Slashdot Mirror


Iranian Physics Student From UT Gets 10 Years In Jail For Spying

scibri writes "Omid Kokabee, a laser physics graduate student from the University of Texas who has been imprisoned in Tehran for the past 15 months, was sentenced to 10 years in jail on Sunday for allegedly conspiring with foreign countries against Iran. Kokabee was arrested in February 2011 while on a trip home, and charged with 'communicating with a hostile government' (i.e. Israel) and 'illegal earnings.' He has consistently denied the charges, and refused to speak at his trial, where no evidence against him was presented. Several international science groups, including the American Physical Society, have spoken up in his defense, and an online petition has been set up in support."

176 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing new here by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sadly, this is a very common theme with the Iranian Government. Usually this is to get the person on board with them. They get out when they are on-board, and often family members are jailed to be sure that they stay on-board.

    As long as crap is in power, crap like this happens. How many brilliant people did Stalin and Hitler kill? So many that we have no way of knowing.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Nothing new here by Bigby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It sounds like the trial-less imprisonment here in the US. He's a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve a (fair) trial.

    2. Re:Nothing new here by garcia · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Agreed. Except the part about the trial having no evidence presented.

    3. Re:Nothing new here by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was wondering how long it would be before some sheltered fool claimed America was just as bad.

    4. Re:Nothing new here by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is so far away from the US that it's laughable

      Agreed. In the U.S. he'd never get a trial.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    5. Re:Nothing new here by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      in usa you don't get a mock trial.. ok, technically in cuba you don't get a mock trial if you're hold by the u.s authorities.

      in iran, they don't need evidence, just that the other 10-15 guys(article wasn't more specific) confess after a beating.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Nothing new here by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was wondering how long it would be before some sheltered fool claimed America was just as bad.

      Actually, it is somewhat worse.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    7. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, we're not. Like, at all.

      The fact that you even claim so proves your utter ignorance, and I hope you never live under actual oppression.

    8. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the US you don't need evidence either. The government can simply tell the courts hey its a national security issue trust us. And that's it. The poor guy gets to rot in prison for undetermined time for completely made up charges.
      Now in Europe on the other hand the courts can't judge you based on non disclosed evidence. Precisely to avoid the arbitrariness that underlies the modern US judicial system. Funny to think that european citizens are more protected from their govenments than US citenzens are from theirs.

    9. Re:Nothing new here by Rakshasa-sensei · · Score: 2

      When your government decided to give a fuck about legalities and do what ever they wanted with 'enemy combatants'... What did you expect people to think?

      Your (and any other) country is only as fair and righteous as what it did in the living memory of those wronged. That is why the Bush years were so devastating; no matter what Obama does the period between 2001 and 2008 very much defines how the rest of the world looks at the US.

      Torturing people is wrong? Says 'dictator A', ok... We'll only do sleep depravation, water-boarding and electro-shocks to the balls, cause that's legal, lol.

    10. Re:Nothing new here by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I believe you're mistaken in calling the parent a "sheltered fool".

      We've suspended Habeus Corpus for anyone branded a terrorist. We've suspended the 4th Amendment any time the NSA wants to wiretap all phone traffic. We torture people. We have secret evidence in trials, which defense attorneys can't see. And National Security Letters can make it a crime to even talk about what the government is up to, even if it's illegal.

      So we have a government capable of *exactly* what Iran did to this guy.

      And if you're arguing that America isn't as bad because we don't to it as often, there are two points to be made. First, Bigby never talked about how the relative frequency of this kind of trial in the U.S. vs. Iran; just that the U.S. has done these things at least once in recent history. Secondly, given that our our handling of alleged terrorism is secret, none of us has real information on how often the U.S. conducts "trials" of the sort Iran did with this guy.

    11. Re:Nothing new here by busyqth · · Score: 1

      Wait.. did anything change after Obama came into office?
      Didn't Obama just sign a law allowing indefinite detention without trial?
      Is there any real difference between Bush and Obama?

    12. Re:Nothing new here by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That, or the imprisonment of completely harmless individuals for completely harmless acts, after giving them a fair trial at a jury of their peers. The US likes to act like it's better than Iran, but it engages in persecution of its own people too.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Nothing new here by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Here's a tip for all Iranians outside Iran. Don't go back. No matter how much you miss the kin and pine for the fjords, if you can manage it, don't go back.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obama has carried on the Bush ideals. So the US simply went from crazy to batshit insane.
      If Bush is ever convicted for crimes against humanity then so does his little black friend.
      Republicans, Democrats words without meaning anymore. Both parties are total whores for the militray-security industrial complex.

    15. Re:Nothing new here by swb · · Score: 1

      You're right, our version of "honor killing" is much worse here. We kill the young woman involved and a couple of puppies and a pony, too, for good measure. Can't let those Persians out-honor-killing us.

    16. Re:Nothing new here by Rakshasa-sensei · · Score: 1

      Obama isn't as blatant about it, at least he pretends to be a good guy.

      Not that I find it acceptable...

    17. Re:Nothing new here by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's the difference between a trial with no evidence, and a trial with classified evidence that the defense is not allowed to see or contest?

      What's the difference if you're held in prison for "indefinite detention", and you have never been charged, and you cannot file a habeas corpus petition to determine if the government even has any evidence to justify imprisoning you? At least in this case, there was a trial. That's more than some folks at Gitmo get.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    18. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And you sir have a reading comprehension problem.
      I'm talking about judicial guarantees, not police violence.

      A court in europe cannot convict you based on undisclosed evidence. It has to be public, all public. Not so in the US. Get to terms with this slight difference.

    19. Re:Nothing new here by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      How many camps does the US have filled with prisoners who don't get trials?

    20. Re:Nothing new here by busyqth · · Score: 2

      Obama isn't as blatant about it, at least he pretends to be a good guy.

      Doesn't that make it worse instead of better? I figure an honest scoundrel is better than a guy who tells you he's on your side while he's stepping on your head.

      Not that I find it acceptable...

      Of course not.

    21. Re:Nothing new here by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here, the entire "plot" is woven, whole cloth by the "investigative" agency. Dupes are recruited from the targeted population to execute the plot, under the continuous supervision and motivation by agency operatives. Ultimately, the "plotters" are intercepted for their stage-managed arrest and exposure.

      In Iran? Well, they first apprehend someone who has a detectable pattern of contact with hostile, foreign governments and provable omissions in record and testimony.

      After that? They are both foregone conclusions.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    22. Re:Nothing new here by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Non-response. He's talking legal system, you're talking vigilantes. And those vigilantes aren't violating their Bill of Rights left and right.

      So, got any relevant comparisons to make?

    23. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was thinking reading the summary. Why in the hell would you even remotely think about going back? Yes, I'm aware family is there. Hell, you could have a massive swath of land that you own, a family, and a basket of kittens waiting for you there.

      But this is an educated person. This isn't just some random agorophobe who hasn't looked at a TV, newspaper, or the internet for the past 5 years. You absolutely, unequivocally KNOW that there is some serious, severe anti-'anything-not-them' mentality over there. Those in power hate the everloving shit out of anything that doesn't strictly follow their exact line of thought. Obtaining a significant amount of 'western education' is basically akin to holding up a sign pointing down at you saying 'DEAR CORRUPT GOVERNMENT: I'M AGAINST EVERYTHING YOU LOVE, AND BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU HATE! PLEASE MAKE AN EXAMPLE OF ME'.

      It's not exactly rocket science that they threw him in prison. If for some reason Canada became a society like Iran, murdering people for the minorest of slights against their bizarre, thousand-year-old beliefs, but I managed to leave... you can be damn sure that there isn't a force on earth that would make me go back without fighting to the end. I wouldn't even remotely think of going back to my land or wife or whatever, I'd be spending every dollar and every minute of the day trying to get them out and over HERE (wherever I moved to).

      Long story short, it was naive as fuck of him to even remotely think of going back. Shit deal he got, and unfair as hell... but it's not like he couldn't have seen the very distinct, real possibility of this happening. I'd honestly be surprised if most people over here were doing everything they could to convince him not to travel back there.

      Also... 10 years? Pfft, I'm not even remotely naive enough to believe that he'll ever leave that prison. The only way he'll ever be leaving there is in a body bag.

    24. Re:Nothing new here by Marillion · · Score: 2

      Of course there are horrible oppressive regimes out there. The depravity they inflict upon their citizens is an abomination to basic human dignities. Iran is a notable and relevant example of such a regime. While the US is scarcely anywhere near as bad as Iran or any of a dozen or more similar regimes, the point that's trying to be made is that liberties and freedoms basic human dignities have been steadily eroding in the name of defending the US from terrorism. Also, there is no sense that anyone in power or "the mainstream" has any interest in reversing the trend.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    25. Re:Nothing new here by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Friends and Families of people that are being held in the camps might.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    26. Re:Nothing new here by Lisias · · Score: 1

      +1 underrated, please.

      "-1" moderation is not a valid argument against ideas. This guy has a point.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    27. Re:Nothing new here by busyqth · · Score: 1

      Hey that's not a bad way to go.
      Everyone starts thinking you were great guy, you get a memorial, etc.

    28. Re:Nothing new here by djlowe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh, I forgot - this is where people somehow don't realize that there is an actual difference between the West and actual tyranny and oppression in the world.

      If you're talking about the US, I fail to see where the difference is. The current President of the US authorized the assassination of a US citizen overseas without due process: http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/assassinations_2/ and now he's dead. [1]

      Worse, to this day even the head of the FBI doesn't know whether or not this applies to US citizens on US soil: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/07/mueller-have-to-check-with-holder-whether-targeted-killing-rule-is-outside-us/

      How, exactly, is this not tyranny and oppression? It appears to me that all the President has to do is point a finger and say "daveschroeder is a terrorist and I have credible evidence proving it." You'll never know what, if anything, that evidence is, because it's protected by "National Security", you know.

      Regards,

      dj

      Notes:

      [1] And you know what? I don't care whether or not he was a "bad person", as many claim. What I care about is that our President ignored the Constitution, deprived a US citizen of their rights and had him killed without being arrested, without be charged and without a trial.

    29. Re:Nothing new here by zlives · · Score: 3, Funny

      your espionage card has been revoked, you now have the new terrorist badge. go directly to gitmo

    30. Re:Nothing new here by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your characterization of American justice is incorrect. You seem to be talking about the dangerously-close-to-entrapment behavior that the FBI engages in, cooking up plots and luring idiots into taking the bait, and then waving them around as evidence that the FBI is protecting us.

      What about foreign nationals like Kahlid el-Masri? He was some innocent German guy who the CIA had kidnapped. The CIA agent who recommended his detention wasn't punished; she was promoted!

      Or Maher Arar? Kidnapped and rendered to Syria for torture. The Canadian government paid him restitution for their part in his detention, rendition, and torture. But when he tried to sue the US? Nope, sorry, State Secrets.

      Or perhaps Lakhdar Boumediene? He was a member of the Red Crescent (think of it like the Muslim version of the Red Cross) He was held for 7 years until a federal judge finally ruled that the government had no evidence. When one side of his nose was broken, US personnel force fed him (twice a day) through the other nostril. Sometimes they missed his stomach and the tube went into his lungs instead. Oops.

      Murat Kurnaz? Another German, held for five years in Gitmo. There's a DoD memo stating that he was cleared for release about one year about his detention, and yet he languished for four more years anyway.

      What about the Uighurs? Everyone admits they aren't guilty of any crimes, and yet many are still stuck in Gitmo after nearly a decade.

      These are ALL perfectly fucking innocent human beings, who were never charged or tried despite spending years and years in detention, sometimes almost as long as this student has been sentenced. There was no plot. There was hardly an investigation.

      I say again, at least this student was given a sham trial before being imprisoned. That sham trial is more than any of those folks I listed above got before they were imprisoned and tortured. The difference between a sham trial with no evidence and no trial at all is in practice negligible.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    31. Re:Nothing new here by uncqual · · Score: 1

      I think Obama's pretty safe. No one wants Biden in the Oval Office (beyond, of course, for an occasional visit to apologize to the President for some gaffe.)

      Selection of Vice President is very important to Presidential security -- Dan Quayle was much more important to insuring the safety of George Herbert Walker Bush than his entire Secret Service detail was.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    32. Re:Nothing new here by zlives · · Score: 1

      +1
      though a semi working sewer/legal system is much better than an open gutter; also allows us to say our shit don't stink.

    33. Re:Nothing new here by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Is that just an incredibly naive way to say "it's not wrong if they don't get caught"?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    34. Re:Nothing new here by zlives · · Score: 1

      +1
      it seems that the general public is apathetic to this erosion, which just makes it worse.

    35. Re:Nothing new here by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or perhaps Lakhdar Boumediene? He was a member of the Red Crescent (think of it like the Muslim version of the Red Cross) He was held for 7 years until a federal judge finally ruled that the government had no evidence. When one side of his nose was broken, US personnel force fed him (twice a day) through the other nostril. Sometimes they missed his stomach and the tube went into his lungs instead. Oops.

      I went to read about the guy on Wikipedia, and...

      "In January 2002, the Supreme Court of Bosnia ruled that there was no evidence to hold the six men, ordered the charges dropped and the men released. American forces, including troops who were part of a 3,000 man American peace-keeping contingent in Bosnia were waiting for the six men upon their release from Bosnia custody, seized them, and transported them to Guantanamo."

      What. The. Fuck? Last I checked, Bosnia was an independent sovereign country. How can this kind of crap be pulled off? Did they do it Mossad-style, or what?

    36. Re:Nothing new here by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There's no doubt that US did things exactly like that, and worse. Here is a Slashdot post that names some names.

      The only difference is that 779 people went through Guantanamo, while Iranian prisons contain far more dissidents who did not get a fair trial.

    37. Re:Nothing new here by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but of all the examples you could have possibly given this is the worst. Was Abu-ghraib right? Don't even be foolish enough to ask. Hell shooting someone in the face is not right, neither is having someone else try to shoot you in the face. Abu-Ghraib is a very unfortunate side effect of war.

      Before you say "but but but but" I'll ask you to volunteer for the Military and go see for yourself. Watch a few of your friends die and get hit by a bullet or two. Lets see how you react when you capture someone and they spit in your face and tell you they will hunt down your whole family and kill them. Try helping out someone asking for help and watching them kill a few innocents, and then yell "he did it!".

      Look, I in no way am condoning atrocities from any side. But in a war, when you have your ass on the line 24/7/365 and you watch people die.. Well, lets just say that it becomes very unhealthy. This is why we should avoid war, instead of mongering as we have been for years.

      SB 1860, much better example. NSA, TSA, both other fine examples. Checkpoints on roads and highways, more prime examples. There are countless Occupy people that have been arrested and detained without bail or trial for weeks. Recently the DEA nearly starved a kid in California to death after locking him in a holding cell and forgetting about him. If not for him needing to be hospitalized, we may have never known that happened.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    38. Re:Nothing new here by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      Don't worry. I've picked up a tail on /.

      Might be run-of-the-mill hasbara or one of the various MISO/Psyop members of the Chairforce that are sent to "police" public forums.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    39. Re:Nothing new here by Beeftopia · · Score: 2

      If you're talking about the US, I fail to see where the difference is. The current President of the US authorized the assassination of a US citizen overseas without due process: http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/assassinations_2/ [salon.com] and now he's dead. [1]

      Not without precedent. The American South seceded and the president ordered lots of Americans killed to stop it.

    40. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is also the Abu Omar case:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Omar_case

    41. Re:Nothing new here by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Secret evidence is a common thing in the US court systems. Just Google that, you will see. Are you sure we are not doing everything listed just because most of it does not make media? I mean... awe hell, I won't even start on the media bashing. To easy of a target.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    42. Re:Nothing new here by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What the fuck, indeed. You should read Boumediene's op-ed in the NYT.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/opinion/sunday/my-guantanamo-nightmare.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

      Also, I forgot a bit about Kurnaz

      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/opinion/sunday/notes-from-a-guantanamo-survivor.html

      Despite all this, I looked for ways to feel human. I have always loved animals. I started hiding a piece of bread from my meals and feeding the iguanas that came to the fence. When officials discovered this, I was punished with 30 days in isolation and darkness.

      [...]

      After two and a half years at Guantánamo, in 2004, I was brought before what officials called a Combatant Status Review Tribunal, at which a military officer said I was an “enemy combatant” because a German friend had engaged in a suicide bombing in 2003 — after I was already at Guantánamo. I couldn’t believe my friend had done anything so crazy but, if he had, I didn’t know anything about it.

      A couple of weeks later, I was told I had a visit from a lawyer. They took me to a special cell and in walked an American law professor, Baher Azmy. I didn’t believe he was a real lawyer at first; interrogators often lied to us and tried to trick us. But Mr. Azmy had a note written in Turkish which he had gotten from my mother, and that made me trust him. (My mother found a lawyer in my hometown in Germany who heard that lawyers at the Center for Constitutional Rights represented Guantánamo detainees; the center assigned Mr. Azmy my case.) He did not believe the evidence against me and quickly discovered that my “suicide bomber” friend was, in fact, alive and well in Germany.

      This is the kind of shit you see in movies (movies like Rendition, which was based on Khalid el-Masri's experience). It's almost hard to believe that my government can do this sort of thing to innocent people.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    43. Re:Nothing new here by djlowe · · Score: 1

      Not without precedent. The American South seceded and the president ordered lots of Americans killed to stop it.

      So, what you're saying is that Anwar al-Awlaki seceded from the Union and was assassinated as a result? Do you have any idea how stupid that sounds?

      Regards,

      dj

    44. Re:Nothing new here by djlowe · · Score: 2

      Your link makes a big issue about the assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki being "far from the battlefield". To the Jehadists the "battlefield" is the entire world, especially where Sharia Law is not enforced.

      None of which addresses my point, which was this: An American citizen, simply accused of being a terrorist, was assassinated, without being arrested, without being charged and without any proof of wrong doing at all, so far as we know, other than the US Federal Government saying that he was a "bad person" and so deserved to die.

      So, who's the next "bad person"? You? Me? You and I will never know, will we?

      Regards,

      dj

    45. Re:Nothing new here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the extent of the difference between Bush and Obama. And as the other poster said, it's actually worse. At least Bush was honest about what a piece of shit he was.

    46. Re:Nothing new here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That must be why they got Dick Cheney to be VP for Bush; as bad as Bush was, having Cheney as Pres would have been even worse.

    47. Re:Nothing new here by couchslug · · Score: 2

      "What about the Uighurs? Everyone admits they aren't guilty of any crimes, and yet many are still stuck in Gitmo after nearly a decade."

      Hand them to Beijing.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    48. Re:Nothing new here by uncqual · · Score: 1

      Wait, wasn't Cheney the president?

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    49. Re:Nothing new here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. AFAIK, "martial law" and a state of emergency was declared when the South seceded. When martial law is declared, civil liberties stop, for everyone. That's fairly understandable for a situation where nearly half your country has decided they want to break away and is in open rebellion (let's not get into a discussion about whether it's right or wrong to put down a rebellion that a majority of the population (in the rebelling districts) approve of).

      What we have now is totally different. There's no rebellion, secession, martial law, etc. Just a government that's decided they don't feel like following a rule of law and would rather just assassinate anyone they find inconvenient.

    50. Re:Nothing new here by Beeftopia · · Score: 2

      The United States of America did not accept the secession, so in the eyes of the USA, the Confederate States of America was not a recognized country. See the "Emancipation Proclamation" which the USA issued to free the slaves in the entire USA, which also covered the breakaway southern states. The secession was a contested issue. So the killing of people in the states attempting to secede, in the eyes of the USA, was still the killing of Americans, in an attempt to stop the secession from completing successfully.

    51. Re:Nothing new here by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      What we have now is totally different. There's no rebellion, secession, martial law, etc. Just a government that's decided they don't feel like following a rule of law and would rather just assassinate anyone they find inconvenient.

      If by "inconvenient" you mean they are "enemy combatants attempting to harm or destroy the USA", then I guess that's true. However, my only point is that such individuals have in the past, also been targeted and killed. In large numbers, actually. The Civil War is such an example.

    52. Re:Nothing new here by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Before you say "but but but but" I'll ask you to volunteer for the Military and go see for yourself.

      Couldn't. Gay. Curiously, people who chant "death to america!" are a bit more accepting regarding military service, though it usually ends with a bang.

      Watch a few of your friends die and get hit by a bullet or two.

      I didn't have to serve in the military to see that. I've been shot myself... twice.

      Lets see how you react when you capture someone and they spit in your face and tell you they will hunt down your whole family and kill them.

      I can't say I ever captured someone, but I've had people spit in my face and tell me they will hunt down my whole family and kill them. Again, gay. Also, small town.

      Try helping out someone asking for help and watching them kill a few innocents, and then yell "he did it!".

      Okay, at this point, I have to ask... what the fuck are you getting at? Is your justification here that two wrongs make a right? That it's okay to kill people, as long as it's for the right reasons? Collateral damage? Where are you going with this... or are you just rattling off the many inhumane things human beings are capable of when told by an authority to do them?

      We torture and kill innocent people; and it's not just foreigners, it's our own citizens. Our fear mongering leaders want show trials for their re-election so badly they throw people to the wolves. The FBI is busy manufacturing terrorists just so they can claim credit for taking them down. And you're acting like we shouldn't be ashamed? That we should just accept it? Are you truly that jaded?

      But in a war, when you have your ass on the line 24/7/365 and you watch people die..

      You don't kill others to protect your way of life, only to come home and kill more people who's crime is living that way of life.

      There are countless Occupy people that have been arrested and detained without bail or trial for weeks.

      Yes, I know. I was there. And no bail or trial for a couple weeks is not the same thing as never having a trial, being disappeared, having the government deny your family, friends, or anyone access to you, never seeing a lawyer, permanently. That's what we've legalized in the past few years; and it goes against everything we have sent generations of young men overseas to die for.

      We should be ashamed.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    53. Re:Nothing new here by nocosd · · Score: 1

      How about this? By pledging his allegiance to an enemy of the United State and actively plotting to kill Americans, he effectively renounced his citizenship, thereby losing his right to the due process reserved for citizens under the Constitution. This wasn't some random person that didn't like the US that was killed. He was openly and actively working with our enemy to kill us. I'd much prefer that someone like him is killed while still planing attacks than waiting for definitive proof of an attack, i.e., the attack actually taking place.

    54. Re:Nothing new here by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, I know, right?

      It's not like there was a law passed that allowed the executive to hold prisoners indefinitely. (NDAA)

      It's not like there were multiple inmates from Gitmo who have Supreme Court rulings bearing their name. (Hamdi, Hamdan, and Boumediene)

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    55. Re:Nothing new here by shentino · · Score: 1

      Seems rather one sided if you can't even use that evidence to sue the government.

    56. Re:Nothing new here by X.25 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how long it would be before some sheltered fool claimed America was just as bad.

      I am pretty sure some Gitmo (ex-)residents would like to talk to you.

      Especially those that were released after being imprisoned (and pretty much tortured), then released because of lack of evidence.

      I presume you are also the type that cheers when Iranian scientists get murdered.

    57. Re:Nothing new here by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows exactly why the are being held. David Hicks demonstrated exactly what they need to do. False confession, plead guilty, one year token detention in the US or their own country and no absolutely no civil suit against the US for false imprisonment and torture. Until they agree to those terms they will remain in GITMO this brought to you by The Shrub, Uncle Tom and soon The Vulture. You can bit Mitt Romney will keep it going once he takes office.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    58. Re:Nothing new here by will_die · · Score: 1

      "There are countless Occupy people that have been arrested and detained without bail or trial for weeks. "
      Please give some examples of theses countless people detained for weeks. Tried looking them up and it is just leads to lie sites lead by occupy with no backing up of the truth. When asked to prove it they cannot, instead you get they keep it just keeps getting repeated like it is the truth.

    59. Re:Nothing new here by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Might be run-of-the-mill hasbara or one of the various MISO/Psyop members of the Chairforce that are sent to "police" public forums.

      I have absolutely no idea what that sentence means, but it sounds terribly exciting in a cyberpunk kind of way.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    60. Re:Nothing new here by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Last I checked, Bosnia was an independent sovereign country

      So were Iraq and Afghanistan until the US invaded them. So in theory are Pakistan and the Yemen.

      The US recognises three types of country: itself, other big countries it has to respect in order to avoid starting WW3, and everyone else, including alleged allies, which it treats in the same way that Medieval kings treated their serfs.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    61. Re:Nothing new here by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      He was accused because he's guilty.

      And how many prisoners at Gitmo are guilty because they were accused? Guess we'll never know, huh?

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    62. Re:Nothing new here by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      The American South seceded and the president ordered lots of Americans killed to stop it.

      No, he didn't. President Lincoln only authorized force after the Confederates attacked Fort Sumter.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    63. Re:Nothing new here by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Hey that's not a bad way to go.

      Well, no, not if you're dying of terminal cancer and only have days to live, I suppose. Otherwise, the best way to go is quietly, in your own bed, not with your brains sprayed over your wife in fucking Texas.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    64. Re:Nothing new here by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      None. The ones you're thinking of are filled with prisoners who received military trials.

      Furthermore, they're not American citizens. The Iranian government does this to its own citizens. For it to be in any way analogous the US would have to be doing this to its own citizens. We're not. At the worst, you may criticize the way we treat non-citizens who were captured on the battlefield actively waging war against us. But this is just a completely different ballgame.

      You're supposed to treat POWs as well as your own people, your ignorant piece of dog shit. But of course, your government has handily decided they're neither POWs nor civilians, so they can do what they want iwth them.

      Anyway, why do you think that the sort of people who can torture someone for months at a time will be concerned about doing the same to someone they consider the enemy too, regardless whether they are a citizen or not? What about the US citizen they droned to death in the Yemen? Again, do you think there is something magically protective towards American citizens about American soil?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    65. Re:Nothing new here by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      How about this? By pledging his allegiance to an enemy of the United State and actively plotting to kill Americans, he effectively renounced his citizenship, thereby losing his right to the due process reserved for citizens under the Constitution. This wasn't some random person that didn't like the US that was killed. He was openly and actively working with our enemy to kill us. I'd much prefer that someone like him is killed while still planing attacks than waiting for definitive proof of an attack, i.e., the attack actually taking place.

      Well, that makes a change from the normal bleating on about how sacred freedom of speech is in the US, and how important due process and the rights of the individual are.

      I suppose it's different when it's a brown-skinned guy with a funny name, rather than your dorky college roommate downloading the Avengers.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    66. Re:Nothing new here by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      The difference is that they have to convince a neutral third party that they cannot threaten or hurt to do this.

    67. Re:Nothing new here by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      No.

      It doesn't involve cars or programming languages.

      Obama is like php where Bush is like c++, would be a better one.

    68. Re:Nothing new here by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Actually we will know. At the very latest in 75 years. Probably sooner.

    69. Re:Nothing new here by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how long it would be before some sheltered fool claimed America was just as bad.

      No, saying that because neither A nor B are perfect, therefore they are the same, is fallacious.

      However, so is saying that because A is not as bad as B, therefore A is good.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    70. Re:Nothing new here by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Well, that makes a change from the normal bleating on about how sacred freedom of speech is in the US, and how important due process and the rights of the individual are.

      No it isn't. "Pledging allegiance and actively plotting to kill Americans" does that sound like speech ?

      (for those who don't know, it's only speech if you DO NOT intend to carry out those acts described, or have them carried out, or even if you just have a vague intention of having someone somewhere do that. The difference is quite simple. If a union leader were to publish in a paper "It would be good if someone murder such-and-such's family before the final meeting on friday" that would be extremely illegal, and may results in decades of imprisonment, yet if a journalist on the other coast wrote the exact same thing it would be constitutionally protected speech (it would still be skirting the edges, but you get the difference, right ?))

    71. Re:Nothing new here by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Okay, at this point, I have to ask... what the fuck are you getting at?

      Pretty much what I started and ended with. Using war time examples to show that the US is "bad" is not the way to do so. War is bad, it's ugly and horrible. You obviously get the hate factor since it sounds like you have been a victim. Saying the US is bad because [insert anything from a war] does not get the point across, and becomes very debatable because, well, it's a war.

      Yes, I know. I was there. And no bail or trial for a couple weeks is not the same thing as never having a trial, being disappeared, having the government deny your family, friends, or anyone access to you, never seeing a lawyer, permanently. That's what we've legalized in the past few years; and it goes against everything we have sent generations of young men overseas to die for.

      Exactly! Pretty much sums up what I stated. The laws being passed that clearly violate the constitution are what we should be discussing if we talk about the US being "bad". Also, because you don't hear about people being detained without trial from Occupy does not mean it's not happening. Hell, because I am vocal here, on Facebook, on G+, etc.. I told all my friends and family "If I vanish start asking questions." for just that reason.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    72. Re:Nothing new here by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Hell, because I am vocal here, on Facebook, on G+, etc.. I told all my friends and family "If I vanish start asking questions." for just that reason.

      I doubt you have anything to worry about, but the fact that people who are intelligent and trying to turn the tide of unending stupidity back are afraid they may be killed or imprisoned for expressing opinions contrary to the popular ones is a rather telling sign of just how far down the rabbit hole we are.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    73. Re:Nothing new here by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Using war time examples to show that the US is "bad" is not the way to do so. War is bad, it's ugly and horrible. You obviously get the hate factor since it sounds like you have been a victim. Saying the US is bad because [insert anything from a war] does not get the point across, and becomes very debatable because, well, it's a war.

      While wartime sounds like a reasonable justification, it loses its appeal a bit when we are ALWAYS at war and the battlefield is EVERYWHERE. If we are going to excuse bad behavior b/c it's "wartime", we need to be a lot clearer on when and where we are at war. And hold our leaders accountable for their warmongering.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    74. Re:Nothing new here by couchslug · · Score: 1

      To the modern West, law is a suicide pact. If we can't win and be Politically Correct, we should die.

      China, having been around MUCH longer than Stupid White Men, takes the historic Chinese view of enemies and doesn't fuck around.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    75. Re:Nothing new here by treethought · · Score: 1

      Personally, I was surprised that the article turned out to be about the Iranian system of justice instead of the affront to the Constitution that passes for a legal system here in the U.S after 2001.

    76. Re:Nothing new here by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Who are these citizens that are locked up indefinitely?

      He could tell you, but then he'd have to kill you.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    77. Re:Nothing new here by shiftless · · Score: 1

      See the "Emancipation Proclamation" which the USA issued to free the slaves in [part of the] USA, i.e. only the breakaway southern states

      FTFY

    78. Re:Nothing new here by shiftless · · Score: 1

      What about his completely innocent 16 year old son, who was also assassinated in a separate attack? Does this "reasoning" you've dreamt up apply to him as well?

    79. Re:Nothing new here by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Quite an interesting definition of "destroy the USA" you've just pulled out of your ass there

    80. Re:Nothing new here by shiftless · · Score: 1

      It isn't semantics, you dumb shit. Which is worse: An outlaw capturing and torturing people? Or the king doing it? One you can escape from, or band together and defeat. The other one is a fucking shitload harder to hide from.

    81. Re:Nothing new here by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Before you say "but but but but" I'll ask you to volunteer for the Military and go see for yourself. Watch a few of your friends die and get hit by a bullet or two.

      Been there. Done that. Got the blood spattered T-shirt. Killed a few as well, including two innocent farmers in an old farm truck, and a 16 year girl who lost her arm and one eye and was maimed for life, all in an attempt to "get back" at those fuckers who were shooting at us.

      Lets see how you react when you capture someone and they spit in your face and tell you they will hunt down your whole family and kill them. Try helping out someone asking for help and watching them kill a few innocents, and then yell "he did it!".

      Logic clearly isn't your strong suit, so let me be clear here to you, and anyone else who is thinking such a ridiculous thing:

      IF WE WEREN'T IN THEIR FUCKING COUNTRY TO BEGIN WITH, BLOWING UP THEIR SHIT AND KILLING THEIR FRIENDS AND FAMILY......NONE OF THIS WOULD EVER OCCUR (YOUR BUDDY DYING, ETC)......NOW WOULD IT??

      How dare you fucking think that YOU have any right to get outraged about a GODDAMN THING when it's YOU who is in THEIR country fucking it up and blowing holes in every goddamn body?

      The fucking arrogance of Americans, and their just plain inability to think astounds me! (And I AM one!)

      ARE YOU SERIOUSLY THIS STUPID??

    82. Re:Nothing new here by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Another power that can be abused, will be abused, and sooner than you think.

    83. Re:Nothing new here by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Let's try this again: any power than can be abused......WILL be abused......and sooner than you think.

    84. Re:Nothing new here by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Your assertion is stupid because "Europe" isn't a singular political or legal entity, nor is there anything special about the U.S. legal system which makes our system inherently legal. No, all so-called "civilized" nations do the exact same corrupt things to their citizens, in the name of various causes, in the same pattern that has played out endlessly for millenia of human civilization.

  2. Is Iran crazy? by crazyjj · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    He's the last nuclear physicist in the country that Mossad hasn't killed, and they're sending him to prison?!?

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Is Iran crazy? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Laser physicist. Not a lot of use in making nuclear weapons. If they'd arrested an actual nuclear physicist, I'd consider it plausible they have a secret lab where enslaved scientists are forced to work on weapons research. But I imagine the TSA is already watching for any American nuclear physicists who might wish to go to Iran and is ready to have them turned back at the airport.

    2. Re:Is Iran crazy? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, he had a life outside iran too and that he wasn't dead is clear evidence that he must be working with mossad.

      maybe mossad should target the mock trial judges though? or the iranian resistance should(it exists.. they carry out the bike bombings etc inside iran).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Is Iran crazy? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they next imprison a biologist specializing in cold blooded, carnivorous sea fauna, we know what's going on!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Is Iran crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Go ask a nuclear physicist (I am actually one) if lasers have an application in some of the more difficult to solve problems in making nuclear weapons. You may be surprised by the answer.

    5. Re:Is Iran crazy? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The TSA is too stupid to catch any nuclear physicists on their way to Iran or anywhere else.

    6. Re:Is Iran crazy? by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

      Maybe thats the only way they can protect him from Mossad under tight security. Who knows what happens behind the walls of the prison.

      --
      -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    7. Re:Is Iran crazy? by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Laser-induced fusion...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    8. Re:Is Iran crazy? by Genda · · Score: 1

      No He's a Laser Physicist... Iran wants to build a "Star Wars Defense System"!

      So if you check out the "Human Rights Watch" you'll find that Iran is a stinking cesspool in the area of human rights and you simply can't be surprised at how unfair or nasty they are and on how little provocation they will burn you down and pee on the ashes. If you are LGBT or friendly to such, an "Intellectual or Social Scientist", an unhappy student, protester of any type, woman, child, religious/racial/or social minority, you best get ready to enjoy the hospitality of "Club Tehran" where they use real clubs and the only thing easier than the living is the dying.

    9. Re:Is Iran crazy? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Considered. But no use for weapons (Equipment a few orders of magnitude too big), and much better-funded efforts than Iran can hope for have yet to make it work net-positive.

    10. Re:Is Iran crazy? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Laser physicist. Not a lot of use in making nuclear weapons.

      You should read up on the Laser uranium enrichment program announced by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

    11. Re:Is Iran crazy? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There is another possibility: Lasers have potential military applications themselves. Point defence. Maybe Iran wants to try reviving the US Star Wars laser counter-missile idea.

  3. Online Petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh shit. A fucking online petition. Those Iranian guys a really wishing that they hadn't fucked with that grad student.

    1. Re:Online Petition by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Hey, they're also totally going to hold a sit-in and bake sale as soon as the Fall semester starts.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    2. Re:Online Petition by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon, every time we have a serious discussion someone has to come out and ridicule it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Online Petition by busyqth · · Score: 1

      Didn't I see on the news today that Iran just hanged a student accused of working for Israel? The online petition idea didn't work out for that guy, so I doubt it will do much for this guy either.

    4. Re:Online Petition by jonadab · · Score: 2

      Indeed. I have some difficulty imagining that an online petition signed by a bunch of physics students and professors -- most of whom are foreigners -- could convince an elected, first-world government to take (or not take) any particular action. The idea that it might matter to the government of Iran is patently absurd.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    5. Re:Online Petition by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      Good source of potential emails for spammers though, huh?

      "Greetings ; I noticed that you care about the rights of fellow men. Good for you. My husband, Dr Nodal Momorani was imprisoned and killed, and I am trying to distribute his $30 million ...." etc etc..

      No disrespect to the student.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:Online Petition by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Yet that is the whole premise of modern 'protests'. Sign a meaningless petition. "Like" a meaningless blurb or post a meaningless forward on Facebook. Send an "outraged" tweet or two. Get the bumper sticker. Get the T-shirt... Go on with your life in the sure and smug knowledge that you've made a difference.

      Oh, and don't forget - declare victory quickly before the next meme comes along.

  4. No evidence at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm glad I live in the US, where the kangaroo courts NEVER forget their kangaroos (freshly extradited from Australia)

  5. Puts things in perspective by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    It DOES put things into perspective, especially for people who like to complain about teh evil government in America taking away their rights, when there are governments which REALLY abuse their own people.

    We have a LONG way to go before the West descends into such a farce. Or at least I hope so -- the evangelical dominionists don't have anything in their ideology remotely like what they have in Iran, where they can call you "mohareb" and just kill you.

    1. Re:Puts things in perspective by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      the evangelical dominionists don't have anything in their ideology remotely like what they have in Iran, where they can call you "mohareb" and just kill you.

      Well, extreme right wing would normally call you "traitor", with the same connotations. They'd probably execute people for it, too - if their blogs and such are anything to go by - it's just that they're not in power (yet?).

    2. Re:Puts things in perspective by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We have a LONG way to go before the West descends into such a farce.

      Not as long as Cannabis is illegal. If the US can maintain the illusion that Cannabis(which is less harmful than most OTC drugs) is so dangerous that we have to lock people in cages for multiple decades just for growing it, what can't they do?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Puts things in perspective by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      If I were forced to choose (heaven forbid), then I think I'd take my chance with the secularists.

      You can at least reason with people who don't take orders from invisible friends.

    4. Re:Puts things in perspective by busyqth · · Score: 1

      If I were forced to choose (heaven forbid), then I think I'd take my chance with the secularists.
      You can at least reason with people who don't take orders from invisible friends.

      You think so? I wonder how many of the middle-class farmers in Russia thought the same way you did.
      They probably tried reasoning with the secularists right up til the time the bullet passed between their eyes.

    5. Re:Puts things in perspective by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      It DOES put things into perspective, especially for people who like to complain about teh evil government in America taking away their rights, when there are governments which REALLY abuse their own people.

      "Things could be worse" doesn't translate into "things are good."

      And this should serve as a warning for what happens when you allow governments to run rampant.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    6. Re:Puts things in perspective by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Or at least I hope so -- the evangelical dominionists don't have anything in their ideology remotely like what they have in Iran, where they can call you "mohareb" and just kill you."

      They just don't have the POWER, yet. They are all "Fred Phelps" under the skin. Why do you think there are so FEW counter-protests when WBC show up to picket?

      Let's see those fucking hypocrites drag their inbred polyester-clad arses out and SPEAK UP when someone professing to be "Christian" spouts "God Hates Fags" at the funeral of one of the troops they supposedly support.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    7. Re:Puts things in perspective by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Peace through superior flower power.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  6. This says it all. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 2

    He has consistently denied the charges, and refused to speak at his trial, where no evidence against him was presented.

    You're guilty because we say so.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:This says it all. by Blindman · · Score: 2

      At least you can't accuse them of fabricating evidence.

      --
      I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
    2. Re:This says it all. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about legal practice in Iran, maybe that's how it is? You're accused, your prosecutor thinks you did it and if you don't defend yourself, it means you agree?

      Not as implausible as it may sound, I mean, it's something similar here in civil court. You don't show up, you're losing by default.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:This says it all. by butchersong · · Score: 1

      In Iran what we normally think of as evidence has little to do with it typically. They seem to rely much more heavily on confessions than evidence in trial and pretty much everyone in Iran knows the confessions they get are a joke. Basically you are imprisoned, tormented until you confess and they tell you exactly what to confess and who else to implicate. They then broadcast these confessions and the average Iranian rolls their eyes because they know they are a joke but there's nothing anyone can do.

    4. Re:This says it all. by Blindman · · Score: 1

      Even in the face of no opposition, a Plaintiff doesn't automatically win. The Plaintiff still has the burden of proving entitlement to a favorable judgment. Unlike a forfeit in sports, you still have to play the game in Court.

      --
      I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
  7. Not Quite "His" Trial by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    and refused to speak at his trial

    From the Nature article

    Judge Abolghasem Salavati of Branch 15 of Tehran's Revolution Court — who is famous for his harsh sentences — tried 10 to 15 people in the same trial, under the collective charge of collaborating with Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad.

    Hardly "his" trial now, wasn't it? From the sound of it, it was just 10-15 students they all accused of the same thing with some of them (like Sina Zahiri) confessing in order to reduce their sentences. Of course, Zahiri's accusation is contact with Mojahedin-e Khalgh Organization (completely unrelated to the Mossad). So now that Zahiri has confessed, Iran has "evidence" that they can now use to justify counter attacks or assassinations or arrests or whatever.

    I'm sure in Kokabee's case, he'd have a lighter sentence if he just said that Israel is doing all the stuff of which they accuse him. Because then Iran has evidence to start some international shit (by the way, I am by no means claiming Israel has no such operations inside Iran).

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Not Quite "His" Trial by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      (by the way, I am by no means claiming Israel has no such operations inside Iran).

      Count on it. Unfortunately for these students, Iran won't be able to find any of them. Every military facility they have is heavily surveilled, documented, and they have US intelligence resources assisting them with satellite time, technology, and financial resources, amongst other things. Iran is desperate to plug that hole, but frankly they're heavily outmatched and being sanctioned and sabotaged every step of the way. Their only real option is to try to win in the court of public opinion: And traditionally, that's done with show trials and confessions, Soviet style. (They aren't the first, or the last, just the most well-known).

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:Not Quite "His" Trial by schlachter · · Score: 1

      It's more likely he gets 10 yrs for not agreeing to work on Iran's nuke program when asked...and for asking to return to the US to finish his studies. Thus he must be a spy.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    3. Re:Not Quite "His" Trial by chrb · · Score: 1

      From the sound of it, it was just 10-15 students they all accused of the same thing

      I haven't seen a report saying that they are students. But, regardless, how do we actually know they are innocent? There have been numerous targeted bombings and assassinations of Iranian scientists and academics. Some organised "terrorist" group has murdered these people, and others have supplied that group with information, weapons, money, safehouses etc. If this were happening in the U.S. - if American scientists and academics were being murdered by a foreign terrorist group - then Americans would be demanding justice, including assasinations and detention without trial. Maybe this man is innocent, but this dirty war is not. There are spies operating in Iran, and they will obviously claim that they are innocent if they get caught.

      Zahiri's accusation is contact with Mojahedin-e Khalgh Organization (completely unrelated to the Mossad).

      Mossad Caught Running MEK Assassinations of Iranian Scientists
      Mossad hit-squads behind Iran scientists' murders - US official
      Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran's nuclear scientists, U.S. officials tell NBC News

      It doesn't help the "we're innocent" argument when U.S. officials have openly called for MEK to not be classified as a terrorist group, and the U.S. military has allegedly provided MEK with material assistance and special forces training.

  8. So was he spying? by doston · · Score: 1

    Personally, I wouldn't be real surprised. Realize that Israel does actively spy, and even spies on the US. http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFTRE78645B20110907 The US actively watches for Israeli spies. I'm not sure why the rush to assume the guy's innocent. Even tyrannical dictators usually have their reasons. I doubt the arrest was terribly politically expedient and I don't know that the guy has anything Iran needs. The evidence may not be presented the way we're accustomed to in the US and the sentence might be harsh, but that doesn't mean the guy is totally clean, either. And personally, I don't trust Israel any more than I trust Iran. Both ridiculously crooked governments with crazy right-wing dictators.

    1. Re:So was he spying? by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Well, at least Mossad is getting smarter than trying to send 3 jewish students into Iran with a bunch of surveillance equipment, trying to claim they're on a fucking Iraqi hiking trip.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    2. Re:So was he spying? by doston · · Score: 1

      Well, at least Mossad is getting smarter than trying to send 3 jewish students into Iran with a bunch of surveillance equipment, trying to claim they're on a fucking Iraqi hiking trip.

      That's the fucking Iraqi hiking trip I was trying to remember! Yeah, those people were obviously guilty, even from the western slanted news stories. I'm not as sure about this student, but I'd be willing to bet he was spying for Israel. If I had to bet, I'd be he was spying. On the hikers, I would have willingly bet everything I own that they were spying.

    3. Re:So was he spying? by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      You think they would have at least given them a decent cover story. Three arabic-speaking jews go from Syria to Iraq, via Israel. Their relatives are all closely tied to Israel. They show up on the Iranian border with spy gear, claiming they were going on a "nature hike" in one of the most dangerous countries in the world.

      Jesus, they may as well have been wearing "I'm a spy!" t-shirts. Pretty fucking cruel of Mossad to even allow that.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  9. You can't go home by Quila · · Score: 1

    I know several Iranians, and none of them have been home in 30 years. They're not stupid enough to get caught up in the political tug of war between the US and Iran.

    1. Re:You can't go home by Sun · · Score: 1

      I thought people would think so too. Apparently, not everyone does.

      A co-worker's brother thought otherwise. He, and a couple of friends, flew to Turkey, stepped into the Iranian embassy and asked to get issued a passport. They gave their current residence (Israel). They then flew to Iran and visited family for several days (not sure how long exactly), and came back quite safely. My co-worker did not think this too weird or dangerous. They were interviewed on at least one radio station here about it, so, obviously, most people do.

      Apparently, things are never as clear cut or simple as people tend to make of them.

      Shachar

  10. And if you want to drive them out of power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You'll support the Solar Tower project, and ban exports of oil and other fossil fuels.

    Then so what? They won't be important to anybody, and they can pound sand if they like.

    At least until some super-technological aliens arrive.

    But that's decades away!

  11. Re:Iran is dooming themselves by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    I imagine his "prison" will be a research facility. He was nabbed before he managed to complete his studies, get a job in the US or some other Western country and never returned.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  12. Re:I feel for the student, but... by busyqth · · Score: 2

    90% of the inmates at Gitmo were innocent as well, and they didn't even get a show trial.

    No, they got free board and lodging in a tropical paradise instead of scrounging for food in a war-torn desert.

  13. Queue "But the US..." comment in 3... 2... 1... by Dave+Emami · · Score: 2

    ... nevermind, I'm too late.

    --

    "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    1. Re:Queue "But the US..." comment in 3... 2... 1... by Dave+Emami · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Umm... no. I'm pointing out that when the US gets accused of something bad, the comments are about the US, and when some other country is accused of something bad, the comments are... about the US. There were several privacy or "Your Rights Online" posts dealing specifically with the US within the last week. Did the comments immediately stray into discussion of Iran? No, nor should they have. Same thing goes here. There's a person -- a tech guy, one of our own -- getting stomped on. How about some sympathy for him? Likewise with the discussion of Saeed Malekpour a few months ago: a programmer is at risk of being executed because of source code sharing (something rather dear to the hearts of a lot of people on Slashdot), and a major chunk of the comments are "but in the US etc. etc."

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  14. Re:I feel for the student, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Then why do non-American Slashdotters still criticize the US? By your reasoning, European slashdotters lost the moral high ground centuries ago; Asian and Middle Eastern slashdotters lost the moral high ground millennias ago. Yet finger pointing persists. Perhaps individuals cannot lose the moral high ground by what their governments have done, and opinions like yours are worthless. Or perhaps you are right, and everyone should shut the hell up.

  15. Brain Drain in Iran by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Iran is desperate to plug that hole, but frankly they're heavily outmatched and being sanctioned and sabotaged every step of the way.

    If you're imposing strict social codes with ridiculously harsh laws while trying to compete with super powers, you're going to have a bad time.

    It's true the USSR and US played a big part in turning Iran into the screw up it is today but at some point the people have gotta turn it around if they don't want to end up completely like North Korea. Smart people don't want to live in places where smart people are bothered and executed. Smart people also can't be told where to live -- they're smart and they figure out ways around that.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Brain Drain in Iran by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      but at some point the people have gotta turn it around if they don't want to end up completely like North Korea.

      Turn what around?

    2. Re:Brain Drain in Iran by Lisias · · Score: 1

      Smart people goes away.

      The people that stays are the ones that endup like North Korea, and this is the problem here (IMHO).

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
  16. If you escape, do not return. by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That simple. Iranians (well, except the MEK) aren't dedicated enough for a protracted violent struggle, so their government will remain as it is.

    The Viet Minh and later Viet Cong were willing to die, by the hundreds of thousands, to take power in their country. The Taliban have demonstrated the same will to fight over decades.

    Either be willing to fight as a revolutionary or get the fuck out before Serious People eat you. The Mullonazis are Serious People. If you aren't willing to slaughter them, you don't really oppose them.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:If you escape, do not return. by Dan667 · · Score: 2

      if you act the same as your enemies you are no better than they are.

    2. Re:If you escape, do not return. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      So you renounce all war and revolution which involves violence? Good luck with that.

      Pacifism wouldn't have freed the US from Britain, freed the slaves in the US Civil War, freed Europe from Hitler, or freed much of Asia from Hirohitos minions.

      Also, it is better to be victor than vanquished. Not conforming to some arbitrary moral standard has no inherent cost. Being on the LOSING SIDE of a violent conflict demonstrably does.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:If you escape, do not return. by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

      if you act the same as your enemies you are no better than they are.

      Sometimes there is no "better", only dead or alive.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    4. Re:If you escape, do not return. by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      you are completely discounting due process. Who decides who gets killed? That is why you cannot just randomly kill the "bad" people like they do.

    5. Re:If you escape, do not return. by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      there is always due process. And it is better.

    6. Re:If you escape, do not return. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      We're talking about struggling against a system that lacks due process. Sometimes it is necessary to fight as dirty (or dirtier than) the established forces if you want to accomplish your goal.

      If the U.S. government likes you while you do it, you're a Freedom Fighter. If they don't, you're a Terrorist.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  17. Re:I feel for the student, but... by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Morality is absolute, not relative. Either be perfect or kill yourself.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  18. Re:I feel for the student, but... by fa2k · · Score: 1

    It's good that citizens complain about injustice and evil abroad, even though their own government is also injust and commits evil actions. Sure, US as a country doesn't have the moral high ground by more than a few inches, but it's better than to shut up.

  19. Not a lot of sympathy by petsounds · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's difficult to glean from the articles, but it seems Kokabee is not an American citizen, but an Iranian citizen who was attending an American graduate school. The act of going to an American school was the first risky move, both to his own safety but that of his family. The Iranian government knew he was attending an American school and simply waited for the appropriate time to use him as a pawn. Did he really think he was going to be able to associate himself with America and not end up being used for propaganda purposes by the Iranian government? He's a young kid so maybe he didn't think about it, but his parents should have.

    I do sympathize that he felt he had to risk everything in order to get a good education in the field of his choice, but he put himself in a very risky position.

    1. Re:Not a lot of sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google "Iranian students in America", and you'll swiftly learn there are in the region of 4000 of them. These are people who have bet their own and their families' welfare on the proposition that merely "studying in America" won't get them into trouble back home.

      Most of them are almost certainly right.

      I don't know whether this guy is guilty or not, but I certainly wouldn't rule out the possibility. He hasn't had a fair trial, but people accused of espionage seldom do.

  20. Re:Made-up charges to prove....? by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    It was 15 people, not 1 person.

  21. Always happens quick by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are a lot of very narcissistic people on Slashdot and any discussion that isn't about America they seem to need to find a way to redirect it to the US as soon as they can. I can never be a discussion about civil rights in another nation, they have to try and steer the debate right back around to America so they can do more whining and make more things about themselves.

    It is extremely annoying, and precisely as expected for this site.

    1. Re:Always happens quick by chrb · · Score: 1

      1) There are a lot of U.S. citizens on Slashdot, so it is hardly surprising that those people are going to discuss stories from a U.S. perspective, making it sometimes U.S. centric.

      2) I think that, rather than being narcissistic, this is simply a case of "People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones." When your elected representatives, and certain media elements, endorse assassination without trial, imprisonment without trial, and torture without trial, then they lose the moral authority to criticise others.

    2. Re:Always happens quick by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It sounds like the trial-less imprisonment here in the US. He's a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve a (fair) trial.

      It sounds like the trial-less imprisonment here in Russia. He's a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve a (fair) trial.

      It sounds like the trial-less imprisonment here in China. He's a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve a (fair) trial.

      It sounds like the trial-less imprisonment here in the DRC. He's a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve a (fair) trial.

      It sounds like the trial-less imprisonment here in Indonesia. He's a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve a (fair) trial.

      It sounds like the trial-less imprisonment here in Syria. He's a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve a (fair) trial.

      It sounds like the trial-less imprisonment here in North Korea. He's a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve a (fair) trial.

      Is that more to your liking? If so, I agree. The US isn't the only state that is in flagrant breach of basic human rights. It isn't even the only democracy who the world media pretends is a good guy that is in flagrant breach of basic human rights. Most of the users on this site are from there though, you can't blame people for caring more about local news. US people: don't worry your country is not the only one who is responsible for unconscionable acts of cruelty, aggression and injustice. Everyone else: don't forget to point out the crimes of all nations, the US is just one. In a way you could say that as colonists the UK are actually responsible for everything the US has done, but that would be stupid, the UK has more than enough crimes to answer for.

    3. Re:Always happens quick by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      If the U.S. is going to be a beacon for democracy to the world, as it seems to see itself, then it must always be subjected to the same scrutiny that it would apply to others. If you want to be a hero, people expect you to behave like one.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    4. Re:Always happens quick by shiftless · · Score: 1

      What an ignorant comment. Let's see:

      #1 WE'RE ALL FROM THE UNITED STATES, STUPID ASS. SURPRISE, SURPRISE!

      #2 HOW THE FUCK ARE WE SUPPOSED TO KNOW (OR CARE) WHAT GOES ON IN YOUR LITTLE SOCIALIST SHITHOLES, OCEANS AWAY FROM US?

      #3 FUCK YOU AND YOUR MOM

      I guess that about covers it..

    5. Re:Always happens quick by shiftless · · Score: 1

      ^ Starting with you, asshole

  22. There's the big difference by Quila · · Score: 1

    In the West, the religious fanatics are not in power. The extreme ones who would kill you for blasphemy, apostasy or homosexuality are laughed at or scorned by the rest of the nation. It is not a reasonable expectation that these people will attain enough power to impose their will any time in the near future.

    In the Muslim world, it's quite often those extreme religious fanatics who are in charge. Iran executed a man for being homosexual not long ago. Salman Rushdie still has a price on his head because he offended Muslim sensibilities. I believe most Muslim states still execute apostates, and Iran has several under sentence of death right now.

    1. Re:There's the big difference by Quila · · Score: 1

      At least now that GWBush and Tony Blair are out of office.

      There is no comparison. The reliigious fanatics haven't been in power in the West for hundreds of years.

  23. and your point is? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Narcissism is in genaral about one self, not about the USA, so what does narcissism have to do with it? Also, how bad is it to compare something that happens in one country that is viewed as "evil" by the majority of people on this site to something that happens in another country that is in fact home to a very large part of the visitors of this website? Even if just to put something in perspective to what happens "back home" and how evil or non evil the other country, or "home" is when you look at the facts without the propaganda attached to it. Maybe people jump at the opportunity to point out that the USA is not a perfect place and that pointing fingers at "evil" nations while being the pot that calls the kettle black isn't really convincing to smarter folks on this planet. If you don't like that, if you already know that is going to happen, why bother reading the topic, let alone comment on it at all? Offense is taken much more often than that it's given.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  24. If you're in Iran, get out by kawabago · · Score: 1

    If you're not in Iran, stay out. Iran is run by paranoid idiots and no one is safe there.

    1. Re:If you're in Iran, get out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds exactly like the US to me, plenty of paranoid idiots in charge there too!

      You know all those Occupy Wall Street folks that were camped out all last summer? If they'd tried to hold their protests in Iran, it would have been the last anybody ever heard from them.

      You idiots keep taking a few incidents (which are loudly decried by much of the population) in one country, and trying to compare them to a widespread series of systematic abuses in another. I really do hope you people are just trolling or schilling, because if you actually believe the legal situation in Iran is at all similar to that of the US (or most other countries for that matter) then you have some serious mental delusions.

    2. Re:If you're in Iran, get out by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      If you think its not you are deluded. Patriot act DHS, TSA, all known for their democratic behavior. Assassinating even US citizens without trial. Get your head out of the sand moron.

  25. Re:I feel for the student, but... by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

    Free board? Like the board that they were beaten with?

    Free lodging? Like being hung by your wrists for days?

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  26. Re:I feel for the student, but... by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

    All the Europeans/Asians/etc who lost the moral high ground centuries/millenia ago *have died*. I wouldn't hold their descendents hostage to a crime their ancestors committed.

    In contrast, all the Americans who cheered wars and torture *are still alive* (most likely because they were too much of a chicken shit to go fight that war themselves).

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  27. Re:I feel for the student, but... by busyqth · · Score: 1

    Free board? Like the board that they were beaten with?

    I prefer to call it deep tissue massage

    Free lodging? Like being hung by your wrists for days?

    You must be referring to the complimentary chiropractic regimen.

  28. Re:Made-up charges to prove....? by shentino · · Score: 1

    Making an example of him so that others are shown their place by example.

    Rather similiar to putting someone in the village stocks for all to see.

  29. He has my sympathy. by twistofsin · · Score: 1

    The first link I clicked in this post was to the petition in support of him. I figured it was the least I could do.

    Sadly when I clicked 'Sign' it asked me for my Facebook login. I don't use Facebook, but you might as well ask me for the passwords to my email or checking or any other account because you will receive the same refusal. I'm not comfortable with proving my login credentials to a 3rd party website.

    1. Re:He has my sympathy. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      type in your name and email and press sign?

      the facebook login is just extra - so that you can just one click it. and if you used facebook you'd know that you'll be sending your facebook login only to facebook(that's why it makes a popup, which then redirects back to whatever site requested the login), which then forwards the information you agreed to petition online and gives petition online the permissions you agreed to for posting to your fb wall. what the facebook login actually does is just give petition online the permission to read your name and email and pre-fill the form with that. you can just fill them by hand too. so learn your stuff before knee jerking right away.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  30. Re:I feel for the student, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But 90% of the inmates at Gitmo were innocent as well

    Citation needed.

    Seriously, what you did is worse than Gitmo itself. You just blanket-dismissed 90% of the prisoners as innocent without knowing anything about them. At least the people who put them there knew some of the pertinent facts of why they were imprisoning those people. Mostly because they were caught in acts of war against the US.

  31. Re:Not hard to believe. by tehcyder · · Score: 2

    See decades ago when the US was seen as the mega super bastion of freedom, truth, shining knight of armor and whatnot, I told my friend, the US is simply a country like others

    I don't know how old you are, but no one I know (in the UK) has thought of the US in those terms since 1945.

    I suppose members of the old Soviet Bloc had a romanticised view of the US until the 1990s though.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  32. Re:I feel for the student, but... by will_die · · Score: 1

    No one was legally beaten, you may have a few occurances when some action occured but they were not authorized and people got in trouble and jail time, or hung for days.
    FYI the amount of time they could be forced to sit or stand in uncomfortable positons was based on scientific studies directly authorized by President clinton on USA citizens.

  33. Re:Not hard to believe. by shiftless · · Score: 1

    Don't worry my friend. Brighter days are ahead.

  34. Another "sheltered fool" weighs in by shiftless · · Score: 1

    I've worked all over the world, including many third world countries. My guess is no rational person would consider me as being "sheltered."

    America isn't "just as bad." It's worse, in many ways. Here the corruption is institutionalized to a far greater extent than any third world country could dream possible.

  35. Alas by shiftless · · Score: 1

    If posting could only be more like particle physics... then every time a moron and anti-moron collided their posts would disappear in a little poof of energy.

  36. Re:Iran is dooming themselves by shiftless · · Score: 1

    A civilization (and I use the term loosely) that persecutes and imprisons its best and brightest is doomed.

    I thought you were talking about the U.S. there for a second.

    What, with all the people who are rotten in prison for growing simple herb indoors in an elaborate 100kW hydroponic cultivation facility.

  37. When will they learn by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    If you ever get out of Iran YOU DO NOT GO BACK. People have died for this before. Don't fucking do it.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel