Slashdot Mirror


Libyan Rebels Weaponize Power Wheels Toys

Danny Rathjens pointed out a story about the DIY weapons created by Libyan rebels. One of the more interesting is a machine gun drone created from a Power Wheels-style ATV. Rebels outfit the toys with a small cannon and attach controls via long wire. A solider can hide while he uses a small television and simple controls to move the vehicle and fire the gun. A similar system is also outfitted to a toy truck with a machine gun on top.

43 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Creative, but predictable. by querist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Desperation is the true mother of invention. These Lybian rebels are determined, and it's impressive what people can do when faced with something that important to them but a limited budget.

    1. Re:Creative, but predictable. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's great to see. I really hope that when they succeed they turn this creative energy into building a democratic, secular, and scientific society that can be a benchmark for the rest of North Egypt and the Middle East to emulate.

      I know - I'm a dreamer.

    2. Re:Creative, but predictable. by rwven · · Score: 2

      True that. I was truly impressed by not only the engineering skills and resourcefulness of those people, but also their attitude toward the "task" at hand.

    3. Re:Creative, but predictable. by blair1q · · Score: 2

      North Egypt?

      Anyway, this is cute stuff, but it's horribly low-volume and inefficient with the manpower they have. And that thing is vulnerable to a quick kid with a hammer, or a savvy sapper with a hand-grenade and a berm to hide behind.

      They should be spending their time doing the diplomatic legwork to get someone to ship them a few hundred tanks, helicopters, and predator drones.

      Because otherwise they're not fighting a war, they're putting on a show.

    4. Re:Creative, but predictable. by Talderas · · Score: 2

      But if there is a civil insurrection, those involved would be quickly annihilated with superior firepower.

      True. The civilian firepower cannot compete with the US military. It is, however, also dependent on the military brass agreeing with attacking the citizens of the nation they are sworn to protect.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    5. Re:Creative, but predictable. by panikfan · · Score: 2

      But if there is a civil insurrection, those involved would be quickly annihilated with superior firepower.

      True. The civilian firepower cannot compete with the US military. It is, however, also dependent on the military brass agreeing with attacking the citizens of the nation they are sworn to protect.

      Also keep in mind during a civil insurrection, that there are A LOT more of 'us' than there are of 'them'. There would be mass defections from the military if they were ordered to fire on civilians too, and some of those folks just might bring some serious weaponry with them.

    6. Re:Creative, but predictable. by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Never hear of the National Guard? They got a shitload of really nice big guns in nearly every little town in the south. How do you think all those survivalists get their hands on C4 and grenades? National Guard my friend, along with the biker gangs that will happily have anything you want smuggled from down south for the right price.

      Hell i'll never forget a cop friend of mine LOLing about pulling over some members of the Folks street gang and they had an RPG which these braintrusts were planning on doing a driveby with LOL! I guess nobody told them about that whole "fire shoots out the back" thing.

      But as someone who has been friends with quite a few military and national guard guys I can tell you not to worry, those guys take things like honor and the constitution VERY seriously and if the fed were to roll the tanks they'd be the first ones handing out RPGs and 50 cals. It wouldn't be pretty, but the civilians wouldn't be having to fight with just shotguns either. With all the pickups we'd have so many technicals we'd have our very own "Toyota war" like Libya VS Chad.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:Creative, but predictable. by Zironic · · Score: 2

      How does Scandinavia fit into your world-view exactly?

    8. Re:Creative, but predictable. by scribblej · · Score: 2

      Hey, maybe you should hope the USA becomes a country like you just described, first, instead of starting wars all around the globe while praising Jesus.

    9. Re:Creative, but predictable. by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Nobody is going to be handing out weapons. Even if it went that far the Feds would do what the Brits did in the revolutionary war and move in and seize the weapons depots before it reached the point.

      But my main point is the millitary wouldn't obey a mission to attack US civilians. Why do you think Vietnam ended, because of protests? No the Vietnam war ended because the millitary refused to fight. The personal charged with identifying targets started sending in reports that no targets were found. Ground and Naval forces refused to fight. It got so bad the Navy had several hundred men who refused to fight locked up in a single 20x20 foot room in SanFran and then the prisoners staged a sit in and refused orders and the Navy had no way to put it down because the guards were outnumbered 50-1. Similar things happened in the Army. In fact one of the great discussions after the war ended was how to get an army to fight that won't fight. It's a primary reason they ended the draft permanently because they feared the same thing happening again.

      One of the major differences between US soldiers and those throughout the world is that the US millitary doesn't swear allegiance to any person, they swear allegiance to the constitution. That Constitution says attacking Civilians is against the law. Now you might point to Kent State, but here is where I turn it around on you. Kent State was National Guard.

      Heck look at Syria, they swear loyalty to the president and even in those cases soldiers are refusing orders and being shot. It's hard to convince people to shoot their own neighbors.

  2. What's next? by mseeger · · Score: 4, Funny

    What comes next? Weapon grade Lego?

    1. Re:What's next? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2

      Ever played with those Lego Mindstorms robotics kits? With a little creativity and hacking of the appropriate hardware you can end up with weapons grade Legos pretty quickly. Never underestimate the power of a creatively designed controller system.

  3. The new Taliban? by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do we know anything about these rebels other than they don't like Gaddafi? How do we know we're not helping an Al Queada style organisation get into power? I have a bad feeling about this.

    1. Re:The new Taliban? by gmack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Libya has been an outright sponsor for terrorist organizations for years and when they backed off on the first world they moved in on Africa supplying arms, training and mercenaries to some of the most vicious rebel groups in the region. You can't get much worse than Gaddafi to begin with so the dice roll is worth the risk.

    2. Re:The new Taliban? by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2

      We won't know until it is done. If you know what happened in Afghanistan many years ago we helped the locals there push out the Russians and then deserted them leaving a power vacuum that was filled up by the Taliban. Hopefully, after the rebels win in Libya NATO (and not just the US) will quickly recognize the new government (which right now only a couple of countries have) and provide as much aid as we can - including helping to draft a secular constitution.

    3. Re:The new Taliban? by Dracos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Something about the fact that they've formed their own central bank seems less than grass-roots to me.

    4. Re:The new Taliban? by dave420 · · Score: 2

      I heard about some defecting soldiers who were expecting to find Al Qaeda and foreign fighters among the rebels, but found only Libyans who simply don't want to be in a dictatorship. If they choose the path of fundamentalism, that's up to them.

    5. Re:The new Taliban? by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 2

      And what in your experienced political opinion indicates that would be worse than Gaddafi, who openly and broadly funded anti-western terrorism? Just let a bunch of seemly oppressed citizens fight for their right for self-governance and check your paranoia at the door. If this all goes ass-over-tit for the West what exactly is going to change for us? It's about time that we all focus a little more on our internal political bullshit and quit worrying about what others may possibly do to us if the absolute worst outcome occurs. Trust me, the crap that internal politics is driving in Western Countys is way more damaging than anything that may happen in Libya after Gaddafi finally gets removed. If you really want to get your paranoia juiced up, ask yourself, what can our political overlords gain by distracting us away from their own internal actions with conflicts in North Africa/Middle East. What policy's are they now going to push for based on what's going on in the world? Magicians use distraction to perform their tricks; as in the zombie apocalypse, worry about what's in your own basement before you worry about what's in your neighbors yard. - I have tin foil hats for sale as well, btw.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    6. Re:The new Taliban? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you see the irony is claiming that battery life is a critical failure when commenting on an article that shows DIY modifications of weapons?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    7. Re:The new Taliban? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      This is exactly why we haven't given them surface to air missiles like we did in Afghanistan in the 80s. They tend to still be around later when they turnaround and start shooting at you.

      Well yeah. Plus it'd be pointless and self-defeating. We gave Stingers to the Mujahideen because they were getting stomped by Russian air power, and being the Cold War we obviously couldn't directly protect them.

