Slashdot Mirror


TSA Shuts Down Airport, Detains 11 After "Science Project" Found

OverTheGeicoE writes "A group of students and a professor were detained by TSA at Dallas' Love Field. Several of them were led away in handcuffs. What did they do wrong? One of them left a robotic science experiment behind on an aircraft, which panicked a boarding flight crew. The experiment 'looked like a cell phone attached to a remote control car with some exposed wires protruding.' Of course, the false alarm inconvenienced more than the traveling academics. The airport was temporarily shut down and multiple gates were evacuated, causing flight delays and diversions."

116 of 537 comments (clear)

  1. Scare quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the "Scare Quotes" in the title? Is someone implying that it was actually a bomb, and not a robot? TFA does not.

    1. Re:Scare quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because that way, more people click on it. Don't you know how news sales works?

    2. Re:Scare quotes by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously the OP did not find the experiment worthy of the term "science project". Maybe he thinks he could do a much better one?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Scare quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because that way, more people click on it. Don't you know how "news" sales works?

      FTFY.

    4. Re:Scare quotes by bfandreas · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Excellent technology frightened the merely mediocre. Who we let gain power. Handcuffs were applied by pigs. Who we let to gain power. That's all there is to be said.


      There was a time when JPL and MRI lured the brightest from all over the world into the country. Now they all get scared away. If anybody wants to meet me nowadays, I call them back to Europe. There's no way that I'd be traveing to the US anytime soon.

      I know quite a lot of stuff that'd be deemed harmful to the US. Like logic, evolution, security related stuff. Maybe not grammar. Screw that. 30 years ago that was a completely different thing. Jimmy Carter. A downhill race ever since.

      Who actually does vote those into office that are eternally scared of the stuff they don't understand themselves? Could you please strip them off their right to vote?

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    5. Re:Scare quotes by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Carter was a disaster as a president. However, the Republicans since 1980 have made a point of nominating the dimmest bulbs in the box.

      Reagan? Already senile. His was a Weekend At Bernie's presidency.
      Bush the Elder? A retread, complete with barfing on foreign dignitaries.
      Then they moved on. BobDole... yeah. Shrub the Younger, whose intelligence could be measured in scoops of raisin bran. McCain, who while a "war hero" from years prior basically campaigned like a zombie.

      And then we get the "brain trust" of this latest batch. Herman "couldn't even make an edible pizza" Cain. Mitt "robber baron" Romney. Rick Sanctimonous, champion of home schooling and anti-science rants. Michelle "hehe, I went into law because my hubby said we were done having babies and I should make myself useful in the daytimes before his nightly blowjob" Bachmann. And of course Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich, who "historians" who have a running bet to top each other and misrepresent American history in a worse way.

      A friend of mine has a better word for these sorts of idiots - they're known as Brain Donors. Kind of like kidney donors, they obviously donated a long while ago and somehow are alive without a functioning brain.

    6. Re:Scare quotes by Moryath · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just realized I'm forgetting one. That one guy... uh... what was his name... uh... thinking...it's on the tip of my tongue... can't quite remember... sorry, lost it. "Oops."

    7. Re:Scare quotes by steelfood · · Score: 3, Funny

      To illustrate to you how scared you should be of "science projects" and their ilk. They're not called "scare quotes" for no reason.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    8. Re:Scare quotes by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is it really so hard to believe that a mechanism connected to what looks like a cell phone could be a bomb?

      Ask someone who has been in Iraq and Afghanistan (or Israel for that matter) what is frequently used to detonate IEDs remotely on command.

      Honestly, I know that there are some pretty ineffective TSA regulations out there, and that there's a lot of security theater going on, but I'd rather look like a fool than let hundreds of people die on my watch. And frankly, what do you think many homemade bombs are, if not science projects taken to a murderous extreme?

      Perhaps this was an overreaction, but nothing in the article provides facts other than the indignation of those inconvenienced.

      I do have to wonder, though, where can we draw the line where stupid things like this don't happen to innocent people, but that real terrorists can't take advantage of those lines.

    9. Re:Scare quotes by Formalin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh, I got hauled into the back room in Vienna or Graz once.

      They showed me a scan of my bag. Large round opaque item in the centre of the bag (the explosive charge, I suppose) with wires headed off to a 'control box' full of electronics, coils, etc.. Looked... fairly intelligent bomb like I suppose, if it was 1940.

      The 'control unit' was an old tube radio I was bringing home, the 'charge' was a lead crystal ashtray (hence the opaque-ness), and the wires were headphone wires which just happened to run between them, on a different layer of clothes... I got a pretty good kick out of it.

      I suppose if the TSA was smart enough to read the xrays, they'd probably have locked down the airport, were it in the US!

    10. Re:Scare quotes by dr2chase · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As I said to someone else, back when the Lite-Brite Mooninites panicked the Boston Police, the first rule of making a bomb, is to not make it look like a bomb. That's why IEDs get buried, stuffed into dead dogs, what have you. Around here, if you wanted to hide a bomb in plain sight, you'd stick it in a crumpled Dunkin Donuts bag.

    11. Re:Scare quotes by Formalin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The tubes all made it. I don't think i even put protective wrap on them... I forget, though.
      It was an old beater, just had sentimental value for the family, so I figured I'd give it a tune-up.

      I never did get FM working on it, though... Maybe I should take another look at it, I was fairly noob back then, this was 10 or 15 years ago. (and I have actual test equipment now, don't need to guess anymore).

    12. Re:Scare quotes by binarybum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do have to wonder, though, where can we draw the line where stupid things like this don't happen to innocent people, but that real terrorists can't take advantage of those lines.

      There is no such line, and I think that most Americans will agree that the one that has been drawn is much more in favor of stupid things like this happening to people than we would like to settle for.

          The important thing to remember is that security is far from free - and the TSA continues to exclusively prove that the dollars being spent on its services only put people at greater risk by diverting funds from more effective investments.

      --
      ôó
    13. Re:Scare quotes by dbIII · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nixon put in some legistation to control air pollution and was trying to push the sort of health care bill that Obama had in mind before it was watered down, turned into an insurance company cash cow and it appears sabotaged by the people that it insisted it be turned into an insurance company cash cow. Crook or not there were many a lot worse than him and some were bigger crooks (Ford for example took a big bribe from the Pesident of Indonesia and started the decline of the US intelligence community). Reagan even sold weapons to the same terrorist group that had earlier killed a lot of Marines in Lebanon.

    14. Re:Scare quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't a Dunkin Donuts bag the first place a cop would look?

    15. Re:Scare quotes by Sun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Didn't read TFA, so I'll answer based on the "data" here.

      It's perfectly legitimate to assume that this is a bomb. Perfectly reasonable assumption to make. What isn't reasonable is the actual reaction.

      Close half the airport? Why? Just taxi the airplane to somewhere remote and examine the object there. An airplane on the ground simply will not go up in flames due to a small bomb (and even if it does, if it's in a remote corner of the airport, let it).

      Detain the people involved? Sure. But why handcuff students?

      And, yes, I live in Israel. And, yes, I simply fail to see such a thing causing such a reaction here.

      Shachar

    16. Re:Scare quotes by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Reagan? Already senile. His was a Weekend At Bernie's presidency.

      True possibly but he some good people around him (and some bad) and good things were accomplished, and the bad can just easily be laid at the feet of the majority Democratic Congress he had to work with.

      Bush the Elder? A retread, complete with barfing on foreign dignitaries.

      Yea because nobody has even become suddenly and violently ill, that was clearly a failing of his part as a person, sure. Actually Bush Sr. Is I think one of our most under rated presidents. In general he kept his promises; but did compromise when being a good steward of the nation required it. He was a care taker president, but a good one.

      Then they moved on. BobDole... yeah.

      Not sure what you are trying to say here?

      Shrub the Younger, whose intelligence could be measured in scoops of raisin bran. McCain, who while a "war hero" from years prior basically campaigned like a zombie.

      Alright.

       

      And then we get the "brain trust" of this latest batch. Herman "couldn't even make an edible pizza" Cain. Mitt "robber baron" Romney. Rick Sanctimonous, champion of home schooling and anti-science rants.

      Again Alright.

      Michelle "hehe, I went into law because my hubby said we were done having babies and I should make myself useful in the daytimes before his nightly blowjob" Bachmann.

      Whoa there, there is no evidence to support the idea that he wants a blow job, at least no one from anyone named Michelle.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  2. When it comes to security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's no such thing as too much fear.

    1. Re:When it comes to security by Entropius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The hilarity is that if the nerds really wanted to play havoc with US air travel, they could, and there's not a damn thing the TSA could do about it.

    2. Re:When it comes to security by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If everybody on Slashdot gets an old phone, opens it up and leaves it on a plane...

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:When it comes to security by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Informative

      If everybody on Slashdot gets an old phone, opens it up and leaves it on a plane...

      Then everybody on slashdot will get detained, probed and then TSA will request additional funding based on the spikes in detaining/probing/confiscations.
      Seriously, there is no positive outcome here. I think those people were handcuffed to create an appearance of hard work. TSA hasn't caught a single terrorist in over a decade of existence. The fact that they are still getting (increased) funding is hard to imagine.

    4. Re:When it comes to security by krept · · Score: 5, Funny

      TSA hasn't caught a single terrorist in over a decade of existence. The fact that they are still getting (increased) funding is hard to imagine.

      That means it's working!

      --
      None of us know everything. Therefore we're all naïve.
    5. Re:When it comes to security by Cramer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This isn't fear, it's pure stupid. They got it through airport security, on to a plane, flew to their destination, and *now*, suddenly, it's a f***ing danger to the entire state of Texas. Those TSA morons just showed stupid they are and how much they can over react. There used to be this thing called "Lost and Found", but today, if you leave anything anywhere around an airport, you're a Terrorist(tm).

    6. Re:When it comes to security by Trogre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lisa, I want to buy your rock.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    7. Re:When it comes to security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then everybody on slashdot will get detained, probed and then TSA will request additional funding based on the spikes in detaining/probing/confiscations. Seriously, there is no positive outcome here.

      No positive outcome? I dare say you're wrong.

      Suppose that 25% of TSA employees are women (being conservative here). This means that, when you'll be groped, there's a 25% chance that it'll be a chick who does that. And 1 chance in 4 of that happening is pretty damn good for Slashdot audience.

  3. You're looking in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The terrorists aren't trying to get on our airplanes. The terrorists are blowing up Planned Parenthood clinics.

    1. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The terrorists are strip-searching people with judicial approval.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    2. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The terrorists are laughing up their sleeves.

    3. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you know? Americans cannot be terrorists. Only people who hate America can be terrorists, and they also plot their attacks from outside the country.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by nschubach · · Score: 2

      Every American is a terrorist... if you ask those in charge. They just like to paint "outsiders" as terrorists to scare the citizens into control.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    5. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Every American is a criminal... if you ask those in charge

      FTFY. Why do you think the number of criminal offenses keeps increasing? Ayn Rand hit the ball out of the park:

      "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    6. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by icebraining · · Score: 3, Informative

      Someone should've offered her a newspaper. Years before she wrote that book, the US government had already relocated and interned 110 000 innocent civilians - 62% of which American citizens.

    7. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If it was a White Extremest Christian my money is on property damage, or arson at most.

      Yep, everyone refers to the 168 dead from the Oklahoma City bombing as "property damage" and no one ever refers to Timothy McVeigh as a terrorist.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/oklahoma/stories/ok042597.htm
      http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0106/09/pitn.00.html
      http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=93055&page=1

      Unless you don't count CNN, ABC and the Washington Post as "MSM".

    8. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by lgw · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do realize that most of her "dystopian" writing was not dire predictions of things to come, but simply descriptions of things she had seen while young, right? That was exactly the sort of thing she was writing about (and far, far worse, in the early USSR).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by lgw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's not even hyperbole, just a basic opinion on when "personhood" begins that differs from the majority opinion. If you share that opinion, it would be hard not to be appalled by the rampant infanticide.

      It's sad that geeks are, on the whole, so quick to just dismiss someone with differing values. When someone comes to a very diferent conclusion, we shouldn't be so quick to assume they're stupid, instead ask whther they're starting from different assumptions (certainly 90% of design arguments at work could be avoided by this practice).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're mistaking a difference of opinion with bias. Yes, there's a difference. Go look it up.

      And this complaining about the slashdot moderation is a really tired meme. The only time it gets brought up is by people who somehow care what their post is sitting at. Yes, it's a popularity contest. That's inherent in any moderation system. No, it doesn't mean that it automatically means that your beautiful snowflakishness is being unjustly trampled. It means that the majority think that what you wrote is dumb, uninformed or stupid. Yes, this is a vague judgment. Get over it.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    11. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by interval1066 · · Score: 2

      So- your point is... that the TSA has been fantastically efficient and worth every penny?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    12. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by hot+soldering+iron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, it's more like "Lots of Americans hate THEIR GOVERNMENT." I actually love my country, and it's idiots, very much. Most of them are fairly kind and happy. But lawyers and CEOs are usually suspected of vile anti-social behavior (correctly) until proven innocent.

      --
      When you want something built, come see me. If you want correct grammar and spelling, get a F*ing liberal arts student.
    13. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by Geezle2 · · Score: 4, Funny
      When someone comes to a very diferent conclusion, we shouldn't be so quick to assume they're stupid

      Very true! I believe that life begins with ejaculation! Every one of you masturbators is a mass murderer!

    14. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would come to the aid of a downed enemy airman during wartime. I would provide first aid and medical treatment as best I could, and then take him to the authorities. Just because they are enemy soldiers doesn't obviate the need to render humanitarian care. Now, on the other hand, providing him succor and then helping him escape back to the other side would be treason.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    15. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was wartime. Different rules apply during war.

      Was there a decade in the last century in which the US not at war with some country (or now, terrorist groups)?

      And those 'innocent civilians'?

      Uuuh, scare quotes. Yes, at least the vast majority of them, exceptions notwithstanding.

      there's at least one documented case of them coming to the aid of a crashed Japanese pilot. Would you have the government just ignore that?

      Are you seriously trying to justify the internment of a whole ethnic group because of the actions of one single individual?

    16. Re:You're looking in the wrong place by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      The TSA is the inverse of the Bureau of Prisons. Guards from the Bureau of Prisons keep convicts in the prison, TSA pretty much keeps armed, dangerous people off planes. It's not impossible to get a weapon past BoP guards, or TSA screeners. Nor is it impossible escape from prison or get past the TSA screeners and agents. What they both do is raise the degree of difficulty such that a planned escape / attack is much more likely to be discovered in some fashion before it is executed and disrupted in some fashion, frustrating the plan.

      What happens when you take the guards out of a prision?

      TSA's mission is deterrence, and handling incidents when deterrence fails.

      On a typical day TSA finds 4 guns and various assorted weapons that would have made it onto a plane if people weren't being screened.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  4. That's a strip search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks, SCOTUS.

  5. Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Zero.

    Number of people nude Xrayed or sexually groped (on their breasts or crotch) or strip-searched or locked in glass jails for carrying breast milk or ..... (this list could go on several pages).

    Millions.

    I hope none of those machines were malfunctioning and ejected lethal doses. They are never checked. TIME TO END THE TSA. And the Fed (give the power back to the State central banks).

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by bonch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The TSA sucks, but I can't say I disagree with their response in this case. The device is described as a robot-like device with exposed wires, resembling a handmade explosive device. According to the statement in the article, the TSA determined that the device was not harmful, the airport reopened, and everything went back to normal. That seems like what is supposed to happen.

      The Dallas City Hall statement in the article:

      A commercial flight which originated in Kansas City arrived at Love Field this afternoon and unloaded passengers. The next flight crew boarded to prep the aircraft for the next flight when a robotic device was discovered on the plane and the crew notified authorities. Air Marshals along with Dallas Love Field officers detained 11 passengers related to the device. It was determined that the device was not dangerous and was a student’s science project. The student was traveling with fellow students and a professor. That student told authorities the robot was accidentally left on the plane. The airport was temporarily shut down until the device could be determined it was not a threat. Gate #12 has reopened and airport operations are returning to normal.

      That doesn't change my opposition to the groping and scanning, of course. But this story seems just a little overblown. I think an airport would have reacted this way regardless of the existence of the TSA.

    2. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by Cosgrach · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hate to admit it, but I'd have to agree on this. They did exactly what I would want them to do. However, I'd have stopped short of arresting to poor bastard who let the thing on the plane. A harmless device and a honest mistake. It could happen to anyone, and it has happened to me.

      I left my hat on a plane. I realized it as soon as I got through the gate. I informed the gate lacky and they called up the flight crew. They could not find it (even though I told them exactly where it was), after a bit of haggling with the guy at the gate, I was allowed to re-board the plane (with out escort) and retrieve my hat. The unescorted bit confused me a little. Still does.

      This still does not make like TSA any less.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    3. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The incident probably cost airlines and various travellers plenty of money (delayed flights etc.). Sounds like a new way to harm America: sneak things onto airplanes that look like bombs. It should not be too hard; if you disassemble a typical laptop and turn a few things around, you'll have something that looks like a bomb.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>>The TSA sucks, but I can't say I disagree with their response in this case.

      A little late don't you think? The TSA's job is to keep bomb-looking devices OFF the plane, not discover them 5 hours later after the flight is already over. If this was a real bomb* then it would have already been used. TSA == fail. (again)

      *
      *I doubt terrorists will waste their time attacking airplanes with bombs. They'll go after soft targets like your home or factory. The best way to deal with them is to keep them OUT of the country in the first place (yes that means walls on both borders; enemies shouldn't be able to just walk in).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    5. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by ClioCJS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      SO "Exactly what you want them to do" is fine a bomb AFTER the flight is over?

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    6. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except this is proof that the TSA completely fucked up and didn't do their job. If the device was such that it would terrify (much more highly trained than the TSA goons) air crew, what the holy fuck was it doing on the plane in the first place, let alone in the cabin or outside of a container in cargo, with the power source disconnected?

      What also pisses me off is that the passengers were the ones who were taken away and interrogated. I wonder: Did the TSA agents who fucked up also get taken into custody and subjected to interrogation?

      If not, why not? Either through intent or incompetence they allowed this to happen. If it was intent, then they're clearly abetting terrorists, and if they're incompetent they shouldn't have jobs anymore.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    7. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by ebh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I like that. Who needs bombs when you can effectively DDoS the airport?

    8. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taking down a plane is scary, and it would really suck for the people on the plane. Hijacking a plane and hitting a building with it is much worse.

      Your argument is that if we didn't have the TSA, we'd not have any security, and that's incorrect. Keep the security we already have - scan the bags, metal detect the people, and be done with it. You can't scan for all the possible ways to make something explode, and any hijacking attempt is very likely to be stopped by passengers that are now aware of the problems (like both of the bombers that you mention).

      9/11 happened because passengers figured the hijackers would make demands, and then they'd go land somewhere and the people would be free, because that's what typically happened with hijackings before then (I believe.. I may be picturing movies). There was no incentive to fight back, and risk of injury or death if they did. When the passengers on Flight 93 found out about the attacks in other places, they realized that they either fought back and maybe lived, or died in a fiery death and caused other people to be injured/die. They then tried to regain control of the plane. I don't think any hijackings with a conscious passenger cabin are likely to succeed for a very long time.

    9. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

      Terrorists have always been forced to disguise their bombs. That didn't help the people on Pan Am flight 103. The reason the two terrorists you mention failed was that they tried to light something on fire with other people around. The TSA had no role whatsoever in foiling those plots.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the Fed (give the power back to the State central banks).

      I hate rider bills.... :)

    11. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Exactly! This should be proof enough that the TSA does not work.

      While I'm no fan of the TSA, perhaps in this example they DID work. Sounds to me that at security they took a look at whatever the hell this thing is/was, correctly declared it as NotBomb, and let it through.

    12. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the fact that it was *left* on the plane means that someone in the TSA already decided it was ok to be on the plane in the first place. In fact, it was judged safe enough that it could be a carry-on, which would be a requirement to be "accidentally left on the plane" (checked luggage would have made it to the carousel with nobody ending up detained, or outright lost forever).

      You'd think that there would be a pink sticker or some shit for nutty stuff that's already passed a first screening. I can tell you, as a guy that carries various odd electronic equipment all over the country, it'd be nice to earn some sort of reward for convincing the apathetic screener that what I'm carrying onto the plane is, indeed, a very expensive spectrophotometer and not an evil pilot killing death ray machine, complete with a USB strangling cable for those desperation fallback plans (please, please stop fucking with ... err vigorously inspecting... that device, sir...).

      Incidentally, I flew a couple years back, and had to give up my $0.99 nail clippers that I'd forgotten I'd put in my pocket. Apparently I could have clipped the pilots' fingernails too short until he bled to death...? They didn't even have the file/stabby bits on em. Still, only $0.99 and I knew better, so d'oh. What pissed me the fuck off, though: I went to a shop on the "glad that's over" side of security to get a book and some chips prior to boarding my flight, and guess what I saw? The same exact fucking brand of stabby-less nail clippers for $4.99. I half wondered if they were MY clippers, and that security took so long because they needed time to repackage them for re-sale to me.

    13. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by bhalter80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Infact I can't remember the last time I saw a TSA press conference where they were claiming victory for foiling a plot to down an airplane. I can remember quite vividly at least 3 occasions in which triumphant passengers subdued lunatics that could have downed airplanes. How bout we leave the security to the people who's asses are on the line and send the not-quite-good-enough-to-be-a-cops home?

    14. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by dr2chase · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mod parent up please. And add to that, cockpit doors are now reinforced.

      Also had a brief demonstration this weekend of what a pilot can do to incapacitate passengers. We had a go-around at our landing, first time I've ever done one. Pilots were not trying hard to be annoying or unpleasant, but the down-down-down then up-up-up made my tummy not very happy. A few more of those, I'd have probably been sick, and I'm sure I was not the only one. Imagine if the pilots were trying -- "fasten your seatbelts, or else".

    15. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was found on a plane right??

      I think the biggest problem here is that the TSA at one airport cleared the device for carry-on (not checked) and that another airport goes apeshit when the same device, already approved, is left on the plane.

      Where is the communication and common sense here? The TSA should have never let it on the plane as carry-on and checked it, with special instructions if you needed to go that far.

      The TSA is responsible for creating the situation here.

    16. Re:Number of actual terrorists blocked by TSA by thesandtiger · · Score: 2

      Nothing you have said makes this any less stupid. They forbade bringing an opebottle of baby formula on, but there is nothing against a strange electronic device of unknown purpose onto a plane? Really?

      I mean, I know they are in the slow class and are only able to identify threats in retrospect, but really, this is pretty dumb.

      If I were trying to protect something I would make a point of making the most stringent security measures the first line of defense, not the last. If this thing was scary enough to make very well trained flight crew freak out the TSA agents screening it should have been pissing their pants.

      Also, a sticker with a barcode should have been applied to this strange object indicating the TSA cleared it. I mean, Jesus, it's not hard to imagine a situation in which someone might fly with something weird and how to indicate that this weird thing had been inspected...

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  6. Science!!! by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

    They grounded us with science...

  7. Obligatory by INeededALogin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I must not fear.
    Fear is the mind-killer.
    Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
    I will face my fear.
    I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
    And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
    Where the fear has gone there will be nothing.
    Only I will remain.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is hardly obligatory you muppet.

  8. Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in please.. by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What kind of moron takes something that "look[s] like a cell phone attached to a remote control car with some exposed wires protruding" onto an airplane?

  9. Re:Before TSA by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many things actually happened in the entire history of commercial flights before the TSA existed? And why do they still exist in light of that? Sheesh.

    Doh! Wasn't logged in for some reason.

  10. It got on the plane by Culture20 · · Score: 2

    If it got on the plane, someone checked it somewhere and gave it a thumbs-up. That makes it more likely to be a toy, just like it looked.

    1. Re:It got on the plane by pluther · · Score: 2

      Or they just didn't notice it as it went through the X-ray machines. TSA misses replica guns and bombs that the FAA tests them with all the time.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    2. Re:It got on the plane by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If it got on the plane, someone checked it somewhere and gave it a thumbs-up. That makes it more likely to be a toy, just like it looked.

      Or it could have been placed aboard the aircraft by a crew member, ground support personnel, or any other person with access to the sterile area that intended to do something illegal. To get a job that gives you access to the sterile area takes little more than a 10-year background check, with no ongoing checks. There is always the possibility that someone could turn or be a sleeper long enough to get a job. That is why aircrews and airline employees are supposed to look for and report anything suspicious, because there are always ways to get something past security. Things like this actually do happen on a fairly regular basis, but it usually involves theft or drugs. The aircrew was right to report it.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:It got on the plane by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it got on the plane, someone checked it somewhere and gave it a thumbs-up. That makes it more likely to be a toy, just like it looked.

      What's to say that when it passed through security it wasn't a cell phone, an RC car and wires with plugs on them - in different bags and/or from different people? I hate to be defending the TSA, but in this case I think it was perfectly reasonable to suspect this could be an airport/airplane assembled bomb. "Forgetting" it on board might be a way to make it blow up on the next flight rather than become a suicide bomber, honestly I have a hard time finding fault with suspected terrorist bombers being cuffed. Yeah of course it sucks for everyone affected when it turns out to be an innocent mistake but if they didn't react to this, what do you expect them to react to?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  11. That sounds reasonable by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm as against the TSA as anyone.

    But come on. Considering what was found, why should any authority there NOT freak out? The flight crew did.

    It's really annoying it had such a large impact but in this case it was I think fully warranted. Even though I think they should have been allowed to enter the plane with the whole kit unscanned, once they left it behind all bets are off.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That sounds reasonable by tibit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People leave stuff on planes. That's a fact. People carry weird looking electronics on board. That's a fact too. You can't scream bloody murder unless there's one. Just because someone has wires n'shit doesn't mean it's dangerous.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:That sounds reasonable by Volante3192 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if the flight crew is freaking out, then either the TSA let it through or gave it the OK because it's ON THE PLANE.

      Either the TSA's useless (for letting a bomb go through)
      or the flight crew's panicking (for assuming the TSA let a bomb go through).

    3. Re:That sounds reasonable by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 2

      Or maybe the TSA checked it, but when someone found it later he had no way to be sure that it was a TSA-approved device and them prefered to be safe than sorry.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    4. Re:That sounds reasonable by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People leave stuff on planes. That's a fact. People carry weird looking electronics on board. That's a fact too. You can't scream bloody murder unless there's one. Just because someone has wires n'shit doesn't mean it's dangerous.

      And people have left bombs behind on aircraft as well. Designed to blow up AFTER the plane took off again. And the bomber left at the stopover, too.

      Of course, I suppose people have hidden bombs in checked luggage as well. (This was one of the incidents that led to the rules where if a passenger fails to board the plane, their baggage is offloaded as well).

      All this happened prior to 9/11. People are a wee bit more paranoid now.

    5. Re:That sounds reasonable by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Since when do people routinely carry weird-looking electronics on board a plane? What, do you consider Kindles, tablets, smartphones, and laptops to be "weird-looking"?

      Since when do terrorists routinely use weird-looking electronics without concealing the weird-looking parts so that the devices look harmless? All of the IEDs I've ever seen in photos have been concealed in other things—laser printer cartridges, suitcases, cardboard boxes, etc. The whole point of such devices is that they are designed to look harmless until they blow up. Sure, they contain weird-looking electronics inside, but from the outside, they look like an old tire or a rusted out muffler.

      Thus, as a general rule, if you see weird-looking electronics, you can feel perfectly safe in the knowledge that it is not a bomb, because if it were a bomb, you would not see the weird-looking electronics. You would see only what their creator wanted you to see.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  12. Re:Before TSA by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

    They're the aviation equivalent of the bear patrol....

  13. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What kind of moron takes something that "look[s] like a cell phone attached to a remote control car with some exposed wires protruding" onto an airplane?

    What kind of moron LETS SOMEONE take something that look[s] like a cell phone attached to a remote control car with some exposed wires protruding" onto an airplane? I mean, if snow globes are verboten, how in the world could that contraption possibly get on board in the first place?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  14. Another TSA Fail by gubers33 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The device obviously got through security in Dallas thus it must not have been a threat. It isn't like that was something that was easily concealed or concealed in a bag if the crew found it. The TSA have stopped exactly zero terrorists while harassing and groping millions innocent people and have multiple lawsuits filed against them costing taxpayers more money then their already ridiculous budget. TSA is a waste of taxpayers money, plain and simple.

    --
    Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
    1. Re:Another TSA Fail by mschaffer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not necessarily. Just up the road at the DFW airport a woman got a handgun past the ever vigilant TSA.

      http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/TSA-Woman-slips-through-DFW-Airport-checkpoint-with-gun-137567048.html

  15. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While not the best decision, I think the point is that he shouldn't have to worry. If it was on the plane, it made it past the TSA, and assuming they did a good job at their theatre, was safe. This whole fiasco is an exercise in how useless and overbearing the security is in airports these days.

  16. Meanwhile, somewhere deep in the Arabian sea .... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Funny

    Meanwhile, somewhere deep in the Arabian sea .... Osama Bin Laden is laughing his ass off. His face is shot so that is the only thing he got left to laugh with.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  17. Well by Voogru · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look at the bright side. They probably got their robot back. If it wasn't for the TSA, they'd never have seen it again!

  18. This is a bit suspicious. by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay. These people happened to be flying with something that looks very suspicious. A cellphone wired up to some other electronic device. Okay. Occasionally people do fly with suspicious looking items that are completely innocent. Then these same people "forget" it and leave it on an airplane? When's the last time you forgot a piece of carry-on luggage on a plane? I'm sure it happens occasionally, but when people are flying they are usually careful about such things. Now put the two together. What are the chances that a group of people bring a very suspicious looking electronic device onto a plane and then they all simultaneously forget it there? Isn't it possibly a bit more likely that they were playing some sort of a prank, or trying to test security at the airport and it backfired? Just a thought.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:This is a bit suspicious. by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      My school age daughter forgot luggage on the plane last year.

      Did it include a cell phone wired to an electronic toy with protruding wires? Probably not.

      ...because the professor wouldn't need to be a professor of rocket science to realise that such things might be seen as suspicious and take extra special care to ensure that they were never, ever left unattended - or avoid taking them on a plane in the first place.

      Having to remove shoes, belts etc., get irradiated and buy overpriced bottles of water airside is a pain and totally disproportionate. Having to engage brain before flying with iffy-looking homebrew electronics projects is a sacrifice I am prepared to make.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    2. Re:This is a bit suspicious. by pluther · · Score: 2
      People leave stuff behind on airplanes quite frequently, actually.

      Pre-TSA, if it looked valuable, the airlines would look up the passenger assigned to the seat it was in and arrange its return. (This has happened to me more than once.)

      Certainly, grounding the plane and investigating a strange-looking device with wires and a cell phone would be an appropriate reaction. And looking up who was in that seat, and questioning them as well.

      But, once they found out what it was, why did they feel the need to arrest the entire class, including the professor? This reminds me of when the city of Boston essentially shut down over the Great Light-Bright Scare of 2007 where they just kept going long after they found out what the things really were.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
  19. Tornadoes by watice · · Score: 2

    "Southwest Airlines cancels more than 40 flights at Dallas Love Field in Texas in the aftermath of #tornadoes. " http://on.cnn.com/Hc37c4 Very next day. I think it's clear who the real terrorists are. Tornadoes.

  20. Re:Before TSA by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 2

    I remember when I could get on an airplane without getting finger fucked and fish hooked by some "highly trained" a-hole in a blue suit with a badge...

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
  21. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

    That is what the flight attendant said it looked like. That does not mean that it looked like that in the slightest. /. once had an article where the police were called on the halo devs for carrying a AF-47 around in public, the AF-47 was in fact a 10 foot long halo sniper rifle replica that does not even look real (http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2011/11/medium_3ce16ecb6851fdac6329346672baea73.jpg).

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  22. Charges? by Githaron · · Score: 3

    They were released with no charges after the situation was cleared up, right? Also, were the handcuffs really necessary?

  23. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by omnichad · · Score: 3, Informative

    Better question - if they let it on the plane, then why didn't TSA ask the flight crew what the thing was instead of treating it like a bomb? Seems somebody should have already known it was on the plane during the flight.

  24. Lack of communication by codepigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Handcuffs, really? Couldn't this have been solved in a matter of minutes if the TSA just asked a few questions of the students and teacher?

    The same with the shooting in Florida. If both guys had just talked/asked questions that teenager would still be alive.

  25. Learn your damn TLAs by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

    Editors, PLEASE learn your TLAs. The TSA didn't / doesn't detain anyone. The TSA run x-ray machines, search baggage and grope grannies. They have no power of arrest or detention. For that they call law enforcement, such as the police or air marshals. The TSA cannot and do not lead people away in handcuffs.

  26. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just to be the devil's advocate, imagine the following scenario.

    Professor reaches TSA, shows the package, passes it through X-ray / opens it to show there is no chemical / explosive, and answers questions to the fully satisfaction of TSA (yes I am teacher these are the children I teach...).

    Sometime later, someone else (who of course has not been told that there was such teacher with such object in the previous flight) finds the surprise. Even if the artifact was competently investigated by the TSA, the people who found it probably had no way to verify that ---> panic button.

    To me, this article is bussiness as usual, and per se (the devil lies in details) it does not show up any incompetence / abuse

    --
    Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
  27. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the lesson is, if you want to bomb an airplane, enclose your bomb in a smooth, brushed aluminum and/or plastic case?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  28. they will get it back as a court room evidence by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    they will get it back as a court room evidence

  29. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 4, Funny

    That would clearly violate the TSAs guidelines on logic and sanity.

  30. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by Teckla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What kind of moron takes something that "look[s] like a cell phone attached to a remote control car with some exposed wires protruding" onto an airplane?

    Uh, someone that does not want the device utterly destroyed?

    Checked luggage gets the shit beat out of it. Also, very often, security personnel will go through your luggage, and break even more stuff, through plain negligence, or just plain re-packing it poorly.

  31. Is the TSA worth it? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's an interesting info-graphic I saw for the first time today. Pretty much falls in line with the rest of the sentiment here.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  32. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    Better question - if they let it on the plane, then why didn't TSA ask the flight crew what the thing was instead of treating it like a bomb?

    Because the flight crew had no idea what it was. They're the ones who reported it. This was the incoming flight crew that had just walked onto the plane. And the outgoing flight crew certainly doesn't know what every passenger is carrying, so even if you could find them, they couldn't help.

  33. How do they know that? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Well, if the flight crew is freaking out, then either the TSA let it through or gave it the OK because it's ON THE PLANE.

    I'm sorry, but that's an incredibly stupid and naive thought.

    The flight crew did not scan the passengers. Also by that time there have been a number of ground crew interacting with the plane. It could have even been assembled in mid-air. The crew has no idea where this thing might have come from.

    There's not way you can expect a flight crew and even law enforcement to not reasonable consider some very roughly assembled electronics as possibly dangerous when found with no owner.

    As I said I'd even be for the guys waltzing onto the plane with no security carrying the thing. That is fine by me, but equally fine is treating something like that as a threat when found totally unattended.

    I mean, lets turn your argument around. You say it's OK because obviously the TSA is awesome and let it on the plane to start with, so obviously t came with a passenger. Great then, since now we "know" it was brought on by someone who went through TSA - WHY DID THEY LEAVE IT?

    I mean, why on earth would someone who carefully constructed such a thing leave it behind? That makes no sense either, in fact even less sense to me. I would be pretty concerned if I saw that because anyone who had the skills to build such a thing obviously would care about it very much and have the intelligence not to forget they had it. I would be more prone to think something like that left behind was nefarious in purpose exactly because it had been left and forgotten.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  34. Soooo ... "exposed wires"? by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The device is described as a robot-like device with exposed wires, resembling a handmade explosive device.

    So if I put coloured epoxy over the wires so they cannot be seen ...

    The point is that the people claiming that this looks like "a handmade explosive device" do not know what "a handmade explosive device" looks like.

    It just looks UNUSUAL so they panicked.

    1. Re:Soooo ... "exposed wires"? by electrosoccertux · · Score: 3, Funny

      pshaw, I've seen movies, kid, movies with explosive devices. They always look electronic and have exposed wires. Usually you cut the blue one.

    2. Re:Soooo ... "exposed wires"? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      And usually it's too dark or some other trick of illumination always makes the blue wire look just like a different wire that you're not supposed to cut.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Soooo ... "exposed wires"? by hot+soldering+iron · · Score: 2

      You seem to think that something unusual should be allowed? You think that they went overboard shutting down down the airport over an unexpected robot device being on a plane? I've seen a military airbase practically shut down because some guy forgot his effing briefcase. THAT scares people, because unattended cases are a traditional method for carrying and deploying explosives. How are they supposed to react to something that is obviously technical, but can't be readily identified? Poke it with a stick?

      When I fly, I damn well want them to be cautious about allowing strange devices on board. At 30,000 feet, I become one of the most conservative individuals you've ever met. I'm much more liberal when I don't have to worry about dying.

      --
      When you want something built, come see me. If you want correct grammar and spelling, get a F*ing liberal arts student.
    4. Re:Soooo ... "exposed wires"? by cicatrix1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was after the plane had landed safely. And well after the highschool science project had cleared security on the way INTO the plane. You're way too fucking scared.

      --

      I know more than you drink.
  35. Reminds me of something that happened to me... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was 2002, and I was taking a course in digital electronics. One of the well-known projects for this course was to build a digital clock from regular 74xx and 74xxx IC's. We were to complete the projects on our own breadboards, and we could, if we wanted to keep the result, buy our own electronic components as well. I bought my own electronics, and as a result, could work on it when I was not necessarily in the lab. I was in a fairly reclusive hallway in the school around lunctime, testing out a circuit I had designed which would get incorporated into my final project, and I was using some LED's for feedback, which flickered quickly as my circuit ran. I was concentrating on what I was doing, and was surprised when someone from campus security came up to me and grabbed me by the shoulder. I spent the next 15 minutes in the office of campus security explaining what I was doing, and as it happened, one of the people from campus security knew the professor and could vouch for the story I was giving. They had called my professor for the course anyways, who came to security, chuckled at the whole incident, because he recognized me immediately, and said that he knew me and that I was okay.

    Later that afternoon, during the class lecture, the prof relayed the anecdote to everybody with much amusement, not mentioning exactly who it was who, evidently, got him called down to the security office because they thought one of his students was building a bomb. He advised us all that we should be building our projects in the lab only, and not in the hallways of the school.

  36. Officials not allowed to use their own judgement by Cassini2 · · Score: 2

    It used to be that police would investigate intelligently, and lay charges appropriately. Now, it appears that everything must reach a judge before common sense is applied. We are living in the days where losing a cell phone will cause a plane to be grounded. We need to get people to use their brains again, and not make major incidents out of false alarms.

  37. Think of the TSA! by Shompol · · Score: 2
    Their reaction seems out of proportion, but then think of the TSA situation too! Like a worshiper who prays day and night for the second coming of Messiah, TSA gropes people and suitcases day and night with no hope in sight. Finally, after years of grouping, someone (not them) finds a thing with wires! This is a Miracle, ladies and gentlemen, a dream come true! The one and only proper response can be summarized with a quote from Spaceballs:

    ...Fasten all seat-belts, seal all entrances and exits, close all shops in the mall, cancel the three ring circus, secure all animals in the zoo!

  38. How did it get on the plane in the first place? by pwnyxpress · · Score: 2

    If it was left on the plane, how did they get it through security in the first place? Did TSA just take their word that it was a science experiment or did security not catch it? Neither one makes me feel any more comfortable with the TSA...not that I'm comfortable with them to begin with.

  39. Where in the Constitution is the TSA mentioned? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    Where in the Constitution is the TSA mentioned?

    Is it in the section labeled "unreasonable search and seizure"?

    Or is it the section about "warrantless searches of citizens"?

    I'm not sure which section it is.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  40. Re:you don't talk about bombs much less look like by element-o.p. · · Score: 2

    What, exactly, does a bomb look like in the post 9/11 world? Because in the only two cases that I'm aware of where someone *actually* had a bomb on an airplane, one looked like a pair of underwear, and the other one looked like a shoe. Clearly, we should therefore ban all underwear and all shoes on airliners, right?

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  41. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by Leebert · · Score: 2

    So you'd never investigate anomalous network activity on your network because clearly your perimeter defenses would keep the hackers out?

    C'mon now; I loathe the TSA as much as anybody else, but if you don't get the concept of defense in depth you're probably not qualified to throw stones...

  42. Math not adding up by shiftless · · Score: 2

    Then everybody on slashdot will get detained, probed and then TSA will request additional funding based on the spikes in detaining/probing/confiscations.

    You seem to be arguing that the limit of this police function as x -> the readership of slashdot is near infinity, but I don't think that's anywhere near the case, based on these axioms: a) population of U.S. is less than infinity and b) the percentage of U.S. population which can be converted into police and guard to succesfully prosecute and imprison the rest before riots and revolution breaks out, is FAR less than 100%.

  43. Re:Earth to Absent-minded Professor. Come in pleas by dr2chase · · Score: 2

    Nah, you're getting "poor impulse control"

  44. Re:It's a crap, not justification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My feeling is that those TSA pigs wouldn't be happier. They found justification for their crap existence and secured some more of future funding for their parasitic operations

    You know the US is no longer a First World country when a government agency can justify its existence by causing a huge economic loss for no real reason.