Slashdot Mirror


How To Watch Internet TV Across International Borders

colinneagle writes "Living in the U.S., one of my greatest regrets is that I can't watch BBC video with iPlayer. If I were living in the U.K., I'd feel the same away about not being able to watch shows on Hulu. But, with a Web proxy or a virtual private network (VPN) and an IP address in a country where the content is available, you can watch these shows. Technically, it's easy to set your browser up to use a Web proxy or VPN software. With a Web proxy and Windows XP, for example, you just go to Internet Options, click the Connections tab, and then click LAN Settings. Next, under Proxy server you click to select the 'Use a proxy server for your LAN' check box. Finally, you enter the IP address of the proxy server and in the Port box, type the IP number that is used by the proxy server for client connections—that's usually 8080. It's usually pretty simple to do that in any browser and operating system. There are also programs, such as Proxy Switchy, for Chrome that makes it easy to switch from one proxy to another in a single session. When you use a proxy, though, all your traffic is still open to network administrators. If you want to visit another country and watch their TV in privacy, you'll need a VPN."

131 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. Is that news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really?

    1. Re:Is that news? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not per se: It's not novel to most slashdotters. it's news in that its happening at unprecedented levels to bypass the horrible media layers injected into a currently popular international event.

    2. Re:Is that news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      News for Inexperienced Nerds?

    3. Re:Is that news? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdot: News for noobs, Stuff that we all know

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Is that news? by jaca44 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not sure I want it to be news to noobs. If VPNs used by all, the "Powers That Be" will start screaming and try and shut stuff down.

    5. Re:Is that news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not only is it not news, it's wrong.

      You don't need a vpn to secure privacy if you have a vps (as I do) or just a ssh account on somebody else's box in the target country; openssh will let you make a local socks proxy, and tunnel the traffic through ssh. For streaming tv across the pond, VPN is overkill, though it's probably worth setting up for other uses.

      (Makes me think about a site to match up folks in the UK with counterparts in the US to exchange restricted (i.e. tunnelling-only) ssh accounts, for mutual benefit. Of course they both need in-country VPSes or other high upstream bandwidth connections -- your typical home connection can't handle decent video on the upstream.)

    6. Re:Is that news? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Except that VPNs are worth billions of dollars to institutional users(like banks). You can't just say "nope, block it"

    7. Re:Is that news? by PRMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Too late. LA Times already posted an article on Aug 1: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/01/business/la-fi-tech-savvy-olympics-20120801

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    8. Re:Is that news? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      We need some sort of vpn exchange where like-minded geeks can exchange local Internet access. And a box to make it easy.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:Is that news? by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Somebody has their shit together SO WELL that their greatest regret is not being able to watch some online TV. And there is even a solution for that! Albeit one that is obvious and not very newsworthy. Imagine having your life that well together. He can't be human! Yes... there is news here...

    10. Re:Is that news? by spazdor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The billion-dollar institutions can easily get their VPN's whitelisted while the rest of us suffer. Don't think for a minute that Citibank's fate is tied to yours.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    11. Re:Is that news? by Githaron · · Score: 1

      Everyone would probably need better upload speeds.

    12. Re:Is that news? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2

      Exactly.

      What I do: ssh -ND 9090 root@(my server).com

      Then configure my browser to use localhost:9090 as a SOCKS proxy.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    13. Re:Is that news? by Githaron · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping.

    14. Re:Is that news? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I though, the article just mentions 15-20 year old technologies, and how the can be used, and have been used for years. This isn't news, in any circle, or any way. Except in the past, that is.

    15. Re:Is that news? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      How? How would you shut down VPNs that works though SSH tunnels? If you block SSH, you kill the internet, so you can't block it, and since you can't snoop into SSH traffic, you can't filter stuff out either.
      That's just to give an example.

    16. Re:Is that news? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      I actually configure all software on my laptop to use proxy "localhost:9999", and do something similar to what you do.
      Whenever I don't want to tunnel traffic (due to bad connection quality, or some other reason), I just run
      ssh -fND 9999 localhost.
      Saves me having to change proxies all over the place. :)

    17. Re:Is that news? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      And have you heard about this intercom computer thing? I hear there is a lot of porn there, and you can play games.
      FILM AT ELEVEN.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    18. Re:Is that news? by Barryke · · Score: 1

      When your 1st world problems are solved, there still are 1st country problems to tend to. If you fix a problem, you'll see new ones. Also but OT, that is exactly why some things should never be fixed IMHO.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    19. Re:Is that news? by Sigg3.net · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is, when you finally get through to watch it, it's extremely boring. Who can I call to correct this serious issue?

    20. Re:Is that news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jezus, you know how to do this but you use root to do it?

    21. Re:Is that news? by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      You probably want to contribute such functionality to the freedombox project.

    22. Re:Is that news? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      The server I'm connecting to doesn't do anything important. Actually all I do there is host my mldonkey client and web proxy, so, yeah, I just use key auth as root to that one, nothing important there.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  2. What slashdot reader is this written for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What slashdot reader is this written for?

