Slashdot Mirror


Huge Tesla Coils Will Recreate Natural Lightning

jjp9999 writes "In order to study the nature of lighting, the team at Lightning on Demand (LOD) plans to build two, ten-story-tall Tesla coils—the largest ever—that will blast arcs of lightning hundreds of feet in length. LOD founder Greg Leyh said the project aims to reveal details on the initiation process of natural lightning, an area that remains a mystery, since smaller generated arcs have more trouble breaking through the air. It is believed that 'laboratory-scale electric arcs start to gain lightning-like abilities once they grow past about 200ft in length,' according to the LOD website, and so the team hopes to build Tesla coils large enough to do this. According to Leyh, 'Understanding how lightning forms [and grows] is the first step towards being able to control where lightning strikes or being able to suppress it completely in certain areas.'"

56 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Exciting! by Aerynvala · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for the SyFy movie based on the 'true story' :)

    --
    http://transformativeworks.org/
    1. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ironically yesterday there was a SyFy movie about the topic of a madman controlling the weather from his iPhone.

      There's a zap for that.

    2. Re:Exciting! by HateBreeder · · Score: 3, Funny

      I will never forgive the SyFy channel for perverting the spelling of "Sci-Fi".
      Not to mention killing off Stargate... or any decent show for that matter. We're now stuck with rubbish like Eureka.
      Maybe they've done some surveys and decided that their target audience should actually be a bunch of retards.

      --
      Sigs are for the weak.
    3. Re:Exciting! by Macrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're now stuck with rubbish like Eureka.

      Eureka has been canceled.

      You are stuck with rubbish like Ghost Hunters.

    4. Re:Exciting! by germansausage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At the risk of sounding like a dick, I have to say that's not even wrong. Lightning and em fields don't work that way.

    5. Re:Exciting! by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Informative

      the electromagnetic field between the phone and antenna tower would provide a path for the lightening

      To make the lightning actually hit the poor sod on the phone, you would need to ensure that the bridge generated by the field between the phone and tower was the path of leaast resistance for the lightning to follow. While it may create a path of (microscopically lower than the air) lower resistance, it would still need to become the optimal path - which is where it would fall down.

      You would have more luck trying to get the guy to play golf swinging metal sticks around, or better yet stand on top of a sand dune in the desert during a storm. In fact it would be much easier to try to rig the house of the person and call their landline (as long as it isn't a wireless phone, but one of the old fashioned curly cord types) and get the lightning to to id that way. There are many more documented cases where lightning has travelled along phone cables. This is because the resistance differential offered by a metal cable is in the order of many many magnitudes higher then the resistance differential offered by an EM field.

      It's like trying to divert a huge river with two options, one is a path in the sand drawn with your finger (That's the EM field) and the other option to divert is with a Panama sized canal (that's the metal phone cable). The lightning will try to pick the path of least resistance from the clouds to the ground, but the likelihood that the path just happens to be the EM field caused by the phone signal is so miniscule that it is almost not plausible. A wet tree, a telegraph pole, an overhead wire, a nearby hill or even a lightning rod would almost always provide a path of lower resistance.

      Not saying it isn't theoretically possible, but to be able to "set it up" to happen just at the right moment when a call is made to "kill" the person isn't realistically plausible.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    6. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not irony. That's just a coincidence.

      It's not much of a coincidence; nothing coincided. Technically it's an example of 'something slightly relevant to this conversation'.

    7. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At the risk of sounding like a dick, I have to say that's not even wrong. Lightning and em fields don't work that way.

      Well, since we're discussing SyFy Channel movies, I have to say that not a single one of them has ever been based on anything resembling science, science-fiction or reality. Really, you'd think they could at least consult a local college physics instructor before throwing this crap out there. Of course, the only difference between a SyFy Channel flick and a Roland Emmerich production is that he a. gets bigger name actors and b. spends more on special effects that ten year's worth of SyFy's movie budgets.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    8. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not saying it isn't theoretically possible, but to be able to "set it up" to happen just at the right moment when a call is made to "kill" the person isn't realistically plausible.

      Well, if you had a high-powered microwave beam capable of ionizing the air above the person you are trying to assassinate you might have better luck. Of course, from a practical standpoint you might as well just cook him with the thing and forget the lightning.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Exciting! by Fluffeh · · Score: 2

      Of course, from a practical standpoint you might as well just cook him with the thing and forget the lightning.

      Yup, it could in theory be done, but by the time you address all the things that you would need to, there would be a multitude of other ways to achieve the same purpose that were more reliable, easier and more believable to a reader of a science fiction story.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    10. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I will never forgive the SyFy channel for perverting the spelling of "Sci-Fi".

      Bonnie Hammer's successor stated that it was because they couldn't get copyright on "Sci-fi".

      Not to mention killing off Stargate... or any decent show for that matter. We're now stuck with rubbish like Eureka.

      They've had a history of that. Take Sliders for example. They tried very hard to kill it off because "it wasn't getting the numbers we wanted." Cast changes, writer changes ... but it was still popular. Ms. Hammer, in her infinite wisdom, ultimately decided that Sci-Fi couldn't afford to keep it in production because they'd committed to a season of "Next Wave", in her words "a guaranteed hit." Turned out to be a guaranteed flop, but by then Sliders was history.

      Maybe they've done some surveys and decided that their target audience should actually be a bunch of retards.

      Yes, considering that they've put on psychics, wrestling, and a number of other drain-bamaged shows in an effort to broaden their viewer base. Hey, dimbulbs ... what color is the sky in your world? John Edwards is not science fiction! There are plenty of other cable channels that cover that crap: I tuned in to their channel because they were offering something special. In the end, what they achieved was the alienation of the viewers who watched their programming because it was the SCIENCE-fiction channel!

      The only retards here are the drain-bamaged fools run that operation. The Sci-Fi Channel, back in its heyday with the likes of Sliders, Stargate and other great shows was about the only reason I bothered to have cable TV. Certainly wasn't for the lame selection of movies that most cable companies offer. Now they spend millions making some of the most incredibly bad movies (and I mean bad ... not "so bad they're good", they're just stupid) rather than pumping that capital into some more quality TV series.

      It's even more depressing when I see all the ex-Stargate actors and actresses showing up in SyFy's movies.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    11. Re:Exciting! by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      But lightning would be a very unlikely murder weapon, thus the appeal.

    12. Re:Exciting! by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 5, Funny

      So your plan is to turn yourself into the antenna that will send the lightning to your target. What could possibly go wrong?

    13. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      there needs to be a +1 uuuggggghhhh.

      You can get a 100% refund of the cover charge at the door.

    14. Re:Exciting! by Fluffeh · · Score: 2

      along with the cloud seeding blimp to encourage the lightning to start at the right time

      Actually, cloud seeding is likely to supress lightning rather than create it mainly by supressing hail that can cause intracloud lightning.

      There are currently three known ways to trigger lightning which might be plausible.
      1) Launch a rocket - Some rockets unspool wire as they launch which acts as a lovely lightning rod back to the ground - however somewhat obvious if this is supposed to be a clean as a whistle murder though.
      2) Have a volcano erupt - Volcanos often form lightning storms near their volcanic plume. This stunning picture was captured in 1994 at the Rinjani eruption.
      3) Have a super powered laser creating the ionized beam into the clouds - however even the military who have been trying this since the 1970's have only managed to notice a slight increase small local discharges within the cloud itself, rather than a cloud to ground strike.

      Whatever way you look at it, it's a really really long shot.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    15. Re:Exciting! by bryan1945 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought "Sharktapus" was a documentary!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    16. Re:Exciting! by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I think the whole downfall started with Bonnie. Wasn't she the one that kicked Bab5 off to TNT (or somebody?)?
      There was also another really bizarre reason given back then why they were changing the name. Something about bringing in non-geeks while trying to keep the geeks and blah blah... The mental backflips they were doing on that one was amazing.
      Once SyFy put wrestling on, I gave up. I watch Eureka, but only because I find it funny. The science may be bad, but I prefer a bad science joke than the usual sitcom jokes about people getting into "wacky situations."
      For the ex-show actors, ever notice how they have maybe 10 minutes of screen time? 3 days work for a paycheck isn't a bad deal.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    17. Re:Exciting! by Phoghat · · Score: 2
      James Bond:" You expect me to tell you my secrets ?"

      Goldfinger: "No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die".

      And, as usual, he doesn't. Just shoot him already.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  2. Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by CronoCloud · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by mkraft · · Score: 5, Funny

      Welcome to Slashdot. You must be new here.

  3. Most important question by Halo1 · · Score: 2

    Will they also play music on them?

    --
    Donate free food here
  4. Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by kurthr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Greg is a great guy, giant tesla coils are cool, and I'd love to know more about lightning, but it seems like lots of properties of air (especially when it has water or other polarizable droplets/particles) are frequency dependent. So I'm not sure how that this is really going to act like the natural lightning that we're used to... Science? Ok, but not Natural Lightning Science.

    1. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm betting he's gonna blow out all his own equipment the first time he turns it on.

      FTFA:

      Tesla coils have an uncanny ability to short out modern electronics—anything from erasing voice mails to blowing out computer screens. To guard against this, the LOD teams usually places “nearby electronics in shielded enclosures,” or they run the coils “far, far away,” Leyh said.

      I know. I must be new here, I read TFA. After a while here, you don't read TFA. Later on still, you don't even read TFS.

      On the absolute existential plain of eternal bliss, you don't even read the title, either. You just post.

      However, I agree with your comment . . . which is why I want to be there when he fires that critter up, and all the ensuing pandemonium rages. Maybe it'll create a Black Hole, and the Higgs Boson will pop out of it. CERN really let us all down there, with the end of the universe, and an angry God appearing looking for His Particle.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      You don't need to read the subjects either. Just locate the nearest comment modded to +5 and post your own as a reply to that. If you say something about 1984, it's practically always considered on-topic hereabouts.

    3. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hi Kurt,

      Since we're attempting to trigger a relativistic runaway breakdown, all that matters is that the formation time is short compared to one period of AC.

      The predicted formation time for a relativistic avalanche is 10's of microseconds, and the 10-story coilforms resonate at a very low frequency (about 5200Hz) so for all practical purposes the slow-moving coil output will appear as high voltage DC during the avalanche.

      -Greg Leyh

    4. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by rgbatduke · · Score: 2

      I'm not completely convinced of this, because the state of the atoms in the surrounding space will be strongly perturbed by the time-varying induced voltages, not just the static coulomb voltage. I would be very surprised if the "lightning" coming off of tesla coils is structured like real lightning precisely at the avalanche for this reason. The initiation of dielectric breakdown in a gradually building radial static field seems as though it would be very different from dielectric breakdown through atoms that have more or less been kicked in the ass sideways by an EMP. Tesla coils RADIATE a large amount of transverse energy throughout their time-dependent cycle, and this energy clearly alters the velocity distribution of nearby atoms to nonthermal "instantly" (nonthermal in the specific sense that they aren't even locally describable by a "temperature") and if they were (averaging) they would be "hot", preheated by eddy currents BEFORE the peak voltage and discharge occur. DC charged clouds OTOH one would expect would heat the surrounding air BY the incipient dielectric discharge, quite possibly over a timescale of seconds as the voltages gradually build and increase the electrostatic wind (nearby air atoms that pick up charge and are strongly repelled, banging through neutral atoms being weakly attracted the other way by straight-up induced dipole forces). In this case one would expect at least sufficient time for local equilibrium to be achieved, enough so that one could speak of the nucleation and growth of the distribution of higher temperatures in the surrounding air, maybe?

      So, I'm curious -- given that you are going to be spending big science money on two 200 foot tesla coils (why two? Why not one and a large conducting sheet so that it sees its own mirror if it is really "DC" enough to ignore eddy currents?) why not build a single giant vandegraff, one with a primary ball made out of e.g. a 10+ meter radius mylar balloon floated over a very large conducting floor so that it sees its own image charge instead of a second, equally expensive primary? Rule of thumb 30kV * R(cm) = V_discharge suggests that a 10 meter radius sphere should arc at 30 MV in air, and it should also have a very large capacitance (so that the energy in an arc discharge should be quite large). An inflated mylar sphere should be cheap enough to be a consumable item, if it comes to that, and the lightning produced by such a device would be very close to REAL lightning in its form and structure because the mylar sphere is actually a model for a real cloud. Indeed, one could use blimp-shaped or irregularly shaped objects to further model the irregular shapes of clouds that increase the capacitance while decreasing the peak breakdown voltage.

      Not that I don't appreciate the desire to create really big sparks, mind you, and tesla coils do make much more impressive ongoing displays... I would just argue that it is reasonable to doubt that the answers you get from a tesla coil would necessarily apply to real lightning where the answers one would get from a supersized vandegraff -- even though they are still on a smaller scale than real clouds -- are much more likely to be scalable and to exhibit the right features at all scales. And if you buy a used goodyear blimp and cover it with e.g. aluminum vapor and use it as the primary tethered to the top of a 100 meter tower, you would be pretty close to the actual scale of a cloud...

      rgb

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  5. Atmosphere by dan_barrett · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully they're building this over a smallish castle + mad scientist lab with convenient skylights, along with the worlds largest knife switch

    1. Re:Atmosphere by mjwalshe · · Score: 4, Funny

      and an Igor - They know the secret of storing lightning in jars

  6. Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by mysidia · · Score: 4, Informative

    This can't be anywhere near civilization, as a Tesla coil can fry any electronics. It also can't be in some forest wilderness, as a Tesla coil can easily ignite trees. As they say, they're making something that's more and more lightning like, which is also more unsafe. So building a 10' Tesla coil is probably not the hard problem.... the hard problem is operating it Safely, and actually being able to take experimental observations.... because, this is all very dangerous.

    And also, will the FCC allow them to operate it, once they've built it?

    Considering spark gap transmitters have long been banned due to the spectrum-wide interference they cause; and the earliest such radio transmitters were tesla coils... and EMI in particular can be generated across the spectrum as well, resulting in disruptions to communications, with such a large tesla coil, and such a large arc, especially if they are attempting to use frequencies associated with wireless transmissions; I wonder what will the RFI fallout will be.

    ; and any horizontally long metallic structure can get induced currents and also become antennae for further RFI emissions. Yes, lightning does show up on the radio spectrum as well, but a powered up Tesla coil emits many arcs not spread out by time, a much bigger footprint than lightning....

    1. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as nobody will sue them if he infringes on some imaginary property, they won't give a shit.

    2. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by ustolemyname · · Score: 4, Informative

      So building a 10' Tesla coil is probably not the hard problem

      It's not 10'. It's 10 stories, so more like 100' Tesla coils. I would call that hard.

    3. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Rinnon · · Score: 2

      Oh come on, we all know where the best place for these kind of mad science projects are. The Antarctic! Worst thing you could do is melt a little ice, and I think we've already got a plan in motion for that one.

    4. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Megahard · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing it would have to be enclosed, like PG&E's facility in San Ramon, seen on Mythbusters. I work less than a mile away and there's no interference.

      BTW to me it looks like a giant breast.

      --
      I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    5. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Pirate_Pettit · · Score: 2

      Maybe I'm just not on the right wavelength, but what sort of danger are we talking about here? I mean, yes, on a personal level, intentionally creating something close to actual lighting is going to be potentially dangerous to those in immediate proximity, but this is no nuke. Early rocketry exposed its researchers to explosive risks, but it didn't take long to anticipate and accommodate those risks, such that most of the time, the only casualty was a chunk of ground and a little pride.

      Build your lighting tower, charge 'er up, and go really far away. sensor packages and telephoto lenses, and who could really get hurt? There's plenty of desert in this country, where localized RF disruption hurts no one, and the ground is so unchanging its practically a constant. We've tested all sorts of explosives in the middle of nowhere for far less noble purposes. I think understanding lightning as a natural phenomenon is a reasonable goal with acceptable, highly localized - and mostly predictable risks. Bring on the lighting machines.

    6. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the radiated output from the coils will be quite low, owing to several factors:

      A) The operating frequency is *very* low, only 5200 Hz. This is actually *below* the frequency range the FCC controls.

      B) The wavelength (over 35 miles) is *very* long compared to the coil height, so it's radiation efficiency is almost zero.

      C) The two coils operate in opposite phase, so the electric fields will tend to cancel at a distance.

      Of greater concern will be the actual *acoustic* noise... which might be upwards of 10's of kilowatts.
      -Greg Leyh

  7. Re:Blasfemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't worry, I spoke to the invisible pink unicorn (blessed be her holy hooves) and she is fine with it.

    The One true One. Her Horniness. She whose hooves many never be shod. Her Pinkness.

  8. Things that make you go BOOM! by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm having horrible flashbacks to C&C: Red Alert.

    I'm having horrible flashbacks to C&C: Music Factory.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  9. This story is everywhere in the last two weeks by mark_reh · · Score: 5, Informative

    and it's wrong. Tesla coils produce high frequency -i.e AC- discharges at very high voltage and very low current. Lightning, on the other hand is a DC or very low frequency phenomenon combining extremely high voltages with extremely high currents. The currents are so high that they instantaneously heat the air and produce a loud boom- you may have heard it before- it's called thunder.

    If he really wanted to duplicate lightning he'd charge up some big capacitors to extremely high voltages and draw arcs between their terminals. THAT would be a better simulation of lightning than the output of any Tesla coil.

    Major props to the guy for marketing his idea. It's been picked up by every news agency from here to Mumbai. I'm sure he'll get the funding he needs to go through with the project.

  10. Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The very first communications of human origin that alien civilizations might receive will come from Nikola Tesla's attempt to broadcast electrical power through the air a little over a century ago. Provided they have sensitive and directional enough receivers, and can somehow filter out the radio noise from the Sun, that would mean that any civilization within a little over a hundred light years might already be trying to respond to us.

    A while back I asked on an astronomy newsgroup, how far away could a civilization with the level of technology that humanity presently has, detect our own radio signals?

    The sorrowful answer was that it was only three light years, which is a light year short of the distance to our nearest stellar neighbor, Alpha Centauri, which is also not likely to have any planets that could harbor life. The SETI researcher who responded also said that our strongest radio transmitters are the Distant Early Warning radars that the United States uses to watch for an incoming nuclear attack from the Soviets. That implies that we are only "communicating" with aliens who are in a generally northward direction relative to the earth.

    I then asked how SETI hoped to hear from any aliens at all. His answer was that we expect that more advanced civilizations would transmit far more powerful radio signals. That doesn't seem right to me, unless they are specifically trying to communicate with other civilizations, as I would expect more advanced technology to result in lower radio power, rather than more, both to conserve energy and to enable more devices to use the available spectrum.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by turing_m · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The very first communications of human origin that alien civilizations might receive will come from Nikola Tesla's attempt to broadcast electrical power through the air a little over a century ago. Provided they have sensitive and directional enough receivers, and can somehow filter out the radio noise from the Sun, that would mean that any civilization within a little over a hundred light years might already be trying to respond to us.

      I wonder what exactly they are going to respond to us with. e.g. "Ahh... looks like another civilization just invented radio communications. Very smart of them. It seems their intelligence is only matched by their carelessness. I think it's about time to clue them in as to why they have yet to find intelligent life on any other planet in the galaxy. For a brief second or two they will finally know that there IS life on other planets."

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  11. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tesla's bad assery far exceeds the Tunguska myth. He figured out how to turn our great big ball of iron surrounded by an electrostatic atmosphere into a giant fucking power source. He knew burning fossil fuels was a bad idea 100 years ago before anyone ever conceived it would be an issue.

    If we use fuel to get our power, we are living on our capital and exhausting it rapidly. This method is barbarous and wantonly wasteful and will have to be stopped in the interest of coming generations.

    He was trying to hand us a solution to problems we didn't even have yet and give us technology not unlike the telecommunications we have today 100 years ago! He even told us how to fucking do it when he filed a patent on the process.

    But hey, maybe these guys are on to his work and just needed a cover story to get funding for their own Wardenclyffe tower. One can only hope...

  12. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by datavirtue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a book that is comprised of transcripts from lawsuits that Tesla was involved in where he used the court proceedings to document some of his tech. He was dealing with some very powerful industrialists, people who basically owned the world as everyone knew it. I have seen documentaries where it is demonstrated that Edison was worshiped by Presidents and important people the world over where Tesla isn't even mentioned--even in passing. When I first learned of Tesla I realized that I never questioned a lot of the things I take for granted and it wasn't well known who invented or developed them, now I know.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  13. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Annirak · · Score: 2

    This is a TERRIBLE source of renewable energy. Lightning is a pulsed power source, where our demands are essentially steady. Lightning is caused either by wind or solar wind (charged particles accumulating in the atmosphere), so why not pick that up directly? We have wind turbines and solar cells. These are far more sensible than lightning as a power source.

    And for reference, wind power is effectively solar, since wind is cause by uneven absorption of solar radiation, which causes convection currents.

  14. Re:Blasfemy by The+Askylist · · Score: 2

    You're just thor. Thtupid thod.

  15. Radio waves. Meh. by PPH · · Score: 2

    That's what aliens will say.

    We've got to push the limits of our understanding of physics and imagine more advanced methods of communications. Ones that could be directed at distant solar systems and get around the speed of light restrictions on communications latency.

    I'm thinking along the lines of wormholes (Einstein-Rosen bridges). Assume that advanced civilizations will have figured out all the problems involved with sending these things around the universe and popping them open in front of target civilizations. Given the energy requirements needed to open one big enough to step through, this probably isn't what they'll use. But what about a wormhole just big enough to send a series of photons through (think fiber optics). We find one end of such a wormhole floating by, we grab it and look at it with an opto sensor. If it looks like we've got intelligence on the other end, we're in business.

    We don't need to solve the physics of how to open or send such a wormhole. Leave that up to the more advanced civilization. All we have to do is recognize the end that's floating by locally, grab it and examine it.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  16. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tesla was the man. He pioneered everything from physics to telecommunications. Though never realized, he actually figured out how to extract static electricity from the air and turn it into a power source. Talk about renewable energy.... Then there is the tesla turbine? You tube it. Its the sickest little mechanical device and so freaking simple its ridiculous.

      I read the other day that scientists every now and again come across a new invention only to find out tesla patented the same thing 100 years prior.

  17. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Well, lets see:

    Production of O3 that protects us from UV. I think that is a big one.
    Starts forest fires every so often that restarts the growth cycles (which shows that nature has adopted to NEEDING lightening).
    Miller/Urey's experiments showing that lightening's impact on various chemicals made a number of base molecules that life needed. I would say that suggests that many more molecules are produced by lightening than we realize, that are likely absorb by bacteria, plant, or some other bottom feeders.

    And that was just a few positives from Lightening.

    Now, as to hemlock, it has a number of interesting issues. A number of animals are somewhat immune to it, so with multiple feedings on it, they build up a quasi immunity to it. That means that other animals that enter the area and attempt to eat the plant will succumb to it. Interestingly, there is evidence that hemlock alkaloids build up in small quantities in herbivores such that if a predator kills and eats them, they die (think mercury in our ecosystem).
    Point is, that nature has adopted and used hemlock.

    What an idiot and asshole you are. Pretending to be somebody that knows something of science. You remind me of another troll (flyinwhitey, ifwm and a few other logins that that idiot had).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  18. Re:some kinds of signals may be not quite random by alannon · · Score: 2

    While I see your point, if you have a truly random entropy source, ANY xored combination of cleartext and cyphertext could (incorrectly) appear to form any arbitrary message in the encrypted message.

    grep "attack at dawn" /dev/random (and wait a while. Probably a LONG while.)

  19. Tesla was 100 years ahead of his time by nido · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the neater things I've read about is how Lockheed Martin went back to Tesla's technology to make a communication system for miners:

    A magnetic-wave generator developed by Nikola Tesla over 100 years ago as a wireless communication device has been updated by engineers at Lockheed Martin to save lives after mining disasters.

    Magnetic waves -- unlike radio waves -- can penetrate hundreds of metres of solid rock. MagneLink, the fridge-sized device developed by Lockheed Martin, allows for phone calls and text messaging. It was tested this year at a mine in Virginia, and production is expected before 2011.

    -Nikola Tesla’s patent redux (very short)

    Heres another link: Tapping Tesla to Save Trapped Miners

    If Tesla was 100 years ahead of everyone else, that means we should be plugging our devices into the Aether ("The wheelwork of nature") soon.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  20. You cannot walk through a wormhole by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2

    you'll come out the other side as a largely random sequence of random types of fundamental particles, mostly photons. trust me. while I only playvacsoftware engineer on the Internet, I really am a physicist.

    you could through one though.

    I spent quite a long time puzzling overbhowbto encode a signal so that any alien that was capable of detecting it would bevquite certainbwas transmitted by intelligent beings. just for our signal to be nonrandom would be insufficient, as there are many physical processes that generate powerful nonrandom signals. pulsars are quickly rotating, highly magnetic collapsedvstars, butvwere thought at first to be signals from alien civilizations.

    you also need a way for your signal to stabbed out from the enormous radio noise of the sun.

    transmit pulse sequences with the number of pulses being a prime number withba modest pause in between. pause in between each sequence then transmit the next larger prime number. repeat until you get to a very large prime then startbover again with two.

    to overcome solar noise, use an interferometer. two antennas spaced far apart have the same resolution as a single antenna as wide as the distance between the two. if you control the relative phase of your antennas you can focus yourvtransmittedvsignal with the same resolution. the focussed signal would appear more powerful than the sun's signal because it diminishes with the square of the distance.

    such antennas could be placed in solar orbit at the earths lagrange points, with solar or nuclear power. they could transmit in many different directions simultaneously by altering their phases.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  21. Siberian Institute for Power Engineering? Really? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy shit, if I were a supervillain, that's exactly the sort of institute that I'd want to run. They probably say: "What happens in Siberia stays in Siberia, except for the bits that were accidentally atomized. Those are floating around somewhere in the upper atmosphere." Also, they probably say: "In Siberia, a couple of people can hear you scream, but nobody really gives a fuck."

  22. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

    That's a nice thought, except he didn't have a way to turn our great big ball of iron into an unlimited free power source. Just the thought is ridiculous. Tesla was obviously a genius, but he made claims for ideas of his that were never realized or were frankly impossible, or claims of amazing discoveries that he then never published. If he did have a method to develop free energy 100 years ago, not publicly divulging the information would have been strange given his financial difficulties as well as just of course he would have.

    Every single person one hundred years ago could tell you that an unlimited free source of energy would have been better than oil. It isn't even really a choice, it's not a matter of Tesla having amazing foresight or being ahead of his time or what have you.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  23. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

    Well, lets see:

    Production of O3 that protects us from UV. I think that is a big one.

    What an idiot and asshole you are. Pretending to be somebody that knows something of science. You remind me of another troll (flyinwhitey, ifwm and a few other logins that that idiot had).

    This is not correct. O3 in the stratosphere is produced by UV-B splitting oxygen.

    O3 produced by lightning never gets anywhere near the stratosphere. Mostly stuck on the surface where exposure can be harmful to humans.

    Last time I checked we are ALL clueless idiots. Disparging others is like a bunch of retards arguing over who is the smarter retard.

  24. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Lazarian · · Score: 2

    Lightning is actually an important source of nitrogen fixation for plants. Nitrogen oxides produced from lightning combine with atmospheric water produces nitrous and nitric acids, and when precipitated back into soil becomes a crucial nutrient source for plants worldwide.

  25. Re:Tesla was 100 years behind practicality. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2
    Edison's original design required powerplants every few miles. It was DC and you back then you couldn't tranform DC up and down as easily. This is very bad for the efficiency of long lines.

    The problem with DC was that the power plants could economically deliver DC electricity only to customers within about one and a half miles (about 2.4 km) from the generating station

    Now Tesla's design was based on AC and thus it could be transformed, allowing for long distance transport. I don't know how wireless fitted into that, but I can assume the powerplants could be far from the actual transmitters.
    note: nowadays the supply lines for extremely long distances are DC again because of induction losses, but it's usually converted to 500KV with step up converters of various designs they didn't have back then.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  26. In other news... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    ...LOD team's equipment struck by lightning; all progress lost.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.