Slashdot Mirror


LSD Can Treat Alcoholism

ananyo writes "LSD has potential as a treatment for alcoholism, according to a comprehensive retrospective analysis of studies published in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The researchers sifted through thousands of records to collect data from randomized, double-blind trials that compared one dose of LSD to a placebo. Of 536 participants in six trials, 59% of people receiving LSD reported lower levels of alcohol misuse (PDF), compared to 38% of people who received a placebo. The study adds to the weight of evidence that hallucinogenic drugs may have important medical uses, including, for example, the alleviation of cluster headaches."

83 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. Go figure by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet another Schedule 1 drug with actual medical applications. Is there any part of the war on drug users that isn't based on lies?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Go figure by six025 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is there any part of the war on drug users that isn't based on lies?

      No!

    2. Re:Go figure by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not just lies but misinformation. I mean, LSD is often a far more exotic of a drug to the people who haven't done it than have. It isn't habbit forming. In fact, after a trip, I often said that if someone put more acid in front of me and suggested I do it again, I might punch them. At its best its long and draining, physically and emotionally. Do some people go crazy and do it every day? Sure, but they are hardly the norm.

      Don't get me wrong, I saw some people have some difficult times, and see things that sounded far more amazing than anything I ever saw. And I have seen it change lives.

      I had a friend who had a few very difficult experiences. He was a bit religious, and talked of seeing deamons around him and being convinced he was going to die. Took him a long time to get over that. Though, it also was the catalyst that changed his life, to become a better person, to get off the myriad of drugs he was using and get a career instead of going into his 20s as a petty crook on his way to jail.

      So do I think it can cure alcoholism? No. I think its a tool that could be used to gain perspective and insight and to become invested in change. That may very well be what enables a person to change... however, I don't think its a magic switch... and it might be a difficult ride.

      Actually LSD has been used in this manner, I highly recomend "LSD Psychotherapy" by Stanislav Groff. Excellent book on the subject, where clinics have been run outside the US for many years. However, its not just "LSD does the work", it is the entire therapy session surrounding it that guides it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Go figure by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Acid: Melts in your mind, not in your hand....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Go figure by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It works with most psychedelic drugs, and there are those without the downside you mentioned. Ibogaine is the current favourite among researchers. Also flashbacks from a single treatment are rarer than most drug side effects, and less severe than many. Given that substance addiction basically results in severe illness, death, harm to others, prison and insanity, I think a small risk of a minor flashback is a pretty acceptable side effect.

    5. Re:Go figure by Higgins_Boson · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Misinformation.

      The only people who had trips that bad were the ones who ABUSED it heavily, did more than they should have or just tripped in the wrong setting or had underlying psychological disorders to begin with, in which case they needed a controlled dose and not a dose from some dude off the street.

      As for FDA approval.. have you EVER watched a commercial for an FDA approved drug? Nice, harmless side-effects like cancer, organ failure, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, blindness, heart failure, brain damage, impotency, birth defects, peripheral neuropathy, weight gain, weight loss, coma, death.

      Yeah... you keep counting on those corrupt assholes in the FDA. I will take my chances with the shady looking guy on the corner.

    6. Re:Go figure by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Probably depends on what it was being tested for the treatment of.

      Risk tolerance certainly drifts around as a function of time, and the FDA is no exception; but there ends up being some vaguely linear relationship between the ghastliness of the condition being approached and how much slack the assorted side effects and risks of the therapy end up being cut.

      Given that alcoholism tends to have pretty dramatic long-term effects on people, many of them pretty nasty, and presently has a lousy cure rate, it might actually have a shot. It would certainly have plenty of company among the 'potentially very unpleasant drugs for definitely very dire indeed psych conditions' that are currently legal, approved, and commonly accepted for use. How much flack it would draw from the 'all you need is more willpower!' school of largely ineffective but morally satisfying therapy would be a different question... Its chances for less serious diagnoses would probably be much poorer, and (depending on what classification it hypothetically received) even off-label use might be strongly discouraged by enthusiastic DEA oversight.

    7. Re:Go figure by JeanCroix · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ibogaine? I hear that Santorum is heavy into the Ibogaine... (/HST)

    8. Re:Go figure by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      its based on lies, racism and religion.

      ie, all the bad things about mankind.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:Go figure by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's ridiculous. I've known a lot of people who have done acid. A lot of people who've done lots of acid. I've been to acid parties. I've hosted acid parties. All of this is to say, I've got some experience with it. And I've never had a flashback. I've asked many former users, directly, "have you ever had a flashback?" Not a single person has ever said "yes" or even "maybe".

      Don't get me wrong, it's got some (semi?) permanent effects--primarily, you will never forget the first time you really trip. I've also noticed that decisions made while tripping seem to "stick" more. At least for me. In my early 20s, I told myself a hundred times that I need to slow down, but somehow when it came time to party I was always up for it. Then, once, I came to the same conclusion while tripping. After that, the temptation to party when I shouldn't was greatly decreased. I can't really explain it, it was just easy to just have a couple beers and go to bed at 2:00 AM instead of getting hammered and staying up until dawn. I didn't even really feel like I was missing out like I did before. It helped me get over an ex-girlfriend that I was being a dramatic teenager about. One night--bam--"hey, she doesn't like you, deal with it, there's plenty of girls out there" and I woke up the next day and it was like I'd been single for a year. It also showed me that there's definite limits to how fucked up I enjoy being.

      There was also other stuff. I'd get a phrase stuck in my head while tripping, and then find myself overusing it for weeks after. Cigarettes had that "acid" feel for a couple days (smokers who have tripped will know what I mean), and weed would make me feel like I was tripping, sometimes a week or more later although that could have been my imagination. I think it permanently gave me a better sense of perspective and empathy, and it gave me the "feel" for looking at a problem from a different angle. The "feel" thing is hard to explain too--it's like how when you're learning to water-ski, when you start out, you don't know how things are supposed to feel in order to stay up. Once you've done it though, you know what you're aiming for. Any potential negative effects aside (I really can't say I have any, but then again how would I know?), it's absolutely had a net positive effect on my life.

      But one thing I've definitely never experienced or heard of anyone experiencing, is a flashback. Ask anyone--the most frequent response you'll get is, "Damn, I wish."

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    10. Re:Go figure by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      LSD "flashbacks" are nothing but vivid memories. Have you ever smelled a smell or heard a tune that transported you back to another place and time? If so, then you've had a flashback. These are not medical events, and I speak from experience.

      The safety of LSD is far better established than many FDA approved drugs. They've studied it so much looking for negative effects that we know all of them by now. It's non-addictive and non-toxic. It doesn't increase the risk of schizophrenia. I don't think there's any question that it's safer than, e.g., Adderall.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Go figure by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I think if anyone would be a candidate for "acid flashbacks" it would be someone who knows he has mood disorders and yet has done it dozens of times anyway. But I've never had an "acid flashback." I will absolutely testify to its ability to help the user completely change the direction in their life -- but this is using it with intent. A lot of people treat psychedelics as nothing but party drugs.

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    12. Re:Go figure by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      As for FDA approval.. have you EVER watched a commercial for an FDA approved drug? Nice, harmless side-effects like cancer, organ failure, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, blindness, heart failure, brain damage, impotency, birth defects, peripheral neuropathy, weight gain, weight loss, coma, death.

      Come on, that's a small price to pay for an erection. Put some perspective in your life!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:Go figure by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh. Try holding a few hits of acid in your hand for an hour or two sometime.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    14. Re:Go figure by jamstar7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, I'm still waiting for those flashbacks they promised me in the 60's.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    15. Re:Go figure by Gription · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only reason that the FDA wouldn't approve LSD as a drug is it isn't patentable and the FDA doesn't do ANYTHING unless it benefits a major pharmaceutical company.

    16. Re:Go figure by sootman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      During this time, [Steve] Jobs experimented with psychedelics, calling his LSD experiences "one of the two or three most important things [he had] done in [his] life."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    17. Re:Go figure by msobkow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A psychiatrist actually talk to patients in North America in this day and age?

      Oops.

      Sorry.

      Time's up.

      Next patient, please!

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    18. Re:Go figure by Deathmoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The war on drugs IS based on lies. Learning is good. Evidence points overwhelmingly to the war on drugs being far more harmful than the drugs it is trying to stamp out. Including LSD. I've known many people to try many different drugs, and LSD is not one that they've had problems with. Not all drugs are evil.

    19. Re:Go figure by Outthere057 · · Score: 2

      It has been at least 10 years since the last time i have taken acid. in the 4 or 5 years that i did take acid i took well over 100 hits. probably closer to 200 or 300 hits. then one day i just decided it wasn't fun anymore so i quit and don't even want to think about taking it ever again even if it was free. as far as flashbacks go when you say you had a mild trip from smoking weed i would consider that a flashback. the last time i dosed i took between 8 and 20 hits of liquid acid. not sure of the exact amount because it was what was stuck to the sides of the plastic bottle i got it in and i sucked on it for about a half hour and all i really remember is the walls melting and just general crazyness. but after that night for close to 2 months any time i smoked weed i would have major trips or what i honestly would consider a flash back. and to this day i still get mild tracers even when I'm completely sober.

      --
      "Drive Fast Kill Slow"
    20. Re:Go figure by marnues · · Score: 2

      Addiction to LSD? Clearly you speak FUD.

    21. Re:Go figure by HairyNevus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, I think it's abut time an Erowid link appeared: https://www.erowid.org/chemicals/lsd/lsd_faq.shtml#flashbacks. Anything you want to know about drugs on the Internet, and Erowid.org is your best bet.

      --
      You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
    22. Re:Go figure by DirkBalognapantz · · Score: 2

      I agree. At some point, you just want to take the trip off like a coat. The trick is never the trip itself. The trick is integrating the experience of the trip back into the mundane everyday world. The last time I ever did acid, I was having an intense feeling of revelation and asked a friend (tripping as well) how he felt. I expected something profound, but he looked at me and said, "Yeah. I've got a good buzz". Something that one moment earlier seemed divine had been reduced to the level of a 6-pack of Mickey's Big Mouth. I lost all interest in doing LSD after that.

    23. Re:Go figure by utahjazz · · Score: 2

      In California, lack of correlation doesn't prove lack of causation.

    24. Re:Go figure by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Different trips. My first one, I didn't recognize the visuals at the time and I smoked a bunch of weed that day with friends so I thought it wasn't even real acid--didn't know what it felt like. My second trip, I took a lot, and saw overlapping patterns of giant eyeballs on the walls, but I knew it was just hallucinations. I've never even come close to losing touch with reality, I can't imagine how much it would take to be unable to tell when something impossible happening (like foot-wide eyeballs opening and closing in diagonal rows on the walls) isn't real. Oh, it looks real, but you can say to yourself, "this isn't possible, so it's not real". The real trick is when something that would normally be crazy happens, like a car accident happening outside your house. It takes hard thought to be able to figure out if that's real or fake, and it ain't always real--a closed door can sound like a car crash, and then you look at the car and it's got a dent, but you hallucinate the dent is the whole front of the car, and then you run outside shouting, "oh my god is everyone okay?!" and then the people react to you shouting and then it looks like a crisis situation which just reinforces that an accident happened even though it didn't and now a couple people who just got out of the car have some guy running at them shouting half-coherent questions and--well, you can probably see how stuff can get out of hand. You have to have the presence of mind to think through all that stuff while you're more fucked up than you've ever been in your entire life.

      The insights only came when I actually sat down and introspected while tripping--most of the time, I just used it as a party drug. That said, I don't think there's a significant difference between your 2nd and 40th trip. As another poster mentioned, there's a near 100% tolerance from one day to the next, but if you wait a couple weeks it goes away completely. Your first is different because a lot of people, their first time, don't even recognize that they're being affected until they're already on the way down. Strong visuals only happen when you're tripping hard, and the basic visuals (tracers, subtle movements in patterns, etc.) are easy to overlook because the mind-fuck is much stronger than the hallucinations at low-medium doses. You're more worried about the meaning of time and whether drinking orange juice is going to make you permanently insane than whether a leaf on the wallpaper might have moved a little.

      I'm a nervous, introspective, pessimistic person, so tripping was always an ordeal for me. But, I'm also a pretty strong personality, so when I felt stuff slipping away I held on harder. Some people trip and fall over that edge, and act like someone in a fugue state, where there's no self-control, and that's the "bad trip" stuff you hear about--I bet a couple of times I had as much internal turmoil as some of those people who ran down the street naked, but I just sat in the corner blowing my cheeks out and scrubbing my hand through my hair every 2 minutes for 16 hours. Not that I'm particularly special or anything, I just never took enough to throw me over that edge, but I definitely got close a few times. I think a fair portion of the people who have the freakouts are looking for an excuse to act crazy, and LSD is one hell of an excuse. And then once you start acting weird, it's easier to keep acting weird and blame it on a bad trip than it is to just pull things together and go "woah, sorry dudes, I was freaking out, I'm good now." But, you've got the mind-fuck going on, so it's hard to rationally say, "oh man I'm taking this too far, it's time to own up to it."

      But anyway, no single trip was a massive life-altering experience like I've heard of other people having. It just helped me look at stuff from a different angle, be more objective, and for some reason I can't explain, coming to the exact same conclusion while on acid had a much stronger effect than it would otherwise, but I always felt like the same person the next day and nobody ever sai

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    25. Re:Go figure by scarboni888 · · Score: 2

      No Santorum is a frothy mixture of used sex lube and fecal matter.

    26. Re:Go figure by scarboni888 · · Score: 2

      hehe - musta struck a nerve on that one.

      And I wasn't even trying.

      Love it!

    27. Re:Go figure by Higgins_Boson · · Score: 2

      I love how you keep modding up your own posts here, hahaha.... funny as hell.

      And I answered your question by pointing out how little you really know about the FDA, mister "I am NOT an American." You simply look foolish thinking that the FDA can be trusted when it's been corrupt for years and years and little to nothing's been done about it.

      Real answer to your question: I've never done LSD.

      I've read hundreds and hundreds of pages of reports and studies on it, however, and the only studies that seem to say it cannot be used as medicine (like psilocybin and marijuana) are the ones funded and created by governments who have anti-drug policies anyway, unless it is a chemical mixture with harmful effects that comes from a big pharma company.

      So keep living in your delusional state of mind, where you think your government always has your best interests at heart. If they did, clearly we'd never fight wars we don't need to fight (read: war on drugs).

  2. Makes sense by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll stop the first time they see their booze bottles as screaming fanged monsters.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's funny, but this was actually the original intent of the original 1950s studies. However, the study participants often enjoyed the LSD experience and were able to talk coherently and honestly with researchers about why they drank and why they wanted to stop. The sessions evolved into a kind of guided meditation, and eventually showed a success rate of about 45-50%. Compare this to the second most effective treatment for alcoholism - AA - which boasts a success rate of 10-12%.

      Hallucinogens can be powerful tools, and I'm glad we're starting to explore them more thoroughly.

    2. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Naltrexone + drinking is even more effective.

    3. Re:Makes sense by cjb658 · · Score: 5, Funny

      My name is Bob and I'm an LSD addict - formerly an alcoholic.

    4. Re:Makes sense by marnues · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I left AA after my court-appointed time ended, but I have to say that AA has many good elements. I found a group that really focused on living life rather than fearing alcohol, loving Jesus, or comparing drunk stories. Unfortunately, AA was developed at a point when Christianity and it's moral teachings were a fact of life in America, so too much nonsense is infused and no one is prepared to make the necessary modifications.

    5. Re:Makes sense by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Informative

      You cannot be an LSD addict - LSD is not addictive.
      Here, educate thy ignorant sefl.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  3. Other results not mentioned by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The study also found a 47% increase in believing they could fly and 39% increase in the belief that they were covered in spiders over that of the placebo group.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Other results not mentioned by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      The study also found a 47% increase in believing they could fly

      They stopped believing in the TSA?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    2. Re:Other results not mentioned by deciduousness · · Score: 2

      Obligatory Bill Hicks quote:

      "Same LSD story every time: "Young man on acid, thought he could fly, jumped out of a building. What a tragedy." What a dick! Don't go blaming acid on this guy. If he thought he could fly, why didn't he take off from the ground first to check it out? . . . I'd like to see a positive LSD story. Would that be newsworthy? Just once?"

  4. This reminds me of a nursery rhyme by Art3x · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "I know an old lady who swallowed a fly . . . "

    1. Re:This reminds me of a nursery rhyme by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      I get the feeling that this story ends with "When wintertime rolls around, the gorillas simply freeze to death."

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  5. Placebo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Placebo? Really? What possible placebo can you give somebody that they won't figure out it wasn't LSD?

    1. Re:Placebo? by medv4380 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Toad Sweat

    2. Re:Placebo? by subreality · · Score: 2

      What possible placebo can you give somebody that they won't figure out it wasn't LSD?

      A sugar pill, the same as always. Given a sugar pill and told that it's a new experimental drug that may cure their problem, a significant portion of people will either be cured or report being cured. It's a large percentage for diseases with a significant psychological component like alcoholism. A significant percentage will also report a wide range of side effects, regardless of the nature of the disease.

      You also don't tell either the LSD or the sugar group that they're receiving LSD. You just tell BOTH of them "its a new drug that we're trying; it can have side effects like completely fucked up hallucinations, but don't worry, we'll comfort you through it and you'll be fine tomorrow".

      And sure enough, a bunch of people will report tripping balls on sugar pills, a bunch of people dropping acid report that nothing happened, but after you check all the statistics, you find that people who took the LSD had a better cure rate than those who didn't.

      Here's the beauty of it: It doesn't matter that they figure out if it's acid or not. It doesn't matter what the mechanism is at all. All that matters is if it works or not.

  6. In other news by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, cocaine addiction has been shown to lower marijuana abuse.

    1. Re:In other news by booyoh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just like WoW ...

      Breaking News: SWTOR can treat WoW addiction

    2. Re:In other news by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Breaking news: Vagina can cure a WoW addiction as well.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    3. Re:In other news by marnues · · Score: 2

      Just another nonsensical comment about drugs from someone who has never used them. That's what makes these discussions so difficult.

  7. Re:placebo for LSD? by CambodiaSam · · Score: 2

    This is an excellent question. It reminds of a quote from Brain Candy:

    ”It’s been two weeks and I don’t feel any different. All I’ve done is gain 8 pounds. What’s in this? Sugar, isn’t it? I’m in the placebo group. My face tells me it’s sugar.”

  8. Re:I've seen phsychology reports differ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    LSD can cause a permanent splitting of the psychosis and the end result can be schizophrenia.

    Is that a fact anywhere but your ass?

  9. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, all those hordes of LSD addicted people are just another problem. Oh wait....

  10. I used to take acid all the time by Nyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man, those were the good old days, when acid was plentiful (the 80's). I really miss taking acid. They said I'd get flashbacks when I got older, which I am still waiting for. I mean, free acid trips? I'm down. Except they aren't happening.

    I want some mother loving acid, LSD, shit, i'll even eat the brown acid from woodstock. Prefer liquid, but I'll take blotter, 4 way, gels, whatever you got.

    Tune in, Turn on, Drop out.

    One of my best trips was when I took some liquid acid, 2 drops, and 20 mins later, i'm watching these crab aliens rip up my ceiling, while blood was dripping down the wall. Not only was I not scared, I was loving it. I don't lose reality on acid, and this was by far the best show ever. I kept thinking my roommate wanted to sleep with (like I really want to have sex on acid, not!), she thought I was the devil, and we were really fucked up.

    I would love to take acid again, but I have no idea where to get it. Guess I can go find some hippies somewhere...

    While acid isn't for everyone, 'cause some of you are crazy upstairs, most everyone should take it. It opens your mind to other ways of thinking, and honestly, most the world needs to open their minds and wake the fuck up.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:I used to take acid all the time by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I assume you're trolling here, but I'l bite. Do you write poems and make breakthroughs in your recreation time? You've never done anything just for the pleasure of it? Watched a cheesy movie? Kicked a ball around with some friends? Gone for a walk?

      Your comment makes me want to try acid. No, I do not expect that I will cure cancer after trying it. But it will be a new experience, like reading a book, or visiting a new town. Maybe I'll learn something, maybe I won't, but at least I won't be on some puritan soapbox criticising adults who are curious about their world and want to learn through new experiences.

    2. Re:I used to take acid all the time by marnues · · Score: 2

      I hope you don't mind the correction, but I would suggest that people with serious mental disorders who want help should seek medical professionals that understand the effects. Properly controlled dosage, mood, and environment could help many people with mental issues. I will completely agree that such people should never use recreationally. There's nothing recreational about a troubled mind losing it's ability to perceive reality.

  11. meh by forgottenusername · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A strong dose of LSD removes any underpinnings with reality. There's no way to prepare for it. For some people it's a good, useful thing which helps them gain a different perspective and form new thought patterns or approach problems in a different way. For others its a hellish experience that causes permanent damage to their psyche. Psychoactive drugs can trigger latent personality disorders. I know this from personal experience.

    Think of LSD as a focuser; if you're prone to anxiety, you're likely to have an extremely hard time, especially if you're in an sterile lab environment (your ambient environment makes a huge difference to your experience, along with the people you are around).

    Anyhow, I have a hard time trusting that study for much. I can see psychoactive drugs having lots of benefits, but a lot of risks too. It's hard to picture someone suffering from alcoholism (which encourages denialism, depression etc) really getting much positive benefit.

    1. Re:meh by brainzach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would they have to do the experiment in a sterile lab environment?

      You can minimize the chances of a bad trip by conducting the test in a more comfortable environment and have a counselor guide the patient through the experience. It will probably be much more positive and effective treatment than giving a guy a lot of acid and locking him in the room for 12 hours.

    2. Re:meh by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Why would they have to do the experiment in a sterile lab environment?

      You can minimize the chances of a bad trip by conducting the test in a more comfortable environment and have a counselor guide the patient through the experience. It will probably be much more positive and effective treatment than giving a guy a lot of acid and locking him in the room for 12 hours.

      But not as much fun to watch.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:meh by forgottenusername · · Score: 2

      That's a good point.

      There's been a whole lot of good research done on the mechanisms of addiction, how brain chemistry is changed.. a lot of data suggests (common sense) that if you change your environment, it's easier to break patterns. Charle Rose had a really good series on the brain where this was discussed..

      I _think_ this one is it: http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/10974 - the whole series is great though.

      It'd be really interesting if they used some modern techniques to figure out what was going on.. like monitoring differences in brain activity in the different regions..

  12. How is this news? by dmt0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some studies in the 1950s that used LSD to treat alcoholism professed a 50% success rate,[29] five times higher than estimates near 10% for Alcoholics Anonymous.[30] A 1998 review was inconclusive.[31]

    https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Lysergic_acid_diethylamide#Alcoholism

    1. Re:How is this news? by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 2

      Yes this is old news, but I am glad it is finally getting reported, even if it is 50 years late. Alcholism does serious damage in society and the failure to use this technique is just another example of the horrific damage done by prohibition.

      It should also be noted that this technique involved a certain type of therapy which is done while under the influence of the psychedelic, and part of the reason for the original suppression of these results was that anti-drug scientists who wanted to discredit the research did a study without the therapy. This basically amounted to shackling people on lsd to a bed alone and waiting. Naturally as this failed to work they claimed the other trial wasn't due to the drug at all. Since the 90's researchers have been working further along these lines using Ibogaine to get around prohibition and have discovered that it in fact works for virtually all addictive behaviour. There are clinics you an go to to get Ibogaine treatment for heroine and cocaine addiction.

      tl:dr = LSD and other psychedelic drugs (with the correct therapy), whilst (relatively) harmless and non-addictive themselves, are the best cure so far found for all substance addiction. This has been known to the anti prohibition lobby for over 50 years but the results never make the mainstream media because they are controlled by those who profit from the war on drugs.

    2. Re:How is this news? by ananyo · · Score: 2

      Some studies in the 1950s that used LSD to treat alcoholism professed a 50% success rate,[29] five times higher than estimates near 10% for Alcoholics Anonymous.[30] A 1998 review was inconclusive.[31]

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Lysergic_acid_diethylamide#Alcoholism

      Because it's a meta-analysis - like the story says. Each of the trials that wikipedia mentions is underpowered by itself - the results are not strongly significant even when they did show 'an effect'. The reason was they were often unable to recruit enough people for the trial. There were also trials that showed little effect (and as the review you quote says - the overall evidence was 'inconclusive'). This is the most comprehensive analysis to date of exactly those past studies - and the picture is more complete and convincing - there IS an effect.
      The question is now - is there enough evidence to warrant a proper trial and collect the really important long term data?

  13. This has been known since the 1960's by stox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sadly, further research was abandoned due to the difficulties of getting permission from the government.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  14. I could not agree more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Posting as AC because I don't have an account. I took LSD this very last Saturday, and I can honestly say that having looked at myself and alcohol and what I realize it's been doing to me, I haven't touched it since or had a single craving. I mean, I'm not an alcoholic, I just drink a 6-pack of tall boys every night for a year, right? It was like turning a switch on and off. I dunno, I'm a reasonably happy person, so I think that it's easier for me to say all of this. "Treatment" for addiction (ANY addiction - even sugar) very rarely focuses on the actual underlying cause of the addiction. Yes, some people just like to party. But LSD has a way of making you look inward at yourself....

  15. Re:placebo for LSD? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    You wouldn't have to.

    You wouldn't TELL the people receiving the placebo that the other half were receiving LSD. They wouldn't know they were receiving a placebo because they wouldn't know what the drug "curing" them was supposed to be.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  16. Re:I've seen phsychology reports differ. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Long time alcoholics tend to suffer from a duality within the mind, the one who wants to stay sober, and the other that wants to drink.

    That's what shandy is for...

  17. Re:Old News by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

    Yes, all those hordes of LSD addicted people are just another problem. Oh wait....

    My thoughts exactly.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  18. Re:LSD can treat alcoholism by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 2

    Weed.

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  19. None of the researchers got drunk during the study by broknstrngz · · Score: 2

    Q: How do you get rid of onion breath?
    A: Eat some garlic.

  20. Re:placebo for LSD? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    You don't tell the control group that they are taking LSD.

    Placebo side effects: dry mouth, and feels a little bit hyper.
    The Other drug side effects: a talking dragon asking you live by the sea.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  21. 60s and 70s by medv4380 · · Score: 2

    About the Time the CIA was doing "tests" to see if it would work as a truth serum. I would bet that the study was probably just a cover to test LSD on people. Even if LSD worked the drawback of Flashbacks or Persistent Hallucinations would make it unusable. Now if LSD were the cure for cancer then persistent hallucinations would be acceptable.

  22. Re:LSD to cure Alcoholism? Yeeees... by teasea · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Trust me...then alcoholism is going to be the least of your problems.

    You have knowledge that taking 250 mgs of LSD will so devastate the average person's life that alcoholism will be a comparatively insubstantial problem?

    Go on...I'm fascinated.

  23. Re:placebo for LSD? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    Don't tell them it's a placebo of LSD. Tell them it is a placebo of asprin.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  24. Re:placebo for LSD? by Vintermann · · Score: 2

    Today, at least, you would have to inform your test subjects that they could receive a dose of a hallucinogenic drug. It's not a trivial matter, bad trips can happen, and they are by all accounts terrifying.

    Even if you didn't inform them, although the placebo group wouldn't know what they did, the non-placebo group would be acutely aware that they didn't get sugar. It's just not possible to bilnd such studies properly.

    To me it sounds like LSD functions a lot like religion. The subjects have a pretty wild, magical interpretation of their experiences - "consciousness expansion", as if what they experience is more real than what the brain can perceive when it's working as intended.

    However, unlike religion, these radical interpretations got a surprising deal of support from the extremely high status whitecoat scientific establishment. A religion-like experience with the full weight of that authority behind it, I would expect to have a pretty spectacular placebo effect.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  25. perfect solution by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 2

    put LSD in beer. or legalize it for sale at bars. brilliant. give me a nobel prize.

    --
    insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  26. Re:placebo for LSD? by JTsyo · · Score: 2

    If 38% of the people can be cured with just a placebo, maybe they should use that first before moving onto LSD.

  27. Re:LSD to cure Alcoholism? Yeeees... by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh come on, regular expressions aren't like LSD. You don't get long term damage from an LSD experience.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  28. Re:Placebo by JTsyo · · Score: 2

    I thought the same thing (and post so further up). One reason might that those that signed up for the experiment wanted to quit more than those in AA. I know courts send people to AA to help them clean up but the person has no desire to succeed.

  29. Re:placebo for LSD? by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 2

    It depends -- there's possibility of "microdose" therapy. Not that I know what that feels like, because I've never taken acid and not tripped.

    --
    Brian Fundakowski Feldman
  30. Ibogaine. by Xoltri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I watched a really interesting show called Drugs Inc. The talked about one psychadelic drug called Ibogaine that can be used to cure opiate addiction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibogaine#Treatment_for_opioid_addiction

    The show is worth watching for sure.

    --
    -Xoltri
  31. Re:placebo for LSD? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    religion and drugs have a huge amount in common.

    they both serve to play with the mind and present alternate realities, then invite the 'participant' to join them in their delusion.

    I've had friends explain their trips to me and how it opened their minds. same kinds of words that very religious people also use.

    are we wearing tinted glasses when we view the world? does religion allow us to take off the glasses and see reality or does it give us the glasses in the first place? are drugs the removal of glasses or the use of glasses?

    if you think you know, then you've got it wrong.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  32. Non AC repost - Funny by Colourspace · · Score: 2

    Sorry - new build machine, didn't mean to AC... In this order I have become addicted to the following on a pretty much full time basis: Tobacco, Alcohol and the 60mg Prozac I have to take a day to deal with life. Before anyone comments on the Prozac/Drugs cycle - I've suffered depression forever, long before I tried anything I 'shouldn't have'.. But I have no regrets on the whole - but weirdly alcohol takes responsibility for 99.9% of those regrets I truly do. Yes less drugs over the years may well have made a difference, but too late to know for sure now. Putting that aside.. E? Can't really handle the stuff. Love it, but I've embarrassed myself on more than one occasion as more than one or at most two pills is too much for me. I end up trying to tell peoples ankles how much I love them. Tried Ketamine a couple of years ago. I suspect I did too much at the time (it being my first and all) but I won't give that a second chance. 'Being in the closet talking to God' is the most accurate description I've heard of anything, ever. Cocaine? Had a bit of a fling with it around 2005-2006, but got over that. Just in time, I think. Still like the odd nosebleed but always end up with a porn bill. Could smoke pot for the UK Olympic team, but then I don't smoke skunk anymore. LSD? Never had a bad trip personally and I swear it has unlocked parts of my mind that would never have been accessible otherwise. I genuinely feel a more rounded person for the times I've taken it (maybe 15 times over the past 23 years?) I drink and smoke every day. Now tell me what is the most damaging drug? I wake up every day hacking my lungs up due to 'light' cigarrettes, ans surely at 20 a day I'd hardly be considered heavy, even by today's standards. Having said that, it's always horses for courses. If it wasn't, Slashdot probably would have burnt itself out through too much agreement a long time ago. I find it hard to get LSD nowadays but I would trip for the next week if it meant giving up the crap I currently find myself spending too much on and really actually damaging my health with.

  33. Psychadelics need to be studied, and used properly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Damn, I wish.

    I did lots of acid in my twenties.. For example, LSD has 100% tolerance increase, but it only lasts for a few days, if that. For example, in those days I had lots of it around.. and it was quality. trip on 1 hit on day 1. On day 2 it takes 2 for the same level of trip. (everyone knows every trip is different, but the same perceived strength). 3rd day it took 4, then 8, etc...I routinely went to 8, 16, as high as 32 more than once and I never have had a flashback. I have had similar feelings here and there when exposed to marijuana, but never what could be called a "flashback" as I've heard them described. And it already has a built-in prevention for long-term abuse, as if that is even a real possibility to begin with..

    These days I wouldnt trip, just because it such an intense experience and requires such a commitment of time and emotion that I am just not willing to go there.. As far as the benefits of LSD, I would put it this way.. "it forces introspection.". Whatever is bugging you, small concerns needling you, particularly issues if self-consciousness, are brought out and you have no choice but to face them. You can't hide from yourself.. I think in this way it makes sense that it could treat alcoholism.. as could any number of psychadelics..

    I truly believe that psychadelics should be something that is embraced by a society and its culture. There should be people experimenting, documenting, and prescribing them. Bad trips are REALLY REALLY bad, but in the proper setting, completely manageable.. just remind yourself that the trip is temporary, and talk them down.. if there were people around who acted as the equivalent of shamen, we could take all of these psychadelic substances and properly utilize them. Aren't we mature enough yet as a civilization that we can quit pretending like psychadelic substances are so dangerous that just possession of them can be punishable by decades in a penitentiary?!

    It's fscking ridiculous.. we cant even legalize marijuana, but sell cigarettes and alcohol on every corner. I suspect that many would agree with me, but until we can get out and vote and put people with similar rational and open minds in our government nothing will change.

  34. There Are a Lot of Very Misinformed People Here by steppedleader · · Score: 2

    For the large number of people posting here about how this will just turn alcoholics into LSD addicts, read some actual research. This article and the linked to study within is a good place to start: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11660210

    Not only is LSD not addictive, it is among the safest recreational drugs known.

    I've never tried it, and it isn't entirely without risks (what is?), but there really doesn't seem to be much reason to be scared of it relative to most other drugs. If it really helps with alcoholism, using it for treating that addiction would probably be a great thing both for alcoholics and society.

  35. Re:placebo for LSD? by tbird81 · · Score: 2

    The world is not a terrible place. The world is a wonderful place.

    "I see trees of green, red roses too
    I see them bloom for me and you
    And I think to myself, what a wonderful world"