Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Exec: Young People Fed Up With iPhone and Android

jfruhlinger writes "Nokia's Windows Phones haven't hit the U.S., but at least one company executive thinks they'll be a slam dunk, since young people have soured on the iPhone and find Android baffling. Of course, much of the Internet commentariat found his remarks even more baffling. Is he right, is he delusional, or is he just trying to build buzz for his company's products the best he can?"

124 of 532 comments (clear)

  1. State Of Mind by rsmith-mac · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is he right, is he delusional, or is he just trying to build buzz for his company's products the best he can?

    It's Nokia, so I'll take delusional for $2000, Alex.

    1. Re:State Of Mind by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's paid to be delusional. What's he supposed to say? "iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude and Android devices in general are rapidly cornering the lion's share of the market and now we've made this commitment to Windows Phone 7 that we can't just drop for a number of reasons" Yeah, I'm sure the shareholders will love that.

    2. Re:State Of Mind by Canazza · · Score: 2

      He's been staring at the Metro interface too long

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    3. Re:State Of Mind by jemtallon · · Score: 2
    4. Re:State Of Mind by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It would take some serious kool-aide to think that people were generally confused by any of iPhone, Android or Windows Phone 7, they are all easy to use. Each has it's pros and cons.

      However, with the serious lack of good 3rd party apps, I suspect mostly due to MS figuratively castrating their developers with insane draconian file access and network access restrictions that prevent any direct cross-app communication on the phone, or network access via anything but http/https... You would have to have gone through a few kilos of LSD before ever thinking Windows Phone 7 could catch up to those two. Nice OS, but MS royally screwed the 3rd party developers over.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    5. Re:State Of Mind by flyingsquid · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it's pretty delusional: "What we see is that youth are pretty much fed up with iPhones. Everyone has the iPhone." OK, so we see that everyone has an iPhone or an Android... and we conclude from this fact that everyone must therefore hate the iPhone and the Android. Reminds me of that Iraqi information minister who claimed that the American troops attacking Bagdad were committing suicide in droves. On the other hand, the guy quoted in the article is their director of marketing and sales, you pay marketing people to foster delusional thinking, so that's not an entirely bad thing. As long as the management isn't drinking the same kool-aid as these marketing guys. If the CEO is so disconnected from reality that he believes this, Nokia is completely hosed. But even if they do go out of business, I have the feeling that a certain Niels Munksgaard, Nokia Director of Product Marketing and Sales has a very bright future and will land on his feet.

    6. Re:State Of Mind by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      I haven't had windows crash as much as either android phone I had crash (two Samsungs, can't remember the models off the top of my head - transform and intrepid I think), since the 90s. Both crashed once every 3-4 weeks on average. My current HTC windows phone has yet to crash on me, and I've had it for almost a year. Mind you, 3rd party app selection sucks, and unless MS fixes their API, no amount of popularity and customer demand will fix that.

      If MS fixes their API issues, Windows Phone 7 could actually be a rather nice competitor in the arena.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    7. Re:State Of Mind by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Informative

      "iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude..."

      I hate that BS apple propaganda. iPhone outsells every other SMARTPHONE HANDSET on the market. If you look at real data, like Total phones, far far far more dumb phones are sold. And the smartphone market? If you look at a more accurate number, like the number of phones with the iPhone OS or the Android OS on them, Android has double the market share of apple. Apple is able to say they sell the most phones because they only offer one... sure if you break up android sales by model, each one gets a much smaller share... but that's stupid.

      Then Windows phones? hahahha... I dont think I've ever met someone with a windows phone.

    8. Re:State Of Mind by rmstar · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you look at real data, like Total phones, far far far more dumb phones are sold.

      That's interesting. Do you have links on this? I got the impression everyone except me spends their time fingering their fondleslabs these days. Also, your claim contradicts the data I can find, e.g. http://gizmodo.com/5817082/everbodys-getting-smartphones

    9. Re:State Of Mind by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      What's he supposed to say?

      Equally

      "Young people have soured on the iPhone, find Android baffling and will see anything tagged Windows as uncool and boring, so we see a huge opportunity for Symbian and MeeGo... Sorry... you say we signed a WHAT with Microsoft? Seriously? Aw shit!"

      ...would likely have been a career-limiting move.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    10. Re:State Of Mind by INeededALogin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes... Nokia needs another open-soure OS to get behind since Maemo, MeeGo and Symbian weren't enough.

    11. Re:State Of Mind by tgrigsby · · Score: 2

      For comparison purposes, I had an HTC Fuze. Liked it at first, although it was a bit slow. Over time I grew to hate it. Had to reboot it every one or two days due to lockups. When it got stolen, I did a little happy dance, put on my sad face, and informed my wife that maybe it was finally time for me to break down and get one of those "Android" phones that all the guys at the office had....

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    12. Re:State Of Mind by u38cg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can't provide citations since the numbers I saw were internal, but the smartphones thing is very much a Western and developed Asian phenomenon. In terms of numbers, the biggest seller out there is still the Nokia something-or-other, 1112 maybe, despite being pathetic in comparison to any smartphone. In large parts of the world, the only thing that counts is price and battery life.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    13. Re:State Of Mind by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      Um, that's pretty much what the GP said;

      • iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude (comparison of handsets)
      • Android devices in general are rapidly cornering the lion's share of the market (comparison of OS)
      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    14. Re:State Of Mind by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2

      Then Windows phones? hahahha... I dont think I've ever met someone with a windows phone.

      I know one person who has a Windows Phone. He's my boss.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    15. Re:State Of Mind by chrb · · Score: 3, Informative

      iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude

      I am no fan of Nokia's recent moves, but to claim that their phones don't sell is simply inaccurate. Nokia sold more 5230 phones in one year alone last year (2010) than Apple has sold iPhones in the whole five years from 2007-2011. Nokia has also produced the best selling phone for many of the years on record. List of best-selling mobile phones:

      Year Manufacturer Model Units sold
      1990 NEC P3 15 million
      1996 Motorola StarTAC 60 million
      1998 Nokia 6120 15 million
      1999 Nokia 3210 150 million
      2000 Nokia 3310 126 million
      2002 Nokia/Nokia/Nokia/Siemens 3510/6100/6610/A50 15 million
      2003 Nokia 1100 250 million
      2004 Nokia 2600/2610/2626/2630 135 million
      2005 Nokia 1110 150 million
      2006 Nokia 1600/1650/1661 130 million
      2007 Nokia 1200 150 million
      2008 Nokia 1680 Classic 35 million
      2009 Apple iPhone 3GS 35 million
      2010 Nokia 5230 150 Million

      If the sales comparison is restricted to smartphones and recent year, then both Samsung Galaxy S and HTC Desire have large sales (30 million and 21 million respectively). Total iPhone sales in 2010 was 40 million, so neither HTC nor Samsung is being outsold by "an order of magnitude".

