Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Tech Manufacturers With Better Labor Practices?

First time accepted submitter srs5694 writes "In light of the recent flood of stories about abysmal labor practices at Foxconn and other Chinese factories that produce most of the tech products we consume, the question arises: Who makes motherboards, plug-in cards, cell phones, and other devices WITHOUT relying on labor practices that are just one rung above slave labor? If I want to buy a new tech gadget, from whom can I buy it without ethical qualms?"

375 comments

  1. Really? by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably no one these days. Either components, or parts are made in china in some form or another. Even down to the base layer PCB. Though it's getting even worse than that, China is getting too "expensive" to operate in. And they're moving out to other 3rd world countries.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Really? by sakdoctor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This question is so misguided, and will only end in hypocrisy.
      If it really bothers the poster that much, simply go without the toy.

    2. Re:Really? by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think the larger question is, does.much of anyone in the first world even really give it a second thought?

      Isn't this the.price they pay for.taking these.jobs.from us where it used to be done for a.living wage and fair.working conditions?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Really? by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a little naive. Fair living wages and working conditions are fairly recent. Don't you follow history?
      Business moved where business could continue to work as it has for time immemorial.

    4. Re:Really? by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Informative

      Quite true. In fact, most people don't know that Europe started to mass-export their industry to North America in early 1800's, and literally built their society on the backs of children here. And they did so right up until the 1930's give or take a little bit. Though if you look further back, companies were exporting their industry as soon as people started landing here and started setting up shop. Hell, England was buying wagon wheels made in Canada, made by children, paid by levy in 1750.

      Though let's not forget, it was this flagrant abuse that forced us. To say enough was enough, and ensure there were working standards, end child slaveshops and all the rest too. Though it went on for a long time before anything changed.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Really? by actionbastard · · Score: 5, Informative

      It goes a lot deeper than just the components. It goes down to the minerals and metals that make up those components:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coltan#Ethics_of_Coltan_mining_in_the_Democratic_Republic_of_Congo

      http://sitemaker.umich.edu/section002group3/coltan_mining_in_democratic_republic_of_the_congo

      Apple gets the spotlight thrown on it because of its popular following. But every company that makes anything electronic or that contains electronic components is just as culpable.

      --
      Sig this!
    6. Re:Really? by WCguru42 · · Score: 1

      Go easy on the punctuation.

      --
      "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
    7. Re:Really? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it really bothers the poster that much, simply go without the toy.

      Well, obviously it doesn't bother you, but it does bother me.

      And I have no problem going without the latest pocket-sized Facebook/Google/AngryBirds appliance. The hard part is going without shoes.

      I'm not rich, but I have no objection to paying a little extra for stuff that's not made by indentured servants. But most of the time I don't even get that choice.

    8. Re:Really? by afabbro · · Score: 4, Informative

      The hard part is going without shoes.

      Low-tech goods can still be found "made in the USA" (assuming you're in the USA, but probably true elsewhere). A Google, for example, turned up this site for shoes. There are lots of things where, if you're willing to pay more and take a more traditional approach (e.g., leather instead of high-tech fabrics), you can buy local. For example, it is easy to buy all your furniture from a local craftsman/woodworker - but the price will not even be remotely like what you'd find at Wal-mart.

      On the other hand, for most if not all high-tech consumer goods, there simply is no other choice.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    9. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is a game about this, they show how every step of the process is horrible. You can get it on http://www.phonestory.org/, they have both Android and iPhone versions (you can't get the iPhone version anymore as Apple banned it for, amongst other reasons "15.2 Apps that depict violence or abuse of children will be rejected "). Also, no it isn't ironic that it's made for disposable phones as that's exactly the public they want to reach.

    10. Re:Really? by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Though let's not forget, it was this flagrant abuse that forced us. To say enough was enough, and ensure there were working standards, end child slaveshops and all the rest too. Though it went on for a long time before anything changed.

      Let's not forget to give the unions credit for ending the abusives labor practices of the last century.

      Without continuously enforcing the labor laws we have, businesses would go back to their old ways in a heartbeat
      because there is always someone willing to take your place for longer hours and less pay.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    11. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isnt it odd that its easier to find domestically produced low tech stuff (relative to high tech stuff) in one of the most (if not the most) technologically advanced countries on the planet?

    12. Re:Really? by drkstr1 · · Score: 2

      Japan??

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    13. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other third-world countries? They're moving their production to New Jersey?

    14. Re:Really? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It goes a lot deeper than just the components. It goes down to the minerals and metals that make up those components:

      The hard part though for raw materials like coltan is that stuff is recycled a LOT. A lot is mined, but these days, a lot is recycled.

      There's only like 11 smelters worldwide that handle coltan, and various industry groups have actually talked to those smelters to buy "conflict-free" minerals, which all have actually agreed too.

      That's good, as no new conflict minerals are entering the system (at least without someone going rogue or conflict minerals with forged paperwork). However, a complete ban isn't possible because an increasing amount comes from recycling, and there's no paperwork anymore. If you want to ban conflict minerals, basically the entire recycling chain must be thrown away because it's impossible to differentiate and the only way is to assume the entire chain is contaminated.

    15. Re:Really? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So wait, you'd rather people in china go back to being subsistence farmers with a 44 year life expectancy (that was by the way, 1960), with no education, so you can feel good about giving extra money to your neighbour who's going to go out and spend more on lunch than someone in china would have made in a week? That's the argument against what is happening in china today.

      China is in transition. There is a huge swath of people, basically 3 or 4 lost generations of people, and another 1 or 2 in the pipeline who are the transition from destitute subsistence farmers who literally never had anything, to a society of people who have little things like antibiotics, and electricity. Unfortunately, they're lost. They're not savable by any laws rules, treaties or procedures. Nothing. And there are hundreds of millions of them, which makes them worth next to nothing. A million workers at foxconn go on strike? No problem, shut down the facility and move somewhere else, and hire a million others, or let foxconn go out of business and someone else will emerge. Because they have generations of people who have nothing else they can do but repetitive manual labour. Chinas literacy rate in 1950 was 20% (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/12/news/12iht-rchina.t.html?pagewanted=all) Today it's still only about 88%.

      Believe it or not, all these exploited workers in china are living the great dream. That their children and childrens children won't have to go through this. But they are condemned to lives of either being peasant farmers who could never read, write or get any actual health care, or being underpaid overworked factory workers. The only thing we can do for them is give them jobs, and we can only give them money based on the fact that they're basically doing the work of robots.

      Remember, there are still 2.7 billion people living on less than 2 dollars a day, and 1.1 billion on less than a dollar (worldwide). http://library.thinkquest.org/05aug/00282/over_world.htm . That's slightly out of date, but it conveys the point. Foxconn's wages are about 300 dollars a month, or about 10 dollars a day (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/08/business/global/08wages.html). Comparatively, people working at foxconn at 10 dollars a day, are doing *extremely* well compared to the lives they would have had 40 years earlier.

      In the west we don't really think about the cost of basic things. Workers at foxconn have access to a diverse diet, which, by the way, is actually pretty tough to get on 2 dollars a day. They have generally clean water, again, not something they would have had as starving peasants. Oh, and they aren't starving. They, and their children will be able to read and write. They have electricity, which again, is a pretty radical concept.

      The only way billions of *people* in the world are going to get out of illiterate starving and dying to preventable diseases, is if we give them jobs, preferably for honest work. That might be making your shoes, and that might be snapping together an iPod. But you can't just go and pay someone in china 10 dollars and hour for a job someone else will do for 2, it's has devastating cascading effect through society, and frankly, for 10 dollars an hour, it would be cheaper to pay a robot than a foxconn worker. They're better to get the 2 dollars an hour or 1.25 or whatever it is, than to get nothing. Because without money they can't build anything to improve their society with, which is why they (along with a lot of other places) are so far behind, and that china has realized this is why they're growing at a break neck rate and fixing it.

      As a grad student, I make about 20k a year (I'm sort of half game developer half grad student, but one is part of the other). I am, by canadian measures barely above the poverty line once you take out my tuition. That's still more money in 1 year that about half the people in the world will make in their lifetimes.

      Yes, china has unfair currency practices which (significantly) undervalue their currency, and

    16. Re:Really? by crutchy · · Score: 2

      google probably searched on a pc with parts made in china, powered by electricity generated using parts made from china, in a house full of stuff made in china, paid for by a credit card made in china, etc.

      the OP is a kook. if he really didn't want anything made by poor chinese slave labor, he'd have to kill himself, because in the "western" world, there isn't anything that doesn't feature something made by chinese slave labor somewhere in its lifecycle. maybe he'd prefer to buy shoes made by american slave labor?

    17. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a lot of local companies that sell to niche markets this way, but it's always niche markets: its just too expensive to justify for normal purchases compared to a normal computer for little performance gain.

    18. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well said. I have no problem with manufacturing happening in China. I do have a problem with Chinese workers being treated like garbage, when that's actually true.

      What makes me a little ill, is this, "well don't buy Chinese goods" argument that usually follows that agreement. It's simply dumb.

      Now if you said, "all finished and unfinished goods imported into the country from anywhere must be produced according to the following labor standards: [...]", I think we would have a constructive discussion about what the benefit and harm would be for both parties.

      For instance, all first world nations would have to agree, or participating members would be at an enormous economic disadvantage. Then, which standards would you create? Do you go with more European 3 month vacations and 4 hour work days, or more American one week vacations and 9 hour work days? What about hiring practices that might be culturally contrary to nation doing the work? Is that fair? Etc, etc.

    19. Re:Really? by geogob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Is it really that misguided? I wanted to mod you down, but on second thought your comment really is insightful... I just don't agree with it.

      If it really bothers the poster that much, simply go without the toy.

      What kind of logic is that? That goes in the same bucket as "If you don't like how it is, make it yourself"... It's also like saying if you are bothered by how animals are handled by *some* producers, why don't you become vegetarian.
      With food, just like with electronics devices, there are ways to consume while reducing your negative footprint. With food, it gets always easier to do so - no so much with electronics.

      ...simply go without the toy.

      Toys, really? I don't know how you live or what you do for a living, but there is no way I could work or live in 2012 without consuming electronic products.

      But it the end, I think what will happen here is the same thing as with what happens when people try to consume animals products only coming from animals treated in the best conditions... most are not ready to pay the price.

    20. Re:Really? by Rennt · · Score: 0

      Yeah, let's all pat ourselves on the back for what a humane job we are doing exploiting these people.

    21. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You present the situation as if it's either the paddy fields at $0.25 an hour or semi slavery at a better rate in a factory. This is a false alternative, there are lots of models of economic development and these are just two - subsistence farming and dictatorship capitalism with a tech twist. There are countries, you probably wouldn't like them, that haven't done either of those. Cuba would be one notable alternative, but there are many other ways of developing a subsistence economy, both tried and untried.

    22. Re:Really? by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No matter how many times you call it exploitation, that doesn't make it so. These people want a better life, which is why they work in factories. Just like Americans did. Just like the English did. Just like the Germans did. Just like the French did. Just like the Japanese did. Just like the Taiwanese did. Just like the Australians did. Just like the Canadians did.

      You are filthy rich in comparison to the rest of the world, but you are so spoiled that you don't even know it. The Chinese people cannot have your life until their country is comparatively rich. Their country cannot become comparatively rich until the majority of the population is involved in wealth creation. Thats a straight up fact and no matter how many times you claim bullshit like "exploitation", you cannot change the facts.

      Yes, we all understand that you feel so strongly for the plight of others that you feel the need to say something, *anything*, as some sort of make-you-feel-good-inside moral protest. Your problem is that your thinking is so shallow that all you are doing is appealing to emotion. There is no logic in your protest. There are no facts in your protest. Its just a protest for protests sake, and for that you should be ashamed of yourself. How shallow, petty, and spoiled you are.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    23. Re:Really? by Trogre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait, so you're saying we should treat China as a charity case? Really? Perhaps you're not aware of China's government and their ridiculously massive military budget. Do you really want to keep feeding that beast? How long until they stop trading with other countries for raw materials (minerals and food alike) and just march in and take them?

      You do realise that no matter what country you invest in there's always dozens of others that miss out - the opportunity cost. Do you worry about the impoverished people in India, Tunisia, Bangladesh, Peru or heaven forbid Mexico? Why favour just one country? China has their own economy - let them sort it out, even if it takes a revolution. The current model is just not sustainable.

      You've written a lot but I'm not sure you've really thought this through - once all manufacturing jobs are outsourced to China what do you think is going to happen to your economy? Where is Mr Social Safety Net going to find his next job once his town's plant closes down? The jobs simply are not, and will not be there.

      Stop buying Chinese made. Now.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    24. Re:Really? by rioki · · Score: 2

      You couldn't be more wrong! Yes, there is room for improvement, but companies like Foxcon are actually the better alternative. People travel long ways to go work there. Why? Because they get food and education for their children, something they would not get in the rural area they lived in. These people choose to move from the "middle ages" to the "industrial revolution", they have a choice and factory work is the better alternative.

      Is it a good idea for companies to move their production to these countries? What would they do if the production would be still in "here" (by varying degrees of here)? Yes, exactly robots! Do you think robots are better than Chinese workers?

      Here is some food for thought, what is better? Pumping money into foreign economies and actually helping them bootstrap themselves or sending a few million sacs of rice every year for eternity, because they are starving?

    25. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The only way billions of *people* in the world are going to get out of illiterate starving and dying to preventable diseases, is if we give them jobs

      Really, that's the only way??
      How conditioned we all are that only money, that divine paper, is the one and true savior of all mankind.
      I do agree with you if we aren't allowed to think out of the box, that box that defines our borders. (Did you define your own box, or had it defined for you??)

      There are more examples in sci-fi than I can come up with of ways we can do it all better, at the moment the population in general is way to selfish to make anything other than capitalism work. (that general population includes me to) However, while capitalism reigns, that won't change anytime soon.

      So, you want to put your mouth behind the capitalist solution, one that for sure will keep us away from that future society we could be, that society you dreamed about when you were younger, or maybe you still dream about it now? Excuse me when I'm not standing in line next to you, cheering the slave workers along, a few more decades and your free! Free to work in better conditions for another master of puppets.

    26. Re:Really? by Saintwolf · · Score: 2

      Well I don't know about America, but I would most certainly never buy anything that I know is "Made in Britain". Watch the IT Crowd and you would understand.

    27. Re:Really? by poptix · · Score: 1

      This is precisely why I am not worried about outsourcing. Look at India, China, or any other 'cheap labor' country. The average income is increasing by leaps and bounds, their *standard of living* is increasing substantially. At some point it becomes too expensive to outsource and those jobs come back home.

      No, money isn't the "divine paper, the one and true savior of all mankind" as a child post put it, but in the world we live in it's the best way to allow for fluid bartering between man hours and standards of living.

      The hope (and reality) is that all "third world" nations will become educated competitors which increases the overall education and happiness of all mankind, quality of products, and technology in general. Too many Americans are liberal idiots that think that government handouts are the solution when there are many people in poorer nations that are hoping for the opportunity to *WORK* for a living and *EARN* their income.

      Fuck the '99%', turn off your cable/cell phone/internet, sell your iPhone/PowerBook/designer clothes and get a real job.

      --
      Just because you disagree doesn't mean it's not true.
    28. Re:Really? by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: 0

      Living conditions will NEVER improve as long as they have enough starving people who'll gladly go work as slaves.

      --
      Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.
    29. Re:Really? by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 2

      That's something that's really, really scary in the IT industry right now. The industry is consolidating into huge companies, slowly but certainly. What's the next step ?

      Well this is what car companies were doing around, say 1935 something around there. While that consolidation kept going, and car companies were growing, things were really, really good for their employees. Once the growth faltered, well we all know what happened.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/19/google-4q-2011_n_1217153.html What does this mean ? Although Wall Streets has some balls to call 2.7 billion "below expectations".

    30. Re:Really? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      No, I actually think it is a good issue to start rising. You know, in thte last two years there has been an increasing interest in so called fair trade electronics. I think it is a concept that in the future will be increasingly popular.

      Nowadays, there is a push for fair-trade products (at least here in Europe). It is logical to think that Electronics manufacturers will start fair-trade programs. I think Apple is going to be one of the first ones (and as far as I know, it is the one that is *starting* to go that way). The reason is mainly because Apple's success is in the "face" it provides for their products which is seen as an "added value". So, apple (or maybe Sony) would be the perfect company to create a new series of products (that are a bit more expensive) with a "fair-trade" certification and which people will buy (just because they are fair trade).

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    31. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you're not aware of China's government and their ridiculously massive military budget.

      China has a ridiculous military budget till you compare it with the USA. Then think of a possible reason why China has a ridiculous military budget.

      How long until they stop trading with other countries for raw materials (minerals and food alike) and just march in and take them?

      They don't do that right now because war is bad for business. So as long as the leaders aren't insane, and the rest of the world does a lot of trade with them, they are less likely to go to war. They stand to lose more than they gain. They keep saying they want Taiwan, but in fact they do lot of business with Taiwan. So as long as nobody does anything stupid it'll be business as usual.

      Lastly, the way out is actually social safety net. As technology improves, humans will become less competitive with machines. So jobs will eventually become fewer. That's the whole point of automation after all. You might then pay people to create silly youtube movies, but it starts to look like artificial subsidies or "make work" programmes too. So at a certain point, you might as well give everyone a certain basic share of wealth from all the extra productivity that automation allows. They want more, they can work for it.

      If you go "100% free market" that wealth just goes to the top 2-5% anyway.

      No matter how much you train a dog it's not going to be writing robotic-factory/farm configuration scripts. Same goes for many people. Civilized people still keep their pet dogs well sheltered, fed and healthy even if those dogs do no work. So why the big objection against keeping humans sheltered, fed and healthy?

      The 100% capitalist free market path will just have the winners own most of everything (like they used to), and they won't need you or me, except maybe a few million as worshippers, slaves, servants. You won't really need that many people to configure and program nearly-fully automated robotic factories. Google, Amazon etc don't really need that many people to serve billions.

      Maybe your job would be designing new toys for the Emperor of Western America to play with.

    32. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panasonic Let's Note and Toughbook notebooks are assembled in Japan by well paid and highly skilled workers.

    33. Re:Really? by xtracto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So wait, you'd rather people in china go back to being subsistence farmers with a 44 year life expectancy (that was by the way, 1960), with no education, so you can feel good about giving extra money to your neighbour who's going to go out and spend more on lunch than someone in china would have made in a week? That's the argument against what is happening in china today.

      Typical slashdot exageration and way to completely miss the point. Given that GP only wrote:

      I'm not rich, but I have no objection to paying a little extra for stuff that's not made by indentured servants. But most of the time I don't even get that choice.

      If you look at programs such as Fair-trade you will see that the idea is increaes the quality of living for those workers in the developping countries. It means paying *them* a better wage for their labour. It does not (directly) mean getting the same manufacturing labour back to developped countries (like USA).

      Believe it or not, all these exploited workers in china are living the great dream. That their children and childrens children won't have to go through this.

      I wonder then, why several persons wanted out of their great dream.

      I understand your general point, living conditions for people working in manufacturing can be better than those living in rural areas. That is true to a certain degree, but it is also true that the living conditions of people in manufacturing are *still* terrible.

      If consumers starting giving preference (with their money) to "fair trade" electronics, they would benefit those sweatshop workers and indirectly they would benefit *their own* economies, as local companies would be able to compete in price once again.

      What GP was saying is that currently there is *no real option*. So as someone put it before, the only option is to avoid buying those electronics. The problem with that approach is that the only statement people achieve is saying "I do not like your product", whereas if there was a "fair trade" option, people could choose to buy that to "state" that "I want products that are produced in fair conditions".

       

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    34. Re:Really? by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 2

      Whist the arn't any actual guidelines for "Made in the USA", the proposed guidelines where 75% of costs. This means if 3rd-world labor is a 10th the price, then only 23% of the work actually needs to be done in the USA. Even that 23% can be done in American Samoa under very diffrent labour laws.

    35. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unions and productivity gains (as in more capital/more efficient capital usage). Two sides of the coin.

    36. Re:Really? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      I wonder then, why several persons wanted out of their great dream.

      While I am not disputing that the incredibly long hours and dubious working standards are not acceptable the number of suicides at Foxconn is more a function of having so many workers than the conditions driving an abnormally high number of people to commit suicide. As you can see below the wikipedia page that you link to states this point in the second paragraph.

      Although the number of suicides at the company is large in absolute terms, the suicide rate is still low compared to the rest of China.

      Obviously this doesn't mean that there isn't a problem, just that singling out Foxconn as a target for this type of debate is quite counter productive when even the harsh conditions they impose on workers are apparently better than a lot of the rest of China.

    37. Re:Really? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let's not forget that it's was the original unions that wanted cottage industries to continue, with the poor practices, the child labour and terrible conditions included - or do you conveniently forget about the acts of destruction gangs of workers carried out against new dangled technologies? The engines destroyed in shipping, the factories burned to the ground (to the point where in England factories started to be built with no flammable material in the structure at all), farming machines destroyed in the night (to the point where farmers were told that they should leave the machines out in the open at night, otherwise they would lose their barns and homes as well).

      If you open your eyes enough, both sides have a terrible history.

    38. Re:Really? by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      Wait, so, we took their jobs?

      My mind is blown.

    39. Re:Really? by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Workers at foxconn have access to a diverse diet, which, by the way, is actually pretty tough to get on 2 dollars a day.

      More Americans understand this than you think. The 44 million or so of us who are on food stamps - I was one of them - try to live on anywhere from $3-6 a day for food. Just check out some of the various Hunger Challenges out there on the Internets.

    40. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the coltan used in electronics production does *not* come from the DRC, and companies such as AMD are working in a multistakeholder group with the Responsible Sourcing Network to get out in front of this issue and ensure they don't use conflict minerals.

    41. Re:Really? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The Luddites were a political movement, not a trade union.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    42. Re:Really? by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 2

      I think the larger question is, does.much of anyone in the first world even really give it a second thought?

      Isn't this the.price they pay for.taking these.jobs.from us where it used to be done for a.living wage and fair.working conditions?

      We do care when it comes to clothes or food - there's a huge 'fair trade' market for these commodities and so there should be for electronics also.

    43. Re:Really? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      China is in transition.

      I'm old enough to remember seeing Chairman Mao on the nightly news. China transitioned to an economic super-power a long time ago. But yes, China has dragged more people out of abject poverty in the last 50yrs than the rest of the world combined, but it has done so simply by repairing the self-inflicted damage of Mao's cultural revolution.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    44. Re:Really? by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Informative

      It wasn't just the Luddites in the 19th century that caused problems for those who chose not to join them. My grandfather, along with his brothers, owned a coal mine in Alabama that was effectively shut down by none other than John L. Lewis himself in 1949, in cooperation with other UMW members and the local sheriff. My family already paid more than the prevailing union wage at the time and refused to go along with the short 3-day work week that Lewis had been coordinating nationwide, so Lewis and his thugs showed up to teach them a lesson and started shooting into occupied vehicles and destroying equipment. More than a thousand shots were exchanged, and one of the union thugs died during the attack. Eventually, 13 of the union people were convicted and fined (note that the miner that shot and killed one of the attackers was never even charged), and 10 more (including Lewis) were nolle prossed.

      Interesting that the UMW doesn't care to include that chapter in its history.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    45. Re:Really? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly robots! Do you think robots are better than Chinese workers?

      Having worked in my fair share of factories I think people should build and operate robots rather than try and compete with them for jobs..

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    46. Re:Really? by geoffaus · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget to give the unions credit for ending the abusives labor practices of the last century.

      Someone should tell my manager that abusive labor practices ended last century - I dont think he got the memo

      --
      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
    47. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree, unions don't do much of anything. Unions simply make jobs markets tighter and harder to get a job in. It really is a pretty selfish thing to do.

      http://cafehayek.com/2011/02/the-alternative-to-unions.html

    48. Re:Really? by necro81 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if perhaps the placement of extra periods in that comment was some sort of steganographic means of transmitting secret information.

    49. Re:Really? by gottspeed · · Score: 1

      We? You got worms or something? I for one consider myself to be equally if not more exploited even if my servitude has better material fixtures. This crap isn't my fault or yours, we can't vote these inhumane practises away even if we wanted to, and its going to get worse before it gets better.

    50. Re:Really? by DarenN · · Score: 1

      If you look at programs such as Fair-trade you will see that the idea is increaes the quality of living for those workers in the developping countries.

      While I am all for fair-trade, and increased quality of life for the workers, paying them more has harmful knock on effects in that it drives inflation of basic necessities and means those not lucky enough to have a decent income suffer more, not less. It's all about relativity.

      Fostering job creation rather than giving aid is the way to go. It gives people something to feel valued for, and makes them self sufficient so you don't have to keep giving aid. Bear in mind that he suicide rate in Foxconn is significantly lower than the Chinese rate of suicide in general.

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
    51. Re:Really? by Rennt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is nothing wrong with appealing to emotion in the face of the kind of unfeeling, self-serving rationalization that passes off human suffering as progress.

      Yes, there is cheap labor to be had in China. And yes, both sides in the trade can benefit from that imbalance. You'll get no argument from me there. We get cheap products, they grow their economy. Everybody wins.

      But what we are seeing is not mutual capitalization of this economic imbalance. If it was, Chinese factory workers would be working ~8 hour days and earning the local equivalent of a living wage. What we ARE seeing some of the most profitable corporations in history writing off human and environmental damage on a massive scale as externalities.

      But thanks for the emotionally manipulative ad hominem attacks. The hypocrisy is staggering.

    52. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are correct. People will chase a dollar, yen etc into the grave. For a while. Sooner or later they will look up and see that the people that are shoveling the dirt on them. It won’t be some foreign country or a scary monster from a fairy tale. It will be the same 1% that were living off of the people when it was "communist china" plus a few new ultra rich. Maybe China has a mystical power to avoid the shortcomings of the rest of the worlds "industrial period". It will take more than chi though.

      If you want facts take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploitation
        * Taking something off a person or a group that rightfully belongs to them
        * Short-changing people in trade
        * Directly or indirectly forcing somebody to work
        * Using somebody against his will, or without his consent or knowledge
        * Imposing an arbitrary differential treatment of people to the advantage of some and the disadvantage of others (as in ascriptive discrimination)
        * Using somebody to buy/provide things for you and never paying them back.

      You might then try applying http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs to the development of personality within a country. Yes we in the developed nations have moved past the need for sacrificing everything for food, water and safety. Now we are looking to be friendly, helpful and actualized http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-actualization. You see our ability to look at the bigger picture as being spoiled. That’s unsurprisingly short sighted and unactualized. Spoiled is the same thing the business owners will tell the workers.. for a while until the workers realize that they deserve far more than somewhat clean water and electricity.

      You sound less like one of the workers in the factory and more like someone shoveling the dirt.

    53. Re:Really? by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      Not that I disagree with your post, but you can't use "sci-fi" as the evidence that future, utopian societies will "do it better." ...It's right there in the latter part of the name, the "fi" part.

    54. Re:Really? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      The luddites were not the only people doing these things...

      And how is a trade union not a political movement?

    55. Re:Really? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I'm not taking sides here, coal mines and unions both have some very dark chapters in their history, I was just pointing out that the original Luddites had very little connection to the early union movement, I agree that in the US after WW2 the unions were heavily infiltrated by organised crime.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    56. Re:Really? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget to give the unions credit for ending the abusives labor practices of the last century.

      They did do great things, but their time has passed.

      They are more of a hindrance to the worker than help these days...and often part of the reason we've lost much of our manufacturing work out of the US...they are unreasonable in what they demand.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    57. Re:Really? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

      Work in a "Right to Work" state, conditions are better yes, but someone is always there and willing to take your place for longer hours at less pay.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    58. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I disagree with your post, but you can't use "sci-fi" as the evidence that future, Utopian societies will "do it better." ...It's right there in the latter part of the name, the "fi" part.

      There are more examples in sci-fi than I can come up with of ways we can do it all better

      Perhaps "could do it better" would've been a better choice.
      No, there is no guarantee that when trying to work out some utopia from some sci-fi movie/book/... we will actually get something better, but does that mean we shouldn't even try? Certainly you could agree that it CAN be better than what we have now.

    59. Re:Really? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      No...late night, typing on a rooted nook color....for some reason it is very easy to get a lot of periods while typing on that thing....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    60. Re:Really? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      For a bit I thought you were talking about the "redneck strike".

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    61. Re:Really? by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      So, AC, let's hear your solution to this problem. How do you recommend this is resolved? Have anything useful to add, or do you just enjoy being contrary?

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    62. Re:Really? by SoulNibbler · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if I quite buy that. I lived in Hangzhou a few years back and it was amazing to me what I could get for 1-2 dollars a day for food. Rice with fried eggplant (8RMB), fried rice noodles (6RMB), a breakfast omelette wrapped in a pancake (3RMB). Even better I would go out to dinner with the guys in the lab and split N+2 dishes for less than 10RMB a person and we ALWAYS had left-overs. When I was living there I cooked fewer than 10 times because it was cheaper to eat out than for me to buy ingredients and kitchen equipment. The wages are reasonable for where they are living and the article was full of half truths (they kept quoting different people without making it perfectly clear that there wasn't a single story) but I still feel that as Americans or Europeans we are taking advantage of these people. I would prefer that robots take the jobs domestically but only so that R&D and Production are co-located in MY tax base. What was scary in the article was the corruption, state employees are getting kickbacks in order to require internships. That is an abuse of power that we should feel bad about. Yes there will always be manufacturing jobs that I wouldn't want to do as long as there are poor people. We however do have an obligation to avoid profiting from the exploitation of other people. For the sake of karma, it's the right choice.

    63. Re:Really? by Pope · · Score: 1

      The best Doc Martens used to be made in England. Thankfully, they've come back.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    64. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.newbalance.com/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Balance#Made_in_USA_.28and_UK.29_stance

      Not expensive. Can be found in most shoe stores. Manufacturing is located in the US and UK.

    65. Re:Really? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Can you get clean water on 3-6 dollars a day? Do you face seasonal shortages of basic necessities, like rice? When your total income is 2 dollars a day (or less) it's very hard to get little things, like meat, or vegetables beyonds one or two.

      Food in the US is also subsidized, the wrong things are subsidized, but it is subsidized. That makes a big difference.

      I'm under no illusion about the 3rd world nature of the US. But food stamps and welfare still put americans in a much better position than chinese peasants. Even at poverty in the US, you still get to go to school, have vaccinations and so on.

    66. Re:Really? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      When I say 2 dollars a day, I mean *total* wages. You're talking about someone earning up around 10 dollars a day being able to spend 2 of it on food (6-7RMB/dollar).

      And even few years ago china was great strides into it's progress, which is a far cry from where they were in say, 1990.

    67. Re:Really? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 2

      As a person of indian decent I have a soft spot for india, who are about 15 years behind china.

      Chinas military budget is about 200 billion USD. The US military budget is about 800 billion. And china is spreading that around 4x as many people. Admittedly, it buys a lot more in china, but as even Clausewitz realized, money in absolute terms buys you a better military. Besides, china needs to defend itself from Russia, the US, India, internal muslim extremists, and just generally have a military, so they can eventually do things like help deal with Somali pirates.

      What happened when we outsourced all our manufacturing jobs to the USA from Britain, or to Germany from Britain, or to Japan from the USA, or to the other china from the USA? China will lose it's cost competitive edge eventually. Probably in 15 or 20 years, maybe a bit more, maybe a bit less, and india will be following along. But as they get there they will create new markets to sell stuff to, and canadian and american manufacturers will have to start thinking the way people in china do "what does someone in that country need that I can make here?". And labour will do what it has always done, and converge and specialize. For all the complaining about china making iPhones, they assemble iPhones, lots of parts are made other places, and if they use intel or AMD parts for similar products then major important portions are made in the US or Europe.

      Again, I reiterate though, chinas currency manipulation causes problems, and chinas general refusal to let US companies do business there is causing problems. Neither of those is acceptable, and, I would argue probably warrant sanctions of some sort. But that is a very different problem than whether or not they should be making things at all.

    68. Re:Really? by kryliss · · Score: 1

      For a lot of people that guy's name is either Jose, Juan, Carlos, Emilio, Ewardo... etc....

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    69. Re:Really? by scamper_22 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No one has ever really given it a second thought.

      Most people who claim to 'care' tend to be from a very colonial mentality. It's the same mentality Europeans used to have in relation to their colonies.

      Never is this more exemplified than in food production. I live in Ontario, Canada. Land of big labor unions. Do you know which group of workers are actually legally prohibited from unionization?

      You betcha, the most vulnerable, at risk, exploited workers... farm workers.

      Why do you suppose this is? Because it is in reality a very colonial attitude that farm workers should not be 'western' workers. That is for lesser beings.

      Even in the 'glory' days of big union. Why is it that you think an auto-worker was earning 80K/year while farm workers struggled in the hot sun for hours on end providing the very food we eat?

      Most societies have never been willing to pay the true cost of labor for its workers. At best, it makes laws that drive the hard jobs overseas or into migrant labor.

      Even in the days of big union, they only focused on a few fields. The auto worker only felt well off because there was a poor non-unionized waitress ready to serve them. Or they could take a vacation and travel to a third world country and take advantage of their cheap labor. How many civilized good labor law Europeans travel to Asia or North Africa to take advantage of the cheap labor... (and cheap women).

      This doesn't even get into the odd realm realm that going for the cheapest labor provides the most needy with the jobs they actually need. There were several studies that showed that when they banned child labor... for example in Bangladesh... it's not like this actually the kids... it just forced them into more poverty and increasingly prostitution. And cheap goods means other poor people can actually get those good cheaply as well.

      Considering money at the end of the day is just us exchanging our own labor, it's typically very hard to really come up with the idea of a 'living wage'. Pay farm workers a living wage and the price of food jumps... and then you want a bigger living wage. Most of what we *need* is just buying labor for each other... typically from the poorest in society. Even things like housing... it's more about competing with your neighbor for the hot location.

    70. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me personally, I try to avoid consuming electronic products... they are difficult to chew.

    71. Re:Really? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um... they tried the sci fi solutions of wonderful fantasy land and 30 million people starved to death under mao.

      It's not charity. We do that to africa and we simply exacerbate the problem. If you just give people aid you drive prices down and make it hard for them to compete (I mean general aid, not specific disaster relief). It's giving them a fair chance. And it's not some divine paper, in fact I was quite clear on what they're getting in exchange. Clean water, electricity, food, housing that isn't dirt and logs, and eventually, stuff.

      There really is no other way. We can't just give them money, and while we can give them some of the 'stuff' (power generators for example), they need to be able to pay for their use, have staff to be paid to run them, we can't possible match the scale required.

      I'm not sure what dream you're talking about. As a kid (and even now as an adult) I want stuff. A house, a car, computer, food, clothes. I want to be able to retire eventually. I'm only going to get those things by exchanging my labour for them, and we use money as a unit of exchange between the two. It's not that complicated a concept, and it provides the granularity '3 chickens and rack of ribs for my vaccinations' lacks. I'm going to guess that people in china may want slightly different stuff, or they set the bar lower than 'a car' and maybe on clean drinking water. But that's how the world works.

      I said, and it is depressing, there are generations (or at least major portions of generations) of people in china who basically lack the skills to do anything else. In 1980 1 in 5 people in china couldn't read or write. Consider that in north america something like 70% of people have a post secondary education of somesort, and in china you have 20% of people who didn't manage to get to grade 2 or equivalent. They *need* to be able to educate their children (and they are, and have done that), but they have millions of people who are a long way from being able to do anything in a 'knowledge economy'. They are also about 30 years away from having a workforce that is effectively 100% literate (which is the literacy rate for under 24's now), and as that shifts they will be able to do more and more. But right now, for some people, manual labour is as good as it gets.

    72. Re:Really? by BBadhedgehog · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that paying someone a fair price for a product (which is what fair trade aims to do) constitutes giving them aid.

      --
      Will you PLEASE F off with the Fing beta now?
    73. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politics is just power. Small, mean and concentrated.

      Workers unions are decent living wages, working conditions, and a fair and equitable share of the wealth extracted from the product of their work. Simple, strait, general, and shared.

      Of course, any bunch of thugs can set up saloon or clubhouse, and call themselves whatever they want. The S in NSDAP, for example, stood for "socialist".

    74. Re:Really? by Saintwolf · · Score: 1

      Nothing beats a pair of really heavy, toe-crushing boots ;)

    75. Re:Really? by ZFox · · Score: 1

      but someone is always there and willing to take your place for longer hours at less pay.

      Just as there is always someone who can do the job better than you at less cost. Either way it sounds like they should get the job. Imagine that: getting a job based on merit and not on seniority or nepotism.

    76. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I thought IBM did it first.

    77. Re:Really? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      If it really bothers the poster that much, simply go without the toy.

      Well, obviously it doesn't bother you, but it does bother me.

      And I have no problem going without the latest pocket-sized Facebook/Google/AngryBirds appliance. The hard part is going without shoes.

      I'm not rich, but I have no objection to paying a little extra for stuff that's not made by indentured servants. But most of the time I don't even get that choice.

      Speak for yourself. I don't want to go without the latest pocket-sized whatever, but there's lots of choices, and I'm willing to spend an extra $$ knowing I'm not supporting slavery.... actually slaves probably have it better, they didn't commit suicide in record number, at least not according to my public education history book.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    78. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I agree with you.

      But... everything cost way less money in China than in Canada. The same food cost way more in Canada than in China. It's the same for everything. The wage don't matter. What is matter is wage versus the cost of living. And I think China ratio of wage/cost of living, is better than the Canadian one. So, they are richer than we are here... with all those TAXES, the ratio seems to favor a lot more any third world wage versus cost of living than the real slave labor paying more than 50% of their wage to the government.

    79. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM assembles its newer model Blackberries in Canada.

      They pay a living wage for doing it too.

    80. Re:Really? by ZFox · · Score: 1

      Even at poverty in the US, you still get to go to school, have vaccinations and so on.

      And a majority of those also have more than 2 color TVs (including 1 plasma), a cell phone, and a car.

      Source

    81. Re:Really? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You couldn't be more wrong! Yes, there is room for improvement, but companies like Foxcon are actually the better alternative. People travel long ways to go work there. Why? Because they get food and education for their children, something they would not get in the rural area they lived in. These people choose to move from the "middle ages" to the "industrial revolution", they have a choice and factory work is the better alternative.

      It's not about Foxconn being a better alternative. It's about that better alternative still not being good enough.

      Those products are manufactured for use by people who enjoy 40-hour week, guaranteed vacation time, government-mandated safety and health standards, and can legally form unions. Why should we demand anything less for the workers that do manufacturing of those products?

      As it is, the reason why they don't get all that is because the companies that use them don't have to do that, and they don't want to because keeping the disparity lets them maintain their high profit margins.

    82. Re:Really? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Interesting that the UMW doesn't care to include that chapter in its history.

      And I'm sure that your family's oral history is a completely unbiased version of what happened.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    83. Re:Really? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Just as there is always someone who can do the job better than you at less cost. Either way it sounds like they should get the job.

      Why? If the goal of the economic system is to meet human needs, then a race to the bottom is counter-productive. (If the goal is instead to enrich the aristocracy, of course, then it doesn't matter.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    84. Re:Really? by dj245 · · Score: 2

      There are lots of things where, if you're willing to pay more and take a more traditional approach (e.g., leather instead of high-tech fabrics), you can buy local. For example, it is easy to buy all your furniture from a local craftsman/woodworker - but the price will not even be remotely like what you'd find at Wal-mart.

      Often the initial price will be higher, but the total cost of ownership is lower. My father has a set of bookshelves that he built himself when he was in his 20's. Now he is over 60 and the bookshelves have held up through countless moves and heavy books sitting on them for decades. I don't believe they even had cheap bookshelves 40 years ago, but I know for sure that if I bought Ikea/Walmart bookshelves now they would not last as long as that.

      Last year I bought a Weber (American made) charcoal grill. It was a few dollars more than the cheap chinese grill but the metal is thick and the paint is a high quality enamel. It is going to last a long time, but people buying grills might think twice about the higher price.

      Things are being made cheaper and cheaper everyday. I have a coworker who recently worked at an automotive safety testing company and according to him even the high end (BMW/Mercedes) manufacturers are getting rid of the real leather seats in favor of fake stuff. Only high end models get the real leather. Fewer and fewer companies make quality products every year.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    85. Re:Really? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, all these exploited workers in china are living the great dream.

      Yes, people living the dream are often known for jumping off buildings.

      But they are condemned to lives of either being peasant farmers who could never read, write or get any actual health care, or being underpaid overworked factory workers.

      And of course, no other option could ever even be thought of. There is no imaginable socioecnomic system where people could be peasant farmers who can read, write, and get actual health care, or be fairly paid humanely treated factory workers.

      Remember, there are still 2.7 billion people living on less than 2 dollars a day,

      The fallacy of scraps from the king's table.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    86. Re:Really? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      And a majority of those also have more than 2 color TVs (including 1 plasma), a cell phone, and a car.

      Color TVs are widely available for free. (Check the "free" section of your local Craigslist.) Cars are a practical necessity in many parts of the U.S. due to the lack of useful mass transit and urban planning that separates jobs from residences, and old clunkers are available for as low as $300 (again, Craigslist) or even for free via various charities. Cell phones have also become a practical necessity -- cheaper than land lines, and try going in for a job interview and telling them you don't have a phone. And because of that, they are often available for free to the poor.

      None of these is a luxury item or means shit as a measure of poverty. The measure of poverty is not a couple of third-hand consumer goods, but the secure ability to have a safe and healthful place to live, nutritious food, decent clothing, and medical care.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    87. Re:Really? by marnues · · Score: 1

      There are always people who want to distill an argument down just to end the argument. I always wonder about the ones on Slashdot. In real-life it could be someone who just wants people to stop arguing around them. On forums though, it's more insidious as they had to take the time to read responses and then write one themselves. In this case, I've determined that the GP actually works in American manufacturing. It's plausible and makes the post less difficult to read past.

    88. Re:Really? by markjhood2003 · · Score: 1

      Workers at foxconn have access to a diverse diet, which, by the way, is actually pretty tough to get on 2 dollars a day. They have generally clean water, again, not something they would have had as starving peasants. Oh, and they aren't starving. They, and their children will be able to read and write.

      Sounds reasonable, but how do we know that they and their children will be able to read and write? Is Foxconn actually enrolling their employees in literacy classes?

      And how exactly do you raise a child in a 10x12 dorm room that you're sharing with four other people? How do you even have a chance to have a married life? From what I've read, Foxconn employees are worked until they literally can't work any more -- what happens to them when they've outlived their usefulness to Foxconn?

      This all still sounds like massive exploitation to me. Maybe the wages are reasonable for the economy, and eating is better than starving, but a humane employer still needs to enable their employees to have a life outside the company. If you're working 16 hours a day, living in a company dorm where you can be rousted from your bed to work a special shift for Apple, buying from the company store, and have no chance of a life outside of work, you're effectively a slave.

    89. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing wrong with appealing to emotion in the face of the kind of unfeeling, self-serving rationalization that passes off human suffering as progress.

      Anyone that works harder than you is suffering? Can't you even see your own lack of perspective? 90% of the world works harder than you and is grateful for it.

    90. Re:Really? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I understand that things are much harder in most of the world. I just don't want the impression that the U.S. is filled with abundance and streets paved with gold.

      One mistake people commonly make is "$3 a day? That's more than people in Africa make! Surely you can get enough for that!" Yes, if I lived in Africa. Instead, I live in America, where the only option for $3 a day is pretty much grains (which are laced with corn).

      We live in an interesting time where the poor are actually fatter than the rich due to the low quality of cheap food. It's expensive to eat healthy now.

    91. Re:Really? by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      because there is always someone willing to take your place for longer hours and less pay.

      This is a constructed reality. Full employment would be a natural consequence of an unmoneyed society.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    92. Re:Really? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, perhaps not. The FBI had something to say about the incident, however.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  2. Silence is golden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lack of responses so far suggests that they all do. most of us can't affors $20k for a cell phone.

    1. Re:Silence is golden by dxkelly · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That doesn't excuse it. If slavery is required to make cell phones at a reasonable price then we'll have to do without.
      "I pity the man who wants a coat so cheap that the man or woman who produces the cloth will starve in the process." -- Benjamin Harrison 23rd President

    2. Re:Silence is golden by debiangruven · · Score: 2

      We have yet to have a commie president. Most of them could be considered socialists though.

      --
      Stay negative.
    3. Re:Silence is golden by icebraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except that alternative is worse for the workers, who already have the option of not working at those factories and, funnily enough, they don't actually prefer it.

      Your solution helps your moral guilty at their expense. For shame.

      http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/smokey.html

    4. Re:Silence is golden by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Oh, and before someone accuses me of rationalizing to justify my toys, I don't need to since I can't afford them anyway. I have a used Nokia and a cheap laptop - no iPhone, Android, tablet, kindle or console.

    5. Re:Silence is golden by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, crappy jobs are better than no jobs at all. You know what's better still? A decent job, with fair pay and reasonable conditions.

      If we refuse to buy phones and such from companies that run mandatory twelve hour shifts and force college students to "intern" doing manual labor for a pittance, that doesn't mean that all those jobs will come back to the US. It means that companies like Foxconn will be forced to pay better wages, shorten shifts, and generally treat their employees better. Shorter shifts also means more people need to be hired.

      End result? Our tech gadgets cost a few percent more, tens of millions of Chinese people get lifted out of poverty, and we can rest easy in the knowledge that we're not growing fat off slave labor. If it keeps a few more jobs from being offshored, all the better, but it's just gravy at that point.

    6. Re:Silence is golden by owski · · Score: 1

      If we refuse to buy phones and such from companies that run mandatory twelve hour shifts and force college students to "intern" doing manual labor for a pittance, that doesn't mean that all those jobs will come back to the US.

      Or, more likely, it will mean that no one makes the gadgets at all and there are no jobs.

    7. Re:Silence is golden by artor3 · · Score: 1

      How is that even remotely likely?

      You think Foxconn, Apple, Samsung, Nokia, HTC, Motorola, TSMC, GSMC, ASE, KYEC, and basically every other electronics company on earth will all just voluntarily shut down, rather than be forced to raise their prices by 5%?

    8. Re:Silence is golden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There won't be anything voluntary about it, but if you think raising the cost of labour to many hundreds of percent higher won't have a massive impact on jobs then you are kidding yourself. Much of it will be automated and many of them will simply go out of business as with massive price rises comes less consumers to buy your product. I think these workers are really screwed no matter which way things go, it is sad, but reality.

    9. Re:Silence is golden by Surt · · Score: 1

      There's been research that suggests a US assembled cellphone would add only about 10% to the price. Move all the component manufacturing here, and add less than 30%. But those margins would kill in reality, because no one (statistically) cares about working conditions in China enough to spend even 5% extra on their phone.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    10. Re:Silence is golden by afabbro · · Score: 1

      Except that alternative is worse for the workers, who already have the option of not working at those factories and, funnily enough, they don't actually prefer it.

      Your solution helps your moral guilty at their expense. For shame.

      There is tremendous irony here. The Chinese threw out the old ruling class for the communists and end up exploited by the capitalists.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    11. Re:Silence is golden by afabbro · · Score: 2

      That 5% is a pure guess. It could be 50% for all you know.

      There's also a difference between shutting down and finding the sales prospects - as prices go up, fewer people can buy - make that line of business unattractive to the point where they get out of it. Consolidation, monopoloy...

      Economics is fiendishly difficult to control.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    12. Re:Silence is golden by artor3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 5% I mentioned was not a guess at all. We had a /. article on how little money goes into Chinese manufacturing a while back. Here's the link to the slashdot story and here's a direct link to the article.

      It shows that Chinese labor costs only make up about 2% of the cost of the iPad. We could triple their salaries and have prices rise by only around 5%. Obviously it would vary by device, but no way would it be 50%.

    13. Re:Silence is golden by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      Make it too expensive to hire workers, and they will just be replaced by robots.

    14. Re:Silence is golden by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of the media blather is fuelled less by concerns about mistreating developing world labour and more about a stealth approach to convincing people that foreign labour = bad, but retaining or increasing local jobs = good. Which has its merits. One nation worrying about the well-being of another nation's labour force out of pure altruism would be something of a historical anomaly.

    15. Re:Silence is golden by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      It means that companies like Foxconn will be forced to pay better wages, shorten shifts, and generally treat their employees better. Shorter shifts also means more people need to be hired.

      End result?

      End result? A greater percentage of the profits being retained by Chinese companies, an increase in your trade deficit and an nice bump to the R&D budgets of your foreign competitors.

    16. Re:Silence is golden by crutchy · · Score: 1

      speak for yourself

    17. Re:Silence is golden by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

      Probably in most cases, but not all operations in a factory line can be done by a robot.

      Either the robot isn't fast enough, or can't do the task no matter what program we throw into it.

      There will always be a need for at least some workers

    18. Re:Silence is golden by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the price, really.
      If you want a new phone you go to a cell phone provider pick a phone and sign up to a contract.
      The actual price of the phone doesn't matter a deal since its buried in the contract.

      Of course the cell phone companies will not be happy about the phones costing more but if they want the contracts they will have to suck it up.

    19. Re:Silence is golden by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Of course the cell phone companies will not be happy about the phones costing more but if they want the contracts they will have to suck it up.

      Of course they won't, the contracts would just become more expensive.

    20. Re:Silence is golden by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Or, it means wages will be finally more expensive than machines (see the US manufacturing) and they'll make the same gadgets without exploiting anyone but without paying anyone either.

      Not very likely? It's already happening...

    21. Re:Silence is golden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now do the same calculation for every single step in the process from digging up stuff from the ground to shipping the finished product. Those 5% will seem rather silly after that.

    22. Re:Silence is golden by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      This is a bullshit claim as AMD planned to make CPU's in New York, Corvette makes their cars in the USA and my Nokia E7 phone is assembled in Finland...

      The real problem is profit in an industry that's about cheaper cheaper cheaper faster faster FASTER!!!!11111 one one eleven.

      I'd still pay for something even if it costs a little more money like, let's say, 50 dollars.

      So what are the costs? Shipping ground materials? I mean hospitals are about to replace surgents with robotic arms (trials are about to start), so why can't an entire factory be automated? I means look at freaking Coca Cola; they produce cans with about less than ten people working in a factory.

      There is no excuse to produce in third world countries at all.

      --
      Here be signatures
    23. Re:Silence is golden by DarenN · · Score: 1

      Yes, triple their wages, causing massive inflation in China making the poor in China even worse off. You cannot dump wealth into an economy like that. The Russians tried it after the fall of the Soviey union and the result was so disasterous that they've ended up with an oligarchy and had to be grateful that a few people sucked up all the money because the economy was a mess.

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
    24. Re:Silence is golden by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Most Palms were made in Canada and their prices were comparable to the competition, or the phones of today. My current phone was made in SK and it costs about the same as an iPhone.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    25. Re:Silence is golden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smug advice coming from someone who's obviously using a computer. If we really "have to do without" you better never post here again or you're a slave driving hypocrite.

    26. Re:Silence is golden by CompMD · · Score: 1

      My employer, a large, multibillion dollar electronics company, doesn't play the game of outsourcing engineering or manufacturing. We make personal gadgets, and devices for cars, motorcycles, boats, and airplanes. Once we have sourced components, we control the development, manufacturing and distribution ourselves.

      For aircraft, all engineering and manufacturing is done in the US in our own facilities. A product goes maybe 1000 ft from the people who come up with the concept, to engineering, to manufacturing, to the warehouse for shipping. And we're the largest and most respected GA avionics manufacturer in the world.

      Our automotive electronics are engineered in several offices in the US, Germany, Romania, and Taiwan, with manufacturing in our own plant in Taiwan. These products constantly win awards for their quality.

      Marine electronics are engineered in the US and England, manufactured in our plant in Taiwan. Our marine chartplotters are regarded as the most advanced in the world.

      Personal gadgets for workouts, hiking, cycling, are all engineered in the US and manufactured in our plant in Taiwan.

      I chose to work here because it was an ethical company. I could have made more money somewhere else, but I knew that I wouldn't have as clean of a conscience. However, I have better benefits than everyone else I know in the area and in the industry, and the company has never had an unprofitable quarter in its entire existence (over 20 years). Its perfectly possible to be in the electronics industry, run a clean business, treat your employees well, and be profitable.

    27. Re:Silence is golden by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Yes, triple their wages, causing massive inflation in China making the poor in China even worse off. You cannot dump wealth into an economy like that. The Russians tried it after the fall of the Soviey unionand the result was so disasterous that they've ended up with an oligarchy and had to be grateful that a few people sucked up all the money because the economy was a mess.

      I'm a Russian who grew up during early 90s, when economic reforms happened. I can assure you that "triple their wages" was not involved, nor was "dumping wealth into an economy".

      The reason why we ended up with an oligarchy is because we rushed to privatize as much of state property as we could, so that the magical "invisible hand' would do its work and bring us all prosperity. Turned out that when you just sell stuff to highest bidder, with few checks, and rampant corruption, it ends up mostly in the hands of a very few people who then form the new financial elite, and proceed to exploit and wreck the rest of the population economically.

    28. Re:Silence is golden by marnues · · Score: 1

      I just came from the Victoria 2 game forum. For a game that is based on the rise of industrialization and globalization you would hope the players have an appreciation for complex systems. Their lack of understanding leads me to believe that most people think that macro-economics works exactly like micro-economics. I hold no faith for Slashdotters understanding this concept.

    29. Re:Silence is golden by marnues · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly what I want, but I'm of the belief that we should let that happen naturally. Artificially raising manufacturing wages will prevent many in the 3rd world from a job that could get them off the farm and into a modern life.

    30. Re:Silence is golden by marnues · · Score: 1

      By capitalists, do you mean the heads of the Communist Party?

    31. Re:Silence is golden by marnues · · Score: 1

      Historical anomaly not at all. The British populace did harp on their government to improve labor conditions all over the empire. Of course, that was a while ago. Chinese workers now have better conditions than British factories workers did then, let alone their colonial counterparts.

    32. Re:Silence is golden by ppanon · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Coca Cola cans probably haven't changed significantly in the last 30 years, beyond different paint stencils. Unfortunately, phones and portable computing devices like tablets have become almost as much fashion accessories as utilitarian devices, with model lines being revamped on at longest a yearly basis. That requires more frequent reconfiguration/reprogramming of any robotic production line. That requires expensive technical skills and associated fixed costs that are harder to recuperate over a short product life cycle than would using a big screen to show a few hundred cheap unskilled labourers how to perform a new process.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    33. Re:Silence is golden by icebraining · · Score: 1

      So not everyone is fired, just the majority of workers. That's much better.

  3. me! by retchdog · · Score: 5, Funny

    we offer a full line of consumer and professional electronics, athletic apparel, and soy products, all officially certified by the retchdog institute for unicorns and sunshine to be completely free of whatever it is you find objectionable. our modest markup of 1200% is necessary to ensure that only the finest managers, assistant managers, and assistants to assistant managers are hired from a competitive field of my friends and extended family.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    1. Re:me! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I want this post printed and framed. Simply awesome!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:me! by NIN1385 · · Score: 1

      This makes me sad.

      --

      If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
    3. Re:me! by retchdog · · Score: 1

      good. that means you have a soul.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  4. No one. by Elgonn · · Score: 1

    No one. Seriously. I don't think you can even make certain all the components of an OpenMoko device are clear of your standards.

  5. No such thing as ethical corporations by jehan60188 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's no such thing. Corporations aren't in the business of creating products in an ethical manner. They're in the business of making money by using the cheapest parts and labor possible.. If they could employ slaves, and get away with it, they would.

    1. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by Nursie · · Score: 2

      It doesn't mean there can't be.

      Firstly, the people within Corporations could stop acting like frakking arseholes all the time, and have some principles. And no, I don't care about the principles of capitalism, the people in charge absolutely can and should be blamed for being amoral bastards.

      Secondly, and we already see this in some arenas, consumers can start spending their money only with corporations they consider ethically sound. The effect of this would be that in order to slavishly follow the maximum available profit, corps would have to act ethically or be outcompeted by those that do.

      I know that both situations are a pipe dream, people care more about price than ethics and most business practices will not change and most people will not demand they do.

    2. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walmart buys lots of their merchandise from China and other third world countries. At the Walmart stores, the associates are often people who can not find a better job. They are paid low wages because most are just shelf stockers. There is lots of stress placed on lower level managers, and associates that work for them.

    3. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by WaterDamage · · Score: 1

      Not true, there are quite a few very good corporations that treat and pay their employees very well. We just tend to concentrate on the bad news. One prime example of the top of my head is Google.

    4. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can and do get away with it every day.

    5. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by zedrdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Valid assumption, wrong conclusion.

      Corporations are in the business of making money... and they have long realised one way of doing that was betting on upper-middle-class consumer guilt to pay a premium in exchange for some sort of vaguely-enforced "ethical business" seal-of-approval. It's a niche market, but a market nonetheless.

      Just look at Whole Foods' CEO: not exactly the hippy-dippy type, just a guy who realised there was a market to tap, and tap he did. Call it cynical (it definitely is), but some corporations will behave ethically, just as long as they can make a profit out of it.

    6. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how it works. They're in the business of making money PERIOD. If that means using more expensive parts and labor in order to prevent PR problems and plummeting sales, they will.

      Of course, that requires enough customers to demand it, which makes it entirely society's fault.

    7. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Corporations are simply amoral, because they're no more than intangible figments of our collective imagination (supported by law). The people running these corporations are responsible for restraining them to some semblance of a moral framework. Sadly, as corporations grow and layers of abstraction are glued together with market-speak, the ability of any single person to monitor their actions wanes. Therefore, slave mining in Africa to sweatshop assembly in Asia get overlooked, with profit incentive to not look too deeply and to shift culpability.

    8. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be more appropriate - and accurate - to claim that a corporation will behave ethically, just as long as the board of directors have some ethics?

    9. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by reasterling · · Score: 1

      One prime example of the top of my head is Google.

      What exactly does the top of your head look like?

      --
      "For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice" -- God
    10. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      What about Ben & Jerry's? Their ice cream is delicious!

    11. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by lkcl · · Score: 1

      but anyone who takes money in return for absolutely no rights in the ownership of their work *is* a slave^H^H^H^H^Hemployee.

    12. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by gutnor · · Score: 1

      That's the capitalistic rule: there will always be someone desperate enough to take a crappy job if there is not good alternative. And there will always be someone with little enough ethic or moral value to exploit a business opportunity as long as it is legal.

      People that hope that capitalism without strong regulation and social security will self-regulate and lead us to a better world are deluding themselves. Same as communism, that does not work, human nature prevents it.

    13. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no, ignorant so-called "Liberal" consumers are following fashion trends. They are perfectly happy to pay premium prices for packaging that contains politically correct language, and corporate business is more than pleased to provide this for them at the lowest cost and highest price that can be attained. Whole Foods is a perfect example: If you think they sell organic products produced via sustainable processes, think again. They and their whole industry have lobbied hard to get the right to use deceptive claims to market fashion food. These days "Natural" more or less means, "Exists in the space/time continuum and complies with the laws of physics therein." Organic? "Carbon based tissues forms built from DNA templates." I exaggerate slightly here - but project the trend and we are there literally, in about five years.

    14. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by Pope · · Score: 1

      Bought out by Unilever a few years ago.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    15. Re:No such thing as ethical corporations by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      He was kind enough to allow me to take a picture of his head.

  6. From whom can I buy? by c0lo · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    1. Re:From whom can I buy? by mirix · · Score: 1

      The ICs are still almost entirely made in the third world. Even when the dies are made somewhere with standards, they're usually packaged somewhere poorer.

      But then you can go further. Some poor bastard mined the tin and copper for the leads. Another processed the ore to raw metal, another stamped the sheet metal. Someone made chemicals for processing the ore, and making the epoxy. Someone trucked that stuff to the packaging facility. Chances are most of those people were working in pretty shitty conditions also.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
  7. DIY/Relativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have infinite time and money, and care not for features, build your own? [insert laughter]

    On a side note, how do you define ethical qualms?

    1. Re:DIY/Relativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You don't need unlimited time or money, you need to be well organized, know your needs precisely and be willing to learn and work hard.

      I run a small artisan bakery, and I not only build the shop from scratch, but I have also made all the equipment I need myself - including mixers, a rather hi-tech production line including a kneeder, dough laminator, rather complex dough proofer, shaper with corresponding loaders. I myself manage to produce about 500-600 items for about half a day, most of it long-rise bread. My ovens even report stuff on Twitter for my customers.

      Not only is everything DIY (including the cast aluminium boxes for the electronics), it is also cheaper than any alternative with similar capabilities and capacity I've been able to source. And it was all made in my backyard, with hand tools from recycled materials over a year, including the learning. I had never touched a shovel, a saw, a router, a milling machine or a soldering iron before that.

      If you want, you can do it, the problem is everyone wants to be a manager, and nobody wants to do the hard work.

    2. Re:DIY/Relativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a link ?

      I'm really interested to see this stuff.

    3. Re:DIY/Relativity by Surt · · Score: 0

      Not sure why you were modded troll. Possibly because you left out the part where you fabricated your own chips at the billion dollar fab in the 800K sq ft of your back yard in order to post to twitter.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:DIY/Relativity by c0lo · · Score: 1
      Please mod parent +Interesting (troll is definitely undeserved)

      This is not to say that parent can say that his shop is "guilt free" in this regard, as it doesn't show any assurance the cast aluminium boxes are made with ethical workforce practices.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    5. Re:DIY/Relativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to fabricate chips - most chips I use are produced in robotic factories in the developed world.

    6. Re:DIY/Relativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not to the equipment part. If you have specific questions I maybe can answer here.

    7. Re:DIY/Relativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cast it myself, and I'm using a DIY furnace. The fire-proof cement, the charcoal, the crucibles and the (recycled) aluminum ingots are all produced in a country with civilized labor laws. Not sure about the paint cans I used as a mold for the furnace though, these are suspect.

    8. Re:DIY/Relativity by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      He's a troll because he posted AC with some outlandish claims. Or the fact that he did mention he took a year, which is much longer than most can elect to be jobless, and left out the cost to buy the tools and materials to build a bakery from scratch, including all the internal workings.

  8. It's all about the money. by WaterDamage · · Score: 2

    Money talks, and we're all guilty in this rat race to the bottom for the lowest cost. When robotics and automation get good enough, even Foxconn exploited workers will be out of work. We're in the middle of a transition to full or almost fully robotic manufacturing, give it a few years, no one will have a job expect robot builders and service men to maintain them.

    1. Re:It's all about the money. by Stormthirst · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is a topic that goes around on ./ every now and then.

      When all the manufacturing etc is done by robots - surely the entire capitalist system will crash. The inherent nature of capitalism is to have a triangle - the wide base with people doing low paid jobs, the people who go to university and get a good education to get well paid jobs in the middle, and the 1%ers at the top.

      If you start messing with that triangle, won't the whole thing collapse?

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting there's anything inherently wrong with this system (buggy whip manufacturers etc) - but ...?

    2. Re:It's all about the money. by moortak · · Score: 2

      When technological changes occur faster in an economy than social changes you end up with massive social disorder. That was the whole issue with the Luddites. Their way of life was being changed by new technology faster than the social structures were changing. People reacted violently. In time social structures and people's views caught up with where the economy had moved and things settled down into a new pattern for a while. We may be due for another rough transition.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    3. Re:It's all about the money. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Uh huh. Have you ever wondered why the majority of people in North America (and not a small majority) work in the service industry, and only work 40 or so hours a week, when their ancestors had to work more or less constantly at food production just to eat?

      Increased mechanization means only that we'll work less and/or more of us will do luxury or useless jobs.

    4. Re:It's all about the money. by AdamWill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've replied to it before on slashdot, but no, that's a fallacy.

      There isn't some magic limited quality of labor that needs to be done, and once we replace all of that with robots, there'll be no work left for people to do any more. That fallacy has existed for hundreds of years. It never quite seems to happen, yet people persist with the belief.

      Couple hundred years ago, it was cotton weaving - see, hundreds of thousands of people used to work weaving cotton, then machines got invented that could perform the job much more efficiently. Surely this would result in there not being enough work for all those people! oh no!

      Well, in a very short timeframe that can happen, but over the long run it just doesn't work out that way. Why? We just keep inventing more work to do. There's no objective definition of 'work'. It's whatever you can get paid to do. Back in the age of manual cotton weaving, for instance, almost no-one made a living in the 'creative industries', which barely existed. Nowadays, tens of thousands of people make a good wage producing utterly unnecessary and frivolous TV shows. The key point is _there's a direct link between the two things_. Automate things that at present take hundreds of thousands of humans to do, and those hundreds of thousands of humans won't - over the long run - starve to death. We'll invent new stuff for them to do. That 'stuff' is frequently frivolous and entirely unnecessary - like television, or advertising, or professional sports, or pet grooming, or personal shopping...the reason all those ridiculous 'jobs' exist is _precisely_ because we've got so good at making the really essential tasks - farming, construction, health care, clothes manufacture, resource extraction, power generation etc - happen very efficiently that, once all of the above tasks are done for everyone in a reasonably developed country, there's still a *massive* potential labor surplus. Via the magic of the free market economy, instead of rationing all the essential labor and the results of that labor out equally so everyone works 5 hours a week and we all live a comfortable life by the standards of 1850, we instead invented a bewildering array of utterly unnecessary 'work' so most people can continue to 'work' 40 hours a week, and be rewarded with the opportunity to buy a crystal-encrufted cellphone, buy a shirt for their dog, and watch 2.5 Men on an HDTV. Ain't humanity great?

      This process can continue more or less indefinitely if we want it to. I see no particular limit to human ingenuity in inventing ridiculous new spheres of activity.

    5. Re:It's all about the money. by Surt · · Score: 1

      The capitalist system exists in order to position the 1% to do away with everyone else. As soon as the robots can build and repair themselves, they'll be tasked to make killbots.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:It's all about the money. by Githaron · · Score: 1

      Not indefinitely. When we reach the point where power is so cheap that it is essentially free and we then create a way to directly covert power to matter, the monetary system will no longer exist. I think when that happens people will strive for social standing and accomplishments instead.

    7. Re:It's all about the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't help but wonder if the energy used to make/run a recycling plant drives us closer to entropy than burying waste and digging up more resources. anyone?

    8. Re:It's all about the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What you've stated can be summarised as "When all basic labour jobs have been automated, those people will then be able to go on to other highly specialised jobs.

      If you can't see why that is flawed, then you need to rethink things a little.

      Let me try putting it another way:

      When all the unskilled work is automated, everyone will be able to become highly skilled engineers!

      Yes, even the blind, or those who just don't understand mathematics. Those with learning disabilities, who can grasp the material but can't apply it properly. Got spina bifida? No problem! You can be a sports superstar! Or an advertising executive! Or even a police officer!

      The human race is not a seething mass of clones, all with the same abilities and intellect. This is the key flaw in your capitalist utopia. There are people out there who just can't think like a mathematician, or a programmer, or an advertising executive.

      Get used to being wrong.

    9. Re:It's all about the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there is a limit to it - namely physical resources. To refactor your picture slightly, we spent the goldmine that is fossil fuels on developing frivilous technologies all because we're too neurotic to sit down and enjoy some peace when given the opportunity. Now we're coming up to the point where energy will be in a deficit and everyone's quality of life will drop. Just think, we could have developed renewable energy sources or put a man on mars or fed everyone in the world by now. We had unlimited energy (relative to how it was prior to fossil fuels) and squandered it on bullshit.

      Software development in business environments has taught me a great deal about life. One of the things I've learned is that the vast majority of people would rather eat the icing before the cake, and they suffer dearly for it. It's an epidemic of idiocy and it's everywhere you look. The dumbest people in our society are rewarded the most resources and are given the most decision making power. The most violent are put into positions of authority. The meek and enlightened cannot take up arms against this otherwise they will become part of the problem. It's a sad picture and I honestly hope that this is just a phase in our evolution. If it's not a phase then life truely is one big cosmic joke.

    10. Re:It's all about the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I can't help but wonder if the energy used to make/run a
      > recycling plant drives us closer to entropy than burying
      > waste and digging up more resources. anyone?

      I'll bite. It's a failure to consider the externalities. The easier-to-recycle-than-mine materials (e.g. Alum) displaces other mining which would cause more entropy than the recycling does. Or putting it another way, "the only thing which is 100% efficient is efficiency" -- in the margin between power-never-wasted 100% and optimal efficiency in a physical sense (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_window_fallacy
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_in_One_Lesson

    11. Re:It's all about the money. by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

      And when the resources run dry because we buried it all? What, dig it up again? Then what?? Oh yeah recycle it

    12. Re:It's all about the money. by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I would call the service industry useless, but whatever.

    13. Re:It's all about the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, the inherent nature of capitalism is aa race to the bottom--to feudalism if you will. The 'triangle' is distorted. You have a HUGE number of the working poor, a relatively few professional types and shop owners making up an anemic middle class, and a very small number of the very very rich. This is what free markets ALWAYS bring, just as conservative economic policies as practiced in the US always bring a bubble followed by a depression.

      The insanity lies with, well, lies. The lies that somehow it won't happen this time, we don't need unions and regulations (the things that hold the excesses in check). Just let the banksters and the multinationals do what they want and it'll be fine. It will. For the 1 percent. Everyone else is screwed.

    14. Re:It's all about the money. by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

      I think his point is that the people who would in the past have done labourers jobs, are now doing useless 'jobs' (NB: The quotes around jobs).

      These 'jobs' require no more intellect or skill than a labourer. Unfortunately (and I think frustratingly for those who *do* have intellect and skill) these 'jobs' get paid the same or better (see professional footballer).

      In England we're seeing a resurgence of plumbers and electricians earning a very good wage. This is mainly because Maggie Thatcher got rid of the apprentice systems back in the 80's which provided a lot of that kind of labour. The number of sparks and plumbers fell dramatically - and now there's a shortage. So much so that when Poland joined the EU, there was a big influx of Polish plumbers into Britain. (The exchange rate was very good, and if you believe the right wingers the Polish work harder).

      Does any believe we can go on converting these labourer jobs into more "creative" jobs (actors, pro-footballers etc)?

    15. Re:It's all about the money. by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Yep. I really hope I live to see the Star Trek Economy days.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    16. Re:It's all about the money. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Most of the service industry is luxury. Most of the useless jobs seem to be in finance, although a few of the four people it took to fill out a web form for my last expense claim are probably also superfluous.

    17. Re:It's all about the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That line of thinking works in a world with unlimited resources and unlimited power.

      We've been forrunate to live in a time of relatively low population compared to the vast resources we've been able to exploit. But we're entering a time of booming population and relative scarcity of resources and power.

      As water supply issues increase, power generation fails to meet demand and population continues to rise ever faster then it's a simple thing to realise that the growth we've enjoyed can't be maintained.

      Even if something like Tokamak can be made to work efficiently that doesn't help solve the resources problem beyond perhaps water (and by extension food production).

      If someone gives you a massive smorgasbord of food, it might seem like you can go on eating forever but you really can't.

    18. Re:It's all about the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think constant work is necessary for food production, you don't know how agriculture works. Is primitive agriculture hard work? Yes. Constant work? No. More than 40 hours a week? In some seasons, but not in others. The super long hours worked by our ancestors were worked by those in factories during the early industrial period.

    19. Re:It's all about the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All manufacturing can't be done by robots, because they are not capable of improving themselves. The only way around this is robots that reproduce, but the limiting factor is in purifying and forming metals, semiconductors, and plastics. They can't just eat a cellphone and absorb the nutrients.

    20. Re:It's all about the money. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You might not be out tilling the fields all the time, but you spend all your off hours cutting wood for heating, making tools, repairing tools, making clothes, repairing clothes, mending fences, rounding up animals, etc. Even most modern farmers work more than 40 hours a week. And yes, I grew up in a farming community.

    21. Re:It's all about the money. by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      Right, and also, 'creative' jobs were just an example. We've invented other jobs for the 'unskilled' - Wal-Mart greeter, for instance. Food service is a wonderfully flexible industry in terms of being able to scale with the supply of workers - most people still don't eat out anywhere near three times a day every day, but the richer the overall economy becomes, the more people trend that way, hence the more crappy low-wage food service jobs get created. There are various other similar fields which can always suck up a few more minimum wage staff - retail is another huge one.

      Note, some responders seem to be assuming I'm a mega capitalism cheerleader saying that this is all for the best in the best of all possible worlds. I'm not saying that, necessarily. I'm just saying that it seems to be what happens, in general, in most human societies: we don't ever say 'well, hey, this particular standard of living seems great, so let's aim broadly to have everyone hit that standard of living, and as time goes on, we'll each have to perform less and less work for all of us to hit that standard of living'. Which, after all, wouldn't be such a terrible outcome. Instead, we seem to keep inventing new luxuries and frivolities to allow us to continue to have a big rich/poor disparity, lots of 'work' for both the rich and the poor to do, and lots of truly ridiculous things for the rich to spend all their money on.

    22. Re:It's all about the money. by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      Oh, and before anyone objects, yes, it'd be perfectly possible to mechanize / automatize retail and food service. This has already happened, to some degree - you can buy all sorts of things from dispensing machines, and there are highly-automated restaurants around. But people will still pay for the 'privilege' of being served or sold to by another person; both for the intangibles of a human interaction and simply for the status of being seen to be served by another person. Even when a machine can perform a task as well as, or better than, a human, more efficiently and at a much lower cost, you will find humans who will pay a large amount extra simply for the knowledge that that task was performed by another human. That's another trend that never seems to die.

  9. Seriously? by Compaqt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is about as useful as asking who doesn't rely on semi-slave labor practices during the industrialization phase of the UK or US (no vacations, Pinkerton detective agency, strikebreaking, pittance wages, etc.).

    Look, this phase is messy, but necessary.

    They can't just start out with a "services" economy all styling each others' hair.

    They have to go through this phase, and it's certainly a step up from the near-starvation they had in the countryside. Then wages go up, slowly, but surely. Before you know it, Chinese will be asking about organic certification before they deign to go to work for a company.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Necessary? From one sample point in history?

      Give me a break, this is greed.

    2. Re:Seriously? by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Japan.

    3. Re:Seriously? by themusicgod1 · · Score: 0

      There is nothing necessary about human affairs.

      For starters, opening borders to allow for said workers to come into the developed world, and offering them free transportation to get there would be one step. Giving them free english/other language lessons and healthcare is another. Are these things we can afford? Both of those things would have huge impacts on the availability of labour at slave and low-wage conditions.

      For the cost of the global bank bailouts we could have done both of those things. For the cost of the bailouts yet to come, we may be able to do more. Now at this point it might be true that we are spent; in that case it should be a goal put on the immediate horizon that once we are able to, we should do something of this nature.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    4. Re:Seriously? by drnb · · Score: 1

      Japan.

      Nope. Japan was a controlled experiment. As part of the post-WW2 reconstruction the US assisted Japan's rebuilding and modernization of its industry and opened US markets to Japan as a form of economic support. Japan was subsidized and externally managed to a degree.

    5. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or we could just spend that money on actually educating a substantial portion of our own populace. The Chinese are more than happy to work for the wages they're getting. Let them.

    6. Re:Seriously? by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      it's not a question of 'let them'. if we don't buy the stuff they produce, that's a reasonable position; it's not through our agency that their labor is exploited. if we're buying the end products, though, we can hardly act as if we're in some kind of external observation position. it is _for us_ that the labor is being exploited. americans would not stand for american workers being treated the way chinese workers are, ditto canadians, brits, etc. why should it be okay for us to accept chinese workers being treated that way in order to produce the goods we consume?

    7. Re:Seriously? by menocu · · Score: 2

      Japan.

      Nope. Japan was a controlled experiment. As part of the post-WW2 reconstruction the US assisted Japan's rebuilding and modernization of its industry and opened US markets to Japan as a form of economic support. Japan was subsidized and externally managed to a degree.

      Ignorance on parade. The Japanese had industrialized well before WW2:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meiji_Restoration

      http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/japan/japanworkbook/modernhist/meiji.html

    8. Re:Seriously? by drnb · · Score: 1

      Japan.

      Nope. Japan was a controlled experiment. As part of the post-WW2 reconstruction the US assisted Japan's rebuilding and modernization of its industry and opened US markets to Japan as a form of economic support. Japan was subsidized and externally managed to a degree.

      Ignorance on parade.

      Yours. Do you need assistance with the phrase "rebuilding and modernization of its industry"? Are you aware that the topic of this thread is not whether industrialization merely occurred but when the more modern mode of industrialization with some worker protections came into existence and whether a nation can go from pre-industrialization to modern industrialization without going through the more primitive industrialization with severe worker exploitation? Do you understand that my comment argues that Japan did not skip exploitation?

      The Japanese had industrialized well before WW2:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meiji_Restoration

      That is not the issue. The issue is whether the industrialization process avoided serious exploitation of the worker. While a market based economy was adopted society remain semi-feudal. For example peasant farmers who could not pay taxes were forced to send their daughters to factories in the city and their daughters wages were used to pay the tax debt, plus interest, minus living expenses paid back to the employer. State repression was used to put down peasant and worker reform movements.

  10. it's the playing field, not the players by jdogalt · · Score: 2

    Fair labor practices are not something that takes care of itself via an Invisible Hand, be it that of Capitalism or of God. So long as the playing field tells the players that they can outsource slave labor, or even just significantly unfair labor (folks with nothing like 1st ammendment rights), then all players that chose not to do so will quickly lose and cease to exist. The only way to solve the problem (that I'm thinking of right now in full on rhetoric mode) is to have better national standards of who we do business with in the global international trade community. Put standards in place, and make it profitable for international actors to meet the improved standards. But as can be evidenced by opening your eyes in the morning and looking at the world, there will be a lot of political pressure against that path. But hopefully one day the incessant light - fueled by real freedom of speech and the press- shining on exploitive employers/slavers, will cause things to move in the right direction. I hope.

    1. Re:it's the playing field, not the players by Freddybear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Fair labor practices are not something that takes care of itself via an Invisible Hand, be it that of Capitalism or of God."

      Yes, actually, they do improve as a result of market conditions (the so-called invisible hand), when employers have to compete for workers in the marketplace. When there is a glut of labor applying for a few factory jobs, then yes, wages will be low and conditions will be poor. But then more manufacturers will build factories to take advantage of that cheap labor and the supply/demand situation will shift in favor of the workers.
      That is exactly what the "invisible hand" is about.

    2. Re:it's the playing field, not the players by jdogalt · · Score: 1

      I mentioned Invisible Hand, because, yes, I am versed in the theory, though some of the more important writings I may have most recently read 20 years ago in college. Without much certainty, I suspect that if I reviewed the classic texts, that I'd find most express what you expressed, though squarely in the realm where the various actors you mention, are all playing on a level capitalistic/legal field. When you start talking about international trade with key players that still call themselves communist, and actually do run very efficient factories with clearly not so rewarded workers (i.e. call it halfway from the 1st ammendment to slave labor)... then it becomes a different equation. Hence the subject of my comment- that the emphasis on the calculous at hand should be the rules of the playing field, and not the choices made within the rules by any particular players.

    3. Re:it's the playing field, not the players by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Yes, actually, they do improve as a result of market conditions (the so-called invisible hand), when employers have to compete for workers in the marketplace. When there is a glut of labor applying for a few factory jobs, then yes, wages will be low and conditions will be poor. But then more manufacturers will build factories to take advantage of that cheap labor and the supply/demand situation will shift in favor of the workers.
      That is exactly what the "invisible hand" is about.

      The problem with your argument is that it is contradicted by established facts.
      Specifically: the balance of power between labor and employers is unequal.

      I could give you a history lesson about employment levels and working conditions,
      but it's much simpler to use the 21st century as an example:

      Even today, with all our labor laws, companies still try to cheat employees out of overtime, equal wages,
      maternity leave, lunch breaks, bathroom breaks, safe working conditions, and anything else you can think of.

      Wal Mart is the lowest hanging on the tree of labor abuses, but it happens everywhere.
      I recall a series of articles on construction deaths in Las Vegas because of lax federal safety enforcement

      The USA tried "the so-called invisible hand" and all it got us was monopolies, unsafe food, substinence wages, and inhumane working conditions.
      I'm also willing to argue that "wages will be low and conditions will be poor" makes for shitty public policy, but that's another conversation entirely.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:it's the playing field, not the players by peppepz · · Score: 1
      This theory assumes that there are no barriers to entry for building new factories (false, only a few people on the planet have the economic resources required to build a microelectronics factory), that the number of factories is infinite (false, and instead of competing with each other, they will happily reach gentlemen's agreements between them), that the consumer is a rational and optimising entity (false, e.g. people line up in front of Apple stores before even knowing what their products are), does not take into account things such as the fact that people can not work for a wage lower than a certain level (even the Chinese will starve if not fed enough). And we haven't talked about real-life disturbances such as patents, scarcity of resouces, transportation costs and so on.

      The "invisible hand" does not exist more than the Carnot machine. It won't fix the workers' conditions.

    5. Re:it's the playing field, not the players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that China has over a billion potential workers, so it's gonna take some time for the supply/demand situation to shift. Secondly the Communist Party is slowing the shift down even further, refusing to implement and/or enforce basic human rights.

    6. Re:it's the playing field, not the players by Freddybear · · Score: 1

      The invisible hand is just as real as the laws of thermodynamics. Yes, there are inefficiencies. Markets do not optimize themselves overnight. But they do a far better job of optimizing for local conditions than any central planner has ever done. There are far more people who can create small businesses which can compete in a free market than there are who can overcome the artificial barriers to entry imposed by labor unions and government regulations.

      Government cannot fix the workers' conditions by regulating industry away from the natural market equilibrium without imposing grossly inefficient bureaucracy on the country, and also by the way creating major niches for corruption in the form of cronyism and rent-seeking. That kind of corruption is far more damaging to the economy than any unenforceable gentleman's agreement. Hello 21st Century crony capitalism.

      If you had read Adam Smith, you would know that he addresses the fact that people cannot work for a wage that is less than they require to sustain themselves and their families. That minimum wage is a natural fact of life which no government can override. If the government tries, all that happens is that the labor market responds by hiring fewer unskilled workers. Unions and government can no more alter that fact than they can legislate the laws of thermodynamics. If they try, they end up "shipping jobs overseas" instead.

      And yes, consumers are irrational. Individual behavior cannot be predicted. Apple computer has had its failures too. But a free market is a far more efficient way of optimizing than any central planner. Eight billion people making their own economic choices are far more capable of dealing with their own local conditions than any bureau full of technocrats.

      Those other "disturbances" you speak of are simply economic factors which take care of themselves naturally, as long as the locals have the ability to adjust to meet local conditions.

  11. General Chinese labor conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in China. It is worth noting that some of the conditions at Foxconn, while terrible by Western standards, are normal here.

    A Chinese friend worked as a waitress. She thought $400 a month (in a culture where there are no tips) was excellent money. Most meals and a bunk in a shared apartment provided. No heat, at a latitude where frost is moderately common.

    In at 9 am to do cleaning, work until after lunch, sleep in the afternoon, start again at 4:30 and work until closing which was usually about 11 but if customers wanted to stay later, some waitresses would have to stay until 2 or 3. No extra money for that. She got two days a month off, and thought that was generous, but a "day off" meant coming in at 4:30 instead of in the morning.

    1. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are opening a new plant in a less prosperous area. Salaries are going up as a result.
      http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90778/90860/7122397.html
      (People's Daily is a Party organ, some skepticism is required)

      And there are long queues for the jobs:
      http://www.itproportal.com/2012/02/01/despite-hash-conditions-thousands-line-up-to-get-a-job-at-foxconn/

    2. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This should be modded up to 6. The real issue, coming from a real person living in the real situation. The "problem" is that employee supply and employer demand meet at a point where the employees are living in what we consider poverty. Any attempt to modify the situation would worsen it. Pay artificially high wages, and too many employees want too few jobs, which invariably leads to corruption (gangsters taking a cut to get people jobs). Furthermore, another company will pay lower wages and get the job done for less, so the high paying employer goes out of business.

      We Americans talk about being "hungry", but that's not an expression in most other parts of the world, and those people want out jobs.

    3. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Clueless. It's a workers market. Wages are going up., and workers often change jobs for better pay and conditions.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by jginspace · · Score: 1

      Most meals and a bunk in a shared apartment provided. No heat, at a latitude where frost is moderately common.

      I'm not asking to be modded down and i'm not trying to be all Monty Python but ... if these bunks are arranged really spaciously they might need heating - depends on the latitude. If they're arranged anything like the standard for employee accommodation then body heat will take care of it. So which to choose? Just how bad is it?

      Let's hear some balanced accounts of conditions in these places. As you said, your friend thought this was a decent job.

    5. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Kenja · · Score: 1

      So its normal for over a hundred workers to threaten mass suicide in protest over the working conditions?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    6. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Well, the Europeans used to whip children to death sometimes as an example in american and canadian sweatshops to ensure that quotas were met. Let's not forget, union rules and union-breakers back not more than 100 years ago. Where people were lynched over it. So, for people to threaten mass-suicide? Sure.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by afabbro · · Score: 2

      She thought $400 a month (in a culture where there are no tips) was excellent money.

      I don't know why people always quote things in dollars-per-month. That is meaningless. When I was in Russia in the late 90s, bus fare was less than 5 cents in the city I was in. At the same time it was $2 in the U.S. I took a family of 8 out to dinner with four courses, vodka, champagne, the works - $25. That would have been $200 in the U.S. Of course, the head of household was only making $300/month - but what did his $300 equate to? Hard to say, given the difference in socialization, piracy, etc. Want a new laptop in Russia (then)? Expensive. Want a pound of beef? Very cheap.

      You can't compare dollar incomes to living standards like that.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    8. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      AC was referring to his friend who is a waitress having a shared apt with a bunk, not factory workers in a dorm. A shared apt is not going to have a sufficient quantity of people in it to talk about the body heat warming the place.

    9. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Sneeka2 · · Score: 2

      This!

      I work in Japan and am making twice the money I made last time I worked in Europe, but a disproportionally large part of it goes down the drain for housing and food. I am not buying any more or less gadgets at the end than I did back then, even though I live in roughly the same conditions (arguably worse housing actually) and get more money.

      The waitress gets RMB2500 (or thereabouts), not US$400.

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    10. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by peppepz · · Score: 1

      When I was in Russia in the late 90s, bus fare was less than 5 cents in the city I was in.

      And this means that Russia in the 90s was very poor. I also live in a relatively poor area, and prices here are much lower here than in the richest parts of the country. This means that we won't starve, not that we're rich. A dollar is a dollar everywhere in the world.

      You can't compare dollar incomes to living standards like that.

      Let's make an internal comparison. The iPhone in China costs 5,000 yuan (793 $). The wages at Foxconn start at $130. Therefore a Chinese has to work at Foxconn for slightly more than six months, without eating, dressing himself, getting sick, buying gasoline, only to buy the phone he builds.

    11. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by jginspace · · Score: 1

      She thought $400 a month (in a culture where there are no tips) was excellent money.

      I don't know why people always quote things in dollars-per-month. That is meaningless. When I was in Russia in the late 90s, bus fare was less than 5 cents ...

      I'm guessing you had the phrase Purchasing Power Parity on the tip of your tongue.

    12. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, people can be brainwashed. This just proves that "generosity" is a relative term. If you grow up being told that you will have to work 16 hour days, with no time of, for 200$ a month, for the rest of your life; then I guess 400$ a month with 2 1/2 days off might seem like a really good deal.

      But that doesn't make it a good deal.

      Thats like a slave who is just to being whipped thinking he's living the american dream when he gets sold to someone who doesn't use the whip.

    13. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

      That's a much more useful comparison. But what about everyday expenses? Does that worker have to eat scraps from the street or can he afford an average, decent (Chinese) meal? And consider that housing and food seems to be mostly provided by Foxconn. Can he buy average clothes at about the average rate as other Chinese? Can he go to the cinema every once in a while, or whatever else young Chinese like to do? Just that he can't afford a luxury item doesn't necessarily mean he's much poorer off than the average Chinese in jobs of similar levels, and that's really what matters. What are his actual expenses and how much does he actually get to keep for his own use? How much of that is tax? The average American factory line worker probably also couldn't afford a new iPhone every month.

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    14. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 out of every 10000 threatened "mass" suicide. Perspective is an honest thing.

      WHY U NO HONEST?

    15. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it's "normal" doesn't mean it's humane or conducive to living a happy and fulfilled live.

      Hell, having to work 8-10 hrs/day x 5 days/wk with only about 7 days/yr off (outside of designated holiday times) is shitty enough.

      Your Chinese waitress friend--what are her hopes and dreams? Where is her free time? Is there someone "at the top" who is making a profit from her labors? That's really the crux of it--if you are slaving YOUR life away so that someone else can enjoy THEIR life, then it's not fair. But if you all must slave your lives away just to survive, then it's necessary.

    16. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I work in China. It is worth noting that some of the conditions at Foxconn, while terrible by Western standards, are normal here.

      A Chinese friend worked as a waitress. She thought $400 a month (in a culture where there are no tips) was excellent money. Most meals and a bunk in a shared apartment provided. No heat, at a latitude where frost is moderately common.

      The difference between a waitress and a Foxconn factory worker is that waitress produces goods that are consumed by other people in the same economy. Their income level is the same as hers (or rather, is computed from the same baseline). The factory workers are paid by Chinese standards, but the products they make are sold in Western economies, and paid for by money earned according to Western standards. That creates a severe disparity, and the difference goes right into the pocket of companies who exploit this scheme.

    17. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

      Uhm, yes. No. Wait. What are we complaining about again?

      Ah right. Won't anybody think of the children?!

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    18. Re:General Chinese labor conditions by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There aren't good standards for comparing standard of living. iPhones are similarly priced in China as the US, so $400 a month to an American would mean over two months salary for an iPhone. And that'd be about right. Sure, food is less, but barely making minimum is not what's being looked at. Maybe what you want is monthly pay - poverty line. Take the average monthly pay, then subtract out the reasonable minimum for a person to find a place to live and put food on the table. Because, aside from that, most other things are remarkably similar in price.

  12. No slaves please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry, corporate overlord here. Slaves require room, board, clothes, etc. provided for them. It doesn't come free. It's much much better now underpaying non-slaves, as people line up to replace them.

    Keep complaining though, but make sure not to change your lifestyle at all. Because that works.

    1. Re:No slaves please. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      um, no.
      You might want to look at the history of corporate behavior in unregulated/low regulated societies through out all of history.

      I deal, they pay for boarding and good. Or force a company store; which is the same thing as slavery.

      Slave doesn't equate to no pay. Slaves can get paid, but then be forced to pay their employer room and board, and force them to use the company store.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:No slaves please. by afabbro · · Score: 1

      um, no. You might want to look at the history of corporate behavior in unregulated/low regulated societies through out all of history.

      All of history? I think you'll find the first 6,000 years or so of human existence to be a very fast read on this subject, since corporations didn't exist until the Romans and arguably not in an identifiable form comparable to modern corporations until well after the Renaissance.

      So as geekoid would say, "um, no."

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    3. Re:No slaves please. by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I see in most of the stories that Foxconn workers live in company dorms, but I have yet to see mentioned whether those are provided for free, or if they are factored into the wages/benefits of the the employee. i.e. does an employee who lives close enough to the factory to not use the dorms receive the same wages as one who does use them?

    4. Re:No slaves please. by Niko. · · Score: 1

      check out "Walmart: the High Cost of Low Price", parts of which were filmed at such a Chinese factory. interviewed workers said they pay a utilities fee regardless, but if they choose other housing they don't get charged rent. wages identical either case.

  13. Moral Panic by Nicknamename · · Score: 0

    And again, moral panic.

    --
    Hitler hates pedophiles.
  14. Does assembly count? by el_tedward · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a laptop from System76. I know they at least assemble their stuff in Americuh. And they support teh linux too, so thats cool.

    1. Re:Does assembly count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering they use parts manufactured by Foxconn, most likely not.

  15. Dumpsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's unfortunate, but the only ethical source of most electronics these days is other peoples trash.

    1. Re:Dumpsters by Kenja · · Score: 1

      It's unfortunate, but the only ethical source of most electronics these days is other peoples trash.

      Buying used wold apply under the same logic. Which is what I do for totally unrelated reasons.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  16. Free-Range Smartphones by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have this hookup in Napa Valley which supplies me with free-range electronics. It comes from a commune where they manufacture phones and laptops using sustainable, cruelty-free paleo techniques. Their R&D division is an ayuhuasca hut.

    1. Re:Free-Range Smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work there! There was this chick who used to go on and on about how paleo people used to use carbon soot-based suspensions and feather shafts to digitize information on dried wood-pulp sheets ... she was bat-shiat insane, of course, and kept trying to get the other guys to use organic solder and spun wool PCBs, but seriously, I mean we all communed with mother Gaia and wanted to be as green as we could, so in the end we had to push her into a polymer recycling tank -- she wound up as really cool pink phone casings and I think she would have liked that.

  17. "..from whom can I buy it without ethical qualms?" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Someone with very high prices. (Or you could do without...)

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  18. I know one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear Acme Slide-Rules in Burlington treats their employees very well.

  19. It is like getting customer service... by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1

    on an airline.
    As a country we aren't willing to pay extra for good service on an airline - it is all about who has the lowest fair on expedia/priceline/... not which brand has good customer service. As a country we are not willing to pay for extras like good customer service, quality, or good business practices. Anyone old enough when the big selling point of walmart was "Made in America"? It was great - walmart was great - jobs were great... Then it was time to lower prices - either by breaking the labor force in the USA or shipping manufacturing somewhere "cheaper". Now walmart requires suppliers to have a plan to manage their manufacturing in China... No more Made in the USA there.
    It is a shame isn't it.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:It is like getting customer service... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      If it makes you feel any better, the Chinese feel the same way about air travel. They only want to spend as little as possible. This known fact is backed up by a little known domestic airline inside China called SSS. It's the largest and fastest growing. I've taken several flights. You get a single bottle of water and all meals are bought on the plane. Halfway through the flight, the flight attendants will walk down the isle with a cart advertising all sorts of crap to sell. As an American, I find that to be some funny shit going on. It's like they're owned and operated by the Ferengi.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:It is like getting customer service... by bre_dnd · · Score: 1
      You got a bottle of water? Fly RyanAir.

      Great airline if you feel a need to stock up on Irish lottery tickets, sandwiches, cheap perfume, toys. They won't stop paddling you stuff from the second they're in the air until landing sets in.

      Those tickets are cheap, but it's incredibly hard to compare their price. The sticker price is not the real price because of "add-on luxuries" -- there's extra fees for online check-in, luggage, paying by creditcard -- and you only get the "final" price once you're 80% thru the booking process.

      As a kid, flying felt like a glamorous way to travel. Airports were exotic places you could go to to watch planes come in from foreign lands.

      My kids haven't flown yet.

    3. Re:It is like getting customer service... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Modern air travel is like being on a bus with wings. There was even idea floating around the industry of stand-up seating to cram even more people into a plane. The concept would work well for flights between Houston and Dallas where the average flight time is 40 minutes. But really? Now they want something closer to a flying subway car?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  20. Look down. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Okay, there on the left is Manuel. There on the right is Palmer. They will work for you as hard as you want them to, and nobody can accuse you of being a slave driver. That said, I think that a large fraction of customers, given the choice, would not buy slavery tainted products. That is one thing that has held me back on the more expensive Raspberry PI: the concern that Chinese manufacture may be tainted. But typically speaking, it is the profit maximizing stores that eliminate your options.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:Look down. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      That is one thing that has held me back on the more expensive Raspberry PI: the concern that Chinese manufacture may be tainted.

      Also that they do not take orders yet.

    2. Re:Look down. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      your sig has a syntax error. Even in old style C.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Look down. by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

      lol the lack of the ';' got to me too.

    4. Re:Look down. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      your sig has a syntax error. Even in old style C.

      The problem is with your assumption that his signature is C, which requires a terminator. It could be perl, where the semicolon is a separator, not a terminator. Sure, it looks like C, but doesn't have to be.

      Personally, I like pascal, where the addition of a superfluous separator is an error. It keeps programmers on their toes, and cuts down on copy/paste errors!

  21. no, it's not necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    it has never been necessary. there is nothing about the manufacture of electronics, or anything else, that requires

    1. not paying wages
    2. raping employees
    3. dumping toxic waste into drinking water
    4. 80 hour work weeks

    etc etc etc. there are ways to produce goods without any of these things. the most productive nation on earth in the 20th century was the united states, and it was largely unionized labor with labor rights and relatively high wages. the only people who think 'slavery = prodcutivity' are people who think the old south was a nice place.

    1. Re:no, it's not necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Way to fail reading comprehension -- or was it just historical awareness?

      The US in (most of) the 20th centuryhad already gone through the stage he mentions -- citing it to say that transitional stage is unnecessary is no argument at all. Now if you could cite someplace that has become industrialized without any workers' rights issues, that might make your point -- but I'm unaware of any such example, because AFAIK it always does happen. (Not to say it must happen, as GP asserts -- I hope you can comprehend the distinction).

    2. Re:no, it's not necessary by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there are ways to produce goods without any of these things. the most productive nation on earth in the 20th century was the united states

      And it got that way by being the United States in the 19th century. Crack a history book.

    3. Re:no, it's not necessary by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      the fact that some economies went through a certain system of development does not somehow make it inevitable that all economies must go through the same system of development. as other commenters have said, that's just an easy sop to conscience.

    4. Re:no, it's not necessary by peppepz · · Score: 1
      And who was the foreign investor that forced people in the USA to work like slaves or starve, in the 19th century?

      United States in the 19th century were developing themselves. China is being exploited by already developed nations who have no reason to resort to slavery, but greed. Don't make it appear as an inevitable law of nature.

    5. Re:no, it's not necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the US began and has been so far always without pollution, poor working conditions, and low wages? I'm sorry it seems you haven't noticed that China is not as advanced as the US in this department. Did you forget that America heavily used child labor to succeed in the industrial revolution? And with complete disregard for their safety.

    6. Re:no, it's not necessary by menocu · · Score: 1

      And who was the foreign investor that forced people in the USA to work like slaves or starve, in the 19th century?

      United States in the 19th century were developing themselves. China is being exploited by already developed nations who have no reason to resort to slavery, but greed. Don't make it appear as an inevitable law of nature.

      First, you've made an assumption about foreign investment in American industry in the 19th century that is false. In fact, it was fairly extensive.

      Regardless, the point does not seem to be so much about who is doing the exploiting, but about the exploitation itself.

      The theoretical justification for saying this is "natural" (not inevitable, surely) is that productivity increases as capital accumulates. This is what makes increases in workers wages possible, i.e. without increasing output per worker, it's not *possible* for the average "slice" to increase in size. As capital accumulates, the possibility of higher workers' wages becomes a reality (even greedy firms have the *incentive* to pay workers the value of their marginal products, which, if capital has accumulated, has increased. All this is in those books too, look it up!

    7. Re:no, it's not necessary by peppepz · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. Are you suggesting that the Chinese get paid too little because they're not productive? People who work almost for free, and eat and sleep almost in the same rooms where they work?
      Are you suggesting that Apple can't pay the Chinese enough because they can't afford better means of production for they've accumulated not enough capital, when they have a market cap of 450 billions $?
      In order for the "slice" to increase in size, they only need to move cake from the large slices that investors and managers keep for themselves, into the infinitely tiny slices that are given to people who actually build the products that make the company rich. For example by making them work in factories that don't explode.

    8. Re:no, it's not necessary by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      The fact that all known post-industrial economies went through the same system of development does somehow put the onus on you with your extraordinary claim that it somehow magically isn't necessary for China.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    9. Re:no, it's not necessary by peppepz · · Score: 1

      No, I still need a better translation. The employers of those people are rich. In fact, they're filthy rich. They live in America, are American-rich and therefore can afford to pay American-sized salaries.

    10. Re:no, it's not necessary by Phydidus · · Score: 1

      there are ways to produce goods without any of these things. the most productive nation on earth in the 20th century was the united states

      And it got that way by being the United States in the 19th century. Crack a history book.

      In fact, China will probably skip quite a few phases of the development cycle, with working conditions evolving faster than they have in OECD nations. The average wage for someone working in manufacture tripled in ten years (from 1995 to 2005), which is a ridiculous amount when you consider how much the sector grew during that period. And aside from systematic raping of employees (I Lol'd) the USA (as the European nations and Japan) did ALL of the above during industrialization. By the way, us people in finance most of you revile so dearly still work 80 hours a week. On average.

  22. Copyrighted marking scheme by hwstar · · Score: 2

    There are UL, CSA and CE marks which go on equipment which convey "This product was tested and found to be reasonably safe". There could also be a mark which goes in the product documentation and on the nameplate which is recognisable by consumers who are concerned about exploitation of workers. The safety marks require bi-annual inspections of the factory and also the submission of objective evidence that the product was manufactured with all the safety critical components in place. The same thing could be done with the supply chain for a procut all the way up to final assembly similar to what has been done with RoHS

    Maybe the EU could incorporate this requirement right into the existing CE mark. If you then wanted to sell your product in the EU, you would have to prove that it was manufactured in a way which did not exploit workers throughout the entire supply chain. This would never happen in the US, though, as the Corps control the government there, and there is a culture of only caring about the price and not about the workers who made the product.

    1. Re:Copyrighted marking scheme by mirix · · Score: 1

      Problem with this is - I see the CE mark on many devices that (yes, [citation needed]) I'm almost entirely sure have not been tested, and don't qualify for CE/TuV/UL/etc. Random worthless electronics from china on ebay, for example.

      That testing isn't cheap, you know.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
  23. sparkfun by decora · · Score: 1

    sparkfun iirc has some interesting stories on their site where they visit China and the lines that make some of their stuff. note: its not foxconn.

    you can also buy used.

  24. university does not = job skills tech needs appren by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    university does not = job skills tech needs apprenticeship for lot's of IT jobs and not just CS. No we need more tech school. Lot's of people are going to university not learning what they need to do a job and end up working at McDonalds or walmart with big loans to pay back.

  25. Pinball Games Are made in the USA by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Pinball Games Are made in the USA by hand.

    1. Re:Pinball Games Are made in the USA by mirix · · Score: 1

      <STRONG> Hand assembled in AMERICA. </STRONG>

      <font class="miniscule">(using components manufactured in the third world)</font>

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    2. Re:Pinball Games Are made in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh I see you took the MGC pinball tour too.

  26. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best of the worst when it comes to manufacturing, and at least the engineering work is done here and not overseas. We don't have a lot of success in electronics engineering in the consumer space anymore...

  27. The sad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that I remember reading an article about steve jobs discussing why products like the ipod will never be produced in america quoting that it would represent a 25% increase in costs and hence price. Personally I'd pay the difference if it meant people didn't commit suicide because of my ipod. I honestly would never buy from apple etc again if i had an alternative like that.

    1. Re:The sad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You remember reading it, too bad you didn't remember any of the reasons.

      The answers, almost every time, were found outside the United States. Though components differ between versions, all iPhones contain hundreds of parts, an estimated 90 percent of which are manufactured abroad. Advanced semiconductors have come from Germany and Taiwan, memory from Korea and Japan, display panels and circuitry from Korea and Taiwan, chipsets from Europe and rare metals from Africa and Asia. And all of it is put together in China.

      In part, Asia was attractive because the semiskilled workers there were cheaper. But that wasn’t driving Apple. For technology companies, the cost of labor is minimal compared with the expense of buying parts and managing supply chains that bring together components and services from hundreds of companies.

      For Mr. Cook, the focus on Asia “came down to two things,” said one former high-ranking Apple executive. Factories in Asia “can scale up and down faster” and “Asian supply chains have surpassed what’s in the U.S.” The result is that “we can’t compete at this point,” the executive said.

      Another critical advantage for Apple was that China provided engineers at a scale the United States could not match. Apple’s executives had estimated that about 8,700 industrial engineers were needed to oversee and guide the 200,000 assembly-line workers eventually involved in manufacturing iPhones. The company’s analysts had forecast it would take as long as nine months to find that many qualified engineers in the United States.

      In China, it took 15 days.

    2. Re:The sad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple’s executives had estimated that about 8,700 industrial engineers were needed to oversee and guide the 200,000 assembly-line workers eventually involved in manufacturing iPhones. The company’s analysts had forecast it would take as long as nine months to find that many qualified engineers in the United States.

      That's a lie. They'd never make them by entirely hand in the US but it's convenient for justification I suppose.

    3. Re:The sad thing by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you want your workers to not commit suicide, the US is a bad choice. The suicide rate in the US is higher than Foxconn already. Moving production here would likely result in an increase in suicidal workers, not a decrease. The average American is more likely to commit suicide than the mistreated Foxconn workers.

      There never was a high rate of suicides at Foxconn. They just have so many workers that a cluster of suicides is enough for the liars to come out of the woodwork and confuse those who don't understand statistics.

  28. You're avoiding the obvious here by atari2600a · · Score: 1

    ALL of the crap you buy is made by slave labour in one form or another. Clothes, coffee, chocolate, hell even VW used der juden before the allied liberation / pastoralization of West Germany...

  29. Robot Overloards Come forth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nearly everyday I see examples of cheap effective robotics doing the same kinds of tasks as those chinese workers. Why don't we just automate the whole process I can't imagine that it wouldn't be far cheaper and more efficient in the long run. .

  30. It's very simple by musixman · · Score: 1

    It's real simple, If you don't like Apple's policies don't use or buy their products (that's called being a man). instead you bitch on your Macbook Pro's about how they are mistreating the employees & make a stand on an internet messaging board. If Microsoft pulled the shit Apple is right now they would have been anti-trusted into bankruptcy... drink the kool aid BTW, I used a mac to post this.

    1. Re:It's very simple by ETEQ · · Score: 0

      (that's called being a man).

      You know, women buy things too. And plenty of them put their money where their mouth is.
       
      Try to avoid misogynistic language... Whether you think you're joking or not, this stuff really matters (probably a lot more than which computer you buy...).

    2. Re:It's very simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sticking up for what you believe in despite all opposition is widely considered to be a manly attribute. Unless you consider masculinity to be a negative, in which case fuck you. I like to decorate and look at beautiful things, which are feminine in nature and I'm a man. Does doing womanly things make me less of a man?

      What happened to balance and moderation and a division of attributes? We don't mean to imply that a woman can't do some things, all we mean to imply is that certain things are more masculine and certain things are more feminine. A person is composed of both attributes.

    3. Re:It's very simple by Surt · · Score: 1

      Nah, if a man does it, it is indeed a virtuous, manly choice. If a woman does it, it's probably just the PMS talking.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:It's very simple by afabbro · · Score: 1

      Try to avoid misogynistic language.

      Nowhere do the OP even remotely imply hating women. You are taking an extreme term and using it in an inappropriate context.

      Ted Bundy was a misogynist. Someone who says it's manly to stand up for your beliefs is not. Someone who says such a person is a misogynist is either an idiot or trying to impress feminists in freshmen Women's Studies discussion sessions. Given the time to acclimate, I would guess second half of the year...like, say, February

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    5. Re:It's very simple by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I can imagine this in 1860. It's real simple: if you don't like slavery, just don't use or buy cotton products! The invisible hand of the market will take care of things!

  31. Intel by greenmars · · Score: 1

    Intel seems to have good labor practices: With the exception of Ricoh, Intel and Motorola Mobility, the IT industry earns dismal grades when it comes to sustainability and social practices, averaging about a D+, Oekom Research AG says in a new report. http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2011/12/19/it-industry-gets-d-green-policy-labor-practices

    1. Re:Intel by wmelnick · · Score: 1

      Intel's motherboards are made by Foxconn. No different than Apple, or for that matter Acer, Dell, Cisco/HP, Gateway, Motorola, Nintendo, Nokia, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba and Vizio

    2. Re:Intel by MarioMax · · Score: 1

      Intel processors are (mostly) made in the USA. Chinese labor practices don't fly in Intel's American fabs.

    3. Re:Intel by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Just because they are made by the same companies does not make them the same.

      Also, I don't think foxconn makes Asus MB

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Intel by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Ty for info about Asus :) Made my good list :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Intel by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

      Maybe not by Foxconn but it was made in China. Picked out the first ASUS motherboard on newegg and found "PCB Made In China" in the first place I looked. Top right corner by the back panel connections

    6. Re:Intel by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      He never mentioned Asus. And yes, they aren't the same. Apple workers at Foxconn are better paid and better cared for than the Intel workers at Foxconn.

  32. Re:"..from whom can I buy it without ethical qualm by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Someone with very high prices. (Or you could do without...)

    Like apple?

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  33. Not so fast... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    If I want to buy a new tech gadget, from whom can I buy it without ethical qualms?"

    I'd love to hear from some of these workers before deciding what those ethical qualms are. I'm all for helping them out, but it'd be nice for them to ask. Afterall, we don't want to cause them to lose their jobs.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:Not so fast... by arose · · Score: 1
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:Not so fast... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've talked to some such workers. They are happy to have a job that isn't working the family farm with 18 hour days of hard labor. They make nothing but manage to save a surprisingly large amount because they are mostly "happy" working at work, eating in the company cafeteria, then sleeping at work in the company dorms and saving all the cost of bus fare or food to add to the savings. They are saving for different things (send home, start a college, start a business, move to a foreign country, and more), but they are managing to save. Some even save enough to get some return on foreign investments.

  34. That's not capitalism. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    No, the triangle works against the free market by consolidating power into the hands of a few people who are then able to control the market. In reality the free market would work better if everyone were on a more equal footing, since it requires people have the ability to negotiate a fair price for themselves. Not that I believe that will happen, but it's important to understand that the people who oppose that are actually opposing the free market.

    1. Re:That's not capitalism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is, a truly free (i.e., unregulated) market runs the risk of devouring itself. Businesses are interested in competition only when they are not on top. Once a company gains dominance in a market, it spends a lot of its energies eliminating competition through any means necessary. Ultimately you may end up with a monopoly or oligopoly (with attendant price fixing, stagnation of innovation, and reduced quality of goods and/or services). Look at the U.S. -- it seems that every time an industry is deregulated, ostensibly for the purposes of engendering competition, consolidation (not competition) results.

  35. Ethical Smethical... by BenJCarter · · Score: 1
    Where can I get gear that isn't potentially riddled with Chinese malware?

    Paranoid, or not paranoid enough?

    --
    For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. - Publius
  36. Easy... by zedrdave · · Score: 1

    Look for the one that costs 3 times the price of those other $100-a-month-Chinese-factory-produced gadgets...

    Funny thing is: you (and most other people living in Western countries) would probably not mind so much paying that difference, had their wages not stagnated or downright sunk (relative to inflation and overall cost of life), in part due to all manufacturing jobs getting outsourced to low-paying countries. OK, nevermind: it's not particularly funny.

    1. Re:Easy... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's not funny, because it's the crux of the issue. The present "free trade" scheme is basically funneling money from Western economies to China. But, what's worse, the companies that sit on the pipe pocket most of that money for themselves!

      Suppose a US worker was producing a gadget and paid $7.25 per hour (federal minimum wage... almost certainly more than that in practice), or around $1200 per month. Now he's replaced with 2-3 Chinese factory workers - so few because, while their productivity is much lower, they work 12-14 hours a day rather than merely 8 - and they are each paid $200 or so per month (again, being generous here - the real figure is closer to $180), for a total of $600. Where did the remaining $600 go? Well, part of it was used to make the product cost $100 less than the equivalent product manufactured in US would be, to undercut local competition who didn't outsource yet. The rest goes into the coffers of company that manufactured it and the one that sold it - and, in fact, in Apple/Foxconn arrangement, most of it goes to Apple.

      And note that this is comparing the lowest wage in U.S. to the one that's middle of the road in China. If you compare real figures, it's even more obvious. One could argue that cost of living in China is lower, too, but it's not that much lower, and you have to account for the extra hours worked, too - so even in relative cost-of-living-adjusted wages, the job became much "cheaper" when it was outsourced, and not for the benefit of workers on either side of the border.

  37. IBM POWER servers by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    They're probably the last bastion of American computer assembly - I believe you can actually get an option code that certifies that an IBM POWER machine is made in the US of US components, even, intended for national security applications.

    1. Re:IBM POWER servers by Elbereth · · Score: 1

      IBM has plants in Albany, NY. They used to have more of them in New York, but they ended up getting shut down. Poughkeepsie and Binghamton, in particular, were hard hit.

      It used to be that there were a few people left manufacturing in the USA, but IBM is pretty much it, now. First they went to Taiwan, and then the Taiwanese companies went to China. Pegatron, the former manufacturing division of Asus (now an independent supplier that sells to Asus), has 80% of their workforce in mainland China. While I'd like to believe that Pegatron treats their employees better than Foxconn, it's probably just not true. Have you seen the prices of Asus' hardware lately? Most of their stuff is amazingly competitive. Back in the mid-to-late 90s, Asus commanded a 50% to 100% premium over the competition. Nowadays, it's a $5 premium. On one hand, I'm glad that technology is so affordable, but I feel dirty even thinking about upgrading my PC. Everything is so cheap, but the prices are cheap because of virtual slave labor.

      We can wring our hands and feel guilty, but nothing is really going to change unless we put serious pressure on these multinational corporations and their suppliers. The workers, too, are going to have to stand up to their fascist leaders, and I doubt that the poor and hungry Chinese workers much feel like it. Their country is going through a really difficult time, and I don't think there's any easy solution. The industrial revolution in America and Europe was a horrible period, and I doubt the Chinese will have any easier of a time. The best thing we can do is to keep up the pressure, so that the companies can't just ignore the workers.

      In the mean time, if you're worried about the morality, you'll probably have to decide for yourself whether it's better to buy products made in a sweatshop and provide income for the workers... or to boycott the products and cause the sweatshops to not hire any desperate workers. Like everything else in life, there are no clear answers. Anyone who claims to have universal answers to morality is a con man.

    2. Re:IBM POWER servers by afabbro · · Score: 1

      They're probably the last bastion of American computer assembly - I believe you can actually get an option code that certifies that an IBM POWER machine is made in the US of US components, even, intended for national security applications.

      Interesting. Does that extends down to the source of all the raw materials?

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    3. Re:IBM POWER servers by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

      Of course not, American simply doesn't have most of the raw materials (ie: rare earth metals, which China has a lot of)

    4. Re:IBM POWER servers by greghodg · · Score: 1

      This doesn't make sense to me. How much manual labor is involved in manufacturing a motherboard? I would assume it's practically zero. Do chinese pick and place machines work for less than american ones? If anything, it ought to be cheaper to make in the US with sufficient automation.

  38. Taiwan by fragMasterFlash · · Score: 1

    It wasn't all that long ago that the worlds manufacturing floor for PC components was Taiwan rather than mainland China. Anyone care to contrast the current working conditions in China to those in Taiwan 10 years ago?

    1. Re:Taiwan by siddesu · · Score: 2

      Working conditions in Taiwan 10 or 15 years ago were much better than China today IMHO. In 1997, the Taiwanese had already had their first truly democratic elections, working conditions were tolerable mostly everywhere, there was already a national medical insurance plan and some social security in place, there were rather strict labor safety laws, environment pollution laws, etc.

  39. Impossible to answer by ukoda · · Score: 2

    Depending on your standard there is probably none. I have spent a lot of time in China over the last couple of years and have visited quite a few factories. The working conditions vary of course but general the higher quality the product the better the factory is made in. I guess the attention to details that make a better product are also more like to make a better work environment. The quality of our product is our reputation which is why we now have our own factory built to first world standards. We also pay our staff well above market value. In return for a better work environment and pay we make clear to our employees that we expect them to take the quality of their work seriously. The result is can produce a quality product at a good price. Of course if we were making high volume low margin products that might not be possible.

    The catch is we don't make all the parts, but deal with factories that do and they in turn deal with other factories of which we have no idea of the their standards. The factories I have visited have been better than I had expected but most would be borderline by first world standards with hardest thing I have seen being the employees who work their whole shift standing. I couldn't do that. Often the heating and cooling is substandard and safety standards are like stepping back 30 years in time. I imagine myself doing their work and in most cases it would be no worse than the kind for work I did part time in my youth. While the work conditions are not great they are not so bad I feel guilty about buying Chinese products. Of course there may be many far worse places I have not seen yet.

    The pay on the other hand is probably a issue. I don't know how much the average worker gets but I suspect it is often unethically low. That is a result of our race to bottom on prices because at the end of the day given two similar products most people will buy the cheaper one and you follow that down the supply chain you will find that is the cheapest labor force.

    There is an irony here that over the 6 years since I first visited China the average person's position has improved. For example my first trip bicycles were the most common transport, now it is electric scooters. With wages rising and work conditions improving China is now loosing it competitive edge over other 3rd world countries who's peoples have not seen any improvement.

  40. It's changing by geekoid · · Score: 1

    China has recently change their laws, and is trying to get out of the cheap unskilled labor.

    Due to this, and increased fuel costs, jobs are starting to return to the US.

    New laws make it illegal to work more then 60 hours a week, even if the worker volunteers. Salary increase, etc..

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  41. That isn't what he is arguing by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    He's not suggesting that it is necessary from a manufacturing point of view. He's claiming it is a necessary stage from a developmental point of view, ie that there is no other (or at least no better) way of transitioning from a largely pre-industrial/agrarian society.

    What are China's other options? It is tempting to view this from a western perspective and see it as some sort of "race to the bottom". From a chinese perspective that wouldn't be the case as they are seeing massive reductions in poverty.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:That isn't what he is arguing by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

      What are China's other options?

      Pay better wages, and receive less profit?

    2. Re:That isn't what he is arguing by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      Did you think that you knew what you were talking about?

      Foxconn annual profit (2010) is $2.2 billion.
      Foxconn employees (2010) is 920+ thousand.

      That means annual profit per employee is $2391.

      Lets suppose they give the entire profit away to the employees. Thats $199 per month, or $6.55 per day, per employee.

      Are you still all smug, or do you now have a lump in your throat because of how ignorant that you now realize that you are? I wonder. The right thing to do would be to have that lump... thats if you have a conscience.. do you have a conscience, or is this fake caring that you do enough for you?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:That isn't what he is arguing by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1
      Oh so you are just another dick on /. huh? Surprise, surprise I guess

      He's not suggesting that it is necessary from a manufacturing point of view. He's claiming it is a necessary stage from a developmental point of view, ie that there is no other (or at least no better) way of transitioning from a largely pre-industrial/agrarian society.

      There are other ways you can do this.... I do have a conscience which is why I believe they could do better, do you have one? Or do you condone this type of behavior, as being acceptable, and the only or at least best way to develop a country?

    4. Re:That isn't what he is arguing by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      There are other ways you can do this....

      What are those? You guys keep saying it... but have not told us how China is going to get rich without wealth creation. Empty words are empty.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  42. Its consumers not corporations that are to blame by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's no such thing. Corporations aren't in the business of creating products in an ethical manner. They're in the business of making money by using the cheapest parts and labor possible.

    Emphasize "possible". "Possible" includes behavior acceptable to consumers.

    Sweat shops and outsourcing are driven by consumer preferences. Namely the consumer's preference for the absolute lowest price regardless of all other considerations. It is a classic tragedy of the commons situation.

    Corporate greed does *not* inevitably lead to sweat shops and outsourcing. Of primary importance to corporations are sales, and sales are determined by consumers. Outsourcing and sweat shops are only possible if there is consumer indifference, if employing such methods will offend customers and result in lost sales then the "greed" motivation says do not employ such methods.

    Corporate greed actually inevitably leads to satisfying consume demands at the lowest possible cost *and* consistent with consumer expectations. Consumers are actually in control of the methods employed by corporations.

  43. Nokia by mystikkman · · Score: 2

    Nokia used to make a lot of components in Finland, Romania etc. but after recent troubles, closed down the factories and moved to Asia.

    Making of N9 Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqxYiXtzKd0&feature=player_embedded

    1. Re:Nokia by mirix · · Score: 1

      I've had / seen several Nokias within the last.. 3-10 years? That were still made in Finland, Germany, etc. Some economy models were korean, IIRC. Lately I think they just say 'made by Nokia' or made in china. Way of the world I guess.

      That was always one of the things I had liked about them. Of course I suppose a fair bit of the silicon was still third world, but... that's somewhat inevitable, right?

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    2. Re:Nokia by sourcerror · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can confirm that. A Nokia factory closed this month in Hungary. They're moving it to Asia too.

  44. Its the consumers not the playing field by drnb · · Score: 2

    ... The only way to solve the problem (that I'm thinking of right now in full on rhetoric mode) is to have better national standards of who we do business with in the global international trade community. Put standards in place, and make it profitable for international actors to meet the improved standards. But as can be evidenced by opening your eyes in the morning and looking at the world, there will be a lot of political pressure against that path ...

    Yes and no. Your logic is flawed because it is government based, based on political pressure. The true solution is to have a consumer based solution, to leverage corporate greed. To have consumers make conscious decisions to pick products more inline with their ideals rather than whatever has the lowest price tag. Corporate greed seeks sales not lowest cost production. Low cost production does no good if consumers reject your products to do your production methods.

    I looked at two full HD resolution computer monitors last week. A Viewsonic made in China and a Samsung made in Mexico. They seemed to be basically equivalent, but the Viewsonic was about US$30 cheaper. After considering that Mexico is a neighbor and that the Mexican government is friendlier I decided to go with the Samsung. I do not mean to suggest that Mexico is perfect with respect to labor practices, just less objectionable. Sometimes that is the only option available.

    That said, the internet has made if far easier to find Made in USA goods than ever before. You are no longer limited to what your local brick and mortar carries.

    1. Re:Its the consumers not the playing field by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      the regulations on 'made in' are fairly lax. 'made in mexico' just means the components were slapped into the case in mexico (in some extreme cases, it may just mean the assembled monitor was stuck into a box in mexico). many of the components were still likely made in China.

      this is a big part of the problem, of course; it's very very difficult to figure out where much of the manufacture involved in any given product was done, with current labelling regulations in most countries.

    2. Re:Its the consumers not the playing field by drnb · · Score: 1

      the regulations on 'made in' are fairly lax. 'made in mexico' just means the components were slapped into the case in mexico (in some extreme cases, it may just mean the assembled monitor was stuck into a box in mexico). many of the components were still likely made in China.

      this is a big part of the problem, of course; it's very very difficult to figure out where much of the manufacture involved in any given product was done, with current labelling regulations in most countries.

      Oh I understand that. In fact some apologists for China make similar arguments, that many parts used in assembly in China are imported from elsewhere. The fact remains that I could choose mere assembly done by a friendly neighbor or a distant party who seems less friendly.

      The converse is also true. In California we have a manufacturer who makes flashlights, Mag Instrument - Maglite. They manufacture some parts and assemble in California, other parts are sourced elsewhere in the US, and *one* part is sourced from China - an o-ring. Due to this one part California law prevents them from putting Made in USA on their packaging. They can't have special packaging for California, no-CA goods may be sold to distributors in other states but find their way to CA stores and run afoul of the law. In epic hypocrisy California is buying steel components for the San Francisco Bay Bridge from China.

      I would be thrilled if made in labels were more like auto labeling and listed the percentage of components made domestically, the percentage imported and where assembly took place.

    3. Re:Its the consumers not the playing field by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Your logic is flawed because it is government based, based on political pressure.

      And why is that flawed?

      The true solution is to have a consumer based solution, to leverage corporate greed.

      You'll spend eternity arranging one. The problem is, you may get some people - even many people - willing to put pressure on the companies, but only if they know that said pressure will actually result in improved conditions. If it doesn't, then they're depriving themselves of some utility with nothing whatsoever in return (other than some vague sense of moral superiority). What's needed is a scheme where, once enough people decide to do this, it goes in effect for everyone. And we already have such a scheme - it's called democratically elected legislature.

    4. Re:Its the consumers not the playing field by drnb · · Score: 1

      Your logic is flawed because it is government based, based on political pressure.

      And why is that flawed?

      Look at history. If a government imposes tariffs or other measure then the other party responds in kind. You generally lose in the end because you have f'd what exports you did have and the marginal decrease in imports is too small to offset the export loss. Trade wars generally fail.

      The true solution is to have a consumer based solution, to leverage corporate greed.

      You'll spend eternity arranging one. The problem is, you may get some people - even many people - willing to put pressure on the companies, but only if they know that said pressure will actually result in improved conditions. If it doesn't, then they're depriving themselves of some utility with nothing whatsoever in return (other than some vague sense of moral superiority). What's needed is a scheme where, once enough people decide to do this, it goes in effect for everyone. And we already have such a scheme - it's called democratically elected legislature.

      Again, legislative based approaches fail as described above. Consumer based approaches have caused industry to change. On the negative it was consumer based pressure that drove outsourcing. The first companies that exported were rewarded with increased sales, those that retained domestic production lost sales. On the positive a consumer preference for green products made a difference for household cleaners and other consumer goods. One company experimented with a greener cleaning product and it was rewarded with increased sales. Other companies followed to satisfy the newly identified consumer preference. While government actions can get tied up in the politics of legislature or the courts by corporate actions and lobbying, a change in consumer preference can force corporate actions through the profit motive.

    5. Re:Its the consumers not the playing field by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Look at history. If a government imposes tariffs or other measure then the other party responds in kind. You generally lose in the end because you have f'd what exports you did have and the marginal decrease in imports is too small to offset the export loss

      This is only true if your exports and imports with that particular country you imposed tariffs upon were even. In case of China, they are decidedly not - Western imports from them dwarf any exports we do there.

    6. Re:Its the consumers not the playing field by drnb · · Score: 1

      Look at history. If a government imposes tariffs or other measure then the other party responds in kind. You generally lose in the end because you have f'd what exports you did have and the marginal decrease in imports is too small to offset the export loss

      This is only true if your exports and imports with that particular country you imposed tariffs upon were even. In case of China, they are decidedly not - Western imports from them dwarf any exports we do there.

      True, but I was too brief. The trade war also comes with recessionary effects, a general downturn in economic activities. The total effect of all this typically dwarfs any increased tariffs.

  45. Korea by confused+one · · Score: 1

    LG and Samsung are South Korean companies. I suspect they build most of their stuff in South Korea; so, technically its built by Korean labor instead of Chinese labor. How's that?

    1. Re:Korea by brian.stinar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if being a South Korean company necessarily means they build most of their stuff in South Korea. South Korea is a developed country, and has much higher labor costs as compared to China. Maybe they do, but I wouldn't think so (no actual evidence here to back up my suspicion.)

      Apple is an American company, but I don't think they build most of their products in the United States.

  46. Easy: Apple by wzinc · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Easy: Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahahaha

  47. No one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who makes...

    Nobody. Just buy your Chinese stuff, be thankful the drinking water into which the effluent is dumped is 8k miles away and support your congress critter when they rail about the need for more EPA regulation you'll never suffer the cost of.

    As for your conscience, just do what this guy does and delude yourself.

  48. A lot of apologists with their heads in the sand by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of apologists on /.

    I guess a lot of people really want their shiny. But it ain't all that hard to at least TRY to limit slave labor in your purchases. Lots of stuff is made outside of China. It is like the Raspberry PI claim that they couldn't find anywhere to produce it except China... right.

    Where is the Arduino produced? In Italy. All of it? Probably not but at least it is not totally outsourced to China for the sake of lowest possible costs.

    There are other phone, mp3 and even tablet makers that produce in Korea and Japan. Some parts may come from China but at least they try.

    But a lot of people prefer just to look the other way, make excuses and claim "ich habe es nicht gewust". Well, the Indians probably are happier on their reserve.

    These excuses have always been used. At least they got work, our own labor laws were pretty bad, they don't know any better, it is their culture.

    Only this time we are not just screwing some minority, this time we are screwing ourselves. Right now, if you try to google "non-china made tablet" you only get articles telling you about Chinese made tablets... and how crappy they are... and how the first china made iPad killers are just around the corner.

    Does that matter?

    Japan was once the place that cheap crap came from and stabs at Sony aside, that is no longer the case. High quality tech is not just produced by Japan on its own initiave, it is researched and invented. Nobody seriously could still think of Japan as a backwards nation with the only selling point hard workers and cheap labor.

    And this change hit the western economies pretty hard. Where are the western TV makers? Until MS entered the market, console makers were ALL Japanese for a LONG time. Granted, you could say that all these consoles are really IBM but how many people make their money of Nintendo/Sony in Japan vs the US? How many wage packages are taken home? Not the 100.000 dollar type, just the average salary with which people pay their rent, their taxes and send their kids to school?

    If China pulls of what Japan and Korea and even Taiwan did before, go from just cheap labor to technically advanced countries with their own products... then the west is done for.

    It is already happening. In Holland the story at the moment is the closing of a car factory. What does it produce? Daf (dutch)... no. Volvo? Volkswagen? Any european or American name?

    No. Mitshubishi. Right now the Dutch government is begging the Japenese to keep some production in Holland. And talking about changing labour laws and wages to attract the business?

    If you can't see the irony, then that explains a lot about peoples attitude towards the global economy.

    And it is already to late, if you are old, you might remember the worry about Japanese buying up western assets. Right now, the Chinese government is already supporting the western economies with massive loans. If they pull the switch for whatever reason, the western economies will think the recent banking crisis was a tiny pimple on the charts.

    The claim by Raspberry PI that they could not produce in the west is either a damning statement about the willingness of people to pay a few pennies extra OR shows just how much the west has collapsed in its production capacity.

    If you can no longer buy tech or even have it produced anymore, then you are now a third world nation. The Brits really believed pre-WW2 that they could outsource farming. Why would you want to sully the british isles with farms when those grounds could be used for hunting and tea parties and let Americans and Australians do the hard work (and make the real money).

    WW2 put a stop to that before it was to late but it is happening again. Farms are closing down because they can't compete with cheaper imports. It makes perfect short term economic sense. Just better hope that nothing happens to those supply lines. Fuel costs, a blockade or a natural disaster in another part of the world.

    The worl

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  49. Who cares, its the US's fault in the first place!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its up to the countries where things are built not up to the manufacturers. No matter what policies you (the manufacturer) put in place, when outsourced to foreign countries its up to them on how the process is conducted. Don't hate the manufacturer hate the country its manufactured in. For example China, opening trade to them was a huge mistake and in doing so other APAC countries were greatly effected but its ultimately the labor laws, within that country, to restrict despicable practices that we frown upon in the US. Either way we have little control when its out sourced. I speak from experience and spending lots of time in the APAC region where most HW is manufactured today. I'm frankly disgusted at the US government more than the manufacturers outsourcing. Its the reason for outsourcing in the first place, we can't be competitive in anything because of nazi rules and regulations. There are 50 agencies to perform the job of one in the US which we are taxed for. Outsourcing is the only way to be competitive. Point the finger at Congress not the companies that outsource!

  50. Re:university does not = job skills tech needs app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I think you are largely right I would love to know who gets a CS degree and ends up working at Mc Donalds, Wallmart, or in any other hourly or low pay job. I will admit that 99% of the kids I graduated with from a top notch CS program could barely program.... but still. I don't see any of them working at Mc Donalds. They were at least brighter than the majority. The school only graduated about 20 of 200 CS students.

  51. Hypocritical media attack by grantspassalan · · Score: 2

    Why go so far afield to other countries when we have the same kind of thing right here in the good old USA? What about these legal and illegal immigrants working on pesticide laced industrial farms? How about the workers at megacorporation slaughterhouses and food processing plants? Are their working conditions really that much better than those at Foxconn in China? Is a Mexican working all day in the hot California sun for minimum wages and living in a migrant worker shack that much better off than a Chinese factory worker? Media like the New York Times are hypocritical to the nth degree. They should start their muckraking investigations right here at home, before they start singling out one particular extremely successful tech company for their hypocritical tirades.

    --
    A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
  52. Re:Hypocritical media attack by Elbereth · · Score: 1

    Yes, other people are doing it, too. This is what every speeder says when he gets stopped by a cop. This is a simple fallacy, however. Just because other people are guilty of doing the same thing doesn't mean that you should face no repercussions. Is it fair to Apple that they've been singled out? No less so than it is that some random motorist was stopped by a cop for speeding, out of all those others who were also speeding. Is that cop is hypocrite if he doesn't pull over every single speeder on the road?

    Hopefully, those fly-by-night companies that exploit illegal aliens will see their day in the spotlight, as well, but there's no reason to ignore Apple's business tactics, just because someone else might be guilty, as well.

  53. Re:university does not = job skills tech needs app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could use a course in basic English skills and proof-reading. A quick refresher on punctuation would not go amiss, either.

  54. Buy used, that's about it. by jbeach · · Score: 1

    At least that way your money isn't going directly to the feudal overlords of the technology serfs. Of course, it's still dependent on those serfs to build it the first time.. Maybe Apple will start charging a premium for gear built only in humane conditions. From what I've heard, the money they save per iPad amounts to $65. I'm sure I'd pay that extra just so I didn't feel like I was killing people for my toy.

    --
    The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
  55. Re:Hypocritical media attack by Niko. · · Score: 4, Informative

    apparently it's not so much the minimal labor wages that make China attractive to manufacturing, but the supply of trained engineers to manage the operation. Apple alone needs hundreds of engineers to supervise the thousands of workers.

    http://www.tuaw.com/2012/01/22/why-apples-products-are-designed-in-california-but-assembled/

  56. Re: 'Apartments' by jginspace · · Score: 1

    AC was referring to his friend who is a waitress having a shared apt with a bunk, not factory workers in a dorm. A shared apt is not going to have a sufficient quantity of people in it to talk about the body heat warming the place.

    Hopefully. And hopefully it doesn't get that cold (the GP seemed to be struggling to make it sound cold - frost is "moderately common" - wow). But I don't think you get the gist: if this is indeed the situation then she's doing well - it's hardly the sob story that was intended. But actually I don't think the picture you have in your head of an "apartment" bears any resemblance to the kind of "apartment" Chinese businesses provide for their staff. Clue: We're talking high population density, high property prices.

  57. Re:A lot of apologists with their heads in the san by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, life in Britain is pretty good. If our economy is going to 'collapse' to that level, then I'm ok with that.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  58. Nokia has been in China for a while by drnb · · Score: 1

    Nokia has been in China for a while. 5+ years ago I saw a program on the business tv channel cnbc showing how Nokia had compliance officers auditing their factories in China. The Nokia compliance person said that they actually spend a bit of their time getting vendors to comply with Chinese labor and environmental laws, as required by the Nokia contract. The program gave the impression that Nokia does more to assure compliance with Chinese law than local governments.

    1. Re:Nokia has been in China for a while by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Yes they have Nordic cover that goes them a few plus points in many peoples minds. But if you look its often made in China.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  59. But there is a point by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Everytime there is a story about car black boxes and insurance, people complain about the invasion of privacy. At all other times they complain that they pay insurance for other people...

    Why should MY ticket payed with a secure and cheap payment option pay for YOUR incredibly insecure and costly credit card? I worked on payment systems and the cost difference is extreme. Credit Cards charge a percentage, have chargebacks with high fees while EU payment systems have a flat rate of cents with no chargeback without a serious investigation.

    Ryan Air just offers what people think they want, the cheapest possible ticket. Customers just don't realize how much they rely on all the "free" extra's others offer. It is budget and means it. It is like ordering a really healthy meal and then being really served one. UGH! A healthy salad has little to no dressing, you are eating rabbit food.

    Everyone of the items you mention cost money, if you want them, you got to pay for them. And you also end up paying for the overhead of choosing (tracking all those options cost money) and for the increased cost of those options because fewer people use them.

    But you knew all this, and still bought a Ryan air ticket. Because you thought you could save a few bucks. Then when you landed, you bought a 5 euro cup of coffee. Right?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  60. I know! by aiken_d · · Score: 2

    Let's save all of those poor asian wage slaves by boycotting products from asia. That'll help 'em!

    --
    If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
  61. That always reminds me of this comic. by khasim · · Score: 4, Funny

    NSFW for language
    http://www.oglaf.com/relief/

  62. If you want an ssd by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Try http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/SSD/OWC/
    Sandforce, designed and built in the USA (they seek US & imported parts). 3/5 or 7 year warranty depending on what you buy.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  63. Re:A lot of apologists with their heads in the san by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also pays to diversity your investments. The Japanese et al. would want to keep some manufacturing in Europe. Not putting all your eggs in one basket - be it a country or continent does help. And then of course there can be government restrictions. You want to sell your car in the EU, Japan? Well you gotta invest here too, or you can leave, there are many other manufacturers who will be willing to invest in return for the right to trade here.

  64. Re:A lot of apologists with their heads in the san by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 2
    I'm sorry I love the RaspberryPi and I applaude them for their development of a great little product. That being said they did look at making their PCBs in Britain and this is what they had to say about it:

    From their own Blog @ RaspberryPi.org (it's older then the main page displays so on the bottom click "older posts" of course):

    I’d like to draw attention to one cost in particular that really created problems for us in Britain. Simply put, if we build the Raspberry Pi in Britain, we have to pay a lot more tax. If a British company imports components, it has to pay tax on those (and most components are not made in the UK). If, however, a completed device is made abroad and imported into the UK – with all of those components soldered onto it – it does not attract any import duty at all. This means that it’s really, really tax inefficient for an electronics company to do its manufacturing in Britain, and it’s one of the reasons that so much of our manufacturing goes overseas. Right now, the way things stand means that a company doing its manufacturing abroad, depriving the UK economy, gets a tax break. It’s an absolutely mad way for the Inland Revenue to be running things, and it’s an issue we’ve taken up with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

    So we have had to make the pragmatic decision and look to Taiwan and China for our manufacturing, at least for this first batch. We are still working hard on investigating UK possibilities; at the moment, we’re investigating an option which would mean that all the Model As (whose demand we expect to be much lower than that of the Model Bs) will be built in the UK, and at the moment that’s looking quite do-able, although it’s not as efficient economically as doing it in Asia. I’ll fill you in on how that goes later on.

  65. Re:Who cares, its the US's fault in the first plac by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

    Don't hate the manufacturer hate the country its manufactured in.

    Uh... last time I checked a manufacturer can go above and beyond what the country says: needs to be in place, safety requirements, etc.

  66. Re:A lot of apologists with their heads in the san by Alioth · · Score: 2

    Really? Britain's economy is in worse shape than any other European country?

    Britain has the lowest unemployment rate in the EU, and a GDP per capita higher than the majority of EU countries.
    Britain still has a AAA rating on its sovereign debt, France is about to be downgraded, and let's not talk about Italy or even Greece.
    Manufacturing output of Britain increased last year despite a recession in the rest of the economy.
    Britain is having to bale out other EU countries like Ireland. Nobody is having to bale out Britain.

  67. Re:cheap Coach wedding ring on sale from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love it.. Chinese counterfeit goods spam in a thread on ethical manufacturers. Heh.

  68. Different type of manufacturing in the States... by DigiTechGuy · · Score: 1

    I know this isn't tech gadgets, but some jobs are in fact coming back to America. Master Lock brings manufacturing Stateside

    Obama is going about this all wrong in a socialist way, by making our tax code bigger and more bloated. There should be no exceptions and conditions for a lower tax, just a flat out lower tax, Eliminate large portions of the tax code, make taxes more simple, and lower the tax rates on businesses. That's just the beginning of it, things like minimum wage should also be eliminated since the people it hurts most are the people such laws are intended to help Minimum wage harms young minorities the most

    Anyhow, go out and buy a Master Lock, I know I will.

  69. No such thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Western decadence is completely dependent on 3rd world slave labor. And we're all complicit by participating with our money. Let that soak in. You are partially responsible for this. And the only way to fix it is to abandon the lifestyle and starve these companies of profits. Short term would be bad. But we need to make corporations understand that they do not have the right to treat people like serfs. Otherwise they will continue to do so until we're all working under such conditions.

    What do you think busting all the developed countroes' economies was all about? Getting us used to a lower standard of living so they can eventually treat us the same way. And we'll be grateful for it.

  70. Re:Hypocritical media attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's still largely an argument about cheap labor, though. Foxconn uses 100,000 workers to assemble phones, because humans are cheaper than even the cheapest machines. You need thousands of people to manage those 10's of thousands of workers. If you built that plant in Japan or the US or Germany, it would probably employ less than 10% that many people and be heavily automated (and the cost per iphone would go to $20, instead of $8).

    It's a silly argument to say "it's not about cheap labor, it's about the fact that you can quickly hire 100,000 workers (and engineers)"

  71. Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, please enforce "fair" labor practices.

    Then the jobs can come back to America.

    Those Chinese folks are too stupid to know that those jobs aren't paying enough.

  72. Yes, there are ethical corporations by wytcld · · Score: 1

    Ethics are basic to human nature - even to animal nature. Rats will put sharing with other rats ahead of their own gluttony. Two year old kids will play fairly with each other even when adults aren't watching, and get mad if any of the other kids breaks the assumed rules of equitability. Adults with no ethical grounding - true socipaths - exist, but in the pure form of that are quite rare. All businesses are in part based on trust. For trust to have a basis, there has to be at least "honor among thieves." If you're doing business in Scandinavia you'll likely find it's honor all the way through. If you're in Southern Italy or China, it's honor, but largely among those with whom you share some sort of family connection. In the US presently it's honor among those who went to the right universities - thus Obama's Harvard people won't bust the banking Harvard people for a broad menu of fraudulent acts against, well, people who didn't go to the Ivys. So we may not like it, but it's an ethic. Harvard people can trust each other to cover their backs. Scandinavian people can trust each other to cover their backs. Even rats and two year olds can. They've all got ethics. The only question is how expansive they are, who is within the charmed circle.

    When Henry Ford paid his workers several times what he had to, that was ethics. Worked out well for all concerned. It's a totally viable business plan to be ethical with everyone. The current state of the world economy would not be such if American and European banks had been ethical, rather than carrying out massive fraud assured that their old-school peers in politics would back them. Lack of ethics is destroying capitalism. Pretending that ethics is incompatible, and should be cast off by corporations, is at the heart of the problem.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  73. Who cares? by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    They don't have a vote in my country.

  74. OP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....very little is made in the world anymore without something like that.

  75. Responding to flamebait by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2
    OK, so that rules out flying with anything powered by RR, or indeed a number of GE engines. Or on an Airbus. If you hang around with the seriously rich, you'll have to avoid a lot of their yachts. ARM is purely a design house, but I think you should avoid phones because they almost all have ARM-design cpus. I doubt you can afford an Aga, but you might manage a Rayburn. I assume you prefer NASCAR to all that F1 stuff.

    I could go on. Burberry is a cheapo Chinese knockoff nowadays, but Barbour isn't. You can buy just about all your clothing needs made in the UK from our local farm co-operative, who tend to be a bit patriotic - shoes are the main problem, and people are starting to make them again as the Chinese start to want real British goods. Most of my clothes are made in the English Midlands or in Scotland; I wouldn't touch cheap imports, but often the price difference is quite small.

    Despite the worst our banks can do, there is a surprising amount of UK manufacturing and it is mostly upper market. Some of it is quite old; there is a company very close to us that has been in business continually since the late 1700s. We have always been quite good at this; we are also crap at the low end, because anybody with any pride in their work naturally wants to work for a reputable company.

    Incidentally, "The IT Crowd" is an arts graduate's fantasy of what IT is like. We have plenty of them available for export...they seem to do well in the USA.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  76. Re:That's sounds like a fine family legend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've come to expect a higher caliber of troll here on Slashdot. This is Digg-worthy at best, and just barely so.

  77. Some are Better than Others by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

    I was listening to a 2600 radio show podcast from a few months ago where they had the guy who made TV-B-Gone. I think it was a fund-raising show if that helps out for anyone looking for it. He talked about how they went over to China and looked into places for manufacturing. The place they chose has high quality chefs on premises to make food for the workers as well as giving lots of educational improvement to them. The factory found that keeping the workers happy leads to better production and less turn-over. The extra cost that TV-B-Gone had to pay to go with a morally sound factory rather than a Foxcon was around 10 or 25 cents per piece (I realize that is a large spread, I don't remember the exact number). So it is possible to find factories in China who treat their people well, make a good product, and are still rather cheap.

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  78. I used to have a conscience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but than I took an iPhone to the knee.

    Foxconn annual profit (2010) is $2.2 billion.
    Foxconn employees (2010) is 920+ thousand.

    That means annual profit per employee is $2391.

    Lets suppose they give the entire profit away to the employees. Thats $199 per month, or $6.55 per day, per employee.

    Are you still all smug, or do you now have a lump in your throat because of how ignorant that you now realize that you are? I wonder. The right thing to do would be to have that lump... thats if you have a conscience.. do you have a conscience, or is this fake caring that you do enough for you?

    Apple alone made $26.71 billion that year.

    Using the same math you did, that comes out to $29032 per worker.
    Plus those $2391 they are already payed it comes out to $31423 per worker.
    Which is 6 times the Chinese GDP, and twice the minimum wage in the USA.

    Imagine... one company with ability to lift almost a million workers not just out of poverty, but straight into 1st world middle class.
    Imagine that "trickling down".

    Instead of... you know... building their house made of gold.
    Sorry... made of glass. Without any corners.

  79. Labour laws are pointless.... by Tomsk70 · · Score: 1

    ....as long as you can go to another country and get your product manufactured by what would be defined as slaves (and illegal) if it happened in your country.

    The only real way I can see of stopping this is to force companies to manufacture anything sold in the country it's intended to be sold in, and only allow raw materials to be imported instead of the products themselves - Nike and the like have been doing this for years and nobody stopped buying their products.

    Sure, the products will go up in price, but I'd suggest that it's a worthwhile cost. It's not as anyone will die if they don't own an ipad.

    1. Re:Labour laws are pointless.... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The only real way I can see of stopping this is to force companies to manufacture anything sold in the country it's intended to be sold in, and only allow raw materials to be imported instead of the products themselves - Nike and the like have been doing this for years and nobody stopped buying their products.

      That's not the only way. The other way is to apply punitive tariffs to any product that's imported from a country with inadequate labor laws, proportional to how inadequate they are. The goal is to make it more expensive to outsource to such places than it would be to provide good working conditions, so it should be just high enough for that.

      Then watch the companies scramble to move jobs back or raise wages in China, spinning it as some kind of charity on their behalf. But, so long as end result is what we want, who cares?

    2. Re:Labour laws are pointless.... by Tomsk70 · · Score: 1

      Yup, that would work too - but I'm not so sure about reducing employment locally just so we can force other countries to wake up; how about a combination, where we refuse to import the raw materials from countries that don't toe the line?

      They then still get exports, we still get a manufacturing industry.

    3. Re:Labour laws are pointless.... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about reducing employment locally just so we can force other countries to wake up

      I actually agree with that, too - I don't see why Western middle class should pay dearly to help create Chinese middle class.

      However, I see this as a issue distinct from evening out labor standards - and one likely to garner less broad support. Hence why I prefer to keep them separate.

  80. NEW BALANCE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you kidding me? Right here in Maine we make relatively affordable CUSTOM shoes:

    www.shopnewbalance.com/us574

    Yes, they are about $120, so maybe 2x the cost of some Nikes, but you choose the colors, and they last longer. Especially if you take care of them. The worst part about cheap labor is that we have made everything a commodity, so we don't even care about taking care of our goods. Just throw it away and get a new one...

  81. Re:That's sounds like a fine family legend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you representative from the UMW; I sure am glad we got to hear from both sides.

  82. Name them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are other phone, mp3 and even tablet makers that produce in Korea and Japan.

    Proof please.

  83. Re:A lot of apologists with their heads in the san by dkf · · Score: 1

    Britain has the lowest unemployment rate in the EU

    The UK rate is currently 8.4% (apparently; not sure how much I believe that since the UK government has a long history of playing shenanigans with the definition of "unemployment" for political reasons) and the Netherlands has an unemployment rate of 6% (the accuracy of which I can't vouch for at all). Both countries are in the EU. Taking both at the quoted rate, NL is lower than UK. Real rates might vary, but I'd still expect that relationship to hold.

    Facts. Always getting in the way of a good argument and making you look stupid! (The figures are all things you can google for yourself in seconds.)

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  84. Re:university does not = job skills tech needs app by tsalaroth · · Score: 1

    My roommate has a CS degree. He had to work off his loans doing "landscaping" (mowing lawns, trimming trees) for 6 years, never really saving anything, just basically overpaying on his loans. Now he's back in school, getting a degree in english for teaching. He already has prospects with that career path. He still has none with a CS degree because he couldn't find a job within 1 year of graduating.

    I guess what I'm saying is, McDonald's is just an example, there's LOTS of people with technical degrees that are NOT working in their field.

  85. Re:Different type of manufacturing in the States.. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    If you bring down taxes and eliminate minimum wage (and other labor regulation) laws, you'll end up with jobs back in America alright - but those jobs will be done in the same abhorrent conditions that we see in China. The whole point of regulation is to prevent such conditions.

  86. Re:Hypocritical media attack by marnues · · Score: 1

    It's the cop who was wrong to stop the speeders. Not that following what someone else does justifies all actions, but this is definitely one of them.

  87. Answers? by rusl · · Score: 1

    It's disappointing the ratio of critique of the question to answer of the question on this page. AFAIK everyone is cynical pessimistic and generally useless on this topic except one person who suggested looking at open source hardware and one baker who is all DIY.

    When did we just decide to give up?

    --
    Stupidity is its own reward.
  88. Re:Hypocritical media attack by ppanon · · Score: 1

    Some workers at Foxconn were made to clean iPhone screens with a cleaner that is a known neurotoxin but weren't given adequate protective gear. The neurotoxicity led to hand tremors to a point were they were eventually laid off due to an inability to do their job. So yes, I expect that is worse than the local job examples you have given, although when migrant farm workers get sprayed with pesticides it probably comes close.

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  89. Re:A lot of apologists with their heads in the san by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot of apologists on /.

    No really. Some of us just see it as it really is: 10% of the world is trying hard to convince the other 90% that they are being exploited. It is quite disgusting, given that I've been that 'exploited' worker until the state came along and stopped me from working overtime. Thanks for adding to my college debt, Massachusetts.