Slashdot Mirror


Fracture Putty Can Heal a Broken Bone In Days

An anonymous reader writes "If we break a bone it can take weeks or even month to heal depending on the type and severity of the break. In some extreme cases the complexity of the fracture can make it impossible to heal properly. Researchers at the University of Georgia Regenerative Bioscience Center have come up with a new solution for healing broken bones that cuts recovery time to days. It relies on the use of stem cells that contain a bone generating protein. These cells are injected in gel form directly into the area of the broken bone, where they quickly get to work forming new bone. The end result is very rapid recovery, possibly sidestepping the muscle atrophy that can come with long bone healing times. The gel has been proven to work on animals as big as a sheep and has funding from the DoD. Lets hope it is proven to work on humans in the coming years."

69 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. How "silly" is it, though? by advtech · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can this putty pick up the comics section from the local newspaper as it heals your bones? If not, I'm out.

    1. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by assertation · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you probably stumped some of the younger slashdotters with that joke.

    2. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know about comics, but it may be able to help a broken humerus.

    3. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silly_Putty

    4. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Would you really want the latest "Garfield" or "Hagar the Horrible" imprinted on your ulna?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    5. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Funny

      HI BILLY MAYS HERE FOR FRACTURE PUTTY! ARE YOU TIRED OF HOPPING AROUND ON CRUTCHES LIKE SOME SORT OF ALIEN BATTLE MECH?! DID YOU BREAK YOUR KNUCKLE BACKHANDING YOUR WIFE BECAUSE SHE WOULDN'T CLEAN THE KITCHEN WITH ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY OXY-CLEAN?! DID THE SOUND WAVES FROM MY VOICE SHATTER THE BONES IN YOUR ARM?! THEN FRACTURE PUTTY IS FOR YOU!

      FRACTURE PUTTY CAN MEND BROKEN BONES FASTER THAN YOU CAN MEND YOUR LOVELESS MARRIAGE! DEVELOPED BY SCIENTISTS FROM THE INSTITUTE OF PLUMBER'S CRACK, FRACTURE PUTTY IS MADE OF INDESTRUCTABLE SPACE-AGE MEMORY FOAM POLYBICARBONATESILICADEXTROSEGLUTAMATE!

      ORDER NOW AND WE'LL SLASH THE PRICE FROM $39.99 TO $19.99! BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE! ORDER IN THE NEXT 15 MINUTES AND WE'LL INCLUDE A SECOND CONTAINER OF FRACTURE PUTTY ABSOLUTELY FREE!

      .

      .

      .

      And to get around the filter... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

      P.S. I really wish they'd do away with the filters. It really hampers the possibility for creative ASCII art and the like that actually made Slashdot pretty cool back in the day. =\

    6. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Given that it's been successful in tests on sheep...My assumption was the next step would be treating 'baaaaaaaad baaaaaaaacks'

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    7. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can this putty pick up the comics section from the local newspaper as it heals your bones? If not, I'm out.

      I think you probably stumped some of the younger slashdotters with that joke.

      yeah, wot's a "newspaper" ?!!!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    8. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      says the anon who sadly didn't post creative ascii art.

    9. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by Hillgiant · · Score: 5, Funny

      It really hampers the possibility for creative ASCII art and the like that actually made Slashdot pretty cool back in the day. =\

      And my "creative ASCII art", he means "penises".

      --
      -
    10. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's like a flexible ipad.

    11. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 2

      It's that thing you can't find a job in when your savings run out and you can't afford the internet for craigslist.

    12. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Funny

      It appears to be some combination of the word "news" and the word "paper". I'm confuzzled however, what is "paper"?

      It's what we used before the three shells.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    13. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, iPads flex! Once, at least.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    14. Re:How "silly" is it, though? by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Tiny URL?

      If you click on one of those on slashdot it serves you right. There is absolutely no need to use one of those here (or indeed anywhere I can think of except in printed magazines or newspapers).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    People creating "jackass" type TV shows and youtube videos are up %1000

  3. Sheep by ChrisMaple · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd steer clear of anyone involved in bones and sheep.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Sheep by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you mean "boning sheep".

    2. Re:Sheep by Stargoat · · Score: 2

      STEER clear of sheep!?!? Wocka wocka wocka!

