Slashdot Mirror


Smartphones: the New Home of Crapware

Barence writes "Smartphones are replacing PCs as the new breeding ground for pre-installed crapware, argues Mike Jennings. The Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini Pro, for example, comes pre-loaded with McAfee security software and other associated apps, four different app stores, and a selection of games and other media management tools. 'And it's not like you can just get rid of this software, either — most of it's there to stay, with hard-coded blocks in place to ensure you don't uninstall any of the tat you don't want,' he adds."

308 comments

  1. Welcome to the Jungle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    We've got fun and games!*

    (*walled garden may contain advertising, crapware, traitorware, behavioral tracking, and all around pointless crap)

    1. Re:Welcome to the Jungle by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Both Maps and Stocks apps MUST GO!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Welcome to the Jungle by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      The fact that you can't remove the stocks app on the iphone is one of the world's great mysteries. What's funny is the apple fanboys trying to justify it. "Why would you want to remove it? It's a free feature. And you might learn something about the stock market!"

    3. Re:Welcome to the Jungle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have any stocks? Who the hell doesn't have any stocks? Are you like one of those Glenn Beck freaks with bars of gold under the mattress or something? Next you'll be saying you don't want the weather forecast app either.

    4. Re:Welcome to the Jungle by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Good point (I think), the apple fanboy response DOES seem less ridiculous than many responses one would get on the internet.

  2. Not news by petteyg359 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even my regular old clamshell has pre-installed non-removable games and applications.

    1. Re:Not news by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Even my regular old clamshell has pre-installed non-removable games and applications.

      +1 And all the carrier branding stuff that's in there, nothing new.

    2. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For the love of all things nerdy mod this guy up.

    3. Re:Not news by MacTO · · Score: 2

      Same here, but I've noticed that the non-removable applications and games on my old phone were buried under menus that I rarely used. On the new phone, well, they're right in my face and a fair number of them are little more than links to websites. Which is much more obnoxious.

      Thankfully I can choose to bury that stuff in folders on my current phone, but how long will it be until they remove that capability? (After all, they do it to make money. You can't make money on what users don't see.)

      Thankfully the market is still reasonably competitive though, so we can still make the choice to reject those phones. Hopefully enough people are smart enough to do so, so that everyone doesn't have to live with the consequences.

    4. Re:Not news by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      There is a huge leap from good old snake to modern crapware.

    5. Re:Not news by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, but how much of it was slowing down your phone? How much of it was running in the background?

      With an old clamshell, chances are those applications really aren't doing much to slow down your phone. With smartphones though, they are because they all run in the background even if you don't use them.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    6. Re:Not news by trikes57+ · · Score: 2

      The phone manufacturers are starting to make noises about making all the carrier imposed crapware uninstallable. HTC for one has publicly come out in favor of this. the carriers get paid to put the csapware on the phones. The more heavily subsidized the phone the more shovelware on it.

    7. Re:Not news by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is news. The news is that this only affects Android. Android has become the new Windows, home of viruses, malware, and pre-installed junk you can't remove. It's even worse than PCs due to fragmentation--the article mentions that the Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini Pro (what a name) has four different app stores. When Linux fans cheer about some perceived victory through Android, they're really cheering the fact that carriers throw Android onto their cheap, flimsy phones and load it with a bunch of branded crap. That's not the victory we wanted.

    8. Re:Not news by Aydsman · · Score: 1

      It is news. The news is that this only affects Android. Android has become the new Windows, home of viruses, malware, and pre-installed junk you can't remove.

      It is also interesting to note that none of these carrier crapware apps are an issue on Windows Phone because they can all be uninstalled like normal apps. So even if your phone does come with them they are simple to remove. The only apps you can't uninstall are built into the OS (e.g. Maps, Games, Marketplace etc.) by Microsoft.

    9. Re:Not news by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Even my regular old clamshell has pre-installed non-removable games and applications.

      And worse. I've not bought a phone via a mobile network provider since getting one that Orange had deliberately broken the mp3 playback functions on. Without a hack (someone found the keys for the DRM so people could sign their own content with certain tools) you couldn't play anything as either a track or a tone without it having a digital signature - presumably they wanted me to rebuy all my stuff from their online store. What incensed me was that the advertising for that phone by that network played up the media capabilities a lot but neglected to mention that they have deliberately broken the feature they were advertising (I reported the matter to trading standards, but heard nothing back).

      The phones I use have always come more directly from the manufacturer since then. Of coarse even with this route there will be probably be crap from the manufacturer that you can't remove (Motorola's "Blur" for instance), so that doesn't stop everything (we'll see what Google does about that now Motorola is in their hands).

      If I'm in the position where I could get a subsidised phone, and I'm happy with the contract extension that implies, I get the best phone (where "best" is defined by what people will pay for the available devices boxed+unopened on eBay) they'll give me for free for renewing the tariff I'm currently on (or taking the one I want if my needs dictate a change would be beneficial) for 12 or 18 months and flog it to subsidise the cost of a non-neutered phone (or if my current device is fine, to subsidise the monthly dues for a while).

    10. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the victory we wanted.

      This is exactly what the open source community chose. You guys can now get pretty cheap and powerful smart phones that you can root and then tinker with to your hearts delight. Were people in the OS community really so delusional that they did not see this coming? And why does it matter? The entire point of an Android device is to root it and put your own ROM on it.

      If you wanted polished and nice get an iPhone.

    11. Re:Not news by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

      You have a decent main point, but worse than PCs due to fragmentation?

      You complain about the Xperia mini pro has 4 different app stores, but is that really worse than getting your apps from thousands of websites across the internet (like you'd do in windows). Nothing is exactly stopping a future OEM from selling Ubuntu laptops with 5 different repository systems either.

    12. Re:Not news by delinear · · Score: 1

      Chances are they're all hooked into your various online accounts too. I'm pretty good at verifying anything I'm going to install on my phone, but sooner or later users will get caught out by a security flaw in a badly coded piece of shoverware that they never even realised was installed. Less of an issue when phones basically made calls and sent text messages, much more of an issue when they're hooked up to online retailers/banking sites.

    13. Re:Not news by delinear · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm missing something, this is exactly how my Android works, so if it's a new (or at least increasing) development on Android phones what's to stop MS doing it at some point too? At the moment they're fighting for market share, if carriers say they want this shovelware in order to promote the OS I can't see MS worrying too much about the feelings of users. Having said that, I have no pre-installed crap on my Android apart from the basics (market place, maps, a few utility apps like calculators and the like), I can install and uninstall any of it and the only carrier branding I have is a single screen when I restart the phone (which I do maybe once every 6-8 weeks). I could have ditched even that level of branding by buying the same contract and phone from a different retailer.

    14. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not free as in speech, but free as in "fuck the user".

    15. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uuum, just flash the generic default firmware. Problem solved. And additonally, everything "your" provider has disabled (like tethering?) will work again too.

      For Nokia this was never a problem. There is a little tool that allows you to set the internal firmware ID. I have set it to generic "Euro" instead of that of my provider. Then just do a normal firmware update using the Nokia software, and it pulls the right firmware and installs it. :)

      And no, this is not a breach of contract. It's your phone. You own it. You do with it whatever you like. Period.
      They will state different shit. But that won't hold up in any court. They bet on you never telling them to go to court.
      You have a contract for a service. That service is e.g. routing UMTS packets to other phones and if they contain TCP/IP packets, to route them to the Internet. That's it.

      But I buy my phone without any contract anyway. I, on principle, never sign a contract that I can't get out of any day I want ever again. So I use prepaid. (blau.de) And it turns out, that that's also the cheapest option here in Germany.
      (No, I'm not affiliated. I just think all those "Take us, because we're so simple. And a retard like you likes it simple, right? (Even if it costs more.)" companies can fuck right off! Blau are the only ones not treating me like a retard and having actually smart deals. I respect that.)

    16. Re:Not news by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      yep, I never figured out how to remove snake from my old Nokia 3210...

    17. Re:Not news by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      Quite. The inclusion of anything made by McAfee is the equivalent of a car salesman pouring a bag of sugar into your new cars fuel tank. "Just hold on a second sir whilst I fcuk this up for you good and proper - wouldn't want you to be used to 100% performance from day 1 otherwise you will be disappointed in the future".

    18. Re:Not news by oakgrove · · Score: 2

      So you hate Android. Who cares? You shove it in everybody's face everytime you get a good excuse. If we all sign a petition agreeing that you hate Android, will you please just go away?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    19. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, who the fuck doesn't want a device that is "polished and nice"?

      How many people (outside the tech crowd) have rooted it & put their own ROM on it?

      Fuck, how many IN the tech crowd have actually bothered?

      Its a fucking cell phone...Android, iDevice, Win7, whatever...all "people" (read: consumers, not shitheads that haven't left their mom's basement in 20 years) want is a device that fucking works. Restrictions are irrelavant. Jailbreaking/rooting is irrelavant. Just put a fucking device in my hands that goddamn works.

    20. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just works? That's for those Apple hipsters who like to ride around on pennyfarthing bicycles and strain their lattes through their handlebar mustaches. Get with the program! Real men use real phones that you have to fight and subdue and bite down on the ear until bleeds so that the phone knows who it's master is!

    21. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't even have to read the author line to know this was a bonch comment. Jeez dude, your delivery is ok but your material? horribly dated. Get some new writers.

    22. Re:Not news by Toonol · · Score: 1

      That all kind of makes me think Android will clearly win, for the same reason free market economies win over top-down ran socialized economies.

    23. Re:Not news by scot4875 · · Score: 0

      Well you got a +5 for being completely full of shit; Apple mods must be out this morning.

      It is news. The news is that this only affects Android.

      There's crapware for iOS, too. Fart apps and crappy games that show you ads and are able to cull your personal details?

      It's even worse than PCs due to fragmentation--the article mentions that the Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini Pro (what a name) has four different app stores.

      Fragmentation -- while being a talking point for Apple fanbois (iOS has no fragmentation! A 3GS can run everything an iPhone 4 can run, right?), the context you've used it in here indicates that you don't know what 'fragmentation' is.

      When Linux fans cheer about some perceived victory through Android, they're really cheering the fact that carriers throw Android onto their cheap, flimsy phones and load it with a bunch of branded crap. That's not the victory we wanted.

      No, they're cheering because they have a handheld general purpose CPU that they have full control over and runs a useful Linux distro. At least, the ones who *care* to do.

      Also, your sig is still idiotic. Irrational Google hate. Must suck to see them as the biggest threat to your precious Apple.

      However, Google isn't Apple's biggest threat -- Apple is. Because of the way they operate, it's them vs. the entire rest of the computing world, and there's just no fucking way they're going to keep up with dozens of hardware manufacturers and the *entire internet* working on improving Android. Besides, how much more can smartphones (and tablets, for that matter) really do? They're going to be commodity devices *very* soon, and that's going to really eat into that lucrative revenue stream that Apple is enjoying so much right now. Most people aren't going to be willing to keep paying for the logo, and they'll be back to their old almost-pushing-10% marketshare.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    24. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are not the 'droids we're looking for?

    25. Re:Not news by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 1

      They're going to be commodity devices *very* soon, and that's going to really eat into that lucrative revenue stream that Apple is enjoying so much right now. Most people aren't going to be willing to keep paying for the logo, and they'll be back to their old almost-pushing-10% marketshare.

      If people were smart, maybe. But you and I both know that there are people out there who would buy a $100 clay brick if it was painted white and had an Apple logo on it.

      After all, people are still buying the damn thing after the Cult of Jobs tried to convince us that the iPhone's antenna problem was due to users holding it the way everyone holds a phone, but did not fit in with Apple's vision of how you should hold a phone. And people obviously bought it, because they keep buying iPhones.

      That's not particularly unique to Apple fanboys either - GM made rolling piles of crap throughout the 70's 80's and 90's, and there are still people who swear up and down that they will never own a non-GM car.

      Brand loyalty oftentimes trumps rational examination of choices to determine which is best. Now that Apple has brand loyalty, it's likely that even if you have a direct clone of an iPhone that's $100 cheaper, those loyal fans will still buy the Apple product.

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    26. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It affects ALL devices, not just Android. The "fruit" series devices has -- uninstallable -- a book store, a stocks program, etc. (check the comments of the article, someone posted a list there).

      I don't understand. Why does having 4 app stores trouble you? There is Costco's, Walmart, K-Mart, Zellers in the real world selling roughly the same product (all made in China =P). I don't understand why a similar environment is a negative thing. There's apps on the Android Market to search all of them automatically for what you want, and Android users get the added bonus of having COMPETING application markets. Result: Free apps from Amazon and GetJar.

