Slashdot Mirror


China Says Its Internet Policies Are Open and Clear

itwbennett writes "Responding to a U.S. request to explain China's policies regarding blocking U.S. websites, China's foreign ministry said the country's Internet policies have been open and clear. 'The Chinese government encourages and actively supports the Internet's development and we also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China,' said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu. 'We welcome foreign companies to invest and develop here, and we will continue to foster an open policy market.' The request, filed under World Trade Organization rules, is an effort to understand the trade impact of such blocking after a number of U.S. businesses have made complaints about access to their websites in China."

181 comments

  1. They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 1

    Act first, apologize later is how that regime acts! They're pathetic.

    1. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I recall a South Park episode, I believe the Chinese forgot to make positive reference to our reproductive biology.

    2. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'd say their policies are very open and clear. "Disagree with us, you and your family die for the glory of the country".

      I didn't say they allowed open or clear access, but those policies sure are open and clear!

    3. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Where's Michael Kristopeit when we need him?
      We just need to channel him away from slashdot users to foreign affairs commentary.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    4. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by TechLA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would say that US is more pathetic. At least China keeps it within their own region. US takes it everywhere with ACTA, DMCA and actually making Verisign and ICANN remove domains for copyright infringement. China filters and doesn't affect other countries.

      Regardless, the summary here is again written in such a manner that it's only there to gain responses like "fuck China!". They *are* very open about their policies. US less so, where everything seems to be done secretly. ACTA has been and is being pushed secretly too. Chinese people also want that kind of controlling of the internet. They know you can't change everything at once or it will lead to even more larger problems. They're slowly changing, but you can't do it at once, and people understand it. It's funny you Americans promote the idea of democracy but then want to force people of other countries to do as you do. Why can't let the Chinese choose themselves?

    5. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      How come is the WTO getting involved? I bet someone told them China blocked their eBay store, or something like that. That is something that might really upset the WTO. And then China responded, knowing the exact words to soothe the capitalist organization, no, no, we're not blocking eBay stores, in fact you can come to China to start your own eBay store yourself, we'll even give you tax breaks if you want.

    6. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese government is a one-party system. A repressive regime that crushes dissent by force and by censorship - they do whatever they have to maintain a tight grip, and have done so for decades. If you don't believe me, try organizing a large-scale protest against the governemt and see how it goes.

      If you brainwash people for decades into believing that censorship is good for them, and then ask them if they like it, of course they're going to say that they do. That's not a legitimate defense for the government's policies.

    7. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Where's Michael Kristopeit when we need him?
      We just need to channel him away from slashdot users to foreign affairs commentary.

      Screw Micheal, we need Dr. Bob! Only by treating subluxations can we cure China!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by TechLA · · Score: 1

      Yeah, doesn't seem like you know anything about the history of China.

    9. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Just like the US gov removing .com and .net domains however they like. Just as unclear.

      At least the Chinese gov isn't being a hypocrite, something the US government is guilty of multiple times for decades.

    10. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by DurendalMac · · Score: 2

      China doesn't push for ACTA and such because they don't give a rat's ass if they're pirating software from the rest of the world. Hell, they practically depend on piracy, knockoffs, etc from the west. I also find it funny that they are open about these policies when TFS said "The Chinese government encourages and actively supports the Internet's development and we also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China", which is such outright bullshit that you wonder why they even bother spinning this shit anymore. You think it's due to China actually WANTING change on the human rights front? Are you kidding me? The party does it to remain in power. It's that simple. Yes, China needs to sort out its own problems, and yes, the US is far from perfect, but really, you're off the deep end here.

    11. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      "The Chinese government encourages and actively supports the Internet's development and we also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China"

      Right, because that's perfectly true and not hypocritical in the slightest.

    12. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by maugle · · Score: 1

      At least the Chinese gov isn't being a hypocrite

      Can you really say that with a straight face? They just said they protect the freedom of expression of their citizens! I don't think they've ever not cracked down on any expression that's critical of how things are being run.

    13. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese would first need to have democracy, before they can choose themselves. I believe you are confusing the wishes of the Chinese people at large with the policies of the unelected autocracy which forces it's will upon them.

    14. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd just want to point out that the US doesn't care if they are pirating software (Or hardware) from the rest of the world either.
      I've seen what happens when someone who isn't a US citizen tries to protect their IP rights in US court.
      When it comes to copyright China is just doing what everyone else already does. You only see the problem because they are sucessful.

    15. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Also, is hypocrisy somehow worse than repressive totalitarianism now? Given that you're right about the US's saying one thing and doing another, the shit we're doing is still comparatively damn minor compared to jailing people for protesting online.

      People always pull that out: "At least I'm not a hypocrite!" Well, some things are worse than hypocrisy, so that's not a "get out of responsibility for your actions, free" card.

      Note that "the shit we're doing is minor" is meant to be limited to online censorship activities - there's plenty of non-minor shit the U.S. is doing wrong.

    16. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making a common error. Freedom of "speech" in the US means that you can criticize the government. Criticizing companies etc. however is not protected. (Although many people think it is.) In China this is the other way around. Neither definition is very specific about this however, it's just implied based on actual laws that govern the protection. IMHO, you're off the deep here by suggesting that everything should be interpreted in the American way.

    17. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Um...no. I see people criticizing corporations all the damned time in the US. Furthermore, I don't see the US military rolling tanks over people who protest corporations.

    18. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Tiananmen square.

      Though Im guessing you cant read my response thanks to the thoughtful scrubbing my post recieved at the behest off all the chinese people.

    19. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that didn't take long. Up pops a cockroach to defend the hive.

      China. What a truly wretched country.

    20. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by andresa · · Score: 0

      And China didn't either. You're ignorant if you think they did. The tank driver DID NOT go over people. The man in the picture did not get pulled over by the tank.

    21. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      They block facebook and twitter, denying those companies access to advertising revenue (well, facebook at least) and game income (facebook again - i haven't a clue what twitters revenue model is). Since they are thereby protecting the Chinese companies that are doing the same thing (weibo, most notably) its a trade issue.

      A ban on imports from certain (or all) countries is a WTO violation, normally.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    22. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by g4b · · Score: 2

      that is something many people do not understand. china may not be perfect, and not very pleasing to the individual in our standards, but in its deepest roots they are not warmongers or tyrants either, and they do not want to "attack the world". The chinese people themselves might not be so dazzled by western wisdom anyway at the moment i think, and we might have to listen up sometimes to them, too..

      wake up. the western world is as free as china is. here you have to own money (best "partner" or "manager"), there you have to be a good chinese (best "partymember").

      the world does not change for the individual over the centuries.

      however, of course they mean with the freedom of expression their version of freedom of expression, which might not apply to every topic there is, but honestly, our freedom of expression is worth nothing if you only are allowed to have opinions, which nobody cares about anyway.

    23. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      ok so any 'regime' (democratic or otherwise) which "Acts first, apologizes later" is pathetic?

      Cos that applies to a lot of them including ones that some may hold in high esteem such as the USA for example.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    24. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      I would say that US is more pathetic. At least China keeps it within their own region. US takes it everywhere with ACTA, DMCA and actually making Verisign and ICANN remove domains for copyright infringement. China filters and doesn't affect other countries.

      Don't forget drone attacks. "Ooops sorry our drone blew up the people at that wedding reception."

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    25. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think that hypocrisy is a perfectly normal human frailty. Everyone is guilty of it to some extent, its not even worth criticising someone for.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    26. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Stargoat · · Score: 1
      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    27. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe Kim Jong-Il (NK, I know...) could use a chiropractor, it might help with his issues...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    28. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Sony is the worst corporation in the world!

      hmm, I think I'm still here, I haven't been shot in the street yet...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    29. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Who were probably shooting into the air and risking the lives of everyone for miles around...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    30. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      So, a website (on US property... .com is US run) breaking US laws, should be allowed to continue to run...in the US?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    31. Re:They mean "Open and *Fear*", right? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      There is nothing wrong with striving to an ideal even if you are unable to reach it yourself. That is the definition of hypocracy.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. Free and open internet in China? by ToiletBomber · · Score: 2

    Bullshit.

    1. Re:Free and open internet in China? by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ya, 99% chance it's BS. However, with nasty inflation hitting all the major cities in China (food now costs as much as here in the US), perhaps they're begging for foreign investment again. But that's purely conjecture on my part.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, word on the street in china is that Chinese banks are in a bad loan bubble that makes ours look like chump change. All of that massive growth they've been experiencing is basically funded on funny money. A fraud silently allowed by the PRC because anything less than 10% annual growth will have their regime kicked out on the wave of a revolution.

      You think you've seen debt? You haven't seen /shit/ until china's economy implodes.

    3. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I'm in Beijing right now and I would say that food here is about 1/15th of what it costs in the US.

    4. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      But how do wages compare? AFAIK wages in China tend to be less than wages in the US, so of course things will cost less. How do the costs of food compare relative to the average wage?

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    5. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      more open than in France, where you cannot discuss illegal actions by police anymore

    6. Re:Free and open internet in China? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I hear the story is much different in Shanghai by friends I know currently living their. They can't stop talking about. *shrug*.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Free and open internet in China? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Like the truth, China has three records of book keeping. What China actually has, what they're telling the public, and what everyone suspects they have. I tend to agree. Their entire system is built on cooking the books to epic proportions. And I can smell the burning half-way around the word.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that the French media reports it is still better than the Chinese government ordering state media to not talk about it and blacklisting/arresting those who do.

    9. Re:Free and open internet in China? by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Relatively recently China allowed the Yuan to float and it has gotten stronger since. 6.38 CNY to 1 USD from 6.82 when it was first allowed to float.. Last year they had a trade surplus with the U.S. of nearly $300 billion. We know this because we know what our deficit was.We know China owns 1.1 trillion in U.S. treasury bonds.

      I admit that I may have information bias so I'm interested in the reverse idea.

    10. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Ok, so because some country is more totalitarian than others it make it okay when one is only "slightly" totalitarian?

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    11. Re:Free and open internet in China? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Sure, we've all know they've been under-valuing their own currency in order to undercut the global market for products and services. Of course the Chinese citizens aren't too happy about it, but their government sure does. All that money flowing into the coffers only to be redistributed how they see politically fit (cronyism for state owned corporate investment).

      No, the real problem is the real estate market. That's a bubble just waiting to pop. It's huge! Much bigger than anything that happened in the US. Admittedly, I'm surprised it hasn't already popped. But I suppose ironically, the very government that caused the problem has the central authority to stop it as well. Well as they say. That's China.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      While not "okay", it's still worlds "better" then China. Your comparison is akin to comparison between Jack the Ripper and a truck driver who fell asleep behind the wheel killing a prostitute standing on the curb as a result.

    13. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Its not better at all. Once you let things slide its only a matter of time before one remorseless truck driver just does whatever the hell he wants, and starts sleeping whenever he feels like it, running over prostitutes since he keeps getting easy treatment and after all, "They are just prostitutes". Sociopaths will always win if you let them since they don't empathize nor understand what harm their actions can cause.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    14. Re:Free and open internet in China? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept

      And the fact that your post equates France with China is good evidence for that.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    15. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slippery slope fallacy.

    16. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Not really. High inflation is a RESULT of foreign investment and fixed exchange policy.

    17. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      'Float' is a misnomer here. They just relaxed controls on exchange rate a little, not nearly enough to make exchange rate reflect the real situation.

    18. Re:Free and open internet in China? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      However, with nasty inflation hitting all the major cities in China (food now costs as much as here in the US)

      Baloney, Im visiting over here right now (one of the 3 major cities), and food is about 1/6th as much as in the US. A 30 mile taxi ride was about $25. And a large KFC meal can be had for about 20 RMB-- about $3. Ive also heard how much some apartments cost in the area, and it is REALLY cheap when you compare with apartments in DC or NYC.

      So inflation there may be, but youre out of your mind if you think food costs anywhere near as much as the US. 1 USD still goes a really long way over here.

    19. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between the Yuan and the Reminbi?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    20. Re:Free and open internet in China? by petman · · Score: 1

      Renminbi is the name of the currency. Yuan is the unit of account.
      Illustration:
      Person 1: I'm broke. can you spare me some renminbi?
      Person 2: Sure, here's 500 yuan.

    21. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you went to China for a vacation, that's the wrong spot. Guatemala is cheaper, cleaner, and closer. A 30 mile bus ride (in the 1990s) was only 2.5Q/person ($0.32 USD). Exchange rate is over 7.5:1. A cinnamon fruit roll from a bakery can be had for around 1Q (2.5"x6"x6" in size - huge). It's possible to vacation there on under $10.00/day. Burger King in Antigua was around 30Q ($4 USD) for two people and it looked like a resort with a two-story atrium and live plants. Panajachel is the spot to stay - mountain lakefront with summer temps in the 70s.

    22. Re:Free and open internet in China? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      You are a nimrod. Nowhere did I equate one with the other.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    23. Re:Free and open internet in China? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Apparently I was a little soon in speaking.

      So things like Papa Johns and KFC are much closer to (and sometimes more than) US prices. But for food on the streets, you can still get a ton for $1.

      Others have commented that for some things prices are indeed higher, especially compared to a few years ago. Groceries tend to be cheaper, however.

      A lot of it probably has to do with the huge number of people without a lot of money who make their living selling things on the street; the bigger companies tend to charge higher prices.

  3. Its simple to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its very simple and clear:
    1) Say something bad about use and we throw you in a dark hole
    2) Piss us off in the process and we shoot you

    Done!

    1. Re:Its simple to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its very simple and clear:
      1) Say something bad about use and we throw you in a dark hole
      2) Piss us off in the process and we shoot you and harvest your organs.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Its simple to me by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Before an apologist comes in:
      This applies if you attempt to form a Tea Party or Occupy Wall Street gathering.

      This applies if you use the law against a multinational where you have overwhelming evidence that you will win.

      This applies if you look at a Party official the wrong way.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  4. What The ??? by zero.kalvin · · Score: 1

    This morning that crazy Italian MP and now this, what the fuck is going on today with the world ???

