Slashdot Mirror


North Star May Be Wasting Away

sciencehabit writes "The North Star, a celestial beacon to navigators for centuries, may be slowly shrinking, according to a new analysis of more than 160 years of observations. The data suggest that the familiar fixture in the northern sky is shedding an Earth's mass worth of gas each year."

129 comments

  1. Oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Polaris must be losing nearly the equivalent of Earth's mass—or a little under a millionth of its own mass—each year,

    In a little over a million years, we won't be able to use that particular star to navigate any more. IT'LL BE CHAOS!

    1. Re:Oh my god! by GodInHell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to take you too seriously -- but it would probably shrink to the point where it became impossible to see the north star long before that.

      We do however have wonderful things called "Com-pass-es" that work similarly (even inside and in daytime).

      -GiH

    2. Re:Oh my god! by Hatta · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Earth precesses once ever 26000 years. In 13000 years north will be pointed towards Vega.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Vega is a fucking space ghetto. I don't want to point to that part of the celestial neighborhood.

    4. Re:Oh my god! by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Polaris must be losing nearly the equivalent of Earth's mass—or a little under a millionth of its own mass—each year,

      In a little over a million years, we won't be able to use that particular star to navigate any more. IT'LL BE CHAOS!

      It's more likely to collapse and blow off gas in a nebula before then, but agree, it's very hard to use nebulas as navigational aids during the daylight hours and tricky enough at night.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Oh my god! by masternerdguy · · Score: 2

      But I use nebulas to navigate in Freelancer all the time. They're so bright and colorful you can't miss them...Oh wait.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    6. Re:Oh my god! by SpryGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, except that over that same time period, we'll be experiencing a reversal of the poles, and the accompaning period of magnetic flux that would make magnetic compasses rather useless.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    7. Re:Oh my god! by jdastrup · · Score: 0

      Sure, compasses work now, until Earth's next polarity reversal occurs, which will be much sooner than Polaris disappearing.

      Face it, we're screwed.

    8. Re:Oh my god! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I thought that was where the Mother Thing was from? Doesn't sound like a ghetto... Wormface and company were from the ghetto.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:Oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're right

      Karma whoring:
      "...Gamma Cephei (also known as Alrai, situated 45 light-years away) will become closer to the northern celestial pole than Polaris around AD 3000. Iota Cephei will become the pole star some time around AD 5200.

      First-magnitude Deneb will be within 5 of the North Pole in AD 10000.

      The brilliant Vega in the constellation Lyra is often touted as the best North Star (it fulfilled that role around 12000 BC and will do so again around the year AD 14000). However, it never comes closer than 5 to the pole.

      When Polaris becomes the North Star again around 27800 AD, due to its proper motion it then will be farther away from the pole than it is now, while in 23600 BC it came closer to the pole.

      In 3000 BC the faint star Thuban in the constellation Draco was the North Star. At magnitude 3.67 (fourth magnitude) it is only one-fifth as bright as Polaris, and today it is invisible in light-polluted urban skies..."

      -Wikipedia

    10. Re:Oh my god! by jamstar7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Vega is a fucking space ghetto. I don't want to point to that part of the celestial neighborhood.

      I thought that was where the Mother Thing was from? Doesn't sound like a ghetto... Wormface and company were from the ghetto.

      Problem is, what comes from Vega are Vegans. If they invade, no more leather, no more steaks. We'll be reduced to eating vegetables and tofu forever and ever and ever, amen

      Course, the upside is, we'll produce plenty of methane, so it might help with the energy crunch, though I kinda doubt it'll be comfortable walking around with a gas pipe up my ass. Maybe that's why the aliens are so into anal probing...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    11. Re:Oh my god! by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      Wow, I only recently started delving into Sci-Fi stories. Never heard of this one but it sounds cool. Thanks for the post! (The most recent one I read is " Machines That Think: The Best Science Fiction Stories About Robots and Computers" A pretty good collection.)

    12. Re:Oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They ll continue working after the polarity reversal. Just they wont at certain points during the reversal.
      However, as the magnetic north pole isnt sitting on top of the rotation axis, it s still not the best method to find directions.
      Luckily enough, chances are the north star doesnt fade before a few reversals have happened. And probably long after mankind has disapeared...

