Slashdot Mirror


Australians Receive SMS Death Threats

beaverdownunder writes "Many Aussies across New South Wales and South Australia had a bit of a shock this morning when they received an SMS threatening them with assassination. Although somewhat varied, the messages have typically read, 'Someone paid me to kill you. If you want me to spare you, I'll give you two days to pay $5000. If you inform the police or anybody, you will die, I am monitoring you', and signed with the e-mail address killerking247@yahoo.com. Police and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have warned that the messages are almost certainly fake, and that no dialogue should be entered into with scammers." I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

192 comments

  1. This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

    1. Re:This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

      They should have sent these SMS to the MPAA, RIAA crminals as well as the bought out Congress senators.
      Hilarity ensues.

    2. Re:This isn't fair! by f3rret · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

      They should have sent these SMS to the MPAA, RIAA crminals as well as the bought out Congress senators.
      Hilarity ensues.

      Hillarity and terrorism investigations.

      People would end up in Guantanomo over this.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    3. Re:This isn't fair! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      They should have sent these SMS to the MPAA, RIAA crminals as well as the bought out Congress senators. Hilarity ensues.

      If the members of the MPAA & RIAA had received them before the other people they would be suing all the other recipients - as well as the 'John Doe' sender - for copyright infringement.

    4. Re:This isn't fair! by EdIII · · Score: 1

      People are going to end up in Guantanomo anyways. Once something like that starts they will continue to find a reason to do so.

      We could at least be amused while it is happening. Think of it as a reacharound.

    5. Re:This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this is a line from a song and the RIAA will be suing anyone who receives or transmits the message.

    6. Re:This isn't fair! by marcello_dl · · Score: 0

      >I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

      You must be new here: just spark off an argument between vi and emacs and we'll be at each other's throat, for free.

      Emacs users will win because throttling someone is far easier than inserting the average key combo.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    7. Re:This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. What's hard about typing M-x force-choke?

    8. Re:This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice trick.

      Bastard.

    9. Re:This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you describe that in terms of a custom hosts file?

    10. Re:This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the faux-irony of this isn't proof this whole /. MyCleanPC thing is a meme, I don't know what is...

    11. Re:This isn't fair! by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

      No way. Barack Obama promised he'd close down Guantanomo when he ran for President 4 years ago. Surely it's closed by now.

    12. Re:This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

      Then you're in luck! The attempt your killer-for-hire made to profit twice on the deal backfired and they aren't even being taken seriously. Now is a perfect time for the plan to continue uninhibited.

    13. Re:This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear MyCleanPC, Fuck off. Yours Truly, Everyone at Slashdot

    14. Re:This isn't fair! by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

      How much did you pay to have the entire country of Australia assassinated? Did they give you some kind of group rate?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    15. Re:This isn't fair! by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know the current $/km^2 of destruction for nuclear devices is these days?

    16. Re:This isn't fair! by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know the current $/km^2 of destruction for nuclear devices is these days?

      It's a logarithmic scale with respect to megatons vs radius. Asteroid deorbinting might be more cost effective for something as big as a continent.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    17. Re:This isn't fair! by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know the current $/km^2 of destruction for nuclear devices is these days?

      It's a logarithmic scale with respect to megatons vs radius. Asteroid deorbinting might be more cost effective for something as big as a continent.

      Biological warfare is significantly more cost-effective.

      For Reference See: Rabbits, Camels, Toads.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    18. Re:This isn't fair! by funky_vibes · · Score: 2

      He did close it, and also made sure nobody gets out.

    19. Re:This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Load up the MyCleanPC site in firefox. Click on Help - report web forgery.
      Don't know if it will work, but worth a try if enough people do it.

    20. Re:This isn't fair! by Meski · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, just the idiots who are polling as voting for the no-alition.

    21. Re:This isn't fair! by Meski · · Score: 1

      We may not notice. Have you seen Uluru?

  2. Someone paid me to post this comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not moderate it or report it to the moderators. I am watching you.

    1. Re:Someone paid me to post this comment by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      I am now killing you this instant. You are dying. Blood everywhere...

      Wanna ride bikes? 8D

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
  3. I would sleep better after such a message.... by mseeger · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    A good joke always brightens my mood and relaxes me which helps me to sleep better.

    1. Re:I would sleep better after such a message.... by GloomE · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just watch out for the high-tech SMS wielding drop bears.

    2. Re:I would sleep better after such a message.... by mseeger · · Score: 3, Funny

      The right to arm bears shall not be restricted....

    3. Re:I would sleep better after such a message.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the bear arms are still hanging on to the hoop snake

    4. Re:I would sleep better after such a message.... by Meski · · Score: 1

      email-sms gateway's easier.

  4. Almost certainly fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Commisioner also stated that "You're almost certainly unlikely to be found dead in the bush 7 days after the message. Reason of death won't probably be 20-25 stab wounds in all body parts. There's practically no possibility your eyes will be burned out with hot iron. We find it very improbable that you will be dismembered with a piano wire and disemboweled. There is no reason for panic. Probably."

    1. Re:Almost certainly fake by AchilleTalon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Since Aussies are all having large penis, the spammers are switching their business in order to continue to make some kind of revenues.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    2. Re:Almost certainly fake by umghhh · · Score: 0

      dismembered with a piano wire - hmmm, that is actually a good idea

    3. Re:Almost certainly fake by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Funny

      This all seems familiar, but $5000 doesn't seem dirt cheap...

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    4. Re:Almost certainly fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia, the land where men are men, and so are the women.

    5. Re:Almost certainly fake by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      This all seems familiar, but $5000 doesn't seem dirt cheap...

      Dirty deeds, indeed.

    6. Re:Almost certainly fake by mwvdlee · · Score: 0

      If all Aussies are having large penis, at least some Aussies must have a big penis that all the other Aussies can have.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    7. Re:Almost certainly fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if it does happen, a dingo did it!

    8. Re:Almost certainly fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... it's probably not a problem... probably... but I'm showing a small discrepancy in the— well, no, it's well within acceptable bounds again. Sustaining sequence.

      CAPTCHA: iniquity

    9. Re:Almost certainly fake by Nimloth · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If Australia is anything like Canada, I'm betting it's a mobile operator doing it. Here they charge 25c per incoming message out of bundle.
      1. Write a script to send 100 000 death threats left and right.
      2. ...
      3. 25 000$ profit!

    10. Re:Almost certainly fake by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Dirty deeds, indeed.

      Dirty deeds done with sheep... in Australia.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    11. Re:Almost certainly fake by z0idberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Australia isn't one of these banana republics where you actually have to pay to RECEIVE text messages.

    12. Re:Almost certainly fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This all seems familiar, but $5000 doesn't seem dirt cheap...

      It's Australian dollars.

    13. Re:Almost certainly fake by Meski · · Score: 1

      1 AUD = 1.02367 USD

  5. Seems a very muted response by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In England at least, judges have determined that SMS messages and Twitter have exactly the same status as any other written publication. Australian law is, I believe, based on English law. So: this would be a blackmail attempt. Five years' jail for every message seems about right. They need to find him and then he can spend the rest of his life locked in his parents' basement. Which, come to think of it, is pretty much what will happen if they don't catch him.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 4, Informative

      Australian law is, I believe, based on English law.

      Back during the colonial days and original formation of the states, this was true. But once the states were formed, they were given limited independence to create their own laws (which had to be approved by the Crown at the time, such as with South Australia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Australia_Act_1834 )

      Full Independence was granted years later, and we now make our own laws as we see fit. Some of them logical, some of them even more fucked up than ever.

    2. Re:Seems a very muted response by mrclisdue · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nowadays, Australian law is based on what the USA wants.

      cheers,

    3. Re:Seems a very muted response by deoxyribonucleose · · Score: 1

      They need to find him and then he can spend the rest of his life locked in his parents' basement. Which, come to think of it, is pretty much what will happen if they don't catch him.

      <pathos>Will no-one think of the parents?</pathos>

    4. Re:Seems a very muted response by Nursie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Should be more than blackmail, this is harassment and a direct threat of harm, which I'm pretty sure is illegal in a large variety of ways.

      The police *should* be chasing this one pretty hard as it will have scared the pants off more than a few people. They probably won't though.

    5. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd love to argue with you and point out instances where you're mistaken, but I'm buggered if I can.

      Between our Patriot-Act-inspired anti-terrorism laws that came in for our good buddy Dubbya; our support for ACTA; our one-sided Free Trade Agreement which screws ourselves; and now the US Marines base in the Northern Territory (because Woomera wasn't enough).

      Well, we've effectively ceded control over ourselves to the US.

      I'm all for supporting our allies, and the US provides us with great protection, but we're legislating ourselves into being conquered.

    6. Re:Seems a very muted response by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think what he meant was that English law and Australian law share a lot of similarities because Aus law is based on the English law; indeed a lot of the Acts are the same, because they predate the split. Hence a lot of Australian courts will take english court decisions into mind, as "non-binding precedence"; indeed, even US courts have been known to do this from time to time.
      Hence the ruling in an English court that a twitter update can be regarded i the same way as any other written document, could be used in an Aus. court as a "well here's what they did" precedence. Obviously, assuming Aus. has no such law or similar precedent in their own legal history.

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    7. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they? It's unlikely that anything will happen.

    8. Re:Seems a very muted response by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Nowadays, Australian law is based on what the USA wants.

      To think I used to be proud to have been born in Australia. What a bunch of crybabies.

    9. Re:Seems a very muted response by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Because death threats are serious business?

      Seems pretty obvious to me.

    10. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 2

      Ahh, got you. I thought he was meaning that all of our laws were merely a copy of the UK ones.

      If laws haven't been enacted here, we do look at precedents set in other states, then other countries. The UK and the US being some of the more obvious examples. In this case, however, the Australian Telecommunications Act already covers these things and is quite unlike the UK version.

      But ultimately, the political parties usually have their own agenda. If we looked at more forward-thinking countries and our origins in the UK, we'd have things like Civil Unions here instead of arguments about them.

      I'm embarrassed by how backwards my own home-state (South Australia) is. Having been founded by a British Act of parliament in 1834 to become a virtual Britian-in-Australia (and the only state to never have been a penal colony), it went on to be so forward thinking as to be the first place to introduce a secret ballot for government elections; the second place in the world to give women the right to vote (The Kiwis beat us by a year); the first place to allow women the right to run for parliament; the first part of the British Empire to legalise Trade Unions; The first state in Australia to prohibit discrimation based on race, colour, country of origin, gender or marital status; the first state in Australia to decriminalise homosexuality; the first state in Australia to make rape in marriage a criminal offence; the first state in Australia to implement a 'container deposit' recycling system (currently 10c refund per can/bottle/milk carton); and the first state in Australia to ban plastic shopping bags

      Since then, it has lead the country in going backwards. It was the first state in Australia to criminalise anonymous free political speech just a couple of years ago (which was reversed on public backlash); the state that denied Australia the R18+ rating on computer games; Is behind the eastern states in its stance on civil unions; the list goes on.

      So... Let's hope they don't continue their backwards tradition and suddenly ban/censor SMS or mobile communications or something stupid. >.>

    11. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No buggery.

      Rule 1: No poofters.

    12. Re:Seems a very muted response by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      "Dobby is used to death threats, sir. Dobby gets them five times a day at home."

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    13. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Santa? Is that you? Where's my pony?!

    14. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm all for supporting our allies, and the US provides us with great protection, but we're legislating ourselves into being conquered." The citizens in the U.S. have been conquered by corporations and the wealthy and their bought and paid for political lackys. Due to their own apathy, most do not realize it though. Is there any way back to what the foundig fathers envisioned for the U.S.A.? Maybe a very bloody revolution, but most of us are too far gone in apathy for that. Very sad to see what the U.S. and the worl have come to.

    15. Re:Seems a very muted response by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Dude, we can't even agree on the laws we want for ourselves, how could we ever agree on what to impose on others?

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    16. Re:Seems a very muted response by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      For some years now that the north-americans are trying to do the same thing here in Brazil. But luckily the local politicians involved are too stupid to have complete success.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    17. Re:Seems a very muted response by operagost · · Score: 1

      the first state in Australia to ban plastic shopping bags

      Bravo, progressives! Your crowning achievement! *golf clap*

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      To be fair, between the Outback Steakhouse, Crocodile Dundee, and Foster's, Americans love (their woefully inaccurate perception of) you guys too much to conquer you.

    19. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where in the South Australia Act 1834 has anyone got the right to bear iPhones and similar implements there of?

    20. Re:Seems a very muted response by rsmith84 · · Score: 1

      Except that the Governor General can come in and take everything over if she deems the parliament is not operating in the best interests of the country.

    21. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 1

      The US Military is too afraid that we'll send The Wiggles there permanently to even consider an invasion.

    22. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 1

      Sadly, it's probably the most progressive thing the 70s. (1975 decriminalised homosexuality; 1976 declared rape-in-marriage a criminal act).

      So the old joke about "Please set your watch back 30 years" upon landing in Adelaide is being kind by 5 years.

    23. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 1

      since the 70s. Gah, I shouldn't be slashdotting at 2am on a Tuesday morning.

    24. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 1

      That's good. We're already evidently competing with the Canadians to become the 51st state. We don't want more competition ;)

    25. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm all for supporting our allies, and the US provides us with great protection, but we're legislating ourselves into being conquered.

      We're just making sure the supply lines of Vegemite remain open.

    26. Re:Seems a very muted response by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I see you when you're sleeping, I know when you're awake. I know if you've been bad or good, and I know what you did to the poor sheep I brought you last year.

      Not a chance.

    27. Re:Seems a very muted response by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      You know what I am sick of people dissing Adelaide. I have traveled widely and there is nowhere else I would rather live. If you think its so backwards why not fuck off and leave it to the many people who love it here!

    28. Re:Seems a very muted response by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 1

      The US Military is too afraid that we'll send The Wiggles there permanently to even consider an invasion.

      Actually the US military is rightfully frightened of our Stinger armed kangaroos (and we're frightened of what the drop bears have).

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
    29. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woggle Power!

    30. Re:Seems a very muted response by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      The US Military is too afraid that we'll send The Wiggles there permanently to even consider an invasion.

      They've stopped worrying about The Wiggles Threat ever since the Three Original Cast announced they're leaving.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    31. Re:Seems a very muted response by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      Pathos: The Love Child of Two-Thirds of The Three Musketeers.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    32. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine that this is worse than "normal" blackmail, because it also contains an explicit death threat.

    33. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. The city itself is quite nice. It's the people that live there that are fucking derro scumbags that expect someone in a wheelchair to move aside for them

    34. Re:Seems a very muted response by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. I live in the Adelaide Hills and this city is without doubt the best city in the country. I have heard people say that you have to go to Melbourne for culture but I suspect they are on drugs.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    35. Re:Seems a very muted response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I am sick of people dissing Adelaide. I have traveled widely and there is nowhere else I would rather live. If you think its so backwards why not fuck off and leave it to the many people who love it here!

      I think people did; which is probably why places like Melbourne, Brisbane and Sydney have higher populations.

  6. Assumptions ... by MSojka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

    It certainly is. On the other hand, assume you can send SMSes in a way which is not traceable and comparatively cheap. Assume you want the entire police force of some place - say, New South Wales - to be too busy and way less effective. Assume you want to commit some other crime which would greatly benefit from the police force in that place being too busy chasing phantoms.

    What would you do?

    1. Re:Assumptions ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      Hmm "Die Hard 3" ?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Assumptions ... by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Funny

      What would you do?

      I'd grab a beer, start up the BBQ, prepare some T-Bones with some olive oil and some spices, and lay out in the sun.

      Did I win?

    3. Re:Assumptions ... by MSojka · · Score: 1

      What would you do?

      I'd grab a beer, start up the BBQ, prepare some T-Bones with some olive oil and some spices, and lay out in the sun.

      Did I win?

      Possibly the "balls of steel" award for doing that in the middle of winter. As mild as it might be at the moment, the evenings can get frosty. ;)

      The thing is, even if the thread is empty and just meant to help another crime (extortion or worse), if only one person gets murdered, even in a totally unrelated act, and the police didn't say what they said, they'd face a public shitstorm. So they say what they say, put a person or two to try and track down the senders (which will likely fail), maybe set up a sting operation for them, and otherwise ignore the illusionary danger.

    4. Re:Assumptions ... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

      It certainly is.

      Nah, timothy's just drolling!

    5. Re:Assumptions ... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      tell me you have patented that already. That seems to be fitting so well with business patents that it would be a pity if it did not get patented

    6. Re:Assumptions ... by jamesh · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

      It certainly is. On the other hand, assume you can send SMSes in a way which is not traceable and comparatively cheap. Assume you want the entire police force of some place - say, New South Wales - to be too busy and way less effective. Assume you want to commit some other crime which would greatly benefit from the police force in that place being too busy chasing phantoms.

      What would you do?

      Mod you -1, Droll.

    7. Re:Assumptions ... by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      What would you do?

      I'd grab a beer, start up the BBQ, prepare some T-Bones with some olive oil and some spices, and lay out in the sun.

      Did I win?

      Maaaaaaayte!

      You forgot the shrimp!

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    8. Re:Assumptions ... by ignavus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Assume you want the entire police force of some place - say, New South Wales - to be too busy and way less effective.

      What would you do?

      Elect Barry O'Farrell as Premier.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    9. Re:Assumptions ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and lay out in the sun.

      First, you lie out in the sun.

      Then you lay your beer down beside you.

      Did I win?

      No, grammar defeated you.

    10. Re:Assumptions ... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. One can lay out in the sun... or rather, two can lay out in the sun.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:Assumptions ... by Enter+the+Shoggoth · · Score: 1

      Assume you want the entire police force of some place - say, New South Wales - to be too busy and way less effective.

      What would you do?

      Elect Barry O'Farrell as Premier.

      I just can't decide if I should mod this Informative, Insightful or Funny... all 3 apply equally.

      --
      Andy Warhol got it right / Everybody gets the limelight
      Andy Warhol got it wrong / Fifteen minutes is too long.
    12. Re:Assumptions ... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Then you lay your beer down beside you.

      But then it would all run out onto the ground !

    13. Re:Assumptions ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Im pretty sure they dont assign "the entire police force" to a single issue, particularly one like this. Seems far more likely "get warrant from courts for SMS records" would just get tacked onto the end of one officer's to-do list.

    14. Re:Assumptions ... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

      It certainly is. On the other hand, assume you can send SMSes in a way which is not traceable and comparatively cheap. Assume you want the entire police force of some place - say, New South Wales - to be too busy and way less effective. Assume you want to commit some other crime which would greatly benefit from the police force in that place being too busy chasing phantoms.

      What would you do?

      Why "another crime"?

      If I'd been paid to kill someone, this sounds like a wonderful way to distract the police - send this sort of memo to 5000 people, wait a week, then kill the one you were paid to kill.

      While they're busy looking for ANY motive other than "paid killing", laugh all the way to the bank...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    15. Re:Assumptions ... by Tom · · Score: 1

      What would you do?

      Something that works. The main police officer busied by this is the PR guy. Sure they'll track the SMS source down and do something about it. Total manpower expended? Ridiculous.

      Plant a real bomb with a non-working but dangerously looking detonator near the train station so that it's discovered 20 minutes before you rob your bank (say, by putting it near the trash bins and knowing when the waste disposal truck comes). You'll have the C&C center busy and quite a bunch of policemen to control the area.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    16. Re:Assumptions ... by Synesthes · · Score: 1

      That actually happened in town here.

      Some enterprising criminals phoned around to a 'borough' at the south end of town, and managed to convince a good number of people that they were calling from Emergency Services and wanted their assistance testing the 911 system at a certain time. Needless to say, at the specified time, 911 operators were flooded with fake calls. As is policy, every 911 call has to be responded to, so suddenly all police and emergency services were stuck in the south end of town.

      The criminals then took the opportunity to rob the Costco at the north end.

      As far as I know, they were never apprehended.

    17. Re:Assumptions ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you SET your beer down... laying it down is a clear indicator that you've had enough.

    18. Re:Assumptions ... by Meski · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Two can get laid out in the sun.

  7. Australians Receive SMS Death Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a fairly common scam usually received by e-mail. Lot of examples on www.419-eater.com where these types of scammers are known as hitlads.

    1. Re:Australians Receive SMS Death Threats by mjwx · · Score: 1

      This is a fairly common scam usually received by e-mail. Lot of examples on www.419-eater.com where these types of scammers are known as hitlads.

      The big difference in this case is that it came in by phone (SMS) and not email, therefore people will assume it's a tasteless prank and ignore it rather than take it seriously.

      I'm not joking, people in Oz are a lot smarter about receiving unsolicited commercial messages via phone than email.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Australians Receive SMS Death Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they are in Oz, but that's because there are no phones or internet there. They only have to fear the witch.

    3. Re:Australians Receive SMS Death Threats by mjwx · · Score: 2

      I'm sure they are in Oz, but that's because there are no phones or internet there. They only have to fear the witch.

      And dingo's, they take babies you know.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Australians Receive SMS Death Threats by socceroos · · Score: 1

      ....plus every other creature that walks, slithers, crawls, flys or swims.

  8. Achmed, is that you?! by dwater · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I keeeel you!

    --
    Max.
    1. Re:Achmed, is that you?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118826/quotes?qt0270469

      Farouk: You have friend, I have friend. My friend go to your house, put bomb under your car and blow you to fucking sky!
      Darryl Kerrigan: What did he do?
      Farouk: He get scared and he leave!

  9. killerking247@yahoo.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope yahoo has some excellent spam filters... And that this piece of news is genuine and not just some personal vendetta against an email addy...

  10. On the bright side... by arse+maker · · Score: 4, Funny

    People who are wanting to commit suicide are finally getting valet service.

  11. When batteries get offended. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you'll die when your phone spontaneously combusts?

    1. Re:When batteries get offended. by azalin · · Score: 1

      Hey, not everybody can afford an iphone...

  12. Never had a death threat spam... by jcr · · Score: 2

    But I did get a spam once from someone claiming that he had evidence that would land me in prison, and threatening to report me to the FBI unless I immediately wrote back for instructions on how to pay him.

    I did reply with a rather graphic description of the services his parents perform for sailors, and never heard from him again.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  13. Almost certainly ass-covering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think it's droll understatement. Whoever drafted the response from the authorities has to put that 'almost' in there in case someone does end up dead. Then they can say that they didn't rule out the possibility of them being legitimate.

  14. Re:What is freedom of speech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am plotting your downfall as we speak, foul Anonymous Coward.

  15. define "Many Aussies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    define "Many Aussies".
    20, 1000, 10 000, 100 000, 10 000 000?

    1. Re:define "Many Aussies" by dontclapthrowmoney · · Score: 1

      Been a big migrant problem here - since 1776...

    2. Re:define "Many Aussies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Whitey never thinks he's an immigrant, though, wherever he may be.

      Or an occupying force, for that matter.

    3. Re:define "Many Aussies" by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It depends whether they're immigrants or not

      I think they were more of an "export" than immigrants.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:define "Many Aussies" by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      "Whitey never thinks he's an immigrant, though"

      Yeah, it's a little hard to consider yourself an "immigrant" in a land where you, your parents and seven generations of ancestors were born.

      Is the White "homeland" really somewhere in Africa where the early humans evolved?

  16. Common hired killer scam. by Technician · · Score: 1

    This type of scam is quite common. Why is this news? The anti scam sites are full of stories of these scammers being baited to annoy then. Plug the text phrase into Google and you should find it reported verbatum on anti scam sites and scam baiting sites.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
    1. Re:Common hired killer scam. by shiftyphil · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mass SMS message rather than email seems to be the main difference.

  17. Re:What is freedom of speech? by Sparx139 · · Score: 1

    Actually, Australia doesn't have complete freedom of speech enshrined in its constitution. It wouldn't surprise me if this sort of speech (sans blackmail scam) were illegal.

    --
    Our culture doesn't get smarter, it just finds new ways of being retarded.
  18. Received a death threat ? by alexibu · · Score: 1

    Hmmm who to call - the police or the ACCC ? Not sure the ACCC would pop into my head in this situation.

    1. Re:Received a death threat ? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Hmmm who to call

      Ghost busters!

    2. Re:Received a death threat ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go crawl back under your rock, racist.

    3. Re:Received a death threat ? by Chrisq · · Score: 0

      Go crawl back under your rock, racist.

      You don't understand what a racist is, do you? I can see that as Hitler was rising you would have been calling the critics racists. Do you call people who criticise the Westboro Baptists racists? While, I have news for you - Islam is like the the Westboro baptists plus a violent army of thugs and suicide bombers. White converts to Islam become terrorists. Black Muslims in the Sudan are terrorists. Brown Muslims are terrorists. The one unifying factor is their war-like belief.

      My brothers are the Coptic Christians in Egypt, who are being killed by the Muslims. My sisters are the young Hindu women in Pakistan who are kidnapped and forced to convert and marry Muslims. So hold on to your supremacist Muslim beliefs, that all others are for you to subjugate or kill. If a Muzzie were to crawl under a rock it would be an insult to the rock.

  19. Add Queensland to list by labnet · · Score: 1

    You can add Queensland to the list. My wife got the 'death threat' SMS. As far as I'm aware, it costs real $ to originate SMS's so hopefully it is traceable.

    --
    46137
    1. Re:Add Queensland to list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not always...

      Vtext.com

      You can send a text to any Verizon # with that for free (its a Verizon site)
      For a long while they didn't have a captcha, and still allow you to enter any "from" number as they have no clue what your number is...
      You can see how easy it would have been to use the service for something like this or even to use it to prank friends now a days

    2. Re:Add Queensland to list by InvisibleClergy · · Score: 1

      Or you can just send emails to phonenumber@vtext.com . That's the easier way to do it.

    3. Re:Add Queensland to list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I'm aware, it costs real $ to originate SMS's so hopefully it is traceable.

      Nope. Most carriers have e-mail to SMS gateways. E-mail is free.

      Get your wife's phone and send a SMS, but in the "To" address enter your e-mail address instead of a mobile number. The resulting e-mail will come from her phone's (not-so-secret) e-mail address. Any e-mail sent to that e-mail address will be converted to a text message and forwarded to her phone.

      Only really a matter of time before spammers start exploiting these gateways, I'm afraid.

      You can easily use Google and find lists of the gateways for most any carrier.

    4. Re:Add Queensland to list by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Not really. Such gateways are only really prevalent for carriers who charge to receive messages. As an example, here in New Zealand none of our carriers have email to text gateways - because there'd be no-one to pay for the text.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    5. Re:Add Queensland to list by Meski · · Score: 1

      Infrastructure has been, and is being paid for by people with phone accounts. It isn't like an sms call would cost more than a cent for carriers anyway.

  20. Re:Never had a death threat spam... by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I did get a spam once from someone claiming that he had evidence that would land me in prison, and threatening to report me to the FBI unless I immediately wrote back for instructions on how to pay him.

    Hey, is that you Julian Assange?

  21. Killer King? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have it your way!

  22. do your worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 9000 miles away from your shack in Nigeria. Do your worst.

  23. um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The last time I checked everything in Australia will kill you in various ways so why would an extra assassin matter? Target a place where everything that moves isn't an assassin.

  24. Re:Fucking Muzzies by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Its a Muzzie wothout brains

    Yeah, you can tell by the terrible spelling and punctuation. Oh, wait...

    trying to get funds for Al-Quaida

    Is that Randy and Dennis's dad?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  25. Related perhaps by TheEffigy · · Score: 1

    I got a different message, claiming I had won a prize and directing me to some fake website (apple.com.au.kqbfn.com or something along those lines). I live in NSW too, wonder of it was the same guys, I've never had SMS spam before.

    1. Re:Related perhaps by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      No, it's different. That's some scumbags in New York buying AT&T burn phones and spamming with them until AT&T cuts them off (hint: AT&T doesn't).

      So, are you Australia's Winner of the Day then? I've been New Zealand's Winner of the Day twice!

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  26. Stupidity Tax by ad454 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of an old Kids-in-the-Hall skit:

    Casher: "And another $5 for the Stupidity Tax."
    Customer: "Stupidity Tax? What's that?"
    Casher: "Oh, since you asked about it, you don't have to pay."

    You previously see the casher successfully get away with charging the tax with the other "stupid" customers.

    The reason why we have so much spam and other scams is because there are enough stupid people to make it economically viable.

    1. Re:Stupidity Tax by shentino · · Score: 1

      So basically we should laud the scammers because they are doing darwin's work?

    2. Re:Stupidity Tax by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Right, because people with no money tend to have fewer kids... hey, wait a minute...

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    3. Re:Stupidity Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. All it takes is for spammers and scammers to THINK there's enough stupid people to make it economically viable. There doesn't have to actually be enough.

  27. Are you sure? by ACluk90 · · Score: 1

    This might not be a scam, the SMS could come from the MPAA: "You all pay us 5000 bucks or we will send over a nuclear missile". Booooom!

  28. Contacting the scammer by fufufang · · Score: 2

    Has anyone tried contacting killerking247@yahoo.com yet? That email account must be bloody famous right now.

    1. Re:Contacting the scammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may hope that yahoo has immediately blocked all incoming mail on this account. Only Just enough access to allow the criminal to logon and hopefully expose his location / ip address this way. Small chance, but anyway.

    2. Re:Contacting the scammer by azalin · · Score: 1

      I'd say the email address turns this otherwise primitive scam into a piece of art. Maybe I should register the .com domain...

    3. Re:Contacting the scammer by MRe_nl · · Score: 2

      It seems to resolve to http://www.whitehouse.gov/assassinations

      Maybe it's legit after all?
      Just a new way of fundraising?

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    4. Re:Contacting the scammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may hope that yahoo has immediately blocked all incoming mail on this account. Only Just enough access to allow the criminal to logon and hopefully expose his location / ip address this way. Small chance, but anyway.

      I'm not saying the thread is real (cause it most likely ain't), but if it were real and Yahoo blocked all incoming mail to that account, the targets wouldn't be able to contact the killer and therefore can't paid the 5000, resulting in them being killed.
      Wouldn't that make Yahoo an accomplice, if anyone ended up dead?

    5. Re:Contacting the scammer by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Someone will probably brute-force it first.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  29. Re:Never had a death threat spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful, you can get arrested for distributing Child porn.

  30. Just fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Fantastic Delights,
    Somewhere, somehow, your vending machine has taken things way too far mate! And now some bloke bothered to accept that challenge!

  31. Re:Oh really? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

    ...and signed with the e-mail address killerking247@yahoo.com.

    ... ... ...yeah, sounds totally legit! This most be...uuhh...the king of all Hitmen! Or something...

    It was probably because Killer Queen was taken by Freddie Mercury and the boys back in 1974 ;-)

  32. The medium is new, the message is not by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Many years ago I received an email claiming to be from Al-Qaeda with an order to kill me. If they are actually trying to kill me, it must from boredom because I haven't seen any other serious effects from it. They also said they would spare my life if I sent them a large sum of cash.

    Oddly enough when I replied to them from a throwaway email address asking them for more information they never got back to me.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  33. I GET THESE EVERY DAY !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From my Ex !!

    I thought that was normal !!

    1. Re:I GET THESE EVERY DAY !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      The ones I get are more like

      Hello.
      You killed my father. Prepare to die.

      --
      inigo@montoya.info

  34. Maybe only 1 Aussie got Death threat SMS and .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    he confused it with message that he would get 7 years of death if he didn't forward it to 10 people and 100 years of wonderful glorious life if he did.

  35. Trolololo by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hello! I understand why you would want to kill a Nigerian prince, however, my country is in turmoil and my money is tied from my hands. Please allow me to send you a check for $30,000 which you can cash and please Western Union all but your $5000 back to me at this address: ..."

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    1. Re:Trolololo by Meski · · Score: 1

      How does that scam work if you aren't nice enough to WU the 25k back?

    2. Re:Trolololo by Yert · · Score: 1

      It's a bad check. Either way, the sender isn't actually out any money other than postage. The recipient either cashes the check for $30,000 and sends back $25,000, then finds themselves $30,000 in debt to their bank or they keep the whole $30,000 and still finds themselves in debt to their bank for $30,000 - but in a much better position to pay it all back, if they haven't blown it all already.

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
  36. Please don't kill me, mate by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    I've left the money in a brown paper bag on the back deck.

    ---
    Then wait for them to explain why, when they've been watching you all along, they suddenly need to know your address.

  37. USA VER by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    IF YOU don't send me $500 I will TXT spam you endlessly and on most plans where you pay up to $0.25 for each TXT it will add up quickly

    1. Re:USA VER by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      I think that's called the switch to US Cellular scam lol. They're the only company to do unlimited incoming anything from anywhere at any time. I hopped on that like Oprah on cheese and was wondering what exactly was mentally wrong with people over at the Verizon and AT&T stores. Anyone anywhere being able to cost you any amount of money with no way to stop it seems like a LITTLE bit of a vulnerability in the logic of their plans.

    2. Re:USA VER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, please can I have Oprah on cheese?

    3. Re:USA VER by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Some of us don't live in a constant state of paranoia.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  38. Re:What is freedom of speech? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Among other things, it is the freedom to tell someone that you hate them and want them dead, rather than smiling at them while you speak ill of them behind their back and plot their downfall.

    I very much doubt that even in the (supposedly) freedom-loving US threats of murder and extortion are excused under "freedom of speech".

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  39. Re:What is freedom of speech? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    Threats are an exception to most freedom of speech laws/amendments/statements of rights. Including in the US.

  40. What, all of them?! by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

    What, all of them?! o_O

  41. Reply to all? by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    The killer just got his new phone...

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  42. Re:Fucking Muzzies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How is it possible that you were able to stop molesting the neighborhood children long enough to post this comment? And how does one type while one is in the middle of shoving an entire chocolate cake into their mouth with the heel of their hand?

  43. Re:Fucking Muzzies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chrisq, you stupid piece of **** - you forgot to check "Post Anonymously" again.

  44. Seriously? by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    What professional hit-man would actually solicit his contracted victim for a bribe? He'd never get hired again.

  45. He was doing it wrong :) by davidwr · · Score: 4, Funny

    He should've sent a followup:

    "The previous SMS was sent to many people in error. Only one of your lives is in danger. If you send me $5000 I'll let you know if it's you."

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  46. Re:Oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thousands found dead in NSW today, witnesses said it appeared to be the cause of dynamite with a laser beam.

  47. fatal flaw #37 in this plan... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Who's going to trust a "killer" who was hired to kill you that is willing to be bought off? Doesn't sound like a very reliable sort to me. So you pay him off, he keeeellls you anyway, and you're out $5000. Or something.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  48. I got that one, not an Aussie by water-and-sewer · · Score: 1

    I received that exact threat about a month ago. It was obviously horse sh*t so I didn't worry about it. I got it by email (at my work account) about three days after LinkedIn got its database hacked, so I assume they got my email address from LinkedIn.

    Either these guys are a bunch of copycatters, or the same thing is happening. If I recall LinkedIn (like everyone else) wanted my cellphone number so they can contact me "in case of emergency." I f*cking hate that - I don't want everyone to have my cellphone number. That means Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Gmail can all bugger off.

    So let's say LinkedIn gets hacked; they get email addresses but they also get cellphone numbers too. Badda boom, badda bing.

    --
    If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
    1. Re:I got that one, not an Aussie by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I don't want everyone to have my cellphone number. That means Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Gmail can all bugger off.

      Give them the phone number for a £5 supermarket-brought phone that you keep switched off 98%+ of the time. I do.

      It's the phone that goes on the boat when scuba diving, and has numbers for the decompression doctors and coastguard ; if it dies in the boat, it cost less than re-filling an air bottle. It's a dumb-as-a-brick phone : voice and SMS only ; it's first £5 PAYG has lasted for 18 months now. And no, the phone-owner doesn't pay to receive calls here, so that's not a problem. Not that it's switched on 8% of the time anyway.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  49. Buy body armor. ASAP! by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    Many businesses that sell police and military equipment balk at the idea of selling body armor to average janes and joes. Recent events have probably heightened their vigilance and paranoia.

    One company told me that they would make exceptions in the case of special circumstances, and specifically mentioned "death threats". If you have an SMS death threat, get your body armor now while it's cheap and available to you.

  50. Re:Never had a death threat spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot help being a narcissist.

    -jcr

  51. Wish I could see the responses to this text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are probably several hundred that say, "I'll double your price if you kill the guy that hired you to kill me!"

    1. Re:Wish I could see the responses to this text by Meski · · Score: 1

      There are probably several hundred that say, "I'll double your price if you kill the guy that hired you to kill me!"

      Bidding war ensues. And for that, there's eBay, and Sniping.

  52. Re:Oh really? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    It was probably because Killer Queen was taken by Freddie Mercury and the boys back in 1974 ;-)

    .... so who took the previous two hundred and forty six killerkingnnn@yahoo.com addresses?

  53. Re:What is freedom of speech? by digitig · · Score: 1

    I think you'll find that even countries that have "complete freedom of speech" enshrined in their constitutions still have laws against extortion.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  54. Should go under "Fraud" by funky_vibes · · Score: 1

    This should go under "Fraud" since there's no way he could kill all of those people in any reasonable amount of time.

  55. Re:Never had a death threat spam... by jcr · · Score: 1

    AC, have I offended you in some way, or are you just behaving like an adolescent because you can't help yourself?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  56. Re:Oh really? by Meski · · Score: 1

    It was probably because Killer Queen was taken by Freddie Mercury and the boys back in 1974 ;-)

    .... so who took the previous two hundred and forty six killerkingnnn@yahoo.com addresses?

    I'm thinking 247 isn't sequential, but a ref to 24h/7d