Slashdot Mirror


Apple Updates Java To Include Flashback Removal

Fluffeh writes "In the third update to Java that Apple has released this week, the update now identifies and removes the most common variants of the Flashback malware that has infected over half a million Apple machines. 'This Java security update removes the most common variants of the Flashback malware,' Apple wrote in the support document for the update. 'This update also configures the Java web plug-in to disable the automatic execution of Java applets. Users may re-enable automatic execution of Java applets using the Java Preferences application. If the Java web plug-in detects that no applets have been run for an extended period of time it will again disable Java applets.'"

71 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. Re:No way! by Kenja · · Score: 5, Informative

    Macs don't get viruses!

    Almost no computer gets viruses anymore. Trojans & malware on the other hand...

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  2. I'm new to this conversation but... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...I was wondering why the art department at work and the guy who makes my coffee was pissed.

    1. Re:I'm new to this conversation but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you wanted "were pissed." Apparently you don't work in the communications department. I'll bet the guy who makes your coffee would have gotten it right.

    2. Re:I'm new to this conversation but... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

      I'm happy to accept that I added art department late and should have to revised ;) I think that makes me marketing...

    3. Re:I'm new to this conversation but... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

      Or even have just revised that. It's not a good day for me.

    4. Re:I'm new to this conversation but... by heroid1a · · Score: 1

      I think you wanted "was pissed off". pissed == was under influence of alcohol wheras: pissed off == angry Ah, you colonials...

    5. Re:I'm new to this conversation but... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      At least he didn't say "pissed on" which means something else entirely.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:I'm new to this conversation but... by citab · · Score: 1

      Nope.... in the states ... "pissed" does mean "angry" ... same as "pissed off" ...

      ah, you former imperialists ...

    7. Re:I'm new to this conversation but... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Hurry up and make up to the guy that makes the coffee. You need your fix. Badly.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  3. immature=no java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So to fix the problem, they say lets disable java by default. They are new to the security game.
    Lets say using adobe photoshop had a vulnerability, apple's defense is disable the running of photoshop when launching a ps file withotut prompting?

    It's like preventing your child walking without your permission every time and then when their grown up and able to make their own decisions and decide to walk, you say, oh you have not walked in a while, you can't walk again.

    1. Re:immature=no java by mug+funky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      apple's design philosophy is to progressively remove features, so this fits quite well.

      (anyone wanting to knee-jerk at my assertation - give me a counter-example)

    2. Re:immature=no java by codepunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree what they should have done is remove java entirely.

      --


      Got Code?
    3. Re:immature=no java by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2

      They're disabling applets, not Java. That would be like prompting if you wanted to open a recently downloaded ps file in your analogy.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    4. Re:immature=no java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You have 3 pieces of software that constantly gets patched for security holes found and they are....

      1) Java - Not installed in OS X by default anymore. Doesn't get installed unless its requested like running Adobe Apps, etc.

      2) Flash - Not installed anymore by default

      3) Quicktime - Rewritten from the ground up starting with QT X. QT 7 and back has always been a security breach.

    5. Re:immature=no java by utkonos · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're missing one: Adobe Acrobat (PDF).

    6. Re:immature=no java by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Informative

      PDF's are handled internally by Preview.app. It doesn't have the functionality of Acrobat reader but it also doesn't have the attack surface.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:immature=no java by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, the fix to the problem was to ship the latest Java build which had closed the vulnerability. And then to follow that up with an update that removed any infection already there.

      Java is deprecated. As a development platform for OSX it was deprecated going on for a decade ago. And as a platform supported by Apple, back in 2010. With the current version of OSX it doesn't even ship as standard. It only gets downloaded and installed for the minority of people that actually use some software that needs it.

      Nevertheless, the only part that is getting switched off when it's not been used for a while is the browser plugin. And reenabling it if required is easy.

      Basically it's a bit like Flash - being helped on the road to complete obsolescence because it's not needed and tends to have vulnerabilities.

      Perfectly sensible.

    8. Re:immature=no java by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Informative

      What, you mean a new feature? Wikipedia is your friend, there's a long list of new features for every major OSX version.
      e.g.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osx_lion

    9. Re:immature=no java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow. A whole hole. That's equivalent to the patchwork software that is Adobe Reader.

    10. Re:immature=no java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It seems silly to blame Java when the entire purpose of Java is to serve as an execution platform for general purpose software. That's like saying "hey we should get rid of executable software, because it could pose a security risk."

    11. Re:immature=no java by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You can just remove the battery from the laptop... unless its a macbook air...

    12. Re:immature=no java by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      I agree what they should have done is remove java entirely.

      They did. Java and Flash have no longer been shipped with OS X for ages now. The primary reason is people keep reinstalling OS X and thus those vulnerable versions. Far better to let the user download and install the latest and greatest from Adobe and Oracle.

      Final Cut Pro X is a recent example. they added some interesting stuff if you're shooting multi-cam, and broke EDL, XML, backward compatibility, the ability to share projects and removed Color entirely.

      Well, Final Cut Pro X is a completely new rewrite. Apple's tradition is new rewrites of software is to get the basics working rock solid first, then add back missing features. This has been true since OS X was first released and didn't have half the stuff (e.g., DVD player) that OS 9 it shipped with also had. It happened again with QuickTime X - there's a reason why OS X supported a dual install of QT X and QT 7. FCP X is more of the same. They also retargeted it for prosumers rather than pros And yes, they still sell FCP 7 - but only by phone sales.

      hardware wise... if they could remove the home, power and volume buttons they would. they lost me as a supporter when they removed the "reset" button - an arrogant statement that their (then OS 8.6) machines will never crash and hence never need the kill button. had to wrench the fuckers out of the wall. God help you if you had a laptop.

      Does a modern PC have a reset button these days? Most of the time if it hard locks, you hold the power button a few seconds and it turns off. You then hit it again to turn it on. Reset's kinda useless since most people found they needed to mollyguard their PCs. Hell, an office full of white box PCs on the floor is a tempting target around family days - little buggers go running off and pushing all the buttons on a PC, including reset. Anyhow, old Macs had them, but they were pin-holes to prevent exactly that sort of problem. (You needed it if you wanted to get into the debugger).

    13. Re:immature=no java by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      That seems to be everyones philosophy of late: Apple, Microsoft, the Gnome Devs, Canonical, the guys which design Android...for crying out loud, I even can't find fitting shoes anymore because they all look the same.

    14. Re:immature=no java by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      Java is deprecated.

      Please don't tell me you're a .NET developer...pretty please...

    15. Re:immature=no java by makomk · · Score: 2

      I think the attack surface of Preview.app actually extends into the OS X kernel itself. One of the iPhone jailbreaks used a kernel-level PDF exploit and it was apparently in code shared with the desktop version.

    16. Re:immature=no java by cbhacking · · Score: 5, Informative

      As of 2010, Adobe Reader was kicking Preview's ass on security. No, that's not a joke. Nor is it fanboyism; I don't use either one. It's just a plain and simple fact. The probable reason? Adobe, like Microsoft, has had many years of being a high-profile target, and has put a lot of effort into finding and fixing security bugs. Apple, quite frankly, has not.

      http://net-security.org/secworld.php?id=9725
      Watch the second video, and jump ahead to 8:57 (almost the end) if you want a simple comparison.

      For the lazy, here's the basic facts: Preview had from the same set of 1400 PDFs downloaded from the web, run through a mutational fuzzer to produce 2.8 million test files. Preview had 7 times as many unique crashes as Adobe Reader, and at least 3 times (more realistically, probably 10 times; at worst, 20 times) as many exploitable bugs.

      When a guy like Charlie Miller (very well-respected security researcher) can find 7 security bugs in Apple's code for each one he finds in Adobe's (using the exact same test cases), Apple has a serious security problem.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    17. Re:immature=no java by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      No, a Mac user.

      Apple used to support Java as a first-class citizen. It was one one level with Carbon (the OS 9/OS X UI toolkit) and Cocoa (the OS X UI toolkit). Carbon has been deprecated because, well, it was only intended to make the switch from 9 to X easier and 9 has been dead forever. Java has been deprecated, too - it's now a second-class citizen like on other platforms and Apple's only officially backed environment for OS X development is Cocoa.

      So it's not deprecated as in "you shouldn't use this anymore" but as in "it's no longer considered a core part of our ecosystem". It lost a status it never had elsewhere. Well, except Android, of course.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    18. Re:immature=no java by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      Oh, then forget that I wrote something...

    19. Re:immature=no java by randomsearch · · Score: 1

      > Java is deprecated.

      What?

    20. Re:immature=no java by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You must be a Java developer. And you're kidding yourself. It's in black and white.

      "Note: As of the release of Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 3, the Java runtime ported by Apple and that ships with Mac OS X is deprecated. Developers should not rely on the Apple-supplied Java runtime being present in future versions of Mac OS X."
      https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Java/Conceptual/Java14Development/00-Intro/JavaDevelopment.html

    21. Re:immature=no java by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Deprecated is in multiple dictionaries with the exact meaning I used. Therefore you are unquestionably wrong.

      You're also wrong about depreciated. That's not the meaning that is intended when software professionals use the term deprecated.

    22. Re:immature=no java by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      Learn to read:
      "Apple will work with Oracle on Java SE 7 and future versions where Apple will contribute most of the key components, tools and technology including HotSpot JVM, class libraries, networking stack and the foundation for a new graphical client."

      This is exactly what Apple does. The difference is only that they are no longer including Java by default on OS/X.

    23. Re:immature=no java by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      I agree what they should have done is remove java entirely.

      Java is not installed by default in Lion, the latest version os OSX. The users is prompted to install it the first time he opens a webpage containing an applet or the first time he invokes "java" on the CLI.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    24. Re:immature=no java by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      It seems silly to blame Java when the entire purpose of Java is to serve as an execution platform for general purpose software.

      That was one purpose of it but not the only one and not the one that has caused the controversy.

      Another purpose from java was to provide a SANDBOXED execution platform for running untrusted software (such as applets from the web) while preventing it from damaging the users system. The problem is getting a sandbox like this right is hard and every so often a flaw is discovered that lets malicious code break out of the sandbox.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    25. Re:immature=no java by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Or a Macbook Pro....

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    26. Re:immature=no java by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      What in the hell are you talking about?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    27. Re:immature=no java by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Apple has washed its hands of Java and turned over the code to the community.

      It is about fucking time. Java developers rejoice the world over.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    28. Re:immature=no java by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of learning to read you penis. It's a different press release. And the word "deprecate" was not withdrawn.

      Basically Apple deprecated it's own built-in port of Java, and said go get it from Oracle. 3 weeks later they announced that they'd let Oracle have the pieces remaining from their now deprecated project. And that they'd help them keep their Java working with OSX.

      The distinction is important, because it means that right now, it's Apple's responsibility to fix. As of Mountain Lion it's Oracle's. Apple deprecated it.

    29. Re:immature=no java by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      well... they removed some of the crashes i guess.

      Was the list too big, your comprehension abilities too poor, or have you just got a Fox News like ability to deny what's there in front of you? Apple adds lots of new features.

      In good design, what you take out is as important as what you leave in. Look at Windows and the PC for what happens when you are afraid to take anything out. You end up with a big pile of shit.

    30. Re:immature=no java by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? You just hold down the power button on any model ever made.

    31. Re:immature=no java by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      Which is good you fucken inbred shit eating monkey since Apple is incompetent at providing security updates to its users.

    32. Re:immature=no java by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's also good because as as Apple has taken another step away from Java, even less use will be made of it. Thus hastening the day when Java is dead. Can't happen soon enough.

    33. Re:immature=no java by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      Happily you'll be dead before Java.

    34. Re:immature=no java by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      Final Cut Pro X is a completely new rewrite. Apple's tradition is new rewrites of software is to get the basics working rock solid first, then add back missing features.

      ask _any_ editor that doesn't work out of their bedroom what "the basics" of a professional editing package are.

      i'm not sure you understand the sheer scale of Apple's fuckup with FCP-x. sure, they've made some amends on a few features, but the entire industry is shell-shocked and afraid to trust again - even my old boss, who was a die-hard mac fanboy (to the extent of installing an xSAN system and having to spend 100k+ on hardware and software getting it to work with the PC, linux, and mac systems in the facility).

      from a pro point of view, it's hard not to see Apple's standard operating procedure as "find software that's potentially disruptive, buy it, hard-sell it so it dominates the industry, EOL it - to hell with the customers".

      i know one should never ascribe to malice something sufficiently explained by incompetence, but given Apple's market capitalization, even a "hater" must concede that they are not incompetent.

    35. Re:immature=no java by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      that method takes 5 seconds.

      wrenching out the power takes less than a second :)

    36. Re:immature=no java by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      in design, form must follow function, not dictate it.

      Microsoft certainly didn't do it as well as they could, but at least they tried. Apple didn't even try.

      i'd be happy if their updates just came with a simple "classic mode", or "expert mode" switch - i know "the masses" (whatever they are) are afraid of too much choice, but any feature will likely have a use, and removing it will likely inconvenience someone. less used features can be shifted out of sight, but should not be removed unless there's a very good reason and _notice_ of it.

    37. Re:immature=no java by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      in design, form must follow function, not dictate it.

      Microsoft certainly didn't do it as well as they could, but at least they tried. Apple didn't even try.

      You are misinterpreting the one thing about design you've heard. "Form follows function" does not mean that everything including the kitchen sink should be included. Designers following form follows function simplify.

  4. only the beggining by thoper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    apple's "security through scarcity" is starting to fade away as they gain marketshare. any popular OS will get viruses, malware, trojans, etc.

    will mac os get a stonger walled garden as a result? i hope not as i was about to buy my first mac.

    1. Re:only the beggining by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Wait a bit longer and you'll only be able to install Mac software you bought through iTunes.

    2. Re:only the beggining by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      apple's "security through scarcity" is starting to fade away as they gain marketshare. any popular OS will get viruses, malware, trojans, etc.

      will mac os get a stonger walled garden as a result? i hope not as i was about to buy my first mac.

      The next release of OS X (Mountain Lion) will warn people when trying to run unsigned apps. Apps sold through the Mac App Store will be signed and devs will be able to get their app signed by Apple for free without having to distribute through the App Store. Unsigned apps will also still run if you tell the system to do so. The fact that Apple are doing things shows they will not go full-on walled garden like with iOS but are still trying to get some of its advantages to their users by choosing this middle path.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  5. Leopard and earlier by SilverCanary · · Score: 1

    Except for Macs running Leopard or earlier of course. Those will probably never be patched.

    1. Re:Leopard and earlier by DurendalMac · · Score: 2

      If an Intel Mac is still running Leopard or earlier then I would have to wonder why. SL will run on any Intel Mac, is superior in nearly every way, and is a whopping $29. If it's a PowerPC Mac, then rest easy, because nobody is going to write malware designed to run on them. What's the point? They're a sliver of the Mac market and that number is going to get any bigger.

    2. Re:Leopard and earlier by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Er, isn't going to get any bigger. Curse you lack of an edit button!

    3. Re:Leopard and earlier by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      ... and will continue to support XP for another two years.

    4. Re:Leopard and earlier by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      The SL upgrade discs work on Tiger installations.

    5. Re:Leopard and earlier by StuartHankins · · Score: 1
  6. The core OS is still pretty secure by Grayhand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most of the problems have been related to people installing software from the internet manually and things like Java. I'm not saying anything pro or con about Apple I own both Mac and Windows machines so I have no horse in this race. Like Linux the core OS is pretty sound I just wish Microsoft had bitten the bullet and made the leap when they did the Vista overhaul. It was a pretty brave move for Apple at the time to switch the OS and it paid off in the long run. Add ons like Java are always going to be a source of headaches. All I know is I rarely have trouble with my Macs but the PCs are another story. One of mine I had to surrender for internet use because it got nailed by a redirect and I tried everything and short of redoing the OS there was no way to scrub it out. I find it safer to use Mac for web surfing and downloading things like software and I use a lot of licensed photos in my work. It's just my personal experience that I run into far fewer issues with the Macs.

    1. Re:The core OS is still pretty secure by exomondo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most of the problems have been related to people installing software from the internet manually and things like Java.

      That's pretty much the case with all platforms, compromise the user and you compromise the security of the system. All the email attachment malware, screensavers, etc... are user exploits and it doesn't matter what platform they are on, of course modern operating systems require explicit privilege escalation but again that's up to the user.

      Add ons like Java are always going to be a source of headaches.

      What do you mean 'Add ons'? You mean 3rd party software? Or in this case not even that since it's Apple that maintains Java releases for OSX.

      All I know is I rarely have trouble with my Macs but the PCs are another story. One of mine I had to surrender for internet use because it got nailed by a redirect and I tried everything and short of redoing the OS there was no way to scrub it out. I find it safer to use Mac for web surfing and downloading things like software and I use a lot of licensed photos in my work. It's just my personal experience that I run into far fewer issues with the Macs.

      I'm equally as careful whether i'm running Windows or OSX, i'm not going to be naive and just install anything downloaded from the net or visit questionable sites on either platform because - as these recent publicized events have highlighted - neither platform is completely secure and it would be pretty irresponsible to tell users that they don't have to worry about security just because it's OSX, best to be just as careful no matter what you use. Sure there are less known issues with OSX - even less for most linux or BSD distros - but as their marketshare increases we are seeing instances of infection increase so best to take as much care no matter which platform you're on.

    2. Re:The core OS is still pretty secure by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      What do you mean 'Add ons'? You mean 3rd party software? Or in this case not even that since it's Apple that maintains Java releases for OSX.

      I'm not sure about the status of the current Java in OS X, but Apple previously announced that Oracle would be handling the development of Java for OS X for future OS X releases.

      http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/11/12Oracle-and-Apple-Announce-OpenJDK-Project-for-Mac-OS-X.html

      My guess is that this means Java resources at Apple are probably not significant and could explain why Apple took such a long time to release this patch.

    3. Re:The core OS is still pretty secure by exomondo · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure about the status of the current Java in OS X, but Apple previously announced that Oracle would be handling the development of Java for OS X for future OS X releases.

      http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/11/12Oracle-and-Apple-Announce-OpenJDK-Project-for-Mac-OS-X.html

      Well from your link:
      Java SE 7 and future versions of Java for Mac OS X will be available from Oracle.
      Then in reference to the update targeting the current malware threat:
      Java for OS X Lion 2012-003 delivers Java SE 6 version 1.6.0_31

      Even with the OpenJDK Apple will contribute most of the key components, tools and technology required for a Java SE 7 implementation on Mac OS X so i'm still not sure what you're defining as 'Add ons', you mean anything outside of the kernel?

  7. Re:riddance by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    NOAA satellite loops are, unfortunately, done in Java and were last updated sometime before half of Slashdot's current user base were born.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  8. Phew by Trogre · · Score: 1

    When this debarcle started, I mis-parsed an article heading and was worried Apple was trying to erradicate Flashblock, and had grave fears for the web.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  9. Re:riddance by b5bartender · · Score: 1

    NOAA has actually migrated away from Java.........to Flash. (no, not kidding.) That's bureaucracy for you.

  10. Least priv/option reset without consent is malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're trying to prevent malware by installing their own malware.

    It is absolutely right to disable Java by default. Even the behaviour of disabling it if not used for a while COULD have been a useful feature IF they turned that behaviour on by default then provided an option to disable it. By taking it out of the user's hands they're just playing nanny. But like any nanny stuck in an office many years and many miles away they can't anticipate the needs of their entire userbase very well. They have just made it a pain for any user to use Java in a browser on their platform. No one needs a computer that decides not to obey settings the user had set (no matter how long ago). Think of what would happen if every setting on your computer set to defaults every week or two.

    I can think of ways around this that don't require any technical savvy. Put a local Java applet in as your homepage for instance. But this is clunky. You should be able to say "no I really do know better" and turn on Java.

    This is the problem when applying the principle of least privilege. It is also the principle of least innovation and the principle of most annoyance. The bottom line is no one needs access to a computer just to live and breath. Least privilege is oxygen, water, basic food. Wouldn't be much of a fun life.

  11. Re:riddance by boristhespider · · Score: 1

    It's also slow as fuck and pisses me off every time I have to log into my account, but it's an unescapable evil.

  12. One thing I'd like to know - where does it look? by boristhespider · · Score: 1

    Within a day of the attack being announced various security blogs (and then Ars Technica) were posting directions for finding if you were infected. Each of those assumed that you'd left Safari and Firefox (and any other browser you might have been using) in the Applications folder. Since I get pissed off wading through jumbled, alphabetical lists of totally different programs, I organise my Applications folder into sub-folders. While I can go and check the programs myself from the command line, from my own experience talking even with other scientists let alone my parents, many others won't be able to do so... but might have the know-how to rearrange their Applications folder.

    Does anyone know whether Apple actually search through the installed directories of browers, or just default locations?

  13. Re:One thing I'd like to know - where does it look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, you're one of those users that takes it upon themselves to "organize" their Apps folder. You make your Mac support people cry and die a little bit inside.

  14. Re:infected over half a million Apple machines by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    Don't know who modded this offtopic but the number of infected machines seems germane to the discussion. And AC's correct that the infection rate was dropping rapidly even before this tool hit :

    "The number of Macs infected by the Flashback malware has gone down by more than half, from 550,000 to 600,000 computers last week to 270,000 in the last 24 hours, Symantec said Wednesday."

    Now whether this is because of an overestimation of the original infection or due to the Apple community being energized and taking action (or a combination of the two) is up for discussion.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  15. Re:One thing I'd like to know - where does it look by boristhespider · · Score: 1

    But... I don't *have* any Mac support people! Maybe I should go and get some - I'd hate to disappoint them.

  16. Re:One thing I'd like to know - where does it look by boristhespider · · Score: 1

    Obviously I could, and probably should, have done this, I agree. In future I think I actually will. It was just a lot quicker to quickly drag and drop things around in Finder than to make a load of links - well, by "a lot" I mean "marginally", but it was quicker. It also didn't occur to me that Apple might occasionally need to patch or scan application folders and might assume a set location...

    Pity you posted AC, any of those reading this with mod points should probably give you a few.