    1. Re:What The ??? by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Same thing that has been going on for the past 3000+ years.

      Now we have nukes, though.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    2. Re:What The ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please.
      People didn't have rights until 200 years ago. Therefore, governments abusing people's rights could not have gone on for 3000 years.

      Stop acting like this is a problem we can't solve because "it's always been this way and always will be". And if you're really too cynical to act, then at least don't discourage those who are willing to try and make things improve. Or maybe you're just shilling for the US government?

    3. Re:What The ??? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Just because governments didn't recognize them doesn't mean people didn't have them.

    4. Re:What The ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the Italian MP? Imagine I have been living under a rock for a few hours.

    5. Re:What The ??? by Count+Fenring · · Score: 2

      I mostly agree here, except for your "people didn't have rights until 200 years ago." The debate on what were rights of citizens goes back beyond classical times. Most societies in human history have concepts of rights and duties.

      That being said, the whole "we can't do anything, it's human nature" argument has always been a crock, and I'm really glad to see someone else fighting it.

  5. Best Part by mattventura · · Score: 1

    and we also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China

    I can't even come up with a response to this.

    1. Re:Best Part by ddxexex · · Score: 1

      and we also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China

      I can't even come up with a response to this.

      I'm pretty sure there's a quote that basically says that in Soviet Poland (?) There is freedom of speech, but in the US there is freedom after speech.

    2. Re:Best Part by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Sure you can - just remember to take deep breaths every so often, between bouts of furious laughter. It's all in the diaphragm.

    3. Re:Best Part by Megahard · · Score: 1

      and we also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China

      I can't even come up with a response to this.

      1984.

      --
      I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    4. Re:Best Part by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      I can. "Bullshit." An amazing phrase, I recommend you try it out sometime :)

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    5. Re:Best Part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and we also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China

      I can't even come up with a response to this.

      The Chinese citizens are free to express their adulation for the Party and the country. They are even free to express their non-committal views.

    6. Re:Best Part by fliptout · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the truth is that many Chinese citizens want this type of censorship to protect them. Most Chinese are conditioned to think that the harmony of the state takes precedence over all else. It follows that any major source of chaos needs to be stamped out.

      I doubt most slashdotters or even most Westerners realize this critical cultural difference. Like it or now, that is the type of thinking you are up against. Conventional wisdom in China says that change is slow, because there are so many people and a lot of cultural inertia.

      Change is coming to China, very slowly. All those Chinese with elite foreign education are returning to China, and those returning chafe at restricted internet access and other abridged privileges (unless they're in government).

      On another note, in Chinese intellectual circles a common discussion is how to manage the decline of the West. We (Westerners) need to become more sophisticated in how we spar with our friendly adversaries.

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    7. Re:Best Part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can:

      lolololololololololololololololololololololol

      China- you have never made me laugh so hard...

    8. Re:Best Part by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Oh, people are completely free to express themselves. As long as they express the right things.

    9. Re:Best Part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent up. It has to be the most succinct analysis of the basic human right of free speech ever expressed (no pun intended).

    10. Re:Best Part by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "but in the US there is freedom after speech."

      Unless you didn't have a state issued permit or said something negative about a business that cost them money (even if true). Or if an emotionally unstable did something emotionally unstable in response to your words.

    11. Re:Best Part by gutnor · · Score: 1
      Yes an No.

      They don't view censorship as we do, they accept it as a tool the government use for their well-being. Now, if you ask a Chinese if he thinks that protecting corrupt politicians, hiding abuse (economical or physical) of his friends, keeping him in poverty or lying to him about decisions that are killing him (like health issues) is part of his well-being, I'm sure you will hear a different tune. What the chinese elite sees when they go back in China is abuse of government power, however their solution is not to adopt the american system, but to remove the abuse from the Chinese one.

      The closest analogy is how European sees government compared to the americans. European accept, even expect big government taking care of loads of aspect that scream communism to any american. When there is a problem, they do not demonstrate for less government as in the US, they demonstrate for better/more government involvement.

    12. Re:Best Part by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      I bet that China, unlike the USA, doesn't have special caged and protected 'Free Speech Zones' where protesters can stand, out of harms way, and exercise their right to free speech.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    13. Re:Best Part by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "but in the US there is freedom after speech."

      Unless you didn't have a state issued permit or said something negative about a business that cost them money (even if true). Or if an emotionally unstable did something emotionally unstable in response to your words.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone

      theres your 'free speech' right there, in that cage designated for the purpose.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    14. Re:Best Part by x6060 · · Score: 1

      Nope, instead of having "Free Speech Zones" they just simply execute you if you try to protest...

    15. Re:Best Part by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      China's FSZ equivalent is in the form of a prison or extended house arrest. In the US, you aren't prevented from leaving the FSZ.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  6. Well, they ARE open and clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in that it's no secret if you engage in activities deemed to be subversive, you will disappear.

  7. Don't misread this. by dmomo · · Score: 1

    Don't be mistaken. It's the policy that is open, this says nothing about the Internet. The policy of censorship can openly the non-openness of the Internet.

  8. Its None Of Your Business Anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese people and government have made the decision that they do not have western style freedoms such as free speech.

    I say, so what? Why is it your concern? If you don't live or work in China, it doesn't affect you in any way shape or form. Why is their such much angst over something that doesn't concern you?

    I say, butt out and mind your own fucking business.

    1. Re:Its None Of Your Business Anyway by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Would you tell us your name?

    2. Re:Its None Of Your Business Anyway by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      The issue is that there's almost 1.5 billion of them. About 1/6 of entire planet's population. If they adapt a more sociologically efficient totalitarian system, they will outcompete us (as in West), significantly increasing the risk of us eventually switching to totalitarian system ourselves to be able to compete better.

  9. US Says... by Derosian · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news the United States claims it is still the land of the free.

    1. Re:US Says... by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

      What?! The land of the free? Whoever told you that is your eneMY! (c) RATM

    2. Re:US Says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And home of the brave.

  10. Liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's too much to say, about the f*cking censorship.

    Here is one I discovered recently - I cannot download Python, I can open python.org, but when heading to python.org/download, I always get a connection reset.

    1. Re:Liar by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they thought it was a euphemism for a trouser snake and were offended that non Chinese had what could be termed a python in their pants?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  11. Shouldn't this be in the idle section? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since we all know this is a lie...

  12. Freedom of Expression by macjn · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this "freedom of expression" includes all Chinese citizens' right and ability to comment on Tiananmen Square. Oh wait, you'd actually need to *know* about Tiananmen Square to express how you feel about it. Seems to me freedom of expression is hollow and meaningless without a the ability to freely get at any information you want. But that's me, I guess.

  13. John Steinbeck would like a word by jeko · · Score: 1

    The Chinese people and government have made the decision that they do not have western style freedoms such as free speech.

    Actually, the Chinese people demanded those Human -- not just "Western" -- rights in Tiananmen Square in 1989. The Government sent tanks against them. Best guesses are that at least 3,000 people were murdered.

