Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best Wi-Fi Solution For a Hotel?

dynamo52 writes "I have been tasked with replacing a managed Wi-Fi system for a mid-sized hotel. They have already selected Comcast to provide a 100mbps connection, which unfortunately must come in at one corner of the ~5-acre property. The hotel plans to provide this service for free, so there is no need for any type of billing management system, though it should be secured enough that the parking lot does not become a free Wi-Fi hotspot. Additionally, there is no ethernet infrastructure in place. The existing APs (hidden away in proprietary encasements) seem to be connected via telephone lines and the owners have strongly indicated they would prefer that no new wiring be installed. Have any Slashdotters implemented similar systems? Specifically, what hardware did you use and what special considerations should I take in designing this system?"

179 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well if they getting comcast tv as well then they may need to rewire the cable system as well any ways. Any way more info on how they AP are setup and linked will help.

    And to cut down on free wifi use you can set a password that you just give out to hotel guests.

    1. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is stupid. How many parking lot surfers are you really going to see? There are plenty of places to get online. Is a parking lot surfer once in a blue moon really going matter? I say not at all. Why is everybody always out to get others? It's not like it is costing your hotel any more money. In fact the only thing costing your hotel money is the time you are wasting trying to deal with a non-issue.

    2. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeaaah... that shouldn't matter actually. The web programmer that transmits credit card data unencrypted should be shot on sight in today's security concerned society. So no matter if the wireless is unsecured, buying shit should still be safe.

    3. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by gmack · · Score: 2

      No need, you can install a VDSL DSLAM where all of those phone cables connect and get a reasonably decent data rate to the hotspots.

    4. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Pharmboy · · Score: 2

      I didn't think that would be a big issue either, however, as others pointed out, making it a simple password would be the equivalent of having a latch on a screen door. Just enough to keep out the majority of unauthorized users looking for a free connect, but not enough to keep out people serious enough that they could bypass tougher security anyway. A reasonable 90%-95% solution.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by RKBA · · Score: 2

      I shop online quite frequently but have never had a credit card number misused because I use disposable Citi-bank "virtual" credit card numbers that are only good for one merchant, expire when I want them to, and have a maximum limit that I can set so that no more than what I specify can be charged to the particular credit card number I generated for that specific transaction with that specific merchant.

    6. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No, it just means that we are not buying V!agra from the merchants selling their wares via email.

      In the last 20 years, my wife and I have had only one fraudulent charge each. My wife's was done by her mother, who actually opened a credit card under her name. That was easily solved by showing that my wife was under the age of 18 when the card was opened, and thus could not have legally opened the card. The other was happening inside of Chase. We could tell this because new charges started showing up on it stolen card number even after Chase claimed to have locked the card to prevent new fraudulent charges. Then when they sent a new card, new charges showed up BEFORE Chase mailed the card out. To be clear, it had not yet left their facility when the first fraudulent charges showed up on the new card.

      So, while we use our cards on line all the time, the only fraud we have had has been off-line.

      You are correct about the card companies themselves making credit card fraud attractive. In both of my cases, the credit card company was uninterested in pursuing the fraud. In my wife's case, there was even a clear paper trail to show who had committed the crime. My theory is that they have some kind of accounting trickery that leads to them making money off of credit card fraud. The fact that it would be trivial for them to implement basic security like PIN numbers and one time "virtual card numbers", yet they are only used in rare cases, shows that they clearly actively want fraud to be committed.

    7. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      If you haven't had a credit card number "borrowed" at least once a year, you're not shopping online. And not going to restaurants either.

      Actually, I use my Visa card regularly: restaurants, gas stations, drug stores, parking, buying clothes, etc.. I usually carry a small amount of cash for incidentals, but if I'm having a $50+ meal with some friends, it goes on the Visa. I have even used the card at restaurants and stores overseas (Europe, the south Pacific, and the Caribbean). I have even been known to make the occasional purchase online, though that's mostly been computers and computer equipment. My habits with the card have not changed in more than 10 years, and I have never once had a fraudulent charge put through on my card.

      You may say I'm just lucky, but I would say that I have a good credit card company. The one time I used it at a dive shop in Curacao having forgotten to advise the Visa folks that I was going to on vacation, they declined the charge, and 2 minutes later my cell phone rang: It was my bank, asking if I was traveling. I have had the same thing happen domestically, buying gas on a road trip, or even at a new station in a different part of town than where I usually buy gas.

      If your card gets fraudulent charges that frequently, maybe you need to change banks?

    8. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, hey, look, a video of a guy stretching out his anus. How incredibly original.

      This stuff isn't shocking any more. It's just offtopic.

    9. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      If you haven't had a credit card number "borrowed" at least once a year, you're not shopping online. And not going to restaurants either.

      Never had a number lifted or borrowed, and I put well over 100k a year on two different cards for personal and work, and have for many years. And I use my cards for everything, never use cash, never buy local what I can order online. Even pizza is ordered and paid online. Seldom a day goes buy without purchasing something small on the Visa although Amex is my card of choice, yet never a fraud charge.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    10. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by onepoint · · Score: 1

      OK spill the beans, whom do you use? that's all good and I recall that level of service, but I don't see it anymore.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    11. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Bingo. This is how the majority of hotels that dont want to spend the money to run CAT5 do it. I used to work at a company that did WiFi for hotels (among other places), and the VDSL solution running over existing internal phone wiring was the most used method.

    12. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by dougmc · · Score: 1

      How many parking lot surfers are you really going to see?

      Who knows? It's easy to discourage them, and there is another advantage ...

      If you use WPA2 with a password, each user has their own connection encrypted separately from everybody else's, even if everybody is using the same WPA2 password. So people cannot sniff each other's traffic.

      (With WEP, if you knew the shared password, you could use it to decrypt everybody's traffic that used the same password. This isn't related to how WEP was cracked, it's just a part of how it works. But WPA2 is smarter and everything is encrypted independently.)

    13. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      I have had fraudulent charges appear on my charge card about every other year, for the last 6 years. Of course, I did not end up having to pay the fraudulent charges.

      I have rarely ever used WiFi for on-line shopping. I try harder than most people to keep both my Linux computer and my Windows computer secure, and do not have wireless. I have always looked to make sure that https has appeared in the URL, instead of http, before entering my charge number. As much as possible, I have usually tried to make my on-line purchases from larger companies, that hopefully are sophisticated enough to know how to secure their websites properly. I rarely ever eat out, and usually pay by cash when I do. But, those precautions were not enough.

      In the previous incidents, my bank quickly called me or put a hold on my account after the first suspicious charge or two. But, in the latest incident I only noticed the fraudulent charges when my bill arrived in the mail.

      The bank sent me some information about one of the fraudulent charges. Someone pretending to be me, emailed a clothing company saying that I supposedly wanted to send about $600 worth of clothing as a gift to my friend in Ghana. His first email asked if he could make such a purchase by sending an email with an attachment showing the front and back of my charge chard. The clothing company said that would be OK. The attached picture of the charge card, had my charge card number on the front, but the name of the bank was wrong. The signature on the back looked like a crude mark made by an illiterate person.

      As a precaution, I am now making more local purchases with cash instead. When I recently had to make an on-line purchase from a less sophisticated small company, I used a prepaid Wallmart gift card, instead of using my regular charge card.

    14. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by durrr · · Score: 1

      Check with data-via-electric-sockets solutions as a replacement for ethernet, put acess points to these.

    15. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Yeaaah... that shouldn't matter actually. The web programmer that transmits credit card data unencrypted should be shot on sight in today's security concerned society. So no matter if the wireless is unsecured, buying shit should still be safe.

      Most ecommerce websites work on the following system

      1: the user visits an unencrypted website
      2: the user adds products to their cart
      3: the user is transferred to a SSL site which may or may not be operated by the same company as the main website to submit payment.

      The question then becomes will people notice if the SSL site they are redirected to has a slightly different name from what they were expecting? I'm betting in most cases the answer is no.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    16. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      It's not just money for CAT5; the DSL hardware is more expensive than the wire. The problem is that you can easily go beyond the maximum network diameter for Ethernet in a large hotel. DSL is good for thousands of meters, not hundreds.

    17. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by kmoser · · Score: 1

      My credit card company always honors my charges made abroad, and I don't have to tell them I'm traveling. Since I made the travel reservations with the same card, I assume they put two and two together and "know" when I'll be in another country. (Which still doesn't prevent somebody from using my card fraudulently in that country at the same time, but that's another story.)

    18. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by witwerg · · Score: 1

      I think this is worth while to consider. I have to admit, the "connected to phone lines" seemed odd me, I didn't see how that would give enough bandwidth for an AP nor why do something such large scale if the system is generally working. Unless they just want to upgrade the system from say G to N, the parent offers a reasonable explanation to an odd (to me) situation.

    19. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Check with data-via-electric-sockets solutions as a replacement for ethernet, put acess points to these.

      Yuck! Homeplug should be illegal the way it messes up shortwave radio.

    20. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) :)

    21. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Restil · · Score: 1

      I don't think the issue is about security, just about keeping freeloaders off of the network, so the speed is available for the people who are actual customers. If you're THAT concerned about security, stay off of the unencrypted access points or route everything through a vpn.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    22. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Restil · · Score: 1

      No, they said they wanted to avoid extra wiring, not equipment purchases. Also, you don't need the dsl runs to each room, just to each access point, of which there will be at most a dozen or so covering the entire hotel (or maybe far less.. not sure how large it is).

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    23. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Restil · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of when I first purchased this house. I was going to be doing work here for a while before I moved in, so I didn't want to move all of my expensive computers over here, but I still needed simple internet access. I ended up bringing over an old linux box so I could hook it up to the newly installed cable modem and I could at least use ssh.

      Only problem is, the cable company requires you to first go through a series of webpages to agree to the terms of service and set up email addresses and such before they actually grant you an ip address, and I didn't have a functional browser on the box I brought with me... and lynx wouldn't work. Ended up having to call them and have them manually do it over the phone. The techie I talked to seemed to think it was very odd that I needed internet access but didn't have a web browser.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    24. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by pfleming · · Score: 1

      I've had Bank of America freeze my account over a $.50 charge that seemed out of line (and was)

    25. Re:Well if they getting comcast tv as well then by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      If you haven't had a credit card number "borrowed" at least once a year, you're not shopping online. And not going to restaurants either.

      I shop online quite frequently. Even before I had a credit card. I started when this meant paying an "acceptgiro" before the goods were send. When online shopping picked up they started using Ideal for convenience (because most people don't have a credit card in the Netherlands).
      It just buggered me I couldn't pay abroad. I had a paypal account for those a while back (but deleted it because they nuked the inherent safety of that system).
      Then I got me a credit card for work related travel. But that was after about a decade of buying stuff online. In the Netherlands I still pay online without credit card, because I don't want people to have my credit card number. I know I will be reimbursed when fraudulent charges are made, but I don't want criminals to have the chance.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  2. Juniper or Aruba by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Juniper's recent purchase of Trapeze gives them a pretty powerful line of wireless hardware with software to support it. One cool feature is the ability to literally draw lines based on floorplan as to where a given AP will allow a client to connect.

    Then there's Aruba. They have some really great management and security features. Browse both vendor's sites and take a look at their literature. I've seen both implemented to good effect in your type of scenario.