    A: Someone who doesn't know what a proxy is, or how to set one up?
    B: Someone who isn't wise enough to google how to watch internet media that is region blocked?
    D: Gnomes
    C: Someone who accidentally stumbled onto slashdot today?
    The answer is D! Because the others are all make-believe!

    1. Re:What slashdot reader is this written for? by damien_kane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The answer is D! Because the others are all make-believe!

      C: Someone who accidentally stumbled onto slashdot today?

      Not entirely true; I've hit /. with StumbleUpon before, so it's possible someone could very well accidentally stumble onto /.

    2. Re:What slashdot reader is this written for? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Cowboy Neal!

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:What slashdot reader is this written for? by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      Dammit! You just ruinned a good joke. You're probably the same guy that ruinned the solar-powered flashlight joke with the rechargable battery comment.

    4. Re:What slashdot reader is this written for? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

      But anyone who uses STumbleUpon to find /. accidentally, and had not found it before, will be very, very quick to move on to something else, I think. So the joke stands!

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    5. Re:What slashdot reader is this written for? by eionmac · · Score: 1

      Always! its by reading /. that I learn.
      Ii have never used a proxy or VPN or knew how to even after many years (since 1984) of managing my own IT . /. is to share and inform for/between interested users. By the way the BBC default commission is " to inform , to educate, to entertain" in that order. This sporting event come under 1 inform and then 3 entertain so it has a very public duty to UK taxpayers, it is the other 'so called rights' to restict information flow for commercial purposes that constrains the BBC under UK regulation not to breach other countries' arrangements, and these are mutual commercial obligations hence USA TV not beiong accessible to UK viewers.

      --
      Regards Eion MacDonald
  3. Here is my experience: Italy to the US by gesker · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:Here is my experience: Italy to the US by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Interesting blog post, but you didn't say the level of bandwidth your place in Italy was subscribing to, nor the amount of money you were paying for your proxy/VPN service in New York. The StrongVPN service says it starts at $7 a month. Did you really only pay $7, or did you get one of their better packages? Also, is that starting rate $7 their true base price, or would I have to get locked into a contract for 2 years in order to get that rate?

      I'm asking because I have family in the UK, and I'd rather not lose some of the streaming video services I'm already paying for in the US when I'm just staying in the UK for a few weeks.

    2. Re:Here is my experience: Italy to the US by Macrat · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out TunnelBear.com too.

  4. Since when is SlashDot a how-to site? by mj1856 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Next thing you know we'll have all the bullshit that goes along with ask.com and ehow.

    1. Re:Since when is SlashDot a how-to site? by Meshach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Next thing you know we'll have all the bullshit that goes along with ask.com and ehow.

      Slashdot's official mission is "News for nerds", I think that this qualifies. During a major event like the Olympics a common complaint amongst techies and non-techies alike is that they are unable to view coverage because of their location. This is informing people that their is technology that enables users to bypass the restriction. I clicked on the story and read the comments because I found it interesting.

      --
      "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
      Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:Since when is SlashDot a how-to site? by tverbeek · · Score: 2

      "How to configure Windows XP to use a proxy" is not news. It's a not-for-nerds tutorial.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:Since when is SlashDot a how-to site? by Meshach · · Score: 1

      "How to configure Windows XP to use a proxy" is not news. It's a not-for-nerds tutorial.

      Since the Olympics are such a major event an exception was deemed appropriate and it is something most of us probably did not know before reading it here on Slashdot . But I agree with both you and mj1856 in that I hope this is not going to become a regular occurrence.

      --
      "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
      Aldous Huxley
    4. Re:Since when is SlashDot a how-to site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know we'll have all the bullshit that goes along with ask.com and ehow.

      Slashdot's official mission is "News for nerds", I think that this qualifies. During a major event like the Olympics a common complaint amongst techies and non-techies alike is that they are unable to view coverage because of their location.

      FFS let me spell this out to you: The root cause of the paradox that is this article, and its posts, is your inability to accept the axiom "Nerds don't sport".

      I clicked on the story and read the comments because I found it interesting.

      If you want to watch sport, you're not a nerd, which is why you think the article is technologically interesting. I assure you, it's not. You, and the article, and the rest of your nerd-wannabe chums can PO. As if its not bad enough that I have to come here and read the comments because there's a channel missing from my television, I now have to put up with this crap aswell - WTF

    5. Re:Since when is SlashDot a how-to site? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's official mission is "News for nerds", I think that this qualifies.

      How? Proxies and tunneling is over a decade old, and can be one of the first results while googleing. What sort of nerd can't use google? What sort of so-called-nerd hasn't heard about VPNs or proxies?
      Also, nerds don't usually care about sports events, wherever they may be.

    6. Re:Since when is SlashDot a how-to site? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the world is full or sports-loving nerds who can't google!
      We call them not-nerds where I come from!

  5. Re:Does this actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes. I use a VPN here in the UK and I can access Hulu.

  6. Next week.... by SilverJets · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your mouse. How to move it left and right AND up and down on your screen.