    It concerns me. This is my business. All men are brothers. Those men were my brothers. Those three thousand martyrs in the cause of Freedom are "Americans" in the truest sense and finest traditions of the word. I stand ashamed that MY government has forgotten them and betrayed their sacrifice.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:John Steinbeck would like a word by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Why do you worry about 3.000 in China tens of years ago, but not millions dying in Africa so that West and China get their cheap oil and other natural resources? By your admission, all men are brothers, so surely the millions CURRENTLY dying would warrant thousands of times more attention at the very least?

    2. Re:John Steinbeck would like a word by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Africans are dying first and foremost because their governments are corrupt. They're the ones taking the resources from foreign aid for themselves. The influence of the West and China is at least slightly positive for the local economies, but that can't erase the fact that the nations are run by unscrupulous parasites.

      Unless you're willing to support wholesale 'regime change' across the continent, stop pretending you've got any moral cachet.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  14. What is the sound by blair1q · · Score: 0

    What is the sound of 1.33 billion people laughing their little yellow asses off?

  15. Open and Clear despotism by sethstorm · · Score: 1


    "Responding to a U.S. request to explain China's policies regarding blocking U.S. websites, China's foreign ministry said the country's Internet policies have been open and clear. '

    It's open and clear that if you speak up against the Chinese government, a Party member, or a western multinational, you will be imprisoned. If you persist, you will die, the family will be billed for the execution(whether by bullet or execution truck), with possible harvesting of organs.


    The Chinese government encourages and actively supports the Internet's development and we also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China,' said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu.

    Only if it doesnt interfere with Articles 54 and 55 of the
    PRC's Constitution. Then those technologies are used to bring people into compliance by force.


    'We welcome foreign companies to invest and develop here, and we will continue to foster an open policy market.'

    Only if they allow China's home market to copy the foreign technology or use it to more efficiently put down dissidents.

    (Before you wish to mod me into oblivion, consider the actions that China has done - instead of stating that I dont understand.)

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Open and Clear despotism by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      The Chinese are notoriously obvious liars when it comes to their government statements. They also put tend to be uncompromising in issues between themselves and another nation that would yield easy and beneficial compromises to both nations. Then they make threats they will never live up to. I don't know if its a cultural thing, but I have noticed Chinese students also cheat their asses off in classes to get ahead rather than honestly go to the professor and ask for help. I've met some decent and honest Chinese people through working in the University system as an RA, and I am not racist in the slightest even though I can see that most people will assume that from my response, but I have also seen them totally ignore their university peers that aren't Chinese and collaborate together to cheat on tests and copy homework on more than one occasion, and the groups of people were not the same. I am probably slightly bigoted in that I don't like the ways certain cultures handle things, but as far as I am concerned we are all the same species and have similar mental and physical capabilities across the board +/- evolutionary advantages each race has based on the environment their ancestors came from.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    2. Re:Open and Clear despotism by crutchy · · Score: 1

      all governments lie when it is in their interest, and the US government is by no means a beacon of honesty.

      the chinese government is also keeping the US from going bankrupt, so maybe they should be a little more appreciative.

      Re: "they make threats they will never live up to" ... i would look at this as being a good thing, as if china had the same foreign policy as the US we would have another world war due to "incompatibility" of US and Chinese policies

      if america loves freedom so much, perhaps they should honour the freedom of other nations to govern themselves however they see fit. if chinese people don't like the way they're governed, they will revolt. just because americans don't understand chinese culture doesn't give them the right to change it.

    3. Re:Open and Clear despotism by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      The Chinese are keeping us from going bankrupt, and meanwhile going bankrupt themselves. Not once did I say anything that your response even made sense for other than the "lying" part, and I do acknowledge politicians lie. Its just that the Chinese have absolutely no ability to make it seem like truth, then they threaten without weight and act like they are somehow superior to everyone else which is basically the same way a fucking egotistical moron with no higher brain function acts. Im not advocating change for another nation since I don't give a damn, nor did I even say anything related. Its not my responsibility to man-up and get killed so that a group of people won't even bother to fight for themselves. You have to start caring more about your own neighborhood when the shit hits the fan since there is no way to help others when your resources are being spread so thin that everyone will starve. In my post, I am advocating that if you come here you are expected to behave a certain way if you expect the same privileges as everyone else. You had the choice to come here, you could have stayed where you came from and dealt with the issues you face day to day however you see fit. I never once said that the US should get involved in other nation's business, however your examples I believe you are mentioning are quite poor. In order to maintain the standard of living self-entitled Americans who bitch, moan and "vote" are accustomed to in the US, we must secure "energy". This energy is oil and there is a whole hell of a lot of it located overseas in the areas we choose to intervene with. Communism, i.e. USSR, threatened our "energy" supply during the cold war because they were a major consumer of it, just like us. This is the motivation for crushing out communism and interfering. If you would like to live in a cottage with your grandparents, parents, siblings, and children, while your family and the majority of the US population starves then by all means, lets just forget oil even exists and is the easiest energy source to get and stop meddling in other oil producing nation's business. I suggest you read articles from this blog to gain some perspective before you spout drivel. http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    4. Re:Open and Clear despotism by radicalskeptic · · Score: 1

      "The Chinese are notoriously obvious liars when it comes to their government statements." It's not just the government, friend.

      It's not racist to point out that a culture has flaws. What I think a lot of Westerners don't understand about China is that it's not just like this government was created in a vacuum; the corruption, lying, cheating and general lack of ethical and moral scruples are facets of modern Chinese culture that also happen to manifest themselves in their government.

      --
      WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
    5. Re:Open and Clear despotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "act like they are somehow superior to everyone else which is basically the same way a fucking egotistical moron with no higher brain function acts"... ie an American.

      "Not once did I say anything that your response even made sense"... if you're an American I wouldn't expect it to (as above)

      "You have to start caring more about your own neighborhood when the shit hits the fan since there is no way to help others when your resources are being spread so thin that everyone will starve"... might want to inform the US congress of this concept (since many americans can't even access public healthcare)

      your hypocritical attitude doesn't offer you much credibility.

      justifying yourself by arguing that America is allowed go beat up the rest of the world over oil because the Russians did it (or whatever point you were trying to make) is typical of what the rest of the world has come to expect of Americans, and is why the rest of the world doesn't hold Americans with very high regard (including Chinese), so it doesn't give the rest of the world much incentive to follow the lead of the US or allow its companies free reign over telco infrastructure.

      the poster you're having a go at was quite plainly not addressing each and every item in your post. he/she was obviously putting forward his opinion, which he/she is free to do so. only Americans would attempt to belittle someone for expressing their freedom of speech in a way that doesn't agree.

    6. Re:Open and Clear despotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China will never go bankrupt as long as America is paying the interest on its loan. Even if America "defaults", it doesn't mean China won't hold America to its debt. The US is totally fucked and China is the new superpower. Deal with it.

  16. well what about there workers rights by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    There factories are like the very OLD US with no safety, have to pay for on site room and board, working off the clock, and other stuff.