      Libya is completely different, because we have free reign to use our Air Force and Navy -- conveniently the branches of military not strained to the limit by two other wars -- and so Qaddafi can't do shit from the air. There's nothing for the rebels to use Stingers on.

      I mean, even in the best case where the rebels are our BFFs until the end of time, some of whatever anti-air weapon we gave them would end up in the hands of the Libyan army and just cause more headaches for us. And the Air Force has been having so much fun with their AC-130s and A-10s! It'd be a shame to have to go back to just using the fast-flying jets for a while.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    8. Re:The new Taliban? by Amouth · · Score: 2

      Sorry but attacking me as if i am "listening to people who make money and power from scaring people" is not a good way to make an argument, in fact its rather insulting.

      I don't give a shit what the media says or what the people in office say or what the banks say.

      I look at it as how our society has developed over the past 100 years and the transfer of wealth from one group to another. We have so many problems right now that are related to money that there is no one/two/100 things you could do to make it all better - sadly that means they keep throwing money that doesn't exist at it.

      the fact that people are using it as an excuse to further their own personal wants is the same mentality that got us where we are today..

      I can't give you an answer - no one can (at least not one someone can poke holes in) but i do know that the current approach is not going to help.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    9. Re:The new Taliban? by badran · · Score: 2

      You mean the gun with a plane strapped to it.

    10. Re:The new Taliban? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      Yep! 30 FOOT barrel! I love the fact that at full auto the gun actually can slow the plane down.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    11. Re:The new Taliban? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      You should play Sierra's A-10 Tank Killer 2 if you haven't already.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    12. Re:The new Taliban? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

      I think the ONLY reason the US is bothering with "helping the Freedom Fighters" in Libya, is BECAUSE the Central Bank does not have their claws in this country.

      Saddam was moving off the Dollar and kicked out Oil Companies -- after years of being "our bad guy" he was suddenly, worst person in the world.

      And guess what? Libya was moving to trading in a collection of currencies rather than the dollar.... ... also, major countries NOT ON BOARD: Iran and North Korea.

      >> I spot a trend...

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    13. Re:The new Taliban? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      Found it :)

      http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/archive/index.php/t-153774.html

      2nd post from the bottom. The gun is offset slightly so that the actual firing barrel is on the center line; because it's a gatlin gun, the firing point isn't the center of the 'gun' like a single barreled gun would be. That makes sense. This wasn't a slowing issue but one of attitude control. With the gun centered and thus the firing barrel offset it would exert a force off to the side of the barrel offset (yaw maybe?)

      It does talk about initial stalling due to the engine ingesting gun gas which was fixed by closing the intakes during gun firing.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  4. The US couldn't have done this for under $100mil by coastal984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would have taken the Army 8 years and $100's of millions of dollars for the US to do this. *Sigh* We really should take a lesson in innovation.

  5. Weapons Development by CPTreese · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was in Iraq 2006-2008 I was often frustrated by how slow new weapons and defensive mechanism were developed by the DA. Often we would end up fabricating our own IED countermeasures using whatever material we found on our base. We often surprised ourselves with the effectiveness of the ideas we came up with. I've often wondered since then how much more effective that process would have been if it had been possible to attach a team of computer scientists and structural engineers to an Army unit. Instead we ended up trying not to get blown up and hope that someone somewhere was getting our INTEL and developing new vehicles and supplies to counteract a very intelligent and capable enemy.

    BTW my time in Iraq pretty much solidified my opinion that our presence over there is pointless. Assume that we were able to establish a democracy in that country it wouldn't take long for it to fall. All it would take is one Sheik to disagree with the constitution and/or government and automatically the tribe under that Sheik would automatically support the Sheik and work to undermine the government. Tribe and family is far more important in that culture than individual rights and government. So why try to force on them a government that runs counter to their culture. Why is it assumed that everyone really wants to be in a democracy? There is no such thing as one government that fits all people. I tend to be more libertarian but that doesn't mean that a socialist style government is necessarily wrong. I only think that people should be given the choice of moving to whatever country best fits their belief system. Lol let the flaming begin.

    --
    If there is no God then free will is an illusion.
    1. Re:Weapons Development by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 2

      So where are they?

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    2. Re:Weapons Development by briansct · · Score: 2

      Funny, your story reminds me of the one my Dad tells about being in the Army Corps of Engineers in Vietnam. Guys in his unit created their own Banana clip to add ammo capability to their assault rifles. Upper levels freaked when they saw what they had done, eventually though, their design made it back and became the curved design now used.

      BTW I agree with your BTW!

      --
      What's the point of Mod points over a long weekend?
    3. Re:Weapons Development by khallow · · Score: 2

      When I was in Iraq 2006-2008

      Things have changed some since then. Iraq still might fall apart the moment the US leaves, but it's not as much of a bloodbath now as it was during your stay there.

      All it would take is one Sheik to disagree with the constitution and/or government and automatically the tribe under that Sheik would automatically support the Sheik and work to undermine the government.

      That's the thing about democracies. It provides a built in system for undermining the government via elections without undermining the society. Maybe that sheik will start shooting, but he's got to consider that his tribe will become fair game for anyone else who allies with the government. And if the government is in good shape at the time, there's going to be a significant military he'll have to face as well.

      Why is it assumed that everyone really wants to be in a democracy?

      How would you know otherwise, if the democracy weren't there? In a democracy, you can at least determine fairly whether people want to be in it and they can leave one freely. And if most people, rather than a few whiny brats, don't want to be in a democracy, it provides easy and painless mechanisms for making that choice happen.

  6. Yup , mindstorm becomes firestorm by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    However I have it on good authority that Gaddafi is lining up crack troops of 5 year olds to disable then break the enemy weapons within minutes by being sick all over them then trying to feed them to an angry cat.

    1. Re:Yup , mindstorm becomes firestorm by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Even broken lego makes very effective caltrops.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. Re:The US couldn't have done this for under $100mi by jovius · · Score: 2

    Too much resources - everything is made to order. Design and production takes time from innovation, and the result is layer upon layer of bureacracy. Besides it's too cozy - your life and future are not under immediate threat and there's too much money at hand.

    It's amazing what dedicated DIY types can come up with.

  8. already done (caltrops) by Kozz · · Score: 5, Funny

    What comes next? Weapon grade Lego?

    Ever step barefoot on a 1x1 in the middle of the night on your way to the bathroom?

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    1. Re:already done (caltrops) by Zcar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Doesn't hurt as much as a d4.

  9. Re:This is why the US army has a challenge. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kind of the point, really. Yes - we can all snicker at over-priced hammers. But the kind of tech that's being produced for big budget military is orders of magnitude more impressive than the hacks being described here (and there's nothing wrong with a good hack). But both have their place and can be appreciated for the technology involved.

  10. Model rocket Stinger by UttBuggly · · Score: 3, Funny

    Watching the video, and the homemade RPG reminded me of a SAM my cousins and I built as kids.

    1) An Estes model rocket...a WAC Corporal...with a B8-4 motor.
    2) A shipping tube with a launch rod glued to the bottom cap.
    3) Copper strips glued/screwed to bottom cap with wires running outside to a Burgess B battery and momentary switch from Radio Shack.

    You slid the rocket down the tube on the launch rod with the nichrome igniter wires touching the copper strips. Aim, press the switch, and whoosh....a balsa and cardboard Stinger.

    We didn't have the C4 and blasting caps for the warhead portion (thankfully), but we could aim and fire a $4 rocket.

    The nosecone was to be built from C4 with a blasting cap on the nose and underneath. If you missed a direct impact, the ejection charge from the motor would slam a washer into the underneath blasting cap and still detonate the missile. At least that was our thinking.

    Again, we never had anything that actually exploded, but something like this would probably work against low-flying helicopters. A C or D motor would give more range, etc.