      There's also no malware on the Android Market, Amazon App Store, nor GetJar at this time, and any malware detected is automatically removed from all devices once found. If you're paranoid about malware, then stay with the reputable companies and you'll be fine.

      Having options is never a bad thing.

      (If you wanted an Android device without crapware, you could simply buy a device off contract direct from the manufacturer. I did, it's called the Nexus One)

    27. Re:Not news by Aydsman · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm missing something, this is exactly how my Android works, so if it's a new (or at least increasing) development on Android phones what's to stop MS doing it at some point too? At the moment they're fighting for market share, if carriers say they want this shovelware in order to promote the OS I can't see MS worrying too much about the feelings of users. Having said that, I have no pre-installed crap on my Android apart from the basics (market place, maps, a few utility apps like calculators and the like), I can install and uninstall any of it and the only carrier branding I have is a single screen when I restart the phone (which I do maybe once every 6-8 weeks). I could have ditched even that level of branding by buying the same contract and phone from a different retailer.

      My girlfriend's HTC Desire has 6 - 8 applications she can't uninstall or move to the memory card. She is also still waiting for the Gingerbread update. So sounds like you had a really good Android experience, not everyone is so fortunate.

      You are correct, Microsoft could change their policies and allow all sorts of companies to install rubbish on their phones. I'm just hoping they don't bend to that pressure.

    28. Re:Not news by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      What use is a slashdotter boyfriend if he can't do this ?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  3. 2 Words by clarkn0va · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cyanogenmod.

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    1. Re:2 Words by arazor · · Score: 1

      Cyanogenmod.

      No good for android 3.0 and higher.

    2. Re:2 Words by artor3 · · Score: 1

      If you root your phone at all, you can remove the crap without needing to switch to Cyanogen mod.

    3. Re:2 Words by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      2 more words - voids warranty.

      I have had 5 defective Moto Droids (and a bad Droid 3). On my last one, when the warranty expired, I flashed CM7, and it was possibly the GREATEST thing that I've experienced on Android. However, if I had done this earlier, I would've had my many hardware warranty claims denied.

      Still using it, even though the WiFi is broken. It's a better experience than most of the crap available now.

      It is VERY encouraging that Sprint acknowledges this problem:
      http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/19/sprints-fared-adib-we-made-a-conscious-decision-to-scale-back/

      I just wish that Big Red would realize this too.

    4. Re:2 Words by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      On most hardware you can flash back to stock and they'll never know.

      Cyanogenmod FTW!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    5. Re:2 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's only 1 word :)

    6. Re:2 Words by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2

      I have had 5 defective Moto Droids (and a bad Droid 3).

      Please say those phones were for a team of people and that's not your personal experience because, if those were all your phones then you might want to look into a different manufacturer... One is a lemon, two is bad luck, three is a pattern, five is you're not paying attention. Heck, that many duds - even across a team of people - I'd be looking for a new manufacturer for my next set of phones...

    7. Re:2 Words by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but if your hardware goes out, that makes it a bit trickier, especially if it is an important bit like the USB port or the screen.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    8. Re:2 Words by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      I was told in the Sprint Store after I brought in my dead battery EVO, "your phone has a non-standard ROM installed which is fine, but we can't do any diagnostics on the software, we can only fix the hardware. If you need software support flash back to the Sprint ROM". They got enough of a charge in my battery that the EVO would charge it itself again, thankfully that issue has been fixed since it was a bit scary when it happened.

      While I like CM7, I much prefer Synergy GodMode.

      HEX

    9. Re:2 Words by exomondo · · Score: 1

      If you need software support flash back to the Sprint ROM.

      This is what happened with the WP7 mango beta, while the device was running the beta no software support was available, if you wanted software support you had to flash back, hardware issues were covered though.

    10. Re:2 Words by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Not if it's an HTC Desire. You can root it, but it's got some hardware thingie too - if you attempt to write to the area of flash that has the OS, then the hardware lock will not just refuse the write but immediatly reboot the phone. There are ways to overcome it, but it's a bit more difficult than your standard rooting.

    11. Re:2 Words by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 0

      Actually the solution is in the last line of TFA :

      "after all, this sort of thing doesn’t happen on iOS."

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    12. Re:2 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you own your phone why the hell do you need to root it?

      This is BS

    13. Re:2 Words by trikes57+ · · Score: 1

      Well props to sprint, then. Most carriers just send you packin.

    14. Re:2 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also not really if it's a sony xperia -- if you go custom there are no working drivers for the camera, wifi gets flakey etc. Not sure if this applies to all sony 'droids models or just x8/x10

    15. Re:2 Words by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but as root you can disable any or all the crap/bloat/malware you want with no penalty (I've often done so on my Desire). Just use Titanium or a similar app, or you can even do it from the commandline by calling 'pm disable ...'

      It's essentially the same thing as deleting the package, but it's a lot safer!

    16. Re:2 Words by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      If the devs cannot put out installation instructions that are not deliberately obtuse and which prevent even an experienced user from bricking the phone cyanogen mod is not much different.

      I've tried to find a coherent set of instructions all on one page that does not brick the phone requiring a heimdall reinstall of the OS or actually sending it to someone who wants money to fix it.

      It's good that's Android is so open as Bionix works at least until you try the pre-installed 'one click lag fix" then it'll randomly reboot till you remove both the mod and the 'fix'. That is some amazing crapware.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    17. Re:2 Words by shellbeach · · Score: 2

      Actually, if you look on XDA there'll be instructions for most devices on how to flash back to stock with a broken screen (timing, numbers of keypresses, etc). And if your USB port is screwed, you can still flash back through the SD card (which is the standard method, anyway) ...

      It's pretty difficult to be in a situation where you can't flash back to stock (not impossible, but very difficult) ...

    18. Re:2 Words by queBurro · · Score: 0

      how is rooting and removing crapware any different from what geohot was up to?

      --
      sag
    19. Re:2 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: Nexus

      One or S, doesn't matter. I don't have any carrier- or manufacturer-specific crapware. That includes apps and UI "enhancements."

    20. Re:2 Words by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Untrue. Sony Ericsson phones can easily have all crapware removed with a simple root. Custom ROMs like CyanogenMod have had problems with driver support, true, but that's a different problem and is being resolved. The camera issue was fixed a week ago.

    21. Re:2 Words by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Paying twice as much to have bloatware removed isn't really a solution. It's more like extortion.

    22. Re:2 Words by asvravi · · Score: 1

      Still waiting for the second word...

    23. Re:2 Words by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      Nope, all me. I am not rough on my phones, but I am very demanding, and don't accept regular faults as acceptable.

      First one started random (~2/day) reboots after ~3 months.
      2nd had a failed touchscreen after ~2 months.
      3rd should have failed at QA- no keypad backlight out of the box.
      4th started randomly locking up after ~4 months.
      and now the 5th has a failed WiFi module (only 3G works) after 6 months. It's out of warranty, so I've stuck with it since, and it's been usable for about 9 months now.

      The Droid 3 had frequent (~2/hour), random reboots right out of the box. Combined with the shit ton of crapware and lack of available options (e.g. I couldn't change the button for the stock SMS app to Handcent, and it took up a lot of room) there was no question- I was done with Moto. Haven't found a good option yet, but I'm keeping an eye out. The SCH-i405 looks promising, but we'll see when it actually comes out.

      It will be interesting to see what Google does with them, but I won't be considering another one until long after they've been revamped.

    24. Re:2 Words by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      If you've already rooted, just use ROM Manager. It takes care of everything.

      If you haven't... uh... find out how to and then use ROM Manager.

    25. Re:2 Words by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      You get what you pay for, if you buy a cheapo Android subsidized by your carrier you'll get crapware. Buy a more expensive Android and you might get crapware, buy an expensive iPhone and get no crapware. Everyone can make their own decision on whether it's worth the money or not, to me it is.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    26. Re:2 Words by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Yet another alternative is to buy a cheap Android unsubsidised by the carrier, of course. You forgot about that, somehow.

    27. Re:2 Words by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Damn, the Droid 3 had good hardware, I was hoping to get one and put MeeGo/Cordia on it if they ever unlocked the bootloader.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    28. Re:2 Words by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      +1. CyanogenMod is ridiculously good and showcases how good the Android platform can be when it is not crippled or loaded with bloatware. I installed it recently on an old HTC Tattoo, which is a "low end" Android with no official updates from HTC, and the difference with the stock 1.6 version is astonishing.

      It's almost like a brand new phone. Hell, even battery life is better.

    29. Re:2 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm. The walled garden, and by extension - iOS, IS crapware.

      So paying double to go with Apple doesn't solve the crapware problem. It only exacerbates it.

    30. Re:2 Words by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Hell, even battery life is better.

      Then either the CM team made a better rom for the Tattoo than the other devices, or it had some godawful battery life to begin with. CM is really nice, I grant you, but the fact that it sucks battery like a first-timer is a common complaint, that my personal experience can bear out.

      NB: I understand they have some things in the pipe for 7.1 that is supposed to address some of the power problems, and plan to try it again when it comes out... whenever the hell that is.

    31. Re:2 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which also comes with its own locked apps you can't uninstall, like say Terminal Emulator. So when you pull down the most current version from Market, you'll have two icons in your menu. And lets not forget Rom Manager and its daily updates.

    32. Re:2 Words by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Maybe the power management on the stock HTC Tatto is crap (wouldn't surprise me at all), but i can attest that the battery life on this phone is noticeably better using CM. Switching the CPU governor to powersave squeezes it even a bit more, and being a low-end device i honestly can't tell the difference between the default one (ondemand).

    33. Re:2 Words by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I tried that, but the phone just reboots. Same happens if I permroot with Visionary, though temproot does work. I eventually got permroot somehow using a USB rooting program (forget the name), but the write-lock remains. I just run droidwall - the spyware can waste a little battery power, but it can't report home.

    34. Re:2 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No true. The HTC MyTouch 4G comes preinstalled with the Qik Video Chat application, which cannot be removed and is constantly running in the background polling for video calls.

      Once I rooted mine and installed CyanogenMod (all praise be to Allah) my battery life increased by about 50% due to the lack of crapware running in the background.

    35. Re:2 Words by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      There is no Android 3 for smartphones yet.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    36. Re:2 Words by lrobert98 · · Score: 1
      One more word: Nope

      Amazon MP3, Facebook, Twitter, and a number of Google branded apps are all preinstalled by Google on my Nexus One and are not removable. Each Android upgrade has brought more of these. Sure, it's not as bad as a carrier branded phone but Google is not exactly innocent either.

    37. Re:2 Words by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      My Nexus One has unwanted crapware, Twitter, Facebook, Books, Amazon MP3. Now granted I use Facebook and sometimes use Amazon MP3 but plenty of people don't. And even though I use them, I would rather install them myself, that way I can put updates on my SD card to save my N1's precious space.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    38. Re:2 Words by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      If the devs cannot put out installation instructions that are not deliberately obtuse and which prevent even an experienced user from bricking the phone cyanogen mod is not much different.

      It's tough to write instructions for people who deliberately try to not understand them in an effort to prove that the instructions are too difficult. In my experience, the answer to "can this be rooted/flashed?" are either "no" or "yes, and here's how to do it." It's really not that hard -- though I will grant that it's generally far more difficult than the 1-click root exploit for iOS.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    39. Re:2 Words by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      It bricks the phone and I've paid for ROM manager. Hell Rom manager will brick the phone if you use the repartition tool.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    40. Re:2 Words by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      So far I've found three items missing from the 'instructions' when doing cyanogen manually. It seems to be a blind spot the pundits have. Even when it's uspposed to 'just work' the ROM Manager will brick the phone in two different ways and I paid for it. It will brick the phone with cyanogen and it will brick the phone with if you repartition.
      The one click lag fix that is installed with bionix without permission will lock the phone up running the processor to overheat then reboot. The phone will get a tad warm.

      No, they're not ready to play with IOS, they ain't even ready to be let out of the basement.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    41. Re:2 Words by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      ... with an HTC Desire?? There are better ways to root (as the actress said) ... try unrEVOked, for starters.

      In any case, if you've got root and a custom recovery, just nuke the ROM and throw CM7 on it ... you'll get rid of all the malware. You can even (in the best-kept secret of CM7) disable particular permissions for whatever software you like: don't like them having the internet? Just disable that permission! Works like a charm, and certainly makes me feel a lot safer about installing software like Swype.

    42. Re:2 Words by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That's the one! Yes, I used unrevoked. It rooted the phone perminantly, but it still reboots if I try to mount the filesystem read-write. I think I'd have to put a new ROM on entirely, and I don't like that much hastle, or the risk of screwing something up.

    43. Re:2 Words by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      I think I'd have to put a new ROM on entirely, and I don't like that much hastle, or the risk of screwing something up.

