Slashdot Mirror


Big Brother Calls 'Shotgun' In Illinois

Reader kackle joins the army of free and accepted Slashdot submitters with this eyebrow-raising story: "I received a form letter from the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority saying that my first-generation 'IPASS' transponder needs to be replaced because the battery is old. I called them for clarification since the first-generation transponders obviously have user-replaceable batteries, and I wanted to keep this version because it beeps when a toll is paid. (This notifies drivers that their battery is still good, unlike the silent second-generation version, which informs them of a dead battery by sending a ticket in the mail.) The woman on the phone explained that they were replacing them just because the electronics are old. This uninformed answer made me research the device. I found that the manufacturer has recently filed a patent application for a new transponder that has a camera in it — a camera pointed inward at the occupants. How long before they make it illegal to cover that camera with tape?"

41 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. So don't cover it with tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take a picture of the inside of your car, shrink it down, and attach it to the camera. They'll be so confused about the driverless car that they won't worry about what laws you might be breaking.

    1. Re:So don't cover it with tape by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      Better yet, cover it in the blood of your enemies!

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:So don't cover it with tape by djdanlib · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't see how this is flamebait - it's a valid point.

      If you put a picture flush onto a camera lens, that's going to be too close for the camera to focus on the image, so there will be no detail - probably one giant blur. Also, it will block any light from entering the system, so there's nothing to reflect off the photo back into the lens.

      You can try it with your own eye or even your glasses, it works about the same. Look at your palm. Now put your palm right over your eye. Can't see anything, right?

      However, the idea has comedic merit. Perhaps one could find a way to make this work anyway... maybe mount it in the glovebox, with one of those electronic picture frames that are oh so popular on Black Friday, and play videos of in-car footage of accidents all day.

    3. Re:So don't cover it with tape by batquux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's the point, anyway? If the device is working, then the toll gets paid. If it's not, they aren't going to get an image from it.

    4. Re:So don't cover it with tape by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      the 'point' is when you have 'tolls' that get paid if you only have one passenger and tolls that you're exempt from if you're HOV.

      HOT lanes are being built in DC and exist in a number of other places. This device is tailor made for HOT lanes...and of course massive privacy invasion, but that's just icing on the cake I'm sure ;-)

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    5. Re:So don't cover it with tape by bennomatic · · Score: 2

      Ah, here's a subtle but distressing possibility:

      If you pass through more than one toll gate, they can determine your average speed between the toll gates, and if it's over the average posted limit, they can send you a ticket. If they have a picture of you driving at both check points, then they have proof it was you speeding.

      Further, if you're being investigated for some reason, your transponder may not be enough evidence ("Just because my car was parked outside that bank doesn't mean I was... I was nowhere *NEAR* that robbery!!"), getting pictures of you driving through toll gates at specific times may be enough to invalidate your alibi.

      It may sound like tin foil hats, but I think this is far more insidious than, say, the caching of cell tower data in iPhone/Android/Blackberry devices.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    6. Re:So don't cover it with tape by lgw · · Score: 2

      There's a stretch of highway near me in Silly Valley that's HOV or toll. Now that works great, lots of traffic in the lane, but if it gets too slow the toll drivers start to bail, keeping it fast.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:So don't cover it with tape by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      I fucking hate that kid >_<

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:So don't cover it with tape by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Ok then use your reprap to print a correction lens sand and polish it, then take a photo from that angle with the right lens view and convert it to a 1200 dpi transparency that you put in front of a diffuser that has a color corrected led light source to compensate for it.

      That does not sound as funny as taping a photo.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:So don't cover it with tape by grangerg · · Score: 2

      Instead of that (for reasons enumerated elsewhere), just get the lens dirty. A "well-placed" smudge makes the image all but useless for enforcement. Consider a "back-up camera" on a car after a good rain; same idea, different source of dirt. I bet if they implement a camera on the device, the lens will get dirty all the time, and rarely on purpose.

  2. Jolly. by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

    So now you won't even be able to enjoy a beer in the front seat without being caught on video.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  3. Are they even making the things yet? by jandrese · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From what I can tell, they have not manufactured a single device with a camera on it. Until they're actually in use somewhere, I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch. For all you know the camera equipped model is for specific edge cases like maybe charging cabs more if they have an occupant or something and won't be used 99% of the time.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Are they even making the things yet? by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

      I agree, it's not a technical marvel to put a small consumer available camera in something like a transponder. There might be uses for it outside the average driver. If they do go through with it... the backlash and work arounds would be endless. Sounds like poster is a bit paranoid of the government :) which is very smart, but don't overdo it by jumping the gun.

    2. Re:Are they even making the things yet? by jythie · · Score: 2

      I suspect some other motive too. Doing a quick bit of googling, it looks like in 1998 they recalled the first generation tags due to voltage problems causing silent failures, though I am not sure if those are the same 'first generation' units the OP is referring to.

    3. Re:Are they even making the things yet? by tchuladdiass · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the Illinois Tollway site:
      The Tollway recommends that these transponders be replaced for two important reasons:

              The older transponder model is no longer being manufactured and, therefore, is no longer certified by the manufacturer.
              Our testing has shown that the older transponder model does not perform as well as the new transponders on the new open road tolling system.

      The first point means that if the tollway were to update the receiver equipment on the roads, they are not guaranteed to work with the old transponders. And I can vouch for the second point personally -- many problems with the first generation of transponders.

      The other main problem with the first gen transponders, is that the battery looks like a regular AA battery, but it is actually a 3.6 volt Lithium battery. Users were replacing them with a regular AA, and therefore getting the under voltage condition.

    4. Re:Are they even making the things yet? by jythie · · Score: 2

      That sounds like a much more plausible reason then rolling out some new transponder with a camera in it that the manufacturer does not appear to actually make.

    5. Re:Are they even making the things yet? by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      It is the new slashdot. Same editorial standards as the Midnight Sun. I do not even get why this is a story?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  4. Re:Damn by Skreems · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah! On the bus, the only cameras recording me are the 3 or 4 little black domes mounted on the ceiling!

    Wait...

    --
    Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
    The Urban Hippie
  5. Easy fix, no? by ArrowBay · · Score: 2

    Seems like a little bit of black tape ought to fix the camera, no?

    And how long will it be before somebody hacks it to transmit pictures of hentai (NSFW) back to the Illinois traffic HQ?

    Or, more likely: how long before somebody hacks it to pick up the camera feed from unauthorized recievers?

    --
    Domains, shared and dedicated hosting, SSL certs, and more: ArrowBay.net
  6. Non-story by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The next abstract part:

    and an evaluation unit connected down-line of the camera that detects and counts the passengers of the vehicle in the image recording.

    Sounds like a company that makes toll devices, are patenting a toll device that can enforce HOV Tolls by detecting if you actually have more then one person in the vehicle . . . . imagine that.

    which informs them of a dead battery by sending a ticket in the mail.

    Nothing in that first page had *anything* to do with a battery, it had to do with their billing system and having invalid license plate data.

    This uninformed answer made me research the device.

    And come up with the completely wrong conclusion.

    Jesus christ I know /. isn't what it used to be, but seriously is this the Daily Mail now?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Non-story by HeckRuler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a toll device that can enforce HOV Tolls by detecting if you actually have more then one person in the vehicle . . . . imagine that.

      I am imagining it. And it's horrible. Think about this. As you drive down the road, they take a picture of you in your car using a camera in your car which is required to use the service. They send that to someone to check to see if you're breaking the rules.... That's a 1984 telescreen snooping on you.

      Now, of course, they only want to use it to enforce the commuter lanes. And as lame as it is, I'm going to invoke the slippery slope argument. If they can catch you for breaking one rule, you KNOW they're going to append the rules to bust drunks. Then video is going to be used as evidence in some horrible crash of a white male not paying attention as he slams into someone. It'll be contested. They'll win. And now you drive in a Panopticon.

      I'm all for people following the rules, but this is putting WAY too much trust in the toll road operators.

  7. Re:LOL .... by mr1911 · · Score: 2

    Rise up America, you're rapidly turning into the most apathetic people around when it comes to your rights. Which means the rest of us are completely fucked.

    It is funny to read you bashing America while admitting you are an even bigger pussy. If you want to fight, stand up and fight. If you want to stand behind and rant about it, put on a skirt and shake your pom-poms.

    --
    This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
    Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
  8. Worst slashdot article ever? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no camera in any ipass system nor any intention of doing so. Camera tech is ancient, this could have been implemented 10 years ago. I know this is the kind of manufactured controversy that gets ad impressions for slashdot, but please, there are real problems in the world, and this isn't one of them.

  9. Re:only a matter of degree by grimmjeeper · · Score: 2

    They photograph your license plate at all manual toll collection points too. The police can get those records just as easily. Dropping the pass in favor of dropping coins in the slot doesn't help.

  10. Re:Let's face it, by prgrmr · · Score: 2, Informative

    What's your problem with Kentucky?

  11. carpool discount, possible reason for the camera by joeaguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the NYC area there are many toll discount programs for call pools with ezpass. In order to get the discount, you must use a cash lane even though you have an ezpass, so an attendant can confirm you are driving with the required number of people for the discount. So you pay less, but you get stuck in traffic with all the people paying cash. If a transponder had an inward facing camera then it could provide a way of letting you use ezpass only lanes and still get the discounts.

    This application makes it no less freaky. I would only ever consider it if there were some technological privacy safeguard. For instance, a built in manually operated only door over the lens. When I approach a toll, I have to slide it open to allow the picture to be taken to get my discount. After the toll, I can slide it back closed.

    There are lots of people who keep their ezpass in the metal coated bag and only mount it when they are near a toll, and there are non-toll ezpass readers all over the place, with the stated goal of monitoring traffic flow. Wanting to pay tolls faster and get discounts should not mean having to submit to random and capricious tracking and a total loss of privacy when traveling.

  12. Re:One good thing about NY by jonnythan · · Score: 3, Informative

    This has never happened. They do not do this and the state has specifically said it will not.

  13. Re:carpool discount, possible reason for the camer by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I approach a toll, I have to slide it open to allow the camera to image the picture of a fully occupied car I hold in front of the lens to get my discount. After the toll, I can slide it back closed.

    FTFY.

    Still, an inward-viewing camera inside the car? Monitored by a State agency? The reason doesn't matter. It's still creepy and wrong.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  14. Re:LOL .... by readin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Tea Party was an attempt to rise up. So the corporate news organizations did everything they could to paint them as racists - and on pretty flimsy evidence. Now Herman Cain is one of the Tea Party favorites. The Tea Party has some clear goals - limit the power of government - follow the Constitution - cut government spending (and thus government control of the economy). What are the goals of these Wall Street demonstrators? If they really are trying to put limits on government what makes you think the corporate news orgs (who can afford lobbyists) will allow it?

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  15. Re:One good thing about NY by djdanlib · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ah, quite right, it appears. I had to ask again to make sure I got the story straight. The warnings they received were about speeding in the EZPass lane, not between the toll booths.

    I went and looked it up... http://www.snopes.com/autos/law/ezpass.asp

    And there is an image of the warning at http://www.nytrafficticket.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/17/speeding-in-the-ez-pass-lane/

    Carry on.

  16. No battery in I-PASS by clorkster · · Score: 2, Informative

    The old models only have a battery because they beep and some (perhaps all) have a display showing your I-PASS balance. The newer models are entirely sealed, and do not require a battery because they work by RFID chips. This post is a bit ridiculous.

    If you want the reasoning... go no farther than the I-PASS website (quoted below):

    I have one of the old display model transponders that beeps. Can I keep replacing the battery instead of swapping it out for a new transponder?

    These older model transponders need to be replaced to ensure customers continue to receive the benefits of I-PASS and avoid toll violations. The Tollway recommends that these transponders be replaced for two important reasons:

    The older transponder model is no longer being manufactured and, therefore, is no longer certified by the manufacturer. Our testing has shown that the older transponder model does not perform as well as the new transponders on the new open road tolling system."

  17. Re:LOL .... by Jibekn · · Score: 2

    You shouldn't follow the media blindly and research things yourself, Tea party members are not racists, nor ignorant. They are painted as such by the corporate controlled media outlets.

  18. Summary is WRONG by LanMan04 · · Score: 3, Informative

    (This notifies drivers that their battery is still good, unlike the silent second-generation version, which informs them of a dead battery by sending a ticket in the mail.)

    This is not correct when you sign up for an IPASS account, you give the toll authority your license plate numbers. If your vehicle goes through a toll and the IPASS unit doesn't work correctly, when the toll authority goes through the photos of supposed violators' plate numbers, yours will be cleared as a registered plate and they just deduct the toll as per usual. It shows up on your IPASS transaction list/invoice as a "Virtual Toll". I had a bunch of those on my statement from when I took the unit off of one car and put it on another for a week, and they didn't seem to care at all. Same regular toll price.

    The summary links for a forum post that says

    "Worse, the way they're sorting out motorcycles from cars is by doctoring the plate number in the system, so when they go to check your plate number, it won't come up even if it's linked to the account, and they assume that you're not an I-Pass customer even if you are."

    So that's some issue with motorcycles and the way their goofy system works, and this was in 2005.

    Now, since they can read your plate and determine if you're an IPASS user, and there is no penalty for not having an IPASS unit in your car if you're a registered user...why have IPASS units at all? I guess for when it's raining or the plate is obscured and they can't collect a toll by OCRing the plate?

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  19. Re:LOL .... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    That's not quite the way I remember it. Instead, I remember the Tea Party having some valid complaints, but then they were quickly co-opted by some greedy politicians like Palin and Bachmann. The Tea Partiers were so dumb and gullible that when these politicians said "we're one of you!" they believed it and adopted them as their spokespeople. After this, the TPers' reputations were ruined.

  20. Re:LOL .... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

    The Tea Party has some clear goals - limit the power of government - follow the Constitution - cut government spending (and thus government control of the economy).
    What are the goals of these Wall Street demonstrators?

    http://coupmedia.org/occupywallstreet/occupy-wall-street-official-demands-2009
    The web page is evolving and you have to essentially read it in reverse order to see the progress
    the order is (AFAICT):

    1: Declaration of the Occupation of New York City (11 demands)
    2: Below Is The Original List of Proposed Demands and Voting Links for #Global Revolution (17 demands)
    3 and Most Recent: LIST OF PROPOSED "DEMANDS FOR CONGRESS (8 demands)

    The page keeps changing, so you mileage may vary

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  21. Re:only a matter of degree by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Others here says that the tolls cost double if you pay using the manual method, and that they photograph your license plate anyway. So if you want privacy, the answer is simple: don't drive on a toll road!!! I'm sure there's other roads that you can drive on, although they won't be as quick or direct.

  22. Re:Just avoid toll ways by Quila · · Score: 2

    Tolls originally had a valid reason. The government would purchase a bond to fund the road building, and the tolls would pay off the bond. I have no problem with this, the users of the road pay for their road.

    The problem comes after the bond is paid off, the government never likes to give up a source of income that people may not notice. Now they only have to pay a fraction of the toll for road upkeep, and the rest is gravy.

    Or even better, instead of paying off the bond with the tolls, they used the money for whatever pet projects they wanted. In either case the toll just becomes another tax.

  23. Re:LOL .... by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 2

    Have you actually turned on a TV or read a newspaper in the last year or two?

    Palin and Bachmann associated themselves with the Tea Party movement. They give speech after speech invoking the Tea Party and they have very many Tea Party supporters.

    And you're trying to say this is "spun by the lib'rul media"? Amazing.

  24. Re:LOL .... by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 2

    Everyone wants freedom for themselves. Heck, even criminals want "freedom" to commit their crimes.

    The Tea Partiers seem to be all about getting as much freedom as possible for themselves, and taking away freedom from anyone who is different from them. And they will use Big Government to pass laws to take other's freedoms away. Have you asked a Tea Partier for their opinions on abortion lately? Medical marijuana? Gay marriage? Integrating (their own) religion with government?

  25. Re:Why not the easy way? by djdanlib · · Score: 2

    Well, here's why the EZPass system is currently a good idea:
    * Bypass the enormous lines at rush hour. Try going over the Tappan Zee at 5:30 PM with one, and you'll never want to give up your EZPass.
    * 10% discount on tolls when paid with EZPass adds up.
    * It has automatic credit card billing so you don't have to make sure you have change on hand for tolls.
    * You can put in the foil bag it comes with to prevent it being read.

    If they can just keep those benefits without adding additional tracking, it would be good. I like the way it is right now.

    The patent specified optional camera(s), acceleration sensors and satnav tracking... I'd like to keep it the way it is!!

  26. Re:Why not the easy way? by jc42 · · Score: 2

    It's not like the government mandated that a unique number be attached to each vehicle by which it could be tracked or anything...

    Dunno whether you were writing tongue-in-cheek, but we might point out explicitly that this has been done. Readers who aren't familiar with the topic might try googling "RFID in tires" and reading a few of the articles.

    So if you've bought a new car (or got new tires) in the US recently, your car can be tracked by RFID transceivers that you drive past. How much of this data is actually being collected doesn't seem to be much documented. There's an obvious problem in that it does require installing the RFID equipment throughout the road system, and it will probably be difficult to keep such a massive installation a secret for long. Today, you are probably mostly tracked this way when you pass a toll station on a major highway, or enter/exit parking lots of specific organizations that have decided to collect the data. But the installed base of RFID gadgetry on roads will probably slowly expand in the future.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.