Slashdot Mirror


Man Mines Midtown New York Sidewalks

43-year-old Raffi Stepanian makes money searching New York City streets, but it's not loose change or soda cans he's looking for, it's gold. Stepanian says he can make almost $1000 a week scouring the diamond district's streets for bits of gold, platinum, and precious gems. "Material falls off clothes, on the bottom of shoes, it drops off jewelry, and it falls in the dirt and sticks to the gum on the street. The percentage of gold out here on the street is greater than the amount of gold you would find in a mine . . . It comes close to a mother lode because in the street, you're picking up gold left by the industry," he says.

183 comments

  1. There are no cats in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    and the streets are paved with gold?

  2. Re:Landmines. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Me too. Might want to reconsider the wording of that headline.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. And now that it's all over the internet by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

    Everyone else will start doing it too, and he'll have to go back to his day job.

    1. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone else will start doing it too, and he'll have to go back to his day job.

      You're missing the plan, man. He's going to sell people the tools to do street mining. After that, he sits back in fat city.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everyone else will start doing it too, and he'll have to go back to his day job.

      You're missing the plan, man. He's going to sell people the tools to do street mining. After that, he sits back in fat city.

      Then comes the book.

      Then comes the TV show.

      Yep, he's on Easy Street, in more ways than one.

      just be careful of claim jumpers.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by rwven · · Score: 1

      Yeah seems like the worst thing in the world he could do is let people know about this...

    4. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      Truth in history (or at least, mythical history). Supposedly nobody made more money during the gold rush years than the shovel makers.

    5. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by vlm · · Score: 1

      Everyone else will start doing it too, and he'll have to go back to his day job.

      I think the problem is living in NYC on "less than $1000 / wk" is probably physically impossible unless you eat rats and live in a homeless shelter. Or you're playing games like claiming you only get $20K of income but you're getting $50K of student loans / grants / scholarships so you're really spending $70K/yr ...

      Where I live, 50K will get you a lifestyle of roughly "small, older house" or a Very deluxe apartment, decent mid-level new-ish car or brand new cheapie, somewhat above average day to day groceries, and leave enough left over to take some fun vacations and buy plenty of cool tech toys. Given a working spouse or roommate, you could achieve an even higher standard of living. Only about 20% of the individuals in the population will make more that you, you'll be relatively rich.

      Its all in the local cost of living...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Truth in history (or at least, mythical history). Supposedly nobody made more money during the gold rush years than the shovel makers.

      Looking over the settlement of California, the gold rush populated the state - failed or retired prospectors built ranches, planted orchards, built toll roads, drove stage coaches, built fishing fleets, etc. Without the Gold Rush California may not have developed anywhere near as much as it has.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. I'm forced to live on $2,000 per month and while it is difficult, I do not live in a homeless shelter or eat rats. Your post is mere uninformed conjecture. Having said that, I would much rather have $1,000 per week to play with.

    8. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Our weather and fertile farmland takes issue with that - it would have developed just as much, but perhaps just not as quickly.

    9. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by insnprsn · · Score: 1

      Before you know it, he's the one wearing the fancy clothes/jewelery that's dropping precious metals and stones in the street

    10. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by OctaviusIII · · Score: 1

      Oh please - $50k/year in New York is extremely doable. The recommended amount spent on housing monthly on $50k is $1,388. That's enough for a one bedroom (okay location) or studio (nice location), or half of a two bedroom (really nice location) with 2/3 left over. Given that the individual wouldn't need a car, that means that 2/3 of the income goes to just what you were describing: vacation, groceries, gadgets, and the like.

      --
      What's this? Another weblog? On transit?
    11. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget air conditioning....

    12. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Shados · · Score: 2

      Are you a new yorker? Because then your standard is quite skewed. My wife's family is all in NYC, and I lived in Montreal and in the Boston area, and a 1400$ apartment with the specs you mentionnd in NYC, by my standards, is totally unacceptable. Total dump in garbage areas.

    13. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Oh, common. It's not the shovel makers. The company which made the most money in the Gold Rush is still with us today. It was Levy's. They made the pants that the pants which were just right for the job (jeans) -- sturdy enough to sustain high wear and tear and yet comfortable.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    14. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      What do rare dams have to do with it? Come on.. Get your common pants manufacturer name right, or Levi's will have to levy a fine...

    15. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by todrules · · Score: 4, Funny

      And then that bastard Levi came along and stole his idea. Damn counterfeiters.

    16. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 1

      Agreed. In my small hometown, the crappiest area is still better than NYC's "really nice location", at least in my eyes. Also, my wife can walk to the party store down the street at night without needing to carry a small arsenal to defend herself with.

    17. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      That's what I used to think, too. But it turns out, most of California's present (huge) population arrived a lot later.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    18. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live (alone) in Astoria, Queens and pay $1,000 per month (includes electricity) for a small one bedroom. It is nothing fancy, but it is comfortable. Nice neighborhood, nice neighbors. Excellent restaurants. Subway 7 minutes walk. Supermarket and laundry less than 5 minutes walk. It really depends on location, luck and perseverence what kind of place you can find for the best rate. But everything is relative and $1,000 is half of my take home pay - so it is a humble existence. Then again, groceries are cheaper than in Manhattan (where I previously lived) and things sort of work out well with a bit of frugality and effort.

