Slashdot Mirror


Independent Audit Finds Foxconn Violates Chinese Work Rules

doston writes "The first independent audit of Apple's supply chain found excessive working hours and health and safety issues at its largest manufacturer, piling more pressure on the technology giant. This investigation targeted Hon Hai Precision Industry which is known as Foxconn. The company says they will try to stop their overtime criminality by July, 2013. Will the public ever sour on Apple devices in light of the constant media attention on supplier working conditions?"

315 comments

  1. Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You fucking idiots. Every computer, laptop, and Smartphone you own was either manufactured by Foxconn or has parts manufactured by Foxconn.

    1. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What, exactly, is your point?

      Apple gets singled out due to its extraordinary profile and profitability. That is inevitable and entirely legitimate. The fact that Foxconn also happens to be central to the supply chain of practically everything with a power cord only highlights the vast scope of the issue. Our electronics are the product of exploitation, abuse and the systematic avoidance of regulatory scrutiny, and it is high time for that to end.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    2. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I believe the AC's point is that there is no alternative, short of neo-Luddism.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Oh fucking Christ by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      >>>Every computer, laptop, and Smartphone you own was either manufactured by Foxconn

      No actually my Commodore was manufactured in the USA.

      Oh you mean CURRENT products..... well yes that's probably true. My windows computer is 10 years old but probably does have some Foxconn parts inside it. HOWEVER apple is supposed to be better than the other manufacturers. They are supposed to be the "good" alternative for us hipsters.

      And they really aren't. Their OS is better but not their hardware.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Oh fucking Christ by guspasho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That point is pure bullshit. The US sustained a large manufacturing sector for decades, and it in turn sustained an expansive middle class. The reason for that is unions. Once the unions began to crumble, the manufacturing became outsourced, or the jobs paid less, and the middle class started to crumble. US households now work twice as many hours per week to make what they once did just forty years ago.

      The idea that we can't have nice things unless they are made by slave labor, or that the Chinese that make our nice things should be happy with their oppressive conditions, is just bullshit. Apple, for their part, is sitting on nearly 100 billion dollars cash, and could do a lot to improve the quality of life for the people who make their products. The current situation is exactly why we, and the Chinese, need stronger unions.

    5. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      Our electronics are the product of exploitation, abuse and the systematic avoidance of regulatory scrutiny, and it is high time for that to end

      1. You seems to imply that the systematic avoidance of regulatory scrutiny only happen in countries such as China or Thailand or Indonesia

      Tell you a fucking truth --- same thing also happen in the U. S. of A.

      2. How prepared are you in paying an arm and a leg for s simple hard disk drive? Or a thumb drive? Or an LCD TV? Or your smartphone?

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    6. Re:Oh fucking Christ by guises · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, "But Timmy's doing it too!" is never a valid excuse.

      The other reason Apple gets singled out is because of their singular ability to change things if they had the will to do so - manufacturer’s will bend over backwards for an Apple contract in a way that they won't do for any other company.

    7. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically you make sure to buy no electronics at all, right? Oh wait, you're just another Apple-bashing hypocrite.

    8. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Desler · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually they are better than the other manufacturers. How many of the other firms who use Foxconn are doing even a fraction of what Apple is doing for the betterment of the people making their products? Oh right, none of them are.

    9. Re:Oh fucking Christ by leucadiadude · · Score: 0

      Spot on.

    10. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      Of course the idea is bullshit. The reality isn't, however. A person could, for example, settle for older computers that weren't made in East Asia under slavish conditions to improve profit margins. Unfortunately, you'd most likely be looking at fairly antique hardware.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    11. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope. we just have to wait another 30 years for the chinese to outsource back to us.

    12. Re:Oh fucking Christ by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the only people who believe that are the people the pro-business far right has managed to trick.

      The right answer is it's actually nobody's fault; the simple fact is the US had a booming manufacturing sector for decades because there was very little competition, with possible competitors either communist, third world, or first world but recovering from WW2.

    13. Re:Oh fucking Christ by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Honestly, I think the outsourcing would have happened regardless. Unions just happened to have accelerated this process via a positive feedback loop. But to be fair about, I wouldn't put the blame squarely on the Unions. They didn't start the process by their mere existence. Of course, they certainly wouldn't have stopped it either.

      Finger pointing aside, the reality of globalism is that it exposes one absolute fact about the Western world. We (and thus our currency) is over valued in the market. Our fucked up Federal Gov decided to run up massive debt thinking our GDP would be sustained enough to pull us out of it. It's not. We are losing jobs AND are left holding the bag. Not good.

      Basically, we're going to have to wait for the rest of able-bodied world to become expensive before it's no longer cost effective to outsource. Who know how long that will take.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    14. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the point is, that this question at the end of TFS, "Will the public ever sour on Apple devices in light of the constant media attention on supplier working conditions?" is simply flamebait. Nobody's disputing that Foxconn's working conditions are problematic, in light of this audit. Foxconn manufactures devices for far more companies that just Apple. So why single out Apple devices as things "the public should sour on?" Should they buy Samsung, HTC, Sony, Motorola, or Nokia devices manufactured by Foxconn instead? Or should we sour on ALL of those devices, refuse to buy them, and engage in a little neo-luddism?

      And if we do the latter, do you really think the million or so people out of work at Foxconn would *thank us* for sending them back to working as subsistence farmers in third world poverty?

      As distasteful as Foxconn's working conditions may be to your delicate sensibilities, they represent a vast improvement in the average chinese worker's living conditions. That doesn't mean there won't be room for improvement, but you're kidding yourself if you think they take (and continue to work) these jobs unwillingly.

    15. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the American middle class manufacturing sector fell was because of unions not because the unions fell but because they got greedy. Unions became inflexible and businesses said FUCK IT

      Of course, it's never quite this simple but if anyone was paying attention the last 3-years they would have seen lots of proof of this point. Living in Wisconsin we had some real big names in manufacturing prove this very point. Kohler (Kohler, WI), Harley Davidson (Milwaukee, WI), Mercury Marine (Fond du Lac, WI), Miller Brewing (Milwaukee, WI), and Thomas Industries (Sheboygan, WI) all went through tooth-and-nail fights with their unions just to get concessions to sustain their manufacturing. And it's not even "overseas", it's other states.

      Thomas Industries left Sheboygan after many decades (Thomas is a division of Gardner Denver) to right-to-work Louisiana. When Miller and Coors went to combine, there was a huge fight to keep Miller in Milwaukee, a historical landmark. Mercury Marine pretty much had their bags packed to leave to another right-to-work state (Oklahoma) before the workers revolted against union leadership and held their own vote to accept concessions (after the city of FdL got the company to reconsider with an added sales tax benefit).

      Kohler union leaders almost saw most of their plumbing jobs shift to Kohler's other plants across the US, Mexico, and China. I live in the are and worked for Kohler as well as have/had family work as accountants for them. There's this mentality that these works are down-trodden while making $26/hour doing unskilled labour. More when they have mandatory overtime. After you add in benefits, it's closer to $50/hour total (estimated numbers from the accountant). Is it any wonder why a company would be attractive to $1/hour labour? Yet, these "evil" companies are willing to keep these good paying jobs in the US if they accept to pay more for things like benefits so the company pays $40/hour instead of $50 in benefits. And $40/hour puts you in upper-middle class range.

      I could go on, but it's obvious. Manufacturing is surviving in the US but that's usually in cases with no unions or unions who where not hostile to their employer. Unions had an important part in history, but it's become just another corrupt political origination that adds inefficiency. There's all kinds of laws protecting works from abuse employers: unemployment, lawsuits for every kind of discrimination (to the point that we more often talk about frivolous lawsuits), OSHA for worker safety, etc. Workers to stand together and "unionize" against such employers was needed long ago. You use to loose an arm in a work accident and get fired for not being able to do your job anymore. Who thinks that can happen in the US without a billion dollar lawsuit?

    16. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the unions began to crumble, the manufacturing became outsourced, or the jobs paid less, and the middle class started to crumble.

      I think you got that wrong. Unions are still alive and well. Once companies realized they could bypass unions by outsourcing manufacturing, things started to crumble.

    17. Re:Oh fucking Christ by narcc · · Score: 1

      And if we do the latter, do you really think the million or so people out of work at Foxconn would *thank us* for sending them back to working as subsistence farmers in third world poverty?

      You're right. It's much better to work long hours in an unsafe manufacturing environment while living in third world poverty.

    18. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Union or not, they would have outsourced. $20/hr for union work, vs $10 for non, vs $0.50 in the orient.

      There was a way to control this - tariffs. Of course that ship sailed, so they'd have to gradually increase tariffs on things until manufacturing starts to move back. (If you suddenly put a 100% tariff on any finished good from the third world, the US would be in a rough spot while tooling up...)

    19. Re:Oh fucking Christ by narcc · · Score: 1

      How much was Apple doing to improve the lives of people making their products before they started getting negative press?

    20. Re:Oh fucking Christ by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      My Amiga 2000 has Foxconn parts. How much older are you aiming for?

    21. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Really? I'm mildly surprised. I'd tear mine apart, but I don't want to lift three CRTs this late at night. Do you have an A1000 for comparison?

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    22. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      This argument of "american made good will be expensive as fuck" is old and bitterly stale, not to mention invalid. Electronics prices were just the same when it was originally made in the USA, except now with production costs slashed to nothing doe to $0.50 an hour labor people are making RECORD profits.

    23. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Genda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but look at what unions are fighting for now and what workers are going on strike for. People are striking for a living wage and to be able to take their kids to a doctor and not be financially ruined by doing so. American workers are quick becoming third world workers thanks to a corporate monolith that is reducing the global work force to the lowest common denominator. I too would fight tooth and nail too to be able to get a high enough wage to only have to work one job and have both a roof and not starve (or have my family starve.) Look at Walmart, a company that trades heavily in China, and pays its worker so little that their health plan is Federal and State Health Care plans for people below the poverty line and these folks get food stamps. Americans subsidize Walmart's bottom line by paying their employees their basic benefits. What part of that isn't obscene?

      Americans are desperate. We've been taking a beating so long, we'll settle for just not standing in food lines or having to ask for food stamps. That's not a rampant sign of unions out of control. Corporations have pushed the American worker to the edge of extinction. If we lack an infrastructure for production its not because we lack skilled labor. Its because American Corporations abandoned American for higher profit margins and bigger bonuses for their Boards of Directors. The United States has been in economic free-fall for most of 3 decades. American corporations have been cannibalizing America making trillions as they siphon off the flood of wealth leaving our country. How long before America has been bled dry. From what I can see, not long.

      Global Corporations are now predicated on the fallacy that they can do unlimited social, moral and environmental damage without ever having to pay the price. This doesn't seem crazy only because they've gotten away with it up until now. There is a carrying capacity, and human economies are quick reaching that barrier. There is no indication that those who steer our economies will address the insanity of their behavior until they succeed in crashing the world. Therefore it is up to men and women of vision and conscience to say enough. It is time to re-engineer society, humanity and global enterprise.

    24. Re:Oh fucking Christ by peppepz · · Score: 1, Insightful
      My Blackberry phone was built in Hungary, a free country (if a bit on the fascist side). My previous Nokia phone was built in Finland, a free country. My current HTC phone was built in Taiwan, a free country.

      The "no alternatives" defense is just the typical excuse given by the exploiters to justify their status quo.

    25. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Genda · · Score: 1
      As distasteful as Foxconn's working conditions may be to your delicate sensibilities, they represent a vast improvement in the average chinese worker's living conditions. That doesn't mean there won't be room for improvement, but you're kidding yourself if you think they take (and continue to work) these jobs unwillingly.

      Exactly... and the Chinese are hard at work trying to get worker's suicide entered as an Olympic sport for this Summer's competitions in London, and they're certain they can snatch a gold!

    26. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your devices may have been assembled in those countries but it is a very strong possibility they contain components that were manufactured by companies like foxconn.

    27. Re:Oh fucking Christ by DerPflanz · · Score: 0

      I believe the AC's point is that there is no alternative, short of neo-Luddism.

      You might forget that Apple has 100 billion dollars in the bank. They could also use that many to invest in a better work environment for Chinese workers instead of making their execs richer than they need to be.

      --
      -- The Internet is a too slow way of doing things, you'd never do without it.
    28. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      We already discussed that. The consumer does not have the power to steer Apple; you and I remain screwed on that front.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    29. Re:Oh fucking Christ by DerPflanz · · Score: 2

      Wo do have the power to steer Apple: don't buy Apple.

      --
      -- The Internet is a too slow way of doing things, you'd never do without it.
    30. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the outsourcing would have happened regardless. Unions just happened to have accelerated this process via a positive feedback loop.

      Well perhaps you can explain why that didn't happen in Germany, which has far stronger unions than USA? Germany remains a manufacturing powerhouse and is only getting stronger. Of course they play to their own strengths. In Europe at least, the market for German products is strong because they are well engineered and accurately made. You want a decent coffee grinder? Trust me, German grinders are amazingly much better than the next best thing. How about a knife? A car? A camera lens? Etc, etc, etc.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    31. Re:Oh fucking Christ by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      The reason for that is unions.

      - wrong.

      The unions impede on the ability of the economy to grow faster, how come the government is all over companies that are supposedly monopolies, but when people form a monopoly on their product - labour (labour also needs to be bought, like all other products), then it's all OK?

      It's not OK when government protects monopolies, be it monopolies of the banks or monopolies of the unions on labour.

      The reason USA had the largest middle class was because USA had the most freedoms compared to all other countries, and so Civil war to WWI USA had developed the real largest middle class - professionals and small businesses.

      Then IRS started collecting income/corporate taxes (and later payroll) and the Fed started printing money (causing the depression of 1921, 1929, 1970s, 1990s, and current).

      The prosperity that came with the end of the WWII, when the Great Depression could finally end because gov't cut taxes by 30% and spending by 64%, was exactly due to the fact that gov't cut spending but also because USA had a limited time monopoly on production - most of the rest of the world was pretty much in ruin.

      That was USA's peace dividend, but it decided that wars are much more profitable for some people and created the military industrial complex. Eventually other countries picked up the slack and fewer US products were bought, but the appetite for big gov't grew, which was now funded not just by 'honest' taxes but also by inflation, and INFLATION DESTROYS SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT - causes companies to shut down the shop and move somewhere else, where their investment capital is not destroyed by the illegal actions of the government.

      Once most of the real manufacturing leaves, the economy is on life support of the fake money and foreign countries willing to exchange their manufactured goods for this fake money, but that can't last forever.

    32. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      And another reason Apple gets singled out is because their habit is put their effort into spin control instead of actually doing anything substantive. The more Apple does that, the more it makes people mad.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    33. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      More to the point, what has Apple actually done since getting called out, other than spend yet more money on Burson Marsteller?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    34. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1
      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    35. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia is just closing down it's assembly lines in Finland. So, no nokias from Finland anymore. I do remember seeing reports about nokia (at least claiming) to monitor worker conditions throughout their supply and manufacturing chain.

    36. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 0

      I think the outsourcing would have happened regardless. Unions just happened to have accelerated this process via a positive feedback loop.

      Well perhaps you can explain why that didn't happen in Germany, which has far stronger unions than USA? Germany remains a manufacturing powerhouse and is only getting stronger. Of course they play to their own strengths. In Europe at least, the market for German products is strong because they are well engineered and accurately made. You want a decent coffee grinder? Trust me, German grinders are amazingly much better than the next best thing. How about a knife? A car? A camera lens? Etc, etc, etc.

      Huh, offtopic? Smells like mod point abuse.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    37. Re:Oh fucking Christ by peppepz · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's sad. That's what happens when companies are taken over by foreign investors with no interest in the company, let alone its workers.

    38. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This argument of "american made good will be expensive as fuck" is old and bitterly stale, not to mention invalid. Electronics prices were just the same when it was originally made in the USA, except now with production costs slashed to nothing doe to $0.50 an hour labor Americans are making RECORD profits.

      fixed that for you, these profits stay in the country

    39. Re:Oh fucking Christ by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      How can this drivel be modded insightful?

      Japan, Germany, Switzerland and France has strong manufactoring sectors. In fact, heavily automated manufacturing for things such as electronics is only slightly more expensive than the type of labor intensive manufacturing that we see in places like China. The problem is the high capital outlay for this equipment which no-one wants to front. It's not a problem while cheap labor is in plentiful supply.

    40. Re:Oh fucking Christ by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe we are still discussing this point when many other countries with much better worker protections that the US are still able to maintain a strong manufacturing sector. Places like Germany, Switzerland, France and Japan, where manufacturing workers get a livable wage, *and* also have healthcare.

      Maybe we should be looking at our system, and why it is failing. From my point of view this is because 1) unfettered free trade has high external cost that is not internalized. For example, worker and environmental protectiosn are much lower in developing countries. These products will be cheaper just by this fact, before labor costs are factored in. 2) Too much focus on short-term profitability. For short-term boost to the bottom line, many companies are willing to start up operations in China (or make other questionable move), many of which require a joint-venture with a local company. This results in the inevitable loss competitive advantage of these companies, not to their immediate competitors, but to a new wave of competitors - look at how high-speed rail technology, for example, is being bought pennies on the dollar from foreign firms. This results in lower profitability in the long term.

      The developed economies that are doing well, do so avoiding these issues by producing high-value goods, which are for most part heavily automated. However, as you can see with the high-speed rail example above, this model has its limits.

      1 is easy to fix - not by import duties, but to ensure that the way imported goods are made is equivalent to the general restrictions of a developed country. There can even be standards similar to how RoHS is implemented.

      2 is much harder to fix. Lassiez faire market theory has failed us - no the question is whether common sense or monied interests will prevail.

    41. Re:Oh fucking Christ by necro81 · · Score: 1

      How many German smartphones can you buy? Or, for that matter, any consumer electronics that are not only designed, but assembled in Germany, using components that were sourced in Germany?

    42. Re:Oh fucking Christ by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Yes, "But Timmy's doing it too!" is never a valid excuse.

      That may be what your parents tell you when you are growing up, because they are teaching you about morality. But please don't conflate sound business practice with morality.

    43. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      More to the point, what has Apple actually done since getting called out, other than spend yet more money on Burson Marsteller?

      WTF? They stopped doing business with numerous suppliers, forced suppliers to pay child laborers compensation including a full wage and the cost of schooling for the rest of their lives as children, they forced more safety procedures and forced working hours to be changed. They openly publish audits every year including a list of what they forced suppliers to change and how many they fired outright for repeated abuses. That's what Apple has done and they've been working on it for years now.

      What has HP done? What has Sony done? What has any other company you think we should buy computers from done?

      If you want to make a positive influence on the market buy Apple, then write to every other computer maker and tell them you didn't buy their product because they don't conduct and publish audits and don't fire suppliers over abuses or if they do they keep it secret. Tell them and stand by it. As soon as someone other than Apple reaches the same level of effort on stopping these abuses, buy from them instead. Get everyone you know to do the same. That might make a difference.

    44. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think corporations should have free rein? I suggest you read about the post industrial U.S. circa 1900. Then once you've educated yourself a little, you can come back and rejoin this discussion.

    45. Re:Oh fucking Christ by RPD9803 · · Score: 2

      I believe the AC's point is more speaks to the OP's question of the public souring on Apple.. I, for one, am tired of Apple being held to a higher standard than Amazon, Dell, HP & Sony. The fact that Apple is also the one paying for the independant audit shows that Apple's actuallydoing more than the aformentioned companies as well. Why, therefore, should the company doing the most already face the most criticism? It may just be a new thing for the apple-haters to rail on, methinks. I've seen a lot of rational people come to absolutely ridiculous conclusions on this issue because "Apple makes more profits"

      --
      Culture + Technology
    46. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wo[sic] do have the power to steer Apple: don't buy Apple.

      Yeah, that's a great idea. It will steer them to be like companies that aren't being boycotted. You know the ones that don't conduct audits or require supply chain improvements but shut the hell up about it. For all the crap people write about how much they are in favor of "openness" we see the truth here. Out of sight is out of mind so you'll punish the one company conducting and publishing audits and paying an independent third party to do the same. You'll reward the dozen or so companies that are not open about it and most likely do nothing at all to improve things.

      You are the problem.

    47. Re:Oh fucking Christ by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Sorry, AC, but you're the fucking idiot. Putting pressure on Apple is what caused FoxCon to change its employment practices.

      Everybody knows that half of electronics comes from that factory, but Apple is the only one with the clout to do anything about it.

    48. Re:Oh fucking Christ by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      when people form a monopoly on their product - labour

      But there is no monopoly on labor. A union is the employees of a company bargaining collectively with management, which is also a collective. Unions take power from the 1% and give it to the 99%. I'm in a union and I hold no monopoly; there are thousands of me. And should I break the contract, management is free to fire me and hire someone else. Management can hire anyone.

      As to the rest of your post, where do you get those ignorant ideas? Not in any college level history class! The 1929 stock market crash was caused by exactly the same thing that caused the 2008 crash -- Republicans and the "the less government we have, the better". Read Only Yesterday: An Informal History of the 1920's Frederick Lewis Allen, the entire book is online here. It was a required text in an undergrad course I took at SIU in the late '70s.

      Everything needs balkance. Too little water and you'll die. Too much water and you'll die. Too much regulation causes problems, too little regulation causes problems. Misregulating causes problems in any case.

    49. Re:Oh fucking Christ by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      How can this drivel be modded insightful?

      Obviously the moderator is as unenlightened as the commenter. We have a lot of rabid so-called "conservatives" at slashdot, and they get mod points, too.

    50. Re:Oh fucking Christ by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      BS. Take Apple's green initiatives. They were far ahead of most in the industry in moving to greener materials and processes, but Greenpeace shit on them anyway because they wouldn't publish an official public document declaring their commitment and improvement plans (i.e. "spin") like their competitors were doing.

      Then when Apple did demonstrate how they're already fairly green, they're accused of marketing and spin. And Greenpeace still went after them because it still wasn't an official document, and going after Apple guarantees press.

      So it is with Foxconn labour. By most accounts factories making their products are farther ahead than most of their competitors. Do they get a break? No, because aha, an independent report says it still sucks compared to western standards (and violates Chinese law, granted, but that means the Chinese government, not Apple, needs to do its job enforcing its own laws, they're supposed to be brutally efficient at that), and the protests ratchet up even higher.

      This is a classic case of give them an inch, they demand a mile. It's like Democrats trying to compromise and the Republicans are so blinded by their ideology and hatred of anything "lefty/liberal" that they refuse to accept any concessions, they want to kill the bill out of spite. Compromise is taken as a sign of weakness so they go after them for even more compromises.

      Yeah, that strategy works great to get what you want, short term. After awhile they'll realize all their efforts just get them even more grief, because it's *never* enough to satisfy their detractors, so they stop trying to concede anything.

    51. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but, if the labor is bought, then you are talking about slavery.

      And no, don't tell me it's a technicality or nitpicking. It's true.

    52. Re:Oh fucking Christ by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      You don't make any sense. All labour that is paid for is bought.

    53. Re:Oh fucking Christ by janimal · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. The unions are absurdly greedy and bureaucratic, which is a good excuse to go somewhere else. The other motivation is that top brass get paid based on stock price. Stock price is a reflection of hype and short term profit pumping. This is a problem that has two jet engines propelling it to hell: unions and the stock market. One would think they're opposites, but both are the problem because of win/lose profit seeking instead of win/win.
      It's a complex problem and I'm not sure it will unwrap itself any time soon.

    54. Re:Oh fucking Christ by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      But there is no monopoly on labor. A union is the employees of a company bargaining collectively with management, which is also a collective.

      - says who? A business owner doesn't have to be a 'collective', especially in private companies there is always somebody specific on top, somebody who owns the business.

      He is then put into a position of looking at one single representative from the entire labour force - union. That's monopoly.

      Unions take power from the 1% and give it to the 99%.

      - this statement does not mean anything. I don't know if you understand, but unions are NOT 99%. In fact unions are created so that people from the 99% cannot COMPETE FOR THE SAME POSITIONS as union members.

      Unions are created specifically to ensure that there is monopoly, so that the employer is faced with a monopoly labour market but also so that there is an artificial barrier to entry to anybody who is not in the union.

      You are under a false impression of what unions are and what they do.

      I'm in a union and I hold no monopoly; there are thousands of me.

      - you are part of the monopoly, you set the prices not on individual level but by agreement with a bunch of other employees.

      Also you are part of the barrier to entry that is put in front of the people who are not in the union, you are preventing them from selling their product (labour) at lower prices and/or higher quality.

      And should I break the contract, management is free to fire me and hire someone else. Management can hire anyone.

      - you are a cog in the union machine, so what?

      As to the rest of your post, where do you get those ignorant ideas? Not in any college level history class!

      - obviously. You don't know a thing about actual history and actual economics, that's on purpose.

      The 1929 stock market crash was caused by exactly the same thing that caused the 2008 crash -- Republicans and the "the less government we have, the better".

      - ignoramus.

      I have a good post on it I am not about to repeat.

    55. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Here, for the record, is a list of major Foxconn customers. It's basically a list of major hardware manufacturers. Foxconn products are everywhere, and it's ridiculous that Apple is getting all the flak.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    56. Re:Oh fucking Christ by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      People are striking for a living wage and to be able to take their kids to a doctor and not be financially ruined by doing so.

      - it has to break, it has to fall apart to the very bone, it was skewed one way for too long, it was the way of destruction of individual liberty. People have allowed the government to overstep the boundaries that gov't was confined in and thus people have gotten used to getting things without actually paying for them, and it is completely utterly wrong.

      No businessman must tolerate being stolen from, and rhetoric that accompanies the theft is atrocious - the rich are not paying their 'fair share'.

      There is no fair share that would ever satisfy the ever hungry government power, and the original US revolution was fought against King who imposed a 3% tax. Serfs paid 25% of their total income in taxes.

      To be elevated to the level of serfs, many 'rich' people have to see their taxes cut by over 50%.

      The true destruction came with a very tiny portion of the population conspiring to allow the super-mega powerful to print fake currency and tax income, and this allowed for huge growth of government power and eventually this is what caused destruction of the economy. The ever growing government appetite and the never shrinking spending, debt, deficit, and the ever inflating currency lead to one logical outcome: the investment capital gets wiped out, and so to prevent this eventuality people moved their businesses wherever, and GOOD FOR THEM. They couldn't do it soon enough, we need people on this planet who have capital and who are willing to keep working rather than just taking off and enjoying their money on a beach somewhere, just drinking cocktails with pretty ladies.

      Pretty much every shop that had a union was destroyed (except for the government at this point, but gov't doesn't count, it doesn't have to actually EARN anything to keep going as long as it can print, and it can print).

      US People with their government have pushed US businesses to extinction. Nothing was ever enough and instead of COMPETING the people decided that they will take the easy road and just attack the businesses with regulations and taxes and inflation.

      USA has been in free fall for 100 years, but especially for the last 40 years since USA defaulted on the dollar in 1971.

      Lastly: you are again talking about 're-engineering' the society.

      Those are the exact words that every other failed revolutionary ever uttered before he descended the country and the people into the civil war, poverty and destruction.

    57. Re:Oh fucking Christ by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The other reason Apple gets singled out is because of their singular ability to change things if they had the will to do so - manufacturerâ(TM)s will bend over backwards for an Apple contract in a way that they won't do for any other company.

      Do you really want to give Apple this power? I mean, let's say Samsung shows off something that blows the iPad out of the water and pre0orders are lining up. You really want Apple to demand that Foxconn now double the salaries of all its workers, reduce working day to 40 hours and pay them time-and-a-half or double-time for hours over?

      Because they can, and they will if it will kill the competition. Like say, a few months prior to said tablet's release, thus ensuring massive shortages and possibly a huge price jump on release day to pay for the increased costs.

      Because if manufacturers are listening ot Apple, Apple can easily say "this applies to the entire company and other customers as well".

    58. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese will likely not develop unions, as unions are a threat to the one party ruling system.

      And if you look at your US business history, many of the reforms pushed by Unions were already starting to be implemented by companies. What was beginning to be realized then and is common knowledge now is that things like a happy workforce and a safe working environment actually improve efficiency and profitability.

      It's interesting you mention unions too, since unions are a big part of the major failings in US industry in the past few years. GM, Chrysler and Ford will never be as efficient as Honda or Toyota because the UAW contracts they're saddled with cost them huge amounts of money for no value in return, such as paying full salary for workers for 2 years if they have no work for them, but also not allowing them to shift workers around into different jobs if a job becomse obsolete. Toyota can move their guys around to the areas where they need work the most and cross train their guys, which gives them a more stable workforce which also reduces cost and increases efficiency. The legacy airline such as Delta, Northwest, AA, are also extremly non-cost competitive iwth newer airlines that came up after deregulation like Southwest and JetBlue; part of the airlines' problem is fuel costs but another part is the labor contracts they're tied to with their unions, which is why their flight attendents are all old, have bad service, etc.

      But hey, what do I know. I work at one of the largest manufacturing firms in the country but is not high tech, and one that is part of the evil military industrial complex too, and I have an MBA. On Slashdot that trifecta of evil makes me the devil here (hence posting Anon).

    59. Re:Oh fucking Christ by toriver · · Score: 1

      Foxconn, with its 18 per million suicides will lose to the United States labor force with its 36 per million.

    60. Re:Oh fucking Christ by toriver · · Score: 1

      No.

      Why aren't HP, Cisco and the other brands also associated with Foxconn getting negative press? Why do they get away with doing fuck all?

    61. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inflation is just tax on people that have a lot of money, if you have $100 in pocket inflation will be $1 tax for you, if you have a million$ in bank/savings inflation is $10K tax, if you have a billion in some stocks inflation is $10M tax for you - the more you have the more you are taxed, is this good or bad depends on do you believe that rich have to be taxed more (i do), alternative is to raise other taxes (like payroll or VAT tax) to compensate for inflation tax removal, or reduce taxes overall by reducing spending of government (this would be best but people being cut from budget would protest a lot)

    62. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe it is off-topic but it is still best post i have read in this topic, deserved its insightful votes

    63. Re:Oh fucking Christ by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      it hurts the poor disproportionately more, because the rich don't hold cash (or don't have to), they can have all sorts of non-cash assets, commodities, businesses, other currencies, whatever.

      POOR people get hurt because inflation eventually destroys the economy and it pushes prices up. Wages don't have to follow at all (like in 70s or now).

    64. Re:Oh fucking Christ by guises · · Score: 1

      Well, it appears that Foxconn is increasing salaries and lowering required hours and I can't imagine that that only applies to Apple products. I'm sure that it applies to everyone. Certainly I don't want Apple to use this as an anticompetitive weapon, but I'm glad that Samsung is being forced to improve the lives of their (indirect) workers alongside Apple and everyone else. This would also make for a pretty impractical weapon, given that it looks like it's going to take sixteen months to implement and it will increase costs for Apple in the long term.

      I'm also not sure what you mean by "giving Apple this power." Apple has this power mostly because of their size, but also because of their persnickety nature when it comes to production quality - it's apparently a get for manufacturers to be able to say that they produce for Apple.

    65. Re:Oh fucking Christ by guises · · Score: 1

      Except that what we're talking about here is the morality of business. There's often a view in these parts that businesses are necessarily amoral. In fact, while the law allows them to be completely self-centered entities, it does not require that. Executives must protect shareholder value, but that doesn't mean maximizing profits with no care or concern for the consequences.

      A company is really just a group of people working together. Mobs are notorious for having lax ethics, but that doesn't mean that we should hold them to a lower standard.

    66. Re:Oh fucking Christ by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      FYI, HTC and Nokia are both Foxconn customers.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    67. Re:Oh fucking Christ by peppepz · · Score: 1

      That didn't prevent me from buying current hardware that wasn't assembled there.

    68. Re:Oh fucking Christ by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      A business owner doesn't have to be a 'collective', especially in private companies there is always somebody specific on top, somebody who owns the business.

      I think you'll find very few unionized privately owned companies. In the 1980s the CEO of a then nonunion airline said "any business that gets a union deserves one." Treat your workforce fairly and they won't need to organize. Any sole owner of a business who treats his employees badly probably won't stay in business long enough for his workers to organize.

      He is then put into a position of looking at one single representative from the entire labour force

      What's so unfair about bargaining one on one?

      Also you are part of the barrier to entry that is put in front of the people who are not in the union

      There are no barriers to entry except qualification for the job. The union doesn't have anything whatever to do with hiring. The company does the hiring.

      you are a cog in the union machine

      I'm a cog in the company machine, and together with other cogs I have more power than without them.

      You don't know a thing about actual history and actual economics, that's on purpose.

      So you're saying that universities lie to their students about history? If so, where did you learn your "truths?" You're saying the text I linked was wrong? Where are your citations for the bullshit in the comment you linked?

      You sound like John up at the bar, who's convinced space aliens walk among us.

    69. Re:Oh fucking Christ by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find very few unionized privately owned companies. In the 1980s the CEO of a then nonunion airline said "any business that gets a union deserves one."

      - nonsense.

      First of all it doesn't actually matter how the company is owned really, but secondly - union organisations exist to make money for the union organisers. Unions appeared in shops that didn't have any need for them (from point of view of employees) enough times that I can give plenty of evidence that this statement is false.

      What's so unfair about bargaining one on one?

      - what are you, Orwellian mouthpiece? How is bargaining with a SINGLE representative of the entire workforce the same as bargaining with individuals about their own contracts?

      There are no barriers to entry except qualification for the job. The union doesn't have anything whatever to do with hiring. The company does the hiring.

      - oh, so much bullshit. Two words:

      Closed shop.

      You can't be that dense, so it's on purpose. Closed shops mean exactly this: you can't be hired unless you also qualify and become a union member, and then you become part of the collective bargaining, not an individual anymore.

      This means people cannot compete based on quality and price of labour and based on their compensation package, they can't chose options that union is against and thus they are all part of one monopoly structure.

      And even when they are not a closed shop, what happens when union starts pressuring the company, the individual workers that are not in the union cannot can expect problems with the company because of the union.

      I'm a cog in the company machine, and together with other cogs I have more power than without them.

      - right, you have more power as long as the employer is locked into your labour market. Guess what, luckily for the employers that's no longer such an insurmountable problem as it used to be. But also you are NOT 99%, that's a huge load of crap, your union makes sure that you are not.

      It's there to ensure that the 99% doesn't compete with your union, and obviously the union sets the rules of who can enter it, so it's a huge barrier to entry. Beyond that - unions cause the employers to have much less ability to hire people because the union usually pushes prices up, not only the salary and benefits, but also the insane threat of litigation, the insane rules that the government enforces on behalf of unions, ability to strike and close the shop, whatever.

      You are not 99%, not even close.

      So you're saying that universities lie to their students about history?

      - not only do the lie to their students, but many of them are lying to themselves and/or are ignorant of actual data.

      The link I gave in the previous comment gives specific data with names of the programs, with dates, it's not something of a secret, it's just nobody provides the context for it in your lectures and the political pressure is always to promote government agenda, and i9t's the same agenda - Keynesian BS shamans are there to give justification to the gov't to steal money, mostly by inflation and taxes and regulations.

      If so, where did you learn your "truths?" You're saying the text I linked was wrong? Where are your citations for the bullshit in the comment you linked?

      - are you stupid? I gave specific data, with names of programs, with numbers, for how much was spent, what the interest rates were, what the money supply was, I gave data on the Hoover and beginning of the FDR time and did a little bit of comparison to 2008. If you can't understand simple things like names of programs, amounts in dollars, interest rates, why would I bother giving you ANYTHING else? You can't follow one post, why would I bother with another?

      You can read my journal, that's a good starting point for you if you actually care to understand something that you will not be taught in your worthless classes by your Marxist lecturers.

    70. Re:Oh fucking Christ by monkeythug · · Score: 1

      [...] is only slightly more expensive than the type of labor intensive manufacturing that we see in places like China. The problem is the high capital outlay for this equipment which no-one wants to front. It's not a problem while cheap labor is in plentiful supply.

      Ultimately it's the 'slightly more expensive' part that's the problem here. There's a reason why no-one wants to front the capital outlay and that's because they can't expect to see a return on their investment if the company can't compete with others using cheap labour.

      Automated manufacturing (ironically mostly pioneered in the East) has the potential to even the scales here - it doesn't matter how expensive workers are in the West if you only need a handful of them. It just needs someone to figure out how it can be done cheaper than outsourcing.

      --
      Don't you wish you hadn't wasted 3 seconds of your life reading this sig?
  2. Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    What a loaded article. It sounds like Foxconn's working conditions are actually much better than most companies in China, and the violations are relatively rare considering that the company has over HALF A MILLION employees. They are also responding to the problems that do exist much more quickly and transparently than many other companies have done.

    1. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next I guess we'll have to accuse Apple of paying off the Fair Labor Association to ignore all the other violations.

      Where are all the other companies that are investigating Chinese Work Rules? Hiding with the hundreds to 10-year old foxconn employees that are now incontinent after being forced to work for 80 hours without a piss break?

      (I'd love to see the FLA audit my job for overtime violations!)

    2. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What a loaded article. It sounds like Foxconn's working conditions are actually much better than most companies in China...

      Attack of the Apple apologists. What it actually shows is that Apple in fact has done little to correct the widely publicized working condition problems in its supply chain. Whether these problems exist in China or anywhere else is immaterial: Apple is the beneficiary of these oppressive labour practices in any case. Now Apple is faced with trimming its fat margins as opposed to its usual strategy of hammering its suppliers in underdeveloped economies in order to maintain its precious stock price. As it should have done in the first place, but reality distortion is Apple's entrenched culture. In the best case Apple begins to purge that ethical and moral rot along with some of the other less admirable legacy of its late founder. But the proof is action, not spin, and so far we have just seen spin from Apple.

      And bear in mind that the Fair Labour Association is on the payroll of Apple and other perps. In other words, the primary purpose of the FLA is to "accredit" the supply chain on behalf of the corps that pay its bills. What is the real truth that would be revealed by a truly independent watchdog?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    3. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure the millions of extremely poor subsistence farmers in China who have an unstable food supply, outdated housing and plumbing, and no healthcare are super appreciative that nice white folks like yourself know what's best for them and prevent Apple from exploiting them with a job that pays several dollars per hour and provides comfortable shelter and plentiful food.

    4. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      You gotta go down and join the union
        You got to join it by yourself
        Ain't nobody here can join it for you
        You gotta go down and join the union by yourself

        Working in the factories would kill a dog
        Working on the belt line killed your soul
        Working in the limestone and cement quarries withered your lungs
        Working in the cotton mills shot your legs and feet all to hell
        And working in the steel mills burned up your spirit
        Like a gnat that lit in the melting pot
        But out of this whole mixing bowl of hell and high water
        The working folk have marched against Billy clubs,
        Against machine guns
        And they sang their way through the whole dirty mess

      Woody Guthrie

    5. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like the same kind of arguments used to support slavery in this country.

    6. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you are an idiot

    7. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by wzinc · · Score: 1

      What business does Apple have telling another company how to do their business? Where's the limit on enforcing your values on other people?

      Also, I think the 800-lb gorilla in the room is: If you have unfair labor practices, terrible hours, etc; why not quit? If that were true, I would. Why are 500,000 people voluntarily working there? Is a gun being held to their head?

    8. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

      I'd like to point out that there is a major difference between voluntary and involuntary.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Work in shit conditions or starve' is hardly voluntary.

      Wage slavery is slavery too.

    10. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the same kind of arguments used to support slavery in this country.

      GP said, "let the Chinese figure out what's best for themselves." I would love to see a citation, anywhere, that shows someone from the 1800s justifying slavery by saying, "let the black people figure out what's best for themselves." That's kind of the opposite of slavery.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Words mean things. And yes, it's absolutely voluntary. People have to work to live however the "conditions" may be. Whether you're hunting on foot with a spear or hacking away at code for enough money to purchase food at the local super market, it's all voluntary.

      Involuntary is where you're being forced by some other person or group with threats of reprisal. Involuntary work is brutal slavery at worst and indentured servitude at best. In either case, the individual has no legal standing to be allowed to walk away from situation or break the contract on his/her own behest.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Although their situation is better, I'm having a hard time agreeing with the "We still treat them like shit, but it's not as bad as their otherwise bleak existence!" argument.

    13. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Genda · · Score: 1

      Okay let me make it simple for you. You're an American steel worker in a country that doesn't make steel any more, so we say we're going to help you out. We are going to give you a job for a couple dollars an hour, which is way more than you're making now on welfare, and you will work the hours we tell you, you will live in a dormitory we provide for you. You will eat what we feed you. You will do what we say with serious repercussions to your future health, happiness and longevity if you don't comply... and any thought of worker's rights, safe working conditions or personal time are fantasies you can give up right now.

      I understand having a job is better than not, doesn't change the fact that this work is less than humane.

    14. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      So, let me get this straight. You Apple apolgists are in favor of oppressive working conditions in the sweatshops that make Apple's shiny toys, is that it? Because whatever semantics games you are playing, your real meaning seems clear enough.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    15. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Apple apologist much?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    16. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Genda · · Score: 0

      You need to read a little more... this is China, you work because you're told to, its not a "Choice" thing. Think labor camp... the phrase "slave labor" keeps popping up because these people are for all intents and purposes slaves. The suicide rate in these places is shocking. If I found out a company I was outsourcing my work to was treating its captive workforce badly, I'd say something to them "BECAUSE I HAVE A FRIGGING CONSCIENCE!", and if they didn't comply, I would take my business elsewhere. To hell with the profit.

    17. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by wzinc · · Score: 1

      Apologize for what?

    18. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by wzinc · · Score: 1

      Ask a question - get yelled at. Ahh, such is ./

      Back to the topic: "If I found out a company I was outsourcing my work to was treating its captive workforce badly, I'd say something to them 'BECAUSE I HAVE A FRIGGING CONSCIENCE!'"

      Well, since Apple has been performing audits and improving conditions since 2006, they must be your favorite company: http://www.apple.com/supplierresponsibility/

      I'm glad I read.

    19. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Oh I don't know, trying to assert that Apple has no moral or ethical responsibility for the bad behavior of its main supplier. Or perhaps you do not know what an "apologist" is. Hint: look in the mirror.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    20. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by wzinc · · Score: 1

      They do not have any obligation to do this; they will keep making money without audits. I'm glad they've been doing audits and making improvements with their suppliers since 2006, but the idea that they should even attempt to care is based a society's (or the board of director's) opinion. Many people were against the Iraq war - the US and allies asserting democracy and Western values on others. This is just a smaller step in the same direction, in-that fewer lives are on the line. Where's the limit on enforcing your (Apple, etc) values/opinions on others? What right do they have to tell Foxconn what to do? The employees work there voluntarily; if they don't like it, they can quit whenever their contract is up.

    21. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      It's an improvement like being shot in the foot is an improvement over being shot in the chest.

    22. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With $100 billion in the bank, Apple could build factories in China and pay worker 100 times more than anyone else whilst providing superior working conditions.

    23. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by badran · · Score: 1

      By this logic slaves can also just walk away.

    24. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to China? Seriously? Do you have even the slightest idea what you are talking about?

    25. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      They do not have any obligation to do this

      And I do not have any obligation to refrain from criticizing Apple, for example by identifying Apple as a morally and ethically challenged organization.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    26. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      This is a teachable moment as to why it's important to have a democratic government people that truly represents the voice of the people. From transparency to civil rights such as the freedom of assembly (ability to form Unions). But until the Chinese deal with it, Apple is providing them and society the means by which to live an improved quality of life. Relative to their previous agrarian occupation that is. Please, get some perspective first. Then you'll understand why the Chinese are flocking in droves to be "abused". To them, this level of work making Apple products is a path of least resistance.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    27. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      involuntary is where you're being forced by some other person or group with threats of reprisal. Involuntary work is brutal slavery at worst and indentured servitude at best. In either case, the individual has no legal standing to be allowed to walk away from situation or break the contract on his/her own behest.

      By this logic slaves can also just walk away.

      You fail at reading comprehension! Read read that again for your own edification.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    28. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by ybanrab · · Score: 1

      Please can I ask what make/model of computer you're posting from ? It almost certainly contains Foxconn parts, and you almost certainly didn't do an ethics check on it before you bought it. The same applies to all clothing, food & services that you purchase.

      So the same judgement would stand ? I've identified that Daniel Phillips is morally and ethically challenged ?

    29. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Lithdren · · Score: 1

      So as long as you're legally allowed to walk away from the job, whatever they do to you is OK in your book?

      Congratulations, you're now a young female irish immigrant in new york in 1911. To prevent you from taking breaks your boss has locked the fire exits of the building, and there's no real fire codes being enforced because nobody knows better. A fire breaks out on the 8th floor of the building you're working on, but you work on the 9th and since there's no audio fire-alarm you dont realize there's a fire untill well after all the exits that are NOT locked are either full of impossibly thick smoke, dead bodies, and/or flames.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_Shirtwaist_Factory_fire

      But hey! Legally, you could have organized a union and prevented this stuff, even if it meant your job; before this horrible event that killed more people than any other event in NY City history up to the 9/11 event. So its all good.

      You're an idiot.

    30. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Rather like the liar Mike Daisey.

    31. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you don't know what a liar is. Look in the mirror. Mike Daisey will be staring back at you.

    32. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. The suicide rate in these places *is* shocking. It's less than 1/3 the suicide rate of China in general, and Less than 1/2 that of the US. *Shocking*, isn't it?

      Where's the moral outrage against MS for the group of Foxconn employees who *threatened mass suicide* in order to negotiate for better pay & working conditions? They weren't working on an Apple product line. They were working on an XBox 360 line.

    33. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Ugh. I HATE having to defend Apple. I've never bought an Apple product, and highly doubt I ever will.

      China's economic problems and poor living conditions are NOT Apple's reponsibility to take care of. If the factories they hire to manufacture their parts consistently provide higher living standards than the workers would have had otherwise, then they are doing their job. We can't just wish away the poor living conditions throughout a country with over 1 billion people, and 100 billion dollars is a drop in the bucket when it comes to actually solving that problem - even if Apple in any way DID have responsiblity for China. We can hope for the Chinese to all one day enjoy the same standard of living as middle-class Americans, but if that's ever going to happen we're ALL going to have to contribute and do our part. And no, that doesn't mean buying from Apple instead of someone else.

      In short, laying the responsiblity for this solely on Apple is a copout. What have YOU done this year to help the poor, whether they be Chinese, American, or otherwise?

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    34. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by toriver · · Score: 1

      Yeah, people should be provided with whatever they need while pursuing whatever career they see fit, like in the United States.

      Oh wait, Americans also are wage slaves.

    35. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by toriver · · Score: 1

      Why don't you Apple haters direct your bile at Foxconn's 20+ other clients as well? Are you against people having menial labor in factories? Are you such a fucking over-educated academic that you cannot fathom that Foxconn work is an improvement over the life they led before starting to work there?

      Double standard fucktards are also fucktards. "Oh, I refuuuuse to buy Apple products because they force people to take paid work instead of starving, people really should take a higher education and get paid big bucks for writing Powerpoint presentations, like me. I only buy HP computers and Cisco routers... oh you meanie you are going to say the dirty words about those being made by Foxconn so I'll go LALALALALA!"

    36. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by toriver · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this amassing of wealth is anti-socialist. There should be a limit to how much money companies and people can make without giving it back. Spread the wealth around please!

    37. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Because the managers had locked the doors to the stairwells and exits – a common practice at the time to prevent pilferage and unauthorized breaks – many of the workers who could not escape the burning building jumped from the eighth, ninth, and tenth floors to the streets below.

      wiki

      Second most deadliest industrial event in NY history at the time. I'm sorry, but forming a Union wouldn't have prevented that unless these girls knew of the dangers ahead of time. For something that is a -common practice-, this would be considered to be a freak accident based on that baseline and general acceptance. Or to put it another way, that's like blaming the World Trade Center building administration for not having mounted missile technology and parachutes available on each floor enough for every person to jump out of breakable windows.

      If it sounds absurd, it should. It also proves my point. You're armcharing after the fact is way out of line to associate this freak accident with workers rights. The major safety improvements happen unfortunately because someone died to pave way for legislated safety reforms and enforcement. That is to say, horrific precedents must take place with the loss of life before such legislation can have an example to go by. Take it too far, and you end up with nanny-state oppression.

      Or to put it another way. Living life is deadly, it's not without risk!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    38. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by quacking+duck · · Score: 2

      The suicide rate in these places is shocking.

      You lost all credibility right there. There's plenty to criticize about Apple, the suicide rate at a contractor's factories is not one of them.

      The Foxconn worker suicide rate (1.5 per 100,000 at its worst, in 2010) is lower than the general Chinese population (22.23 per 100,000).

      It is lower than New York (6 per 100,000), which itself is over half the national average (11 per 100,000).

      It is lower than US soldiers soldiers (20 per 100,000 as of 2008), which was already an 80% jump over the rate in 2004.

      It is lower than suicide rates at both MIT and Harvard (10.2 and 7.4 per 100,000, respectively, from a 2001 report). That's right, MIT and Harvard students are PAYING to be there, and their suicide rate is higher than Foxconn workers.

      What are you doing about those shocking numbers? Who are you holding to account and starting online petitions to boycott?

      The only thing shocking about the suicide rate of Foxconn workers is that people like you keep thinking it bolsters your argument. Hint: it does the exact opposite, if only you'd thought to analyze it for one minute.

    39. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Fanboi will say anything at all to avoid admitting Apple is once again proved to be full of empty promises. Must suck to be you.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    40. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You're a Mike Daisey the liar fanboy. Still clinging on to his every word even after he admitted making it up. How sad is that?

    41. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you such a fucking over-educated academic that you cannot fathom that Foxconn work is an improvement over the life they led before starting to work there? Unless you are willing to switch places with them you are just another over-educated first worlder protecting those 30% savings on your iDevice. You were born into better, so you deserve it right. Will you forcefully keep that Chinese out of your country? Yes. There's your slavery if you don't see it anywhere else. You keep them in their oppressive regime by force of arms and then bullshit about "voluntary" anything. Sickening.

    42. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by arose · · Score: 1

      People who don't Realize the Dangers of Being Locked in a Factory and Other Libertarian Myths by DigiShaman, no workers died in a fire during the second printing of this book.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    43. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by arose · · Score: 1

      "Let the Americans figure out what's best for themselves" would be the equivalent, that sentiment probably existed too.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    44. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 0

      Today we learned that Mike Daisey was right, whether he learned it first hand or not. And what does that make you?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    45. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      A bit of extra overtime doesn't quite match Mike Daisey and your lies does it.

      Starting at point 1. You're saying that the Foxconn guards do have guns, despite the fact that they don't.

      You're as big a liar as Mike Daisey.

    46. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      A bit of extra overtime doesn't quite match Mike Daisey and your lies does it.

      Starting at point 1. You're saying that the Foxconn guards do have guns, despite the fact that they don't.

      You're as big a liar as Mike Daisey.

      The biggest liar is you, arguing that because a labor activist may have been wrong about armed guards that he was therefore wrong about everything else. As we learned today, we was right about the oppressive working conditions. Now, you attempting to push that under the rug, that makes you a bad person. Period.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    47. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      because a labor activist may have been wrong about armed guards

      He wasn't wrong. He lied. Just as you do. He has no integrity. Just as you don't.

      People like me and Ira Glass, the honest people of the world, in equal parts despise and pity scum like you and Mike Daisey.

    48. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      lol sure then, can you find a reference to someone who thought that? As far as I can tell, the main viewpoint in Europe was, "how can take advantage of their fighting?"

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    49. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      I am criticizing Apple, not defending Daisey.

      I hope you understand that it is people like you who reinforce the picture of Apple as a morally and ethically challenged organization.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    50. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's people like you and Daisey that are liars. You give people that are honestly interested in labour rights a bad name. Him only interested in selling tickets to a show, and you only interested in being an Android fanboy.

      You had the opportunity to properly disassociate yourself from Daisey and admit he was a liar. But you didn't. You tried to pretend that he wasn't a liar. You're no better than him.

      You have no morals and no ethics.

    51. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Actually, anyone critical of Apple's ethics is a liar according to you. And you are a slimeball camp follower according to me.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    52. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No, just the ones that have proven themselves to be liars, such as yourself and Mike Daisey. He's admitted his lying, when are you going to admit yours?

    53. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      You have made it clear what you are. No need to elaborate.

      Barbed wire around a Foxconn factory

      Please bear in mind that your gaping-minded ah hominem attacks are perfect encouragement to continue digging for dirt on thug Foxconn and thug Apple. And there is plenty of dirt to find so this should be fun. Thankyou.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    54. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You search for guards with guns and all you can find s barbed wire. LOL! What an idiot you are.

      An idiot that's never seen a factory. Barbed wire fences are pretty standard everywhere. They keep intruders out. What, did you think they were to keep employees in? Are you really that insane?

      Now why don't you man up and admit, that Mike Daisey lied, and you made a mistake repeating his lies.

      Because whilst you don't do that, you're still a liar.

    55. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      It was you who mentioned the armed Foxconn guards, not me. I mentioned the Foxconn barbed wire, which is a fact.

      Want more Foxconn barbed wire? Here you go. There's lots more proof where that came from. Just keep being obnoxious and I will keep posting it. Oh wait, no I will post some more of the slimy things Apple has done and is still doing, that will be way more fun. And it is just amazing how much of it there is on the net, just waiting to be linked by me for your viewing pleasure. Did you know I am making a collection of sleazy Apple links? Because of you.

      As far as I am concerned, you are a typical example of Apple degenerate culture, and an excellent reason for the rest of us to be critical. By the way, posting under an psuedonym does wonders for your bravery, doesn't it? As I say, an excellent representative for Apple, carry on.

      And remember. This is not just about Foxconn, it is about Apple. Foxconn and Apple Fail to Fulfill Promises

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    56. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I mentioned the Foxconn barbed wire, which is a fact.

      Of course it's a fact. And you thinking that there's anything unusual or wrong about a factory having fences with barbed wire on top is hilarious. You really are a cretin who's never seen a factory in his life.

      And a liar of course. Let's not forget the fact that you are a liar. One who's actually more dishonest than Mike Daisey.

    57. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Want a picture of Steve Jobs parking in a handicapped space?
      I know you do, because you continue to post ad ad hominem attacks from behind the safety of your anonymous nick, which reminds me of what a morally bankrupt organization Apple is. See, the moral of this story is: Steve jobs said it is OK for Apple to flout the law. Notice, no licence plate. Steve jobs said it is ok to disregard morality and ethics. There you go, people like you. I guess that's how to got to be like you are.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    58. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Daniel Phillips, I can see the reason why you're concerned that your name isn't anonymous, given that your name, Dan Phillips, is associated with being a liar and a rapist.

      http://articles.dailypress.com/2011-01-11/news/dp-nws-rape-suspect-fled-to-iraq_1_norfolk-resident-police-spokesman-chris-amos-fugitive-unit

    59. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your content free post, here is another inconvenient Apple link for you.

      Each time you post, I add another one of those to my collection, and you can rest assured you will be seeing them again. Too bad for you, you have hitched your cart to thug Apple.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    60. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your content free post.

      Each time you post, I add another one of these to my collection of crimes committed by Daniel Phillips. This one is burglary. I don't know if you'll see this one again, there's an awful lot of Daniel Phillips crimes out there.

      http://www.fox40.com/news/headlines/ktxl-wanted-suspected-car-burglar-arrested-20111118,0,2823782.story

      Too bad for you chose off-topic astroturfing route, rather then being a decent human being and following discussions. We can all play that game.

    61. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1
      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    62. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Blimey Daniel Phillips, turns out you're an arsonist too. Have you no moral scruples whatsoever?

      http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/01/daniel_phillips.php

    63. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      But, Daniel Phillips, probably that time you raped a child was the worst.

      http://www.wavy.com/dpp/news/local_news/Norfolk-police-find-rape-suspect-in-Iraq

    64. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1
      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    65. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1
      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    66. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! Turns out your an iPhone developer. Stockholm syndrome?

      http://www.linkedin.com/in/danieljamesphillips

    67. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
    68. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The rape is the worst though. Daniel Phillips is a pedophile.

      http://hamptonroads.com/2011/01/man-flown-iraq-face-norfolk-charges

    69. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You're slowing down! I give you 3, you only have one?!

      Oh I see that you, Daniel Phillips are listed on ripoff report for Plagerism, Theft, Scandalous Fraudulent Liar. You naughty boy.

      http://www.ripoffreport.com/consumer-services/dan-phillips-d-p-mak/dan-phillips-d-p-makeup-studi-4b72a.htm

    70. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      BTW, I notice I notice that Daniel Phillips is a very common name, but according to Wikipedia, not a single one of them ever did anything notable.

    71. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You should read this. It gives you a clue about what it's like to work for a living. In America.

      http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/mac-mcclelland-free-online-shipping-warehouses-labor

    72. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1
      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    73. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You could do with dropping a few pounds if you;re going to run around naked, Daniel Phillips.

      http://pearleegates.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/college-group-plans-naked-5k-run-to.html

    74. Re:Please stick to "news", Slashdot by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1
      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  3. "Try by 2013?" by supaneko · · Score: 1

    Can someone enlighten me as to why they are only willing to try and why this would take more than a year...or any time at all?

    1. Re:"Try by 2013?" by rhook · · Score: 1

      This is China we're talking about, they need time to grease the right wheels and get the law changed in their favor.

    2. Re:"Try by 2013?" by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 0

      This is China we're talking about

      This is Apple we're talking about.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    3. Re:"Try by 2013?" by Nikker · · Score: 1

      That stood out for me too. Wouldn't that imply the contracts Foxconn has already agreed to are based on the currently (over) scheduled hours? Now that their own/Apple's audit has uncovered this they are just going to shrug it off because they don't want to pay for more underpaid employees .... wow we really are going down the rabbit hole aren't we?

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    4. Re:"Try by 2013?" by pavera · · Score: 1

      My guess would be existing contracts. Their existing contracts with companies (apple, dell, hp, etc) specify their rates for product, if they raise wages, hire more workers and have to continue to deliver product at their existing contract rates, they'll be losing millions per day.

      Now obviously, the companies could let Foxconn out of the existing contracts, and/or renegotiate now to raise wages, but they probably don't want to do that... Also, Foxconn probably can't hire an extra 100,000-200,000 workers in a day.

    5. Re:"Try by 2013?" by sjames · · Score: 1

      I think I'll try that one should I get pulled over for speeding. Honest officer, I'll try to slow it down within a year or so.

      Should I offer to pinkie swear?

    6. Re:"Try by 2013?" by Nikker · · Score: 2

      So if I do something illegal and it would cost me time and/or money to just to stop being illegal then I don't need to stop! I guess I should start stealing stuff because if I stopped I would lose money compared to when I didn't steal!

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    7. Re:"Try by 2013?" by pavera · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying its right or good, but if China isn't going to fine them for the violations, then what incentive do they have to stop? If China wants this to stop they need to fine Foxconn more than they are making violating the law.

    8. Re:"Try by 2013?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as Yoda would say "do or do not... there is no try."

    9. Re:"Try by 2013?" by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      ok genius, lets see you change every single bad thing for what? damn near half a million workers, retrain management and make it all work without cutting productivity... overnight...

      I will be awaiting your perfect solution in the morning, I wake up at 6AM CST

      for fucks sake, I work for an American company supplying OEM electronics for American factories, with a team of about 60 people over 2 shifts, and running 10 prototype boards though 4 pick-n-place machines and their solder ovens took an hour of negotiation with 2 managers and lots of tip-toes to insure that we would not disrupt production or any other disruption to the human / robotic "machine".

      Just your question of "why would it take any time" tells me the nearest you have ever been to mass production is flipping burgers, and shit, I am just some dude working (engineering) at a place putting out just under 10,000 units a day, I dont even want to imagine the nightmares of getting something non-standard done at a place that plops out 10,000,000 + units a day.

    10. Re:"Try by 2013?" by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      My guess would be existing contracts.

      "Contractually obligated to keep hammering the oppressed as hard as possible for a couple more years" will not play well for Apple or Foxconn, both of which are making mountains of cash.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    11. Re:"Try by 2013?" by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      So if I do something illegal and it would cost me time and/or money to just to stop being illegal then I don't need to stop! I guess I should start stealing stuff because if I stopped I would lose money compared to when I didn't steal!

      I have in my past worked with German health and safety officers, and if there are problems where things happen that are against the law, but not an immediate danger, then companies will always be given time to fix problems, then they will be re-inspected and they will be fine as long as there is improvement, even if not all of the problems have been solved.

      The reason why this is done is that German health and safety officers are probably more intelligent than the average slashdotter and they know that their job is not to uphold the letter of the law, but to create safe working environments. And to do that, they demonstrate not that they can punish companies that break the law, but that they can help companies to stay within rules that are there for a reason, and not just because they are the law.

      And I may be the first to post this here, but in cases of emergencies where the company would suffer direct consequences if people cannot work overtime, then exceeding this 48 hour limit is actually legal in China. So starting from the f***ing article, the assumption that continuing with overtime while more people are getting employed would be illegal, is just wrong. It's like going over the speed limit is bad, but braking so hard that the car behind you crashes into you, just to get below the speed limit, is even worse.

    12. Re:"Try by 2013?" by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      They covered this on the TV news last night. It seems that FoxCon employees live in on-site barracks, like American workers were forced to back in the 19th century before we had unions. Takes time to build the barracks; they have to hire a lot more people make up for not being able to force them to work crazy overtime hours.

    13. Re:"Try by 2013?" by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Well yes, stability is good. When Company X decides to start taking up contracts of work knowing local laws and regulations and drastically over consigns its workforce actually forcing the employees to stay at work to cover the companies contracts it gets both illegal and dangerous. People get tired, do poor work, possibly get injured, co-workers take up the slack pushing themselves even further.

      In terms of your speeding driver analogy your job with Health and Safety would be similar to a Police Officer pulling you over by going behind you, turning on warning lights (red/blue flashers) and guiding the idiot to the shoulder of the road. You know why they do this?

      You should already know how to drive ;)

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  4. Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by jjohnson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will the public ever sour on Apple devices in light of the constant media attention on supplier working conditions?

    No, because they'd need to sour on all electronics to avoid Foxxcon's (and its ilk's) moral taint.

    It's not an Apple problem, it's an industry problem, and Apple does better than most at identifying and correcting these conditions.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    1. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by DaMattster · · Score: 2

      As others have noted Foxconn is a sub-contractor of multiple companies so really Apple should not be the fall guy. But, this is China and personal freedoms are just not as valued and China is not a democracy.

    2. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Criminal is criminal.

    3. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the Chinese working laws are not being observed at Foxconn, your point is moot. They are being unlawful, be it a democratic country or not, and should be punished.

      It's not about personal freedoms, but legality.

    4. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove it.

    5. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, some of the key demographics that Apple targets make a big show of caring about such things - and many of the products that Apple sells are somewhat frivolous (i.e. high priced entertainment). If Apple mainly sold their products to Ayn Rand types for use in cancer research, the situation might be different.

    6. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>Apple apologists. Of which a huge herd appears to have swooped upon Slashdot

      There was a time when Apple was good. After the Atari/Commodore era had ended (70s/80s/early 90s), the Macs were running on the PowerPCs. They were good quality hardware with a decent OS (though not capable of preemptive multitasking until 2002).

      Switching to generic Intel PCs through Foxconn was a mistake. IMHO.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    7. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      As others have noted Foxconn is a sub-contractor of multiple companies so really Apple should not be the fall guy. But, this is China and personal freedoms are just not as valued and China is not a democracy.

      Foxconn isn't anyone's subcontractor. Foxconn is a contractor. And only an idiot would put blame on Apple here because Apple is the company that hired FLA to do audits at Foxconn exactly for the purpose to find if everything is up to scratch there and to find and fix problems.

      However, what is even more stupid is your claim "personal freedoms are just not as valued in China". Show me a Western country where working 48 hours a week is illegal.

    8. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Pi+Is+A+Rational · · Score: 1

      The PPC hardware was cool, but I always felt the OS itself was lacking. I was never really a Macintosh fan, more of an Apple II series type of dude. Switching to x86 was good for Apple, they've made more money than they ever would have selling their laptops.

    9. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by anyanka · · Score: 1

      Norway, for one: http://www.norway.no/temaside/tema.asp?stikkord=94261 (p. 31-37 of the pdf linked at the bottom)

    10. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Space+cowboy · · Score: 0

      Foxconn employs 800,000 people, it's the tenth largest company (by head count) in the world. Are you *really* suggesting that Apple goods account for a majority of those people's jobs ? Really ? You think that FoxConn employ over 400,000 people on Apple production lines ?

      You, sir, are either an Apple hater, spouting venom without cause or woefully misinformed.

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    11. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Raenex · · Score: 2

      It's not an Apple problem, it's an industry problem, and Apple does better than most at identifying and correcting these conditions.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?pagewanted=all

      "Many major technology companies have worked with factories where conditions are troubling. However, independent monitors and suppliers say some act differently. Executives at multiple suppliers, in interviews, said that Hewlett-Packard and others allowed them slightly more profits and other allowances if they were used to improve worker conditions.

      'Our suppliers are very open with us,' said Zoe McMahon, an executive in Hewlett-Packard's supply chain social and environmental responsibility program. 'They let us know when they are struggling to meet our expectations, and that influences our decisions.' "

    12. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP speaks truth. Why is this modded down?

    13. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Foxconn is a sub-contractor of multiple companies so really Apple should not be the fall guy.

      Utter rubbish. Apple is by far the biggest beneficiary of these oppressive practices and is riding high on the hog in part because of these abuses.

      Wow, Apple astroturfers hoarded away plenty of points for modbombing today.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    14. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      It's not an Apple problem...

      ...according to Apple apologists. Of which a huge herd appears to have swooped upon Slashdot the moment this article appeared.

      See what I mean?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    15. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Well, apple *is* the most valuable company in the world. Their product is made by foxconn, which helps realise their enormous profit margin. I don't think any other company's products made by foxconn are anywhere near as profitable.

      So it stands to reason that they benefit the most, financially, vs other foxconn partners. Whether they have the highest production volume or not isn't really relevant. Others may benefit more in terms of raw quantity of widgets, but that isn't really what we are talking about. Also, since the others have a smaller margin, they're in less of a position to spend more...

    16. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People bash Apple for it because:

      1) Apple makes ridiculous amounts of money, but they're completely unwilling to spend any of it on making the world a better place. Steve Jobs, the asshole that he was, was completely against charitable giving, and they refuse to pay their suppliers enough to ensure that basic human rights aren't trampled upon.

      2) Many Apple product purchasers are people who are avid supporters of human rights, care about the environment, etc. They then conveniently ignore all their convictions because they want the new trendy piece of locked-down junk that Apple has put out.

    17. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Foxconn employs 800,000 people, it's the tenth largest company (by head count) in the world. Are you *really* suggesting that Apple goods account for a majority of those people's jobs ?

      Why do you Apple astroturfers insist on putting words in my mouth? I said Apple is by far the biggest beneficiary of Foxconn's oppressive practices and that is verifiably true. Moral of this story is: do not every make the mistake of accepting the claims of an indignant Apple cultist at face value.

      Now crawl back into your miserable astroturfing hole please, and do not refer to me as "sir" if you do not mean it.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    18. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I try hard to buy electronics made in socially responsible factories, and it isn't as difficult or expensive as you might think. For example I have a Panasonic laptop and Panasonic TV that were made in Japan, and a Samsung TV that was made in South Korea. My phone was made in South Korea too. Arguably there are still components in these products that originate from China, but at least I'm not directly supporting Foxconn.

      Japan has wages comparable to the US. Not sure about South Korea but they can't be far off. What is Apple's excuse for not having factories in the US?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Apple does better than most at identifying and correcting these conditions.

      Yes, Apple does better than most after receiving the most scrutiny and attention for it. But the public would never boycott Apple's devices because we want to have our cake and eat it too, and usually eat someone else's as well. We do a lot of eating, is what I'm trying to say. At any rate, it's fine to raise a stink about Foxconn and Apple, but no, we'd never go beyond the crying phase to the actually-doing-something-about-it phase. It's other people's job to do things, so we tell them what to do, and they pretend to do it. It's a lot like our system of government actually.

    20. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by cavebison · · Score: 1

      It's not an Apple problem, it's an industry problem, and Apple does better than most at identifying and correcting these conditions.

      First part yes, second part no.

      Apple is "appearing" to do more than most, and succeeding very well by your comment. There's nothing to show they are actually influencing Foxconn policy. If they were doing anything significant, we would have seen some change by now.

      If there's one thing Apple is good at, it's image.

    21. Re:Bullshit Anti-Apple Screed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time when Apple was good. After the Atari/Commodore era had ended (70s/80s/early 90s), the Macs were running on the PowerPCs. They were good quality hardware with a decent OS (though not capable of preemptive multitasking until 2002).

      Switching to generic Intel PCs through Foxconn was a mistake. IMHO.

      You've packed so much quality wrongheadedness into this post...

      1. The '90s -- even the early '90s -- were not Apple's finest hour. The entire decade was full of Apple blunders and failures. More so on the software side, but also on the hardware.

      2. Apple didn't switch to "generic Intel PCs". They switched to designing Macs with Intel CPUs and chipsets. The one and only time they shipped generic PC HW was an x86 development box built around an off-the-shelf P4 motherboard. They made only a thousand or two, just enough to support internal and 3rd party software developers while their HW team created the first true Intel Macs.

      3. Apple didn't switch to Intel "through Foxconn". The first Mac made by Foxconn in mainland China was one of the revisions of the G3 iMac. As in, one of the models so old it had a CRT. Then and now, Apple does the engineering, Foxconn does the manufacturing.

      4. Only a crazy man would think Apple made a mistake by switching to Intel. PowerPC wasn't keeping up, and the situation kept getting worse. Switching solved their performance problems and greatly reduced the barrier of entry for people who wanted to try Macs, but didn't want to risk spending that much money on something which couldn't run Windows if they ended up hating MacOS.

  5. Good for Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Considering Apple is trying and doing a well job at finding problems I will continue to buy Apple products. Better than most other companies that don't only not care but will not even look into what is wrong with their suppliers as long as products keep coming.

  6. Equal pressure? by NiceGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone going to apply the same pressure to ALL the other computer/phone companies that use the same facilities? I know Slashdot has a extreme anti-Apple bias, but does it blind you to the obvious? The computer you're using right now has parts that were made by Foxconn.

    1. Re:Equal pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone going to apply the same pressure to ALL the other computer/phone companies that use the same facilities? I know Slashdot has a extreme anti-Apple bias, but does it blind you to the obvious? The computer you're using right now has parts that were made by Foxconn.

      That was my reaction. I love this quote from the summary.

      "Will the public ever sour on Apple devices in light of the constant media attention on supplier working conditions?"

      Rather extreme bias. There's also an assumption that Apple sets the wages and working conditions. Foxconn offers products at a given price and what is Apple to do say they are too cheap? Stop singling out Apple and trying to infer it's all our fault for buying Apple products. According to a recent pole half of all Americans own an Apple product. You can't demand cheap products then be offended when they result in poorly paid workers.

    2. Re:Equal pressure? by artor3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While it's not particularly fair for Apple to take the heat for this, that's the price you pay for being the biggest and most influential company in the industry.

      Besides, flamebait-y summary aside, people aren't souring on Apple. What they are doing is pressuring Apple to pressure Foxconn. Foxconn then hires more people, pays better wages, and requires shorter hours. The result is that the best workers will go there, and there will be indirect pressure on other Chinese companies to improve their conditions. I know my company is giving across the board ~30% raises to our Chinese workers this year, even though we haven't been in the news at all.

      The end result is a good one -- the Chinese working class gets better pay for less work, the working class in the Western world faces less offshoring as Chinese wages rise, and the only drawback is that iGadgets and Androids will cost one or two percent more to manufacture. If Apple has to take a disproportionate amount of blame to achieve these results, so be it. I'm sure their executives are sobbing all the way to the bank.

    3. Re:Equal pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has a extreme anti-Apple bias

      What version of Slashdot are you reading?

    4. Re:Equal pressure? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Yes. We should boycott APPLE and EVERY OTHER Foxconn customer until they come into compliance with the law.

      And those of us who use Foxconn as a supplier should de-source them. There are plenty of other suppliers.

    5. Re:Equal pressure? by exomondo · · Score: 2

      Anyone going to apply the same pressure to ALL the other computer/phone companies that use the same facilities?

      Logically you would go for the entity with the most influence over the operator of the facilities, that would be Apple.

      I know Slashdot has a extreme anti-Apple bias

      I don't know what you've been reading but quite clearly the apple threads on /. are full of discussion (well arguments if we're honest) over apple policies and devices, it's not some apple-hater love-in where everyone is just patting eachother on the back for criticizing apple like you seem to think it is.

    6. Re:Equal pressure? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Yes. We should boycott APPLE and EVERY OTHER Foxconn customer until they come into compliance with the law.

      So... Off the top of my head... Microsoft, HP, IBM, Apple, Acer, AMD, ASUS, Cisco, Dell, Intel, Motorolla, Nintendo, Nokia, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba... Whos left that doesn't do anything with Foxconn?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    7. Re:Equal pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The computer you're using right now has parts that were made by Foxconn."

      Oh snap. We're so screwed and hypocritical.

      So the guy with a Foxconn capacitor on his Japanese branded German sourced motherboard or somewhere in his made in the US power supply is as equally guilty as the ipad user where the entire machine is nearly made by Foxconn?

      Isn't that like saying an anti-gun person is a hypocrite for using GE lightbulbs because GE makes guns for the US military?

      There are degrees and measures of difference here.

    8. Re:Equal pressure? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Anyone going to apply the same pressure to ALL the other computer/phone companies that use the same facilities? I know Slashdot has a extreme anti-Apple bias, but does it blind you to the obvious? The computer you're using right now has parts that were made by Foxconn.

      Easy. Apple can, because it'll become a great competitive advantage.

      Imagine Samsung is about to release a new phone, and Apple sends FLA inspectors to the Foxconn factory to ensure that it's not just Apple employees getting the good treatment. If the conditions are worse (because Apple forces inspections so Apple lines are nicer), then boom, line is shut down, and Samsung is short of phones.

      Apple's got immense power now - they can point to what they're doing, and point to how bad everyone else is, and use that power to abuse their position.

    9. Re:Equal pressure? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has a extreme anti-Apple bias

      What version of Slashdot are you reading?

      Unless everyone unfailingly defends Apple, the site has an extreme anti-Apple bias.

      That's how it works, apparently.

    10. Re:Equal pressure? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You can't demand cheap products then be offended when they result in poorly paid workers.

      I'd have modded you up, if Apple fans were, in fact, demanding cheap products. Apple hardware is, in fact, sold at a premium.

      Actually, I take that back, Apple fans *are* demanding cheap products and they're getting them. That they're expensive doesn't make them any less cheap. What the impact the quality of the product has on the pay of the workers, I do not know; typically, however, you get higher quality product from higher paid workers.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    11. Re:Equal pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't really matter if you pay them more. Rent just goes up and food suddenly costs more. The standard of living goes up a bit, but a 30% increase in wages will just be absorbed in a nearly 30% increased cost of living. Unless Foxconn or another company engages in benevolent price fixing for their workers, they're not really all that much better off. It's just like the gold rush when you could strike it rich, but pay most of it out just to get by. China gets a lot of flak for being a "communist" country, but it's hard to say that they really care.

    12. Re:Equal pressure? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2

      I know Slashdot has a extreme anti-Apple bias

      Actually, it's an anti-evil bias.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    13. Re:Equal pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has the clout and the wallet to be a force of change. They used to be great about this, but now they're rich and successful, and they're kinda mailing it in anymore.

      Call that anti-Apple bias if you want. I'll say you, sir, have Stockholm syndrome, and need to wake up and rejoin reality.

    14. Re:Equal pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. The NDAs that Foxconn signs with each of their customers don't allow *other* customers to authorize *anyone* to visit the production lines/facilities for any other customer.

      That is: Apple can't authorize inspections of lines which are producing HTC, Samsung, or HP devices. Just as HTC, Samsung, and HP can't authorize inspections of lines which are producing Apple devices. This is done to prevent (or at least minimize) industrial espionage.

      Apple can (and does) police the environments in which Apple devices are made. They *can't* police the environments in which any *other* company's devices are made.

    15. Re:Equal pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has the clout and the wallet to be a force of change. They used to be great about this, but now they're rich and successful, and they're kinda mailing it in anymore.

      That's nonsense. Apple switched to Foxconn and similar CM partners long before Apple became rich and successful. Back then, they didn't have the clout or the wallet, and they didn't give a shit either. Now they do have clout and wallet, and they are giving at least some shits.

      Call that anti-Apple bias if you want. I'll say you, sir, have Stockholm syndrome, and need to wake up and rejoin reality.

      Here is some reality for you:

      http://www.apple.com/supplierresponsibility/

      Is this all that's needed? Probably not. Find me any other major consumer electronics company which uses mainland Chinese labor and is doing even a fraction of that much, or is being as open about the problems. Just one company will do.

      Yes, there is real anti-Apple bias here and in the press, and the problem with that is not so much that it's a bias against Apple, it's that relentlessly focusing only on one company gives a free pass to all the others.

  7. You are delusional.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....if you think the working conditions of other manufacturers are any better.

    1. Re:You are delusional.... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 0

      Where's your evidence?

      There are many other contract manufacturers in China.

      There are many other contract manufacturers NOT in China.

    2. Re:You are delusional.... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Where's your evidence?

      There are many other contract manufacturers in China.

      There are many other contract manufacturers NOT in China.

      This exemplifies something is really detest about Slashdot. Asking for evidence to support claims get modded down.

      Is this just a shouting match?

  8. July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by PatPending · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    1. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the company known for its ability to immediately roused 8,000 workers inside the company's dormitories, ... and within half an hour started a 12-hour shift fitting glass screens into beveled frames. Within 96 hours, the plant was producing over 10,000 iPhones a day is now going to take 487 days (or 1 year, 4 months) to make this change?

      It's taking that long because they're passing on a portion of the profits to the right officials or perhaps are being squeezed for a little more. Hopefully it'll all just blow over. If not, some inspectors will come in and everything will be "legal" for a few days. A little while down the road someone will make waves again and the process keeps on repeating.

      Capcha: Patrons.... heh.

    2. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Maybe because to reduce the workload per person, they'll have to find more workers (the pool of which is starting to dry up), build more infrastructure to support them, etc. Alternatively, they could automate more tasks, but that would also require time and effort to procure, install, and configure the massive amount of equipment needed.

      What, you were expecting them to call all their clients tomorrow and say "Oh, you remember that contract we had for $DEVICE? We're cutting production by 25% starting today. Sorry for the inconvenience."

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      That anecdote shows they can very quickly make a lot of people work more hours. That's the opposite of what they have to do here, which is make more than a million people all work less. Their two options there are dropping contracts and/or letting deadlines slip, because they don't have the workforce to fill them all. Or, they can hire another quarter million full time employees. I'm sure there is space for those quarter million people to live, too.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    4. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      not enough workers IN CHINA???

    5. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by medcalf · · Score: 1

      Not enough trained workers in the right place with the support infrastructure to house and feed them. Logistics is everything.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    6. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there is space for those quarter million people to live, too.

      Absolutely! Home Sweet Cave

    7. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by guspasho · · Score: 1

      The labor pool is drying up? When Foxconn is the Chinese equivalent of a dream job? I keep hearing about how Chinese are so lucky to be working at Foxconn because it's do much better than most other Chinese can hope for, those 60hour workweeks and rat-infested dormitories are so much better than what anyone else in China has. How can the labor pool be drying up?

    8. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Having put in numerous 90+ hour work weeks myself, sometimes over 100, I'm not so sure 60 is so terrible unless they are at it for too long.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ..they'd just have to take less manufacturing contracts.

      they're overselling their capacity. and well, according to chinese law of all laws, yeah they should call their customers that the production is cut by the amount needed to hit legal overtime limits.

      if it's an issue of maintaining profitability.. if they have to do those overtime per person in order to hit the black, then their business isn't built on solid foundations.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Shenzhen alone has 10 million people. Zhengzhao has 8 million. These are cities where they already have factories. They just need to bring them in and out of the factories.

      Training is not that much of an issue for the majority of the workers. Most of the jobs are low-skill. High levels of training are only necessary for engineers and supervisors.

    11. Re:July 2013 = 487 days (1 year, 4 months) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear hear. Complaining about 60 hour workweeks is being spoiled. Many people in the US work more than that and still keep some semblance of work-life balance.

  9. So you're telling me, by tehlinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    China has work rules!?

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    1. Re:So you're telling me, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, sir, it's only you showing off your ignorance.

    2. Re:So you're telling me, by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      yup... you're not allowed to kill them, or cause them to commit suicide... this is why Foxxcon installed anti-suicide nets... it doesn't really stop them from killing themselves, but they're not doing it on company property so it doesn't count against the company

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    3. Re:So you're telling me, by LittleImp · · Score: 1

      And what moron refers to Taiwan with China. Everyone will think of mainland China....

    4. Re:So you're telling me, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's an old Chinese proverb. "China has many rules, but also many hands willing to wave you by for the right toll"

      I okay I made that up but it's still true.

    5. Re:So you're telling me, by TheSync · · Score: 1

      China has work rules!?

      You can read them here. Those are only the national laws, there may be local laws above those as well.

  10. Re:Evil is as evil does... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is apple overcharging their customers? They sell their products for a certain price and customers choose to buy it over similar competing products. Apple's gross margin last quarter was 44%, Samsung's was 32%, so yeah, apple charges a larger premium, but if the customer is willing to pay that price Apple can and should charge as much as they want.

  11. Re:Evil is as evil does... by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I see you don't understand the nuance of the supply chain. The reason that iPhones and so on (and other devices like Xboxes, HP computers, Playstations, Android phones and other things made in that same factory as the iPhone) are not made in the US isn't really a wage issue, it's a worker numbers issue, as well as a logistics problem. All the pieces that make a product are made nearby (or a great many of them are), so moving the assembly to the other side of the world creates huge issues unless there is a very specific reason that makes it economically viable (like in Brazil, where enormous import taxes have made it favourable to build an assembly line inside the country). There are some instances where a component is made in a different place and then shipped (for example, Samsung's Texas facility that is making ARM chips for Apple), but generally minimising the need to ship components around *really* cuts the cost of assembly (far more than the cost of paying hypothetical US factory worker wages, of which there aren't nearly enough to staff an operation of that size anyway).

    They use China because it is cost effective to do so - they have a strong manufacturing base, a large and upwardly-mobile workforce (since they are going through their industrial revolution right now), a growing middle class and a solid infrastructure. The claim that they're using China to dodge environmental regulations is laughable - one of the first companies to limit the amount of expanded polystyrene used, the use of low-lead solder, the removal of PVC from cabling and plastics... and all this before Greenpeace "shamed them" into "making changes" (ie, just telling people what they were doing).

    Putting Apple in the "Big Evil Corporation" list over something like this is just enormously naive. Globalisation is not going away, nor are Apple the only ones doing it (nor are they the "worst offenders" by an extremely long distance). This doesn't give them a free pass - they need to demand better conditions and so on (and they are doing so), but the world is not the black and white super simple "everyone is either a Jedi or a Sith" Star Wars fantasy.

  12. it always happens by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will the public ever sour on Apple devices in light of the constant media attention on supplier working conditions?

    You mean, kind of like how in the 90s, people stopped buying from a company with a certain swoosh on their shoes?

    Oh wait, that didn't happen, and Nike's dividend has grown from $0.03 to $0.30. That, despite having relatively well organized protest groups, including groups at over 40 universities. Protests and media attention aren't going to do much. There is zero financial motivation for Apple to make more than a token, symbolic move to improve working conditions. That is enough to appease the minds of their customers. Anything else they do is bonus.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  13. Half the households in America own Apple products by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    I love showing articles like this to those liberals.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  14. a material world by msheekhah · · Score: 1

    we live in a world where the west's material goods are supplied by slave labor, figuratively speaking of course, and many times, those jobs are the best ones around. this says a lot about the countries that we get our material goods from.

    --
    Mark Anthony Collins
  15. Oh fucking Christ Part 2 by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder which company asked FLA to perform an independent audit at Foxconn. That wouldn't be Apple. That couldn't possibly be Apple. Guess what: It was Apple.

    Interesting choice of words, "overtime criminality". So people are working 60 hours a week and get paid for overtime. So what are things like in IT in the USA? I hear there are people working 60 hours a week as well, and not getting paid for overtime. In the games industry, there are people working 80 hours. In the medical profession, 80 hours seems to be the average in the USA (at least according to Wikipedia).

    1. Re:Oh fucking Christ Part 2 by peppepz · · Score: 2

      There are some differences between working at a manufacturing line, where you can't literally have a pause to pee because the line will go on with or without you, and waiting behind a desk for patients to call you. Also, there's a difference between getting paid 16,000 $ a month (a doctor in the USA) and 300 $ a month (a worker at Foxconn).

    2. Re:Oh fucking Christ Part 2 by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      So what are things like in IT in the USA? I hear there are people working 60 hours a week as well, and not getting paid for overtime. In the games industry, there are people working 80 hours. In the medical profession, 80 hours seems to be the average in the USA (at least according to Wikipedia).

      Well, easy, that should be illegal as well.

      Aside from that, studies show that productivity decreases after 40 hours anyway, so working 80 is completely pointless and counterproductive.

  16. No not really by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Turns out you can have your electronics made elsewhere. China is not the only place. They are the cheapest, but when you start paying for higher quality goods, they can be made in other places, often ones with not only better worker conditions but higher quality controls. For example my receiver is made in Japan. The lower end models are made in China but the high end stuff is made in Japan (it is a Japanese company). My speakers were built in Ohio (with the drivers themselves made in Denmark) or the UK (with UK drivers) depending on which ones you are talking about. My TV is less high end, but it was still built in Mexico.

    Well guess what? Apple charges high end prices. Don't try and say they don't, their massive profits, massive amount of money in the bank is evidence they do. They can afford to move their production somewhere else if they want. It would mean less profits though.

    I'm not saying they need to, I'm not playing morals here. I'm saying that this bullshit of "Oh they can't do anything!" is just that: bullshit. They charge the kind of prices they can produce their shit elsewhere and have the kind of money that they could set up their own production lines presuming they couldn't find anyone who could meet their needs.

    However it would mean trading off some profits.

    1. Re:No not really by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Just a thought. But what if empowering the local Chinese with more wealth and work advancement opportunities provided enough societal confidence for political change? Would new-found freedom from governmental reform be worth it? I'm just asking...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:No not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, what if paying the slave owner frees the slaves? What if kicking a man cures his trauma? What if you can kill the village in order to save it?

    3. Re:No not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the well-bing of Chinese workers are being taken into account by Apple, why not start their own Chinese plant, with good working conditions?

      It's not like the Chinese gov't would oppose this move. Means more taxes and a better PR.

      But I guess they are not interested, since we can't really say they don't have the money to do so.

    4. Re:No not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you want to avoid human rights abuses, you will automate the assembly line with robotics, and that will require fewer but more skilled people to maintain. china is simply not the place for this- their education, economics, everything is better suited towards turning people into robots instead, and treating them as such.

  17. Re:Evil is as evil does... by Namlak · · Score: 1

    Sure, I understand the supply chain.... but how did it get like this? It's not like China had all these empty factories already built and all these organizations created and staffed hoping for someone to come along and the US had nothing in place. Cheap labor and relaxed environmental rules attracted the entire manufacturing ecosystem there. If we hadn't dismantled our manufacturing ecosystem by essentially transplanting it to China, we'd have all those capabilities, too. I think there is enough people needing work in the US that Apple could have sacrificed a certain amount of profit to be a better US citizen and establish it's own manufacturing ecosystem here. It would help me decide to purchase their products, leading to.....

    I also understand the concept of Demand - I don't like the way they're doing business so I don't buy their products. Sure, almost the entire consumer electronics world uses Foxconn and similar companies but when Apple is literally overflowing with money, I think they could have "Thought different" about what to do with it. I'm using this knowledge by affecting the part of this that I can - the Demand part.

    And since I have been modded Troll, I'll add that I didn't say that *I* thought they should be treated as an Evil Corporation (regardless of what I think), I'm curious as to the reasons why the public at large (and the media) isn't. Likely, it's Shiny Trinkets Syndrome.

  18. Queue the angry mobs by Xacid · · Score: 1

    Queue the angry mobs of workings who actually want to work those incredible hours. They can't get the wages we do but they can certainly work much more than us and are often willing to.

    1. Re:Queue the angry mobs by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they all want to work more hours per day for their fixed daily rates...

    2. Re:Queue the angry mobs by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Hey - I don't make the rules. However, I did read in a few places that one of the biggest demands from employees was more hours. Like I alluded to in the previous, there apparently isn't much room to move up, but supposedly you can get wider (more hours).

  19. Fox con irony. by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What's mildly amusing about this is that some of those worker complaints we heard about were the worker's demand for more overtime.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Fox con irony. by goombah99 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      A report from China Business News (via MIC Gadget) profiled Foxconn worker and iPad assembler Wang Xiaoqiao (who opted to hide his real name). According to Wang, iPad line workers are beginning to work fewer hours and get more days off as supply meets demand. Wang said iPad production was ramped up in March, bringing assembly time from 10 hours a day down to 8 hours. However, he is not happy about working less. Wang explained:

      “The new iPad production started earlier this year, with one class of workers at each assembly line. Nearly 1,000 units will be mass-produced in a standard shift of 8 hours, plus 2 hours of overtime work. 150 – 180 units were produced during a peak iPad production run in February. However, in March, iPad employees worked fewer hours, and sometimes regular weekday shifts could not be archived My base pay is 2,350 yuan, and I need to pay 190 yuan for social security tax, 120 yuan for housing fund, 110 yuan for accommodation fee, and some money on having meals. I’m going through a difficult time for this month,”
      While this might sound like a positive thing for a company often accused of making its employees work excessive hours, Wang said he is not happy about making less money and the lack of bonuses for overtime:

      Wang is actually upset about it, since working fewer hours means no bonus pay. Last month, Wang worked six days a week, and got a day off. Today, he gets 3 days off, and work for only 4 days in a week. He was planning to buy new furniture by doing overtime work for more pay, but that seems to be impossible now.

      http://9to5mac.com/2012/03/28/as-supply-meets-demand-ipad-line-workers-get-more-days-off-but-are-they-happy/

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:Fox con irony. by Genda · · Score: 2

      So what Wang is complaining about is that after they tax him, take money out for his room and board (we call that working for the company store here in the U.S.) and all the other ways they nickel and dime the poor bugger there's nothing left to send home unless he's working a 60 hour week.

      Its not that he wants more hours, its that he needs more hours if he's to have anything left after being financially raped by his keepers. That's not exactly a powerful argument for humane treatment.

    3. Re:Fox con irony. by FairAndHateful · · Score: 1

      Its not that he wants more hours, its that he needs more hours if he's to have anything left after being financially raped by his keepers. That's not exactly a powerful argument for humane treatment.

      Read the bit in italics again, please

      My base pay is 2,350 yuan, and I need to pay 190 yuan for social security tax, 120 yuan for housing fund, 110 yuan for accommodation fee, and some money on having meals.

      I don't know what his "some money on having meals" adds up to, but before that, he's keeping over 80% of his wages. I'm assuming that either the housing fund of the accommodation fee covers putting a roof over his head (if anyone knows more, please correct me), but by most western standards, having more than 80% of your income left over after you pay for housing and retirement would be a cause for celebration, not a claim of rape.

    4. Re:Fox con irony. by plasm4 · · Score: 1

      Also, the average Chinese worker has more holiday time than the average American worker, in fact they might have more holiday than the average EU worker.

    5. Re:Fox con irony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foxconn charges $0.70 per meal and $17.50 per month for rent in their dorms which is actually cheap for urban China, where it is difficult for young people to find places to live within commuting distance of their work.

      Shenzhen is a boomtown and has grown at an immense rate, in 1982 it had 352,000 people, by 2000 it was up to 7 million and in 2010 it hit 10.3 million people. If you've lived in a place with incredibly growth rates, you know what that does to prices of accommodations and food.

    6. Re:Fox con irony. by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      I would also love to know (for sure) if the 2350 yuan is weekly, biweekly, or monthly. The article reads as if that is weekly. As a weekly rate though 2350 yuan is ~$373 USD. US minimum wage pays about the same (30 hours a week is $225). I think the numbers are meant to be monthly or Chinese workers make way more then we think they do.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    7. Re:Fox con irony. by FairAndHateful · · Score: 1

      I originally assumed monthly, but it's starting to look like a shorter time period, especially since the average assembly line worker in China makes about $1000 USD a month. At least if this is to be believed. A weekly paycheck would put this guy about 30-40% above the average for assembly line workers, which sounds pretty believable for electronics.

  20. Foxconn is a decent employer by Chinese standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm a foreigner in China and I can tell you people here routinely work long hours and live in cramped dorms.

    Peasants have always had it rough and conditions for the many who come to cities to find work are generally not much better. A construction site here typically has barracks/dorms for the workers. It is not at all unusual for the companies to cheat or delay on their pay. Here's one story (from a Party newspaper, take with salt) about that: http://english.people.com.cn/90882/7707122.html

    I had Chinese girlfriend who worked as a waitress; she thought she had a good job. Come in around 10 am, work until 2, nap or go shopping unitil 4:30, work until about 11. If some customers wanted to stay later, a few waitresses would too. Two days "off" a month, meaning come in at 4:30 instead of in the morning. Sleep in bunk beds in an apartment the boss rented near the restaurant.

    There are long queues for Foxconn jobs: http://micgadget.com/21420/thousands-line-up-for-foxconns-jobs-in-zhengzhou/

  21. Not really by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    My phone is made in Taiwan. I don't know who HTC uses, maybe internal, but it is of Taiwanese origin, not Chinese. My computer does have some Chinese parts in it, namely the powersupply and motherboard, however neither are produced by Foxconn. Not saying the companies that made them (CWT and MSI) are any better, but there you go.

    The rest of the components are different countries. My CPU was fabbed by Intel in Chandler, Arizona and packaged by Intel in Costa Rica. My RAM was made by Micron (under their Crucial brand) in the US. Not sure where the chips on it came from, they have plants in the US, Europe, Japan, Israel, Malaysia and so on (none in China yet). My SSDs were made by Western Digital in the US, my HDDs by Western Digital in Malaysia.

    None of this is because I'm trying to avoid China or anything, just pointing out that a computer is much more international than you might think. Some components you have no choice on country. Any 32nm Intel CPU was fabbed in the US, since that's where they only 32nm fabs are. They can be packaged in a few places though. Any powersupply was made in China, they have the only people who do, like Seasonic and CWT (only a few companies actually make PSUs, the rest just spec them to order). RAM you can get all over.

    If you decide Foxconn is a company you don't approve of, you can avoid them, though it'll likely take some doing.

    However I think a big problem people have is that Apple charges premium prices but uses cut rate manufacturing. You can't say they don't charge a premium, how do you suppose they maintain those massive profit margins?

    Often when you get premium priced goods, you get better manufacturing too. For example I like Denon receivers. Their cheaper stuff is all made in China. Fair enough. However their higher end units are made in Japan. I suspect part of it is to maintain better quality control, and part of it is just because Denon is Japanese and their Japanese market may care about that.

    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My phone is made in Taiwan. I don't know who HTC uses, maybe internal, but it is of Taiwanese origin, not Chinese. My computer does have some Chinese parts in it, namely the powersupply and motherboard, however neither are produced by Foxconn.

      Guess what... Foxconn is a Taiwanese company, with headquarters in Taipei.

    2. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My phone is made in Taiwan. I don't know who HTC uses, maybe internal, but it is of Taiwanese origin, not Chinese. My computer does have some Chinese parts in it, namely the powersupply and motherboard, however neither are produced by Foxconn.

      Guess what... Foxconn is a Taiwanese company, with headquarters in Taipei.

      Yeah. Oops, Sycraft?

    3. Re:Not really by clifyt · · Score: 2

      Wait? You don't buy from China? You buy from Taiwan (officially known as the Republic of China) and is the home of Foxconn? And even though Taiwan and China are separate gov'ts, they both treat their employees almost the same...and one can claim their products are made in Taiwan even if it is made on the mainland?

      Here is news for you, HTC is primarily built AND DESIGNED by Foxconn. It isn't hard to look this up. Go on, I'll wait.

      So while you are being snarky about how much above everyone else you are, you are buying a phone that actually has more to do with Foxconn than the Apple's do...

  22. What a crock by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    They're basically saying "We know we're committing crimes and we plan to continue to do it until July 2013

    1. Re:What a crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're basically saying "We know we're committing crimes and we plan to continue to do it at the very least until July 2013

      FTFY

    2. Re:What a crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow so you can do that in China? Isn't that like a captured serial killer saying I'm going to try to cut back on my killing of prostitutes and eventually give up all together by this time next year.

  23. Re:Evil is as evil does... by Kenja · · Score: 1

    There is also the issue of trade tarifs. China has them, we dont. So if a company (say Apple) wants to see in China, it is very expensive to do so if their goods are not made there. On the flip side, it is far cheaper to sell goods in the US that are made in China.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  24. OP: Try to look a more than one source by PNutts · · Score: 4, Informative

    Spin can go a lot of different ways.

    From the article:

    The FLA found few safety violations, noting that the company had already dealt with problems like blocked fire exits and defective protective gear.

    The FLA found that many workers at the Foxconn factories want to work even more overtime, so they can make more money. Foxconn told the FLA that it will raise hourly salaries to compensate workers for the reduced hours.

    Heerden said that it's common to find workers in developing countries looking for more overtime, rather than less.

    "They're often single, they're young, and there's not much to do, so frankly they'd just rather work and save," he said.
    The auditors examined one years' worth of payroll and time records at each factory, conducted interviews with some workers and had 35,000 of them fill out anonymous surveys.

    Apple has started tracking the working hours of half a million workers in its supply chain, and said that 89 percent of them worked 60 hours or less in February, even though the company was ramping up production of the new iPad. Workers averaged 48 hours per week.

    1. Re:OP: Try to look a more than one source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect from western media cabals?
      These ultra leftist western media are pathological haters.
      Especially when the righties are kicking their butts.

      As if Foxconn can't go and interview more applicants lining up outside their factory, if they really wanted to put in an extra shift.
      You think Foxconn is stupid? Why have workers nodding off affecting quality, when the solution is waiting in line outside their factory gate 24/7? And they don't even have to pay the new shift overtime rates.
      Better, cheaper. If only the west could learn these lessons.

    2. Re:OP: Try to look a more than one source by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Apple has started tracking the working hours of half a million workers in its supply chain, and said that 89 percent of them worked 60 hours or less in February, even though the company was ramping up production of the new iPad. Workers averaged 48 hours per week.

      Those claims would appear to be blatant fabrications in light of today's report. I wonder exactly who made them.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  25. "overtime criminality" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to laugh. I'm sure there are a lot of doctors right here in America who wouldn't mind working only 60 hours a week.

  26. Re:Evil is as evil does... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be illegal. You can not on-shore such a labor-intensive production line while remaining loyal to your shareholders (which you have to do by law). If Tim Cook and Co. on-shored the production of Apple devices, and spiked costs, they would certainly have legal troubles since the board of directors would have to SUE them for not acting in the best interest of the shareholders.

    This situation is the result of two phenomenons: globalization through trade agreements and laws governing the practices of public corporate management (profit seeking by law).

    Apple is doing exactly what apple should be doing:

    1. Answer pressure from the media about their operations, and make sure their suppliers are also answering pressure to fall back into compliance.

    2. Hiring the FLA to make sure their suppliers are in compliance with the local laws and regulations set forth by the governments in those localities.

    3. Seeking the lowest cost of operation to fulfill its goals.

    If we want to cry out about the treatment of the workers at HHPC:

    1. Write to your congressmen regarding the trade agreements that are signed and ask that your country enter into agreements that meet your requirements from a labor standpoint (and be prepared to pay the increase costs of the products that are now sub-optimally built from a cost standpoint).

    2. Stop buying the products made in those places (I understand most are not willing to go without the newest HHPC-manufactured good).

    3. Ask yourself what happens to 500,000 workers who now lost the job that earned them the ability to eat (hint: look into the economics of Africa and the problems they have).

    Its so funny how much these "hipsters" blame corporations and paint them as evil... when in fact they are doing exactly what they should be doing. By law they must seek the most profit within the bounds of other laws.

     

  27. Workers upset over overtime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recent interviews with workers in Apple manufacturing areas of Foxconn showed the chief complant to be overtime. That is not getting enough! workers on Apple lines do not get overtime but complain that if they worked for nearby competitors they could work all the overtime they want.

    The real idiocy is i know plenty of people in the US working hours that would be illegal in China. Some of them working in government, It's also interesting to note that critics have complained that Chinese laws only require them to give 0ne 5 minute break ever 2 hours. You do realize that nowhere in the US are employers required to give any breaks other than meal breaks.

    The fact is the Chinese have better labor laws than the US.

  28. Re:Half the households in America own Apple produc by Pi+Is+A+Rational · · Score: 1

    Half the households in America own Apple products [citation needed]

  29. Re:Evil is as evil does... by deathguppie · · Score: 1

    It's easy to understand that people like you were not around at the beggining of this century in the US. When people worked 6 10hour days a week for minimal wages. It wasn't modernization that stopped the practice. It was people on the streets demanding it. Unions and a lot of violence and heartace.
    People in China don't have that option. Unions are illegal, and there is no recourse for poor working conditions. There is no reason to believe in fact that things will ever change over there, or that we will ever be able to compete with the near slave labor conditions in their factories.
    Your assertion as to why manufacturing phones in China is more cost effective, is baseless and speculative at best. The Chinese workers are not going to be able to stand up for themselves legally and anyone with half a brain knows it.
    On a side note I can't help but notice that this thread has been carpeted with one sided moderation on the issue. Makes me wonder...

    --
    once more into the breach
  30. Re:Half the households in America own Apple produc by guspasho · · Score: 1

    I don't think those articles show what you think they show. Either that or you think liberalism is based around the idea that people hate Apple products.

  31. Re:Half the households in America own Apple produc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  32. Give them the T-shirt by Pesticidal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Excessive hours? It's all part of the Apple culture: 90 Hours A Week And Loving It

  33. Close, but no cigar by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're right that apple gets singled out due to it's extraordinary profitability. But the reason they're singled out is, you'd think a company with a profit margin like that could let the workers live like humans, wouldn't you?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  34. Less support? Doubtful. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    "Will the public ever sour on Apple devices in light of the constant media attention on supplier working conditions?""
    Do people still by Nike products?

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  35. Re:Oh my by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you use Windows? Because rumor has it they have some of these conditions there, too.

  36. "overtime criminality" by wzinc · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many iPhones Apple sold in the time it took the writer to come-up with that phrase...

  37. Re:Pure Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The desire for a reasonable slice of the pie shouldn't be referred to as greed, especially in light of what's on the opposing side of the equation.

    The labor unions fought for "more" from management and the "ownership society" (in the vernacular of the neoconservative right wing) because it was there and could have been shared, easily, for the betterment of all concerned. The high tech mfg isn't the auto-industry, which failed because it refused to deal with reality and build better cars. Audi and BMW, which don't mfg ANY low-end cars, and do business in Germany, one of those SOCIALIST states, are profitable and competitive. And Apple amassed 100 BILLION fucking $'s while leading their industry in innovation and price.

    Don't give me this crap about the greed of the unions. Management and government together have 'arranged' globalization and the migration of U.S. mfg as well as anything else they can 'outsource' because it fed stock options, bank accounts of the already wealthy and an entire propaganda industry which supports politicians' placement in Washington.

    You should really take a look at what's happened to 'our' economy, starting with Ron Raygun, as the financial sector's bite of GDP doubled and the rest of the economy shrank shrank proportionately. It's called stagnation, and the only reason the stats don't look worse is because our illustrious 4th estate doesn't bother to report on how 'oafishoil' measures have been manipulated over time to make it seem like all remains well in the garden, as long as we tend to the roots and wait for the next season of growth.

    Gotta watch Being There again.

  38. Meet the new boss same as the old boss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't affect Apple in any way whatsoever. Afterall where would the iSheep and fanboys get their apple-gasms from?

  39. Re:Half the households in America own Apple produc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing more than half the country has higher than conservative intelligence.

  40. Re:Oh my by Genda · · Score: 1

    Have you ever seen the slave labor camps in Redmond! It'd make a Marine Drill Sergeant cry like a baby!

  41. Get some perspective by peppepz · · Score: 1

    I think that all those commenters believing that China's working conditions are OK should be "re-educated", in the Mao sense, by working for a year at some Foxconn manufacturing line (without access to their american bank account for the whole period, of course).

  42. ABC by jones_supa · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you haven't seen it already, here's the ABC News clip of the Foxconn factory to get a glimpse inside.

  43. Re:Evil is as evil does... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    Putting Apple in the "Big Evil Corporation" list over something like this is just enormously naive...

    ...according to all the Apple astroturfers.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  44. So... by pev · · Score: 1

    Surely if it's genuine "criminality" then hands up, fair cop and time to stop NOW? As an individual you don't get the option to turn round and say "sure I'll stop robbing banks in a year or so once I've had time to re-organise my life and finances and arrange a different stream of income" ...?! One rule for us...

  45. Re:Evil is as evil does... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    People in China don't have that option. Unions are illegal, and there is no recourse for poor working conditions. There is no reason to believe in fact that things will ever change over there, or that we will ever be able to compete with the near slave labor conditions in their factories.

    Right, as I said - China is going through its industrial revolution right now, with the migration of workers away from subsistence farming and other non-technology jobs into an industrial workforce, with the corresponding rise of a middle class. That is exactly what happened in the West too - just much further back in time. If you think it will never change (or that is hasn't already changed *enormously* over the last 20 years), then you don't really have an eye on history.

    Your assertion as to why manufacturing phones in China is more cost effective, is baseless and speculative at best. The Chinese workers are not going to be able to stand up for themselves legally and anyone with half a brain knows it.

    They're not baseless and speculative; they are well understood and heavily researched and calculated. A mass market consumer product supply chain is one of the things large companies know a lot about.

    On a side note I can't help but notice that this thread has been carpeted with one sided moderation on the issue. Makes me wonder...

    What, that reality has a "bias" that doesn't agree with you, thus it must be some secret conspiracy of paid moderation designed to silence the highly influential and world-famous /. commenters?

    Slashdot *wishes* that Apple was pureeing Chinese children and using their bones to make glue for iPad screens because that type of glue is extra sticky and impossible to remove, making the device harder to repair at home, then perhaps they would have some actual justification for the frothing rage and wild speculation that goes into their white-hot hate of the company. As it is, they're just another large American company; some bad parts, some good parts, some uninteresting parts. It's not like they have a secret underground volcano lair.

  46. Re:Evil is as evil does... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    According to anyone who actually looks at the facts.

    Putting *any* corporation in the "Big Evil Corporation" list is naive, since it speaks to a thought process that is one dimensional and superficial. No single large entity is entirely "evil" or "good". Apple has plenty of both, but it's not exclusively one or the other. The world is not made up of Sith and Jedi. The vast majority of people, companies, groups, organisations fall somewhere in the middle.

  47. Poster's last sentence by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

    "Will the public ever sour on [tech gadgets produced in China] in light of the constant media attention on supplier working conditions?"

    FTFY, because if we face facts Apple is simply the richest, most high profile company using Chinese manufacturing at this time.

    If Apple had it's 1999 or 2000 market cap I'm not sure we'd be hearing squat about this.

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
    1. Re:Poster's last sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFY, because if we face facts Apple is simply the richest, most high profile company using Chinese manufacturing at this time. If Apple had it's 1999 or 2000 market cap I'm not sure we'd be hearing squat about this.

      I'm not sure that is the whole story. Apple was very profitable for a long time before these news stories became popular. They became popular after the press started doing articles that were sourced almost entirely from Apple's openly published audits. One of the reasons articles target Apple is because Apple makes for good news, but another is that it is easy because Apple funds the investigation. They conduct and publish audits and pay a third party to do the same. Other companies do nothing and keep their heads down. It is a sad lesson about the press and the average reader.

  48. Re:Evil is as evil does... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    Wow, and speaking of Apple astroturders.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  49. Apple does that - but for workers, not the factory by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    "Executives at multiple suppliers, in interviews, said that Hewlett-Packard and others allowed them slightly more profits and other allowances if they were used to improve worker conditions."

    Apple on the other hand gives the workers on Apple products bonuses directly. Which do you think the workers would rather have "improved worker conditions" such as better soap in the executive washrooms, or more pay?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  50. 90 hours of WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90 hours of work as a desk jockey will tire you out and probably make you unhealthy over time, but 90 hours of factory work on heavy machinery could kill you when some drives a forklift while sleep-deprived. That aside, everyone in the factory I work for has done 60+ hours for the past two weeks, which is apparently illegal in China and those jobs involve heavy lifting and running around constantly. It also matters a lot whether those hours happen over 5, 6 or 7 days.

    Honestly, it's to Apple's benefit not to have people doing those kinds of hours regularly, because people produce much lower quality stuff and they work a lot more slowly than they normally do. Any factory that has people doing hours like that is poorly run. And yes, I most certainly am including my own workplace in that description. That said, there were people acting like they won the lottery when they got their checks with 40+ hours of OT, so I certainly believe that the workers like the cash, though if they're anything like us, they were swearing constantly about everything while actually working the ridiculously long shifts.

    Anyhow, it appears that things will improve for the Chinese workers. Some of them will probably be mad about getting less OT, but the changes sound positive overall.

  51. Negative motivation by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    There is in fact negative motivation for Apple to improve worker conditions at all.

    If they had not hired this investigator stories about worker conditions would die off naturally instead of being fanned.

    So because Apple is trying to investigate and help, they are being attacked. If I ran Apple, it would be - lesson learned, don't try to help. At least if I didn't have any moral qualms...

    If people really wanted to help Chinese workers they would ask other companies to fund similar studies, to put pressure on them to "be like Apple". But now no company would be stupid enough to actually look at worker conditions because they see they would simply be attacked for it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Negative motivation by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      So because Apple is trying to investigate and help, they are being attacked. If I ran Apple, it would be - lesson learned, don't try to help. At least if I didn't have any moral qualms...

      You are making the false assumption that Apple gives a rats ass about people's opinions. They do that only to a tiny degree. Like with environmental issues, Apple was always a leader because (a) it is good karma and (b) it often saves cost to be environmentally friendly. They just didn't care about publicizing things. The same with treatment of workers: Apple has been doing a lot in the last years, long before anyone talked about it. One area has actually never been mentioned by the press at all: Employment agencies charging foreign employees several monthly salaries to get them a job. Apple actually made companies pay back many million dollars in such charges to their employees.

      Summary: Apple doesn't work to improve working conditions because of anything the press, or some blogger, or some lying bastard on a radio show is saying, but because they want to improve working conditions. And they won't stop working on improving working conditions because of some 5troll 5flamebait article on Slashdot either.

  52. Why should it be illegal to do what I want? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Well, easy, that should be illegal as well.

    Why? If a person is willing to work that long, why should it be illegal to do so?

    When I was young I sometimes put in 80+ hour weeks on projects at work. You know what ? I enjoyed it! Yes in theory the company was "taking advantage" of me by allowing me to work that long, but the truth is I wanted to and was happy to do so because I was enjoying myself and what I was learning.

    Even now, I am reluctant to put in 80 hours but I still work sometimes a lot of hours during the week. I would hate to have my CHOICE of working denied simply because you are too lazy to do so and want to put obstacles in the way of truly productive people.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why should it be illegal to do what I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? If a person is willing to work that long, why should it be illegal to do so?

      Yeah, you go ahead and fly on that plane where the pilot's just done a 72-hour continuous shift; and you go ahead and be operated on by the surgeon doing a 100-hour week. As long as they're willing, why not?

      Retard.

    2. Re:Why should it be illegal to do what I want? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Well, easy, that should be illegal as well.

      Why? If a person is willing to work that long, why should it be illegal to do so?

      Suppose my wife needs a major surgery that costs $200k. Suppose a company likes the work I do and offers to front me the money if I agree to work for them until I've paid back that loan - they'll pay me a salary like $70k, which will go directly to loan repayments, minus some allowance to cover my living expenses while I live in the company dormitory.

      Such arrangements were common as recently as 200 years ago. They were entered into completely voluntarily. And, of course, they are completely illegal today as they should be. Even slavery historically was often an arrangement entered into voluntarily (though certainly not in the US - I'm talking about ancient history).

      The problem is that the general labor pool has relatively little power to negotiate working conditions on the large scale except through legislation. Labor practices like indentured servitude take advantage of people in desperate situations and trap them in situations that are only somewhat less desperate.

      In any case, there is really little need in our society for excessive working hours and the problems that it brings like unemployment, health issues, and child raising issues that we all pay for in the end. Employers have to pay what the market demands, and restrictions on hours will increase demand for workers and chances are everybody who actually works for a living will be making the same money or more. The only people who lose out in such a system are those whose main source of income is from ownership of capital, and, well, if things get too bad for them they can always get a job.

      Of course, the only way such a system can actually work is if you place tariffs on imports from nations that do not have similar laws. Otherwise companies will simply shift the jobs elsewhere. The US and Europe already suffer from this problem to various degrees.

  53. Once again the white man screws over the chinese by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Rather than letting a guy work like hell while he is young, American do-gooders want to make sure that the Chinese have to endure a decade more of factory labor than they would otherwise just to lead a comfortable life when they leave.

    Nothing like nosy Americans to screw over the poor of the earth, all the while claiming they are helping.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  54. Only an Apple Hater by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Only an Apple Hater would claim that voluntary labor was slavery, just because Apple is involved somewhere.

    Take your "logic" elsewhere and screw over some other group of poor people instead why don't you?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  55. More Apple Hater Propoganda by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    We are going to give you a job for a couple dollars an hour, which is way more than you're making now on welfare

    How evil is that! Offering money which you have a choice of taking! BASTARDS!

    you will work the hours we tell you

    Actually the workers are trying to get more hours to earn more, so FAIL.

    you will live in a dormitory we provide for you

    They could live elsewhere but why? the dorms there are cheaper and have zero commute so they can work more,m which I have to remind you again is what they WANT to do. FAIL.

    You will eat what we feed you.

    That is total bullshit, as the ABC thing showed they have a cafeteria or the workers could eat their own food. FAIL.

    You will do what we say with serious repercussions to your future health

    The report said the safety issues had been fixed. FAIL.

    So basically all I can get out of your fail laden Apple Hater screed is that you hate chinese people and want to keep them working in factories years longer than they would otherwise.

    I think I've found true evil, only it's not Apple...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  56. Re:Evil is as evil does... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    You misspelled "astroturfers", or you're 12.

    Still deciding.

    Nice counterpoint though, I can really see the thought and intelligence behind your argument!

  57. Priorities by phorm · · Score: 2

    To be fair, part of the problem is that priorities are also extremely f**ked up. Many have piled on tons of debt to live in a house they can't afford, drive an expensive car that's twice what they require, and watch a home-theatre that they don't need.

    As an acquaintance of mine said: it's a bit irritating and confusing to be stuck in a grocery line behind the girl who's paying in food stamps while chatting on her iphone...

    People need to wake up and fix their priorities. As long as having an iphone, big-screen, and monster-truck are priorities, people will not focus on the issues of savings, corruption, violation-of-rights and other such things that need change before the situation can be bettered.

  58. Re:Pure Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's refreshing to to see something not libertarian in /. nowadays.

    Also, it should be noted how right-wing arguments are almost always to blame someone for some sin. the greed of unions, our luxurious way of life...

    It's amazing to see some people in 2012 still using the sin logic.

  59. Re:Evil is as evil does... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    Right up there with your string of logical fallacies, you should go look that up.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  60. Making no assumptions by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You are making the false assumption that Apple gives a rats ass about people's opinions.

    Remember I was just saying *I* would do as a hypothetical. It has no bearing on what Apple will do, very obviously in fact they are continuing to try and help because they feel it is correct to do so.

    In fact I agree with you that Apple does not care at all what people think and just continue to do what they see as the right thing to do.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  61. Re:Evil is as evil does... by TheSync · · Score: 1

    When people worked 6 10hour days a week for minimal wages. It wasn't modernization that stopped the practice. It was people on the streets demanding it. Unions and a lot of violence and heartace.

    Or it was technological and business practice improvements raising US worker productivity which lead to rising wages and affordability of better working conditions. Unions may have played a role, but without productivity improvements, unions could not have had much influence (and indeed, they did not until in the US the 1920's).

    Chinese factory worker wages are continuing to rise, despite the lack of unions, as the capital stock improves and businesses are able to become more productive.

    there is no recourse for poor working conditions

    Many Chinese migrants move from factory to factory as they build up a work history to find ones that have better work conditions and higher pay.

  62. China is not a free country. by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

    Just a thought. But what if empowering the local Chinese with more wealth and work advancement opportunities provided enough societal confidence for political change? Would new-found freedom from governmental reform be worth it? I'm just asking...

    China is not a free country. It is a country that literally crushes dissidents under tank treads. It is a country that arrived where it is today by relying on brutal exploitation, and those in power are not just going to roll over.

    People who claim that China in just going through a phase that current first world countries went through a few generations ago need to understand that China today is not like the US in the 19th and early 20th century. The US is better now than it was then, but it was a million times better then that China is today in terms of social and political freedom.

  63. Re:Oh fucking Christ - thank you for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Informative, how do i mod this up? :)

  64. Re:Evil is as evil does... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Point one out to me, just for kicks.

    Quote it specifically.

  65. Re:Evil is as evil does... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    Point one out to me, just for kicks.

    Quote it specifically.

    Because you really don't know? It would not surprise me. OK, "According to anyone who actually looks at the facts..." False attribution... "appeals to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or fabricated source in support of an argument."

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  66. Re:Evil is as evil does... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    jo_ham, what you have to realise about Daniel Phillips is he's a follower of Mike Daisey. A liar. He has no morals or ethics.

  67. Re:Evil is as evil does... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Daniel Phillips ought to look up the concept of "telling the truth". He's still claiming that Mike Daisey was right, long after Daisey himself admitted to lying. Neither one has morality nor ethics. They're as bad as each other.

  68. Re:Evil is as evil does... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Oh look. Daniel Phillips, the one who's still claiming Mike Daisey was right, long after Daisey himself admitted to making up all the Apple accusations.

    What a pair of liars.

  69. Re:Evil is as evil does... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    No, I mean quote something of mine that is a logical fallacy. If you can't, then clearly I didn't make one, and you're just slinging words to try to escape from your losing argument position.

    Of course, we both know that's what's happened here.

  70. Re:Apple does that - but for workers, not the fact by Raenex · · Score: 1

    I love how you created the strawman that better working conditions equates to soap in the executive bathroom. Also, I could find no source for Apple giving bonuses to supplier workers. If you want something real to sink your teeth into, I did find a survey in the news that what Foxconn workers really want is increased pay, but not so much shorter hours or better working conditions:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/foxconn-workers-would-rather-get-salary-boost-than-reduced-hours/2012/03/30/gIQA27NvlS_story.html

    The same article I originally quoted from said that Apple was notorious for driving down the prices paid to suppliers, which must ultimately come out of wages paid to workers.