes and legislation that makes their business more profitable in order to stay competitive. Finally, they need to stay friendly with law enforcement and regulatory agencies to avoid running afoul of the law.

      The other dimension to my claim that they are pusedo-government is the authority they exercise. Facebook, for example, has the ability to control they way people are able to interact on the Internet. Moreover, they are expected to police their website and block spammers. Banks really hold a great deal of power, too much to list out here. Other corporations may not have as much of a direct influence on the general public, but they still exercise a great deal of control over their employees.

    24. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by joggle · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time believing that, especially the mention that they never encounter blocked content. My Chinese girlfriend frequents renren.com (the Chinese version of Facebook), and encounters a blocked video almost every week or two, always on things that aren't the slightest bit controversial.

      She was unaware of the censorship on Baidu vs. Google though. Heck, she didn't even realize Google could be used for Chinese language searches.

    25. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      most of those cases are of people being fast and loose with their (incriminating) information. no government intervention required.

      See what I mean? Somehow the debate has shifted from why the government is looking at things that are none of their business to why their victims were talking about inappropriate things. The effect is a chilling on free speech, people are expected to censor themselves, and if they don't they deserve to be victimized. No good can come from that. Practically everyone does something illegal every day. Why shouldn't we talk openly about it?

    26. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by cavreader · · Score: 1

      This discussion was originally about the government suppressing political discussion. Allegations of the government hiding political mechanization's from the American people like the Chinese government tries to do. And it's not only China, hell the people in Egypt and Syria actually think they won the 73 war against Israel when in fact Israel beat back the Arab attack and ended up taking control of even more land than they did in 67! In return for a peace treaty Israel gave Egypt back the Sinai along with the thousands of Egyptian soldiers they had cutoff and surrounded in the desert and a promise not to broadcast the actual truth to the Egytian people. That was some speedy negotiations too because the soldiers were running out of water. Now that is effective censorship in action. If you look at the TV, Radio, newspapers, and the web you can't get way from the political discussions. Media organizations do have their own editorial slants and bias but there are no shortage of organizations or individuals that hold differing editorial positions and they attack each other incessantly. The trick is trying to identify the BS both sides are spouting and somehow dig for the truth.

    27. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      No one knows. Those who posted about forbidden topics just vanished, along with everyone who read what they wrote.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    28. Re:Viewpoint from an American in China by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      You have just made my point. The law enforcement agencies in your examples targeted individuals, rather than blocking the information directly. A good counter example would have been the domain name fiasco that happened a while ago, but even that happened as part of a criminal investigation.

      All of this is beside the point, because I am not claiming that the US is better, or significantly different. My whole point is that there is no practical difference, only a theoretical one.

  15. Airplane lessons begins at home. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    When was the last time anyone flew an airplane into an American skyscraper?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Airplane lessons begins at home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During the last republicans reign?

    2. Re:Airplane lessons begins at home. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Prior to 9/11 when was the last time anybody tried? And for that matter, what other time has anybody tried that?

    3. Re:Airplane lessons begins at home. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Those 9/11 attacks are much like the (original, not the computer variant) Trojan Horse: A once-in-history stunt. It worked well for the attacker that first and only time it was tried. It will never work again in history. Never. Because it worked for a single reason: It was unexpected and hit an unprepared foe.

      Why the plane attacks won't fly again, ever? First, no pilot is going to open the cockpit anymore, no matter what you threaten him with. You're gonna kill his 300 passengers? No problem at all. He can easily explain the blood bath with the threat of using the plane to kill 3000. Logic in numbers, simple as that. And I guess 300 people who KNOW they are going to die will one way or another overpower a handful of terrorists. Hell, I'm DEAD anyway, I can just as well die a hero. *pounce* If only 5 percent of the people feel that way you'd have to have at least 10 terrorists to even stand a chance in the confined space of a plane, and your passengers will be armed with suitcases and bags, more than enough to fend off knives. And if everything fails and the pilot doesn't respond anymore, nobody would bother questioning shooting the plane down when push comes to shove. Remember 9/11. End of discussion.

      Nothing like that will ever happen again. Even if you forgo all airport security past the nominal one of the pre-9/11 time.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Airplane lessons begins at home. by Synonymous+Homonym · · Score: 1

      1945, but I think it was not intentional.

