Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Government Ramps Up Weather Control Efforts

formaggio writes "China's government is intervening with nature by rolling out four regional programs to artificially increase precipitation across the country by 10 percent before 2015. The program is anticipated to bring in an additional 230 billion cubic meters of precipitation per year by 2015. This is on top of the 50 billion cubic meters of precipitation China already artificially creates annually in the northeastern province of Jilin."

139 comments

  1. soory by masternerdguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry commies, but only the Allies can have the weather control device. Go play with your nuke and iron curtain.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    1. Re:soory by cyachallenge · · Score: 1

      Silly Command and Conquer Red Alert references.

    2. Re:soory by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Sorry commies, but only the Allies can have the weather control device. Go play with your nuke and iron curtain.

      Don't be too harsh, they may end up with Oobleck and a valuable lesson they'll have learned!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:soory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      'Technology Stolen', 'New Construction Options'

    4. Re:soory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you have preferred a One Piece reference?

    5. Re:soory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the right people in the world actually knew what dangers have been created by HAARP and Cloud seeding chemtrails, superheating the ionosphere would not be a brunt of jokes on slashdot, but rather some could be exposing the smegma using this technology as warfare. Wait until we realize that the magnetosphere no longer protects the planet, I'll be laughing at your jokes then, remembering that you got modded 3 points for it..

    6. Re:soory by Amouth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      wasn't it "structure captured, new construction options"?

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    7. Re:soory by mrozone · · Score: 5, Funny

      You seem to forget that they captured our construction yard a while back.

    8. Re:soory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just hope their condenser doesn't spawn mind worms.

    9. Re:soory by spyder-implee · · Score: 1

      If you use a spy, tech stolen. If you use an engineer, structure cap'd.

      --
      Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
    10. Re:soory by Amouth · · Score: 1

      forgot about the spy - only ever used them to attack radar domes .. also i was always paranoid and surrounded my radar domes with sandbags so the other people at the lan couldn't do the same..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    11. Re:soory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe...

      Looks like China is about to make it rain on Dim Ho. :D

    12. Re:soory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how much I've played that game and I never figured out why the AI surrounds the tech centers with walls... OMG I feel like such a newb... LOL Now I wanna play Red Alert again!

    13. Re:soory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent comment is actually quite Insightful - not nearly as much Funny.

  2. Evaporation by LoudMusic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are they also creating an evaporation effect in the region that supplies air moisture to the region they're trying to create precipitation in?

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:Evaporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, just makign clouds that are already there precipitate. They are stealing our water!

    2. Re:Evaporation by v1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They are stealing our water!

      That's what I was wondering, where would this water normally be falling mostly? Russia? Japan? Pacific Ocean? If it was just headed for the ocean anyway, it doesn't appear to be selfish of them.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:Evaporation by jpmorgan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, if you think about the Langmuir equation, decreasing the partial pressure of water vapour in the atmosphere by inducing precipitation will increase the evaporation rate. Then it's just a matter of prevailing winds which, assuming the Chinese aren't complete idiots, they've probably thought about.

    4. Re:Evaporation by hedwards · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just as long as they leave our precious bodily fluids alone, I say what's the harm?

    5. Re:Evaporation by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      inducing precipitation will increase the evaporation rate.

      so in layman's terms, not only will they be causing less rain to fall downwind of you, but they'll also be causing more water to evaporate downwind - lowering humidity and making the problem of less-rainfall more severe. (assuming it's over land and not ocean anyway)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    6. Re:Evaporation by msauve · · Score: 4, Funny

      "If it was just headed for the ocean anyway, it doesn't appear to be selfish of them."

      If that's the case, they're spinning it wrong. They should be claiming they're trying to offset ocean level rise due to AGW.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    7. Re:Evaporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that is exactly the opposite of what that quote means. Read much?

    8. Re:Evaporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some cases, its not about where the water falls but where it flows.

      Worst case (visible) scenario, you have flooding and mud/landslides simply because preexisting (natural and man-made) infrastructure in X area was never designed for such amounts of rainwater.

    9. Re:Evaporation by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nope, just makign clouds that are already there precipitate. They are stealing our water!

      Actually, there are a number of countries that are actually saying exactly that - "You are stealing our rain and it isn't a joke.