      It's really not much of a hassle (providing you back up all user Apps+Data with Titanium and everything else with dedicated tools (SMS with SMS Backup and Restore from the market is the only thing I've ever backed up separately)) You can (and should) always do a nandroid backup before touching a thing, as you can then restore it if -- in the very worst case scenario -- you lose anything.

      It's also quite amazing how much faster the Desire feels when you strip the hideous Sense bloatware off it! I still can't believe how much HTC undersold that phone by encumbering it with ghastly software ... And if you want to run Gingerbread on the Desire, using a non-HTC ROM is the only way to go. (Note that you can get Gingerbread + HTC Sense custom ROMs from XDA, if you happen to like Sense -- still way better than the official HTC ROMs!)

      Anyway, good luck if you do decide to try it; otherwise, too bad about the unfreezable/unremovable bloatware ... :(

  4. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Apple is delighted by the extra customers being sent their way.

    1. Re:Apple by Nova+Express · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ditto. Complain all you want about Apple's "Walled Garden," but I bet 95% of consumers would prefer not having that shovelware foisted upon them (especially the crap they can't remove) over the ability to play Ogg Vorbis or install a different operating system on their phone.

      --
      Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

      http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    2. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      What? No, it just means they're stuck with Apple's crap, whatever that may be

    3. Re:Apple by mjwx · · Score: 2

      So that's why people are leaving their Iphone 3GS's for new Android handsets. The fastest selling OS is Android, people are buying it because it's better.

      The overwhelming majority of PC user's couldn't care less about "crapware" but are finding each revision of Itunes worse then the last and are relishing the chance to be rid of it. The critical difference is that they aren't forced to jump through hoops by the crapware to do basic things.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Apple by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Such as? I can remove whatever I want.

    5. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just go an android manufacturer that doesn't do this. The beauty of choice.

    6. Re:Apple by mkraft · · Score: 1

      The only reason Android is the fastest selling [i]phone[/i] OS (if you count tablets iOS is still on top), is because there are more manufacturers of Android phones than iPhones. As for people switching from the iPhone 3GS to Android, from what I've read there are just as many people switching from Android to the iPhone 4. People with AT&T are switching to Android and people with Verizon are switching to the iPhone (grass is always greener I guess).

      Then there's this:
      http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/survey-over-half-of-phone-buyers-already-want-iphone-5-984013

    7. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, Apple doesn't put crap on the things they sell. That is kind of their schtick.

    8. Re:Apple by cathector · · Score: 2

      you can ?
      i can't.
      eg, stocks, itunes, game center, etc.
      it is fairly easy to hide them away in a group labeled "crap" tho.

    9. Re:Apple by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Cool story bro

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    10. Re:Apple by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Fine, they can go off in Apple's walled garden.

      I won't stop complaining, because I don't want such a restrictive approach to impact my ability to use my computers (of any form factor) the way I want to- and Apple's moves are making that highly likely.

    11. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, once you boil it all down to the bone, it's just a matter of dealing with a different pile of crap. A good example is Apple's iTunes. The OS X version can occasionally be messy but is usually a non-issue, but the Windows version can fuck itself up because someone sneezed. And since Apple has opted to tie backup/restore functionality and other maintenance issues to their buggy, bloated iTunes application, sure it's easy to be snooty about crapware in Android but iPhones aren't free of their own issues.

    12. Re:Apple by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      The only reason Android is the fastest selling [i]phone[/i] OS (if you count tablets iOS is still on top), is because there are more manufacturers of Android phones than iPhones.

      You have it backwards. The only reason there are more manufacturers is because there is more demand. They wouldn't be able to support making that many phones if they were not being bought.

    13. Re:Apple by EvilJoker · · Score: 2

      if you count tablets iOS is still on top

      Are you sure about this? According to this there will be about 90 million iOS devices sold in 2011, and about 180 million Androids. Even if we assume those numbers are strictly for phones, that leaves a gap of 90 million devices.

      According to this, Apple's selling fewer than 30 million iPads per year. And that doesn't even account for any of the popular Android tablets out there, such as the Xoom, the Eee Transformer, and the Nook Color.

      Yes, iOS rules in tablet space. But it does not bridge the gap in phone space.

    14. Re:Apple by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      So that's why people are leaving their Iphone 3GS's for new Android handsets. The fastest selling OS is Android...

      And the single most popular smartphone is the iPhone 4. The second most popular smartphone? The iPhone 3GS.

      Sorry - you were trying to make a point. Silly of me to inject facts into your discussion.

    15. Re:Apple by LordLucless · · Score: 0

      This has nothing to do with the "walled garden" app-distribution model. It's perfectly feasible for Apple to do the same - they just don't because they have half a brain. The same way my Google Nexus S didn't have crapware pre-loaded on it - because Google cares about the reputation of their device.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    16. Re:Apple by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the iPod Touch. Its numbers are significant.

    17. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Apple is delighted by the extra customers being sent their way.

      Just one more reason to try to do away with the cell phone

    18. Re:Apple by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      So that's why people are leaving their Iphone 3GS's for new Android handsets. The fastest selling OS is Android, people are buying it because it's better.

      People are buying it because it's cheaper and the iPhone is not available on their carrier. If people were *leaving* the 3GS for Android, the iPhone wouldn't be gaining market share and the 3GS wouldn't still be the second best selling phone in the U.S.

      If you really think that people are clamoring for the low-end Android phones because they think it's better, I've got a bridge......

    19. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What about Clock, Camera, Calendar, Notes, Calculator, Compass, Voice Memos, Maps, iPod, iTunes, YouTube, Photos, Stocks, Game Center, Weather, Contacts, Phone, Safari Messages and Mail? Sure, some of those are very useful and probably not worth removing, but others (Game Center, YouTube) are just crap that I would prefer not to have taking up space in my "Junk" folder.

      Not to mention that for most of the useful ones, there are better versions available (Digits to replace calculator, Evernote/Onenote to replace notes...) That if you decide to use, you get to put up with the original icons wasting space.

    20. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the single most popular smartphone is the iPhone 4. The second most popular smartphone? The iPhone 3GS.

      Sorry - you were trying to make a point. Silly of me to inject facts into your discussion.

      Because on iOS you have no choice in hardware...duh! If the iphone4 wasn't the most popular phone then iOS wouldn't be even on the smartphone radar in competition terms.

    21. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So high iphone sales means the iphone is good, high android sales means android is bad...gotcha.

    22. Re:Apple by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      So that's why people are leaving their Iphone 3GS's for new Android handsets. The fastest selling OS is Android, people are buying it because it's better

      Andoid isn't "better" pe sé, but for a lot of people an Android phone is a better fit because:
      - they need some hardware feature (like a physical keyboard)
      - they are on a budget, and lots of Android phones are cheaper than an iPhone.

      I'd say the iPhone is the best phone in its category, with Android expanding by filling the need for smartphones outside of that category where people are increasingly dumping their dumb phones for app-phones. This is also why there's constant speculation about Apple creating smaller and/or cheaper versions of the iPhone to expand into some of those other market segments.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    23. Re:Apple by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      But they are all the carriers bitches, that was why the smartphone market was stagnant until Apple arrived on the scene in the first place.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    24. Re:Apple by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 0

      Suppose the Macbook was the most popular single laptop. Does that make OS X the most popular laptop OS?

      Of course not. OS X is restricted to a few models of Macbook, while I can order laptops running Windows from Dell, Toshiba, HP, Asus, and each might have more models under a single one of their brands (say, Dell XPS) than there are models of Macbook.

      Or was your point that Android is a weak enough brand that people don't understand the difference between Apple, Android, and some random other phone that claims to be smart?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    25. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it's neither a phone or a tablet, that's irrelevant to this thread.

    26. Re:Apple by _4rp4n3t · · Score: 1

      Not if you buy the handset outright, independently of the contract, like I did with the Nexus S.

    27. Re:Apple by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      It may also be because Android based phones give you more choice than just four hand sets (of which just one current model). An iPhone is more than just iOS, just like an "Android phone" is more than just Android.

    28. Re:Apple by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Try making a handset that is not iPhone but does run iOS (legally). Given the choice, I'm sure some other manufacturers would produce iOS based phones already.

      Your argument may hold up when talking about competition from Symbian or WP7.

    29. Re:Apple by Aphrika · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I wish I could remove the Stocks and Weather apps built into my iPhone, but Apple won't let me, even though there are alternatives... I just have to stick them in a Crap I Don't Use folder on the last screen...

    30. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there breakdowns for the specific models and the gsm/cdma versions?

    31. Re:Apple by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You could just by a Nexus S that comes with vanilla Android and an unlocked bootloader you know. Pricing is a bit better than an iPhone.

      Actually you can get unbranded phones easily in the UK. If you sign up via a third party like Phones 4 U they will give you an unbranded model instead of the branded one you would normally get when you deal directly with the phone company. That is how I got my Galaxy S, and it is largely crapware free.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:Apple by jimicus · · Score: 1

      They don't really support them - not in the same sense that Apple do with the iPhone. Most of the handset manufacturers are still very much stuck in a 10 or 15 year old mindset where they build the phone, put the software together and as soon as it's in mass production they hardly touch the phone's firmware (except in occasional cases of really heinous bugs, and not always then).

    33. Re:Apple by delinear · · Score: 1

      The argument is still flawed. People aren't randomly picking phones, meaning the OS with the most handsets gets the most hits, they're making choices based on styling, price, usability, past experience, etc.

    34. Re:Apple by delinear · · Score: 1

      So price isn't a factor in how good something is? I'm sorry, but for most people living in the real world, value for money is certainly one of the key factors in determining how good a product is. Almost all product rating systems factor in price and mark products down if they're considered overpriced.

    35. Re:Apple by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 1

      So that's why people are leaving their Iphone 3GS's for new Android handsets. The fastest selling OS is Android, people are buying it because it's better.

      Actually, in the US the fastest selling handset is the iPhone 4. The number 2 fastest selling handset is the iPhone 3GS. The former is 14 months old, the latter 26.

      Nice try though...

    36. Re:Apple by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 1

      Because on iOS you have no choice in hardware...duh! If the iphone4 wasn't the most popular phone then iOS wouldn't be even on the smartphone radar in competition terms.

      The original point was people buy more Android phones because they are better, but stating the fact that the iPhone 4 and the 3GS are the two top-selling smartphones on the market, your conclusion is that's because with iOS you only have 2 hardware options? So if Android is 'higher quality' (even though customer satisfaction numbers say otherwise, and sales of individual handsets don't seem to support that assumption), how come only 2 phones are outselling a few hundred different ones? Nice logic you have there, you are basically stating that -1 + -1 = 3, or something similar.

      Also, since when does the typical Slashdot reader think 'sells more' implies 'is of higher quality'.

      It's fascinating to see how flexible typical geek thinking is, when it comes to defending minority opinions.

    37. Re:Apple by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 1

      So high iphone sales means the iphone is good, high android sales means android is bad...gotcha.

      You are posting this as if there's some kind of paradox or contradiction in that... There isn't...

      Just look around you and find out different people buy different stuff for different reasons. Many bad products and services are succesful, even though they are competing with good products and services. Price is often (but not always) the explanation.

      In the case of Android, it's pretty obvious why Android is outselling iPhones, it's because there are literally hundreds of times more Android phones than iOS phones, and the vast majority of them is bought by people who either don't know about smartphone OS's, don't care about it, or simply don't want or cannot spend the money on an expensive high-end phone.

      If you sincerely think 'Android outsells iPhones' implies 'Android is better than iOS', you are delusional. That would mean each and every crap Android phone you get for free in a BOGO deal is better than the iPhone, and that's why people get them. 90% of Android phones sold = utter crap, 10% = good phones. Just go ahead and look up some customer satisfaction rates and return statistics.

    38. Re:Apple by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      One nice thing about the iPhone is the fact the "baseline" installation has just about NO "crapware" installed--if you want to install extras you have to get it through the iTunes App Store. That's why I'm waiting to get the next-generation iPhone when that comes out.

    39. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are just apps that you don't use. Lots of people find them useful.

      Crapware is garbage that is not useful to anyone but the people making a profit off it.

    40. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quite like their crap.

    41. Re:Apple by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      On my N900 I could uninstall my desktop manager or even my kernel with a single command :D

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    42. Re:Apple by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      iTunes isn't crap? I'd say that's subjective, to be generous.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    43. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Android is the currently winning Phone OS because it is cheap as fuck.

      I can go into my carrier today and get a 2-year contracted Android phone for $0. It is likely a giant festering pile of shit, but it is there sitting in the smartphone pile for free.

      Apple? $199 to start, still a 2-year deal. (Not counting for any deals, promos, etc that might be on).

