Slashdot Mirror


PC Makers Run Short of Popular Drives

Lucas123 writes "The impact from the monsoonal flooding in Thailand over the past three months is now being felt by users as computer system manufacturers are unable to meet supply needs. Lenovo told its corporate customers this week that is has run out of a number of drives including several types of 7200rpm and 5400rpm HDDs. 'Akin to the hysteria when banks defaulted in the 1930[s], PC orders across the industry are being placed for which HD supply does not exist,' a Lenovo rep wrote to his clients. IDC this week said the HDD shortages that have resulted from the flooding of four major Thailand industrial parks will likely be felt into 2013. Western Digital and Toshiba have been hit the hardest. PC shipments are also expected to fall short by 3.8 million units in the first quarter of 2012 due to component supply shortages. Meanwhile, there has been some indication of retail HDD price stabilization, but for some of the most popular hard drives prices continue to soar."

353 comments

  1. Don't bitch. by masternerdguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We're short on hard drives, and the factory workers are short on homes because of flooding.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    1. Re:Don't bitch. by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not only that, but many people have died too. It's currently over 600 deaths.

    2. Re:Don't bitch. by heinousjay · · Score: 5, Funny

      Plus people have cancer, so no one has the right to complain about anything.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:Don't bitch. by Pastor+Jake · · Score: 3, Funny

      My fellow-believer,

      Despite the less-than-Christian wording of the title of your comment, I must agree with your overall sentiment. It pains me that during the season of Christ's birth, consumers are complaining of a shortage of a material luxury when there are so many people who lost loved-ones and the basic necessities they need to survive because of the flooding. My prayers go out to those affected and those who wanted Santa to bring them that extra 10TB RAID 0+1 array; may the Lord provide the former with what they need, and may the latter be cured of their addiction to pornography.

      Your respectful peer,
      Jake

    4. Re:Don't bitch. by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In fact world would be much happier place if people did actually stop complaining about unimportant things. Indeed, about an year ago I got seriously ill and doctors were sure I wasn't going to wake up and that I was going to die. I didn't, but after that it's hard to bitch and complain about little things.

    5. Re:Don't bitch. by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dont you understand, this is serious! Its TOTALLY worth comparing to the 1930s depression!

      Nice summary tho, totally a good comparison. Might want to throw in a comparison to the loss of drives being similar to the loss of lives in the holocaust, for good measure.

    6. Re:Don't bitch. by heinousjay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, everything would be great if people weren't people, but they are, so it's important to learn to work with it.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    7. Re:Don't bitch. by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And considering Thailand is a Buddhist country (the good Theravada kind), it doesn't really fit either.

    8. Re:Don't bitch. by Goaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is not comparing the severity of the situation. It is comparing the feedback reaction making that makes the situation worse.

    9. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      godwin's law!

    10. Re:Don't bitch. by RandomAvatar · · Score: 2, Funny

      but what if we don't WANT to be cured of our addiction to pornography ....

    11. Re:Don't bitch. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      unimportant things

      Right. Now if only someone could define what that means...

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    12. Re:Don't bitch. by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

      Furthermore after the floods they may be out of jobs too, a lot of factories may very well pick up and move elsewhere(most likely China)

    13. Re:Don't bitch. by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      I know for a fact you aren't a christian. Your a neocommunist.

      I doubt you know that for a fact. But now we all know for a fact you're semiliterate.

      rj

    14. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those slaves never had a chance

    15. Re:Don't bitch. by hawguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      My fellow-believer,

      Despite the less-than-Christian wording of the title of your comment, I must agree with your overall sentiment. It pains me that during the season of Christ's birth, consumers are complaining of a shortage of a material luxury when there are so many people who lost loved-ones and the basic necessities they need to survive because of the flooding. My prayers go out to those affected and those who wanted Santa to bring them that extra 10TB RAID 0+1 array; may the Lord provide the former with what they need, and may the latter be cured of their addiction to pornography.

      Your respectful peer,
      Jake

      No Christian needs a 10TB RAID0+1 array - Jesus would use RAID6 (with a battery backed caching RAID controller)

    16. Re:Don't bitch. by Multiplicity · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back to complaining then, boys! We still got until someone comes with "the definition"!

    17. Re:Don't bitch. by Multiplicity · · Score: 2

      No Christian needs a 10TB RAID0+1 array - Jesus would use RAID6 (with a battery backed caching RAID controller)

      Nope, he actually would use RAID5, and thrash the array because a) one disk totally failing on him and b) another one failing reads three times during recovery. But don't worry, somehow a three-day ddrescue would finally bring back all data (to be saved in "the cloud", of course).

    18. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Positive statement of the day? "I have cancer, so I can't bitch about it."

    19. Re:Don't bitch. by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      Don't take it out on others just because you're imperfect and ignore all of the S.M.A.R.T. and controller warnings... Some of us tech Gurus do religiously tend to our flock of hard-drives and recognize when they are in spiritual, and physical, need of replacement....

    20. Re:Don't bitch. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Try harder.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    21. Re:Don't bitch. by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 2

      It's called a run.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    22. Re:Don't bitch. by mad-seumas · · Score: 2

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs

    23. Re:Don't bitch. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Dont you understand, this is serious! Its TOTALLY worth comparing to the 1930s depression!

      It was a Lenovo rep who made that comparison. If he doesn't make his quotas, his children will have to go back to work in the factory making flip-flops for fat Americans and his wife will get sold into sex slavery, so cut the guy a break.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:Don't bitch. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      unimportant things

      Right. Now if only someone could define what that means...

      Well, we're all hanging around Slashdot - so I don't think we're really qualified to make that call.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    25. Re:Don't bitch. by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Plus people have cancer, so no one has the right to complain about anything.

      What about the people with cancer who lost their home due to flooding, and now can't get a hard drive upgrade. even they aren't allowed to complain? Harsh.

    26. Re:Don't bitch. by chromas · · Score: 1

      I was sure your link said "Bacon_run". I must have glanced at your name.

    27. Re:Don't bitch. by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      It's a soft definition: The important things in life are the things you can't do without even when you're desparate. That list will differ depending on your circumstances.

      It's worth thinking about from time to time to get a better perspective and learn to appreciate what one does have.

    28. Re:Don't bitch. by zippthorne · · Score: 3

      Complaining does two very useful things. 1) it allows one to vent about things that ought to be better but aren't. 2) it allows one to form the idea of how things ought to be into something that can be communicated to others.

      You're in an excellent position for effective complaining, btw...."I woke up for THIS?"

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    29. Re:Don't bitch. by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Funny

      We're geeks. Computers are on that list. So back to bitching about the lack of hard drives.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    30. Re:Don't bitch. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      So, I guess you can't complain about anything, then. Your wife was just murdered? Please! You don't need her. You can live without her. Stop complaining.

      Sometimes voicing dissent or complaining is both fun (for some) and useful (depending on who you voice it to). There will likely always be a situation that is worse than the one you're currently in, but that doesn't mean that you can't complain.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    31. Re:Don't bitch. by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      I'm just mad they haven't come up with that damn definition by now. What's taking them so damn long?!

    32. Re:Don't bitch. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Your wife was just murdered? Please! You don't need her.

      That was assuming that the list is composed entirely of things that you need to survive.

      If it is just composed of things that you want badly, then anything could qualify. That's subjective, after all.

      I was really just questioning the fact that he acted as if complaining was bad and the fact that he used "unimportant things" as if such a thing doesn't vary from person to person.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    33. Re:Don't bitch. by shentino · · Score: 1

      The world would also be happier if there wasn't anything to actually complain about.

    34. Re:Don't bitch. by mitso6989 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, what do you think the reaction would be if there were a shortage on sports, or women's fashion shoes. Everyone has their thing.

    35. Re:Don't bitch. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Tiger has a Seagate 2Tb external for $120 with free shipping and a nice Samsung 1Tb 2.5in internal for $130 so it looks like they can find them. I wonder if they have better deals set up with the distributors than the OEMs that are bitching?

      If you have a laptop those samsung drives run real nice and the 32Mb cache almost makes them as fast as 7200RPM thanks to its intelligent caching, at least in my own benchmarks. i'd be snatching but i already have 320gb in my netbook and 6tb in my desktops so i don't think I really need any more space for awhile. enjoy!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    36. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complaining is the standard way of communicating for quite a lot of people.

      As I am dead tired of it, I'll just say that it's fine by me. >_

    37. Re:Don't bitch. by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 2

      As tech support for a certain four-letter PC manufacturer, because of this I remind peope with good income every day that there has been a natural disaster in another part of the world. I like to think that this has caused some of them to donate to the releif effort.
      Meanwhile starvation in Africa goes unoticed.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    38. Re:Don't bitch. by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      My prayers go out to those affected and those who wanted Santa to bring them that extra 10TB RAID 0+1 array; may the Lord provide the former with what they need, and may the latter be cured of their addiction to pornography.

      Your respectful peer, Jake

      hey! leave my porn addiction the hell alone you insensitive clod.

    39. Re:Don't bitch. by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Don't forget data-scrubbing... the fight the inevitable corruption that's inherent in their imperfect physical forms.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    40. Re:Don't bitch. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Yep, the feedback reaction is also due to the fractional fulfillment many companies do. So if we really need 100 HDDs, think we'll only get 33% of what we ask then we put in an order for 300 HDDs. We get 100 HDDs now, we might get 200 HDDs later but oh well they'll just go in storage until we need them. The important thing is that we get what we need right now. So you start dealing with more and more imaginary numbers on both sides...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    41. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome! I hope they all die.

    42. Re:Don't bitch. by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      unimportant things

      Right. Now if only someone could define what that means...

      I'm onto it, but my database to catalog all catagories of "things" in existance has run out of space, and I can't seem to get any new harddrives.

    43. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unimportant things

      Right. Now if only someone could define what that means...

      From my experience there is a consensus that "unimportant" means everything that I think is important.

    44. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it a year.

    45. Re:Don't bitch. by bug1 · · Score: 2

      People can only truly understand something that they have experienced.

      When they hear of someones hardship, they can try and "imagine" how it must feel like by comparing it to something they have experienced. They are comparing something they truly know about (their own experience) with something relative to their own experience.

      Nobody can truely understand a more extreme experience than they have encountered themselves. i.e. Its always worse when it happens to you.

    46. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Christian needs a 10TB RAID0+1 array - Jesus would use RAID6 (with a battery backed caching RAID controller)

      Jesus, being omniscient, would know that the IOps on a RAID6 is absolutely atrocious. So, ceteris paribus, 10 TB of striped mirrored disks is better than 10 TB worth of RAID 6.

    47. Re:Don't bitch. by kcitren · · Score: 1

      Don't worry the feeling will come back, trust me.

    48. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a biblical reference, buddy.

    49. Re:Don't bitch. by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Nah, Jesus was the first to point out the advantages of cloud storage. Of course it's a proprietary system owned and run by his dad. But it's been in operation for a few millennium with billions of subscribers. I haven't heard a complaint from any of them.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    50. Re:Don't bitch. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes voicing dissent or complaining is both fun (for some) and useful (depending on who you voice it to).

      I like the Spider Robinson quote that is similar: "Pain shared is diminished; joy shared is increased." A friend and I one day reduced/generalized it, in stages: "Communication tends to help"; then "Communication is helpful"; then "Communication helps"; and she finally ended it with a one-word, raising-fist-gesture, "Communicate!"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    51. Re:Don't bitch. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      "Bacon_run" is what you get shortly after eating, if it's undercooked.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    52. Re:Don't bitch. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "what do you think the reaction would be if there were a shortage on sports"

      Fuck yes! Perfect time to introduce my chainmail hackey-sack competition!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    53. Re:Don't bitch. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, we'd bitch about the lack of stuff to bitch about.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    54. Re:Don't bitch. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      They're nothing.

      Let them die twice like me, then they can talk about what sucks and what doesn't.

      BTW, death isn't all that bad! It's warm and dark and peaceful (at least, that is what my body tells me it remembers from death.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    55. Re:Don't bitch. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      Clean raw meats are just fine. I have eaten most market meats absolutely raw with zero ill-effect, from fish to beef to pork to chicken (hell I've even eaten ostrich raw.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    56. Re:Don't bitch. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Jesus uses RAID 2, like real gods do (like me.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    57. Re:Don't bitch. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Hah, China? They're already overstuffed with optoelectronics, there's no room for HDD manufacturing.

      Go get yourself a passport and go see for yourself. Shenzhen especially - it's as if the only industry available is food or optoelectronics.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    58. Re:Don't bitch. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was a rather localized joke. (I just got some probiotics a few days ago, and began taking them this morning, so hopefully they will help in making my enjoyment of bacon an end-to-end experience...)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    59. Re:Don't bitch. by PwnzerDragoon · · Score: 1

      I hope you did that on purpose, otherwise you may want to go back to cooking school.

    60. Re:Don't bitch. by shentino · · Score: 1

      And those people are the sour-pusses that need removed.

    61. Re:Don't bitch. by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think pettiness is an unalterable trait.

      Isn't misbehavior best discouraged?

    62. Re:Don't bitch. by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

      may Facebook quote, that i altered from the same source, "Shared sadness is decreased, and shared joy is increased, this is the little loophole to entropy that makes life worth while"

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
    63. Re:Don't bitch. by Ster · · Score: 1

      Don't take it out on others just because you're imperfect and ignore all of the S.M.A.R.T. and controller warnings... Some of us tech Gurus do religiously tend to our flock of hard-drives and recognize when they are in spiritual, and physical, need of replacement....

      I do hardware diagnostics for an HPC storage system vendor, including drive testing, qualification, and failure analysis. SMART has its uses, but, in my experience, if you've tripped SMART, you're already in serious trouble.

      It's not helped by the fact that pieces of SMART which are actually in the ATA standards are basically tripped/not-tripped - none of the attribute structures are in the current specs, let alone which attribute IDs mean what. Heck, even getting the thresholds is no longer in the ATA standard!

      Fortunately, *most* vendors implement *most* of the SMART structures the same way, and *most* use the same attribute IDs to mean the same things, and *most* still implement the sub-command for getting the thresholds. But all the really interesting data that could be used for more aggressive failure prediction (i.e. beyond the almost-always too late SMART trip) is vendor specific, and getting that information out of some vendors makes pulling teeth look like taking candy from a baby.

      </rant-let>

      -Ster

    64. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And consumers stock up on RAM.

    65. Re:Don't bitch. by helix2301 · · Score: 1

      The US had an issue like this in March after Japan's earth quake there was a ram and flash drive shortage. Now do to flooding in Thailand were short on hard drives it's amazing how dependent we are on other country's for technology hardware.

    66. Re:Don't bitch. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Nice.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    67. Re:Don't bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't going to wake up and that I was going to die. I didn't.

      Sure about that?

  2. Scam??? by spaceplanesfan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I might be wrong, but I feel, really feel like the flooding wasn't that big factor

    but rather its great excuse to jack up the prices.

    I remember similar story about RAM and Taiwan earthquake, when it was found out that damages to facilities were really minimal.

    1. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the employees are either dead or homeless now. have fun running 2 hard drive factories alone, in a wasteland caused by a flood because those people have bigger problems than work.

    2. Re:Scam??? by FairAndHateful · · Score: 2

      I don't think it's just an excuse to jack up prices. Guy at work today was trying to get a hard drive to build a server, and I hear him on the phone. "Wait, what do you mean they're no available anywhere?"

      It makes me wonder why we're building so many in the same place. Doesn't anyone remember the saying at putting all of your eggs in one basket?

      That said, compared to the effect on the people, it seems trivial.

    3. Re:Scam??? by Tynin · · Score: 5, Informative

      I might be wrong, but I feel, really feel like the flooding wasn't that big factor

      but rather its great excuse to jack up the prices.

      I remember similar story about RAM and Taiwan earthquake, when it was found out that damages to facilities were really minimal.

      Wish it was a scam... but I cannot help but feel sorry for their loss. Please check out these pics, showing the damage done, I haven't been able to find any newer pics, but the damage is beyond bad.

      To address your concerns on this hdd scam, I present pics of from a Western Digital production plant:
      http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2011/11/1/photo-horrific-images-of-flooded-western-digital-factory.aspx

      I couldn't bring myself to look for pictures/video from the surrounding area, but my heart does go out to them.

    4. Re:Scam??? by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhhh...Tigerdirect was selling a Seagate 1.5Tb for $69 the other day, the 1Tb external for $99 so there are drives still out there, you just got to keep an eye out. I would suggest having an email account where you get the daily emails from ALL the major and minor tech stores, from Tiger and Newegg to Surpluscomputers and Geeks. That way since most of these things are first come you can jump in quick enough. BTW sellout.Woot! usually has all the sales listed so i'd add them to my daily checklist.

      I'm just glad i got my 6Tb worth of space before the flood along with taking care of my long time customers and family. all i have left in SATA drives is a single 80Gb and that one is going in the new quad i'm building my GF for Xmas. All she does is FB and IM anyway so 80Gb with win 7 HP will be just perfect for her. I just hope the guy bringing me some off lease boxes this weekend has drives in them, because i'm down to a handful of IDE drives from 40Gb to 200Gb and then that's it. Lucky for me this time of year i already have the new boxes sold and all that is left is the off lease for those looking for a last minute affordable PC.

      Man the moron that thought putting all the eggs in one basket ought to be FIRED. Does anybody know if the Maxtor factories were located there too? Because it seems like all I'm seeing now is Seagate drives and I'm wondering if they are not just using the Maxtor facility and slapping Seagate labels on them.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I too call BULLSHIT!

    6. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still see a few more floors that are untouched by water!

