Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Passively Cooled Hardware For Game Emulation?

akutz writes "I recently sold a 2011 Mac mini on Craigslist because after using it to rip my Blu-ray collection, I tried to use it as an emulation station connected to my TV. However, emulators like Dolphin, BSNES, etc. would cause the Mac mini's fans to spin up like turbine engines — much too loud for my liking. I ask, therefore: What hardware would you recommend for building a passively cooled mini-system that will serve as a media center's emulation station?"

229 comments

  1. Xbox? by Deathnerd · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with buying an old xbox, and softmodding it with a Linux distro? That'd be the cheapest, most effective option IMO.

    1. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loud, really loud

    2. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with answering the question that was asked, instead of the question that you have in your head?

    3. Re:Xbox? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      It would be cheap, but if you what you want is a quiet system it would not be effective.

    4. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      honestly if "hey let's ask Slashdot about this" is your first approach to problem-solving ... you know, instead of matching your specs against parts that are available on the market ... you really should not be building any computer systems. sure, users here can recommend this and that but it won't fix the real deficiency. not only should you be able to do this on your own, it should be easy for you.

    5. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with answering the question that was asked, instead of the question that you have in your head?

      How demanding this one! Kids have no respect nowadays.

    6. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with buying an old xbox, and softmodding it with a Linux distro? That'd be the cheapest, most effective option IMO.

      Not quiet, too slow to do serious emulation.

    7. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that with my original xbox and it worked great. Wasn't that loud either. You can probably find one for abo 20 bucks now.

    8. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, seriously, why would anyone ever try to do something that they don't already know exactly how to do? And then they have the audacity to ask for help? Fucking asshole.

    9. Re:Xbox? by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Horribly loud. Though, doing this with a smaller, quieter Wii might be just the ticket.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    10. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, seriously, why would anyone ever try to do something that they don't already know exactly how to do? And then they have the audacity to ask for help? Fucking asshole.

      the question, my false-dichotomy AC pal, is whether remote help from a bunch of strangers who can only communicate via text is the very best way to do a potentially complex task for the very first time. i submit that it is one of the worst ways and likely to cause problems not easily solved by someone who cannot see the thing. the way to learn this is in person with a friend or a hired person who is willing to show you how.

      or at least read enough to really understand the subject to where searching for parts based on your own specs is something you can do yourself. if i don't know how to change a tire on my own, rebuilding a modern engine is not a wise choice for my introduction to auto mechanics.

      that is what your knee-jerk "anyone who disagrees with the premise must be an asshole!" prevents you from understanding. maybe you still disagree. now you at least understand.

    11. Re:Xbox? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I second the Wii. Homebrew Channel has several great emulators.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    12. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a bunch of strangers who can only communicate via text

      We can do a whole lot with text, but communicate?
      ( ).( )
      ffpbptbptt!

    13. Re:Xbox? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Uhhh...it sounds like an F16 taking off?

      Anyway let old Hairyfeet set you up and show you how its done. First I'd start with this box, while personally i like a little more elbow room he said little so little it is. Next up for a nice powerful but cheap CPU I'd go with this Phenom triple if he has a tight budget or this Phenom II quad if he has a little more to spare. I have this Phenom II chip in my own system and it is easy to under and over clock, and I have built plenty with the first Phenom triple chip, both are great.

      Then you'll have to measure the depth to know how big a HSF you can go for, bigger is of course quieter so if it has enough room (haven't used a shuttle in awhile so I can't remember the depth offhand) I'd use something like this which if you turn on C&Q when you aren't slamming the Deneb this will be pretty quiet. Then for GPU something like this HD6570 which IIRC is the largest AMD makes that will still go low profile and passively cooled.

      Finally slap in a 1Tb Samsung EcoDrive (quiet as a church mouse) and 4Gb of RAM along with Win 7 HP X64 (or the OS of your choice) and voila! You are good to go friend! Enjoy!

      I could make it a hell of a lot more powerful and silent cooling BTW, but that would increase size. You can't beat the laws of physics, if it is powerful it is either gonna need fans or a big ass heatsink to cool the sucker. I've found most liquid cooling to be just as noisy if not more than regular HSFs, it just moves the fans from the CPU to the radiator. But this should give you a nice combination of speed and quiet and when you aren't slamming the living hell out of the Deneb all you will hear is the quiet hum of the PSU, that's it. With mine I hear the AC on the far side of the room more than I do the PC not 3 feet away from me, its nice.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace the stock fan with a quiet 80mm fan, point it inwards so it cools better, It requires cutting some plastic away to make space, but isn't difficult, I've done two. if necessary also mod the fan so it runs slower.

      TBH, I don't know why they didn't design it that way in the first place. When you can easily make space for a 80mm fan, why put a 60mm (or whatever it was) size fan in, and why doesn't it blow across the heatsinks for more effective cooling? I can only assume the designers were morons or just didn't give a fuck. These changes if done at the design stage wouldn't have increased the cost at all and could have had a noticeable impact on the fan noise.

    15. Re:Xbox? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      233mhz processor. It does a fairly good job with 16 bit games, but there's no way in hell it could handle dolphin or the like. Last I tried, even ps1 emulation was pretty spotty.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    16. Re:Xbox? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      A 95W chip in a cramped shuttle case? You know what that thing will sound like under load?

      I'd get one of the 45W AMD chips for socket AM3 (there are a few you can pick from, from single core Semprons to a triple core), put it in a larger case where slow moving large case fans will be adequate to keep it quiet. Should be nearly silent, and if you're willing to spend the money on a fanless power supply and one of those massive passive CPU coolers you could probably keep the thing cool with just one case fan if you wanted to.

    17. Re:Xbox? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't in the building an engine range of difficulty, and it doesn't say or imply that the asker doesn't now how to build a system. Thus, even the changing a tire part of your argument isn't really valid.

      What we have here is someone asking for specific part numbers. There is a HUGE number of different motherboards, and a whole lot of different processors out there. That isn't even starting into the number of video cards available. Going to spec sheets isn't helpful beyond a vague hand wavy level of info. Anyone experienced with building systems knows that you can't just go by the spec sheets. So, this person clearly described their use case, provided a real world example of a system that does not meet his needs, and asked a group with a tendency towards computers if any of them have built a system that would work in his use case. He was looking for specific model information. He also did not imply that when he got some recommendations, he wouldn't then review those models to one specific system.

      There is nothing about asking for recommendations that would imply incompetence.

    18. Re:Xbox? by Lisias · · Score: 1

      What hardware would you recommend for building a passively cooled mini-system that will serve as a media center's emulation station?"
      What about a old xBox (blablabla)?

      I can't see what did you see of wrong here...

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    19. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked the Xbox CPU was 733MHz or so.

    20. Re:Xbox? by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      like the AC below me wrote, the xbox used a 733 MHz cpu, specifically a somewhat gimped pentium 3 (in between a real p3 and a celeron in terms of cache/buss).

      You are right though, dolphin emulates a gamecube, which had a 485 powerpc cpu. It is up for debate which of the two cpu's has better performance, so trying to emulate one on the other is pretty much not gonna happen. The ps1 is an order of magnitude slower, so emulation should be possible, WITH sufficient amounts of optimization, that last part might be missing in most psx emulators though.

      Perhaps a linux'ed PS3 might be a better match for the OP, but you know... Sony nixed that capability.

      On topic, i'd say the first step is establishing what kind of software you want to run, and what the minimum hardware required is. If you want to run Dolphin, see what kind of hardware it needs, use that as a baseline, seek components from there.

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    21. Re:Xbox? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      I like talking about my build. Using my old case and PSU, I built a Core i5 2500K, z68 motherboard, 16 GB DDR 1600 RAM, 96 GB SSD, and Radeon 6950 for $575. It's soo fast and runs at very nice temps.

    22. Re:Xbox? by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      I just replaced my too-hot Phenom II with one of the dual-core 45w processors you mentioned and with the stock cooler my temperature never goes above 100F. I can't tell any difference in performance either, although it'll surely benchmark much lower.
      Next time I feel a bit spendy I'm going to go for a big copper heatsink with either a big slow fan or none at all. It'll be great!

    23. Re:Xbox? by na1led · · Score: 1

      I agree, the Wii IMO would be the best emulation console. It's small, quiet, lots of emulators, and the controllers are adaptable. This console can also play GameCube games, and the GUI is the coolest I've seen from any device.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    24. Re:Xbox? by Restil · · Score: 1

      First of all, he's asking for advice. There's no reason to assume he hasn't already done some of his own research, but if someone out there has already accomplished the same goal and could provide a simple, clear, precise answer, then it certainly doesn't hurt to ask.

      Secondly, his question, and any reasonable responses that result from it could lead to inform and inspire others who have considered something similar, but never followed through on it, not to mention those who never even pondered the idea before, but are now thinking about it. Even if the submitter ultimately leaves unsatisfied, others may indirectly benefit from the discussion, and ANY responses which provide ANY solution are still potentially meaningful to someone.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    25. Re:Xbox? by neokushan · · Score: 1

      I think the poster above you is confusing the Xbox CPU with the PS2 CPU, but even so the PS2 CPU isn't a mhz-mhz comparison.
      When it comes to emulation, it's even more difficult to compare as after a certain point, emulation quality is almost exponential to the amount of CPU power you need. That's why you can emulate a SNES on a 200Mhz CPU and play 95% of games, but to play 99.99% of games, you'll want closer to 2.5Ghz (of a modern CPU, which is orders of magnitude faster than a P4 at that speed).

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    26. Re:Xbox? by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      i fully agree with you, right up to

      a modern CPU, which is orders of magnitude faster than a P4 at that speed

      Yes, a core i7 has much better performance per clock-tick then a P4, but not orders of magnitude (which implies at the very least 100x)

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    27. Re:Xbox? by neokushan · · Score: 1

      True, perhaps I did overstate that somewhat, but there is still a significant difference between them.

      A Pentium 4, running at 3.4Ghz, gets a passmark score of 549 (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_lookup.php?cpu=Intel+Pentium+4+3.40GHz).
      A Core i5-2500 running at 3.3Ghz gets a score of 6560 (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5-2500+%40+3.30GHz), which is very nearly 12x faster.
      Of course, it's not really a fair comparison as a P4 is a single-core chip and such, but it does give an idea as to how much faster today's processors are compared to those from a few years ago.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    28. Re:Xbox? by akutz · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I've already looked at possible options, especially around PSU configurations since that is where a lot of the heat is generated. I posed the question to /. because of the discussion it might generate. I know that comes with a certain asshole quotient, but I'm willing to put up with you young whippersnappers (I'm 31 -- ancient) in hope of some interesting responses.

      --
      -- -a
    29. Re:Xbox? by akutz · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. When using makemkv or mkvtoolnix my Mac mini (was about 5 feet from me in my office closet) was spinning up like it was a race. The same goes for my Mac book Pro when I use Aperture. I've noticed that doing *anything* with Macs and graphics cause their fans to work like Wayne Brady is threatening to choke a bitch.

      --
      -- -a
    30. Re:Xbox? by akutz · · Score: 1

      Hey. Only my wife or mom get to call me an idiot! :)

      The reference was to a prostitute working hard to avoid the ire of her pimp, in this case Wayne Brady from the now infamous Chapelle's Show sketch.

      Well, maybe your Macs don't do those things, but as you said, you produce music, not video. I'm specifically referring to GPU processing, so unless the music software utilizes the Leopard+ OpenCL APIs, your GPUs probably aren't hit that often. Aperture does, however, and just photo editing for me (when I edit the pictures I take in RAW format) is fairly fan intensive.

      --
      -- -a
    31. Re:Xbox? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Uhhh...did you miss the "I have THE VERY SAME CHIP" part? Stock in a room that stays at 74f it runs around 85f-91f, depending on how much i multitask. Under full load with a 5 hour video encode it hits 128f-131f.

      It ain't the chip friend, its the HSF. With a good copper based heatpipe HSF you'd be surprised at how quiet you can make it. and don't forget the guy got rid of a Mac Mini so he'll want equal to or better than what he had, or what's the point?

      Finally don't forget the guy wanted to run BSNES which sure as hell ain't gonna run on that 45 watter friend. hell if he wants more than 25FPS he'll probably have to OC a little even with the 95watter. If I was building something to run that piggy I'd be looking at a Thuban 125w 6 core! Remember this is a program that runs "PIXEL PERFECT" emulation by simulating every. single. part. of the chip path. that kind of perfect emulation sucks the living hell out of cycles. The interview with the guy even said the odds of even running a Dreamcast emulator with the precision he is running BSNES would be impossible with today's tech!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    32. Re:Xbox? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Uhhh...C&Q not work on the OS you were on? Because I have a 95w Deneb quad and unless I'm slamming the CPU I'm rarely above 91f. If I'm slamming it of course it'll get to around 128f, 138f if I leave it at stock clock (normally I underclock slightly as it keeps it cooler in my apt when transcoding for hours) but of course if I'm slamming the CPU I'll completely stomp your 45w anyway.

      So I'm sorry but I just don't get it. Why would you not simply underclock what you had instead of buying a new more expensive CPU that has less performance? You know it is beyond simply in Vista and 7, right? You go into advanced power management and tell it to have the max CPU speed be 80% and voila! It simply uses C&Q to drop the chip down one notch, in my case dropping a 2.8GHz to 2.1GHz. It gives me the best of both worlds as I have a quiet machine most of the time, and a more powerful machine when I need it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. check out logic supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I haven't bought anything from them recently, but they were nice to deal with in the past. They have a whole bunch of passively cooled (even sealed) systems that aren't too expensive. I have been considering picking one up for some time to use as a router/firewall.

    1. Re:check out logic supply by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Second the above. You don't even need passively cooled, though they do have a large selection of C7 and Atom-based options that are passively cooled. I have an HTPC, most of whose components were bought from LogicSupply... the only moving part in that system is the stock cooling fan for the P8400 CPU, and it is damned near silent.

      It shouldn't be too hard to put together a silent or nearly silent system that's got plenty of horsepower for what the submitter suggests. It will, however cost. Probably more than getting a Wii and installing homebrew, which will do most, if not all, of what the submitter is asking for. As others before me have suggested, perhaps getting the Nintendo would be a better idea....

  3. short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fans by obarthelemy · · Score: 5, Informative

    i've ried to go fully fanless, with very low-power CPUs (atom, E-350) and no graphics card. The T climbs quickly. OTOH, a low-power CPU (i3 2100T with the included 600 RPM fan, a PSU with a quiet FAN and an 80+ gold rating, and probably no graphics card, will make no audible noise, less than the hard disk. silentpcreview.com has lists and reviews of components.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  4. reserator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emulation like the dolphin is hard on hardware. You'd have to pony up for some serious cooling, like the zalman reserator.

  5. Uh, deal with it? by Lanteran · · Score: 1

    You can't do Gen6 emulation without real hardware- real hardware is not passively cooled. Liquid cooling mitigates the problem though, I guess.

    --
    "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  6. That really depends on what you're willing to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the one hand, you could open up your mac mini, disconnect the fans (or replace them with a quieter one) and let your mac mini silently cook itself to death over a year or two. On the other hand, if you're pro, but lazy, you can go out to any storage store, but a large-ish bin, fill it with a non-conductive liquid, throw your mini into (place it gently), and run a pump into another room with a cooling mat. This is close to silent and looks strange but it'll keep your mini ice cold.

    if you're not willing to touch you mini or immerse it in water, go to bestbuy or your local electronics dealer and buy a longer cable ( i assume you're using the HDMI port), make sure you get one long enough to run into another room, then you can either make a hole in your wall (pro tip: holes behind your television are invisible), and just run your mini in another room.

    on the other hand, if you're lazy like me you'll just go on the internet, download ubuntu netbook, and get the ubuntu emulators, Ubuntu is linux so you're run better, and hopefully cooler, cutting down on fan noise

    --MH

  7. Go to silentpcreview.com by IYagami · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.silentpcreview.com/

    Or a complete solution from Zotac for330 USD:
    http://techreport.com/articles.x/21556

    1. Re:Go to silentpcreview.com by gregrah · · Score: 1
      The review on the Zotac box doesn't include any noise measurements. In fact - the only mention of noise that I found in the review was:

      I worry about its aural characteristics trending toward a high-pitched whine over time, and I'd actually prefer a slightly larger enclosure if it accommodated a bigger heatsink-and-fan assembly that ran quieter under load.

      Probably not a great recommendation for a user who is looking for a silent pc.

    2. Re:Go to silentpcreview.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      silentpcreview doesn't seem to update very often. The recommended fans page was last updated in 2007.

    3. Re:Go to silentpcreview.com by gregrah · · Score: 1

      You're correct that they don't update as often as other review sites - but they do still release new reviews periodically, and their reviews are the best for anyone who is first and foremost interested in building a silent PC.

      I'd also add that not a lot has changed in fan technology over the past few years. The Noctua and Nexus 120mm fans at the top of the page are still very high quality fans that are as quiet and reliable as anything else you'll find on the market.

    4. Re:Go to silentpcreview.com by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      And their forums are an awesome resource.

      I recently made a 'quiet-ish' gaming HTPC. It has all top-of-the-line hardware in a smaller form-factor case (antec nsk24800). I had to mod the case, the VGA card, and the heatsink to get everything fitting and decently cooled. Was it worth it? Probably not... but it makes the geek in me happy. My final build photos are here: http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=62147

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    5. Re:Go to silentpcreview.com by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, quiet-ish is effectively silent at the distance you're sitting. In a home theater setup, you're sitting a LOT farther away from a machine than you do at a desk, usually, so a "quiet-ish" machine (sound baffles, large-slow fans, etc) might be sufficient.

    6. Re:Go to silentpcreview.com by akutz · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I was looking at the Zotac solutions on NewEgg in fact.

      --
      -- -a
  8. Just use a console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hack your Wii and throw SNES9x GX and FCEUX GX on it. BSNES by its very nature is going to consume a lot of power, its focus is accuracy, not optimization. Also anything that can Dolphin at a decent speed is going to consume a lot of power, I don't think you could passively cool it unless you used watercooling.

    1. Re:Just use a console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. YOU DON'T NEED BSNES. Zsnes is much more efficient and unless you care how fast the triforce animation spins, is good enough for 99.9% of games.

    2. Re:Just use a console by gknoy · · Score: 2

      The AC parent makes a good point, in case it's lost in moderation:
      Why do you want to emulate the Wii? It's likely cheaper to just BUY one, and then put some Wii-specific NES/SNES emulators on it. Substantially cheaper than building your own silent gaming(emulation) PC.

    3. Re:Just use a console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless you want to play Earthworm Jim 2, or AGTP's translation of Cu-on-pa or Shin Megami Tensei, or SD Gundam GX, or a half-dozen BS-X data packs like BS Konae-chan, or Power Slide FX, or Super Mario Odyssey, or Speedy Gonzales, or...

      And even at that, if you want to play Battle Blaze, F1 Grand Prix, SOS, etc then you need to use the newest Snes9X releases that are more accurate and... wait for it... twice as slow as the older ones, and not much faster than BSNES!

      But hey, Mario and Zelda work okay, that's close enough to 99.9%, right?

    4. Re:Just use a console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Zsnes is much more efficient and unless you care how fast the triforce animation spins, is good enough for 99.9% of games.

      Here's a list of 100 known bugs with ZSNES, from their site: https://zsnes.bountysource.com/development/bug_report
      There are hundreds more not on the list. And there are only about 1,200 unique SNES games. But even going off just the official list, your 0.1% was only off by a factor of 80 or so.

    5. Re:Just use a console by Narishma · · Score: 1

      BSNES by its very nature is going to consume a lot of power, its focus is accuracy, not optimization.

      That's inaccurate. bsnes' focus is accuracy then optimization. In other words, it doesn't sacrifice accuracy for speed, but it's still pretty well optimized. And that's only talking about the accuracy profile. There's also a compatibility profile that works very well even on my first generation Atom netbook.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    6. Re:Just use a console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZSNES's SPU emulation is absolute crap in a large percentage of games. SNES9X is a little better in that area but it still has some sound issues along with all of the other messed up timing and effect problems. BSNES is the only way to go if you want true SNES emulation.

    7. Re:Just use a console by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      The Wii only supports standard-definition (480p) video output. Emulators can render it at full HD 1080p. Emulation might be desired for quality reasons in a home theater setup.

    8. Re:Just use a console by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Nice! I didn't know that. That's just about the only reason I can think of to do it, then, but it's a pretty solid one if you have a TV setup good enough to be called a "home theater".

    9. Re:Just use a console by akutz · · Score: 1

      I like BSNES, or more specifically, I like OpenEMU on my Mac. However, the new system will likely run Windows since it runs everything. Maybe Ubuntu or OpenSUSE, we'll see.

      --
      -- -a
  9. Not sure if this is what you're looking for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My laptop does a pretty good job at staying silent when I'm running emulators. When I run games like FEAR 2 and APB Reloaded at max settings, I can hear the fans, but they are extremely quiet compared to desktop towers. My desktop idling drowns out any sound my laptop under full load. Hell, my 2TB external hard drive is louder than my laptop under full load.

    My laptop is an ASUS G73SW with a Sandy Bridge i7 2630QM with an nVidia 460M 1.5GB graphics card, 8GB of RAM and a 500GB HDD. It is so quiet the only way I can tell my computer is on when the lid is closed (I have sleep/hybernation disabled on lid close) is by looking at the lights on the side. I got mine off of Newegg for about $1100, which is cheap for the power you get from it, but may be overkill for what you're looking for, and is likely larger than the system you're looking for. Being able to run many modern games at max settings at 1080p or near max settings means it should be more than enough to handle Dolphin. I've run emulators from the NES era up to the N64/Playstation/Dreamcast era without any performance issues from my PC (I have run into emulation bugs, though they are documented in the emulators themselves). I haven't tried PS2/Gamecube simply because I don't know of any emulators that run the games reliably and I have systems that can run them in hardware (hacked/modded Wii and PS2).

  10. try PFMD by Skewray · · Score: 1

    Just take your Mac Mini and drop it into a bucket of PFMD (perfluoromethyldecalin, otherwise known as artificial blood plasma). The heat conducts away and even if the fan starts up, you won't hear it. Too bad you sold it already.

    1. Re:try PFMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's freaky!? What about dropping it in a bucket of real blood?! Mwuhahahahah!!1!!1!

    2. Re:try PFMD by EdZ · · Score: 1

      Or Flourinert. Or Novec. Or Galden. Or Midel 7131. Or Luminon Tr-i. Or Transformer oil (if you can find it and filter it). Or if you're on a budget less than the few thousand these liquids cost, regular mineral oil. Of course, you don't want to dunk HDDs or optical drives in it.

  11. Can't have everything by Malvineous · · Score: 0

    Passively cooled, mini-system, emulation. Pick two.

  12. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by greg1104 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Right; the next jump from "the Mac Mini fans are too loud" doesn't have to be fanless, which is particularly troublesome in an emulator situation where the CPU will always be running. The key to low noise fans is to get big ones that move air even at lower speeds, which right now means 120mm. Using fans that are too small, in order to make the case really tiny, is what the Mac Mini does wrong for this application. A case like the Sugo SG05-B will give you those in a reasonable form factor. It won't be tiny, but there's a fundamental trade-off here: you can either make your fans cool well, be small, or be quiet--never all three at once. I have done here on past emulator boxes is to use a case with a larger fan like that, combined with one of the Zotac Mini ITX boards using an Intel Atom processor.

  13. MicroATX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you build with a microATX, you might be able to go with a power supply instead of an adapter. This would provide one less fan.

  14. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A no-fan hot CPU temperature does not make a difference since the i3 is putting out more heat any way you look at it. The Atom TDP is 8 or fewer watts. The i3 is putting out more than 8 W of heat, that is for sure. That a fan is there does not change anything. Except that the fan itself is adding heat, to the tune of a watt or more.

    NEXT !!

  15. Go with hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is an option for some of those systems:
    * SNES flash cart $145
    * NES flash cart $135

    The only fanless emulation I've experienced was a fully cracked PSP with:
    * PSP2600 1.2.0 (atari 2600)
    * SMSPlus 1.2.55 (GG, SMS)
    * Masterboy V2.10 (GB, GBC, GG, SMS)
    * Nester J 1.12 (NES)
    * picodrive 1.35b R (Megadrive/Genesis)
    * Snes9x Euphoria R2 (SNES)
    * gpSP Kai 3.4 test 3 (GBA)

    And with an 8GB SDHC + Memory Stick Pro Duo adapter, you can fit one copy of EVERY GAME ever made for all of those systems (except the GBA collection, which is quite large).