    19. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1

      Then came the churches then came the schools
      Then came the lawyers then came the rules
      Then came the trains and the trucks with their load
      And the dirty old track was the telegraph road

    20. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1
      from the TFA:

      ...armed with tweezers and a butter knife

      I doubt that there's much money in that.

    21. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Phleg · · Score: 1

      $50,000, with a minimum of 20% tax rate ends up being $3,333/mo. That's 41% of your income, which is a completely fucking ludicrous proportion of your income to spend on housing.

      --
      No comment.
    22. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by vagn · · Score: 1

      Tools schmools. Time to plant potatoes.

    23. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Only if you really want to use Income/3/12 as your solution for recommended monthly housing spending. By that metric, I pay half the rent I should. I'd suggest either starting from after tax income or dividing by 4. Sure, you may have to stretch beyond this in NYC (though this guy lives in queens) but a third of your pre-tax works out to be a lot of money.

      Not that I don't agree with you that 50k in NYC is doable. It certainly is and MANY of the people who live there do it with less than that.

      --
      Bottles.
    24. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      Levy's is not still with us today. There is a company that owns the name and has it sown on to someone elses clothes, but the actual company that made the product you are talking about has not existed for years, probably decades.

    25. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as the tools consist of a putty knife, tweezers and a pan I don't see him getting rich that way.

    26. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Tax rate? You seriously think he's filing income taxes from sifting trash from the gutters? Plus, he lives in Queens. He can probably afford a decent 1BR on what he makes...

    27. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Not needing a car is not equivalent to not needing to travel.What, the buses and subway are free in NY now?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    28. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by bws111 · · Score: 2

      What do you mean? The website for Levi Strauss and Company claims they have a 150 year history, and says the founder was Levi Strauss. It also has this little warning for people researching the company:

      But be careful: there are a lot of myths about our company and our jeans in cyberspace, and you shouldn’t rely on the Internet for historical research.

    29. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Levy's is not still with us today.

      Well knock-off brands usually don't last that long. Levi Struss on the other hand is still around.

    30. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Not sure that warning is all that accurate, come to think of it. Someone told me not to trust the internet for information like that.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    31. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by loafula · · Score: 1

      You're missing the plan, man. He's going to sell people the tools to do street mining. After that, he sits back in fat city.

      You mean a styrofoam cup and a butter knife?

      --
      FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
    32. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Even in Manhattan, $1k/week is pretty much the median income: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Manhattan#Household_income

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    33. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Not needing a car is not equivalent to not needing to travel.What, the buses and subway are free in NY now?

      Yup. At least they are compared to needing a car. Many people continually pay a car payment, the average of which is around $500/mo. Add in $75/mo for basic insurance, then money for gas, tires, maintenance, air fresheners, &c, and you're easily up around $25/day, 7 days a week.

      Buses cost money. But not that much money.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    34. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Not unless he gets shot before then. That man needs to be damned careful whom me peddles his shit to. Especially in New York of all places.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    35. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes love over gold and mind over matter to do what /he/ does that he must.

    36. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Megane · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when winter comes, all the gorillas will die off. That's the brilliant part of the plan.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    37. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      They don't make any jeans. They just order them and have them labeled.

    38. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Or if you live a hundred miles north for that money you can probably find yourself a 1500+ square foot 3 bedroom house with land, in a decent location and a Car. For us Upstaters you are talking a quality of life that someone on welfare lives like.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    39. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by h4rr4r · · Score: 1
    40. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. At least they are compared to needing a car. Many people continually pay a car payment, the average of which is around $500/mo. Add in $75/mo for basic insurance, then money for gas, tires, maintenance, air fresheners, &c, and you're easily up around $25/day, 7 days a week.

      I read that article and kept thinking WTF? Then I found the date. "Published April 25, 2007" That's during the worse of the credit bubble and right before the correction. I really doubt things are that bad today.

    41. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by LocalH · · Score: 1

      He will be now. I guarantee the IRS (as well as NYS and NYC officials) will be looking into this. Income doesn't have to be money, so the relevant tax authorities would be fully within their rights to go after him, and he's just given his name and location directly to them!

      --
      FC Closer
    42. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spend 45-46% of my income on housing in the bay area. Yay for grad school. Yay.

    43. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by bmo · · Score: 1

      New York is one of the safest places on the planet.

      Crime is at historic lows since they started keeping records.

      Remove your head from your ass.

      --
      BMO

    44. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Misusing whom only makes you look stupid.

      who:whom :: he:him -> "who me(sic) peddles his shit to" OR "to whom he peddles his shit". But not whatever bastard hybrid you were attempting.

      And WTF are you doing peddling his shit anyway?

    45. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I think you overestimate the IRS's competence as well as motivation for going after someone who is effectively a high-end dumpster diver :)

      But regardless of the tax consequences, after this article his Diamond District gold mining days are numbered. As a few posters have pointed out, if you strike a gold vein the LAST thing you want to do is tell everyone where it is! (especially if it's on land you don't own...)

    46. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      That isn't come on knowledge.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    47. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      Nope, the lion's share of the money that was made in the Gold Rush was made by the merchants. Here's an example of the prices for some staples along with how much the average gold panner/miner brought in per day.