    5. Re:Airplane lessons begins at home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1945, somebody flew an airplane into the Empire State Building, but they weren't trying to.

    6. Re:Airplane lessons begins at home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (And for that matter, what other time has anybody tried that?)

      From the NY Times, Feb. 18, 2010 edition:

      "Leaving behind a rant against the government, big business and particularly the tax system, a computer engineer smashed a small aircraft into an office building where nearly 200 employees of the Internal Revenue Service were starting their workday Thursday morning, the authorities said."

      The office building wasn't a skyscraper, but it wasn't a small building, either.

    7. Re:Airplane lessons begins at home. by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      This is a good point, and it makes me feel a lot better about airplane security. Because airport security is useless/

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    8. Re:Airplane lessons begins at home. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I do not know when or where the next terrorist attack will come, or if, but one thing is certain: Whatever may happen, it will not have anything to do with airplanes.

      The reasons for this are easy to guess. First and foremost, terrorism lives by the element of surprise and, well, terror (duh). An expected attack is not terrifying. Why did the 9/11 attacks have the impact they had? Because it was completely unexpected and a total surprise. Even Pearl Harbor was more predictable because there were heavy tensions with Japan, and while the US were not really the darling of islamists around the globe, nobody would have expected an attack like this. Another one like it would be met with a lot less hysteria and would probably cause as much or even more damage, but by far not the same level of terror and fear. It's expected. It's a known attack vector. Using it for terrorism is quite useless.

      So airport security may be useless as it wants to be, since it doesn't change jack. It's security theater to make people feel good and secure. And it serves at least two purposes. First, it acts as a "see, we do something" show in a situation where you can't do jack. Frankly, you CANNOT fight suicide terrorism. It's not possible. You can try to eliminate the source, you can try to show people who'd suicide attack you that there are better ways to give your life some meaning, but you cannot stop something like this head on. It's like the war on drugs, you can't stop the flood with a broom, you can try to eliminate the base for it. But since we're not willing to do that and change the "american way of life" to something that doesn't equate a bully beating the lunch money out of the other kids, terrorism will not readily stop. But since whatever form the next attack will take it won't hit airports, you can use this security theater to employ people who would otherwise be unemployable. Think of it as some kind of wellfare where people actually have to do something instead of sitting on their fat ass. You can safely put people into this job who will not do a good job because it simply does not matter.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. /. Trolling Great Firewall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did /. start putting pictures instead of icons for the article pic? And girls on top of that. I smell Chinese firewall trolling.

    1. Re:/. Trolling Great Firewall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it got me to read the article...

  17. Jobs? by Christian+Marks · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile admirers of the shoe attacker showered the anonymous young man with promises of everything from Nike trainers to replace his lost footwear, to iPads, sex and jobs.

    I can understand an iPad, but what is he going to do with Steve Jobs?

    1. Re:Jobs? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      See how far he can throw him?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. Not Copylefties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I realize that in your anger, you won't be able to separate me from the IP apologists, but I appeal to your cooler-headed colleagues of the copyleft movement and its ilk.

    The so-called "filesharers" are not members of the copyleft movement, which seek to use copyright laws to push their idea of copyright equality. Pretty much like socialists, hopefully of the democratic stripe. The "filesharers" are more like copy libertarians, who don't want any copyright laws or at least want to restrict the copyright regime to industrial grade infringement. They are like the pro-gun lobby who at most want laws restricting the ownership of battle grade weapons like machine guns or rocket-propelled grenades, or the pro-drugs lobby who want the freedom to get stoned or high on low-grade narcotics and stimulants.

  19. proof by thesh0ck · · Score: 0

    pic/video or it didnt happen.

  20. RIAA/MPAA Execs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder when the eggs and shoes will start flying in the US when RIAA and/or MPAA execs show up at events...

  21. Chinese vs American philosophy by Cryacin · · Score: 1, Funny

    Chinese: Throw nikes
    American: Throw nukes

    See? Not that different.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  22. Missing something here... by jshackney · · Score: 1

    Seems like most of you are missing a crucial point here. Or, possibly, I'm far too paranoid. FTFA:

    Chinese police are seeking a man who said he threw eggs and shoes at the architect of China's "great firewall", the world's most sophisticated and extensive online censorship system.

    and, FTFS:

    Meanwhile admirers of the shoe attacker showered the anonymous young man with promises of everything from Nike trainers to replace his lost footwear, to iPads, sex and jobs.