      An interesting thing though, is that the Chinese mainly use Silver Iodide Rockets to seed the clouds. Silver Iodide is considered a hazardous substance, a priority pollutant, and a toxic pollutant by the US. Exposure can result in the following:

      Chronic ingestion of iodides may produce “iodism”, which may be manifested by skin rash, running nose, headache, irritation of the mucous membranes, weakness, anemia, loss of weight and general depression. Chronic inhalation, ingestion or skin contact with silver compounds may cause argyria characterized by blue-gray discoloration of the eyes, skin and mucous membranes.

      Will be interesting to see what happens during the next ten to fifteen years after this has been in place for long enough to really get into the soil, the food chain and the poor saps who this rain falls on.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    10. Re:Evaporation by Dyinobal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Might explain the drought in Texas, or maybe that is because we elected Rick Perry. Though the fact he prayed for rain and we got wild fires instead might be considered evidence towards that theory.

    11. Re:Evaporation by jbeaupre · · Score: 0

      And yet iodine is added to table salt.

      I think you may want look up the words "concentration" and "dosage."

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    12. Re:Evaporation by magarity · · Score: 2

      An interesting thing though, is that the Chinese mainly use Silver Iodide Rockets to seed the clouds. Silver Iodide is considered a hazardous substance, a priority pollutant, and a toxic pollutant

      ...Will be interesting to see what happens during the next ten to fifteen years after this has been in place for long enough to really get into the soil, the food chain and the poor saps who this rain falls on.

      Hah, a little silver iodide added to the water supply might make it better by displacing some of the serious industrial contaminants they already put in it. You haven't been paying attention to the environmental news out of China if you think these rockets are a serious health concern.

    13. Re:Evaporation by spagthorpe · · Score: 2

      I would guess a main reason for the additional rainfall would be food production, and since China seems to export quite a bit of it to us (heavy metals and all), I imagine it'll be our problem as much as theirs.

      --

      WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?
      (Smash amp, burn guitar, take home the groupies)

    14. Re:Evaporation by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      so in layman's terms, not only will they be causing less rain to fall downwind of you,

      Other than Japan, there's nothing downwind of China until you hit the California coast.
      Which isn't to say that China has no effect on California.
      They have to deal with pollution and dust from China often enough for it to have been studied in some detail.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    15. Re:Evaporation by Praeses · · Score: 2

      Many of their power plants are indirectly evaporating water. I am curious to see how the quantities compare.

    16. Re:Evaporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And add the term "chronic ingestion" to the list.

    17. Re:Evaporation by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Perhaps dust particles of sufficient size might suffice?

      I am tempted to say something common, like carbon, might be worthy of consideration. Of course, it would require some research, but might be worth it.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    18. Re:Evaporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since when did Iodine = Silver Iodide??????

    19. Re:Evaporation by daem0n1x · · Score: 2

      They're already pumping carbon particles into the atmosphere. I mean, a huge shitload of them.

    20. Re:Evaporation by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      Clearly this could be stopped by killing all the butterflies in China.

    21. Re:Evaporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the case they might be equivalent. IANAD but I found this:

      Iodism /iodism/ (iah-dizm) chronic poisoning by iodine or iodides, with coryza, ptyalism, frontal headache, emaciation, weakness, and skin eruptions.

      http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/iodism

    22. Re:Evaporation by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This was a plot in, of all things, a Japanese anime - specifically, One Piece.

      Despite the rain [that Dance Powder] creates however, the powder unfortunately caused long periods of drought to other countries. The process in which the artificial rain is created, nurtures clouds that aren't ready to rain yet. When this happens, all of the water contained within these clouds would all be used up. Because of this, other countries and locations, who would naturally benefit from rainfall when these clouds would naturally mature, are greatly deprived.

      The controversy that this powder brought whenever it was used, started a war. The lives lost in this war was so great that the World Government outlawed the manufacturing and possession of Dance Powder world wide.

      Link to article

    23. Re:Evaporation by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Just as long as they leave our precious bodily fluids alone, I say what's the harm?

      Well, somewhat goofily: your current bodily fluids are yesterday's weather. So, no, they're not doing that.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    24. Re:Evaporation by cmholm · · Score: 1

      Points for Dr. Strangelove reference.

      --
      Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    25. Re:Evaporation by FangVT · · Score: 1

      Just as long as they leave our precious bodily fluids alone, I say what's the harm?

      Purity of essence is the most important thing.

    26. Re:Evaporation by fotbr · · Score: 1

      And your current bodily fluids are also tomorrow's weather...so they're messing with both the past and the future!

    27. Re:Evaporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason to not buy Chinese shit.

    28. Re:Evaporation by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Will be interesting to see what happens during the next ten to fifteen years after this has been in place for long enough to really get into the soil, the food chain and the poor saps who this rain falls on.

      Direct health effects aside, they are salting their fields. This problem will take care of itself, sooner or later, one way or another. It just won't be very pretty when it does.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    29. Re:Evaporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Direct health effects aside, they are salting their fields. This problem will take care of itself, sooner or later, one way or another. It just won't be very pretty when it does.

      Actually, iodine deficiency is a problem in most inland parts of the world where natural iodine in the soils has been washed out over the millenia - there is no natural recharge mechanism except perhaps volcanism. Look up goiter and cretinism. Growing up in Australia, most of my life I've only seen iodised salt used. But with the trendy tendency to use "gourmet sea salts" in cooking (quite absurd as all of our common table salt is from our relatively pristine seas dried in our unpolluted environment), iodine deficiency is becoming an increasing problem.

    30. Re:Evaporation by zazzel · · Score: 1

      Will be interesting to see what happens during the next ten to fifteen years after this has been in place for long enough to really get into the soil, the food chain and the poor saps who this rain falls on.

      Are they going to use the extra precipitation for agriculture - and export the goods to other countries?

    31. Re:Evaporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry 'bout it. This is just political BS with spin and counter-spin slathered on top.
      CHINA: "We control the weather! We are the true masters of the elements."
      USA: "Yeah right, I call bull.... No, wait. You're stealing water from whoever is downwind of you. Yeah, that's right. That's the ticket."

      Sorry for the ancient SNL reference.

    32. Re:Evaporation by MaWeiTao · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's Korea, Taiwan and the Philippines. Given that South Korea, Taiwan and Japan all have amongst the largest economies in the world and massively dense populations I'd say that what China is doing is very important. They already have to deal with dust storms blowing over from the ever expanding Gobi desert.

    33. Re:Evaporation by jbeaupre · · Score: 2

      Because both the iodine added to table salt (KCl for Mortons) and silver iodide (AgCl) are ionic compounds. When ingested, the body sees both sources of iodine as identical.

      So in the context of iodine effects on the body, they've been the same for about 100 years now.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    34. Re:Evaporation by dainbug · · Score: 1

      After watching Gov Perry's debating performances, Its clear his prays are so disjointed, inarticulate, pandering and down right silly that any Cloud-dwelling-Super-Being would be forced to curse his state with wildfires.

    35. Re:Evaporation by PGGreens · · Score: 1

      But, I only drink rainwater and pure grain alcohol. By taking all the rain water, the Chinese are trying to force me to drink fluoridated tap water!

    36. Re:Evaporation by aceboomblain · · Score: 1

      Killing all the butterflies in China will just stop some tropical storms in the Western Hemisphere. We need to get all the good ole Texas butterflies to flap there wings in unison, creating one large super hurricane in China.

    37. Re:Evaporation by snadrus · · Score: 1

      What butterflies! Have you seen our record drought? Wait a minute....

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    38. Re:Evaporation by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Doh! I meant KI and AgI. Oh well. Must be all that fluoride in the water.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  3. Ask dick cheney was fond of saying... by Sebastopol · · Score: 0

    man can't affect the world's climate...

    paraphrased.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:Ask dick cheney was fond of saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we need to yet again discuss the difference between climate and weather?

    2. Re:Ask dick cheney was fond of saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we need to yet again discuss the difference between climate and weather?

      No. In this case the GP takes a warmist position. As such, weather phenomena may be selectively cited and no distinction between weather and climate is necessary.