    1. Re:well what about there workers rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there were as many americans fighting over jobs as there are in china, you can be sure that safety would take a back seat in the US as well

      i'm no expert at chinese culture, but any westerner claiming to be is a dick head. just because we see safe workplaces as important doesn't mean they do. getting hurt on the job might be an acceptable risk if it means they can get paid and feed their family.

      war is an interesting analogy: nowadays we see war as a horrible and atrocious thing, but in the early 20th century it was a natural part of life. many westerners wouldn't survive in places like somalia and bosnia because the cultural differences and differences in expectations are just too great.

      china is in a pretty fortunate position actually, because it is already learning how to deal with the problem of overpopulation that other nations are yet to face, and we might eventually come to realise that living under what we now call a "regime" could in fact be a necessary evil. it has nothing to do with human rights or censorship, but simply maintaining a civilised state and preventing total anarchy. remember that there might be 312 million people in the US, but there are 6 and a half BILLION people in China! the logistical challenges of trying to feed that many people alone just cannot be compared, let alone maintaining order.

      it should be America learning from China, not the other way around.

    2. Re:well what about there workers rights by crutchy · · Score: 1

      Re: "6 and a half BILLION"

      sorry, make that "1.3 BILLION"

      ie: china's population is 4 TIMES that of america

      i misread the world population off the wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population)
      comparison still stands to reason though
      cheers

  17. Can they be open about there high speed rail syste by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Can they be open about there high speed rail system?

    What about the full report on that high-speed train crash?

  18. And additionally... by spitzak · · Score: 1

    War is Peace,
    Freedom is Slavery!

  19. Their policies *are* open and clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Chinas' internet policies *are* open and clear! They are very open with their policies, and very clear with their policies!
    Eg: Its very clear that they will block any sites they deem detrimental to the communist party, the state, the army or anything else they deem inappropriate. They are quite open with this policy. They will tell anyone who asks, and will even inform people who didn't ask. Its their *internet* that isn't open or clear, but their *internet policies* are very open and clear. Call it semantics if you like, or even pedantic, but its true. I have every expectation that is exactly what they meant.

    1. Re:Their policies *are* open and clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I thought that too until I read the summary. They're not exactly protecting anyone's freedom of expression here.

  20. The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by sethstorm · · Score: 1


    Article 54. It is the duty of citizens of the People's Republic of China to safeguard the security, honour and interests of the motherland; they must not commit acts detrimental to the security, honour and interests of the motherland.

    Article 55. It is the sacred obligation of every citizen of the People's Republic of China to defend the motherland and resist aggression. It is the honourable duty of citizens of the People's Republic of China to perform military service and join the militia in accordance with the law.

    Imagine the Patriot Act on a massive dose of despotic steroids, as a Constitutional Amendment. That is Article

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that "article 55" is true for Finland and Switzerland. Two countries that you could argue to be far more "free" and "democratic" then US. We have universal conscription, and it's largely viewed as an honor to serve your country.
      Of course we have a history of having to defend our sovereignty with armed forces rather then using army to project interests of our country outside our borders.

      Article 54 on the other hand is present in pretty much any modern state. It's the law against treason, which in most Western states still carries very heavy penalties. Wording may be different, but meaning is exactly the same.

    2. Re:The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that the US used to require universal militia service as well. The Militia Act of 1792 required that all white men of military age keep serviceable rifles/muskets (it was literally illegal not to own a gun) and a certain minimum number of cartridges therefore and report to militia musters on a regular schedule.

      Sadly we as a society rapidly grew too lazy to continue this extremely healthy practice.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    3. Re:The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by Ltap · · Score: 1

      Or, alternatively, militias were made obsolete by modern professional armies and are now rather quaint. The time when a war could be fought with the weapons and combat experience any given citizen had is long past. The only purpose this would serve would be to give random people combat training, even ones who do not want it. As well, arguing that the USA needs much of a military for self-defense is laughable -- the USA's military is used almost entirely in other countries, with the exclusion of the National Guard. There is simply no need for a military in self-defense, which is why, for much of its history, the USA more or less had none other than its navy.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    4. Re:The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Not really, Article 54 goes way beyond what we have in the US. There's all sorts of things that I'm free to do in the US which would probably hurt the honor of America. And there's tons of things that corporate interests do which are detrimental to the interests and security of the homeland.

    5. Re:The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You're very wrong. Gaddafi's Libya used militia system, with very weak and useless central army and very powerful and well equipped militias under direct command of each tribal authority.

      They were so efficient that they were able to almost win a war even under massive bombardment from NATO, and it took several months of severe bombardment and very disadvantageous terrain (it's impossible to hide heavy weaponry from air power in the desert) for NATO bombing campaign and NATO still needed special forces on the ground before these militias started to lose the war.

      The amount of money spent on militias, vs total spent by NATO and NTC and relative success of militias in the early stages of the war shows just how cost-efficient militias really are.

    6. Re:The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and his country was a despotic shithole where he used those hired thugs to terrorize dissenters. The only reason he didn't have an organized military is that it would have been a competing power base that would have ousted him for being the tyrant he was.

    7. Re:The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Of course we have a history of having to defend our sovereignty with armed forces rather then using army to project interests of our country outside our borders."

      Because you're too weak to have any influence outside of your own borders. And of course, when you get invaded what else is there to do but to "resist" in futile effort.

      It always cracks me up when people use tiny little countries and their policies as an example of conducting politics for a large country like USA whose influence and responsibilities span half the globe.

      Yes, hurrah for your conscripts that they serve your country so proudly knowing well that they will never have to fight because the US (ahem, NATO) will always come around to do the real job and bail you out. Yea, everyone's an f**n hero when there is nothing to do.

    8. Re:The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you look beyond simple propaganda, you'll notice that his country, while a "shit hole" by Western standards was widely envied by all of its neighbors for being prosperous, free and democratic. Now, with the civil war going on, it's more pitied with its vast wealth and functional infrastructure all but destroyed.

      I'm not kidding. Look it up. Most of the power in the country wasn't even in Gaddafi's hands - it was in the hands of tribal councils who were largely autonomous down to the point of having their own laws and armies. Gaddafi's first rule was that you can call yourself whatever you want in Libya - so long as you're Libyan to the outsiders and you only go through Gaddafi's government for foreign contacts.

      The despotic part primarily concerned tribes that had longstanding feuds with tribes that were close to Gaddafi. After the civil war, it's highly unlikely to change - the only thing that will likely change is direction of despotism, where formerly oppressed will now become oppressors. What most people do not seem to realize is that Libya as a country is not uniform - it consists of ethnically localized and largely autonomous tribes that tend to have feuds with each other dating back centuries.

    9. Re:The Chinese Constitution prevents freedom by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Neither Finland nor Switzerland are in NATO. Swiss remained neutral in WW2, while finns were part of the axis, and were subjected to the most fierce land assault of entire world war 2, as well as one of the most one sided wars in history fought to a standstill in winter war.

      As it is now, Finland remains the only country in Europe to be a part of Molotov-Ribbentrop that retained its sovereignty both before and after WW2, in spite of Stalin sparing no effort, materiel or cost to annex it. And it's still neutral, not part of either former (and currently collapsed) Warsaw pact nor NATO. Considering that NATO's war plan during cold war a pre-emptive tactical nuclear bombardment of the country to deny USSR the usage of its infrastructure, its love for NATO is understandably low.

      So if you seriously think that someone in Finland or Switzerland thinks that US will do anything but stab the country in the back when a serious conflict occurs, you're talking out of your ass.

  21. More concise translation to follow: by kheldan · · Score: 3, Informative

    'The Chinese government encourages and actively supports the Internet's development and we also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China,'

    Translation: 'The Chinese government encourages and actively supports the Internet's development as a State-controlled and censored network and we also protect the State-monitored and scripted freedom of expression of citizens in China,'

    'We welcome foreign companies to invest and develop here, and we will continue to foster an open policy market.'

    Translation: 'We welcome foreign companies to invest and develop here as long as they conform to State-mandated censorship policies and anything else we care to dictate to them, and we will continue to foster the illusion of an open policy market.'


    ..and before any of you decide to moderate me down as a "Troll": Yes, I strongly dislike the Chinese government, and would sooner trust the word of some strung-out meth-head with the DT's than anything they would say -- and furthermore I think you're a fool if you think otherwise.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:More concise translation to follow: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% agree with you there...but only 87.5% agree with you if you said the same about the US, "and scripted" is something that takes creativity, planning, a single agenda the state agrees on...I just don't see that in the US government.

    2. Re:More concise translation to follow: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: we are looking for a lower cost solution to try and hack your systems

      or

      Translation: we have to many firewall rules and cant find the right rule to undo..

    3. Re:More concise translation to follow: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: 'We welcome foreign companies to invest and develop here as long as they conform to State-mandated censorship policies and anything else we care to dictate to them, and we will continue to foster the illusion of an open policy market.'

      Of course they want the companies to follow the law, every civilized country works like that. You may disagree with their censorship laws, but getting mad at them because they make people follow the law doesn't make sense.

    4. Re:More concise translation to follow: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Chinese isn't much better than the original translator. What it actually says is "We don't give a damn what you think, we're winning".

    5. Re:More concise translation to follow: by cheaphomemadeacid · · Score: 0

      ..and before any of you decide to moderate me down as a "Troll": Yes, I strongly dislike the Chinese government, and would sooner trust the word of some strung-out meth-head with the DT's than anything they would say -- and furthermore I think you're a fool if you think otherwise.

      now, if you viewed ALL governments like that maybe the world wouldb't be such a stinking pile of recession right now...

    6. Re:More concise translation to follow: by Frangible · · Score: 1

      I've got no love for the Red Chinese government, but every government on the planet censors the internet to some degree. Child porn? BRB, FBI. Copyright infringement? I've seen numerous Google notices my search results have been restricted due to that.

      In a lot of European countries a copy of Wolfenstein 3-D would get you jail time! (they have to be intolerant, or some people might become intolerant, which cannot be tolerated)

      Sure, I can read about Fabul Gong or whatever that dissident group is China seems to get all emo over all the time, but I couldn't care less about that anyway.

      I don't see why China gets so butthurt about Tibet either, fact is the Tibetan people were worse off in the harsh caste system before China came along. Their invasion of Tibet was unnecessarily brutal and harsh, but today your average Tibetan is quantifiably better off for it. These are minor, stupid things that China is censoring, that are not so important.

      Really, China's reply is actually more something along the lines of "lol wut? Thanks for the money!"

      And you know what? China's right. As long as we trip over ourselves to sell out our jobs and technologies to them so an elite few can make a little short-term profit, they can basically do whatever the hell they want. But that's not China's fault-- China has more than earned every dollar we've paid them. We were betrayed from within, and that is where the problem lies.

  22. Just a memorized excuse to apologize for China by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    That excuse has been replayed so many times that it has to be written down as an official excuse of the PRC.

    Likewise with China and the US. Since China hasnt left the US alone (Lenovo acquisition, CNOOC attempted acquisition, various attempts to buy influence with the Chamber of Commerce), attacks on China are fair game.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  23. Re:Just because governments didn't recognize them by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Nope.

    Whatever a government recognizes is what rights you get. All rights are "alienable". You 'deserve' nothing.

    It's only what the greater education of a government agrees upon is what you get for rights. Some folks up top found the awesome trifecta to crush us with because they dare us to be "against terrorism", "Against protecting children" and your choice of a third.

    Look at that Computer Black Box proposed. That's the attempt at a Grand Slam. Who knows what a Black Box records.

    I know now what 2012 is, it's the collision of all this social tech tension. The Mayans nailed it to the year.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  24. Inflation prices in my hometown by qwerty765 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Inflation not just hit all cities in china, but also villages too. From my visit to my hometown, I noticed that one kilogram of eggs, last year, was 4 yuans. Now it is 10 yuans. When my wife was in high school, an egg roll snack would cost 2.5 yuans. Now it is 6 yuans. I fully support Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu as she is looking out for the interests of Chinese citizens. I am proud of China for what it is - capitalistic, energetic, and full of opportunities.

    1. Re:Inflation prices in my hometown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's in American cultures to whine about everyone else. first they yell at China for taking away their jobs, now they yell at China for blocking US websites effectively preventing investment into China, which takes away demand for jobs in China.

      it's like that kind of bullshit parenting where the parents would simutaneously tell their child "why did you turn off the night light? are you trying to trip me on purpose?" and "why didn't you turn off the night lights? are you trying to waste my money on electricity purposely?"

    2. Re:Inflation prices in my hometown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inflation not just hit all cities in china, but also villages too. From my visit to my hometown, I noticed that one kilogram of eggs, last year, was 4 yuans. Now it is 10 yuans. When my wife was in high school, an egg roll snack would cost 2.5 yuans. Now it is 6 yuans. I fully support Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu as she is looking out for the interests of Chinese citizens. I am proud of China for what it is - capitalistic, energetic, and full of opportunities.

      Not to mention being the largest dictatorship in the world with a population who for some reason seems to think it is a good thing...

    3. Re:Inflation prices in my hometown by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Most Chinese view this current government as just another dynasty. In their view, it too shall pass. The intellectuals among the middle class want democracy. They want their voice to be heard. The poor just want to be left alone and live their simple life care free with all the blood, sweat, and tears that go along with it. As for the super rich, they mainly have ties to the CCP in some form or another. Either directly or indirectly through a state owned company.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Inflation prices in my hometown by qwerty765 · · Score: 1

      I've been with the poor, the rich, the super-rich, the middle-class, and the intellectuals in China. They talked about life, other people, and etcs. They hardly say anything about politics. Critics in the United States see China as a country or a single person because it is far from them. The people over there in China did not see it that way, they see low-level details such as having multiple cell phones, schools, your height, or whether the food taste great or bad. Whenever they see the government, they see low-level details such as police, traffic, marriage bureau, schools, road tolls, train stations, airports, city halls, and etcs.

      Most Chinese people don't see what you see.

    5. Re:Inflation prices in my hometown by qwerty765 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention being the largest dictatorship in the world with a population who for some reason seems to think it is a good thing...

      What dictatorship?

    6. Re:Inflation prices in my hometown by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Most Chinese don't see what we see because they're Chinese, and we're American (not all of Slashdot of course). It's our view of human nature in both the past and present that's fundamental to how we view humanity and the concepts of freedom and democracy. Without such views, you can live a normal life as do many Chinese. But life does become (in our view) a whole lot better when you hold public officials accountable for their actions. Such concepts make life more fair and just for the individual because we as a nation are now personally empowered to foster change. To the Chinese, they simple don't have this culture ingrained into them. It's not that they're not capable because they are. Taiwan is an example of mainland China fracturing at the political level and over a period of time they've developed a culture of freedom in much the same way as Hong Kong. But as for the mainland population, thousands of years of culture is pretty hard break. Although it is doable. Never forget that.

      As for the Chinese, well the one's I've spoken to in Shanghai do grumble about their government behind closed doors. But I wouldn't go so far to say it's any more or less than everyone else on Earth. Except for places like Libya and Egypt. But I digress.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Inflation prices in my hometown by qwerty765 · · Score: 1

      I've spoken to at least a hundred Chinese people and many more in many cities (Beijing, Shanghai, and etcs). Count me in as Chinese. You talked to me too.

      I'm aware of the culture and thousands of years of culture is indeed hard to break. It is partly what we are proud of and it is partly not what we like cause it can hold back progress in science and technology and society (we are very superstitious with funerals and numbers).

      Taiwan and Hong Kong went ahead with great wealth. Funny things were that there wasn't democracy in Hong Kong (British leaders were not elected by Hong Kong people) and authoritarianism governed while Taiwan grew up economically. It is in their genes and culture that helped them to reach high-level wealth. Indeed, greater degree of freedom exist in both of them today. China will be next to have high income per person.

      I agree that public officials should be held accountable for their actions. I'm just glad Wen Jiabao and Hu Jintao are fighting against corruption in government. Life was hard three decades ago. Life is easier today and I hope that life will be easier three decades later. What's wrong with grumbling about one's government? Don't we grumble about our government too?

  25. Off by population size by qwerty765 · · Score: 1

    What is the sound of 1.33 billion people laughing their little yellow asses off?

    Nope, it is 1.4 billion people laughing off. Perhaps you need to catch up with news fast.

  26. But of course ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The policies are open but not their Internets

  27. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does the Chinese government need to make internet access open for US companies? Did I miss the headline about China becoming another US state or is China still a sovereign nation free to make up its own policies?

    "America, fuck yeah! Coming again, to save the mother fucking day yeah!"

    1. Re:Why? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Why does the Chinese government need to make internet access open for US companies?

      Because China bitched and moaned until the WTO made them a member, being a member of the WTO means your bound by WTO rules.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      newsflash!

      US doesn't equal WTO

      WTO doesn't have jurisdication over the use of a sovereign nation's telecommunications infrastructure. it just promotes international trade. there are no rules giving access to foreign companies by default. agreements must be negotiated. From the WTO website: "The WTO does NOT tell governments what to do"

      http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/10mis_e/10m01_e.htm

      Just keep on bitching America

  28. It made an impression by jeko · · Score: 1

    I watched Tiananmen as it happened, so yes, it made an impression. As for the others, you'd see a radically different world if I were in charge. :-)

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:It made an impression by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Likely you would fall to the same vices, corruption or self-delusions as anyone else. It's easier to say you could make things better, then through your own ignorance fuck things up even worse. I sincerely doubt you are capable of understanding : economics, finance, engineering, mathematics, science, sociology, psychology, religion, law, and medicine all at once to a sufficient level that would make you a capable ruler. You need a severe reality check.. brother.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
  29. Open and Clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up is Down, Right is Left, Black is White.

    Notice any resemblance to the current administration...?

    1. Re:Open and Clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google search terms (nothing sensitive) being blocked. VPN ports being throttled (and or blocked.

      Nothing sensitive like the terms democracy, freedom, Tibet, Falun Gong ?

    2. Re:Open and Clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google search terms (nothing sensitive) being blocked. VPN ports being throttled (and or blocked.

      Nothing sensitive like the terms democracy, freedom, Tibet, Falun Gong ?

      I can actually understand why twitter and facebook are blocked here. In a country where you have an enormous divide between the large very low wage earning class (migrant workers) and the middle class causes a lot of unrest and without being able to control the spread of information it's very easy for a small group to organise large riots (look at what happened in london recently). Not all of these are strictly beneficial for the common good. Is a large riot going to help people to increase the standard of living? probably not. Unlike other single party systems run by other countries, China's government actually does work, does invest in infrastructure, education and is improving the standard of living year by year. Issues such as corruption is institutionalised, but I don't think there is any easy fix for that.

      Words like democracy and freedom have specific meanings but in practice does even the US have true democracy when large corporations are allowed to lobby and provide huge funds to presidential candidates? Do individuals really have that much power?

  30. Time to officially classify the thing by FyberOptic · · Score: 2

    This is part of the reason why the internet here in America needs to be officially declared as a utility, much like the telephone, so that companies and the government are unable to filter or censor it, or to give certain companies advantages over others in what travels across it.

    Seriously, the internet is in 75+% of homes by now. I bet when the telephone was considered a utility, it was still in far fewer homes than that. What's the difference?

    1. Re:Time to officially classify the thing by hedwards · · Score: 2

      The voters were still concerned with their own well being.

    2. Re:Time to officially classify the thing by Lockyy · · Score: 1

      erm... I think money is the difference, yeah, definitely the money. Specifically the quantity of money involved.

  31. Widget salesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Widget salesman says widgets are great.

  32. All the nations are guilty by msobkow · · Score: 2

    All the nations engage in censorship. It doesn't justify it, but what's the difference between:

    • China censoring dissent
    • US police forces attacking peaceful Occupy protestors expressing their constitutional right to be heard
    • The BBC tailoring their news content based on your access country
    • Global media suppression of the messages brought forth by the Occupy protestors, with claims that no one knows what they want
    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:All the nations are guilty by misosoup7 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, all countries censor, just to a different extend. China does it much more so and openly than most other nations out there.

      Of course blocking twitter and other social media that is not state controlled is a great idea for China. When you have to manage over 1.2 billion people, it's very very hard to make everyone happy. The US only has 300+ million and it's already hard for congress to agree on anything. Now if you make that 4 times as many people, it's even hard to agree. And as a single party state, you must make it as hard as possible for people to riot and try to brainwash them into being complacent. This leads to all sorts of Human Rights violations, but what kind you do if you don't want a social meltdown?

      A lot of people talk about "democracy" for China as if China can just jump to a multi-party system and everything will magically be better. However, reality doesn't work like that. Switching forms of government will always create large amounts of turmoil, both socially and economically. Socially because not everyone will be happy with the new form of government and the policies instituted. This will often lead to splitting of the state given a weak central government. Economically because businesses do not know what policies the new government will implement and the social turmoil. Business tend to be very conservative given economic uncertainty (you can see if very well currently in the US and Europe, businesses are not hiring and not spending on acquisitions).

    2. Re:All the nations are guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rights are fine as long as they're convenient to uphold. When it becomes inconvenient, rights are brushed aside. IMO this is a pattern that is repeated over and over again.

    3. Re:All the nations are guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that in the U.S. the peaceful Occupy protesters arent attacked by police -- it is the moron Occupy protesters who resort to violence, and should be met by police. The peaceful ones I can go walk over to and have coffee with, unlike in China with Falun Gong (can you even read this post in China now that I mentioned that?)

    4. Re:All the nations are guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is very clear what the Park parkers want, they want someone else to give them what that other person has earned because it is "fair". Lemmings.

    5. Re:All the nations are guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? you need someone to spell out the differences for you?

      "China censoring dissent"

      dessents land in jail for decades, sometime die

      "US police forces attacking peaceful Occupy protestors expressing their constitutional right to be heard"

      nothing happens to peaceful protesters, slap on the wrist and a night in jail for those less peaceful

      "The BBC tailoring their news content based on your access country"

      no deaths involved.

      anything else needs clarification?

    6. Re:All the nations are guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the nations engage in censorship. It doesn't justify it, but what's the difference between:

      • China censoring dissent
      • US police forces attacking peaceful Occupy protestors expressing their constitutional right to be heard
      • The BBC tailoring their news content based on your access country
      • Global media suppression of the messages brought forth by the Occupy protestors, with claims that no one knows what they want

      If you can't figure that out for yourself you should not ask the question

    7. Re:All the nations are guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that when the Chinese government suppresses dissent 99% of Slashdot readers (and media commentators) cheer them on and declare that China is the greatest country on earth and an unrivaled Utopia with no flaws to speak of, all the while repeating crude racist stereotypes about how Chinese people just aren't ready for freedom (because they're "different" from us *wink wink*).

      Then when the US government implements the exact same policies as the Chinese government, the Slashdot crowd complains.

      But, I mean, it's like, totally not subtle racism, or anything.

  33. Backwards speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't "protect" a damn thing.

    If you support free expression of the people, STOP FUCKING WITH THEIR INTERNET.

    Obviously if they said or posted something, THATS THEIR FREE EXPRESSION.

    Oh why are the slit eyed nations so focused on doublespeak and oppression. Pitiful.

    1. Re:Backwards speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming from someone who clearly understands how other cultures can be "different".

  34. Open and Clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the opposite of clear, even the ISPs have trouble telling the difference between a network outage and governmental interference. We quite often call them up to get them to help us identify what the issue is.

    The only reason I can see they are doing this subtle blocking is to make the local population believe that these foreign services are unreliable. When I first got here, it was common opinion that google docs was unreliable, slow and had many outages (something thats just not true). A short list of other ones: Amazon AWS - blocked in 20 minute segments several times a week. gmail being throttled so that it is excessively slow. gmail being blocked. Google search terms (nothing sensitive) being blocked. VPN ports being throttled (and or blocked). The only style of VPN that seems to reliably work here is OpenVPN running on port 80.

  35. .. he said, it being Chinese National Opposite Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course....

  36. Yes, Clear! by sam0737 · · Score: 1

    The policy has been very CLEAR that anything against the party are blocked.

  37. The Chinese Government have no morals or ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese goverment uses anyone and anything they want to their end. To do that, they have to be complete liars and thieves, which they are. They steal our technology, use little girls for political purposes by stealing them from their familes, and steal information from anyone to subjogate their population. There is absolutely nothing a Chinese politician can say that isn't a 100% absolute lie. Of course, then there is our politicians and the last two democratic presidents that were professional liars....

  38. Policy is; Access isn't by fatp · · Score: 1

    The policy is "all Internet access is censored, not open and not clear". This policy is open and clear.

  39. problems hit closer to home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think us Americans should be more concerned about what's happening with our great democratic allies such as the French, with random censorship that would make Chairman Mao proud, than to worried about the godless commies in China.

  40. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now perhaps my wife can go back to her country to visit her parents without getting picked up at the airport by uniformed men, or maybe her parents will be allowed to get a visa without first having to sign a document where they betray their personal beliefs.

    For the unwashed masses: they happen to practice Falun Gong.

  41. Hipocrits by waperboy · · Score: 1

    "We also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China" - they [Chinese authorities] continue to lie blatantly. They throw regime opponents in jail, and then proclaim they protect freedom of expression. They still don't see the ridicule of their own behavior.

  42. Where have I heard that before? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Open and Clear". Reminds me of the "Fair and Balanced" claim.

  43. Re:Can they be open about there high speed rail sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not so hard. The guy in charge initially was obsessed with speed. He created difference classes of trains with matching tracks. Each class operating at a different maximum speed. Under his 10+ year watch there were no major accidents with high speeds trains.

    However, his bosses were scared of his obsession for speed and had him replaced. (That's the official reason anyway - maybe someone just didn't like the guy or promised the job to their buddy.)

    The new guy then goes ahead to lower the speed of the trains. How? By combining different classes of trains on the same track! This means that slower trains need to transfer to a bypass, stop and wait, while a faster class passes. You can imagine how this makes scheduling much more complicated, and hence things go horribly wrong when the right train is not at the right place at the right moment due to a minor failure elsewhere.

    FYI the more recent crash in Shanghai, also mostly accident free for years, has also been placed under this new guys' watch.

  44. The truth had spoken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ask any Chinese person, they will all aggree with this statement (or experience some random connection problems).

  45. policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our internet policies are open and clear... about how closed and restricting they are.

  46. Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much all I have to say, since it's so damn to find a "Made in US" sticker now.

  47. Google Mail Censored in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess this explains why my employees have set up VPN access to Google Mail for Chinese relatives? It's open and clear that Google Mail doesn't work in China 50% of the time?

  48. They are bold, a flash from the past by Quila · · Score: 1

    "In China, we don't have software blocking Internet sites. Sometimes we have trouble accessing them. But that's a different problem." -- Yang Xiaokun, Chinese diplomat, at the 2006 Internet Governance Forum in Athens

    They'll lie right to your face and expect you to believe it. They're probably so used to their own people cowering in fear of calling out government lies they actually think we will too.

  49. Uh-huh... by Smerta · · Score: 1

    China: "We also protect the freedom of expression of citizens in China".

    Sure. And "The check's in the mail" and "I won't come in your mouth."

  50. STFU or we'll call your loans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did soon to be deadbeat losers start to tell the rich guys how to run their business.
    Make no mistake about it, the United States will NEVER be able to pay back $14^12 (and growing) without something drastic happening.

  51. Ran it through Google translate by sousoux · · Score: 1

    In Chinese: 'We welcome foreign companies to invest and develop here, and we will continue to foster an open policy market.'

    In English: 'We really want you to come here so that we can rip your IP off and then compete with you in your local markets with prices that are very low due to our feudal employment policies and government subsidies. In fact, Germany you are not moving enough production to China and we need you to because we haven't managed to spy on you much because your security is too good and we aren't smart enough to copy your stuff.'

  52. Absolutely true by ymenager · · Score: 1

    Yes, for once the chinese have made a very clear and true statement, without a doubt their internet policies are open and clear:

    "Whatever we don't like is banned"

    Can't get clearer or more open than that