Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Killing DVDs Like Apple Killed Floppies?

cheezitmike writes "While there has been lots of outcry about Netflix separating their DVD service from their streaming service, media expert Eric Garland says they're just doing to the DVD what Apple did to the floppy disk. 'I was reminded of so many precedents: Facebook revamping its user interface, the introduction of the first Blueberry iMac, the one with the conspicuously missing 3.5-inch floppy drive on the front. All of these were moments when there was a paradigm shift that led to an immediate public outcry. People made a lot of noise and had a lot of complaints. People were very upset about these shifts...until they weren't. In the news cycle, the outcry is significant and it is problematic, but it's also important to note how quickly these things are forgotten.'"

52 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What did apple do to floppies?

    1. Re:Apple by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny
      You don't remember? They went around, door to door, and stole the floppy drive from every macintosh ever created. You had a Mac with a built-in floppy drive? Too bad asshole, now you need to shell out for an external floppy drive.

      Or maybe they introduced a new line of computers without a floppy drive and the comparison doesn't apply.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Apple by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure, but I think it involved Vaseline, peanut brittle, and a keg.

    3. Re:Apple by Canazza · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everyone knows AOL killed the floppy disk when they gave everyone a CD ROM with the whole Internet on it.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    4. Re:Apple by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      LOL....but getting back on topic...

      I don't get it...I'm surprised I see as many people as I do opting for streaming over the disks from Netflix with this price rise. Is this mainly people that do not have a nice HD tv to watch on.....?

      I mean, I've been with netflix since 2000. I've always been on the 3 out at a time...and upgraded to bluray.

      The streaming, was a nice add on...for free.

      However, I pretty much only used streaming (when I could find something good in the very limited selection) for older shows or movies that weren't very high quality source material.

      But for newer movies or shows...I'm always opting for bluray rental. I mean, I didn't shell out over $2K for a 59" plasma HD tv (and I have a sound system to back up the great image) to just watch substandard source material on. I mean, streaming can't match the quality video/audio that I get on a bluray disk.

      *sigh*....are there really that few people today that care about quality audio and video? I guess. Then again, I"m one of those that has refused to buy music online until it comes in a lossless format with no DRM. I buy CD's....and rip them myself to lossy formats for portable players in lesser listening environments (gym, car)...but I'd rather have the best source I can get for my living room where I have spent years since my childhood building a quality audio/video system. I'm not talking about the crazy audiophile stuff you hear about (frozen cables for $1K/ft, etc)...but solid equipment.

      Ok...enough said...I ramble...but if you do ignore the audio aspect of it...most of the good HD tv's coming out today DO present an awesome picture, so, just wondering...why so many people settle for streaming when they spent so much $$ on a quality HDTV?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Apple by justsomebody · · Score: 2

      it is quite simple. their brilliant move away from floppies was like this
      - apple stopped deploying floppy drive with G3 and replaced it with another even more abysmal technology... zip drive, which off course flopped badly for its disks being so easy corruptable.
      - G4 stopped zip nonsense, leaving users complaining how there was no external device where they could save data to. floppy removed, no more scsi, cd-rom by default and lack of any usb external device. you couldn't believe how many usb floppies were sold in that time for macs. company i worked for in that time sold few more than they sold macs
      but who are we to judge what steve the holly decided it is best for their users

      I for one simply stopped using floppies in 486 era as soon as i bought my first cd recorder. never bought one floppy drive after that

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    6. Re:Apple by RoverDaddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I didn't shell out over $2K for a 59" plasma HD tv (and I have a sound system to back up the great image) to just watch substandard source material on.

      Well there you go. I -didn't' shell out $2K for a 59" plasma HD tv. My TV is 32" LCD, only 780p. No sound system, just the TV speakers.

      The big win for streaming for me and my kids is that I get to decide what I want to watch -right now-, not two days from now when I can get turnaround of my latest DVD from Netflix. Yes, it's mostly back catalog, but so what: it's not like I've already seen every movie ever made. There are dozens of flicks from the past 5 years I still haven't seen. And my daughter is gobbling up the tween-age series available like she's never had TV before.

      I'll be dropping the DVD subscription when the price goes up. For the occasional desire to see a recent release, I'll go Redbox.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    7. Re:Apple by localman57 · · Score: 5, Informative

      even more abysmal technology... zip drive, which off course flopped badly for its disks being so easy corruptable.

      Wtf? Zip was revolutionary at the time. A typical 486 had a 200 to 400 Meg hard drive. A lot of the computers couldn't even address more space than that without a software hack to simulate LBA. A single $20 zip disk represented 1/4 to 1/1 of a typical PC hard drive. The Zip drive was the first reasonable device on which a user could easily back up their entire computer. Yeah, they had reliablity problems, but the cost per megabyte and ease with which they could be moved from PC to PC (parallel port version) was totally unmatched at the time. They sold millons of them for a reason.

      I for one simply stopped using floppies in 486 era as soon as i bought my first cd recorder. never bought one floppy drive after that

      Your timeline is off, or you were fabulously weathy. The 486 golden era was around 93' to 95. (the pentium 60 came out around '94). At that time, many computers shipped without CD drives of any sort. A really hot-shot machine had a 4x reader and no writer. Even around '97 a CDR (not RW) cost many hundreds of dollars, ran at 1x or 2x speeds, required a 3rd party program because there was no OS integration (and they were all horrible), and produced as many coasters as finalized disks, at nearly $1 per disk.

    8. Re:Apple by eln · · Score: 3

      I have a 1080p TV. I use Netflix streaming all the time, and I've had the same Netflix DVD out for about 6 months now. I switched my plan to the streaming only plan just recently, and as soon as I find where I put that DVD, I'll mail it back in.

      It's really a matter of convenience and immediacy. With streaming, I can choose from a pretty good selection of movies and TV shows as soon as I decide I want to watch one. I don't have to try to predict what I'll be in the mood to watch 3 days from now, and I don't have to sift through the smoldering ruins of a video store or deal with the tiny selection of a Redbox.

      Yes, the streaming quality is worse than, say, blu ray, but it's still perfectly adequate for most movies. Hell, I grew up on VHS, and the streaming is much better than that.

      So why do I have the HDTV at all? Because certain movies really benefit from it, and those movies I'll usually rent on DVD or blu ray from a Redbox (or the locally-owned kiosk that has better movies, probably because they buy the "not for rental" copies of movies and rent them out anyway), or buy them on blu ray. Also, televised sports are better on HD (although they're not full 1080p of course).

    9. Re:Apple by SomePgmr · · Score: 2

      The big win for streaming for me and my kids is that I get to decide what I want to watch -right now-, not two days from now when I can get turnaround of my latest DVD from Netflix.

      A million times, this. I used to cycle out the one DVD at a time thing... but like others, it tends to sit around forever until I watch it. I know my friends and family have this problem too.

      In the meantime, I'm cruising through 20 discs worth of TV shows I like and various movies I wouldn't want to gamble on getting in the mail. Streaming from a large catalog of content suits both my indecisiveness and sense of immediacy, just right. And the picture is quite good, if even as a trade-off for unmatched convenience.

    10. Re:Apple by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 2

      I think your are off by a few years. My 486 that I got for college in 1991 had a CD drive in it. Every new computer that I saw had a CD drive by 1994. I remember getting a CD burner for less then $100 in 1996. I remember the pent II I got in late 1997 had a CD and 4x CD burner in it.

  2. ha by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple has never been relevant enough on the desktop to kill any desktop technology. PC CD-Rs and then the internet killed floppy drives.

    1. Re:ha by Stormthirst · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That and cheap USB keys which were faster, considerably more reliable and many times the capacity.

    2. Re:ha by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      somehow they were relevant enough to push and make popular by being early adopters, even of tech they didn't invent and even of things others sold but didn't make wildly popular. USB, Firewire, SCSI, gui with mouse, touch smartphones,

    3. Re:ha by eln · · Score: 2

      Cheap CD-R drives and the ability in basically every BIOS to boot directly from a CD completely killed any advantage the floppy had. Apple's decision to stop putting floppy drives in their computers was a response to the already-obvious obsolescence of the technology. They didn't kill the floppy, it was already dead by that point. PC makers kept including floppy drives in their machines for a while after that because some PC buyers wanted them for some reason and they were so cheap as to be practically free for OEMs.

    4. Re:ha by Missing.Matter · · Score: 2

      Oh they did come later than CDRs, but nothing truly replace the functionality of the floppy until thumb drives. USB drives were small and portable, robust, rewritable, sharable, and as of Windows 2000/ME could be plugged into almost any computer. Still they were more expensive than the floppy, but of course that changed rapidly.

    5. Re:ha by Missing.Matter · · Score: 2

      The iMac came out in 1998.... the same year as a little known operating system that found its way on to 90% of computers and also happened to include native USB support.

    6. Re:ha by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would you want to do that? (I'll make an exception if you work for a charity or something that won't waste donations on modern hardware).

      Older hardware has it uses. I mean, you don't need a brand new, screaming i7 multi-core box with SLI graphics cards to run a home firewall with iptables, etc....you don't need it to make a nice little audio server for the home stereo to host your music collection ripped to flac, etc.

      I am by NO stretch of the imagination a 'green' person, tree hugger or someone who has ever bothered with recycling anything...BUT, hey, if something is still useful, why spend money on something new if the old will keep working reliably for awhile longer?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:ha by TimeOut42 · · Score: 2

      Nope, I had a Diamond RIO Mp3 player (huge full size HD w/ an LCD Screen), keyboards, mice, cameras, etc. Apple's baby was Firewire, not USB. Apple had Zip to do with the passing of floppies.

      It was the increase in the RAM in computers which resulted in much larger programs being written. Since high speed network connectivity didn't really exist, there had to be a different medium to install all these huge programs; 30 disks just wasn't going to cut it. So, the next logical choice at the time was either Zip Drives or CD-roms. Zip drives were slow and too expensive to have any real staying power, so it fell to CDs. The next step after that was DVDs. Now that we have better connectivity we are seeing external media beginning to make it's exit.

      But, it certainly wasn't Apple that drove that cart off the cliff.

      Sean

    8. Re:ha by LateArthurDent · · Score: 2

      Apple has never been relevant enough on the desktop to kill any desktop technology. PC CD-Rs and then the internet killed floppy drives.

      If anything, one of the reasons I refused to buy an Apple back in those days was the lack of a floppy disk. I stayed with a floppy drive right up until USB flash drives were cheap enough and front-facing USB ports were ubiquitous. Actually, I stayed with them a little bit longer, until it was possible to flash my motherboard's bios with a thumb drive.

      I own apple computers now though (when they switched to Intel and I knew I could dual-boot windows).

    9. Re:ha by boarder8925 · · Score: 2

      Never had any issues with my floppies shitting out on me. Zip disks, however...

    10. Re:ha by icebraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, if it's supposed to run 24/7 for some months or even years, it might be 'greener' to get a new device like a router that runs Linux or a Sheevaplug, since they'll probably use much less energy than older machines (the Sheeva uses about 7W or so).

    11. Re:ha by dave420 · · Score: 2

      *cough* Windows 98 SE *cough*

    12. Re:ha by localman57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The funny thing is, in a lot of elecrical engineering labs the floppy is still alive and well. A lot of expensive measurement equipment, such as Techtronix oscilloscopes and logic analyzers had a floppy inside for storing .bmp files of the captured wave forms, and tables of raw captured data. These devices remain useful for many, many years, as the measurement capabilities change/improve much more slowly than the digital interfaces to them. There's a USB floppy disk drive duct-taped to one of our lab benches downstairs for just this reason.

    13. Re:ha by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Both of which took a couple years to become affordable after Apple prematurely killed floppies.

      I was still using floppies long after Apple "killed" them. And when a worthy replacement came along... I switched.

    14. Re:ha by rotorbudd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We have several planes, jets I might add, that use floppies to update nav databases. That's a lot of floppies every 2 weeks.
      We could get the CD upgrade but Honeywell wants 12 grand for each aircraft.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it, but artillery is addressed to " Whom It May concern"
    15. Re:ha by rotorbudd · · Score: 2

      Our avionics guy. He's got PLENTY of time.
      Both of the floppy planes are BAE 125s (British built from the early 80's)
      Everything else uses memory cards with data downloaded from Jepps.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it, but artillery is addressed to " Whom It May concern"
  3. No. by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, it's nothing like that. CD-ROMs were already well adopted by the time floppies came along, and there was no licensing issue going from floppy to optical media the way there is when going from optical to streaming.

    So no, the comparison isn't meaningful.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:No. by jaymz666 · · Score: 2

      No, I guess my point is that we went from installing an application on 27 floppies in which one could be bad and kill the whole process, to installing an application on a single CD.
      Since DVDs are RO, that's what my comparison is based on

    2. Re:No. by mswhippingboy · · Score: 2

      CD-ROMs were already well adopted by the time floppies came along.

      Wha?

      .gnola emac seippolf emit eht by detpoda llew ydaela erew sMOR-DC

      There, FTFA.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    3. Re:No. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh, sorry, but that's simply not true.

      Floppy disks were around long before the CD was invented, much less the CD-ROM.

  4. Totally false analogy. by Kenja · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple did not build their business model on providing floppy disks to people like Netflix did with DVDs. What's more, floppy disks faded into disuse due to higher capacity formats being available. With ISP data caps and poor streaming quality, DVDs are simply better for most people compared to streaming only service.

    All Netflix is doing is chasing away customers. The reasons behind this can be debated, costs etc, but the end result is the same. More money for less service means fewer customers.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Totally false analogy. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      killing dvd deliveries kills netflix. simple as that. soon enough pretty much any company can license the stuff from studios, buy space and bandwidth from the cloud and that's it. but setting up the logistics for the dvd mailer system - now that's not something anyone can do.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Totally false analogy. by Prosthetic_Lips · · Score: 2

      To me, the only way Netflix is going to be able to sustain this new pricing is if they get a similar set of movies in their streaming system as on DVD. I have Netflix, and so many of the movies I want to watch (or parts of a series -- ugh) are on DVD that I have no choice but to keep both.

      So, when the price goes up, I'm just going to cancel the whole service. If I can't give you money to watch a movie I want to see, what good does it do me? I'll just have to run down to Redbox or some other competitor and get the movie some other way.

      Do I think Netflix is going to kill the DVD? Not if they cannot get the studios to expand their streaming library.

  5. Not yet. by kehren77 · · Score: 2

    Maybe if they offered their entire DVD library via streaming. But even then, there are still many people who don't have streaming hooked up to their TV or are in a rural area where they have no access to broadband.

  6. No by jaymz666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have you seen the lines at redbox units on the weekend? Four and five people deep at out local Kroger, with two redbox vending machines.

    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a shopping bag loaded with DVDs.

      Well, okay, the bandwidth isn't that great, perhaps, but I'm pretty sure you'd hit your ISP's 'unlimited' (FUCK YOU ISPS) cap well before you'd hit the bag's maximum capacity. :p

    2. Re:No by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      Yup, that's how I watch movies because a large chunk of our U.S. internet is behind third world class in its ability to stream or even deliver movies in a timely manner. AT&T's trickle of a pipe (3 MB/sec) isn't sufficient with my family of four and my various other IT things going.

  7. Like Vanilla Ice? by geoffrobinson · · Score: 4, Funny

    like Vanilla Ice was able to kill our brain like a poisonous mushroom?

    Can we get any other good examples?

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  8. A Long Death by Lance+Dearnis · · Score: 2

    No, I don't think so - not for a while. The Redbox model is highly productive. People still want the premium editions, still want the Blu-Rays. Not everyone has the bandwith needed for high quality streaming. People still prize the reliability and dependency of physical media, ESPECIALLY with how sometimes things just disappear from Netflix. If Netflix is killing DVDs (Which I'll admit is possible), I don't see DVDs dying for about a decade, at least, as the content models have to shift first - and those guys are notorious for suing the pants off of everyone, getting stupid laws passed to protect their industry, and have tons of money to fight with.

    1. Re:A Long Death by HikingStick · · Score: 2

      Redbox is doing things that I believe hurt its own model, though, too. Inventories have been split between Blue Ray and standard DVD (meaning fewer titles for either format). Now, with the addiiton of game titles, that further erodes the space available for a variety of titles. Of the last half-dozen times my wife and I have stopped at a Redbox location, we only rented once (though we intended to rent each time). We just couldn't find any titles that interested us in stock (the ones we wanted were already checked out).

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  9. Haven't bought new DVDs in years by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

    In looking at how I consume media from Netflix I have basically been mostly a streaming customer since they have started expanding their selection. In the past year I have gotten 1 new DVD that I have gotten around to watching. I don't have cable and live in a low area so over the air digital TV is mostly out (I only get 2 channels now) so most of my "TV" is done streaming over the internet. My wife or I can watch most recent episodes of shows we like from Hulu, or directly from the networks, and for older shows and movies we can watch them off of Netflix. The $9 a month I pay is great for the all I can eat video buffet I currently enjoy, I don't even mind the commercials on the free Hulu or network sites since that is what you get when watching cable or over the air TV anyway. I would have had the internet connection I have anyway since I do push a lot of data in and out of my computer each month any way.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  10. Bondi, not Blueberry by tverbeek · · Score: 2

    For the record, the iMac that debuted without a floppy drive came in only one color: Bondi Blue. The Blueberry iMac was part of a later generation.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  11. PC Games Killed the Floppy by chronosan · · Score: 2

    But I don't think they can be blamed for DVD's demise. PC Games almost went from CD distribution direct to digital, very few years on DVD.

  12. E-mail killed floppies by rwade · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would say that the wide-adoption of corporate/small-business e-mail systems in the mid-late 90s killed the floppy disk. Up until then, legal assistants, secretaries, financial analysts, and other workers on the lower-rungs would truck a floppy disk from desk to desk to collaborate with colleagues, present work to the boss, or deliver documents to clients. With e-mail, the small files that could go on floppy disks could more easily be sent more easily with even the slower LAN and shared-internet connections.

  13. Re:Lol 1998? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gee, I dunno dumbass... people who needed to SAVE stuff ? In 1998, a CD burner cost about $700, plus another $200 for the SCSI adapter. I know, I was the only guy in town with one, and business was gooooood!

  14. They're making the same flawed assumption as Apple by jaskelling · · Score: 2

    They're assuming that everyone has cheap, reliable, easily available broadband. Whether it be for movies, operating system downloads, or just everyday use, this is a patently false assumption. When the floppy was killed, DVD/CD media was an immediately available replacement for many, if not all users simply by visiting their local store. In this case, users are at the behest of other companies who do not have a financial incentive to provide service to many areas - let alone ensure reliability or access. This is before we even mention the picture & sound quality or the constant "rebuffering" waits. Yes, all you lovely people who loudly proclaim the death of physical media for downloading - many of us envy your ability to make that change. And before someone says "Well move to somewhere that it's available", I live in a major metropolitan area, top 25 DMA. The internet service sucks due to poor infrastructure, regardless of who you subscribe to. And let's not forget bandwidth caps. Downloading/streaming only is not yet a viable permanent solution.

  15. Apple fanboys are funny by 0123456 · · Score: 2

    Apple may have been among the first to stop supporting floppies, but only a fanboy would claim that removing them from Apple machines that made up a minute percentage of the desktop market somehow killed them. Floppies simply became obsolete, though I still had to find a floppy disk to install a BIOS upgrade on a new system as late as 2008.

  16. That and USB drives by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    The Mac Zealot RDF version of history says "Apple stopped including floppies and they died off!" However if you look at what actually happened it was more like they stopped shipping floppies and users had to run out and buy USB floppy drives because there was no replacement. I remember at the newspaper I worked at when we got a bunch of iMacs for our newsroom, and they all needed to have floppy drives so that journalists could transfer stories to and from them.

    The floppy started dying when CD-RWs got cheap, and also to an extent with zip disks (anyone else remember those). However CD-RWs were kinda inconvenient as a replacement and zips not all that universal. When it really started dying off was when USB drives got cheap. They were a complete and easy replacement for floppies. There was no reason to use a floppy instead of one.

    That Apple stopped shipping floppies and they then died off years later is of no real relevance. While it helped the process along, it did not cause it by any stretch of the imagination. They stopped using floppies long before there was a useful replacement, hence people had to add them back.

    Now Netflix is different. What they are doing, along with others like Steam, is offering a service that provides an alternative to DVDs. Thus they really are helping to kill it off. They aren't saying "We are taking away the hardware, you figure out what to do," they are saying "Here's something that makes the hardware unnecessary, if you want."

  17. USA is not the world by JReykdal · · Score: 2

    As Netflix is AFAIK an american thing the rest of the world is still using DVD's.

  18. Neither one happened by hoppo · · Score: 2

    Apple killed the floppy? They killed a technology by omitting it from a product whose market share couldn't even be measured in single-digit percentages? I know Steve Jobs is amazing and all, but that's just super human.

    Apple merely recognized the obsolescence of the floppy disk, and omitted it because it was overhead that provided little value. Netflix is recognizing that streaming is the future of their business, and is acting to make that future as lucrative as possible.

    The article assumes these companies are causing trends, when they are merely reacting to them.

  19. Floppy was not killed by Apple. by scorp1us · · Score: 2

    Floppy died a painfully slow death, but did thanks to Zip disks (100MB capacity, and could survive back-pack abuse much better than the 3.5" 1.44MB cousin) Which worked for a while (having to carry around the Zip drive... but really USB flash killed it all. Highly durable, will survive laundry. Small, fast, and accepted everywhere.

    DVDs in comparison are fragile. Scratched media. Over-powered lasers (lie on some Sony players) kill RW disks.

    And for those of us on the "edge" wireless and dropbox is replacing any media at all.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.