    7. Re:Scam??? by fnj · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Uh, all the eggs were not in one basket. I heard figures of around 10-20% of world hard drive production that was in Thailand. Not even sure that ALL the production in Thailand was affected. Then there is sub-component production, which complicates the picture.

      The real problem is that there wasn't excess capacity. Also, the just-in-time inventory fad where nobody actually stocks anything any more makes any disturbance like this much more critical. But mostly I think there are elements in the manufacturing, distribution, and retailing chain that are orgasmic about the opportunity for gouging afforded by the disturbance. As always, it's very difficult to pinpoint the profiteers, but they are clearly there.

      Hope you guys are enjoying the invisible hand of the ingrown corrupt super-capitalist market which you worship. It's more like an invisible phallus raping you in your sleep.

    8. Re:Scam??? by clanrat · · Score: 2

      Have you seen the photos of the WD factory? The water was near the ceiling on the ground floor. Vehicles in the loading bays were submerged to the roofline. This was a significant flood event.

    9. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      JIT fad? WTF?

      Did you expect those evil capitalists to stock enough 80GB drives to meet your demands in case of bad weather?

      Look, just delete your oldest porn, you've used up the fappability and you'll have plenty of room to store more important things, like new #OWS porn.

    10. Re:Scam??? by hal2814 · · Score: 2

      "Doesn't anyone remember the saying at putting all of your eggs in one basket?"

      Yeah, that was Mark Twain: "Put all your eggs in one basket and then watch that basket."

    11. Re:Scam??? by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story,
      put your high paid (but not needed for day to day operations) staff on the ground floor and your important manufacturing facilities with all the massively expensive equipment on the upper levels.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    12. Re:Scam??? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Oh man that's bad, and after WD got stuck with a 525 million dollar arbitration loss to Seagate last month. frankly i just hope WD survives getting a big one two punch like that, as I'd hate to see a world where all you had for HDDs was Seagate.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:Scam??? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      That would still present the issue of moving all the needed materials, waste and finished products around. Moving all that by boats would be quite limiting, especially since the boats would have to be rather small. They _could_ do a few rounds of drives a day, but I don't know if that would cover even the costs of turning the machinery on.

    14. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maxtor = Seagate since 2006

    15. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple. don't buy any hard drive that's popular.

    16. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #OWS porn.

      That hadn't occurred to me but of course rule 34 is always true. Actually some of it's quite cute (NSFW if you live in a sad place).

    17. Re:Scam??? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      but rather its great excuse to jack up the prices.

      It's a perfect opportunity for your HDD factory to undercut them, then.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Scam??? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have a friend out there who's been sending photos. His entire ground floor is flooded. He ran out of food last week and had to go out to get more. This involved swimming from his house, with a crocodile (or possibly alligator, I'm not sure which you get in Thailand) watching him from the opposite side of the canal (apparently it attacked a few people, but no one was killed). This doesn't sound like the ideal conditions for getting the raw materials or workers to the factory, and shipping the finished product would be quite a literal description. Oh, and his landline Internet has been down for over a month, but he's able to use 3G.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to give an eloquent reasoned reply. Instead I'll just say "oh fuck off".

    20. Re:Scam??? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Hope you guys are enjoying the invisible hand of the ingrown corrupt super-capitalist market which you worship. It's more like an invisible phallus raping you in your sleep.

      The IT hard drive industry is definitely not the industry that's doing most of the "raping" and profiteering.

      Fact is hard drives were a bargain for what you get - a high tech device with powerful rare-earth magnets, high precision moving parts, 7200 rpm platters, store 2TB of data and _typically_ work for 3 years without failing. All for less than USD100. And sometimes with a 3 or even 5 year warranty.

      In contrast it's difficult to get a cheap, comfortable, adjustable and long-lasting chair. Despite the fact that we've been making chairs for thousands of years. And it's only in 2006 people actually bothered to find out that sitting up straight is bad for your back: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6187080.stm
      So what were the chair makers doing all these years?

      If the "just-in-time fad" and other similar "fads" made chairs (or other similar stuff- clothes?) cheaper and _better_ year by year, and only more expensive after a once in a 50 year massive flood hits Thailand, I'd be all for it.

      --
    21. Re:Scam??? by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that there wasn't excess capacity.

      - well, if YOU see such an opportunity in excess capacity of hard drives and their components, why don't you enter the market yourself and produce them? If you are right, you'll make a good living, maybe become one of the top 1%.

      Hope you guys are enjoying the invisible hand of the ingrown corrupt super-capitalist market which you worship. It's more like an invisible phallus raping you in your sleep.

      - oh yeah, the shortage of HD is like somebody raping you while you are asleep. Makes perfect sense, you asshole.

    22. Re:Scam??? by TobiX · · Score: 1

      Also, the just-in-time inventory fad where nobody actually stocks anything any more


      I wouldn't call it a fad. With the current rate of technological advancement, where last-month products have already been made obsolete by some newer / better tech, I would call it sensible management.
    23. Re:Scam??? by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 1

      Also, the just-in-time inventory fad where nobody actually stocks anything any more makes any disturbance like this much more critical.

      You, the consumer, have complete power to override this "just-in-time inventory fad". Simply buy hard drives 6-12 months before you need them, and just-in-time becomes irrelevant to you. You can pat yourself on the back when supplies are low (right now), but you pay more on average when prices are dropping (the last ten years or so).

    24. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silence is consent.

    25. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tigerdirect was selling a Seagate

      You lost me at Seagate. Well, actually, you lost me at TigerDirect...

      I'd rather pay $1.99 for a doorstop at the hardware store than buy another Seagate. I've had to send back 27 of 40 bought in the last 6 months under warranty, not including having to send back 7 of the 27 warranty replacements within a month.

    26. Re:Scam??? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Before the flood i paid a grand total of $193 for 6Tb worth of storage, that 2 2Tb drives, a 1Tb OS drive and a 1Tb external for OS backups. You really can't complain when before the flood I was buying 2Tb Samsung for $59 and 1Tb for $35, even at 5400RPM the cache size makes them fast enough for OS drives. This of course isn't counting the 320Gb I have in my netbook nor the 320Gb laptop external drive i got to go with it. The netbook was $350 with that much space AND an upgrade to 8Gb of RAM, and the mini external was a whole $32 on sale, that's just nuts!

      Once the mess is cleaned up we'll go back to sub $50 1Tb drives and sub $80 2Tbs and be up to our asses in more storage space than we can use again. I mean counting the internal and external drives i have something like 7.4Tb worth of space and that is just an insane amount of space for so cheap. Even loading ALL my games, music, and favorite movies i have something like 74% free on main machine which has 3Tb of storage in it. what am i gonna do with all that space? fuck if I know but it was cheap so who cares?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    27. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stupid foreigner question: does it normally take this long for flooding to recede in Thailand? It sounds like they've been flooded for the better part of 2 months now, which seems odd.

    28. Re:Scam??? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You don't use pricewatch to get the better deals that newegg and tigerdirect can't offer?

      No wonder your prices are so high.

      Seagate 2TB for $50.

      Enjoy your overpriced stuff.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    29. Re:Scam??? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "And it's only in 2006 people actually bothered to find out that sitting up straight is bad for your back: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6187080.stm [bbc.co.uk]"

      Actually, we knew that back in the earlier 90s. The curvature of the spine explicitly makes straight-up sitting a bad thing.

      That's why we had chairs that reclined slightly.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    30. Re:Scam??? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I have a batch bought in the last 6 months and they're all fine.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    31. Re:Scam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why don't you buy Samsung HDD? For many years I have not bought anything else than Samsung and I'm absolutely satisfied with them. They are simply great and they were already quite quiet when other HDDs where still making lots of noise.

      Also i believe Toshiba is still making HDDs, but I think only 2,5 inch.

    32. Re:Scam??? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2

      So why don't you buy Samsung HDD?

      Seagate buys Samsung hard disk unit

    33. Re:Scam??? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Reclining slightly isn't the same as 135 degrees.I also remember in the 90s there were "ergonomic" stools (something like: http://www.office-furnitures.net/2011/05/16/ergonomic-stools/ ), and other ridiculous furniture ideas.

      Whatever it is, the trouble is most current workplaces don't have chairs where you can recline to 135 degrees in an actual scientifically proven ergonomic position while working on your PC for hours. They recline but not that far back.

      And even if your office chair goes that far back there's usually no proper leg support, and most cubicle designs may prevent you from getting close to your desk if your legs are supported and extended. So it's still crap.

      I'm sure there were people who knew what are good positions - many hospital beds certainly allow reclining in all sorts of angles, but my point is the furniture industry is crap when compared to the hard drive industry. And yet they often can charge kilobux for their crap.

      --
  3. What do they expect? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's what they get for putting all (or most of) their eggs in one foreign basket.

    I mean, sheesh. It's not like "single point of failure" is an unknown concept or anything.

    1. Re:What do they expect? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they gambled.

      we all lost.

      isn't a totally free market GREAT??

      no one watches out or cares. its just a blind grab for short term revenues. no one thinks long term. no one does, anymore.

      its surprising this hasn't happened *more*.

      silly humans. we can't plan for shit, as a species.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:What do they expect? by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Natural disasters can happen anywhere in the world, it's just a matter of which kind. This is one of the largest floods Thailand has had within 100 years. You really can't plan for such, or otherwise you can't really do anything if you're constantly afraid of something happening. These factories aren't cheap either. Of course, you're always free to start your own factory and "care" more.

    3. Re:What do they expect? by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      isn't a totally free market GREAT??

      When you consider that it resulted in a price drop for 2TB HDDs from $250 or so in 2010 to $75 as of 3 months ago, yes, it is great.

      The "spike in prices" is only a spike because of how cheap everything had gotten, and it only got so cheap because of heavy competition. Second guessing things and claiming it would have been better with heavier regulation and restricted ability to outsource is moronic.

    4. Re:What do they expect? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      they gambled.

      we all lost.

      They tried to lower costs and considered the risks, but got zapped anyways. Maybe they learned something. I've enjoyed satisfyingly low prices combined with generous leaps in capacity for years now, so I can't see that I "lost". A year from now, they will be back on the bargain treadmill.

    5. Re:What do they expect? by Grave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, you CAN plan for this. By, you know, not putting 75% of the entire world's manufacturing of hard drive motors into a single location.

    6. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They"? Who is "they"?

      Sorry to bust your idealistic bubble, but many think in the long term.

      They're just not thinking about *YOUR* long term.

      Pull your own weight and quityerbitchen.

    7. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hopefully this will become a case study for how diversification of supply chain can be immensely profitable - if any one of those companies had split their factories 50/50 with another location, they could basically print money for the next 12 months by undercutting the entire rest of the market by 50% (which would still be above what prices were before the flooding)

      It's amazing how companies don't learn - Toyota & Honda did the exact same thing by having a diverse set of models instead of focusing only on gas-guzzling SUV's, and all of a sudden when gas prices skyrocketed they made a fortune.

    8. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they gambled.

      we all lost.

      isn't a totally free market GREAT??

      no one watches out or cares. its just a blind grab for short term revenues. no one thinks long term. no one does, anymore.

      its surprising this hasn't happened *more*.

      silly humans. we can't plan for shit, as a species.

      What? where else can you have all those slaves making hard drives?

    9. Re:What do they expect? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 0, Troll

      isn't a totally free market GREAT??

      It is, yes. But what you have here is just about the opposite of that - a steaming pile of regulation and taxation that drove a large percentage of the hard drive manufacturing industry to one geographic area (a friendly regime).

      All the US plants weren't closed because US workers were cheap and the business environment was conducive to low-friction business.

      silly humans. we can't plan for shit, as a species.

      True that. And yet the central planners spend all their days believing that they can because they're smarter than everybody else.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:What do they expect? by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seriously. They should have built a RAID5 of manufacturing plants.

      --
      Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
    11. Re:What do they expect? by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're confusing "influence of free market" with "influence of technological progress". Former had little to nothing to do with prices of medium going down as technological progress made better technologies and processes available for use.

    12. Re:What do they expect? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1
      "And yet the central planners spend all their days believing that they can because they're smarter than everybody else."

      You said it.

    13. Re:What do they expect? by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      we all lost.

      No, we didn't. We all won. Even with the price increases, hard disks are available and the price per terabyte is ridiculously cheap. The only people who think they lost, are the whiney bitches who are comparing the prices to what they were a couple months ago. Try comparing the cost to what it was two years ago, and terabytes are slightly cheaper except they also use fewer SATA ports.

      What we're seeing isn't expensiveness; it's volatility. If you can't handle that the prices sometimes vary between "dirt cheap" and "cheaper than dirt," then boo-fucking-hoo. DO NOT make me start sentences with "I remember when," you spoiled little whipper-snapper.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    14. Re:What do they expect? by fnj · · Score: 1

      Certainly disasters can happen almost anywhere, but it's not true that you can't foresee or avoid floods. Don't build your factories in a FUCKING FLOOD PLAIN. Or figure the cost of adequate levees into your plans.

    15. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're confusing "influence of free market" with "influence of technological progress". Former had little to nothing to do with prices of medium going down as technological progress made better technologies and processes available for use.

      And, uh, where do you think that technological progress came from? You think the Glorious People's Hard Drive Committee would have delivered $250 3TB hard drives to the world?

    16. Re:What do they expect? by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      Or just done it on like, the second floor. Or the third.

      The third floor of a concrete building is pretty immune to flooding.

    17. Re:What do they expect? by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but it's a trade off. What if gas prices had fallen? American car companies would have been poised to dominate the market. Or what if, instead of flooding in Thailand, new local resources resulted in 50% lower costs there? You'd have to close your other branches as they would no longer be economical. What if that kind of thing already happened? Maybe there's a reason that geographic location is used for manufacture of hard drives (presence of rare earth elements like neodymium?).

      It's all well and good in hindsight to say that putting all your eggs in one basket is wrong, but if building your factory within one river valley reduces costs significantly then one would argue that building anywhere else would be similarly irresponsible.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    18. Re:What do they expect? by Pyrion · · Score: 1

      It's also what they get for building on a floodplain.

      --
      "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
    19. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a friggin break. These are hard drives. That we've lost some manufacturing capability is unfortunate, but hardly devastating. These were not factories that pumped out some lifesaving drug, these are factories that made consumer products. And you're saying that they should be placed with all the care one would normally associate with nuclear missile silos?
      Get your priorities in order.

    20. Re:What do they expect? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      I was just thinking that the one thing that would help bring hard drive prices back down would be to sprinkle a little government regulation into the mix.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    21. Re:What do they expect? by Luckyo · · Score: 0

      From a large sum of things, most prominently human need to progress or fail. We have seen this in history as various empires dominated others from stone age, to various metal ages, to age of sailing, firearms and colonialism, and now at technological age where progress keeps on speeding up.

      "Free market" as a general concept plays a small part in this. Free market as portrayed in libertarian dogma has no part at all.

    22. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The decrease in prices was partly due to improved technology, and partly due to relocating manufacturing to more cost-effective locations (i.e., Thailand).

      There's a trade-off between making the supply of hard drives cheap (by concentrating manufacturing where it's most cost-effective) and reliable (by diversifying it around the world). This trade-off exists whether the market is free or government-run. But I trust people in a free market, whose own money is on the line, to make a decision on that trade-off better than a government would.

    23. Re:What do they expect? by Restil · · Score: 1

      It's not worth it. The industry turns over every couple years anyway. This will just turn out to be little more than an unexpected re-tooling operation and will present, at most, a minor annoyance for the industry for a few months. In the meantime, remaining facilities that were unaffected by the disasters will scramble to increase production to pick up the slack and within a few months, things should be back to normal. The cost to insure against minor annoyances such as this aren't worth the overhead cost that would be added to each product sold, and we probably wouldn't accept them if they were. We would rather have to face the possibility of having an inconvenient bump in system prices for a few months out of every 20 years, rather than pay significantly more all the time just to insure that prices remain stable during disasters. The best part about this is that consumers can easily adapt to a HD shortage. Those that REALLY need them will pay for them, but everyone else can always make do with what they've got for a while, even a couple years if need be.

      This will probably have a much larger impact on a company like Google who purchase a LARGE amount of HDs all the time, and rely on the ability to constantly increase storage capacity. Will be interesting to see what happens there.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    24. Re:What do they expect? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Considering that one of the major incentives to move is... government subsidies, cheap price of living usually at least in part organised by local government, various tax breaks managed by government and other similar perks, your selective definition of "free market" is akin to average politician's selective memory.

    25. Re:What do they expect? by shentino · · Score: 1

      We can plan quite well.

      It's just that we're selfish bastards whose plans only exist to cover our own asses and don't give a damn about anyone else's.

    26. Re:What do they expect? by shentino · · Score: 1

      The decision was in the hands of someone who got high enough in the corporate chain of command to have the authority to make this decision in the first place.

      With that in mind I'm not entirely sure this was an accidental oversight.

    27. Re:What do they expect? by shentino · · Score: 1

      what if said consumer product was part of the control system for a factory for a life saving drug?

    28. Re:What do they expect? by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      if any one of those companies had split their factories 50/50 with another location, they could basically print money for the next 12 months by undercutting the entire rest of the market by 50%

      If they have had split the factories and only one half of them would be hit by the disaster, then it would not be a reason for such shortage and thus no reason for raised prices. Hence the surviving half of the factories would not profit so much. Am I wrong?

    29. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rather think this looks like a typically broken monoculture, which is a hairswidth removed from a monopoly, the opposite of free.

      In the fantasy world of the free market, there would have been a lot of places producing harddrives, competing with each other, no? And when one failed another would pick up the slack.

      This is obviously not what has happened.

    30. Re:What do they expect? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The company that had split their factories 50/50 would already be out of business, because their competitors have a more efficient supply chain, are in a single facility, and thus have been undercutting *them* for the last dozen years. The geographic concentration problem of hard drive manufacturers is a result of cutthroat competition, not something that happened in spite of it.

