Slashdot Mirror


Slackware: I'm Not Dead Yet!

New submitter xclr8r writes "The longtime tinkering and learning distro of Linux Slackware found itself at the center of rumors and speculation when its website was down for a few days. Caitlyn Martin, developer of Linux Yarok, voiced concerns in DistroWatch and declared that she would be basing the new project off a distro with a more secure future. Meanwhile contributors continued to plug along with additions to the change log. Eventually Eric Hameleers expanded on his initial communication of 'old hardware — lack of funds' to a more thorough explanation quoted in the article. Have your pop up blocker ready."

252 comments

  1. not until by hguorbray · · Score: 5, Funny

    netcraft confirms it!

    -I'm just sayin'

    1. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Distrowatch: 'Ere, he says he's not dead.
      Slashdot: Yes he is.
      Slackware: I'm not.
      Distrowatch: He isn't.
      Slashdot: Well, he will be soon, he's very ill.
      Slackware: I'm getting better.
      Slashdot: No you're not, you'll be stone dead in a moment.
      Distrowatch: Well, I can't take him like that. It's against regulations.
      Slackware: I don't want to go on the cart.
      Slashdot: Oh, don't be such a baby.
      Distrowatch: I can't take him.
      Slackware: I feel fine.
      Slashdot: Oh, do me a favor.

    2. Re:not until by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Slackware will never die. I still have my Walnut Creek CD's from Slackware 3.6 the only other software I kept from that period is Win 3.11, OS/2, and a few DOS versions. But your post is funy none the less you probably are a big Slackware fan.

    3. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit it's become self-aware. And mildly retarded.

    4. Re:not until by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Dude, I totally have a set of those walnut creek cd's as well! Hard to believe I used to pay someone for discs back then rather than just downloading and burning like I would today. Oh, how times change.

    5. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish it were that easy.

      It turned me into a newt!

    6. Re:not until by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still have my Walnut Creek CD's from Slackware 3.6

      Oh. So just those disks.

      the only other software I kept from that period is Win 3.11

      Of course.

      , OS/2,

      And that.

      and a few DOS versions.

      So basically you still have every bit of software you've ever owned.

    7. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So I'm not the only one then. I have old OS/2 disks around here somewhere, and right before me, the Platypus with "official linux slackware version 3.0 2 disk set." "The internet's favorite 32-bit multiuser Operating System" READY-TO-RUN INCLUDES KERNEL 1.2.13 & 1.3.18 (its a Walnut Creek CDROM).(tm). ....It's still too young to vote only 17 years old but still readable! Other people got excited about other software in October 1995, but I still have this, complete with the 8 page booklet that tells you everything you need to know about Linux. I remember having to configure the boot floppies, and add command line paramaters so that my cdrom drive would actually read the install cd (I am very glad we have left "jumper pin" interrupts behind). All I did after this is start building my own kernels so that I didn't have to pass command line boot parameters, and to also make my sound card work.

    8. Re:not until by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm running Ubuntu Norwegian Blue. To be honest, the uptimes aren't great.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:not until by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 2

      Actually I threw away most of my junk two weeks ago. But your post is funny and it blew right over my wifes head. She comes up the the computer and says "what are you laughing at" so I showed her and she didn't get it.

    10. Re:not until by VanessaE · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps, but the plumage must be lovely :-)

    11. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have the 3.0 set (ELF binaries!)

      I also have 2 Linux Developer's Resource sets from InfoMagic. With Slackware 2.2 and 3.1

      From the back of the Walnut Creek Slackware 3.0 set:

      Official Slackware Linux turns your machine into a powerful
      32-bit multi-tasking Unix workstation. Develop program with
      a full range of software development, text editing, and image
      processing tools. Play the popular arcade games DOOM from
      id Software and awesome new ABUSE from crack-dot-com.
      Connect your machine to the Internet!

      Patrick Volkerding, the author of Slackware, also authored this
      CDROM. The first CDROM contains the easy to install Linux
      system (kernel 1.2.13 and 1.3.18) and complete source code.
      Patrick carefully selected the best software from Internet Linux
      archive sites for the second CDROM

      Slackware requires 4 to 8 megabytes of memory, and 12 to 250
      megabytes of hard disk space. A typical installation with C and
      C++ (v. 2.7.0) development tools, Emacs (v. 19.29),
      networking with e-mail and news, the XFree86 X Window
      System (v 3.2.3), and several applications uses 50 megabytes.

      Slackware Linux is compatible with most Intel PC hardware,
      from PCI / Pentium motherboards to 386, and supports all
      modern CDROM drives, sound, ethernet, and mice.

    12. Re:not until by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      Not yet dead? A good /.ing will fix that.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    13. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transameritech, anyone? Slack 1.0

    14. Re:not until by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      Not Walnut Creek, but still Slack 3.6 (Cheapbytes was the source for me). Easier and faster than downloading over 28.8k dialup.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    15. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Downloading and burning? In this modern age we use USB flash drives sir. Stop wasting money and time burning discs.

      http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/

      http://www.pendrivelinux.com/yumi-multiboot-usb-creator/

    16. Re:not until by bheading · · Score: 1

      Must be pinin' for debconf.

    17. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried nailing it in place? Might keep it up long enough to get a sale at least.

    18. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dyed it with boot polish to cover some oil stains it got when I was shot down.

      CAPTCHA=pigments

  2. It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It can hurt pretty badly when your favorite Linux distribution comes to an end. I've lived through this horrid experience once before, with Stampede Linux. We were as close as a man and Linux could get. I ran it on all of my PCs. Then one day it was no more, and I was destroyed. For several months, I had no purpose in life. But eventually the pain does go away, and I found other Linux distributions. I'm using Debian now, and while it isn't as glorious as Stampede Linux was, at least it's still Linux.

    1. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by TWX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had never even heard of Stampede Linux when you posted this, and I've been a Linux user since 1995 when I had to buy cheap CDs from the local computer store that were distributed by Walnut Creek. It's obscure enough that Wikipedia doesn't even have a page for it.

      Slackware has at least has the history to have been continually in existence since '93, almost since the beginning of Linux itself. Mind you, I and a whole bunch of other people jumped ship over the Libc5 debacle and I ended up on Debian where I've remained since. I would be saddened to see Slackware go away, but it wouldn't lead to a loss of purpose in my life.

      You wouldn't happen to be Matt Wood, would you?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by jimmydevice · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought that was a prerequisite for posting on /.

    3. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by couchslug · · Score: 0

      "I'm using Debian now, "

      What happens if Ubuntu orphans Debian and you are out in the cold again? (runs)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably realize that Ubuntu can't exist without Debian and be very confused for a while.

    5. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      ...and yet the irony was not lost.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That whooshing sound was the sarcasm flying over your head.

    7. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by belthize · · Score: 1

      You'd have more purpose if you'd develop a Herd mentality.

    8. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more.

      Was it like, say... getting run over by a herd of your favorite quadruped?

    9. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, Stampede was one of those L335 D00DZ versions of Linux that was all the rage for about six months before everyone who is anyone moved on to the next totally awesome kickass distro. (Apparently the current "hipster distro of the month" is Mint Linux.)

    10. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have more purpose if you'd develop a Hurd mentality.

      Fixed that for you.

    11. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Or a HURD mentality... just that a hurd of gnus have yet to get the numbers to cause a stampede

    12. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by shiftless · · Score: 0, Troll

      That knock at the door was the asshole police. They have a warrant for someone fitting your description.

    13. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no,

      a Nerd mentality

      Oh wait, it's already the case.

    14. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by dow · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used Stampede for a while, and it was pretty much Slackware but compiled for 686 processors, where Slackware was still using 386 as the target. You could achieve a similar speed up to Stampede's level by just compiling your own Slackware packages for the most heavily used libs and applications.

    15. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by haruchai · · Score: 2

      You've been using Linux since '95 and you can't find a distro's website?

      http://www.stampede.org/introduction.php

      And while Wikipedia is very useful, it's pretty lame for a longtime Linux user to use that as the yardstick for a distro.

      Now, if it didn't appear on Distrowatch, I'd agree that it's obscure.

      Please switch permanently to Windows or Mac; you're bringing down our technorep.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    16. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by haruchai · · Score: 2

      It was basically the original Gentoo

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    17. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It was the original Gentoo sometime circa 2005. Today, it's the original Arch.

    18. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      It can't possibly be that bad. If it is, kill it with fire. On second though, nuke all remaining media from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    19. Re:It hurt bad when Stampede Linux was no more. by KingRatMass · · Score: 0

      I don't want to come off as prejudice but all assholes look alike to me! This sounds like a case of rectal profiling. Someone should contact the AFF.

  3. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary is, as usual, misleading. Caitlyn Martin didn't post this in a DistroWatch article, she (and some other posters) mentioned it in the comments section of that website. She also didn't say she was moving the derived distro to a new base, she said she and the rest of the development team would be voting on the issue as to whether to move to a different base.

    Honestly, how bad does a person's comprehension skills have to be to submit this kind of summary?

    1. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      yeah, slackware might not be dead, but slashdot sure as fuck is

    2. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... as bad as a /. editor's?

    3. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost as bad as that of someone who wants kudos for cutting a 'derived distro'.

    4. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm probably of questionable sanity myself to answer that but don't you think similarity in letters are prone to occur since there just around ~25 letters in the alphabet?

      Also, eugenics it's about controlling who can reproduce or even fetuses... the elderly definitely are out of the eugenics subject IMHO...

    5. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      there just around ~25 letters in the alphabet?

      You must be a physicist.

    6. Re:Correction by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

      The summary is, as usual, misleading. Caitlyn Martin didn't post this in a DistroWatch article, she (and some other posters) mentioned it in the comments section of that website. She also didn't say she was moving the derived distro to a new base, she said she and the rest of the development team would be voting on the issue as to whether to move to a different base.

      Honestly, how bad does a person's comprehension skills have to be to submit this kind of summary?

      I think it's more likely sensationalism rather than poor comprehension. I don't think there are any "news" sources that don't participate in sensationalism these days. Slashdot has the misfortune of having a reader base that is likely to notice.

    7. Re:Correction by Iron+Condor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh - a substantial fraction of Linux distros out there are derived from Slackware: http://futurist.se/gldt/wp-content/uploads/12.02/gldt1202.png

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    8. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has the misfortune of having a reader base that is likely to notice.

      Yeah, /. readership is right up there with Yahoo! News when it comes to intelligence.

    9. Re:Correction by NoMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slashdot also has the dubious honour of adding to the problem, simply by posting this as "news" 11 days after Eric clarified the issue and 5 days after the linked story was posted.

      How is it that actual "news for nerds" takes a week or more to appear here, while everyday events like new Firefox versions are often posted before they're released?

      (And no, I'm not new here...)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    10. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how Microsoft Sam totally sounds like a person?

      Yeah, well apply that to Slashdot comprehension skills when summaries are verified.

    11. Re:Correction by Artifakt · · Score: 2

      German has 26 'regular' letters of latin style, and the "Sharp S", . Often even native speakers will only count the 26. German also commonly uses umlauts over three vowels, but these are nearly never counted as seperate letters.
      So, there are actually an average of 26.5 letters in the 2 alphabets - the parent poster has subtracted when he should have added and then set an arbitrarily low threshold for precision and relied on a rule of thumb for rounding, ergo he's an engineer.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    12. Re:Correction by xclr8r · · Score: 1

      The summary is, as usual, misleading. Caitlyn Martin didn't post this in a DistroWatch article, she (and some other posters) mentioned it in the comments section of that website. She also didn't say she was moving the derived distro to a new base, she said she and the rest of the development team would be voting on the issue as to whether to move to a different base.

      Honestly, how bad does a person's comprehension skills have to be to submit this kind of summary?

      I know it's bad form to post on one's own submission but I'll make an exception.

      Where in the summary does it say Caitlyn posted anything in an article? You are projecting words into the summary that are not there. Here is Caitlyn's quote verbatim from the journalist's article.

      "You remember that comment about my involvement in the development of a Slackware derivative? Forget it. We're already discussing about delaying the release and rebasing off of something with a more secure future,"

      I mixed up the words distro and base as I was being rushed unexpectedly before submitting, I sincerely apologize to Caitlyn for that.

      On another comment there was discussion of timing of the submission - how late it was. I had not seen anything about this story until Thursday night and I found the news shocking and it was "news to me". Submitting the story was my way of calling attention to Slackware's need of assistance. I cut my teeth in IT beyond the windows control panel on Slackware and hope it continues to live on in the future.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
  4. Debian by Svartormr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you want a reliable distro that will survive every other distro, you go with Debian. The developers fight like cats and dogs and it just keeps going on, getting better and better.

    1. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There must be some level of agreement given that the Project Lead (Stefano Zachiroli) was just re-elected to his third term in a row.

      Debian forever!

    2. Re:Debian by wmbetts · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you think Slackware is going away anytime soon I have a bridge to sell you.

      --
      "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    3. Re:Debian by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think if something happened to Pat V. where he could no longer continue with Slackware, Robby Workman and Eric Hameleers and a few others will pick up the slack (pun intended)

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    4. Re:Debian by wmbetts · · Score: 2

      I agree development would continue and life would go. It just wouldn't be the same with out Pat though.

      --
      "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    5. Re:Debian by 101percent · · Score: 2

      The parent has no relevance to this article. What does debian's survivability have anything to do with slackware's webserver going down and a new project based on slackware (of which there are many). Besides, slackware has been around as long as Debian. Ian Murdoc tried to recruit Patrick Volkerding for the Debian project at its beginning, but Pat respectfully declined and went ahead with Slackware. I'll give you Debian's survivability, but Slackware is just as old with far less resources than Debian. To use seniority as leverage to dismiss slackware shows you know nothing. This is the wrong way to promote Debian, which is a wonderful project which proves itself without such tactics. Since you don't mention any of these features, you again prove you know nothing.

    6. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it is in Brooklyn. I've wanted one there ever since I bought my Siltech Emperor Crown speaker cables.

    7. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What does debian's survivability have anything to do with slackware's webserver going down

      Everything if Slackware's webserver is running Debian.

    8. Re:Debian by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      Sure, but who really wants to deal with the fleas you'll catch? I don't think they make a collar strong enough to repel Debian developers.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    9. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Debian is especially good if you are a historian and want to know what open source computing was like five years ago...

    10. Re:Debian by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 4, Informative

      Debian is a great distro, I must agree. However, I find it to be a little rough around the edges, and prefer Mint's Debian-based edition. LMDE (Linux Mint Debian Edition) offers the fast, clean, stable Debian base with all the bells, whistles, and eye candy that that the Mint team are known for. It is 100% Debian-compatible, and ready out of the box to serve as a great general purpose desktop OS. First Mint took Ubuntu and made it better, and now they have done the same with Debian, and I couldn't be much happier with the result.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    11. Re:Debian by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      They make a shampoo for that. Just wash the developers once in a while and you'll have no trouble with fleas, just as with cats and dogs.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    12. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can deal with the real fleas coming from your mom's basement, surely you can deal with virtual fleas from a developer on the Internet.

    13. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and his black and white cat.

    14. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just wouldn't be the same with out Pat though.

      Yeah, we might actually get PAM, and have working fingerprint scanners.

    15. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want a blast from the past, try Centos/RHEL!

    16. Re:Debian by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Besides, slackware has been around as long as Debian

      Longer. Although only by a matter of weeks.

    17. Re:Debian by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      If you want a reliable distro that will survive every other distro, you go with Debian. The developers fight like cats and dogs and it just keeps going on, getting better and better.

      Except for GNOME3...

    18. Re:Debian by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

      Debian is for hippies. Get your priorities straight man!

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    19. Re:Debian by JK_the_Slacker · · Score: 1

      July 16, 1993: Patrick Volkerding releases Slackware 1.00. 16 August, 1993: Ian Murdock announces that he wants to create a distro called Debian. No code is forthcoming. 15 September, 1993: Debian 0.01 ALPHA is 'released'. 17 October, 1993: Debian 0.02 ALPHA is 'released'. 02 November, 1993: Debian 0.03 ALPHA is 'released'. 05 November, 1993: Slackware 1.1.0 is released. 07 November, 1993: Debian 0.04 ALPHA is 'released'. 23 November, 1993: Debian 0.80 BETA is 'released' (limited beta). 28 November, 1993: Debian 0.81 BETA is 'released' (limited beta). 26 January, 1994: Debian 0.90 BETA is 'released' (public beta). 29 January, 1994: Debian 0.91 BETA is 'released' (public beta). I keep hearing this 'only by a matter of weeks' line. It looks to me like the first public 'release' of Debian occurred in January of 1994, six months after the first release of Slackware. Or does anyone want to argue that Duke Nukem Forever came out in 1997? Note that I'm giving Debian the benefit of the doubt here, by calling a 'public beta' a 'public release'.

      --
      I'm waiting for a "-1 somepeoplejustshouldn'tgetmodprivileges" meta-moderation.
    20. Re:Debian by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      The way I'd put it, it's like this. There are three rough categories I put distros in.

      The first one is for control freaks. That's where you want to know exactly what's running on your system, no extra packages out of the blue, no unwanted fat. It's also a good one if you want to learn a lot about the inner workings of the system in short order. Today, the best representative of that category is Arch.

      The second one is the other extreme, "it just works, and all buttons are in the right places" kind of thing. That's basically a direct competitor to Windows and OS X - full-fledged DE out of the box, working auto-configuration for most everything, and UI configuration tools. As a consequence, while you can reconfigure the system to be something other than what it is out of the box, it's usually relatively harder, and may even break things. The best choice here today is probably Mint, though LMDE is a close second.

      The third one is somewhere in between. It's something like "it just works, and by 'works' I mean like Unix". That's where you get a reasonable default package selection for the vase system, auto-configuration where there's little reason to fiddle (but overridable should you want to) and config helpers for other things where it makes sense; but no attempt to choose for you in areas where you'll likely want to make your own choices - like WM/DE. Of course, full configurability throughout. It's more or less like the first category, but with a bunch of choices made for you in advance in those areas where 90% of people would choose the same way. That's where Debian shines.

      That last category is almost always what you want to run on production servers. The second is most typical of an enterprise desktop (though it depends - if it's a dev's desktop, he might rather prefer the last as well). At home, though, it's purely a matter of personal preference and constraints like how much time you're willing to spend tinkering with the system.

    21. Re:Debian by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I doubt that Debian is doing or offering Gnome3. They seem to be going w/ ICEwm, and give people the choice of what else to download, be it KDE, GNUSTEP or GNOME2. There was some confusion about whether Gnome3 would run on BSDs due to its reliance on systemd, and since Debian is also doing a kFreeBSD port as well as a Hurd port, they decided not to go w/ Gnome3. Debian would have done well to have made either KDE or GNUSTEP their default UXs.

    22. Re:Debian by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....I had thought Debian came out within two months or so of Slackware coming out. Thanks for the history update.

    23. Re:Debian by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      So, when do you run Slackware?

      I use it in both 1st and 3rd - 2nd one I'm not sure what is.

      --
      This is blinging
    24. Re:Debian by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Where do you put sabayon?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  5. What happened to Patty boy? by oldhack · · Score: 0

    I know he got sick years back, but ... is the dude ok?

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Although there is a recurring theme of "What would happen if Patrick Volkerding got hit by a bus?" in alt.os.linux.slackware, AFAIK he recovered a looooong time ago. It was one of those oddball ailments you only get from, like, kissing double-agents on the lips or something. They gave him an antidote almost immediately, but it I suspect they didn't pay him to shut up, so tossing him a bit of coin couldn't hurt.

    2. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by wmbetts · · Score: 0

      He's fine now and has been for a while. He got sick because of poor oral hygiene.

      --
      "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    3. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by oldhack · · Score: 0

      Somebody tell the mofo to brush his teeth once in a while.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    4. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1, Funny

      He's fine now and has been for a while. He got sick because of poor oral hygiene.

      That must have been one nasty set of chompers. I've known people who brushed.. maybe monthly, but it was nowhere near enough to actually get them sick.

    5. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I never brush. No biggie. It only starts bleeding if I do.

      Once I went without showering for 3 months. I think the skin has odor control built in. People who shower often, like just about every normal person, start smelling bad after a day or three without a shower, but just hang in there and don't cave for these "shower" modernities.

    6. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by armanox · · Score: 0

      I think so. He even posts on /. every so often.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    7. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by lightknight · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Holy hell.

      Slackware Linux, 13.37 CDROM set $ 49.95

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    8. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -shrug- grab the torrent, burn it on your own media, hit the DONATE, button & toss him what you think it's worth. Welcome to the information Age.

    9. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, Too Informative

    10. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. Like many of our senses our sense of smell is more sensitive to _changes_. It gets harder to notice the smells around you after a while. So if you permanently stink, you may not notice it much since your stench is always around you.

      But other people who smell different are likely to notice.

    11. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people around you can still smell it. You don't because you get used to it. Just like you can get used to cold/hot climates or noise you can get used to bad smells.

    12. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by teg · · Score: 0

      Once I went without showering for 3 months. I think the skin has odor control built in. People who shower often, like just about every normal person, start smelling bad after a day or three without a shower, but just hang in there and don't cave for these "shower" modernities.

      Young Steve Jobs, is that you?

    13. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by BlueScreenO'Life · · Score: 0

      Or he could be current rms.

    14. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by dbc · · Score: 0

      Actually he *did* brush his teeth regularly, but didn't replace his toothbrush often enough. It started growing things. Nasty, nasty, things. So regular brushing just kept putting the nasty things back into him. Lesson: replace your toothbrush regularly.

    15. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not the case. If I understand what he had, this describes how anyone can get the infection -- If you are born with very minor to serious heart defect, you may need to take antibiotics prior to a dentist visit. If you do not, in rare situations you can get a specific heart infection, which is curable but *very* difficult to cure. In some cases, these heart defects can remain unknown to your Dr, so you do not even know you are at risk. Even a heart murmur could be enough to put you at risk.

    16. Re:What happened to Patty boy? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      He did say that he once went w/o showering - which is not rms - rms never showers anyway. Speaking of which, how come Patrick fell sick but rms never does?

  6. slashdotting slackware.com is like by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Funny

    entering an 85 year old man in to the WWF

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:slashdotting slackware.com is like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because staged fights are so dangerous.

    2. Re:slashdotting slackware.com is like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Is there a problem with someone like Sir David Attenborough being an ambassador for the World Wildlife Fund?

  7. Google is not my friend today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can someone please tell me what Linux Yarok is?

    1. Re:Google is not my friend today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some oddball internal thing written for consulting clients.... of some kind. She claimed that there'd be a public alpha of the thing in 2010 (called Yarok Bereshit, no kidding...). Either based on Salix or Slackware, although they [five people in total apparently with two developers total] did a bit of custom code. As of this spring it was still planned to produce a 'public release alpha at the end of this month.' Funny that someone who claims that any business without a website is doomed turns out to be developing a distro that either doesn't have a website or is so badly advertised that Google plain can't find it. End of the day, I have to agree with the shampoo AC below: who cares?

  8. what the hell is yarok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Googled it, you get shampoo. Who cares about some developer for some project nobodys ever heard of?

    1. Re:what the hell is yarok? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      what the hell is shampoo?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:what the hell is yarok? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      what the hell is shampoo?

      It's an emacs command: ESC-x shampoo (ESC-2 ESC-x shampoo to lather, rinse and repeat.)

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re:what the hell is yarok? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Funny

      what the hell is shampoo?

      It's an emacs command: ESC-x shampoo (ESC-2 ESC-x shampoo to lather, rinse and repeat.)

      Oh geez ... I was joking. Now I find out that it actually is an emacs command. Dammit, emacs.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:what the hell is yarok? by migla · · Score: 1

      >what the hell is shampoo?

      Fake doodoo.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    5. Re:what the hell is yarok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell is shampoo?

      It's that guy that invented everything.

  9. I invoke the *Not Dead Yet* clause all the time by Trikenstein · · Score: 1, Funny

    but I use it for leering at much younger women
    (sometimes I even flirt)

    Still end up with a bent nose sometimes tho

    and every once and awhile I get that moment where you yell *Wee-Haa There's a naked woman in my bed*

    1. Re:I invoke the *Not Dead Yet* clause all the time by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 5, Funny

      slipping ruffies to people is a crime you know.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:I invoke the *Not Dead Yet* clause all the time by Trikenstein · · Score: 0

      So many ways to respond to this
      So little time to waste on it

      I'm (just barely) on the wrong side of 50 (how the fuck did that happen)

      I'm blessed in that women in their 30's ....
      Well even when I was in my teens I was into women in their 30's

      although these days 40'ish and 50'ish women are fascinating

      but I digress
      Apparently you drug women to get them to spend any kind of time with you

    3. Re:I invoke the *Not Dead Yet* clause all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I was a dirty old man even as a young boy ;).

    4. Re:I invoke the *Not Dead Yet* clause all the time by Trikenstein · · Score: 1

      i wub you *wink*

    5. Re:I invoke the *Not Dead Yet* clause all the time by devphaeton · · Score: 1

      As a late 30s guy who has a 21 year old woman asleep in his bed right now, I can't decide which is the first thing I should say:

      1) It doesn't take drugs, just a charming personality to win them over.
      2) There's a smoking hot 21 year old in my bed right now, and I'm up at 2:00am reading old articles on Slashdot.

      eh...

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    6. Re:I invoke the *Not Dead Yet* clause all the time by Trikenstein · · Score: 1

      as I stated my age above, no need to repeat.

      My one bitch
      You should get 30 decades to be in your 30's

      I've had (been awhile) 18, 21 etc, etc, etc year old *tang*
      They were all very fine, beautiful, as only youth can bestow

      But to me anyway when they reached their 30's they stopped being girls and became women

      I guess my point is everyone matures at a different speed.

      Enjoy your 30's buddy
      You ain't ever gonna get that back

    7. Re:I invoke the *Not Dead Yet* clause all the time by devphaeton · · Score: 1

      Enjoy your 30's buddy
      You ain't ever gonna get that back

      Unfortunately I'm all too aware of this.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
  10. We're not dead, but an old server is. by volkerdi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good hello folks! It's wonderful to see we've made it onto Slashdot in-between releases again!

    However, our website hardware is nearly toast, and is also co-located a long way away from where I live. It is an ancient VIA based system with a Celeron and 512MB of RAM. It also sports a Maxtor hard drive connected to a Promise Technology PCI IDE card, and LILO boots from a 3.5" floppy drive. Frankly, this wasn't really great hardware even when it was brand new, but it ran our site and mailing lists with excellent uptimes for over a decade in spite of that. It looks like the trouble could be a flaking Tulip based Ethernet card (getting DUP and dropped packets, and RX/TX errors). It was doing OK again after a reboot, but I'm having some trouble reaching it again for some reason.

    We're looking for a new place to put the main site. Perhaps it could move to our other server, connie.slackware.com (in which case we need a PHP guru to port it to the latest version). There are other Slackware related servers that might be able to host us as well. To be honest, connie is also getting a little long in the tooth (that's a Pentium III with 256MB of RAM).

    RIP bob.slackware.com, and long live Slackware!

    1. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Yo man, are you the deadhead I'm thinking you're supposed to be?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by volkerdi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yo man, are you the deadhead I'm thinking you're supposed to be?

      My name is August West.

    3. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      With a Slashdot ID that low it might really be Adam West!

    4. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by willie3204 · · Score: 1

      Phew,
      I wasn't worried but thank you for the post!

    5. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow, do you need us to take up a collection to buy new hardware? Is there somewhere we can go to donate?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hi Pat. Great to see you here! ;)

      You could really put a link on the slack website, where people could go and donate some hardware.
      I can donate even a nice laptop bought off of ebay better that these specs to Slackware.

    7. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by 101percent · · Score: 2

      First understand this: Slackware is Patrick's bread-and-butter. Granted I'm not too sharp on network management etc... but perhaps he wants his server to be within his control and not floating around in some nebulous cloud. He's been a dedicated GNU/Linux community member/leader for decades, so you should stop being such an ass and realize that as you get older you stick to the things you know; brick-and-mortar real servers which you have control over, the way it has been done for decades. He's not trying to build an empire; from the interviews I've read/heard he's just a down-to-earth guy that likes plays music and lives simply. Why would he try to expand, especially if it means giving up (albiet not too much) control over what provides his income. What's next, Steven King writing/storing his next novel on Google Documents?

    8. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Erm, why are you assuming VPS means cloud?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Amouth · · Score: 1

      If you would like a donation of more modern hardware just say so - i have several boxes with far better specs that are decommissioned that i don't have a need for.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    10. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a link to donate (left side -DONATE-). Why not just send the cash, and let him determine the hardware?

    11. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed, I've got a nice server sitting here in my apartment collecting dust, since I stopped working at the datacenter. (by nice I mean quad core 2.8 with 4gb of ram).

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by 101percent · · Score: 1

      Because I fired my managers a long time ago.

    13. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a link to donate (left side -DONATE-). Why not just send the cash, and let him determine the hardware?

      So that he would not choose a Celeron or some bullshit hardware again.

    14. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      We're looking for a new place to put the main site. Perhaps it could move to our other server, connie.slackware.com (in which case we need a PHP guru to port it to the latest version).

      Your site is nothing but TABLES! Maybe intead of porting it, you should use one of many many Open Source (TM) CMS that use more modern web standards...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    15. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      With a Slashdot ID that low it might really be Adam West!

      Don't believe him; he's a liar.

    16. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Instead of paying to colo two really, really shitty 'servers', why don't you just get a small linode vps? Worry about the distro instead of wasting time fighting with a $3 eth card.

    17. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh. Force the distro's manager to use the hardware you want him to use. Get off the painkillers.

    18. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by metrix007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because cloud is a meaningless buzzword which means "computer on the internet".

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    19. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Because "cloud" is a meaningless buzzword which means "computer on the internet"

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    20. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it works, is easy to maintain, is understandable with little effort, consumes few resources, why care about those bloated content management systems?

    21. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by IntlHarvester · · Score: 2

      Post should have been modded +5 Funny just for the nostalgia trip hardware rundown

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    22. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by lightknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, no.

      Cloud means multiple redundant servers, on the internet, running virtual machines. Usually hooked up to some 'pay as you go' billing & provisioning system.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    23. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      eh just slap a new nic in it, it will go for another decade, its not like your site is overly complicated, and it works fine (well it used to work fine)

      while your in there pop a new coin cell in it, dont want the next update to be "stupid CR2032 shat out its guts and ate the traces off the motherboard"

    24. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0) uh we're talking about slackware here.
      1) the guy just admitted to using a celeron with a VIA chipset.

      While you're at it maybe you should pop down to the museum and ask the boss there to clear out all that old junk.

    25. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      move a page or two to appspot for goodness sake. geez..

      server is dead? what a joke in this day and age.

    26. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that he would not choose a Celeron or some bullshit hardware again.

      Ah, bullshit hardware
      like the Celeron I've had running as my firewall for something like seven years, with something like 10 hours total downtime in that period (OS Upgrade, memory upgrade, HD upgrades, third network card fitted, etc).
      like the PIII system I finally retired last month after a decade of 24/7 service, which is still getting occasional use as a testbed.

      Both these bullshit systems have seen a whole bunch of 'oooh shiny... fucktons of RAM, Cores, and CPU clocks' systems come and go for one reason, reliability. I know they won't go on forever, and I'm particularly dreading the day the Celeron starts failing as I've never found another system that reliable (ok, I tell a lie, but that was an DEC Alpha based firewall running OpenBSD many, many moons ago)

      Btw, though it probably has been guessed, the Celeron firewall machine is running Slackware.

    27. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You know, Celerons weren't really all that bad. We ran groups of redundant web servers with Celeron CPUs. They weren't blazing fast, but they were cheap. For the price, it was an easy sell to buy more servers, and let them all work a little easier. That was with an amazingly high load site too, and despite the claims of fire and brimstone the first thing to go after 4 or 5 years was usually just the CPU fan. As generic home grown servers, they out performed the name brand comparables at a fraction of the cost.

            Of course, they all got retired years ago. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    28. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      Patrick, check your email. :)

      I'm volunteering development and other suggestions.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    29. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and have the hellhole of upgrading the cms every few months for exploit bugfixes, needing a gig to serve two simultaneous users, not work with links.. the thing worked for a decade.

      now, what they might/should do would be to move the system to a vm installation and run it for another decade.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    30. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by realityimpaired · · Score: 0

      10 years ago, the price difference between a Celeron and a Pentium made sense when it was a low duty server.

      These days, you can put together an AMD-based 2.6GHz quad core with 8GB of RAM for under $400. Less if you have a hard drive and case you're willing to recycle. And that's new hardware... if you go to a second-hand computer store, you can pick up a 3.2GHz dual core with 4GB of RAM for $200, which should be plenty potent enough to handle a straight webserver.

      I'm more than a little surprised that slackware.com was running on a 10-year old server in colocation... if the hardware really was that old and underpowered, somebody needs to get fired. I wouldn't keep hardware in colo more than 5 years, and even that is pushing it, simply due to the upgrade cycle and lifecycle of the hardware. I've had a hardware blow up (craters on one of the IC's) on systems that were less than that, and it wasn't pretty.

    31. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was easy to maintain and understand with little effort, they probably wouldn't be needing a PHP guru to port it.

    32. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by stox · · Score: 1

      But I'll get back on my feet again someday,
      The good Lord willin', if He says I may.
      I know that the life i'm livin's no good,
      I'll get a new start, live the life I should.
      I'll get up and fly away, I'll get up and fly away, fly away.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    33. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keeping a core server live for a decade is like being proud of how long you've worn the same underwear. You may think it's funny, but it tends to drive sensible people away. The crusties do tend to accumulate, and they're unlikely to survive cleaning.

    34. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by metrix007 · · Score: 2

      Got a cite? It's not what the wiki says. VM's and the billing system is just a common implementation. The "cloud" just means uploading it somewhere you can access from anywhere == computer on the internet.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    35. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Informative

        Honestly, there are a lot of old servers still out there. Sometimes it's budgets that keep them in place. Sometimes it's poor management. Sometimes it's the simple fact that it still works. I've encouraged people to upgrade. Sometimes they don't do it because of money (small hosting, no significant change, they don't upgrade), or sometimes stupidity (small hosting, large customer base, fear of change).

          I won't totally agree with all the reasons.

          One of my own servers is an dual Opteron 240, 1.3Ghz with 2Gb RAM. It started out life with 3 250Gb IDE drives as a RAID5. All of the drives have failed at some point, and they've been swapped with 320GB drives. It happens to be currently running Slackware64 13.37. It started out life with Gentoo, then Redhat, then Slamd64. I only went the Gentoo and Redhat route, because there was no 64bit Slackware at the time. That server, when it was new, cost about $3,500.

          The new servers are AMD FX-8120, 8 core, 3.888Ghz with 16GB ram and mirrored 1TB SATA drives. I went the route that Google did with their open rack mount servers, so I saved a good bit of money on cases. Each of those cost just about $600. I suspect most datacenters wouldn't allow me to run with the open rack style, so I'd have to drop an extra $300 to $600 on cases. These run a fresh install of Slackware64 13.37.

          Both the Opteron and the FX machines are still running. I just haven't moved everything away from the Opteron yet, but I do have the hardware to move it to.

          I wrote to Patrick (Slackware) about some good options. I won't go into depth on them here. It's up to him and his folks if they want to use them.

          I am a huge Slackware fan. Anything Slackware didn't provide directly in the distribution, I used to get from linuxpackages.net. For the last few years, I've gotten additional stuff from slackbuilds.org. Between Slackbuilds and the sources on Slackware, it's been real easy to roll up my own updated packages. It's much easier than the old days of just installing additional stuff from source, and not having a clean removal path.

          For a big commercial company, I don't recommend leaving hardware running for over 5 years. That's the end of the usable life. In 5 years, there is bigger, better, and faster available. It's also usually close to the end of life for the drives. I know some places upgrade yearly, which is fine and dandy if you have a huge fiscal budget, and IT people who like to keep real busy. :) It seems that places that really do the yearly upgrades have things set up and documented better to allow for smooth migrations between machines. Places that stagnate on solutions tend to have more stuff tied in closely to a specific setup, and it's difficult for them to move.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    36. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Your above server specs remind me of my old FreeBSD (4.something) box wharfrat.nethead.com.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    37. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Nethead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, and Pat, your /. UID is old enough to have used images.slashdot.org which was a Pent 90 box running slackware that I setup in Seattle at Wolfe.net when /. saturated their T1. Slackware was a big part of how /. got started.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    38. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by drkstr1 · · Score: 2

      Hi Pat, long time Slackware user here. Sorry to hear you're having server trouble. It seems like I'm about due for another box set. My tee-shirt could probably use a replacement too (although I might upgrade to the polo if you still have them).

      Cheers, and thanks for all the fish!

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    39. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of cloud prodvider do you use ? Their hardware seem pretty obsolete ...

    40. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you need a couple Tulip based Ethernet cards? My wife has been wanting me to throw out the entire box of old ISA based Ethernet cards now for a few years. I had a need for them until a few months ago when I finished fully virtualizing all my Slackware boxes.

    41. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      You don't get it. We want the Slackware server to run on that kind of antique hardware. That's how we know it'll stay lean and mean! ~

    42. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by zoward · · Score: 1

      Pat, put up a Kickstarter project to get Slackware a new server already. You'll probably have a rackful of blades by the end of the month.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    43. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      I first heard of Linux in 1994 and the local computer store had slackware on floppies.

      It is amazing to hear that your servers are that old. You should put up a paypal link. With the donations you get, you should be able to pick up a few of these.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    44. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pat, thanks for Slackware, and keep up the good work. I've been using it since 1995, when I first got into Linux.

      Over the years, it's given me plenty to learn, and I owe my professional success to Slackware. When I started out, I didn't have much money, so I used to get cheapbytes Slackware disks and bought the occasional T-shirt or 3 from the store, and the odd official disk set a bit later.

      I've just bought a subscription to show a bit more support. I wish you all the best.

      Learning Slackware was the best thing I ever did. When people have trouble on Red Had, Ubuntu, WindRiver etc. they come to me for help, which I can do because I learned on Slackware.

    45. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The other thing is that nowadays, the Celeron is really low end. What Intel now calls the "Pentium" is closer to what the Celeron used to be, with the Celeron seemingly targeted for more embedded type applications. With that said, Celerons will still work just fine for many server applications.

    46. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Here's your citation.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    47. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My chosen deity has uttered two pearls of wisdom.

      "My name is August West." /me blinks stupidly. /me quickly scurries off to wikipedia.

      The page "August west" does not exist. You can ask for it to be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
      For search help, please visit Help:Searching.
      /me fails

      I have failed my lord and slack savior.

      I shall end myself now.

    48. Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. by TwoBeans · · Score: 1

      RIP bob.slackware.com

      "Bob" is dead, you say? Maybe this year IS the year...

      --
      -2B
  11. That might not help Slackware by helvstrom · · Score: 2

    That kind of outage doesn't really help Slackware. I've used Slackware since 1992 or 1993, I believe, and I would not change to any other distribution, but it is quite scary when you have a lot of work on top of a distribution that has its website off-line for that long. You simply start thinking if it won't last much more, and many people might start migrating to more popular distros. Anyway, the best way to avoid that is to support it, subscribing to it, or buying some stuff from the store. I won't hurt.

  12. "Developer" of Yarok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering a Google search for Linux Yarok more or less only returns hits for her and not the project, I call bluff, hype or a new KDE/Gnome skin. All three are ofc much needed.

  13. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and where are all of the mac servers?

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  14. Slashdot Store URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is http://store.slackware.com/cgi-bin/store

  15. What would your alternative have been? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I hope to keep my Slackware box running for the foreseeable future, I do wonder what other distributions people would consider if Slackware became unmaintained.

    So, Slackware appreciation thread? Why do you use Slackware, what other distros have you considered, and why don't they quite cut it?

    I think for my home PC, I'd consider Arch Linux. Like Slackware, it keeps its packages reasonably vanilla, and has a transparent configuration system. On the other hand, I think it's far too unstable for servers that do important work.

    For servers I'm already mostly using Debian... It's a good distro, but I'm assuming that people with Slackware configurations have some special requirements that it doesn't meet?

    1. Re:What would your alternative have been? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you found Slack to be, "...far too unstable for servers..." it's pretty clear that it's not the hardware, it's not Slackware, it's the person.

    2. Re:What would your alternative have been? by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Slackware: the only distro of linux where it's always the user's fault.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:What would your alternative have been? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I read the GP's statement as referring to Arch Linux, rather than Slackware.

      As to the GP's question of what to use instead, I'd imagine that Slackel would be a fine alternative for him - it's pretty recent and still active, and should fill in the void if Slackware were to disappear.

    4. Re:What would your alternative have been? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently can't read; GP said Arch was unstable, not slack.

  16. Slackware User by apharmdq · · Score: 2

    I'm a relatively new Slackware user, having only been using it for the past 2 years, but I can't think of another distro I'd rather use. So I'd be devastated if Slackware did die.
    However, I knew from the start that this was just people overreacting. Eric regularly posts updates on his blog, and although the changelog and updates in -current aren't as frequent as some other distros, they are there.
    I'll definitely be getting a subscription as soon as the next release comes.

  17. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by mcneely.mike · · Score: 1

    and where are all of the mac servers?

    They're serving 'Cat' his dinner...

    'Fish'
    'Today's fish is trout a la creme. Enjoy your meal.'
    'Fish'
    'Today's fish is trout a la creme. Enjoy your meal.'
    'Fish!'
    'Today's fish is trout a la creme. Enjoy your meal.'

    --
    soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
  18. Too lazy by migla · · Score: 1

    Too lazy (or whateve - I don't actually believe people are lazy as much as I think they feel more or less angst about doing things) to ... now I forget what I was too lazy for. Anyway.

    Isn't this old news? Didn't I hear German Mc Schnizel rant about this issue a week or more ago and wasn't he saying that it's just a website that is down due to not having funding for the website or whatever, while ftp servers and things were chugging along as they always had been?

    So no need to panic. Slackware is slackware and don't need no stinking websites, but could possibly use some donations for renting a webserver for people who like that kind of thing to look at.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  19. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

    and where are all of the mac servers?

    I actually had an apple rep suggest we install mac mini's as servers in a datacenter to support our apple footprint! Apple is clearly not even remotely interested in corporate users.

  20. Origin of name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a) "Cut me a little bit of Slack" ware

    b) "Our developers are known for their propensity to Slack" ware

    c) "If you don't want to pay Red Hat support prices you can always download some old Slack" ware

    1. Re:Origin of name? by lightknight · · Score: 2

      I believe it's from the cult of the subgenius, or something to that effect. They explain the name on the site somewhere.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  21. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by Calos · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say about Macs and/or servers, but I can appreciate an obscure Red Dwarf reference all the same. Kudos for that, now I have the urge to go watch it.

    --
    I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
  22. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by migla · · Score: 2

    To be pedantic, though...

    As Red Dwarf references go, that one is not so obscure. Or maybe you meant read Dwarf was obscure itself.

    Anyway. Anyone not familiar with Red Dward should make sure to google red dwarf torrent. It's the greatest thing since sliced monty python.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  23. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by wmbetts · · Score: 2

    Darwin iMac.local 11.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.3.0: Thu Jan 12 18:47:41 PST 2012; root:xnu-1699.24.23~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

    Not sure which part says it's Debian. I have a feeling I got trolled.

    --
    "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
  24. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

    Anyway. Anyone not familiar with Red Dward should make sure to google red dwarf torrent. It's the greatest thing since sliced monty python.

    And yet it's apparently not great enough for you to be willing to financially support its creators or actors.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  25. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For ever and ever and ever, for a single piece of work. Yeah, that makes sense. About as much sense as paying your plumber every time you flush.

  26. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by armanox · · Score: 1

    Care to tell which version? I can post for 10.4 and 10.6.

    ares:~ armanox$ uname -a
    Darwin ares.home 8.11.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.0: Wed Oct 10 18:26:00 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.24.17~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
    ares:~ armanox$

    hephaestus:~ armanox$ uname -a
    Darwin hephaestus.home 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:33:36 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
    hephaestus:~ armanox$

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  27. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    MacOS *is* Linux. Debian, to be precise.

    That's news to me. AFAIK, MacOS is based on the Mach kernel, not the Linux kernel. In other words, *not* Linux.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  28. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by unixisc · · Score: 2

    Yup, dunno what GP was smoking. If anything, MacOS is FreeBSD, if one ignores the XNU kernel, and in fact, a certified Unix, which Linux is not.

  29. How many base distros... by unixisc · · Score: 2

    Okay, how many base distros are there in Linux? So far, I've counted 6 - Debian, RedHat, Slackware, Gentoo, Arch, TinyCore.. Any others? I'm open to being corrected if any of those I listed are actually derivatives.

    1. Re:How many base distros... by neonsignal · · Score: 1

      Suse, Puppy, Arch, a number of Mandriva forks, etc

    2. Re:How many base distros... by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      SUSE and Mandriva are RPM-based and are thus based on Red hat.

    3. Re:How many base distros... by neonsignal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Using the same package manager doesn't necessarily mean there aren't other major differences. It isn't easy to define 'base distros'; how much does a fork have to change before you consider it a separate distro? I classify Ubuntu as 'based on' Debian, not because it shares the same package manager, but because it currently continues to derive packages from the Debian system (with additional patches). Whereas while Mandriva and its forks have originated in Red Hat, they no longer draw from it.

    4. Re:How many base distros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Educate yourself. I bet you weren't even born back then, so I'd recommend a huge cup of STFU.

    5. Re:How many base distros... by lagi · · Score: 3, Informative

      refer to this image: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9a/Gldt1009.svg

    6. Re:How many base distros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find SuSe was initially based on Slackware, not Red Hat. They may have incorporated many Red Hat conventions, but I'd doubt it's as easy as saying "they're based on Red Hat".

    7. Re:How many base distros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail Linux history, 7-digiter. SuSE is a slackware derivative originally, with RPM and a shitload of distro-specific configuration crap bolted on. I think Mandrake Linux was a Red Hat fork with KDE, so you're right on that.

    8. Re:How many base distros... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      The main article might also be useful.

    9. Re:How many base distros... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Slackware isn't really a base distro... although it obsoleted the distro that spawned it, SLS.

    10. Re:How many base distros... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That list seems to be classifying distros by package managers. Is that the right way of doing it? It does somewhat answer my question - Debian, RedHat, Gentoo, Slackware, Pacman and others

  30. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    WTF...???
    [MAC] OS X was based on the NeXTSTEP/MACH kernel and a lot of BSD code for its Unix personality.
    Do people now think that anything that looks vaguely Unix-like must be some variant of Linux? Sheeesh!

  31. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    But you ignore the fact that the userland of MacOSX is largely Debian-based.

  32. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by unixisc · · Score: 3, Informative

    It may have been made using GCC, but Apple has been using FreeBDS as the basis of the userland in both OS-X and iOS. So how are either of those Debian based?

  33. DOUBLE *FUCKING* STANDARD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhh, so since it's a Slashdot Love Fest, death-by-tables is fine. Of course ***ANY*** other site, you all would be SCREAMING and proper web design and CSS and so on. DOUBLE STANDARD

  34. Mac servers opportunity by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Looks like a market opportunity for any company that could take, say FreeBSD, get from Apple whatever utilities it needs and port them to FreeBSD, and then make that the basis of servers for the Macs. For the hardware, they could buy boxes from HP, Dell or any other server company, and put everything together. After that, target Mac corporate users.

    1. Re:Mac servers opportunity by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Apple already sell servers, it's just that no-one wants to use them. And FreeBSD already does servers too, and people are already using it. Even companies that love Apple just don't tend to see it as a good server backbone. Must be an image thing; sort of the reverse of MS's problem in making their Windows products trendy.

      And I can't see why Apple would want to license utilities to another software company when it would only undercut their own products. Presumably they would take a similarly dim view of it as they do "hackintoshes" and Mac clones.

    2. Re:Mac servers opportunity by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Look at the product suite on their website - the best they have is Mac Minis. I agree that it's probably a perception problem - just b'cos people never embraced A/UX doesn't mean that OS-X Server is similarly unusable.

    3. Re:Mac servers opportunity by cmarkn · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the Mac Pro Server? http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MC915LL/A?

      --
      People should not fear their government. Governments should fear their people.
  35. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by Raenex · · Score: 0

    RIP Linux - we're all using Macs now.

    Nice job, Mac fags.

  36. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    You only need to buy the DVDs once.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  37. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    [professorial tone] You know that girl, the one in the movie with the dinosaurs?

    That's you, that is. [/]

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  38. And? by shiftless · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Uh - a substantial fraction of Linux distros out there are derived from Slackware

    Any of them that I (or anyone else) has heard of?

    Slackware simply doesn't provide the basic features most distros call for these days, such as a package management paradigm. No, the "old UNIX way of doing things" isn't sufficient in today's world for widespread deployment across multiple systems and configurations.

    Simply put, slackware fills a niche, which seems to be shrinking ever-smaller as the years pass.

    It was great as an introduction to UNIX back in the Windows 98 days when I first tried it. Its floppy-disk sized images were helpful for a person like who me still had dialup. The experience I gained installing it and playing around was valuable, and it led me on to purchase a RedHat starter kit in the mall gaming store.

    So yeah, Slackware has value as a basic bare-bones UNIX intro system.....but this is 2012....who needs that these days? Why install that with great pain and anguish when you can just install a complete, modern operating system with pretty desktop and everything, then get at the UNIX stuff little by little as needed or preferred?

    1. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh - a substantial fraction of Linux distros out there are derived from Slackware

      Any of them that I (or anyone else) has heard of?

      SuSE Linux 1.0 was a direct German translation of Slackware.

    2. Re:And? by dow · · Score: 1

      Last time I used Slackware I used it with NetBSD's pkgsrc as the package management tool. It worked reasonably well. Even a traditional BSD UNIX has a more modern package management system.

    3. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh - a substantial fraction of Linux distros out there are derived from Slackware

      Any of them that I (or anyone else) has heard of?

      Well, there's this obscure distribution called S.u.S.E. Other than that, Frugalware and Slax seem well-known. I could've sworn Arch Linux had some relation with Slackware though...

    4. Re:And? by Noryungi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any of them that I (or anyone else) has heard of?

      SuSE Linux was originally based on Slackware, if I remember well.

      Slackware simply doesn't provide the basic features most distros call for these days, such as a package management paradigm.

      I truly don't care about package management -- or paradigms -- much, really.

      Slackware gives me 95% of what I need - the rest I can compile on my own, thank you very much.

      No, the "old UNIX way of doing things" isn't sufficient in today's world for widespread deployment across multiple systems and configurations.

      Simply put, slackware fills a niche, which seems to be shrinking ever-smaller as the years pass.

      I would say exactly the reverse: Slackware allows one to deploy software and updates quickly and effectively, by knowing exactly what has been installed and how.

      If by "niche" you mean people who know what they are doing, and like having a system with a minimum of hand-holding, then, yes, I agree that this is an ever-shrinking niche. I am in charge or recruiting people here at my work, and it's astounding the number of Linux "experts" who are unable to go beyond "yum install" or "apt-get install" into the real nitty-gritty of compiling software exactly as you want it.

      Let's face it: a lot of so-called "Linux administrators" these days are little more than clicky-clicky Windows drones, people who almost never use a command-line and prefer staying with dumb GUI tools. Yes, I blame Ubuntu and Debian and Red Hat and the like for this sorry state of affairs. People who know Slackware are, at least, a lot more aware and a lot more knowledgeable in all things UNIX and Linux. The same cannot be said of a lot of people out there.

      Feel free to moderate me to oblivion while I go and donate money to Slackware.

      --
      The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    5. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slackware simply doesn't provide the basic features most distros call for these days, such as a package management paradigm.

      slackpkg update
          slackpkg install-new
          slackpkg upgrade-all

    6. Re:And? by Kazymyr · · Score: 2

      The niche that Slackware fills still better than any other distro is: small, highly customized, floppy-sized (or close, USB stick-based these days) "live" bootable mini-distributions aimed at a very specific goal. Such as system repair, etc. Slackware is just easier to adapt to such a role, because of the lack of those basic features you mention.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    7. Re:And? by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

      Bingo! Slackware was very easy to package into your own custom distro. We used it to build a light weight kiosk terminals that would boot off a 512 mb thumb drive.

      All you had to do to create individual software packages was put the files you needed in a folder (EG --install-directory), then run pkgtools on it. Drop all the packages you want into the appropriate folder on the installation media, and you were done. Of course there was a lot more to Slackware that made it easily customizable like this, but I guess you would have to actually use it like this to appreciate the simplicity of Slackware.

      My friend used to tell me that Slackware was for hackers, and Debian is for hippies. I've grown to understand this much more over the years. :)

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    8. Re:And? by imthesponge · · Score: 0

      "Let's face it: a lot of so-called "Linux administrators" these days are little more than clicky-clicky Windows drones, people who almost never use a command-line and prefer staying with dumb GUI tools. Yes, I blame Ubuntu and Debian and Red Hat and the like for this sorry state of affairs. People who know Slackware are, at least, a lot more aware and a lot more knowledgeable in all things UNIX and Linux. The same cannot be said of a lot of people out there."

      Those are the people who use their PC for work instead of as a hobby to tinker with endlessly.

    9. Re:And? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      See here! Vector Linux is one I have heard of, and Slackel as well - but that's b'cos I often see what's up in distrowatch. There is Salix OS as well. Nothing there, however, about Suse being based on Slackware.

    10. Re:And? by rastos1 · · Score: 2

      "Let's face it: a lot of so-called "Linux administrators" these days are little more than clicky-clicky Windows drones, people who almost never use a command-line and prefer staying with dumb GUI tools.

      I'm a Slackware user. Since at about 1995. Just recently I was googling for solution for some problem. And I've found a solution that basically said "run the tool that Ubuntu uses to reinstall everything and that should fix it". And everybody in the discussion thread hailed how great advice that is. For me that does not answer the question at all. It does not help other distro users at all and it also does not answer the question what is actually wrong. It reminds me of the Feynman's Wakalixes makes it go. It does not explain anything. The set of people that understand how stuff works is shrinking and shrinking ...

    11. Re:And? by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      You could always use the tool slackware uses to reinstall everything? slackpkg works perfectly fine. But that doesn't solve the problem either :)

      --
      This is blinging
    12. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it. The other day I had someone ask me a very simple question on how to set up a RAID1 using "Linux". I told him how I would do it from a BASH command line (all of my 10 servers are headless Slackware boxes running only BASH, my laptop runs Slack exclusively with XFCE) and his eyes started rolling back. He looked at me like I was crazy for using the command line and said that he needed to know how to do this in Ubuntu using a window manager. I told him I knew nothing of the particular tools that are included with the window manager of his particular distribution and that what I was telling him would translate to any distro of his choice. He just looked at me like I was stupid and said something along the lines of "I thought you knew Linux." WTF?!

      Now if Slack would come with a XEN DomU virtualized kernel and an LDAP server binary out of the box I would flip my shit.

  39. transexuals in computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of Caitlyn Martin, why are so many of the females in computing (esp. system development/security) M2F transexuals?

    I know it's a male-dominated sport, even among those who positively discriminate eye candy like Google, so why in particular does it attract women who were born in a guy's body?

    1. Re:transexuals in computing by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      Probably because computing is a career which doesn't require a lot of interaction with the public. A lot of transgenders have very serious body image and confidence issues, and it's a very good career choice for somebody who doesn't want to have to face people they don't know.

  40. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by dow · · Score: 1

    Well since it is played near constantly on TV in the UK, you could probably set your recorder to record every episode that airs and have the whole lot in a week or so anyway. They are currently filming a new series too :)

  41. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

    [professorial tone] You know that girl, the one in the movie with the dinosaurs?

    That's you, that is. [/]

    Red Dwarf and David Baddiel references in the one topic? I must be dreaming!

    --
    If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
  42. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by rjames13 · · Score: 1

    I think he means the toaster from that skit is an appliance.

  43. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

    And yet it's apparently not great enough for you to be willing to financially support its creators or actors.

    The actors and writers have already been paid for the work they put into the show. The only people you're supporting by buying it on DVD at this stage in the game is the distributor.

  44. Re:Year of the Linux Deadtop by mcneely.mike · · Score: 1

    I was just referencing parent's user id... Lister king of smeg.

    --
    soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
  45. I got started with slackware 3.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I remember uploading slackware to pirate bbs boards when I was in college (1996-1997), once I found out about that there was no need for os/2 or windows of even pirated programs, I stopped playing video games, spend the next decade trying a lot of distros, and here I am 34 and still single, wasted my life with fiddling linux, and I don't even work in IT field, just still a newbie user as well. I use Fedora now but am thinking of going back to ubuntu, we'll see.

    everyone else I know has kids, is married, but hey at least I have compiled a kernel before... that and I am rich!

  46. Hey Pat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to see that you're still into that minimalist Slack thingy. And regardless of some of the ruder comments here, many of us still understand that Slackware is designed to run on even the most graceless, aimless, feckless, and pointless hardware, and to do so for a decade or so, with minimal intervention. Even if parts occasionally fall off.

        We miss you at T.R.'s. We miss T.R.'s as well; Mark got respectable, sold the place off, and is now raising hell in Sacramento.
        We now go up the street to Phair's. Great selection of craft brews, and decent pub grub.
        Best wishes from the Knights of the Square Table.

        Damn. Posting as AC, as I've forgotten my old low-five digit Slashdot ID.
        Oh, well.

  47. Re:Travel Destinations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To improve the message, you could have included something like "I fondly remember how I had a Slackware laptop with me when I was there". Slashdotters are not that easily suckered by just some random spam.

  48. I think that arch ... by pumapunku · · Score: 1

    ... has taken away a lot of user from slackware. Better package manager, bleeding edge software, rolling release .... I had been a slackware user for year, but now I have arch almost everywhere.

  49. funtoo by lagi · · Score: 1

    guys, try this one.
    you can just plug in a debian kernel in it and you have arch, but gentoo :)
    @http://www.funtoo.org

  50. OS-X, Mach and Linux by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Apple once did a Linux distro based on the Mach kernel, called MkLinux. I doubt it ever took off. MacOS, or more precisely OS-X (since MacOS also refered to System 7.x on PPC) is based on NEXTSTEP, which is FreeBSD userland on XNU, along w/ the Quartz display manager, but not directly on Mach.

    It is therefore more accurate to call OS-X as BSD or FreeBSD, although some purists object to that due to the fact that Apple uses the XNU kernel (i.e. Mach 3.0 with FreeBSD) instead of a pure FreeBSD kernel. Either case can be defended, but it's totally inaccurate to describe OS-X as Linux. Particularly now, when Apple is explicitly removing all GPL3 software from its OS, and replacing it w/ BSDL software instead. I know Linux ain't GPL3, but usually, when it's pointed out that OS-X ain't Linux, the next line of defense is to point to the GPLed stuff, which is Linux userland. But even that Apple is moving away from - I doubt they'll keep bash - will probably go for a different shell under a different license, such as zsh or even the original bourne shell sh, since Apple doesn't have problems w/ licenses such as CDDL or Common Public License.

    At this stage, I do wonder - is there a strong reason for OS-X to retain the XNU kernel, instead of just adapting the FreeBSD or PC-BSD 9 kernel, and then putting Quartz on it and letting it loose? What does XNU bring to the table that FreeBSD can't provide? As it is, Apple doesn't use Mach as a microkernel (NEXTSTEP was originally based on Mach 2.5, and when they moved to Mach 3, they used it in a monolithic configuration w/ FreeBSD), and besides, Mach is one of the slower microkernels that are there - more recent ones, like Minix 3.2 and L4 are available. So what exactly does Apple gain w/ XNU?

  51. Slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slackware forever ... until world exist!

  52. package managers are not proof of origin by wilec · · Score: 1

    The original SuSE Linux distribution was a German translation of Slackware. Slackware was initially based mostly on SLS. Over the years SuSE Linux incorporated many aspects of other Linux base distros. SuSE incorporated some Red Hat Linux feature and tools , such as its RPM Package Manager and its file structure. wabi sabi Matthew

  53. the site may be down but... by pouar · · Score: 1

    The site may be down but you can still get slack through torrents, assuming you know how to use google.

    --
    while :;do if windows sucks;then mv windows /dev/null;pacman -Sy linux;fi;done
  54. Slackware is a great fun to learn distro by ekim04tteckaz · · Score: 1

    I have been using Linux for 1.5-2 years now, still a Linux noob by anyone's standards. I started out on Ubuntu, and liked it for a while until the introduction of Unity, which to me was awful. This made me want to change distros, along with the fact that I didn't feel like I was learning anything about Linux beyond apt-get. So, bravely I jumped into Slackware(and supported the project by purchasing the install cd through their website) and haven't regretted it one bit. Slackware is a fun to learn distro, and it's very true that this operating system will not hold your hand. I've been on forums, wikis, read man pages, manuals etc... This distro encourages it's users to learn and be active in the Linux community. Over just a few months, as compared to a year on Ubuntu, that I've had Slackware on my box, I've learned how to partition a hard drive, how to edit .conf files, how to install apps and their dependencies, how to use SlackBuilds, how to extract and convert files, how to navigate and execute files in a terminal, how to configure wireless the nitty-gritty way. Most importantly, I'm learning how to not need Windows for anything.(other than school's VB class...) I've learned all this and i'm still learning the ins and outs, and I'm just a 1st year Community College Student(for programming, switched from web-design) with only one programming class under my belt, so those devs out their afraid to make the jump, you have no excuse, if I can do it, you can. I am a huge fan of Slackware, and would like to thank Pat, and Eric, and all the others who put the work into deving up this great distro, it just flies on my little netbook, and when I get my alienware m11x I'll promptly be installing and running slackware on that as well. Wish I could run it on the Vivaldi when I purchase that as well...

  55. kde distros are failing or am wrong? by deepclutch · · Score: 1

    when slackware founder ditched Gnome for Kde, many Gnome and non-Kde users suffered. now, it is like all Kde distros are failing ?

    --
    move to FOSS,save ur nation's resources.