    Yes, we had way too much time on our hands. One of our test flights did cause 3 casualties...to a neighbor's chickens. A fin came off on launch and the rocket arced into the neighbor's chicken yard at feeding time. The rocket didn't hit the massed birds but 3 apparently died from fright. We paid for the dead birds from allowances and odd jobs.

    Years later, in the Air Force, I was assigned to the USAF Rocket Propulsion Lab at Edwards AFB. I managed not to kill or blow up anything there.

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
  11. Cool story - but ... by shugah · · Score: 2

    Once this civil war is over, we will be left with taxi drivers, engineers and school teachers with experience in guerrilla warfare, improvised weapons and explosives manufacturing, sabotage and military / para-military tactics. I just hope they all return to teaching, driving hack and designing pipelines once Ghadaffi is deposed. Without "boots on the ground" NATO and the US has very little influence on the leadership and/or world view of the various factions that currently are united against their resident tyrant. But Ghadaffi is an equal opportunity tyrant who made enemies of both Muslim fundamentalists and progressive modern Muslims and secular Libyans. Currently all of these groups are united to oust Colonel Crazy, but if history is any indication, once that goal is in sight, they will start vying for who controls the future of Lybia. The Mujahideen, who were once western allies, begat the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

    --
    If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
  12. Re:This is why the US army has a challenge. by Octorian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People often forget where that $800 hammer comes from :-)

    - You need to have a DARPA program to fund research into advanced nail insertion technology (ANIT).
    - Then you have some FFRDC do an involved trade study that concludes that a hammer is preferably to the DARPA-developed ANIT project.
    - A program executive office (PEO) now hosts an industry day presentation on the US Army's Tactical Hammer Needs to the tool-making industries
    - The PEO now publishes a Request For Information (RFI) to solicit information from industry on steel hardening and handle-forming capabilities that could be used for the hammers.
    - Finally a Request for Proposal (RFP) is published, along with a detailed performance spec, requirements list, and statement of work. There is a limited number of hammers desired, with options for buying more later. They also have to conform to various Military standards that no tool you'd buy at Home Depot would ever have to confirm to. Also, they do need to be made in the US in a facility that holds the proper security clearances.
    - The PEO finally selects one of the submitted proposals, awarding the contract.
    - One of the loosing contractors decides to file a formal protest, and drags the process out longer. Eventually a settlement is made, and the selected prime contractor takes them on as a subcontractor for handle-to-head integration.
    - After several rounds of requirements engineering, systems engineering, and product R&D, along with approvals at preliminary and critical design reviews (PDR/CDR), the government gives the go-ahead to enter Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP).
    - Testing eventually finds issues in the initial batch. Some design changes are made, costs are passed along, and eventually the hammer enters full-rate production (FRP).
    - Following training and deployment, the MK42 Tactical Nail Insertion Device (code-name "Hammer") is deployed into the field.
    - Meanwhile, nails are getting tougher, and follow-on program for the MK49 Objective Nail Banger is announced.

    I could go on forever :-)

  13. Re:This is why the US army has a challenge. by gilleain · · Score: 2

    Have you ever seen Power Wheels in action? They run at 5mph, a more expensive model might approach 10mph. An adult can outrun these things. Not that it's necessary given that it's a slow moving target. Battery life on these things is maybe 30-60 minutes. They're really only good for getting across fairly flat terrain. And from the video I've seen it looks like it operated via a cable, not wireless.

    A more serious problem should be apparent from the video. There is a guy standing next to the toy truck, feeding it the ammo belt...

  14. Re:A-Team written by computer script by Psmylie · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would have made a lot more sense if they hadn't cut the line "Thank goodness we crashed into a pillow factory!"

    --

    psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  15. Re:SImply not cooperating can stop things... by couchslug · · Score: 2

    "Simply not cooperating can stop things..."

    Less obvious is the massive cooperation required to make non-cooperation effective.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."