    Admirers, eh? I'd say that if I wanted to find someone, I'd find his price and start pursuing him. Just a thought, but I'd probably offer him a job. Maybe he needs one. Or, if that's not enticing enough, how about some sexual service[s] (to be provided by someone other than me, of course). Go down the list until you find his price. Then, when there's no possibility of escape, make him disappear. Just sayin'.

  23. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The office of Fang Binxing, known as the father of the great firewall, denied the attack had happened

    At least they're consistent.

  24. Who throws a shoe, honestly? by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    I mean, in addition to Random Task and Muntadhar al-Zaiydi, now we have this guy launching shoes and eggs.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Who throws a shoe, honestly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The appropriate thing to throw is of course eggs and tomatoes. And sausages, and tea, and toast and... Wait, where were I?

    2. Re:Who throws a shoe, honestly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not like they can take away your shoes if you go through a security checkpoint...

  25. Wow Sex and Jobs? by SluttyButt · · Score: 1

    Now will you excuse me while I hone my egg-throwing skill.

  26. Hmm, I wonder... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    A bit off topic... but say you needed a good software/networking architect and Fang Binxing came for an interview, would you consider as a good candidate or a bad candidate? On the one hand he's designed the Great Firewall, but on the other hand... he's designed the Great Firewall.

    1. Re:Hmm, I wonder... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      For the company I work for currently? I'd hire him on the spot! He's got experience with impossible tasks.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Hmm, I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends WHY you need a good software/networking architect.

  27. seems a bit implausible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Twitter user who claimed to have pelted him, who posts under the pseudonym @hanunyi, wrote: 'The egg missed the target. The first shoe hit the target. The second shoe was blocked by a man and a woman.'

    This guy is merrily tweeting after his excellent adventures?
    Remember, China is a country with a justice system that is not the joke that it is here in the west.
    I'm surprised the police hasn't gotten around to re-educating his throwing arm towards the production of license plates for the glory of the motherland.

  28. shoe dodging by aahpandasrun · · Score: 1

    Should have taken classes in the George W. Bush school of shoe dodging

  29. Can you Google Tiananmen Square... by BenJCarter · · Score: 2

    ...from the Chinese Segments of the Internet?

    If so, progress has been made. If not, paranoia runs deep.

    --
    For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. - Publius
    1. Re:Can you Google Tiananmen Square... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can, but you only get results referring to the square itself, not the tragedy that took place there.

  30. Wrong Target by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

    It's the wrong target altogether. If a country allows for an oppressive government, then short of foreign military occupation it's the fault of the people living in the country for letting it happen. In china, it's not the programmer's fault for the great firewall, it's the chinese fault. The programmer is just a scapegoat. In the US, it's not the FBI or the "government's" fault for abusive 4-th-amendment ignoring national security letters, it's your fault and your neighbor's fault and his neighbor's fault...

    Stop looking for scapegoats. Talk to everyone you know about these problems, tell them who they can vote for to fix them, or they are YOUR fault.

  31. Chairs! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Throw chairs people of China! Throw chairs shouting 'programmers, programmers, programmers" while you sweat profusely! Your geek cool creds will increase dramatically! Eschew the shoe. Embrace the chair!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  32. egg pelting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were they 1000 day old egss?

    Robbins Mitchell
    Houston,Texas

  33. Re:Baning VPN will be bad for business and may cut by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Nonono, you can get it, you just have to declare that you need it and what for. Probably also where you plan to connect to and a release form that you're not going to use it to do "illegal" stuff.

    I'm kinda surprised we don't have something like that already.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  34. Helping circumvate the firewall. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been travelling though china for a few weeks now, and the great firewall is incredibly iritating. If anyone wants to help the chinese people towards freedom, and me towards facebook, I suggest running a bridge for tor. Its not hard to do and is very helpful to anyone stumped by the great firewall.

  35. Shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "denied the attack had happened."

    Is this a Distributed Denial of Shoe attack?

  36. hilarious ads by Alimony+Pakhdan · · Score: 1

    Anyone else seeing Confucius Institute ad banners on this page?