    1. Re:Go with hardware? by AAWood · · Score: 1

      I have a 1.44mb floppy disc here, and I can fit a copy of every game ever for those systems (except the ones I can't fit) on there too. Amazing!

  16. Intel Atom D525 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just finishing up a bar-top arcade machine project. I chose a passively cooled Asus AT5NM10T-I, which uses a Intel Atom D525, and cost me less than $100 at NewEgg. It works great for everything except the most modern games on MAME. The emulators I'm using for NES, SNES, the Gameboys, Genesis, Atari 2600, etc. all run without even a hiccup. I only run into problems with the N64 emulations, but I think that's a limitation of the emulator, not the system. Temperatures have never exceeded 150F.

    BTW, check out HyperSpin for a front end on an arcade box if you're going with a Windows OS. It takes a lot of effort to get the artwork together for everything, but when you're done it's just about awesome.

  17. ACube's Sam4x0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out ACube Systems series of Sam main boards (runs Linux or AmigaOS). 100% passive cooling, pretty good performance.

    http://www.acube-systems.biz/

  18. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Rockoon · · Score: 2

    E-350's have decent graphics capabilities and you can pick up CPU+MOBO combo's for a very nice price
    and then a CASE+PSU combo's for

    The bare-bones system will thus cost as little as $130, and will kick the snot out of Atom solutions.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  19. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the person asking the question didn't do their research. The MacMini 2006 that I have (yes it would SUCK to try and play a PS2 or Gamecube game on it, but read further) never goes to "Turbofan Jet" mode unless the fan sensor has been unplugged. When running it full tilt on a Folding@home or similar program, isn't loud at all.

    What does this say? It says that either the design of the MacMini 2011 is terrible, requiring the fan to run at full power, or the more likely problem is that the EMULATORS themselves are not running on the hardware efficiently.

    Now consider that most of the emulators are designed to run on Windows. ZSNES started in DOS, SNES9X started in Windows, both of them were ported to MacOS/Linux later. The story is the same for pretty much every emulator. The person asking the question didn't say if they were running Windows with BootCamp, or in a VMware Fusion or Parallels, or something else.

  20. Ok here's what you do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy the best computer (within your budget) that will play all your games. Heat is irrelevant atm.

    Now, take it apart and put it back together without the fans inside a mini-refrigerator. The fridge will keep it cool (not a freezer as that will make it too cold) and you won't have to hear a thing as mini-refrigerators don't make much noise.

  21. Uh... silent system to run Dolphin? by jensend · · Score: 1

    All reasonably modern machines, including silent low-end machines (like the passive AMD A-350 setup one person suggested), are well above the requirements of emulating 5th-generation or slower consoles (i.e. up to and including the n64 and original Playstation).

    But for newer consoles you have to have a fair amount of speed, and any system with the capacity to run Dolphin at playable framerates is going to need a fan. You can make a fairly quiet system that will do it (look for mid-range low-wattage CPUs and GPUs, and check out silentpcreview), but the combination of CPU and video card requirements for Dolphin mean a totally passive setup is out of the question - even with ridiculously large heatsinks etc.

    1. Re:Uh... silent system to run Dolphin? by jensend · · Score: 2

      Oh, and use snes9x or some other reasonably speedy emulator rather than bsnes unless you're playing a game that snes9x etc can't handle well. bsnes is more accurate than other emulators but that comes at a tremendous performance cost. Your mac mini likely wouldn't ramp up fan speeds doing snes9x.

    2. Re:Uh... silent system to run Dolphin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i beg to differ if he got a big enough heat sink it could passively cool it but we are talking basketball size here...

      You probably wont be able to get anything capable of running dolphin quiet at anything under a mid tower case size unless you fabricate the case your self then you might be able to work it out to fit a big enough heatsink onto a matx or itx. Another though would be getting a black edition cpu with more power than you need and under volting and under clocking it to make it run cooler and allow you to either passively cool it or have the fan running slow enough that you cant hear it.

      IF a e350 can run it then i got a laptop with one it runs really quiet and really cool it never gets too hot on my lap.

    3. Re:Uh... silent system to run Dolphin? by Narishma · · Score: 1

      That's a misconception. There are 2 versions of bsnes, one that's very accurate and requires a lot of power and another that works for most games and will run fine on even low end Atoms while still being more accurate than most other emulators.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    4. Re:Uh... silent system to run Dolphin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One solution is to buy a real wii and hack it to run homebrew emulators. It will not be very noisy and will probably cost less than a x86 based solution.

    5. Re:Uh... silent system to run Dolphin? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      Heck if you want to emulate PS1 games you could buy a PSP with video out. ...man.... I can't believe a handheld that came out 6 years ago can emulate a PS1.

    6. Re:Uh... silent system to run Dolphin? by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Sony knows the full specs of the PS1 and the PSP. The PS1 and PSP also run similar CPUs (instruction set wise). It's nice, but not super impressive. Somewhat like Windows 7 running Windows XP games.

  22. Describe the goal, not the step by tepples · · Score: 1

    I think it has something to do with Describe the goal, not the step. The goal is to play video games originally designed for discontinued platforms using a more modern computing platform. The step might involve a Mac mini.

    1. Re:Describe the goal, not the step by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2
      Was your comment aimed at the original question asker? If so, I'm not sure why.

      "I recently sold a 2011 Mac mini on Craigslist because after using it to rip my Blu-ray collection I tried to use it as a emulation station connected to my TV. However, emulators like Dolphin, BSNES, etc. would cause the Mac mini's fans to spin up like turbine engines — much to[sic] loud for my liking. I ask, therefore: What hardware would you recommend for building a passively cooled mini-system that will serve as a media center's emulation station?"

    2. Re:Describe the goal, not the step by ArundelCastle · · Score: 2

      Interesting, you highlighted the OP's question, while I would highlight his *reason for asking* the question.

      ...would cause the Mac mini's fans to spin up like turbine engines — much too loud for my liking. I ask, therefore: What hardware would you recommend for building a...?"

      The answer to controlling how loud your Mac is, something which Macs are infamous for, is to install a 1.3MB utility that gives you control over the various fan speed presets. Sometimes the Mac's fan controller goes too fast or too slow for the heat generated. Sometimes the sensor gets crammed in the wrong place. It's important to monitor and control it. Meanwhile, the Mini will sit happily on a netbook cooling stand, and you can buy whatever size fan you want for that. Problem (potentially) solved for $40.

      http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/23049/smcfancontrol
      http://www.123macmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=196467&sid=94a8929424920b9e36f8bb2131c58d48#196467

      Sometimes the engineer way to solve a problem solves the wrong problem. But it sure does use up a lot of energy, time and money. Which young men seem to have rather a lot of.
      OP: Try cooling off yourself before you decide to throw out the problem before even finding a solution. ;)

    3. Re:Describe the goal, not the step by akutz · · Score: 1

      Macs in general (including my 2011 Macbook Pro) spin up like crazy when doing anything with their graphics cards. The Mac mini is no exception. When using the Dolphin emulator to run Wii and Gamecube games at 1080p the Mac mini's fans go into hyper active, ludicrous speed. I don't turn them down because I know that they're on for a reason.

      --
      -- -a
  23. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by gregrah · · Score: 1

    Wow that is a very nice price for a silently cooled cpu+mobo - I might need to order one.

    Just wanted to add that for a PSU in this system you would definitely want to go with a picoPSU.

  24. alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spinning heatsink, no fan slower RPM

  25. Raspberry Pi by gauthamg · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Raspberry Pi by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Because it's not released yet, and because it's impossible to run Dolphin on a sub 1GHz ARM.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    2. Re:Raspberry Pi by Larryish · · Score: 1

      When is the fucking Raspberry PI going to be released?

      Is it hardware, or vapourware?

    3. Re:Raspberry Pi by AAWood · · Score: 1

      They're aiming to release them in November, and given the foundation only started up in mid-2009 that's hardly a long enough dev cycle to be accusing them of "vapourware" IMO.

  26. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    for the same price, you can get an H61 board, and a Pentium or i3 (the 35W versions are nice, and not that muh more expensive) that will "kick the snot out of" the E-350, except for graphics, and even there...

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  27. That is the best idea by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    However if you insist on fanless, the answer is to go large, not small. A tiny system like a mini has to have fans since there isn't much room for heat sinks. In terms of moving heat you can have surface area or airflow, and tradeoff between the two, but you have to have one or the other.

    So you get a large case, for full sized ATX parts. Then look at graphics cards that you can get fanless, or get an aftermarket fanless cooler from someone like Arctic Cooling. It is expensive and you don't get high end, but so long as you get a big ole' block of aluminium, you can have a mid range or lower end GPU with no fans.

    For CPUs stick with a dual core Sandy Bridge. Emulators don't tend to use more than 2 cores (many only use 1) and moar cores = moar powers. The Core i3-2100T is what you should look at. Extremely low power dissipation, like 35watts TDP. You probably can't find a fanless processor heatsink, but just buy a really overkill one and take the fan off. Something like an Arctic Cooling Freezer 13, which is stupid massive. It is rated for 200 watts with its fan so 35 watts without should work.

    For PSUs you want them efficient. You can find some that are fanless, and also some that have fans, but will turn them off under a light load. The Corsair AX750 is such a PSU. It has a fan but can provide perhaps 20% of its power with the fan off. That would probably do it, given that your system will not need much power.

    Stick with non overclocked RAM and don't put too much in the system, it generates heat too. That means 1333MHz standard "value" RAM for Sandy Bridge.

    That leaves just the harddrive. These make more noise than you'd think. Getting a 5400rpm drive helps, as slower speed means less noise, and heat. Also getting a case that has silicone isolator pads helps. However the real answer is an SSD. No moving parts, very little noise (all electronics make a tiny bit of noise). Expensive, but if you demand no noise, that is what you need.

    Ultimately the GP has the right of it though. For less money you can just get a more powerful system with large, slow fans. Unless you have a really quiet room, you aren't likely to hear it, and you sure won't when you are emulating as the sound from the games will drown it out.

    However if you want real fanless, it is a real option. Just remember you have to spend more, and settle for lower end parts. It'll still be powerful, but not as powerful as the amount of money you spend would imply.

    1. Re:That is the best idea by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Informative

      However if you insist on fanless, the answer is to go large, not small. A tiny system like a mini has to have fans since there isn't much room for heat sinks.

      Tell that to the massive heat sink on the ASUS E35M1-I motherboard.

      With that and a quiet laptop hard drive and fanless power supply, it's finally truly possible to build a completely silent (from 3 feet or so) small form-factor machine that doesn't perform like 5-year-old hardware.

    2. Re:That is the best idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not very massive. Look at some aftermarket coolers from Noctua, Scythe etc. 1kg of aluminum is the standard. For example Scythe OROCHI:

      * http://www.hwp.ru/Coolers/Orochi/orochi_cooler_16.jpg
      * 1.2 kg
      * 120 x 194 x 155 mm (4.7 x 7.6 x 6.1 inch) (for comparison, that minitx board is 6.7x6.7 in)

    3. Re:That is the best idea by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      Put in an SSD that is just big enough for the OS, and store all of the data a NAS like this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822165122. It could have 0 moving part in the living room. Who cares if the drive in the laundry room makes noise or not.

    4. Re:That is the best idea by sznupi · · Score: 1

      The cat?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    5. Re:That is the best idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However if you insist on fanless, the answer is to go large, not small. A tiny system like a mini has to have fans since there isn't much room for heat sinks.

      Not true. I'm typing this on a fanless 1 GHz Atom based pc, which is only slightly larger than a 3.5" HD. One side of the case has cooling ribs, and the CPU is connected directly to it. It works fine.

    6. Re:That is the best idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to go SSD, just use a USB Flash disk and save yourself some bucks.

    7. Re:That is the best idea by akutz · · Score: 1

      That's why I went with the 120mm Noctua fans for my media center. https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.2041483608086.109253.1574203932&l=b86a32bbdd&type=1. They are very, very quiet.

      --
      -- -a
    8. Re:That is the best idea by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Only problem with those fans is they have almost no static pressure. So when they are in an unimpeded environment, as you have there, they move quite a bit of air with little noise. However put them somewhere that has impediments to airflow, like a computer case with a dust filter, and they can't seem to move any at all.

      I had to use something else in my system for that reason. The things were great sitting on a desk, but just didn't move air in the case.

    9. Re:That is the best idea by akutz · · Score: 1

      That's why Noctua makes different models. I chose the model best suited for an unimpeded environment.

      --
      -- -a
  28. Aquariums! by bmo · · Score: 1

    Take Mac Mini motherboard out of chassis.

    Replace hard disk with SSD

    Submerge everything in a mineral oil filled aquarium. Put in fake fish, gravel, a castle, and a bubble pump, for an authentic effect.

    ??????

    Profit!

    --
    BMO

  29. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    good remarks, you could go with an external picoPSU and small case. The cheapest I could find is the T-3410 at logicsupply.com: case+ picoPSU (35W cpu max, no room for expansion ie no graphics card) is around $70. That brings you down to a single fan: the Intel stock one, @600RPM, is silent. I've done that exact build for a friend. Tried it for me as a fully passive E350 with Asus's passive board, but lost my nerve seeing the temp was always 60-70 C, and added a small, and noisy, fan. I should have gone with the i3 + big slow fan.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  30. Front-end and back-end by tepples · · Score: 1

    the more likely problem is that the EMULATORS themselves are not running on the hardware efficiently.

    Now consider that most of the emulators are designed to run on Windows. ZSNES started in DOS, SNES9X started in Windows, both of them were ported to MacOS/Linux later.

    That shouldn't really matter. As long as multiple platforms can run the same programming language (C++ runs on every 32- or 64-bit platform that runs unmanaged code, and x86 assembly runs in DOS, Windows/x86, Linux/x86, and modern Mac OS X), an emulator can be written with a separation between the platform-specific front-end and the platform-independent emulation engine. Now if the front-end takes up more than half the CPU time, that's a completely different story.

    The real problem is that standards for emulator accuracy increase over the years, and for example, bsnes takes a lot more CPU time because it emulates the corner cases of the Super NES chipset more closely. In addition, people expect to be able to emulate fifth- and sixth-generation consoles nowadays (PS1, N64, PS2, and GameCube/Wii).

    1. Re:Front-end and back-end by sznupi · · Score: 1

      In addition, people expect to be able to emulate fifth- and sixth-generation consoles nowadays (PS1, N64, PS2, and GameCube/Wii)

      5th gen, nowadays? It was quite hot in the last millenium (always fun to use this wording ;) ) - those were possibly even the hottest times of 5th gen emulation, as far as popular attention and usage went. And, really, just a very short time after SNES emulation really arrived; it seems it was not strictly about processing power, more about collaboration and disseminations (via the web) of information, emulators (and roms...), new techniques becoming widespread.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:Front-end and back-end by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      PS1 and N64 emulation are easily doable, those will even run half-decently on an N900. Some PS2 games will slow to a crawl on a system that can run Crysis smoothly with max setttings. You really can't have enough processing power for that, and more cores don't really help.

      I've been looking into Wii emulation recently, I can't imagine it will be any less resource-intensive than PS2 emulation.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  31. Most emulatable systems require low hardware by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Up to a Playstation 1 you only need an 800Mz machine with a decent video card. Dreamcast needs a lil bit more for smooth operation but it's fine.

    PS2 is where stuff gets tricky, because the devs haven't bothered to support heavy multi-threading or multiple cores to any reasonable degree, but most games can be run at decent speed and compatibility.

    You really do not need much hardware-wise until you get to PS2-level stuff.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Most emulatable systems require low hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look under the speedhacks in pcsx2, there is now an option that enables multithreaded VU. The speedups are significant too, but it will require more than 2 cores to be effective. epsxe/pcsx are also capable of running pretty well on 300MHz machines, just so long as they are bolstered with a decent video card to offload some of the work.

    2. Re:Most emulatable systems require low hardware by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm playing the wrong games. It seems like it got too focused on fixing the issues to make the various FF games work, but chokes to death on almost everything else I've tried. I got some love from Persona 3 and Rogue Galaxy, but even the original Ratchet and Clank was too much. And I'm not running a wimpy chip, either (Phenom II X6 1090T).

    3. Re:Most emulatable systems require low hardware by Khyber · · Score: 1

      What is your video card and settings? I had zero issues with Persona 3 FES or Persona 4.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Most emulatable systems require low hardware by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Persona 3 wasn't a problem, other than a bit of audio lag at times, I was only commenting that it was one of the few exceptions, rather than the rule. Sorry if I wasn't clear.

      Its a Geforce 9800GT, though. As for the settings, I spent so much time dicking around with them I don't even remember now. :)

  32. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by gregrah · · Score: 1

    Link?

    If I can get an i3 and H61 board for $89 I'd probably buy that instead.

  33. Silent PC Review by gknoy · · Score: 1

    Silent PC Review's articles, while not always about the latest hardware, are REALLY well written. They do lots of sound related testing (decibels up close, decibels from far away, etc), and often have lots of very detailed pictures. Their article is the primary reason I bought my Antec Mini P180 (which, granted, is likely not at ALL what the original poster wants).

    To the original poster: Build a silent PC yourself, with the hardware necessary to meet the performance needs of your emulators. Large fans that spin slowly are your friend, as would be water cooling. Note that frequently the cost of doing this is noticeably more than "Buy a used XBox" or "Buy a Mac Mini", as you will end up buying parts that are of relatively high quality, and perhaps investing in something expensive like water cooling. Emulating things is likely a lot more processor intensive than watching HD movies, these days, as so many chipsets now support the movies in hardware, whereas emulation is often about CPU mojo.

    Generally speaking, making sure that your case uses large heat sinks and large-diameter fans (which can throttle their speed) makes for a nearly-silent PC system. My Mini P180 probably meets your sound requirements, though I expect you want something in a smaller form factor.

    Looking at their site, you might like some of these articles. For the older ones, which are from nine months ago, you can likely use the same case/fans/PSU and drop in a similarly priced newer-generation motherboard and processor pairing and get similar results.

    Fanless i5 (£1223): http://www.silentpcreview.com/aleutia-h3r
    - Basically, an i5 system in a small form factor box which is effectively a giant heat sink. They don't recommend it for a media pc but it looks like it'd have plenty of mojo for emulation. (I assume, as I haven't done any emulation of recent systems ever.)

    Mid-level gaming build ($1000): http://www.silentpcreview.com/Silent_Mid_Gaming_PC
    - Tower form factor. You probably want something smaller.
    - Note the Really Large heat sink on the CPU, and the very large fan on that. It's worth it.

    Small Form Factor gaming rig ($1000 to $1200): http://www.silentpcreview.com/Silent_Gaming_System_Build_Guide
    - Another i5 system, with aftermarket cooling accessories for the video card and so on.
    - Stays cool and relatively quiet at a 1 meter distance even under sustained heavy load (Crysis).
    - This is probably the one most like what you want.

  34. Big and slow... by talesin · · Score: 1

    ...fans, of course.

    Fanless is a nice thought, but doesn't tend to work out well even when engineered on a whole to shunt heat efficiently. Not really going to find a mini-system that'll be able to be too quiet, but a nice mid-tower hidden in the back with a USB hub taped down by your TV usually works out well. Built mine with four (five, counting the PSU) 120mm fans; one intake/HDD, one exhaust, and two just to move air over the CM Hyper 212 CPU cooler (in/out sandwich).
    Running all four at 800rpm makes them whisper-quiet; even with HDD isolation rubbers, the drive read/write is significantly louder than the fans.

    Still keeps an Athlon X4 635, three 2TB WD Green drives, and a fanless Zotac GF 460 GTX down below 35C at idle (and that's just the HDDs peaking that, the rest idle about 27C), popping up to just shy of 60C on the video card at full load for an extended period; none of the rest going above 45C.

    Tears along in zsnes, MAME, epsxe, pcsx2, mupen64... and can rock along in TF2 at 1920x1080 with no issues if something more modern is wanted.

  35. Go custom by wesleyjconnor · · Score: 1

    I got a whopping great big aluminium heatsink custom made for an old hp ultra small last year took the cover off and stick it directly on the cpu, it wasnt pretty but it worked a treat, stuck it in a cupboard and forgot about it

  36. Mini isn't really a good idea... by frooddude · · Score: 1

    Small spaces make quiet cooling difficult. Bigger fans are quieter at moving the same amount of air. The more air you move over a given heat sink the better the cooling (with diminishing returns, see various HSF reviews). So go for something larger with good airflow and some very quiet fans.

    My HTPC has a PSU with a fan that I've never heard since it's temperature controlled and I'm not abusing it. The HSF is a Scythe Ninja something or other with a Panasonic D12SL 120mm fan, can't hear it. Graphics card is an MSI N460GTZ Cyclone. Sounds like a loud card, right? Well it's dead silent on movies (good for those quiet scenes) and none of the games I play have "quiet" atmosphere so when it does get cranking I still can't hear it over the audio of the game. You can always get aftermarket coolers for real silence if that's where you want to spend your money. All that packed into an Antec Solo with a cheap 64GB SSD, although when I had the 320GB single platter spindle in there you couldn't hear it at all.

  37. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    If I can get an i3 and H61 board for $89 I'd probably buy that instead.

    Very unlikely, as the cheapest H61 board is about $40, and I can't find an i3 that will fit it for less than $110, and both those prices are rock-bottom, include rebates, etc. Real world would be closer to $180 for the combo.

  38. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by cgenman · · Score: 1

    As a long-time hardware silence modifier, I second silentpcreview.com.

    Some Rules:

    1. Be aware of how much air circulates around the device. Those TV cubby-holes that are built to enclose systems are absolutely terrible for air circulation. Either put the system outside of the TV stand, or add fans there too.
    2. BIGGER fans can move the same amount of air while moving more slowly... the smaller the fan, the more it tends to scream. Certain big 'ole desk or table-fans can run slowly enough to be silent, yet move a hell of a lot of air. You get a lot more mileage than you should by pointing a 2' wide desk fan at the back of a computer.
    3. Faster components, when run more slowly, need less cooling. If you're getting an i3 processor that goes up to 3 ghz, get the one at 1.5 ghz, or underclock one down further. Don't go for the top-of-the-line graphics card, go for the budget model of the same year, if it is using similar parts.
    4. Always go for full sized (3.5") Fluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB) based Hard Drives, spun at 5400 RPM. I believe Seagate (Barracuda) and Maxtor (now part of seagate) made these. HDD's are by far the most difficult component to quiet down without accidentally destroying them.

  39. Ps3 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok , not passive, but a modded ps3 runs emulators quietly. (sony antisue) at least so i have heard (/sony antisue)

  40. Small, quite, and performance... choose 2 by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    As the subject says, small, quiet, and performance, choose 2. You can easily make a passive cooled (quiet), high performance system to do emulation, it won't be small. You can build a small, high performance system, it won't be quiet. You can build a small and quiet system, it won't have the performance needed. Pick your poison. Personally I am of the quiet and high performance kind of person. Go get a nice Antec Fusion Remote MAX case, slap together a nice Intel i5 system, put in a big massive Noctua NH-D14 heatsink on it, along with a passive AMD/ATI HD5750, and be done with it. You can try and get by with one of the 35W TDP Intel's in a mATX case, but it might not be enough for you to do some of the trickier emulation. Heck, some SNES stuff still can't be done right on the fastest CPU's under emulation, let alone anything past the 16bit era....

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:Small, quite, and performance... choose 2 by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add "price" in there. My system is quiet, fast, and relatively small - but using an SSD and efficient cooling/case, it's not particularly cheap. Not Mac-Mini small either, though, more mini-tower small. But if you really want quiet and fast an SSD is pretty much a requirement these days...

  41. submerge in mineral oil by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Informative

    Simple solution:

    Buy several large 4 liter cans of shop grade mineral oil (It doesnt have the "perfume" normally found in baby oil, which is also mineral oil), and a small aquarium. Put some shiny black light aquarium rocks in the bottom.

    Put the systemboard, including the heatsink and fan, directly into the aquarium. (I would suggest something in a tiny form factor, like a mini ITX, since you can use a beefy wall wart to power it, rather than a full blown PSU.)

    Route cables up and out the top through a repurposed aquarium filter tube. Where the charcoal filter would be in the tank filter, use wireties to control the cabling. You can put a cable switch box in there to serve as the port end connect point, so your normal AV and HID cables arent hanging out of the "water".

    Populate the tank with those mechanical bobbing fish, and some bubbler toys.

    Fill the tank with the mineral oil, drop in some aquarium bubbler stones for dramatic effect, and place a blacklight in the aquarium tank light of the cover.

    VOILA. Something that wont sound like a jet engine, has heavy thermal mass to dissipate the heat of the system, has a continual supply of lubricant for the ball-bearing CPU fan, and makes an interesting accent to the room all in one go.

    The fish arent real, and the mineral oil doesnt evaporate, so you never have to clean the tank, assuming you keep ambient dust out.

    1. Re:submerge in mineral oil by adolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mineral oil works.

      But one should be aware of the effects of condensation. Any water which condenses in the system (and it will, especially if you're pumping non-dry atmospheric air through it for show) will settle to a layer at the bottom, and may eventually become ruinous to any electronics it finds.

      Not that this is likely to be a big deal straight away, but it could eventually become one. Keeping the board(s) elevated a bit, with a little drain valve under the layer of rocks should fix that up neatly enough. A few drops of a water-based dye that isn't solvent in oil (food coloring?) to better visually differentiate the layers might be fun, too.

      Such home modification generally stipulates the use of an aquarium made from either acrylic or non-tempered glass, but both are easy to find (10gal and smaller are generally non-tempered, as a rule).

      Later on down the road (probably years from now), just drain off the water. There's no need to try to get it all out since that won't happen anyway. Then, for maximum material efficiency, just boil the results to get rid of the water and put it any leftover oil back in the tank. :)

    2. Re:submerge in mineral oil by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      There's also the problem of oil wicking up through cords and wires.

    3. Re:submerge in mineral oil by adolf · · Score: 1

      Why is that a problem?

      Some folks pay a lot extra for flooded cable.

    4. Re:submerge in mineral oil by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      That is why you put the switch box in the filter box.

      You know, one of those ugly metal enclosures with a big rocker switch on it, used to switch which PC your keyboard, mouse, and monitor are hooked to?

      You simply leave it stuck in one position, and use the port ends on the back creatively so your expensive AV and HID cables arent hanging out of the mineral oil, and as such, dont wick any up.

    5. Re:submerge in mineral oil by Moekandu · · Score: 1

      Simple? No.

      Awesome? Yes!

      Makes me wonder just how big/bitchin a system you could put in a 10gal fishtank. Just think of all the wild component mounting configurations you could to with clear plastic.

      --
      Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself; but talent instantly recognizes genius. -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
    6. Re:submerge in mineral oil by adolf · · Score: 1

      Or get bulkhead connectors and mount everything to a patch panel above the tank.

      With dremel tool, or a nibbler, or some basic hand tools one can cut the holes out fairly quickly. Alternatively, there's maker-friendly companies like Bud Industries who can very cleanly stamp out a one-off customized panel fairly cheaply.

      Or, for the budget hacker, just get short male-to-female extensions from Monoprice (et cetera), and zip-tie them to a board. :)

  42. Simplest Solution by josiahgould · · Score: 1

    Why does it have to be emulation? You can pick up most of the systems you'd want to play for cheap, and most of them have Flash Carts or Mod Chips available.

    1. Re:Simplest Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have such a setup and it requires 4 separate powerstrips to hold all the various wall warts.

    2. Re:Simplest Solution by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1
      As someone who is in the process of collecting the consoles of my youth, "cheap" gets you what you'd expect, the loose, crumby, stained, faded console from the bottom of someone's cupboard, or from the box in their attic. If that's what you want, great, but to get a nice one you have to pay more. Not to mention that 5 or 6 consoles multiplied by "cheap" = "expensive". And, personally, I would rather save my consoles the wear and tear of being used every day and sitting exposed in a dusty environment.

      It depends what your priorities are, but the benefits of the emulation option that I can see are:
      1. It's a single box (no need for a mess of cables at the back of the TV and no need to swap them in and out)
      2. Younger members of the family don't need to remember which console their favourite game is on, just select it from a list
      3. NES+SNES+Megadrive+Master System+N64+Playstation...etc..: One alone is "cheap", once you add them all up, it comes to "expensive"
      4. One box that can be made to look "wife-friendly" i.e. like it belongs next to your satellite box/expensive TV and not in a child's bedroom
      5. The box can also play DVDs/CDs/BluRay/Movie Files off USB/Hard-drive
    3. Re:Simplest Solution by akutz · · Score: 1

      This. I already have the solution for movies and TV shows. I have a Synology 1511+ with 12 TB in conjunction with a Boxee box that does what I need for media. I'd like to achieve the same for games. Adam gets it. It's aesthetically pleasing to have one system, the wife doesn't mind, and it's just neat to be able to switch between games at will.

      --
      -- -a
  43. Don't forget file servers! by Above · · Score: 1

    Like many tech-savvy home users I want a file server at home,but the reality is 95% of the time it is doing nothing. Be it noise (fan less), eco-friendly (use less electricity) or room friendly (make less heat) a low powered fan less system seems to be a great idea.

    But it's damn hard to find. There seems to be an assumption that low powered and fan less means you want super-small. Pico, or mini-ITX. No one seems to think you would use it for a file server, so > 2 SATA cuts your choices by 50%, and > 4 almost doesn't exist.

    I'd be ok with CPU's with speed step that could step _way_ down, like down to 5W, but they don't seem to exist. No one makes motherboards with Intel mobile processors for end users. Repurposing a laptop has other drawbacks.

    I think it's an untapped market...perhaps a small one, but big enough more solutions should exist.

    1. Re:Don't forget file servers! by erice · · Score: 1

      No one makes motherboards with Intel mobile processors for end users. Repurposing a laptop has other drawbacks.

      I think it's an untapped market...perhaps a small one, but big enough more solutions should exist.

      Really? Google for "atom server board". You will find several options.

    2. Re:Don't forget file servers! by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      With the caveats that none of these make it to your 5W (but get close at between 7W and 15W) and acknowledging that none of these are server grade , http://www.linuxtech.net/features/intel_atom_pineview_motherboards_overview.html has a fantastic list of Atom based boards.

      Gigabyte's D525TUD offers 4xSATA, 1xIDE and PCI for a RAID card. Asus have the AT4NM10T and AT5NM10T which lose the IDE port of Gigabyte, but replaces PCI with PCIe x4. Jetway do a board with 4xSATA and ION graphics - your fileserver could double as a media center, although the power is going to jump to 30W+. Zotac have a DTX board with 6xSATA and PCIe x16.

      Some of these can run passively, although if you are going to want more than 4 drives you are going to need some kind of cooling.

      I have been using the D510UD as a home server in a 4RU case with some large, slow Noctua fans. It's not noiseless, but it is very quiet.

    3. Re:Don't forget file servers! by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      Atom is not a mobile processor. Atom is a humorous commentary on the market inertia of x86, even in places where ARM is much better suited.

    4. Re:Don't forget file servers! by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      At my parents, I'm running a D510MO with three 2TB disks and it has a mini-PCI express slot in which I dumped Startech.com 2 Port Mini PCI Express Internal SATA II Controller Card. Alas, it turned out that one of the ports is then blocked by a USB header, but it gave me the (desired) third SATA port. It's not noiseless due to the powesupply and the disks, but it doesn't need to be as it's in the basement.

      For my own usage, I use a Soekris net5501-70 with a 1TB 2.5" SATA disk. You can only put in one disk as far as I know, so it doesn't fit your requirements. It does make a fine fileserver and it's virtually silent. A fileserver doesn't actually need much oopha. I do a nightly backup to USB. It's not RAID as with my parents, but I feel secure enough in case of disaster.

      Of course, if your intention is to run RAID0, you can disregard anything I said, but then my 1 disk option isn't all that much dangerous.

      For the record, there are Atom motherboards that come with > 2 SATA ports. Thing is, I originally didn't plan to use more than two. I changed my mind, hence the PCIe card. In hindsight, I should have gone with a more expensive board (Intel Atom boards are dirt-cheap) that natively had more SATA ports.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re:Don't forget file servers! by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Ah, completely forgot... I also have a fanless Atom 330 based board with four SATA ports. That one was expensive (well, compared to the Intel D510MO). It was being used for another purpose when I was building my parents server. Again, you won't get it 100% silent because of the disks. For the power supply, you'd be able to take something like PicoPSU, I think...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    6. Re:Don't forget file servers! by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. Now show me a motherboard with included ARM CPU for < 100 € in microATX format with Gigabit NIC, four SATA-II ports on which I can install my operating system of choice (Okay, let's limit it to Linux or OpenBSD, either one is ok for me) without having to hack anything.

      Unless you can, the x86 dependency is here to stay and the Atom, while an underpowered chip, can be gotten cheap and run fanless.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    7. Re:Don't forget file servers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP ProLiant Microserver - 4 bay, has a fan but it's low RPM and quiet, works great with FreeNAS. The default 1GB (ECC) RAM config is sufficient, assuming you're running linux / *BSD. I got mine on offer so it was considerably cheaper than I could have built an equivalent from scratch. Or maybe a Synology Diskstation (runs Linux, GPL printout in the box), I configured a 2-bay one of those for work and was impressed at how much easymode functionality you get for the low price.

  44. Use MAME + mini itx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get a via mini-itx and use MAME.
    via processor's are fast enough to run mame no problem above 1Ghz
    www.mini-itx.com

  45. Big box by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    I bought an HP "box" about 6 months ago for my TV. It's big and powerful enough that the fans don't go crazy when I run ZSNES. My opinion: go with something about the size of a home theater receiver, because it'll be able to move enough air to cool itself without making lots of noise.

  46. Shelf? by sootman · · Score: 1

    Why not just put it into an entertainment center with an open back (for ventilation) and a closed front?

    As others have pointed out, the way to get rid of the noise from a small, fast fan is to replace it with a big, slow one. Not exactly easy in a Mac mini, but if you added some big slow fans to the entertainment center to move the air around the Mini (or whatever you get) then the fans inside might not have to work as hard. Another option would be to remove the case from the Mini. I don't know if the new 'unibody' models use the aluminum enclosure to transfer heat but once it's open, you could easily move a LOT of air across it and/or add custom fans and heat sinks.

    Since you brought it up, what software did you use for ripping BDs on a Mac?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  47. My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had no trouble using my wife's Hp Mini 110 as an emulation station. I wipe windows from it and installed linux and had no trouble playing anything up to 64bit games. Never tried anything newer than the N64, though.

    That being said, it's so quiet, you wouldn't even know it's on. The downside is the battery life, but if you're paying at home, just use the cable. :)

  48. A-Tech Fabrication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guys at A-Tech Fabrication build to order fanless, fully passively cooled computers and cases. I just ordered one for myself and am super-excited. There’s a long thread at AVSForum about them too. I dunno what the people talking about how it is “impossible” to get a passively cooled computer are talking about—I’ve had one for years.

  49. ASRock makes quiet barebones PCs by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Try one of the ASRock barebones PCs. I bought one to replace my last home-built silent PC.

  50. Re:That really depends on what you're willing to d by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    i always wanted to try immersion cooling. finding the right non conductive liquid is the trick, as far as i can tell. That, and sealing all your connections. turns out, non conductive liquids seeping into your electrical contacts is not helpful.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  51. Aleutia boxes are good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.aleutia.com/

    I have a Dual core T2 with 4GB and a 128GB SSD. It has no fans and is completely silent. It was reasonably priced, and works great for MAME and UAE (the two game emulators I use).

  52. Surround it in ice cold beer! by Covalent · · Score: 1

    If this is in a rec room or den, just buy a mini-fridge. Cool your CPU and your beer of choice at the same time. You'll have to get creative with the cabling, and your electric bill will suffer, but so long as there's nothing perishable in the fridge you can run it at the lowest setting. And the large thermal mass of all of that beer (you'll have to keep it stocked, of course) housed in aluminum (with its high thermal conductivity) is the perfect heat sink.

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
    1. Re:Surround it in ice cold beer! by CagedApe · · Score: 1

      Actually this won't work. The condensers in a refrigerator are not meant to be operated constantly, they kick on and off. As soon as you put a heat source, i.e. a cpu, into your fridge, the condenser will go into constant draw. This will burn it out in approximately 1-3 days. You COULD however swap the condenser from something that is meant to have a constant draw like a window A/C unit. But even then, you'd have trouble keeping it cool effectively.

  53. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

    Having a small fan doesn't need to be a hinderance.... I have a mini ITX-based HTPC system with a 1.5" fan on the CPU, and it's still damned near silent, even when watching h.264 full screen 1080p video. If you have sufficient air flow around the CPU, then you don't need the CPU fan to move much air specifically over the CPU. Put it in a case like this one, and minimize the number of moving parts (in my case, no moving parts aside from the CPU fan), and you can do quite nicely with a small fan keeping the CPU cool and still being quiet.

  54. mini-box.com by dalias · · Score: 1

    My favorite source for passive-cooled computers is mini-box.com. They have some great mini-itx boards (both integrated cpu and socketed) as well as ideal enclosures and power supplies for fanless operation. I'm using the board with the Atom D510 and M350 enclosure with M3-ATX power supply. The plain pico-PSU power supplies are cheaper, but be aware that they pass the 12v rail from the DC input directly to the motherboard/drives and may not work if your 12v brick cannot deliver stable 12v. I like the M3-ATX because it handles wide input voltage range and I can use it directly with a 12v lead-acid battery system and charger and even hot-swap temporary power sources (like 8-10 alkaline D batteries) in as backup while servicing the main battery system.

  55. pico-psu by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

    I've been building a lot of mini-itx systems lately and attempting to keep them as quiet as possible. I've built several systems that are near silent and only have one fan in them, yet perform quite well...as long as the motherboard's built in video card is good enough for you. Just get a PICOPSU-160-XT and a (fan-less) power brick from mini-box, and it moves a great deal of the heat outside the case. Get a good, low-noise cpu fan and an SSD hard drive, and it will be whisper quite. Add a water cooled cpu cooler and it would be dead silent. Heck I live in Texas and don't use the AC a lot to save on my electric bill, and all my pico-psu systems have been holding up fine.

    If you want a top of the line video card, throw all the above out, because a pico-psu just won't cut it. Outside of that, I love them.

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  56. low end cpus are not good for EMU uses media cente by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    low end cpus are not good for EMU uses also for a media center you may want to have to room for a x4 pci-e cable card tuner. A big HDD to hold data. Maybe a SSD for the OS and apps.

    Some Emulation setups like visual pinball + pinmame you need a better video card then on board Intel video.

  57. Mini itx System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go for something with an ITX board with a fusion E350.

    My preference would be the ASUS AT5IONT-I-DELUXE because it has a wireless card built in. and one of the silverstone itx cases for reliability.
    the board is completely passive and the integrated graphics are enough to handle most stuff

  58. Mac Mini Fan Control by cmholm · · Score: 1

    Based on my own experience, reflected in a number of anecdotes in support forums, I believe the Mac Mini (and Macbook Pro) is configured not to run the fan at all until the CPU temp hits 80 C (and thermal shutdown at 90), at which point you go from zero dB fan noise to turbine mode. A frequent mistake when opening up a Mini is to leave the fan control lead unplugged, causing the fan to go max rpm the moment power is reapplied.

    A workaround is to have the fan spin at a lower rpm, and ramp up gradually as the temperature climbs, for which I use Fan Control. It allows you to set a number of fan speed profiles, and is free speech/beer. My Mini's fan is usually turning at 1500 rpm in a quiet home office, and is largely inaudible to me until it hits 3000. Using this tool in the tropics, I've never had the Core Solo system go beyond 70 C (and 4000 rpm), even while running Handbrake.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    1. Re:Mac Mini Fan Control by pbjones · · Score: 1

      the new Mac-Mini runs it's fan all of the time, but at only 1800 rpm, once you start to work the thing hard it needs to run at twice that speed. Bad case design leads to noise as the air exits the box. Someone could do a kit that sits under the mini and does a better job of cooling. But as the OP has sold the mini, it's too late. Spend money, buy a nice passive cooled case.

      --
      There was an unknown error in the submission.
  59. HP Microserver by kevinroyalty · · Score: 1

    take a look at the HP Microserver. it's a dualcore AMD CPU, supports 8GB RAM, no OS (install what you want), gig ethernet, and you can put up to 4 hard drives in the case, and 2 expansion cards. small, and quiet, and uses very little power (no fan on the CPU, but a large 120MM fan for the case).

  60. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    >>If you have sufficient air flow around the CPU, then you don't need the CPU fan to move much air specifically over the CPU.

    Right, which is something a lot of people ignore. They'll make a silent PC and then stick it into a cramped airless cabinet beneath their TV, and then wonder why their new linux-based DVR keeps skipping as the CPU desperately tries to step down its power use to keep the temps under control.

  61. Throttle the CPU by Solandri · · Score: 1

    The problem I've seen from games and emulators is that if your CPU has the horsepower, they will max it even if they don't need it. Why does a 3D game need to render at 160 FPS when my hardware is only capable of displaying 60 FPS? It doesn't, but it's hard-coded to render as many FPS as possible so it does.

    The easy fix I've found is to throttle your CPU. For older versions of Windows and Core processors, you could use a utility like RMClock to limit its max GHz. For i3/i5/i7 processors and Windows 7, you can lower the max processor performance under control panel -> power options -> change plan settings -> change advanced power settings -> processor power management -> maximum processor state. My laptop used to run 3D games at 2.4 GHz at a sweltering 88 C and fan spinning like a turbine. I limited it to 1.78 GHz (75%), which dropped the temp to 70 C and the fan noise is bearable without headphones. The drop in framerate is mostly imperceptible.

    I don't know what options OS X has for throttling CPU speed, but that's what you should be looking for. Emulating really old games should easily be doable with the CPU throttled to its minimum.

    1. Re:Throttle the CPU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem I've seen from games and emulators is that if your CPU has the horsepower, they will max it even if they don't need it. Why does a 3D game need to render at 160 FPS when my hardware is only capable of displaying 60 FPS? It doesn't, but it's hard-coded to render as many FPS as possible so it does.

      Er, there's an extremely simple solution to this: turn on vsync. Most games support it.

  62. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just an intel fanboi pimping his wares. You cant get a i3 and h61 that cheap.

    Anyways the e350 is much better for graphics.. so it would prob play nicer with hd video and games.

  63. Atom boards lack ECC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Atom boards are not servers, even if the salesman claims so, because they lack ECC.

    Intel has a mini-ITX server board with a C206 chipset. That's real. There is also a rumour they will bring out a server style atom (with ECC) next year.

  64. Wii by Jiro · · Score: 1

    I'd agree to just mod a Wii. It's not going to run bsnes but it's quiet, it's actually easier to mod than an Xbox, it will still emulate just about everything from the 16 bit era and before (unless your game only works on bsnes), and since it is a Wii, it plays Wii and Gamecube games so you won't need Dolphin.

  65. HTPC - iAtom 1.8 2C, 2GB DDR3, 40GB SSD, 2TB HDD, by JakFrost · · Score: 1

    I build this HTPC system last year and loaded it with XBMC Live running on Ubuntu (now 11.04) that can do full 1080p hardware accelerated decoding of complex scenes without dropping a single frame (I do my own encodings). Because the Intel Atom is a dual-core at 1.8 GHz along with nVidia Ion Next Generation which is equivalent to a GT210 video card it can shred on graphics.

    HTPC - iAtom 1.8 2C, 2GB DDR3, 40GB SSD, 2TB HDD, Blu-Ray, ATSC+ClearQAM, Mini-ATX, 120mm Fan

    Subtotal: $588.91
    Shipping: $22.22
    Total: $611.13

    MOB: ASUS AT5IONT-I Intel Atom D525 (1.8GHz, dual-core) BGA559 Intel NM10 Mini ITX Motherboard/CPU Combo
    MEM: G.SKILL 2GB 204-Pin DDR3 SO-DIMM DDR3 1333 (PC3 10600) Laptop Memory Model F3-10600CL9S-2GBSQ
    TVC: AVerMedia AVerTVHD Duet - PCTV Tuner (A188 - White Box) MTVHDDUWB PCI-Express x1 Interface
    SSD: Intel 320 Series SSDSA2CT040G310 2.5" 40GB SATA II MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)
    HDD: Western Digital Caviar Green WD20EARS 2TB SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive
    DVD: LITE-ON Black 4X Blu-ray Disc Reader SATA Model iHOS104-08
    CAS: APEX MI-008 Black Steel Mini-ITX Tower Computer Case 250W Power Supply
    FAN: GELID Solutions FN-SX12-10 120mm Silent Case Fan
    REM: AVS Gear GP-IR02BK Vista 2 channel IR Remote Control

    Temperature Sensors

    This thing is completely silent when watching TV and it doesn't overheat or suffer from any thermal problems, even in super hot temps outside and a warm house at 80 F.


    user@XBMCLive:~$ sensors
    atk0110-acpi-0
    Adapter: ACPI interface
    Vcore Voltage: +1.12 V (min = +0.85 V, max = +1.60 V)
      +3.3 Voltage: +3.33 V (min = +2.97 V, max = +3.63 V)
      +5 Voltage: +5.05 V (min = +4.50 V, max = +5.50 V)
      +12 Voltage: +12.10 V (min = +10.20 V, max = +13.80 V)
    CPU FAN Speed: 989 RPM (min = 600 RPM)
    CHASSIS FAN Speed: 0 RPM (min = 600 RPM)
    CPU Temperature: +50.0C (high = +60.0C, crit = +95.0C)
    GPU Temperature: +52.0C (high = +60.0C, crit = +95.0C)

    user@XBMCLive:~$ sensors -f
    atk0110-acpi-0
    Adapter: ACPI interface
    Vcore Voltage: +1.12 V (min = +0.85 V, max = +1.60 V)
      +3.3 Voltage: +3.35 V (min = +2.97 V, max = +3.63 V)
      +5 Voltage: +5.05 V (min = +4.50 V, max = +5.50 V)
      +12 Voltage: +12.10 V (min = +10.20 V, max = +13.80 V)
    CPU FAN Speed: 983 RPM (min = 600 RPM)
    CHASSIS FAN Speed: 0 RPM (min = 600 RPM)
    CPU Temperature: +122.0F (high = +140.0F, crit = +203.0F)
    GPU Temperature: +125.6F (high = +140.0F, crit = +203.0F)

  66. Silent PC == Monster Cable... by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

    Honestly, for all I've read about the "silent PC" it just convinces me that it's all in people's heads and the "silent PC" has become the new expensive Monster Cables pushed at you by the sales reps at Best Buy. I used a G4 Mac Mini for years in my living room, and sitting twelve feet away I can honestly tell you I never heard the damn thing. I then went out and replaced it with an Early 2009 24" iMac, put it on an end table less than 3 feet away, and connected three external hard-drives to it and they're all happily spinning away.

    The battery operated clock on the other side of the room is louder than all that put together and the clock itself isn't even that loud.

    Even when putting the iMac under a heavy load the thing barely makes a sound, its whisper quiet just like the old G4 was before it. Of course if it *was* making a lot of noise its unlikely I'd notice what with the fact I'd be engrossed in what it is I'm doing and having the volume cranked up a bit; I wouldn't be able to hear the fans even if I was listening for them!

    Because let's be serious here original poster, you're trying to convince yourself that when you've got a good game going with the surround sound turned up to comfortably enjoyable levels you can still somehow hear a tiny little fan blowing from the bottom of your AV cabinet on the other side of the room? And that somehow that tiny little fan is throwing out so much noise it overpowers the combined power of your enjoyment of the game and your kick ass 5.1 surround sound and subwoofer setup? (Taking poetic license here, you might not have a kick ass surround sound set up. But hell, even the speakers on your TV should be more than loud enough to overpower any sound coming off the computer!)

    Go get the Mac Mini back, you've already got it configured to play the games you want, and turn up the volume on your TV a bit more. Spending a metric shit tonne of money for what amounts to the sonic equivalent of a Monster Cable when a quick flick of the volume control knob will take care of your problem is about as stupid a buying a Monster Cable because the sales guy told you a hundred dollar cable makes the picture on your TV look a bazillion times better.

    1. Re:Silent PC == Monster Cable... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Heck, I have a 2009 mac mini in my sleeping room, and I am rather sensible to noise but I under normal circumstances I dont hear the thing, no matter what other posters say. If I have media on, there might be noise, but the tv takes care of not hearing the mini and if it is in normal mode waiting to do something or standby, there is not a single noise.

    2. Re:Silent PC == Monster Cable... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      It's not purely hype. Pursuing silence, rather than quiet-enough, is probably excessive, but some computers really are too loud.

      My old tower had several fans, none of them large, and it sounded like distant jet noise all the time. Anyone in the same room with it could not hear (or talk to) people who were outside the room, etc. You can imagine that my wife didn't like that. My new machine (now two years old?) was built with the goal of being Quiet. My case has multiple layers and sound-blocking materials on the inside (Antec Mini-P180, unmodified), and only a few (large) fans inside. When I boot it up, I hear fans spin up. It lasts maybe ten to 15 seconds. After that, the only sounds I hear are hard drive sounds, or a DVD spinning in the drive (occasionally). The fan on the top spins slowly enough that I have to listen hard to even notice it, and sometimes can only tell it's on by putting my hand directly above it to feel the warm air. I cannot recommend this case enough - it was a dream to work with. My next computer will have one too, I suspect.

  67. which emulators, and what games by smash · · Score: 1

    Is the question you need to answer. Decent emulation of old hardware often requires fairly hefty CPU - and there's no getting around that (other than trading off frame rate or accuracy).

    I suspect you may (counter-intuitively) find more success with large cased desktop hardware than the small form factor laptop style hardware - the reason for this is that large fans make less noise for the same airflow than small high speed ones.

    Sure, a mini, laptop, etc is fairly quite when it is idle. Ramp up the CPU however and they sound like a turbine. A desktop will have some fan noise at idle, but it won't ramp up much under load.

    I doubt that a passively cooled system will provide enough cpu power to run emulation at an acceptable frame-rate, other than for rather old hardware, in a somewhat inaccurate manner, however depending on the emulators required, YMMV.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  68. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by stms · · Score: 1

    Both of your solutions are a bit overkill you could have just adjusted the Speed Step/Cool'n'Quiet settings in the Windows power management menu. You loose a bit of performance by doing this but the Mid-2011 Mac Mini should still be able to use dolphin even after lowering it quite a bit (though you may have to lower your settings some).

  69. Re:HTPC - iAtom 1.8 2C, 2GB DDR3, 40GB SSD, 2TB HD by JakFrost · · Score: 1

    The chassis fan is connected to the CPU fan lead, there is no CPU fan on this motherboard. The temps are high but they are always this high even with the fan spinning slowly to cool down the case and also the fan in the power supply.

    There might be less expensive and more powerful options available this year with the AMD and Intel with integrated graphics but I haven't looked into them in terms of thermals, Mini-ITX, case compatibility, noise, etc. My little HTPC runs non-stop as my Linux server and HTPC box and works great so I recommend it.

  70. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, good luck trying to run Dolphin or BSNES on that setup.

  71. panda board (arm TI omap4, dual core, 4 Watts) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running full tilt, I have rarely seen my panda (with spinning disk, and multiple usb wired and wireless interfaces) based on this board pull 5 watts. Usually around 4.3W under load. Low watt = low heat. Don't even need a heat sink let alone a fan. Measurements via kill-a-watt.

    You can probably expect even less power consumption since an SD card and the panda board is all you will need.

    Plenty of oomph to emulate old game hardware. Good video perf.

    Check your distro of choice armel repos to see if they have what you want. In a year, expect armhf to be ready (at least by Debian, who is leading the way on this port) you will see a 20% speedup for some applications with just this software change (so a free upgrade in a year).

    Video is a binary blob for now, but work is in progress on a free driver. The built-in wireless is kinda crappy, but sufficient for some purposes. Expansion is via usb, i2c, and gpio.

    A small learning curve, but a pretty friendly arm board. No need for a jtag for end-user use; you can't brick it-- everything, including uboot lives on the SD card, so just pull the SD card, and plug it into your main box to fix things.

  72. PS2 or Atom330 on Peltier coolers by Lisias · · Score: 1

    I don't know exactly what hardware you want to emulate, so I will describe my emulation needs and solutions.

    I use a modded Sony's PS2 to play Sega Genesis, Atari and SNES games. The PS2 is pretty silent, and the emulators are not that bad.

    I don't play N64 or newer (or less older) games, but I can (barely) play Orbiter http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/ on an Atom 330 with 2GB RAM and a 5400 Samsung EcoGreen HD, so I presume that it's possible that this box can handle these emulators. I will check this soon and post the results.

    The Atom330 is nice because it's TDP is around 2.5W. While I'm using a traditional fan heatsink, I think that with a so low TDP it's possible to use a Peltier processor cooler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_cooling (I saw one once for a Pentium M333 some years ago).

    This will not work nice on environments with high humidity because of the risk of water condensation.

    --
    Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    1. Re:PS2 or Atom330 on Peltier coolers by Lisias · · Score: 1

      By the way, my box uses an Intel mini itx board with i950 graphics.

      http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/D945GCLF2_atom_330/

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    2. Re:PS2 or Atom330 on Peltier coolers by akutz · · Score: 1

      I was born in 80, so nostalgia for me is the NES, SNES, Genesis, and GBA. However, I've recently discovered Dolphin so I've been enjoying some GC games (LOVE WindWaker) in 1080p. I probably would have to sacrifice the Dolphin emulation, but I would really love to gut an old Gamecube or NES and create a nice little emulation station in its shell for the aforementioned (less Dolphin) systems...

      --
      -- -a
  73. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These days, go for small SSD which is essentially noiseless instead of loud HDD for system partition. Emulators shouldn't take that much space anyway.

  74. Mobile low-voltage chipset/CPU by galvitron · · Score: 1

    I would go with a LV (low-voltage) or ULV (ultra low-voltage) Core2 Duo mobile CPU on a Intel based Mobile chipset.

    Anything more than two cores is a waste on current console emulators. There are small mobile chipset motherboards that take the Intel mobile processors from the previous architecture. They can be had for around $400 and will take 4-8 GB of ram and use a fairly modern chipset like the PM45. I think Commell still makes them with a PCIe X 16 slot. You could get a passively cooled single slot graphics card for modern emulators like Dolphin and the Model 3 emulator.

    I think this MB and cards/cables, etc will fit in a very small case, probably around the size of a Mini-ITX case.

    Then, get a small SSD for the OS and apps. Put the roms on a high-speed network share for lots of room for full sets (like MAME)

    Then, put a good front-end like Hyperspin and you're good to go.

  75. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    OTOH, a low-power CPU (i3 2100T with the included 600 RPM fan, a PSU with a quiet FAN and an 80+ gold rating, and probably no graphics card, will make no audible noise, less than the hard disk. silentpcreview.com has lists and reviews of components.

    Dolphin is a Wii emulator, so it may need a real graphics card, especially if he's considering 1080p (wii doesn't do 1080p but the emulator does).

    I'd recommend the $40 fanless Radeon HD 5450. As you can see from this review the 5450 provided double the framerates compared to a i3 2100 without a video card, in many cases going from unplayable 20-something fps to very playable 50+ fps.

    Of course in that same review they threw in a $70 Radeon HD 5570 which many times offered 2-3x the framerates of the fanless 5450, but the 5570 has a fan and noise is the primary concern to the poster, not price or framerates.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  76. Fanless != silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With that and a quiet laptop hard drive and fanless power supply, it's finally truly possible to build a completely silent (from 3 feet or so) small form-factor machine that doesn't perform like 5-year-old hardware.

    In theory, theory is the same as practice. Ironically enough, however:
    Noise emanating from E35M1-I motherboard when the CPU cycles between C0/C1 states

    Several others have reported this issue on this motherboard and on certain ASUS laptops. FAIL. In a quiet room, the whiny squeal can be heard several meters away and emanates from underneath the large heatsink. The sound in question is actually more annoying than a fan, which seems further ironic.

    Oh, and don't neglect to notice that there is extremely poor Linux support for the onboard thermal sensors, and the situation will likely never improve because ASUS is actively blocking this:
    Linux drivers for motherboard sensors?

    One might imagine that functional support for environmental sensors (ie. CPU and motherboard temps) might be important for a system that is being run passively.

  77. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You meant they would "lose" a bit of performance. "Loose" is a completely different word.

  78. fit-pc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.fit-pc.com/web/

    Should do the trick.

  79. dislocation by chizor · · Score: 1

    do consider placing the computer you choose farther away. in many cases, putting it in the next room or attic or a cabinet will resolve this problem.

    --
    ... !
  80. Don't think like a consumer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want a "passively cooled mini-system"
    Costs are always a factor, but my advice is not to think like a tinkering consumer.
    Media machines need to be powerfull have mass storage, etc..
    Build a suitable machine and then extend all the perhiprials you need to the location, and locate the machine in the basement or a closet etc..
    There are many solutions to do this, and it's the proper 'real' way. On the top end there is Crestron/Extron and on the bottom there is MonoPrice.

  81. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by beelsebob · · Score: 1

    What it says to me is that the OP doesn't actually own a MacMini – after all, his assertion was that he was using a MacMini (a machine which doesn't have an optical drive) to rip his BluRay collection. Even earlier MacMinis never had BluRay drives.

    My bet is troll Article is troll.

  82. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by mcvos · · Score: 1

    Exactly. It's not that hard to build a PC with only a few slow, quiet fans. Silent PC Review helped me out a lot 3.5 years ago.
    I've got an Antec Solo case, Seasonic S380 (I think) PSU, passively cooled E8400 and HD3850, and I think a Nexus case fan. Two fans total (the PSU and the Nexus) do make some sound, but you only really hear it when the rest of the world is really, really quiet. And even then it's barely audible. If your game makes any kind of sound at all, you won't hear it.

    And I'm sure than you can improve on my setup.

  83. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by justforgetme · · Score: 1

    why not go the atom route? You buy an atom mobo so you will get cpu+gpu in a heat efficient package. put a Thermalright HR-02 or a Prolimatech Megahalems or the 2kg copper one from thermalright :-P and you are set to go. The atoms that come with the top line mobos atm will give you a doual core quad thread system that should be able to deal with any emulation you throw at it plus a decent desktop env.

    --
    -- no sig today
  84. Neo or FitPC2i by advid.net · · Score: 2

    Here are the fanless systems I have used :

    * Neo . The whole case is an aluminum radiator, with fins on two sides, and holes.
    It died after 4 years (DC input capacitor on mobo, I guess).

    * FitPC2i . The aluminum case is the radiator, with no fins, no holes (except for connectors).
    Very small. Still running fine after 1 year (in the dust).

    Both systems are silent - 0db - with solid state storage. Instead of SSD I use USB key and mmc on the FitPC2i.

    Various configurations use those fanless cases, you can find some more suited to your needs

  85. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

    1) Ask slashdot what fanless hardware to use for emulation
    2) Casually mention you previously tried a mini, but it was too loud
    3) ???
    4) PROFIT!

    Seriously though, what would be the point in trolling this? Most slashdotters wil get stuck in designing mini-itx system or suggest modded consoles for solving the problem, like the good little geeks they are. The Apple Defense Squad might hook on to the "mini was too loud" bit, but there are much more fun ways to troll those guys.

    As for the mini blu-ray thing, you have a point, i'm guessing external blu-ray drive?

    --
    People, what a bunch of bastards
  86. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just an intel fanboi pimping his wares. You cant get a i3 and h61 that cheap.

    Anyways the e350 is much better for graphics.. so it would prob play nicer with hd video and games.

    That depends. HD video should be equal (both have HW decoders, and the i3 HW encoder is probably superior), and some kinds of gaming have different demands than others. For example, TFA submitter wants to play games on emulators. Emulators tend to need tons of CPU power, and almost no GPU. Given the trends in a lot of recent emulators (use more CPU cycles for more accurate emulation) I'd rather pay the extra for an i3 if building a system to run them.

  87. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by robthebloke · · Score: 1

    I had a similar - if completely different problem. I got fed up trying to work with the constant whirr of my GPU/CPU fans coming from my desktop PC. After a bit of experimentation (replacing fans with quieter ones), I finally plumped for some of this stuff, and the results are pretty impressive. If you're an extreme overclocker it's probably not for you, but for everyone else it's a godsend!

  88. move the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    put it in the other room... just because it's connected to the tv doesn't mean it needs to be next to it.

  89. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.pricewatch.com/gallery/motherboard_combos/i3-2100

  90. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    The cheapest i3 chip is $100 and is 73W. The 35W chips are $135. You still dont have a motherboard.

    That was an E-350 + Motherboard for $90. Thats also passive cooling (silent) on this 18W combo. Are any of the i3's capable of running on passive?

    If you cant find emulator performance reviews for the E-350, look for people running the emulators on old 3.73ghz P4 boxes, because the E-350 is a bit faster than those.

    Intel literally has nothing in this class.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  91. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    The i3 H.264 decoder is definitely superior. Thats the one thing Intel did right with its GPU!

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  92. Fish Tanks full of mineral oil? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, I solved this problem with a longer video cable.
    There is no reason for the media computer and AV electronics to be on the shelf below the monitor. Just put them elsewhere.
    I'm fortunate enough to have a coat closit within a few feet of the wall mounted living room TV. I simply draped a longish HDMI cable through the wall/attic into the closet. Now all the components sit on wire shelves in the coat closet where I can't hear or see them. There is a small IR repeater near the TV with the emitter shining on the closet wall opposite the components so all the remotes work and a RF keyboard and mouse (Gyration) for the computer. It does not even need to be a closet. you could put everything in an end table cabinet or credenza. A bit of sound damping and ventilation would do the trick.

    The best part for me is that my coats are warm in winter when I pull them out of the closet.

  93. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    My home server/HTPC only has a fan in the PSU - and the only reason I haven't gone fanless is because I can't justify the cost for such a tiny noise savings, especially with so many spare PSUs lying around.

    It has an Intel E5500 (2.8 dual core) with a Xigmatek Loki cooler with no fan, using onboard video (good enough for non-gaming stuff, and it's energy-efficient).

    Now if I pegged both CPUs it would eventually overheat - in the BIOS I set it to hard-shutdown at 75C. To keep the temps under control I have a minutely cron script that checks the temps. Above 64C it limits the SpeedStep setting to 1.6Ghz (it can run pegged at 1.6 all day and never get too hot). Once the temps drop it opens the limits back up so it can run at 2.8Ghz.

    If both cores are pegged for an extended period (the only thing that ever caused this apart from 2 CPUburn threads is when I was slow-formatting 2 encrypted disks at once) it will cycle between 1.6 and 2.8Ghz and the temps will stay under 65C or so. It normally idles around 38-40C, but that's in a hot climate. Last time I put a Kill-A-Watt on it, it was drawing 40W with the two disks that are usually active spinning.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  94. My advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have alot of expierience in this matter and have a mac mini 2010 so I know what you are talking about. All I can say is you can passively cool the components but the case needs some airflow. Do not purchase anything with a fan smaller than 120mm. Recommended parts would include:

    Fractal Design R3 case (With the included fans turned down on the fan controller it is near silent like the mac mini. They make a smaller version if this is too big.)
    SSD for Boot/Application drive, WD Green for media drives.
    Seasonic X-400 Fanless Gold Power supply
    Thermalright HR-02 Cooler (Can passively cool a 130w CPU)
    Zotac GT 430 Zone Edition or any passively cooled 210 or 220 nvidia card. (The former is better if you have a modern receiver)
    Scythe low rpm fans if you decide on a different case. You can only hear them if you put your ear up to them.
    If you need a CPU Intel make low power Sandy Bridge CPU's that wont get very hot even at full load.

    Or you could just wait till HD PLex release their cases to market. I dont know if the i5 graphics will be enough for your needs though. Regardless check out Silent PC Review.

  95. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    You mean a 40mm fan? Wow that's small. I've only seen them in 1U rackmount servers and some HDD coolers, never on a CPU.

    A few years ago I was running my home server on ancient hardware - a 700Mhz P3. It had two 60mm fans stock but they were worn out, I just screwed a scrap 80mm fan right into the aluminum heatsink (that's how the stock fans went in as well - just screws dug into the heatsink fins). Worked great and even though the fan was running flat out all the time, it wasn't that loud as long as I kept it clean.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  96. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Unless that's a software feature the CPU won't step down its power use to prevent an overheat. I wrote a script for my server to do just that (I wrote about it here)

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  97. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Certain big 'ole desk or table-fans can run slowly enough to be silent, yet move a hell of a lot of air. You get a lot more mileage than you should by pointing a 2' wide desk fan at the back of a computer.

    No need, you can get 140mm or even 200mm PC fans these days.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  98. Simple, buy a bigger CPU and underclock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't that hard of a problem really.

    Buy a gaming grade high end CPU. Underclock the hell out of it. Should still out perform the entry level chips without nearly the same amount of heat. Remember that better processors are simply the most efficient ones from any yield.

    Now buy a big heat pipe heat sink for a gaming rig. Remove the fan on that.

    Now under-volt your RAM slightly and test for stability by running a break-in for a few days.

    Move the harddrive outside of the case. It will put out lots of heat you don't want getting in there.

  99. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    There are Celeron, and then Pentium, below the i3. Main difference is the graphics part, goes from HD to HD2000 to HD3000, which is a concern for games and emulation, though the CPU itself will be much better than Atom/E-350. Prices start at $56 at newegg.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  100. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by goarilla · · Score: 1

    they do, try running a cpu benchmark and see the performance drop when it starts throttling because of heat.

  101. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    What temp does this usually kick in at? I have a desktop widget that shows the current frequency setting, and at least up to 75-80C it will stay pegged at max. frequency.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  102. Long Cables by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    I assume someone has already pointed out that the mac mini's problem isn't active cooling but too small of fans (a mistake I"ve made before as well).

    What I'd suggest is longer cables. Specifically, I normally put my TV-connected computers in a different room and just run a USB cable and HDMI cable to them. If your cables can't reach, for $50 you can extend HDMI over 2 cat-6 cables. You can also get self-powered USB repeater cables which can let you extend USB out pretty far. Then your computer can be as big, loud, and ugly as you want. At your entertainment center all you have is a USB hub (with a USB sound card and bluetooth receiver) and the cable going to your TV.

    --
    I do security
  103. Your Best Option by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 1

    Your best option is an i3-2100T on a bare bones H61 motherboard. TDP for the i3-2100T is only 35 watts. It will run circles around Atom and AMD fusion solutions. The faster the cpu gets it's work done the faster it can get back into a low power sleep state. The i3 idles lower than Atom and every AMD chip. Put a good, large, low profile heatsink on the i3. You want one with a big, slow 120mm fan. Go with a low rpm 120mm yate loon fan for optimum quietness.

    --
    "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
  104. BSNES? Well there's your problem. by Born2bwire · · Score: 1

    BSNES would make a supercomputer beg for mercy. The author of the program even wrote an article entitled, "Why Perfect Hardware SNES Emulation Requires a 3GHz CPU." Just use SNES9X as it is pretty efficient and it doesn't suffer from some of the... errors... that the BSNES author harps on again and again in his defense of BSNES.

    http://www.tested.com/news/why-perfect-hardware-snes-emulation-requires-a-3ghz-cpu/2712/

  105. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 1

    CPU performance of the E-350 is a real dog. I was looking forward to putting one in my home server but when I saw performance/watt numbers I went i3 instead. I got an i3-2100 + motherboard for $150 at newegg after combo and rebate. That was months ago when i3's and H61 boards were more expensive. Totally worth the extra $60 IMHO. P4 performance in 2011 is no deal even at $90 for cpu and board.

    --
    "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
  106. PS3 by emuls · · Score: 0

    Try to find a slim PS3 that has 3.55 or earlier firmware. Runs snes, genesis, gba, nes games just fine.

  107. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 1

    Check out jonnyguru's reviews of the picoPSU's. Basically, they're shit. After reading them I'd never put a pico in any of my machines. Better to go with a lower wattage bronze or gold psu from a good company like seasonic. Get one with a big 120mm fan.

    --
    "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
  108. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Garganus · · Score: 1

    Mac Minis; Blu-Ray drives: no. USB ports: yes.
    just sayin'

  109. simple solution. by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    Put the machine with loud fans in the next room or a closet and use wireless controls plus an extra long hdmi cable.

  110. aopen dex4501 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been been running these for close to 3 years. Aopen DEX 4501 barebones, intel P8600 (fastest compatible chip with max 25 watts of heat), solid state harddrive. One is my security camera system. One is my desktop PC. Both run debian. The security system one gets way hotter. The MB failed a few months ago and nobody can get just the MB. You have to buy a whole new barebones. I re-worked the video processing to reduce the heat a little. The things work because they have big chucks of aluminum and copper. That's also why the barebones kit cost more. Anything that doesn't have a big chunk of something heavy (copper, aluminum, water) will either be very slow or have a fan on it. Basically, these are mid-range laptop components wrapped in big chucks of metal. I can hear most all electronics (low-quality cell phone charger, any fan, my aging LCD monitor), but this setup is silent. It's way easier than my previous water cooling setups. The other silent PC solution I've found that really works is HEAVY DRINKING. I've never notice electronic noise right before I pass out.
    Here's a pic:
    https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/bKSWk_5N-CDmBH56P6QnOSTfsuhFOFAYu-khprhJ3BY?feat=directlink

  111. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    You mean http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story9&reid=207 ?
    At the end of which he gives them a "Recommended" award, with grades between 7 and 8 out of 10 ?

    Indeed, this looks really really bad ~

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  112. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by akutz · · Score: 1

    I used the external LG Super MultiBlu drive in combination with makemkv and mkvtoolnix (for muxing the PSG subtitles back in).

    --
    -- -a
  113. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by akutz · · Score: 1
    --
    -- -a
  114. Re:I AM ALREADY TOO COOL !! by akutz · · Score: 1

    Too cool for school. You know it! :)

    --
    -- -a
  115. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bypass the circuits. Pull/cut the plugs to fans and wire in your own controller. Why fool w/ Apple's crap, when you can do it yourself?

  116. Get a Wii by meustrus · · Score: 1

    Why not get a Wii? There's no good reason why your emulation station has to be a "normal" computer. Besides, you won't have to worry about Dolphin emulation on a Wii, you can just use the built-in hardware. And please don't complain that "emulation" is code for "pirating" and so this solution won't work. Another benefit is that your Wii and the SD card you're going to need can't be more than $200; can you say that for your Mac Mini?

    Go to Wiibrew.org to find out how to install Homebrew Channel with Hackmii. There are plenty of methods, the best currently being Bannerbomb or Letterbomb (depending on your Wii version). Preinstall Homebrew Browser on the SD card and use it to get some nice stuff like SNEX9xGX and Wii64. If you never want to take the SD card out again you can install ftpii to use Filezilla as long as the Wii is connected to your home network. You can even play DVDs with WiiMC if the Wii is old enough (newer ones have DVD video instructions purposefully removed from the hardware).

    If you followed these instructions, then congratulations! You've got yourself a cheap, silent machine that can play Wii/Gamecube games natively and with their original controllers, as well as any emulated system like SNES or Nintendo 64 with any Wii supported controllers. Much better experience overall than trying to get a "normal" computer to run such a setup.

    --
    I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
  117. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh, but the E-350 won't run OS X 10.7, due to no AMD support for Lion yet, and at 10.6 one is stuck at 1024x768:
    http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=256686&view=findpost&p=1723598

  118. Raspberry Pi! (when its released ofc) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Raspberry Pi would be great for these kind of purposes, to bad it is not released yet

  119. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  120. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by sznupi · · Score: 1

    What does it matter in home server? (and most "average user" stuff) It will be idling virtually all the time anyway. Or, when in a modern browser ("average user" stuff), E-350 will have GPU acceleration. Similar with video, nicely offloaded in both cases. And in some rare game... the E-350 is probably at least as good in overall perf/Watt, and most likely higher performing.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  121. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

    It's one of these:
    http://www.logicsupply.com/products/epn_41els_02

    The system in question is a Mini ITX system, and the processor is a P8400, mobile penryn-based Core2 Duo. When I turn the system on, the fan spins up to about 5000-7000 RPM, and sounds a bit like a jet engine taking off, but once the system is booted it spins down to about 200-300rpm, is still slow enough under load that I can't hear it when I'm watching full-screen video. You can hear it when it's idle, but not from more than 2-3 feet away. Since that system is on 24/7 and rarely rebooted (it's an HTPC, but it's also my network fileserver), and is bolted to the back of a 42" TV, that really isn't a problem.

  122. Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The key to low noise fans is to get big ones that move air even at lower speeds"

    The key to low noise fans is not being close enough to them to hear. Build a beast and extend the perhiprials....