Slashdot Mirror


Huge Tesla Coils Will Recreate Natural Lightning

jjp9999 writes "In order to study the nature of lighting, the team at Lightning on Demand (LOD) plans to build two, ten-story-tall Tesla coils—the largest ever—that will blast arcs of lightning hundreds of feet in length. LOD founder Greg Leyh said the project aims to reveal details on the initiation process of natural lightning, an area that remains a mystery, since smaller generated arcs have more trouble breaking through the air. It is believed that 'laboratory-scale electric arcs start to gain lightning-like abilities once they grow past about 200ft in length,' according to the LOD website, and so the team hopes to build Tesla coils large enough to do this. According to Leyh, 'Understanding how lightning forms [and grows] is the first step towards being able to control where lightning strikes or being able to suppress it completely in certain areas.'"

23 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Exciting! by Aerynvala · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for the SyFy movie based on the 'true story' :)

    --
    http://transformativeworks.org/
    1. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ironically yesterday there was a SyFy movie about the topic of a madman controlling the weather from his iPhone.

      There's a zap for that.

    2. Re:Exciting! by Macrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're now stuck with rubbish like Eureka.

      Eureka has been canceled.

      You are stuck with rubbish like Ghost Hunters.

    3. Re:Exciting! by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Informative

      the electromagnetic field between the phone and antenna tower would provide a path for the lightening

      To make the lightning actually hit the poor sod on the phone, you would need to ensure that the bridge generated by the field between the phone and tower was the path of leaast resistance for the lightning to follow. While it may create a path of (microscopically lower than the air) lower resistance, it would still need to become the optimal path - which is where it would fall down.

      You would have more luck trying to get the guy to play golf swinging metal sticks around, or better yet stand on top of a sand dune in the desert during a storm. In fact it would be much easier to try to rig the house of the person and call their landline (as long as it isn't a wireless phone, but one of the old fashioned curly cord types) and get the lightning to to id that way. There are many more documented cases where lightning has travelled along phone cables. This is because the resistance differential offered by a metal cable is in the order of many many magnitudes higher then the resistance differential offered by an EM field.

      It's like trying to divert a huge river with two options, one is a path in the sand drawn with your finger (That's the EM field) and the other option to divert is with a Panama sized canal (that's the metal phone cable). The lightning will try to pick the path of least resistance from the clouds to the ground, but the likelihood that the path just happens to be the EM field caused by the phone signal is so miniscule that it is almost not plausible. A wet tree, a telegraph pole, an overhead wire, a nearby hill or even a lightning rod would almost always provide a path of lower resistance.

      Not saying it isn't theoretically possible, but to be able to "set it up" to happen just at the right moment when a call is made to "kill" the person isn't realistically plausible.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    4. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At the risk of sounding like a dick, I have to say that's not even wrong. Lightning and em fields don't work that way.

      Well, since we're discussing SyFy Channel movies, I have to say that not a single one of them has ever been based on anything resembling science, science-fiction or reality. Really, you'd think they could at least consult a local college physics instructor before throwing this crap out there. Of course, the only difference between a SyFy Channel flick and a Roland Emmerich production is that he a. gets bigger name actors and b. spends more on special effects that ten year's worth of SyFy's movie budgets.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not saying it isn't theoretically possible, but to be able to "set it up" to happen just at the right moment when a call is made to "kill" the person isn't realistically plausible.

      Well, if you had a high-powered microwave beam capable of ionizing the air above the person you are trying to assassinate you might have better luck. Of course, from a practical standpoint you might as well just cook him with the thing and forget the lightning.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I will never forgive the SyFy channel for perverting the spelling of "Sci-Fi".

      Bonnie Hammer's successor stated that it was because they couldn't get copyright on "Sci-fi".

      Not to mention killing off Stargate... or any decent show for that matter. We're now stuck with rubbish like Eureka.

      They've had a history of that. Take Sliders for example. They tried very hard to kill it off because "it wasn't getting the numbers we wanted." Cast changes, writer changes ... but it was still popular. Ms. Hammer, in her infinite wisdom, ultimately decided that Sci-Fi couldn't afford to keep it in production because they'd committed to a season of "Next Wave", in her words "a guaranteed hit." Turned out to be a guaranteed flop, but by then Sliders was history.

      Maybe they've done some surveys and decided that their target audience should actually be a bunch of retards.

      Yes, considering that they've put on psychics, wrestling, and a number of other drain-bamaged shows in an effort to broaden their viewer base. Hey, dimbulbs ... what color is the sky in your world? John Edwards is not science fiction! There are plenty of other cable channels that cover that crap: I tuned in to their channel because they were offering something special. In the end, what they achieved was the alienation of the viewers who watched their programming because it was the SCIENCE-fiction channel!

      The only retards here are the drain-bamaged fools run that operation. The Sci-Fi Channel, back in its heyday with the likes of Sliders, Stargate and other great shows was about the only reason I bothered to have cable TV. Certainly wasn't for the lame selection of movies that most cable companies offer. Now they spend millions making some of the most incredibly bad movies (and I mean bad ... not "so bad they're good", they're just stupid) rather than pumping that capital into some more quality TV series.

      It's even more depressing when I see all the ex-Stargate actors and actresses showing up in SyFy's movies.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Exciting! by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 5, Funny

      So your plan is to turn yourself into the antenna that will send the lightning to your target. What could possibly go wrong?

  2. Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by CronoCloud · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by mkraft · · Score: 5, Funny

      Welcome to Slashdot. You must be new here.

  3. Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by kurthr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Greg is a great guy, giant tesla coils are cool, and I'd love to know more about lightning, but it seems like lots of properties of air (especially when it has water or other polarizable droplets/particles) are frequency dependent. So I'm not sure how that this is really going to act like the natural lightning that we're used to... Science? Ok, but not Natural Lightning Science.

  4. Atmosphere by dan_barrett · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully they're building this over a smallish castle + mad scientist lab with convenient skylights, along with the worlds largest knife switch

    1. Re:Atmosphere by mjwalshe · · Score: 4, Funny

      and an Igor - They know the secret of storing lightning in jars

  5. Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by mysidia · · Score: 4, Informative

    This can't be anywhere near civilization, as a Tesla coil can fry any electronics. It also can't be in some forest wilderness, as a Tesla coil can easily ignite trees. As they say, they're making something that's more and more lightning like, which is also more unsafe. So building a 10' Tesla coil is probably not the hard problem.... the hard problem is operating it Safely, and actually being able to take experimental observations.... because, this is all very dangerous.

    And also, will the FCC allow them to operate it, once they've built it?

    Considering spark gap transmitters have long been banned due to the spectrum-wide interference they cause; and the earliest such radio transmitters were tesla coils... and EMI in particular can be generated across the spectrum as well, resulting in disruptions to communications, with such a large tesla coil, and such a large arc, especially if they are attempting to use frequencies associated with wireless transmissions; I wonder what will the RFI fallout will be.

    ; and any horizontally long metallic structure can get induced currents and also become antennae for further RFI emissions. Yes, lightning does show up on the radio spectrum as well, but a powered up Tesla coil emits many arcs not spread out by time, a much bigger footprint than lightning....

    1. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by ustolemyname · · Score: 4, Informative

      So building a 10' Tesla coil is probably not the hard problem

      It's not 10'. It's 10 stories, so more like 100' Tesla coils. I would call that hard.

    2. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the radiated output from the coils will be quite low, owing to several factors:

      A) The operating frequency is *very* low, only 5200 Hz. This is actually *below* the frequency range the FCC controls.

      B) The wavelength (over 35 miles) is *very* long compared to the coil height, so it's radiation efficiency is almost zero.

      C) The two coils operate in opposite phase, so the electric fields will tend to cancel at a distance.

      Of greater concern will be the actual *acoustic* noise... which might be upwards of 10's of kilowatts.
      -Greg Leyh

  6. Things that make you go BOOM! by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm having horrible flashbacks to C&C: Red Alert.

    I'm having horrible flashbacks to C&C: Music Factory.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  7. This story is everywhere in the last two weeks by mark_reh · · Score: 5, Informative

    and it's wrong. Tesla coils produce high frequency -i.e AC- discharges at very high voltage and very low current. Lightning, on the other hand is a DC or very low frequency phenomenon combining extremely high voltages with extremely high currents. The currents are so high that they instantaneously heat the air and produce a loud boom- you may have heard it before- it's called thunder.

    If he really wanted to duplicate lightning he'd charge up some big capacitors to extremely high voltages and draw arcs between their terminals. THAT would be a better simulation of lightning than the output of any Tesla coil.

    Major props to the guy for marketing his idea. It's been picked up by every news agency from here to Mumbai. I'm sure he'll get the funding he needs to go through with the project.

  8. Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The very first communications of human origin that alien civilizations might receive will come from Nikola Tesla's attempt to broadcast electrical power through the air a little over a century ago. Provided they have sensitive and directional enough receivers, and can somehow filter out the radio noise from the Sun, that would mean that any civilization within a little over a hundred light years might already be trying to respond to us.

    A while back I asked on an astronomy newsgroup, how far away could a civilization with the level of technology that humanity presently has, detect our own radio signals?

    The sorrowful answer was that it was only three light years, which is a light year short of the distance to our nearest stellar neighbor, Alpha Centauri, which is also not likely to have any planets that could harbor life. The SETI researcher who responded also said that our strongest radio transmitters are the Distant Early Warning radars that the United States uses to watch for an incoming nuclear attack from the Soviets. That implies that we are only "communicating" with aliens who are in a generally northward direction relative to the earth.

    I then asked how SETI hoped to hear from any aliens at all. His answer was that we expect that more advanced civilizations would transmit far more powerful radio signals. That doesn't seem right to me, unless they are specifically trying to communicate with other civilizations, as I would expect more advanced technology to result in lower radio power, rather than more, both to conserve energy and to enable more devices to use the available spectrum.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  9. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tesla's bad assery far exceeds the Tunguska myth. He figured out how to turn our great big ball of iron surrounded by an electrostatic atmosphere into a giant fucking power source. He knew burning fossil fuels was a bad idea 100 years ago before anyone ever conceived it would be an issue.

    If we use fuel to get our power, we are living on our capital and exhausting it rapidly. This method is barbarous and wantonly wasteful and will have to be stopped in the interest of coming generations.

    He was trying to hand us a solution to problems we didn't even have yet and give us technology not unlike the telecommunications we have today 100 years ago! He even told us how to fucking do it when he filed a patent on the process.

    But hey, maybe these guys are on to his work and just needed a cover story to get funding for their own Wardenclyffe tower. One can only hope...

  10. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by datavirtue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a book that is comprised of transcripts from lawsuits that Tesla was involved in where he used the court proceedings to document some of his tech. He was dealing with some very powerful industrialists, people who basically owned the world as everyone knew it. I have seen documentaries where it is demonstrated that Edison was worshiped by Presidents and important people the world over where Tesla isn't even mentioned--even in passing. When I first learned of Tesla I realized that I never questioned a lot of the things I take for granted and it wasn't well known who invented or developed them, now I know.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  11. Tesla was 100 years ahead of his time by nido · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the neater things I've read about is how Lockheed Martin went back to Tesla's technology to make a communication system for miners:

    A magnetic-wave generator developed by Nikola Tesla over 100 years ago as a wireless communication device has been updated by engineers at Lockheed Martin to save lives after mining disasters.

    Magnetic waves -- unlike radio waves -- can penetrate hundreds of metres of solid rock. MagneLink, the fridge-sized device developed by Lockheed Martin, allows for phone calls and text messaging. It was tested this year at a mine in Virginia, and production is expected before 2011.

    -Nikola Tesla’s patent redux (very short)

    Heres another link: Tapping Tesla to Save Trapped Miners

    If Tesla was 100 years ahead of everyone else, that means we should be plugging our devices into the Aether ("The wheelwork of nature") soon.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  12. Siberian Institute for Power Engineering? Really? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy shit, if I were a supervillain, that's exactly the sort of institute that I'd want to run. They probably say: "What happens in Siberia stays in Siberia, except for the bits that were accidentally atomized. Those are floating around somewhere in the upper atmosphere." Also, they probably say: "In Siberia, a couple of people can hear you scream, but nobody really gives a fuck."