Slashdot Mirror


Jaguar and Land Rover Angle For Production In China

First time accepted submitter ourlovecanlastforeve writes "Those of you still hanging on to Jaguar and Land Rover as the last vestiges of the truly British automobile in the States may find yourselves grasping at straws as Chery announces a nearly two billion dollar joint effort with the auto brand to move production to Changsu in China." Anyone still hanging on to that idea might also be interested to learn that Jaguar and Land Rover are subsidiaries of India's Tata, maker of the low-priced Nano.

141 comments

  1. Yay it's a lose-lose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    My opinion,this is how it breaks down:

    Jaguar - the name means high maintainence! Or Land Rover, the name means shit fuel economy!

    Really it'll be great.

    1. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you ever driven an American car?
      You get the high maintenance *and* the shit fuel economy - but not only that, you get poor braking and handling, lacklustre performance *and* poor ergonomics and aesthetics!
      Now how's that for a package?

    2. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I've driven American cars. Compared to Japanese and German cars, they suck. Compared to British cars, they're great.

    3. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Think about it. Just like American women. Just like American women.
      As for me, I'll import thank you (without tariff please!).

    4. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...this is how it breaks down...

      I see what you did there.

    5. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      ^^^^^^ needs mod points. Pretty much nothing changes except when you take the car to the dealer for service now there's rice in the engine.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    6. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 0

      Yeaahh.... That probably sounded a lot better inside your head, didn't it? Maybe it should have stayed there.

    7. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      German cars? You mean like the BMW One Series that's oh so popular in the UK but were a common site completely failing to get up anything more than a horizontal plane when the tiniest bit of snow fell with their excuse being "Oh you need snow tyres" whilst the Jaguar and Land Rover drivers just drove on past them with their normal tyres chuckling to themselves?

      Or perhaps they should've gone for lovely Japanese Toyotas, because it's not like Toyota has ever had any recalls or anything.

      I live in a posh neighbourhood, and a lot of people have BMWs. One chap bucks the trend by driving a tiny little Fiat Panda 4x4. last winter a lot of BMWs failed to make it up the hill out of our estate. This guy doesn't even clear his driveway, he just drives out. I felt really glad that he had his day!
      ,br> In winter rear wheel drive really sucks.

    8. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top 10 Reasons My Land Rover Discovery Sucks

          http://www.angelfire.com/mn/landroversucks/

    9. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely baseless and massively general... Way to go.

    10. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by zlives · · Score: 1

      they should invest in audi's

    11. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I guess if you can't work out how high your vehicle is, how a doorlock works, or how to change gear then you're going to run into some sort of problems...

    12. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Are you stupid, or just plain stupid?

      Ide rather buy an american car than something like a vw or beemer these days. Those are for lease only, as they WILL break.

      And toyota/honda.....woops just feel asleep there.

    13. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you get poor braking and handling, lacklustre performance *and* poor ergonomics and aesthetics!

      I'd say the braking, handling, performance, and aesthetics are pretty acceptable in my Corvette.

    14. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I've driven an American car, in fact I've driven a couple of them. It gets pretty tedious trying to keep up with normal UK motorway traffic with that 6.5 litre engine banging off the rev limiter at 80mph.

    15. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      BMW DOES make AWD vehicles (they are the models that have an X or XI in them). More important then going forward is braking and handling which neither FWD, RWD or AWD has an advantage in low traction... there is no substitute to winter tires. If you actually owned a BMW with 50-50 weight balance and winter tires, you'd realize they are actually really awesome in the snow. The fact your posh neighbours can't make it up the hill is probably more tire choice then anything.

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    16. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      As an early 2000's Land Rover owner myself, I can say I have a love hate relationship with it. I do proper off-roading with it and abuse it royally. The things that fail are all small things and the things that should not fail (such as window regulators, door openers/locks, switches, ABS/Traction control electronics, plastic bits etc.) - The odd thing about that is they seem to be targeting the american users who only want the a luxury vehicle - pushing users to all the things that will fail on it...
      Now it seems now land rover isn't even serious about the off-road aspect, it's all about status and luxury, the thing the landrover cannot deliver.

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    17. Re:Yay it's a lose-lose! by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      Too bad your Corvette doesn't represent the average American car in almost any aspect...

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  2. epitome of globalization by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 5, Funny

    Owned by Indians, built by Chinese, bought by Americans and marketed as British.

    This must be the epitome of globalization.

    1. Re: epitome of globalization by Barsteward · · Score: 2

      "Designed by the British, Owned by Indians, built by Chinese, bought by Americans and marketed as British." would be the full advertising slogan.

      China is still shit are car design if their version of MG/Rover is anything to go by. Luckily the western version of MG is still being designed in the UK

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    2. Re: epitome of globalization by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They probably had to move manufacturing to China to maintain their lasting record for poor reliability.

    3. Re: epitome of globalization by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jaguar died as a brand in 1987, when Ford took them over. From there, they've largely rested on prior laurels. That said, most pre-1987 Jaguars were a cult. You could tell when one was really dead because it stopped leaking.

      You can still get 50grand on eBay (++) for a 50's xk120/140. But the days of glory are largely gone, as they not only don't hold their value, but never achieved Ford's reliability goals, let alone Tata's.

      The Mini Cooper is an example of a brand redone, but bettered, by BMW. Nominally made in Oxford (some elsewhere), it's an international effort that makes a stellar little ride, if deeply in a niche. Of course it helps to have a couple of popular movies featuring your car's ability to descend stairs and make wicked turns.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re: epitome of globalization by Zubinix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Jaguar are selling more cars now than ever before. In part due to Tata's good management. The brand has been reinvigorated rather than been killed off.

      China is the world's largest car market having recently overtaken the US. So it makes sense to move some production facilities there.

      Give credit where it's due and be thankful that a savvy operator like Tata gave new life to these otherwise dying car brands and stop your old world bias.

    5. Re: epitome of globalization by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China will give you the build quality you ask for. People go to China to build cheaply, so "cheap" is the most important parameter. Then they get all confused when "cheap" (cost) ends up being "cheap" (quality).

      The iPhone had more trouble with poor design (antenna issues) than any build issues. "Cheap" wasn't the primary concern for Apple. Flexibility and capability were higher. I've not seen anything on the Apple Foxconn products that indicate quality issues.