    48. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that you're referring to those dangerous hasidem gangs that roam the diamond district, forcing everyone to buy retail?

    49. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Everyone else will start doing it too, and he'll have to go back to his day job.

      Which is why it's a bogus story. There's no pot of gold on New York streets. Only in a con man's mind. Yeesh.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    50. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by hierophanta · · Score: 1

      New York City median income: $48,631 mean income: $75,809

      50k is obviously doable and according to the census data: you would be making slightly over half the population
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_New_York_City#Income

    51. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Maybe not in Manhattan, but you can find places in the Bronx, Brooklyn and Queens for those prices. Right now Long Island City and Astoria as well as Greenpoint will have those types of offerings.

    52. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      BMO, just look at his sig. Everything you need to know about DigiShaman is in that sig,

      OF COURSE he thinks NYC is a dangerous pesthole, full of dangerous criminals.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    53. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Shados · · Score: 1

      I'm not debating if its doable or not. I'm saying it sucks. Hard.

      My mother in law's 2 bedroom in a co-op is worth well over 600-700 grands (I forget exactly, so give or take 50k), and I would NOT live in it. Thats in Queens.

      My new apartment in Cambridge, MA, in porter square at 1400$/month is borderline acceptable.

      And my old apartment (I just recently moved) in Laval, Quebec, 25 minutes from downtown montreal using public transportation was 445$/month (2 bedroom). Its a bit cheaper than average because I had it for 15 years and the laws there are very strict about raise, but 600$/month was okayish.

      Basically what Im saying is that the standard of living in NYC for people in the median or below is HORRIBLE. Those apartments fall apart and/or they crap way more people than they should in it.

    54. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by bmo · · Score: 1

      Oh god, I didn't think they existed.

      I heard about them in legends. I thought they were just sockpuppets.

      --
      BMO

    55. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      So? That doesn't mean that the Levi brand jeans made in other countries aren't made differently, or possibly to a higher standard, than other brand jeans.

      (I'm not saying they *are*, either. I'm just saying that even if they do contract with factories in other countries, their jeans *COULD* still be different in quality than other jeans.)

    56. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Misspelling aside, Levi was the company that made the most money on the Gold Rush. The fact that they keep making money on their name only demonstrates how old and stable the brand is.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    57. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By fertile farm land you mean heavily irrigated desert that use a large portion of the watershed from the west side of the continental divide? The farm land that is now being torn up because that watershed is so dry that other states are taking water for people and farmers cant get enough to water their crops now?

    58. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      fuhgeddaboudit!

    59. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      So why isn't this guy using a UPS and a shopvac?

    60. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Without the Gold Rush California may not have developed anywhere near as much as it has.

      If I were I rightwingnut I'd toss in some quip about "and nothing of value would have been lost".

      Oh wait, if I were a right wingnut I wouldn't have a sense of humor.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    61. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you think New York is a safe place. Please stay there, don't move.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    62. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      What day job ?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    63. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Truth in history (or at least, mythical history). Supposedly nobody made more money during the gold rush years than the shovel makers.

      Looking over the settlement of California, the gold rush populated the state - failed or retired prospectors built ranches, planted orchards, built toll roads, drove stage coaches, built fishing fleets, etc. Without the Gold Rush California may not have developed anywhere near as much as it has.

      So if I understand you correctly, The CA Gold Rush is responsible for "Avatar"

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    64. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in Holland housing is expensive. For a quick and dirty estimate on how much you can afford to pay on a mortgage, mortgage brokers use 35% of your net income, add your tax benefit, and arrive at the interest. Divide by the interest rate to obtain your maximum mortgage estimate. Note, I bought my house just before the economical crisis; banks are more strict nowadays. But my point is that 35% is in the order of magnitude of 41%. Quite common around here.

    65. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by Eivind · · Score: 1

      I agree, spending a third of your after-tax income on housing, is a lot. But a fixed fraction makes no sense at all anyway. Because very obviously, you'll spend a higher fraction of your income, the lower your income is.

      Offcourse if you're richer, you'll want to live more nicely, but that doesn't imply that earning twice the amount, it'd make sense to spend twice as much on housing. That would only make sense if you didn't want to spend *anything* on those things which the poor spend nothing on.

      We're reasonably well off, with a household-income of 150% of the average for our city, and spend 20% of after-tax income on housing, and even that is spending a lot, it's only so high because we've prioritised having plenty of space since we're a 5-head family and with relatives from far away staying with us often it makes sense to have an extra bathroom and bedroom for guests.

      In contrast, if you're poor, it's damn close to impossible to find acceptable living-quarters for 1/4 of your income, especially if you've got kids.

    66. Re:And now that it's all over the internet by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Either way, they are not a company that makes jeans. They are a company that orders and sells jeans.

      As to quality, Levi's biggest innovation recently has been their Signature line, made specifically for Walmart, and now sold at many low cost retailers. These are jeans that are so cost focused they omit many of the normal Levi's features. They use cheaper dyes, lower QA, thinner denim. I think that sort of thing speaks for itself.

  4. Re:Landmines. by biodata · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought data mining, some kind of new information supersidewalk.

    --
    Korma: Good
  5. Yeah, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until the dzhoos find out. Then there will be a by-law forbidding this practice as soon as they can find the right congress-thing to pay off.