    3. Re:Ask dick cheney was fond of saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, please enlighten us mr. expert.

      and then for a finale you can tell us why correlation doesn't imply causation and that open source is inherently superior to walled gardens. /basks in the glow of your superior intellect/

    4. Re:Ask dick cheney was fond of saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? give me an example of when AGW people have done that. none exist.

      mark it blank. next frame.

  4. I have to ask... by hipp5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but what could go wrong!?

    1. Re:I have to ask... by Chicken_Kickers · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, right. When China does anything, it's "intervening with nature" and the sinister sounding "weather control". When Amurikka does it, it's "triumph of technology over nature" or "advancement of mankind". Fucking Slashdot.

    2. Re:I have to ask... by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suppose the first question to ask would be where the moisture would've fallen otherwise. Unless they're creating new evaporation/condensation into clouds, which it doesn't sound like since they're discussing seeding rockets, they're just causing it to fall somewhere instead of somewhere else. Maybe that harms somewhere else, or maybe it doesn't; would need more information to say.

      They appear not to get this, or not want to acknowledge it, though, with the quote: "Because clouds are boundless, weather control is boundless". Clouds might be boundless if you're doing isolated cloud-seeding operations, but on a massive industrial scale, clouds aren't really boundless...

    3. Re:I have to ask... by RandomAvatar · · Score: 1

      Well, besides not know who or what Amurikka is, I would have to say it is more a "fucking with nature on a large scale" intervening with nature than the fact that China is the one doing it purposely. I personally think that we should try to limit what we do to the environment... At least until we find another one we can inhabit.

    4. Re:I have to ask... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Um, no offense, but that seems to be really reaching.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:I have to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Slashdot.

      Do yourself a favor and go away.

    6. Re:I have to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Slashdot.

      You have managed to have sex with an actual website... respect man, awesommmmme! :p

      And of all the websites he could've chosen....

    7. Re:I have to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of all the websites he could've chosen....

      Some people prefer virgins.

    8. Re:I have to ask... by hierophanta · · Score: 0

      yeah, he should have said 'fucking media outlets'. please please try to convince us that media outlets are not propaganda machines and /. is not one of them, then move on to the next thread and complain about how its about M$ or Ipo again

    9. Re:I have to ask... by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      And fat pimply ones no less. Hey, no arguing with taste.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
  5. STOP!! Do Not Continue by MBC1977 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This reminds me of an Edding's book I read once, "Guardians of the West" where the lead character started playing around with the weather (to prove a point to some very inept thinking people). Several months later his grandfather comes to his castle, and virtually berates him for tampering with the "most powerful force in nature".

    Somehow I think this very fitting considering (1) this is China we're talking about and (2) anyone (including the US) who plays around weather is virtually certain to cause an adverse effect somewhere else. So please DO NOT TAMPER WITH THE WEATHER!!.

    Thanks. :)

    --
    Regards,

    MBC1977,
    1. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 1

      Somehow I think this very fitting considering (1) this is China we're talking about and (2) anyone (including the US) who plays around weather is virtually certain to cause an adverse effect somewhere else. So please DO NOT TAMPER WITH THE WEATHER!!.

      From the article it seems they have already caused adverse effects, and yet they persist.

    2. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by blakecraw · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a Herbert book where the Guild wanted a prohibitive price for weather satellites.

    3. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, the grandfather and one of his sorcerous pals spent a year or so preventing the main character's actions from triggering a new ice age.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the fremen just didn't want to be observed.

    5. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't nuclear physics the most powerful force of nature?

    6. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several months later his grandfather comes to his castle, and virtually berates him

      If he did it virtually wouldn't it have been more effective to use Cisco Telepresence, or even Facetime or Skype if the castle couldn't afford Cisco's exorbitant fees?

    7. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Herbert book in question was Dune. The 'rulers' were being inhibited from putting weather satellites by the Guild because the natives were paying off the Guild with Spice to prevent anyone from knowing what was going on in the native areas.

    8. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the same book. In a later epic battle, the old wizard had messed with the weather many years in advance of the battle. The result was an incredible storm right when thy needed it.

      But more to my point: the USA has hurt the earth through ignorance, the Chinese will do it through diligence.

    9. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap! A Belgarariad reference! Posting anonymously and giving you a mod point just for dredging that one up!

    10. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      Cheers for the Eddings reference. Love it. If I hadn't already commented on this story you'd have my mod points.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    11. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by ormondotvos · · Score: 2

      I can think of a dozen places easily where they'd love for you to tamper with the weather, intelligently. Texas, for starters.

    12. Re:STOP!! Do Not Continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Lynmouth flood, which might have been the inspiration for the Kate Bush video "Cloudbusting".

  6. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, what? Since when can China control the weather?

  7. Robbing Peter to Pay Paul by jklovanc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about downwind areas where the water would fall naturally? Might that effect snow packs and cause drought during summer months?

    1. Re:Robbing Peter to Pay Paul by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's where they're trying to get the water to. Most of the areas where they're trying to get more water are pretty much as downwind as possible. I think the wind patterns there are generally west to east there, although I could be wrong.

      Ultimately, the water gets into the ocean eventually, it's mostly a question of whether it's via run off or rain.

    2. Re:Robbing Peter to Pay Paul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were messing with a few acres of land it really wouldn't matter, but what they're doing ... global warming is a little joke compared to the destruction these idiots will cause.

    3. Re:Robbing Peter to Pay Paul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they won't put farms downwind? I would love to live in a place where it only rains on farms.

    4. Re:Robbing Peter to Pay Paul by DolomiteZipper · · Score: 0

      Maybe THIS is the cause of global warming? Sure looks like a smoking gun to me.

    5. Re:Robbing Peter to Pay Paul by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Maybe THIS is the cause of global warming? Sure looks like a smoking gun to me.

      The only thing that is smoking is the joint you're holding on to. Time to put it down for a while.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  8. When the rain falls here, it doesn't fall there by CityZen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see international problems brewing with this...

    I hear that in some localities, the rain water (that falls on your property) doesn't belong to you, and you're not legally allowed to have rain barrels.

    Weather alteration will amplify issues like that, such that countries have to make treaties regarding who can claim which clouds.

    Of course, you have to wonder about a range of possibilities: You can make your neighbor have a drought, or potentially have a flood.

    1. Re:When the rain falls here, it doesn't fall there by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Yup. Think there's a fuss about who owns the water in a river (which, btw, is the reason China is in Tibet and will never leave)? It's gonna be worse when people try to make clouds rain in a place that they would normally just pass over. At least, with a river, it's pretty obvious if someone is diverting massive amounts of it. But with rain-making machines, it's generally hard to tell that something out of the ordinary did take place. Add some cross-border animosity to the mix, and suddenly Twain's quip about whiskey and water is going to be more true than ever.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:When the rain falls here, it doesn't fall there by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here, I'm required by law to catch rainwater. But in Colorado, it's illegal to do so, as the water rights are owned downstream.

    3. Re:When the rain falls here, it doesn't fall there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see international problems brewing with this...

      Dear China,

      Please stop altering global weather patterns or we'll cry.

      Signed,

      The Rest of the World.

  9. How is this any different than US/CAN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see North American Weather Modification Council http://www.naiwmc.org/

    1. Re:How is this any different than US/CAN? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what it is about that site, but it doesn't give me a good feeling.

  10. already bought off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China already bought him off. Part of his price for not starting a civil war after the 2000 election fraud. China's corporate masters didn't want that much havoc.

  11. I can see it now. by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    I can see it now.

    China claims success in their Weather Control efforts, when in reality those increases in precipitation are actually a result of their contribution to global warming--warmer air has the potential to "hold" more water.

    1. Re:I can see it now. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I can see it now.

      China claims success in their Weather Control efforts, when in reality those increases in precipitation are actually a result of their contribution to global warming--warmer air has the potential to "hold" more water.

      One would think, with all the particulate matter they throw up into the air they would already be causing increased precipitation.

      Well, Mulholland and his lot thought they could make the desert bloom, bring water to the southwestern US from the Columbia River and the Great Lakes, so ambitious were their schemes. Fortunately they only met with limited success - which Los Angeles was developed out of.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:I can see it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fortunately they only met with limited success - which Los Angeles was developed out of.

      So you're saying that even their limited success ultimately led to disaster?

    3. Re:I can see it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Global warming is pseudo science designed to make some people a lot of money. You're gullible and it's unbecoming of a slashnerd.

    4. Re:I can see it now. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Well, Mulholland and his lot thought they could make the desert bloom

      They certainly had a lot of drive!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  12. Nice try.. by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    But if the moisture isn't already in the air in sufficient quantities, it doesn't want to come pouring down.

    Why not just build desalination plants to take demand off rivers downstream and reservoirs upstream to retain water from high rainfall years?

    Built the Three Gorges Dam, which is a dam disaster to the population and environment, now they going to play around with the sky. Not very forward thinking, really.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Nice try.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with desalination plants is, the salt has to go somewhere.

    2. Re:Nice try.. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The ocean?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Nice try.. by daem0n1x · · Score: 2

      The main problem is that they yield extremely expensive water.

    4. Re:Nice try.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      The main problem is that they yield extremely expensive water.

      Then you're doing it all wrong. Brute force desalination, with a power plant behind you, is a very crude way of doing it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  13. Uh VERY bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In theory this isn't as bad as it looks, in practice it's oh so much worse, and someone needs to start doing the same in Canada and the US Pronto.

    1. Erosion - Enough said
    2. Flooding - Thailand.
    3. Rainfall/Snowfall - Since China and the US are both in the northern hemisphere, this means that any rainfall that would have fell in North America has been intercepted by China. This is because the Jetstream goes from West to East in the Northern Hemisphere. Less rain, less crops, less food.
    4. Earthquakes - screwing with the rainfall patterns also lubricates the faults, so this might cause more earthquakes along the Pacific as stresses change.

    The problem that worries me the most is the rainfall loss. China can't magically siphon water from the ocean, so this is rainfall that didn't precipitate over Europe. Any rainfall that doesn't fall in Asia ends up falling on the Pacific coast of North America. If the US and Canada started doing it, Europe would have the same result. If water is pulled out of the atmosphere too fast, then we have an even worse problem whereby everything that isn't in the 50 miles of the West coasts ends up as desert.

    We shouldn't tamper with the weather. It doesn't matter if there is a global warming or global cooling problem, if we start preventing clouds from forming, water just vaporizes. See Mars. If warming goes out of control, See Venus.

    1. Re:Uh VERY bad by norpy · · Score: 2

      You forget that taking moisture out of the air will reduce the partial pressure and more evaporation will occur.

      By the time this "dry" air makes it across an ocean it will once again be laden with water.

    2. Re:Uh VERY bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      4. Earthquakes - screwing with the rainfall patterns also lubricates the faults, so this might cause more earthquakes along the Pacific as stresses change.

      I'm not aware of any studies showing increased rainfall influencing quakes. However, there does seem to be some consensus that induced seismicity from dams and other human actions is real.

      If you throw more water on the land than is typical, it'll eventually percolate in and cause the strata to weigh more. I don't think it's too far fetched to say that altering the weather pattern in an area could accelerate seismic activity locally. I think it's a lot less likely that it'd have influence on the entire "ring of fire". I think the local weather patterns would be like a freckle on the butt of a rhinocerous in that regard.

  14. Kaboom! wooho, there are some cloud now by youn · · Score: 1

    sounds like a mad scientist plan... but hey if it works :)

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  15. this sounds like a syfy channel movie by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    The good part is where it goes out of control.

  16. Re:Climate change... by hedwards · · Score: 2

    Depends on the weather patterns. If somebody did that on the west coast of the US, that would cause all sorts of problems for people down wind. But, if they did it just upwind of the east coast it would have negligible effect.

    I'm not sure precisely how the wind patterns are in that part of the world, but I have a feeling that the impact will be relatively minor. I'm not sure that rain falling on the ocean is really that much different then rivers flowing into the river. Apart from differing types of pollution.

  17. Re:Climate change... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    AlGore hasn't seemed too excited over the other ecological disasters in China. Merely making it rain is trivial in comparison to some. So I'm guessing he's going to ignore it, but will have some pedestrian answer prepared if he's ambushed.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  18. Fiendish Yellow Brains! by ph4cr · · Score: 1

    Oh, I don't know. Considering we exist in a closed system (we live on a ball, in space)... What Could Possibly Go Wrong? No KYOTO for us! We can fix billions of years of planetary evolution with our fiendish little yellow brains!!!

  19. Does it even work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are presumably seeding clouds with silver iodide. I thought that was debunked years ago?

  20. Makes you wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If cloud seeding is/has been used off the coast of Africa during Hurricane season. As a Floridian, I am pretty aware of new storms forming in the area, as they tend to eventually track across the Atlantic towards the gulf states. /takeofftinfoilhat

  21. Re:Climate change... by ajlitt · · Score: 1

    Mr. President, we must not allow a precipitation gap!

  22. Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not nice to fool with Mother Nature! Be it rain or butter you just don't mess with her.

  23. And yet by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    I wonder how this will do with the warming that is occurring? Supposedly the models show that China's rain is suppose to drop a great deal. Perhaps this is their way of winning their cold war.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  24. A great world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where most cities in the world are covered in a single gray cloud most of the day, and no one thinks twice about it. Colder climates, shorter life spans, eating and drinking poison, what a great world we live in today.

  25. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chairman Sheng-ji Yang of the Hive has discovered Ecological Engineering!

  26. Something wrong with the maths. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "China's government is intervening with nature by rolling out four regional programs to artificially increase precipitation across the country by 10 percent before 2015. The program is anticipated to bring in an additional 230 billion cubic meters of precipitation per year by 2015. This is on top of the 50 billion cubic meters of precipitation China already artificially creates annually in the northeastern province of Jilin."

    A 10% increase on 50 billion cubic meters is an additional 5 billion cubic meters, for a total of 55 billion cubic meters.
    If 230 billion cubic meters is 10%, then they must already be producing 2,300 billion cubic meters, or am I going silly.

  27. Destro already build one by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    He just can't keep the damned Joes from meddling with Cobra's plans to dominate the world with it.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  28. tax time by fonitrus · · Score: 2

    Maybe the Australian Carbon Tax which is suposed to offset climate change effects be passed on to the Chinese since if this program goes full scale day to day operation they will efectively be responsible for the weather in other countries :) :) I mean i read a butterfly farting in Brazil causes thunderstorms in Jakarta some sort of chaos theory effect. So TAX THE CHINESE!!!

  29. Effects of Weather Control ==> Drought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Romania for at least 4 months it was no real rains as they are usually seen during summers and autumns. Drought was officially reported on "extensive agricultural areas in eastern, southeastern, southern and western territory" of Romania. (http://www.meteoromania.ro/images/comunicate/comunicat-seceta-dec-2011.pdf)
    What about your country?

  30. Where are all "climate change fighters" ? by kubusja · · Score: 1

    It looks like it is not that China does not try to prevent stop the climate changes.... It actively tries to cause ones.... Where are all naive climate savers who help to move industry from USA/Europe to China ?

    1. Re:Where are all "climate change fighters" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be interesting to do some science to see how the magnitude of this compares to everything else that is supposed to be causing climate change.

      With the current state of the science, I don't know if the Chinese rain makers are a gnat on the elephant, or the elephant, or if the elephant is just a figment of the climate changes folks imagination. (A sad state of affairs for such a potentially important issue. The Berkley folks seem to be helping this situation some what.)

  31. Re:Climate change... by Olivier+Galibert · · Score: 1

    That's where it can get interesting... Water vapor is a greenhouse gas, a *way* more efficient one than CO2. If they manage to reduce the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere, that is going to reduce the greenhouse effect.

    Interesting, 'innit ?

        OG.

  32. Re:Effects of Weather Control == Drought by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Its been dry all over europe this year. The rhine and danube are at record low levels.

  33. ALL YOUR RAIN by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    ALL YOUR RAIN ARE BELONG TO US

    - Chinese government, weather control division

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  34. The Power to Further Enslave by fygment · · Score: 1

    Make a region dependent on an artificially created local microclimate ... and use your control of it to extort whatever you want from the region.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  35. climate change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    climate change?
    You want climate change?
    THERE's our climate change - they're taking extra rain that should be available to the REST of us!

    Other places will dry-up while THEY fill their communist swimming pools!

  36. Re:Climate change... by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

    Ahh, modded down by the usual slashdot sycophants. Anything pro-US, anti-socialist, or anti limousine-liberal is modded down as low as it will go.