    13. Re:Oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Y2K hysteria to me.

    14. Re:Oh my god! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Well played, sir.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    15. Re:Oh my god! by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      I call dibs on the world wide contract to fix the P1M bug. Don't wait till the last second, pay me now.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    16. Re:Oh my god! by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      slashdot ate your degree signs (some geek site huh?)

      also of interest is that Deneb is presently the North Pole star of Mars.

    17. Re:Oh my god! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      The Earth precesses once ever 26000 years. In 13000 years north will be pointed towards Vega.

      For fun I cranked up Stellarium to check the relative positions of Polaris and Vega. Does anyone know a way to make Stellarium draw a trail for stars like it does with planets? I turned up the time rate to whiz through thousands of years per second and can sort of make out the the path of Polaris with respect to the North pole due to precession, but it would be nice to have it trace out the path.

      BTW, Stellarium stops at the year 99999. That seems like an odd limit.

    18. Re:Oh my god! by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      But Polaris is the BEST pole star! Of all the stars close to the polar precession circle, Polaris is the brightest star that is very close to the actual polar axis at the point of closest approach. There are only 4 or 5 naked eye stars that are closer to the precession circle, but they are a good bit dimmer than Polaris. The only one brighter is Vega, but it is never closer than about 5 degrees.

      Polaris is currently getting closer and closer to the pole. It will reach its closest apparent declination on 24 March 2100 (only 0.45 degrees away) - which, thanks to the singularity we nearly all still be alive to witness (Kurzweil has never been wrong has he?).

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    19. Re:Oh my god! by Tastecicles · · Score: 3, Funny

      ah, that's because when it clicks over to 100,000 the Morlocks invade...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    20. Re:Oh my god! by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 2

      Wow, I only recently started delving into Sci-Fi stories. Never heard of this one but it sounds cool. Thanks for the post! (The most recent one I read is "
      Machines That Think: The Best Science Fiction Stories About Robots and Computers" A pretty good collection.)

      Have Space Suit—Will Travel is OK, but a bit strange, like many of Heinlein's novels. If you haven't read anything else by him I would rather recommend Starship Troopers or The Moon is a Harsh Mistress for starters.

      I haven't read the collection you mention, but I have read about half of the stories therein, most are good ones. While I'm here I can give you some completely unsolicited pointers: Stephen Baxter (Evolution, and Manifold books, which explore fundamental concepts of physics and cosmology), the novels of Iain M. Banks (the "M" is important, it's what he uses for SF works), and Eric Brown (for instance the collection Kéthani), for contemporary works. If you liked the Vinge story his novels are enjoyable as well, although not centered on AI.

      For more classical/space opera stuff Asimov's Foundation series is nice, and pretty much all of his short stories come recommended. If you liked The Bicentennial Man you should check out his Robot series (titles on Wikipedia). Arthur C. Clarke has several brilliant classics: 2001 (and the other "year-titled" books), The Fountains of Paradise (explores space elevators) and the Rama series.

      Of course those are just favourites of mine, YMMV. It's a daunting amount of SF out there, and a lot of it is crap, but it's immensely rewarding when you find something you really like.

      If you or anyone else can recommend other stories based on my recommendations, go ahead :)

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    21. Re:Oh my god! by unitron · · Score: 1

      Clarke's short stories should not be overlooked.

      I particularly recommend "I Remember Babylon".

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    22. Re:Oh my god! by unitron · · Score: 1

      So there's still a good reason to learn COBOL?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    23. Re:Oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually in about 1000 years it will no longer be the pole star, the movement of the sun through the galaxy, combined with earth's axial precession, Polaris will no longer point to true north, it'll begin to form wider circles if you do a slow exposure film of it.

      Back in 3000 BC (5,000 years ago) there was another pole star that is still in the northern hemisphere, called Thuban, which was the pole star then.

    24. Re:Oh my god! by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I love "The City and the Stars". Short and one of his best works, IMO.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    25. Re:Oh my god! by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

      What happens at Vega stays at Vega.

    26. Re:Oh my god! by matfud · · Score: 1

      Try Ken Macleod or Alister Renolds. Both are excelant authours. I like Ian M banks too. Asimov is cool too. Try Edgar Rice Buroughs if you want a taste of the past. John Carter of mars.

    27. Re:Oh my god! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, in a couple thousand years we'll have a new north star.

    28. Re:Oh my god! by matfud · · Score: 1

      The Stars My Destination (Alfred Bester) although I think it was renamed Tiger Tiger. There are lots to read. Some are shit. Many are good.