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    3. Re:Sheep by couchslug · · Score: 2

      The ideal date turns into a case of beer and a pizza when you're done.

      A seat cover and lamb chops ain't bad!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  4. They still have to be your own cells, right? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It'd be a bummer if you don't have a large supply of your own stem cells in your home fridge, or else this wouldn't work, or am I misinformed and you can use other peoples stem cells for this?

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:They still have to be your own cells, right? by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Said it was developed from stem cells - but, it is a gell containing a bone generating protein.

    2. Re:They still have to be your own cells, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I had my ankle fused recently and part of the procedure was some kind of putty that they infused with a small sample of marrow they scraped from right below my knee. My recovery was about a month, but it worked remarkably well. I am not sure how that compares to the procedure in this article, but it is not hard to harvest the needed stem cells from the patient themselves.

    3. Re:They still have to be your own cells, right? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      You have a decent supply of stem cells that should work just fine, right in your body.

    4. Re:They still have to be your own cells, right? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      if you don't have a large supply of your own stem cells in your home fridge

      They know (in the lab anyway) how to take a random cell from you, force it to turn into a pleuripotent stem-cell and then make it become a 'whatever' (e.g. bone) cell. A happy side effect of Bush's fetal stem cell ban.

      So, I guess on a long-term basis, you'll have to wait a few days after you break your bone for this kind of treatment. Or, I guess if you're rich you can have this kind of stuff banked and ready. It's not worth $10,000 a year to me to guard against this kind of wait, but maybe if I had 4 billion in the bank I'd look at it differently.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  5. Here we go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The question we're all afraid to ask:

    What happens if I rub this stuff on my penis?

    1. Re:Here we go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Depends how fast and hard you rub

    2. Re:Here we go... by schlachter · · Score: 4, Funny

      boner

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    3. Re:Here we go... by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      Ever heard of a bacculum?.....

      Here's a hint.. the bone forms through ossification of a portion of the corpus cavernosum.

      Another hint: humans are one of the few (only?) Primates to lack them.

      (Granted, you would probably have to inject the stuff for that to happen.... and I doubt it would be controlled.)

  6. NOW they develop this... by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just spent six weeks in a cast after breaking my right arm Christmas Night (no...no rogue or drunk reindeer involved). There is now a titanium plate and six screws in my arm. My other wrist is broken also (yes...I fell and had a hell of hard time getting up). Now, I have to endure painful PT to regain full use of my arm again and have a 5 inch scar too (no...it is NOT cool).

    How I would have loved to have this stuff injected into the fractures and have it immobilized for a few days while it took action and fuzed the bones. I do hope this comes to fruition...cool stuff. Who said war wasn't useful?

    1. Re:NOW they develop this... by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      . I do hope this comes to fruition...cool stuff. Who said war wasn't useful?

      Take all the money we spend on wars and spend it on R&D. We'll get a lot more cool stuff a lot faster. War is not useful. It's good for absolutely nothing.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:NOW they develop this... by Intropy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good God, y'all.

    3. Re:NOW they develop this... by jdastrup · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I consider myself religious and do not hate stem cells. In fact, I support stem cell research. "People that are against stem cell research" have been trying to block this, not religious people. Yes, as with everything, there is some overlap. But many religious people own toasters. Does that mean all religious people like toast?

    4. Re:NOW they develop this... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Funny

      War is not useful. It's good for absolutely nothing.

      No..it always has the minimum benefit of teaching Americans geography.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    5. Re:NOW they develop this... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Take all the money we spend on wars and spend it on R&D. We'll get a lot more cool stuff a lot faster. War is not useful. It's good for absolutely nothing.

      If the money not spent on war were spent instead on R&D, this would be true -- cut the DoD budget in half and give the money to NIH and NSF, and we'd have a boom in science and technology like none the world has ever seen. But politics doesn't work that way. The military wastes a hell of a lot of money, no question about it. It also spend a lot of money on very worthwhile research, and like it or not, it's easier to get Congress to appropriate that money for wounded soldiers. Who, regardless of your opinion on the way in which they were injured, deserve to have their wounds cared for as well as possible by the same government that sent them out to get injured in the first place.

      In the specific area of trauma care, the simple fact is that most of modern emergency and orthopedic medicine is an outgrowth of military medicine. Like it or not, next time you call 911, you'll have a much better chance of survival because of generations of work directed toward keeping wounded soldiers alive.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:NOW they develop this... by Nyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... Who said war wasn't useful?

      Family members of the dead.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    7. Re:NOW they develop this... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      War is not useful. It's good for absolutely nothing.

      I don't know, they had some pretty solid hits ("Low Rider", "Spill the Wine", "The Cisco Kid" and "Why Can't We Be Friends?") and seem to have a fairly decent following. Just because you don't like American Funk, doesn't mean someone else doesn't.

      --
      The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
    8. Re:NOW they develop this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not that odd. Soldiers have (ostensibly) a choice. Fetuses (which are viewed as living humans by those against abortion and against embryonic stem cell use) are not given the choice. Fight the belief that a fetus is a living human being if you want to fight those against abortions and embryonic stem cell research. So long as you enter the debate assuming (rather than proving) that a fetus is not a living human being you cannot possibly win them over because your whole argument is a non-sequitur to the other side.

    9. Re:NOW they develop this... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No it doesn't, they just remember the names of places. The Chaser did a bit where they took a map and rewrote it so that Australia was labelled as either Iran or North Korea, then showed that map to Americans and asked them to located them. They just saw the name, and pointed at it saying "there it is!"

    10. Re:NOW they develop this... by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I were an injured soldier, I might want a break. Perhaps athletes will be among the first adopters. If you want to find people who are often injured, and to whom recovery might be worth tens of thousands of dollars per day, look to the NFL.

    11. Re:NOW they develop this... by N3Bruce · · Score: 2

      Amen Brother!!

      I really wish this discussion would take a more serious tone than boning sheep!

      I was involved in a serious car accident last May (I was the front seat passenger and the other driver was at fault), and which resulted in a compound fracture of my Tibia and Fibula. I spent 2 weeks in a trauma center followed by 3 weeks in a rehabilitation hospital, followed by months of physical therapy, and now wound care (the force of the impact ripped the front of my leg open). My most recent X-rays show incomplete healing of the Fibula, even after 8 months. While poor circulation in my legs is part of the reason I am slow to heal, even under the best of circumstances a fracture like this will result in several months of disability. Electrical stimulation is probably the next step, but orthopedic medicine in its current state doesn't have much more to offer me, and I certainly don't want to go back under the knife again if I can avoid it. Here is hoping they can bring it into the mainstream soon!!

    12. Re:NOW they develop this... by idontgno · · Score: 4, Interesting

      With the interesting side effect of calling most members of the armed forces crash test dummies.

      I'm a veteran, and I have used VA medical care. I have to confess that this analogy works very well from that perspective.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    13. Re:NOW they develop this... by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is only true because it is easier and more economical to destroy the blastocyst for collection than it is to harvest single cells from them nondestructively.

      This then causes a viscious circle, in which researchers requiring access to fresh embryonic cell cultures are strapped for cash and labspace/time, because they are denied funding, because of destructive collection techniques. Being strapped for cash and time, they can't realistically use nondestructive techniques using the limited funds they get from private investments, and still do their research... necessitating destructive collection. (Which in turn, reinforces the situation where they don't get grant money.....)

      The solution is to offer grant money with the hardlined requirement of nondestructive collection. When the majority of embryonic stemcell collection is non-fatal to the embryos, then the religious types won't object to the collection and research.

      The scientists cannot really be the ones to act here; they are strapped for research funds enough already, and are the victims of the viscious circle. The ones that need to act are the religious politicians who are currently ignorant/recalcitrant of the non-destructive alternatives. (These non-destructive approaches have been around since the 90s, when the whole embryonic stemcell shitstorm started. I remember a c-span segment late on a Saturday night with a cellular biologist giving a presentation against the stemcell funding ban to a practically empty building. The politicians had scheduled his presentation for a time when they wouldn't be there. The whole basis of his presentation was the refutation of the "embryonic stemcells == murder" partyline that was driving the ban's momentum. It was a very good presentation, but again, nobody was in attendance.)

      If you ask the hardnosed "embryonic stemcells are murder!" Religious crowd what they would think if the cells could be harvested without destroying the blastocyst, thus preserving it for future implantation, you will find that they react with shock, curiosity of if that's true, and then curiosity/anger of why that isn't done exclusively.

      The problem is not that the tissue comes from blastocysts. The problem is that the blastocysts are destroyed. This is only necessary because of the funding restrictions an.d the added costs and culture times associated with single cell extractions.

      Fix the funding problem with some limiting verbage to require nondestructive collection, and the whole ethical tapestry dissolves like cotton candy in a rainstorm.

      Of course, the real challenge is getting the willfully ignorant in government to realize what they are doing.... as the poor researcher found out the hard way. I don't remember his name, but whoever he is, I do applaud the effort.

    14. Re:NOW they develop this... by Nutria · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've only seen conservatives and the religious get their panties in a twist over fetal stem cell research. Back in the day, W made it as explicit as possible that he was only banning fetal stem cell research.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    15. Re:NOW they develop this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not so sure they're learning much geography from war. The last time, they were looking for a Saudi-Arabian man who attacked them from Afghanistan and went hiding in Pakistan, yet they went looking for him in Iraq.

    16. Re:NOW they develop this... by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 2

      Sorry man - I feel for you. Broke my scaphoid snowboarding 8 or 9 years ago (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphoid_fracture). It was in smithereens, really; a full break down the middle and another less-complete fracture offshooting from the center of that. Which ones did you break? The wrist, especially, has a lot of little bastards in a wee tiny bit of space, and anything needing pins in your other arm must have meant it was NASTY.

      In my case, I had the option to go with pins and a small supportive plate, but the expensive-as-hell surgery was expected to leave me between 50 - 70% range of motion. My other option was a cast with hope that the bone would heal well, which would leading to an almost full recovery. Sadly, it did not (the scaphoid's blood supply is super weird; when it breaks it has a very high incidence of necrosis). What should have been 3 months in a cast was nearly 2 years. The initial 3 months was spent in a full arm cast, fingertips to collarbone. Rough.

      The little bastard STILL makes my wrist hurt, pop, crackle, and sometimes just not work quite right, over a decade later. I still can't do some things without mild to serious pain, like weight lifting, bowling, shooting a basketball, riding a bike; hell even using the gearshift in my car hurts if I twist or pull my wrist just right. (Before the ACs tease me with the oh-so-original joke, I switched hands years ago for that, and haven't looked back since. =). Anyway, when it finally started to fuse together, you could see how oddly it healed in the x-rays; the angle is now all wrong and my other wrist bones are displaced accordingly.

      I can tell you, if they get this stuff to the point that treatment in people is generally successful, I'll gladly undergo a re-break and re-set. If I could be assured of a quick, and just as importantly, successful recovery this time around, I'd do it in a heartbeat. I turned down surgery for the risks and cost in the first place, and turned it down again after the cast came off for the fear of many more months of recovery PLUS no guarantee of success anyway.

    17. Re:NOW they develop this... by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd actually go you one further and say "some people you refer to" instead of "religious people you refer to".

      Religion doesn't necessarily have have anything to do with opinions on abortive stem cell harvesting, research, or usage, for either side. Here are two anecdotal examples:

      1- My mother is very religious, but thinks abortive stem cells should be harvested since the embryos/fetuses are lost already. Her position is one of salvaging what possible good can come from what is essentially a complete tragedy.

      2- I'm atheist, but I think there are plenty of other ways to harvest stem cells, and I think abortive embryonic/fetal stem cells are of questionable long-term use anyway. Using your own stem cells, which your parents (hopefully) acquired for you at birth, is FAR superior, and we should be striving to have stem cells harvested from as many births as possible. There are also certain types of useful cells residing in your spinal column, though they aren't as nearly as amazing as the ones available at birth. Although I'm not *ethically* against the harvesting of abortive stem cells, my position is one of utilizing the non-abortive avenues of procurement to their full potential, and only using abortive stem cells for testing purposes or as a last resort.

      As I said, these are anecdotal, but I can see lots of people having various opinions on this type of subject, and the claim that only the religious are on one side and only the non-religious are on the other is just plain false.

    18. Re:NOW they develop this... by BancBoy · · Score: 2

      Say it again!

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    19. Re:NOW they develop this... by silentcoder · · Score: 3, Informative

      >I've only seen conservatives and the religious get their panties in a twist over fetal stem cell research. Back in the day, W made it as explicit as possible that he was only banning fetal stem cell research.

      1) Back in the day when he made that ban, there wasn't any other kind. The adult stem-cell harvesting techniques only got invented to get around the ban.

      2) Even then it was stupid. Nobody was proposing doing special abortions for stem cells, just using the ones from the abortions happening anyway. Even then that wasn't required - fetal stem cells don't require abortions at all and could even then be harvested in quantity from things like the placenta and umbilical cord.
      So there was a massive ready supply being dumped in the medical waste basket at every hospital maternity ward in the world for no reason whatsoever.

      Now while the discovery of adult stem-cell harvesting opened up some useful new avenues of treatment, the fact is that the gap between the ban and that development greatly slowed down massive areas of research and many treatments that may have been becoming available now will still be away for several years - years during which many patients will die who would have lived if not for that ban.
      So much for a pro-life law.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    20. Re:NOW they develop this... by silentcoder · · Score: 2

      > If you are a non-believer, and you are wrong, when you die you will be in for a very rude awakening. If you are a believer, and you are wrong you will be in, oh wait you won't care.

      You know, you wrote so sensibly, then you ended on Pascal's Bargain - which sadly has been completely and utterly discredited for the utterly horrible and illogical trash-argument it always was.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  7. A theoretical question about height by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There exist treatments overseas for increasing a person's height which rely on repeatedly fracturing leg bones and spacing them such that they heal at a distance, essentially lengthening the bone.

    Do we have any osteopathologists on slashdot who can comment on whether this can theoretically shorten such a procedure's duration to make someone taller in a matter of one or two weeks? The current procedure takes at least a few months, if not a year.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:A theoretical question about height by Intropy · · Score: 2

      I don't know anything about the topic, but I'd guess there are also limits on how quickly you can stretch out the other parts of your body like muscle, tendon, and skin.

  8. Adult stem cells better then fetal? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 4, Informative

    Three nice things about them:

    1) They are usually harvested from the entity translated too so less problem with rejection ( is this the case here the article didn't say).
    2) The have been proven to work and use in many other places.
    3) No one has any moral objections to them.

    So many good reasons to not even worry about fetal stem cells , but no one ever bothers to talk about that.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    1. Re:Adult stem cells better then fetal? by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right now, Fetal Stem cells have many more advantages.

      Except that these are multipotent, not pluripotent stem cells, and therefore, we're not talking about fetal stem cells.

      The sources for MSCs include "umbilical cord blood, adipose tissue, adult muscle or the dental pulp of deciduous baby teeth"... but not fetal stem cells.

      Nice try, though...

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    2. Re:Adult stem cells better then fetal? by drainbramage · · Score: 4, Informative

      Would it have been so hard to not be a bigot and just provide at least one source?
      Perhaps 'Stem Cell Basics': http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/basics5.asp
      -----
      While decrying zealots make sure you don't see one in the mirror.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
  9. Apples vs Oranges by pavon · · Score: 2

    Adult stem cell are easier to control, but are not nearly as versatile as fetal stem cells. It is wrong to claim one is better than the other.

  10. large animals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this would be great for horses. its nearly impossible to allow multi-leg fractures to heal properly with a large animal .. they usually just get put down.

    1. Re:large animals by dzelenka · · Score: 2

      this would be great for horses. its nearly impossible to allow multi-leg fractures to heal properly with a large animal .. they usually just get put down.

      This is the first thing I thought of too. There's big money around horses that could move this technology along.

      --
      Bah!
  11. Other bone glue by Rexel99 · · Score: 2

    There is also a product called 'kryptonite' which is often used for chest surgery which is like a compound glue that sets within 24 hours. Very much improved my heart surgery healing time but I also wish they used it on my knee to improve that repair time.

  12. That's similar: by no-body · · Score: 3, Informative

    Using stem cells for skin healing:

    http://www.thatvideosite.com/video/the_skin_gun

  13. veterinary applications by TBedsaul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems to me this would be a great benefit to veterinarians. The hardest part of treating a fracture in an animal is getting the patient to stay still while they recuperate. Would be a lot easier to do that for a couple of days vs. several weeks. Racehorses might be able to live with injuries that result in euthanasia now.

  14. Get back to me... by captain_nifty · · Score: 2

    when they figure out a way to use this to make me some artificial bone wolverine like claws.

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. not sure by no-body · · Score: 4, Funny

    what bone fracture has to do with ssh....
    anyway - weird things exist nowadays

  17. PuTTY by gnurfed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is there ANYTHING a telnet/SSH client CAN'T do? :p

  18. sheep in the metaphorical sense... by schlachter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, you mean they literally tested it on sheep. They weren't referencing the people who volunteered for testing?

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  19. Hope its proven? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    Well, if they had done their research they would find that it was proven long ago that artificially adding stem cells to healing bone works.

    It also forms new bone on amputees.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  20. Re:Could not be fun beeing the sheep. by sexconker · · Score: 2

    So what? Sheep are not conscious. Life does not equal consciousness.

    No consciousness = no ability to suffer or to have emotions. They don't feel pain, their nervous system just processes the information that it is wounded the same way your laptop processes the fact that it's battery is empty or that it's keyboard has been amputated... I mean unplugged.
    They respond to wounds and injuries, but they don't interpret any of it as pain without consciousness. And no evidence shows sheep are conscious (unlike other animals).

    There is exactly as much evidence to show that sheep, plants, and rocks are conscious as there is to show that humans are conscious.

    Step 0: Cogito ergo sum
    Step 1: Define consciousness
    Step 2: Describe the physical construct and mechanisms which create consciousness
    Step 3: Identify consciousness in various things
    Step 4: Show that no other construct / phenomena could result in consciousness
    Step 5: Identify a lack of consciousness in various things

    We're on step 1.

  21. stemcells.nih.gov says by wreakyhavoc · · Score: 2

    In this new study, the researchers used a rat model of ALS to test for possible nerve cell- restoring properties of stem cells. The rats were exposed to Sindbis virus, which infects the central nervous system and destroys the motor neurons in the spinal cord. Rats that survive are left with paralyzed muscles in their hindquarters and weakened back limbs. Scientists assess the degree of impairment by measuring the rats' movement, quantifying electrical activity in the nerves serving the back limbs, and visually judging the extent of nerve damage through a microscope.

    The researchers wanted to see whether stem cells could restore nerves and improve mobility in rats. Because scientists have had difficulty sustaining stem cell lines derived from rat embryos, the investigators conducted their experiments with embryonic germ cells that John Gearhart and colleagues isolated from human fetal tissue in 1998. These cells can produce unchanged copies of themselves when maintained in culture, and they form into clumps called embryoid bodies. Under certain conditions, research has shown that the cells in the embryoid bodies begin to look and function like neurons when subjected to specific laboratory conditions. The researchers had an idea that these embryoid body cells in their nonspecialized state might become specialized as replacement neurons if placed into the area of the damaged spinal cord. So they carefully prepared cells from the embryoid bodies and injected them into the fluid surrounding the spinal cord of the paralyzed rats that had their motor neurons destroyed by the Sindbis virus.

    To test this idea, the researchers selected from laboratory culture dishes barely differentiated embryonic germs cells that displayed the molecular markers of neural stem cells, including the proteins nestin and neuron specific enolase. They grew these cells in large quantities and injected them into the fluid surrounding the spinal cords of partially paralyzed, Sindbis-virus-treated rats.

    The response was impressive. Three months after the injections, many of the treated rats were able to move their hind limbs and walk, albeit clumsilywhile the rats that did not receive cell injections remained paralyzed. Moreover, at autopsy the researchers found that cells derived from human embryonic germ cells had migrated throughout the spinal fluid and continued to develop, displaying both the shape and molecular markers characteristic of mature motor neurons. The researchers are quick to caution that their results are preliminary, and that they do not know for certain whether the treatment helped the paralyzed rats because new neurons took the place of the old, or because trophic factors from the injected cells facilitated the recovery of the rats' remaining nerve cells and helped the rats improve in their ability to use their hind limbs.

    Nor do they know how well this strategy will translate into a therapy for human neurodegenerative diseases like ALS. And they emphasize that there are many hurdles to cross before the use of stem cells to repair damaged motor neurons in patients can be considered. Nevertheless, researchers are excited about these results, which, if confirmed, would represent a major step toward using specialized stem cells from embryonic and fetal tissue sources to restore nervous system function. http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/scireport/chapter8.asp

    ----

    I am not in Rome, I am in a rush.