    16. Re:State Of Mind by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Informative

      For the record, your info is (half a year) out of date. As of the Mango SDK release, WP7 now officially includes TCP and UDP sockets. Yes, it was idiotic of them to ship without those in the beginning, but they are available.

      Unofficially, where I do most of my development, WP7 has a full WinSock stack, but you're not going to get those into the Marketplace. Apps using System.Net.Sockets will and have, though.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  2. Obvious Troll is Obvious by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And looking to promote his company.

    1. Re:Obvious Troll is Obvious by MightyYar · · Score: 3

      Or maybe he just read an iPhone or Android story on Slashdot and believed all of the frothing lunatic haters.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. And Another Thing ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    The kids these days, they don't like the broadband. They are fed up with the cable and the fibre. Everyone has the fibre. Also, many are not happy with the complexity of broadband and the increased risk of viruses over broadband. So we do increasingly see that the youth that wants to be on the cutting edge and try something new are turning to dial up.

    Right now, it is so confusing to the customer. Where is the softly assuring BEEEEEEP WAHUNG WAHUNG SCSSHHHHHHHHH white noise after connecting that lets you know that you are receiving 56k service?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:And Another Thing ... by IANAAC · · Score: 2

      Right now, it is so confusing to the customer. Where is the softly assuring BEEEEEEP WAHUNG WAHUNG SCSSHHHHHHHHH white noise after connecting that lets you know that you are receiving 56k service?

      You just KNOW there's some hipster out there thinking "Hey! If I can find a away to recreate that, but faster, I'll be RICH!"

    2. Re:And Another Thing ... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Should be simple enough. Here's the plan:

      Register domain 56Kb.it.

      Implement a basic URL-shortner/social-media-linking-crap mechanism.

      When somebody clicks on a 56Kb.it shortened link, it redirects them to a fairly standard framed-web-proxy-page arrangement; but with an (HTML5, of course) audio widget that plays the dialup noise, and deliberate bandwidth throttling of the framed page to a bitrate chosen randomly from the historically plausible performance of a '56k' dialup line.

      It's pointless, wasteful, adds an extra point of failure, and is really a pretty stupid gimmick. Should be all over the social networks within hours.

    3. Re:And Another Thing ... by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      NPR's April Fool's joke last year was exactly that - hipsters turning to dial-up modem cafes because they wanted the Internet to be slow again.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    4. Re:And Another Thing ... by Liambp · · Score: 2

      Gosh how I loved that SSCSSHHHHHHH when it eventually did connect. In my mind I can still hear those bits pouring down the telephone line into my computer. Some modems (might have been pre 56k days) even let you keep the modem speaker on constantly so you could listen to your data all day long. The sheer nerdy joy of it.

    5. Re:And Another Thing ... by linuxwolf69 · · Score: 2

      That's ok, I don't have Cable or Satellite TV for the last year and a half. Got a new TV with tuner built in, so borrowed an antennae from a friend to see if I could get some local channels. Daughter saw locals and says "YAY! We got Cable!" When we told her no, it's over the air, she says "same thing... Do we have Cartoon Network?"

      Thinking back though, she's never had over the air, only cable and satellite. It's a shame the things kids have today and don't realize how "bad" we had it as little as 15 years ago.

      now get off my lawn....

  4. Out of touch by zule666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Guess that's why my teenagers wanted iPhones..

  5. Hee hee ya they sure are.... by Stumbles · · Score: 2

    the only thing baffling (not really) is how stupid Nokia's shareholders have been.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
    1. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many of them have sold off the shares. Nokias shares are down ... alot.

      It was the board that decided to select an alliance with Microsoft.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    2. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by s73v3r · · Score: 2

      The only thing that has kept me hanging on to a small set of shares is the idea that Microsoft is simply going to buy Nokia soon.

  6. Not sure what he's thinking... by Scoth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think I've ever met someone who wasn't a hacker/tweaker sort who didn't like their iPhones. Regardless of your beliefs about their business practices, Walled Garden, etc, by and large the iPhone works and works well. I'm not sure exactly who he talked to about being fed up.

    I've also not met a lot of people unhappy with their Android phones, though they may not be using them to their full customization potential.

  7. I'm not young, but... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I've soured on the Android (performance and privacy issues) and the iPhone looks expensive (based on the iPhone tax it looks like service providers charge). But, I also had about 2 years of development experience on the inferior Windows Mobile platform when Microsoft pissed on the developer base, then shoved us out the door.

    I'd say he's right there's room for another competitor, but his ain't it.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:I'm not young, but... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Informative

      Privacy is an issue for you with Android devices so your first idea is to turn to an Apple product?

      This is were a young person would post a picture of Jackie Chan looking utterly baffled.

      You seem to have either a short or selective memory. Prior to the iPhone, the standard practice for cell phones were for handset makers to make phones for carriers with their carrier branding on the case and carrier specific apps permanently installed on the phone. The iPhone was sold to "consumers" and treated like a consumer device rather than something created specifically for a carrier.

      Apple has put into place restrictions to protect the privacy of users from third party apps from collecting personal information without concept.

      If you are referring to the "log" file that was in the backup file, that did not contain any personal information in it. Location information was stored "ON THE PHONE" to speed up location services acting as a "CACHE".

      All carriers are capable of tracking you through their backhaul infrastructure without any help from Apple.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:I'm not young, but... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      My phone cost about a day's pay more than yours and let's me work from anywhere I want, so I can take off on what would be a normal workday and be outside instead of in a windowless office in the third basement.

      And by the way, kids consider constant connection to Facebook "a real life."

    3. Re:I'm not young, but... by oodaloop · · Score: 2

      WebOS? I'd love to see it as a viable open-source alternative to Android.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:I'm not young, but... by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm still trying to figure out why I supposedly need to be connected to Facebook 24 hours a day. Constant mobile internet connections were cool... in 1990. Today they're a sign of a lack of real life.

      Really? I can sit in a meeting at work (or anywhere, for that matter, even without wifi) and use my phone to open a Windows remote desktop connection (or SSH session) to the server and actually write code on the server right through my phone. People are amazed when they give me a bug report at the beginning of a meeting which is fixed by the end. No laptop required, my laptop stays on my desk now.

      You may only use the internet to connect to Facebook, but there are other people who get real work done even using their phones.

      I can also check Slashdot on the shitter, so I've got that going for me. Which is nice.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    5. Re:I'm not young, but... by Kartu · · Score: 2, Informative

      @ Prior to the iPhone, the standard practice for cell phones were for handset makers to make phones for carriers with their carrier branding on the case and carrier specific apps permanently installed on the phone. @

      You forgot to add "in the USA". You could get unlocked, unbranded phones in Europe before iphone and sure you can get it after.

      On Android you know which app has which permissions, but you don't with iOS.
      Having this piece of news in mind, talk about Apple's "protect the privacy" is very ironic:
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/20/iphone-tracking-prompts-privacy-fears

    6. Re:I'm not young, but... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

      @ Prior to the iPhone, the standard practice for cell phones were for handset makers to make phones for carriers with their carrier branding on the case and carrier specific apps permanently installed on the phone. @

      You forgot to add "in the USA". You could get unlocked, unbranded phones in Europe before iphone and sure you can get it after.

      On Android you know which app has which permissions, but you don't with iOS.
      Having this piece of news in mind, talk about Apple's "protect the privacy" is very ironic:
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/20/iphone-tracking-prompts-privacy-fears

      I don't think you understand what privacy is. Privacy protects information that can identify a "person" specifically things like your name, address, phone number and government issued ID numbers. Privacy policies do not protect statistical information like what was contained in the log file. It does not identify a person. Devices do not have privacy rights and you agree to give access to your phone identifier number to your carrier when you sign up for service. The only time location because a privacy concern is if the location information is tied to your account information which was not the case for the log file.

      You are doing disservice to consumers who actually have real privacy risks from using the Android platform. Don't forget that Google is an advertising company and not a consumer technology company. They do not view consumers as they customers. There is also the real risk of downloading malware from the marketplace because google does not have proper vetting processes in place.

      iOS does not require a series of allow/deny prompts beyond location services in third party apps because Apple has a strict set of guidelines for what an application can access and they vet all of their apps in the app store. You can always go into location services in the settings app and turn location services for specific apps off and or turn off location services entirely.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  8. Kids want to differentiate themselves... by lonechicken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... in the same way as their friends.

  9. Nobody does that because everyone does that by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He employs some great logic. Here is a direct quote:

    "What we see is that youth are pretty much fed up with iPhones. Everyone has the iPhone," he said.

    If everyone wants something, then nobody could possibly want it... right?

    1. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Nobody goes there any more, it's too crowded." -Yogi Berra

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's right though. It's a wise point of insight. iPhone and Android are ripe for played-out cultural saturation, just like Facebook.

      Maybe if Nokia doesn't drop the ball, they can parlay this natural social rhythm into success, unlike SOME people (I'm looking at YOU BlackBerry). ...hate to imagine any Microsoft involvement though. I wish they and their shitty Windows Phone would just die.

    3. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by berzerke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Everyone has the iPhone," he said.

      And perhaps they are looking for the next bright shiny, must have item. If everyone has one, it isn't as special anymore. Fads come and go.

      Now whether or not the iphone IS a fad is another question I'll not try to answer. Personally, I've played with my wife's iphone and just can't see why people are so crazy about them. Overpriced and not very flexible IMHO. But maybe it's peer pressure. I've always been rather resistant to it, while my wife is at the other end of the spectrum.

    4. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      iPhone and Android are ripe for played-out cultural saturation, just like Facebook.

      If people are tired of smart phones, they're not going to suddenly rush to buy one that runs Windows.

    5. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      My mom has had sex. They sell Sex For Dummies books. Those two criteria right there are reason enough to never have sex.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There are people like that. Before the iPhone killed the iPod, people would buy Zunes just for the "its not popular" aspect.

      Will it be enough market to keep WMP going? Probably not. However, WMP has one advantage -- Microsoft can easily have it the only phone that works with a new "secure" protocol of Activesync. If MS also licensed it to Apple, Android would be effectively locked out of the enterprise like it was back in the 1.5 and 1.6 days. This by itself would all but kill Android as a competing phone. Exchange support makes or breaks handsets. Even Apple came to Microsoft to get support in their devices.

    7. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by poetmatt · · Score: 2

      I've never seen a stronger case for Nokia being a willing Microsoft crony than a Microsoft exec who leaves to Nokia, fosters a relationship with Nokia, and now trashtalks their competitors.

      Does he really want Nokia to fail this badly?

    8. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by somersault · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think we dislike things directly because they're popular and we want to be hipsters. IMO it's probably more to do with our experience with Microsoft and Intel over the last couple of decades. We often will root for the underdog even when there isn't much of a difference to the end user simply because we don't want any one company getting too far ahead of the rest and crushing innovation.

      Then you also have to consider that we simply are more aware of the alternatives in many situations and will choose the option that is best for us, which won't very often be the most popular choice. It's when geeks start acting like what's best for them is best for everyone when the problems start. Usually it takes the world a few years to be ready for what we are happy to use straight from the bleeding edge. Having said that, I think Android is a decent balance of customisability vs usability. You could probably say the same for the iPhone - as long as you jailbreak it first..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My mom has had sex. They sell Sex For Dummies books. Those two criteria right there are reason enough to never have sex.

      Dude, that's a horrible mental image - it's bad enough knowing that *my* mom had sex, but your mom did too!? That's disgusting!

    10. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by The+Man · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's right though. It's a wise point of insight. iPhone and Android are ripe for played-out cultural saturation, just like Facebook.

      Maybe if Nokia doesn't drop the ball, they can parlay this natural social rhythm into success, unlike SOME people (I'm looking at YOU BlackBerry). ...hate to imagine any Microsoft involvement though. I wish they and their shitty Windows Phone would just die.

      And this for me really highlights how Microsoft especially but also its partners have really dropped the ball. If you can't be the saturation player (Apple), and you can't directly challenge the saturation player (Google and its partners), then you have to offer a compelling niche product. That approach can succeed, especially for smaller companies for whom even a niche product produces meaningful revenue. But there are two big problems here: First, neither Nokia nor Microsoft is a small company; Nokia needs to be a major challenger for its business model to work, and Microsoft is investing a lot of money in mobile and needs more than just one or two partners with niche products to generate a return. Second, the Windows brand has plenty of value, but is a handicap to anyone trying this approach in developing a new niche product. Windows is hardly the brand people associate with innovative, hip new products or being off the beaten path; many if not most people interact with it every day and for them it is background noise, the default, the standard, something that is so bland and ordinary as not to even occasion comment. Is that really the brand that Nokia, or Microsoft for that matter, thinks will excite people who are tired of iOS or Android, or people looking for a less-common status symbol?

      If Microsoft were smarter they would have recognised this and invested the time and energy into coming up with an alternative brand for their mobile products, perhaps leveraging the successful Xbox brand. But in a sense that would also have been an acknowledgement up front that their approach was unlikely to pay off big; a new brand might generate a niche following, but only the Windows brand is likely to be able to take on Apple and Google... most likely by eating RIM's lunch in the corporate space. In other words, either Microsoft has badly misjudged the cachet of Windows among ordinary individuals or its intent all along was to sell Windows Mobile into places where corporate IT makes the decisions rather than end users. That strategy looked decent a few years ago, but we have really seen a lot of changes recently in how employers handle supporting their employees' personal mobile devices. Recognising that it's cheaper to support their existing iOS and Android devices than to issue their own fleet of business-only devices, and that most people prefer to have at most only one phone and one tablet anyway, almost no one is still handing out a single device and refusing to support anything else. In the absence of products that are compelling on their own, RIM is finding that the decay of the corporate mobile device mandate is very bad for business. Microsoft, and therefore their partners as well, seem to be in the same spot.

      It looks like the niche player, whatever it ends up being, will be built around WebOS. It has open source cachet, underdog cachet ("back from the dead"), and it's not a terrible technology. With two dominant players duking it out for the mass market and a potential family of niche alternatives brewing, where does this leave Microsoft? With a lacklustre brand, tiny market share, an apparently outdated strategy, and no compelling products on the market, it's hard to imagine Windows Mobile going anywhere. Too late to market to be where Android is today, and too stodgy a brand to be what Nokia wishes it were (not that a niche business is what Microsoft wants anyway), Windows Mobile looks like a dead end. If anyone knows the value of getting in early, it should be Microsoft; the entire company exists today solely because of its first mover advantage all those years ago. Nokia was happy to get a backer, but it appears to have picked the wrong one. They could be doomed as well.

    11. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm curious why you know that Sex For Dummies exists. I was not aware of this. I'm trying to picture the person who would walk up to a bookstore counter and pay for that. I'm picturing a mix between Stallman and Buscemi.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    12. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When I tried to flex my friend's Droid X it snapped in half too. :)

      Seriously though, most users aren't looking for flexibility. I really don't want the option of being able to run Apache on my phone and being able to SSH into it so I could configure it right.

      They're looking for practical applications of their devices and Apple's doing a damn good job of attracting application developers.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    13. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My mom has an iPhone. They sell iPhones for Dummies books. Those two criteria right there are reason enough to never buy an iPhone.

      What, because it works, is easy to use, and you can get documentation for it that an actual consumer can understand?

      So any technology your mom can use is bad? I take it you have eschewed all forms of technology she can operate like TVs, plumbing, and toasters? Or is it just phones?

      Oh, you can also get Linux for Dummies, Windows for Dummies, and a whole raft of things ... so if the presence of a Dummies book is your criteria, you should stop using anything listed here ... they even have your beloved SQL.

      Seriously man, I consider any technology my mother can operate to be fairly well implemented; because she's in her 70's and for her to decide she needed a GPS, laptop, scanner, digital camera, digital picture frame, a USB drive for backups, and a PVR ... well, that was quite a series of leaps for someone who isn't all that interested in that kind of stuff.

      Why should technology be something that your mother couldn't possibly use?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's been on display in many a bookstore, so anyone buying and reading a lot of books could easily have seen it for sale.

      And the reason why people would by it is the same as why people buy the book "The mole who wanted to know who pooped on it's head", it's a fun book and you just might learn something.

    15. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by s73v3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a huge difference between just choosing something that may not be popular, and bitching about something simply because it is popular. A lot of the latter is what happens here on /.

    16. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe they had sex with each other. Back when they were hot.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    17. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2

      Most of the hipsters / geeksters who disdain whatever is most popular or anything perceived as mainstream also parrot the same lines and maintain orthodoxy with a fairly uniform set of viewpoints, they just come from a different source.

    18. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except: 1. Microsoft doesn't want to kill Android because last I heard they were making truckloads of money from licensing agreements. 2. Exchange only matters in the enterprise sector when it comes to Exchange users. There are plenty of non-exchange enterprise users and there are plenty of non-enterprise users who don't care one bit about Exchange.

    19. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've noticed this too. People parrot the same lines and maintain orthodoxy with a fairly uniform set of viewpoints. Frickin sheep.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    20. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Sebastopol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You illuminate an interesting subtext:

      I think the fact that you put "stability" at #1 means you've probably never owned an iPhone. I've had a 3GS since the week it came out and stability has never even crossed my mind: it just works. The only time I think about stability is when I'm playing Words with Friends and it crashes and vanishes.

      Stability shouldn't even be an issue. No one bought Bakelite phone in the 1960's based on stability: it was correct by construction _already_. I think iPhone nailed that. Of course, I've never owned an Android (used 'em plenty and don't mind 'em one bit), but I would expect "stability" to never enter my conscious thought with Android phones either.

      I just wish the bar was set higher so that absolutely no one would feel compelled to include "stability" on a list of important features.

      It's like saying, "I'm shopping for a car, and my #1 important feature is that it doesn't spontaneously burst into flames." We shouldn't have to even think about that.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    21. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nokia needs to be a major challenger for its business model to work, and Microsoft is investing a lot of money in mobile and needs more than just one or two partners with niche products to generate a return.

      I think you've identified a very real reason why this whole partnership was a terrible idea: It requires one partner or the other (if not both) to get screwed. There is basically no chance of WP7 taking over the entire market. The best it can really hope for is to split the market three ways with Android and iOS, and even that seems extremely optimistic at this point. Windows Mobile, the discontinued product, is still outselling WP7, and those are the just-released latest numbers.

      What is Nokia supposed to do with only a small part of a small percentage of the market? Even the entire volume of WP7 sales is probably not enough to sustain them. And Microsoft can't even let them have that, because they'll never get their market share off the floor with only one vendor who, by necessity, will itself have to continue selling and marketing non-WP7 in the interim.

    22. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't bitch about Microsoft Windows because its popular (though it is), I bitch about it because it makes my days unending drudgery and pain.
      I know you will probably think I am drinking the Slashdot cool-aid, but I assure you 90% of the frustration in my day is caused by something Microsoft did.
      I also have Apple, Linux and Solaris machines and none of them give me the "WTF were they thinking?!" headaches that Windows does.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    23. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      While I agree somewhat, I'd also point out that "popular" does not mean good.

      Besides the whole Microsoft Windows argument, McDonald's hamburgers are the most popular. The most watched television series is still "Baywatch." And I believe the best selling beer in the world is Budweiser.

      Or, as I like to say, "Eat Shit: 10,000,000 flies can't be wrong."

    24. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by N0Man74 · · Score: 2

      "Yes! We are all individuals!"

    25. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      Your Linux machine clearly does not run a recent version of Ubuntu then.

      / typed, for reason that frankly I'm somewhat unable to recall, from a machine running Unity.

    26. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Patch86 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That seems like a redundant title for a book to have...

    27. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      Even the entire volume of WP7 sales is probably not enough to sustain them. And Microsoft can't even let them have that, because they'll never get their market share off the floor with only one vendor who, by necessity, will itself have to continue selling and marketing non-WP7 in the interim.

      Well to be fair, it is possible to have a good market share with only the one vendor. Apple is the only vendor or iOS products, and RIM the only vendor of BlackBerries. And if you had to pick a "one vendor" to bet your product's future on, you could do worse than Nokia- former title holder for #1 smartphone market share, and current title holder for #1 overall mobile phone market share.

      That said, I do actually agree with you.

    28. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      I'm not.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    29. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by mosb1000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If this is the way you think about your wife, and talk about her, you should probably consider what effect that behavior may be having on your relationship.

      If someone does succumb easily to peer pressure, then that's a real issue that should be addressed. But buying an iPhone really doesn't qualify all on it's own, because it is actually a perfectly good phone, and iPhone users tend to make more of an effort to help their friends see all the good things an iPhone can do. I would know, I've encouraged many of my friends to buy them.

      It looks to me like rather than actually trying to understand why people would want an iPhone, you are simply saying that since you don't want one, the only reason that anyone else could want one is that they are influenced by peer pressure, while you are not. And regardless of how you think you meant it, being susceptible to peer pressure is not a good thing, so you are basically saying that you are better than iPhone users because they give in to peer pressure and you don't.

      Not only are you over-simplyfing, but you are making basically no effort to understand the alternative point of view. That's even more troubling, because the alternative point of view happens to belong to your wife.

    30. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by painandgreed · · Score: 3, Funny

      And the reason why people would by it is the same as why people buy the book "The mole who wanted to know who pooped on it's head"...

      To entertain small children?

    31. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by ggeens · · Score: 2

      While there are plenty of non-Exchange mail servers, the number of non-Exchange mailbox servers in enterprise environments (>1000 users) is pretty small.

      Don't forget Lotus Notes. IBM has some very large accounts using that.

      OTOH, Groupwise is on the way out.

      --
      WWTTD?
  10. If you by MemoryDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    want your kid to be beaten up by the school bully, then give him a nokia windows mobile 7 phone.

  11. As a certified "young person"... by HopefulIntern · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a "young person", I do not see how anyone can claim Android is "baffling"... to begin with it was more of an engineer/dev/nerd phone but it quickly changed and now IIRC is the most popular phone OS. My facebook news feed often contains complaints or questions about "why is my iphone xxx" but not once have I seen any of them asking for help with a droid.

    1. Re:As a certified "young person"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      They would have complained but they couldn't figure out how to post using their droid ;-)

    2. Re:As a certified "young person"... by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Funny

      They did try - they sent you a text message, but it went to the wrong person.

  12. Imma go with "delusional" by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't speak for really young people, but the 20-35 crowd with whom I work love their Androids.

    They tend to see the iPhone as a bit more "stuffy", but that distinction may have more to do with company policies regarding who gets what, than with any actual differences between the devices themselves. But "Baffling"? C'mon, you just slide through the screens to the one you want, and tap when you get there.

    Now, if you want to ask if the business world will get all hot over a device they can lock down via domain policies - I'd at least give that one a 50/50 (with the "not" 50% swearing like a sailor at the horror of having any mobile device trusted on their domain). But the actual users? Yeah, I'll have to go with the Nokia execs as "delusional" on this one.

  13. WP7 sales suck everywhere. by scorp1us · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not like Nokia phones are going to be any different from other vendors' WP7 phones, despite the privileged position Nokia has. Their real chance to be different was with the N9, and by all accounts the phone is a success in the markets it was launched in. People love it -- if they can get it. Carrier subsidizing is the only "feature" that is missing. But good news Newegg now carries it! ($630) so no dealing with shady importers.

    I hate my Android, but I'll likely go back to iPhone, unless I swing the N9 for xmas. Yeah, I'm not even a year into the Atrix and I'm looking to spend another $630 because Android is crap. I prefer a "walled garden" to an open field of shit. I'm only waiting to see how the iPhone 5 changes things.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:WP7 sales suck everywhere. by hellkyng · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'm only waiting to see how the iPhone 5 changes things."

      Then you don't have to worry, I am sure it will change everything.

  14. I agree! by loftwyr · · Score: 5, Funny

    I showed my Android phone to my 2 year old and within minutes she was fed up. To her, all those icons and such were baffling. But then I showed her a windows 7 phone and she ate it up! It spent far more time in her mouth than any other phone in the house!

    1. Re:I agree! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well said.
      His post was clearly serious.
      Obviously, he needed your guidance
      Once again, thank you.
      Sincerely,
      Herbert.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  15. HELLO NOKIA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    NOKIA cant make a QUAD BAND DUAL SIM PHONE! I am forced to buy a LG or a SAMSUNG. Wake up NOKIA

  16. Exacty wrong by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know why older people have this misconception that young people are more iconoclastic than older ones. Just because the Young do not have the same icons as the old I guess. Teens and young adults are gregarious and sensitive to peer pressure to an extreme, more than more mature people.
    If Nokia counts on many Young having it as an argument against the iPhone, I wish them good luck. They could try "your moms and dads have them too", but since moms and dads still mostly have Nokias, at least in Europe, that doesn't sound too smart either.
    Sounds like clutching at straws to me.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  17. Wrong! by wfs2mail.com · · Score: 2

    Actually, soured by the BS from companys like Nokia and HP.

    "We're releasing this product in a few months"
    "No, wait, next year"
    "Oh, never mind. We're changing directions"
    "Oops, changed out mind again..."

    A year or two goes by and then they release a piece of garbage without half the promised features. They tease and tease with carrots, but in the end deliver an overpriced rutabega. I have my issues w/ both iphone and android, but the alternatives offered are garbage.

  18. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by swanzilla · · Score: 2

    Maybe the young people just want to make PHONE CALLS on their cellPHONES. Now get off their lawns.

  19. Fed up with the lawsuits, not the phones. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every other day I'm hearing about smartphone makers suing each other, that's what I'm fed up with.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Fed up with the lawsuits, not the phones. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because if companies would stop being childish and suing each other, improving their product instead of throwing lawyers around, I might have a better phone in my pocket.
      And that does effect me personally.

      --
      What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    2. Re:Fed up with the lawsuits, not the phones. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      1) price.
      2) product delays
      3) advancement is delayed
      4) courts are tied up for stupid bickering
      5) industrial waste as delayed devices don't end up sold
      6) stupid lawyers pocketing cash that should go toward new fabs

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  20. same old crap by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    seriously, was he around nokia stuff _last_ decade?

    puffing up the music portfolio. well, that's something they've been trying for almost a decade.

    and some other stuff as well.
    “We would prefer a wireless transfer than a docking station," said Munksgaard. "A docking station has limitations because the phone has to be in a certain place. We are extremely pleased with the experience you get with the device in connection with Nokia gear. We don’t have a docking station at this point, however we are confident that as the Windows Phone ecosystem grows, third party docking station makers will support us.”

    well fuck nokia, pc suite on 3650 allowed me to install packages wirelessly from the pc, installation options and all. then you started taking things away one by one.

    read my typing: wp8 will have a task history/switch view just like android, symbian and ios. because otherwise it's going to continue sucking more than series40.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  21. Re:Android vs iphone vs windows phone wars 3,2,1.. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

    at this point, it's Android and iPhone fanboys versus stupid Nokia exec.

    I think that trying to find a consensus amongst youth is stupid and foolish. Just because a group of youth take to something doesn't mean that this is what the young do or are into.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  22. I think Nokia missed the boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's really missing the marketplace is a Linux console phone. All this graphics nonsense is just slowing people down. And what could be better than the feeling of compiling a kernel in your pocket?

    1. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, they screwed up trying to follow up the N900 with the N9, while giving the promising N950 only to a few devels, and so far killing the future for those great portable computers with phone functionality.

      And all android phones have a linux console, just in case you would want to compile a kernel.

    2. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by SpzToid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My N9 arrived from Switzerland and I think it is just freaking beautiful, and Microsoft really did a number on Nokia to muzzle this thing. Like:

      The main website for the N9 is http://swipe.nokia.com/ Okay, so you're saying 'swipe, yeah I've heard of that. so what?' Man, if only Microsoft wasn't paying Nokia so hard to put a muzzle on it. Check out the videos at the bottom of that page, particularly the 2nd thumbnail'd from the left, at the very bottom. Dig on the one-handed swipe GUI. So now maybe you're thinking, 'well okay, if the one-handed GUI carries over through out the rest of the OS maybe...'

      Okay, to do that, you have to wait for the Over the Air update (or use another way) to install the PR1.1, i.e. the first service pack for the OS since the phone was released. Then 'swipe' is fully installed, and you can also access control-keys, up/down arrows, etc. And it is freaking awesome! And being a linux guy of course I installed the devel extras which gets me the busybox terminal, and oh man what a gorgeous phone/client.

      Today I was playing with the calendar and daily alarms; gorgeous! The included browser is fast and I'm a web-dev and really appreciate the perspective it brings to understanding modern mobile html5/touch browsers (that pops-up .flv videos in the media player but now .swf files).

      I am certain Microsoft paid Nokia to *bury* the one-handed swipe GUI so deep as to obfuscate it completely. But I also think the Good Work of the Nokia linux team refuses to be buried so. At any rate, I give the N9 the coolest, most-positive thumbs-up review. And it does linux. (Oh, and who needs a million apps if I can bash script & ssh all over the place?)

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    3. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by SpzToid · · Score: 3, Informative

      To better clarify my earlier post, and what I mean about having to add the swipe keyboard yourself (thanks Microsoft!) check out this blog post: http://everythingn9.com/advanced-keyboard-functions-nokia-n9. Having done so, this OS really can be used one-handed if so desired, with minimal strain if any (once practiced).

      If only the kids were paying attention to these developments.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    4. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by gmuslera · · Score: 2

      The N9 is a great phone, smartphone even, with far better hardware specs than the N900 and with an impressive screen. But the N900 is more a pocket computer than a phone. That is the boat that Nokia missed.

  23. Remember: by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Informative

    The plural of anecdote is data.

    Now go ask a thousand other parents what their teenagers want and check back here after you do. I think you'll find iStuff to be consistently high up on the list.

    BTW your "industry insider" is more commonly known as a shill. He is selling a product. He - of course - isn't going to say "well our product isn't as good as Apple". He is going to say something positive about his product and negative about the competition. That's his job.

    Find a neutral third party with a purely objective viewpoint and you'll have an "industry insider" worth listening to.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Remember: by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The plural of anecdote is NOT data. Data implies a controlled set of information that can be plotted against a single (or at least a few known) variables. An anecdote has no control of its variance, which makes it impossible to compare to other randomly collected anecdotes.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:Remember: by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      False. Controls are only required where there is a specific subset of the population you wish to analyse. When you're trying to analyse an entire population your only control is that there are no controls. This is definitely data.

      If we asked everyone what their kid wanted for Christmas and the answer is iPhones, then that is data. If we asked everyone on slashdot, then the result is still data except rather than specifying controls we simply specify the shortcomings of the data and replace "everyone" with "slashdot users".

  24. Snorting fumes in the fab by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think this guy's be hanging out in a wafer fab snorting fumes.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  25. Even *I* bought an iPhone... by tekrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I liked my Palm Pilot so much, I bought a Treo. However, the Treo was a terrible phone, I had to spend extra and buy it on eBay because the 680 wasn't supported by t-Mobile and for years I lived with it. Then, finally I started phone shopping.

    A friend lent me his Nokia 900 and I found it to be un-useable. It interpreted *everything* as me wanting to use the device, including putting it back into a belt-holster... So it would start playing videos in my pocket, and when I wanted to really use it to make a phone call, the battery was dead.

    I didn't like the iPhone's on-screen keyboard, but, when the iPhone4 came out, it finally supported a bluetooth keyboard. So, I bought the iPhone & keyboard. When I'm away from the keyboard, I've learned to live with the onscreen keyboard.

    For the last year and 2 months now, it's been OK. I haven't wanted to run my phone over with my car, something I've wanted to do to both the Treo and the Nokia. Sure, it doesn't do everything, but, I have to admit it's better than what I was getting previously. The keyboard has made taking notes and writing emails very easy, making the phone a 60% desktop replacement.

    It's a fairly good PDA, and even with AT&T service, it's been a use-able phone. All it has to do is not suck entirely, which tends to be what the other products do.

    Considered that kids want what the other kids have, my guess is that this quote from Nokia that kids want a Windows Phone is rubbish. Kids want an iPhone. Apple is already on track to be the biggest phone-maker in the world.

    Nokia, RIM, Samsung, and Sony do not have a chance unless they undertake some serious R&D and make something equally revolutionary. And somehow "revolutionary" isn't a word *anyone* associates with Microsoft. Windows phone ain't it, any more than GEOS phone. WebOS could have been it, but Palm and the HP both screwed that pooch.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  26. what are these things you call by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    ......phone....calls???

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  27. The carriers. by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are fed up with the carriers, not the phones.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  28. Are you seriously suggesting... by Haxagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... that Windows phone runs Windows? Think of it like this: Android phones don't run Ubuntu.

    1. Re:Are you seriously suggesting... by RDW · · Score: 5, Funny

      Think of it like this: Android phones don't run Ubuntu.

      Indeed. It's easy to tell the difference because only one of these platforms defaults to a dumbed-down smartphone GUI. And the other is sponsored by Google.

    2. Re:Are you seriously suggesting... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      Nice curtains, maybe?

      Yeah, That will outsell Android, with its robots.

      I would short Nokia, but I already did.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  29. Look at the Guy's Title by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    By "Exec" in the title the actual position of the speaker is in fact "director of Portfolio, Product Marketing & Sales at Nokia Entertainment Global", which equates to something like "manufacturer of consent via media manipulation, innuendo, and implication". No hard science or technology in that guy's department.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  30. Just ditched nokia for android by colin_faber · · Score: 2

    As a long time nokia user I just recently switched to android based phone. This was due too many factors the top being the fact that Nokia does a HORRIBLE job supporting their customers. After many successful generations of upgrades for my self within their `E' series business line I finally had enough with the E52 and E72. In both cases the phones barely worked, constantly had critical failures of the business applications and were nearly impossible to sync up with external, non-windows, non-nokia systems. The second being the fact that the quality of their hardware has gone from good to horrible. The mostly high quality builds have been replaced with cheap, plastic junk that breaks very easily. On my E52 I went though 4 screens between giving up on the phone, this in contrast to the E51 which is still in near mint condition after years of abuse. All of this is in contrast to the reasonably open experience I've got with the Android based phone, and much better build quality. It's no surprise that nokia would partner up with Microsoft (FOR BILLIONS OF DOLLARS). Soon I suspect you will see them shift from a leader in the mobile phone market to another patent troll with crappy hardware and software offers.

  31. Wait for windows phone in 2013... by IYagami · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just imagine: in 2013 having a windows phone that:
    a) Can be used as a phone (of course!)
    b) Can be used as a tablet (windows 8 with the Metro UI)
    c) Can be used as a computer (windows 8 with the Classic UI)
    d) Can be used as a game console (it is rumored that the next xbox could run in ARM processors a variant of the windows 8 kernel).

    Microsoft is known for improving its products version after version... Everyone thinks that Windows Phone 7.5 is a very goog start: just read the reviews:
    - Engadget ( http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/27/windows-phone-7-5-mango-review/ )
    "While Windows Phone still needs a glass of water to get rid of a few hiccups -- and let's face it, every mobile OS has plenty of their own -- it ironed out a lot of the wrinkles from earlier versions and made it a much more feature-laden, user-friendly experience. With Mango, WP7 has caught up with Android and iOS in nearly every way, and in some areas it's even surpassed the other two in functionality. Despite a grim first year, the bright future of Windows Phone is forcing Ballmer to wear shades."
    - The Verge ( http://www.theverge.com/2011/10/24/2509332/windows-phone-75-mango-review )
    "Put simply, regardless of your preconceptions, Windows Phone finally deserves an honest look the next time you’re ready to buy a phone — particularly as we start to see new devices come to market over the next few weeks."
    - gsmarena ( http://www.gsmarena.com/windows_phone_7_5-review-655.php )
    "WP7 lacked key functionality, which deterred potential consumers. Version 7.5 however brings things that will appeal to businesspeople, social networking buffs and people who like a novel software experience. If you're using Microsoft software (chances are you're using at least Office at work), WP7.5 offers the smoothest, most well-rounded experience. The rich bundle of several social networks and IM clients and emails and texts is beautifully organized too. And let's face it, the Windows Phone interface is the only UI around that's truly different - iOS, Android, even Symbian are becoming harder and harder to tell apart. The only thing that held it back was the lack of multitasking and now that's been sorted out."

    1. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by JeremyR · · Score: 2

      Great, so in 2013, Windows Phones will be able to do what other phones already can today. And of course, the competition will be standing still in the meantime. But Windows Phone will be worth the wait, we promise!

      As for Windows Phone 7.5 being "a very good start," it's not a "start." Microsoft has been trying for years to be relevant in the mobile space. So they finally got some of it right on the seven-and-a halfth try? Good for them. (OK, I know that Windows Phone releases haven't been consecutively numbered since 1.0, but you get the idea.)

      Microsoft is in catch-up mode, and I expect that they'll stay there, as this time they're not able to leverage their existing monopolies as they were able to do when they initially missed the boat with the Internet.

    2. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      yes wp 7.5 is very goog.
      that is, it's shit.
      honestly, I'd rather have series 60 5th edition than that pile of crap. c7 over any of the wp phones any day.

      beautifully organized? are you literally smoking crack? wp7 is different for diferences sake - and because whipping up a fucking menu and billing it up as an operating system is the oldest trick in the book. there's a reason why it's moving away from that release per release, by wp 8.5 frizzleberry it'll have a sliding notification box with a task switcher(history) - just like all other small screen os's and the big screen version will have a honeycomb style switcher- so will ios btw.

      for the record, I use a xperia play currently. it's smooth, fast and expendable without sucking cock for certs, plays music and plays all non-hd vids I can throw at it. ndk is good enough for porting emulators, I can have replacement homescreens that aren't total hacks(one of the biggest gripes on symbian, really). it even receives mms messages ok(from my mom, stfu about "nobody uses mms", because yo moma does). and I a simple homescreen widget to enable wifi-hotspot was available - because there's no bullshit favoritism on the unlocked models and no artificial monopoly on who gets to provide software to do what!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  32. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by Relayman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uh, no. The young people make very few calls on their phones. It's text messages, IM, Facetime, VOIP over Xbox, facebook; everything but phone calls.

    - Living with a 20-year old in the basement.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  33. Nokia can't even give away their product. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Om Malik commenting on the state of Nokia in Finland.

    I co-incidentally happen to be in Helsinki, a few miles away from Nokiaâ(TM)s global headquarters in Espoo, Finland. Walking around the downtown (where I am staying), I have seen many more iPhones than Nokia phones. And most of the startup people I met have some variation of the iPhone. One of them who is still in college told me that Nokia gave him one of their new phones, and he decided to use it as a way to support his nationâ(TM)s largest employer. A month later, he switched back to the iPhone. Ouch! When you canâ(TM)t give away your phones to your own âoeyouth,â it is time to stop hating on other platforms and look for ways to get people to use your product.

    Nokia can't even give away their phones!

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  34. It's called denial by eclectro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the first of the five stages of grief.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  35. Making a mistake by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are doing it wrong. They should push it as a business friendly phone. Nice tight integration with Exchange server. add on some security tools. Enable remote wiping, and perhaps even a remote bricking.
    Sell it as an Enterprise phone. Replacement for the blackberry.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    1. Re:Making a mistake by Spyder · · Score: 2

      The enterprise mobile email system really needs to move to an app. Fewer folks and fewer companies want to deal with a work issued phone. We need an app for all of the smartphone platforms that keeps the mail store encrypted and authentication credentials at rest. It also needs an infrastructure that supports remote wiping of the app's authentication and user data. We no longer need to run the hardware side for mobile enterprise mail and sticking to that model is just making RIM's biggest problem over again.

      There are hard parts to solving a lot of expected functions, like how do you keep the authentication information secure and do automatic email pulls or how to keep the user data secure and still do calendar reminders.

      --
      Spyder
  36. In other news, by fotoflojoe · · Score: 2

    Chrysler exec claims that young people are fed up with Ford and baffled by General Motors.

  37. My Daughter by hondo77 · · Score: 2

    My daughter is fed up that I haven't bought her an iPhone yet. Does that count?

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  38. From a sign in a cubicle at Nokia by erroneus · · Score: 2

    "You don't have to be delusional to work here, but it helps!"

  39. He could be right if talking about Maemo... by funky_vibes · · Score: 2

    seriously, rim, iphone, android, microsoft just offer different flavors of the same thing.
    the same walled garden with the same shitty appstores that only sell farting apps.
    the phones are in no way ergonomic to use, the only focus being quick to learn for the most basic tasks.
    I've tried each and each time still return to a good old symbian or n900 phone.

  40. Survey says... by lmcgeoch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some Creepy old guy walks up to a group of kids.
    Creepy old guy looks at kid using his iPhone

    Creepy old guy: Can you play xbox with your iPhone?
    Kid with iPhone: No

    Creepy old guy looks at kid using his Android.

    Creepy old guy: Can you play xbox with your Android?
    Kid with Android: I don't think so.

    Headline: Young People soured on the iPhone and find the Android baffling.

  41. So far I've been impressed with WP7 by Lifyre · · Score: 3, Informative

    My wife now has a WP7 phone (HTC Arrive) and loves it. The OS seems well put together and while it doesn't seem to be a power user phone it does many of the functions better of being a phone, text platform, and media consumption device much more smoothly than either iOS or Android. I use both an Android (Galaxy SII currently) and an iPhone 4 on a daily basis, my preference is heavily on the Android side for many usability and functionality reasons. I also run custom ROMs on my android vs. stock on the iPhone which may have much to do with my experience.

    That said the WP7 has been impressive enough that it may just be my next phone.

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  42. Re:Android IS crap by SoCalChris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your complaint about Android's keyboard is one of its best features. Sure, the stock Android keyboard is just mediocre. It works fine for most people, but for those who want something better, you can easily replace it. I found one that I like, that works really well for me (SwiftKey), so I was able to very easily replace the stock keyboard app with that one. My wife didn't care for the stock keyboard or SwiftKey, so she easily replaced hers with another (Swype, I think?). I can't stand her keyboard, but she loves it. We both can easily type using our onscreen keyboards, and we both routinely use the onscreen keyboard instead of the built in hardware keyboard.

    My son has an iPhone, after using SwiftKey, I think his keyboard is horrible. As far as I know he's stuck with it though, there's no way to change the stock keyboard on it. It may be a little better than the stock Android keyboard, but it absolutely blows compared to some of the aftermarket Android ones.

    You also made a comment about Samsung just using the free software that's available instead of developing their own. Do you remember just a few years ago, when each phone had its own OS? Those were absolutely horrible. I wouldn't even consider a phone not running Android or iOS any more. I don't think many other people would either.

  43. There's an app for that. by mosb1000 · · Score: 2

    There's an app for that.

  44. From my vantage point.... by SwedishChef · · Score: 3, Funny

    From my vantage point they're probably still hot! :D

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  45. N9 by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

    Of Nokia's current offerings, the only one that tempts me is the MeeGo-based N9, which has a decent Linux and 64GB of storage. It also has Nokia's Ovi Maps, which are pretty good, at no extra cost. Alas, it is destined to be an orphan. If Nokia pushed it more broadly, it would be a winner - far better than their W7 Lumia 800 (costs more for slightly fewer screen pixels, similar features, but only 16GB storage) which I also handled in one store.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  46. Apple was caught TRACKING YOUR MOVEMENT by Kartu · · Score: 2

    Apple was caught TRACKING YOUR MOVEMENT if you own an iPhone, somehow that is not a privacy concern in your books? (oh, they certainly "don't know" who the owner of iPhone is, eh?)

    Dolphin HD was cought giving out information about sites your visit on Android platform. It was doing it on both iOS and Android, yet only Android users could catch it, see the problem? Where was your mythical Apple's "strict set of guidlines"?

    As most stuff surrounding Apple, being better protected than on Android is yet another myth.