Steve Jobs' Idea For an Ad-Supported OS
milbournosphere writes "It looks like Steve drew up an idea for an ad-supported OS. A patent was filed back in 2009 detailing how it was done. From the article: 'Rather than charge the normal upgrade price, which in those days was $99, he was thinking of shipping a second version of Mac OS 9 that would be given away for free — but would be supported instead by advertising. The theory was that this would pull in a ton of people who didn't normally upgrade because of the price, but Apple would still generate income through the advertising. And any time an owner of the free version wanted to get rid of the advertising, he or she could simply pay for the ad-free version. Steve's team had worked out the preliminary numbers the concept seemed financially sound.'"
Forum post says Mac OS X. I don't think he'd get many takers for Mac OS 9, even if he was giving it away without ads.
Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
That's a classic bait n' switch. How usable would an OS that pops ads all the time be? What if, after installing, they upped the ad frequency etc? Would the ads be embedded or fetched over the network? Could you downgrade to your previously legally obtained, ad-free, OS without losing all your work?
This isn't an Apple bash or even a Steve Jobs bash. That idea is pure, unadulterated, marketing evilness.
Nothing cheapens a product like plastering it with ads even if you can get rid of them by paying.
The summary is confusing and inaccurate. The patent was filed in 2008 (not 2009), and the reference to MacOS 9 was referring to a piece in a book ("Insanely Simple: The Obsession That Drives Apple's Success" by Ken Segall, according to the linked article) that suggests that the idea for the patent originated in 1999 (not 2008 or 2009) with Steve Jobs -- back when OS9 was heading towards release, making the reference to OS9 actually make sense.
All this gleamed from clicking the sole link in the /. post, spending 15 seconds skimming it, and having a very basic knowledge of recent OS history. Proofreading, please?
There were companies in the late 90's and early 2000 that were doing this with PC's and free internet. How soon we forget. Eudora or Opera anyone?
by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
1. Put adverts in OS
.
.
.
.
2. Call it an "upgrade", not adware
3. Patent it
4. Threaten all add supported software makers with lawsuits (planned)
5. Make unfathomable wealth by not actually inventing or even implementing anything (goal)
Back in 1999, there was freepc.com. They didn't just give away the OS - they gave you a whole computer. Applications could only use a 640 x 480 area of the screen, which was a common monitor size back then. But FreePC shipped with a bigger monitor and display card. The rest of the screen was devoted to ads.
Like most web sites today. And phones. And tablets...
They were just ahead of their time.
Everytime I turn on my Mac, I get that picture of an apple.
Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
I suppose you would rather pay cash for every web page you visit?
"In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson
Chrome OS -- it's designed to integrate with the Google ecosystem, whose purpose is advertising in exchange for services. It's a step removed, but it's the moral equivalent.
EXACTLY
Let's just *always* give the OS away for free...!!! .... reminds me, what was that Linux thing again?
Fuck that shit.
Couldn't you just block the ad server at the router/firewall level?
Would the OS fail to work if it could not download ads?
There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
MS *did* do this with their office suite.
There's an edition of Vista that doesn't let you change the background (that's a premium feature!), or run more than 5 tasks at a time. It usually comes bundles with the ad-supported version of office, which takes about 50% of your screen real-estate on the netbooks that actully had it pre-installed.
haha! That was a rhetorical question. There are many a commit in the kernel sources with my name, but, thanks for the thorough and gratuitous explanation ;^)
Sometimes, interruptions to your train of [get Amtrack tickets at a discount, pre-order here] thought are just not worth [Increase your net-worth. Talk to a TruWealth financial adviser today.] the money saved. [Save money on expensive phone bills! Get MagicJack phone service for as little as $19.95 a year! ]
The best way to ensure [save 15% or more, with Gecko Insurance] that never happens [Hi, I'm Mayhem. Avoid mayhem.] is to pay the upgrade [upgrade now to a premium account and get unlimited access free] fee and just be [just be yourself with interchangable mouse covers in 49 different wild colors] done with it. [Get the job done faster with MultiStep, the swiss army knife of folding ladders!]
I appreciate [Need to express your appreciation with flowers?] a little mental peace [Tie dye peace-symbol tee shirts, now 20% off!] [Excedrin, for those Excedrin moments.] and quiet. [Try Bose QuietComfort (tm) noice-canceling headphones, risk-free!]