      I've never figured out why the public buys the "china is poor quality" when the products are designed, sourced, sold and supported by Wal-Mart (or whoever) and they suck, so Wal-Mart just says "china" and everyone seems satisfied.

    6. Re: epitome of globalization by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Informative

      They haven't moved it. There are two factories in the UK and they are recruiting heavily right now.

    7. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "The Mini Cooper is an example of a brand redone, but bettered, by BMW."

      Rubbish, The "Mini Cooper" as reimagined by BMW is a fat slug designed for Bavarians and the US market.

      Compared with the Issigonis Mini, its an appaling 21st century lump, with the style and visual appeal of a road accident. Like the current "Fiat 500" its an insult to the vehicle it allegedly draws its inspiration from. Here's a thought for you. I followed a BMW "Mini" yesterday. Between it and me was an original, 44 year old Mini. If the BMW had stopped suddenly, its odds on that the Mini following it could have ended up INSIDE the BMW without any problems. Ok a bit farfetched for a BMW "Cooper", but someone DID fit a Mini bodyshell inside the most bloated BMW "Mini" of all, the Mini Countryman.

      Mini comparison: BMW vs Morris

      It really does make you weep.

    8. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has been marked as a 5 & Funny but it is the truth.

      Over the last year or two, there has been a marked increase of products sold in the UK being rebranded and/or advertised using the Union Jack. I'm not sure if this is due to the Olympics or with the rise of public support for Scottish independence, here north of the border. When you look at most of these items a lot of them aren't manufactured in the UK and the companies are not British. This is highlighted in this article where 91% of the souvenirs for the London Olympics are made in China:

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2096215/Olympic-sell-91-London-2012-souvenirs-abroad-thirds-coming-China.html

      Britishness has become nothing more than a commercial brand.

    9. Re: epitome of globalization by petsounds · · Score: 2

      The MINI Cooper was great while designer Frank Stephenson was at the helm, but once he was lured away to Ferrari the Germans had no idea what to do with the model. They replaced its spunky engine with a boring, flat torque curve Bavarian engine, and made a mess of Stephenson's elegant lines. BMW may have helped revive the brand, but they proceeded to ruin everything good about it.

    10. Re: epitome of globalization by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      They are only moving assembly to China for the Chinease market. Shipping made cars two per container from the UK is not feasible. Everyone in Europe, America, Africa etc will still get the British made cars.

      TFA is fud. The factory near where I live in Birmingham is recruiting like crazy. Soon to open a new engine plant in Wolverhampton too.

      Parts for cars come from all over the world now anyway. Assembly doesn't employ many people compared to R&D, sourcing, etc.

    11. Re: epitome of globalization by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      It only died in the sense they produced something called the X-Type which was a ford mondeo with a Jag badge and skin.

      but under Ford, their build quality and reliability improved so much that Jag/Land Rover now produce cars of quality build and reliability.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    12. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I live around the corner from one of them. They've just spent god-only-knows how many millions re-tooling it for production of the new Evoque. I'd be very surprised if production of that went anywhere else for a while

    13. Re: epitome of globalization by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      China will give you the build quality you ask for. People go to China to build cheaply, so "cheap" is the most important parameter. Then they get all confused when "cheap" (cost) ends up being "cheap" (quality).

      Very true, and this is not just for tech gadgets. Pretty much the entire astronomy industry is currently manufactured in China. Hell I've read Celestron is owned by a Chinese company. Celestron, Meade, Orion pretty much have all their equipment made in China, and to call any of their equipment unreliable or poor could not be further from the truth.

      The problem with working with the Chinese is battling through the bullshit. One of our engineers tried to buy a valve from China one day. When he asked about certification documents, the company replied with something along the lines of, "What certification would you like us to fake for you?" in only slightly less obvious words. I had a similar experience with water filters. I've never seen a TUV certificate use numbers like 100% on anything, yet the certificate applied with this "TUV certified" filter was covered with 100% numbers. Yes it was cheap.

      You get what you pay for. This applies to consumers and to businesses looking for a manufacturing plant, and China can supply both.

    14. Re: epitome of globalization by Cederic · · Score: 2

      JLR are moving head office to Coventry too (from Rugby, so not a major move).

      Tata is Indian, but JLR is a wholly owned subsidiary, and run as a standalone company.

    15. Re: epitome of globalization by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      The Mini Cooper is an example of a brand redone, but bettered, by BMW.

      Yes, but....

      My girlfriend has a late model Mini Cooper S. It still has some weird spots. For example, if someone pulls too hard on the door handle, rather than pulling it twice to unlock then open, it will fuck up the latch assembly. That's not the part at the handle, it's actually at the back of the door. I've had to fix hers twice, when passengers didn't know to pull twice, and broke it.

      The oil filter is non-standard. It's available at parts stores, it's just odd. It's in a horrible position to reach too. Not that it's the worst I've seen. Asian import cars are notoriously worse. At least changing the filter doesn't dump dirt oil on the exhaust.

      A friend has one also She discovered the "death rattle". There's a flaw in the design, somewhere around the timing belt. It'll start to rattle a little, and within a few miles it will fail. The dealer fix for it is to replace the whole engine, due to the damage it does. That's fine if it's under warranty. If it's not, it's a very expensive repair.

      Otherwise, they're cute. They don't move as fast as a performance car, even with the supercharger. The worst problem is, they seem to be invisible. You will get cut off, and people will change lanes into you because they simply don't see you. That's not a design defect, it's just a small car that people assume doesn't move very quickly. My cars look like they're fast, so the opposite is true. People get out of the way, or avoid getting in front of me, even if I have the cruise control set to the speed limit. :)

          On the topic though. Jaguars have a wonderful reputation for being expensive decorations at the mechanic. Don't expect to drive one daily, as it'll spend more than half its life at the shop. From what I understand, it got a little better under Ford, but it will be an awful lot worse when they're 100% Chinese engineering.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    16. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China will give you the build quality you ask for. People go to China to build cheaply, so "cheap" is the most important parameter. Then they get all confused when "cheap" (cost) ends up being "cheap" (quality).

      The iPhone had more trouble with poor design (antenna issues) than any build issues. "Cheap" wasn't the primary concern for Apple. Flexibility and capability were higher. I've not seen anything on the Apple Foxconn products that indicate quality issues.

      I've never figured out why the public buys the "china is poor quality" when the products are designed, sourced, sold and supported by Wal-Mart (or whoever) and they suck, so Wal-Mart just says "china" and everyone seems satisfied.

      The most important factor is that China is the fastest growing car market in the world, so guess where it might actually be worth increasing car production capacity.

    17. Re: epitome of globalization by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Since Ford sold them, they have completely redesigned their entire lineup. The truly bad car - the Ford Mondeo-based X series - is completely gone. They have a brand new mid-range sedan - the XF - which is selling well worldwide, competes head-on with the BMW 5-series, but is $10K less expensive. A lightly modified XF went over 225 MPH at Bonneville, and their cars are being raced in the LeMans series. A totally new sports car is being introduced this summer.

      Yes, this was all done with Tata's credit card - but they've hardly been resting on their laurels.

    18. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work on cars atm, and a mini cooper came to the shop and I had to pull it in. I'm a pretty big guy and I was worried how the hell I'd fit in it. I was surprised to find out there is a damn surprising amount of room in those little vehicles. I didn't even need to move the seat, and the driver was a half a foot shorter than I am.

    19. Re: epitome of globalization by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Nearly all of us are posting from CHINESE computers.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    20. Re: epitome of globalization by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      For your own sake and ours please don't ever cite The Mail, especially if you're talking about "Britishness".

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    21. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Ford sold them, they have completely redesigned their entire lineup. The truly bad car - the Ford Mondeo-based X series - is completely gone. They have a brand new mid-range sedan - the XF - which is selling well worldwide, competes head-on with the BMW 5-series, but is $10K less expensive. A lightly modified XF went over 225 MPH at Bonneville, and their cars are being raced in the LeMans series. A totally new sports car is being introduced this summer.

      Yes, this was all done with Tata's credit card - but they've hardly been resting on their laurels.

      Not completely redesigned. The new XF is still based on the Ford Thunderbird / Lincoln LS platform.

    22. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mail is mostly rubbish but they do occasionally report the facts correctly. A quick google verifies the facts reported by the Mail in this instance of most London 2012 souvenirs are made in China.

    23. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GM couldnt bid - they couldnt meet the minium quality control standards

    24. Re: epitome of globalization by Niedi · · Score: 1

      They'll just produce the cars for the asian market in china, which is nothing special. Or do you really think that e.g. a Volkswagen or a BMW sold in China is actually assembled in Germany?

    25. Re: epitome of globalization by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I own a Mini S. It's not bad. It retains its value, and the prior owner got to sort out the bad stuff. It's odd. It's not a Hillman, it's not quite British, but it can keep up with the very best of them on a slalom run.

      IMHO, the original Sir Wm Lyons Jags had style, and strange internal design. IRS suspension was a wonderment. The 3.8 and 4.2 engines were ill-fitted, but a good one lasted a while.

      Post Ford acquisition, they were butt ugly. Then they increased the warranty, and probably cost Ford billions. They just weren't the same. No verve, no panache. The S-type was a long shot, and the rejuvenated XK-8 can be had on eBay for a song. But you won't sing long.... they break.

      Tata? They know lipstick, but they don't know engineering.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    26. Re: epitome of globalization by Xest · · Score: 1

      "The Mini Cooper is an example of a brand redone, but bettered, by BMW."

      Seriously? I don't know a single Mini owner that hasn't had problem after problem, and had to pay a small fortune each time their car has needed replacement parts, and I know plenty of Mini owners.

      It may not be worse, but it's certainly not a better brand under BMW.

      I'm not sure why there's this view German cars are that great, take a look here for example: BMW, Mini, Audi are right towards the bottom:

      http://www.reliabilityindex.com/manufacturer

      This isn't to say British cars fare any better, but it's pretty clear if you want reliability then these supposedly prestige German brands are far from even being close to the best. Audi, BMW, Mercedes are all fucking shit for reliability.

    27. Re: epitome of globalization by zlives · · Score: 1

      this also has a side effect of protecting copyright/technical data from being made into a cheap copy in china. as the chinese govt is the defacto partner in production.

    28. Re: epitome of globalization by zlives · · Score: 1

      speak for yourself, mine was grown organically and locally...

    29. Re: epitome of globalization by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      I own a Mini S. It's not bad. It retains its value, and the prior owner got to sort out the bad stuff.

      It definitely retains it's value. My girlfriend's is still worth quite a bit. She has the advantage of not driving it much, and it stays in the garage, so it's in great condition. My cars get the driveway, so they get birdshit bombed. :)

      Since it's FWD, it has bad torque steer. My performance car is a slightly modified '00 TransAm WS/6, that I've been driving for 10 years, and have drive over 100,000 miles. That gives me a different frame of reference, since I don't "drive" it, it just does what I want it to. :)

      There's one place in particular that the torque steer jumps out and says "LOOK AT ME!". We live near a highway, where the speed limit is 45mph, but everyone drives that part of the road at 65mph. For your own safety, you have to get onto it and get up to speed quickly, or wait for quite a while for a large gap in traffic.

        In her Mini, the torque steer jerks me around a little.

        In my Firebird, it just goes. If the road is wet or there's loose debris on the road, the rear of my car will slide sideways a little. I don't mind the rear sliding, as it's easy to correct for. You just always point the front wheels where you want to go, and let up a little on the throttle and it instantly goes straight.

      The mini's suspension was surprising. As you said, it's great for a slalom. Both cars have excellent suspensions, but hers is so narrow with such a short wheel base, it does well. The Firebird is longer and wider, so it takes a little more skill. I've had them out autocross racing, so the difference is noticeable. On bits where I can go fast, the Firebird is the winner. Very tight turns and narrow spots on the course, the Mini wins.

      We have a SUV also, with taller tires, and a softer suspension. It makes for a very comfortable ride, but in a situation that requires handling over armor, either car is preferred. Going from the mini to the SUV, it feels like your driving an APC. I like to joke that I could pick up her car and put it in the back of the SUV. :) The SUV is a necessary evil though. It's hard to carry large packages or luggage for 4 people in either car.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    30. Re: epitome of globalization by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Now you know at least one Mini owner that's not mad.

      The Mini is only owned by BMW as a brand. Most are made in Oxford, of French, German, even US parts. The profit originally went to BMW. The rest went to the local dealer, and it's British only in the majority of its assembly labor.

      Most Mini owners I know, in the US where I live, have mostly very good things to say about them. There are various minor complaints, but overall satisfaction in my anecdotal sampling say they're happy. So am I.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    31. Re: epitome of globalization by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I've owned too many cars. I'll agree that the differential causes rapid torque rise offsets that translate to unmanageability. Turning off the auto-adjustments seems to make little difference, although you might try it to see if you like the control better.

      I've been wondering about chipping it, and changing the table in several places. I'm tempted. But it's one more project in an endless list of projects, including a 70 VW Wesfailia (pun intended) and a couple of motorcycles. For now, I have only impulse needs to put my foot into it, and then, only under certain conditions does the mismatch bother me. I strong grip on the steering wheel compensates now that I know where it goes wampus.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    32. Re: epitome of globalization by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Jaguar is doing well because FORD turned it around, and sold it for a fat profit. Tata hasnt had it long enough to start breaking it yet.

    33. Re: epitome of globalization by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          In reading around on the Cooper S, it looks like the better mods are to swap out the supercharger pulley and header to the cat.

          We were diagnosing some misbehaving with hers, and I had my tablet reading the OBDII via bluetooth (gotta love the bluetooth OBDII reader). I noticed the supercharger really doesn't do anything until you're very close to redline.

          From what I read, the headers tubes are a bit small for the application. There are kits that contain both the pulley and header, that aren't horribly expensive. That seems to be the way to go before trying to tune the computer. From what people were saying, the programming is pretty good, and will work well with the other improvements.

          I haven't gotten her to say yes to it yet. It's only just over 20k miles now, so it's still "new". :)

          Ya, I've driven way too many cars over the years. If it has wheels, I've probably driven one. I handle the torque steer fine. It's just counterintuitive to have the wheels that you depend on to navigate the car, also being the drive wheels that can lose traction under hard acceleration. RWD, you can lose drive wheel traction and still point the car in the direction you want to go. :) Plenty of people will argue both sides of that though.

          Hers is a project for sometime in the distant future. I'm repairing and upgrading the SUV right now. I have stuff I want to do to my car also. Since she doesn't want the Mini messed with, I'm just maintaining it as-is.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    34. Re: epitome of globalization by bazorg · · Score: 1

      China is the world's largest car market having recently overtaken the US

      Largest potential market, surely? On a recent episode of Top Gear (2012), they said they have about 58M cars in total for the whole of China. Well in line with what's on Wikipedia for 2009: 40 motor vehicles per 1000 people.

      Even if people are talking about market value (price x quantity) I don't think China's auto market is more valuable than that of the USA?

    35. Re: epitome of globalization by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      In part due to Tata's good management

      You are kidding, right?

      "Good Management" and Tata are mutually exclusive

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    36. Re: epitome of globalization by Gingernads · · Score: 1

      Near where I live there is a new Mini that parks next to a Volvo, I just had to photograph the comparison: http://bit.ly/L7Yq7Q As a lover of the original Mini, it's shocking just how far they have strayed from the template whilst still having the cheek to call it a Mini. BMW missed a trick, they really should have re-launched the Maxi.

      --
      Your optimism strikes me like junkmail addressed to the dead.
    37. Re: epitome of globalization by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      China is still shit are car design if their version of MG/Rover is anything to go by. Luckily the western version of MG is still being designed in the UK

      Remember hyow bad Korean cars were? They'd never be as good as Japanese cars, which would never be as good as American cars in the 50s, 60s, which would never be as good as British cars, etc., etc., ad infinitum, ad nauseam

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    38. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tata is a funny name for a company considering that it is the French translation for Moron.

    39. Re: epitome of globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wont be bought by any Americans I know. Chinese cars are shit.

    40. Re: epitome of globalization by cramoft · · Score: 1

      Your statement "Jaguar died as a brand in 1987, when Ford took them over." is bullshit. After Ford took over the reliability was much better. If you ever owned a Jaguar prior to Ford and wanted max performance the engine needed a tune-up and the valves needed adjustment quite often (once a month). I got so fed up maintaining the engine I replaced it with 350 cubic inch Chevy V8, got better gas mileage, more power and a hell've a lot more reliability. Had to tune it up every 6 to 8 months.

    41. Re: epitome of globalization by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Our experiences differ vastly. I've restored them. I can tell you that in certain areas, Ford did indeed uprate the car. Might have been more reliable. And it wasn't Jaguar-- it was an empty brand. Ford then stole several Jaguar design features (look at the Mercury Sable for a starter).

      Jaguar owners look at people that changed the drive trains with distain. Their cars, the ones with the 350s and T400s, were called "lumps". I didn't have to tune or adjust valves (??) on the 3.8 and 4.2s that I owned. The engines were much tighter than what you describe. Sorry you got a ringer.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  3. But for how long? by vik · · Score: 1

    Give 'em a few years and they'll be out of China, looking for cheaper labour in Africa or somesuch.

    1. Re:But for how long? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2

      Probably Vietnam next actually. Vietnam is becoming to China what China is to the US.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    2. Re:But for how long? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      They are only moving assembly to China for the Chinease market. Shipping made cars from the UK, two per container is not feasible.

      Everyone in Europe, America, Africa etc will still get the British made cars.

    3. Re:But for how long? by zlives · · Score: 1

      so shipping to us can accommodate more than 2 per container... look for a new plant in mexico

  4. won't matter by ozduo · · Score: 1

    As long as they stick some imitation wood-grain on the dash the snobs will still buy them1

    --
    I got to the chocolate box before you, that's why the hard ones have teeth marks.
  5. States? by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

    What does "last vestiges of the truly British automobile in the States" mean? Does it mean something different than "last vestiges of the truly British automobile in the world." Or does this stupid sentence mean something else stupid?

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
    1. Re:States? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, "United States" != "world". So the sentence probably means exactly what it says.

    2. Re:States? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Or does this stupid sentence mean something else stupid?

      It's not the sentence that's stupid, just the ignorant reader that's stupid. TVR is still a "British company" (though owned by a Russian). But TVR doesn't sell in the US. The US has restrictive rules designed to be barriers to entry, so the US doesn't get many low-run models, and there are still some specialty UK makers that are available in the UK, or abroad in locations more open to specialty cars.

      So this, being explicitly a US site, is discussing the US effects of this, not the UK (or world) effects. When the summaries explicitly state US-only, people complain, when they don't remind everyone this is a US site, then people complain. Either way, people complain. But only the morons.

    3. Re:States? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Nobody can buy a TVR, they haven't been made since 2006.

    4. Re:States? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for the explanation. The subject of the article does seem rather arbitrary. Apparently a Briton is has written the sentence in question which makes it even more incomprehensible.

  6. Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by pegasustonans · · Score: 2

    I've certainly heard of people who seek cars made in a certain country, but does anyone actually value this more than whether their car is a piece of shit?

    In any event, reducing the auto industry in certain countries may help to discourage auto-friendly subsidies and allow competing industries to emerge.

    I, for one, am ready for my self-driving vehicle (and I don't care where it's made).

    --
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    1. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by outsider007 · · Score: 2

      Would it kill you to buy American?

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    2. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Funny

      LOL probably literally. American cars are shit.

    3. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      I bought my car based partly on its country of origin. More accurately, one of the contenders was eliminated because it's made in Mexico and I didn't feel the company had been building cars there long enough to have a proven track record. If they'd been building the car in their home country, it would have stayed on the list longer and may have been my final choice.

    4. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I've certainly heard of people who seek cars made in a certain country, but does anyone actually value this more than whether their car is a piece of shit?

      I have family overseas (not Europe) and they definitely care whether the car was manufactured and assembled in the USA/Mexico/Europe or mfg/assembled somewhere in Asia or Africa.

      This was the first wikipedia plage I came across that listed the various plants an auto manufacturer had:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz#Factories

      But everyone has plants in Africa and South America that manufacture parts and/or assemble complete cars.
      The quality control for parts isn't as good and the QC for assembly isn't as good.
      People care and they pay more for cars that aren't built/assembled on their continent.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's interesting that you picked Mercedes. In the last Consumer Reports, in terms of over all brand quality, they placed Mercedes below Ford!

      The other German cars makers are pretty much in the middle of the pack and after all their troubles, the Japanese still take just about all the tops spots - and Toyota is still there.

      Buy smart; buy Japanese.

      And as far as parts are concerned, there's only a handful of big parts suppliers in the World: Bosch, VDO, Walbro, and a couple of others that I can't remember their names. It may seem that they're are more, but they are more than likely owned by the big guys.

      And ALL of them are under HUGE pressure to reduce costs (i.e make things cheaper - more plastic).

    6. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In a sort of way, I did buy my car based on the nationality of its brand.

      I like Italian cars a lot, from the high-end ridiculous supercars and in particular all the way down to their basic, characterful people's cars, like the original Fiat 500. But we have owned a number of Fiats in my family and I know all to well about the reliability and rust problems that have always plagued them.

      So when I saw they had started building cars in Poland, I took notice. Contrary to popular belief, Poland is a proud, hard-working, honest and straight-forward nation with a history of solid (if unsophisticated) engineering. It was only during WW2 and the Cold War that Poland took a serious nosedive, but they've certainly been doing everything they can to get themselves out of the shadow of combined Nazi+Soviet oppression.

      I have been driving my Polish-built Fiat for nearly 5 years now and I have not had a single problem with it. Mechanically, electrically etc. it has been completely flawless.

      So yes, I bought my Italian car because it was built in Poland.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    7. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've certainly heard of people who seek cars made in a certain country, but does anyone actually value this more than whether their car is a piece of shit?

      I've owned two American cars in my life. A 1988 Pontiac Firefly, which was basic transportation, and very good on gas. I was driving it in high school, and for my limited means at the time, it made sense. It's also a car that can't be made any more, because it would never pass modern safety standards. Those same safety standards would add a significant amount of weight to the car, and it would never get the mileage that it used to, even if they were to remake it.

      The second American car I owned was a 2007 Chev Aveo. That was complete unadulterated shit. It was a terrible ride, it was not as good on gas as they advertised, it was uncomfortable, it handled like you were driving through a lake, in all, it was a terrible car. For the time that I owned it, it was in for several major repairs, including one where I was without car for 2 weeks... the dealer fixed me up with a Pontiac Grand Prix as a loaner for that 2 week period. That car had a better interior, but it was still low quality/plasticky, it still handled like you were driving through a lake, and it was even worse on gas.

      Contrast that with the numerous Japanese cars I have owned... I have never had a major repair on any of the Subarus I have owned, despite having more than a million km's between them. My 2011 Impreza is immensely better in ride quality and handling than any American car I've ever driven, and it actually gets the gas mileage that they advertised for the Aveo, even though it's got all-wheel drive and I'm not even trying to drive it efficiently. And it's not just Subaru that I can say that about... in my family, we have owned Honda and Toyota cars that we can say the same about.

      While there are certainly European brands that I would buy if I could get them here, I would never consider buying an American car until the Americans figure out how to make a car that goes around corners. In the mean time, I have never had a bad experience with a Japanese car, and would definitely recommend them to anybody looking for a car. It's not that individual American cars which are good don't exist, it's that most of the "good" American cars are actually European or Japanese designed/built and just rebadged.

    8. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparing a cheap Chevy aveo to higher-priced Subarus? Nice

    9. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      FWIW Toyota and Honda have cars that are 80% made in USA by content (including the parts). At one point they might even have been the most American cars ;).

      http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp?section=top&subject=ami&story=amMade0611
      http://abcnews.go.com/Business/american-cars/story?id=13801165

      --
    10. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Actually, I compared a $21,000 Subaru to a $40,000 Pontiac Grand Prix as well... Good reading skills, though. :)

    11. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      It is funny that both of your American cars were not American at all. The Pontiac Firefly was originally a Suzuki (cultus or something). Chevy Aveo is a Daewoo Kalos.
      The Aveo was never meant to be a US Spec car, it worked OK in Asia where it is used over smaller distances and the weather is OK. Nevertheless, it was one of the cars that put Daewoo out of business.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    12. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      So does Subaru... my parents' Legacy was built in Indiana. :)

      Still a Japanese design, with Japanese specs, though, so the point stands... though interestingly (and perhaps it proves the point), the Legacy is a 2004, back from when GM had its talons in Subaru, and their car has the worst automatic transmission I have ever driven... downshift lag is at least 4-5 seconds when you try accelerating, and it seems that whoever designed the thresholds for upshifting was drunk, as they're not consistent at all. I don't like automatic transmissions in general, but on the rare occasion I've been forced to use one, I have driven much better than theirs. It's still never had any major repairs, though, even though the odometer is pushing 460,000 kms.

    13. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      This year I was in the market for a performance sedan, and eventually ruled out all of the German makes - Audi, BMW and Mercedes because of their less than stellar service record.

      Eventually I ended up with an Acura. Perhaps not the conformist choice in this segment, but far less likely to have service issues.

    14. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been driving my Polish-built Fiat for nearly 5 years now and I have not had a single problem with it. Mechanically, electrically etc. it has been completely flawless

      Definitely not your traditional Fiat =]

    15. Re:Who buys automobiles based on nationality? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Can we start not giving mod points to idiots? Maybe an intel test or something?

  7. Relevant Topic, I'm sure by dyingtolive · · Score: 2

    For some reason, it still blows my mind that it can be cheaper to manufacture a vehicle and then transport it halfway across the world than it could be to manufacture the vehicle locally.

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    1. Re:Relevant Topic, I'm sure by srussia · · Score: 3, Informative

      For some reason, it still blows my mind that it can be cheaper to manufacture a vehicle and then transport it halfway across the world than it could be to manufacture the vehicle locally.

      I believe the China factory will be producing for the Chinese market. The Solihull factory is still making LRs.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    2. Re:Relevant Topic, I'm sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you don't have to worry about things like minimum wages, social security, worker health and safety, and environmental protection, you can make things very cheaply.

    3. Re:Relevant Topic, I'm sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Land Rovers are still built in Solihull, Jaguars are designed in Coventry and built in Castle Bromwich, Birmingham, England. I'm off on a factory tour in a month's time.

    4. Re:Relevant Topic, I'm sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it works. If you fuck with human rights and the environment, that is.

    5. Re:Relevant Topic, I'm sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is only 1/3 of the way around the world from the US.

      To go half way, you had to do what GM did with importing the Pontiac G8s from Australia.

    6. Re:Relevant Topic, I'm sure by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      That's really the foundation of China's booming manufacturing industry. As national business models go, it works very well. It does mean exploitation and pollution, but some people in the Chinese government must have decided that the economic benefits are worth it. They were probably right - without the forign investment in industry and the economic strength from exports, they might still be just another third-world country getting by on rice-farming and memories of the glory days when they could claim to be the greatest civilisation in the world.

    7. Re:Relevant Topic, I'm sure by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Land Rovers are built all around the world already. Defender series is built in Turkey for Turkish Army since early 90s.

    8. Re:Relevant Topic, I'm sure by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's an industrial revolution - it was no different in UK during ours. It's just easier to document in the 21st century. China is gradually creating a middle class, and will work itself out of the current boom. Regulations will come in, wages will increase, pollution will become more of an issue.

    9. Re:Relevant Topic, I'm sure by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Not forgetting the Evoke made in Halewood near Liverpool. New engine plant will be in Wolverhampton.

      R&D in China. The engine technology from Ford and PSA Peugeot Citroën would not be allowed to be manufactured or assembled in China so they are having to design new engines. Similar to Focus in America are manufactured in Mexico. PSA Peugeot Citroën and others such as Mazda do not allow their technologies to be built in Mexico. The Focus in America stayed on the Mk1 platform and engines for 12 years while Europe released new versions based on totally new platforms and refined engines. Only until mk3 Focus did the USA catchup.

  8. Sensationalism by motd2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The linked blog article reports roughly 20% of the full story. In actual fact, the UK factories are maxed out and employing more and more people, and only production destined for the Chinese market is being moved to China as part of this joint venture.

    1. Re:Sensationalism by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      just give it a couple of years... they'll be blackmailing the UK government for subsidies & tax breaks when the Chinese plant is on stream

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  9. Incestuous relationships by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.toomanycars.info/CarRelationship/Auto%20Family%20Tree%202008-Layout2.png

    ^This graphic is many years out of date, but it'll give you an idea of the complicated relationships that car manufacturers have.
    When it comes down to it, the car companies that aren't partially owned by one another are all cross licensing technology and sharing engines or chassises with one another.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  10. Transportation is cheap, labour is expensive by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2

    For some reason, it still blows my mind that it can be cheaper to manufacture a vehicle and then transport it halfway across the world than it could be to manufacture the vehicle locally.

    I'd tend to agree with you, but then we would overestimate the real-world cost of transportation. If transport halfway across the globe is feasible for oil, bananas & cheap plastic toys, why would it not be feasible for high-tech products like electronics, cars etc?

    Labor cost is what counts. Relative to that, transport is cheap.

  11. Ugh! by Quillem · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tata Motors is a subsidiary of the Tata group. The latter is worth at least USD100B which makes it larger than BMW. The former and its subsidiaries also make everything from lorries, buses, and heavy lifting equipment to a number of other road cars besides the Nano. The Nano is in many ways considered a relative failure in India and it's their other cars which are more popular.

    While export might be a possibility, the article clearly mentions that the Chinese domestic market alone demands 40000 imported JLR models which will very likely increase dramatically when they are produced locally and sold with cheaper price tags. A little googling would have also revealed that China is fast becoming the company's largest market and that JLR is expanding its factories in England and hiring more people.

    If anybody needed an example of FUD, the OP would be an apt candidate.

    --
    Quillem : An India-centric mishmash of things.
    1. Re:Ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tata also made the trucks the drivers on ice road truckers dangerous roads drove.. They worked fine other than the cabs were made completely out of wood lol

  12. Last vestige of British autos in the US? by damnbunni · · Score: 1

    Given that Jaguar and Land Rover are no more British than Ford is American - they're all global brands, these days, and even figuring out who owns what is a pain.

    However, you can still get a British car in the States; there are a couple of importers selling Morgans here.

    (I have no idea if you'd WANT a Morgan, but I admit they're neat lookin'.)

    1. Re:Last vestige of British autos in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you may enjoy driving an Ariel Atom V8.

      http://www.arielmotor.co.uk/

  13. Far-East manufacture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    makes sense to service markets in China, Japan and India (etc), where particular models are in high demand.

    Landrovers in the sense of the Defender line have been manufactured under licence worldwide for some time now.

    Although owned by Tata, Jaguar Landrover is still headquartered in the UK and design and manufacture is UK based too, with plants in the West Midlands (Solihull, West Bromwich) and on Merseyside (Halewood). Halewood currently produces Jaguar cars (don't know which particular models!), the LandRover Freelander and the RangeRover Evoque.

    SO

    As someone above proposed an advertising strapline, here's a fairer summary.

    Jaguar Landrover. Owned by Indians, Designed in Britain, Built in Britain, Marketed as British, Sold to anyone who wants one. Worldwide.

  14. WELL AT LEAST IT'S NOT FUCKING GERMANY !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the Brits have any cars left made in England ??

  15. British motoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might become one example where the Chinese made product is more reliable than original.

  16. Rand Lovers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The libertarians will say that this is just the free market in action.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Rand Lovers by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      With all the tariffs, rules and regulations, barriers to entry and existing oligopolies, the market is far from "free". Only idiots think otherwise.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Rand Lovers by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      So libertarians do think that then :P

  17. Congradulations Brittan by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the 21st century. Annoy China and you'll all be riding horses. It's ironic enough that your national car companies are owned by a former colony. How far the empire has fallen.

  18. Sigh-another generations-old stereotype to destroy by mccalli · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sad to see many posters trotting out old reliability myths.

    Jaguar have topped JD Power Satisfaction rankings, and many other rankings, on and off for years now. The unreliable ones you're talking about were made in the 70s and 80s by, effectively, British Leyland.

    Things looked up in the early 90s when Ford took over. They started bringing modernised toolsets to the construction process, and as a result reliability started climbing. It has continued climbing until it is now well ahead of <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=mercedes%20reliability&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8">Mercedes</a>, for example, which is trotted out often as some form of reliability paragon.

    It takes a long time to change reputation, that's the problem. That reputation didn't match reality as of about 1995 onwards (possibly slightly earlier) with the dumping of the XJ40 and the move to the X300 design (still marketed as XJ6/XJ8), but people still trot out what they once heard in a bar or from their dad. It's annoying - drop it. Jaguars are as reliable, if not more so, as anything else in their class.

    Personally I've owned XJ40 and X300-type XJ6 cars (one a Sovereign, one an XJR). I've owned an X-Type and an S-Type, and am currently contemplating an older XF. During the same time period a friend of mine has owned BMWs and Audis - we've spent about the same on garage bills (an RS8 being a notable exception - bills dwarfed anything I'd seen on the Jags). The X and the S were fine, the XJ40 electrically temperamental, the X300 (XJR) was just superb.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  19. poor understanding of the current situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    JLR is actually doing rather well at the moment. The vehicles are UK designed, and JLR is taking on large numbers of staff in the UK to do more design work. I know several ex-colleagues who went to work there.
    It is because of the growing Chinese market, that some assembly of vehicles will be added in China, not due to the costs in the UK.
    Now that British/American style management has been removed from JLR, there is much better long term planning, and much stronger investment in the product line.
    If I was working for JLR, I'd much happily work under Indian management, rather than the mediocre bean-counting 'business degree' incompetents, who ran all of the indigineous British car industry into the ground.
    Of course, matters are even worse in the United States. The US car companies still have this type of management, and are completely bankrupt hulks, with terrible product lines. I am shocked, on every visit to the United States, just how bad their vehicles are.

    1. Re:poor understanding of the current situation by Cederic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. The British are great at designing cars, when allowed to do it properly are great at building cars, and no matter how much help you give them are utterly shit at running car companies.

    2. Re:poor understanding of the current situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Chris Bangle does a great job of designing cars for BMW :)

    3. Re:poor understanding of the current situation by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The people in Britain who design and build cars are rarely given the chance to run the companies.

    4. Re:poor understanding of the current situation by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      What, are you stupid? Ford brought jaguar around. British leyland had owned them and trashed them. Tata hasnt owned jag enough to do shit.

      "Now that British/American style management has been removed from JLR, there is much better long term planning, and much stronger investment in the product line."

      I mean, do you talk directly out of your ass, or is there some sort of piping involved?

      Looking at your manner of speaking, you are clearly an indian native. Indian shills are just as obvious the chinese shills.

  20. Brands are meaningless. by Fished · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was shopping for a car last night, and while reading stickers was struck that the Honda Pilot actually has more domestic parts than the Dodge Durango, and not by a little bit. I knew that this was at least potentially true, but was really struck when I saw it on the label.

    I don't really care who owns the company, because they're just fat cats (and can starve for all I care.) I care who actually gets the middle class jobs involved in auto manufacturing.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:Brands are meaningless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This holds true for Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai and Kia as well. In fact the Nissan plant in symra, TN is retooling for some new models of Nissan and Infiniti while production of the xterra and others is moving to the plant in Mississippi or Louisiana (I forget exactly where)

      Most domestics are a Canadian or Mexican produced product (I know my friends 2001 vw golf was brazil iirc.. It was that or Mexico). It seems anymore the asain brands are more domestic to us than any others

  21. Glad a lot of people realise the misleading ttitle by Necroloth · · Score: 1
    As many have pointed out, they aren't moving production, they're simply creating NEW production sites in China. The cost of importing is crazy high and so due to Chinese Law, have to forma JV to reduce the tax cost. Most of the German brands already do this so it's not unheard of or new. Pretty much all of these built vehicles will remain in China rather than exported.

    In actual fact, the really rich Chinese would probably still import the vehicles because there is a brand image and greater snobbishness for European built as opposed to China-built.

    As for JLR as a company.. they've been doing really well and Jaguar have revitalised the brand with complete new lineup that isn't a throwback to the 70s but much more modern and sleek. I can't wait for the F-Type to come out!

  22. Landrover is the British military vehicle by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Good luck going to war against China.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Landrover is the British military vehicle by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Good luck going to war against China.

      Somehow I don't think that if Britain went to war with China the inability to build landrovers would be the deciding factor.

  23. Citation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be interested in a neutral, credible, source to support your trolls.

  24. Tata is the H-1B company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tata Motors [wikipedia.org] is a subsidiary of the Tata group [wikipedia.org]. The latter is worth at least USD100B which makes it larger than BMW.

    Oh come on now. Tata is mainly a staffing company. Tata specializes in replacing US, and European IT workers with cheaper Indian workers.

    The car companies are a side-line, at best.

  25. Unions by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that the unions will love this move. Remember when Boeing first tried to create a "new production site" in South Carolina. [/sarcasm]

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unions won't give a shit. They are building plants in China for the Chinese market. It costs way too much to ship cars by container. Heck, even BMW makes cars in the US for the US market.

  26. Re:Sigh-another generations-old stereotype to dest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a '93 XJS convertible. It has been utterly reliable- in the time that I have owned it, it has never spent a day in the shop. There are a couple of problems- the cigarette lighter doesn't work, and it may never have worked- it and the ashtrays are spotless, and have been since Day One. And as to the Air Conditioning: the British concept of Air Conditioning has always been so... quaint.
        Gas mileage- not so hot. 14mpg around my quite hilly town. Double that on the Freeway.
        Ford did an excellent job with fixing Jaguar. It's a shame that they failed so badly with their own cars back then.

        My first car was a beat up 1965 Rover 2000SC. It and a Redwood tree had a very bad argument one day- I walked away unscratched. My next car was a beat up 1966 Mustang fastback, with the 271 HP V8, the one with the solid valve lifters. It was a real pig of a car. It couldn't steer straight, brake straight, or accelerate straight. And anything involving going around corners... well, what could one expect for $375?
        My most reliable car? A Mercedes 300SD. I never had a problem- until a Elm tree fell on it. (Northern California- trees happen.) My most unreliable car? A Mercedes 300D, which in the course of two months, went through two fanbelts, a water pump, an alternator, a starter, a battery, a glow plug, a glow plug relay... and the cigarette lighter and Air Conditioning didn't work.

        Maybe I've just been lucky with my XJS.

  27. In Africa by arcite · · Score: 2

    You wouldn't be caught dead in Landrover, well unless you're a poser. Now, get a fully loaded Toyota Land CRUISER, then we're talking.

  28. Re:Glad a lot of people realise the misleading tti by nickmalthus · · Score: 1

    Funny how the Chinese use tariffs to protect their industries and their economy is booming while our leadership bleats "unfettered trade, no taxes!" and our economy is declining and our government going bankrupt. Surely the communist Chinese are adhereing to the lenin axiom "The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them." Our pie-eyed leadership is so focused on short term greed that they cannot see the long term threat.

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be-T J
  29. I take transit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So f@ck you all

  30. They're getting better by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    mostly because the gov't is forcing them too. The increased fuel economy and safety requirements raised the price of cars so much it wasn't worth making junk. Read consumer reports and you'll find they US and Japanese cars are pretty close, if not identical.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They're getting better by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. The last CR listed the top nine most reliable brands as Japanese.

      It isn't close.

  31. Last British Auto manufacturer? by mister_playboy · · Score: 2

    My vote goes to Morgan Motor Company:

    The Morgan Motor Company is a British motor car manufacturer. The company was founded in 1910 by Harry Frederick Stanley Morgan, generally known as "HFS" and was run by him until he died, aged 77, in 1959.[1] Peter Morgan, son of H.F.S., ran the company until a few years before his death in 2003. The company is currently run by Charles Morgan, the son of Peter Morgan.

    Morgan is based in Malvern Link, an area of Malvern, Worcestershire and employs 163 people. Morgan produced 640 cars in 2007. All the cars are assembled by hand. The waiting list for a car is approximately one to two years, although it has been as high as ten years in the past.

    There is also Bristol, although it sounds like they aren't building cars at the moment:

    Bristol Cars is a manufacturer of hand-built luxury cars headquartered in Patchway, near Bristol, United Kingdom. Bristol have always been a low-volume manufacturer; the most recent published official production figures were for 1982, which stated that 104 cars were produced in that year. While no official figures have been produced since then it is believed[by whom?] that in recent years production has been around 20 cars per annum.

    Unlike most speciality automakers, Bristol does not court publicity and has only one showroom, located on Kensington High Street in London. Nevertheless the company maintains an enthusiastic and loyal clientele.

    The company suspended manufacturing in March 2011, when administrators were appointed and 22 staff were made redundant. In April 2011, the company was purchased by the Kamkorp Group.

    TVR was very British up until they stopped production... Jaguar and Land Rover rank a lot lower on the British scale to this car guy.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  32. Re:Sigh-another generations-old stereotype to dest by longbot · · Score: 1

    Mercedes is worthy of it's reputation for reliability... provided you own one made before 1994, which is when their build quality started to nosedive.

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
  33. Chinese quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of you idiots need to uncork your heads out of your anus's.
    99.99% of you whiners about dodgy Chinese quality control, have your apartments full of possessions that are made in China.
    Trash talk is only cool if you're not a fucking hypocrite.

    There are A LOT of people who would pay more for a car made in Japan, than the same model made in the USA.
    This doesn't mean that everything the American make is inferior to the Japanese counterpart.

    1. Re:Chinese quality by Gingernads · · Score: 1

      There are A LOT of people who would pay more for a car made in Japan, than the same model made in the USA. This doesn't mean that everything the American make is inferior to the Japanese counterpart.

      On the contrary, you American have very large penis. We Japanese have very tiny penis.

      --
      Your optimism strikes me like junkmail addressed to the dead.
  34. The BRICS are picking up craps by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    By snapping up Jaguar and Land Rover, TATA of India may have thought they've landed a good deal

    Thing is, Jaguar and Land Rover are no longer the _in_ thing

    By spending $2 Billion for a factory producing Jaguar and Land Rover in Changsu, Chery of China may think that they are smart

    Thing is, only stupid people buy the Jaguar and Land Rovers

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  35. If you still want a 100% British car... by sqldr · · Score: 1

    http://noblecars.com/

    Not cheap though...

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.