  6. Aren't landmines illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who thought of laying explosives, not extracting minerals, when he saw the word "mines?"

    1. Re:Aren't landmines illegal? by alesplin · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thought of laying explosives, not extracting minerals, when he saw the word "mines?"

      Nope.

    2. Re:Aren't landmines illegal? by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thought of laying explosives, not extracting minerals, when he saw the word "mines?"

      Nope.

      That makes at least three of us.

    3. Re:Aren't landmines illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four.

    4. Re:Aren't landmines illegal? by PwnzerDragoon · · Score: 1

      You mean he's not? I thought that was how the stuff got on the sidewalks to begin with...

  7. Talking about mining... by Saishuuheiki · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who else thought this would be more along the lines of about land-mines or claymores? It would at least be a more interesting story...

    Also much like old-fashioned gold mining, once others start doing it he can't make as much money doing it anymore

    1. Re:Talking about mining... by xrshalar · · Score: 1

      I admit it. I thought it was going to be about mines planted in the NYC sidewalks.

    2. Re:Talking about mining... by todrules · · Score: 1

      Or at least blowing up sidewalks to get to the gold. Taking a pickaxe to the ashpalt right in the middle of traffic. There's much more efficient ways at mining than what he's doing.

    3. Re:Talking about mining... by matt_hs · · Score: 1
      "Would you please tell the court why you . . . took it upon [yourself] to dig a very big hole in the middle of 1st Avenue?"

      "Well, there are so many holes in 1st Avenue, [I] really didn't think anyone would notice."

    4. Re:Talking about mining... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Or at least blowing up sidewalks to get to the gold. Taking a pickaxe to the ashpalt right in the middle of traffic. There's much more efficient ways at mining than what he's doing.

      One man's more efficient way of mining is another's more fun way of mining.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    5. Re:Talking about mining... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Who else thought this would be more along the lines of about land-mines

      Yeah, me to. I had visions of some nutcase booby-trapping paving slabs. Sounds like the contrived plot of an early-1980s computer game but stranger things have happened.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:Talking about mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking about Great Danes. Ever seen a present left by one of them? We ain't talking danegeld.

    7. Re:Talking about mining... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      With all the talk about BitCoins and BitCoin mining recently, I figured someone had found a way to convert foot traffic into computing power.

    8. Re:Talking about mining... by Ironlenny · · Score: 1

      I thought he was either digging up the sidewalk or digging for sidewalks.

      --
      There is a system for subverting the system and you should use that system!
    9. Re:Talking about mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did. I was expecting to hear about New Yorkers getting legs blown off of them by high explosives. Honestly, that seems to be more likely for New York than someone just picking up metals. Welcome to New York, cesspool of the East!

  8. Re:Mining is dangerous. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mining gold and other precious metals is a filthy job dripping with toxic chemicals: arsenic, cyanide, lead, mercury, etc.

    Correction: "*Refining gold ore and other precious metal ores* is a filthy job dripping with toxic chemicals: arsenic, cyanide, lead, mercury, etc." He's not doing any of that. He's literally just picking already refined metal up off the street. While he might be at hazard to whatever filth he has to brush off the metal, he's not not dealing with a large amount of toxic chemicals.

  9. Boom Town by dummondwhu · · Score: 4, Funny

    NYC is going to become the next boom town! That's when the whores move in! Oh, wait...

    1. Re:Boom Town by steelfood · · Score: 1

      It's about time! 42nd Street peep shows, here we go again!

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  10. Re:Mining is dangerous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article doesn't mention the use of any chemicals at all. He's just looking for scraps in the cracks of sidewalks and dirt, sweeping shit up, etc. It was likened in the article to picking up cans on the ground and redeeming them from nickels. I doubt you need any chemicals to do that either although you probably use them in mines to get the aluminum originally.

  11. "Prescious"? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 0

    C'mon guys, if you can't spell, use a spell-checker. They have their limitations, but you obviously need one.

    1. Re:"Prescious"? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      C'mon guys, if you can't spell, use a spell-checker. They have their limitations, but you obviously need one.

      Watt? Maui spell ink is purr fact. Yew justice two critic all, hat's awl. Bee nites two udders, wound and hew?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:"Prescious"? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Bee nites two udders,

      I just tried typing nites and it got flagged as a spelling error. Yep. There it is up there with the red underscoring.

    3. Re:"Prescious"? by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      knights?

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    4. Re:"Prescious"? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      My spelling checker was perfectly fine with it. I think yours is illiterate. :^)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    5. Re:"Prescious"? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So you have the 'People Magazine Reader' plug-in installed, I take it.

  12. Re:Landmines. by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 2

    That, too, was my first thought; my second involved him creating sidewalks with big square blocks of cobblestone and a pickaxe...

    --

    kurzweil_freak

    5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

    Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

  13. Re:Mining is dangerous. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, unlike gold (which does require large amounts of toxic chemicals to refine), aluminum isn't refined chemically; instead, it takes large amounts of electricity (which is why you didn't have aluminum production until the 20th century).

  14. The man has no idea.... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    In a production-level mine, you will get a lot more minerals out of it than a thousand bucks per week.

    1. Re:The man has no idea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A production level mine is a huge pit visible from space, requiring the movement of an ungodly ammount of rubble, and employing perhaps hundreds of people. If you think of him as the only "employee" of the mine, than he is doing better than many mine workers. Of course, that depends on the country. In Nevada, miners do just fine. They seem to do OK in Chile too, given the heroic efforts undertaken recently to rescue them. In some other countries the miners are virtually (or even really) slaves.

    2. Re:The man has no idea.... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      A production level mine is a huge pit visible from space...

      You're thinking of an open pit mine. Not all, or even most mines are like that. Some have a vertical shaft going straight down to where the seam of ore is, others have slanting shafts into the sides of mountains or hills that you can walk down. As an example, if the mine in Chile you mentioned had been an open pit, the miners either wouldn't have been trapped, or if they were, it wouldn't have been for anywhere near as long.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:The man has no idea.... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      In a production-level mine, you will get a lot more minerals out of it than a thousand bucks per week.

      Considering how much investment he's had to make in equipment and payroll, I'd say he's ahead of the cost curve.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:The man has no idea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working alone with a butter knife?

    5. Re:The man has no idea.... by mark-t · · Score: 1
      He doesn't say that though... he says that the amount he finds is greater than what you'd find in a mine - with no qualifiers.

      The amount he claims to find in a week might perhaps be equivalent to what you could get out a production level mine in a single day, if things were running very very slowly.

    6. Re:The man has no idea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop taking peoples' words so literally.

  15. "Can make" by Aladrin · · Score: 2

    Oh, "Can make". I thought he was averaging that at first.

    No, sometimes he almost makes $1000 (in the video, that's "over $800")... Other times, maybe he makes nothing? We don't know.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:"Can make" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also said he's been doing it since 1984, did he not?

      You've got to have a lot of faith in your earning ability to do something most people would find difficult, frustrating, and vile for the amount of time that he's been doing it.

  16. Re:Mining is dangerous. by Dishevel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do not feed the trolls.
    This is a hardcore quack fucker just trying to advertise here.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  17. Re:Mining is dangerous. by Adam_ST170 · · Score: 1
    From The Artice:

    "The stones are already cut and manufactured -- it's a step above a mine," he added. "I'm finding them already cut and polished. "You just have to get down on your knees and get it," he said. "It's the same principal as collecting cans on the street and redeeming them for nickels. It's redemption of reusable gold. This is the gold that has been on this street for 60 years. I know how to look, and I know where to look for it."

    The reason the article makes no mention of chemicals is because he doesn't use any.

  18. Mines ? by rossdee · · Score: 2

    My first thought was IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices like Iraq and Afghanistan )

    1. Re:Mines ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too.

    2. Re:Mines ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? IEDs = Mines in your mind? God bless the media and their bringing war into the mainstream. An IED is what you make yourself when you don't have access to a manufactured placed munition such as a mine (Claymore, Limpet, so on). Go eat a sammich.

    3. Re:Mines ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Improvised Explosive Devices like Iraq and Afghanistan

      I for one don't want to be anywhere near either of these when they blow up.

  19. Bull by molo · · Score: 1

    I walk on this street going to work, 47th between 5th and 6th. There is no way this guy is getting the equivalent of half an ounce of gold per week from the street. Its not like you look down and see flakes or anything. Insanity.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:Bull by royallthefourth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tomorrow they'll post an article about a sysadmin at a big company clearing out old home directories and supplementing his income by finding bitcoins.

    2. Re:Bull by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Based on what experience?

      How about you spend amonth doing it? or just following him around? No, that would be data, and it's much better to assume that even though you aren't specifically looking, clearly you would see things you aren't looking for in a manner that's least efficient for searching*.

      The probability that, on average and in that area, you can get a grand a month isn't really that bad.

      *granted, I am assuming you walk in a manner efficient for getting from A to B and not a systematic grid search.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Bull by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Hi, I'm a sysadmin. I see servers come and go at a local data center. As the owners pack up their equipment to leave, I often see bitcoins falling out of the vent holes and onto the floor. All you need to capture them is to use a token-ring field. It's a new advanced technology built off of the original token-ring network.

      For more information on how YOU can be in on this exclusive one in a lifetime offer, please e-mail me at imawanker@example.com for details.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Bull by Megane · · Score: 2

      That's because he's so good at keeping the street clean!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  20. Re:Mining is dangerous. by HelioWalton · · Score: 2

    But wouldn't some chiropractic dealings help prevent this destruction? Or would that just be caused by some subluxations?

  21. Clever ploy... by Kozz · · Score: 1

    Someone in the city's administration needed to clean the streets and sidewalks but ALSO save money, perhaps?

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  22. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man used to mine streets of NYC for $1,000 a week until he decided to tell his story to a reporter and droves of unemployed new yorkers decided to get in on the action themselves.

    1. Re:Correction by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Man used to mine streets of NYC for $1,000 a week until he decided to tell his story to a reporter and droves of unemployed new yorkers decided to get in on the action themselves.

      Get off my mine.

  23. Diamonds On The Soles Of Her Shoes by imgumbydamnit · · Score: 2

    Oh great, now I have the Paul Simon song stuck in my head:
    "People say I'm crazy
    I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes
    Well that's one way to lose
    These walking blues
    Diamonds on the soles of your shoes"

    --
    To err is human. To arr is pirate.
  24. Re:Mining is dangerous. by BizzyM · · Score: 1

    And this is how you ruin your perfectly good setup.... tell people about it. Now every kook and get-rich-quick wannabe will descend on NY's streets looking for dropped jewelery and whatnot with metal detectors you would expect to see at the beach and leave this guy with nothing except competition. Loose lips do what, again?

  25. NY, there is no such thing as "finder is keeper" by layer3switch · · Score: 1

    NY Personal Property Law Article 7-B section 252, anything over value of 20 dollars must be reported and file title to police. Fail to do so carries misdemeanor charge. If not claimed by owner, the property goes to the finder, only after he/she files for title of that property.

    I assume, this guy will be hit with misdemeanor charge pretty soon.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  26. ET impregnated me with Elvis' baby!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People... please... this is the New York Post!!!! It's no more believable than The Onion! (...or Fox News, same owner)

  27. Re:Mining is dangerous. by daedae · · Score: 1

    Although this is the first time I've seen him post without spouting any chiropractic terminology.

    Not saying he's not a troll, or even that he's not trolling in this case... but could this be the advent of a kinder, subtler "Dr." Bob troll?

  28. Rule 1 about find a gold vein by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shut 'ur trap.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Rule 1 about find a gold vein by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Yep. At least until you've mined it out, and this guy has kept his secret for some 27 years - until now.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  29. Re:NY, there is no such thing as "finder is keeper by geekoid · · Score: 1

    why? he finds lots of piece individually worth less the 20 dollars.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  30. Re:NY, there is no such thing as "finder is keeper by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

    Or each piece he finds isn't worth much, but the total of it all combined over a week is.

    So each piece may only be worth $2, but he finds 400 of them, bringing the total to $800. So I doubt that personal property law would apply

  31. Re:Mining is dangerous. by sadness203 · · Score: 1

    Well, there's a lot of berrylium extracted in the process, that goes into the air, it's not that "clean"

  32. Let me finish slapping myself first by nightcats · · Score: 1

    I worked for 20 yrs. in that area and walked those streets (47th - 49th between 5th and 6th Avenues) thousands of times with nothing more in my mind than annoyance at the street hawkers, bums, mendicants, and hustlers that clog the walkways. There used to be a great tech store there, by the way, corner of 6th Ave. and 48th, forget the name but spent plenty of time there. And a beautiful used book store on 47th amid all the jewelry shops ("wise men fish here"), and of course Scribner's on 5th Ave., where Faulkner and Fitzgerald used to hang out (last I checked it had been turned into a Benneton's, ugh). All those messianic crazies going up and down those block ("Moishiach is Coming!"). What a strange neighborhood. If you've never been to NYC, rent a Dustin Hoffman movie called "Marathon Man" and check out the beginning, which was filmed right there in the diamond district.

    --
    Development is programmable; Discovery is not programmable. (Fuller)
    1. Re:Let me finish slapping myself first by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Is it safe?

  33. Denver capitol gold dome, too by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    The capitol building of Denver has the dome covered with 200 ounces of 24 carat gold, and it needs replacing about every 40 years. That means it's losing several ounces per year, and most all of it is coming off in rainwater that ends up dumping through the drainage spouts down the sides. People tried to collect it, like this guy. I've been told, but can't find an online reference, that collecting rainwater from the Capitol Building was made illegal to prevent mayhem, so now it goes down the sewer.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:Denver capitol gold dome, too by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      The collection of rain water from the capitol building being banned might also have to do with water rights, since I know that it is big deal in in that area of the country and those laws can be pretty bizarre as well.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:Denver capitol gold dome, too by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      True in some places in Colorado things like rain barrels are illegal. Which doesn't make much sense to me at all but there you go.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Denver capitol gold dome, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then, don't collect it. Filter it!

    4. Re:Denver capitol gold dome, too by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 200 ounces in 40 years means 5 ounces of gold per year, at say $1500 an ounce (not exactly true because troy ounce > normal ounce) = 5 * 1500 = $7,500 a year. Yeah I think I just found my new full time job. Not.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Denver capitol gold dome, too by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      The capitol building of Denver has the dome covered with 200 ounces of 24 carat gold, and it needs replacing about every 40 years. That means it's losing several ounces per year, and most all of it is coming off in rainwater that ends up dumping through the drainage spouts down the sides. People tried to collect it, like this guy. I've been told, but can't find an online reference, that collecting rainwater from the Capitol Building was made illegal to prevent mayhem, so now it goes down the sewer.

      Does it make gold bricks?

    6. Re:Denver capitol gold dome, too by operagost · · Score: 1

      It does if you graft from the water company. If you disagree, consider how when a town decides to build a sewage treatment plant or city water, they usually force residents to hook up at their own cost.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Denver capitol gold dome, too by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2

      True in some places in Colorado things like rain barrels are illegal. Which doesn't make much sense to me at all but there you go.

      It's not that they're illegal per se. It's that in arid states, water rights are more than 100% used, and first in time of use gets first priority, meaning the people who have water rights older than yours, get to use their entire allotment of water before you get to use any. Collecting rainwater means someone else doesn't get their full allotment. As it turns out, California is one of the major water rights holders, so it's not because the guy down the street is complaining that you can't retain the water that would otherwise run off your land into the gutter: it's because the likes of California and Arizona have won large numbers of SCOTUS rulings upholding their water rights. (I've been told that water rights cases are the largest category of cases to go to the Supreme Court, but don't have a citation.)

      And not being able to collect water in a rainbarrel is by no means the weirdest consequence of this: people who live near irrigation ditches or rivers have been required to cut down trees, because the trees are sucking up groundwater that is being replenished by leakage into the water table from the canal or river.

      Water rights is a huge facet of local and state governments in arid states.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    8. Re:Denver capitol gold dome, too by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Not really in this case. It is mainly to do with water rights. As one person pointed out that the largest water rights holders in are actually in California and Arizona. The idea is that you have first rights to the water that falls on your ground but that you do not second or third rights. For example it is also illegal to use gray water to water your own plants. So after making your pasta that water must go down to sink. It is also illegal in some places to wash your own car. They are actually amending the law on rain barrels or trying to because they realize that it is a bit silly for the average home owner.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  34. Foraging would have been a better word, then by Benfea · · Score: 1

    I would chide you for being pedantic, but pot... kettle... yeah.

  35. That's right you bunch of foreigners! by vawwyakr · · Score: 1

    This is America and our streets are paved in silver, gold, platinum and some highly carcinogenic chemicals......

  36. This article is from the New York Post by Benfea · · Score: 1

    C'mon, guys. Pay attention. The NYP has about as much credibility as your average supermarket gossip rag. That's not to say that everything they say is wrong, but if they're your only source to a story don't put much stock in it.

    1. Re:This article is from the New York Post by spymagician · · Score: 1

      +1 Thank You... Glad someone pointed that out.

    2. Re:This article is from the New York Post by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter? Unless you're planning on sweeping the streets for gold yourself, nobody cares whether the story is true or not.

  37. In tonight's news... by Loopy · · Score: 1

    NY City code enforcement officer fines man for mining gold without a permit. The city's spokesman commented, "If we're going to hold grade-school girls with lemonade stands to our stringent codes, we can't rightly overlook this guy, can we?" The mayor could not be reached for comment.

  38. Re:Mining is dangerous. by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    Whatever it is I vote it should die.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  39. Re:Mining is dangerous. by repapetilto · · Score: 1

    It'll be like a tourist attraction with this dude as the guide. Go to 47th street and look for gold in the gutter while your gf looks at shoes and necklaces or whatever.

  40. STOP! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Stop linking to NY Post articles! It is not a credible news source. Chances are they invented this 47th street gold miner.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  41. Re:Mining is dangerous. by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

    Don't forget cryolite, which is apparently toxic to insects (I don't know about humans).

    And people said high school chemistry would never come in handy!

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  42. Re:Mining is dangerous. by yurtinus · · Score: 1

    But we could make it into spheres... and then power our spaceships with them!!!

    --
    +1 Disagree
  43. Re:Landmines. by tacarat · · Score: 1

    That's horrible. Mod up please.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  44. Mining by squidflakes · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what the address is for the Streets of New York server, but only a thousand a week and he's only selling the gold? What's he doing with all the stone, gravel, sand, dirt, redstone, diamond, and lapis he's probably finding?

    1. Re:Mining by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      lapis is basically worthless, still.

  45. Students loans are DEBT not INCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can understand how you might be confused because you can spend them on food, housing, etc but that doesn't change the fact that they are loans. Anyone who claims student loans as income to the IRS certainly needs more schooling! LOL

  46. Re:Mining is dangerous. by slackzilly · · Score: 1

    More people looking for gold on the streets -> More people developing back or neck pain...

    --
    - "If one man can create that much hate, you can only imagine how much love we as a togetherness can create."
  47. Not much good... by Krater76 · · Score: 1

    All that gold isn't going to do him much good when the creepers, skeletons and zombies come around. If he can't find some wood, coal, and cobblestone, he's in for a long, dark night hiding in some dirt hole in Central Park.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    1. Re:Not much good... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that about the only useful purposes for gold are a watch (and you only need one), and powered rails. What a tree puncher...

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  48. Lost Property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming someone once owned these bits of valuables, wouldn't he need to wait before claiming the property?

  49. Re:Mining is dangerous. by rally2xs · · Score: 1

    Naw... that's dilythium... and they're crystals anyway...

  50. Re:Mining is dangerous. by drsmack1 · · Score: 1

    So, what does this have to do with backs and back pain? Someone please speak to the submitter and let them know that this site is for "News for Chiropractic Spammers, backs that matter".

  51. 47th street between 6th and 5th ave's by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    That's the Diamond district where there are lots of sweat shops. My father worked for several large jewelry firms as a diamond setter. The back rooms where the artisans worked wasn't air conditioned during the summer and the large windows were left open (they were the awning type that opened with small slats so you couldn't really jump or fall out of an open window). Many of the work benches were right up against the window, and I could believe that some small stuff would fall to the street now and then. A lot of the gold that got 'lost' was the bits between castings that get cut off. Jewelry is cast using the lost wax technique. Molds are made from latex rubber carrying the impression of the original artwork. Wax is injected into these molds to make wax castings. Next these castings are attached to wax rods which are attached to a base. These rods will form the channels into which molten gold is poured. The wax assembly is lowered into a cylinder and plaster is then poured into the cylinder and allowed to harden. The wax is then melted out which also cures the plaster removing all moisture. This forms a plaster mold into which molten gold is poured. The rods connecting the castings are waste gold which is recycled, but bits of it sometimes get lost (and this adds up). Even the gold filings that are removed from the castings to mount diamonds and other stones is saved to be recycled. Still a far amount probably got blow out the open windows and fell to the street. Small diamonds are hard to mount. The artisan has to drill holes to sit the stone into and raise prongs over the stone with a small chisel. If he slips he can chip the stone or it might go flying away. (small diamonds of fractional carrots are not super expensive, but a piece can have many of them so it adds up).

  52. Per the usual by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I actually read the article and it made no mention of Raffi earning almost 1000.00 per week. Slashdot can be a wee bit prone to embellishment. Raffi probably got lucky when he made 819.00 in 6 days but this, by no means, implies that this is a regular amount of revenue. Although, I give the guy credit for ingenuity.

  53. Re:Mining is dangerous. by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

    Reference is Galaxy Quest. Their Star Trek spoof uses Beryllium spheres.

  54. Re: Clarification by bmo · · Score: 1

    >Crime is at historic lows since they started keeping records

    I said that and it's complete nonsense, because obviously records were kept going all the way back to New Amsterdam.

    I really meant to say "Since statistics have been published" and that would be 1963 - nearly 50 years ago.

    --
    BMO

  55. Musical goatse? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Oh great, now I have the Paul Simon song stuck in my head:

    Hmm... that must be annoying. Let me replace it with something else:-

    "Here's a little song I wrote,
    You might want to sing it note for note,
    Don't worry,
    Be happy."


    Oh, that's okay... not at all, don't mention it! ;-)

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  56. Minecraft New York? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The creepers do come out at night there.

  57. Re:NY, there is no such thing as "finder is keeper by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    So each piece may only be worth $2, but he finds 400 of them, bringing the total to $800. So I doubt that personal property law would apply

    Er... why would you think that? If we only have the OP's reporting of the law to go on (and it's correct) then in the absence of any law or regulation that would tie together otherwise unrelated incidences of lost-and-found (i.e. lost by different people) what legal basis would there be for being able to "add them up" like that instead of treating them separately? None, as far as I can see.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  58. OK, not really seeing why this is a Slashdot story by gosand · · Score: 1

    or did we get rid of the "news for nerds, stuff that matters" part?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  59. Re:Mining is dangerous. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    No, you see, gems with subluxations are only valuable if, phrenologically speaking, you lump them together underneath a pyramid, where they can infuse your chi with healing and, um, inner serenity. And stuff.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  60. Re:Mining is dangerous. by imhennessy · · Score: 1

    or defeat the Shadow.

    --
    Like to brew? Want to talk about it? Brattlebrew: groups.yahoo.com/group/brattlebrew
  61. Similar Story-- by Guppy · · Score: 1

    http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-06-09/news/29638632_1_gold-dust-gold-rush-jewelry-district

    Deep below the workshops in Baghdad's cramped, rundown jewelry district, unemployed men spend their days scouring the city's sewer system for the one thing they say can bring them money: flakes of gold. Several times a month, men desperate for an income descend as far as 15 feet into the dark in search of gold bits that have been washed down the drain by craftsmen cleaning up after a day of etching and molding jewelry.

  62. Made a marginal living a lot worse for himself. by mianne · · Score: 1

    ~$800/week doesn't go very far in NYC though. Meanwhile he's not only pulling precious metals and gems out of sidewalk cracks but also shards of glass, toxic substances (cadmium, lead, etc) bacteria from animals and the homeless, and likely other hazardous substances. He has to get up close and personal with it to retrieve it and then bring all the material to his friend's studio and sift through it by hand.

    He's likely uncovering finds deposited over the last 100 years or so, and while occasionally someone loses an earring on the street, most likely he's collecting faster than it's being generated. Advertising his income stream to the world not only will get copycats out there, but will alert the tax authorities to his activities if they were not already in on it.

    He's turned a potentially dangerous profession with only a moderate income with little future growth potential into something a whole lot worse by sharing his story.

    --
    Javascript, cookies, flash, and ActiveX must be enabled in order to view this sig.
  63. Big article about this in India's gold district by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NYtimes magazine had an article about this phenomenon in India's gold filigree carving districts, with street-people trailing and tailing the workers as they went home and sweeping up behind them to catch any loose flecks of gold left over from the gold-engraving carving work.

  64. Re:Mining is dangerous. by mug+funky · · Score: 1

    THIS

    he'd make much more than $1000 a week doing walking tours and asking for donations at the end.

  65. Re:Mining is dangerous. by mug+funky · · Score: 2

    you don't find "-1 funny" to be even slightly amusing?

  66. Re:OK, not really seeing why this is a Slashdot st by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    It's a fairly nerdy topic.

    I would even go so far as to say that it's more nerdy than a large bulk of the 'IT related' stories that get posted. Slashdot has gotten pretty badly infected with IT types in the last decade. Sometimes they even assume that's Slashdot's target audience.

  67. Re:Mining is dangerous. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Errr, electrolysis isn't chemistry?

    Speechless.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"