Slashdot Mirror


The Real-Life Doogie Howser

An anonymous reader writes "Sho Yano this week will become the youngest student to get an M.D. from University of Chicago. He was reading at age 2, writing by 3, and composing music by his 5th birthday. He graduated from Loyola University in three years — summa cum laude, no less. When he entered U. of C.'s prestigious Pritzker School of Medicine at 12, it was into one of the school's most rigorous programs, where students get both their doctorate and medical degrees. Intelligence is not Yano's only gift — though according to a test he took at age 4, his IQ is too high to accurately measure and is easily above genius level. He is an accomplished pianist who has performed at Ravinia, and he has a black belt in tae kwon do. Classmates and faculty described him as 'sweet' and 'humble,' a hardworking, Bach-adoring, Greek literature-quoting student. And in his own words, 'I may not be the most outgoing person, but I do like to be around people.'"

303 comments

  1. Does he wear by future+assassin · · Score: 0

    Nike Air Revolutions?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Does he wear by Mike+Hock · · Score: 0, Funny

      Better Question... does he use Linux... or even better, Does he blend?

      --
      ---lame
    2. Re:Does he wear by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      No, I believe what the OP was looking for was a referral to 'Pumped up Kicks'.' Better run better run, faster than my bullet.

  2. Stuoid people by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Funny

    >Despite his gifts, success was not guaranteed. Several medical schools wanted no part of him because of maturity questions. Even at Pritzker, some faculty members worried they would be robbing him of a normal adolescence. On a college campus, he was a natural target for wisecracks. Some asked harsh questions about whether his mother was pushing him somewhere he didn't belong.

    Now Imagine if he had mutant powers...

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Stuoid people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      now imagine if he was rolled into real science, like physics or maths.

    2. Re:Stuoid people by Squiddie · · Score: 2

      I would say that those are real concerns. Seems like they were unfounded in this case. Good for the lad, I'm glad for him.

    3. Re:Stuoid people by CrowdedBrainzzzsand9 · · Score: 2

      Obviously the young fellow won't be a /. reader. For example, I can never remember if my PW is abc123 or 123abc.

    4. Re:Stuoid people by Hodr · · Score: 1

      What episode of Dougie Houser, MD was that?

    5. Re:Stuoid people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I checked - it is abc123... Welcome.

    6. Re:Stuoid people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The first thing that came to my mind was "This guy's wasting his talents. He should be scouring the real estate papers, looking for an available, secluded, inactive, hollowed out volcano. Once there, he can begin plotting world domination and enslavement of the inferior pathetic wretches known as 'other humans'."

    7. Re:Stuoid people by quenda · · Score: 0

      12 years to complete medical school? How thick can you be? Must have a rich family to be allowed to stay that long.
      I don't know what is normal at UC, but around here it is six years between high school and medical graduation.

    8. Re:Stuoid people by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You would expect that. Deep down we all know the truth, that kid ain't all that smart, it's just the rest of us are pretty dang stupid and we laugh at the sub 100s. Humbling ain't it. We got this ego thing going about how smart people are, it's little reminders like this that let us know how smart people can actually be. We ain't all that far off our primate cousins regardless of delusions religious and political delusions.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:Stuoid people by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      21-12 = 9 years, and the program was an M.D. combined with a PhD. in molecular genetics and cell biology.

  3. IQ? by dave420 · · Score: 0

    I do wish people would stop using that as some sort of gauge of intelligence - it has very little to do with intelligence, and just modernity.

    1. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [citation needed]

    2. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone is crying because he couldn't get into MENSA? Dude EVERYONE gets into MENSA... er except you.

    3. Re:IQ? by jgtg32a · · Score: 2

      True it isn't the best but there is a rather nice coordination between smart people and higher IQs.

    4. Re:IQ? by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do wish people would stop using that as some sort of gauge of intelligence - it has very little to do with intelligence, and just modernity.

      Sure, but the only thing worse than an IQ test is every other form of intelligence measure. Claiming that the test has issues (it does) should not be used to divert attention from the fact that some people are very smart while others are mind-bogglingly stupid.

      It's like saying that thermometers suck because they don't account for wind chill, humidex, UV exposure or different peoples' metabolism. You may be correct, but I'm still going to check the temperature before going outside.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    5. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And correlation too!

    6. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you were making some kind of obscure pun, I believe the word you were looking for is 'correlation' not 'coordination'....

    7. Re:IQ? by Tanktalus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please excuse jgtg32a, he didn't get into MENSA, either.

      :-)

    8. Re:IQ? by umrguy76 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do wish people would stop using that as some sort of gauge of intelligence - it has very little to do with intelligence, and just modernity.

      [citation needed]

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iq#Criticism_and_views

    9. Re:IQ? by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Someone is crying because he couldn't get into MENSA? Dude EVERYONE gets into MENSA... er except you.

      My cat got into Mensa

    10. Re:IQ? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except for, you know, all the things the IQ predicts with strong correlation. You know, useful extrapolation, a fundamental tenant of science. Within that category of things, there's all sorts of things IQ is useful as a predictive gauge for:
      *Productivity of new employees without previous experience in the field
      *Income(up until about IQ 120, where huge diminishing returns take effect)
      *Crime rates and recidivism rates
      *Lifespan
      *Chance of acquiring an advanced degree
      *Political views

      You know, other than all those major, life-impacting things, IQ doesn't predict anything.

      I believe judging an individual on a single characteristic is both pointless and wrong. I just take issue with the meme that IQ is somehow irrelevant or useless as a means to understanding human intelligence. It reflects an ignorance of the observed reality we live in.

    11. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_multiple_intelligences

      Some of us don't actually believe that's why the IQ test is bad.

      I don't think there are stupid people. Just people who are smart in different ways, and I don't think I'm the only one. And thermometers do suck when you're trying to gauge everything about the outside but only choose one measurement. You'll get that measurement, for better or worse.

    12. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think there are stupid people. Just people who are smart in different ways, and I don't think I'm the only one.

      Please spend an afternoon in a jury selection pool and then let us know if you'd like to change your hypothesis.

    13. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm familiar with some of those criticisms. Stephen Jay Gould is perhaps one of the most prominent ones. Unfortunately Gould himself has been discredited when it was recently (1-2 years ago IIRC) that he was basically making up stuff in "Mismeasure".

      Some of the other people think that 'g' is too restrictive of a measurement and misses out on some other aspects of cognition. While I agree to some extent that there is more to us than just mere g, g itself (as proxied by IQ scores) has been shown to be an extremely reliable predictor of success and personal outcomes in life. So far, I've seen no real substantive rebuttal to that.

    14. Re:IQ? by Hentes · · Score: 1

      You can come up with basically any test and intelligent people will get high scores on it. Intelligence means general problem-solving skills, and intelligent paople will perform better than average under any conditions. The problem with IQ is not that it gives low scores to intelligent people, but that it has a large number of false positives, and that is basically unreliable in accurately measuring average people.

    15. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do wish people would stop using that as some sort of gauge of intelligence - it has very little to do with intelligence, and just modernity.

      Sure, but the only thing worse than an IQ test is every other form of intelligence measure. Claiming that the test has issues (it does) should not be used to divert attention from the fact that some people are very smart while others are mind-bogglingly stupid.

      It's like saying that thermometers suck because they don't account for wind chill, humidex, UV exposure or different peoples' metabolism. You may be correct, but I'm still going to check the temperature before going outside.

      OK, read the temperature then. It says 75 degrees. That sounds perfect to you, so you head outside in shorts and a t-shirt...right into the pouring rain.

      Oh, oops. Did your thermometer not accurately measure barometric pressure or humidity to try and provide you with all the information needed to make a proper assessment of the weather? A rather singular view not working out so well? Hmmm, I wonder if there's a correlation there with IQ tests...

    16. Re:IQ? by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, people are smart in different ways. Some people excel in multiple categories. Others barely budge the needle across the board. The latter are what we call 'stupid people'.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    17. Re:IQ? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      IQ tests like many forms of test is a way to quantify peoples abilities. People with High measured IQ tend to be more intelligent then people with low IQ. However there are a lot of factors that goes into be an intelligent or a mentally useful person. However the IQ is a form of measurement, and chances are your performance will coincide with the standard distribution level you are in.

      The last time I was formally tested for my IQ I was in middle school, they did it not to rate how smart each child is, but to find underachiever in the system were they can get extra help. At the Time my IQ was above average, it wasn't genius, but it was strong. Later because I had problems in school with writing I had a bunch of other tests taken, it showed my Reading Skills was Average, my Writing Skills were near remedial, but my Abstract Reasoning was Genius. While I have worked on my reading and writing skills, which it seems every Grammar Nazi points out, is one of those setbacks that hold me back, however my stronger skills, I have learned to compensate and relay more on them to help push me further. To be honest I have judged my life to be Well above average compared to my peers.

      The IQ test seemed to average a persons intelligence. But it doesn't mean that they overall stupid or smart, it is just an average. As people may have stronger skills and weaker skills, and unlike Role Playing games, they are not fare and balanced, You can get The Super Smart Kids, who is good with people, and is a good athlete too, you can also get the Weak Little Kid, who had severe learning problems, and is just a complete jerk.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    18. Re:IQ? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do wish people would stop using that as some sort of gauge of intelligence - it has very little to do with intelligence, and just modernity.

      [citation needed]

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iq#Criticism_and_views

      Now that's just plain funny...

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    19. Re:IQ? by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Even if IQ was the best method doesn't mean that we should rely on it as a precise measurement of intelligence. Maybe intelligence is too variable, complex and human to be measured in a single number? Just because current weather forecast is the best we have, I'm not going to leave my water-sensitive stuff in the garden for weeks even if they don't predict rain, because I know that it's not that accurate.

    20. Re:IQ? by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think there are stupid people. Just people who are smart in different ways,[...]

      Someone clearly didn't work in tech support when he/she was younger.

      Six months of that and it should be pretty clear to anyone with a couple of neurons still firing that yes, there are stupid people. In fact, stupid people are very likely to call tech support, not just because their internet connection is down but because the power is out, they don't like their neighbor or they just plain feel like yelling profanities at someone who works for a company they have no relationship to.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    21. Re:IQ? by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 0

      While I have worked on my reading and writing skills, which it seems every Grammar Nazi points out, is one of those setbacks that hold me back, however my stronger skills, I have learned to compensate and relay more on them to help push me further.

      Aaaaaaag. I cringed reading that.

      I'm still not sure whether you meant Grammar Nazis point out your mistakes, or that they point out that the poor reading and writing skills are holding you back. Probably the former, but jeez.

      Also, you misspelled rely.

      "While I have worked on my reading and writing skills, which it seems every Grammar Nazi points out, they are still one of those setbacks that holds me back. However, I have learned to compensate and rely more on my stronger skills to help push me further."

      (Lucky thing I proofread this - I edited in a word and put it in the complete wrong place. That would have been embarrassing...)

    22. Re:IQ? by PyroMosh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay, let's extend the analogy further.

      So you've proven that a thermometer provides inadequate data to make the decision on how to plan one's dress for the day.

      You've then implied that perhaps IQ tests as measuring tools are similarly faulty.

      But surely your solution to this is not to abandon thermometers in favor of other measurements exclusively? Surely the correct thing to do is to use thermometers in concert with the other data they cannot provide. Much as is done in practice in meteorology today.

      And if that *is* the correct approach, how does it discredit the use of IQ tests? Would they not continue to be appropriate for use (assuming the analogy is a valid one) in concert with other data that they cannot measure, just as thermometers are?

      Does this not support Lev13than's ultimate point that the test may not provide all desirable useful data, but it none the less still provides useful data?

    23. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there were a balance within this system, then I'd say he's only brilliant because there are so many mind-bogglingly stupid people. And this would coincide with the "collective unconsciousness," attributed to Carl Jung.

      And I tend to believe in the "collective unconsciousness" because I've seen theories spoken after I envisioned them earlier.

    24. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope not to the German Mensa: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa

    25. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is an example of Jellomizer's exact opposite. Above average reading and writing skills, but otherwise a complete moron that totally missed the boat. Thanks for the example!

    26. Re:IQ? by flaming+error · · Score: 2

      Or the spanish mensa

    27. Re:IQ? by avandesande · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What is generally recognized though is that the accuracy of the test also diminishes at greater than 120. Richard Feynman had an IQ of 'only' 125.
      http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CGIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRichard_Feynman&ei=re7MT9foDIKE8ATci_2lDg&usg=AFQjCNFlZ7QHTlH2GfvFMOBQXefQcbolfQ

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    28. Re:IQ? by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      It was deliberate. And you're welcome.

    29. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unless you were making some kind of obscure pun, I believe the word you were looking for is 'correlation' not 'coordination'....

      Yeah, correlation doesn't necessarily imply coordination. I thought everyone knew that.

    30. Re:IQ? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Giving IQ any merit is racist. That's why IQ tests are banned from employment screenings. Racists also use IQ research to attempt to ban low-IQ people from breeding - and we all know who they're talking about.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    31. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, a thermometer is inadequate to make a decision on how to dress... Like for example if I should wear a jacket or not?

    32. Re:IQ? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Someone clearly didn't work in tech support when he/she was younger...stupid people are very likely to call tech support

      Selection bias. You may believe there are more stupid people than there are simply because a disproportionate amount of your interactions have been with stupid people. Additionally, stupidity, ignorance, and laziness all have similar symptoms, so it's easy to mix them up.

    33. Re:IQ? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think there are stupid people. Just people who are smart in different ways

      Is there any particular evidence to support your belief, or do you just hold to it because it's a nice, politically correct thing to believe into that doesn't offend anyone?

    34. Re:IQ? by Genda · · Score: 3, Funny

      I spoke to your cat, she deserved it, that dissertation on tongue bathing was genius.

    35. Re:IQ? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      The statement I replied to was "I don't think there are stupid people". If you manage six months of tech support and come out believing there are no stupid people only "people who are smart in different ways" then I'll be amazed. They are out there. Statistically they make up a large portion of the population (just look at the normal distribution curve for IQ and tell me with a straight face that the 30% on the far left of the curve aren't stupid, have you ever met someone with a sub 60 or so IQ? That's stupid no matter how you cut it).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    36. Re:IQ? by Genda · · Score: 1

      Perhaps its corrugation and cardboard was involved?

    37. Re:IQ? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Can someone start by giving me a concise definition of what "intelligence" is? Ive asked folks who stand by the IQ test, and I dont think I've ever gotten a good answer yet.

    38. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there are stupid people. Just people who are smart in different ways,

      Being able to recite every Nascar stat does not make one smart.

    39. Re:IQ? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Well, 120 is one standard deviation, so I suppose I believe that.

    40. Re:IQ? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      The fact that all that is true(except the allegation that IQ testing is fundamentally racist) doesn't have any baring on the fact that what I said is also true. What's your point?

    41. Re:IQ? by Genda · · Score: 1

      The other problem is finding tests that function across a broad operating range of intelligence. As intelligence rises, perception expands and the kind of patterns and associations that can and are made don't simply increase in number but differ vastly in kind and complexity. So the kinds of things a person with a can perceive differ significantly from those a person of . Building effective tests at the top end of the scale is difficult, It's hard for people to project a meaningful set of problems into the realm of a mind functioning at above genius level. These are nonlinear processes and models of intelligence often break when dealing with extraordinary people.

    42. Re:IQ? by Genda · · Score: 2

      Life is like a box of chocolates... Its composed primarily of complex sugars, lipids and fatty acids... -- Dr. Forest Gump Jr.

    43. Re:IQ? by Genda · · Score: 1

      I don't care how you map the multiple dimensions of intelligence, there are people somewhere who will end on the short end of the stick in multiple even all dimensions. These folks are the stupid people. They walk among us. Some even get elected to high office. Half the population by definition has to be of below average intelligence, and I can honestly say I've met a fair number of folks who were... let's just say slow on the draw. Not bad or evil... just not bright.

    44. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Measuring IQ is purported to be based on valid scientific methodologies, is it not?

      Since in my opinion it is, I feel not only is it right to continously question its methods and validity, we would be doing a dishonor to ourselves and society if accepted that single metric as a wholesale indicator for someones place in this world.

      Bluntly put, we are not masters of Intelligence, learning and how that relates to the individuals place in society writ large. I don't think the latter is what IQ necessarily strives to do, but one need only look at the controversy surrounding 'The Bell Curve' to see that humanity still has a lot of growing up to do. Especially when it comes to measuring Intelligence as a means to progress and improve society.

    45. Re:IQ? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Who said it was a singular metric. It is a metric. I suppose I have lower expectations from science, especially psychological science, but having predictive objective measures of complex systems is useful, even when they don't necessarily tell the whole story.

      It measures one thing, and as we develop more useful predictive tools, IQ may eventually fall to the wayside, or possibly act in conjunction with the new discoveries. I don't the problem.

    46. Re:IQ? by boristdog · · Score: 1

      but I'm still going to check the temperature before going outside.

      I'm still just going to poke my head out the door or window.

    47. Re:IQ? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Well, there seems to be a strong correlation between scoring high on our "modernity" tests and graduating medical school, becoming an accomplished pianist, earning a black belt, composing music, being an accomplished pianist, and just plain being a genius.

    48. Re:IQ? by chispito · · Score: 1

      Please spend an afternoon in a jury selection pool and then let us know if you'd like to change your hypothesis.

      Oh, you think spending your time with potential jurors is bad? Wait until you are selected and reach deliberation.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    49. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone clearly didn't work in tech support when he/she was younger...stupid people are very likely to call tech support

      Selection bias. You may believe there are more stupid people than there are simply because a disproportionate amount of your interactions have been with stupid people. Additionally, stupidity, ignorance, and laziness all have similar symptoms, so it's easy to mix them up.

      The grandparent did not need to determine the quantity of stupid people in a given population, only their mere existence.

    50. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The diminishing returns on higher IQ once you cross 120 come from the natural human inclination to express oneself. For an intelligent person presenting to a decision maker trying to make a decision that involves a little narration of thought process and logical procession through options to arrive at the best one. That just doesn't work when the gap in intelligence is too large.

      If you want to be persuasive, remember that starts for them as a perceived personal connection and ends when your confidence becomes theirs. Reason has very little to do with it.

      So speak to their level with a bare minimum of detail and with a lot of eye contact and patience. When they ask good questions be happy and answer them, with lots of eye contact and patience. When they ask stupid questions, DON'T show your impatience... explain why the question doesn't apply by way of familiar analogy. Even if it's an imperfect fit, a kernel of truth that they can recognize trumps an actual reason they can't understand. Do so with, you guessed it, lots of eye contact and patience.

      Took me about a year working to figure this out; has taken a decade to get reasonably good.

    51. Re:IQ? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      It's weird that you spend a couple paragraphs talking about your social graces while referring to other people in a manner the denotes that you consider them beneath you. I'm sure it wasn't your intention, but it reads that way.

    52. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Selection bias is irrelevant. The statement was "I don't think there are stupid people." mikael_j pointed out a method by which to identify stupid people. Yet another method is "work in customer service anywhere". By working in say... a clothing store, or a fast food checkout, that would have less of your selection bias, since generally everyone tends to wear clothing and eat... but you will still encounter the absolute stupidest of people whom you can't possibly fathom how they haven't swallowed their own tongues yet.

    53. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If intelligence were a measure of how well you understood how to speak to women, I doubt the IQ test would determine it accurately.

    54. Re:IQ? by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      Half the population by definition has to be of below average intelligence.

      Maybe I will prove myself to be in the lower half, and not being a mathematician myself, I was lead to believe that the average was the sum of scores divided by the number of samples. Because of this, an extraordinarily high score, or extraordinarily low score (or cluster of scores in a region) will skew this:

      Scores
      120
      130
      50
      280
      75

      This averages to 131. In my sample above, all but the highest score is below the average.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    55. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know how you feel. I thought I was pretty smart before I had to do jury duty, but since I had to give myself a lobotomy with a ball point pen to put up with the whole process, I think I..... what was I saying?

    56. Re:IQ? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Oh look, yet another bleeding heart liberal has discovered that reality doesn't care about political correctness.

    57. Re:IQ? by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Maybe I will prove myself to be in the lower half, and not being a mathematician myself, I was lead to believe that the average was the sum of scores divided by the number of samples.

      That's the arithmetic mean, which is one form of average. Other common ones
      Geometric mean--the nth root of the product of the scores, where n is the number of samples. In your example, that's approximately 110.37
      The median (rank the samples in order and take the middle one, or the mean of the middle two if there are an even number of samples)--in your example, that's 120.
      The mode (the most commonly occuring value(s) in the set)--in your example, there are 5 modes (50, 75, 120, 130, and 280). If you change your example set to 50, 50, 130, 145, and 280, then there is only one mode: 50.

      But, yeah, the statement you're objecting to is either wrong or under-specified (it'd be basically correct if it had specified the median).

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    58. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree as stated it is a naive notion. But it depends on how you define "dumb" and "smart". A great artist or athlete may be called a "genius", while being "dumb" as a box of rocks when it comes to math/formal logic, or getting their home internet to work. I think we all have some talentn to help ensure our survival in society. So, let's ask a different question: Are there any useless people?

      I really do think that almost everyone is better than average at something. There are so many potential skills that society values, it'd be hard to be bad at them all. It's up to you to identify, hone, and market your skill in the right way. Most who say "I'm not good at anything" are wrong. They just aren't particularly good at math, sports, or grammar. Some might be empathetic. (counselors, social workers, etc.) They might have great spatial coordination (carpenters, contractors, painter/artists, etc.), or a great physique (athlete). Maybe they have good attention to detail, or are charismatic and persuasive (lawyer, politician, useful in business). Any one of these skills is useful and potentially beneficial to society as a whole.

      I think that very very few people are truly useless, although there are plenty who don't use their talents appropriately. That's a separate issue.

    59. Re:IQ? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I agree as stated it is a naive notion. But it depends on how you define "dumb" and "smart".

      In the common sense way, of course - as a measure of intellect / wisdom / cunning, or some combination thereof

      The question of whether there may be other skills at which one succeeds is a different one. I'm not arguing that people with higher than average empathy or spatial coordination are not useful (though I'd rather not speak of people in terms of being "useful" in general), but I don't see why that should have anything to do with being smart.

    60. Re:IQ? by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      and there we have it. . . Mean, Median and Mode.

      I always thought that average = mean, and that median and mode were two other entities as opposed to other types of average. .

      Time to go back to school and pay attention this time.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    61. Re:IQ? by deek · · Score: 1

      The original word worked well enough for us to understand his point. Live a little. Try using a different word, aujourd'hui.

    62. Re:IQ? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I could be offended by that belief, if I was offended by the beliefs of random people on the internet...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    63. Re:IQ? by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      How to dress in *total*. According to the person who's post I was replying to, it can be. The thermometer alone only tells you the temperature. It won't tell you if it's raining or not.

      Some may prefer a light jacket in the rain even if the temperature would not suggest a jacket would be desirable. In that way, it is helpful, but not the whole picture.

    64. Re:IQ? by uglyduckling · · Score: 1
      All may be true, but you've really trying to redefine the question. Intelligence is an attribute, just like height, strength, courage, beauty. Some are easier to define than others. You're right that some people are considered 'dumb' but have skills in other areas, e.g. being physically strong.

      That doesn't mean that all people are smart in some way, that's just conflating intelligence with skills and attributes in general. Smart people, generally, can be expected to be able to grasp concepts, gain knowledge, and then make inferences in any subject matter that is presented to them. Less smart people may not understand certain things no matter how carefully and elementally it is explained to them. That is an attribute, and it can be measured to an extent.

    65. Re:IQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm at the Mensa right now, and let me tell you the food is disgusting.

    66. Re:IQ? by lamber45 · · Score: 1

      For a gaussian ("bell curve") distribution, all three are the same. For a lot of actual or plausible distributions, all three are fairly close to each other; though it's certainly possible to think up pathological cases where none of them is useful.

    67. Re:IQ? by pthisis · · Score: 1

      And, as noted, there are many kinds of mean (geometric and arithmetic means being the most common, but there are harmonic mean, quadratic means, Lehmer means, contraharmonic means, etc). Some of those can be generalized into power means.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    68. Re:IQ? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      All of my children have high IQs. My oldest son went to gifted school, jumped two grades, and was held back for good reason. Social imbalances. When his friends got to 16, he was 14, and he too wanted to also get his driver's permit. When his friends got to 18, and could go to the bars, he was 16, and had to lie about his age, or stay home. I gave him driving tests and the like until he was of age for the permit.

      In university, he was bored, but did math, music, and finance. Before age 20, he graduated, moved to Florida, got an MBA, learned Spanish to add to his English and French. He could imitate the accents of Cubans, Mexicans. He picked up Portuguese, Chinese and Russian. After 10 years in the USA, he left for Latvia, taught Spanish, learned Russian and applied for a job in Moscow.

      My other son, gifted in Finance, is very analytical, and is also worth bragging about. His skills in Poker and Blackjack which he did part time for a few years earned him a lot of money. (In Canada, gambling wins are not taxable, unless you are a professional gambler (have no other job).
      I dont want to bore you, but he is one of the fingers on my hand, not one finger is better than the other.

      My daughter is number 2 of the three. She got bored with University, took her Mrs. Has 3 kids, and now deals very professionally with autistic children. She is called on for many consultations and her success rate is way above average.

      Do they take after me? Are they above average? No and Yes. Their mother was very smart and married me.
      Gifted or not, Hi IQ or not, I love them all. But you cannot BS any of us. The important thing that we measure, is their kindness, generosity, and caring about others. That is more important than IQ or high scores.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  4. One can only hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hopefully he will go into research and stay away from patients, because there's more to being a successful clinician than sheer brain-power, and most of it comes with experience and invariably, age.

    1. Re:One can only hope by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 2

      Sounds like he has a pretty well rounded set of skills, he can probably infer very quickly that which you call wisdom.

    2. Re:One can only hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, having started at a younger age, he will have much more experience than other doctors his age and thus be a much more successful clinician.

  5. much congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    always good to hear that someone is excelling at a young age like this kid. i just hope he doesnt feel like he missed on life experiences later in life. i cant imagine if prodigies feel that they missed out on college-keggers, or proms or things like that.

    1. Re:much congratulations by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, most of the best parts of college are not the classroom stuff at all. I feel sorry for people who miss out on that, as the social stuff is the one part of college you can't come back to 20 years later or even a few years earlier.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    2. Re:much congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      what, binge drinking? Universities in different part of the worlds have different value on the "social stuff." Just because he doesn't conform to the US norms doesn't make him a freak, nor does it necessarily stunt his ability to grow or mature. As he stated in the article, his fellow undergrad spent afternoons watching cartoons.

      My undergrad experience, my peers were playing 90s nintendo games trying to recapture some kind of nostalgia, while others were doing keg stands. Personally, I wish I could've skipped all that and done something better with my time. I don't even keep up with those friends and last I heard, they had menial jobs. I'd rather associate myself with people who are ambitious and work towards a future.

    3. Re:much congratulations by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, most of the best parts of college are not the classroom stuff at all. I feel sorry for people who miss out on that, as the social stuff is the one part of college you can't come back to 20 years later or even a few years earlier.

      That is so true -- and, in fact, I would say it applies much more to intellectual socialization than to things like frat parties and beer binges.

      The social aspect of college seems to have shifted over recent decades to encompass more and more non-academic things. (Many studies have shown that students 50 years ago spent a lot more time studying, etc.) But many of the most important aspects of my intellectual development happened in college due to conversations I could have with peers, whether it was stuff related directly to class or random philosophical debates with the guy next door at 3am.

      I imagine that it would be a lot harder for a pre-teen or young adolescent in a college to build up the kind of relationships with significantly older students that could result in such intellectual socialization.

      This is just a random theory, but I've wondered whether a lot of the awkwardness and "weirdness" we see in prodigies -- and their frequent inability to continue success at the same level as adults -- isn't just because of the lack of normal emotional social skills, but rather because they don't tend to work closely enough with peers at the appropriate level who are working through similar problems as they learn material (even if they are a decade older). Most very young prodigies tend to be taught by adults who often have things sort of "figured out" (or they think they do), but I feel like I learned the most from conversations with other peers in college who were actively trying to figure stuff on the same level... that exploration seems to be an essential skill in moving from the great "absorbing" and problem-solving skills most prodigies possess to the ability to do more creative and productive work as an adult.

      Or, to put it another way: eventually, there are no more math books with "challenge problems" in the back, and you need to have some sort of intellectual skills to figure out what to do after that, unless your greatest goal in life is to join MENSA and do puzzles all day. Having productive intellectual socialization with peers in college and graduate school seems, to me, to be one way you learn how to think about the sorts of problems the rest of the world might actually be interested in, once there are no more introverted "academic" challenges to complete.

    4. Re:much congratulations by iamhassi · · Score: 2

      always good to hear that someone is excelling at a young age like this kid. i just hope he doesnt feel like he missed on life experiences later in life. i cant imagine if prodigies feel that they missed out on college-keggers, or proms or things like that.

      Don't worry, he's 21

      Yeah, not quite doogie howser. I mean much respect, 21 is young, but I still feel a little let down, he's not a teenager graduating from medical school like doogie so he's no doogie howser so the /. post is very misleading

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    5. Re:much congratulations by demonlapin · · Score: 1, Interesting

      He is 21 now. He will be making ~60k/year for the next five years and will then graduate to a pediatric neurologist income (don't know about Chicago specifically, but the ones I know in the South pull about $250k/year, and South/Midwest correlate pretty closely in physician income). He can start dating college chicks now, with the added bonus that he's actually got an income and the promise of more soon.

      Plus, if you are thinking more along the lines of all-night bull sessions with friends, med students do plenty of that in the gross anatomy lab, on call, etc. It's not exactly the same as college - you don't live in dorms - but it's not exactly like normal adult life, either.

    6. Re:much congratulations by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      I think you need to be around 19 - 25 to get the most out of a college kegger. High IQ doesn't seem to produce the hormones required for full enjoyment. This kid can spend the next decade working into a tenured professorship or inventing something awesome and have no responsibilities but partying as hard as he can by the time he's in his 20s. I wish i had done it that way.

    7. Re:much congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you put yourself in a position where you can't enjoy a vibrant and varied social life after college, perhaps you've done goofed.

    8. Re:much congratulations by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Social part? You clearly don't study Engineering. Or your universities differ greatly from ours. I've never noticed any "social" part in university study.

  6. Obligatory by meekg · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    What a snob!

  7. spoiler alert by kobi77 · · Score: 1

    She and Dr Robert Chase didn't really kiss in House MD, it was just a plot device! CO out

  8. An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by rossjudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like he's headed to spend the next five years as a pediatrician resident. What strikes me is this: After all the acceleration, does he end up simple having a professional career that's ten years longer than normal? Without some exceptional accomplishments along the way, it might not have been the best trade-off.

    1. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and he got to skip all the school crushs, dances, in-crowd/out-crowd stuff for ..... ?

    2. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      A mansion, exotic cars, social status......

    3. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We did too, and we all turned out okay!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by V.+P.+Winterbuttocks · · Score: 3

      We did?

      --
      I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.
    5. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's going Peds Neuro, so not even

    6. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ...might not have been the best trade-off.

      Particularly if lady luck gets bitchy and he is run over by some dumb ass texting while driving next week.

    7. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 2

      Pediatric neurology. Big difference.

    8. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      and he got to skip all the school crushs, dances, in-crowd/out-crowd stuff for ..... ?

      the good stuff?

      Come on, you're on /., as if you had anyone crushing on you or went to any of the dances. Even Cowards had a hard time in high school, who wouldn't want to give that up for a few more years in college dorms because *that's* where the fun was

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    9. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pediatric neurology? Interesting choice. I think we can safely assume that he's not in it for the money.

      As well, he'll most likely wind up in a large metropolitan area (one big enough to support pediatric subspecialists). Of course, he could be bound for academic medicine, too.

    10. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by guttentag · · Score: 1

      What strikes me is this: After all the acceleration, does he end up simple having a professional career that's ten years longer than normal?

      One day he'll have his own horrible sing-along blog musical tradgicomedy miniseries in three acts. That's about all that's left to do with that sort of experience and multifaceted talent. That's what Doogie did.

    11. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Peds neuro is decently compensated, though it's definitely not up there with the surgical specialties. And some surprisingly small cities support pediatric hospitals - a friend of mine works in one in Temple, Texas.

    12. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He says "I am living my dream," 10 years longer of doing what you love sounds pretty damn good, whether it's pediatrics or pediatric neurology (and it is pediatric neurology). I don't think most people describe their job or career as "living their dream" so he is really quite fortunate.

    13. Re:An Extra Ten Years Being a Pediatrician? by pthisis · · Score: 1

      1. Temple is a special case when it comes to medicine; it's the home of Scott & White Medical Center, a VA hospital, and a huge Texas A&M med school campus--at least when my dad was there, it had more doctors per capita than any other city in the US.

      2. Your POV is skewed by living in Texas. Temple's over 60,000 people in population, hardly a small city*. Portland, ME is the size of Temple and has a nationally acclaimed pediatric hospital. Burlington, VT is even smaller (45,000ish) and has one, too (both are the largest city in their respective states).

      *Even in Texas most cities are closer in size to Lampasas or Marble Falls than to Temple--Temple's in the top 10% of Texas cities by population.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  9. excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is people like him who eliminate the quasi-religious belief of meritocrats that success is dependent on hard work and that you "get what you deserve".

    Fact is, it's mostly down to nature.

    1. Re:excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      success is dependent on hard work [...] Fact is, it's mostly down to nature

      no, luck is 10 times more important.

    2. Re:excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      success is dependent on hard work [...] Fact is, it's mostly down to nature

      no, luck is 10 times more important.

      There is no such thing as luck! It's who you know and where you are from.

    3. Re:excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it is who you know and where you are from but luck put me there and made me run into them by chance.

    4. Re:excellent by mikael_j · · Score: 2

      Those are great examples of luck-based factors.

      Other luck-based factors are things like when you start your company (the timing feels sort of right but is the market really ready for your product? or maybe you've already missed the boat? This obviously isn't all luck but to a large degree it is, sometimes the difference between the winner and the also ran can be that the winner had a slightly crappier product but ever so slightly better timing) and minor marketing choices (your research shows both advertising campaigns should result in a 20-50% increase in sales but the truth is that six months down the line one will give you a 200% increase in sales, the other will only get you a 20% increase, which one should you pick if all the research shows them to be equal? What if I told you a factor is a random celebrity making some statement on TV two weeks after you've chosen which one to pick? Didn't make it easier now, did it?).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    5. Re:excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luck is very important. Timing is everything. You see the same ideas getting re-hashed over and over, then eventually it takes off because everything aligns.

    6. Re:excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'luck' is a matter of seeing an opportunity and seizing it.

      I have seen more wasted opportunities by friends and family than I thought possible.

      But do not discount 'luck'. Your run into a guy at a bar and SEE that he could help you out. For the 'lucky' they saw that this guy has money and opportunity you can use. For the 'unlucky' they had a drink with him and didnt care what he had to say.

      The real 'luck' part comes into play as you may or may not be presented the opportunity. Hence the saying 'make your own luck' (getting your product onto Oprah for example). Then even if you are presented the opportunity you need to be ready for it (luck favors the prepared).

      For example my cousins. They grew up in the same neighborhood hung out with the same people. SAME opportunities. Yet they live in a trailer and I live in a 2 story and have a nice car. They squandered their 'lucky breaks'. I told them they were. They even *knew* they were (which is even more sad). I seized them (and have let a few real money makers go as I have become profoundly depressed).

      Part of my 'luck' is I grew up in the US with parents who gave a damn. Presenting me with opportunity. But I needed to be trained in realizing there WAS opportunity. Which is why immigrants come here. They see it because they dont have it where they come from.

  10. Real life Doogie Howser? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

    He'll go into obscurity for a few years. Then, out of the blue, he'll show up to help the real-life Harold and Kumar and then become a womanizer in NY on a real-life "How I Met Your Mother".

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Real life Doogie Howser? by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      He'll go into obscurity for a few years. Then, out of the blue, he'll show up to help the real-life Harold and Kumar and then become a womanizer in NY on a real-life "How I Met Your Mother".

      But first he has to use his psychic powers to help fight giant space spiders.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  11. Not an easy life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My father was someone like that, IQ literally off the charts, used by the University of Chicago to help calibrate IQ tests for people with IQ's over 200. Multiple degrees for the sake of multiple degrees, the whole nine yards. Did his buddy's doctorate thesis for his PhD in an unrelated field just to help him out, and his buddy is now a leading expert in his field. People's expectations were off the charts with how they how wanted to exploit him. His own expectations of himself and others became unfathomably high.

    Had trouble his entire life connecting to normal people, even people of normal genius level intelligence had trouble relating with him. He thought so far ahead of everyone else that he even thought ahead of himself. When you spend so much time thinking past tomorrow you have trouble living for today. The result was this life was a mess and the practical details of his life were something that I often had to to take care of for him.

    Being a genius is an accident of birth, being a genius compared to other geniuses is arguably more of a curse than a gift. In the end the longer he lived the more he learned to dumb himself down when around others. It was a social survival skill. I do not envy the person in this article.

    1. Re:Not an easy life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True genius is being way ahead of the crowd but still learning to blend in.

    2. Re:Not an easy life by Idbar · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Like life wasn't full of jerks already, a person like him will have to face them at a faster rate.

    3. Re:Not an easy life by amirishere · · Score: 1

      he learned to dumb himself down when around others.

      yeah I know what you mean, my fellow earthling.

    4. Re:Not an easy life by timeOday · · Score: 2
      Interesting quote from the article:

      But he'd much rather talk about his upcoming residency in pediatric neurology, which will dominate the next five years of his professional life. He became enamored of the field while doing a rotation at LaRabida Children's Hospital in Chicago, caring for patients with cerebral palsy, shaken baby syndrome and other ailments.

      "I really liked not just taking care of kids, but the way the whole team worked together - the medical team, the social workers, nutritionists, DCFS workers ... the idea that you can do a lot for these patients, even if you can't cure them."

      To me that does not sound like some sort of idiot savant. If anything he sounds more interested in getting a job and doing work, rather than amazing us gawkers with brilliant insights.

      In any case, I think picking a single person in advance and waiting expecting them to make a great discovery or a huge fortune is a mistake. It downplays the role of luck in the process. 92% of smokers will never get lung cancer.

    5. Re:Not an easy life by avandesande · · Score: 2

      Read "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" if this kind of thing interests you.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re:Not an easy life by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      Good book. I too recommend it.

    7. Re:Not an easy life by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you look at the statistics for lung cancer you'll see quite the opposite. 24.4% of male, heavy (5 cigarettes per day) smokers end up with lung cancer. I don't even equate 5 cigarettes as heavy, as just about everyone I've ever known who smoked, did at least 5 a day, and many did a whole pack (20-25) cigarettes a day. That doesn't even account for all the other bad things that smoking can give you. That's just a single disease. The signs at the checkout at the grocery store state that 1 in 2 long term smokers will die of a smoking related disease. That's not odds that I want to mess around with.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:Not an easy life by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      This kid will need two things for his output to match his promise. The first is the ability to cope, and the second is the opportunity to make a difference at some point. He can learn the skills to cope, but opportunity may be more difficult to come by.

    9. Re:Not an easy life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know anyone who would consider 5/day as a heavy smoker.

      That statistic seems cited from http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/164/12/1233.full , which has:

      "In a recent example of this approach in southwest England, the cumulative risk of death from lung cancer by age 75 years among lifetime smokers in the United Kingdom was estimated at 15.9 percent for men and 9 percent for women, rising to 24.4 percent among men and 18.5 percent among women for lifetime smokers who reported smoking at least 25 cigarettes per day (2)."

      So, it looks like that about.com article changed the "25" to "5".

    10. Re:Not an easy life by idontusenumbers · · Score: 1

      My father was someone like that, IQ literally off the charts

      Did they go to extreme lengths to come up with this chart? Every manual method and software method I can think of or have experience using is hard-coded to prevent 'going off the chart'. The only reasonable explanation is that those doing the charting pulled some graph paper that was duplicated and designed on a basis of containing the average person plus/minus a standard deviation or two which is just silly.

    11. Re:Not an easy life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --Yawn--

      The number of "brilliant people" who can seem to get their shit together begs the question... somethings wrong with the measurement. Regardless he wasn't so confused he didn't manage to find a member of the opposite sex and (unless a dna test proves otherwise) hand offspring so as far as evolution is concern job done.

    12. Re:Not an easy life by haruchai · · Score: 1

      A fact I just learned about that book - it holds the Guinness record for most rejected, by 121 publishers!!
      I guess Pirsig didn't lack either persistence or self-confidence.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    13. Re:Not an easy life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because it is unmitigated shite. It is hands down one of the worst books I have ever read in my life, full of pretentious dribble and written by a certified arsehole. For some reason people with limited brains think writing "quality" fifty times a page and giving yourself a stupid Greek name makes you very smart, and that reading that tripe makes you even smarter still. If only life were so easy.

      I doubt there is a simpler test for whether somebody is a wannabe pseudo-intellectual than if they like ZATAOMM.

    14. Re:Not an easy life by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Feel free to point that out to avandesande (143899) and SockPuppetOfTheWeek (1910282), both of whom appear to have read it.
      I have not.

      But, I did read Finite and Infinite Games by James P. Carse, a long time ago and I recall enjoying it immensely.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    15. Re:Not an easy life by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I liked the book but don't consider myself an intellectual. I like motorcycles and engineering though!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    16. Re:Not an easy life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Pirsig is not a genius, just a pompous asshole with a giant ego.

    17. Re:Not an easy life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea how the charts were developed to begin with, I would imagine that standard tests like IQ tests would be fairly well detailed and available online if your curious and not simply trolling. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that your not trolling and try to help explain a little better. Standard deviation's for IQ tests are really only good for certain ranges and breakdown the further away from the bell curve you get. I'm about 3-4 standard deviations above normal (185) and I can easily get a 20 point difference between a test one day and another.

      For someone with an IQ in the 200+ range you get so far out of deviation that the results become effectively meaningless. Take the Giga society, they have a requirement of an IQ of 196 which is smarter than .999999999% of the population. In practice this means there are seven people in the world who are qualified to be members of this society. The problem of course is how to actually accurately measure an IQ that high?

      There simply aren't very many people on the planet to compare them too. That is why my father spent an extended amount of time under study with the University of Chicago. He went off the top of the standard psychological IQ tests, that is part of how he was selected to begin with. They spent a fair bit of time using him to help develop and calibrate their tests as it is very difficult to accurately measure IQ in subjects at either extreme of the range.

      He spent a fair bit of time doing tests while hooked up to medical scanning equipment (MRI?) and they even using medical laser's to test how quickly eye's reacted to being flashed. As memory serves the laser was what was what they finally came up with as being the most accurate measurement. I'm not sure if that particular test ever made it out of the pure research setting though, it's impractical and needless unless your talking about someone in upper IQ ranges to begin with.

    18. Re:Not an easy life by master_p · · Score: 1

      What has your father to say about Physics? more specifically, the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics? has he ever looked into that?

    19. Re:Not an easy life by DarenN · · Score: 1

      They say they "like Dostoyevsky"

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
  12. Lots of people could do this by lemur3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IF only the school systems in america werent structured how they are I imagine that we could have many folks finishing schooling much earlier than 18 and college a few years later..

    I know many students who were held back merely because they had to wait to go on to the next year.. at best put in an "advanced placement" course..

    we could easily have students graduating highschool at 14 or 15 ...if not sooner.. with the 'smart' ones beating that.. all of the time.. but.... it just doesnt seem to happen

    1. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we could easily have students graduating highschool at 14 or 15 ...if not sooner..

      It depends what you want to teach them. If you want them at a higher level of education, then no. Most kids are struggling with certain things such as simple math.

    2. Re:Lots of people could do this by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would agree with this, in sixth grade my reading skills were measured as 'beyond college' and my math skills were 'college level'. However my school had been reteaching me the same set of things for like four years and I was bored to tears. By the time I did go to college my love of learning had worn off and I didn't really care about pleasing teachers or scoring particularly high. I had already started working in my field though during high school, so I had some idea of what I planned to do. That alone is better than most people I see come to college as undeclared and then they ramble about taking random classes for the next 4 or 5 years.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    3. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, give smart kids a full course of education that's at an appropriate level for their abilities!

    4. Re:Lots of people could do this by tepples · · Score: 1

      But in order to do provide an appropriate education, wouldn't the state have to steal more of your money through its department of revenue?

    5. Re:Lots of people could do this by green1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This always struck me as odd. When I was in school it always felt to me like I could finish all the learning for each year in a couple of months if only I was allowed to do so. But instead I had to sit there while the teacher went over each thing a dozen times, and then reviewed it a dozen more. And you couldn't read ahead because you'd be told that the class hadn't got there yet. One of my friends in grade 7 gave up and taught himself calculus during math class, the teacher didn't dare stop him, but neither did he allow him to complete a single assignment or test before the requisite time, nor could he advance to the next grade early (despite the fact that he was already working himself 5-6 grades ahead of the class)
      And yet despite this you see stories like this from time to time where someone manages, despite the system, to come out ahead. Personally I want to know how they managed to get through the school system before the age of 18. The system which seems designed more to keep young people off the streets than it is to educate them.

    6. Re:Lots of people could do this by CastrTroy · · Score: 0

      I think schools would be much better off if they started separating the students into different academic abilities much earlier on. When I was in highschool, they put all the students in the same classes for grade 9 to figure out where they should really be before separating them into "Basic" (highest aspirations are to graduate high school, with a very simple workload at that, realisticly they probably only have a grade 8 education anyway. Mostly for people with learning or behavioral problems.), "General" (for students who want to prepare for trade school/community college), and "Advanced" (For students who wanted to go to university). This was great because once you got out of grade 9, if you were serious about school, so were the majority of the kids in your class. Unfortunately, it also made me realize how much of a waste the 9th grade was, when they were trying to evaluate and figure out where to put everyone. Only a few years before that, the students has to decide which stream to go in before they entered high school. I think this whole process could be put much earlier. Probably around grade 5-6 you could start to separate out who the kids were who were going to make it into higher education. I guess some people probably think that's a little young to "give up" on students who could possibly make something of themselves. After a 2 years of "general" courses, it's almost impossible to make up for the lost time and graduate from the "advanced" program. But I think that we have a lot to be gained in not holding back those who can, and want to, do something great with their life.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have been around for longer than the US system or the US itself. The % of extraordinary people probably hasn't changed much.

      Part of being extraordinary is doing something most people cannot do.

    8. Re:Lots of people could do this by berashith · · Score: 2

      I always felt the same way. I had an algebra 2 course that offered extra credit for work in the final two chapters, which we werent going to go over in class. This was supposed to be done throughout the semester, and turned in during the last week just in case you needed a few points. I turned in the entire section by the end of week 2, but the teacher never let me do anything interesting even after I showed initiative. I sat there while she literally read the book to us, and then got bad grades on homework quizzes, which consisted of copying the work from 4 random questions from our notebooks to prove that we had completed all of the work. It didnt matter if we understood the lessons or could apply the concepts, the requirement was to have written out all of the hundreds of problems, and use a sampling of 4 of them to deteremine if we were doing our work.

      I think this class sucked away the last bit of enjoying learning through school that I had left, and it took years for me to care about classes and grades again. This has taken quite a toll on my life and career.

    9. Re:Lots of people could do this by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Ignorance is strength!

      I'm sure you know why...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    10. Re:Lots of people could do this by michaelwigle · · Score: 2

      Personally I want to know how they managed to get through the school system before the age of 18. The system which seems designed more to keep young people off the streets than it is to educate them.

      They home schooled.

    11. Re:Lots of people could do this by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You would need special schools and to set up qualifications to get into them and remain in them. This appears to be unacceptable in an egalitarian society and it is doubly unacceptable in one filled with jealousy and people who want their kids to be seen as "smart". Since rich people have the ability to buy their way in, where other parents do not, you end up with high end schools with a certain number of kids whose parents are simply rich, and this only makes the egalitarian sorts even more against separate schooling.

      The public school system is not there to teach geniuses, it's there to provide a basic standard of education to everyone. Perhaps we should let the smart kids out sooner, but again it becomes a matter of jealousy and things like that. Do not underestimate the deadening effect of "democratic values" on certain things.

    12. Re:Lots of people could do this by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      If they had done that to me, in 5th-6th grade, I would have gone into your "general" category because my grades were subpar and I refused to do my homework. Since they held off, I ended up going to a very good university because I graduated in the top 5% of my class. I don't like holding smart kids back, because I was one, but college is very, very far away for a 5th or 6th grader and you can't expect them to be acting in they will when it starts becoming a reality. As it stands, at that age, it is almost how good your parents are at ensuring you do your work, than it is about your own abilities.

    13. Re:Lots of people could do this by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And you couldn't read ahead because you'd be told that the class hadn't got there yet. One of my friends in grade 7 gave up and taught himself calculus during math class, the teacher didn't dare stop him, but neither did he allow him to complete a single assignment or test before the requisite time, nor could he advance to the next grade early (despite the fact that he was already working himself 5-6 grades ahead of the class)

      Our standard system is broken, since in the name of "socialization" we require students to stay with other kids at almost exactly the same age. (Of course, the fact that socialization skills and social maturity advances at vastly different rates in different kids doesn't seem to bother anyone, let alone the academic abilities.)

      Nevertheless, there are many strategies for students "stuck" in scenarios like that. In math classes, to take your example, I found working on the "extra exercises" and "challenge problems" to be a useful diversion, and teachers were generally happy to discuss them before/after class, since most teachers like motivated kids, and it's not a lot of extra work to look in their teacher's manual to see the solution.

      I found that most teachers were actually pretty accommodating and left me alone to do whatever I wanted to during class, once they realized I already knew the answers to most everything... it would have been more annoying and more disruptive to the class if I were trying to be actively engaged asking challenging questions or keeping other kids from offering answers.

      At some point the "challenge problems" became rather boring, so I started working on calculus some years ahead of time during math classes. I'd just bring the book and work on those problems myself while the class did whatever it was doing. When I started asking the teacher questions, he could answer some of them, but eventually he just referred me to the calculus teacher, who was quite helpful and met with me a few times to discuss some problems and concepts.

      I know quite a few people who had similar experiences -- the key for kids stuck in such a situation is to encourage them to keep doing their own independent work and not to be afraid of asking teachers about the stuff outside of normal class time. While some teachers were more helpful to me than others, I remember very few who didn't seem thrilled to discuss more advanced topics with me for a few minutes outside of class when they were free.

      And as someone who has gone on to teach, I can say that such students often are the best part of your day -- many times, they'll ask questions that will get you to think about stuff in new ways, even if it's dealing with very fundamental topics.

      There are really bad parts to our educational system, but someone with the right attitude and motivation can still end up arriving at college well ahead of the pack, even if a few years later than they might have in a more ideal world.

    14. Re:Lots of people could do this by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Shit, even college felt that way to me.

      Outside of my foreign language classes, there were maybe two or three courses that seemed to actually need all the time allotted them.

      Then there were the first year classes that were just a review of grades 7 (!!!) to 12. If I'd known better I'd have just tested out of them, but by the time I wised up it was too late for most of 'em. Didn't even occur to me beforehand that non-remedial college courses might just be a review of junior high and high school material.

    15. Re:Lots of people could do this by vlm · · Score: 2

      One of my friends in grade 7 gave up and taught himself calculus during math class

      LOL I did the exact same thing at the same age, picked up a calc book, started reading, liked it. Calc is believed to be exotic and complicated such that none of it can be learned until university, however 50% of it can be learned at a pretty low educational level. To learn 100% of calc requires the full preparation, but 50% is possible at a pretty early age. How hard is it to explain the geometric concept of a first, second, third, etc derivative to a reasonably bright gradeschool kid? The limit definition of a derivative? The concept that a integral is just a backwards derivative, sorta? A couple different schemes for numerical integration that aren't much worse than using the quadratic formula?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    16. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Our standard system is broken, since in the name of "socialization" we require students to stay with other kids at almost exactly the same age.

      If they wanted me to be "well socialized" they should have put me with people my own intelligence regardless of age since being picked on for being a nerd by moronic little demons didn't make me well socialized at all. The opposite in fact.

    17. Re:Lots of people could do this by thepike · · Score: 1

      Personally I want to know how they managed to get through the school system before the age of 18. The system which seems designed more to keep young people off the streets than it is to educate them.

      It depends a lot on your parents. Aside from the possibility of home schooling (which has to bring about all sorts of problems for university admissions) they can do a lot to push you through more quickly, or not allow it. For one thing, they can send you to better schools that will actually look for gifted students and help them along. Alternatively, they can fight for (or against) advancement. For instance, it was twice suggested that I skip a grade, but my parents wouldn't let me because I was already small for my age and they were worried about me being picked on. Similarly, if my parents had fought for it, I could have graduated high school in 3 years. Probably could have done college in 3 years too, if I'd worked harder at it.

      That said, I'm glad my parents did what they did. I'm working on my PhD in molecular biology now, and I'm in no hurry to be done. All those extra years in school didn't teach me any more bio, or math, or better writing skills, but I had a lot of fun during that time and definitely formed a lot of relationships that are important to me. That's what I always think people like this are missing out on.

    18. Re:Lots of people could do this by eth1 · · Score: 2

      This...

      The whole grade-level system needs to be thrown out. A better system would be to have a year-round trimester, with courses designed to cover material quickly and be taken twice by most people. The quick studies will be out in one term, and some people might stay for three. You advance in each subject independent of the others (except where dependencies are involved, like physics needing calculus), and when your current instructor thinks you're ready for the next step.

      If you add in the ability for students who learn in one term to bank some of that extra time as time off, you also add a very strong incentive to study.

    19. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think socialization is not just about dealing with similar people to you, but also people who are different.

      Better get used to dealing with moronic devils at an early age, than to grow up in a bubble wrapped green house and be totally unprepared to deal with moronic devils when you enter the real world.

    20. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure . . . I could have done that, too. In fact, at various points during school, I did work ahead, but some part of my personality rebels against doing extra work. I still had to finish all of the same boring assignments everyone else did. Then, I had the choice of doing extra work or slacking off. I generally chose slacking off as doing the extra work wasn't going to get me anywhere. It wasn't until the last couple of years of high school that I could reasonably work ahead and be rewarded for it, by graduating/finishing one term early.

    21. Re:Lots of people could do this by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      The other issue is that "tracking" -- the educational term for separating students into different levels -- does have bad effects as well as good ones.

      Yes, it's great for kids who get into an "honors" track not to have to be in the same classroom as the unruly or dumb kids. It allows them to move ahead more quickly and to make more efficient progress. It also allows slower kids to be with their peers and get more attention as needed.

      But numerous studies have shown that tracking decisions are (1) often made based on poor teacher decisions and evaluations, and (2) tracked students often find it very difficult to switch between tracks once they end up there, even if their abilities really change.

      In terms of the former, most teachers are not developmental specialists, so their judgments about various abilities and possible tracks for development are often suspect. And that's not even taking into account errors due to teachers' biases for or against particular students, genders, races, etc. (which have been shown to be significant in such decisions in many cases).

      As for the latter, different kids have different "spurts" in their intellectual development, just as they have in their physical or social development. If these are ill-timed, students can end up in a lower track and never really be given the opportunity to catch up. I know of quite a few students who had significant (but not insurmountable) learning disabilities, but they were often placed in special ed with kids who were in fact mentally retarded. A student in that scenario has little chance of ever catching back up to a mainstream classroom, even if cognitive abilities significantly improve. On the other hand, a few of my friends were tested for advanced abilities and ended up being put into a special enriching learning class a couple times per week in elementary school. Once a student was in the program, you stayed there -- but, by the end of middle school, it was clear that some of the kids still belonged there, but some of the others really should have been tracked a lot lower again. (It's hard to convince parents that their kid should be removed from a program like that.)

      These sorts of problems are behind the strong push for "democratic values" in keeping students all on the same track, which is of course a sort of "lowest common denominator" solution.

      A better solution would be to have more flexible boundaries between "tracks," which would more easily allow students to move up and down. Unfortunately, given that various studies show that teachers tend to settle into a particular opinion of a student rather quickly, it can be difficult to get objective opinions to move students around properly. (And no, standardized tests are generally not the best answer, since they tend to be so limited in what they test.)

      Unless you have schools where there are effectively NO levels and each student is treated as an individual, you're never going to get all students at appropriate levels. And teaching everyone as an individual makes things really tough for teachers, giving tests, etc., and is basically impossible with the teacher/student ratios we have at most public schools.

      I'm not saying there are no solutions. But whether your democratic values keep all students in the same class or whether you aggressively try to track students into different levels, it's still going to hurt a lot of kids and help others.

    22. Re:Lots of people could do this by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      I reacted differently to being a bit beyond what my age said I was supposed to be capable of: I never gave up my love of learning, just my love of schooling. Once you discover that those are 2 different things, there's much less limit to what you can accomplish or think about.

      For instance, I've never taken a philosophy course, but I can still enjoy mulling over Plato.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    23. Re:Lots of people could do this by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      IF only the school systems in america werent structured how they are I imagine that we could have many folks finishing schooling much earlier than 18 and college a few years later..

      I know many students who were held back merely because they had to wait to go on to the next year.. at best put in an "advanced placement" course..

      we could easily have students graduating highschool at 14 or 15 ...if not sooner.. with the 'smart' ones beating that.. all of the time.. but.... it just doesnt seem to happen

      ^^^^^^^^ THIS

      I'm more interested in how he got a college to even *look* at him. I've been looking into it, and I can not find a state that will grant a GED to anyone under 16 and even then you need high school superintendent permission. Without a GED even community colleges won't allow someone to take a class.

      So how did this kid cut through all the red tape to get to college without a GED?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    24. Re:Lots of people could do this by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Then, I had the choice of doing extra work or slacking off. I generally chose slacking off as doing the extra work wasn't going to get me anywhere.

      Of course, that's completely false. Unfortunately, I think you missed the entire point of what "education" is, then. This sort of attitude does more to poison the American educational system than any non-ideal classroom setting could ever do.

      And I'm not saying it's entirely your fault -- the American educational system has more-or-less been designed from the beginning to keep learning and independent thought in check, to produce good obedient workers who only do what they are told, etc. If you want an "education," rather than just "schooling," you sort of have to do it yourself.

      Anyhow, even outside of education, if you only ever do the minimum of what people ask you to do, you're probably not going to get ahead in life. That's perhaps a greater lesson for kids to learn than the entire rest of the crap taught in schools.

    25. Re:Lots of people could do this by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      It depends a lot on your parents. Aside from the possibility of home schooling (which has to bring about all sorts of problems for university admissions) they can do a lot to push you through more quickly, or not allow it.

      Or your parents can be poor and so you're stuck in a backwoods public school where what family you're from and what religion you are matter more to your academic advancement than academics.

    26. Re:Lots of people could do this by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      Similar situation to me. By the time I was in 8th grade, my literature/reading instructor gave up and just sent me off to the library to write on Fridays when everyone else was doing reading comprehension instruction. Unfortunately, the school system didn't permit skipping grades without unanimous approval from teachers as well as parental consent, and my mother thought I'd be better off simply trying for one of the specialty magnet schools in town for high school. She was probably right, as far as socialization was concerned; I was just another smart kid in a sea of smart kids, and it took me down a few pegs while at the same time allowing for the proper level of intellectual stimulation. But I could have just as easily jumped to the local state college and done just fine at 15 or 16.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    27. Re:Lots of people could do this by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I know many students who were held back merely because they had to wait to go on to the next year

      But then if you let the brighter students advance faster, it means you lump all the others in 'stupid school'. And most/everybody agrees that it's good to have the brighter students mixed in with those too stupid to tie their own shoes, for the sake of the 2nd category. I've never really understood it, but there's a name for it: elitism. There's only one place where I've seen it applied with success without favoritism nor nepotism: french Grandes Ecoles.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    28. Re:Lots of people could do this by dargaud · · Score: 2

      But to the smart kids, it feels like a punishment. Not just 'feels', you actually make them waste years of their life. Is that just ?

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    29. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our standard system is broken, since in the name of "socialization" we require students to stay with other kids at almost exactly the same age. (Of course, the fact that socialization skills and social maturity advances at vastly different rates in different kids doesn't seem to bother anyone, let alone the academic abilities.)

      Having skipped some grades and moved ahead, I'm going to say you're wrong. I'd probably have been better off staying with the same age group, and learning all the social lessons at the time you're supposed to learn them. Learning social lessons when you're 20 that you should have learned at 14, because you were effectively ostracized by being significantly younger during middle/high school is not amusing.

      Sure, there are some things broken - but trying to keep people in the right social development path is not one of them. If you expect your high potential people to be able to make an impact after they exceed professionally, you need to be sure they're capable of relating to everyone else.

      Yeah you get a few amazing outliers that end up on TV for everyone to fawn on, but that's not the majority.

    30. Re:Lots of people could do this by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      Yep. I took my college placement test in 7th grade, and scored in the 90th percentile for college freshmen. By 9th grade, my score was higher than the average for students entering MIT (at least the ones that took the ACT test, which is what I took). The only thing that prevented me from dropping out of high school to go to college was that my parents wouldn't let me. Of course, I didn't go on to do anything all that interesting. At the time I thought I was some sort of super genius, but it turned out I was just an early bloomer academically, and I'm very good at taking multiple choice tests.

    31. Re:Lots of people could do this by Amouth · · Score: 1

      Growing up i had problems just getting into the "advanced placement" stuff.. I've always been very good at math but never in English, in the county i grew up in you had to place/test at the "advanced" level for all subjects to be put into "advanced placement" if you where like me and defunct in one subject you couldn't advanced any more than the normal rate.

      It wasn't until 8th grade i managed to talk the teachers into letting me take multiple levels of math at the same time so that i could actually learn something. the US public school system does not handle exceptions to the normal well.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    32. Re:Lots of people could do this by Reapy · · Score: 1

      I agree here too. I gave up schooling after I got my BS in comp sci. I remember quite clearly on graduation day hanging up my cap thinking "never again". I know I should have continued on with a masters in some way, shape or form, people really do look at it for salary caps and such, it would have meant more money etc, but I honestly was just so fed up with school... but I'm still not fed up with learning, not by a long shot.

    33. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, whenever I see these child prodigy stories I wonder how exactly did they skip all these grades? I scored at 12th grade level in 6th grade, they never mentioned skipping even one grade, ever. Then when I wanted to take the GED and test out of doing high school altogether they said I had to wait until my class would have graduated. Maybe they thought I would decide to stick around for high school and boost the schools performance in the SAT ratings or something. Well, no I quit the hell out of there and just waited until I was eligible for the GED. It wouldn't have even been legal to quit at 15 but my mom has an MFA which allowed her to sign off on some "home schooling" paperwork that let me off the hook legally. Still no college would take me. I had to start at a community college, get all A's and then transfer into a real school. So, seriously, I would love to know how these child prodigies get around all the bureaucratic bullshit and go straight into MIT or Berkeley or whatever because the administrators and paper-pushers seemed to do everything they could to bust my balls growing up. Maybe it was because my family was working class so they didn't take me seriously, I don't know.

    34. Re:Lots of people could do this by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      He went to a private university. They're not bound by (most) rules, certainly not ones like requiring a GED.

    35. Re:Lots of people could do this by hexagonc · · Score: 1

      I would say that the only part of calculus that can be learned at a low educational level is taking derivatives. Taking derivatives of elemental functions involves little more than substitution. Anyone with a solid grasp of highschool algebra can do that. However, things get quite a bit more complicated when you start talking indefinite integrals and even limits. Complex pattern matching is involved even with seemingly simple indefinite integrals and will require a good understanding of trigonometry -- a skill even someone very good at algebra could be lacking. Proving derivative formulas with limits is similarly nontrivial; at a minimum you need to be good with algebraic manipulations involving rational functions. You and most slashdot readers probably found it easy but that's because you were already independently interested in math and was skilled enough to do a lot of algebraic manipulations in your head. In the US, at least, that is obviously the exception rather than rule. The reason calculus is taught last in highschool, if at all, is because in order to do anything nontrivial with calculus requires a solid foundation with algebra, trigonometry and perhaps geometry. Considering that students struggle with algebra and trigonometry alone, what chance do they have of understanding something that builds on top of it?

    36. Re:Lots of people could do this by strikethree · · Score: 2

      You should be at 5 insightful right now.

      I was like that and now my son is like that (tuned out of class, far ahead of our peers in knowledge and understanding). I gave him some college level tests and he actually did better than me on one of them. Needless to say, he passed all of them. I can NOT get my son accelerated. They just want to fail him and hold him back because he has completely tuned out because of how painfully repetitive and stupid it all is. I have tried turning it into a self-discipline game that is super easy for him to win but the damage was done by the 4th grade. Any mention of the word "school" and he completely shuts off.

      It has taken some time, but I have turned his mind back on. He finally has a sense of wonder about the world again and I can even get him to do research on his questions and ideas... but, I have to be extremely careful because if he thinks I am trying to "teach" him anything, he shuts down immediately.

      Yeah, I have some extreme anger towards a system that has made life extremely painful for both my son and myself. My son has that same anger and all I can do is teach him to put it off long enough to where he dies before it causes any problems.

      To all of the fantastic teachers (professional or not!) out there: You folks are magical and deeply loved and appreciated. You have had an incredible and deep impact on my life that I will never forget. You are as gods. When you die, may angels lift you softly up into heaven where you are given a place of honor for all of eternity.

      To all of the bad teachers and school administrators out there: Fuck you! You are amongst the most evil bastards out there. You steal imagination and hope from children so that their tears of frustration grant meaning to your pitiful and worthless existence. I hope that your deaths are are prolonged and extremely painful and that demons shackle you and drag you down to hell while you are kicking and screaming in terror.

      Meh. How can I help my son not turn out like myself?

      (um... CAPTCHA is catalyst. Bizarre. Oh, and I apologize for the stream of consciousness rambling.)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    37. Re:Lots of people could do this by green1 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that when someone does this extra work in school, they get absolutely no reward, or even acknowledgement for it. slacking off is therefore the encouraged behaviour because you will be treated the same either way.
      I can work 4 times as hard as the kid beside me, and still do the same tests on the same days, still move to the same next grade at the same time... or I can slack off, barely pass, and be in exactly the same position.

      Where's the incentive to succeed?

      If I knew that I could work harder and skip a grade (and therefore a year of school) I would definitely have done so! but every time I tried to work ahead the teachers told me to wait for everyone else to catch up.

      We need to stop seeing school as being X years long and instead see school as being until you have met Y requirements and know the material. But schools focus very hard on the number of hours of instruction each class should take instead of the goals of what material needs to be taught and understood.

    38. Re:Lots of people could do this by green1 · · Score: 2

      because you were effectively ostracized by being significantly younger during middle/high school is not amusing.

      Teenagers are cruel, they always have been, and probably always will be. That said, it seems likely that they pick on people who have skipped grades mainly because it is so uncommon. If our education system was completely goal oriented, instead of age oriented, there would always be a mix of various ages in every class, and that particular excuse for picking on kids wouldn't be as likely (I'm not going to pretend that it would stop kids from picking on other kids, but I don't think age would be such an issue if the school system wasn't programming them to make it so.)

      We shouldn't care what age a kid is when determining what grade they should be in, we should look at their knowledge and let them work accordingly. If that means that you have a 15 year old in grade 3 and a 7 year old in grade 8, so be it.

    39. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Education needs to be accelerated so that a university education is achieved before puberty. After that it's just so hard to focus on books.

    40. Re:Lots of people could do this by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I attended (1) public school (2) in a small town (3) in Texas (4) in the 90s. So four things Slashdotters would definitely assume were working against me.

      That being said, I had multiple opportunities to skip grades (two of my closest friends both graduated from high school two years early). The first was when I was five. My mom didn't want me to skip because of socialization issues (and size issues: I was already small for my age!).

      Instead, they sent me to second grade for reading, fifth grade for writing, and fourth grade for math.

      So it's sometimes hard for me to believe this meme of "I couldn't skip a grade in the US" when I had George W. Bush, proto-No Child Left Behind, and anti-intellectual social attitudes working against me nearly from the get go.

    41. Re:Lots of people could do this by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      no.. public school creates dutiful, obedient office workers and blue collar tradesmen. people who don't rock the boat. this is why smart people consider it torture, not the sweater wearing prep book worm semi-popular people, but the ones who are smart but are so miserable they end up with 'inconsistent' stamped all over their report cards.

    42. Re:Lots of people could do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was the kid in that boat too. If a teacher made the mistake of posting homework on the board at the start of class, my homework was done by the end of class. That being said, I do enjoy helping people and when I could tell the class was not getting it, would often ask a question phrased in a particular way to bridge the gap and help the teacher. Being smart does not mean just running off on your own, you can help too (:

    43. Re:Lots of people could do this by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      He went to a private university. They're not bound by (most) rules, certainly not ones like requiring a GED.

      He went to Loyola University Chicago when he was 9 and their admissions says they require a high school transcript, no exceptions for home school and he was home schooled.

      So I still wonder why did Loyola accept him? Yes yes, he's a genius, I got that, but there are a lot of geniuses who are still wasting the first 18 yrs of life going through all 12 years of school before learning something that actually matters.

      If you can't tell I'm rather frustrated with the school system in the US, I wish it gave smart students the chance to live to their full potential instead of holding them back and making them wait for the group.

      Students should be able to enter college when they're ready, not when they have been alive a certain number of years

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    44. Re:Lots of people could do this by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      No, their requirements don't say that they make no exception for homeschooling. They don't say anything about homeschooling at all. At least, not on the pages you linked to.

      He was nine at the time. You're going to be blazing a new trail when you do that no matter where. State universities get hung up by rules. Private ones can bend them.

  13. Before my time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a Doogie Howser?
                  - Sincerely, a young'un

    1. Re:Before my time? by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      There's this thing called "google" which can be helpful. I mean, you're already on the net in a browser, it's not hard. Heck, just going directly to wikipedia gets you the hit in one try.

    2. Re:Before my time? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Sincerely, learn to fucking google. I highlighted the words and right clicked to the answer.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Before my time? by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      Something close but not exactly like a Doody Howitzer.

      Shite projectiles!

      Now, there is a bad mental image!

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
  14. I went to school with him at Mirman in Los Angeles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I went to school with Sho at Mirman in Los Angeles. Humble? But, of course, this was before puberty, so things may have changed. As for gifted, I wouldn't know since I didn't really understand the deeper meaning of anything he had to say. And this from a student who also wen tot a school for gifted children. Looking back on the experience, I wish I had been gifted a little more like Harry Reems and a little less like Sho.

  15. When I was applying to med schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (didn't get in btw) one of the things they kept saying when I went on interviews is that they wanted to make sure this is something you really wanted to do. I kind of felt this was horseshit and just another hoop to jump through and of course this is a data point in support of that position. (Since I could very easily see that a decision a12 year old made might not be the one he agrees with as an adult. Hell, he's already a pianist, he could dump medicine to go on to a career as a classical musician.) Admittedly some of the schools arguably thought that way but the fact at least one did makes me wonder.

  16. Do any of these geniuses ever pan out? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps you just don't hear about their childhoods after they've found success, but I always hear stories about these geniuses graduated X years early, but rarely about their professional accomplishments.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:Do any of these geniuses ever pan out? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      I graduated a year early. My work's generated millions of dollars and saved thousands of lives.

      You've also never heard of me, which is nice.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:Do any of these geniuses ever pan out? by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      That's because in this day, hard work and dedication is almost distinguishable from intellect. I mentioned this in a post below, but I knew 3 people who graduated college at 17/18, and then went on to do nothing. I had very close interactions with one, and he was the laziest person I'd ever met... basically graduated college and figured he had proven himself, without realizing that's when then real work begins.

    3. Re:Do any of these geniuses ever pan out? by hvm2hvm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe because they get employed by huge corporations and you only hear found the cure for cancer/designed a mind reading device/etc.

      --
      ics
    4. Re:Do any of these geniuses ever pan out? by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      Yes. Its all about resources. The smartest kids can do great things, but science has gotten to the point that it needs some very pricey tools to actually run experiments. Corporations are the only sorts who can afford those things, and they are going to be uninterested in making one of their researchers into some sort of prima donna unless they can avoid it, or profit off of it.

    5. Re:Do any of these geniuses ever pan out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you just don't hear about their childhoods after they've found success, but I always hear stories about these geniuses graduated X years early, but rarely about their professional accomplishments.

      Erik Demaine comes to mind.

    6. Re:Do any of these geniuses ever pan out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, you do, you just need to pay attention. For example, there was one guy who was covered quite extensively here on Slashdot, who went to Berkeley at age 15, his name was Hans Reiser, and he was quite accomplished at, at well nevermind.

      On second thought, maybe it's better we DIDN'T hear about their accomplishments.

    7. Re:Do any of these geniuses ever pan out? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      A lot of it boils down to kids never learning to apply themselves. I coasted along lazily in math class until I hit integral calculus, which was a giant brick wall to me. Everything else I had understood at both a logical and fundamental level, whereas with three dimensional solids I understood the concepts but the math was not something I instantly grasped. This really fucked me over; I'd never learned how to study math because I never had to before. I think if I had been challenged in an accelerated program I would have picked up those critical skills and been better prepared. As it was, I had to learn how to actually study math from scratch.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    8. Re:Do any of these geniuses ever pan out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason you don't hear about professional accomplishments as often is because prodigy's accomplishments are usually fairly average. Right now this kid is doing great work for being young, but that's because we're comparing him to his biological age group and not his intellectual age group. He's doing fantastic compared to other 21 year old students, but how is he compared to the doctors that are graduating with him. We would like to think that he would turn out to be the greatest doctor of all time because he's getting started early, but there's no reason to believe that he will just because he's young.

      Prodigies often underwhelm because his biological peers will go through the same training that he has already finished, he's currently ~10 years ahead. How much further ahead will he be in 10 years? In 20 years? If I asked you which is more likely to make a breakthrough the doctor with 0 years experience or 10 you'd say 10, but if was 10 years versus 20, or 20 versus 30, it is much more of a toss up.

  17. Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by trenien · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Am I the only one who thinks that such a genius is bound to make major leaps in whatever field he invests himself in?

    As such, the path he has chosen is good news for diseased children. However, humanity as a species isn't affected by those personnal tragedies he decided to focus on. On the other hand, there's a number of subjects in physics, genetics or even medecine that could have had a much wider impact.

    Yes, I'm aware such a way of thinking classifies into the cold-hearted bastards category.

    1. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by tanujt · · Score: 2

      I see the point, though where do you propose to draw the line in deciding what's best for a person to do in the interests of humanity?

    2. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the key is to talk them into it so they make the choice themselves

    3. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who thinks that such a genius is bound to make major leaps in whatever field he invests himself in?

      That's the same as saying that the guy who buys 10000 lottery tickets is bound to win the lottery. True, his odds are better than most, but there are too many other factors in play. The age of solo science is long past. Modern science is a collaborative endeavor. You need to be able to work with other people. If you are a genius, you need to be able to work with less intelligent people. Your destiny is shared among them.

    4. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by bosef1 · · Score: 1

      I understand your comment. But think of it like this: children get sick with a lot of the same diseases adults get. What if this guy says, "You know what, on my weekends, after my round of banging supermodels after blowing their clothes off with my mind, I'm going to kick cancer's ass. 'Cause what pisses me off more than anything is to have to tell a seven-year-old they probably aren't going to make it to nine." Or what if he comes up with a new surgical procedure that makes it easier to fix some congenital defect that a lot of people get, so now there's a lot more people who can have normal lives. Wouldn't that be awesome for the species?

    5. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, people with those problems should be weeded from the gene pool. Yes I'm joking, and yes some people think that if we killed all those who need glasses, we'd get more people with better eyesight...

    6. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by evil_aaronm · · Score: 2

      What he's shown so far - and admirably well, evidently - is that he can master what's already known. We have no idea what he can come up with on his own. No slagging on the kid, but, at this point, he's just a walking bio-encyclopedia: he has facts, but we don't know if he has "wisdom." The ability to store all of those bits of information does not directly correlate into the ability to make something from them. We'll have to wait and see how he does.

    7. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      He will only work to his full potential in fields that interest him. Insofar as that may well be a waste of time, it is a shame, but I don't think there is much that anyone can do about it. He is not going to make breakthroughs in a field that bores him or he feels nothing for.

      When it comes down to it, there is no need for someone who is more efficient than two other people, because you can always hire two or three more people. What people like this are needed for is to make discoveries that are not simply incremental, but revolutionary. And to get there, you pretty much have to allow these people to work on what they feel like working on.

    8. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by zmughal · · Score: 2

      From TFA, he actually worked on both a Ph.D. in molecular genetics and cell biology as well as an M.D., so it is likely he will be working on research as well.

    9. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by trenien · · Score: 1
      I completely agree. I never said he should be forced to work on whatever subject somebody decides is most interesting.

      What I'm saying is that it is a shame for us, as a species, that his interests weren't on something with a wider impact.

    10. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, humanity as a species isn't affected by those personnal tragedies he decided to focus on.

      The hell it isn't. Those children are part of humanity, too. There's a reason humans care for the weak and the sick amongst us, instead of leaving them behind to die as other species do. And that reason is twofold: One, sometimes the physically weak turn out to have other advantages that contribute to the survival of the group. Two, compassion binds society together. Few things inspire more pro-social feeling than a stranger who cares for a sick child.

        I'm pretty sure that the biggest threat to humanity as a species is its own tendency to treat its members as disposable.

    11. Re:Too Bad for Humanity as a Whole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a point, but one day we should be able to fix genetic defects in a live human.

  18. medicine is a waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if this kid wants to be successful he needs to go to Wall St. everything else is for chumps.

    1. Re:medicine is a waste of time by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      if this kid wants to be successful he needs to go to Wall St. everything else is for chumps.

      As a child prodigy, it is presumable that by an early age he's already figured out what you have, in all your years, failed to - that the endless pursuit of little green pieces of paper is, ultimately, an idiotic endeavor.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  19. Measurement of IQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...according to a test he took at age 4, his IQ is too high to accurately measure.

    I never really understood why statements like this are made, as if he could never be tested later in life to re-validate or measure his IQ accurately. Regardless if he proves to be off the charts again at age 10, 15, or 25, it just sounds very stupid to make statements about single-digit age IQ tests that make it appear that a 4-year old "stumped" test writers. Or perhaps it begs the question of the validity of IQ testing at that age in general.

  20. I wish him success by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    I'd almost prefer him go into music... none of my business of course... it's just that exceptional people probably do the most good doing something creative. Be that expanding our understanding in science or advancing something in one of the arts or inventing something in some form of engineering.

    He's a 21 year old kid that has spent a lot of his time hitting the books harder then anyone. And he can do whatever wants. The best of luck to him.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  21. Key info missing from summary: MD at Age 21 by Guidii · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hate having to RTFM just to find the one key point.
    Editors: Stop burying your leads!

    1. Re:Key info missing from summary: MD at Age 21 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone wrote a Manual on this kid? Woah, I shoulda RTFA to notice that, thanks!

  22. Genius by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know any genius level people, but I know 3 who were fast-tracked through high school and graduated very prestigious colleges at 17/18. They all went on to get PhDs, and they all failed out for the same reason: sometime during their PhD they wanted to try to re-live their youth as they should have, and began acting like teenagers again again. Drinking, partying, getting in trouble.... these guys were the smartest guys I knew, but each one, on their own, managed to derail their careers because they completely missed their youth.

    Not saying this kid is in any danger of going down the same path... maybe his massive intellect will divert him from temptation. But every time I hear about someone graduating college exceedingly young, I always wonder when their fuse is going to run out.

    1. Re:Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that experience. Not that I was on some fast track gifted program or anything but one day in college I realized "Holy shit, I'm going to graduate without get laid once!" and then spent the last two semesters chasing girls. Had sex with some hot chicks but my GPA turned shitty and now I'll never a get a Phd, at least not from a good school. When I look back at my college days in my head I hear one of those game show noises they play when somebody loses like "Bwom, bwom, bwaaaa". Fuck. Oh well, life goes on.

    2. Re:Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't "geniuses" then. They were merely people of average intelligence who desired to do frivolous things. That wouldn't be bad if they didn't screw up their careers, but they did.

  23. Just 21... by identity0 · · Score: 1

    He will now be taking charge of a research program on the effects of alcohol on a brilliant young mind.

    1. Re:Just 21... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      You think you're being funny, but we had a psychology professor at our university who got the university to fund his research project on the state of mind of a middle aged man sailing around the world. And yes, he was his own research subject, as he sailed around the world. No, I really don't think it's possible for someone to be introspective enough to write a scientific paper on their own state of mind.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  24. That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I entered Harvard at 5, and graduated summa cum laude. I was tenured by the age of 6. By the age of 7 I burnt out and turned to drink, hookers and gambling. Now I am a bitter 8 year old who hates the world, and can't get a job due to my prison sentence.

    It'll be just the same for this guy, just you watch.

  25. Asians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. All those ages by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    and you can't put the age he's at now/getting the degree at into the summary? PFFT..

    Bad summary-

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  27. Nerds!!!! by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Where are the Alphas when you need them?

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  28. i judge genius by creative output not grades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    real geniuses produce breakthroughs in art, science and technology. paper geniuses collect academic credentials.

    so far all this kid has proved is that he has the academic game figured out.

    1. Re:i judge genius by creative output not grades by aintnostranger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      real geniuses produce breakthroughs in art, science and technology

      this. You nailed it. How is it that we rate someone as genius because of this degrees and IQ?? Does anyone care about Bach's IQ / degrees? Would we remember Newton if all he had were IQ and degrees?

    2. Re:i judge genius by creative output not grades by slew · · Score: 2

      Short answer: this is news.

      Long answer: News is "new". It isn't news whatever breathroughs in art, science that Bach or Newton did as it isnt' new. What is being reported on is the novelty of his early graduation, not a prediction of his potential future contributions to society or his IQ (which is merely background filler material for an article). Since his graduation is happening now and it's apparently noteworthy and new, therefore it "news". It wouldn't be news if you reported on his IQ after he took a test, when he still hadn't graduated (who would care), nor would it be news if you reported on this story 1 year from now when he was doing some sort of medical residency (but still has a high IQ and still has the degree)... They don''t call this 15 minutes of fame for nothing...

      A feature story on the relationship of genius and IQ might be an interesting feature story, but it's been beaten to death. There apparently is no corrolation. You can read one of the people that espose this theory in this book (which by the way was "news" when it was published, but now is just background filler material).

    3. Re:i judge genius by creative output not grades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this just some silly word games you play to cut someone down to size?

      He's definitely a genius because of his IQ and his ability to assimilate information.

    4. Re:i judge genius by creative output not grades by aintnostranger · · Score: 2

      I'm not bashing it being news, which it is. I'm bashing the summary for declaring him "above genius level".

  29. I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    What's a "Doogie Howser" ?!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by Pope · · Score: 1

      And you're too stupid to copy and paste something you don't know into your favourite search engine? Geez.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's a "Doogie Howser" ?!

      A TV show about a boy genius doctor from 1989-1993.

      Now, please get off the damned lawn. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose since today we've displayed that there are folks here who have never heard of Amelia Earhart or Charles Lindbergh, Doogie didn't stand a chance.

    4. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Seems like he was some sort of dude in an american TV show sometimes in the last century. I am over 40 years old and I never heard of him either.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a "Doogie Howser" ?!

      Ask a gay man.

    6. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may know him as Barney Stinson, or possibly Neil Patrick Harris.

    8. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      You're nineteen years old but your user ID number suggests that you must have joined Slashdot around the turn of the millennium? For someone having used Slashdot since they were seven years old or so, it's surprising that you still haven't found out about Google.

      Either that or (a) you were aping a 19-year-old for comedy effect or (b) you were telling porkies. ;-)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    9. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
    10. Re:I'm nineteen years old and what is this ? by kwoff · · Score: 1

      Ignoring your sarcasm: 200k user id, when did you sign up for slashdot....? :) Very web-lazily, http://anti-slash.org/essays/uid_analysis/ , 700k in 2003, so you signed up (errm, when did I sign up?) around 2000? So as a 9ish-year old you were a slashdot prodigy? ^.^ (or using your daddy's account, heh)

  30. Genius level ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you mean IQ above genius level ?
    Where does the genius level IQ start ? How can you be over genius, what's that called ?
    This is nonsense.

  31. Damn you slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for making me feel like an under-performing old fart! *shaking fist*

  32. Daniel Goleman by Saija · · Score: 1

    I'm reading now "Emotional Intelligence" and this book talks about how only the IQ is not the only key to success in life. There is also some information about how persons IQ-centric often lack some social skills

    --
    Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
  33. Smart kid, dumb career move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok so they say he's so smart but then he goes into Medicine?

    Ok, was it as a researcher? Or just your average run of the mill speciality that anyone who has the money to get through school can get?

    As mentioned previously, engineering, physics, biochemistry et al seem to be a better fit for such a mind.

    Seems whomever was guiding him to a career may have made the choice FOR him.

    1. Re:Smart kid, dumb career move. by CityZen · · Score: 1

      According to the article, he's a medical scientist with an MD. PhD.

  34. In another two decades ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... with experience and the inevitable cynicism that comes with it:

    Dr House.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. IQ test at 4 by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

    How about a measurement at some point that matters?

    This just in: all children 6 months old are super geniuses! None of them can be accurately IQ tested!

    Do one now, find out that yes, he's very gifted with work ethic and otherwise he's pretty run of the mill smart. I'd be shocked if he was over 200, and floored if he was substantially over it.

  36. Re:Stupid people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some asked harsh questions about whether his mother was pushing him somewhere he didn't belong.

    That Tiger Mom can push as hard as she wants. There is simply no way Mark Zuckerberg is going to marry a dude!

  37. Tae kwon do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and he has a black belt in tae kwon do.

    Ah, now it makes sense.

    Sho Yano: "Suit up! Give me an A+ or else you're in for an ass-wiping that would be legen-what-for-it-dary!"
    Teacher: "Yes, Sho Yano, sure... Whatever you say... Please don't hurt me..."

  38. Stop sullying Doogies good name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Doogie Howser was a doctor at 16, five years earlier!

    U mad?

  39. William Sidis by yoctology · · Score: 2

    Even Albert Einstein got a divorce. I think whatever gifts this young man has will be dogged and encumbered by being labeled a sideshow freak--even in the best possible way. Look at the biography of William Sidis. Even taking into account the myth-making of genius/madness, I see little benefit of being a prodigy, but I see a lot of attention addiction and other maladies that may choke out a fulfilled and happy life.

  40. My favorite line by dtmos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Davidson, who was on the same OB-GYN rotation, recalled the teenage Yano's reaction to witnessing his first birth. "He just looked at all of us and said, 'There's got to be a better way.'"

    1. Re:My favorite line by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      Oh I really like this kid!

  41. This is sad by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    While Yano's intelligence is simply amazing, there is a sad side to this story. Yano was virtually robbed of his youth and part of being young is playing with toys and exercising one's imagination. Youth is something you don't get back and he was jet propelled into becomming an adult. This is learning to run before you learn to walk. I hope that Yano doesn't regret not really having a youth.

    1. Re:This is sad by proslack · · Score: 1

      He had a youth. It just wasn't a typical youth. It doesn't say anywhere that he didn't have toys or exercise his imagination. In any event, a kid that smart isn't going to have a "normal" youth by any standard. How would he even relate to another teenager? When you are that smart you are, in a relative sense, surrounded by morons when you are in school. He'd have more in common with his teachers than the other students, even if he was lucky enough to be in a full-time gifted program. I suspect that this young man has a great life ahead of him, and I wager it won't be filled with regrets of a "robbed childhood".

      --


      Floating in the black seas of infinity without a paddle.
    2. Re:This is sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it ever occur to you that maybe he wasn't interested in sitting around playing with toys all day?

      dom

  42. Make babies. Lots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we humans have one single shred of sense, we will help him form babby at alarming rate.

  43. Missing the point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care about all his myriad academic achievements, what I really want to know is: does he keep a journal on an Apple II?

  44. So why aren't the world's problems solved by now? by cvtan · · Score: 0

    We keep hearing about prodigies like this when they are young, but what happens to them when they get old enough to actually do something? You would think all these geniuses would have solved world hunger and world peace by now. Do they turn into average folks by the time they are 25? Drugs and hanging out with loser friends are major forces that loom in this child's future.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  45. I am similar.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was basically a highly advanced student. Never was able to skip grades or anything though. My mom wouldn't let them for fear of ruining my social growing.

    Like others said above, schooling was a lot of repetition and I felt a lot of it was nonsense. Like other kids memorizing what chapter covered a certain concept.

    I carried a pillow to my classes and slept as much as possible. Aced tests and did no homework. Came out with a C/D average on the classes that didn't try to fail me since it's "cheating" to use my brain to avoid doing the homework.

    I failed government senior year since I was already working and living on my own and I did not have time to attend a city council meeting which was required to graduate.

    So I didn't graduate. Technically I'm a drop out, yet at 18yrs old I made 60,000 a year. I'm 24 now and earning $90,000/year. I'm such a good coder no one cares whether I had school or not.

    If this kid is so smart, he will easily be able to best my $30/hr at 18 and my current $45/hr at a large automaker. I guess we'll have to wait and find out.

    All he's proved is that he's smart...... I proved that I'm smart and I made a hell of a lot of money without a diploma or degree. Seems pretty smart to me.

    1. Re:I am similar.... by CityZen · · Score: 1

      His desire is to "make a great contribution". Presumably, that means to humanity, and not to his bank account.

  46. Now I really have a case of the MOOONdays... by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

    This, just... wow. I didn't think it was possible to be more self-deprecating, but I think I managed to.

  47. He is Asian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His parents decided on doctor.

  48. Child prodigies usually are always... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..."screwed up in the head" by the time they reach young adulthood. Without at least a small, appropriate amount of "getting into some mischief with your peers" during your child & adolescent years, you'll become socially retarded and develop personality disorders.

  49. Fibonacci number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He was reading at age 2, writing by 3, and composing music by his 5th birthday."

    The summary just didn't tell us what he did at age 8 and 13. But you could've easily deduced that he graduated at 21.

    1. Re:Fibonacci number by V.+P.+Winterbuttocks · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he's all set to lose his virginity at age 34.

      --
      I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.
    2. Re:Fibonacci number by zapatero · · Score: 1

      The fib. projection for 34-virginity assumes he's been on a date by 21. If not then date at 34, virginity at 55.

    3. Re:Fibonacci number by V.+P.+Winterbuttocks · · Score: 1

      After staring at women's vaginas all day, I'd sure hope he manages to take a couple of them on dates before he's 34.

      --
      I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.
  50. A dog cannon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On first glance I though the article was about a "Doggie Howitzer"

  51. Composing music by idontusenumbers · · Score: 1

    Composing music is something an average 5 year old does.

  52. Money is better than playing. by tekrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If he's that bright, he'll be earning mad money before he's 25. If he's earning 100k+ by that age, he'll be driving a Porsche and banging chicks like a rock star.

    Sorry, but that easily replaces a childhood with toys.

    What's sad is that you identify this kid as sad because he was rushed to adulthood, when there are millions of kids also robbed of their childhood because of poverty, and a lack of opportunity to advance like this kid did, simply because they were born into some shithole.

    And that shithole could even be in the USA -- many areas of this country are devastated by crime and poverty -- some kids don't even get to make it to his age, they are killed by stray gunfire, or in some even worse places (in the third world), sold off to slavers, or turned into child soldiers. Other kids here in the USA join gangs because there is no other choice.

    If he makes good money while he's young enough to enjoy it, it will trump any and all childhood 'play'. Don't be sad for this kid, turn your empathy towards those that actually need it.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Money is better than playing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's that bright, he'll be earning mad money before he's 25. If he's earning 100k+ by that age, he'll be driving a Porsche and banging chicks like a rock star.

      I'm 26. I make $100k/year. I'm pretty damn smart, and I'm sure this kid blows me out of the water.

      I live very comfortably, but as great as your description sounds -- this is nowhere near enough money to own a Porsche and live like a rock star (while being anything that approaches fiscally responsible).

      I had a pretty normal childhood and finished college & grad school in a quick-but-fairly-normal timeframe, but there are still times I regret that I didn't take the chance to party more in college. I'd give a substantial portion of my income to be able to go back and relive some of those years where I was too damned focused on school...

    2. Re:Money is better than playing. by Shados · · Score: 1

      Making 100k by 25 gets you a porsche and lets you bang a lot of chicks? Damn, why didn't anyone tell me? I've been missing out >.

    3. Re:Money is better than playing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeated studies show that once you have enough money to comfortably live on, and a sense of security, further income does not significantly increase happiness. The journals are full of these studies, both cross-sectional and longitudinal.

      If you honestly think 100k/year, Porsches and "banging chicks like a rock star" is the formula for happiness, you have a long way to go before you find happiness.

  53. What is IQ anyway? by mbkennel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Maybe intelligence is too variable, complex and human to be measured in a single number?"

    Anything can be measured in a single number, the question is 'how useful and predictive' is this number? With IQ, the empirical answer is "reasonably but not universally predictive".

    There actually is a technical point behind IQ. If you measure performance across all sorts of cognitive (and sometimes other) aspects, appropriately normalize the subscores and then look at the principal component (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_component_analysis) across large samples of individuals you observe a phenomenon: a significant (though not total) fraction of the variance can be explained by the single, largest principal component called 'g' in psychometric literature. This phenomenon did not have to be true empirically, but it is, and the degree to which it is true is also quantifiable.

    In a nutshell, people who perform high or low on some subsets are also substantially more likely to perform high or low on other cognitively-oriented subtasks.

    So, yes, "intelligence" does mean something and is a fact of Nature. Note, that of course, the subjects typically tested on an 'IQ' test have now been post-hoc chosen to be those which have high g-loading, i.e. are substantially correlated within individuals.

    If the typically tested tasks had also included, for instance *) ability to sing on tune *) ability to catch thrown balls while running, *) ability to distinguish odors *) ability to discern emotions in faces, etc, all of which clearly require brainpower, their "loading on the principal component of IQ" would be substantially weaker than the correlation between performance on predicting numerical sequences and analogies in natural language.

  54. My iPod knew about this story by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Just as I started reading this story, Rod Stewart's "Some guys have all the luck" played on the iPod. Spooky.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  55. The quote I enjoyed the most: by CityZen · · Score: 1

    > Davidson, who was on the same OB-GYN rotation, recalled the teenage Yano's reaction to witnessing his first birth. "He just looked at all of us and said, 'There's got to be a better way.'"

    First I laughed, but later I asked: what, exactly, is "better"? Certainly we can all easily come up with ideas on what is better for the mother and the baby, but what is better for humanity? That is not an easy question.

    1. Re:The quote I enjoyed the most: by V.+P.+Winterbuttocks · · Score: 1

      Whatever it is, it probably doesn't involve staring at a woman's vagina as it is subjected to the most unsexy thing possible.

      --
      I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.
  56. When IQ's go non-linear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a few people that have exceptionally high IQ's. I'm no slouch, having an IQ of 140, but I pale in comparison to them.

    One fellow was insanely intelligent. It was like dealing with a super-advanced alien at times. That is, if you were able to get past his odious personal habits, of which he had many. I remember one in particular: take a near-scalding hot bath, use no soap, get out, and liberally apply hand lotion all over his skin (head to toe). Admittedly, he had nice, supple and smooth skin. Too bad the body odour was...unique, to say the least. An interesting side effect was that his bath rings looked like geological strata (I don't think he ever cleaned his bathroom even once, altogether another story).

    Another chap was one of these "off the chart" types. I remember him more as being a living embodiment or reincarnation of Charles Manson with the insights of Stephen Hawking. Wild hair. Wild beard. And really, REALLY wild eyes. Decided that willpower is stronger than neurobiology and picked up a heroin habit "out of purely intellectual curiosity". Died from an OD at the age of 17 while working on his Masters.

    Last but not least was someone I worked with. Typical neckbeard alpha-geek. To say that he is an insufferable tool is an understatement, but he was smart enough not to let his personality quirks push him into the unemployment queue. However, some of his quirks did cross a line. Unrepentant sinophile. Now, I understand that there are many, many Caucasian males that suffer from having a decided preference for Asian women (AKA "Yellow fever"), he took it to the ne plus ultra. I think HR had to tell him to stop pestering the female Asian staff to pose for various photographs. Then, there was his unfortunate habit of personal dress. Whilst I would enjoy wearing walking shorts to the office during the summer months, he too would do the same, albeit with too-small jogging shorts. Really, there is nothing like seeing a testicle bust loose while having a meeting with a large client. It suddenly makes a PowerPoint presentation become a presentation about something else entirely. Most people were mortified beyond description. Shortly thereafter, he left on a sabbatical that has yet to conclude (This was almost 10 years ago). The unfortunate side effect was there was a blanket ban on the wearing of shorts in the office, which considering what had happened was completely understandable. (I just started wearing a kilt to prove a point. Being of Scottish descent does have a few advantages)

    I would not trade anything I have to be any of those three. They simply have more intellectual capability than I do, but there is more to life than being the smartest person in the room. Sometimes, being "normal" is not such a bad thing when you consider the implications of being "abnormal".

  57. Shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...your writing skills weren't at like '12th grade' by the time you left college. :)

  58. Sequence his DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He seems to have all the perks of intelligence without the madness and autistic baggage.
    We could use more genius among the population and learn alot from how his brain is wired. (Detect and cure autism, for example)

  59. black belt in TKD and genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He lost his genius cred in my book, when he decided to pursue a martial art that focuses on a combat range (ie kicking) which is the hardest to maintain. The school yard bullies can eat up for breakfast.

  60. Giant Island Creatures. by dadioflex · · Score: 1

    I'm not talking about the giant creatures from Doug McClure movies, but... well, yes those as well... life is a funny thing. It generates sports and anomalies. I applaud this little guy, but he is no more a representative of the human race than that giant crab, from any Doug McClure flick, is a crustacean spokesperson. Society was progressed in leaps and bounds. Nowadays? If he avoids getting papped to death, he may achieve obscurity in research. Like most scientists.

  61. New goal for my 1.5 year old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he can't read by 2, he's a failure.

  62. From what language does his name come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and how do you say "whoop dee fucking doo" in it?

  63. above-average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These people are the exception rather than the rule. Not only their intelligence but their accelerated-education path.

    Most above-average people are stuck on a slow path, in the class-room with the normal and dumb. Depending on family life, this allows social skills to flourish. Being smart, they can be above average without trying, which is all society allows most of the time. It teaches them to reach a mediocre skill-set then stop.

    By the same token, how many geniuses do we hear about? Those who are labelled geniuses and given extra education achieve very little. The pressure to perform is also a pressure for perfect altruism by saving the world. I can think of no reason why very smart equals totally selfless. These children tend to sacrifice their sexual/social experiences in the name of intelligence. Being told they can 'save the world' would create entitlement issues but there don't seem to be any obvious examples. Such a prediction will invariably fail because geniuses, like most people aren't motivated by other people's interests.

  64. More Dr Sam Beckett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With that list of accomplishments it reads more like he'll be inventing Quantum Leaping soon and travelling within his own life time.

  65. a Chinese kid that plays piano? by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    Shocking.

  66. This kid.... by EngineeringSquirrel · · Score: 1

    Show off.

  67. What I hope for the kid, by axlr8or · · Score: 1

    Is that he sincerely gets to be himself someday, not a publicity stunt. If he's that smart and can survive with that intelligence into adulthood he should truly be amazing. I mean, eventually he will figure out that 90 percent of 'adults' are totally id and that is SOOO depressing. Good luck kid.

  68. A real-life Doogie Howser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be legen... wait for it...

  69. College is bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real ones actually start college and leave quickly to start their own companies and work directly in a field they love and have a passion for in this world. People that can think quickly and problem solve anything are the real bright ones in this world.

  70. Perspective from a younger MD by jncook · · Score: 1

    I'm one of those young-ish MD degree people. High school grad age 17, BA computer science age 18, MS computer science age 19, MD age 23. Medical school was rough. Everybody else in my class had so much more life experience to draw on, which gives you better perspective about aging, disease, family issues and the like. Also, it was hard at age 19 to relate personally to my classmates who were married, had kids, etc. -- or the patients who might be four times my age. I learned how to do it, and got reasonably good at it, but it was hard.

    In the end, I gave up clinical practice and went back into computer science. +1 to the poster who said "insert-name-of-faceless-corporation". I work at Google now. There are lots of smart people here. :-)

  71. Here are 3 problems for these geniouses to solve. by master_p · · Score: 1

    1) the grand unified theory of physics.

    2) an economic system that is fair, allows for balanced development and does not cause crises.

    3) a programming language that allows a compiler the sophistication of human reasoning in order to catch as many bugs as possible.

    Now, if these geniouses can make progress in any of the above, they would offer a real good service to humanity.

  72. These guys come, they go by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    The tool, intelligence, must be coupled with an intensely accented motivation array to bring about a "genius." Maybe that accent is mental illness. Maybe not. But something other than pure intelligence must be present for the merely intelligent person to excel. And this guy doesn't have it. If he did, we'd be marvelling at his creations right now, not how quickly he learned the creations of true geniuses. One more "genius" for the "excellent mediocrity" bin of life.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  73. Re:So why aren't the world's problems solved by no by neminem · · Score: 1

    According to one of my favorites songs, a true story of a kid from the town I grew up in a number of years ago, after graduating college, the kid decided to go back to junior high. http://www.broadjam.com/artists/songs.php?artistID=35045&mediaID=271694

  74. Necessary lyrics post (I didn't write them) by neminem · · Score: 1

    Carla Ulbrich's 'Boy Wonder':

    I was 11 years old when I finished my degree
    Got my picture in the paper and my story on TV
    To be so young and so amazing took a genius they were sure
    I was the center of attention and my future was secure

    Chorus:
    I'm the boy wonder They all know my name
    I'm the boy wonder but still I feel the same
    They talk about boy wonder and the promise that it brings
    But I'm the boy wonder and it doesn't mean a thing

    So they asked me how I did it was I born a prodigy
    I tell them anyone can do it if they live a life like me
    Buried in the books while the others played outside
    I learned all about scholastics and a father's selfish pride

    CHORUS

    I was told it was an honor when I made the Guinness book
    So I opened up a copy I just thought I'd have a look
    My perusal was revealing I still see it in my sleep
    Haunted by the volume of the company I keep:

    The largest ball of twine and the longest fingernails
    People struck by lightning The fastest moving snails
    Tallest totem pole and the longest loaf of bread
    Most objects juggled while turning pirouettes
    Largest jigsaw puzzle and the biggest piece of cheese
    My years of study had earned a place with these ...

    So I forfeited my childhood living in the public eye
    And a paragraph in Guinness was my consolation prize
    Now my choices lay before me with the future open wide
    So when I graduated college... I went back to Junior High

    I'm the boy wonder but now I've changed my name
    Because I've always wondered what it's like to be the same
    No longer living under the attention that it brings
    Yeah I was the boy wonder and it didn't mean a thing

  75. will he be successful? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    The unfortunate thing about people of this caliber is that they start off really great, then fade out into monotony, never going further then what they are paid to.
    How about we develop a program that allows them to push the boundaries without worrying about regular life,
    unless of course they want to have a regular life as well....I know it can be lonely in those instances,
    so we should do our best to keep them well maintained socially so they do not feel the need to digress from their potential.
    I hope the parents are well connected, it would be great to have him in a place like NASA or other scientific domains, cancer research, etc...