      In any manufacturing business where margins are incredibly tight (probably 2-3% net margins on average for hard drives and other pure commodity manufacturers of that sort), you can't spend a bit more than the next guy to buck the trend or you will get undercut for Dell's/HP's/etc. business, lose 20% of your gross sales one night, and find you can no longer cover your overhead and suddenly you're out of business.

    31. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's elasticity.

    32. Re:What do they expect? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      if any one of those companies had split their factories 50/50 with another location, they could basically print money for the next 12 months

      And if they were lucky they'd recoup the profits lost due to forgoing the economies of scale in the first place.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    33. Re:What do they expect? by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 1

      They can still get new hard drives, it just costs a little more.

    34. Re:What do they expect? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That is a lesson that I don't think will sink in unless and until something major happens in China The day that happens, affecting a wide range of industries, companies may well learn the lesson of the eggs and #baskets. But not until then.

      The minimum any company should have is production capacity for the customers they absolutely have to service, and whose business is key to meeting their quarterly numbers: that way, their future is absolutely in their hands. Other capacity can come either from other plants, or from CEMs or other suppliers.

      Problem is that when there is a glut in the market, such plants won't be operating anywhere near full capacity, and the company either has to keep funnelling cash their way, or furlough them, or even worse, close them down. Closing them down means they're not available when the market is in allocation, furloughing them just highlights the point that they have excess production capacity, and pouring cash their way erodes margins and makes decision-makers look bad when the quarterly numbers are released. Not a pretty choice for any company, but yeah, they could justify at least 1 or 2 extra production facilities.

    35. Re:What do they expect? by happyhamster · · Score: 1

      What is moronic is stubbornly clinging to failed, inhumane "free market solves everything", dog eat dog ideology and resisting any attempt to soften its blows.

    36. Re:What do they expect? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Hopefully this will become a case study for how diversification of supply chain can be immensely profitable"

      That is why I have manufacturers from Germany to China to USA.

      No case study needed - anyone with brains knew this (hell, anybody that watched the Reboot episode with 'Admiral' Dot Matrix kicking Captain Capacitor's ass should have learned this lesson - diversification.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    37. Re:What do they expect? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Just for my edification, what are the species that CAN plan for shit?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    38. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. This is probably the purest denial of market innovation that I have ever seen. This comment presents a perception of the world where creativity and productivity come into being magically, and that the freedom to associate, to collaborate, to trade voluntarily and to discriminate between products creates no incentives or efficacious environment to select for better and better products, created by better and better methods.

    39. Re:What do they expect? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Or cities. Or in the path of semi-annual hurricanes.

      Hear that, Florida? Louisiana?

    40. Re:What do they expect? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Mod up as ROFL.

    41. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just checked my order history at Newegg and I bought a 1TB WD Green drive for $110 in Jan 2009, which is almost three years ago. The same drive today is $140.

      I agree that current prices may not necessarily be "expensive," but it does suck paying higher prices than I did three years ago for the same level of technology.

    42. Re:What do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope they don't relocate to a country prone to earthquakes. Imagine the horror of all those lost sectors right out of the box!

    43. Re:What do they expect? by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that it is measurably more expensive to build a plant elsewhere, if you can choose your elsewhere.

      A recent report on shipping in the economist claimed that it cost $700 per cargo unit (20 foot container) to move a container from Shanhai to Amsterdam. That's 3 cents per T-shirt.

      Components have much higher value/volume ratio. Moving the stuff around is dirt cheap.

      So the question is, "Why are they all there in Thailand" My guess is that they have a training facility and an established corporate culture there. THAT is harder to move.

      ***

      If I were underwriting insurance in such a location, I'd give a hefty discount on flood insurance for people who built on pylons to the height of the banks at the edge of the floodplain.

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  4. This is what you get... by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    ...when you overly optimize for business friendliness. Perhaps moving everything to the Third World was a bad idea after all.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:This is what you get... by heinousjay · · Score: 0

      That's a fairly interesting conclusion to draw. I guess when all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:This is what you get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third world sounds so.....................20th Century?

    3. Re:This is what you get... by fnj · · Score: 1

      It wasn't just moving everything to the third world that was stupid. It was moving everything to a single fucking flood plain in one small spot of the third world that was stupid. I think we have found out why real estate was so fucking cheap there.

    4. Re:This is what you get... by Artemis3 · · Score: 2

      It had nothing to do with the location, it had to do with placing everything in a single place. It's probably cheaper that way.

      If the plant were in the US and the flooding occurred there, the result would have been the same. Capitalism logic dictates: to maximize profits you need to lower expenses, including wages as much as you can. Especially if you have someone competing with the same product.

      "Third world" (obsolete term without Second world) countries allow lower wages and more exploitation (more working hours with less benefits) than "First world" countries, in short, it is cheaper so production moves there. Otherwise your competition will do it and undercut your prices and steal your sales.

      In the past, there were many more companies making HDs, so if a plant failed, it didn't hurt that much. But nowdays, there are basically 2 left, and if one fails you lose half the world production.

      Things like these have happened to ram production as well. There is nothing to do but wait until production is restarted and prices go down again. I wonder how SSD manufacturers will capitalize this?

      Netbooks started with SSDs but moved to HDDs because they were cheaper, but now?

      --
      Artix
      Your Linux, your init.
  5. No HHDs = SSDs? by djh2400 · · Score: 2

    Might this shortage help spur interest in SSDs?

    1. Re:No HHDs = SSDs? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      why, because SSD's float?

      (too soon?)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:No HHDs = SSDs? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      That's silly. Even with the current rise in hard drive prices, SSDs are still terribly expensive by comparison. Otherwise, SSDs would have already been seen as competitive against hard drives even before this supply problem.

      Only 2x or 3x for a lot better performance? Not everyone would have jumped on it but there still would have been plenty of performance minded consumers lining up to buy them.

      Even with limited supply, it still makes much more sense to escalate to larger drive sizes before going to SSD.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:No HHDs = SSDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSDs aren't as popular because they are expensive. I'm not going to switch from platter drives to SSDs because one is as expensive as the other. I'll just wait until the price drops back to a sane level.

    4. Re:No HHDs = SSDs? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's silly. Even with the current rise in hard drive prices, SSDs are still terribly expensive by comparison. Otherwise, SSDs would have already been seen as competitive against hard drives even before this supply problem.

      Only 2x or 3x for a lot better performance? Not everyone would have jumped on it but there still would have been plenty of performance minded consumers lining up to buy them.

      Even with limited supply, it still makes much more sense to escalate to larger drive sizes before going to SSD.

      Terribly expensive if you look at price per GB, but not terribly expensive if you're just interested in getting a nice, high performance, low power, quiet drive, and don't need a ton of disk space, then SSD's are quite reasonable.

      Newegg sells a 120GB SSD for about the same price as a 1TB hard disk drive. Most people (well, maybe not the Slashdot crowd) don't need a TB of disk space and the SSD will work quite nicely for them.

      When I upgraded from a 1TB drive to a 64GB SSD in my desktop, I kept the 1TB drive for my large storage needs. It turns out that except for a single DVD that I ripped a few months ago, I haven't stored anything on the 1TB drive, and still have lots of room on the 64GB drive. My 8GB of photos and 12GB of music still leave me lots of room to grow. I imaging that by the time I do outgrow the 64GB drive, I'll be able to buy a 256GB or even 512GB SSD for the same or less price than I paid for the 64GB drive.

      I think the problem that computer manufacturers face is that when a consumer sees a computer with a 500GB hard drive next to one with a 120GB SSD, they are going to go for the 500GB hard drive since bigger numbers are better.

    5. Re:No HHDs = SSDs? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      That's silly. Even with the current rise in hard drive prices, SSDs are still terribly expensive by comparison.

      It depends on what you are comparing.

      If cost per gigabyte is your main concern then HDDs arround 2TB are still your best bet by far.

      OTOH if you are comparing cost of a system drive for an office desktop things are much closer. A 60GB drive will let you install windows,office etc and still have half free. Looking at my local supplier the cheapest sata HDD* is arround £70 while a 60GB SSD is arround £80.

      In the early days of the crisis there were smaller SATA drives available cheaper but at least at my local supplier they have sold out now.

      *there is a 120GB IDE drive for £33 but afaict most modern motherboards don't have IDE.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    6. Re:No HHDs = SSDs? by Pentium100 · · Score: 3, Informative

      *there is a 120GB IDE drive for £33 but afaict most modern motherboards don't have IDE.

      So, if your motherboard does not have IDE, it is still cheaper to buy an IDE drive and a IDE-SATA adapter.

    7. Re:No HHDs = SSDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSDs may not float...but DDs (double Ds) do.

    8. Re:No HHDs = SSDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSD + HDD = match made in heaven.

    9. Re:No HHDs = SSDs? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I'd be more worried that those 120 GB drives are a bunch of new-old stock someone dug up somewhere, especially since 120 GB isn't a size I've seen them make for a while. Even if the drive is "new", if it's been sitting since 2006 I wouldn't trust it.

  6. SSD Time by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    It's time to make the switch to better speed, performance and reliability.

    1. Re:SSD Time by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Better reliability is a somewhat dubious claim.

      Given the current pricing on SSDs, reasonably priced drives represent the amount of storage available on laptop hard drives 10 years ago. If I am not using my old laptop drive from 2002 it is not because it's not reliable enough but simply due to the fact that it was overtaken by technology.

      Until stories of people chugging along on 5 or 7 year old SSDs are commonplace, the technology simply won't have the track record to justify such claims.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:SSD Time by atriusofbricia · · Score: 0

      It's time to make the switch to better speed, performance and reliability.

      SSDs will remain the toys of those who want large e-penises (replace with organ of choice) and those few who really "need" the speed until the price comes down to something less than gold pressed diamonds.

      Not to say they're worthless. Just vastly overpriced and overrated for the vast majority of people.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    3. Re:SSD Time by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Speed and performance are the same thing, and reliability is pointing towards HDDs in terms of controller reliability, media reliability and amount of bugs due to technology being still in infancy.

      And of course, let's not forget price per amount of storage.

    4. Re:SSD Time by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 1

      They're really good as OS drives or your most commonly used programs, but not for storage. That's why I have both SSD and normal drive on my laptop too.

    5. Re:SSD Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? This comment is insane. Anyone that owns an modern PC has one bottleneck left in daily use. The spinning-disk harddrive! An intel 120g SSD can be had for 189 anywhere. Thats fine for any home user's OS, games, whatever drive. They make computers wonderfully snappy. Every single person needs one. The user can feel the responsiveness in every action they take. Save a file, load a level, BOOT goddamn boot and hibernate alone make it a good buy. With an SSD you finally feel like you have the computer you'd be using in the year 2011. They also breathe new life into 4200/5400rpm drive'd business laptops! Find any Dell your end users hate and swap in an SSD, you can even cheap out and get a 60gb drive for them, as all user files should be saved to the network anyway. Your users will be happy with you for once. Im going overboard, but its outright crazy to say they are overrated. Consumer SSDs are the only impactful piece of technology for John Q PCOwner, everything else is just esoteric numbers that dont reflect the user experience.

    6. Re:SSD Time by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've obviously not used a machine with the OS and apps on a SSD.
      I will not be getting another computer without a SSD.
      Sure, for bulk data, such as music, movies and photos, these all live on spinning disks, but for things where latency and throughput matters, SSDs are more than worth the additional cost.

      Configure you machine with a small (120GB is usually enough) SSD. Put your OS and all your Apps on this disk. Put everything else on a multi-TB spinning disk and you will feel like it's a whole new computer.

      You'd be crazy (or just too rich to care I suppose) if you wanted your media collection to live on SSD, but even for that hybrid disks are pretty good in a lot of usage scenarios.

      You'll also get little to no benefit putting SSDs on a RAID controller - most RAID controllers are optimised for the access times and throughput of regular hard disks, even if in this case regular means a 15k RPM SAS disk.

    7. Re:SSD Time by mikkelm · · Score: 2

      SSDs of respectable make and model can be found as low as a dollar per gigabyte these days. Either you've never used an SSD in your daily computing, or you have a very unusual perception of value. An SSD as an OS/application drive is by far the most noticeable upgrade that you can perform on a current desktop computer.

    8. Re:SSD Time by EdIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are neither over priced or overrated. Just misunderstood.

      Gen 1 was shit, much like the first automobiles. Just a curiosity for the early adopters and extremophiles. The latest ones are not really over priced. That's just what it costs, which reflects what the market will bear. Sure, there might be price fixing, but for what it *is*, it seems reasonable depending on the model and features.

      It is most certainly not overrated. The performance increase is quite substantial over spinning media. Form factor and density are pretty darn good too. Let's not forget that with no moving parts you don't have to worry about letting it fall. Of course, spinning media has some features to mitigate that, but SSD mitigates it by fundamental design.

      My own laptop has a small 64GB SSD and two 1TB "normal" drives. The responsiveness of the OS *skyrocketed*. You don't need huge SSDs. The smallest SSD on market would probably suffice.

      This is where they are misunderstood. With proper configuration you can move all user data to the larger cheaper drives and use the SSD for core files and temporary storage/cache. Even with Windows 7 bloated to all hell I still have a lot of programs installed (faster to have their files on the SSD too) with almost 1/3rd of the drive free. It's nice to not have to defrag either. With TRIM support the reliability and lifetime of the drive goes up quite a bit too.

      Where they are not overrated at all is server applications. You can build a very very fast DB server with some SSD's. So there are valid enterprise use cases for SSDs when you compare their costs against vastly more expensive solutions delivering higher I/O and throughput such as the ioDrive2. There are quite a few drawbacks to a PCI-E implementation of SSD that can balance against the resultant bottleneck of the SATA bus. However, with 6 GB/s SATA that is less of a concern and there are some pretty decent SATA RAID controllers that can better handle the load. For a number of database applications you don't need a large amount of space, but higher performance. Build a RAID with cheaper and more affordable 64GB SSDs with a decent controller ($1500-200$) and you have a storage solution at about 25% of the cost of the enterprise PCI-E SSD solutions.

      Like I said, very misunderstood.

      The vast majority of people would see a tangible and cost justified benefit simply be using it for the core OS files. I know I am.

    9. Re:SSD Time by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If you try and use SSDs for bulk storage you will waste a ton of money.

      Use them for files with heavy random use patterns though (e.g. your OS and apps) and you will get a big boost in responsiveness for a relatively small outlay. Especially if the machine is a bit short on ram and can't take a ram upgrade.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    10. Re:SSD Time by hawguy · · Score: 1

      It's time to make the switch to better speed, performance and reliability.

      SSDs will remain the toys of those who want large e-penises (replace with organ of choice) and those few who really "need" the speed until the price comes down to something less than gold pressed diamonds.

      Not to say they're worthless. Just vastly overpriced and overrated for the vast majority of people.

      With a 64GB or 120GB SSD costing around the same as a 1TB had drive, I think the hard drive is the big e-penis, and the SSD is for people that know that size doesn't matter (for most people).

    11. Re:SSD Time by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Configure you machine with a small (120GB is usually enough) SSD. Put your OS and all your Apps on this disk. Put everything else on a multi-TB spinning disk and you will feel like it's a whole new computer.

      Or, buy a hard drive (or a few of them) that costs as much as the 120GB SSD, keep the OS on the current 15kRPM hard drive and not worry about free space for quite some time.

    12. Re:SSD Time by rsborg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Better reliability is a somewhat dubious claim.[...]

      Until stories of people chugging along on 5 or 7 year old SSDs are commonplace, the technology simply won't have the track record to justify such claims.

      I have no idea why people insist on their drives being so damn reliable. Shit breaks. You need to have a backup plan. You can get free, reliable disk-imaging software that mirrors your drive(s) for all three major desktop OSs.

      I run all my personal laptops on SSDs with a weekly imaging (my OSX laptop has time machine that runs nightly). If my drive fails, I just boot from external for immediate issues, and I can replace the drive in a day or two if while I RMA or buy a replacement.

      The key here is to have a process that emphasizes backups. I've gotten all my relatives on the religion too... nowadays there's no excuse other than you wanted to save $100 or so to not buy a 2nd external HDD.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    13. Re:SSD Time by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 2

      if you're talking about 15k enterprise drives (yes, I was and I nearly added this comment too) then dollars per gigabyte they compare pretty well to SSD.
      Here RRP on a Seagate Cheetah 15k.7 600GB SAS hard drive is $914 - this is an enterprise-grade server hard disk.
      An Intel 320 Series 600GB SSD is $1684 - not even twice as expensive.

      No matter how you configure spinning hard disks, you will not get the IOPS that you can easily get from a single SSD.

      If you haven't extensively used a machine with a SSD, no amount of argument I make will sway you to realise what incredible value for money a SSD actually is in real-world usage scenarios.

      Buy an SSD for your OS and Apps. Buy multi-TB disks for your bulk data. Never have to worry about disk iops or throughput or free space for quite some time.

    14. Re:SSD Time by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      if you're talking about 15k enterprise drives (yes, I was and I nearly added this comment too) then dollars per gigabyte they compare pretty well to SSD.

      I have a 36GB and a 146GB 15k U320 drives, but I paid less than I would have if I had bought SSDs (especially for the 36GB one, which I bought maybe 4 years ago). I do not remember the exact prices I paid, but I compared them at the time and found out that HDDs were cheaper (also, they can be written more times, but I hear that new SSDs also can be written a lot of times).

      Buy an SSD for your OS and Apps. Buy multi-TB disks for your bulk data.

