Slashdot Mirror


TSA Shuts Down Airport, Detains 11 After "Science Project" Found

OverTheGeicoE writes "A group of students and a professor were detained by TSA at Dallas' Love Field. Several of them were led away in handcuffs. What did they do wrong? One of them left a robotic science experiment behind on an aircraft, which panicked a boarding flight crew. The experiment 'looked like a cell phone attached to a remote control car with some exposed wires protruding.' Of course, the false alarm inconvenienced more than the traveling academics. The airport was temporarily shut down and multiple gates were evacuated, causing flight delays and diversions."

54 of 537 comments (clear)

  1. Scare quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the "Scare Quotes" in the title? Is someone implying that it was actually a bomb, and not a robot? TFA does not.

    1. Re:Scare quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because that way, more people click on it. Don't you know how news sales works?

    2. Re:Scare quotes by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously the OP did not find the experiment worthy of the term "science project". Maybe he thinks he could do a much better one?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Scare quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because that way, more people click on it. Don't you know how "news" sales works?

      FTFY.

    4. Re:Scare quotes by bfandreas · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Excellent technology frightened the merely mediocre. Who we let gain power. Handcuffs were applied by pigs. Who we let to gain power. That's all there is to be said.


      There was a time when JPL and MRI lured the brightest from all over the world into the country. Now they all get scared away. If anybody wants to meet me nowadays, I call them back to Europe. There's no way that I'd be traveing to the US anytime soon.

      I know quite a lot of stuff that'd be deemed harmful to the US. Like logic, evolution, security related stuff. Maybe not grammar. Screw that. 30 years ago that was a completely different thing. Jimmy Carter. A downhill race ever since.

      Who actually does vote those into office that are eternally scared of the stuff they don't understand themselves? Could you please strip them off their right to vote?

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    5. Re:Scare quotes by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Carter was a disaster as a president. However, the Republicans since 1980 have made a point of nominating the dimmest bulbs in the box.

      Reagan? Already senile. His was a Weekend At Bernie's presidency.
      Bush the Elder? A retread, complete with barfing on foreign dignitaries.
      Then they moved on. BobDole... yeah. Shrub the Younger, whose intelligence could be measured in scoops of raisin bran. McCain, who while a "war hero" from years prior basically campaigned like a zombie.

      And then we get the "brain trust" of this latest batch. Herman "couldn't even make an edible pizza" Cain. Mitt "robber baron" Romney. Rick Sanctimonous, champion of home schooling and anti-science rants. Michelle "hehe, I went into law because my hubby said we were done having babies and I should make myself useful in the daytimes before his nightly blowjob" Bachmann. And of course Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich, who "historians" who have a running bet to top each other and misrepresent American history in a worse way.

      A friend of mine has a better word for these sorts of idiots - they're known as Brain Donors. Kind of like kidney donors, they obviously donated a long while ago and somehow are alive without a functioning brain.

    6. Re:Scare quotes by Moryath · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just realized I'm forgetting one. That one guy... uh... what was his name... uh... thinking...it's on the tip of my tongue... can't quite remember... sorry, lost it. "Oops."

    7. Re:Scare quotes by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is it really so hard to believe that a mechanism connected to what looks like a cell phone could be a bomb?

      Ask someone who has been in Iraq and Afghanistan (or Israel for that matter) what is frequently used to detonate IEDs remotely on command.

      Honestly, I know that there are some pretty ineffective TSA regulations out there, and that there's a lot of security theater going on, but I'd rather look like a fool than let hundreds of people die on my watch. And frankly, what do you think many homemade bombs are, if not science projects taken to a murderous extreme?

      Perhaps this was an overreaction, but nothing in the article provides facts other than the indignation of those inconvenienced.

      I do have to wonder, though, where can we draw the line where stupid things like this don't happen to innocent people, but that real terrorists can't take advantage of those lines.

    8. Re:Scare quotes by Formalin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh, I got hauled into the back room in Vienna or Graz once.

      They showed me a scan of my bag. Large round opaque item in the centre of the bag (the explosive charge, I suppose) with wires headed off to a 'control box' full of electronics, coils, etc.. Looked... fairly intelligent bomb like I suppose, if it was 1940.

      The 'control unit' was an old tube radio I was bringing home, the 'charge' was a lead crystal ashtray (hence the opaque-ness), and the wires were headphone wires which just happened to run between them, on a different layer of clothes... I got a pretty good kick out of it.

      I suppose if the TSA was smart enough to read the xrays, they'd probably have locked down the airport, were it in the US!

    9. Re:Scare quotes by dr2chase · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As I said to someone else, back when the Lite-Brite Mooninites panicked the Boston Police, the first rule of making a bomb, is to not make it look like a bomb. That's why IEDs get buried, stuffed into dead dogs, what have you. Around here, if you wanted to hide a bomb in plain sight, you'd stick it in a crumpled Dunkin Donuts bag.

    10. Re:Scare quotes by binarybum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do have to wonder, though, where can we draw the line where stupid things like this don't happen to innocent people, but that real terrorists can't take advantage of those lines.

      There is no such line, and I think that most Americans will agree that the one that has been drawn is much more in favor of stupid things like this happening to people than we would like to settle for.

          The important thing to remember is that security is far from free - and the TSA continues to exclusively prove that the dollars being spent on its services only put people at greater risk by diverting funds from more effective investments.

      --
      ôó
    11. Re:Scare quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't a Dunkin Donuts bag the first place a cop would look?

    12. Re:Scare quotes by Sun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Didn't read TFA, so I'll answer based on the "data" here.

      It's perfectly legitimate to assume that this is a bomb. Perfectly reasonable assumption to make. What isn't reasonable is the actual reaction.

      Close half the airport? Why? Just taxi the airplane to somewhere remote and examine the object there. An airplane on the ground simply will not go up in flames due to a small bomb (and even if it does, if it's in a remote corner of the airport, let it).

      Detain the people involved? Sure. But why handcuff students?

      And, yes, I live in Israel. And, yes, I simply fail to see such a thing causing such a reaction here.

      Shachar

  2. You're looking in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The terrorists aren't trying to get on our airplanes. The terrorists are blowing up Planned Parenthood clinics.

    1. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The terrorists are strip-searching people with judicial approval.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    2. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The terrorists are laughing up their sleeves.

    3. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Every American is a criminal... if you ask those in charge

      FTFY. Why do you think the number of criminal offenses keeps increasing? Ayn Rand hit the ball out of the park:

      "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by lgw · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do realize that most of her "dystopian" writing was not dire predictions of things to come, but simply descriptions of things she had seen while young, right? That was exactly the sort of thing she was writing about (and far, far worse, in the early USSR).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by Geezle2 · · Score: 4, Funny
      When someone comes to a very diferent conclusion, we shouldn't be so quick to assume they're stupid

      Very true! I believe that life begins with ejaculation! Every one of you masturbators is a mass murderer!

    6. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was wartime. Different rules apply during war.

      Was there a decade in the last century in which the US not at war with some country (or now, terrorist groups)?

      And those 'innocent civilians'?

      Uuuh, scare quotes. Yes, at least the vast majority of them, exceptions notwithstanding.

      there's at least one documented case of them coming to the aid of a crashed Japanese pilot. Would you have the government just ignore that?

      Are you seriously trying to justify the internment of a whole ethnic group because of the actions of one single individual?

  3. Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Zero.

    Number of people nude Xrayed or sexually groped (on their breasts or crotch) or strip-searched or locked in glass jails for carrying breast milk or ..... (this list could go on several pages).

    Millions.

    I hope none of those machines were malfunctioning and ejected lethal doses. They are never checked. TIME TO END THE TSA. And the Fed (give the power back to the State central banks).

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by bonch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The TSA sucks, but I can't say I disagree with their response in this case. The device is described as a robot-like device with exposed wires, resembling a handmade explosive device. According to the statement in the article, the TSA determined that the device was not harmful, the airport reopened, and everything went back to normal. That seems like what is supposed to happen.

      The Dallas City Hall statement in the article:

      A commercial flight which originated in Kansas City arrived at Love Field this afternoon and unloaded passengers. The next flight crew boarded to prep the aircraft for the next flight when a robotic device was discovered on the plane and the crew notified authorities. Air Marshals along with Dallas Love Field officers detained 11 passengers related to the device. It was determined that the device was not dangerous and was a student’s science project. The student was traveling with fellow students and a professor. That student told authorities the robot was accidentally left on the plane. The airport was temporarily shut down until the device could be determined it was not a threat. Gate #12 has reopened and airport operations are returning to normal.

      That doesn't change my opposition to the groping and scanning, of course. But this story seems just a little overblown. I think an airport would have reacted this way regardless of the existence of the TSA.

    2. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>>The TSA sucks, but I can't say I disagree with their response in this case.

      A little late don't you think? The TSA's job is to keep bomb-looking devices OFF the plane, not discover them 5 hours later after the flight is already over. If this was a real bomb* then it would have already been used. TSA == fail. (again)

      *
      *I doubt terrorists will waste their time attacking airplanes with bombs. They'll go after soft targets like your home or factory. The best way to deal with them is to keep them OUT of the country in the first place (yes that means walls on both borders; enemies shouldn't be able to just walk in).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by ClioCJS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      SO "Exactly what you want them to do" is fine a bomb AFTER the flight is over?

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    4. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except this is proof that the TSA completely fucked up and didn't do their job. If the device was such that it would terrify (much more highly trained than the TSA goons) air crew, what the holy fuck was it doing on the plane in the first place, let alone in the cabin or outside of a container in cargo, with the power source disconnected?

      What also pisses me off is that the passengers were the ones who were taken away and interrogated. I wonder: Did the TSA agents who fucked up also get taken into custody and subjected to interrogation?

      If not, why not? Either through intent or incompetence they allowed this to happen. If it was intent, then they're clearly abetting terrorists, and if they're incompetent they shouldn't have jobs anymore.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    5. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by ebh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I like that. Who needs bombs when you can effectively DDoS the airport?

    6. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taking down a plane is scary, and it would really suck for the people on the plane. Hijacking a plane and hitting a building with it is much worse.

      Your argument is that if we didn't have the TSA, we'd not have any security, and that's incorrect. Keep the security we already have - scan the bags, metal detect the people, and be done with it. You can't scan for all the possible ways to make something explode, and any hijacking attempt is very likely to be stopped by passengers that are now aware of the problems (like both of the bombers that you mention).

      9/11 happened because passengers figured the hijackers would make demands, and then they'd go land somewhere and the people would be free, because that's what typically happened with hijackings before then (I believe.. I may be picturing movies). There was no incentive to fight back, and risk of injury or death if they did. When the passengers on Flight 93 found out about the attacks in other places, they realized that they either fought back and maybe lived, or died in a fiery death and caused other people to be injured/die. They then tried to regain control of the plane. I don't think any hijackings with a conscious passenger cabin are likely to succeed for a very long time.

    7. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

      Terrorists have always been forced to disguise their bombs. That didn't help the people on Pan Am flight 103. The reason the two terrorists you mention failed was that they tried to light something on fire with other people around. The TSA had no role whatsoever in foiling those plots.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the Fed (give the power back to the State central banks).

      I hate rider bills.... :)

    9. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the fact that it was *left* on the plane means that someone in the TSA already decided it was ok to be on the plane in the first place. In fact, it was judged safe enough that it could be a carry-on, which would be a requirement to be "accidentally left on the plane" (checked luggage would have made it to the carousel with nobody ending up detained, or outright lost forever).

      You'd think that there would be a pink sticker or some shit for nutty stuff that's already passed a first screening. I can tell you, as a guy that carries various odd electronic equipment all over the country, it'd be nice to earn some sort of reward for convincing the apathetic screener that what I'm carrying onto the plane is, indeed, a very expensive spectrophotometer and not an evil pilot killing death ray machine, complete with a USB strangling cable for those desperation fallback plans (please, please stop fucking with ... err vigorously inspecting... that device, sir...).

      Incidentally, I flew a couple years back, and had to give up my $0.99 nail clippers that I'd forgotten I'd put in my pocket. Apparently I could have clipped the pilots' fingernails too short until he bled to death...? They didn't even have the file/stabby bits on em. Still, only $0.99 and I knew better, so d'oh. What pissed me the fuck off, though: I went to a shop on the "glad that's over" side of security to get a book and some chips prior to boarding my flight, and guess what I saw? The same exact fucking brand of stabby-less nail clippers for $4.99. I half wondered if they were MY clippers, and that security took so long because they needed time to repackage them for re-sale to me.

    10. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by dr2chase · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mod parent up please. And add to that, cockpit doors are now reinforced.

      Also had a brief demonstration this weekend of what a pilot can do to incapacitate passengers. We had a go-around at our landing, first time I've ever done one. Pilots were not trying hard to be annoying or unpleasant, but the down-down-down then up-up-up made my tummy not very happy. A few more of those, I'd have probably been sick, and I'm sure I was not the only one. Imagine if the pilots were trying -- "fasten your seatbelts, or else".

    11. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was found on a plane right??

      I think the biggest problem here is that the TSA at one airport cleared the device for carry-on (not checked) and that another airport goes apeshit when the same device, already approved, is left on the plane.

      Where is the communication and common sense here? The TSA should have never let it on the plane as carry-on and checked it, with special instructions if you needed to go that far.

      The TSA is responsible for creating the situation here.

  4. Science!!! by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

    They grounded us with science...

  5. Obligatory by INeededALogin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I must not fear.
    Fear is the mind-killer.
    Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
    I will face my fear.
    I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
    And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
    Where the fear has gone there will be nothing.
    Only I will remain.

  6. Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in please.. by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What kind of moron takes something that "look[s] like a cell phone attached to a remote control car with some exposed wires protruding" onto an airplane?

  7. That sounds reasonable by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm as against the TSA as anyone.

    But come on. Considering what was found, why should any authority there NOT freak out? The flight crew did.

    It's really annoying it had such a large impact but in this case it was I think fully warranted. Even though I think they should have been allowed to enter the plane with the whole kit unscanned, once they left it behind all bets are off.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  8. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What kind of moron takes something that "look[s] like a cell phone attached to a remote control car with some exposed wires protruding" onto an airplane?

    What kind of moron LETS SOMEONE take something that look[s] like a cell phone attached to a remote control car with some exposed wires protruding" onto an airplane? I mean, if snow globes are verboten, how in the world could that contraption possibly get on board in the first place?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  9. Re:When it comes to security by Entropius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The hilarity is that if the nerds really wanted to play havoc with US air travel, they could, and there's not a damn thing the TSA could do about it.

  10. This is a bit suspicious. by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay. These people happened to be flying with something that looks very suspicious. A cellphone wired up to some other electronic device. Okay. Occasionally people do fly with suspicious looking items that are completely innocent. Then these same people "forget" it and leave it on an airplane? When's the last time you forgot a piece of carry-on luggage on a plane? I'm sure it happens occasionally, but when people are flying they are usually careful about such things. Now put the two together. What are the chances that a group of people bring a very suspicious looking electronic device onto a plane and then they all simultaneously forget it there? Isn't it possibly a bit more likely that they were playing some sort of a prank, or trying to test security at the airport and it backfired? Just a thought.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  11. Lack of communication by codepigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Handcuffs, really? Couldn't this have been solved in a matter of minutes if the TSA just asked a few questions of the students and teacher?

    The same with the shooting in Florida. If both guys had just talked/asked questions that teenager would still be alive.

  12. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just to be the devil's advocate, imagine the following scenario.

    Professor reaches TSA, shows the package, passes it through X-ray / opens it to show there is no chemical / explosive, and answers questions to the fully satisfaction of TSA (yes I am teacher these are the children I teach...).

    Sometime later, someone else (who of course has not been told that there was such teacher with such object in the previous flight) finds the surprise. Even if the artifact was competently investigated by the TSA, the people who found it probably had no way to verify that ---> panic button.

    To me, this article is bussiness as usual, and per se (the devil lies in details) it does not show up any incompetence / abuse

    --
    Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
  13. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the lesson is, if you want to bomb an airplane, enclose your bomb in a smooth, brushed aluminum and/or plastic case?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  14. Re:It got on the plane by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it got on the plane, someone checked it somewhere and gave it a thumbs-up. That makes it more likely to be a toy, just like it looked.

    Or it could have been placed aboard the aircraft by a crew member, ground support personnel, or any other person with access to the sterile area that intended to do something illegal. To get a job that gives you access to the sterile area takes little more than a 10-year background check, with no ongoing checks. There is always the possibility that someone could turn or be a sleeper long enough to get a job. That is why aircrews and airline employees are supposed to look for and report anything suspicious, because there are always ways to get something past security. Things like this actually do happen on a fairly regular basis, but it usually involves theft or drugs. The aircrew was right to report it.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  15. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 4, Funny

    That would clearly violate the TSAs guidelines on logic and sanity.

  16. Is the TSA worth it? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's an interesting info-graphic I saw for the first time today. Pretty much falls in line with the rest of the sentiment here.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  17. Re:It got on the plane by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it got on the plane, someone checked it somewhere and gave it a thumbs-up. That makes it more likely to be a toy, just like it looked.

    What's to say that when it passed through security it wasn't a cell phone, an RC car and wires with plugs on them - in different bags and/or from different people? I hate to be defending the TSA, but in this case I think it was perfectly reasonable to suspect this could be an airport/airplane assembled bomb. "Forgetting" it on board might be a way to make it blow up on the next flight rather than become a suicide bomber, honestly I have a hard time finding fault with suspected terrorist bombers being cuffed. Yeah of course it sucks for everyone affected when it turns out to be an innocent mistake but if they didn't react to this, what do you expect them to react to?

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  18. Soooo ... "exposed wires"? by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The device is described as a robot-like device with exposed wires, resembling a handmade explosive device.

    So if I put coloured epoxy over the wires so they cannot be seen ...

    The point is that the people claiming that this looks like "a handmade explosive device" do not know what "a handmade explosive device" looks like.

    It just looks UNUSUAL so they panicked.

    1. Re:Soooo ... "exposed wires"? by cicatrix1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was after the plane had landed safely. And well after the highschool science project had cleared security on the way INTO the plane. You're way too fucking scared.

      --

      I know more than you drink.
  19. Reminds me of something that happened to me... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was 2002, and I was taking a course in digital electronics. One of the well-known projects for this course was to build a digital clock from regular 74xx and 74xxx IC's. We were to complete the projects on our own breadboards, and we could, if we wanted to keep the result, buy our own electronic components as well. I bought my own electronics, and as a result, could work on it when I was not necessarily in the lab. I was in a fairly reclusive hallway in the school around lunctime, testing out a circuit I had designed which would get incorporated into my final project, and I was using some LED's for feedback, which flickered quickly as my circuit ran. I was concentrating on what I was doing, and was surprised when someone from campus security came up to me and grabbed me by the shoulder. I spent the next 15 minutes in the office of campus security explaining what I was doing, and as it happened, one of the people from campus security knew the professor and could vouch for the story I was giving. They had called my professor for the course anyways, who came to security, chuckled at the whole incident, because he recognized me immediately, and said that he knew me and that I was okay.

    Later that afternoon, during the class lecture, the prof relayed the anecdote to everybody with much amusement, not mentioning exactly who it was who, evidently, got him called down to the security office because they thought one of his students was building a bomb. He advised us all that we should be building our projects in the lab only, and not in the hallways of the school.

  20. Re:When it comes to security by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Informative

    If everybody on Slashdot gets an old phone, opens it up and leaves it on a plane...

    Then everybody on slashdot will get detained, probed and then TSA will request additional funding based on the spikes in detaining/probing/confiscations.
    Seriously, there is no positive outcome here. I think those people were handcuffed to create an appearance of hard work. TSA hasn't caught a single terrorist in over a decade of existence. The fact that they are still getting (increased) funding is hard to imagine.

  21. Re:When it comes to security by krept · · Score: 5, Funny

    TSA hasn't caught a single terrorist in over a decade of existence. The fact that they are still getting (increased) funding is hard to imagine.

    That means it's working!

    --
    None of us know everything. Therefore we're all naïve.
  22. Re:When it comes to security by Cramer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't fear, it's pure stupid. They got it through airport security, on to a plane, flew to their destination, and *now*, suddenly, it's a f***ing danger to the entire state of Texas. Those TSA morons just showed stupid they are and how much they can over react. There used to be this thing called "Lost and Found", but today, if you leave anything anywhere around an airport, you're a Terrorist(tm).

  23. Re:When it comes to security by Trogre · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lisa, I want to buy your rock.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  24. Re:It's a crap, not justification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My feeling is that those TSA pigs wouldn't be happier. They found justification for their crap existence and secured some more of future funding for their parasitic operations

    You know the US is no longer a First World country when a government agency can justify its existence by causing a huge economic loss for no real reason.