      When 30% of the USA is unemployed....$0>$199

      Andriod is not superior. It is not some amazing OS that nobody will ever dare to match. Granted, Android (itself) isn't a festering turd without carrier and manufacturer shitware either - it is a goddamn strong OS.

    44. Re:Apple by wootcat · · Score: 1

      You qualify your first sentence by specifying the 3GS, but even so, can you cite sources for this data? We all know Android is outselling iOS, but I've seen no numbers on how many Android purchases are from iOS users switching camps. I'm sure there is a percentage, if for nothing else than to switch to a provider with better cell service, but you make it sound like everyone is dumping iOS the first chance they get, which is not the case.

      Android being better is an opinion, and not everyone shares your opinion. For some, dealing with mal- and crap-ware is certainly not "better".

      --
      I'm really a low 5-digit Slashdotter, but this ID is where I am now.
    45. Re:Apple by wootcat · · Score: 1

      I literally don't think you know what literally means.

      --
      I'm really a low 5-digit Slashdotter, but this ID is where I am now.
    46. Re:Apple by Samalie · · Score: 1

      You know, I've been using iTunes for probably 8 years or so at home on a windows box.

      I agree 100% that iTunes is bloated to fuck.

      Beyond that, I have literally NEVER had one single problem with iTunes. Not one GPF, not one crash, not one corrupted backup or fucked up playlist or anything. Other than the fact that it sucks down resources faster than a vietnamese hooker for an american dollar, iTunes has worked on Windows properly for a LONG time now.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    47. Re:Apple by toriver · · Score: 1

      For all practical purposes it is a very small tablet. Or perhaps the Samsung Galaxy Tab at 7" should not count either?

    48. Re:Apple by wootcat · · Score: 1

      iOS 5 should solve this problem, yes? From what I've read, with iOS 5 comes cloud-based syncing -- no need for iTunes to be installed anywhere. I could be wrong, but it's my understanding that you won't need to have iTunes to activate, maintain, sync or update your iOS device, which should allow you to live an iTunes-free life, should you choose.

      --
      I'm really a low 5-digit Slashdotter, but this ID is where I am now.
    49. Re:Apple by toriver · · Score: 1

      Competing with multiple vendors on the same platform is not to the manufacturer's benefit. A customer choosing a Windows PC from HP implicitly also "un-chooses" one from Dell, Asus etc.

      This is why Microsoft is the company that makes any profit in the consumer desktop market.

    50. Re:Apple by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      2 phones aren't outselling 100 different ones. More Android phones are being sold than iOS phones, remember?

      Apple: 4 + 3 = 5
      Android 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 0.5 + 0.5 = 10...

      (numbers not to scale)

    51. Re:Apple by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Looking at my (work-provided) iPad:

      Youtube
      Videos
      iTunes
      iPod
      Game Center
      Facetime
      Photobooth
      Safari (replaced)

      Oops.

    52. Re:Apple by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      And the most popular laptop manufacturer on college campuses? Apple.

      Guess what Apple's marketshare is amongst laptop manufacturers. Then, as a thought experiment, guess what the iPhone's marketshare is going to approach in a few years.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    53. Re:Apple by Idbar · · Score: 1

      I'm curious about what a manufacturer needs to do to:
      1. Don't get crapware in their systems
      2. Remove the Telco brand from their devices

      To me is something that Apple asked to be done, but other companies won't. Why Samsung/HTC/Motorola/Sony have to put up with all that crap from ATT and Verizon, and Apple doesn't? Well that's something I completely don't understand.

    54. Re:Apple by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      I disregard style, as I am an old git, the price is unimportant as my contract can get me any handset without any top-up fee but usability in the sense of feature set is of paramount importance to me and the past experience angle is damned strong.
      I won't have a Nokia because I once had to get a particular service pack of windows to run the Nokia updater software and said software (despite 'saving' and 'reloading' my data ) threw away all my settings and the map data.
      I won't have an iPhone as I have had an iMac and an iPod and used iTunes several times.
      I won't have a Sony because, well, Sony are a set of ****s.
      I won't have an LG because I have had an LG Renoir.
      Kind of narrows the field.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    55. Re:Apple by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Competing with multiple vendors on the same platform is not to the manufacturer's benefit.

      That depends. For example:

      A customer choosing a Windows PC from HP implicitly also "un-chooses" one from Dell, Asus etc.

      But Dell, Asus, etc. didn't have to write Windows. Apple may have no competition for "machines which run iOS", but they also bear the costs of initial development and continued maintenance of iOS, not to mention improvements. If I bought a Droid with an unlocked bootloader, I could make it better (thus making me more satisfied with Motorola) by installing an upgrade from Google, at zero cost to Motorola.

      This is why Microsoft is the company that makes any profit in the consumer desktop market.

      They aren't the only one that benefits, though. Say what you will about Macs being superior; competition has driven PC hardware forward to the benefit of consumers. I think Apple switching to Intel was a pretty striking verdict on that.

      I'm also not sure what any of this has to do with the earlier discussion of who has more marketshare currently. Whatever the motivation, the reality is that consumers are overwhelmingly choosing Android over iOS, which handily counters the claim that "Complain all you want about Apple's "Walled Garden," but I bet 95% of consumers would prefer..."

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  5. I like options by whiteboy86 · · Score: 0

    4 appstores to have is better then 1 restricted appstore, and secondly some well known firewall is probably better then no firewall at all.

    1. Re:I like options by redherring728 · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point. The problem is not the existence of them, or even really the fact that they're pre-installed, but the fact that you cannot remove them.

    2. Re:I like options by whiteboy86 · · Score: 1

      Android is an open system, you can remove any app on the system you want, it is just not so obvious for beginners.

    3. Re:I like options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tried it on the droid3? Still locked. No root. It's pretty much the iconic Android phone (people talk about droids and iphones) and it's locked tighter than a duck's ass. Android is open. The versions of Android foisted off on consumers may or may not be open, depending on version, vendor, and ease of exploitation. There's no way of rooting the Droid 3 yet, and I have an inkling it won't be opened up until Moto makes it happen.

      Yes, I can install a different launcher, or otherwise obscure the crapware, but it's there for the duration. No way of removing it without root.

      Root isn't guaranteed, so even if it is technically "open," that doesn't mean much.

    4. Re:I like options by Salvo · · Score: 1

      It depends on the quality and efficiency of the "Firewall", especially on a Portable Device. Even well known Security Software may be inappropriate in certain situations.

      If the Software can't detect new threats (out-of-date definitions, no dynamic threat control) it is pointless having.
      If the Software is constantly running in the background, consuming CPU cycles, RAM, network bandwidth and Battery, it is less than useless; it is a liability.

      Software solutions that get bundled with an OS in return for some financial kickback to the device manufacturer (Crapware) have no incentive to add value to the UX, so are generally detrimental to the UX.
      I'm not saying that McAfee's software solutions are Crapware, but it is likely that Sony-Ericsson did receive a financial incentive to include their product.

    5. Re:I like options by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      No, they are impossible to get rid of unless you root your phone which voids your warranty in most cases.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    6. Re:I like options by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      It's not even just that. It's that it's not removable and it's crap nobody wants.

      Safari isn't removable on iPhone. IE isn't removable on Windows Mobile. But nobody complains about those because they are intrinsically useful, and even if you don't like them, it's just because you prefer an alternative to the default.

    7. Re:I like options by delinear · · Score: 1

      By definition anything I don't like but can't uninstall is "non-removable crapware". To suggest Windows and iOS don't have this because most people are happy to put up with the pre-installed apps is just blinkered, it's exactly the same as carrier lockdown on Android and it's universally bad for the end user, the only reason you hear more complaints from Android users is because they probably bought the phone expecting more openness, it doesn't mean other users wouldn't like this too. I wish we could focus less on Android vs iOS vs WP7 vs whatever and more on carriers vs customers, because that's the real issue.

    8. Re:I like options by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      No, it is not the same. On the one hand, you have the provider of the platform offering a default application to interface with certain built-in services which they feel (along with many others) are important differentiating features of the whole product. Moreover, presumably, this software is engineered to be fully integrated with the system.

      On the other hand, you have carriers and phone manufacturers auctioning off a phone's "real estate" to the highest bidder of any number of third-party developers, and pre-installing their software--not because it is intrinsically useful, best of breed, or particularly best suited or integrated--but for the mere reason of honouring a cross-marketing deal.

      Not being able to uninstall software that came integrated with your OS is reasonably tolerated. Not being able to uninstall third-party, off-the-shelf software that is by definition not integrated with the system, is asinine.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  6. Solution: go Apple by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whether computer, tablet, or phone, Apple don't do this. It's *one* of the reasons I like them.

    Simon.

    (haters in 3,... 2,... 1,...)

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Solution: go Apple by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Not only that, they COULD do it, and people would still buy their stuff/defend them. But they choose not to - I love that.

    2. Re:Solution: go Apple by Animats · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ITunes? AppStore? Apple has preloaded marketing-oriented apps; they're just all Apple's.

    3. Re:Solution: go Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither do google for that matter.

    4. Re:Solution: go Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Whether computer, tablet, or phone, Apple don't do this. It's *one* of the reasons I like them.

      Yeah, Apple's not a solution. iOS 5 is bundling a Twitter app with it, which is bloatware I don't need. Likewise for some of the other crap that comes with it like the stock ticker I'd never use or the horrible weather app that I'd replace with a third party app... except that "duplicates functionality" so by Apple's rules there shouldn't be any. (But there are, so, yay consistency.)

      On the Mac side, there's iLife which gets bundled with new Macs whether you want it or not.

      (haters in 3,... 2,... 1,...)

      I'd rather be a "hater" than a blind fanboi suckered by Apple's marketing into overpaying for crap hardware.

    5. Re:Solution: go Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the crap do you propose Bonjour is, then? Oh, and Safari whenever you install iTunes? Oh, and iTunes itself?

    6. Re:Solution: go Apple by Trufagus · · Score: 1

      Solution: go Nexus

      Get the best of both worlds: no crapware, no jail.

      (But I must add, I haven't encountered any crapware on non-Nexus Android's here in Canada. The problem seems to vary by carrier and country.)

    7. Re:Solution: go Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Nike+iPod.

    8. Re:Solution: go Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just a blind hater. I have a 3rd party weather app, and multiple stock market apps. And there is no "twitter app" in iOS 5.

    9. Re:Solution: go Apple by robbyb20 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a voided warranty for phone.... When will people realize that Android ISNT OPEN! its locked down once a manufacturer gets their hands on it. By unlocking the phone, they make it same like they are appealing to the masses but they arent. Open your eyes!

    10. Re:Solution: go Apple by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2

      That's like complaining your OS comes with a browser and a package manager. It makes no sense, those apps are part of the core use cases for the device.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    11. Re:Solution: go Apple by jonwil · · Score: 1

      The fact that it insists on trying to force iTunes and Safari on you when you install QuickTime is the reason I never install QuickTime on my Windows box. If actually requires it, I find an alternative that does not...

    12. Re:Solution: go Apple by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      That's like complaining your OS comes with a browser and a package manager. It makes no sense, those apps are part of the core use cases for the device.

      No problem with them coming with the device, but why not let users replace them with something better or remove them entirely if that doesn't match *their* use case?

    13. Re:Solution: go Apple by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a funny thing. Marketing is the core function of iOS.

    14. Re:Solution: go Apple by delinear · · Score: 1

      I can change or even uninstall the default browser and package manage on my OS. This thread is about stuff the vendor installs and forces the user to use - to say Apple don't do that is wrong, even if they do have a slick user interface. I'm not saying it's necessarily bad for the user in the majority of cases, but it's still exactly the same thing.

    15. Re:Solution: go Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. By expanding on your logic you could say that Settings, Photo, Video, Spotlight, and Contacts apps are crapware as well.

    16. Re:Solution: go Apple by delinear · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about? Nexus isn't a root unlock exploit, it's a handset sold with vanilla Android with no carrier/handset manufacturer extras. And my Android experience matches GP's here in the UK - you can easily track down a handset, even on contract, without lots of carrier crap installed if you shop around. Independent handset retailers like Carphone Warehouse tend to provide exactly this. No rooting or unlocking required, full warranty included.

    17. Re:Solution: go Apple by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      But these programs aren't crapware, which is what we're talking about :

      "Shovelware (sometimes also crapware or garbageware) is a derogatory computer jargon term that refers to software noted more for the quantity of what is included than for the quality or usefulness. The term is also used to refer to software that is ported from one computer platform or storage medium to another with little thought given to adapting it for use on the destination platform or medium, resulting in poor quality. The term is also sometimes used to refer to pre-installed software.[1]"

      Safari, iTunes, AppStore these are pillars of the iOS, essential components to the user experience Apple offers and AppStore is really the only one you are forced to use (if you want to install software.) If you are the kind of person who wants to change package managers you do not want an iPhone anyway, the whole philosophy of it is exactly the opposite of that.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    18. Re:Solution: go Apple by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      As far as I know you can easily remove them on OSX and use alternatives.

      On iOS it's harder, and there are no alternatives unless you jailbreak the device, except Opera is available. But then you could argue that having your repository and sync application be OS specific isn't so weird, and in case of iPod/iPhone central to what Apple is trying to do.

      You don't install SuSE or RedHat and then complain that they use rpms, or Windows and complain that they use .msi or you have to use ActiveSync to connect to Windows Mobile devices.

      By the way, what is the standard sync application for Android phones? I honestly don't know and a simple search couldn't tell me.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    19. Re:Solution: go Apple by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a funny thing. Marketing is the core function of iOS.

      In a sense it's the core function of Apple. I recently read this interesting article called "Apple's Retail Success Is More Than Magic" on Forbes.com. It explains that Apple focusses on making customers happy first, and only making a profit second. From the article:

      "Apple has grasped that making money is the result of the firm’s actions, not the goal."

      "According to several employees and training manuals, sales associates are taught an unusual sales philosophy: not to sell, but rather to help customers solve problems. “Your job is to understand all of your customers’ needs—some of which they may not even realize they have,” one training manual says. To that end, employees receive no sales commissions and have no sales quotas."

      I found it a very enlightening insight into why Apple is so successful and has such a loyal following.

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/06/17/apples-retail-stores-more-than-magic/

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    20. Re:Solution: go Apple by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      By the way, what is the standard sync application for Android phones? I honestly don't know and a simple search couldn't tell me.

      There isn't one, because Android devices are not designed to sync with a workstation. Android has been designed with the idea that the data you want to sync with it is accessible over the internet, so they keep themselves in constant sync over the network. YMMV, but I find that works a lot better than syncing with a specific workstation - I don't have to remember to boot up a specific workstation, connect my phone to it and let it sync, it just syncs by itself constantly through the day. So for example, if I update my calendar over the web using a random workstation, those changes spontaneously replicate to my phone almost immediately.

    21. Re:Solution: go Apple by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      A media player that uses proprietary transfer methods and is tied into a particular company's music store is hardly comparable to a browser...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    22. Re:Solution: go Apple by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Meh. That's more of an example of the media (and now you) playing the role of Apple's advertisers.

    23. Re:Solution: go Apple by Toonol · · Score: 1

      If they can't be uninstalled, sure. That's pretty straightforward. They may not be the worst example of it, because compared to McAffee nearly anything seems benign. But still, you should be able to remove them from your phone and use your own utilities.

    24. Re:Solution: go Apple by remote_wsx9 · · Score: 1

      At least Apple makes some effort to provide a decent user experience. In contrast to the crap getting loaded on the Android phones, which is cynically made purely to fill space on the screen. It has the same mentality that almost completely overtook the Internet: give the suckers crap, take the money and run. It's "punch the monkey" all over again.

    25. Re:Solution: go Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stocks. Weather (by Yahoo). Book store. Check the comments in the posted article. Someone made a comment there. Nice try though.

      Just because it's from the device manufacturer doesn't exclude it from being crapware. I for one, have never check stocks or the weather on my phone -- at least using an app. (I use a Nexus One)

    26. Re:Solution: go Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has plenty of un-removable crap, it is just Apple branded crap. That is one benefit from Apple keeping their OSs on such a tight leash; other people can't put crapware on it, and they get to add their own while everyone considers it "features".

  7. Free and open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm happy with my N900, it runs true Linux, i.e. it allows me to install/remove any app I want, right out of the box, without the need to execute some 3rd party binaries to "jailbreak". But as we all know - most people love to be pulled through the mud (as long as they are made to believe they are being pulled through liquid gold by the hand that pulls them).

    1. Re:Free and open by Desler · · Score: 0

      Wow, some loser must be bored to be modding me down as troll for something that isn't even remotely trolling. If you want to be so lame go ahead, I have plenty of reserve karma.

    2. Re:Free and open by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 1

      Plenty of Android phones have to be jailbroken. Here's the first Google result for android jailbreaking. A complex set of tutorials to get root access on Android.

      The N900 has root access out of the box. Here's the first Google result for N900 jailbreaking. A tutorial on how to use the N900 to jailbreak other devices.

    3. Re:Free and open by anethema · · Score: 1

      The N900 is still fat, has crappy 3G bands for north America, has crappy app selection, etc etc.

      It is a really cool device for a nerd to have, but isn't exactly the mecca of smartphones.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    4. Re:Free and open by bemymonkey · · Score: 2

      That may be true, but even with all their crapware, low-end Android devices are mostly faster than the N900, have a better selection of apps, require less end user knowledge of Linux and have a touchscreen that works in the way people expect it to ("Like the Eyefone!")...

      Not sure what your comment is supposed to contribute, really... I like my guitars, and my bed, and my pants... oh and lasagna!

    5. Re:Free and open by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      it's not jailbreaking on android, it's rootkitting... hair/split

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    6. Re:Free and open by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      has crappy app selection

      LOLWUT?

      When the N900 first came out it generated a lot of interest but people thought there were few apps for it because there were few apps in the Ovi store.

      The Ovi store is where the commercial cruft goes. The good stuff is in the community repos.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:Free and open by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      while we're splitting hairs, rooting != rootkitting. similar, but not the same.

    8. Re:Free and open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you call low-end? The smartphones I'd call low-end would certainly be less powerful than an N900, and therefore slower*, and the N900 doesn't require any end user knowledge of Linux, it is there if you want it, if you don't you can install apps through the app manager or the Ovi Store.

      *Android isn't any faster than Maemo.

  8. Twydroid by awshidahak · · Score: 1

    Mine came with twydroid which is completely useless cause twitter doesn't support it (not to mention that I rarely touch my twitter anyway) and I couldn't remove it until I rooted it and installed a special app to remove it.

  9. Verizon FTL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My Droid 3 just showed up today... with 28 pre-installed crapware apps. I've so far only found a way to remove 2 of them.

    1. Re:Verizon FTL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much did you pay for the phone? And how much of it is subsidized by Verizon via the crapware?
      When I buy emachines, they're infested with junk. Last time I bought a thinkpad, only 3-5 system utils by IBM (smartdisk equivalent). Not that useful to me, but not exactly an ad/ bloatware either.

    2. Re:Verizon FTL by CBob · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Verizon.

      Foistware/crapware & crippled phones have been standard practice there for years.

    3. Re:Verizon FTL by jonwil · · Score: 1

      The only reason Verizon are so popular is that they have spend vast sums of money buying spectrum (and in some cases exclusive rights in places like stadiums, subway systems, tunnels and other things) so that they can have the largest coverage footprint and can have coverage in all those places the other guys wont get.

      If AT&T were smart, instead of investing big $$$ on LTE and high-speed-data, they would do whatever it takes so their coverage is as good as Verizon. And they would offer special deals to any Verizon customer willing to jump ship.

  10. AT&T by utkonos · · Score: 1

    You mean you don't use AT&T family map every day? And you would rather use Google maps' navigation function rather than AT&T Navigator? But it's a pay service. It must be better. What is wrong with you?

  11. Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have never understood the appeal of mindless games like Angry Birds. The common app phone is such a wasted instrument. How much more it could really be. I will only use apps on my Android phone that I myself wrote.

    1. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Likewise, all my friends and I will only use apps that curmudgeon99 wrote.

    2. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by clarkn0va · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's cool if you're into microcode trojans. Personally I can't stomach the thought, which is why I do all my own rare earth mining and built a clean room into the basement.

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    3. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, people do *pay money* for them. Yes, app stores are full of crap apps and mindless simple games that make c64 games look sophisticated in every department except gfx+sfx, but if you do happen to make it big by being ever so slightly less shit (and advertising...), you currently make millions - literally - for crap that takes literally about a month to develop, tops.

      Until the buyers show a little more discernment, then the situation is not going to change. I just hope to make a six figure sum with my crap apps before the market crashes, then I can afford a decent house, put some money aside, and work part time.

    4. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Can you point me at the browser you wrote? And the SMS client? I hope you wrote a good GPS navigation application.

      I have a litany of other apps that I use day to day, but I'll start with the basics where I assume your use overlaps mine.

    5. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I will only use apps on my Android phone that I myself wrote.

      I have never understood the appeal of mindless games like Angry Birds.

      Somehow I think those two are related.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      My 2 year old understands the appeal of Angry Birds. In fact there are very few other games she can play...but she picked up Angry Birds pretty quick.

      You sound like someone who wouldn't be happy with an app UNLESS you yourself wrote it - so go you.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    7. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn?

    8. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you point me at the browser you wrote? And the SMS client? I hope you wrote a good GPS navigation application.

      I have a litany of other apps that I use day to day, but I'll start with the basics where I assume your use overlaps mine.

      Browser: Fire Whoosh
      SMS client: Whoosh! There it goes.
      GPS nav: iWhoosh GPS

      I too have a litany of other apps.

    9. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by Aceticon · · Score: 2

      ... and built a clean room into the basement

      Not clean enough, according to your mom.

    10. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chill dude, it was a joke. Try to fathom the concept.

    11. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by the_wesman · · Score: 1

      maybe you should stop visiting slashdot. you know, because it's a site that you didn't write :)

      --
      calling all destroyers
    12. Re:Don't Trust Any App You Didn't Write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's that undefinable "X" factor. What makes one game wildly popular and another slightly different game...not wildly popular? Monopoly was rejected as violating a ton of fundamental game rules (e.g. no final destination, you just keep going around and around the board), and it did all right.

      Angry Birds is extremely simple, but highly addictive. Like Tetris. And as much as one audience wants complicated lengthy games which take hours and have story lines and require you to learn the rules, there's another audience that is just looking for a quick fun diversion.

      It's the same reason thrillers and romance novels sell so well. Not everything has to be a deep and meaningful weighty tome. Some ofmy favorite books are things like "The History of the Making of the Atomic Bomb" and "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" - but I also like Frederick Forsyth and Lincoln/Child novels.

  12. yes yes yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smartphones suck. They force you to run applications you don't want. They completely block you from doing what you want with your own hardware (unless you break their protections, EULAs, and possibly the law.) The PC revolution (led by Microsoft - if you're old you might remember when they were the underdog) is over. MS was the first company to realize the benefit of giving users (some) control over their hardware. Remember that anyone? Now we're headed back to the dark ages, when the hardware manufacturers tell you exactly what you can and can't do with the computer that you paid for. And oh how so ironic - many if not most of these devices are running Linux.

    If you don't understand why the distinction between GPL2, GPL3, and the Affero GPL matter, then you are living under a rock (or maybe you are just plain stupid).

    1. Re:yes yes yes by wsxyz · · Score: 1

      The PC revolution (led by Microsoft - if you're old you might remember when they were the underdog) is over. MS was the first company to realize the benefit of giving users (some) control over their hardware. Remember that anyone?

      Actually I don't.
      I remember, before there ever was an MS-DOS or an IBM PC, that Apple shipped their computers with complete schematics and ROM listings which, I would say, amounts to "giving users control over their hardware".

    2. Re:yes yes yes by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the OEMs, blame the carriers.

      A number of OEMs (including HTC and Sony Erricson) have said that they WANT to ship unlocked Android handsets but that the carriers have said NO.

  13. Android - Ti Backup by ProfM · · Score: 1

    Titanium Backup seems to remove that crapware. Of course you have to root your phone.

  14. buy unlocked phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I missing something here? Unlocked smartphones are $500-$600. If you can get the same phones for free or $150, odds are it's being subsidized by the cell company somehow (ads, "free-trial" apps, bookmarks, etc).

    I bought my samsung vibrant for $150 and then rooted and got rid of crapware. My friend bought it unlocked for $499 with no crapware. There's a low-end smartphone for free (2-year contract) that's loaded with junk.

    Pick your poison. It's like complaining facebook doesn't protect your privacy, all the while it's a service you use it for "free."

  15. So don't buy a shitty phone then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of options which don't have bloatware. The Nexus S, for example, is crap-free.

    1. Re:So don't buy a shitty phone then? by KillaBeave · · Score: 1

      Yep. All hail the Nexus S! Seriously, it's the only smartphone I considered just because I knew I wouldn't have to deal with the the ATT bullshit preloaded. Sure it doesn't have the latest whizbang 3D or a crazy large screen, but it does have a gorgeous amoled screen, a decent processor and a clean OS. Only thing I wish it had was an SD slot ... but with 16gb on board I should still be ok. Still I'd rather have the expansion slot if needed.

  16. Tit for Tat? by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 1

    What is Tat? Where do I get it and how do I exchange it for the other one?

    1. Re:Tit for Tat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Tat? Where do I get it and how do I exchange it for the other one?

      Exchanging it usually involves paying for booze and movies you have no desire to see.

    2. Re:Tit for Tat? by WebManWalking · · Score: 1

      Where? Either Vietnamese kindergartens around the beginning of the year, or else in ancient Egypt. (Tet for tot, or Tut.)

    3. Re:Tit for Tat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now give credit to the comedian who wrote that joke...

    4. Re:Tit for Tat? by petman · · Score: 1

      Strange, they usually they come as parts of a package. Tat

    5. Re:Tit for Tat? by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 1

      Thank you to Dennis Miller from his glory days on Weekend Update, c. 1986.

  17. smartphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like Windows Phone XP 7 Home Phone Edition? Possibly, but so far nobody has used one. iPhone? Mmm, nope. Meego? WebOS? (just kidding!).

    I guess they mean Android. Just another advantage of being Open (tm).

  18. Try and remove some icons by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Try and remove a lot of the default icons like the stock app. You can't unless you jailbreak it.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Try and remove some icons by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      And you can't do a lot of non-standard things with an Android phone unless you root it. Your point?

    2. Re:Try and remove some icons by exomondo · · Score: 1

      And you can't do a lot of non-standard things with an Android phone unless you root it.

      Right. Your point?

      If you're looking for his point then read his post in the context of what he is replying to, it should make sense, but just in case it was that both iOS and Android prevent you from removing those default applications.

    3. Re:Try and remove some icons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you don't use that particular app doesn't mean it's crapware.

    4. Re:Try and remove some icons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the stock app isn't running in the background all the time though. sure, it's annoying having the icon there when i never use the app, but i just move it to a lonely spot on the last home screen along with other pre-installed apps i never use. it's never in my way and doesn't slow down my phone.

      do i like having to do this just to get rid of the icon? no, not really. do i wish apple would let me remove the icon? sure. is it a big deal? no, not really.

  19. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the Microsoft fanbois still try to say those awful windows phones will catch on eventually! Don't hold your breath. Oh wait, you're still holding your breath waiting for Zune to take over...haha.

  20. Wrong on Twitter, two ways by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    iOS 5 is bundling a Twitter app with it

    Totally wrong. They are NOT bundling a twitter app.

    What they are doing is in fact the opposite of bad. They are adding twitter posting as a system library, that applications can bundle in but do not have to use.

    The reason why it's the opposite of bad is that Twitter is requiring the odious OAuth authentication protocol, which requires a number of stages to authenticate. Since iOS includes Twitter access as part of the core, it does all the Oauth stuff behind the scenes and all you have to do is enter a username and password.

    That means that any apps that also post to twitter (which is quite a lot of apps these days) will have much simpler sign-in processes for the user to make use of twitter, basically none if you've logged in once anywhere else already (and before you get freaked out about background tweets going out know that the user has to confirm a tweet should go out before it is posted).

    On the Mac side, there's iLife which gets bundled with new Macs whether you want it or not.

    Which you can also simply drag to the trash?

    It's not crapware I'd say if it's actually useful though!

    I'd rather be a "hater" than a blind fanboi suckered by Apple's marketing into overpaying for crap hardware.

    Funny, I'd rather spend my time using a computer than configuring it, paying about the same for the privileged. But whatever floats your boat.

    It's also rather funny you call Apple users "blind" when it's you who apparently can't see with clarity what that are doing.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by MacTO · · Score: 1

      My last Mac came pre-installed with a demo of iWork. The one before that came pre-installed with a demo of Microsoft Office.

      Then there's the stuff that a lot of people find useful but I just don't want. Some of which is quite easy to remove (e.g. iLife) and some of which is difficult or impossible to remove (e.g. iTunes). And don't get Apple wrong: iTunes isn't bundled as a wonderful media player. It is bundled to sell you more stuff (which is why most crapware exists).

    2. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      some of which is difficult or impossible to remove (e.g. iTunes).

      If you really wanted to, you could simply drag iTunes into the trash like any other app. Why do you think it's difficult or impossible to remove?

      You do need it around to work with any iOS devices, that is true... but that's a different matter than claiming it's integrated into the system at a level you cannot remove.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I remove it since I don't use twitter posting at all?

      If not, then it's not "the opposite of bad"; at best, it's "a necessary evil" -- and that's only if you buy the line that shared libraries and daemons can't exist as installable packages, lest people crap up their systems with evil libraries and daemons. (There's another option, of course, having a system repository of Apple-controlled shared packages, and letting AppStore packages depend on those, but not on other AppStore packages -- but AFAIK Apple doesn't do that. No fucking idea why...)

    4. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Except that won't actually work. Trust me on this, because I had to reinstall iTunes under Mac OS X 10.6 just to get my iPhone to sync with it again.

      The process starts by dragging iTunes into the trash. But you're not done yet!

      Next, delete /System/Library/AppleMobileService.kext and /Library/Receipts/AppleMobileDeviceSupport.pkg.

      Reboot. Empty the trash to remove iTunes, and reboot again (according to Apple, I suspect this reboot is unnecessary, but what do I know).

      That finally removes iTunes, and has your Mac back to a state where you can reinstall iTunes and possibly get it to work again.

      Yep, Mac OS X sure is easy compared to Windows.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    5. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, two passes at the trash! How horrific!

      I taken it you've never had to go registry key hunting in Windows or had to search for DLL's placed all over the Windows directory...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by _xeno_ · · Score: 2

      Oh wow, two passes at the trash! How horrific!

      Wrong - there's only one pass at the trash.

      What there are two of (well, three if you reinstall) are reboots - once after moving iTunes to the trash, and once again after emptying the trash. (And optionally a third if you decide to reinstall iTunes.)

      Under Windows, the process is simply "go to 'uninstall a program,' select 'iTunes,' click 'uninstall,' and then needlessly reboot because Apple can't be bothered to look up how to remove services properly."

      Under Mac OS X, you'll need to find that support article I linked to learn about the kernel extension you need to remove. And go through the "drag to trash, reboot, empty trash, reboot" process for some reason.

      I taken it you've never had to go registry key hunting in Windows or had to search for DLL's placed all over the Windows directory...

      Nope. Especially not with first-party Microsoft software, and especially since Microsoft introduced the Windows Installer. Programs that use that tend to uninstall cleanly - and by "tend to" I mean that I've never had one fail to uninstall properly, or require anything like the ridiculous hoops you have to jump through to get rid of iTunes for Mac OS X.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    7. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I'd rather spend my time using a computer than configuring it

      yeah if only apple provided that, but no i have to configure my application folders even though it clearly already knows the categories and then you have the pointless and idiotic task manager that serves no purpose, they should have just integrated application closing into the springboard. then having to configure my email client, configure the accessibility features, configuring the calendar, configuring the internet and mms. i don't want to have to spend my time configuring stuff, i just want to use it.

    8. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by mjwx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny, I'd rather spend my time using a computer than configuring it

      I'd rather be using my computer then fighting it because I have a need it's designer didn't envisage.

      I'd never use a basic image manipulation program like Paint after all.

      My 4 years of supporting Mac's in an enterprise taught me that Mac's have a very, very limited feature set and if you want it do anything different you're in for a world of pain that makes compiling the most obstinate Linux distro from scratch feel like a holiday.

      BTW, Installed LinuxMint last night, most pain free install I've ever had and everything I need works out of the box. No compiling needed.

      paying about the same for the privileged.

      Keep telling yourself that, you're only fooling yourself. Macbook 13" = US$1129 - Old Core 2 Duo CPU, old Nvidia 3 series, only 2 GB RAM.
      Asus U31SD = US$725 - 2nd Gen i3, new Nvidia 5 series/hybrid Intel IGM, 4 GB RAM.

      Even if I buy a 128 GB SSD, The current gen Asus it's still $200 cheaper then the old tech Mac. The price for a Macbook gets 50% worse if I try to buy one locally (in Australia) but the Asus only goes up by 10-15%.

      No doubt you have all kinds of wonderful excuses (your cognitive dissonance wont let you accept Mac's are nearly twice the price as other PC's) but provide links or I'll just repeat myself.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      "Can I remove it since I don't use twitter posting at all?"

      No, but the tradeoff is worthwhile - much easier login to Twitter for many that DO use it, vs. 3kb of space that sits latent in storage for those that do not.

      Remember that if it were an external download Twitter would simply demand it use the full Oath process, the way things work now.

      It's better for developers and most users, and as noted not really a detriment to anyone else.

      There's another option, of course, having a system repository of Apple-controlled shared packages, and letting AppStore packages depend on those, but not on other AppStore packages

      I'm not sure quite what you mean here, in what way does the current system of Apple controlled Frameworks installed on device that App Store apps make use of not meet that criteria?

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    10. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by m50d · · Score: 1

      Multiple stages is the only way to do this kind of authentication safely. OAuth is the closest thing to a standard out there. If iOS is bundling a general OAuth authentication library then that's all to the good, but if it's twitter-specific then that's very much evil - they're abusing their position as the phone maker to promote one particular service, and I wonder how much twitter paid them for it.

      --
      I am trolling
    11. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by iainl · · Score: 1

      Umm, maybe I'm missing something. But given that iTunes is the application for syncing your iPhone with your computer, why were you (a) uninstalling in the first place, and then (b) suprised when you couldn't sync?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    12. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why are you even bothering comparing year-old discontinued hardware?

    13. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      The key word is "again:" iTunes broke. It used to work, and then it broke. Searching for a way to fix it brought up that Apple support article explaining that I'd have to reinstall iTunes, which involves those crazy instructions to actually remove it completely.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    14. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes his argument look better?

    15. Re:Wrong on Twitter, two ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supporting Macs in an "enterprise"? Like one of those places that only uses Microsoft dialects of networking protocols where you should be using something standards based? I find Macs quite pleasant to work with when you strip out all the proprietary digital glop presented by Microsoft servers.

  21. I opt for freedom. by Olmy's+Jart · · Score: 1

    Right. This is why you root your phone. It's to de-crappify it. You take that crap off. I love Cyanogen Mod! Shouts to Cyanogen and congrats on the new job!

    Vendors of phones and network providers refuse to accept the very concept that you own your bloody phone and have a right to do with it what you want. It's the Bell system from the '60's and earlier (pre AT&T divestiture) all over again. They get to tell you what you can do with your property and you will smile and you will like it.

    Apple is even worse. They will dictate your entire experience and, if they are not happy with an applications which does not meet their agenda, politically or socially, they will cut them off. They take dictatorship and crapware to a whole new realm of reality. Oh well...

    I opt for freedom.

    Several of the vendors have gotten on the clue train. HTC is there. Samsung hired Cyanogen and is opening THEIR bootroms. Motorola (soon to be Google, maybe) fought it but threw in the towel and announced they would unlock their boot roms. They ARE getting it. The VENDORS are getting it. The carriers are NOT as yet. The clue train has not arrived for them. We need to teach them and we need to teach them a painful lesson. If it costs them money to kept their hands on our short and curlies, eventually they will get a clue and release their grip. AT&T sucks. They want to extend their control as much for the money as to dominate you and dictate to you where you have no option. That's mind control. That's corporate 1984. That's what we call a "monopoly" and that's what has to be prevented.

    ITMT... It is established law that you have a right to root your phones (DMCA exemption as determined by the library of congress...)

  22. So? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    My phone came with some crapware too, and I can't remove it... but so what? The Kindle App? The Amazon.com shopping app? Some weird subscription GPS app that doesn't work as well as Google Apps? If I can't remove them, why wouldn't I just get over it and ignore them? It's not like they pop up when I don't want them to, like Norton Antivirus on a new PC. They just sit there. So what?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:So? by Uncle+Robert · · Score: 1

      Why not sue and charge these company's rent for using your memory?

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they take up space, and space is limited.

      They might also do stuff in the background and make the phone slower... and spending battery power, which is bad enough on all smart phones already.

    3. Re:So? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Because they insist on being run at start up so they can waste some resources and burn a little data? Because they take up space? The principle of the thing?

    4. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Android phones can be rooted pretty easily. I rooted my Droid2 within 3 weeks after getting it just to remove the crapware. I love having total command and control of my Smart phone.

  23. Common defect by Microlith · · Score: 1

    This is the problem when the device vendor makes a fatal mistake in judging who their customer is.

    Almost all cases like this they assume that some 3rd party, whether some junk software maker like McAfee or in the case of phones, the carriers, is the customer instead of the end user. So instead of getting a good, clean product (and paying what it actually costs) you get a subsidized version full of garbage.

    This is one reason I refuse to buy devices on contract, and why I build my own PC. Perhaps if the handset vendors decided to push back against the carriers' bullshit, we might not have this issue.