    1. Re:Juniper or Aruba by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Motorola Solutions (the enterprise network and public safety side of the split) also makes a really good enterprise wireless solution. I like the LiveRF function you can get on some products. If you have a floor plan with AP placements, you can generate a live heat map of your coverage. If you also use their integrated WIPS/WIDS system, you can also do live spectrum analysis, wireless forensics (you can actually pick out a wireless client and watch the history as it moved throughout a location moving from AP to AP), and a bunch of other useful diagnostic tasks.

      disclosure: I work for motorola solutions.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    2. Re:Juniper or Aruba by That's+What+She+Said · · Score: 1

      What you seem to be suggesting is something like Motorola Solutions' AirDefense Services Platform.

      OP's customer seems to be using Motorola Solutions products, or something very similar from a competitor. He says:

      [...] there is no ethernet infrastructure in place. The existing APs (hidden away in proprietary encasements) seem to be connected via telephone lines and the owners have strongly indicated they would prefer that no new wiring be installed [...]

      The only product I know that uses Cat-3 (standard telephone cabling) is Motorola Solutions' T3 PowerBroadband. It's quite a nice product, but only supports 802.11b/g.

      But the problem the OP faces now is the infrastructure itself. He just didn't tell us what the problem is, letting us to guess...

      To start, I would recommend AirDefense Mobile Site-Survey or hire some certified professional to do an assessment and determine best access point locations. This can avoid the need to replace the entire infrastructure. It would require some repositioning of APs and, maybe, the addition of some more.

      After that, he could add other AirDefense products to the mix, including the ones you seem to have suggested, to manage the network, prevent intrusion and also to provide services like RTLS and VoWLAN, so the workforce gets more efficient.

      If the problem is performance (not coverage), I would suggest 802.11n and Cat-6 cabling, which the OP said the hotel owners don't want. Another option would be wireless mesh (a.k.a. WDS, but somewhat different), which is not as good and costs more.

      Disclaimer: I don't work for Motorola Solutions. I resell their products and provide services like consulting, site-survey and configuration here in Brazil (pretty far from the OP).

  3. No Offense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No offense... but judging by your wording, the hotel should really hire a professional. Mark my words: this will turn well for neither you nor the hotel.

    1. Re:No Offense... by tg123 · · Score: 1

      No offense... but judging by your wording, the hotel should really hire a professional. Mark my words: this will turn well for neither you nor the hotel.

      I agree this is not something you should attempt without professional advice, you have a nightmare in the making here.

      Have you thought of using internet over mains wiring?

      There are plug packs that that plug into a power socket and have a network connector on one end .

      http://www.solwise.co.uk/net-powerline.htm

      This would give guests close to the ease of use of a wireless network without the headaches of security concerns and wireless dropouts.
      You could then set up a small wireless network for the lobby and common area.

    2. Re:No Offense... by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      good grief no , there is a slight issue that mains wiring has to be on the same circuit to work and even then at a moderate distance (20 meters or so ) the speed will be the equivalent of an acoustically coupled modem connected to two tin cans and a piece of soggy string.

      The advertised distances are a complete joke.

      chances are you will need to run some cables and with the distances some of these probably need to be fibre
      to make it work in any reasonable manner.

    3. Re:No Offense... by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Chances are, you've had some bad experiences with some bad hardware... I use powerline networking at home... the best link (that's actually a real world application) is about 40m of cable, and pulls 55-65mbit depending on what's running on the circuit at the time. The *worst* link is about 75m of cable between the two adapters, both of which are connected to a different phase of the power line, and pulls about 15mbit between the two.

      That said, I still wouldn't consider powerline networking for the hotel. It's not a commercial-grade solution, and will not satisfy the needs of potentially hundreds of users. It's good for maybe 10-15 users at most before the line becomes saturated. If the hotel doesn't want to run Ethernet, and the existing Cat-3 that's there isn't good enough, then the person asking the question should wash his hands of it and let the hotel find somebody else who will install a product that they won't be happy with. Either that, or he should use the existing wireless network that's already there, and simply tie it in to the new 100mbit connection that's coming in.

    4. Re:No Offense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You say this man should seek professional advice and then you SUGGEST SENDING INTERNET OVER POWER LINES?! What the fuck is wrong with you?! It's a hairbrained scheme that betrays a deficient understanding of physics. Sending radio frequency signals over unshielded transmission lines RADIATES THE SIGNAL LIKE A GODDAMNED ANTENNA! Fuck you and everyone like you who thinks it's fair to shit all over the spectrum so you can send your data around without pulling some cat5e/6 like you're supposed to, asshole.

    5. Re:No Offense... by evanism · · Score: 2

      No offense, but it's people like you that cause offense. He asked a clear question in plain English. He should be rewarded for this.

      It proves nothing to jam a sentence with jargon to make one look smart.

      Rather than a single critique, you could provide a cogent answer, but you didn't. You just created white noise and denigrated a guy who is trying to do his best.

      Offense taken.

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    6. Re:No Offense... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      I'm actually interested in the solutions proposed by the Slashdot community, because it's an interesting problem. What would a professional recommend in this scenario?

    7. Re:No Offense... by f3rret · · Score: 1

      You kinda aggro, friend.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    8. Re:No Offense... by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      What mod do you use for a total asshole who happens to be absolutely correct?

    9. Re:No Offense... by dynamo52 · · Score: 1, Informative

      My intent was to simply disregard this post and instead only pay attention to those posters who provided constructive input and advice. In truth however, I do take offense to your comment. I am a professional who has managed network environments for a wide array of businesses in various industries. The scale and scope of this project are well within my operating parameters and I have little doubt that whatever solution I end up deploying for this client will provide the services required in a reliable and cost effective manner. Furthermore, I know my own strengths and weaknesses. I fully recognized that there were particular aspects to this deployment that I have not encountered so I knew some amount of research would be necessary prior to even making recommendations. As part of this research it occured to me that Ask Slashdot might be a perfect forum through which I could gain tremendous value by the collective knowledge of all who visit this site. This has proven to be more true than I could have anticipated.

      Prior to asking, my preferred course of action for this job was and still is to simply run new cabling and deploy a series of centrally managed POE APs. After that the choice would be a fairly simple one of platform and hardware, though thanks to Slashdot I have found a couple of interesting options ofwhich I had not previously known. I also had considered mesh networks but as I had not personally deployed any I wanted feedback on the reliability of such systems. Again, Slashdot provided valuable insight. I will fully admit that I was not completely familiar with the backend infrastructure of their DSLAM setup, though once I understood what it I was looking at the logic of the system is readily apparent and there is a strong argument to be made in favor of simply mirroring this system. If this is the chosen course of action, through a little blood and sweat, I could probably punch down the blocks myself and configure the DSLAM and modems, but more likely I will work with an existing colleague or find one more skilled in these particular tasks (and hopefully learn something along the way). In short, I do have the resources to make this happen as well should the need arise.

      So I'm sorry my lack of jargon and unnecessary technical info causes you to question my skills but I am fully confident my ability to listen to the client, understand their needs, and communicate with them effectively, combined with my attention to detail and the simple ability to get things done will in the end leave them better served than most of these "professionals" of whom you speak.

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    10. Re:No Offense... by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      what i wanted to do was use the powerline networking to get from the bar where the main router was into an outside building easily within 40 meters of the bar. however the power for the new building although originating from the old was a different circuit and nothing was detected. for a single fused circuit it works as soon as i was trying to make the jump between one run of cable to another it was a no go even when the distance was a few feet. For English or Irish circuits sockets tend to be on a ground floor circuit an upstairs circuit and kitchen on its own circuit. This will tend to mean linking via a down stairs socket to an upstairs one will not work.

      perhaps there is an issue with ring mains, (signal would be moving in 2 directions perhaps).
      I've known a few people try these mains networking systems and it has always been a failure.

      on more hub orientated circuits perhaps there is less interference.

      devolo dLAN units were used in my case and returned due to the inability to do the job required, the salesman who sold me the units assuring me they would work was re educated by his manager ...

         

  4. Just make sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just make sure that every client will have to run an install script that sets up the passwords and as as a bonus installs a bitcoin miner.
    You'll be rich before you know it!

  5. Repurpose the telephone cabling by bartmanus · · Score: 2

    100 Mbit Ethernet really requires only two twisted pairs so you might just get away with replacing the connectors on the end of the existing cable which has exactly that number of pairs! The old cable is probably not shielded at all so before jumping on this try it out with a few interconnected hotspots and load the system as best you can.

    1. Re:Repurpose the telephone cabling by forty-2 · · Score: 2

      second that, I've gotten away with using CAT3 in a pinch, but testing the longest runs is a good place to start. Hell, it might not even be the end of the world if it negotiates @ 10Mbps. Presumably there's local power @ the WAP location?
      How many rooms? (or 'keys' as they say in the hospitality business)

      --
      never drink kool-aid from a big vat
    2. Re:Repurpose the telephone cabling by minkie · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a reasonable plan only if the existing cabling is Cat-5 or better. Most dedicated phone cabling (especially if it's more than about 10 years old) is almost certainly not Cat-5.

    3. Re:Repurpose the telephone cabling by adolf · · Score: 2

      Is there any reason at all to use greater than 10 megabit Ethernet at all?

      10base-T is made for Cat 3, and it's nowhere near as slow/ugly with modern gear as some of us remember from the dark old days of cheap unswitched networking. Just ratchet the port speed down to 10Mbps and call it a day (with the usual caveats about distance limits and the like).

      Setting the port speed explicitly results in much more reliable communication than just expecting the NICs at either end to just figure it out for themselves, which they're generally not terribly good at doing.

      If some of the lines are very long, or dedicated pairs are not available, there's other options. HPNA is one standard which can work at absurdly long distances over ruddy existing cabling and can piggyback on existing telephone and coax circuits. (Though using coax may conflict with any video-on-demand system that the hotel may already be using.)

    4. Re:Repurpose the telephone cabling by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      not when the 10 is being used for like 20-30 rooms.

    5. Re:Repurpose the telephone cabling by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Since the connection is going out to the internet is only 100mb, it probably is plenty. At 10 drops, they are already saturated, even if the drops went to single rooms. This isn't a LAN situation. 100% of the traffic will be running across the 100mb internet connection. Wireless repeaters might give speeds, particularly if the signal is set up directionally, but saturating a 10mb line isn't really a major concern when your link to the outside world is already as anemic as they are planning.

    6. Re:Repurpose the telephone cabling by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      normal people do not spend all day and all night needing perfect streams, if it gets on and lets them mapquest the closest dennys in a quick amount of time most people are happy.

    7. Re:Repurpose the telephone cabling by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Do you realize how slow a 10 megabit connection is today? That's only 1.25 MB/s. That's only good for maybe half a dozen users, tops. Get a few people watching YouTube, sending files with email, VPNing into the office, and 10 megabit is a joke. Even HD YouTube is around 5 megabit/s.

      Personally, I'd allocate 10 Mb per room. 1 Mb per room is probably sufficient today, but it'll be totally inadequate a few years from now. I'd run CAT6 everywhere, and start with 1 Gb/s hardware.

      I work in an office of 50 people, and our 100 Mb/s pipe is often saturated. We have a single AP, and it's always saturated. We could probably use 5 APs. Users are really bandwidth hungry today.

      --
      Be relentless!
    8. Re:Repurpose the telephone cabling by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Whether the rooms are connected via 802.11b pringle cans or 10gigE optic fibre, the bottleneck is still probably going to be the 100 Mbps internet link as I'd expect most hotel traffic would go over that link rather than stay internal.

      The owners might think (rightly or wrongly) that in their situation the ROI of "hey free wifi" isn't worth rewiring the hotel. Offices with mission-critical IT needs are a different ballgame, and yes I'd start with CAT6 and GigE too.

    9. Re:Repurpose the telephone cabling by adolf · · Score: 1

      Do you realize how slow a 2.4GHz 802.11 connection is in the real world with random consumer devices and hidden nodes? And that's only half-duplex, CSMA. That's only good for maybe half a dozen users, tops. Get a few people watching YouTube [.....], and a "54mbps" radio is anything but.

      (I'd parody the rest of your comment, but you're so far off in left field with regards to what the poster was asking for that you wouldn't get it anyway.)

  6. Policy by Patik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The best hotel wifi experiences have been when I was given the SSID and (simple) password at check-in and, most importantly, the signal reached my room. There's nothing worse than having to go down the hall every time you want a signal, and many people will have smartphones so don't make the password 20 digits.

    1. Re:Policy by brusk · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. I just stayed in a hotel where I could only get a signal in the bathroom.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    2. Re:Policy by Relayman · · Score: 1

      Most public WiFi connections I use don't require a password. You load a non-SSL page in a browser, agree to the terms and conditions and you're connected.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    3. Re:Policy by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Thats annoying, and its free wifi.
      Just give us a network name and password instead.
      Much simpler, and it works better.

    4. Re:Policy by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it's not like it needs to be a complicated password.

      Just make it five letters or something and change it every day around at checkout time. Have them calculated in the future so you can give out the next few days to guests. You can print out a form with blanks that say 'Here are the next three days of passwords', and have the desk people fill them in as needed, or you can print it on some paperwork you give guests anyway.

      You could probably even get away with changing it just once a week.

      No one's trying to absolutely stop all non-guests from possibly accessing anything...the point is to stop the problem where people go 'I can get free wifi in the parking lot of the hotel down the street'. Pretty much any barrier to that will send people somewhere else.

      And having a password also gives you legal grounds to have people arrested who don't belong on the network. It doesn't matter how simple or poorly guarded a password is, just like it doesn't matter how flimsy a lock on a door is to make it breaking and entering. Once they start using a password they're not entitled to (Because it clearly says at the top of the paper, 'for hotel guests only'), they're toast.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:Policy by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Kiwis are not animals. They are often confused with them, but the kiwi is a fruit.

      It grows on a bush, and eventually becomes large enough that it grows a beak-like stem and legs and falls off, running around as if it is an animal. It is at this stage that it spreads kiki seeds, often confused with eggs.

      It is a common mistake, like thinking a sponge is a plant or that a duck-billed platypus is real.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  7. Bridges by phrostie · · Score: 1

    Does it need to be an open Wifi or can you set up Bridges?

  8. WMN by hamvil · · Score: 1

    Look for a cheap and reliable wireless mesh networks. Forget cisco and the other big names. Companies like meraki and aerohive will sell you the hardware as well as the management service (for a monthly fee). As an alternative you could look for somebody to deploy custom openwrt based access point with a routing daemon, e.g.: olsr, batman, wing, and many other alternatives.

  9. Repeaters by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

    For a mid sized hotel you should be able to mount N class repeaters on each floor. If course that will depend on how big the floors are so you may need more than one. Ideally you would need to place the unit in the middle of the floor for maximum coverage. The network should be secured and the password should be changed regularly. This will keep the wardrivers out of your parking lot and it shouldn't be too dificult for the average end user with a laptop to find the ssid and enter the pin. You probably don't want to get some off the shelf equipment from Best Buy as you will need more power than those units are designed for. I imagine someone here could recomend a brand that would work.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    1. Re:Repeaters by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Do people still wardrive? I always figured that was an early 2000s "geeky fun" activity that's long since become boring and uninteresting.

      I know I wardrove a bit during the early days of wifi, but these days I find the idea kind of ridiculous and immature. :)

    2. Re:Repeaters by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. It's been quite a while and free wireless is considerably more prevalent these days but who knows what these kids do today. I know what I'd be doing with that 100 mb connection though. That's good stuff.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  10. Meraki wifi mesh by braddock · · Score: 2

    This is pretty much what Meraki was designed to do.

    1. Re:Meraki wifi mesh by superid · · Score: 1

      My condo association installed Meraki based wifi to service 250 condo units on at least 5 acres. I have no major complaints, other than occasionally I find a coverage dead zone.

  11. time warner cable has a in room AP systems by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    time Warner cable has in room modems / AP system for hotels that is tied to the hotel cable system. Now I don't know if comcast has them or not but if they do then all you have to do is run a cable off of the tv system to the AP spots. But that may need to have cable boxes in each room and limits on how much analog tv you can have on the system.

  12. yea ok by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    just set a coffee can around the antenna and choose which 4 rooms is going to have acceptable wifi, or sprinkle the place in apple airports

    or you could just do it right the first time and be done with it

  13. DSLAM and Auth Server by ZeroNullVoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Setup your own DSL network using existing RJ11/Phone cabling.

    You will place dsl modems in each area you want access points.

    You can even have all rooms or some premium rooms with hidden away dsl modems and a network cable coming out.

    You just need to setup a dslam after the modem and configure routing.

    You would want a login interface so users have to accept terms and conditions.

    Using the dsl method, you can setup access points at whatever strength seems secure enough wherever there is a phone connection or wiring, and you can splice the wiring if necessary.  You will need to place cheap filters on every normal phone connection, but that is a minimal cost.

    You can also look at ethernet over power line, but there are lots of variables and speed issues that makes this not ideal.

    1. Re:DSLAM and Auth Server by arisvega · · Score: 2

      I find your lack of fonts disturbing.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    2. Re:DSLAM and Auth Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pray that he does not alter the kerning any further.

    3. Re:DSLAM and Auth Server by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      This has been suggested elsewhere also. I am now leaning in favor of this solution.

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    4. Re:DSLAM and Auth Server by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      In addition to this you can setup m0n0wall or pfSense using captive portal where users are presented with the TOS and a login when they first connect. I think from a legal point of view this is very important. But IANAL so TIFWIW.
      The login can be a shared account that is changed how ever often the hotel staff feels is necessary (unusual traffic in the parking lot). Or they can issue vouchers that expire after a period of time. The latter will of course have more overhead.

      I use a few m0n0wall captive portal setups for real estate market centers where hundreds of agents need their own credentials and clients need vouchers. It is incredibly simple, reliable, and free. I use this embedded pc and they work great with 100mb connections.
      If you want better reporting and and many more features look into pfSense. I find m0n0 to be sufficient for my needs, if you are look in for a good starting point this would be my first choice.

  14. Is the telephone wiring Cat-5? by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 1

    If the wiring is already Cat5, then you should be good to swap out the proprietary boxes and find the other end for the router/network closet.
    If they are really telephone-grade wires, find the other ends and pull Cat5 through (by tying string/cat5 to the existing wiring.)

    Whatever the right thing is, do it right the first time and the hotel will save money either fixing it or dealing with unhappy guests. It may cost more initially. Really unhappy guests don't return.

    IMarv

    1. Re:Is the telephone wiring Cat-5? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      its probably cat3 which most automatically call telephone wire cause they dont know what they are doing, and they saw the same stuff punched into the pbx.
      which cat 3 does make nice telephone wire, thats not why it existed originally

    2. Re:Is the telephone wiring Cat-5? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      If he finds CAT3 and the phones only use one pair, he might hit the jackpot: you can run 10-base-T over CAT 3, as it is rated for 10 MHz / 100m IIRC.

      This means getting a good network switch that you can program to automatically derate the ports to 10-base-T, playing some games in the PBX wiring closet, sticking wireless repeaters at the other end, and Bob's your uncle.

      No hotel guest would complain about a 10Mbit network if the coverage was good and there weren't too many stations per AP.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:Is the telephone wiring Cat-5? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      yea cat 3 would be perfectly acceptable at 10 meg speed to the wifi branches. I recently did this for a warehouse that needed network in remote areas, zero budget for wire but they had a 1000 foot long box of cat 3 lying around. In the end I had them string the cat 3 from the closest switch and jaked it into a old linksys router and upgraded its firmware.

      now one "remote" location is wired, and 4 others are nailing the wifi with strong signals, even with a few of them streaming pandora radio saturation rarely exceeds 40%

      as retarded as all that sounds you to do dumb stuff for a friend

  15. stitching things together by v1 · · Score: 2

    The existing APs (hidden away in proprietary encasements) seem to be connected via telephone lines and the owners have strongly indicated they would prefer that no new wiring be installed.

    It's possible that running cable through the building is a nightmare. The owners may have painful memories of how things went when the last APs were installed. Talk with them and find out what went badly. There may be a better way, or maybe not.

    You may be forced to do wireless repeating. This is going to make a significant increase to the cost, but that may be the only option. First thing I'd do is start scouting around to see where good spots for APs are. The current ones may have simply been spaced evenly with no signal planning/testing whatsoever. Try the roof. You may not be able to run cable around IN the building, but have NO problem getting up onto the roof, and scatter APs around above people instead of in the hallways, thus avoiding the cable running problem. (you'd also be farther from the parking lot)

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  16. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by RobertLTux · · Score: 2

    and i would bet that one or more will be consulted (since i think that the SlashHive can't show up "on site") but the comments here will give enough info so that any SnowJobs are prevented.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  17. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by Mycroft-X · · Score: 1

    He knows that, he's one of them. Are you implying that Ask Slashdot isn't the place to get free advice on how to do work you're being paid for?

  18. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by arisvega · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. seems like there is an entire market of consultants ..

    Yes, people hire them because they are too embarrassed to "ask slashdot" by themselves.

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  19. How to sell new cable to them by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    if the cable is more than say 5 years old i would bet money that it is not within CURRENT building code (if its within the building code in force at the time). So now would be a good time to rip the old stuff out and rerun with new stuff (bonus if they will foot for proper cable chases and such).

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    1. Re:How to sell new cable to them by LandDolphin · · Score: 2

      An issue with older buildings that are out of code on many issues is that they can usually stay out of code until they perform $X amount of renovations. So working on redoing the cable/wi-fi might cause them to have to spend thousands on other out-of-code renovations.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    2. Re:How to sell new cable to them by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      so you make sure that when a code update project gets done that wiring is part of it (in this case make sure that they know that performance may be "impaired" until the wiring gets fixed).

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    3. Re:How to sell new cable to them by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      They only have 100 Mbps outbound. As long as they have at least two standard phone lines to work with, they can route the data over the existing Cat 3 using 100BASE-T4, and they're done. No performance penalty is required. If they only have one Cat 3 wire to work with, they're pretty much screwed unless they pull new cables, as they'll have to wire it for 10BASE-T.

      That said, if they're going to upgrade the wiring, they should go ahead and pull fiber. In the long run, they'll be glad they did.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:How to sell new cable to them by amorsen · · Score: 1

      There are better standards than 10base-T for single pairs of phone wire. VDSL and HomePNA are obvious choices, with VDSL being the obvious choice for an installation like this. I have no idea where you would find 100base-T4 NICs and switches today.

      It will take a lot of work to go from having to ask for the basics on Slashdot to implementing a reliable hotel wireless network.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  20. Done. by richie2000 · · Score: 1

    I've done this at a small (~70 room) hotel/conference center with three Linksys WRTG54Ls, one master and two repeaters plus three sets of high gain antennas.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
    1. Re:Done. by hamvil · · Score: 1

      And if that should not prove up to the task you can always flash those routers with OpenWRT or DD-WRT and try this: wing

  21. WiFi access points, meshing and user auth by MC68040 · · Score: 2

    Hi,

    Right this is only going from personal experience. At work we've bought UniFi access points.
    Not to plug it overly but the roaming for clients between access points and easy provisioning system is a treat including the handling of the "guest" network with user/pass sign-on in the browser.

    As far as cabling etc goes if you've got any largeish distance to cover then a simple wifi bridge should do the trick?

    All of this of course depends on the amount of clients you are expecting to be online at one given time on the network. If you want to use this as an meshed network then you will obviously get a higher latency the further you go from the core node.
    The above example would not be suitable for a very large hotel, and if you want to cover large outside areas then the antennas will cost a few buck not just in hardware but testing coverage / installation.

  22. Think about data through lightbulbs by DrD8m · · Score: 1

    Could be a solution
    http://www.good.is/post/forget-wifi-it-s-lifi-internet-through-lightbulbs/

  23. Re:mesh by Adriax · · Score: 1

    Openmesh. Support for a public and a private network, standard encryption choices on both, coupon codes could be used to limit guest vs parking lot access. Just have to run a cable to strategic points so your bandwidth isn't completely limited by wireless speeds at the last mesh hop.

    http://www.open-mesh.com/

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  24. DD-WRT by paulsnx2 · · Score: 1

    Get a few routers (I like Linksys), set them up as repeaters, and find strategic places to set them to get the coverage you need. Set up each with an easy to remember password (which will allow anyone "in the know" to use the network).

    And you are pretty much done. If you want to do something more fancy for logging in, DD-WRT has many options. I have no personal experience with them, however.

    1. Re:DD-WRT by paulsnx2 · · Score: 1

      Grrrr.... Left out the step where you flash your routers with DD-WRT firmware (http://www.dd-wrt.com). But I guess that is obvious from the title.... I hope....

    2. Re:DD-WRT by carnivore302 · · Score: 1

      wrong advise. I don't even know where to start. Oh, I do. Get a professional to do this.

      --
      Please login to access my lawn
  25. Xirrus is the way to go by bigBlackSabbath · · Score: 1

    Simply put, Xirrus is the brand. They make wireless arrays, which are circular enclosures containing multiple antennas. Their OS is based off of Gentoo Linux, and they support passive capture, multiple SSID's, the ability to map nodes onto a floor plan, integration with internal as well as external RADIUS servers.

    Simply badass. They generally target places like schools, hotels, convention centers, etc.. We just bought a bunch at my job (a school) and they simply kick-butt. They are not cheap, but after scouting what's out there, they offer a complete solution which is super easy to maintain and operate.

  26. sveasoft wins by haemish · · Score: 1

    Check out http://sveasoft.com/ - they have firmware loads for commodity WiFi nodes that turn them into excellent mesh's that do exactly what you want. Excellent tech, dirt cheap. Easy.

  27. Wha? by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As usual for "Ask Slashdot," you have left out key details that would allow people to give you meaningful responses. For example:

    1. What is the hotel using now and why does it want to replace it?
    2. What is a "proprietary encasement," and who put the APs there? Are you expected to put new APs in the same encasements? What will happen to the old APs?
    3. You say the hotel doesn't want to lay any new cable. That might just be too bad, but it also seems to imply that there is already some cable somewhere. Why not use the existing cable? You say the APs "seem to be connected by telephone wire," but you don't sound sure. Perhaps it's just long strings with tin cans at each end? Is there any way to find out?
    4. If the existing network is as strange and nonstandard as you make it sound, why is that? Was there something unique to the property that made that the best solution, and is it smart for you to ignore that?
    5. Before you begin, have you verified that the hotel's contract with Comcast actually allows it to offer Internet access to the public?
    6. You say the hotel wants to provide the network for free, so there's no need for any billing management system. Are you then comfortable with the idea that there will be no logging of the network at all, and no record of who might have used it and when? Is BitTorrent OK? How about botnets?
    7. If the patrons aren't expected to pay for the network, can they expect it to exist at all? That is, do you have a plan to test and verify that every room will have equal access to the network, and that a guest who came last summer won't return this summer and find out that the hotel doesn't seem to have WiFi anymore (when in fact it's just their new room)?
    8. Are you aware of FCC regulations regarding signal strength of your antennas, for those portions of the property that might be natural dark spots?
    9. Does your task include just replacing the network or does it also include managing the network, making repairs, etc.? How much time do you plan to devote to that?

    There may be more to this job than you have considered.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Wha? by dynamo52 · · Score: 4, Informative

      OK, while others here have provided good suggestions you are the first to ask specific and relevant questions.

      What is the hotel using now and why does it want to replace it?

      They are using a third party provider that manages the entire system. This system includes a paywall that they no longer feel is advantageous to their business. Additionally, they are bringing in Comcast to provide telephone and television services as well.

      What is a "proprietary encasement," and who put the APs there? Are you expected to put new APs in the same encasements? What will happen to the old APs?

      The existing APs are located in individual bottom floor rooms in two story buildings. They are placed in boxes sealed with tamperproof bolts. The only lines in are what appears to be a standard telephone line and a power cable. There is also a telephone line coming out connected to the telephone. Presumably, the company who manages the current system will take the old APs. The existing networking equipment is also protected from closer inspection though does connect through standard telephone punchdown blocks.

      You say the hotel doesn't want to lay any new cable. That might just be too bad, but it also seems to imply that there is already some cable somewhere. Why not use the existing cable? You say the APs "seem to be connected by telephone wire," but you don't sound sure. Perhaps it's just long strings with tin cans at each end? Is there any way to find out?

      If new cabling is required then so be it. The owners would just rather it be kept to the absolute minimum necessary.

      If the existing network is as strange and nonstandard as you make it sound, why is that? Was there something unique to the property that made that the best solution, and is it smart for you to ignore that?

      I think the primary reason again was the desire to avoid new wiring.

      Before you begin, have you verified that the hotel's contract with Comcast actually allows it to offer Internet access to the public?

      Yes

      You say the hotel wants to provide the network for free, so there's no need for any billing management system. Are you then comfortable with the idea that there will be no logging of the network at all, and no record of who might have used it and when? Is BitTorrent OK? How about botnets?

      The ability to centrally manage the APs is a strong plus. Additionally, logging is not highly critical but the ability to ensure that bandwidth is distributed as equitably as possible would be nice. Yes, I would like the ability to restrict botnets and other undesirable traffic.

      If the patrons aren't expected to pay for the network, can they expect it to exist at all? That is, do you have a plan to test and verify that every room will have equal access to the network, and that a guest who came last summer won't return this summer and find out that the hotel doesn't seem to have WiFi anymore (when in fact it's just their new room)?

      It should be available throughout. I do plan to test signal strength from every room.

      Are you aware of FCC regulations regarding signal strength of your antennas, for those portions of the property that might be natural dark spots?

      Yes, I will add APs as needed

      Does your task include just replacing the network or does it also include managing the network, making repairs, etc.? How much time do you plan to devote to that?

      I will be managing the system also. I do not wish to devote a tremendous amount of time to managing this system once it is in place. A central management console will be highly valued.

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    2. Re:Wha? by tg123 · · Score: 1

      I would appreciate that you keep quiet if you don't have anything constructive to offer. Your smart ass attitude of "let me think that straight for you" is what makes Slashdot such a painful place to hang out. If you are knowledgeable, you could still make educated assumptions to these supposedly key details and provide helpful answer. You inability to do so should not be blamed on the person asking the question. Besides, I think most of the detail you ask for are irrelevant....

      Your ignorance is astounding this has to be a troll oh well here goes.

      What the previous poster is trying to do is get a picture of what the install site is like and with this info they can provide some suggestions.

      This is not a small setup that you would have for your home.
      This really needs to be given some thought or else if you make assumptions the network will not work and the job will have been done all over again .
      This being an example of what could go wrong.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2028085/Blind-man-accused-illegally-downloading-porn.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
      The problem really is that the story poster is being very vague and has not given enough information.

    3. Re:Wha? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Why are you asking this? There is no reason you should need to know why they want to replace something.

      So you tell me you want a new car. I say get a Scion. Case closed.

      I'm almost certain he means that the hotel uses leased lines (which is dedicate circuit telephone wire, not circuit switched like your typical telephone) and some sort of modem to connect the APs.

      Glad you're certain of that.

      There is ethernet over phone line and ethernet over coax cable adapters that he can use to avoid laying new ethernet wires.

      We know all that.

      As a commentor, it is your job to mention these options, not to ask him back and blame him for not providing you with the detail.

      Really? What's that job pay? And who's blaming anybody? You sound very defensive. Have you had your coffee?

      building wiring is often a hack job just like how much of the programs are spaghetti code. Electricians who are good at wiring is hard to find. All you can do is to work with the mess and make it better.

      And what does "working with the mess" entail? Might that not limit your choices?

      Good that you brought it up, but why can't you answer your own questions?

      Because I'm not the one who can provide the answers. How much money do I have in my pocket right now, and why can't you answer that question?

      I'm sure they will take care of it.

      Yes I'm sure.

      That's his business, not yours.

      You know what, why don't you just roll over and go back to sleep? You could obviously use a couple more hours, because you're very cranky and you aren't thinking straight -- otherwise you might see that management capabilities might be pretty important and they also might make a big difference in costs.

      The point of my post is that the original submitter seemed to have a pretty blasé attitude about the whole thing, when it doesn't necessarily sound like a trivial job.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:Wha? by dynamo52 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Other relevant info:

      There are currently ~15 APs on site

      The coverage area includes approximately 350 rooms, two courtyards, and the lobby area.

      There are four two story buildings that house the rooms.

      The total dimensions of the property are ~100m x ~200m

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    5. Re:Wha? by SpzToid · · Score: 2

      Given these stats, I agree with the poster who earlier suggested you use dd-wrt as the firmware solution, flashed onto relatively cheap commodity routers. Via the dd-wrt shop are some 'exotic' APs, with weather housing, etc. Most importantly is the router database of supported commodity units. Basically you configure as many as needed to achieve saturation, spreading channels, etc. Using modern routers with dual-frequencies, N, and what have you; it should not cost much, and these units might just drop in to replace your current APs at their current location. Each unit can be 'remotely' managed via a web-interface, on your hotel LAN. They also show real-time signal graphs, with channels, for further placement refining; also via the http/s gui.

      DD-wrt is a linux server on cheap wifi hardware, and the wiki is very good. I've never had to create a mesh network, but everything else I've done with dd-wrt has gone extremely well. Note that if you configure one, perhaps from manufacturer X... you can easily backup the config file, and apply that to dd-wrt router Y from another manufacturer, which saves a lot of setup time, errors, etc.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    6. Re:Wha? by Tiger_Storms · · Score: 2

      Some more questions I'd like to ask you to help with your project. and a few suggestions

      Is this hotel apart of a hotel chain or is it owned by individuals? Most hotel chains much use companies that they recommend for setup and support for their hotels. Some chains require this others only suggest it I'm sure they know this, but it wouldn't hurt to ask.

      Does the company use Comcast Business class internet? If not, do they know there's a 250mb cap on the internet?

      Is this hotel Enclosed ie. (walk ways are in the center of the hotel rather than outside) if it is inside you shouldn't have much trouble setting up the access points for every 3-4 rooms that is assuming normal wood construction. If there's concrete in-between the floors your in trouble and might have to do 5-6 rooms with AP's on both floors.

      On top of the internet they are getting do they have a gateway already setup? Using a linksys, d-link or netgear router isn't going to handle 40+ guests on a full night, I would recommend a business gateway Nomadix AG-3100 so it can do load balancing and make sure no one customer takes all the internet for them self. This device will also have a built in portal that the hotel can use to setup weekly passwords to keep people from stealing their wireless. The Nomadix gateway also has a great support team that you can call and work with if for instance something goes wrong. Also the gateway supports Multiple IP's which is a must when it comes to 2+ people trying to connect to their company vpn from 1 location and something you'll never find on a cheap router make for home use.

      If your looking to support this your self are you aware most hotel guess don't come in until either very early in the morning or very late at night, which can generate calls at any given time of the day if something goes wrong or fails to work.

      One last suggestion if you saw telephone cables used in their setup I would highly recommended you run new cable, just for error rates alone. but in the process of doing that get access points that support POE and you can get a switch that can give it out that way you only have to run 1 cable to the desired location and you can reboot the devices remotely in the last job I had we did this to many hotels and it's saved us lots of money and time because you don't have to tell the hotel staff to unplug power from the devices, or have to wait until morning for the crew who knows where everything is.

      --
      This is a Mac, what you have there is an embarrassment to your fellow computer users.
    7. Re:Wha? by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      Is this hotel apart of a hotel chain or is it owned by individuals?

      I am not exactly sure of the ownership structure but it is not a chain. Management has full discretion.

      Does the company use Comcast Business class internet?

      Yes, Comcast is fully aware of this circuit's intended purpose.

      Is this hotel Enclosed

      No. All walkways are outdoors. The existing APs are in bottom floor rooms.

      On top of the internet they are getting do they have a gateway already setup?

      No. I am replacing the entire network. I already have ideas for switches, gateways, etc, but why not solicit free outside advice if possible? :)

      If your looking to support this your self are you aware most hotel guess don't come in until either very early in the morning or very late at night,

      I do work with associates to provide 24/7 availability to clients. I would obviously prefer as centrally managed a system as possible.

      One last suggestion if you saw telephone cables used in their setup I would highly recommended you run new cable, just for error rates alone. but in the process of doing that get access points that support POE and you can get a switch that can give it out that way you only have to run 1 cable to the desired location and you can reboot the devices remotely in the last job I had we did this to many hotels and it's saved us lots of money and time because you don't have to tell the hotel staff to unplug power from the devices, or have to wait until morning for the crew who knows where everything is.

      I am totally with you here. POE is definitely the preferred option but the wiring consideration is key. My leaning is to cable APs to a few key locations and set up a wireless mesh to fill in the gaps.

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    8. Re:Wha? by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative
      I've put together a wired/wireless Internet distribution system for a hotel.

      The existing APs are located in individual bottom floor rooms in two story buildings. They are placed in boxes sealed with tamperproof bolts. The only lines in are what appears to be a standard telephone line and a power cable. There is also a telephone line coming out connected to the telephone. Presumably, the company who manages the current system will take the old APs. The existing networking equipment is also protected from closer inspection though does connect through standard telephone punchdown blocks.

      This is just a regular DSL/DSLAM setup. Basically the hotel is acting like a phone company providing DSL, and the phones in the hotel rooms are the "DSL customers". You go to where the hotel's phone switching equipment is at, and hook up a DSLAM which is connected to your public Internet router. You then use that to "provide DSL" to each of the rooms where you want a wired network drop. The chosen rooms (or tamperproof proprietary boxes in your case) have a DSL modem, which splits the ethernet from the POTS.

      You can piggyback this over your currently existing phone lines (that's the whole point of DSL), or you an run new Cat 3 lines just for the DSL (if you don't plan to offer wired network service in the rooms, and don't want customers messing with the hardware). Most hotel phone systems have plenty of extra capacity and lines for you to do this without having to install new cable. The reason for using DSL is that ethernet's specs limit it to 100 m, about 85 m in real life in my experience. That's way too short to reach from one end of a hotel to the other. DSL on the other hand is good out for several km.

      It's pretty straightforward stuff if you've done any networking setup. The same stuff about regular DSL applies (e.g. use filters on any extra extensions). And unlike DSL from the phone company, you have to deal with both ends of the service. Most hotels use VDSL/VDSL2 because it allows higher bandwidth over a shorter distance. ADSL is really optimized for Cat 3 distances of several km, which isn't necessary for a hotel, and its max uplink throughput may be insufficient for a heavily used public WAP. I'd provide links but I did this about 5 years ago, so the links I have would likely be outdated.

      The ability to centrally manage the APs is a strong plus. Additionally, logging is not highly critical but the ability to ensure that bandwidth is distributed as equitably as possible would be nice. Yes, I would like the ability to restrict botnets and other undesirable traffic.

      Once you get the DSLAM and DSL modems set up, they act as a bridge and are transparent. The WAPs will show up on whatever LAN you have plugged into the DSLAM. If you want (and I would recommend), you can make it its own subnet. Assign static IPs to the WAPs so you can manage them. The fancier models will even let you set up VLANs, so you can do fancy things like limit direct access to the WAPs to a VLAN that's not available to customers connecting over the wireless (provided the WAPs are VLAN-aware). You will also have to handle QoS and bandwidth throttling, to prevent a single customer from using up all the bandwidth. But that's a given.

    9. Re:Wha? by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      Very useful post, thank you!

      Do you have any specific vendor recommendations for the multiplexor and modems?

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    10. Re:Wha? by Solandri · · Score: 2

      I used Zyxel. We only needed 24 ports, and they had the cheapest VDSL DSLAM with 24 ports at the time. Didn't really have any problems with them, and based on talking with the current hotel staff it is holding up just fine. The only gotcha was their VDSL modems used an AC adapter which has 9V AC output. If someone equipment expecting DC had the same plug, you could fry it by plugging in the DSL modem's AC adapter. Oh, also, they don't make VDSL modems anymore. They've moved on to VDSL2 modems. They're supposed to be backwards compatible but neither I nor the hotel has had a chance to test them. I have no experience with the other manufacturers.

      In theory you can use any brand VDSL modem with any brand VDSL DSLAM. The scattered reports I found at the time said that this wasn't always true in practice. ADSL seems to be more compatible and cheaper because its use is more widespread, so that may sway things in favor of ADSL. The primary drawback of ADSL was the 3.5 Mbps upstream limit - VDSL could do 18 Mbps both ways, VDSL2 can top 100 Mbps up to 1.5 km, 50 Mbps up to 3 km. From what I hear, certain fiber internet services are using VDSL2 from the street over the copper phone line to avoid having to lay down fiber to the actual home. So maybe VDSL equipment has become more compatible and cheaper.

      You need to decide which technology to go with based on your bandwidth requirements, current market prices, and which technology you think will stick around. Just do a Google shopping search on DSLAM and your choice of ADSL2 or VDSL2 (or any other DSL - I don't know what is hot now).

    11. Re:Wha? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      I should add, though the DSL modems use standard RJ11 jacks, most DSLAMs do not. If it has a significant number of ports, the DSLAM will use probably use an RJ21 jack. You will need to learn about phone punchdown blocks and using a phone punch tool to send the DSL signal over the appropriate phone line. It's not that difficult if you're at all tech competent, but it does represent a small learning curve. If you know how to make your own LAN cables, this stuff will be easy to pick up.

    12. Re:Wha? by unencode200x · · Score: 1

      An arm of the company I work at has an advanced network engineering team that does many things, among them wireless. They've done wireless in really, really challenging environemnts (think 150K sqft room full of steel bars 75 feet high); also some hotels. Over the years, many vendors, technologies, etc. have been evaluated and used and we always come back to Cisco. Their stuff fucking just works and requires zero maintenance when configured properly. I'm talking, you just give people the password and go. Done. It's not even that expensive. Cisco, like some others, have central management that not only manages the devices but also hands off wireless clients from one AP to another seamlessly, among many other smart things. It's very different from stringing up a bunch of DLinks and putting them on different channels.

      If you want to this work really well and require as little maintenance as possible find yourself some people that have done this before and have a high level of certifications and many references in their area. Otherwise, you might save a few bucks buying gear but the hotel guests will be constantly frustrated by drops, slowdowns, and other problems.

      Good luck!

      --

      Chance favors the prepared mind.
      Perfect is the enemy of good.
    13. Re:Wha? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      If you want to do this properly, it won't be cheap or easy.
      Companies like Cisco have some incredible products that will do exactly what you want, but you probably won't be able to configure them yourself.

      You will probably need to run new cabling to the wireless access points, but if it's done properly this time, it'll be relatively future proof.
      Install one run of cat5e or cat6 cabling to each area where you need an access point, probably in a ceiling cavity or something like that. Install the access points, and power them via a Power over Ethernet switch (avoiding the need to run power cables to the access points too)

      If you want to minimise the number of APs that you use, you can get some high-gain omnidirectional antennas for the APs to extend their coverage. If you've got a really tricky floorplan with lots of reinforced concrete walls, then you may need to go for more but lower powered access points.

      Using the correct infrastructure from Cisco will provide all sorts of benefits - things like the APs being able to talk to each other over Ethernet and adjust their transmission power so they don't interfere with each other, being able to co-ordinate fast handovers from one AP to another so if you're, say, streaming media and move from one AP to another AP, the stream continues with no interruption.

      You then want some kind of access solution - I've had great success with m0n0wall (http://m0n0.ch/) and this is the easy bit of the solution and something you will be able to manage yourself.

    14. Re:Wha? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      Judging from this info, you'll probably get away with 1 AP per floor located centrally and one for each courtyard and one for the lobby if you have high-gain antennas on the individual floor access points.

    15. Re:Wha? by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      Again very useful. After a little additional research this seems like the most viable solution.

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    16. Re:Wha? by Tiger_Storms · · Score: 1

      I do work with associates to provide 24/7 availability to clients. I would obviously prefer as centrally managed a system as possible.

      The only thing I can recommend with a Network Operations center is to use SNMP to monitor your gateway and access points, we used it at my last job it was very helpful to check every 15 minutes to get a very close idea when devices go up/down and you can monitor everything separately. Now you don’t have to do it that often but it’s a good way to keep track of any problematic access points you might run in to.

      I did installing and managing for hotel’s for three years with my last job there were weeks of hell and weeks with almost call problems at all. I bid you good luck.

      --
      This is a Mac, what you have there is an embarrassment to your fellow computer users.
    17. Re:Wha? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      If it's just a two story building, it's probably easy to do the cable runs. As a poster above suggested: Use the roof.

      Or the courtyards.

      I.e, if it's a hassle to run wiring inside, simply do not do that. Run the wiring outside, and either punch into a storage room at the very end, or simply attach the AP to the outside of the building. (You can get ones that work outside, but you can also easily find weather-proof boxes designed exactly to hold stuff like that at Home depot.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    18. Re:Wha? by goodwid · · Score: 1

      > My leaning is to cable APs to a few key locations and set up a wireless mesh to fill in the gaps.

      I would highly recommend Meraki for this. they have one web interface to manage all your APs, they take care of firmware updates, and are pretty much designed for exactly this application. Oh, and they're perfect for mesh networks, and support POE.

      --

      The net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. -- John Gilmore
  28. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by ron_ivi · · Score: 1

    But it seems like there is an entire market of consultants whose entire job description is planning this sort of thing?

    Which seems absurd as well. Why is there an entire market of consultants whose entire job it is to plan wireless access points and routers? Seems like the kind of project that you could figure out by googling and reading the docs from the wireless network equipment companies; and then checking technology websites (like slashdot) online to see if people had any feedback/reviews they wanted to give for such systems.

  29. Nevermind the Wi-Fi... by IonOtter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Disclosure: I work for a major service provider/telco.

    Don't worry about the wi-fi system so much, there are plenty of solutions for that. Instead, worry more about the connection.

    You can have the best wi-fi in the world, but if your connection is down, then you've still got a hotel full of angry customers.

    Some things to consider?

    1. Network diversity. If you are going to get a multi-T1 setup, then make sure you request network diversity. Yes, it costs more, but if you have all of your T1 connections riding the same sets of DS3s to your hotel, you have a single point of failure. I work with this my entire shift, every day at work. The customer bought a 6-T1 MLPPP ckt to make sure their business had enough bandwidth, but all six are riding the same DS3. The DS3 craps out and *poof*. And DS3s crapping out is dreadfully common. Also, having your circuits come to you from different central offices is also a good idea. Again, it'll cost more, but it'll be worth it when some idiot takes out a telephone pole or punches an auger down through the F2 pairs.

    2. Employee training. I cannot stress this enough. Every single hotel we do business with all has one, maybe two "IT people", and everyone else in the entire hotel cannot tell the difference between a Cisco or a Black & Decker (router). And trying to find that "IT Person" at 1AM is like trying to find chicken teeth. In the meantime, I'm sitting at my desk, getting escalations from your senior management, pulling my hair out and waiting for SOMEONE on-site to pull the cable out of the RJ48X so I can test to a loop.

    Teach your employees where the smartjack is located and what the lights on it mean. Teach them what the CSU/DSU is, and what the lights on that mean. Show them how to do a hard-boot (unplug-replug), how to follow the cables, how to "exercise the jack" (unplug-replug). And if you REALLY wanna give me a warm fuzzy, make a loopback plug, show them how to use it, and leave a few of them hanging on a peg in your telco room.

    I know that sounds like a lot to ask from your "associates", but if I can teach a grocery store manager how to do it over the phone, you can certainly do it too.

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:Nevermind the Wi-Fi... by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      you want your bar to be the pool guy...

      You say that in jest, but I assure you, it's true. It was for a major "value" hotel chain, and their "local point of contact" was the pool guy. That said, he was sharper than most sales reps I've had to work with?

      --
      [End Of Line]
    2. Re:Nevermind the Wi-Fi... by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      you're an about to be retired ma' Bell tech

      Guilty as charged. Sorta. I came into the industry late in the game, so yeah, wireline is on the way out. At least on the DS1 and below, anyway. Still need DS3 and above to get data to the towers, so I'm being moved to another group in the new year. Looking forward to a change, DS1 and below is getting tedious.

      Disgruntled as fuck? Begrudged? Arrogantly stated???

      I'm sorry, AC, but I can't even claim nolo contendre to that. Sheesh! I'm guessing YOU ran into one of those disgruntled as fuck oldsters and have been emotionally scarred ever since. What'd he/she do? Tell you to "hold these wires" while dialing out on a rotary phone?

      Anyway. Time spend educating your employees on how to solve problems is never wasted. I'm sad you think otherwise.

      --
      [End Of Line]
  30. RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Go and learn about wireless networks, read the books associated with CWNA for instance.

    Ignore the monkeys on here, i've seen about 5 or 6 people posting what I can only assume is a joke or perhaps 1just distilled ignorance, you really just need to RTFM.

    This must be what it feels like to be an admin on #linux :o

  31. Re:Setup multiple cheap routers by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    just use repeaters and you dont have to fuck with 2/3rds of that

  32. Re:Yet another... by ToBeDecided · · Score: 1

    The largest problem by far is that he did not state what kind of budget he was given. I really wanted to give him some advice, but with such vague requirements you could write a fairly large book on the subject and still not provide an adequate answer.

  33. Checkbox WiFi Hotspot Router by C0L0PH0N · · Score: 3, Informative

    I spent several months researching wifi hotspots for a similar installation. I settled on the Checkbox Hotspot (http://www.layerfour.net/store/index.php/checkbox.html). It is a "standalone" hotspot router, which means you put out a one time purchase price, it is not an ongoing service. In addition, you can buy "repeaters" which extend the range as far as you want, and are integrated with the main "Checkbox" hotspot router. All the software is built into the router. It gives you options to print "tickets" which can be for any period of time. They can also be preprinted, say for 1 day, a week, a month, etc, etc. You can also specify "tickets" for special events which let all computers attach using the same "code". Also, you can specify "permanent" tickets. The router locks to the MAC address of the connecting computer, and the service expires when the ticket expires. Those are the key features I was interested it, but it also has a number of other features. Definitely worth looking at. I believe the Checkbox router is a "G" series router, if that is an important issue.

    1. Re:Checkbox WiFi Hotspot Router by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      This does look interesting. How reliable has this system been for you? Also, how much time and energy have you needed to support this implementation and what are the most common support scenarios you've encountered?

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    2. Re:Checkbox WiFi Hotspot Router by C0L0PH0N · · Score: 1

      It does look interesting, and we will be purchasing it this fall. So I don't have any answers for you at this point. We spent a bit of time designing tickets, and the pricepoints at which to sell them, so we designed our infrastructure to manage the system. But I represent a snowbird's computer club in Arizona, and they only ramp up from October thru April, so that is why we haven't moved on it yet. My intent is to review everything in this forum and see if there is anything better, but from what I've seen so far, this Checkbox thing "checks" all our boxes so far. I especially like the completely standalone nature, and the ability to add integrated repeaters. By the way, we intend to charge a small fee for daily, weekly, monthly or season use. Hope that helps.

  34. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by flosofl · · Score: 3, Informative

    It sounds like you have zero experience deploying enterprise class wireless for high traffic scenarios. It's a lot more than just plopping a couple commodity access points and hoping for the best.

    You have to do a site survey to determine the best layout for the APs including equipment placement, channel patterns and power levels to maximize the best SNR against the overall cost. 2.4GHz or 5GHz or both? What are the structural barriers in place? Do you want to have blanket coverage or only cover certain areas? What level of WLAN redundancy do you want? How much should your coverage overlap? Are you bridging wirelessly? Using extended VLANs, centralizing the traffic and management? How are you handling zone handoff?

    There's a lot of initial prep work that goes on before you even begin to place equipment.

    --
    "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
  35. Anyone else shocked by eharvill · · Score: 1

    that a hotel will actually provide a decent Internet connection to its guests? I don't think I've ever stayed at a place that gave me more than 1Mbps down. I usually have to tether my droid to get a functional connection.

    --
    At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    1. Re:Anyone else shocked by darkgrayknight · · Score: 1

      Last hotel I stayed at had "free wi-fi", but that only existed on the first floor and only around the office, even then, I connected to the router, but could not connect to the internet. Asking the staff at the desk, she knew nothing and couldn't help.

  36. You left out the biggest piece of relevant info by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    They already have a wifi system. Why are they replacing it?

    1. Re:You left out the biggest piece of relevant info by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Elsewhere in the comments, the current provider installed and manages the whole thing and charges the guests to use Wifi. They would prefer to provide their guests with free Wifi, presumably to attract more of them.

  37. There's Wi-Fi, and there's wi-fi by rah1420 · · Score: 1

    You could do like the timeshare did where we recently stayed at in Ocean City, MD. They boasted free wi-fi. That said, the access point was in the office and was accessible only in the office, on a small bistro-style table (and only when the office was open) or in the indoor pool next door.

    Epic fail.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
  38. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by hamvil · · Score: 1

    I do this for a living and my typical hotel manager (or campus, camping, etc) would not know where to start. Maybe for many of us is easy to look for documentation troubleshoot all the quirks you can find on commodity hardware and deploy a wireless network across several floors or several building. But for many people this is not trivial even when you have the usual computer wiz as cousin. Of course you can always for a nice cisco solution with controller, the problem is these solutions are very costly and they still need trained people for setup and deployment.

  39. Density by Troke · · Score: 1

    In situations like hotels and hospitals, coverage is not that big of an issue. Client density becomes more of a concern with a 2 person room possibly having 6 devices (tablet, phone, laptop) 4 rooms can have 24 devices connected which leaves handy homeowner routers in the dust. An Aruba, Enterasys, or Meru have worked well for me in the past (with these companies doing a cloud based controller these days so you don't have to purchase the $10,000 device up front)

  40. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by Dthief · · Score: 1

    Apparently basic research skills are on the decline in modern society...

    Just for consultants

    --
    www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
  41. Re:Ubiquiti Unifi by Adriax · · Score: 1

    Ooo, nice stuff. I've used Openmesh before with good success before.
    Between openmesh and this unifi I might actually be able to convince the guys in charge of our physical network to upgrade to something from this century.

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  42. Re:Cry. by hamvil · · Score: 1

    And you clearly cannot distinguish between concept and implementation. A WMN uses chains of repeaters (the mesh routers) to rely a packet from end to another. At each hop a packet is received demodulated processed in order to discover its next hop and then encoded and transmitted again which is at its heart the definition of "a repeater", the you can do it at level 1 (regeneration or cooperative forwarding) , at layer 2 (switching), at L3 (routing) or at the application layer (which is what peer-to-peer networks do). The fact that it is done using WDS, or master/slave chains or using a routing daemon does not change the essence of things.

  43. Re:Here is what you do by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    Oh, man. Not only NSFW but an extension of the goatse image to new heights of disgustingness. You do not want to click on these links, trust me.

  44. Re:Setup multiple cheap routers by mspohr · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the "different channels" part. I stayed in a few hotels this summer with lousy setups where they had all of their APs on the same channel. When the signal was weak (in most of the hotel), the connection would constantly switch back and forth between the APs which means that it spent most of its time connecting.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  45. DSL and Cable by Kagato · · Score: 2

    A lot of hotel's use DSL or Cable infrastructure. The back end equipment is more expensive than traditional Cat5+, but that is typically offset by the wiring costs. If you already have Comcast Business Systems or Comcast Telcom delivering the 100Mbit then I would ask them if they have a line up on bridging technology ready to roll.

    The biggest issue you'll have with the actual WiFi is selecting a product that can handle the load in your common and event areas. Consumer/SOHO APs start to crush after 10+ clients.

    While you won't have to have a billing system, you should still have something on the backend that will track the users and make them accept an AUP. Astaro is the cheapest turn key system combining firewall capabilities and pre-integrated APs.

  46. Hotel Front Desk != IT Support by j-stroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I suggest you shop for a turnkey vendor with an up-time monitoring & support package and signal strength survey as part of installation. That way when any trouble is observed, its logged and dealt with before the front-desk gets inundated with calls. Nothing is going to make you more unpopular with this business than the sheer volume of calls when it stops working. It will be inconvenient for you to drop everything to service this low-markup client. Save tinker toy wi-fi play for hobby time.

  47. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

    Which is probably why he asked the question. Is there any vendor neutral books you would recommend? I don't have any experience in this field either, but it's always interesting to see where other people started from.

  48. Not that difficult by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    I feel you're overthinking this.

    Existing WAPs. I'm assuming you have admin access to them. If they're connected to telephone wire that means the hotel has its own DSL network (search for the DSLAM) or some prorietary data over phone solution (weird little dongles on each end). No need to replace these things. 90% of the work is already done.

    Find the DSLAM or whatever router is currently serving the WAPs. Pull you comcast line to there. If the router or switch is aged, consider replacing them.

    Verification, for small businesses I prefer to just give out a WPA key that changes monthly (teach staff how to change them). Ideally, you can have a radius system but that will require API access to their guest management software to pull values like last name, room number, etc. That might be overkill though.

  49. I've done a few of these, mostly on-the-cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've done a half-dozen hotel deployments in my time. Mostly very much on the cheap, because the owners weren't charging for the service, so it had to be low over head to maintain, as well as cheap upfront. Not economical, but really really cheap. The first one I did was with buffalo equipment. All the equipment set up as dual AP/repeater mode devices, since there was no wire in the walls for back-haul. Just a box in each of the linen closets with an external hi-gain antenna. We set WEP keys on the devices and gave the owners some text about how to configure the wireless on a guest's PC. The went to a business card printer and had the instructions and WEP key printed on cards that were handed out to guests at check-in. I also hooked them up with some USB wifi dongles they could rent out if the customer's PC didn't have wireless (this would have been in the early 2000's, so wireless wasn't baked in to everything). It worked fairly well for a while. The owners and full time staff learned what they needed to do when guests on one floor or another couldn't connect, basic troubleshooting steps for the front desk staff, sending up staff to a closet in the right area to reboot a locked up access point, etc. Over all it worked, but was far from bulletproof. With subsequent deployments I've tried a number of other setups, and I think I have a pretty good solution that seems to work with minimal hiccups.

    1) Always use a wired back-haul. this was the main issue with my first deployment, and there were enough issues with it that I never had confidence in the lower-end marketed devices to try it again. If phone cable is all that is available you could try HPNA gear for the back hauls, but I've never gone that route.

    2) Use POE devices where possible. This is for 2 reasons, obviously placement is easier, but also because this give you a central place that all the devices can be power cycled. A front desk dude at 2 AM can cycle power on the POE switch , or more likely power strip with all the injectors plugged into it, rather than chasing down all the APs that might potentially be causing the problem (this will potentially briefly p*ss off all the other users). At 2 AM, with the staff hired by most of the places I've installed, an on-off switch is usually the maximum technical demand you can put on these guys.

    3) Do a site survey to check for channel crowding and signal strength. The APs don't even need to be configured, just get them powered up in an approximate area of where you're thinking of placing them. Coverage can surprise you, specially with the way that hotels are constructed with metal firewalls between segments and a lot of metallic infrastructure in the walls. It's not like a house or an office building, there is a lot more metallic plumbing/HVAC/laundry chutes in some of these older buildings than you'd think. I used to use a laptop and Netstumbler, now I usually just run WiFi Analyzer on my android phone.

    4) Try to upsell the ownership to at least some business class WiFi gear. My favorite stuff is Netgear WG302's. They seem to run pretty well over long periods and you can find them at reasonable prices. They support two external antennas for better than average low-end device coverage, and a variety of omni and directional antennae are available for them. WG302's can run on POE as well. They are not perfect, you can get a bad one, and I have returned some with infant mortality in the past. Once they've burned in for a month you're usually pretty safe. They are B/G only, not N.

    5) Use some type of encryption on the network. I prefer WPA-PSK (that's WPA version 1) because it's a good compromise of compatibility and encryption quality. It'll keep most of the non-guest riff-raff from using your WiFi from the parking lot, while allowing the actual guest riff-raff to type in a simple password instead of a long hex string. WPA2 is better encryption, but I've seen a number of un-patched XP machines that couldn't connect to it, and the goal isn't really security, but minimizing the amount of sta

  50. Re:Dear slashdot by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I do see your point with that satire(and it is a good one!), what's wrong with asking? A professional should be able to tell what he needs to do without asking, sure, but I respect the professional who both knows, and asks to check himself/find better ideas.

    --
    Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
  51. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by dgatwood · · Score: 2

    True, but judging from the hotels I've stayed in over the years, I'd be willing to bet that few, if any of them did... well... any of that. They buy or lease some pre-built router box, toss in two or three access points per floor, all in bridging mode, cable it up with 100BASE-TX or maybe Gig-E, connect the other side to some sad DSL modem, or if you're really lucky, a T1, and call it a day.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  52. Scale and be happy by luizd · · Score: 1

    Just buy a bunch of tp-link, replace its firmware with openwrt and do whatever you want: mesh, wds, etc...

    Even if the hardware might not be as robust as a cisco, just multiply the number of units you buy. It's the same principle of RAID (redundant array of inexpensive discs). Just build an RMIR (redundant mesh of inexpensive routers)

  53. Open mesh by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

    IMO Open mesh should do the job. 60$ to 99$ a piece, no dependency to third parties (unlike meraki); free, open source. Zero config, just plug in power and go. You can centrally manage things like bandwidth, splash page, etc.

    Meshes have no practical coverage limits, can be finetuned as you are using many small APs (which connect wirelessly to each other) to customize the coverage areas, only one of them needs a link to the lan/wan.

    Meraki started nice, but became proprietary and expensive, open mesh retained the openness of the original MIT project, and is even more reliable.

    --
    Artix
    Your Linux, your init.
  54. First: Rewire! by Hymer · · Score: 1

    Running on old telephone cables is a very bad idea, you may put a lot of hardware to compensate for the cabling but the right solution is to rewire to CAT6.
    The WiFi solution should be something like a Zyxel NXC5200 and NWA5160N or the older Zyxel NXC8160 and NWA8500 or a similar Cisco solution (which will cost you at least 50% more). The NXC provides a central management point, firewall and a captive portal, NXC communicates with its NWA's over Ethernet.

    Do not take the gig if they insist on running on old cabling, if you do prepare for serious trouble.

  55. Solved problem by Relayman · · Score: 1

    This is a solved problem. There are any number of companies that provide wireless systems for hotels. There is no reason to go any other way.

    We might as well be discussing how to find an electrical provider for the hotel.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  56. SmartShare at the main connection by haffy · · Score: 1

    A SmartShare on the main connection will give you a few nice things:
    1. User Load Balancing - the 100 Mbit/s connection is shared evenly amongst the active users. No bandwidth waste and no unnecessary bandwidth limits. (No configuration required.)
    2. Dynamic QoS - VoIP (including Skype) is prioritized over Data traffic. (No configuration required.)
    3. Limit bandwidth for Peer-to-Peer users, so they don't swamp the wireless access points, and possibly even stop using their Peer-to-Peer application. (Optional.)
    4. Redirect SMTP connections to the ISP's SMTP relay, so Outlook (and other email clients) still works when guests' laptops are configured for using the SMTP relay of their ISP at home.
    5. Real-time and historical graphs showing how much bandwidth is available for each user, so you know what kind of bandwidth the guests actually have available, and when it's time to upgrade the internet connection.

    Did I mention that I work for SmartShare Systems (http://www.smartsharesystems.com/), and that we sell lots of SmartShare boxes for hotels, dormitories, highschools etc. for this kind of network. And lots of smaller SmartShare boxes for small businesses using internet and cloud based services on low (or medium) bandwidth connections.

  57. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by flosofl · · Score: 2

    I've heard some good things about CWNP. I don't know about getting their certs but their study guide seems to do a good job of covering the fundamentals.

    --
    "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
  58. Re:Dude, I don't wanna shit all over your question by flosofl · · Score: 1

    Too f-ing true.

    --
    "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
  59. Re:Here is what you do by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

    Holy crap...you weren't joking. I think I'm going to be ill.

  60. DO plan for a paywall by crath · · Score: 1

    The hotel plans to provide this service for free, so there is no need for any type of billing management system

    Business conditions can and will change, and at some point in the future management will decide to charge at least some of their guests for Internet access. My point is simply: be flexible. Don't go with a system that prevents charging at a later date. Your best strategy might be to go with a solution that handles payment, and then set the price to zero (i.e., free). Then, at a later date management can set a different price.

  61. And where does Google get its information from? by cowtamer · · Score: 2

    You know, Google has to get this information from somewhere. I can't even count the times when I Googled something, only to find 15 other people who've asked the same question, and nothing but snarky replies saying "just Google it you moron!"

    Suggestion for you: just don't click on any "Ask Slashdot" links and leave this feature for those of us who actually want to learn something...

    There is no shame in asking -- nobody is born knowing everything.

    1. Re:And where does Google get its information from? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      Funny, reading Slashdot, I found multiple ways of setting up mesh networks for wireless ( given it's 2 years old, but it's a research point ) and then I googled the idea for a simple large wireless network, for 500 users, and a front end security for the guest.

      a simple free Radius server http://freeradius.org/ by the way, there might be a a way to integrate it to you Point of Purchase software

      there is multiple research ideas about Hotspots which could be usable

      given I have not looked at the routing issues but I know that's covered

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  62. CapturePoint by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    Check CapturePoint. They have a pretty simple way to do it that puts everything in the router and can extend the network using inexpensive mesh nodes instead of hardwired access points.

    --
    -- $G
  63. I work for a WISP by pat_trick · · Score: 1

    I do this for a living, so here's a few more questions (I see some were asked by PCM2 already):

    How many buildings are there on the property? How tall is each one? What is the layout (facing each other, central courtyard, one long line)? What is the construction material of the exterior of the buildings? The interior (between rooms)?

    Is there a central telephone room that all the buildings link into? Have you run a line tone to make sure?

    Check each room to see how many telephone pairs are going in. If there is more than one pair and the n+1 pairs are not in use, then you can throw in and mount a wireless modem in each room. There are vendors that make mounts that are tamper-resistant. The trick is to find out how much penetration the wifi signal from that modem is going to get between each room. Buy one modem, get access to a room, and to all the rooms adjacent (above, below, sides, and across the hall) to see what kind of coverage you can get. Download inSSIDER to help with this analysis.

    From this testing you'll be able to determine what kind of signal you're getting in the adjacent rooms, and thereby determine what layout of modems you need.

    Get a DSLAM on the property, and get your system up and running.

    How you chose to manage the back end is up to you; we use RADIUS. However, since you're managing a single location, you could probably do it with an HP Procurve MSM 710 or even an MSM 313. This will track user logins and sessions independent of any wireless access point that you set up.

  64. Common mistakes to avoid by dwmw2 · · Score: 1

    Two things:

    Firstly, make sure that if you have a captive portal, a guest staying for a reasonable period of time will only have to accept the terms and conditions, log in or whatever *once*. If I put my phone on the hotel wireless, I expect it to *stay* on the hotel wireless, and automatically register to the VoIP server whenever I'm in the building. I do *not* expect it to keep breaking every few hours until I fire up a web browser on the phone. It's almost as annoying on my PC — when I'm away from home in a hotel with timezone differences, there are often work-related IMs or IRC conversations which happen during my "night", and if a broken hotel network cuts me off during the night and forces me to re-login, that *really* hampers my productivity.

    If a hotel has a captive portal which doesn't *remember* the fact that I've logged in and accepted the T&Cs, I will *refuse* to stay there on my next trip.

    Secondly, we are well into the 21st century now. It is entirely unacceptable to provide a newly designed and installed system without IPv6 connectivity. It's not even as if IPv6 is *hard*, so there's no excuse.

  65. Re:Terms and Conditions? by WidgetGuy · · Score: 1

    My friend, you need a copy of ULALyzer by Javacool Software. The free version will do much to lower your irritation level. We all know EULAs are not going away. As you note, they're not only here to stay, but they're getting more abstruse with each passing day.

    The program produces an "overall" rating for the EULA you give it to analyze (in most cases, just by moving your mouse over the EULA text on your screen -- but, sometimes, cut and paste is required; for example, when you want it to analyze a Web site's TOS). In addition, it produces a list of "potentially troublesome" words and phrases (with a ranking of 1-5 on the "troublesome" scale). Click your mouse on one of these phrases and you can see it in the context of its section in the EULA. Sure, you still have to do some reading, but nowhere near as much a you would without ULALyzer.

    I don't work for Javacool. Just a satisfied customer.

    --
    One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
  66. Internet over mains....... Ham radio by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 2

    Have you thought of using internet over mains wiring?

    "It's as if millions of Radio Hams suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced."

    Broadband over power line wipes out short wave radio.
    http://www.arrl.org/broadband-over-powerline-bpl


    .

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  67. I been at hotels where at best I was getting 1.5 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    I been at hotels where at best I was getting 1.5 on a speed test and other time I needed to reload web pages over and over just to get them to load. So don't cheap out on the links from the AP back to main hook up.

  68. DIY by sheddd · · Score: 1

    I rolled out a 35 AP network @ a 345 room hotel by myself; giving support support blows; people are idiots and expect you to fix problems on their end (usually wifi or dhcp turned off); it's nice to have a 3rd party to handle it. If you want to use existing phone lines you're looking at an additional cost per run to go Ethernet --> PhoneLine --> Ethernet. Our system is far from perfect but hey, it's free! It cost ~$25k in Cisco equipment.

  69. Meraki / Mesh Wifi? by ResQuad · · Score: 1

    "must come in at one corner" and " no new wiring" read to me like: You definitely need mesh wifi (really, really good mesh).

    I've installed Meraki at a few businesses (nothing huge like a hotel, granted) and the web interface works wonders. They build in features like QOS, traffic shaping and splash pages. Basically _anyone_ who isn't a total technophobe can manage a Meraki install. Their meshing is, so far as I've seen, very strong. I think you'd want to have more than 1 "gateway" device (That which is connected to the internet), but you don't have to unless it's a problem (so you can skip most new wiring, except for power of course).

  70. Captive Portal by pr0f3550r · · Score: 1

    You will need to have some sort of captive portal. Even though it will be free, the property must indemnify themselves from potentially illegal activity. To do this you will need to have DHCP logging, web traffic logging and most importantly, Terms of Service that require the users to accept that their actions are their own and that they may be logged. ClearOS is nearly done with a captive portal module that brings the costs of this way down, outside of this it provides the logging required to make this work.

  71. Re:Dear slashdot by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 1

    To that, I say "Fair enough."

    --
    Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
  72. Physical plant is the first choice to make by tibit · · Score: 1

    First of all, you need something to transfer the data over until it hits the air. For that you have a couple options as to the physical plant -- the stuff the data goes over: phone line wire (cat3), twisted pair (cat5), power lines (with 120VAC on them), fiber optic, and coaxial cable. CAT3 (phone wire) is cheapest, especially if you can reuse existing lines. Cat3 will support 10BASE-T Ethernet and DSL. Cat5 will support 100BASE-T Ethernet. Fiber Optic -- can be ATM or Ethernet. If coaxial cable (RG-59 as used in cable tv) can be used with no other signals on it (if you can), then 10BASE2 is a "simple" but obsolete and slow solution. Best forget about it. You'd much rather use something like Gefen TV Ethernet over Coax to push a 100Mbit/s full duplex Ethernet link over the coaxial cable. If you have to coexist (tap into) existing cable TV distribution plant, then use a DOCSIS-based solution.

    I would not use 10BASE-T since a segment is limited to 100m in length, same for 10BASE-2, and it's really obsolete. So you are left with, most practically:
    - Cat3: DSL
    - Cat5: 100BASE-T Ethernet or DSL
    - Fiber: 100BASE-FX Ethernet
    - Coax: Gefen solution for dedicated run, DOCSIS solution for coexistence with cable tv distribution

    That's just the first step, but a very important one. You have to inventory existing physical plants that are available, also inventory available power, and price all options out.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  73. Suggested Hardware? Mikrotik Routers.. by fatgreek · · Score: 1

    Check out Mikrotik hardware.. inexpensive, stable, and made for this.
    Also easy to manage and maintain.

  74. Aruba Wifi - http://www.arubanetworks.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    15 APs? Seems like not enough...

    Personally, I have experience with my company's 110 AP Aruba Wifi network, but that includes a few branch offices with barely sufficient coverage (ie. 3-5 APs).

    Now, to be honest, we have a rather dense deployment, which uses some of the APs as what Aruba refers to as Air Monitors. The Air Monitors simply monitor the network by jumping from channel to channel listening for clients, listening for interference, and assisting load balancing when roaming between APs. I don't know if another solution provides features like that, but the system works great. Plus it's all centrally managed, from a device called the mobility controller. Since we treat this network with the same regard as out GigE LAN (ie, for business to continue smoothly, it's critical), we have redundant mobility controllers.

    Big Caveat! It's not very cheap, however I've been looking for a smallish mobility controller to use with the APs left over from our last upgrade and they run 2k-4k for the smallest version (A-800 - manages 16APs), and thats just for experimenting/testbed... What we actually run for production currently can handle up to 128 APs...

    Now, the benefits are awesome! It can handle just about any authentication mechanism, it supports virtual ESSIDs, it will load balance users across APs, it supports firewalling, intrusion detection, IPsec, centralized traffic handling... This list goes on for a long time. Honestly, if you can afford to get it used (check ebay), it's super worth it.

    Neat trick it can do is trilaterate a user's position and place it on the floor plan, along with it's margin of error. This works on a per floor basis.

    I guess, unless money is no concern, you would have to buy it all used. Look for AP-52s and an A2400, or a pair of A800s.

    Unfortunately, this solution requires POE, which may be possible. You would need a few POE midspans placed appropriately based on your layout. Any place you have a distribution switch, you should provide POE either from the midspan, or from the switch itself, if possible.

    Look, I don't know if I've mentioned this, but it's a fairly costly solution, but it is a correct solution, and it would be a deployment done right if you can afford the density you really need.

    I hope the "telephone" cable is cat5; that would really help...
    (note: we have run FastEthernet over 2 pair T1 cabling for reasonable spans (50-70 meters) with custom patch cables at each end to put the correct signals on the right pins for 100BaseT. ymmv)

    Sorry for rambling, been at a cookout all day. ;-)

    TL;DR Aruba Wifi is awesome but pricey compared to commodity stuff, but it's worth it once you see what it can do.

  75. Leases by ktappe · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've read (almost) this whole thread and while everyone is talking about cabling and whatnot, I've not seen anyone mention DHCP leasing. I just spent the last 2 weeks traveling and spending every other night in a new hotel. EVERY place had problems with DHCP leases. That is, you could connect to the WiFi spot(s) but often could not get a lease and ended up with a self-assigned IP. From what I read, this is due to leaving the routers in the factory config. which is for long lease times (I think 4 days is common). That sux when you have guests coming and going daily; the leases take days to expire and the router runs out of IP's to dole out. So whatever you end up doing, please have the routers configured for *short* leases (perhaps 1 hour?) so when guests depart their slots can be reallocated to new arrivals.

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  76. Re:Ubiquiti Unifi by irving47 · · Score: 1

    The nano's are nice, but Unifi has the kind of management the OP is going to need to keep things under control. The nano's are just "dumb" AP's

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  77. Re:WTF? by evanism · · Score: 1

    Money. No bux. Perhaps you don't have a real job in a real company where the money isn't free?

    --
    Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
  78. Problem well described is half solved by Whuffo · · Score: 2

    How many rooms, how many stories. What's the size of the building? What are the walls made of? What's your budget?

    All of these things make a difference in what will be needed to provide a usable WiFi signal to all rooms. Don't do anything less than WiFi; most traveling devices have WiFi capabilities, but many of them do not have LAN jacks.

    Comcast already has cable to the office; have them put their cable modem there - not at the property line. Then you'll be able to secure the networking equipment and make the owners feel more secure.

    Beyond that, distances and construction matter. You're going to need multiple access points; how many and where to put them depends on the particular scenario. Even the height of the access point from ground level makes a huge difference in coverage.

    It's quite possible to do this at a fairly low cost and provide reliable service to the guests. But if you've never planned and installed a network system like this before - run away as fast as you can and let someone else do it.

    The specs on the access points are wishful thinking under the best of conditions; this job really needs someone with experience in wireless installations to plan it.

  79. Good Reference... by Congruent0 · · Score: 1

    Check out the Tom's hardware report on Independent Wi-Fi Interference and Capacity Testing

  80. Xirrus. Nuff said by tekkster · · Score: 1

    Omnidirectional, modular board, control if you want direction.

  81. Support Startuppers by a.sappia · · Score: 1

    hi, I work in a company inside the Tech Incubator of the Politecnico di Torino. (http://www.i3p.it/) Inside there are a lot of NewCo: one of them has a nice solution for Wireless management as you ask. This company is Trampoline (http://www.trampolineup.com/). I checked the website and it looks like they don't have an english translation, but you may contact them easily. Let us know how it'll end! AS P.S.: I don't work @ Trampoline :)

  82. Re:More Acronym Hell by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

    Associated Presses. (ok, ok. Access Points.)

  83. Planned WIFI deployment and Ruckus Wireless by rod · · Score: 1

    Hi. Based on a friend's investigation, Ruckus Wireless has a very compelling solution for distributed, planned wireless.
    I agree with some comments that nowadays, the only hotspots I get good connections are the very well planned ones. Places where a WIFI hotspot has been installed usually gets overloaded and doesn't work well.

  84. Why not have open Wi-Fi? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    I mean, do you really think there is going to be an issue with a person pulling into your parking lot, trying to use your WiFi? You may get a few of these, but so what? I doubt it will be of any significance - they can go across the street to McDonald's and get Free WiFi. And, hate to break it to people, but WiFi really does not travel THAT far. IF it penetrates the building material of the hotel, it very likely will not pass the parking lot. Shoot, at a McDonald's, I can be across the street at Walgreens and SEE the access point, but I cannot really connect until I get into the parking lot of the McDonalds, and cannot really get a decent signal unless I get right up to the building or go inside (even then, sometimes you do not get a usabel signal). Let's face it - WiFi is just not strong enough for that.

    I say, screw the password-protected WiFi. Its really not needed at a place like a Hotel where they are giving it away.

  85. mulling it over... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    ...seems to me that ethernet-over-power to wireless APs would be the simplest solution. Each AP would have its own password, and it all connects back to the single WAN insertion point.

    Least, that's how I'd do it.

    Netgear's Powerline 500 would offer duplex throughput adequate for multiple 802.11n wireless access points.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.