    29. Re:Oh my god! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      The precession of the equinoxes and proper motion of stars means we'll have a new north star long before either happens. A series of them, actually.

      Not that a pole star is actually necessary anyway. There isn't a decent south polar star currently. For actual navigation rather than just direction finding, it's only slightly easier to use Polaris rather than any other star, it requires a special table, and you need at least one other star for a fix anyway.

    30. Re:Oh my god! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Thanks guys (and/or gals), I needed a laugh today. :)

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    31. Re:Oh my god! by dwye · · Score: 2

      The precession of the equinoxes and proper motion of stars means we'll have a new north star long before either happens. A series of them, actually.

      Not that a pole star is actually necessary anyway. There isn't a decent south polar star currently.

      The North Star is a fairly recent thing. Isaac Asimov used "Shakespeare" quoting Julius Caesar calling himself as constant as the North Star to "prove" that Francis Bacon couldn't have ghosted that play, at least, because Bacon would have known that, due to the precession of the equinoxes, in Roman times the nearest star to the pole spot covered half of the range from horizon to zenith each night, and thus would never be called "the North Star." Of course, Asimov then pointed out that that argument also proved that he, Isaac Asimov, could not have written one of his juvenile books published under an alias, because of an equally simple mistake that surely a science writer as good as he was could never make (except that he did).

      Anyway, if Polaris was eaten by an interstellar space goat sometime in the past so that its light disappears tomorrow, we can still use the method which has worked since the Neolithic. The two stars in the pan of the Big Dipper (aka, the Wain or Wagon in The Odyssey) farthest from the handle (or tongue of the Wagon) line up to point to the pole point more exactly than a fairly dim star in a fairly dim constellation ever have, and will continue to do so for thousands of years more. One can also use two stars in Cassiopia to line up with the pole, but I cannot remember which two without being outside on a clear night (and thus away from this keyboard and my wifi signal).

    32. Re:Oh my god! by dwye · · Score: 1

      It's a daunting amount of SF out there, and a lot of it is crap,

      Would you say, perhaps, 90%? (aka, Sturgeon's Law, after famed SF writer Theodore Sturgeon who declared, on a talk show, that 90% of EVERYTHING is crap, after the other guest, an English professor, claimed that 90% of [then-]current [ie, late 50's] SciFi was crap)

      Seriously, a lot of the crap can be good, too, if approached in the right mood. E. E. "Doc" Smith produced some utterly laughable crap that is fun to read, just as Plan 9 From Outer Space (generally acclaimed as the Worst Movie Ever) is fun to watch. Since John Carter of Mars is coming out soon, you might check out Edgar Rice Burrough's Barsoom series, which is a ripping good tale that has no realism at all to weigh it down. Just remember that most SF before the mid-1960's was written for nerdy 12-15 year-olds who thought that crystal radios were cool and something like transistor radios were Buck Rogers stuff, and judge it charitably.

    33. Re:Oh my god! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Either you or Asimov was exaggerating - at the time of Julius Caesar's death in 44 BC the nearest bright star to the pole was Kochab (at the time probably brighter than Polaris although it's a little fainter now). It was about 8 degrees away from the pole. That's a lot more than Polaris's current 0.5, but hardly half the horizon to zenith distance.

      The pointer stars in the big dipper you're thinking of are Merak and Dubhe (Dubhe is also one of the common navigational stars). None of the stars in Cassiopeia line up with the pole. Maybe you're thinking of Merak and Dubhe, which, if you follow the line through them through Polaris intersects Cassiopeia.

      Incidentally, Kochab in 44 BC would have made a much better guide to true north than naked eye estimation of where the pole is from a pair of pointers.

    34. Re:Oh my god! by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      The precession of the equinoxes and proper motion of stars means we'll have a new north star long before either happens. A series of them, actually.

      Not that a pole star is actually necessary anyway. There isn't a decent south polar star currently.

      The North Star is a fairly recent thing. Isaac Asimov used "Shakespeare" quoting Julius Caesar calling himself as constant as the North Star to "prove" that Francis Bacon couldn't have ghosted that play, at least, because Bacon would have known that, due to the precession of the equinoxes, in Roman times the nearest star to the pole spot covered half of the range from horizon to zenith each night, and thus would never be called "the North Star." Of course, Asimov then pointed out that that argument also proved that he, Isaac Asimov, could not have written one of his juvenile books published under an alias, because of an equally simple mistake that surely a science writer as good as he was could never make (except that he did).

      Anyway, if Polaris was eaten by an interstellar space goat sometime in the past so that its light disappears tomorrow, we can still use the method which has worked since the Neolithic. The two stars in the pan of the Big Dipper (aka, the Wain or Wagon in The Odyssey) farthest from the handle (or tongue of the Wagon) line up to point to the pole point more exactly than a fairly dim star in a fairly dim constellation ever have, and will continue to do so for thousands of years more. One can also use two stars in Cassiopia to line up with the pole, but I cannot remember which two without being outside on a clear night (and thus away from this keyboard and my wifi signal).

      But wouldn't the movement that aligned (and will be removing) Polaris as the "North Star" also affect the alignment of both the Big Dipper and Cassiopeia?

      I guess I'll go back to my GPS for direction finding and use my time instead to begin worrying about this interstellar space goat you've turned me onto...

  2. Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's not exactly a lot. I'm sure our own dear Sun is losing that much mass every year and you still see 5 Billion on its birthday card.

    Slow astrophysical news day, I guess.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mass of the sun is 330,000 times the mass of earth.

      So if it were losing an Earth-Mass yearly it would have had to be 7 times as massive as today at the beginning of the Pleistocene, and would only have a life expectancy of about 330,001 years left.

      The Sun appears to have been active for 4.6 billion years and has enough fuel to go on for another Five billion years or so..

      So I think you may have lost a few digits (in the exponents) when making your calculations.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Polaris is listed, at least in Wikipedia, at 7.54 solar masses. Also, it is a ternary system: one large star, a smaller star and a white dwarf.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by icebike · · Score: 1

      How is that germane to the GPs post?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Thanks for running the numbers. My initial guesses would also have been off by a couple of orders of magnitude. I knew an Earth's mass was pretty insignificant compared to the sun, but 330,000 years go by pretty quickly in galactic standards.

    5. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It goes to credibility, your honour. FFS, he presents facts and you jump on him whilst idiot anons get +whatever insightful/informative.

      Go suck on a lemon, will ya?

    6. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      The star grows dimmer and brighter over a roughly 4-day cycle, and the team studied variation in the length of that cycle. ...
      Even that 4-day pulsation isn't constant: In 1844, it was about 12 minutes slower than it is now.

    7. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      Oops .. clarifying: I was quoting the linked article.

    8. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      Among other things, it shows an explaination for the mass lossage. The mass might be feeding the smaller star or the white dwarf.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    9. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by maugle · · Score: 1

      Among other things, it shows an explaination for the mass lossage. The mass might be feeding the smaller star or the white dwarf.

      Ooh, if it's sending matter onto a white dwarf, we can hope to see an awesome Type 1a supernova in that part of the sky sooner or later.

    10. Re:Cough. Earth's Mass?!? by icebike · · Score: 1

      While that's true, it has no bearing on THIS particular sub-thread where the claim was made the OUR Sun was losing an Earth's Mass every year, when such could not be the case.

      I don't deny the facts of the post, just the odd placement of the reply. I wonder if the post was misplaced?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  3. Pivot point by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's probably losing all that mass due to heat from friction. It must be under tremendous pressure, seeing as how the entire night sky pivots on that single point. Long-term this will have huge consequences - when the North Star finally wears through completely the entire universe will ricochet off into nothingness like a spinning top.

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:Pivot point by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's probably losing all that mass due to heat from friction. It must be under tremendous pressure, seeing as how the entire night sky pivots on that single point. Long-term this will have huge consequences - when the North Star finally wears through completely the entire universe will ricochet off into nothingness like a spinning top.

      Not to worry. Once we get our booster technology straightened out, we can send up a big can of WD-40.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Pivot point by Lev13than · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to worry. Once we get our booster technology straightened out, we can send up a big can of WD-40.

      That's the first lesson in any basic astrophysics maintenance course - always keep your turtles oiled.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    3. Re:Pivot point by johnvile · · Score: 1

      that's brilliant

      --
      "What Are They Gonna Do When Were All Using Freenet"
    4. Re:Pivot point by johnvile · · Score: 1

      Or a politician

      --
      "What Are They Gonna Do When Were All Using Freenet"
    5. Re:Pivot point by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget the turtle wax.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:Pivot point by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You, Sir, belong in management.

    7. Re:Pivot point by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      oh noes, they'll slip and fall off each other's backs, all the way down.

    8. Re:Pivot point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be global warming and celestial cooling.

      More turtle max, please.

  4. Thank God! by johnvile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank God its not shedding the amount of gas a politician evacuates each year. It would be barley visible.

    --
    "What Are They Gonna Do When Were All Using Freenet"
    1. Re:Thank God! by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank God its not shedding the amount of gas a politician evacuates each year. It would be barley visible.

      I know right! And then wheat would we do?

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    2. Re:Thank God! by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 4, Funny

      I apologise for that; I have a very rye sense of humour.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    3. Re:Thank God! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Well, it's certanly corny....

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:Thank God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *grain*

    5. Re:Thank God! by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should rethink my priorities. These last couple of posts should've made me think of bread, but instead the first thing that came to mind was alcoholic beverages.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    6. Re:Thank God! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think you spelt it wrong.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Thank God! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Beer is sometimes referred to as liquid bread. This is good for me, because I have a sor ghum.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Thank God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But CNN would cover it like it is the only thing happening in the entire universe.

    9. Re:Thank God! by dwye · · Score: 1

      I think you spelt it wrong.

      No, he spelled "it" correctly.

  5. Thanks a lot "Name a star, buy a star" by GauteL · · Score: 2

    After decades of overselling the North Star, is there any wonder there's so little of it left?

    1. Re:Thanks a lot "Name a star, buy a star" by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      After decades of overselling the North Star, is there any wonder there's so little of it left?

      It'll be replaced by Mark Zuckerberg, so not to worry. He's a major star on Wall Street right now.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  6. Re:frosty piss by voltacid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What an anonymous coward.

    --
    - Only government can take perfectly good paper, cover it with perfectly good ink and make the combination worthless.
  7. Damn... by Ugarte · · Score: 1

    that's going to suck when all our compasses stop working.

    1. Re:Damn... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed... everyone knows that the first magnets fell to earth from that star, which is why it always experienced a small tug in that direction. Future magnets inherited this trait by mimicking the original magnets' functionality, which was to adhere strongly to certain types of metals.

    2. Re:Damn... by Ugarte · · Score: 2

      Fucking magnets, so *that's* how they work!

    3. Re:Damn... by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Still not clear on blankets, though. Those things are a magical fucking mystery.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    4. Re:Damn... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      they insulate to contain the body of a person and their hot nubile lover, which is why they only work half as well for slash-dotters.

  8. Blame it on Hard Sectoring by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    North Star has been gone for a couple decades now.

  9. Does this mean victory for the Southern Cross? by Kenja · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this mean victory for the Southern Cross fighting style? Or am I just too much of a nerd so no one will understand the reference?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Does this mean victory for the Southern Cross? by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Nope! I was just wondering if somebody would make a Fist of the North Star joke and what it would be.

      I was trying to come up with something, but wasn't getting any decent ideas.

    2. Re:Does this mean victory for the Southern Cross? by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 1

      No, my brain went to about the same place as yours. I was a bit surprised that no one joked about it sooner.

    3. Re:Does this mean victory for the Southern Cross? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      My hamster style will beat your.... ok, never mind. I was gonna go all Mormon on you, but thought better of it.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:Does this mean victory for the Southern Cross? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I'm going to do hamster style anymore.

    5. Re:Does this mean victory for the Southern Cross? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means that the North Star is already dead. It just doesn't know it yet.

    6. Re:Does this mean victory for the Southern Cross? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      lol

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  10. Re:first post!!! by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    GPS. Hey, they spent all that money putting those satellites in orbit for a reason ya know.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  11. Shrinking Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All stars shrink just like our sun but not that fast to be noticeable after such a long period of time of observation. A more realistic idea (to me anyway) is that light pollution is simply making it appear to be shrinking. That is unless it was observed by something like Hubble from space.

  12. perhaps by alienzed · · Score: 1

    too much fiber?

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  13. Guess it is time to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...make our own star in the sky.

    But really, it could be done.
    There is a semi-stable orbit up there that isn't too large that it couldn't replace it
    All it needs to be is a huge lens and some magical arrangement of mirrors to allow pretty much omni-directional capture of sunlight with no moving parts, but semi-directional output down towards Earth.
    You COULD have moving parts, but it would be more complicated than it need be. All it needs is some fuel and corrective orbit systems so it doesn't break away and end up spiraling away to a horrible death.

  14. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by grahamsaa · · Score: 2

    Um, Christ died about 2,000 years ago.

    --
    Facts have a liberal bias.
  15. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know what mythos you are referring to, but I doubt it will affect anyone outside your sect.

    Besides, Catholics don't speak for all Christianity, and their mythos is radically different from anyone elses. Most denominations that I know don't teach that the north star has any added significance.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  16. Losing gas? by TWX · · Score: 1

    The data suggest that the familiar fixture in the northern sky is shedding an Earth's mass worth of gas each year.

    Sounds like my Uncle Fred...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Losing gas? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      is shedding an Earth's mass worth of gas each year.

      Sounds like my Uncle Fred...

      The New Fart Diet fad! I'll make millions! That is until the fad dies, and my revenue source vanishes into thin air.

  17. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was brought up Catholic and part of the mythos is that the north star was born when Christ was born. It's what led the three wise men too Him. When the north star is gone will that symbolize that Christ is dead?

    Not Polaris. Even Arthur C. Clarke knows that!

  18. Re:IN MARGARETAVILLE !! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It blew out a Flip Flop, stepped on a Pop Top.

  19. Easy fix: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    just forward all AOL disks and discount mortgage mailers to it.

  20. Pushme Pullme by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Just combine it with the star Pushlaris, and it will all balance out

  21. Re:IN MARGARETAVILLE !! by eclectus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    CSB: A pub I used to frequent had live entertainment in the form of a man on stage with a guitar singing various bawdy pub songs. A bunch of us were in one night when we convinced our friend ( a wonderful indian grad student who knew no fear) to get on stage and sing 'Margaritaville'. He didn'tt know the song, but the entertainer said he would feed him the lines as they came along just before along, like a human karaoke machine. So he get's up there and sings. The singer feeds him the line 'stepped on a pop-top' and he sings it as 'stepped on a pop tart' because he had never heard of a pop top.

    I still can't sing it the original way, I like pop-tart better.

    --
    This signature is a waste of 42 characters
  22. Release the Chaff! by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's a grain (or at least a germ) of truth in each of those posts. Kind of a cereal furrow of truthiness, just plowing along, planting seeds of doubt, perhaps to just lie farro, but then again, maybe knot.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  23. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Christ who? You mean the magical character with zero proof of existence in the work of historical fiction called the bible?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  24. Don't worry by wbr1 · · Score: 2

    For celestial navigation after it has waned away, you can use the new spiffy Dark Matter Detector 5000 (Copyright Garmin). It points whichever way the scientific wind is blowing.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  25. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by Mogster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hrmm I'm Catholic and have a degree in theology. And this is the first time I've ever heard that the star of Bethlehem is supposed to be Polaris - it's certainly not part of the general 'mythos' as you put it

    General teaching is that the Star of Bethlehem only hung around until not long after the Wise men left. And from a more scientific viewpoint if it's true then it was likely a supernova

    --
    ACK NAK RST
  26. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by mjperson · · Score: 2

    Um no. The Christmas star was seen in the East, not the North. The North star has nothing to do with Christ. It never has.

  27. Awww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It found out we invented GPS and don't need celestial navigation any longer.
    I hope the rest of the starts don't follow the lead. :)

  28. Re:IN MARGARETAVILLE !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was an adventurer too, until I stepped on a Pop-Tart.

  29. Relativity Speaking by Niscenus · · Score: 5, Informative

    A solar mass is over 300,000 Earths, and Polaris is atleast 7 solar masses, adjusting for the most conservative of all estimates. It's apparent magnitude is about 1.9, while the magnitude of drop off (nolonger visible to the human eye) is defined at 7 (with 6 being relatively hard except under good conditions).

    Setting aside the nuclear chemistry that will occur in the meantime (which tends to increase brightness), that Polaris is, in fact, multiple stars and the overall reduction of radiative and mass pressure that will be reducing the production/consumption rate*, I would posit even losing half of its mass, it would likely still be visible in 2000 years, which means the Northern Star will have since switched to Gamma Cephei.

    So, no big loss here. Personally, I, for one, welcome our new Alrainian OverStar.

    ****
    *You know what, I'm actually going to do these in the coming weeks. This is sound like a fun problem, even though I do a lot more in theoretical particle physics than cosmology.

    --
    "Yeah...it was the numbers that were irrational, not the murderous cult of vegetarians...." -- Hippasus of Metapontum
    1. Re:Relativity Speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  30. Just another thing to blame on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    global warming.

  31. If Carlsberg made the obvious, news... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    ...then this would surely take the prize.

    Stars convert matter to energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation as a result of nuclear fusion reactions in the core. Ergo, they shed mass - our own Sun sheds mass at the rate of some 4.2 million tonnes per second (citation). This converts to pure energy, incident at Earths equator at around 1000W/m^-2.

    But don't worry, if the iron cycle weren't endothermic then the Sun would be good for another 600 billion years or so...

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  32. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    hang on, if the North Star was what was supposed to bring the wise men to the stable, then wouldn't they have come from the SOUTH, not the EAST??

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  33. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

    Please supply evidence that there actually was a Christ as per Christian Bible!

  34. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've been to 3 separate universities where, in the restrooms in the science wings, above the toilet paper dispenser, was a note reading "theology degree. Please take one".

  35. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by khallow · · Score: 1

    I was brought up Catholic and part of the mythos is that the north star was born when Christ was born.

    Last I checked, the Vatican got out of the business of making physical predictions from religious belief. I doubt that is part of their orthodoxy even by error.

  36. Faster or slower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:

    Even that 4-day pulsation isn't constant: In 1844, it was about 12 minutes slower than it is now.

    This long record, from 1844 to the present, shows that the pulse of Polaris runs about 4.5 seconds slower every year.

    So is it getting faster or slower?

  37. Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hokuto Shinken is invincible!

  38. Re:first post!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do I have to do all the thinking around here? Just find East and turn 90 degrees left.

  39. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Three men. Not three wise men. Because if you start out in Persia and follow the North star you're not going to end up in Judea any time soon.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  40. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    There was a philosopher/political activist/very naughty boy with the same name who died around the same time. Perhaps you're talking at cross purposes?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  41. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Funny, since Polaris wasn't the north star 2000 years ago. Perhaps you've been worshipping the wrong star all this time?

  42. Some trivia about the "Star of Bethlehem" by wfstanle · · Score: 2

    There is some more interesting trivia about the "Star of Bethlehem" mythology.

    1. The "Star of Bethlehem" was supposed to be in the east. We all know that the stars appear to move from the east to west through the night. Stars appearing in the north appear to circle around the north star. and really can't be describes as appearing in the east. How can it be that any star, except Polaris, can appear to be fixed in the sky?

    2. According to legend, the magi were wise men that came from the orient, and followed the "Star of Bethlehem". If the magi came from a location that was somewhere east of Bethlehem, and they were following a star that appeared in the east, they would be going in a westward direction. How did they get to Bethlehem? They would have to circle the globe to do that!

    Just some riddles to think about. The story of the "Star of Bethlehem" is not an important belief of Christianity. However for fundies, it is in the Bible so they have to believe that it is exactly the way it happened. They have some explaining to do. There are more inconsistencies in that story, if you just think about it a bit.

    1. Re:Some trivia about the "Star of Bethlehem" by currently_awake · · Score: 2

      The wise men were likely arab merchants who used celestial (stars) navigation to reach the places where they traded. To the illiterate peasants who formed early christianity their method of navigation would sound like "We followed a holy sign, a glowing star in the night sky!".

    2. Re:Some trivia about the "Star of Bethlehem" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly my point! There also another, and maybe more likely possibility. They might have come from Egypt instead of the Orient.

  43. I am constant as the North Star! by pugugly · · Score: 1

    Full of Gas and spewing on for years . . .

    Explains so much about Star Trek VI

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  44. Re:What does it mean for Christians? by matfud · · Score: 1

    No there is a christion bible and I will not support it. You know it is total gibberish

  45. Wait a minute... by Niscenus · · Score: 1

    Didn't I just say that?

    --
    "Yeah...it was the numbers that were irrational, not the murderous cult of vegetarians...." -- Hippasus of Metapontum
    1. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't a man complement?

  46. Absolutely Not! by Niscenus · · Score: 1

    But I will accept useful supplements, such as this...for now...muah-ha-ha-ha-ha!

    --
    "Yeah...it was the numbers that were irrational, not the murderous cult of vegetarians...." -- Hippasus of Metapontum
  47. Re:frosty piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And people wonder whether Slashdot is headed down the toilet...