    1. Re:Common defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one reason I refuse to buy devices on contract, and why I build my own PC. Perhaps if the handset vendors decided to push back against the carriers' bullshit, we might not have this issue.

      Unfortunately, most american cell phone users want a cheap/free phone, unless they are dying for an iPhone. I don't remember the last time I spoke
      with someone who was paying anything close to list for a cellphone.. All the crackberry users I know, their company buys the phone. 95% of the android users I know got their phones for less than $100 on a contract renewal.

      Given this situation, it is the Carriers that keep the handset makers in business not the enduser. Heck .. I wouldn't pay $135 for an unlocked version of my current claimshell ..

  24. Pre Installed? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

    Ha! Verizon actually ADDED crapware to my DroidX with a software update that did nothing but force install the demo for some football game that could not be removed.

    Now I use CyanogenMod.

    1. Re:Pre Installed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon Thunderbolt Preinstalled Crapware:

      Bitbop (pay video service)
      Blockbuster (pay video service)
      City ID (pay caller ID City service)
      Kindle (pay book service)
      Lets Golf 2 (link to download pay app)
      Mobile Hotspot (costs extra $30 a month to use)
      News (wtf?)
      Rhapsody (pay music service)
      Rock Band (link to download pay app)
      Slacker (pay music service)
      TuneWiki
      VCast Apps (crap, overpriced app store)
      VCast Media (crap, overpriced ringtones?)
      VCast Music (really, couldn't this be part of "media"?)
      VCast Videos (same)
      VZ Navigator (pay app to do poorly what Google Navigation does for free)

      Now, they've gone and done an update. This update has added "VCast Music" buttons into the default music player. Every 2 or 3 times I use Navigation, it asks me if I want to use VZ Navigator, regardless of me checking the "do not ask me again" box. This is a huge steaming pile of crapware! All the VCast stuff is a totally outdated and unnecessary market designed 10 years ago to sell overpriced media on dumb phones.

      I am definitely going to root.

  25. Physical Buttons by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

    I've seen commercials for phones that even come with "Crap-Buttons" now. Actual hardware that launches facebook. That's some serious faith that facebook is going to survive Google+

    1. Re:Physical Buttons by DamienNightbane · · Score: 0

      If they're anything like my BlackBerry, you can probably reprogram the buttons to launch whatever you want.

      I have my two launch buttons set to the camera and my media.

    2. Re:Physical Buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well after Twitter survived Google Wave without breaking a sweat I bet Facebook isn't too worried.

  26. But Android is Open... by BoRegardless · · Score: 0

    How do handset makers get away with closing it when Android is supposed to be "open"?

    1. Re:But Android is Open... by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Because Google didn't bother ensuring that it was open for you. They hyped up the "open" aspect to draw in developers who were otherwise interested in mobile Linux.

  27. Really? by mevets · · Score: 1

    Is that the only reason you won't stop complaining?

    Since you can root your android phone, (or iPhone, if you prefer a better experience), run whatever on your computers and stuff, you really have nothing to complain about.

    Yet, here we are.

    1. Re:Really? by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Well if I had an Android phone it would be rooted, but I won't buy into the iPhone precisely because Apple makes so many decisions for you.

      Since you can root your android phone, (or iPhone, if you prefer a better experience), run whatever on your computers and stuff, you really have nothing to complain about.

      Well, since Jobs is all about the "post-PC" era where PCs are high priced things few people have and instead most people use locked down devices like iPhones and iPads, I'm free to be critical.

    2. Re:Really? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, it's still worth complaining about, because there's a definite network effect here. While there are things Apple won't let me do with the iPhone that I want to do, the fact is, the more people use iOS, the more software development jobs are for iOS, and the more apps are for iOS -- and the more likely it is for a larger portion of these to be iOS-exclusive, and for at least one of them to be something I need...

      This is exactly what happens with Windows. The more people use other platforms like cell phones or even Macs, the more companies are forced to migrate to something at least semi-portable, like the Web -- and the more I get to use stuff I want, like Android or outright Linux on the desktop. Or, failing that, at least we get the stuff that needs to be native on Android, too.

      Except this would be worse than Windows. Apple is already going this direction on the desktop, and it really seems like too many people are moving in the direction of making iOS-like machines the norm... meaning the days when I can expect to buy a typical desktop computer and hack together some software to share with my friends may be numbered. The days a child can take the computer they have for other purposes and just use it to pick up software development may also be numbered.

      So, complaining loudly about it, if it convinces anyone to avoid iOS and adopt anything moderately open, is still valid.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:Really? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      the more people use iOS, the more software development jobs are for iOS, and the more apps are for iOS -- and the more likely it is for a larger portion of these to be iOS-exclusive, and for at least one of them to be something I need...

      Maybe its just down to the type of apps I use, but I've found the exact opposite really. I have an Android phone (a rather old HTC Dream that will need replacing before long) and my girlfriend has an iPhone 3GS. She sometimes gets annoyed that some free app I have on my Dream either isn't available (and seeming no equivalent app exists) for the iPhone, or that she has to pay for it whilst I got it for free. This latter point is more irritating when, not infrequently, the _same_ app from the _same_ vendor is free on Android and charged on the iPhone. On the other hand, I don't think I've seen anything on her iPhone that I've wanted and haven't been able to find the equivalent of for my Dream.

      I do wish that apps were more cross-platform though - it is annoying to not be able to share data between an Android app and an iPhone app. For example, a shopping list app backed by a shared server would be really useful. i.e. myself and my girlfriend could both access our joint shopping list from our respective phones and tick off stuff we got so we don't end up duplicating shopping. There are plenty of stand alone shopping list apps for both platforms (i.e. the data is held on the phone, so no chance of automatically sharing it between the two devices) and there are a *few* server-backed apps that would do the job. Unfortunately, all the server-backed apps are "iphone only" or "android only" so it would be fine if we both had android devices or both had iphones, but since the same app isn't available for both (and they all use proprietary protocols) we can't use them. There are a few todo-list type apps that could be used for this, but generally they are complete overkill.

      The days a child can take the computer they have for other purposes and just use it to pick up software development may also be numbered.

      It can already be argued that modern computers have harmed the software development industry by hiding the dev tools away. When I was young, when you turned on a home computer, the *first* thing you saw was a BASIC command line. This "no effort" method of presenting a development environment definitely encouraged a lot of people to play with it and get interested in programming. These days, you have to actively want to develop some software and go find the dev tools because they aren't right in your face every time you turn on.

      Of course, the modern operating systems are a lot more friendly for the average non-techie and we wouldn't want to go back to the old ways, but you can't escape the fact that we'd probably have more young programmers if the first thing they saw when turning on a computer each time was a development environment.

      I think if a significant proportion of home-computers become locked down devices that you *can't* develop for (at least, not without an expensive development licence) then that's going to seriously backfire for the computer industry because that will pretty much eradicate new programmers - now rather than just having to dig around and find the dev tools, you have to pay for a licence and you can't distribute your silly little buggy application to your friends because the only way to distribute will be via the Appstore (and lets face it, when people first start coding, their applications *will* be silly and buggy, preventing them doing this is just going to put them off bothering to develop).

    4. Re:Really? by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      For your example, have you looked at Our Groceries? My wife and I both use it on Android, but their website says it's available for iPhone, too. It's server-backed, so lists are synced across phones. Obviously I can't say for sure, but I imagine it would work between iOS and Android.
      http://www.ourgroceries.com/download

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    5. Re:Really? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      For your example, have you looked at Our Groceries? My wife and I both use it on Android, but their website says it's available for iPhone, too. It's server-backed, so lists are synced across phones. Obviously I can't say for sure, but I imagine it would work between iOS and Android.
      http://www.ourgroceries.com/download

      Thanks - it looks promising so I'll check it out. The only one I found before was Grocery iQ, which seemed like it would do the job but for some crazy reason the vendor has restricted it to the US (WTF?) - not a problem on Android because the MarketEnabler app will let you spoof a fake home network to Market, but I couldn't see a sensible way of installing it on the iPhone.

    6. Re:Really? by toriver · · Score: 1

      The reason it is free on Android is that Android has a 90% piracy rate so they wouldn't get paid anyway... :)

  28. Lowering the bar... by mevets · · Score: 1

    I thought "fuck itself up because someone sneezed" was integral to the Windows experience.

    Apple could have stuffed an 'iTunes inside a VMWARE virtual mac' so people wouldn't have to suffer with the Windows experience.

    Since they have a better experience to offer, why would they want to step above the fray?

    1. Re:Lowering the bar... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I thought "fuck itself up because someone sneezed" was integral to the Windows experience.

      Nope, just iTunes on Windows. Much more large and complex applications like Maya, Photoshop, AutoCAD, etc... are all fine cross-platform, just seems Apple's developers aren't that good at writing Windows software or have tried to do a lazy port, but of course that is to be expected given they are obviously much more focused on OSX.

  29. 'Smartphones' have never been full of anything ... by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

    butt crapware.

  30. root by asamad · · Score: 1

    root it, install what you want !

  31. Only applies to non-iPhones by wisebabo · · Score: 2

    Sorry to these religiously opposed to the iPhone but it doesn't come with any crapware.

    Unless you consider iOS ITSELF to be crapware but I think most people (as indicated by the highest approval ratings in the industry) would disagree.

    1. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by DamienNightbane · · Score: 0

      High approval ratings don't mean anything when you have a literal cult following.

    2. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why can't I remove the Stocks app - which I don't use? Last ime I looked, knowing stock prices wasn't a requirement for a phone.

    3. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't come with crapware. No.

      iOS could be a nice toy, but the iphone is utterly and intentionally crippled by apple, so the crapware here is first party.

      But besides that:

      itunes is crapware you are forced to install in your PC if you want your device to be of any use. Luckily, there is vmware so my desktop doesn't get infected by that shit.

    4. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by iainl · · Score: 1

      There are apps you can't remove under iOS - basically anything that comes pre-installed to the first screenful of stuff. App Store, iTunes (meaning the store, not your music), Game Center, Weather, Stocks, Face Time and YouTube all strike me as apps that not everyone would want, but can't be removed.

      However, two ways that these are vastly better than the Sony instance is that none of them are running in the background stealing your CPU cycles and memory, and that all of them can be tucked away in an "undeletable crap" folder if their icons offend you.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    5. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I originally loved my Motorola Droid. Then the updates came down and it never worked right again. The phone would ring, but you could not answer it. Press a button and wait, and wait.

      I got an iPhone shortly after it came out on Verizon. It works great. No pre-loaded crapware, and it will always respond to the home button, even if the app itself crashes. For an example of crashing apps on the iPhone, see Facebook. That's as close to crapware as it gets.

    6. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Although I think you should be able to uninstall stuff like the Stocks thing.

      It's fine that they have some demo applications on there to show of what the phone can do, especially from the start before all these apps existed, but I would like to be able to remove them. It's not crapware in the sense that it gets in your way, but whatever you do, it's still useless clutter somewhere.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    7. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      You'll need something to sync your phone, Apple has iTunes, Microsoft has ActiveSync, Nokia has the Nokia PC suite, Android has ?.

      I don't know what the default sync application for Android is, and I can't find it with a simple search.

      I don't think iTunes is the real problem, each mobile device platform needs an application to sync. Stuff like the Stock application are things that are more annoying.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    8. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      It's called a file manager.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    9. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      Sorry to these religiously opposed to the iPhone but it doesn't come with any crapware.

      Giving up all your alternatives by conceding to vendor lock-in is far worse than crapware. By participating you become an advocate.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    10. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS is crap-ware....proprietary, locked down, must only use what we say you can; hello china! Every wonder why the iPhone is manufactured in china? it makes Steve Jobs feel all warm and cuddly seeing someone else control peoples lives as intrusively as he does.

    11. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does come with crapware. iTunes is crapware. The stock weather app is crapware. The stock market app is crapware. How do I know? Because I had an iPhone.

    12. Re:Only applies to non-iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stocks. Weather (by Yahoo). Book store. Check the comments in the posted article. Someone made a comment there.

      Just because it's from the device's manufacturer doesn't exclude it from being crapware. I for one, have never check stocks or the weather on my phone. (I have no stocks, and I just look outside for the weather. =P)

      Some crapware people actually like. Swype on the Galaxy S series phones, for example.

      As much as I dislike crapware, it makes devices slightly cheaper since other companies are PAYING to have those apps installed (yeah, the provider's taking a large cut, but whatever)

  32. Re:'Smartphones' have never been full of anything by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

    butt crap

    Somehow I feel there's a connection there.

  33. I want a new iPhone 5 but, by Dee+Ann_1 · · Score: 0

    I heard that Verizon puts Microsoft Skype on all their smartphones. That, is 100% unacceptable.
    I'm also very unhappy with the fact that Twitter is embedded into iOS 5 and can not be removed.

    I intend to jailbreak my iPhone 5 just as I have jailbroken my previous iPhones (two gen1's and a 3GS) and it is my hope that I can strip these unwanted apps from my phone at that time. I do not play games of any kind and I do not want any games on my phone. And most of all, I want ad blocking. The embedded ad crap in iOS pisses me off, big times!!! I'm not going to share my limited and expensive bandwidth with ads that are 99% of the time irrelevant to me. I don't want ANYONE monitoring what I do with my smartphone or tracking my physical location or what I'm browsing online, it's no one's business. The number one reason I insist on jailbreaking is to regain control of my privacy and control over my limited and precious bandwidth. It's MY PHONE, I bought it, I paid for it, it's my property, it's PRIVATE and personal and I do not give anyone permission to stick their noses into anything I do. Not Apple, AT&T, Verizon, app developers, ISP's or anyone else, anywhere. Keep the f**k out of my business!

    1. Re:I want a new iPhone 5 but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter isn't embedded in iOS 5. You need to manually install the official app to get the functionality.

      If you go to the Twitter system preferences without Twitter installed it will simply tell you as much.

  34. Garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The carrier-backed bloat is reason enough to move to iOS, unless you're of the opinion that iOS is itself part of the crapware problem.

  35. That's why I got the Nexus S 4G by vga_init · · Score: 1

    It's pure Google :)

    1. Re:That's why I got the Nexus S 4G by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      And possibly the next-generation of Motorola cellphones--they'll all be "pure" Android experiences.

      I've read that Google may insist on very strict pre-installed software policy--and that includes the "skin"--on Android 4.0 ("Ice Cream Sandwich").

    2. Re:That's why I got the Nexus S 4G by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      Second that, but what's to say Sprint won't sell out to Apple too? If Apple were to give sprint a big kick-back to drop Google they could do it.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    3. Re:That's why I got the Nexus S 4G by vga_init · · Score: 1

      Personally I think it's too late for Sprint to drop Android... too much of their business depends on it. iPhone will definitely bring some business, but not enough business to drop an entire line of their most successful phones.

  36. This is the shape of things to come... by Genda · · Score: 1

    PCs evolved in the wild wild west of arpanet, open source, even Microsoft had to deal with the explosion of possibilities, endless sources of hardware, software and content.

    Telephones evolved for a century in the authoritarian straight jacket of Ma Bell, and phone companies are used to controlling every aspect of your digital resource, charging you for everything, forcing you to take what they want to give you. BUSINESS GET"S HARD JUST THINKING ABOUT THIS. The death of the PC will not be because of application integration, but because American Business hates having to dance to the tune of its customer, and will do everything humanly possible to force a migration to a platform that gives them complete control. That what makes the pad computer perfect. Its a PC that the provider can control like a cell phone.

    Consider what you're loosing, and demand your freedom at every turn. Your Cell Phone should be free as a PC, not the other way around.

  37. Re:I'll opt for what suits me... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    Freedom is nice. I like having the freedom to configure the phone the way I want, but that freedom usually comes with the necessity to do that configuration. On the other hand, Apple does not allow me to configure many of the iPhone's aspects... but it'll be fine right out of the box, without having to fiddle with it for hours on end. That's not because the iPhone is the greatest thing since sliced bread; it's because it just offers what I want out of a phone. The user experience that Jobs dictates works for me, and it seems to work for many other people. I did not even bother to jailbreak mine.

    Sure, freedom would be better, and the iPhone has a few niggles that I'd like to fix but can't. But on the whole I am very pleased with it and I did not have to spend much time to make it so. Even better: Apple dictating the entire experience means that the carriers don't get to push their crapware on the phone either, and they generally are the worst offenders. I have seen some fine examples of what a crapified phone looks like, and it's why I have stayed away from Android so far. With that said, the market for Android phones is getting close to the point of offering a phone that's close to what I want it to be, out of the box. If that happens I may well switch; I'm not that much of an Apple fanboi...

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  38. Ain't Android more secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they are Linux (and in case of iOS, BSD), shouldn't Androids be more secure than Windows boxes and immune to viruses? After all, one supposedly needs to break into root in order to corrupt the hardware, but if Android (and iOS) operate in a normal user mode, wouldn't it be difficult for malware to infect a phone unless its root account happens to be open?

    Or is there something else I am missing?

    1. Re:Ain't Android more secure? by X3J11 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. While only a rooted device can be compromised in the traditional sense, with the appropriate permissions an app can still do damage. Voice recording, using the network to send private data, keystroke logging via the input method. There's lots than can be done "unprivileged".

  39. I prefer cell-phone console over NetFront browser. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cell Phones are digital prisons in a world that migrated everyone away from the freedom of a PC that grew from a homebrew computing club era and into the pockets of corportations that strip-mined technology from Americans.

    Seriously, who in their right mind buys a computer that you can't put your own software upon? That's exactly what a PDA with a Cellular Network Adapter has become: a Prison CELL phone.

    I have a PDA and a Verizon MIFI, so why can't a Cell phone let me decide what apps can move network through Phone Service that I payed for? What's wrong? Afraid I'll use another chat protocol without the metering? Afraid I'll degrade my audio bitrate to something efficient like CB Radio 10-bit audio? Afraid I'll save more money by sending Facsimile across the network?

  40. Re:6 Words by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Does not work on all phones.

    For some phones there far less ... buggy ways to remove crapware.

  41. Nexus S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All phones must be like the Nexus S. Just the default OS installed and nothing else. No UI customization crap, no additional crapware.

    1. Re:Nexus S by Jeng · · Score: 1

      The G2 is also a fairly crap free phone. I've only come across two apps I can't uninstall that I want to uninstall.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  42. Tell me about it by X3J11 · · Score: 1

    Every time I update my Galaxy S, I have to figure out how to root the bugger just so I can remove all the extra crap Bell puts on it, as well as most of the Samsung stuff.

    And as a long time Linux user, I find it irrationally offensive that I need to jump through hoops finding a root method that works just so I can remount a partition read/write to delete all the junk. Why do they insist on bundling a for-pay GPS nav app when it comes with Google Maps?

    I still love my phone, though. I just wish they'd lose the lock-it-down mindset and start treating it like a portable computer.

    1. Re:Tell me about it by FrigBot · · Score: 1

      Yeah tell me about it. I just got a Galaxy S2. I really like it. It's my first cool phone. Only ever had lame clamshells before this. Anyway I can't figure out how to update Android on it. It came with 2.3.3.

      That Bell Navigation app is the biggest scam ever. They want you to pay $10 a month to use it. I wonder how many rubes are out there paying for that crap. Not to mention their "Radio and TV" crapp-app.

      Then there's the issue of tethering. This phone can become a mobile wi-fi hotspot. But they told me if I use that feature they charge $15. WTF? Then they said tethering is only allowed on the iPhone. Seriously, what?

      Maybe next time I'll just buy a phone and activate it month-to-month. They sure don't want you doing that though.

  43. you need to install crapware on your pc by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    you need to install crapware on your pc(win or osx pc) to start up your iphone.

    but this crapware stuff on android is legacy of the phone companies having too many buddies in subcontractors who's crap they need to get into the phones.. but what's pathetic, is that the GOOD extra usability apps aren't included almost ever, rather some quickly done clones are included - and that's how it's been in mobile business since forever, sadly.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  44. Sprint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice that Sprint has started making a large portion of its crapware removable. No more rooting my phone just to remove nascar!

  45. We are discussing phones. Phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, these little devices in our pockets that make calls and surf web sites.

    Oh, but the issue is freedom! Freedom! We have to defend our rights! Look at you, championing the greatest cause known to human kind.

    Honestly, get over yourself. The issue here is not freedom. Again, we are talking about helpful little gadgets that provide convenience for modern-day living. What matters most is that they function well with minimal irritation. Nothing else. Anything beyond that means the device is defective, and you should never have bought it in the first place.

    The ability to root the device and clean-out crapware (then doing it all over again when you upgrade it, replace it, or fuck it up with your tinkering) is not saving humanity. It is only wasting time which could be better spent.

    In otherwords, find yourself some worthwhile armchair activist position and buy products that just work.

  46. ... and so what by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Sony-Ericsson suck.

    And I say that as a Swede (Ericsson is Swedish.)

    Their Android phones was late and have outdated Android versions.

    Why should anyone give a shit?

    Obviously a Chinese "new comer" as ZTE can do it much better considering the price and specs of the Blade.

    Nokia could deliver good stuff both in price, quality and probably software. But the management suck so it doesn't help.

    As long as all the phones will be the same in software (and more or less in functionality) the only thing which matters is price & quality. If you make the software worse you'll get less points obviously.

  47. The biggest win Apple got by macshome · · Score: 1

    I think that the lack of any carrier branding or crapware on the iPhone is the biggest win Apple got from the carriers. They pretty much tell them that they will take it like they make it.

  48. Good god. by Kwpolska · · Score: 1

    There shall be an easy way to get rid of it by re-installing Android, just like on Windows.

    On the plus side, the only crapware I got is foursquare, facebook (and no twitter...), a shitty game (I saved $3, yay!), an office suite demo, a worse Browser icon and some widgets (even if they are useful sometimes).

  49. Windows Phone 7 by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 0

    This was one of my motivations in choosing an HTC Arrive over the Android affairs on Sprint. They can't put bloatware on there that can't be removed. You can even remove the silly Sprint software. I realize I could have rooted an Android phone, but I'd just as soon not. I remember the first time I had encountered this sort of behavior on a Blackberry Storm with Verizon. It angered me that they could push their stupid VCast software on me with no recourse whatsoever. It made matters worse considering they were doing something like that with a so-called "business" phone.

  50. That's why you should root your phone by nej_simon · · Score: 1

    On my new samsung galaxy I had like four "apps" that did nothing but opening the default web browser with different start pages (my carrier's music and video services etc). After rooting the phone I used an uninstaller app to remove them + some other cruft.

  51. Why do Apple Haters not read? Mac 4GB, newer by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Macbook 13" = US$1129 - Old Core 2 Duo CPU, old Nvidia 3 series, only 2 GB RAM.

    "This item has been discontinued by the manufacturer and is no longer available."

    Nice job on the comparison skippy! I bought a 13" Macbook Pro for a family member last November that had improved specs over that...

    When we aren't comparing Apple products sold two years ago, things look a little different

    As in that has an i5 and 4GB RAM. What did yours have? Oh that's right, an i3 as in a chip for a child's toy or perhaps a blender.

    So if you want to buy your throw-down computer you'll be replacing in a year, go ahead. I can see common sense means nothing to you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  52. Remember, this is slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please define 'Tit' as well and why one would want some.

  53. For $350? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you wanted an Android device without crapware, you could simply buy a device off contract direct from the manufacturer.

    But then I'd pay $350 more because AT&T doesn't offer a discount on service for bringing your own phone instead of taking a subsidized one. T-Mobile does, but it will more likely than not stop once AT&T finishes buying T-Mobile. Most people aren't willing to pay $350 just to hide crapware.

  54. Perhaps you undercounted by tepples · · Score: 1

    the article mentions that the Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini Pro (what a name) has four different app stores.

    Perhaps you undercounted. I can think of at least five app stores compatible with Android off the top of my head: Android Market, Amazon, AppsLib, SlideME, and Soc.io. Windows has even more, starting with Steam, Impulse, and GOG for games alone. But you want more app stores so that competition forces each to become better.

  55. Every video game console by tepples · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who in their right mind buys a computer that you can't put your own software upon?

    Just about anybody who has bought a major video game console with a D-pad since 1985.

  56. Self-compiled browser by tepples · · Score: 1

    Browser: Self-compiled Fennec.

    "But why are you trusting the compiler? Haven't you heard of the 'trusting trust' attack?" That attack is obsolete. Bootstrap your compiler with diverse compilation and it becomes much harder to slip in a trojan.

  57. Pocoyo by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yeah, from what I've seen Angry Birds sounds like it'd be for the Pocoyo demographic.* Heck, Pocoyo even has an Angry Bird as one of the characters.

    * Not that there's anything wrong with that. Even Pocoyo has a so-called periphery demographic.

  58. No surprise... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    The smartphone will be the PC sooner or later, at least for anyone not primarily into content creation. The hardware is becoming passable as a gaming platform, and the IO is extensible in multiple ways (just observe what Motorola did with the Atrix by simply giving it mini-hdmi and micro-usb ports).

    End result is that one can dump the phone on the desk and plug it into various stationary gear to watch movies, work on documents (consider a Android phone that goes from 2.x interface to 3.x interface when the video out is active) or game.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm