Slashdot Mirror


Copycat "hiPhone 5" Surfaces In China

hypnosec writes "A fake iPhone 5, inspired by the leaked images of the device, has been discovered to be on sale in China. The quality of the hiPhone 5 varies with the price, with the most premium version of the device being available for 800 yuan or £76. The device reportedly comes in red and pink. Chinese media is reporting that the fake iPhone 5 is thinner than the iPhone 4 and comes with round edges. Other reports are claiming that the device is extremely light and almost feels like that one is holding a plastic toy. The reports are likely based on some images that were leaked by the supply chain." Since they're going to the trouble of building counterfeit stores, the knock-off phones shouldn't surprise anyone.

227 comments

  1. Commentary on the Dollar? by Sociable+Scientician · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it a telling commentary on the decline of the US dollar that the price, on an American website such as Slashdot, is quoted only in yuan and pounds sterling?

    1. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reuters is an American website?

      Oh, you mean the copy-and-paste job on Slashdot. Nope, not surprising at all.

    2. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Baloroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. It is, however, extremely odd, considering that Reuters lists only the dollar and yuan amount. I'm extremely confused why pounds sterling entered into it. Perhaps the submitter has an axe to grind about /. being an American website?

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    3. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by ushere · · Score: 2

      us$ in australia fluctuates daily - last year it was hovering around 60>70 cents aus - now it's $1.08. so as a 'standard' it's now more than useless....

    4. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yuan is the local price, and Reuters is a British company.

      Make sense now?

    5. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Obviously it isn't a judged to be a huge threat to Apple. If it becomes one, action will be taken swiftly -- the USTR can wield the Super 301 at any time.

    6. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by bahface · · Score: 1

      Thieving, lying, completely dishonest. I think that describes much of what goes on the USA as well.

    7. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by siddesu · · Score: 3, Informative

      As to the "thieving", you should remember that US was involved in a large-scale theft of "intellectual property" from the rest of the world until the harmonization of copyright laws post WWII. Which harmonization happened because at that time US authors asked the US government for it. The same thing will eventually happen in China, when they amass enough "intellectual property" they want to make money from. Give them another 20 years.

    8. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Darkness404 · · Score: 2

      How are they lying or thieving anymore than "Dr. Thunder" or "Mountain Thunder" sodas being sold at grocery stores? These are simply off-brand cell phones in the same way "Dr. Thunder" is an off-brand version of Dr. Pepper, only sold for a better price.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    9. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by thesh0ck · · Score: 0

      Its actually in US$ on the real article. Whoever made this post put it in pounds.

    10. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you're a retard. Every currency fluctuates in relation to every other currency.

    11. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA are going to sue and cite prior art

    12. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are these numbers coming from?

      A year ago today, the US dollar was 1.11 aus. Now it's 1.02.

    13. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      No. It is, however, extremely odd, considering that Reuters lists only the dollar and yuan amount. I'm extremely confused why pounds sterling entered into it. Perhaps the submitter has an axe to grind about /. being an American website?

      Yes it looks like the submitter changed the currency, but wild speculation about why is still wild speculation - and you seem to be a touchy about it.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    14. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Larryish · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine the tagline:

      '"hiPhone 5: If you thought it was an iPhone, you must have been high."

    15. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful
      So long as it's a "hi-Phone" and clearly not an "iPhone," I don't see what your problem is, or why this is a story.

      As for the "lying, theiving, completely dishonest Chinese" nobody is forcing Apple to put their manufacturing there.

    16. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Nope. Lots of countries tie their exchange rate to the dollar.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Better than the real article would be the real product listings. It's here somewhere:

      http://www.taobao.com/

    18. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that, as noted in previous comments, the original Reuters article used Yuan and USD; the person who posted onto Slashdot converted it to pounds.

    19. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by halowolf · · Score: 1

      Honestly, when you outsource so much manufacturing to other countries that have cheap labour and lax environmental laws, this is what is going to happen. Its pretty easy to manufacture some knockoffs when you have a rather substantial amount of the worlds manufacturing capability.

    20. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by quenda · · Score: 1

      around 60>70 cents aus - now it's $1.08. ..

      Blink and look again: $1.02 as I type. The markets appear to be slightly volatile at the moment.
      Maybe the submitter wanted to use a more stable currency, not that I would have chosen Stirling either!

    21. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      Nope. Lots of countries tie their exchange rate to the dollar.

      That used to be true at the time of Bretton Woods, which failed during the 1970s. Few still do.
      (all the green ones peg to USD)

      If you exclude the petrol exporting states on the Arabian Peninsula (their main and often close to only
      income is in USD, so they don't have too much of a choice), you are left with huge economic powers
      like Zimbabwe, Cuba, Eritrea, Venezuela, and a couple of tiny islands and Central American states.

    22. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by bane2571 · · Score: 2

      If the chinese can sell something of Iphone quality for what? a 10th of the cost? Then you have to wonder who the thief is.

      if it isn't of iPhone quality, then apple has nothing to worry about.

    23. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as it's a "hi-Phone" and clearly not an "iPhone," I don't see what your problem is, or why this is a story.

      As for the "lying, theiving, completely dishonest Chinese" nobody is forcing Apple to put their manufacturing there.

      No, but Apple is forcing their Chinese slaves to manufacture there.

      Fuck anyone that tries to claim Foxconn "employees" aren't actually slaves.

    24. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USD is the most traded currency. Therefore everyone (for approximate values of everyone) knows approximately how their local currency converts to USD.

      It's not a standard because it's stable, it's a standard because of the volume of it traded.

    25. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      > If the chinese can sell something of Iphone quality for what? a 10th of the cost? Then you have to wonder who the thief is.

      You know that it takes more than component costs to get a smartphone off the ground, right?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    26. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by cavreader · · Score: 1

      China does not create intellectual property they steal,"borrow", or buy it from others. Why waste money on R&D when you can just take advantage of someone else's work. It's really not such a bad idea if you think about it. And there is little anyone can do because reverse engineering an existing piece of technology is easy. The only leverage available to prevent this from getting out of hand and harming the people who actually developed the technology is to raise import tariffs on products from the offending country.

    27. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Even if this is so, China will have copied everything worth copying in the next 15-20 years. Once China catches up, they'll have no choice - they'll either have to begin inventing things on their own, or stall. If they are smart, they'll avoid the "IP" trap of the Western economies and begin inventing in a more liberal IP regime that will make them more efficient. But efficient or not, they will begin to invent.

      In the meantime, the part of the world that came up with the "intellectual property" concept will have spent even more valuable resources on enforcing the unenforceable instead of a sensible reform that will create an environment, allowing the use of those same resources for more R&D. I'll let you guess who will be better off in the end.

    28. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I hate to tell you, but China is set to pass the US in quantity of published research output.

      You might argue that the quality isn't quite the same, but clearly China does produce intellectual property.

    29. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us not living in the industrial pit that is happy to chew it's population alive to spit out cheap iphones for people halfway around the world to buy, lining the pockets of the local elite? Say what you will about Chinas abuse of IP, it's not improving the standard of living for the average citizen.

    30. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Say what you will about Chinas abuse of IP, it's not improving the standard of living for the average citizen.

      Really? Chinese were better off under Mao, when the average citizen was chasing the sparrows out of the rice fields? You obviously haven't been to China of 20 or 30 years ago.

    31. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In that case they'll only fluctuate wildly against almost every other currency.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by luk3Z · · Score: 0

      Dollar is a cr@p.

      --
      Recipes for USA bankrupt - http://tinypaste.com/0d66f dd = dollar deluge (printed in the infinity)
    33. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      So long as it's a "hi-Phone" and clearly not an "iPhone," I don't see what your problem is, or why this is a story.

      As for the "lying, theiving, completely dishonest Chinese" nobody is forcing Apple to put their manufacturing there.

      Are you telling me that this is not an iPhone clone:
      http://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=10810707081

      (Yes, that it is the hiPhone 5)

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    34. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      You mean like how US submitters often convert measurements to feet and inches or pounds and ounces? Pounds are the worst for us in the UK because we don't use them as a measure of a person's weight, we always use stones. Well, I always use kilogrammes but I am a minority.

      Don't read too much into it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by beat.bolli · · Score: 1

      So it's not only the Swiss Franc that's strong relative to the US$. In the last 12 months, the dollar has dropped from CHF 1.05 to 0.75...

      --
      Karma: none (due to not believing in reincarnation)
    36. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      My brother got one of those, although I think it is the previous version (hi-Phone 4) in Mexico.

      The device is OK for its cost, and actually I would say it is even cheapo. However, the software is of course not apple's IOS, but a simple Java based "feature-phone". The only similar thing with the iPhone is the outside.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    37. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Except that the software of the Chinnese device is not close to the one form Apple, and the quality of the hardware is also less than stellar..

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    38. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that they invented gunpowder. Lucky that the "western" countries didn't take advantage of the lax intellectual property laws of the time to basically wage war (literally) on everywhere that didn't know how to use gunpowder.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    39. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tick tick, Take your 568mL of beer else were. :-P

    40. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It is, however, extremely odd, considering that Reuters lists only the dollar and yuan amount. I'm extremely confused why pounds sterling entered into it. Perhaps the submitter has an axe to grind about /. being an American website?

      Maybe the submitter is English ?

    41. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      No. It is, however, extremely odd, considering that Reuters lists only the dollar and yuan amount. I'm extremely confused why pounds sterling entered into it. Perhaps the submitter has an axe to grind about /. being an American website?

      If someone from the UK wants toconvert a figure into pounds (or someone from Europe wants to convert it to euros) why shouldn't they? I don't suppose Americans worry when foreign news is translated into USD, miles, gallons or whatever.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    42. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by tibit · · Score: 1

      And somehow even the Swiss think that CHF is now overvalued...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    43. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by tibit · · Score: 1

      Nope, that's not how it works. Soviets did the same thing, and they never caught up, because if all you do is copy, you can't. Copying takes time. There's no chance of catching up. You'll perpetually be years behind the curve.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    44. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      You lose your AAA rating and wonder why this happens?

    45. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Maybe the submitter wanted to use a more stable currency, not that I would have chosen Stirling either!

      Indeed, why use the currency of a medium sized Scottish town rather than the much better known GB Pound?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    46. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by cavreader · · Score: 1

      According to a lot of people China is supposed to pass the US in about every category but I have seen little evidence this actually happening unless you are talking about rising energy consumption, deteriorating environmental conditions, or rising inflation. Even with China's much lauded manufacturing base the US is still the #1 manufacturer in the world with a 1/4 of China's population. China's cheerleaders have based their forecasts on China continuing to maintain the same growth rate without encountering any problems, in other words, using idyllic conditions to predict future results while discounting and minimizing any negative factors entering into the equation. Add in some wishful thinking and you have the perfect propaganda to attack the US with. And people continue to assume that there is not an elite and privileged class in China that rivals any in the US and they will extract the bulk of the benefits of any new IP they happen to develop except they don't have to tolerate any real opposition from the general public because they always need more help on the prison farms with no Wi-fi coverage available to tweet any discontent.

    47. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Why would it be quoted in a foreign currency (USD)?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    48. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/mar/28/china-us-publisher-scientific-papers

      China is second. I realize many Americans think they produce all of everything, always have and always will, but being second in the world in academic output strongly suggests China produces intellectual property. If you look instead at Chinese researchers, as opposed to research done in China, they may well already outrank the US.

    49. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by cavreader · · Score: 1

      I think the US got a tremendous jump start on the rest of the world because of WW2 not because Americans were any smarter or capable than others around the world. The US was practically the only country with no damaged infrastructure and masses of traumatized citizens just trying to put their lives back together to deal with. The US lead in production and economic metrics has been shrinking over the years as other countries become able to concentrate more on their international relationships instead of their internal domestic concerns. As far as the number of research materials being generated in China even the article you linked to admitted the current figures represent only quantity not the quality of the research. And I am sure China is not the only country by a long shot that publishes fraudulent and idiotic scientific papers. There is a lot of international cooperation in scientific pursuits which makes it hard to say any particular country is 100% responsible any new scientific achievements. The thing that amazes me is that the people with the raw intelligence and potential come from all races and geographic locations in the world. The shame is that some of this intelligence can be wasted if there are no resources available to support and nurture those who are gifted. There are probably a few people in places like Somalia with the raw intelligence and potential of any great scientist but they usually have no way to fulfill their potential.

    50. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The point was to refute the OPs assertion that China produces no intellectual property. Being the second largest producer of journal articles, even if they are of lower quality than those produced in other countries (they're all peer reviewed by the same people), strongly suggests that assertion is false.

      The US also got a big jump start by accepting scientists and other skilled people fleeing the war in Europe and by appropriating more during the invasion.

    51. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the ever popular measure of "football field" in the US.

    52. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by cavreader · · Score: 1

      I pointed out that quantity does not equate to quality and using that 1 metric is not a very accurate or realistic way of measuring real world scientific achievements. What percentage of published scientific papers address things that are actually useful in the real world? What percentage of published scientific papers contain only theoretical concepts? The original claim was that China is producing more IP because their quantity of published papers is increasing and I don't think that can be claimed as a factual statement.

    53. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Nope, that's not what happened, believe an old fag who was a small nut in the effort when much younger. SU leadership were only interested in copying military designs and building hobby facilities to produce them for the army. Mass-producing for the economy as a whole, for commercial distribution was never-ever a goal. Hence, economies of scale did not happen and there was never enough payout to sustain the effort.

      For a wildly successful recent example, you need to look no further than Japan, Taiwan or Korea. In those places commercialization of the "theft" was the main goal and even gov't sponsored copycat production became eventually a private and commercial enterprise. There, things went very, very differently than they did in the Soviet bloc. Japan was very liberal in enforcement up until the 80s, but is now as strict an "IP" heaven as any other place, you don't even get fair use there. Korea and Taiwan are on the road to becoming more protective too. All three countries now produce a lot of everything -- from basic research to new commercial designs, etc.

      Of course, there is a lot of detail and variation in the process that I'm glossing over, but there's no doubt at all that a competitive and smartly managed sector can use copying as a springboard. This is especially true if they can access large monopoly rents in the worldwide markets due to IP laws, and those can sustain them long enough.

    54. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by tibit · · Score: 1

      Look at it from the commercialization angle, I think you may be up to something. But I don't really see Japan as a big copier -- or maybe I'm just ignorant in this respect?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    55. Re:Commentary on the Dollar? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      They were, but it was ages ago. They copied cars, toys, electronic devices and what not in the 50s and the 60s, there were even tons of jokes about it. That began changing in the 70s. Of course, it doesn't happen anymore, now that everyone from IT to agriculture relies on IP laws. In fact, you can see a lot of Japanese TV shows that ridicule the Chinese for copying Japanese products unskillfully. Awwell, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

  2. US dollars? by jmcbain · · Score: 0, Redundant

    800 yuan or £76

    Can one of you foreigners please convert that into real currency?

    1. Re:US dollars? by 101010_or_0x2A · · Score: 0

      I was going to mark this Funny, when you said "real currency" and US dollars in the same context. The yuan *is* the real currency, get used to it.

    2. Re:US dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      690 NOK

    3. Re:US dollars? by aXis100 · · Score: 2

      1kg of Bananas ;)

    4. Re:US dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was going to mark this Funny, when you said "real currency" and US dollars in the same context. The yuan *is* the real currency, get used to it.

      Not until they stop keeping it artificially undervalued.

    5. Re:US dollars? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      About 86.5 Euros.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:US dollars? by ushere · · Score: 1

      $us is real currency!?

    7. Re:US dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6.2 Lap dances in Vegas.

    8. Re:US dollars? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Gold is the "real" currency. You think China can't/won't print Yuan or RMB when it needs them? That's the thing about gold - you can't print it.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:US dollars? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      About 1 and a half barrels of oil.

    10. Re:US dollars? by definate · · Score: 1

      African or European?

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    11. Re:US dollars? by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gold is a shiny rock that has some interesting properties. There is no such thing as a "real" currency. Just currencies with rules that you prefer and currencies with rules that allow for conditions you don't care for to arise.

      You might as well be trying to argue "Linux" Distro X is the only "real" computer because you dislike the practices of Ubuntu, Android, Windows, and OSX.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    12. Re:US dollars? by mirix · · Score: 2

      2118mg Au.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    13. Re:US dollars? by Macrat · · Score: 2

      The yuan *is* the real currency, get used to it.

      No, Flooz is the real currency.

      Whoopie said so.

    14. Re:US dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $124.65 with the current exchange rate of 1 USD = 6.41822 CN.

      http://www.xe.com/ucc/convert/?Amount=800&From=CNY&To=USD

    15. Re:US dollars? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Ben Bernanke, is that you? Sure, argue with thousands of years of tradition. Go stand in Jerusalem, the Vatican and Mecca and tell all the worshipers that they are raving lunatics and see how many you manage to convince. Gold is accepted as a symbol of wealth all over the world, and it is quite rare meaning that you don't have to worry too much of being inflated out of your wealth (like with, say, US dollars). That you choose not to recognize this fact is your right. But that doesn't make you right.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    16. Re:US dollars? by femto · · Score: 1

      Give me the bananas any day. The US dollar is currently worth 0.95 Australian dollars, but bananas in Australia currently cost $13/kg. A much better exchange rate!

    17. Re:US dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, a little thick with the hyperbole, no? You got a pillow case full of gold in your closet or something?

    18. Re:US dollars? by quenda · · Score: 1

      Not until they stop keeping it artificially undervalued.

      Why is it always the other guy's fault? How about the US pegs the dollar to the Yuan at 1:3? Too soon?

    19. Re:US dollars? by quenda · · Score: 1

      Gold has little intrinsic value. If you want a *real* currency, go back to salt. It worked for the Romans.
      The British navy conquered the world while using rum as payment.

    20. Re:US dollars? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yep this is the American way. If you can't attack the argument, attack the person arguing. Kinda like S&P. Or the Tea Party. Or whatever. Giddy-up cowboy, your country is the one falling to shit. And yes I have a wad of gold that I bought 15 years ago, at $400/oz. Not gold certificates (worthless), ETFs (less than worthless), but 99.999 pure gold coins. And if you think gold is so worthless then why are you sitting there wishing that bad things would happen to me?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    21. Re:US dollars? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Gold isn't worthless, but it's no more real a currency than anything else. It DOES have the property that it's somewhat more difficult to come up with more of it though.

      Gold, just like any currency, is only worth what someone is willing to pay you for it. Everybody who buys gold against a coming apocalypse is an idiot - go see how much your gold is worth somewhere where food is hard to come by.

      Yes, gold has been valued through most of history, but not all, and so have other things. Various people liked other shiny rocks, shells, volcanic glass, meteors... anything rare could be used as currency. We use bits of metal and paper. All only have value as long as a bunch of people think they do. Only things like food have actual, inherent value.

    22. Re:US dollars? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You need to travel. Please try and listen more than you talk when you do.

    23. Re:US dollars? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I imagine China would LOVE that. Direct control over your currency instead of indirect. Perfect.

    24. Re:US dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No gold is it has intinsic value.

    25. Re:US dollars? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And yes I have a wad of gold that I bought 15 years ago, at $400/oz.

      And it's gone up in value, good for you. But then so have Damien Hirst artworks, John Lennon autographs and original Barbie dolls.

      They're not currency either.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    26. Re:US dollars? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1
      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    27. Re:US dollars? by polle404 · · Score: 1

      About 2.7108535 grams of gold.
      Oh. yeah... American...
      About 0,095622543 oz. of gold.

      --

      ~men are from earth. women are from earth. deal with it.~
    28. Re:US dollars? by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      2.14 grams of gold.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    29. Re:US dollars? by deains · · Score: 1

      Just under 13 bitcoins.

    30. Re:US dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GBP76 = 0.0702 oz of gold

  3. But can they... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Sure, China can copy apple products(along with manufacturing the official ones); but could they, through the bold adoption of a "One Child, but as many as you want if the first one looks like Steve Jobs" policy, conceivably create a Counterfeit Steve Jobs? Complete with a melamine turtleneck?

    1. Re:But can they... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1
    2. Re:But can they... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      They have (well Taiwan has, which is sort of China.)

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  4. Cool. by liquidweaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the invisible hand of the market doing its job. Exploit workers overseas and pervert the spirit of patents, copyrights, and trademarks only to further monopolize your position, going so far as to crate proxy lawsuits against your competitors and creating injunctions on other businesses only for extortion... yes, I'll have to admit I hope the hiPhone team springs of the excellent designs of the iPhones and makes a better, cheaper product. It's called progress.

    --
    mov ah, 4ch
    int 21h
    1. Re:Cool. by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Yeah, not gonna happen. This has absolutly nothing to do with the "Invisible Hand" giving the market a handjob. The iPhone is popular, whether you like to admit it or not, so the Chinese are gonna make cheap, crappy clones of it. Such as what happens to anything remotely popular.

    2. Re:Cool. by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2

      And where exactly is Apple's iPhone made?

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    3. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you misunderstood.

      When the Chinese want to make something "cheaper", any hope of "better" goes out the window.

      If you'd simply refuse to buy their product unless it's up to your standards, like Apple does, yeah... you might get a good product.

    4. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. I wish. But... no. Go inspect one of the original CN-iPhone imitations. My mom bought one for $50. Perhaps the hardware was equivalent (in truth, it wasn't even close) but it utterly failed on the software front. It was a cheap 1990's Nokia-dumbphone emulator.

    5. Re:Cool. by MacTO · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ since their crime is violating trademarks (to swindle the consumer). They definitely did not create a clone of the iPhone.

      Besides, how do we know what the quality is like? I've never really trusted the, 'it feels cheap,' test because most people equate weight and sturdyness with quality. Which means that you could make a steel frame and suddenly have something that's well built (even if the design or manufacturing process is faulty).

    6. Re:Cool. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      That's ok Japan used to make crap in the 1960's. Now they don't. If China allows enough internal competition and/or shoots enough factory owners, the quality will eventually improve. Then what are you going to do?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:Cool. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The iPhone isn't that popular. It does suffer a disproportionate amount of "HEY GUIZE LOOK AT MY NEW iPHONE" propaganda though, which makes people think it's more popular than it is. Stand outside a crowded Apple store and count how many people are actually walking away with one. Most of the people are just sitting there all day basking in the glory of their Apple god wishing they could afford the shinies.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing we should be doing right now. Tariffs.

    9. Re:Cool. by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      These things come with crap called a "java based OS." They stink.
      It'd be interesting if they came up with a clone that could actually run iOS.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    10. Re:Cool. by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      And where exactly is Apple's iPhone made?

      Foxconn, right? What do I win?

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    11. Re:Cool. by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      At the very least you would think they would throw Android on it.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    12. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone isn't that popular.

      What, are you retarded or something?

    13. Re:Cool. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The iPhone isn't that popular.

      What, are you retarded or something?

      No but apparently you are. You see there where it says 27% of market share? Listening to Apple users rant on about their phones you'd think they had 99% of share and that there simply is no other phone. But since Apple users fail at life so they feel they need to validate themselves through a trinket, it's not surprising they fail at math too.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    14. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have guessed that they were significantly less than 27%. 27% is absolutely huge for a single type of phone (or a single "line" of phones). Especially since they're on the high end of what passes for a "smart phone" nowadays.

    15. Re:Cool. by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      You see there where it says 27% of market share? Listening to Apple users rant on about their phones you'd think they had 99% of share and that there simply is no other phone. But since Apple users fail at life so they feel they need to validate themselves through a trinket, it's not surprising they fail at math too.

      So you think 27% of the market is not much? 27%, for one smartphone (essentially one model, depending on how you categorize updates), made by one company? The 50% market share that Android holds is for 36 bazillion different devices made by 40 different companies for EVERY carrier. RIM only accounts for 17%, but I doubt anyone would blow-off Blackberries as insignificant, even if they are only for stuffy suit-and-tie types and they are inferior. Would you also argue that iPods are not popular, even though most people call other-brand players "ipods?" I don't have an iPhone, nor anything made by Apple, but I have to admit they make slick products with a lot of nice features. I won't buy an iPhone because of all of Apple's stupid limitations, not because it isn't a great device, or popular.

      Thanks for including the statistics to prove your argument wrong, as I'm sure I would have been too lazy to look up the numbers.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    16. Re:Cool. by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      So wait, just because you disagree with Apple means that their product should be stolen?

      Do you seriously think a Chinese firm would have pushed out anything like an iPhone before Apple produced theirs?

      There can be a lot of progress in the world through open standards and the like which Apple should be pressured into doing by their customers, but theft of a design is not it. You can produce a spectacular smart or cellphone without ripping off a company. The way this is done rips off consumers and Apple and is just sheer laziness mixed with greed. This product will not work well if you're expecting an actual iPhone.

      (I have no problem with the name though, what's the first thing you usually say to someone on the phone?)

    17. Re:Cool. by Billlagr · · Score: 1

      Like my Rollexx, and all the Panatronic and Sonny products

    18. Re:Cool. by exomondo · · Score: 1

      but theft of a design is not it.

      They didn't steal the design, it is based on a concept mockup, the iphone5 doesn't exist.

    19. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to work on your statistics reading skills. Esp your analysis of what they really mean in the real world.

    20. Re:Cool. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      It's important when you're refuting someone's post on the basis of an article to actually read the damned article you are refuting. 27% includes all Apple products, since it's a set compiled by operating system, and IOS is Apple's proprietary operating system. However several models and indeed several devices fall into this group.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    21. Re:Cool. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      These things come with crap called a "java based OS." They stink.
      It'd be interesting if they came up with a clone that could actually run iOS.

      People are saying "Apple deserves this" for making their products in China, but I disagree.

      In fact, this device is based on rumors of the iPhone 5. Which means the chinese company doing this has had to design the case, the electronics and the software themselves. I don't think they're using the same components at all - so other than possible design, everything in the hiPhone5 is completely original.

      Put in that context, it's more interesting ot see the state of original Chinese designs moreso than copycat.

    22. Re:Cool. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      27% is absolutely huge for a single type of phone (or a single "line" of phones).

      The Ford F150 is the most popular truck in America. Why? Because GM makes the Chevy Silverado and the GMC Sierra.

      But that doesn't mean Fords are actually more popular than GMs, just as iPhones aren't more popular than Android phones.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    23. Re:Cool. by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      In fact, this device is based on rumors of the iPhone 5. Which means the chinese company doing this has had to design the case, the electronics and the software themselves. I don't think they're using the same components at all - so other than possible design, everything in the hiPhone5 is completely original.

      Put in that context, it's more interesting ot see the state of original Chinese designs moreso than copycat.

      Have you ever seen one of its predecessors ? They aren't indicative of Chinese engineering (at least I don't hope so for their sake.) Hiphones are just cheap generic phone innards mashed into a case resembling genuine Apple devices (or in this case mockups thereof) with a skinned UI. At least they did as good a job as Samsung ripping off the icons ;-) but they are otherwise just really crappy.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    24. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? After selling 15 million iPhone 3G, 35 million iPhone 3GS, and 30 million (and counting) iPhone 4, they're not that popular?

      If anything, iPhones have the opposite problem: they're really not that chic and special anymore, now that everybody and their cat has one. Personally, I'm not particularly worried about the chicness, but I do worry about losing my black iPhone 4 nowadays because it's so hard to tell them part from other people's.

    25. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the statistics are for smartphones, the "iOS" portion of the market share specifically excludes non-phone iOS devices such as iPod Touches, iPads, and the Apple TV. In fact, the share number is comprised of exactly four models: iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, and iPhone 4, the flagship versions for each year since 2007. The original iPhone is mostly extinct and the 3G is also on its way out, so (looking at the sales figures from wikipedia) 27% is divided up pretty evenly between 3GS and 4. About 13% each for 3GS and 4 seem like the right market share figure.

      And incidentally, those are HUGE numbers for single handset models. The days in which Nokia could swamp the market with single models are long over.

    26. Re:Cool. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Here is actually an interesting review of one of the previous iPhone clones. The case pretty much looks like the real thing, the menus of the software kind of look like iPhone, but the software part is rather half-assed. Probably many of the simplest dumbphones have more functionality. Wacky stuff anyway. :)

      Actually, I've been searching for some blog that explicitly goes through various Chinese counterfeits. If you know any, I'd be curious to read such...

    27. Re:Cool. by gutnor · · Score: 1
      What you see is the visible reason why patent and trademarks have been invented.

      Cloning a product or business is a lot easier and cheaper than coming with a competing product/business: they don't have to invest in R&D, they can skip all the prototyping, trial/error phase and all the testing by simply cloning the final version. They even re-use the brand recognition which is also something costly to build: with it, they can even more money by selling lower quality substitute because their customer expectation will be based on the original product quality, not the actual quality of the knock off.

      So the problem patent/copyright are trying to solve is real as seen in China. However, when looking at US, it is clear also that patent and copyrights are not a proper solution either.

    28. Re:Cool. by xtracto · · Score: 1

      You may be kidding, but about 20 years ago there was a brand called COBY which produced cheap copies of SONY electronics. Nowadays (at least in Mexico) they actually are a good low/mid range priced electronics brand. For people who earn USD$300 a month, buying a USD$800 iPod is impossible; nevertheless, buying a $20 device that will perform the same service is OK.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    29. Re:Cool. by Terrasque · · Score: 1

      At the very least you would think they would throw Android on it.

      You were saying?

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    30. Re:Cool. by tibit · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The worst thing you can do is to let Chinese assemble your entire product that contains electronics. Here's what will happen: once you're happy with what you're getting, they'll start reverse engineering the design to cheapen it up. They'll start by removing the decoupling capacitors until it stops working, and then they'll put some back. They'll change to capacitors with less stable dielectrics -- say X5R/X7R to Y5V to Z7U. The latter can lose 75% of their capacitance when brought up to working voltage. They'll change metal film or thin film resistors to cheaper thick film. They'll replace low tempco resistors with ones with worse tempco. They'll use electrolytic capacitors with worse temperature and lifetime ratings. They'll use cheaper, knockoff electromechanical components like switches. And so it goes. All while lying through their teeth about it. The rule with Chinese electronics production is this: if you must, get the boards assembled there, but under no circumstances are test setups to be made available, other than basic electrical test for continuity/impedance. You get their best-effort boards and you functionally test and package them elsewhere. The Chinese seriously seem to think that if it works when it leaves the production line, everything is fine. Long-term reliability is a concept that must be foreign.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    31. Re:Cool. by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Those are figures for the US. You cannot assume that they apply equally to the Chinese market.

      I keep having to point this out to my boss, who is a complete Android fanboy. Our company only does business in the UK, yet he is constantly citing irrelevant US market share figures in order to justify an increasing focus on his platform of choice. That's not to say that we shouldn't be writing Android apps, but his logic is badly flawed.

      Also, it's only taking into account 'smartphone' marketshare, which artificially deflates iOS figures (which is doing well in devices that are not technically phones) at the expense of other platforms (which are not).

    32. Re:Cool. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen one of its predecessors ? They aren't indicative of Chinese engineering (at least I don't hope so for their sake.) Hiphones are just cheap generic phone innards mashed into a case resembling genuine Apple devices (or in this case mockups thereof) with a skinned UI. At least they did as good a job as Samsung ripping off the icons ;-) but they are otherwise just really crappy.

      Still requires work and effort to do.

      Heck, you should see some of the crappy iPod clones - they look the same, but man are they just plain awful - the screen, the software, etc.

      Either way, the only thing possibly stolen from Apple is the design (and given the way people on /. feel about it given the Apple v. Samsung and Apple v. Motorola lawsuits). Everything else is different. Sure it may be a remashed generic phone design, but someone had to take the time to lay out a circuit board, find appropriate parts (crappy as they are), and do the necesary software mods. 95% of the work may already be done, but converting that reference design to something people will buy is where all the ODM work comes into play (they all do it - HTC, etc. - they take the reference design and repackage it and modify software as appropriate).

      Most of the innards of phones you find today will be fairly similar. Whether it be Samsung, HTC, Motorola, or whatever.

    33. Re:Cool. by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      The iPhone isn't that popular.

      You lost all credibility with that statement, and everything after it was ignored as being equally stupid. Just because you don't like the iPhone does not mean that it's not popular. It's the single best selling smartphone out there. The iPhone sells better than any model of Android phone. To try and discredit that as being "faddish" shows that you are nothing but an anti-Apple fanboy.

    34. Re:Cool. by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Did you see the sales numbers in your own link? The ones that show the iPhone having higher sales than any singular phone out there? To look at that, and then to somehow say that the iPhone isn't popular shows that you're an idiot.

  5. Extremely light? Yuck! by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

    Other reports are claiming that the device is extremely light and almost feels like that one is holding a plastic toy.

    So now mobile devices that are light weight are assumed to be cheap? Interesting.

  6. Re:Extremely light? Yuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK most of the weight in any mobile device isn't the electronics so much as the battery. I hate light-weight things in general, but for a phone I'd mean that there is practically no battery life, unless of course they made a break-thru in storage I haven't heard about or it is solar and the electronics are just that efficient.

  7. Can they slap an injunction on Apple? by Grumpinuts · · Score: 3, Funny

    If the Chinese have announced an iPhone5 and are shipping, does that mean they can sue Apple when they release the iPhone 5?

    1. Re:Can they slap an injunction on Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they released a hiPhone 5. See? It's totally different!

    2. Re:Can they slap an injunction on Apple? by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      where have you been for the last 2-3 decades?

      having and enforcing a patent has nothing to do with releasing an actual product.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
  8. What no bitcoins? by perpenso · · Score: 1

    800 yuan or £76

    Can one of you foreigners please convert that into real currency?

    I am shocked that no reply posts have converted to bitcoins yet. Has that "joke" truly runs its course? :-)

    1. Re:What no bitcoins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      78,000 bitcoins.

      No, make that 78,500.

      Sorry, 79,000.

      80,000.

      Hmm, no wonder no one has tried to convert it. It changes too fast . . .

  9. Hmm.... let's see... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chinese economy soaring, US economy crashing. China not giving a shit about patents, US living on patents... Correlation or just coincidence?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just irrelevant. Patents are en explicitly enumerated power in the original US Constitution. The first patent in the US granted under that power was done so by Thomas Jefferson in 1790.

      That said, this demonstrates the reasoning behind IP. Sure, those that ignore it can copy existing items easily, but without that monopoly Apple would have no impetus to spend the time and money inventing the original product.

    2. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by suutar · · Score: 1

      I am inclined to say correlation, considering that other times the US or parts thereof didn't care about patents were some of our growth spurts.

    3. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by stms · · Score: 2

      They're not doing as good as everyone in the US thinks.

    4. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it would give them more competition. There is a big difference between Apple's iPhone and the hiPhone. The hiPhone is probably better.

    5. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 2

      Eh... correlational coincidence. Remember, there have also been reports of groups in China outright recreating whole companies, passing themselves off as the real companies, signing contracts with other companies as the real companies and the original company being baffled about complaints about the quality of products they don't like.

      The Chinese economy is soaring because they don't care about ANYTHING. Were looking back to an industrial revolution style mindset in the modern era. Not caring about patents seems to be a subset of that mindset that correlates, but not causates. They also have obscene amounts of funds being pumped into their country by the US borrowing money from them to buy their own goods mixed with a currency that is even more rigged than the US Dollar.

      Their economy is just as built on pillars of sand as most of the Western World's economies. It will come down to whether they are clever enough to pound support columns to bedrock before the sand pillars collapse.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    6. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are doing plenty more to fuck themselves over than allowing patents to be granted.

    7. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese economy soaring, US economy crashing. China not giving a shit about patents, US living on patents... Correlation or just coincidence?

      Ah, why is it always the evil creators and the noble pirates? The Chinese company is leaching off the Apple creation to sell some inferior products. How do I know they are inferior!!! The price is your first clue.

    8. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no causal relationship between the two. China makes no money by selling patentable technology. Thus, they don't yet feel it necessary to enforce ip laws.

    9. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of all the dumb comments on slashdot, this one is so mind-bogglingly stupid, I just had to laugh because it must be some lame attempt at a joke.

      The fact that its modded so high really indicates you people may know about computers, but economics and finance just ain't it.

    10. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by blarkon · · Score: 1

      Rip off the idea of a successful Chinese company in China and see what it brings you. It won't be a slap on the wrist.

    11. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has been dumping a ton of stimulus and government mandated programs into their economy, they have just as bit of a housing bubble and the only reason their economy is still running is massive government stimulus. Look up Zhengzhou New District or any of the dozens of empty cities built just so they could keep on building. They are going to implode at some point.

    12. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      As soon as any successful idea comes out of China, we might try that.

      I had to deal with Chinese companies and Chinese workers. It seems their society don't really reward critical thinking or inventiveness.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      How much of that obscene amount of funds do you think is going towards military programmes?

      And yet for some reason there are still people in the western world who don't think twice before buying Made In China. If only they could see what is likely to happen next...

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    14. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by base3 · · Score: 1

      Except that China has the advantage that they can shoot their rapacious capitalists if they threaten to crater the economy.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    15. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ghost cities are there to account for the rural migration rush like the rush that occurred in places like Brazil.

    16. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by _xeno_ · · Score: 2

      Anyone who remembers US history should be able to answer that one.

      The US Industrial Revolution was literally based on IP stolen from England. Samuel Slater copied the design of patented British cotton mills as best he could and brought them to the United States.

      Thanks to this act of blatant "intellectual piracy" he's now known as the "Father of the American Industrial Revolution."

      Today? It's the same thing, different countries.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    17. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Wow! Honestly, that's a little scary. That they're in a bubble is obvious, but I didn't know that the bubble is quite that thin. If China's stability fails (economic or otherwise) while we're still in this economic climate, then the economic tsunami would be more than a little concerning.

    18. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Nowhere near as much as bring spent in the US on military projects...

    19. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... let's see....

      Chinese human rights record terrible, US human rights record relatively much better. China not giving a shit about patents, US living on patents... Correlation or just coincidence?

      Chinese economy soaring, US economy crashing. China not giving a shit about the safety of trains, US ensuring trains are safe... Correlation or just coincidence?

      Chinese X going up, US X going down. China not giving a shit about A, US giving a shit about A. Correlation or just coincidence?

      See? Mods, stop modding up comments as horribly stupid as the parent.

    20. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Uhm, would you like to bet on that?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    21. Re:Hmm.... let's see... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Certainly, yes - bring that bet on. The US military budget is far in excess of that of China's.

  10. Yuan is no more real than US dollar ... by perpenso · · Score: 2

    The yuan *is* the real currency, get used to it.

    The Yuan is pegged to the US dollar so it is as real as the dollar is.

    1. Re:Yuan is no more real than US dollar ... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The Yuan is pegged to the US dollar so it is as real as the dollar is.

      ~6 years ago, China unpegged from the dollar and pegged the Yuan to a basket of currencies.
      After 3 years of that, they re-pegged to the dollar.

      China will make whatever monetary moves are necessary to keep inflation low and destabilizing speculators out.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  11. a lot of cheap ripoff phones have carp software by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    a lot of cheap ripoff phones have carp software

    1. Re:a lot of cheap ripoff phones have carp software by TimHunter · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's definitely something fishy going on here.

    2. Re:a lot of cheap ripoff phones have carp software by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 3, Funny

      And carpy spell checkers as well.

    3. Re:a lot of cheap ripoff phones have carp software by perpenso · · Score: 1

      And carpy spell checkers as well.

      The genuine ones aren't any better.

    4. Re:a lot of cheap ripoff phones have carp software by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      I hear you... I bought one just for the halibut...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:a lot of cheap ripoff phones have carp software by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      And carpy spell checkers as well.

      Carpy spell checkers are common for Chinese phones. The Japanese ones have koiy spell checkers.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  12. Assembled, not necessarily manufactured by perpenso · · Score: 1

    And where exactly is Apple's iPhone made?

    If by "made" you mean "manufactured" then it is made in many countries. However the Chinese and non-Chinese made components are assembled in China.

  13. Garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China has been selling hiPhone garbage on eBay since the original iPhone. The policy at eBay is to kill all listings that look like an iPhone that aren't priced like one.

    So buyer beware, when the real thing comes out, watch out.

  14. Re:Extremely light? Yuck! by suutar · · Score: 1
    Oh, it's hardly new. Almost everyone is surprised how light a cellphone is the first time they handle one and worry about fragility.

    Unless you weren't using 'cheap' as a synonym for 'fragile', in which case I have no idea where you got it from the sentence you quoted.

  15. iPhone 5 production line parts and design? by Kylon99 · · Score: 1

    What are the chances that this was produced from or in part from the iPhone 5 designs or parts? We've heard the stories about factories in China often continue production after the official 'stop' resulting in counterfeit products that are actually the same products, just unauthorized.

    Isn't it conceivable that there could be certain parts meant for iPhone 5 already in production and that these parts were used to make this new phone?

    Just a thought...

    1. Re:iPhone 5 production line parts and design? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      As you've stated this does happen, and it often happens with cellphones. The Samsung Chocolate (A phone I don't even see why they would have bothered to copy) had copies coming out the back doors of the factories that made it, re-branded and renamed. The copied version made it to market in China before Samsung actually got it in - leading most Chinese to wonder why Samsung would so blatantly copy a generic Chinese design.... Of course the Chocolate - like almost every other Korean product - was probably a ripoff of something from Sharp or Panasonic.

    2. Re:iPhone 5 production line parts and design? by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Going the unofficial production run route doesn't work so well unless components to be assembled are domestically manufactured or are easy to acquire commodities. I believe Apple manufactures some key components outside of China. Also note that occasionally there are stories about Apple buying the entire production run of some new screen, RAM chip, etc.

    3. Re:iPhone 5 production line parts and design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't happen, at least not how you describe it.

      Usually what happens in chinese counterfeits, is that they only -look- like the target, but are made of extremely inferior, if not completely non-working parts.

      There's high grade counterfeits which have some cosmetic appearance resembling the real deal, but only obvious that it's a fake when you turn it on. For all we know the counterfeit iphone 5's are iphone 4 or iphone 3 PCB's and firmware jammed into iPhone5-like frame. Counterfeit iPods for example, only look like an ipod until you turn it on, then you realize that the software software is sadly pathetic and barely functional. Nike shoes and high brand bags like Chloe and Louis Vuitton counterfeits are the same way, they're designed to fool someone that isn't familiar with the product.

      Then there are low grade counterfeits, which don't even try to be a functional device, they're simply an iphone5 look-a-like, but have whatever shit hardware and software they can fit in it. Again only designed to fool someone who can't physically try the device. With Nike shoes and LV bags, these are often made of plastic instead of leather, and have a usability life of a few days to maybe a month. Most counterfeit iPod's fall under this, they only look like an iPod, but they're only small capacity USB drive with a mp3 decoder on it (think ipod shuffle) they don't actually have any functionality and have short battery lives.

      The targets of these counterfeits are senior citizens, and dumb people (like americans) who think they're getting a deal. It's not that different from Nigerian princes wanting to mail americans a million dollars, they just aren't real.

      If the device isn't within 5% of the price on apple's website. It is a 100% guaranteed fake. Even so called "refurbished" models and most new and preowned apple devices on craigslist are fake if they are in a neighborhood with a large Chinese population. And this isn't even being racist. Google Canal St, New York (China town.) Even websites that mention Canal St will get ads on google adsense selling counterfeits.

    4. Re:iPhone 5 production line parts and design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the Chocolate - like almost every other Korean product - was probably a ripoff of something from Sharp or Panasonic

      A japanese engaging in slandering koreans? Colour me surprised.

      Care to provide the evidence that the Chocolate was copied from Sharp or Panasonic? "Probably" doesn't cut it.

  16. But the store for it is awesome by bobstreo · · Score: 1
  17. Copies, yeah, but some chinese designs are great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_UicgYwyB2Bw/Skqlj68bB0I/AAAAAAAAD4I/seNR0o_hAAs/s1600-h/mini-copy_1390313i.jpg , for example.

    Those terrible red chinese communists, I'd love to tell them one thing or two... does anyone have their number?

  18. Same here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with you completely. I am not surpraised at all.

  19. Quick Action is Necessary! by craigc05 · · Score: 1

    We must move immediately to keep poor people from buying cheap knock-offs lest Apple's copy restriction privelege be slightly devalued in a market that doesn't exist for their over-priced steveDevices! Surely there are several thousand young men and women willing to go overseas, fight and die to protect this sacred monopoly.

  20. No way! Really? by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Holy crap? Seriously? China copied some super-popular electronic device and sold a higher-quality version for a tenth of the price because they aren't all greedy assholes and don't get hung up on bullshit like intellectual property and other bogus patent-based shit? Wow...

    If they stole them from Apple and sold them, I'd be a little upset. As it stands, they are manufacturing, marketing, and selling them themselves, using their own investment money. Fuck you Apple, you don't own an idea.

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    1. Re:No way! Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from the higher quality thing sure. The reviews I've read of iPhone clones point to shit software and miserable hardware (I.e. Bad resistive touch screens). An iPhone clone running android might be fun. Not worth my trouble, but somewhat virtuous. Somebody seems to have made one, but I haven't seen a 3rd party review.

    2. Re:No way! Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in my day, this was called +2, Troll

  21. Losing control by choice by HW_Hack · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you turn over manufacturing to a 3rd party that you have no real control over.

    Yeah - good luck with that. Oh and those fake Apple stores .... they were going to build those anyway. Apple just helped things along by sending China all its design info.

    I hope this happens to many "American" companies who outsource manufacturing.

    --
    Its not the years, its the mileage .....
  22. Fake iPads do use Android by perpenso · · Score: 2

    At the very least you would think they would throw Android on it.

    Fake iPads do that. The packaging looks like Apple's. The device looks like Apple's. Start it up, wait ... that's a droid logo.

  23. Carp software eh? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    Sounds fishy to me.......(:

  24. Most likely explanation by brokeninside · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The submitter lives in the UK and pounds sterling is his or her native currency.

    But feel free to presume ideological reasons if you'd prefer to grind an axe rather than use common sense.

    1. Re:Most likely explanation by slackbheep · · Score: 1

      The phrase " When in Rome... " comes to mind on the topic of common sense.

    2. Re:Most likely explanation by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You mean the price should be in Euros?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. Re:Extremely light? Yuck! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    What do you mean "now"? It's not whether they're light, actually, but whether they're dense. Cheap, shitty electronics have a lot of empty space. Expensively designed and molded electronics have less.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Ideas that are missing from this mindshare by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

    Something nobody seems to be pointing out is that maybe Apple and other American companies need to understand the Chinese culture and Chinese laws and hire better Chinese lawyers to prevent or be able to litigate against these kinds of maneuvers in China.

    Another idea, how about American companies just make a part of their manufacturing deal with Chinese manufacturing companies for that company X to effectively buy all IP rights for said product to be manufactured in only China. If Chinese manufacturing company X doesn't make an even more cut-rate offer to get the business, company Y will get it instead and make tons of money not only manufacturing for the US, but by also making local knockoffs legitimately.

    1. Re:Ideas that are missing from this mindshare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I'm sure apple never thought of any of that, and you know better than all of their lawyers, consultants, foreign advisors and whatnot. They should really have hired you to single handedly bested all the other people they have hired.

  27. None of you have actually seen or used it by chanchao · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a comment from a person who has actually bought one as a gimmick, I can tell you that it wouldn't fool the blind. It is simply NOT a copy of the real thing. They are typically Android phones, or some pen-based phone OS, with an external design that looks like an iPhone. As soon as you use it however, it's really very clear what it is.

    The only good thing I can say about them is that they come with a TV app.. ;) You can watch TV on them, there's typically an extendible antenna. (Yes, analog free to air TV still exists in Asia).

    Sorry to burst bubbles, but there is nothing innovative about them. They're cheap cheap phones with a TV, and a case looking like an iPhone. And this makes journalists think that there is a story.

    Same for the allegedly fake Apple store: Newsflash: Apple products are legally sold in non-Apple stores all over the world. This is simply a legal reseller of actual Apple products who went the extra mile of decorating his store in an Apple style. Oh the horror. :rolleyes:

  28. Free Software opportunity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It be cool if they put MeeGo on these and conquered the world.

  29. Damn TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even a damn picture of the device. sigh.

    Anywayt, when is Apple going to block the sales of this device on China over this patents and intellectual property blatant violations? Oh wait, they can't. Silly me. Keep doing that to Samsung, maybe you can milk son bucks from them.

  30. I bought a decent chinese android phone for $110 by voss · · Score: 1

    Android 2.2 and has Android market access.

    Its not state of the art and it has a resistive touch screen but it runs the apps I want and I can use it with
    my cheap prepaid sim card.

    If I were Apple id be FAR more worried about the increasingly "cheap and good enough" android phones
    than any crappy iphone knockoff.

  31. Where's the lawsuit? by John+Saffran · · Score: 1

    Isn't Samsung being sued because the Galaxy Tab "supposedly copied" the look-and-feel of the iPad?

    Yet the hiPhone (and other chinese rip-offs, including that fake apple store in china) blatantly advertises itself as an iPhone clone and seems to get away with it scott free.

    You'd think that with the amount of money Apple has in their coffers they'd have an official or two in their pocket to make sure that the hiPhone manufacturers are being kept in line ..

  32. When everyone discovers Neo OpenMoko Freerunner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then they'll wonder why they ever bought into a PDA with proprietary software and a proprietary Network Adapter that you can't turn-off from reporting your GPS location.

    OpenMoko is where it is at, and I don't care how much faster a iPhone or a Hi-Phone ever becomes when my phone runs open-source Linux with a USB host adapter (Neo Freerunner) that where it is eclipsed by processing power will always be more modular that never-again will a so-called CELL PHONE such as my PDA ever become antiquated and non-servicable to the next junk network. I even run the Linux client of Skype in a VM on this Neo Freerunner whenever the WiFi is within range of an open AP. Iphone is a hood-rat compared to this.

    Who in their right minds would buy a locked-in computer phone like a Sony Mylo 2 just because Apple Inc created it? It's all cripple-ware computers trying to supplant desktops and Open Source. We all knew the result of when Homebrew computer hobbyists and VESA assented to their ISA bus to be copied into corporations offering a competing product. It's poorly implemented, moth-balled, and gone, with every revision of the corporations fabbing their patented technology to astro-turf ontop of existing open standards to divert interests in science to a vendable exploit.

    1. Re:When everyone discovers Neo OpenMoko Freerunner by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

      It's a good idea, but a *poor* device! Slow proc, crappy screen.
      At least go for a Nokia N900 - Not *quite* so open, but the important bits are, and it has an unlocked bootloader so Android, Ubuntu and such can be run natively(as well as in a chroot).

    2. Re:When everyone discovers Neo OpenMoko Freerunner by tibit · · Score: 1

      WTF are you talking about w.r.t. the ISA bus? ISA was a fundamentally slow bus, using single-ended transmission lines and data strobing that was never meant for a bus with multiple connectors on it. ISA is basically what a Z80 CPU bus looked like, with an extra control line or two. It works fine on one PC board, but as soon as you bring connectors into the mix, you're up for trouble. There was no way to keep it working and making it faster, too. It was a technological dead end, so to speak. Good for what it was, and that's it. It's still used in embedded computing -- PC 104 is nowhere near dead, and if all you have is a couple serial ports or other "slow" devices (even a text mode display), ISA is perfectly adequate.

      How the heck could you call PCI (the major bus that came after ISA) "patented technology to astro-turf ontop of existing open standards" -- that I just don't know. If that's what you meant, that is, because your rant is hard to comprehend.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  33. Rounded Corners? by jeffrey.endres · · Score: 1

    Definitely a patent infringement!

  34. subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    But will it run iOS?

    Speaking of which, how did Apple not manage to get sued by Cisco?

    1. Re:subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably something along the lines with the settlement from here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys_iPhone

  35. Cargo cult by The+Man · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anyone of the South Seas tribes who, after WW2, made wooden radios and beacons in the expectation that they would cause aircraft bearing advanced goods to land?

  36. Beats the cloud storage by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    You never know who has developped the hardware/software in China and if there are any backdoors for law enforcement. Considering that they are running the Great Firewall of China, I wouldn't want to have all my data stored in the "Cloud" as I presume a lot of the iPhone data does right now or is moving that way.

    If this phone doesn't do the Cloud storage, I would see this as a definite advantage for personal freedoms (relatively speaking) .

    1. Re:Beats the cloud storage by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      iPhones don't store any of their data "in the cloud." There is the option to sync it with a server, which you have to pay for right now and will be free in the future.

  37. Re:I bought a decent chinese android phone for $11 by quenda · · Score: 1

    Its not state of the art and it has a resistive touch screen

    Of course it does. You ever try writing chinese characters without a stylus? Or taking your gloves off to answer the phone in February in Beijing?

  38. Why buy from Apple? Seriously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is time to re-think this through. Apple decided that Chinese make good products. Well, now they make decent products based on Apple's work, which was based on others work. Since Apple has decided that only the share holders and top ppl of apple deserve to be American, why not go all the way through? Lets just quit buying Apple (and MS for that matter) and start buying chinese products that are ripoffs.

  39. Geek status symbol by utkonos · · Score: 1

    I wonder if these bootleg iphones will become a truely geeky status symbol. "Forget the real iPhone. They are easy to come by. I have the super-exclusive hiPhone 5. You can't get these things ANYWHERE. I have a hookup in China that smuggles them into the states if you're interested. They cost four times as much as the real iPhone here in the US because they're totally illegal."

  40. Hiphone phones have been out for a while by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    There have been Hiphone phones for years now. The first one wasn't very good, but by the Hiphone 4, they were getting halfway decent reviews.

    It doesn't integrate with Apple's overpriced ecosystem. It's a straightforward unlocked GSM smartphone. And, unlike with Apple, you can replace the battery.

  41. Well said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you ever needed proof that "Communism" is a far right wing tool to exert power over the masses, go to China. The link he showed is true. They just want to overpopulate these ghost blocks with people from the countryside to activate their kill grid and wipe out as many people as possible when they neutron us or whichever way they choose.

  42. Why are people so surprised? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Netherlands benefit from the Marshall plan, American tax payers money send to Holland to restart the economy after WW2. One of the most notable was the investment that allowed Hoogovens, an iron smelter, to be created. It would become one of the better ones in the world, a major contribution to the dutch economy AND a competitor to American steel.

    Japan was also selected by the US for enhanced economic growth. Much of its culture was heavily guided by McArthur including things as schooling. Now MAYBE some Americans thought they could turn that country into a source of cheap labor but the Japanese government had an entirely different idea. With long term plans they setup entire industries with a clear goal of first producing crap for the local market and parts for the foreign market then improving the local products and shipping cheap but not good to foreign markets, then good products locally and finally good products abroad. Honda? Toyota? Sony? There is a long list of super companies that ALL started out with lousy reps in the west. Then for a long time they were just known for high quality. Japanese cars especially went from barely fit to drive to examples of just how crap American made cars were by comparison.

    Korea saw all this and liked it and did EXACTLY the same thing. All the Asian tigers are copying it and China is just very very good and extremely large. A few japanese cars coming on to the western market just meant Detroit lost a bit of fat. Korea made Detroit go hungry. Chinese cars will finish Detroit off. Indian cars will rape its corpse.

    What was produced in Japan was copied in Japan. Same for Korea and China. And then Japan changed and actually started to produce better good themselves because the Japanese government still invested in industry not the financial market. Anyone who think the financial market is an industry should just die. Why was the transistor pocket radio made in Japan? Transistors were not a Japanese invention. Name an American consumer electronics brand. I don't know any and I am near half a century old. (Meaning I saw some of the switch from Japanese crap to Japanese quality) Granted I am from Holland but why do I know several Japanese and other asian brands but not a single US brand for TV's?

    It shows just how long this process has already been going on. The process of all production shifting to the east.

    The portable transistor radio was a famous Sony product for fitting a radio into a shirt pocket if you first enlarged the pocket. But the walkman then came into fashion. An American concept? A European one? No, Japanese again. MP3 players would re-boot that industry. Did Sony make them? No. Were they made in the US? If you now happily shout YES because of Diamond... oops sorry, the first mp3 player was made and sold in asia. Search for MPMan.

    And for a long time the biggest players were Korean. Not American until the iPod hit the scene. A device entirely made in China. US design, asian production... cheap knockoffs... gosh if only there was an example in history... well there isn't ONE example in history, there are LOTS.

    What is forgotten by a lot of people is that the west did not get what it was thanks to the million dollar incomes. It got there on the back of people making a mimimum wage but making it reliable. Working on an assembly line may not be glamorous and may not be the future you want for your kids but it puts bread on the table and pays the rent. 1 iPod designer, 1000 people on the factory line supporting their families. Only problem, the 1 iPod designer is in the US,the 1000 people are in China. What do the 1000 Americans do? Work for the iPod designer? That is what reaganomics would tell you. But reagan and his supporters are morons. The current economic cricis is the proof.

    The US, the west, ANY country NEEDS those 1000 factory workers because if those 1000 aren't on the assembly line they are un-employed. England and its riots, France and its riots and the US and its riots are the warning signs.

    Paris Fra

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Why are people so surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very well said

    2. Re:Why are people so surprised? by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      Now go tell those rioters you are talking about, they can have all those factory jobs if they accept working for a globally competitive salary (as in divide by 10 for Norwegians at least).

      No, I think the solution for rich countries will rather be heavily automated with robots doing as much as "humanly" possible. Will we keep those 1000 factory workers instead of just the one ipod designer? No, but instead of losing them all we might get to keep 50. If we don't do it, some other company in some other country surely will.

    3. Re:Why are people so surprised? by fortfive · · Score: 2

      Name an American consumer electronics brand

      Umm, Apple, Inc.?

    4. Re:Why are people so surprised? by Trilkin · · Score: 1

      Motorola as well.

      --
      Nobody cares what the CAPTCHA for your post was.
    5. Re:Why are people so surprised? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      Motorola sold its TV division to Panasonic in japan in the 70's.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    6. Re:Why are people so surprised? by Trilkin · · Score: 1

      [Carson]I did not know that.[/Carson]

      --
      Nobody cares what the CAPTCHA for your post was.
  43. Not quite. N900 is Japan+Norway closed source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason APPLE has an Iphone is because they weasled into the phone industry like how Microsoft has been weasling into the console gaming industry. These are monopolists, you idiot!

    It's not a poor device, is not a slow processor, it's not a crappy screen. I suppose you would lecture why none should buy a OpenPandora console?

    Confirmed: processor over 400MHz, Touchscreen, gravity gyro's, Camera, True-Color, GPS, Wifi 802.11G, 850/900 MHz bands etc, and Linux.

    What were you trying to run on your OpenMoko besides a mp3, Internet Radio, or VideoCam/Video-Phone session?

    Part of buying a product is that you endorse the company to a profit that pays for the development of the next model to be much better. The first Linux PDA was a Agenda VR3 PDA (60MHz NEC processor /w 16MB RAM) from ST Electronics, and they never released the next model because of attitudes like you.

  44. Where's the website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone found out how to buy them online yet?

  45. Well duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they're going to the trouble of building counterfeit stores, the knock-off phones shouldn't surprise anyone.

    That's somewhat of a tautology, isn't it?

    I mean, they're hardly going to build a counterfeit store, and then use it to sell genuine iPhones, now, are they?

  46. Re:Extremely light? Yuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually mobile devices that are light are assumed to be expensive. That's why a knockoff that's lighter and cheaper than the original is usually expected to lack in quality.

  47. WHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do we continuously do business with a country that is nothing more than a common crook?

    When will we EVER raise the damn import taxes on China? I could care less if we receive imports from them, or if a business fails that relies on them as well.

  48. Talk about not getting it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Where are Apples factories?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.