      This assumes I have a lot of money. If I have enough money to buy a SSD OR a multi-TB HDD, I'd rather buy the HDD. After all, my bulk-storage HDDs are old (newest bought in 2007), and I could replace almost all of them with a single drive (or just add the drive to have more space).

      Also, I am sure that a SSD would make my computer load programs faster, but I do not close them all that often. I have firefox running all the time (and restart it when it starts using too much memory or becomes too slow, maybe once every few days), same with other stuff, except games of course, but games do not take long to load either (especially compared to play time).

      Here RRP on a Seagate Cheetah 15k.7 600GB SAS hard drive is $914 - this is an enterprise-grade server hard disk.
      An Intel 320 Series 600GB SSD is $1684 - not even twice as expensive.

      Is the SSD as reliable as the HDD?

    15. Re:SSD Time by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why people insist on their drives being so damn reliable. Shit breaks. You need to have a backup plan.

      It's not about the backup, or the data. When I buy something, I want it to last (especially if it is expensive), because I do not like paying for stuff that breaks soon.

      Even if I make a backup three times a day, when the drive beaks, my computer crashes. Then, I have to order a new drive and wait a day for it to arrive (hopefully, the drive did not break on Friday afternoon). When it arrives, I have to install it, restore the backup and restart my PC. Oh, I also had to pay for the new drive.
      Well, I could buy two drives and keep one as a spare, but then I will be paying twice the money for the same space and some part of the hassle still remains. On a desktop, I could use RAID1 but I would still need to buy two drives. Laptops usually do not have the space or the battery capacity to afford RAID1.

      Same is true for other devices (for example power supplies). SSDs cost more than HDDs, so I would expect them to last longer (and since my hard drives are quite reliable, a SSD would have to work at least 10 years). As the technology is new, nobody knows how long SSDs will last, so I will have to wait and see.

    16. Re:SSD Time by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      SSD prices have dropped quite significantly since 4 years ago. They were obscenely expensive back then, and now they're expensive, but worth it.
      You (probably) don't need 15k RPM drives for bulk data in a workstation or personal computer.

      If the choice comes down to one SSD or one HDD, and you have lots of data then you have to get the HDD. Instead of getting the biggest HDD you can get for, say, $200 however, you will be better off if you spend $100 on a small (60GB) SSD for your OS and $100 on a large, but not quite as large, HDD.

      As for reliability, it's rather a moot point as that's what backups are for.

      As I said, unless you've experienced the general speedup throughout the entire OS when running off an SSD, don't discount it. As someone else in this thread said, it makes a computer built in 2011 feel like it's meant to be in 2011.

      On a general workstation or personal computer - the one thing you spend waiting on is disk I/O. Generally you're waiting on iops (I/O operations per second as the number of I/Os per second is a better measurement than the amount of data transferred per second). These days computers generally have enough RAM, they generally have enough CPU, they generally have enough graphics processing but all of these operations are usually waiting on disk IO.

      I whacked a SSD in my laptop. It went from a machine that was sluggish to feeling like (not benchmarking like, mind you, but from a user's perspective, feeling like) it was faster than my Mac Pro workstation. Apps launched instantly, the machine booted in 15 seconds to a usable desktop with apps launched. Just doing stuff felt a lot faster. It went from having a disk that would be flat out at 400-600 iops (and bringing the whole machine to a standstill) to having a disk that could handle over 7k iops and still feeling responsive.

      Before SSD came along, you'd need $100k+ of spindles to sustain 7k iops. Now you can do it on a $100 SSD.

      I'm not arguing with your points, they're all valid. I am saying that you need to experience a machine running on an SSD to make a valid judgement on the worth of SSD vs HDD.

      It's not just rebooting and loading apps that benefits from having a SSD, although these are areas that show the most marked improvement, the general responsiveness of the machine is improved drastically. It used to be that machines never had enough RAM, and adding RAM was the cheapest way to speed things up. Now they generally do have enough RAM and adding a SSD is the way to go. I've put SSDs in people's computers as an upgrade and with no exaggeration it feels like a whole new computer.

    17. Re:SSD Time by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      As for reliability, it's rather a moot point as that's what backups are for.

      I wonder how "fast" the OS would be if it was running from the tape backup while I waited for the store to get the new hard drive for me (takes about 1 working day, sucks if the drive broke on Friday afternoon). Assuming I could get it to boot from tape, I know LTO5 has a special filesystem to make the tape look like a hard drive. Maybe it would be possible to do something with LTO2 as LTO5 drives are quite expensive.

      My computer was not built in 2011, but is still good enough for me and I can upgrade the CPUs to 1.4x faster than the current ones if some game does not run because of the CPUs.

      You (probably) don't need 15k RPM drives for bulk data in a workstation or personal computer.

      No, the 36GB is for OS+apps and the 146GB is for games.

      SSDs are more durable (not as sensitive to shock etc) than hard drives, so putting one in a laptop could be a good idea, but a SSD with laptop IDE connector would probably be even more expensive (as the demand is lower).

      As for the responsiveness, I believe you. My computer does not seem slow responding to me, but maybe that is because I am used to it taking that bit of time to do something that would be done instantly with a SSD. But if it's only for that, then I'd rather save the money and buy a new video card (or CPUs) when games become too slow or I want to encode video or do calculations faster. If I had a 3600RPM drive as a system drive, then the lack of responsiveness would annoy me and I would consider spending money on making the PC more responsive.

    18. Re:SSD Time by shentino · · Score: 1

      So basically, SSD is L5 cache between your ram and your hard drive

    19. Re:SSD Time by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      You've no doubt built a very good system there. I used to do the same thing when I built my own computers - get enterprise grade components wherever I could.

      Look at SSD though. You can get a 60GB SSD for $80 that will be at least a factor of 10-100 faster than the drives you've got.
      10-100x the iops.
      Seek times reduced from over 10ms to around 0.1ms
      Something like 500MB/sec data transfer rate
      Lower power consumption.
      Lower noise.
      No moving parts.
      MTBF of 2 million hours.

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227737

    20. Re:SSD Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So were do you store your backups at/on? SSD or HDD? because if you store on a HDD you completely invalidate your arguement imo.

    21. Re:SSD Time by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      The seek time of my system HDD is ~3ms average, 5ms end-to-end. Yes, the SSD would be a lot faster, especially for random reads/writes (no, I would not get 500MB/s transfer rate, unless I found a PCI-X SATA3 controller, SCSI is only 320MB/s). However, the computer feels quite responsive now. Though I probably should get a small (4GB or so) SSD for the page file, so that the computer would work as if it had more than 4GB RAM (I do not want to reinstall Windows to 64bit, not because of the 64bit, but because reinstalling would be tedious). Maybe I should get a DRAM based SSD, those should have no problem with writes.

      How do modern SSDs handle writes? Do they still wear out soon if you write a lot to it?

      As for power and noise, well, my computer uses a lot of power so reducing it by 6W or so won't matter. The computer also has high airflow fans (my room sometimes reaches 40 degrees in the summer, over 30 a lot of times), so the drive cannot be heard anyway (and it's not that loud).

    22. Re:SSD Time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If my drive fails, I just boot from external for immediate issues, and I can replace the drive in a day or two if while I RMA or buy a replacement.

      Maybe, if you're good with a soldering iron.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:SSD Time by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      It's not about the backup, or the data. When I buy something, I want it to last (especially if it is expensive), because I do not like paying for stuff that breaks soon.

      Even if I make a backup three times a day, when the drive beaks, my computer crashes. Then, I have to order a new drive and wait a day for it to arrive (hopefully, the drive did not break on Friday afternoon). When it arrives, I have to install it, restore the backup and restart my PC. Oh, I also had to pay for the new drive.
      Well, I could buy two drives and keep one as a spare, but then I will be paying twice the money for the same space and some part of the hassle still remains. On a desktop, I could use RAID1 but I would still need to buy two drives. Laptops usually do not have the space or the battery capacity to afford RAID1.

      Same is true for other devices (for example power supplies).

      Ok, here's a little economics for you: convenience costs money. Between the two extremes of paying as little as possible and having as little downtime as possible, you have to find a point where you are comfortable with the amount you are spending, the downtime you incur when it happens, and how predictable that downtime is. As you've placed yourself on the former extreme, you're saying that your personal time to recover from a downtime, and your ability to predict when that will be, is worth less to you than the money it would cost you to mitigate your situation.

      SSDs cost more than HDDs, so I would expect them to last longer

      Why on *earth* would you expect that? It's a *completely* different technology, with completely different failure modes.

      (and since my hard drives are quite reliable, a SSD would have to work at least 10 years). As the technology is new, nobody knows how long SSDs will last, so I will have to wait and see.

      The technology isn't that new: right now you can pay extra to get SSD drives which are guaranteed for a given number of writes. How long they last will depend on your usage patterns, but I've seen specs for drives which are guaranteed for *years* of continuous writes. Not only that, but *they'll tell you when they need replacing*.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    24. Re:SSD Time by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      Hardly. Backup drives of either sort fail, just like primary storage of either sort.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    25. Re:SSD Time by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Until stories of people chugging along on 5 or 7 year old SSDs are commonplace, the technology simply won't have the track record to justify such claims."

      Umm, I've been running SLC SSD drives for a very long time in my research facilities, almost the amount of time you dictate.

      Ever hear of Compact Flash?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    26. Re:SSD Time by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "My computer was not built in 2011, but is still good enough for me and I can upgrade the CPUs to 1.4x faster than the current ones if some game does not run because of the CPUs."

      Umm, hi, socket changes would like to have a word with you.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    27. Re:SSD Time by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Yes.
      How to breath new life in an old laptop when you cannot find IDE SSDs but only SATA SSDs ? Get a ZIF to IDE adapter and a ZIF SSD. With some chewing gum you are all set: my 7 year old HP laptop now boots in under 10 seconds with Kubuntu.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    28. Re:SSD Time by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't buy the fastest CPUs for the motherboard at the time, so I can upgrade. The current CPUs are 2x Opteron 270 (dual core 2GHz), I can replace them with 2x Opteron 290 (dual core 2.8GHz), that would be 1.4x faster, since speed depends on the frequency within one family of CPUs.

    29. Re:SSD Time by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      Modern SSDs are much better with writes. They all have pretty extensive wear-levelling built in to the firmware so that even if you write to the same block over and over again, the writes get spread out over the cells that make up the disk.

      I've seen figures quoted such that if you were continually writing to the disk, filling it up over and over again at a rate of 10's of MB per second then you'll still have 3-5 years of life - which is about what I'd rate a hard disk for in demanding applications like that too.

      Furthermore, the failure mode of SSDs indicate that writes will fail before reads do. Once you've got failed writes, you still should be able to read the data from the SSD and recover it.

      As tedious as reinstalling Windows is, you've now got the perfect opportunity. Get a 60GB SSD and install the x64 version of Windows on that. Then you can do a gradual migration without having to wipe your C: drive. As fast as an SSD is, RAM is an order of magnitude faster so adding more RAM is always going to be better than adding more swap.

      You have a kick-arse system there that can be even better with some careful optimisation - Windows 7 x64 on an SSD will seriously give it a whole new lease of life.

      Failing that, convince one of your mates to go and put an SSD in their system - you really need to use one first-hand to appreciate the benefits.

    30. Re:SSD Time by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      As you've placed yourself on the former extreme, you're saying that your personal time to recover from a downtime, and your ability to predict when that will be, is worth less to you than the money it would cost you to mitigate your situation.

      I do not have unlimited amount of money. Even though I would like to get very reliable components to have as little downtime as possible, I cannot afford them. So I go for "as little downtime as possible, given this limited amount of money". Hard drives are quite reliable in my experience, so I'm using them. I do not know how long SSDs last (5, 8, 10 years?).

      Why on *earth* would you expect that? It's a *completely* different technology, with completely different failure modes.

      Well, almost everyone is saying how reliable SSDs are because they have no moving parts to wear out. Also, since I do not really care about the speed, the only reason I would buy a SSD (instead of a cheaper HDD) would be reliability. If that SSD failed before a hard drive that has been already spinning for 7 years, I would be disappointed.

    31. Re:SSD Time by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      writes get spread out over the cells that make up the disk.

      So, when the power fails while the SSD is writing, I lose not only the data that was not written yet, but some other data as well*?

      * as I understand, the wear leveling works by moving the data around. I need to write x KB, so, the SSD moves x KB of less often changing data from one location to the other (that is more worn) and the writes the new x KB to the less worn location.

      As tedious as reinstalling Windows is, you've now got the perfect opportunity.

      Nah, assuming all my hardware and software worked with 7 x64 (though, as I understand, x64 versions of Windows do not support 16bit apps). Installing all the software I installed in the last 4 years would mean that my computer would not work as well for the coming weeks ("Oh, I need to do this, let me start this app real quick, oh, I forgot to install it, hmm... now where is the setup file"). Last time I reinstalled Winows on my main PC was 4 years ago, when I built this PC. That was worth it, because I went from a single core 2.2GHz CPU (Athlon XP 3200+) with Radeon 9800Pro to dual CPU dual core 2GHz (2x Opteron 270) and Radeon HD2900XT.
      All that for additional couple of GB of RAM (6 out of 8 slots are in use already with 4GB) - not worth it. Well, at least until new games stop supporting WinXP.

    32. Re:SSD Time by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

      Also, I am sure that a SSD would make my computer load programs faster, but I do not close them all that often. I have firefox running all the time (and restart it when it starts using too much memory or becomes too slow, maybe once every few days), same with other stuff, except games of course, but games do not take long to load either (especially compared to play time).

      so you've adapted to the computers lack of speed by changing your behavior. Commendable! when i'm coding, not having the 10 sec lag while it spins up and does a grep means 10 seconds less i have to remember something while i work.

      Humans have limited short term memory and anything that can allow a human to process within that short term memory horizon is going to confer a big advantages.. i wish people realized that that specific ability to buffer is quite variable and should not be relied upon, when saying a system is "good enough". Good enough for you, maybe, on a good day, when you were on lots of caffeine and young. I say the computer revolution is about *maxmizing my intellect*, and SSD's do that by working close to the speed of my thoughts. Which is why i love them /end rant :)

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
    33. Re:SSD Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And HDD is L6 cache between your SSD and Google.

    34. Re:SSD Time by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      Why on *earth* would you expect that? It's a *completely* different technology, with completely different failure modes.

      Well, almost everyone is saying how reliable SSDs are because they have no moving parts to wear out. Also, since I do not really care about the speed, the only reason I would buy a SSD (instead of a cheaper HDD) would be reliability. If that SSD failed before a hard drive that has been already spinning for 7 years, I would be disappointed.

      SSD lifetimes aren't measured in years, they're measured in *writes*. If you had an SSD powered on for 10 years but never written to, it might well have another 10 years left in it (barring failures that are common to all electronic devices, that is). Keeping a platter spinning for that long would be asking for trouble.

      That being said, the reliability of an SSD isn't so much in that they last for a long time, it's that you can know with a fair degree of precision *for your use case* when they are going to fail *after*, so you can budget to replace them *before they fail*. This is necessary because, unlike hard drives which often fail gradually while giving you a chance to pull your data off, SSDs fail instantly and completely.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    35. Re:SSD Time by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Using it as a cache is one possibility, Intel bundle an implementation of that with their z68 chipset*

      Doing so is potentially more efficient than deciding what to put on it yourself but it's also less predictable (what you want cached and what the computer decides to cache may not be the same) and afaict at least intel's implementation locks you into windows on the Z68 chipset. SSDs are now cheap enough that you can just use a HDD for media and a SSD for everything else without breaking the bank. Heck i'm considering not putting a HDD in my next desktop initially (especially if I HDD prices are still high when I get around to building it), I can always add one later if I need the space.

      *I suspect only supporting it on z68 is an artificial restriction but I don't know for sure.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    36. Re:SSD Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, 15k RPM is still no comparison for SSD with the OS. There more to it than data throughput, you want simultaneous access and not having to wait for mechanical heads moving around and fighting queue and contention.

    37. Re:SSD Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am unable to find an SSD that can handle my steam directory what to speak of all my other apps.

  7. China to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why isn't China in the hard drive business?

    Isn't China one of the leading rare earth metals exporter at the moment?

    1. Re:China to the rescue? by Guppy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why isn't China in the hard drive business?

      That's actually a very good question.

      There's an parallel situation with semiconductor manufacturing. There's a interesting paucity of foreign companies with fabs in China.. There's only about three entries from foreign companies. All the other fabs in China belong to the native Chinese company SMIC, which has substantial state investment... as well as a history of IP-theft lawsuits.

      It's almost as if semiconductor manufacturing corporations were smart enough to foresee the long-term consequences of building up their own future competitors.

    2. Re:China to the rescue? by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      And note that while idevices and similar are "made" in china they are made by chinese contractors, not by the western companies that sell them.

      Afaict the trick to dealing with china is to keep your assets (both "IP" and tangible) OUT of the country. Sure get em to fab and assemble the PCBs and put them in boxes (it's not as though they will learn anything they couldn't learn by buying your product and dissecting it) but don't put anything in that you can't afford to lose (and if you are a big company that extends to having the dealing with local companies be done in a manner that does not involve your executives traveling to china where they can be held hostage on trumped-up charges).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:China to the rescue? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      You'd be compounding the problem given that they aren't known for quality.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    4. Re:China to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      executives traveling to china where they can be held hostage on trumped-up charges).

      Like that Russian programmer who was held hostage by the government for half a year when he foolishly visited the United States, only freed after he paid the $50,000 ransom (and agreed to try to fuck his employer)?
      Please give a link that supports your claims, I don't think China would do that to a rich foreigner who is investing in the country.

    5. Re:China to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is in the hard drive business!

      I purchased a new hard drive from NewEgg a couple weeks ago because I had to replace a failed drive. The 1.5TB Seagate was made in China.

    6. Re:China to the rescue? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      That means the final assembly screwdriver plant is in China. The expensive high tech stuff is done elsewhere. For example the read-write heads are made in Northern Ireland.

  8. price of SDD is still more then HDD of the same si by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    size so there price will need to come down as well.

  9. Clearly something is wrong here... by The+Optimizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... because just before drive production went offline I finally outfitted my new home server with 9TB of storage for just $420. Pretty much my entire life, it's been that once I go and buy some computer hardware, two weeks (or however long the return period is) later, the price is guaranteed to be cut significantly (or a much better version is released).

    Someone needs to check the alignment of the universe.

    1. Re:Clearly something is wrong here... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping that the current batch of drives last long enough for the prices to correct themselves.

      I just bought a bunch of drives myself too. It had been a few years since buying the last batch and seemed like a good time to get ahead of the older batch of aging hard drives.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Clearly something is wrong here... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to check the alignment of the universe.

      you're right, its out.

      be a dear and find us a left handed monkey wrench.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Clearly something is wrong here... by Macrat · · Score: 1

      I got lucky as well.

      I just happened to have finished over the past year buying 2TB drives during various $69-$89 Fry's Electronics specials.

      I'm currently using ten of them. :-)

  10. In unrelated news... by arose · · Score: 1

    In unrelated news, my desktop's hard drive just failed 15 minutes ago. Fuck.

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    1. Re:In unrelated news... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      A client that I perform server maintenance for just had two drives drop out in the same day (one for each server). So two RAID5 containers are now in a degraded state and their out of warranty to boot. Not my fault, I warned and pleaded with them years ago about renewal. Anyways, yes. Drives always seem to go bad at the most inconvenient of times. It's almost a law a nature or something.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:In unrelated news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murphy's law, Anything that can go wrong will go wrong (at the worst possible time). Seems like he knew what he was talking about!

    3. Re:In unrelated news... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, you have a backup!

      Also, time for a SSD. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:In unrelated news... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Murphy's Law isn't a law and should be re-written as such.

      I haven't blown up the planet and that's the worst thing that could go wrong at any time.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:In unrelated news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because bad days for all others outweigh your blowing the planet up.

  11. We Should Be Making Them Here by rally2xs · · Score: 0

    HD's and a lot of other stuff. No, its not the labor rates, its the taxes. We can't do squat as long as we have a 35% corporate tax rate Federally combined with an average 4.5% state tax rate to give us the 2nd-highest corporate tax rate on the planet. All we need to do is abolish the IRS and the income tax, totally, and we'll have an economic boom of biblical proportions. And, we'll make hard drives, too. Its called The Fair Tax. It abolishes the IRS, and taxes consumption instead. It will reindustrialize America.

    1. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you tell em Ayn!

    2. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baseless conjuncture, particularly since what you actually need to do for that is repeal all environmental and labor protections. You might have something resembling an economic blip then, but you won't notice as you will be working 16 hours in a smogfilled factory.

    3. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever bother to check what the _effective_ corporate tax rate actually is? If there is one thing Us corporations are NOT, it is burdened by taxes.

    4. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't do squat as long as we have a 35% corporate tax rate

      Corporate tax is on net profits, not on revenue. You can make 10 hard drives, you can make 10 thousand hard drives, and that tax won't hit you any harder just because you're doing greater business. If you can make money, then you're making money, and if you can't make money in the US, well you're not getting hit with the corporate tax anyways. And that's without any of the many special deductions and loopholes companies like GE use to make huge profits and yet pay no federal income taxes.

    5. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Just the opposite.

      As we get factories springing up like mushrooms across the land to employ the millions of unemployed, labor will become scarce, and competition for those workers will become more intense. Employers will have to offer good working condx in order to lure those that can weld, wire, pipefit, milwright, machine, etc. into their factories. If you want to see the extreme example of this, note the wooing of software developers with lavish campuses for workplaces that contain tennis courts and weight rooms and swimming pools and everything you could want in pleasant working conditions.

      Helping that along _could_ be unions, if things were to go in the direction of medieval torture dungeon - UAW workers make more than $100K with overtime at time and a half, with Sundays at double time, all negotiated by the unions. That sort of protection can spread if need be, but if employers have learned anything at all, they won't abuse people to the extent that a majority of them would vote for a union.

      And no, we don't need to completely remove environmental regulations, although getting a bit more reasonable might help a lot. Spending billions on the last 0.002% of some pollutant isn't necessarily cost effective if the misery caused by the economic recession resulting from most of our jobs moving overseas is more expensive to the American people.

    6. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      If they end up paying zero taxes, its only because they've paid almost as much as the taxes to lawyers and accountants to guide their every move in the direction of least tax exposure. But the bottom line on that is that their products are very nearly as expensive as if they'd just paid the taxes, because of the necessity to pay those high-priced lawyers and accountants. The whole income tax system hurts the companies that either pay the taxes, or pay the lawyers/accountants to avoid paying the taxes, and its really expensive either way. We cannot have the highest labor rate on the planet and the 2nd-highest corporate income taxes on the planet and expect to compete.

      What we should be doing is to try to make things as cheap for industry as we possibly can, so that there will be more profit and therefore more industry, which means employment will be more plentiful. Automation or not, the factories still need people to install those machines, repair those machines, move them around, wire them up, supply them with compressed air or hydraulic power or chemical supplies such as paint and so forth. While such factories won't employ the 1000's that factories of old did, we can still make it up on the volume by building many more factories.

      And think of the boost to the global warming efforts to have AMERICAN factories which will, naturally, run on natural gas or wind, as most new electrical plants are gas-fired, and 100's of new electrical plants would be needed as 1000's of new factories are built, and this would TAKE AWAY the work from the factories in India and China, which are digging coal as fast as they can. We can get our energy from 1 carbon atom and 4 hydrogen atoms of the methane molecule, about as clean a deal CO2-wise as you can get with fossil fuels, and we will likely be the first to convert all that to solar and geothermal as soon as it makes economic senses to do so. Until then, we have oceans and oceans of natural gas, more than 50% more than the next-most-plentiful supply on the face of the earth, Russia.

      The reindustrialization of America is a win on many fronts, but we're going to have to abolish the income taxes to make it happen.

    7. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Corporate tax happens on the SUPPLIERS to the corporation that are making the hard drives, too. It doesn't matter that the hard drive mfgr is only breaking even and paying no corporate income tax, he is in fact paying it in the elevated prices of all the components he buys from his various suppliers. Need a supply of raw material for casting hard drives? That will be supplied by a company making a profit, because if it wasn't, it'd be out of business. And, the HDD mfgr here will be paying the cost of that supplier's corporate income tax.

      And if we want corporations here to make no profit just to avoid killing taxes, that is a killing philosophy that has already sent most of our jobs overseas, esp. the blue-collar jobs.

      Why not seek to allow corporations every chance possible to make money in America? If that works, we should be up to our ears in newly-employed people. Right now, our unemployment compensation is costing the US Gov't, or more precisely "the rest of us", $100 million a year. Food stamps come in at $70 million a year. Those expenses could be brought down considerably if we could have several 10's of 1000's of new factories, and therefore new jobs, that would enable people that can weld and wire and install and maintain machinery in factories to get off that sort of gov't assistance. Growing the economy has to happen, or we're going to go bankrupt, I believe.

    8. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      If for no other reason, corporate personhood seems like an excellent reason to keep taxing corporations. After all, if they have all the benefits (plus some) of being a citizen, they might as well pay for it like everyone else.

    9. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      The "they" in corporate personhood still drills down to the employees paying those taxes through lower wages and the customers paying those taxes through higher prices, and the stockholders paying those taxes through lower dividends. And, all those people are us.

    10. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If they end up paying zero taxes, its only because they've paid almost as much as the taxes to lawyers and accountants to guide their every move in the direction of least tax exposure."

      [citation needed]

    11. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      I've forgotten where I read that, but the figure is about 75% of the tax expense is paid to lawyers and accountants to avoid paying the tax.

    12. Re:We Should Be Making Them Here by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Or one could more tightly integrate the IRS with the DoD, while making tax avoidance and corporate/economic scuttling(as practiced by those that deny prosperity - through tax evasion and hiring freezes - until they get their political will) an act of terrorism.

      There is no part of the world the US's military cant go and no person they cannot repatriate. Say what you will, but when one wishes to destroy the US economy by threats or acts of offshoring, the US government is obligated to act to halt such activity without regard to jurisdiction.

      You can have that when you have businesses committing to a long term (50+ year) presence in good faith and hiring people as-is in the US under the same terms. Otherwise those tax cut promises are empty words.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  12. @_O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    @_o gay robots

  13. No, it is not like a bank run. by feepness · · Score: 4, Informative

    Banks only keep a portion of deposits on hand. This is standard regulated procedure called "Fractional Reserve Lending". No bank can return every despositers funds on demand at the same time. None of them. Anywhere.

    When bank runs occur, there is a systemic lack of funds to meet demand due to fractional reserve lending.

    This is simply not enough supply to meet demand, and not similar to failure of fractional reserve lending at all.

    1. Re:No, it is not like a bank run. by jamesh · · Score: 1

      It's a little bit like a bank run. People hear that something is running out so they try and get more of it, thus assuring that it does actually run out.

      The comparison fails on pretty much every other level though.

    2. Re:No, it is not like a bank run. by shentino · · Score: 1

      Which is why we have the FDIC to protect depositors and the FRS to protect the banks

      If a bank runs out of cash but still has a healthy balance sheet, it can take out a loan from the fed and not be forced to dump its assets at a loss to the sharks.

    3. Re:No, it is not like a bank run. by shentino · · Score: 2

      We have the FDIC to protect depositors and we have the Fed to protect the banks from liquidity problems.

      Liquidity problems only kill a business because they have to dump capital overboard to circling swarms of sharks that take advantage of the emergency to extract bargains.

    4. Re:No, it is not like a bank run. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> None of them. Anywhere.

      Well, except for a central bank, which can always just print the shit out of their currency.

  14. Just like with girlfriends... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 0

    I guess that means I'll have to settle for one of the unpopular ones.

    --
    That is all.
  15. Ridiculous Comparison by pdxer · · Score: 2

    'Akin to the hysteria when banks defaulted in the 1930[s], PC orders across the industry are being placed for which HD supply does not exist,

    This is not even remotely "akin".

    --
    Looking for a job in Portland, Oregon?
  16. Consumption tax on whose backs? by tepples · · Score: 0

    Taxing consumption would appear to shift the tax burden onto those for whom consumption is a greater part of income, namely the working classes that can least afford a tax hike. Wikipedia's article about the FairTax proposal claims that even with a deduction equal to poverty income, the tax rate for the middle class will rise and that for the top 1 percent will fall. Or what am I missing?

    1. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by rally2xs · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are missing the fact that the well-to-do's spending on their toys far outstrips what they've been paying in income taxes, and especially since they are so masterful at hiding their income from the taxes. You also have to study the Fair Tax to know that no poor person pays a penny of Fair Tax. Also good to know is the fact the the income taxes are highly regressive, starting with 15.3% of the 1st dollar that the poor person makes, in the form of the payroll taxes (social security and medicare) and are further compounded by the hidden income tax in the price of all American-manufactured goods, which amounts to, on average, about 22% of the selling price of those goods. Add everything together, and the poor are being crushed by up to 37% taxes on their income right now. The Fair Tax would reduce that to zero via the mechanism of a prebate, which is essentially the gov't giving every social-security-number-carrying American enough money each month to pay the Fair Tax on income up to the poverty level. So, if you are making the poverty level, you pay no tax. If you are making less than the poverty level, you get a bit of a subsidy. If you are making millions, you're going to be sending millions to Washington when you buy your next $70 million dollar yacht.

      As for the middle class taxes rising, my own taxes would fall about $2K, and at somewhat less than $100K income, I'm square in the middle of the middle class. The testimony of 2 Fair Tax experts before the house ways and means committee earlier this year stated the fact of the rich's spending outstripping the middle class's tax burden. It;s here:

      http://waysandmeans.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=252676

      And if you go down to the bottom of that page, you can call up the video of the whole testimony and get those statements in real-time, on video. Unfortunately, I think that comes at about 1 hr and 36 minutes into the testimony, if I remember right.

    2. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by swalve · · Score: 1

      Nothing. That's the point: giving the rich people a break and soaking the middle class.

    3. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Income tax is progressive tax, consumption tax is regressive. That's by definition. The entire point of income tax is to tax the rich more than the poor - the point is to tax disposable income, not basic survival income.

      2. People with lots of income can very easily sidestep any consumption tax. They just buy their $2m yachts in South Africa or Swaziland or Barbados.

      Simply put, if you do not tax income, you tax nothing. Most of the ultrarich do not spend the money. They just roll it over into some other investment. If you "make" $200m a year, you simply cannot easily spend that much.

      So yes, you can have your "fair tax" and crap like that. All you will get is any income over $100-$200k will never get taxed, ever. And you'll get a lot more cars registered in Mexico on American roads. Especially the luxury and exotic cars.

    4. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by MimeticLie · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      I'd take anything said by the proponents of any proposal with a grain of salt. Let's see what FactCheck.org has to say (emphasis mine):

      With the prebate program in effect, those earning less than $15,000 per year would see their share of the federal tax burden drop from -0.7 percent to -6.3 percent. Of course, if the poorest Americans are paying less under the FairTax plan, then someone else pays more. As it turns out, according to the Treasury Department, “someone else” is everybody earning between $15,000 and $200,000 per year.

      Which seems to contradict your statement about saving money until you look at this graph, which includes payroll taxes. So, yes, someone like you making more than $74,000 would save money. As would someone making less than $24,000. However, the $24,000 - $74,000 group (let's call them the lower-middle class) are the ones paying for it. That doesn't sit well with me.

      Moreover, I'm not convinced that abolishing corporate taxes would bring all those American manufacturing jobs streaming back. For something like software development, where you'd be paying a high wage to your employees no matter where you were located, sure. But manufacturing? Even with 0% corporate taxes, American labor still costs a hell of a lot more than Chinese or Thai labor.

    5. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by IICV · · Score: 1

      You do realize that even if you call it a "prebate", you're not getting a basic income program past the current crop of right-wing nutjobs, right? They'd say that you're giving Cadillacs to welfare queens, and that would be the end of it.

      Though I have to admit, they would probably be super okay with a flat 20-ish percent tax on their "toys" if you got rid of the capital gains and income taxes entirely; after all, toys can be bought overseas.

    6. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by shentino · · Score: 1

      Any tax scheme that pisses off the lobbyists wont fly.

    7. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What you're missing is that that's exactly what the FairTax folks want.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Lets talk American labor. The auto companies said, all over the news programs when they were going bankrupt a few years ago, that their labor rate is $78 / hr. That's because of all the benefits and the retirees' expenses. And here:

      http://www.mt-online.com/component/content/article/40-january2009/85-uptime-lessons-from-auto-manufacturing.html?directory=90

      we learn that it takes 30 - 33 labor hours for the big 3 here to build a car. That's about $2500 in labor.

      The Fair Tax people, long before this article came out, have calcualted that, on average, about 22% of the price of all American goods is composed of income tax expenses incurred by American companies manufacturing things here. That's corporate income tax, employees' individual income tax that makes their labor more expensive, that also includes the payroll tax that the employees pay at 15.3% for medicare and social security that again, makes their labor more expensive, the embedded income taxes in all their raw materials and machine tools and everything else they buy, and so forth.

      Imagine now a $40K SUV. It is reasonable to expect that the embedded income tax expense is around $8800. Compare that with the $2500 that goes into the labor of building the $40K SUV. An SUV would get dramatically cheaper with income tax gone as opposed to making slaves of all the workforce and shafting the retirees of all their pay.

      As for the manufacturing coming back, a survey commissioned by Bill Archer, former house ways and means chair, asked 500 foreign CEO's what their reaction would be if the USA passed the Fair Tax. 400 of them said they would build their next factory in the USA. The other 100 said they would move their company HQ to the USA.

      http://www.examiner.com/finance-examiner-in-national/survey-shows-that-companies-would-create-jobs-us-if-fair-tax-was-instituted?render=print

      As for the Factcheck people, imagine how long they took to consider this question, and then note the testimony of 2 PHD economists familiar with the Fair Tax before the house ways and means committee earlier this year:

      http://waysandmeans.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=252676

      If you scroll down to the bottom, bring up the video, and jump to the 1 hr and 36 minute mark, you find that these economists, under oath and threat of perjury, have testified that everyone's lifetime tax outlook goes down EXCEPT the very rich, who will pay more than they have been paying, because the Fair Tax hits them harder because of all their spending outstripping what their current tax burden is, which is greatly avoided through loopholes that they're very good at exploiting.

      These PHD's have spent quite a lot of effort modeling the Fair Tax, and I am much more likely to take what they say about the Fair Tax bringing back prosperity rather than a website like FactCheck who, again, likely considered this for a couple days to a week.

      And although the economists didn't say explicitly, imagine how many rich just don't have income taxes because they don't work. They sit around and break off a piece of cash from a very large pile of it that belongs to them and live on that each year, as well as the taxes on capital gains which is necessarily much lower than the income tax rates, or you'll kill invenstment if you try to raise them.

      And that's the point - the income taxes are and have been killing the US industry for 50 years, ever since the US lost its consumer electronics to Japan starting in the 60's, and are losing the intellectual employment to places like India even today. When it _all_ goes overseas, we'll have just the thing that absolutely MUST be

    9. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      The right wing are mostly the ones supporting the Fair Tax. Its the left that seem to be dragging their feet. Hey, don't ask me... maybe they want their constituency to remain poor and looking to them for gov't help?

    10. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Income taxes are not progressive. Poor people pay 15.3% of EVERY dollar they earn to the social security and medicare payroll taxes, while those taxes have a cap so that the rich do not. That is incredibly regressive. Also, income taxes embedded in the US cost of doing business here are responsible for about 22% of the price of all goods manufactured here being composed of income taxes, which are paid at 22% by the poor as well as 22% by the rich. We are really hammering poor people at tax rates up to 37.3%, which would totally go away under the consumption tax known as the Fair Tax.

      People buying goods overseas still owe the tax, and a $70M yact is a whole lot harder to conceal than a Swiss bank account.

      You are simply wrong about the rich not spending their money. Who do you think are buying those $10M mansions and $70M yachts like John Kerry's?

    11. Re:Consumption tax on whose backs? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Simply put, if you do not tax income, you tax nothing."

      Spoken like a true idiot that has never had to work a retail job in their life.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  17. And in other news by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Western Digital has restarted HDD production in Thailand earlier than expected.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsavitz/2011/12/02/western-digital-lifts-dec-qtr-view-restarts-thai-mfg-shrs-up/

    1. Re:And in other news by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting article...

      The facility had been under six feet of water October 15; it was pumped dry November 17; power was restored November 26; production resumed November 30.

      Some people here predicted months or years of downtime, but now at least the WD factory is back online in, what, 6 weeks??

    2. Re:And in other news by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      This is probably the highest priority technical effort going on in the world today.

  18. Back in my day . . . by paleo2002 · · Score: 2

    My first computer had a 256Mb hard drive that stored the OS, applications, files, AND had room left to turn on virtual memory. And I had to walk uphill in the snow to buy floppy disks!

    It used to be that if you didn't need a file any more you deleted it. If your disk filled up, you didn't just buy a new one. Aside from graphics, recording, and IT professionals, does anyone really need much more than a few hundred gigs? Or do that many people insist on digitizing their entire DVD library?

    1. Re:Back in my day . . . by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      It used to be that if you didn't need a file any more you deleted it. If your disk filled up, you didn't just buy a new one.

      Since the days of your 256 meg had drive prices have gone down, USB enclosures were invented, and our computers became capable of doing more with whatever data we fed them.

      Aside from graphics, recording, and IT professionals, does anyone really need much more than a few hundred gigs?

      Yes. The digital camera was invented as well.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Back in my day . . . by dave562 · · Score: 4, Funny

      256MB? Get off my lawn. My first computer did not even have a hard drive.

      Damn kids.

    3. Re:Back in my day . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A computer? in my times we used proper abacuses!

      kids these days...

      get off my forecourt!

    4. Re:Back in my day . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pff, my dad's first computer was a human !

      Now get out of my cave!

    5. Re:Back in my day . . . by TobiX · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded funny at all? Have you kids seriously never used a computer without a hard drive? IBM PC? Amiga? Not even a Commodore 64? Come on!

    6. Re:Back in my day . . . by dak664 · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Back in my day . . . by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the PC-XT and the PC-AT. All we used then were floppies.

      Talking about the GGP, 256MB - you don't even get that little RAM these days, unless it's a Raspberry Pi.

    8. Re:Back in my day . . . by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Remember when high school teachers called 3.5" disks "hard disks?"

    9. Re:Back in my day . . . by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded funny at all? Have you kids seriously never used a computer without a hard drive? IBM PC? Amiga? Not even a Commodore 64? Come on!

      Indeed... back in the early 8-bit days- and indeed throughout the 8-bit era in most countries outside the US- most home computers didn't even have a *floppy* drive, let alone a hard drive.

      I got an 8-bit Atari and floppy drive bundle in the mid-80s, and this was very good at the time because the other one's I'd been interested in didn't include the floppy (and would have been outside my price range if they had). Loading from tapes sucked.

      Incidentally, some company *did* offer a 20MB (yes, twenty MEGAbyte) hard drive for the Atari 8-bits around that time. It cost £750 back then (including the interface), equivalent to almost £1500 (or over US $2300) in today's money. Surprisingly, not everyone owned one. ;-)

      Now get off my LAN!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:Back in my day . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to download high def porn a few hundred gigs can get used up pretty quick

    11. Re:Back in my day . . . by jimmydigital · · Score: 1

      My first computer had a 256Mb hard drive

      Pfft... you kids and your trying to be all nostalgic. My first computer didn't HAVE a hard drive.. it had a cassette tape and you were lucky to get one of those. The first system of mine that did have a hard drive had a 51/4 full height 5 meg hard drive that used an MFM interface and was manually set in bios to a 'Type 1'. It turned at 3600 rpm and could do 5 mbit/s (ok had to look those up). At the time it was immense.. both in data capacity and size and weight. You could easily kill someone with it.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. -HLM
    12. Re:Back in my day . . . by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      My first computer, an Acorn Electron, had an audio cassette drive for storage.

    13. Re:Back in my day . . . by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Ya, I remember upgrading my 286 4Mhz computer with a 20MB! HD. I remember thinking when DOOM2 took up 500k that there is no way I am ever going to fill this thing! :)

  19. Post-flood hard drives by Guppy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Western Digital has restarted HDD production in Thailand earlier than expected.

    I'd definitely be a little careful about the first few batches of new drives that come off those assembly lines, considering all the decontamination, repair and re-calibration the flooded manufacturing equipment would have needed. Would be interesting to know if there's going to be a bump in their drive rate failure over the next few years for Western Digital, Hitachi, and Toshiba.

    1. Re:Post-flood hard drives by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      I'd definitely be a little careful about the first few batches of new drives that come off those assembly lines,

      I'm not sure how you would tell. I had a WD drive fail after a few hours of use last year and its replacement will consistently fail after about 900GB is written. According to the SMART data it is perfect, but irrespective of the enclosure it is in, or the cables used, or the host it is connected to, I get I/O failures after writing ~900GB of data (on a 1TB drive).

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Post-flood hard drives by fnj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's hard to predict, but it's also possible the quality will take a jump upward because the equipment is freshly reconditioned or certified.

    3. Re:Post-flood hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a read problem on a 500GB WD at around 400 GB, the drive needed a cold boot to sort itself. SMART data showed just ok's. Got a replacement from warranty.

    4. Re:Post-flood hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard drive failures of Western Digital??? I didn't think that their failure rate could get any worse. I'm at nearly 100%. I have a shelf full of them so much so that our company no longer purchases Western Digital drives.

  20. A suggestion for Western Digital... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get some people to build a solid 12 foot high reinforced concrete wall around the factory. Make bridges over it for people and stuff to get in and out. Seal it up really tight. Then you won't have this same exact flooding problem in the next rainy season.

    1. Re:A suggestion for Western Digital... by mcavic · · Score: 1

      Or just build a few hard drive factories in countries other than Thailand.

    2. Re:A suggestion for Western Digital... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Yup - like Philippines, or Mongolia.

  21. In other words by chicago_scott · · Score: 1

    This is an opportunity...

  22. Even the teensy ones? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1, Troll

    What will Microsoft et al do without a constant supply of itsy-bitsy hyper-overpriced drives to shove into consoles? Will they be forced to buy cheaper 1TB drives off the shelf of Walmart and partition them down to a size that sounds great to a gamer and laughable to everyone else?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  23. Seagate can die and the world would be better by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 0

    I litterally as I was reading these a Seagate 2TB died on me that was part of a 7TB raid0. it's the 8th fucking seagate I have had die on me in the last 2 years. I have had 1 WD die on me in the same amount of time[out of about 25+ active drives 12ish are seagates and the rest are WD or hitachi]. I will NEVER buy another seagate drive for me or my clients. EVER. I've had enough. The last 3 drives I sent in for RMA came back and 1 was DOA 1 died again within 6 months the other was the same fucking drive I sent in and it was still broken. As soon as I am done bitching here I am going to seagate and cancelling my partner program and I am going to pull the 15 or so seagate drives I still have, wipe them and put them on Ebay. I had 10 years of my life on those drives and NO I did not have backups. I'm just one person who can't afford to buy another 7 goddamn TB just to backup my main 7. Though looking back I just lost FAR more of my life then the 1400 dollars it would have cost me to have a spare backup. Do youselves a favor and NEVER buy a fucking Seagate drive, but if your a glutton for punishment I'll have about 10 drives on ebay this weekend you can pick up cheap.

    1. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 2

      since I can't find a delete I need to appoligize for my outburst. I was in [and still am] in a kind of shock you only feel when you realize you didn't plan ahead and lost almost 6 TB worth of data that I have accumilated over the years, all my programs sources, old websites I have done, all my games, mp3s, movies, dvd/blu-ray rips [that can take an hour + each to rip :(:(:(:(:(:(:(] But where does one backup THAT much data? Anyway sorry for the outburst, I am sorry if anyone took the time to read my post.

    2. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by HBI · · Score: 1

      My array is 3TB. I have another system with a 3TB drive that I rsync a copy of it to regularly. Something like that sounds like the ticket for you.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      But where does one backup THAT much data?

      Well, I'm sorry to hear that the 0 in Raid 0 refers to the amount of data you'll get back when something goes wrong. :/

      I did want to answer your question, though, as I've encountered this myself. I have too many gigs of data to easiliy back up. One of the things I've done is organize things a bit. For example, I have some data I'll likely not need for several years, if ever. I have that all compressed. I call this the 'Archive Data'. Every so often I dump all this data to a cheap external drive and throw it in the closet somewhere.

      Then I've got data I need a little more urgently, I call it the 'Active Data'. It gets backed up once a week on a drive that stays on all the time. During this backup, the 'Archive Data' folder is skipped. This dramatically reduces how much space I really need for a backup, and it speeds the process up quite a bit so I'm more likely to do it frequently.

      Finally , and I should have mentioned this sooner, but everything I do is organized by 'project'. That project could be "2009 taxes' or "Beach Photoshoot' and so on. That 2009 Taxes folder? Yeah I can compress that and throw that into Archive. The point is that you keep the actual amount of data you need to keep backed up in a much smaller space. I mean 6 TB won't even fit on one drive!

      Oh, I do have one other suggestion. I have a few DVD rips myself. But I don't back those up provided I still have the original media. Yeah, it takes a long time rip them, but I don't care about them when I've got old bits of work I need to keep handy in case I go job searching again.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... a 7TB raid0. ... I had 10 years of my life on those drives and NO I did not have backups.

      You got exactly what you deserved. Sorry, anyone using RAID-0 without backups does not deserve sympathy: period. You were playing with fire the entire time.

      I'm not even going to comment on your "don't buy Seagate" diatribe either, because it's opinionated bullshit. The reality of the situation is that everyone's experiences differ. You can boycott Seagate all you want -- go buy another brand if it makes you feel better. Failure rates for all brands are about the same. Apparently you weren't around for the days when WD had massive (tens of thousands) batches of drives being packed/shipped which had head alignment problems back in the late 90s, and the same with Maxtor (though the problem was different). Who's "good" and who's "bad" changes all the time. Deal with it. And how do you deal with it? BY HAVING BACKUPS. There are two brands I boycott because of preposterously high failure rates within our company (Fujitsu SCSI U320 drives), and absolutely what-the-fuck-were-you-thinking firmware bugs (Samsung drives). Those are the only two I tell people to avoid, otherwise buy whatever makes you feel better about yourself. Seagate's firmware fiasco was handled inappropriately and thus I only boycott the models of drives which were susceptible to that bug (while Samsung's situation spans multiple models and entire lines).

      And if you want to minimise the impact of having to restore from backups every time you lose a drive? Use a different form of RAID, like RAID-5. You then can lose a single disk without having to worry about restoring from backups. If you stick with RAID-0, you're going to be restoring from backups every time you have a drive failure.

      I hope you've learned your lesson.

      -- Someone who's been working with magnetic storage (at a low level) for about 10 years

      EDIT: Captcha phrase is "depends", which made me laugh since in this context it made me think of adult diapers, which the OP sounds like he needs after his experience.

    5. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      How do you back up 6tb of data? With three 2tb hard drives. Even at today's prices, that's as little as $425 off the shelf at Best Buy (including tax) for three external USB2/3 drives. And RAID 0 for the only copy of your life's work? Come on, dude. Just...come on.

      I hope you learned how to properly evaluate the value of your data and that you need to take reasonable steps to protect it.

      BTW, break of a Jackson or three and buy yourself a 32-64 gig USB stick to store encrypted copies of the most "can't live without" data you have. Tax returns, family photos, etc. I have a tiny Patriot Flex hanging on my keychain with that stuff and larger caches on my netbook and notebook. Having a Big Ass Array (brought to you by Carl's Jr.) doesn't do much good if the building burns down.

      Also, there are data recovery services that can get data from a broken array. They're expensive but they exist.

    6. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by dave562 · · Score: 2

      So let me get this straight, you had a multi-drive RAID0 array and you are upset that it crashed? Do actually know anything about hard drive reliability rates? Well, you do now.

      RAID was invented for a reason. Controllers support hot spares for a reason.

      Lesson for next time. Go with RAID5 or RAID6 and eat the loss of capacity. Parity is worth it. Granted, RAID is not a backup strategy but RAID0 is just a ticking time bomb waiting to go off. You will have a drive failure. It is inevitable.

    7. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by mcavic · · Score: 2

      All hard drives are prone to failure. Sometimes you get lucky and find some that run for 5 years or more, and sometimes not. Back in the old days, I thought the WD Caviar was a terrible model, but now it seems to be good. I like Seagate in general, but I did have two drives with a chirping problem. I'm running on two Samsung drives now that seem a little slow, but reliable.

      Backup considerations really need to come first. I only have 500 megs of data, so I run an automatic Ghost image each night. But with 6 TB, I would cut it in half and make do with 3 TB, mirrored.

    8. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      didn't start out that way :( And it wasn't actually raid0, it was more like I built my media center with a 1TB drive, everything went high-def, needed more space to store my tv shows and stuff so I kept adding another 2 TB as dynamic drives to the pool until I added the last drive and started to worry. I really DID want to back it up and redo it but I didn't have enough space on the rest of my network to backup everything [not many people have a spare 6TB just laying there :(] And then this goddamn flood drove the 2TB drives to over 300 bucks each and I was like, I'll wait until they come back down, and well... poof its gone. My real big loss is about 25 virtual machines which I can not get back, the other stuff I can re-rip or whatever. But the hours lost alone suck, I really wish I had not posted but it just was like you have got to be kidding me, I'm reading about hard drives and poof a 2TB drive dies on me that same very instant [could have been 6 minutes earlier as that is what I have my system watcher poll] but now its there and there is nothing I can do about it. Worse than drunk texting I would think,

    9. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      I realize everyone's piling on to you for using RAID 0, but they're absolutely right. Think of this way: Hard drives are one of the most common failure points for any PC. This shouldn't be surprising--moving parts bring into play all sorts of wear and tear issues that simply cannot be avoided in the long-enough term future. But when you set up a RAID array, you're courting trouble because each drive significantly increases your potential points of failure. If you have 6 drives, and each one has a 90% chance to be functioning properly at the 3 year mark, that's 47% chance that at least *one* will fail in that time frame. And with a non-parity raid setup, all it takes is one failure to cost you everything. Striped raid is great for increasing your speed and storage, but it comes at a huge reliability cost. Next time, assign one drive to parity and you'll be much, much safer. Even if one 1 failing is a likely event, 2 failing simultaneously will be very unlikely.

    10. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by TheLink · · Score: 1

      You might be able to recover some of the data. You must not make any changes to any of the drives.

      If the failure is not bad - you don't hear weird noises from the drive, and you can still read most of the sectors from the drive, then you can make a clone of the drive to a new drive. Then put it into the array and try to copy the most precious stuff to you, especially stuff that cannot be easily recreated again to somewhere else.

      If the failure is bad, you may have to spend $$$$ to get help from data recovery experts.

      --
    11. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by Kjella · · Score: 1

      dvd/blu-ray rips [that can take an hour + each to rip :(:(:(:(:(:(:(]

      I was about to feel sorry for you but LOL, if that's the saddest moment you can't have lost much. Backup the stuff you've made yourself, family photos and all that other shit and if you lose a DVD/BluRay rip, go get it off TPB or something. Seriously. Personally I have three stages. Most is backed up by nothing, stuff I can rip again or download again. The more important stuff is on two physical HDDs (just copy-pasted, not RAID), it'll protect against single disk failure. Finally the really important stuff is also backed up at my parent's place, in case of fire, my whole machine getting stolen or whatever else disaster should strike here.

      I screwed up bad with RAID5 once, lost the entire array because of one dead disk and one flaky disk that'd fail on every rebuild. Now I do JBOD and copy-paste, if you don't need high availability then it's actually not a bad backup method. Easy to understand, no software required. For things that are incremental like photos you don't need a version control, if it's tiny then just do date stamped folders and full copies. No stress at all.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I'm not even going to comment on your "don't buy Seagate" diatribe either, because it's opinionated bullshit. The reality of the situation is that everyone's experiences differ. [..] Failure rates for all brands are about the same. [..] There are two brands I boycott because of preposterously high failure rates within our company (Fujitsu SCSI U320 drives), and absolutely what-the-fuck-were-you-thinking firmware bugs (Samsung drives). Those are the only two I tell people to avoid, otherwise buy whatever makes you feel better about yourself.

      So in other words, *his* recommendation to avoid Seagate based on several failures is "opinionated bullshit", but you feel quite entitled to tell us to avoid Fujitsu drives based on *your* bad experience. Despite this contradicting what you said that "failure rates for all brands are about the same".

      Apparently you weren't around for the days when WD had massive (tens of thousands) batches of drives being packed/shipped which had head alignment problems back in the late 90s, and the same with Maxtor (though the problem was different). Who's "good" and who's "bad" changes all the time.

      Actually, I would have said the same thing- all hard drive companies seem to go through good and bad phases, and I certainly wouldn't recommend (e.g.) Seagate simply because they were quite good a few years back.

      Still, from a mixture of personal experience and what I've heard from others, it seems that Seagate *is* going through a particularly bad phase in terms of reliability at present. (It might just be coincidence, but I was quite wary when Seagate took over Maxtor a few years back, as the latter never had the best reputation for reliability and it was likely that drives produced at former-Maxtor facilities would probably be sold as Seagates. And it seems to have been around then that Seagate entered their current phase).

      How do you deal with it? BY HAVING BACKUPS.

      Have to agree with this one though. There's no hard drive manufacturer reliable enough that one should ever *not* have backups for valued data. And much as I don't want to come over as taking self-righteous easy shots at the OP (he's already been punished for his mistake), anyone who knows enough to be running RAID-0 knows- or should know- the nature of the beast. Namely that it significantly *increases* the risk of total loss from drive failure, which is always a possibility, regardless of drive brand. Even if Seagate are crap, they're not entirely to blame here, and I'm still trying to figure out what he was expecting.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Drive failure rates are around 3%/year so with a N-drive RAID0 your failure rate goes to N*3%/year.
      You gambled and you lost.

    14. Re:Seagate can die and the world would be better by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Just be glad that you learned this lesson with your data, and some company's. We've all been through it at one point or another. I've never lost multiple terabytes, but that's because I learned the hard drive reliability lesson in the early 1990s.

  24. Really?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the world isn't a &variable?

    Surely you jest...

    --

  25. Bullshit by unity100 · · Score: 1

    or you are just the unlucky person.

    i have never ever had any seagate die on me at ANY point in the last 10 years. not only that, i just had removed a 75 gb seagate drive - one which i forgot when i started using - it may be approx 6 years or more. and from that point on that disk kept spinning while hosting oses on it that changed over time - windowses, linuxes, this that. it had programs and games installed on it too. and it was quite silent even after it was 6 years old, still running well. i removed it, because i replaced it with a ssd.

    and even as of now, that disk sits in a drawer, with the image of my ssd which has all oses and programs installed on it as of this moment. if i have any problems, i can just plug in that drive and keep working.

    1. Re:Bullshit by dave562 · · Score: 1

      You are statistically luckier than just about everyone else. Seagate drives die just as much as any other drive. Manufacturers have good runs and bad runs. How many hard drives have you come into contact with in the last 10 years? I've been in contact with thousands of them. There is no such thing as a perfect HD manufacturer. They all fail sooner or later.

    2. Re:Bullshit by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      then you are the luckiest person alive. I have used seagates since there WAS seagates and over the last 5 or 6 years they have gone to shit. It's easy to say I have never had a drive fail when you only have one or two drives, but I have 10 computers most with 4 drives each, some with up to 10 drives. yes it was my fault for putting anything important on a raid0. and as I look most of what I had there is replaceable. I do keep my REALLY important stuff spread out over a few raid5's and I DO backup my just cant live without crap. Out of the last 100 or so hard drives I have bought and or sold in the last couple of years I'd have to say at LEAST 20% of the seagates have died or are showing issues, [yes all under warranty and i happen to live 10 miles from seagate's RMA center in McAllen, sp at least no shipping] about 5% of the western digitals and not one of the 5 hitachi's I have have failed. Though I still am weary of the Deathstar name. I have some seagates that are 7 years old [if not older] and work perfectly. But lately seagates BLOW. about 6 months ago I built a 6 disk raid6 with dual hotspares using 120Gig seagates and 2 have already dropped off the raid. have another raid6 using the same setup but is over a year old and 3 of those drives have dropped. I have another with 8 1TB WD 5200rpm and none of them have even hickupped using 3ware 9650SE controllers, I double and sometimes triple backup all my clients stuff, but it never becomes an issue to me unless poof it's gone. I'm going to call them tomorrow and see if I can order a paddle board and see if I can get the drive to last long enough to move stuff off, but I double whammied myself this time. I didn't hardware raid, I made them dynamic disks and just kept adding them as I got them. Right now I am about 55% seagate, 40% WD and 5% other so it is slightly skewed against seagate, but the fact that I have 9 drives sitting on my bench to either RMA or pull magnets and of those ALL are seagate, all different sizes, some pata some sata but all dead says a lot about seagate.

    3. Re:Bullshit by unity100 · · Score: 1

      I have used seagates since there WAS seagates and over the last 5 or 6 years they have gone to shit. It's easy to say I have never had a drive fail when you only have one or two drives, but I have 10 computers most with 4 drives each, some with up to 10 drives. yes it was my fault for putting anything important on a raid0.

      then your problem is with raid. your raid controllers, motherboards, whatever. maybe you should spend more on raid controllers than hard disks.

  26. Military to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why isn't China in the hard drive business?

    That's actually a very good question.

    There's an parallel situation with semiconductor manufacturing. There's a interesting paucity of foreign companies with fabs in China.. There's only about three entries from foreign companies. All the other fabs in China belong to the native Chinese company SMIC, which has substantial state investment... as well as a history of IP-theft lawsuits.

    It's almost as if semiconductor manufacturing corporations were smart enough to foresee the long-term consequences of building up their own future competitors.

    Or the military of various countries saw how bad an idea it would be and "encouraged" them not to go overseas.

  27. But.. by TheFoxMan88 · · Score: 1

    Here in Australia we just getting over the price hike from the flooding in QLD that caused the price of Bananas to go through the roof, that I could live with but this is insane!

    1. Re:But.. by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      Wait, so you have simultaneous price hikes on Peanut Butter *and* Bananas? This seems like a conspiracy to me.

  28. flooding is just an excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with Tynin flooding is not the factor for raising prices
    greetings
    Web Design India

    1. Re:flooding is just an excuse by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      I'm sure its *a* factor, at least--but yeah, there's probably some price fixing going on as well using the flood as cover.

  29. nope. by unity100 · · Score: 1

    i have used around 3-4 seagate drives in the last decade, recommended/bought everyone else seagate drives, anyone i know here almost exclusively uses seagate drives (they sell like hotcakes in turkey, almost every build has seagate), and the times i can remember hearing someone say 'drive died on me' are the times with quantum brand drives, and thats a looong era in the past. (early to mid 1990s).

    neither in forums nor among acquaintances i hear people say 'drive died on me'. a lot of people may be even thinking hard drives dont die.

    problems you mention may be relevant to bigger than 1 tb drives, teething problems. and the mobos to support them - my new 990fx gigabyte mobo proudly boasts that it can support 3 tb drives, for example.

    1. Re:nope. by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      Hard drives fail. A lot. At about 3% per year according to one study. They're one of the, if not the, most likely to fail components. Given the moving parts and speeds they move, that's not completely unexpected. In fact, if you count heat issues caused by broken fans, I'll bet you could trace a *majority* of hardware issues to moving parts.

      You may have been lucky lately, but that's all it is. You're a statistical outlier. Hard drives are just not very reliable at the best of times, no matter the brand.

  30. I'm still fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So long as they don't run out of my 32 meg drives I'm happy. I'm a little worried when I finally upgrade to Windows 98 but 95 is doing fine on the 32 meg drives. E-mails are a little slow to download but Word 2.0 just blazes. I was considering the upgrade to ME but I hear there's problems so I may just wait since 98 does everything I need and it should kick 95's ass!

  31. Digital Cameras are affected as well by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    I was told in an electronics store that there are supply problems with digital cameras as well. The Canon S100 was supposed to be a big Christmas hit. Amazon in the country where I live has already warned that it will probably not be available until next year.

    Good news for some of the competitors models. So I don't think that this is just price jacking . . . Canon would love to sell these, but can't.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  32. hmm by strack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    if only there was some sort of technology that could elevate the extremely high value factory above any sort of flood. i think i have the solution. i call it a 'hill'

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You 'hill' device infringes my patent for "A system of flood avoidance through increased height of floor and foundation placement by natural or artificial features, including but not limited to use of piers, stilts, trees, stands, ladders, mountains, columns, support members, hills, stairs, jacks, levers, inclined planes, and geologic features." I demand $11,000,400,000.73 in damages, and that all infringing 'hill' devices in your possession be turned over at once.

  33. GF by r00t · · Score: 4, Funny

    all i have left in SATA drives is a single 80Gb and that one is going in the new quad i'm building my GF for Xmas. All she does is FB and IM anyway so 80Gb with win 7 HP will be just perfect for her.

    Not Linux? Do you just not love her or is this some S+M thing you two are into?

    1. Re:GF by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually i'd like her to have an OS that works, thanks ever so. I have WinXP boxes in the field going on a decade, that's three service packs and not a SINGLE driver failure, not one. Until Torvalds stops Goatse-ing the kernel and allows Linux to have a hardware ABI its simply unsuitable for purpose unless you are a CS grad, a nerd who thinks reading man pages and doing forum dances is a "fun" way to spend a weekend, or a programmer. Since my GF is none of those things I'd like her to have a functional OS and Linux doesn't cut the mustard friend.

      Hell when i point out Linux is too dependent on CLI fixes and has too many drivers breaking on update instead of getting "well maybe we should do something about that" from the community I get 30 responses telling me how "powerful and leet" CLI is, with one going as far as to ask me "Well how do you expect to write a GUI for "for" loops" like IRL Suzy the checkout girl and other normal people are sitting around writing if/then/else statements? I'm sorry but the entire Linux community is off their nut. I'd be happy to post the link from LinuxInsider BTW, its almost comical how completely out of touch with reality the Linux community is with the wants and needs of consumers. They truly believe that grandmas write for loops and ordinary folks like my GF just can't wait to learn all about their 1970s terminal throwback.

      As I finally threw up my hands and said "Its like mass insanity, how else can you explain otherwise rational people behaving so irrationally" and the fact you think an easy to use OS that can be updated for years without breaking and is supported until 2020 is ""S+M" shows that you too are peobably a little off your rocker friend.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:GF by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, once you have a new friendly distro like ubuntu or mint set up, and dont do the half yearly upgrade dance (ubuntu keeps a version supported for two years anyway), shit doesnt just break out of nowhere. I am typing this on an old thinkpad with ubuntu 10.04 installed and the only reason i use the CLI at all is because sometimes i find it more convenient then using the UI with a trackpad, or when i ssh into my servers for maintenance.

      If all your GF does is facebook/internet, a simple box with recent ubuntu/linux mint will do just fine. Keep in mind your GF shouldnt have admin access, as it isnt needed and can only pose a risk.

      Also, why the hell build her a quad? a dual core is more then enough for that usage pattern

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    3. Re:GF by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "I'd like her to have a functional OS and Linux doesn't cut the mustard friend."

      Apparently you haven't used Ubuntu in a while (ignoring PulseAudio bullshit.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:GF by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sorry but that's bullshit friend. pulseaudio is a fucking nightmare from hell, the 6 month upgrades break more shit than they fix, and thanks to Torvalds and his itch scratching the kernel is constantly changing like the shifting sands.

      I often have close to a dozen off lease machines coming through the door so I HAVE tried Linux friend, and its a fucking mess. hell the Linux of 2004 was more stable than this, the DEs have been gutted and replaced with frankly alpha quality code, the wireless is beyond broken, half the time I can't get jack shit to stick in network manager unless I go CLI (which when i complain again I get 40 treaties on how fucking wonderful CLI is, bite me CLI nutters!) so there is no other way to put it, its really programmer's toys at the moment, certainly not anything i'd trust to a non tech. and since her dad had a heart attack she is having to live 150 miles away and we see each other on the weekends, how the fuck am i supposed to fix her box if Linux takes a shit on Tuesday? with windows she simply calls me and gives me the code for remote assistance and BAM! I've got full control, just like i'm sitting at the box. since i haven't seen Windows Ethernet go down in ages (again unlike Linux where the last ubuntu update took a big shit on network manager for me) as long as she has a connection i'm right there if something goes wrong.

      I'm sorry but until the nutters let go of the damned CLI and treating everything from the kernel up as tweaker central its simply unsuitable for purpose. in the retail biz rep is EVERYTHING, I get a bad rep i might as well close the doors and Linux shits itself worse than Windows 98 from what I've seen. here try my "is it safe?" test and see for yourself, this test simulates what my customer would go through if they only owned the box THREE years. Oh and before you say LTS allow me to say FUCK LTS, its a code word for "runs old shit" and most of the software is NEVER backported so you're looking at third party security risks, no thanks. ALL of my machines MUST have the latest patches, no unpatched software allowed.

      Now download the version from 3 years ago, get all the drivers working (CLI is allowed here, after all you're the builder ATM not the buyer) and once it is done allow it to update to current, remember NO CLI from this point on because you are Suzy the checkout girl, not some geek! Now see what happened? see how much shit be broke? THAT is the problem. I'm typing this on an XP Home box that has had the same install since 2003, no bugs, no crashes, no broken drivers, and that is after TWO, count 'em two service packs and about 2000 patches.

      So I'm sorry friend but from my perspective, and I know this'll piss you off but I call it as i see it, Linux IS Windows 98, no more, no less. What was Win98? It was a CLI OS with a DE shell that wasn't very stable and kinda sorta worked for the basics but if anything went wrong you'd need to go CLI, in fact you could just go straight to CLI and bypass the shell completely. what is Linux? Why It is a CLI OS with a DE shell that isn't very stable and kinda sorta worked for the basics but if anything goes wrong you'd need to go CLI, in fact you could just go straight to CLI and bypass the shell completely. BTW did you know Windows doesn't even HAVE easy access to CLI or even start>run anymore? In windows 7 it is buried waaaaaay in the back under accessories where nobody will EVER find them unless they go specifically hunting for it because IT IS NOT NEEDED. can YOU say the same? of course not because the answer to EVERY question in Linux ALWAYS comes down to "open up bash and type" period. Ask for anything else and you'll get shit thrown at you.

      Enjoy your programmer's paradise friend, but since programmers are 0.04% of the population don't be surprised when you never gain any share. Hell I could go on all day pointing out the failures in Linux but why bother? you'll just call me filthy names because I won't drink the koolaid and pretend that inside every grandma there is a C programmer wa

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:GF by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Do you even read what you posted? "As long as she doesn't need sound its good" well who the fuck wants an OS with no damned sound? Pulse is a damned nightmare from hell friend and frankly the whole community has gone right off the deep end with the 'CLI is teh leet!" bullshit. Here check out this exchange and see how batshit the community has become. especially check out WorBux who thinks grandma knows what CP and MV is along with saying you need CLI for "for" loops, like normal people are writing if/then/else programmer horseshit!

      Frankly MSFT could raise their prices 300% it wouldn't matter, apple might gain some more share but Linux sure as hell won't, because the community is so out of touch the normal users might as well be Martians! For the last 3 years NONE of my users besides me has even HAD CLI access, because i remove it from my image to clean up the start menu, do you know how many complained? hell do you know how many even noticed? NONE, zip zero zilch nada squat nein. Year after year, patch after patch, Windows just WORKS, no broken drivers, no fucked up "settings won't stick" BS like what I went through with networkmanager in Linux, no forum dances, no CLI fixes, none of that. The machine i'm typing this on is a circa 2003 WinXP Home box i got several years back out of a pallet of refurbs and keep as a nettop because its ultra low power Sempron makes for a cheap nettop and it still has the SAME INSTALL from 2003, that's two service packs, around 1800 patches, know how many broken drivers I've had? Know how many times I've had to go CLI with it? i'm sure you know the answer and THAT is why Windows is WELL worth the price!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:GF by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed you managed to go on an entire anti-Linux rant without once mentioning the application your mythical end user needs. The fact that there might be some task for which the available apps aren't up to snuff is at least a somewhat viable starting point for a counter-Linux argument.

      As is, your rant is pathetically outdated FUD.

      I would rather run an OS that's SAFE to run until 2020 regardless of whether or not it's being constantly tweaked. It's also less trouble for me if the people I support do the same.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:GF by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Sorry but that's bullshit friend. pulseaudio is a fucking nightmare from hell, the 6 month upgrades break more shit than they fix

      So why bother? It's not like you're running WinDOS and need to protect yourself from the virus of the week. Subjecting yourself to Windows-isms on an entirely different platform is mindless and unecssary.

      The rest of your rant boils down to "repeating a lie won't make it any more true".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:GF by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > well who the fuck wants an OS with no damned sound?

      Your post is mindless hysterical nonsense and FUD. The situation is not nearly as bad as you're trying to make it out to be. Sound works quite well in Linux.

      You might have problems with a particular bit of hardware but that's a different sort of problem and one that hiding behind monopolyware won't necessarily protect you from (especially if you are clinging to XP).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Hairyfeet, I'm not 100% sure, but I get the feeling you *might* personally have a preference for using Windows operating systems over Linux-based ones. If you could respond with a few hundred more inflammatory words to let me know for sure, that'd be just peachy.

      Also, did you have a traumatic experience using a commandline when you were young? Possibly lost family members due to an accident involving a poorly-formed regular expression? Just curious.

    10. Re:GF by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      So in other words you answer is "Linux is magical and never gets bugs so don't update it" correct? care to

      explain these my friend? protip: NO OS is secure without being patched NONE.I'd also point out the KDELook bug of year before last, oh and here is a nice little how to for writing Linux bugs.

      But thank you for posting, yours is a PERFECT example of why linux on the desktop is as dead as disco. When pointed out the myriad of problems the community simply sticks their fingers in their ears and goes "La la la, CLI is leet! You don't know, you are noob, you are not leet! You must be a M$ Ninja dirty poo poo head!". would you like me to link to the OEMs that have abandoned Linux, including Asus which started the whole netbook craze? just ask and its yours, maybe you can explain how the ENTIRE PLANET is wrong and you're right.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:GF by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      So your answer is works for me along with imaginary problems kill windows is that correct? If you are gonna use the same memes every lintroll has used since the beginning of time could you PLEASE just use the linux TMs and save us all some time? kthanx. Now be sure to claim I'm a secret M$ ninja dirty poo poo head hiding in a hole in Redmond while you are at it.

      BTW, how many machines have you sold at retail? How many systems have you built for sale? Could that answer be.....zero? I've been building and supporting systems and users since before there even WAS a Windows, back when Gem and DOS and a dozen others out there fought and bled and died. And i'm sorry friend but your problem and why Linux will never ever in a million damned years go anywhere on the desktop is twofold. One Linus Torvalds, who says such brilliant things as Linux isn't designed, it just grows like a virus Yeah linus its called an STD and thanks to you asshole Linux will NEVER have a stable ABI even though OSX, BSD, Solaris, Windows, hell even OS/2 has one, and two because the developers are all geeks scratching itches and don't give a flying piss about USERS. Since MSFT doesn't make any money if they ignore the users they have no choice, linux devs since they don't get paid simply tell the users "LOL Goatse'. For examples see GNOME Shell and unity.

      So please, go back to patting yourself on the back for "sticking it to teh man" meanwhile when i'm finished this brand new Windows 7 quad WILL run pretty much non stop for the next 8 years, no bugs, no crashes, no CLI or forum dances or broken drivers. Can you HONESTLY say the same about YOUR OS? I think most definitely not. Good day sir.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. A downmod for a post making fun of an attack piece, and an upmod of the attack piece? Stay classy.

    13. Re:GF by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      It has NOTHING to do with preference, in fact I ran OS/2 right up to Win2K and it has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that Linux at its core is broken. there is NO QA, NO ABI, NO attempt even not to break shit, its nothing but "Doing your own thing" and too damned many cooks all spoiling the broth. I'll point out that one of the largest OEMs on the planet Dell has to run their own repos or Linux takes a big old shit and dies when you update it.

      Now you tell me friend do you HONESTLY think I can get better QA than Dell? or that i have enough money to call china and have my own designs built, pay a bunch of developers to constantly write drivers to make sure said design works, and even after all that end up having to maintain my own distro because Linus going Goatse on the kernel breaks shit constantly?

      FOUR drivers friend, that is ALL it takes to support windows for a good decade plus, probably closer to two thanks to the fact Windows is pretty long lasting with driver models: 2K/XP, 2K3 X64/XP X64, Win Vista/7 32 bit, WinVista/7 64 bit, tada! Now my customer is supported until 2020 with NO driver borkage. compare this to ANY Linux forum and what do you see after each upgrade, hell what did I see with my own two peepers? 'Update foo broke my drivers" is the order of the day. BSD, Solaris, windows, OSX, hell even OS/2 has a stable driver ABI but Linus thinks his shit don't stink and since he said in 1993 he wasn't gonna allow one then by god Linux will never have one! And please don't link to that treaty by one of the kernel devs because it is a RELIGIOUS treaty and he even goes so far as to say he hopes that those that use non free drivers have broken systems!

      So I'm sorry friend but your OS is simply unsuitable for purpose. its a geek hacker programmer hobbyist OS, not an OS for Suzy the checkout girl or the other billions of non programmers out there. its unstable, drivers constantly shit themselves on upgrade, its DEs are in flux, hell everything from the kernel up is about as stable as the shifting sands, its a fucking mess friend. While i like the IDEA of a free OS in practice you get a shit sandwich then told "you can't complain because its free!". yeah but a free shit sandwich is STILL shit.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:GF by hairyfeet · · Score: 1
      Safe huh? Get ready to be slapped by some facts friend,

      Get ready, here they come! Kinda makes that koolaid just a little bitter now, don't it? I believe in using the best tool for the job, but to say Linux is secure or better than any other complex OS is frankly bullshit. Hell I was talking to a 15 year Linux admin on one of the other sites that had gotten so sick of Linux fuckups they were going to BSD and if THAT didn't "just work" they were gonna wash their hands of FLOSS on the desktop and just go Mac.

      BTW if you'd like a little more food for thought, what OS was 3 of the 4 CAs running that were compromised? take a look and see. Maybe they just had bad configs? Surely someone with knowledge would be safe right? Guess again and its not a fluke by any means.

      As for an application? How about the fucking OS? If that shits itself and dies, like what happened here (read the final straw by a 15 year plus Linux admin who just dumped your OS) I'd call THAT a problem, wouldn't you?

      But it doesn't matter what I say, it doesn't matter if I wallpaper this page with links backing everything i say up 100%, because you are a FOSSie. A FOSSie refuses to believe reality and instead screams "Nigger faggot jew!" or "FUD shill astroturfer!" to all that do not bow before the bullshit effigy made in the likeness of RMS. I'm sure now instead of answering all this evidence and citations you'll just call me some names, like a frightened child who just got told Santa wasn't real. Sorry friend but i happen to live in the real world and out here? Linux works about as reliably as Windows 95.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    15. I think that it's great that you've been able to run Windows for so long, and experienced no driver or stability problems. You definitely should receive some sort of award or official recognition.

      Anyway, I'd love to chat, but it's Monday and Suzy's PC is infested with malware again.

    16. Re:GF by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Then that is YOUR FAULT for not putting on one of the many free and well functioning AVs isn't it? I'd suggest Avast or Comodo, both 100% free (Comodo is even free for business users) with sandboxing and scan before load on webpages. hell just for shits and giggles on a machine I was gonna wipe anyway I TRIED to infect it, I went to every single "Look at teh lezbos!" topsite I could find using Firefox so there would be no sandboxing on the browser, just to give the bugs a chance. Know how many bugs got through Avast? NONE, zip zero zilch nada squat.

      So there is frankly NO reason to see an infected Windows machine anymore, not when we have low rights mode, DEP, ASLR, and sandboxing. BTW Avast Free takes up so little RAM and CPU I don't even notice it on the Sempron nettop, on anything built in the last 5 years its so tiny its not even worth noting. meanwhile they can run ALL the software, both FOSS and proprietary, they can update the PC for the life of the OS with NO driver breakage or DE crapping or "open up CLI and type" horseshit, it all "just works". Hell look at the numbers friend, you can't even give your product away! Doesn't that hit you with the cluebat? I mean do you honestly think every OEM and retailer on the planet wants to pay the extra cost of windows across the board?

      I'd love nothing more than to have a free OS for the refurbs and off leases but linux is ONLY free if your time is worthless and my time isn't, sorry. until Torvalds retires and you get someone in charge of the kernel who isn't a douche you can give it up. BTW I predict not 3 months after Torvalds retires Linux will FINALLY get a hardware ABI, and everyone will act like its the second coming even though we retailers have been saying for years the current Linux driver model makes Win9x look like a rock solid stable OS. Don't blame me because your shit be broke, I didn't design the thing. BTW if you'd like I'll be happy to wallpaper this page with links to Linux vulnerabilities and broken driver messes, just ask.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    17. Re:GF by r00t · · Score: 1

      Ironicly, pulseaudio and Network Manager are the fault of people like you. You demanded a non-CLI way to control things, and you got it. Now you don't like it. Well, thank you very much for fucking up my formerly-reliable and formarly-understandable CLI. I hope you're proud of yourself.

      how the fuck am i supposed to fix her box if Linux takes a shit on Tuesday? with windows she simply calls me and gives me the code for remote assistance and BAM! I've got full control, just like i'm sitting at the box.

      VNC works everywhere.

      The traditional way is remote X11 forwarding. You ssh in with forwarding enabled, and then you can run GUI commands. This is about to be broken too, by Wayland, again because regular GUI users don't do remote X. Thanks buddy. Your influence is just peachy.

      Oh and before you say LTS allow me to say FUCK LTS, its a code word for "runs old shit" and most of the software is NEVER backported so you're looking at third party security risks, no thanks. ALL of my machines MUST have the latest patches, no unpatched software allowed.

      By that standard, you're running the Windows 8 beta now. No? Well surely at least Windows 7... what? You run XP? That's the Windows LTS.

      Now download the version from 3 years ago, get all the drivers working (CLI is allowed here, after all you're the builder ATM not the buyer

      It looks like you are installing unsupported drivers. It's the only explanation for why you'd even notice the lack of a kernel driver ABI. Well, don't do that. Unsupported drivers can fuck up any OS. Drivers downloaded from some random web site are NOT supported.

  34. It will break before you outgrow it by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    It will break before you outgrow it. That's what the statistics predict anyway. HDDs tend to have a much longer MTBF than SSDs, so you may want to take extra care of those backups.

    SSDs MLC technology needs bigger die sizes to remain reliable, or smaller die sizes to remain cheap. Pricing of SSD won't come down that fast, until they come up with affordable new technologies for storing data that are not SLC/MLC flash. There are several technologies that are almost ready for production, but it will be a while before they have proven themselves in the field and have significant market penetration.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:It will break before you outgrow it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will break before you outgrow it. That's what the statistics predict anyway. HDDs tend to have a much longer MTBF than SSDs, so you may want to take extra care of those backups. .

      This is a myth with modern SSD technology. fx Intel X25-E is rated at 2 million hours MTBF. That is better than most mechanical hard drives.

    2. Re:It will break before you outgrow it by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      It will break before you outgrow it. That's what the statistics predict anyway. HDDs tend to have a much longer MTBF than SSDs, so you may want to take extra care of those backups.

      This is completely backwards. SSDs have a *much* longer MTBF than HDDs; up to 20 times longer. But I'm willing to stand corrected if you have some up-to-date data that says different. Do you?

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    3. Re:It will break before you outgrow it by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The actual RMA data (I've read the study but forgot where to find it) shows that SSD's are (percentage-wise) slightly less reliable than hard drives but the speed more than makes up for both the price and reliability issues.

      MTBF is a useless metric, you want MTTDL (Mean Time TO Data Loss) and you shouldn't trust either an SSD or HDD without both a fail-resistant data model (RAID or similar solution) and at least 1 layer of backups, optimally 2 or 3.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:It will break before you outgrow it by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      Well, this: http://news.softpedia.com/news/French-Website-Publishes-HDD-SSD-and-Motherboard-RMA-Statistics-196538.shtml ..says that SSDs do better overall than HDDs, though it depends on the model exactly how much better and there's some overlap (avoid OCZ I guess!) Yeah, of course you should backup anything that's important (though a while back, I abandoned data I'd accumulated for many years and frankly I don't miss it at all...)

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  35. jackpot by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What would be a nice to see: Global movement to help Thais get back on their feet.

    What will actually happen: Drive manufacturers scream jackpot as visions of twenty years of price fixing begins. Self-involved consumers look everywhere for someone to shut-up and take their money.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  36. Could you imagine if this happened in Louisiana by somethingtoremember · · Score: 0

    Because the pictures look to me like Katrina hit, except there were no hard drive factories there in New Orleans that got this much press.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhumibol_Adulyadej



    There shoulda been though. It's too bad countries still don't know how to build proper flood levees, media conglomerates, reps from major hardware manufacturers, governments (shit I didn't say Thailand is run by an autocrat did I?

    Too bad that more hard drive manufacturers don't exist in the United States. I guess they all exist in Thailand. (sarcasm, sorry)

    What really needs to be addressed in this thread is an entirely two-fold problem: overseas labor taking jobs from the US, and the participation of multinational corporations in the creation of the consumerism which powers those jobs in not sourcing the used hard drive market to the public in a cost effective manner leading to a falsely inflated sense of demand and general market insecurity about the price of hard disk drives, as well as about better storage alternatives than local hard drives.

    To me, although the news about hard times in Thailand is upsetting, there have been far worse disasters on the human population in our lifetime. (especially in that part of the world -- the tsunami)

    What really should be questioned is what will the storage capacity of hard drives be 5 years from now? 50 years from now? And also, how much does the human brain ACTUALLY store?

    http://slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=yro+thailand http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Nagin ~ ~ ~ ~

  37. It's not just hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    My company makes electric wires (some of the stuff we make go into hard drive motors) and we were hit badly by the flood. We were lucky that we aren't located inside an industrial park so we started going into the factory to recover our machinery on the week that we got flooded, even though the water was chest high. The industrial parks were closed for months before anyone are allowed back in.

    It's been 50 days since we were flooded and the entire compound is now dry, but since every piece of machinery is damaged (roughly US$10 million loss) it may take up to three months before we can start production and six months or more before we can go back to the original production capacity.

    We were interviewed by Taiwanese TV here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z62rHpW3mgg

  38. Design Patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should get a design patent on any manufacturing plant built in a squared-rectangular shape, with rounded corners for safety, and placed on top of an elevated area for flood-protection.

    Imagine the profits from suing just because the manufacterer next-door copied your vague, prior-art design and just slapped a 'Samsung' sign out-front.

  39. SSD? by jon3k · · Score: 1

    Seems like a huge opportunity for SSD vendors? We've got a number of projects coming up that require hundreds of new workstations and we're already struggling with getting equipment. I'd gladly pay more per machine to avoid delaying these projects, and end up with better performance as well.

    1. Re:SSD? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      That's sort of like saying production problems in economy car plants are a huge opportunity for supercar builders. Have you seen the $/GB on those things!?!? And even if you can run a workstation in the meager space of an affordable SSD, the average joe won't say the performance benefit was worth it when the SSD suddenly goes titsup and the data is unrecoverable.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:SSD? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Well, first of all, I have SSDs in every computer I own (2 desktops - win7/fedora15, htpc running f14+xbmc, macbook air) and the average joe will absolutely see a massive difference. Have you ever used a desktop computer with an SSD? The difference is absolutely shocking. Also, of the 4 SSDs I own (including all the way back to the original OCZ Vertex) I have never had a single failure. Feel free to believe angry anecdotal evidence on the Internet, but I have actual real world experience with them, and I cannot recommend them highly enough.

      Cost is absolutely a concern, and that has to be weighed against opportunity cost of completing these projects. SSDs are down to about $1.50/GB. I'd be more than happy to replace the 300-500GB HDD that I'm getting in workstations now with 30GB SSDs and go from $40 to mabye $45? I'd also use a fraction of the power, produce nearly no heat, make no noise and be able to sustain a 1500g shock. The machines we're rolling out are all kiosks in a healthcare environment and won't have anything other than a web browser and Microsoft Office installed. And if they happen to fail I'll RMA it (under warranty, ocz offers 3 year warranty directly, plus OEM warranty of course) and have another one in place within 24 hours.

  40. Quick!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick everyone! Gather the USB flash drives and we will RAID them together.

  41. 5400RPM? Ick. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I often say that hard drives on off-the-shelf computers are like tires on cars: They sell them with the cheapest bargain-basement shit they can get their greedy little hands on. And the 5400RPM drive is the knockoff-brand all-season of hard drives.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  42. Re:Murphy failed by scsirob · · Score: 1

    Murphy must have had an off-day. If Murphy succeeds then two drives within a single RAID-5 set would have failed..

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  43. Any change in RMA procedures ? by ChefJoe · · Score: 1

    I had a 1TB Seagate drive start throwing SMART errors after 4 years (it was actually an RMA replacement for a Seagate that was giving problems within a month or two of installation) and just sent it in for RMA. I'm kind of curious if they'll start offering cash instead of hard drives at some point or if I can look forward to a coupon for a drive at some future date. Even more fun is that I had a 1 yr old Western Digital Caviar Black at work start going out (it's so much fun backing up 100 gigs of data when the drive transfer rate stutters along for a 2-4 MB/sec average) and their LifeGuard tool keeps telling me the drive passed, even though there's a queue of sectors to reallocate and it'll take a week (literally, 192 hrs) to do the extended tests at the scan rate it's getting.

  44. Market failure from externality (risk) by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    It's also called market failure. Risk of single-point-of-failure disaster was an externality that now everyone now has to pay for but was not priced into the product up front.

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  45. Only in Thailand ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flooding in Thailand has exposed a manufacturing/marketing culture of Concentration . Clearly , worldwide component users (in this case PC manufacturers) have not done any risk assessment. Why not spread the manufacturing of essential components across a continent. Phillipines , Indonesia ,Vietnam come to mind but also Central American countries . In many of these countries PC components(HDs in this case) can be produced competitivly.

    Highlandham in northern Scotland

  46. An opportunity for our CIA and NSA to enforce tax by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Assess taxes on the spot for foreign owned assets, with strict penalties. Your exotic car becomes a liability for you, and an opportunity for the US to seize it.

    Same thing for yachts - if it has a foreign flag, be prepared to pay tons for the privlege. Even if you think you can hide in international waters.

    Enforce the tax law with zeal and indifference to influence. Then make sure loopholes are closed, and the accountants that find them punished.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  47. bridal department by bridedays · · Score: 1

    bridal department Is still to uncover a beautiful V-Neck Flowergirl Dresses can price time and energy. numerous wedding experience parties as well as common inside bride attire high-priced Special Bridesmaid Dress . Instead, head to formal evening Spaghetti Strap Mother Dresses , as well as some part.YQ

  48. "toile" or "prototype" by bridedays · · Score: 1

    "toile" or "prototype" Second, manufacturing design and design Floor Length Mother Dresses is understood because consumer, to ensure it really is in fact suitable bride. when the toile isn't consistent, by using standard, by providing the customer, it really is in fact normally stress / tags and despatched back yet again in the direction of Prom Dresses . Since the attire must be to inform the consumer is arranged to Bridal Dresses .YQ

  49. Now is the time to sell your HDDs! by pavelthesecond · · Score: 1

    Now is probably the right time to sell that stash of old HDDs laying around. You might actually get close to what you originally paid for them!