    1. Re:Next week.... by heptapod · · Score: 5, Funny

      omg, my mouse has two buttons and a wheel between them! i hope this is a continuing series!

    2. Re:Next week.... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Slow down there, cowboy, I am writing this down. Left. Right. Up. what was the last one?

    3. Re:Next week.... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Your mouse. How to move it left and right AND up and down on your screen.

      Chapter 3: Moving Diagonally.
      (How to successfully combine left/right with up/down.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:Next week.... by Rogue974 · · Score: 1

      I saw that too!! It was amazing! Did you keep watching and see that the wheel can also be clicked on as well!!!

      I hear next week they are going to talk about this thing with letters on it. I hope they cover the ESC key and where there ANY key is. Som many things ask me to hit the ANY key and I end up having to hit the computer power button because I can't find it.

    5. Re:Next week.... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of George Carlin talking about the magazines for absolutely everything, including Walking: "Here's a great article, putting one foot in front of the other!"

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:Next week.... by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      B A B A Select Start. Not only can you watch Hulu, but you can be shot 29 times with impunity!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    7. Re:Next week.... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, someone will post a 'straight line' tutorial for Gimp.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    8. Re:Next week.... by amorsen · · Score: 1
      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    9. Re:Next week.... by heptapod · · Score: 1

      i always type "any" and that works. sometimes before i'm done typing! computers can be so magical.

    10. Re:Next week.... by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Wait, and all this time I've been talking into the mouse? THANK YOU!

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    11. Re:Next week.... by formfeed · · Score: 1

      Even worse.

      Since open proxies aren't that abundant anymore, this is an article about drawing with a mouse - for people who don't own one, have never seen one, and don't know where to get it.

    12. Re:Next week.... by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      WOW! Slow down there, brainy!

    13. Re:Next week.... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Um, please tell me how to make said screen show pictures, plz.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  7. Yes and no by davidwr · · Score: 1

    No, I can't confirm it, but I will call your bluff:

    As long as the VPN isn't blacklisted, it should work. If it doesn't, then there is a technical problem that can be fixed.

    Now, the reality is that IP addresses or ranges that become known as VPN providers will become quickly blacklisted.

    Here's a case where it should work and will very likely NOT become blacklisted:

    You subscribe to a service that lets you see Cable TV on any device on your LAN, or you put a TV card on your home computer. You then put an inbound VPN on your LAN. You go on vacation abroad. You tunnel in and watch American TV from Britain or, if your home is in the UK, you watch BBC in America. Not only is this unlikely to be spotted, but since you are already a paying customer, it's unlikely to make anyone want to shut you down as long as you keep it to yourself.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Yes and no by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      So tunnel all the traffic via ssh or something.
      They will never know.

      Do the proxying a layer below.

    2. Re:Yes and no by Rossman · · Score: 1

      Here's a case where it should work and will very likely NOT become blacklisted:

      You subscribe to a service that lets you see Cable TV on any device on your LAN, or you put a TV card on your home computer. You then put an inbound VPN on your LAN. You go on vacation abroad. You tunnel in and watch American TV from Britain or, if your home is in the UK, you watch BBC in America. Not only is this unlikely to be spotted, but since you are already a paying customer, it's unlikely to make anyone want to shut you down as long as you keep it to yourself.

      You have just described a Slingbox. While they are great they address a different need.

  8. Excuse me but... by zrbyte · · Score: 1

    ... WTF is this "story" about (beside the obvious) and how is this news for nerds?

    1. Re:Excuse me but... by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

      At least this is all there was to it:

      The first rule of usenet is you don't speak about usenet

  9. How to watch US TV in Canada by davidwr · · Score: 2

    Set up your over-the-air TV antenna close to the US border.

    Oh wait, if you are like most Canadians, you probably do that already.

    *cue rim-shot*

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:How to watch US TV in Canada by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Or just buy cable. In my travels through Canada I noticed all the cable systems pick-up and rebroadcast ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, CW stations from Maine, New York, Michigan, North Dakota, and Washington states. (Good thing too since I couldn't find any Canadian shows worth watching... except Red Green.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  10. X-Forwareded-For by andydouble07 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Of course sometimes you can just set the X-Forwarded-For attribute in your browser to an IP address inside the country. A fair amount of web servers are set up to blindly trust it. A lot cheaper than a proxy when it works.

    1. Re:X-Forwareded-For by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what that means.. Can you Google that for me?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:X-Forwareded-For by MacBurn11 · · Score: 2

      ...and submit the howto afterwards?

    3. Re:X-Forwareded-For by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Of course sometimes you can just set the X-Forwarded-For attribute in your browser to an IP address inside the country. A fair amount of web servers are set up to blindly trust it. A lot cheaper than a proxy when it works.

      There are lots of free open proxies too, but that doesn't mean they're reliable or stable.

      I realize your solution is free as well, but is it really more reliable than hunting around for free open proxies?

    4. Re:X-Forwareded-For by Shikaku · · Score: 2
  11. Or just use Bittorrent by cpu6502 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you're going to steal BBC Video (since you never paid the TV tax), then you might as well do it the easy method and just do a torrent download.

    To be honest though I've not really found much on BBC I wanted to watch. "Doctor Who" and "BBC News" is the only thing that comes to mind and both of those I can get legally (via Syfy or PBS). Plus there are other alternatives like France24, NNK-japan, and RT which come free through my antenna.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You should checkout Sherlock and TopGear.

    2. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are *a lot* of people, expats and otherwise, that would be absolutely fine with paying for some sort of international license for the BBC. I see this "you're stealing BBC" crap from Brits, but they are not giving an option to us and we're asking for it.

    3. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      There are countless BBC documentaries mostly of good quality...no need to torrent, you can just watch them on You Tube. Not perfect but waaaaay better than the brain dead US stuff.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    4. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Does BBC have a channel on youtube? What do I search for?

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    5. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Are governments allowed to assess a tax (or fee) outside of their own territory?

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    6. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You should checkout Sherlock and TopGear.

      Question: Can you stream Wheeler Dealers? It airs on Discovery UK, if that matters...

      I love that show.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    7. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you're looking at it the wrong way. They may not be able to "tax" me, a US citizen, but there should be absolutely no reason why I cannot choose to give the UK government money, especially if I end up getting something out of it (access to the BBC).

    8. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Its on the Velocity channel a lot.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    9. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Typing 'BBC, long' in the search filed should turn up a load of one hour documentaries. There will be a load of junk mixed in, but plenty of good stuff as you browse through the pages.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    10. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      sorry, search 'field' - excuse typo.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    11. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by Cederic · · Score: 2

      they are not giving an option to us and we're asking for it

      The BBC lack international broadcast rights for much of their content.

      The olympics is licenced to the BBC for UK broadcast and Internet distribution. It's licenced to someone else in North America. The BBC can't legally transmit it to America.

      Similar constraints apply to almost all of the content they don't create in-house, and they create remarkably little these days.

      Of the content they do create, international sales (e.g. Top Gear and the output from their Natural History unit) are a significant source of funding for the BBC and help keep the licence fee down.

      There are *a lot* of people, expats and otherwise, that would be absolutely fine with paying for some sort of international license for the BBC.

      This is why the BBC have a premium channel in the US. They still can't broadcast the Olympics on it.

    12. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      I'd gladly pay for plenty of UK shows. But I can't, even if I want to. They don't actually loose any revenue, since there's no way for me to give them money, so how can I feel guilty about it?

    13. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what about Dr. Who? Sherlock?
      Also, I haven't heard of any company streaming the olympics in Argentina either.

    14. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Second vote for Sherlock, it's awesome.

      Nerds would probably also appreciate QI (is that on BBC?), there have been an assortment of fabulous UK shows over the years including, but not limited to, Ultraviolet, Edge of Darkness, Jekyll, Coupling, Hustle, Spooks.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    15. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Its on the Velocity channel a lot.

      Yea, that's where I first picked it up, but have since cancelled my cable subscription, and as far as I'm aware Velocity isn't available in online streaming format...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    16. Re:Or just use Bittorrent by eionmac · · Score: 1

      Problem with an international licence fee, is i tis not covered by the international regulations or conventions between countries.
      However, use a VPN to get to UK
      Using location of the VPN servers as address and your name pay the licence fee.
      Then you have legitimate access via/due to 'business address' in UK.

      --
      Regards Eion MacDonald
  12. Re:Does this actually work? by kwark · · Score: 2

    The last time I tried the problem was in the flash players/plugin making direct connections to content by ignoring the http_proxy settings of the browser. Setting the default route to the VPN made it work, long story short: proxy settings in browser might not be enough.

  13. Setting up is easy... the hard part is by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    finding a decent open proxy. They go down all the time with no warning. So pay up and get a commercial account or be prepared to make open proxy hunting a part of your daily/weekly routine.

    I used to play a MMRPG that banned my entire continent's IP... I still remember the feeling of joy upon finding a fast open proxy outside my banned zone!

    1. Re:Setting up is easy... the hard part is by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      finding a decent open proxy. They go down all the time with no warning. So pay up and get a commercial account or be prepared to make open proxy hunting a part of your daily/weekly routine.

      I used to play a MMRPG that banned my entire continent's IP... I still remember the feeling of joy upon finding a fast open proxy outside my banned zone!

      How do you feel about sharing the details of that proxy? :-)

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    2. Re:Setting up is easy... the hard part is by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      We obviously need a p2p solution to this problem. Almost like using TOR, but with the only exit connections allowed going to the streaming service in your region. So if you live in the UK you can access Hulu by being a proxy for other people accessing the BBC.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    3. Re:Setting up is easy... the hard part is by antdude · · Score: 1

      Are there good updated lists to get free open proxies?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  14. Attention know-it-alls by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some people might find this useful, so let's not get too carried away with our technical superiority. If you don't find the story informative, don't read it.

    It never ceases to amaze me how many people on messageboards will weight in on a topic that they're not interested in just to say "I'm not interested in this topic." On /. we seem to have people who do nothing but post inane comments about how they're not interested in a particular story, usually in the Idle section. I find it amusing because clicking two buttons to post a reply was an even bigger waste of their time than the few seconds they spent reading the summary.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  15. Re:TV on the web? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Maybe they're saving the torrent tutorial for next week's filler article.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  16. Isn't this what VPS are for? by mysqlbytes · · Score: 2

    Personally I have a VPS in every country I want to get content from. I have a US VPSs, for Netflix, Pandora an whatever else. I have a UK VPS for BBC iPlayer, Channel4 and so on. Cheap as chips generally. I think my UK one cost $30 a year! Sell the service to my friends, and bingo I've made my money back, and I don't have to worry (too much) about some third party stealing all of my traffic

  17. Another alternative is...change your DNS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://unblock-us.com/ is what I have been using. They have a free trial and the experience has been pain free. Long term cost would be $4.99 / mo
    I'm not sure exactly how it works, but it just does! (Can someone chime in on how they do it without a VPN??)

    $.02,

    -TJJ

    1. Re:Another alternative is...change your DNS! by heypete · · Score: 2

      If I understand correctly, for the vast majority of traffic they provide ordinary DNS resolver service.

      When you attempt to access something on their list of stuff-that-needs-to-be-proxied (e.g. Netflix, Hulu, etc.) their DNS servers don't return the canonical result, but instead point toward proxy servers run by unblock-us. Data is then automatically proxied as needed.

    2. Re:Another alternative is...change your DNS! by grub · · Score: 1

      That pretty much sums It up. We've used unblock-us for a few months now (we're in .ca) and are quite happy with it. It's cheaper/easier than the vps I had. I run their DNS #s on my OpenBSD gateway running BIND so everything in the house gets to use it.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Another alternative is...change your DNS! by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      I am currently paying $5 a month for a vps in the uk. Costs no more then the unblock-us stuff and you have far more functionality. I also use static routes based on RIPE subnets in my openvpn configuration that routes traffic across either my UK or DE hosts (both cost me $5 a month, and I will be switching my US one as well (that one is costing me $25 a month, but I found one for around $5 a month). I only need the basic VPS, I'm not running intensive applications.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  18. I lol'ed... by logicassasin · · Score: 1

    people in the office stared as I let out a hearty "guffaw"

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
  19. BBCA delivers by logicassasin · · Score: 1

    I watch TopGear as often as I can thanks to BBC America (the original BBC version, not the wretched, bastardized, hillbilly, neck of red American version). I'm a fan of Jeremy Clarkson on the show, love his wit and overall disdain for American cars.

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
  20. Slashdot: time travel for your brain! by billcopc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Slashdot,

    I've been doing exactly this for, oh, I dunno, 8 or 9 years. I even have several fellow /.ers as clients on my VPN/proxy/privacy service. Thank you, Soulskill, for this lovely little time capsule from 2004.

    Stay tuned for our next story, where a young startup named Apple plans to change the world with a new kind of graphic calculator, tentatively called "Newton".

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  21. Replacement for proxy switchy please? by vlm · · Score: 1

    There are also programs, such as Proxy Switchy

    Proxy switchy gets angry on my desktop linux box, recently it starts whining because its not on gnome or kde and refusing to work, for not apparent reason other than it would be fun to complain. Too bad, before they put that detection code in proxy switchy it worked perfectly.

    Anyone have a suggestion for an alternative that is less buggy, or at least does not have that bug?

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Replacement for proxy switchy please? by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 1

      FoxyProxy for Chrome is being released this week, early next week at the latest. disclaimer: I'm one of the developers.

  22. Or not watch it? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    When I spent some time in Japan, I didn't watch any American TV and nothing bad happened. The USA was still there when I came back, and it turns out that I didn't miss any shows worth watching (and most of what I would have watched is on Netflix anyway).

    1. Re:Or not watch it? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      When I spent some time in Japan, I didn't watch any American TV and nothing bad happened. The USA was still there when I came back, and it turns out that I didn't miss any shows worth watching (and most of what I would have watched is on Netflix anyway).

      Oh, geez. There's so many unhelpful, sarcastic ways this can be answered. Let's just stick to two:

      Yes, but given how many doomsayers there are nowadays, the USA might not be there tomorrow. Or at the very least, November, when the entire country will end if we don't vote correctly. It's frustrating, really.

      Even in the USA, I get my news (political or otherwise) through the web, not TV

      Okay, now, turn that around, smart guy. How many shows in Japan do you miss?

      Well, I'm not really that much in to TV, so there's no shows in Japan that I miss enough to watch to watch from here. When I'm in Japan, I love to watch the morning talk shows where they visit restaurants and try our their specialties, but not enough to go out of my way to watch them.

  23. Could have been better by zerosomething · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't this have been a better post if it included a list o open VPN and Proxy services for each country?

    --
    It all starts at 0
  24. Re:Does this actually work? by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

    i use tinyproxy to watch hulu.com. the configuration is trivial, you just need to make sure you

    comment out these:
    AddHeader "X-My-Header" "Powered by Tinyproxy"
    ViaProxyName "tinyproxy"

    uncomment and set this:
    DisableViaHeader Yes

    the rest of my config is almost unchanged.

  25. Re:TV on the web? by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

    The BBC is made from British taxpayer money, for British citizens. Where is the problem with that? I don't get it. Especially since they have plenty of stuff available for international audiences.

    Would Slashdot also run a story about a hack that gets one subscriber status on Slashdot without paying? If some other big site did, how many Slashdotters would utterly pee themselves?

  26. Really necessary to proxy everything? by javakah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    2 years ago I decided that I wanted to view stuff through the BBC's iPlayer, forgetting that most of the good stuff from the BBC makes it here, and what doesn't make it here tends to be the dregs. Anyway, I found an open proxy in the UK and was barely able to get video across it. That was just the starting point. From there I looked at all of the HTTP communications (with Live HTTP Headers) and using FoxyProxy was able to just have certain pieces of data going through the proxy. I narrowed it down to just a few small HTTP communications that were being checked for location, and just proxied those. I got good streaming video after that because the actual video was being served up by Akamai. I wound up being served BBC video content from a server in Arizona.

    Given that BBC America has most of the better stuff from the BBC, I haven't bothered messing with that kind of thing in several years.

    This kind of thing may not work now, but it's worth checking to see just how much data really does have to be proxied/vpned if you are doing that kind of thing.

    1. Re:Really necessary to proxy everything? by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      most of the good stuff from the BBC makes it here

      You forgot the qualifier of "eventually". Also acceptable would be "maybe". There's plenty of good shows I've found on netflix that won't see the light of day on BBCA.

      Given that BBC America has most of the better stuff from the BBC

      Like Star Trek: TNG? Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves? Battlestar Galactica? Gordon Ramsay cursing at people?

      Add in that it's only available with a giant expensive bundle of crap cable/sat subscription, and is not even HD for most providers. And then the biggest insult, having to watch the few good shows cut down and defaced with horribly targeted ads.

      I would gladly pay to access an iplayer app on my roku. Not quite the $18/month that UK residents do, but make it $10 and I'm there...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
  27. Re:Here is my experience: US to UK by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2

    Since I like to watch UK streaming tv, I signed up with a VPS provider who along with their US datacenters, has a datacenter in the UK, and added a UK VPS to my account, along with the two others I have in their Dallas DC. An install of OpenVPN and Squid on the Ubuntu 10.04 OS and I'm off to watching UK TV. So far, its worked perfectly. I'm loaning it currently to friends who are rabid Olympics fans. Oh and the good part? The VPS is an OpenVZ 512mb container, choice of all sorts of Linux distros, and with 300GB/mo transfer, 15GB of diskspace, and costs me a whopping $5.95/mo. The two I have in Dallas are also $5.95/mo. As soon as $$$ are a bit looser in my wallet, I'm planning on going with the $59.95/yr plan on the two Dallas slices... Google ThrustVPS.. Don't have any financial ties to them, just been a customer for nearly two years and very happy with their service...

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  28. Re:TV on the web? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where is the problem with that

    I've always viewed one of government's roles is to provide necessary services to the population that would not be accomplished without its intervention. Construction of roads is a necessary service. "Dr. Who" is not.

  29. Slightly Related... by Nexzus · · Score: 1

    but geo-location blocking by the NHL is pretty much my last hurdle before cutting the cable cord.

    The NHL offers a service called Gamecenter Live that allows you to stream live games to a computer or certain STBs. All games except those from within your broadcasting region. For me, it's the Canucks as I live in Vancouver.

    I can't watch the Canucks live over this service because of the blackout restrictions imposed by the NHL. And they even have terms in their contract stating that if you use technical means to bypass the lockouts, ie VPN or proxies, they can terminate your service with no refund.

    I want to send the following message to the NHL:

    Hey NHL, I want to give you money. Please take it. All that I ask in return is to be able to watch the Canucks over GameCenter Live with no restrictions. I don't think that's too much to ask.

    From what I understand, the sports networks pay you to broadcast your content (ie, your games). The cable networks make money by selling advertising to a sizeable audience. My "value" to the NHL for watching one game could be calculated by something like the following.

    value = (1 / Total VIewers Per Game) * (Money Paid to NHL for Broadcasting season/82 games broadcasted per year)

    I think I could probably pay you up to 1.5x value per game, you'd be very happy, and I'd still be ahead with regards to the cable bill.

    When I do finally cut the cable cord, there can be two scenarios:

    1) Legal, easy streaming to my PS3 in high quality. You get paid for your content, I have no monthly cable bill. Everybody wins*

    2) Illegal, awkward low quality streams through a PC connected to my TV, You don't get paid for your content. I'm still not paying for cable, but it's almost not worth it because of the streaming headaches. Nobody wins.

    Pretty simple choice there.

    *Assuming you give a shit about the cable companies or sports networks.

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
  30. What? by Rydia · · Score: 1

    Wait, there is a slashdot article on the front page detailing how to violate various broadcasters copyrights? I mean, I know it's preaching to the choir, but I'm astounded this is an actual article.

    IPlayer in particular isn't region-locked because the BBC hates foreigners; the service is paid for by television licenses, which people outside of England (obviously) aren't paying. It's much more than just defeating a region-locking scheme, it's basically piracy. Seeing it front and center is crazy.

    1. Re:What? by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      Until the BBC offers television licenses to foreigners or finds some other way to sell the access, then I have no choice but to pirate BBC - and since they wouldn't be getting revenue from me anyway they cannot claim that I have caused them any damages, so my "crime" is nothing other than victim-less piracy. If I live in Canada but can tune in American TV and radio stations, am I stealing their content since I most likely won't be visiting the sponsors of their programs?

      That said, what about UK citizens who paid their license but can't view content while they are traveling?

      I can understand why those who sell information prefer to hold copyrights and expect to be paid for each book, disk, or download they sell, but when you create content and make a profit from your intended audience, why be upset when your unintended audience also benefits from the content you created? There seems to be something inherint in the human pysche to be offended everytime someone else benefits from a byproduct of their labor. For example, if my cow craps on the road to the market, I don't care and leave it behind, but when I see people scooping it up to fertilize their gardens then I start scooping it up myself, even if I can only sell one cow pie and I have to pay half of that revenue to bury or burn the manure to keep it out of the hands of those greedy bast*rds that want to use my manure without paying for it. It's the worst of our human nature and one of the main reasons there is still so much poverty when there are plenty of resources to provide for everyone's needs.

    2. Re:What? by tomalpha · · Score: 2

      I pay my TV licence (ok TV tax) in the UK gladly.

      The BBC is one of the few things I think we do well in the world - the journalism and news reporting is beyond world class - it's world beating. Impartial reporting, truly global coverage. That can be hard to believe sitting in England, but as soon as you spend long enough abroad to try any other country it makes you appreciate how good the Beeb really is. Just try any southern-mediterranean broadcaster, Chinese state television, Russian state television, Fox News in the US (ok extreme example, but the rest of the local and national US news is also worth taking a look at while you're visiting) and compare it with the Beeb. It's simply in a different class.

      This may come across as slightly anti US-TV. It's not meant to be, but you've gotten me angry and ranting now. It is meant to be scornful of someone stealing content from my favourite broadcaster, and because I have paid for it: stealing from me. Now get off my lawn, persuade your native/adopted/temporarily-visiting country to get better television, and get a pro-piracy story off the front page of slashdot.

    3. Re:What? by ranpel · · Score: 1

      Gosh, when you say it like that it's almost as if it really is too hard to offer a donate button, a log in and some content for your trouble. It's basically lunacy. "You can, but you can't because, well, because." Sure. Makes perfect sense.

      I mean if people really, really give zero fucks why should anyone else give zero fucks?
      Do we not reap what we sow?

      --
      \r
    4. Re:What? by volmtech · · Score: 1

      In what way does anyone watching BBC content in another country diminish your viewing enjoyment or cost the BBC income? Watching their Olympics feed instead of NBC's may lose eyeball time for NBC's advertisers but in not way does anything negative to the BBC.

  31. Re:TV on the web? by dwater · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tax? i thought it was a licence fee, and you get iplayer access in UK irrespective of if you pay or not, and don't outsside the UK irrespective of if you pay or not.

    --
    Max.
  32. then there is a technical problem by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If your proxy is detectable, then you aren't doing it right.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  33. Re:TV on the web? by JackDW · · Score: 1

    Yes, particularly as this hack circumvents the need to pay for international iPlayer, where you pay a monthly fee for access to iPlayer programmes.

    --
    You're an immobile computer, remember?
  34. Re:TV on the web? by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

    Licens fee, taxes -- same difference? Though thanks for the correction, that was sloppy of me.

    you get iplayer access in UK irrespective of if you pay or not, and don't outsside the UK irrespective of if you pay or not.

    When you happen upon the browser of a slashdot subscriber, you can see stories before they go live, even though you're not the one who subscribed!!!!111. Clearly the approach isn't perfect, so even though it has decent motives at heart, pirate away.

    See what I did there?

    And yes, I'm a hypocrite, I downloaded a few Dr. Who seasons a few years ago, I just couldn't stop watching.. but I didn't feel entitled to it, I was fully aware I was "stealing". I still see a difference between what I do because I'm weak or an asshole, and openly advocating it. Interwebs, grow the fuck up.

  35. Re:TV on the web? by Johann+Lau · · Score: 2

    Construction of roads is a necessary service. "Dr. Who" is not.

    Well, strictly speaking, nothing is "necessary", you always have to qualify with "necessary for X". E.g. Roads are necessary for driving cars, which in turn is necessary for disease, pollution and slavery, while Dr. Who is necessary to learn about sonic screwdrivers.

  36. Yes, they do it all the time by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    Are governments allowed to assess a tax (or fee) outside of their own territory?

    Yes.

    Long Answer:

    The US routinely assess taxes on its citizens everywhere in the world (it is one of the only, if not the only, country to do this to its citizens). When I lived in the UK I had to file returns in both countries. Had I lived in Hong Kong or Switzerland, I would have had to pay the difference between their tax rate and the higher US tax rate to Uncle Sam.

    As far a fees go, just about anyone who has applied for any kind of visa will be able to attest that governments routinely charge fees outside of their borders. Visit any US consolate abroad to apply for an immigration visa to the US, or any other country's consulate abroad for the same purpose.

    So yes, governments can and do assess taxes AND fees outside of their borders. I think it would be perfectly fine for the BBC to sell their service to viewers abroad...except they probably made the mistake of buying some of their content from other studios, and are prevented from doing so by the usual "splinter the market" contractual clauses that stem from the same outdated mindset that has given us region encoded DVDs and Blurays.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  37. "U-S-A, U-S-A ..." by Crypto+Cavedweller · · Score: 1

    And remember this is a very American thing to do. First you surrender completely to corporatism so your televised coverage of international events is abysmal. Then you absolutely refuse to be taxed at any level that would create a publicly-minded entity that provided vastly superior coverage to that corporate entity. And then you freeload on the infrastructure paid for by other taxpayers in other countries that aren't quite as shortsighted, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the system they paid for.

    1. Re:"U-S-A, U-S-A ..." by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      But exploiting the citizens of other countries is an American tradition! Just be glad your oil is offshore at the North Sea and not on your soil or we would be tempted to re-occupy your nation for the benefit of our beloved corporations. And yes, I said "re-occupy" as the first occupation was back in WWII when we saved your ass and didn't even charge you for the service.

  38. Re:it's called an adequacy troll by Cederic · · Score: 2

    People don't come to Slashdot for the stories. They're badly written, usually days behind the mainstream and other tech media and frequently misrepresent stuff.

    People come to Slashdot for the comments.

    I don't want to read comments from people too fucking stupid to use Google to work out how to set up a proxy. I don't expect regular readers of Slashdot to need to use Google to find out how to set up a proxy.

    I don't understand why this story exists. I'm reading it for the comedy value, and so that I can help feed back to Slashdot admin that dumbing down the content on Slashdot will be a great way of killing the site.

  39. for those by present_arms · · Score: 1

    who do use proxy' to see Iplayer, you can get live feeds for all the free (in the UK) OTA digital channels at http://tvcatcup.com/

    --
    http://chimpbox.us
  40. Not new, but using a VPS is better then a proxy by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

    I have been using vps's for a very long time. Recently I added 2 new ones, one in the UK and one in Germany, in addition to my existing US one (which I will be switching soon to a cheaper one).

    The US one I have been using for years is somewhat pricey, at around $25 a month, as an early adopter one gets to pay a premium. However I have looked recently and found much cheaper ones (I only need a basic VPS).

    I run openvpn on the US based VPS, with the UK and DE ones connecting to it as a client (In addition to my home gateway connecting to it as well).

    On the VPN server, I have routes set based on on the various IP databases (RIPE in the case of EU), those get pushed out to the clients. Completely transparent to the laptops, smartphones and desktops in my home, if I go to say bbc.com I get routed out the UK VPS.

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  41. Nerds don't watch TV by Ardisson · · Score: 1

    Also, nerds don't care about sports and don't watch Olympic games.

  42. Re:Does this actually work? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

    So, in short, flash is problematic?
    No news here either.

  43. Re:it's called an adequacy troll by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    People don't come to Slashdot for the stories. They're badly written, usually days behind the mainstream and other tech media and frequently misrepresent stuff.

    People come to Slashdot for the comments.

    I don't want to read comments from people too fucking stupid to use Google to work out how to set up a proxy. I don't expect regular readers of Slashdot to need to use Google to find out how to set up a proxy.

    I don't understand why this story exists. I'm reading it for the comedy value, and so that I can help feed back to Slashdot admin that dumbing down the content on Slashdot will be a great way of killing the site.

    Ooooh, you're so superior! Look at you! I'll bet there never was a time when you had to learn how to do a Hello World prompt.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  44. Re:it's called an adequacy troll by Cederic · · Score: 1

    A Hello World prompt? Never done one. It's not a prompt.

    I wrote my first Hello World application 28 years ago. I don't expect Slashdot to teach me. I don't expect Slashdot to teach anybody.

    I do expect Slashdot to link to Hello World in 441 different languages. Here, have a peek: http://www.roesler-ac.de/wolfram/hello.htm

    Notice the difference. You're expecting Slashdot to treat you like an idiot. I'm assuming the reader is familiar with Hello World and drawing their attention to something fun that a number of other people have put together, that's also educational, that they might enjoy contributing to.

    Is that being superior? Really?

  45. Re:it's called an adequacy troll by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Yes. Smug. Arrogant. Superior. I'll bet you get a huge erection from posting about your superiority on /.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars