Slashdot Mirror


Online Learning Becomes Court-Ordered Community Service

An anonymous reader writes "Yahoo Finance reports that convicted criminal offenders can serve their court-ordered community service hours online by taking educational courses through Community Service Help. According to the article, there is a high correlation between criminal activity and lack of education. Who knew? 'About 40 percent of all U.S. prison inmates never finished high school, and nearly 44 percent of jail inmates did not complete high school. More current data shows that hasn't changed. In Washington, D.C., for instance, 44 percent of Department of Corrections inmates are not high school graduates. Less than 2 percent had 16 years or more of schooling.'"

160 comments

  1. Great idea! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2, Funny

    More criminals online. Exactly what we needed.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democrat Voters

    2. Re:Great idea! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Nah, online criminals come fro Nigeria, not Kenya.

      Oh hang on, you said voters, not politicians. As you were, gentlemen.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Once again by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Correlation != cause. Educating them will just mean smarter criminals. Not everyone can work in banking.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Once again by bipbop · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, only the smart criminals can work in banking!

    2. Re:Once again by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      Educating them will just mean smarter criminals. Not everyone can work in banking.

      But the banks are hiring again, and we're running out of educated sociopaths, so they'll have to make do with educated convicts.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    3. Re:Once again by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      True ... some will need to go into Law or Politics.

    4. Re:Once again by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Informative

      You raise, a good point. The evidence suggests that to some extent criminals lack of education is caused by other variables that lead to both to criminality and make completing school more difficult. In particular, criminals have on average lower intelligence, http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201006/why-criminals-are-less-intelligent-non-criminals poor impulse control,http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleID=101809 and extremely high self-esteem ,http://www.emotionalcompetency.com/papers/baumeistersmartboden1996%5B1%5D.pdf, all of which are associated with doing poorly in school.

      However, there's also evidence that some amount of criminal behavior is due to lower education reducing work opportunities. The most successful programs at reducing recidivism are those which educate the convicts. https://www.stcloudstate.edu/continuingstudies/distance/documents/CollegeEducationandRecidivismEducatingCriminalsisMeritorious1997.pdf although the exact causes of this are unclear http://www.bop.gov/news/research_projects/published_reports/recidivism/orepredprg.pdf. So, while there is a correlation v. causation issue, it does look like education genuinely helps.

    5. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe the real reason is that educated criminals just commit legal crimes. I've recently read a study which said that being better off is associated with lack of empathy, lack of a sense of right and wrong, and lack of self reflection.
      So I have my doubts about the project. What if (in contrast to g'parent post) they do become bankers? Is that really better? They can do much more harm there than as ordinary criminals, and because it's legal we can't lock 'm up any more.

    6. Re:Once again by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

      I don't see why this was moderated to "funny"...

      As some one else said, there are a lot of reasons why people drop out of high school. Many of the dropouts I know dropped out because they were already into criminal behavior, and school "cramped their style". Did dropping out cause their criminal activity, as these studies suggest? No, quite the opposite!

    7. Re:Once again by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for that great writeup. I seem to never have mod points when I'd want to use them.

    8. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Educating them will just mean smarter criminals.

      Not true! They could become lawyers!

      Oh...

    9. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hallelujah. I have more than a few issues of my own and I have always thought that mental illness was at the root of most "evils" of modern society.

    10. Re:Once again by priceslasher · · Score: 2

      Does the study suggest that dropping out causes criminal behavior (or just increases)? Everyone in prison isn't necessarily pathologically anti social or destructive, and even teenagers mellow out eventually.

    11. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still required to work on the assumption that lower intelligence, poor impulse control, and extremely high self-esteem are variables that cannot at the very least be mitigated, if not outright avoided in many cases, by proper education. It's still up for debate, but the Flynn effect seems to suggest otherwise.

    12. Re:Once again by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But very few can work in unskilled labor, those jobs are practically going away not to mention when the going gets tough you're in competition with all the skilled labor too. I remember there was an article here in Norway about a position as warehouse assistant, they got 3-400 applicants and the job market here isn't even tough. If it had been I'm guessing 1000+ applicants because it's the kind of job absolutely everyone can do. But there's a very limited number of McJobs and even most of those want people that have worked retail before plus domain experience like working with food. You don't need qualifications to stand on the street corner and sell drugs or break windows and steal shit. Of course some would continue to be criminals, but I think a lot of them did because they failed at everything else.

      Of course this is just highly anecdotal, but at least on my school I'd say there was a group of losers that compensated by being badass. Drinking, smoking, talking tough and following through if necessary, breaking the rules - if they couldn't be successful at school they'd make their own kind of success. They were attractive to the kind of girls that like "bad boys" too, that was important in that age. Particularly since those that were neither badass nor did well weren't treated very nice. But once that becomes the defining order, it escalates. You're not drinking beers to be badass, you're drinking liquor. Or you're doing drugs. You're not breaking school rules, you're shoplifting. And as everyone else's opinion of you deteriorates - other school mates, parents etc. your standing in the gang only becomes more important.

      I'm not talking about street gangs in New York here, I'm talking about a fairly quiet suburb in low crime Norway. I'm thinking this is a pattern that exists more or less all over the world, of course it doesn't explain all crime but I think it explains a lot of petty crime, the kind people say came from "hanging with a bad crowd". And yes, I'd say failing at school is a leading cause as to why people start doing that. I'm not so sure it'll help though, most of these people were failing for a reason and they're not going to be the brightest even if they get remedial education. But maybe it can give them some sense of achievement on the other scale, they might not win any Nobel prizes but they're making a honest living. It's at least a chance to getting out of a bad circle if they're willing to take it.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:Once again by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, some will. But there's always the chance and hope that at least SOME will get smarter.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Once again by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      I don't believe lack of education makes one more likely to commit crime, only more likely to get caught. Smart and educated criminals will get away with their crime far more often than those who are stupid and lack education.

    15. Re:Once again by GmExtremacy · · Score: 2

      I wonder if it would help if our (at least in the US) public school system wasn't such a piece of garbage...

    16. Re:Once again by Idbar · · Score: 1

      See, I came to the comments for the same reason. Of course lack of education ends in you having to steal (even kill) when you can't find a job to support your activities (namely, family, drugs or whatever). But also this is not the reason the penal system is full with them, but also because they cannot afford a pool of lawyers to keep them out of there, as the bankers do.

    17. Re:Once again by KermodeBear · · Score: 2

      'About 40 percent of all U.S. prison inmates never finished high school, and nearly 44 percent of jail inmates did not complete high school.

      Oh my god! This means that 60% of prison inmates did finish high school, and 56% of jail inmates finished high school too! Surely this means that we should ban all high schools!

      --
      Love sees no species.
    18. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't need qualifications to stand on the street corner and sell drugs or break windows and steal shit. Of course some would continue to be criminals, but I think a lot of them did because they failed at everything else.

      Which is why in rich countries it might not be such a bad idea to give everyone a basic income ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income ), and have compulsory high-quality preschool education so that at least more grow up to be useful people. Unless you execute them, you're going to pay for these "dropouts" one way or another. If there are fewer and fewer jobs for their ability what do we expect them to do? Die? No matter how much you train a dog it's not going to write automation programs for Google Data Centers. And you don't need millions of programmers.

      As for your other important point, yes humans are pack animals. If society kicks them out of the main pack, they will find a different pack. If you do not provide them a suitable and less problematic pack to belong to, they will join gangs (and return to gangs ).

      We need to address both the needs above - the basic needs and the social needs. Providing just the basic needs will just generate gangsters who'd use their basic income to fund crime.

    19. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the world needs ditch-diggers, too.

    20. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      educated criminals just commit legal crimes.

      As opposed to illegal ones? And this shit got modded up?

    21. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is quite sad that many of the people posting here seem to honestly believe that most criminals are just bad people, and that socioeconomic factors have little to do with their choices. The fact that less than 2% of criminals have college degrees* (compared to 22% of adults in the general population) should make it quite obvious that many criminals commit crimes because they at least feel they have few other options.

      I guess it is much easier and ego boosting for middle class individuals to believe that criminals are just bad people, instead of trying to determine the root cause of why otherwise decent people decide to commit crimes. While there are many people who are just rotten eggs, I would be willing to bet that if a majority of prison inmates had grown up in stable middle class families that most of them would not have started a life of crime.

      * This statistic comes from the story summary, I did not check its accuracy.

    22. Re:Once again by sjames · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what can be done about IQ, but it is entirely possible that where education is enforced, they might learn to exert better impulse control and also that they're mot as smart as they think they are.

    23. Re:Once again by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You've got a UID in the lower 30% and you haven't realized it's all the fault of the education system for not recognizing that the, ummmm, difficult and underachieving students are all special snowflakes and unrecognized geniuses?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember there was an article here in Norway about a position as warehouse assistant, they got 3-400 applicants and the job market here isn't even tough.

      Really? I find it difficult to believe. Was there anything unusual about that position?
      From what I know a tenure-track position at a decent university can average around 200 applicants per spot. I have difficulties imagining that more candidates apply for a warehouse assistant post.

    25. Re:Once again by Kjella · · Score: 1

      From what I know a tenure-track position at a decent university can average around 200 applicants per spot. I have difficulties imagining that more candidates apply for a warehouse assistant post.

      I couldn't find the source but here's one (in Norwegian of course) where they got 119 applicants from friday afternoon to wednesday morning, no report on what the total ended up as. Maybe it was the final figure for this one or a similar one or my memory is off, but yes they do get very many applicants. Did you get the first 100+ applications in half a week? At 3% unemployment and maybe 1 million people in Oslo+surrounding areas that's 30,000 unemployed. If we say this is a position practically everyone can apply for and 1% do, there's your 300. It's not that unreasonable actually.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    26. Re:Once again by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      basic income as a general term would cover the system in use in norway, yet people flock to a basic job opportunity(instead of studying to be a nurse for example, though I'd rather be a janitor than a nurse but that's just me).

      it doesn't help with the need to have something to do, to have some outside purpose for your daily routine.

      Judge Dredd while posing as a comic book about violent criminals and an equally violent sheriff is actually about this, you still have to do something with your time and even a meager job will give you more money than social security in a system that isn't built by total idiots(like some systems actually are.. where taking a meager job nets you less money than soc-sec)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    27. Re:Once again by neonKow · · Score: 2

      There may be factors that make you more likely to be a criminal, but there's no "criminal gene." These are still human beings, and generally people just want life not to suck. They're not thinking, "oh, whatever I do MUST be immoral, so when I have an education, I will just be a a BETTER criminal." The thing about having an education is that suddenly a lot of legal and upstanding ways to make money open up, and they tend to be more attractive than crime and the risk of prison.

    28. Re:Once again by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It's only going to get worse, the amount of education required will only increase with time as more and more advanced work is automated.

    29. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Citations to back up your arguments? You must be new here...

    30. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can recognize future criminals in your school as "too cool for school" characters. In other words, they are not criminals because they lack education. They don't lack education, they loath it, schooling is something lesser beings do. Make a quick and easy buck and then, if you ever need knowledge, buy or molest into submission a dozen educated guys for a dime.

      So, if they are willing to get education, that is a major breakthrough towards their rehabilitation. Even without any real, useful education, if they could manage anger and physical violence, most criminals would make major carriers as corporate managers. As many criminals with clean record do.

    31. Re:Once again by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      I've recently read a study which said that being better off is associated with lack of empathy, lack of a sense of right and wrong, and lack of self reflection.

      Stop making conclusions off /. headlines. If you would have actually read that study or read the comments on that story then you would know that the methodology was bunk and the study shouldn't be used to make conclusions about anything.

      Also, your argument that it may be better for them to be petty criminals than bankers is equally weak. Let's rewind 150 years and use that argument: "It's probably better that they remain slaves, after all, they can't hurt anyone chained up like that."

      If you're going to comment: 1) Know what the fuck you're talking about 2) Take a formal logic class, preferably both deductive and inductive 3) Don't ask flamebait questions under posturing as legitimate concerns.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    32. Re:Once again by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      though I'd rather be a janitor than a nurse but that's just me

      I think this quote says a lot about society, in many ways. I'd rather be a janitor than a nurse, too. Even if nurses were paid much more than they are and janitors paid slightly less.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    33. Re:Once again by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      Best way to rob a bank is to own one. Next best is to borrow so much that it's the bank that has a problem when you can't make the payments.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  3. Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does that mean educated people are less criminal or just better in hiding their crimes ?

    And in the latter case, doe we really want to educate criminals ?

    1. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly. The people incarcerated are generally just even stupider than cops...

    2. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you could somehow give everyone a decent job, I suspect you could eliminate most of the crime. You'd still have psychopaths who kill people for fun, and successful white collar criminals who think it's a good way to make a living.

    3. Re:Uhh... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A lot of criminals commit crimes because they don't believe that they have any options. You put them in prison and they come out and still can't get a job (especially now that they have a record), so what do they do? Commit more crimes. Give them some useful skills, and they see that they do have a choice.

      A small minority are just naturally and incurably sociopathic. Most of these work in management...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    5. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and some education is criminal.

      University of Hard Knocks : we have nearly 100 percent placement.

    6. Re:Uhh... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sounds quite logical to me, what inconsistencies do you see in his theory?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Uhh... by kanweg · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't explain the high percentage of the US population in jail.

      Bert
      Who remembers an item by Michael Moore (or an assistant of his, if I recall correctly), where a guy couldn't become a cop because there is an intelligence test for cops and if you're too smart you can't be hired. The last sentence of the cops' spokesman before the door is closed is priceless: We're there to protect crime. The reporter is flabbergasted: Did he really say that?

    8. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of criminals commit crimes because they don't believe that they have any options. You put them in prison and they come out and still can't get a job (especially now that they have a record), so what do they do? Commit more crimes. Give them some useful skills, and they see that they do have a choice.

      This begs the question: will education in useful/employable skills result in their leaving crime to become a productive member of society. They likely don't have an education because they lack innate self-control and/or the ability to delay gratification. Then there is the problem of just raw stupidity, nach _The_Bell_Curve_. Simply providing a skill set (even if possible) is unlikely to magically solve either of these problems.

      That said, there are some incarcerated individuals who want to improve themselves (and are the ones most likely to be capable of change.) This is where the limited resources should be applied. Otherwise we are just urinating into the wind.

    9. Re:Uhh... by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't explain the high percentage of the US population in jail.

      The "war on drugs," or more accurately, "prosecuting people for victimless crimes," is probably a pretty good explanation...

    10. Re:Uhh... by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      I think he's looking for actual evidence and not just someone saying that they think it's true.

    11. Re:Uhh... by swillden · · Score: 2

      You put them in prison and they come out and still can't get a job (especially now that they have a record), so what do they do? Commit more crimes. Give them some useful skills, and they see that they do have a choice.

      This presumes that having skills gives them a choice. Unfortunately, their record means getting a job is still basically impossible. Perhaps the best education we could give them is to teach them how to start and run successful small businesses, because people don't check the records of those they do business with. Of course, the ex-con had better not need a bank loan. And an education in business administration may just make an ex-con a more effective/efficient drug dealer.

      I don't know that there's a better way. If I were an employer, I wouldn't want to hire an ex-con. But the way the system works now means that people who do one stupid thing can be screwed for life.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Uhh... by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      Sounds quite logical to me, what inconsistencies do you see in his theory?

      "citation needed" doesn't mean that the whole thing is bullshit, just that somebody would like to see something other than speculation on the topic.

      The idea that heavier objects fall faster is reasonable and logical too, it's just not correct.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    13. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      useful skills. that should be the key to the conversation. an attempt to displace the criminal skils with useful skills should be seen as a valid attempt at reform.

    14. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This begs the question

      No it doesn't.

    15. Re:Uhh... by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      A lot of criminals commit crimes because they don't believe that they have any options. You put them in prison and they come out and still can't get a job (especially now that they have a record), so what do they do? Commit more crimes. Give them some useful skills, and they see that they do have a choice.

      A small minority are just naturally and incurably sociopathic. Most of these work in management...

      It is not a small minority. 1 in 24 people are sociopaths and in prison populations that ratio rises to nearly half .

      Most are in jail not because they lack education, but because it's where they belong.

    16. Re:Uhh... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Since this program is for doing court ordered community service, we're not likely talking about hardened criminals committing heinous crimes (yet). Perhaps they're close enough that this can move them to the right side of the line at least.

    17. Re:Uhh... by Xtifr · · Score: 1, Informative

      This begs the question

      No it doesn't.

      Yes it does. The fact that a stupid mistranslation of a latin phrase became generalized by the public doesn't mean that the generalization is any wronger than the original idiotic mistranslation. Either the phrase has no valid uses, or it has two.

      Furthermore, the standard claim that "raises the question" serves just as well is clearly false. An interesting scientific result may raise a question, but you will never see anyone, no matter how informally they're speaking, describe it as "begging a question". As used by normal English speakers, the phrase "begs the question" almost invariably describes human behavior and motives, and seems to have a strong correlation with places where the phrase "he's begging for it" could be used.

      Yes, the phrase certainly became popular in its common, standard form because of the idiotically mistranslated formal-logic term, but that doesn't make it "wrong" any more than bizarre formation misderived from technical (or not) terms. "Terrific" has other meanings than "causes terror", and "octopi" is accepted by dictionaries that never mention that the proper Greek plural would be "octopodes". English doesn't necessarily follow your narrow preconceptions. Get over it.

    18. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Language changes, man.

    19. Re:Uhh... by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      So he needs a citation of someone speculating the same thing he's speculating? Or perhaps he should back it up with statistics pulled from some bogus study some Sociology grad student composed. A logical statement doesn't require a citation.

      Personally, when discussing social issues I think statistics and research get in the way. A person's anecdotal experiences are probably more informative than Sociological research, which is impossible to make objective. At least with anecdotes people take it with a grain of salt instead of masquerading as a source of authority because 9 out of 10 people answered 'blah blah blah' on a survey issued by some ambitious grad student.

      If we're talking hard science then I fully understand asking for a citation or describing a way to set up a replicable experiment. The greatest failing of Sociology and Psychology is the incorrect assumption that human behavior can be reduced to a hard science.

      How do you really expect this guy to provide a citation that proves that most criminals are criminals because they have no other options? How would one answer that question using hard science? Survey prison inmates? That's fails because survey = bullshit science. He might be able to provide a citation with some figures to back up that ex-cons have a difficult time finding work, but, why? You have to be pretty detached from society to not know this is true.

      I'll take logic over statistics any day.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  4. Teaching the curve not the median by awilden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course there are many reasons that people don't finish school. Sometimes it's because they're not smart enough. Other times it's because they're bored out of their skulls, or family issues are pulling them away, or a million other reasons. Maybe this should be interpreted as yet another reason that we need to revamp schools so that they do more than just deliver a "one-size-fits-all" education to the middle of the bell curve. Education is expensive, but prison is far more expensive.

    1. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Education is expensive, but prison is far more expensive.

      Not if you try to customize every kids education. You'd have to turn that sentence around. Look, if you don't like the education system, home school your kid.
      Plus, privatizing prisons is extremely lucrative for business and creates tons of jobs.

    2. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But prisoners sometimes are used for customer service and apple picking. Are we sure prison is more expensive? I see it as slave labour.

      Yes, the problem with education is that it is expensive. Maybe if we didn't spend so much on "defense" here in America we could devote more towards k-12 and higher education.

      I figure there's roughly 50 million k-12. If we gave them each a voucher to use at a school of their choice (yes, including public schools) for $3k (with 1/3rd used to create free/better lunches), I think it would be significant. So if a school has 1000 high school students, you can figure that's an extra $2 million ($1 million for free/better lunches). Hiring homework graders would be a start to provide teacher relief. Maybe they could devote more time towards helping students after school.

      Higher education... anyone care to talk about that? State governments can't afford to provide all necessary funding to their public colleges to keep tuition low.

    3. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately we are only at the beginning of the "private prison" experiment in the UK, so I have to ask: why don't prisoners just refuse to work? I guess that there will be loss of privileges if some don't, but why don't they all just refuse? Are we at the stage where food/water is withdrawn entirely, or people beaten, in the style of a concentration camp?

    4. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Customising isn't that hard, if done at the correct granularity. My school split the year group into about smaller classes for each subject. Most of these were streamed based on ability so if you were, for example, gifted at mathematics but not at French then you'd be in a class learning mathematics faster but a slower French class. This used to be common in the UK, before the governments of the '70s and '80s decided that judging people based on their ability was elitist and therefore bad.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are we sure prison is more expensive? I see it as slave labour.

      Slaves are expensive. It costs something like $40k/year to incarcerate someone. If they're working the equivalent of a minimum wage job at the same time, then it's not really a good investment.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's "subsidized" by taxpayers though.

    7. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by bipbop · · Score: 3, Interesting
    8. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 2

      Privatizing prisons is insane, it creates an incentive for throwing more people in jail..

    9. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, it doesn't really create any jobs that weren't there when it was state run... but indirectly, it does. By throwing more people into jail, you not only reduce the number of people who are competing for jobs, but you also have to hire a few goons to keep them from getting away.

      The system works!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 1

      In the U.S., inflation-adjusted spending on education has more than tripled in the last 50 years, while outcomes have remained flat.

      One-room schoolhouses have a better track record of educational achievement than our modern system.

      We could probably reduce spending on education and reduce the need and expense of prisons, but those who make the decisions don't want that. The education system is doing what it was intended to do: dumb down the population. And it's doing it well.

    11. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

    12. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Privatizing prisons is insane, it creates an incentive for throwing more people in jail..

      Those incentives exist with or without private prisons. Plenty of people profit from government run prisons. For instance, here in California, the prison guard unions spend huge amounts of money promoting tougher sentencing. This includes donations to politicians that vote for tougher laws, and financing the "Three Strikes" voter initiative. We have prisoners serving 25 years for stealing a pair of socks.

    13. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No, that would be racist.

      Beatings and starvation ill be reserved for white prisoners on the grounds that someone who looked like them 200 years ago was disrespectful to a brown person who was chucking a spear at him.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      How do people profit from government run prisons? Are prisoners used as slave labor? I can certainly see how that would create an incentive for jailing more people as well..

    15. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Um, he gave an example. Anyone employed by a government-run prison profits by it. And yes, prisoners are used as slave labour - or "community service" as we call it.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    16. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by neonKow · · Score: 1

      On the most basic level, prisons employ guards. Prison guards are in the prison guard union. The union wants its people paid more and to have more jobs, so they lobby for things that result in more prisons or more guards per prison, like longer terms or harsher sentencing. This union is the most powerful union in California, followed by the teacher's union.

      I am not making this up.

      Also, even if you don't use prisoners as laborers, you still have gov't funds going into building and maintaining the facilities, as well as wherever you send people after prison, and ways to catch and convict people.

    17. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also apparently chemtrails are bad; http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20369 you're point might be valid but don't link to nuttjob sites.

    18. Re:Teaching the curve not the median by Tim+C · · Score: 2

      This used to be common in the UK, before the governments of the '70s and '80s decided that judging people based on their ability was elitist and therefore bad.

      Well, my school did that back in the 80s, my daughter's school does that now in 2012, and while I could be wrong I'm pretty sure my teacher friends (2 at this sort of level) both teach in schools that do that (one in London, the other in Leeds). I know, the plural of anecdote isn't data, but I think streaming of pupils in schools is still pretty common. (There's plenty to dislike about education in the UK, but from my perspective that isn't one of the things)

  5. Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the girl on the main page... Sign me up!

    1. Re:Sign me up! by mcavic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but is that her boyfriend? He could beat me up with one hand.

    2. Re:Sign me up! by gambino21 · · Score: 2

      Check out the girl on the main page... Sign me up!

      And compare her with the unshaved, tattooed man. I guess they're trying to promote the (educated) bad boy gets the girl stereotype.

    3. Re:Sign me up! by xeoron · · Score: 1

      All you need is some bear mace. If it can bring down a bear, you know you should be safe, unless they are immune to pepper spray.

    4. Re:Sign me up! by hey! · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but is that her boyfriend? He could beat me up with one hand.

      He's wearing a Bob Marley Festival tee-shirt. Obviously a non-violent drug offender busted for lighting up to get closer to God.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  6. This is for small crimes only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So it makes sense to do this. The jails are overcrowded already and it forces people to get educated, which should help them gets jobs. I would image many of people are doing this because a) they are bored, b) need money so they steal or c stupid or d) a combination of a, b, and c.

    1. Re:This is for small crimes only by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      You think that's a good thing? Think again:

      1. These people have a prior conviction.
      2. Any job these people could possibly apply for will be competed over by far more applicants than there are jobs.
      3. To have ANY chance to be chosen, these people would have to offer their workforce at a far lower price than anyone else.

      In a nutshell, if it accomplishes anything, it's more pressure on "honest" people and, in the end, lower wages for everyone.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:This is for small crimes only by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's hinted at in Shawshank Redemption, but I'm pretty sure based on other things I've seen/read that there's an element of reality behind it.

      Even workfare programs can have the same effect; force dolites to sweep the streets and eventually the street sweepers end up on the dole.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:This is for small crimes only by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Work doesn't magically multiply. If you give a job to someone, someone else is going to be short of a job. If you create a low wage alternative, companies will follow and refuse to pay more than that low wage alternative asks.

      For reference, see outsourcing.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. I don't think they became criminals... by dtmancom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think they became criminals because they didn't finish high school. Perhaps they didn't finish high school because they were already inclined to become criminals. My logic is as sound as theirs.

    1. Re:I don't think they became criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have both kinds, but the fact remains that programmes that educate convicts can dramatical reduce the number of re-offenders. which is what you want out of a 'correctional facility' right?

    2. Re:I don't think they became criminals... by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      But then that means less money for these private prisons.

  8. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all noticed that a long time ago.

  9. Repeated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    33% of statistics are simply repeated. Of cited statistics 67% are not repeated. More recently 33% of statistics were repeated.

  10. In other news... by jouassou · · Score: 3

    "...give me all yo' money, or I'll bust yo' ass like Atahualpa at Cajamarca!"

  11. Correlation != Causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It could be that there's another underlying cause that tends to make one act criminally and avoid education...

  12. HS education=compliance=no jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The sort of people sufficiently compliant to complete high school are the sort of people sufficiently compliant to think that we must do what we're told.

    I have excellent school and university grades (mathematics, not some wishy social science). It was a waste of fucking time. I've stopped respecting the law. I shouldn't have bothered in the first place. Maybe one day I'll end up in jail. Who cares? Most people were quicker than me and learnt this lesson earlier.

    And before you wonder, no, most people aren't locked up forever. You do your time, you make a life for yourself in jail, you come out again, do something outside jail, perhaps you get caught again.

    1. Re:HS education=compliance=no jail by jouassou · · Score: 1

      I have excellent school and university grades. It was a waste of fucking time. I've stopped respecting the law.

      I don't get your reasoning; the law didn't force you to attend university, you made that choice.

    2. Re:HS education=compliance=no jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point, my slow friend, is that "going to high school and university" and "respecting the law" are both constituents of "taking part in a worthwhile society".

      There is no worthwhile society to take part in.

    3. Re:HS education=compliance=no jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey genius, maybe if you had studied "wishy social sciences" instead of some abstract bullshit totally divorced from reality you would have realized what a scam capitalist civilization is a lot sooner. Ever met an anthropologist or sociologist who actually thinks we have a healthy and well functioning society?

  13. Doesn't that mean that 60%... by scorp1us · · Score: 0

    Did graduate? We should stop educating people because it leads to a life of crime. 3 out of 5 people in jail did graduate compared to 2 out of 5.. Clearly graduation is correlated with a life of crime. Plus who wants smart criminals?

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  14. The obvious solution by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    The obvious solution is to lower the requirements for gradution. Give everyone a sticker star, everyone's special. After all, if you have the right to a public education, why not have the right to a diploma too? Then once everyone has a piece of paper they didn't do any work to get, none of the criminals will have graduated from high school. Problem solved.

  15. Wrong correlation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    There is a correlation between a lack of education and a conviction.

    If you're educated enough you can easily avoid jail time.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. Re:Go to jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Interesting that if you actually look at the site (Community Service Help), for a criminal to get involved in this "non-profit" organization, they need a credit card number and a Pay Pal account.

    The whole Community Service Help Website reads like a sleazy advertisement. Note the picture of the smiling, big breasted girl showing her cleavage right on the front page of this "charity".

    This whole business appears to be a Slash-vertisement. Couldn't Slashdot reference an academic journal instead of some sleaveball Website that seeks to profit off of vulnerable people?

    References:
    http://www.communityservicehelp.com/

  17. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the statistics compiled from government sources here

  18. copyright concerns by can.you.feel.my.808 · · Score: 1

    the online learning comprises embedded youtube khanacademy.org videos.. i wonder if they are breaking any copyright laws by using these

  19. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, they have a higher chance to get convicted and get longer sentences when committing the same crimes as other races. Just like men get longer sentences compared to women. Turns out getting judged by a jury of your so-called peers sucks in a world of rampant racism and sexism.

  20. thats the worst part of jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    99% of people are just stupid as shit. getting into fights is at least kind of exciting, as bad as that sounds. listening to uneducated fuckfaces talking about dumb shit all day is the real torture of jail.

  21. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't high school mandatory in the USA?

    1. Re:WTF by MLease · · Score: 2

      No. At least, one is not legally required to obtain a high school diploma. I believe most states permit people to drop out of high school at the age of 16, though there may be parental permission required to so so, etc. And, of course, most jobs require a minimum of a high school diploma. But as far as the law is concerned, it's not mandatory.

      --
      I'm sorry; I don't know what I was thinking!
    2. Re:WTF by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also, kids that get in a lot of legal trouble tend not to be able to finish a high school diploma. Juvenile detention centers do teach classes, but the credits end up being so fragmented as kids jump between detention and regular school that it's difficult for them to actually fulfill the requirements -- and that assumes they don't just fail their classes anyway.

      I have personal experience with this. My daughter is very bright and capable, but suffers from a severe emotional disorder which leads her to make a lot of dumb decisions. Even though she typically does very well in school, her time in treatment centers, trouble with the law, expulsions from schools, etc., mean that she's chronically behind on credits. For example, she completed much of the first semester of Calculus this year (as a junior), but then got in trouble and ended up getting no math credit at all. She's now in a residential treatment center and taking dum-dum math because it's all they offer, but won't get any credit for it because she's already done it.

      In her case, because she's so bright, the solution will likely be to take the GED as soon as the state will let her, and she'll pass it handily. Or else I'll pay for summer school classes, or something similar. She's smart enough, and has involved parents, so she has a chance to be able to make it. Kids with similar issues but without similar advantages are really screwed. Of course, if she can't learn to manage her mental illness -- which is very, very hard to do -- she's going to be screwed, too. We try to help every way we can, but we can't live her life for her, and as she becomes an adult the consequences of bad decisions are going to become even more severe.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:WTF by im3w1l · · Score: 1

      So many horrible ac-trolls... Feel for you

    4. Re:WTF by swillden · · Score: 1

      So many horrible ac-trolls... Feel for you

      Thanks. It doesn't bother me much, though. One side effect of dealing regularly with the mentally ill is that you develop a very thick skin. I've had far more vicious things screamed at me by my daughter, and I care about her, so some random troll doesn't faze me.

      I do really wonder what motivates a person to spend their time spewing anonymous hate. This particular troll has been stalking me for months now, so he's really invested a great deal of time and effort into it. He rarely resorts to canned resplies, either. I can't even imagine ever wanting to do something like that, and certainly not putting the kind of effort into it that he has.

      I mean, I get that some people find the notion of hunting abhorrent (though most think nothing of eating meat that was raised and slaughtered in an industrial operation), and my bio says I like to hunt -- though in fact it's been years since I actually got out. But if the goal is to protest hunting, surely there are more effective outlets for his efforts. And the sort of personal venom he spews will make anyone automatically discount him, in fact he gives his own cause a bad name. I can only conclude that he's dealing with his own serious emotional issues and I'm just a convenient target for his attempts to relieve his own pain.

      If that's really what's going on, I suppose spewing profanity at me on-line is better than a lot of other things he could be doing. If he finds it therapeutic, I'm okay with that. I wish there were some way I could help him. I've tried responding, but I knew even before I did that it would just make him even more vicious. I think he really needs professional help, but obviously there's no way I can convince him of that.

      So, I just read his posts and shake my head. It's sad.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the analysis. I'm indeed against hunting and wouldn't mind seeing all you hunters being shot with a Cheytac m200. I'm also vegetarian. I feel sorry for your daughter but it's only fair when you think about it. You spent years masturbating while taking the life of innocent animals and now karma has come back to you, in the form of a Regan MacNeil clone that you can enjoy daily.

      It doesn't really take me that long to reply to you. Sometimes I'm taking a break, or waiting for Houdini to fnish a render pass, or whatever.

      The reason why you bother me is because you feel the need to comment in every goddamned Google story. Like I explained to you already, there is no real internal communication. There was a long internal debate about the Real Names policy and the Vic Gundotra asshole just ignored it. Ditto for the Honeycomb source code. The fact that you can rant about it on eng-misc doesn't mean shit when management ignores direct questions at TGIF and does whatever they want. So don't give me the openness crap. The only reason why I still work there is because Google pays me a lot of money in exchange for 1-2 hours of work a day. Also, the food is awesome. Most of the top managers in my part of the company are utter assholes and that's what I said in the Googlegeist form. Outside of work I never use any Google product and always advocate alternatives.

      If you want to continue defending Google on /. feel free to do so, but make sure you mention that those are your opinions and they do not represent Google's or I will report you to the HR idiots.

      --
      I work for the arrogant Google assholes. These are just my opinions, not my employer's.

    6. Re:WTF by swillden · · Score: 1

      You spent years masturbating while taking the life of innocent animals

      I generally just ignore statements like this, because they typically indicate a completely irrational attitude of a sort which no rational response can enlighten, but since the rest of your post is almost rational, I'll make an exception this time.

      Your comment indicates a complete misunderstanding of hunting and hunters -- at least all the hunters I know. There is no joy in killing, and there's certainly no sexual component to it. The joys of hunting are many, and the feeling of success at taking your quarry is a big part of it, but not because it's a kill. In fact, I find that I enjoy hunting just as much with a camera as I do with a bow, and I enjoy both of them much more than I do with a rifle. The truth is that other than taking my son bird hunting, all of my hunting for the last few years has been with a camera.

      I enjoy being out in nature. I enjoy watching, tracking and learning about the animals. Being a successful hunter requires a great deal of understanding of the habits, instincts abilities and preferences of wildlife. I enjoy testing my skill against theirs, seeing if I can predict their actions well enough to position myself on their path, and if I can move quickly and silently enough to sneak up on them. I also enjoy eating them. If it weren't for that, I would only hunt with a camera, because getting good photos is even more challenging, and because cleaning, dressing, hauling and butchering is hard work.

      I obviously have no problem with killing them; it's the natural order of things and, as I said, I like the meat. But your theory about why hunters hunt and what we get out of it is completely wrong.

      It doesn't really take me that long to reply to you. Sometimes I'm taking a break, or waiting for Houdini to fnish a render pass, or whatever.

      So you're a HWOPS SRE? FWIW, it's blaze builds that motivate me to read and post on slashdot.

      The reason why you bother me is because you feel the need to comment in every goddamned Google story.

      I comment on whatever I find interesting. That generally means stories about software development, security, cryptography, some politics (especially anything related to the TSA), and stuff about my current and previous employers. It just happens that there are a lot more stories about Google than the rest... and the comments posted about Google are more wrong than the rest. Yes, I do have the disease.

      Like I explained to you already, there is no real internal communication.

      Have you ever worked anywhere other than Google? I may have an advantage here, in that I spent 20 years in the industry, working for/with dozens of large corporations (I was a consultant for much of my career). I've seen a lot, and I'll tell you that Google is incomparably better.

      There was a long internal debate about the Real Names policy and the Vic Gundotra asshole just ignored it.

      You're wrong. Vic didn't ignore it, he explained it. You apparently didn't agree with his rationale, and neither did many others, but that doesn't mean it wasn't provided, nor that the debate wasn't real. I personally agreed with the Real Names policy. I think pseudonymity/anonymity is very important, but it also provides huge potential for abuse which would really lower the value of Google+. I think pseudonymity can be done in a way that works no Google+, but I agree with Vic that it has to be done carefully. It's better not to allow it than to allow it and then screw it up -- and trying to make sure that a pseudonymous account's real identity never leaks, across all of the Google properties, is definitely not trivial.

      Ditt

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  22. Reeducation by KPU · · Score: 1

    It's all about spin. "I sentence you to 30 days of reeducation." How does that sound?

  23. educated criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is it simply that the vast majority of those in prison lack the education required to be successful criminals? They aren't educated enough to not get caught, and when caught, to work the systems to avoid prison? If you educate an amoral convict, why do you assume you are making anything other than an educated and far more effective criminal?

    I'm not against education, I just don't believe it is the magical solution to crime. Correlation and causation, AGAIN!

  24. Re:Go to jail by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sadly profiting off of misery is a time honored tradition here in America, hell i wouldn't be surprised if over 75% of the "community service" forced upon people by the state didn't involve kickbacks or bribes. Its just slave labor, getting for free what one normally would have to pay for. Hell look at that judge that was sending kids to boot camp for any old reason he could think of because he was getting a kickback. in case you haven't noticed our courts have become just as corrupt as any banana republic, just sit in on some sessions and be prepared to be horrified. I have watched the rich walk away from some insanely long list of charges because his very expensive lawyer "had a quiet talk with the judge in the back" while some poor Rube with a $20 bag of weed got a year in prison. The only justice is what you can buy, no different than any South American hellhole we USED to make fun of. But power corrupts and money is power so now you have two systems, one for the rich, one for the poor.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  25. Funding? by TechieRefugee · · Score: 1

    My only question is where the funding for this kind of stuff is coming from? Is it all gonna be taxpayer dollars, or is there going to be a "Serial Murderer" discount at your nearest University of Phoenix?

  26. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by icqraid · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia's information of the New Century Foundation and the Pioneer Fund lead me to doubt the validity of this website.

  27. Here's a crazy idea: Freedom of Association by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about allowing all those of us who simply don't want to live with criminals, to FREELY ASSOCIATE with only non-criminals?

    What a crazy idea! We can't have that! How would all the poor, hard done by criminals survive, without the law abiding to leech off of?

    Who makes their food, makes their clothes, builds the houses they live in, provide the hospitals for their bastard offspring, etc.?

    US! The hard working, law abiding sheep, who have to pay taxes to support the very scum who are ruining our lives!

    How many people would actually CHOOSE to live in a society with criminals in it? Obviously only a small percentage. (I believe they are called 'liberals'...)

    1. Re:Here's a crazy idea: Freedom of Association by PPH · · Score: 0

      Who makes their food,

      Mexicans

      makes their clothes,

      Chinese children

      builds the houses they live in,

      Hondurans

      provide the hospitals for their bastard offspring, etc.?

      Jews.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  28. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Nice theory except it doesn't explain why a white woman is 17 times more likely to get raped by a black man than a black woman is to be raped by a white, or why you are on average 15 times more likely to get robbed by a black than a white. Lets cut the bull folks and speak the truth: 50 years of welfare has been more devastating to the black race than dropping an atomic bomb on them. You went from more than half the households being married to something like 9% now, it gave the lowest of the low an excuse to pop out kids they promptly abandoned or let run wild, and it gave rise to the "thug life!" "culture" which glorifies being the scummiest criminal you can be. Hell look at it, it glorifies the abuse of black women and violence and dope slinging. This when mixed with desegregation turned out to be a disaster because instead of having bankers and lawyers and doctors in the neighborhood to emulate all of those folks got the fuck out and all that was left was dealers and whores.

    Lets face it folks, all a half a century of white guilt did was create a permanent "scum class" with a victim mentality and a seething hatred of anything "whitey" like education or even speaking proper English. I've seen it myself many a time, being hired to play "coming home" parties where getting out of prison is celebrated like you just got out of Harvard. Those that live the "thug life!" are treated well and looked up to, those that actually try to better themselves are attacked by the community. Frankly it shocked the hell out of me, because i'd never seen anything like it with ANY other race. in fact the last figures I saw stated that a black straight off the boat from Africa are more than 20 times more likely to become middle class than a black born here. Now you can scream 'racist!" all you want but it ain't whitey that is creating those numbers or forcing them to embrace victim mentality and "thug life!" culture, that's the blacks. I have been in the poor sections of just about every race and culture you can name and have NEVER seen such an attitude from anybody else, never.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  29. No wonder by a-zA-Z0-9$_.+!*'(),x · · Score: 1

    The educated criminals go into politics.

    --
    Epitaph: At last! Root access!
  30. There is a correlation between being caught... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    ...at criminal activity and lack of education.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  31. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    "You went from more than half the households being married to something like 9% now, it gave the lowest of the low an excuse to pop out kids they promptly abandoned or let run wild, and it gave rise to the "thug life!" "culture" which glorifies being the scummiest criminal you can be. Hell look at it, it glorifies the abuse of black women and violence and dope slinging."

    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1077/is_1_59/ai_110361377/ - the article says 48% (down from 70%). So you're simply lying.

    And about 'welfare class' - that's another simply quantifiable lie.

  32. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because they get married doesn't mean they stay married or hang around as part of the household. His figures might be off, but most of his points still stand:
    http://newsone.com/nation/newsonestaff3/children-single-parents-u-s-american/
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39993685/ns/health-womens_health/t/blacks-struggle-percent-unwed-mothers-rate/
    The US blacks have a self-destructive culture. They glorify what keeps them down.

  33. Re:Go to jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL What a creative way to soak the 'offender' and harvest personal information about people with criminal histories, and all in the name of efficiency!

    The schpiel is: let "US" save YOU money by 'letting you' sign up with a non-profit using a web interface... All for JUST $49.95!

    Then, after you've done your community service, we'll make sure that all the right organizations know who you are and where to find you.

    I'd bet real bit-coin that the lists of people required to do community service are worth a pile of money. I'd even go so far as to wager that the politicos who orchestrate right-wing voter suppression efforts are involved in this business, directly or indirectly.

  34. Re:Go to jail by TobiX · · Score: 1

    > This whole business appears to be a Slash-vertisement.

    Yes, because a substantial part of Slashdot's readership gets into trouble and needs to do community service on a regular basis. I can totally identify with the "bad boy" on that front page.

  35. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. "The solution to pollution is (not) dilution." It doesn't work for sociology any better than it does for ecology.

  36. "Who knew?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew that
    B|
    Apparently...almost everyone knew most criminals did not finish high school because of

  37. Re:Go to jail by chromeronin · · Score: 1

    And the education stats quoted in the article, remember the "criminal" population is just a list of those who got caught. Maybe this just means those without higher education are simply more likely to get caught and prosecuted for their endevour. I'm sure if you included politicians in the mix it might lift the stats a little.

  38. American schools compared to French schools by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Alrighty since we are discussing schooling here and just recently been exchanging emails with a friend who grew up in France, came to US many years ago and recently retired. Below are some of her thoughts:

    Computer sciences was my major. It was not taught when I grew up in France, and my minor a French teaching degree so that I could teach French after retirement. My education was completed in France where I obtained a master's degree in Math/English. I completed college here to show that I also had an American Degree. Most firms feel re-assured as they do not know how to recognize foreign degrees, the schooling being very different. For example we start high school at the age of 12!... unheard here. Overall... foreign schooling is FAR! superior to lower level American school. In America education only get very serious at the master/doctorate level... (Of course this is my personal belief).

    At 11 years of age children are tested BY THE GOVERNMENT, that is under the supervision of government appointed testers in all fields of primary learning, that includes foreign language too which we start at about 8 years of age. The exam that we take is therefore all comprehensive and it takes 2 days: language arts etc., 1 day, then mathematics and sciences the second day. The results are posted outside on the third day. Children who DO NOT pass this serious exam continue school till the age of 15 then go to trade school. Children who pass this exam are considered for advance studies, "the college" till 15 years old, then the university. This sorting out takes place at the age of 11... I went to a private catholic school. Before the the government test, my teacher gave us exams each week and if we did not make at least 90 points on a 100 WE WERE NOT presented to the state appointed test. That is what system I followed... I am not certain it is entirely the same today, but children DO TAKE their studies seriously knowing they are going to be chosen or "discarded".

    Trade schools are much much better than what is done here. For example, there are trade schools for hostelry, therapy, cooking, jewelry cutting, wood working for furniture making, art, fashion design, accounting, etc. One can find a carrier even going to a trade school.

    I started school at 3-1/2 (ahah) and started serious school at 5 year of age and foreign languages at 8 (English and Latin). One learns a lot in 6 years (6 to 11)... especially when parents are as pushy as mine. I am so glad though to have had "my" chance at education. In my family "family" and "education" was the focus. The rest was secondary. I played with children in school only... I believe I was allowed to bring one friend for "gouter (afternoon tea) once. I played with my cousins a lot. "outward" direction was only for studies.

    A study was done by Harvard Med School recently showing that babies ages 6 months understood a great deal of the meaning of words. Somehow, by showing them objects such as pets, bottles, balls etc.. and following their line of sight (special lighting) it was apparent that the child under study always looked immediately at the object mentioned. My son could understand French and English when I spoke to him as a baby. It made no difference... I would say, for example: Vient ici, and come here please, he followed the order. Fun study!

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:American schools compared to French schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really hope that you didn't copy and paste this exactly from your friend's thoughts. If so, she should ask for a refund on her master's degree in English. Especially if she began learning English at age 5.

    2. Re:American schools compared to French schools by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was a direct cut and paste. It was also an email where she dumped her thoughts and not rewrite drafts. First drafts are always horrible, do a direct translations of what comes out the mouth. You will be amazed, lots of fodder for grammer nazis.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  39. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone's finger is on the Godwin button: Margaret Sanger

  40. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The references for that publication (what was linked is just the executive summary, the full publication is published as a PDF that is on the same page) are noted and can be easily verified.

    Your claim that the organization is fudging the numbers has been noted and rejected.

  41. Re:Go to jail by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

    What?

    You lost me at "big breasted."

    Where do I sign up?

  42. Re:Go to jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    INote the picture of the smiling, big breasted girl showing her cleavage right on the front page of this "charity".

    Probably to remind offenders what they will be missing out oin if they don't stop offending.

  43. Re:Go to jail by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

    Bob's bitch tits are a poor substitute indeed.

  44. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I didn't have time to look up the latest figures. Lets cut through the bullshit and the PC garbage that keeps anything from being spoken or discussed anymore. notice how quick the liberals had to hit the flamebait button for me daring to point out that 50 years of white guilt and a victim mentality has been BAD for black people? its not white folks glorifying not being educated and calling those that try to get ahead "Uncle Toms" and "acting Whitey" it is the blacks. notice how they've had to come up with "flash mob" as a nice way of saying 'roving black gangs" and many of the MSM refused to even print what those that were on the scene at the state fair at WI said which was "Its gangs of blacks attacking white people"? Why is that?

    Its actually quite simple. 50 years of hand outs instead of hand ups combined with a massively self destructive attitude that has built up around that culture has created an entire class that is filled with seething hatred for what the other races have yet without the foresight to see that it is their own self destructive behavior that is the cause. look up the numbers on African black VS USA black if you don't believe me. Despite language problems and having to acclimate to a completely different culture the African blacks are actually becoming middle class while if anything the USA blacks are getting worse when it comes to poverty, lack of education, and houses filled with unwed mothers and unwanted children. this when combined with white guilt and fear by whites of being called racist, no matter how ridiculous the circumstance, has led to a truly self destructive spiral for the American black.

    Sadly i got to witness some of this just myself the other day as Human Services came out for what had to have been the dozenth time to the apt building down the street. there an unwed black mother has been just leaving her 5-8 year old children wandering the streets for hours at a time because she simply doesn't want to deal with them. When I asked the HS lady why in the hell they haven't taken those kids which are obviously being neglected and are in serious danger of getting ran over since that apt is right next to a major roadway filled with Semi trucks? She told me flat footed they were told not to do anything about black mothers unless it was something so shocking like getting the kids high or beating the shit out of them because "they'll just scream racism and its too big a drain to deal with the courts". Now does anyone believe those kids, who have been neglected and turned out no matter how bad the weather because their mother has a revolving door to her bedroom (I know this because that is what got her kicked out of my building) is gonna have a prayer of getting a decent education or becoming anything better than their mother?

    In the old days she would have been shunned as the filthy whore she is and that shunning would have either straightened her ass up or she would have left town. Now black culture glorifies truly destructive behavior, unwed mothers, dope dealers and gangbangers, honestly it couldn't be MORE destructive if it was written by the Klan. People can scream racism all they want but until we as a nation actually say "enough is enough" we are literally breeding a criminal class that goes straight from the projects to the prisons and is nothing but a constant drain on society not to mention the human costs in all the rapes, murders, and violence. you have a culture that glorifies gold plated bling yet disdains any legal way of actually earning the gold they covet. Is it any wonder so many blacks are in prisons? by hiding your heads in the sand you are avoiding racism, you are growing it by the day because the "thug life!"ers are growing like a cancer. Every one of those kids popped out by a mother that doesn't give a shit or even know who the "baby's daddy" is (another lovely phrase given to us by black culture because of such a high unwed rate) is MUCH more likely to continue the spiral simply because there is nobody at home that gives a shit whether

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  45. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I think it's better to turn all white people into slaves, right? After all, as you're telling us white people can work just fine. And if they're slaves and forced to work at gunpoint they'll work even harder!

    I'd say it's a win-win solution!

  46. Stupid Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee wow. A disproportionate amount of the jail community has not graduated high school. Could it be, I don't know... because the ones that do finish high school are smart enough to be less likely to be caught?

  47. Crime prevention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly the conclusion to draw is to throw high school dropouts in jail right away, preventing crime!

  48. You... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...gotta be good to society johny.

  49. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The left is incapable of discussing racial issues from outside of their boilerplate narratives about white privilege, oppression, institutional racism, affirmative action, and etc. Their ideas have been in place for several decades and have been shown to be failures. Instead of acknowledging these problems as fundamental failures, they continue to bury their heads in the sand all while they propose re-hashes of the same failed ideas. All while blaming white people and demanding a continued battle against anything seen as too culturally white (see Tim Wise, Mark Potok, and etc.).

    BTW did you hear about the nonsense going on at Towson University? A bunch of kids in the campus branch of YWC chalked "white pride" all over campus and the left practically fell over themselves to whine and cry about how the campus has become unsafe. See here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uDgEKUozxI. It's really funny but very pathetic and sad.

  50. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > there an unwed black mother has been just leaving her 5-8 year old children wandering the streets for hours at a time because she simply doesn't want to deal with them.
    When I was that age playing outside for hours at a time was considered healthy. There usually weren't any adults around and me and my friends would roam many miles away from home.

    > When I asked the HS lady why in the hell they haven't taken those kids which are obviously being neglected and are in serious danger of getting ran over since that apt is right next to a major roadway filled with Semi trucks?
    I fail to see how the presence or absence of semi-trucks is relevant, kids have little mass and smaller bones; a small car will kill them just as easily. But kids tend to realize this as well so it's really not that dangerous. I played next to railways and a 70 mph highway. You don't have to be a fucking rocket scientist not to walk in front of a moving vehicle.

    > Now does anyone believe those kids, who have been neglected and turned out no matter how bad the weather because their mother has a revolving door to her bedroom s gonna have a prayer of getting a decent education or becoming anything better than their mother?
    Kids are not made of sugar and will not melt when exposed to rain. Unless it's under 263K outside I really see no point in keeping them inside.

    > (I know this because that is what got her kicked out of my building) i
    Yeah, sure, *that* is how you found out.

    > In the old days she would have been shunned as the filthy whore she is and that shunning would have either straightened her ass up or she would have left town.
    Do you kiss your mother with that mouth? Enough with the slut-shaming already, we get it, you're racist *and* sexist.

    > Is it any wonder so many blacks are in prisons?
    No, with prejudiced people like you on a jury, having many black people in prison would not surprise me at all.

    > (another lovely phrase given to us by black culture because of such a high unwed rate)
    What's your obsession with marriage?

    > Hell you already have chunks of your inner cities that even the cops won't go into after dark
    So you're saying they're not doing their jobs?

  51. Just one word. Benjamin... by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    Khan Academy

  52. Re:Go to jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course you need a credit card number and a paypal account - the thing costs $49.95, which, as they point out, is very reasonable compared to thousand dollars' worth of inconveniences that normal community service brings you. And since when is "profiting off of vulnerable people" by providing a useful service that helps them a bad thing?

  53. I am confused by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

    "About 40 percent of all U.S. prison inmates never finished high school, and nearly 44 percent of jail inmates did not complete high school"

    I am very confused when I read this sentence from the article (and summary) above. What does the difference between "U.S. prison inmates" and "jail inmates"? If "jail inmates" are in the U.S., aren't "prison" and "jail" the same? If so, then what the different between "never finished" and "did not complete"???

    1. Re:I am confused by compro01 · · Score: 1

      I believe jails are smaller/lower security facilities for short sentences (less than 2 years) and pre-trial custody, whereas prisons are larger, more secure, and for longer term.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:I am confused by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      A jail is a local level holding facility, usually used by a city or county. If you're arrested for being drunk and disorderly in public and you're thrown in the drunk tank, you're in jail. If you commit some type of misdemeanor that lands you a 90-day sentence, you'll serve that in jail. A jail is commonly a part of a police station.

      A prison is a state level holding facility. If you commit a felony like steal a car, for example, you'll go to jail until you go to trial. Once you're found guilty and sentenced you'll be sent to prison. There are also federal and military prisons.

      There's no difference between "never finished" and "did not complete," the author was just avoiding a redundancy.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  54. Computer Access by halfkoreanamerican · · Score: 1

    Do these offenders have computer access to be able to complete this mandatory requirement? I suppose it is more likely that one might have a computer as opposed to a vehicle. Still, it is not universal.

  55. Re:Racial Breakdowns? by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

    There's a major flaw in your logic.

    The fact that black people live this lifestyle has nothing to do with the fact that they're black and everything to do with the fact that they're poor. You're not describing black people, you're describing poor people. I don't know a single black person who feels the type of us vs. them mentality you describe, and judging by your post I think it's safe to say that I'm much more familiar with black Americans and those who suffer from poverty in general. Blacks just tend to live in poverty because of historical circumstances.

    Yes, our education system is so inadequate and so weighted against the poor that we are breeding a criminal class. Yes that correlates to black people because black people tend to live in poverty. But when discussing the problems facing education, poverty, and crime discussing race is counter-intuitive. The white kid in the projects with an unemployed mother and imprisoned father is just as disadvantaged as his black neighbor. The fact of the matter is race matters less and less these days. The problem with that is because it has nothing to do with black upward mobility and everything to do with white downward mobility. Those white families who were blue-collar, middle class a generation or two ago are falling into poverty and becoming a part of the criminal culture.

    It seems that we agree that education is the only solution, but I think your tirade about race is misplaced and fruitless. What you seem to think is black culture isn't black culture, it's criminal culture. When you label it as black culture, not only are you being inaccurate, but you're inciting racism by blaming a people. When you label it criminal culture, you're being more accurate and you're condemning a behavior, not a skin tone.

    --
    "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  56. Re:Go to jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And since when is "profiting off of vulnerable people" by providing a useful service that helps them a bad thing?

    Always.

    If you can't figure out the reason why then you are either an idiot or an American (excuse the apparent ad hominem... I just get so very tired of dealing with people like you. In fact, it is people like you that make communism look good, compared to the status quo in America, that is).

  57. Reality check from another world, slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone who was close to me got screwed by her well-paid lawyer, and spent most of 2004 in jail in FL. Among the things she told me:
    1. *most* of the other women had never finished high school... as in, they came to her to help write letters, they were
                    that illiterate
    2. Many had literally no idea how to get a job, rent an apartment, or open a checking account
    3. The jail allegedly had a GED program, but would only run it "if they had a full class"; in spite of the illiteracy, somehow
                  they never had a full class in the previous year. My friend offered to teach, and both taught and read to the others.

    The upshot is that many people go into crime because they have no idea how to handle the real world. Giving them a self-paced means of education, with a legal push, might actually help.

    Now, if we could just seal records - if you've *EVER* spent time in jail, for anything, anywhere in the country, employers will search and find, and oh, no, having a conviction doesn't mean we won't hire you (like *hell* it doesn't!!!).

                          mark

  58. Is it 40% or 44% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else read that?

  59. Re:Go to jail by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    It's probably safer than joining the Army (navy, whatever) and trying to shoot foreigners.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"