Slashdot Mirror


In Brazil, All Vehicles Must Have Radio IDs By 2014

morcego writes "Brazil's National Traffic Council (CNT) published Friday a resolution that institutes the National System of Automatic Vehicle Identification (Siniav). According to the Q&A published (Google translation from Portuguese), only 'visible and public' information will be available (vehicle year or fabrication, make, model, combustible, engine power and license plate number), without any personal information about the owner or registration data. This system will be mandatory for all vehicles (cars, trucks, motorcycles, etc) and should cost vehicle owners approximately R$5 (less than US$3)."

161 comments

  1. certainly much simpler than by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    certainly much simpler than spending gazillion dollars on cameras with ocr for the plates, like what's being rolled out in western world.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      certainly much simpler than spending gazillion dollars on cameras with ocr for the plates, like what's being rolled out in western world.

      Not sure where you live... but you ever heard of lastpass? Been around for what? 15 years?

    2. Re:certainly much simpler than by gtirloni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't want to disappoint you but Brazil is pretty much in the "western world" too. And it has lots of cameras with license plate reading tech for speeding tickets, etc.

      --
      none
    3. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed. In the UK, this information is already written on the tax disc on the front of every car. A radio chip would be much cheaper as you'd only need one for the life of the car, plus all of the information is linked to the central database anyway making tax discs mostly worthless.

    4. Re:certainly much simpler than by SourceFrog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why yes, I'm all for more efficient methods for re-creating 1984.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    5. Re:certainly much simpler than by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

      Brazil has high income disparity. They manufacture airplanes (Embraer) but a lot of people live in slums next to the rich people's fenced mansions with high security guards who have to leave their houses in bullet proof cars.

    6. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Brazil is part of the western world, so are Gabon, Botswana, Dominica, and Iran.

      Why? And why did you link to a list of countries by GDP - you can't seriously think that oil revenues make Qatar "western"?

    7. Re:certainly much simpler than by mister2au · · Score: 2

      I see your Wikipedia and raise you 1 Wikipedia ...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_world

      In the contemporary cultural meaning, the Western world includes many countries of Europe as well as many countries of European colonial origin in the Americas and Oceania, such as the United States of America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, etc.

    8. Re:certainly much simpler than by FunkDup · · Score: 3, Interesting

      a lot of people live in slums next to the rich people's fenced mansions

      Sounds a little bit like South Africa, or to some extent the USA.

      This article says:

      There is no agreed upon definition about what all these nations have in common apart from having a significant population of European descent.

      --
      Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds -- Albert Einstein
    9. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> high security guards

      This is South America after all: "Dude, halt or I'll...um..hey..wow, man, did you ever look at your hand, man?"

    10. Re:certainly much simpler than by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have bad news for you, Iran is a modern country, regardless to what you're shown on TV. Their government may be oppressive and backwards, but the country itself is very modern. I travelled 2000 miles by bus through Brazil, and many parts of Brazil are still richer than America's Gulf Coast (Biloxi, Gulfport, etc). The GDP says one thing, but wondering through the capital cities at night tells another. The rural parts of many countries do need to catch up though.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    11. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I haven't. Tried to google it but it seems you are referring to a password manager while replying to a comment abount license plate detection. Care to elaborate or provide a link? Not sure where you live ..

    12. Re:certainly much simpler than by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I think he was implying that those countries aren't "western."

      On the other hand, I think they have cities that at least appear that "appear western."

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    13. Re:certainly much simpler than by craigminah · · Score: 2

      ...and it will improve the accuracy of drone strikes as well.

    14. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by your definition, Japan and Korea are part of the west...

    15. Re:certainly much simpler than by zill · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why yes, I'm all for more efficient methods for re-creating Brazil.

      FTFY

    16. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the point of a tax disk is to serve as a visual excuse for police to pull you over - "why did you stop the car", "no tax disk" - it's a robust indisputable reason, whereas "we decided to search the database just to see if they had a valid disk" looks more like a fishing trip.

    17. Re:certainly much simpler than by Vladius · · Score: 2

      The Mississippi Gulf Coast was ignored in the aftermath of Katrina because of New Orleans, even though Bay St Louis is where the eye came ashore.

    18. Re:certainly much simpler than by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      You have to be pretty close to see that a car has no tax disk. They make them a different colour every year, so it's about as easy to see if one has expired too (although, there's some significant overlap, so the colour just means that you need a closer look). If you're close enough to see the tax disk, you're almost certainly close enough to wave an RFID reader at the car.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re:certainly much simpler than by mister2au · · Score: 1

      I know you're being funny and I got a chuckle out of it ... but just fyi:

      South American has the lowest levels of opiates use of any region in the world, cocaine at about half the rate of first-world countries and cannabis lower that all areas except SE Asia.

    20. Re:certainly much simpler than by murdocj · · Score: 2

      don't recall the last time I saw any of my neighbors in a bullet proof car in the USA... care to elaborate?

    21. Re:certainly much simpler than by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know you're being funny and I got a chuckle out of it ... but just fyi:

      South American has the lowest levels of opiates use of any region in the world, cocaine at about half the rate of first-world countries and cannabis lower that all areas except SE Asia.

      http://geocurrents.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Per-Capita-Opiate-Use-Map.jpg
      It would seem Africa and East Asia use less opiates on average, thanks to Brazil.
      Perhaps even Australia may use less opiates on average.

      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_prevalence_of_opiates_use, I looked up my own country, the Netherlands, where laws on opiate usage is somewhat more lenient than most countries in the world; about halfway down and much less than highly anti-drug countries such as the US. What does that tell you? Either enforcement is less in the US (22% of inmates will tell you otherwise; http://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/usa/incarceration/) or legalizing drugs actually lessens drug use (taking drugs is not rebelious and anti-establishment if you can legally do so).

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    22. Re:certainly much simpler than by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 0

      Do you live in a slum?

    23. Re:certainly much simpler than by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      By any reasonable definition Brazil is western. European language, Christian major religions, colonized from the east by people from Europe. IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE. Western does not mean "wealthy."

    24. Re:certainly much simpler than by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 0

      I have bad news for you, Iran is a modern country, regardless to what you're shown on TV. Their government may be oppressive and backwards, but the country itself is very modern.

      How is that be news, other than the part where they're governed by power hungry theocrats who are hostile to freedom?

    25. Re:certainly much simpler than by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Do you live in a slum?

      I had no idea the people in slums could afford bullet proof cars.

    26. Re:certainly much simpler than by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 2

      Name a time in American history when the Mississippi gulf coast was not ignored.

    27. Re:certainly much simpler than by fnj · · Score: 1

      Um, cocaine is not an opiate.

    28. Re:certainly much simpler than by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      They were considered 1st world nations, during the cold war....

    29. Re:certainly much simpler than by mister2au · · Score: 1

      I think i know another part to the answer to that and it is alternate drugs.

      Australia is low on opiates but VERY high on cannabis and amphetamines (particularly ecstasy) ... in our case (being an isolated island) it's all about what it easy to import which also drives costs - I guess also partly about law enforcement which cocaine/heroin is in a different class to ecstasy.

      I'd guess Netherlands is probably a little the same with a higher proportion of recreational drugs and less hard drugs ... but no doubt social forces (including laws) make a huge difference.

    30. Re:certainly much simpler than by mister2au · · Score: 1

      Um, cocaine is not an opiate.

      Correct - that why I mentioned opiate, cocaine and cannabis separately.

    31. Re:certainly much simpler than by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lastpass is an RFID issued for toll road payments along the U.S. east coast. Makes it so they can just deduct your toll from an account instead of having to stop at a boothe.

      Updating the summary: "This system will be mandatory for all vehicles (cars, trucks, motorcycles, etc) and should cost vehicle owners approximately R$5 (less than US$3) and their privacy."

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    32. Re:certainly much simpler than by NerdmastaX · · Score: 0

      Actually, I haven't. Tried to google it but it seems you are referring to a password manager while replying to a comment abount license plate detection. Care to elaborate or provide a link? Not sure where you live ..

      hes referring to the cards in peoples windows called E-Zpass it allows you to pay a toll without stopping fully, we also have things on our trucks (lorries where you are) that allow some to pass through weigh stations and it has sensors on the trailer wheels to tell the weight.

    33. Re:certainly much simpler than by NerdmastaX · · Score: 0

      Lastpass is an RFID issued for toll road payments along the U.S. east coast. Makes it so they can just deduct your toll from an account instead of having to stop at a boothe.

      Updating the summary: "This system will be mandatory for all vehicles (cars, trucks, motorcycles, etc) and should cost vehicle owners approximately R$5 (less than US$3) and their privacy."

      hey buddy how did your post completly replace mine? i call bs. slashdot is molding comments around

    34. Re:certainly much simpler than by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget industrial pollution!

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    35. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should go visit some of the shanty towns in Cape Town. It is fairly normal to see very nice cars parked next to 6'x6' sheet metals shacks...where you also see 60" tv on the wall inside of them. Its a strange place. Not all that live there are are desolate as they make themselves out to be.

    36. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LastPass is a password management program- I believe you mean SpeedPass

    37. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first world, second world, third world, classification of countries pertained to diplomatic affiliations, not poverty levels. The first world was the US and its friends, the second world was the USSR and its friends, and the third world were officially unaffiliated countries. The unaffiliated countries generally were undeveloped, so now "third world" has come to mean undeveloped countries.

    38. Re:certainly much simpler than by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      That's not western any more than it's eastern. It's just the way people are.

    39. Re:certainly much simpler than by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

      I can certainly see a market for RF jammers for this. Unless they set up cameras at the same location at the readers, who can say which vehicle that passed by had the jammer?

      Most likely they would never know you didn't spew your digital ID without some sort of visual check at the same time. And because the RFID tag supposed to eliminate the need for the cameras, how can they correlate the car with the missing RFID response? If anyone was using a jammer, I suppose they would just turn it off when passing the cameras anyway.

    40. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why yes, I'm all for more efficient methods for re-creating 1984.

      LOL, me too!....NOT!!!

    41. Re:certainly much simpler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lastpass is an RFID issued for toll road payments along the U.S. east coast. Makes it so they can just deduct your toll from an account instead of having to stop at a boothe.

      Updating the summary: "This system will be mandatory for all vehicles (cars, trucks, motorcycles, etc) and should cost vehicle owners approximately R$5 (less than US$3) and their privacy."

      LMAO........very well said!

    42. Re:certainly much simpler than by HArchH · · Score: 1

      Your GDP ranking does not determine if you are "first world", "second world", or "third world". It has as much to do with the quality of the infrastructure and the social and political climate. It might have to do with the level of education (or the mean and median grade achievement level), or it might have to do with the general level of literacy.

  2. Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by betterprimate · · Score: 1

    Hm. An RFID chip to be installed on the windshield in Brazilian heat? Surely, nothing could go wrong.

    1. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by jamesh · · Score: 3, Informative

      we have tollway rfid devices in Australia that sit pretty much in the hottest part of the cabin, and they do just fine for the lifetime of the battery (~5-10 years). Are you seriously suggesting that they haven't thought of this??

    2. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by betterprimate · · Score: 1

      We're not talk about the "hottest part of the cabin". From the TFA, the requirements are that all cars must have an rfid in the windshield. We are not talking also about tollway devices where one can simply replace it if it malfunctions. The purpose of these devices are to track stolen cars and unclaimed loads. Making this mandatory is to assume that the chip will never malfunction. And yes, I'm seriously suggesting they haven't thoroughly thought out the repercussions fully just as they have not thoroughly thought out the mandate... else this wouldn't warrant discussion.

    3. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to burst your bubble, but RFID chips have already been installed on the windshields of many cars over here in Brazil, for several years. They are automated toll charging chips that allow you to cross tollbooths without stopping. AND THEY WORK JUST FINE.

      The difference is that the existing system is optional. This new one will be mandatory.

    4. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by betterprimate · · Score: 1

      Hate to burst your bubble, but RFID chips have already been installed on the windshields of many cars over here in Brazil, for several years. They are automated toll charging chips that allow you to cross tollbooths without stopping. AND THEY WORK JUST FINE.

      The difference is that the existing system is optional. This new one will be mandatory.

      Have they ever malfunctioned?

    5. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give up.

      You posted a worthless comment, as though the folks implementing this couldn't have possible thought about the heat, but you've been shot down.

      Now you're just looking more like a retard than you did in the first place.

    6. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      The purpose of these devices are to track stolen cars and unclaimed loads

      And there was I thinking the purpose was to facilitate Mafia hits on rival drug lords. My bad.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    7. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give up.

      You posted a worthless comment, as though the folks implementing this couldn't have possible thought about the heat, but you've been shot down.

      Now you're just looking more like a retard than you did in the first place.

      Google EZ-Pass [malfunction]... Retard.
      Then post informatively.

    8. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by betterprimate · · Score: 1

      The purpose of these devices are to track stolen cars and unclaimed loads

      And there was I thinking the purpose was to facilitate Mafia hits on rival drug lords. My bad.

      In Brazil, those two statements are redundant. ;)

    9. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Why should they have batteries? Passive transponders fill the bill.

    10. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Why should they have batteries? Passive transponders fill the bill.

      I'm not sure about the proposed rfid devices in Brazil. The ones we use in Australia (called e-Tag) also beep (one beep = okay, two beeps = funds low, etc) which requires a battery. An active transponder is much more likely to reliably transmit a signal back from the distance required too (our readers are a significant distance above the road to allow for high vehicles etc), with multiple vehicles being scanned at once.

      If in Brazil they are using handheld readers that work at close range then yes, batteries would not be required.

      IMHO, even in Australia having to have an e-Tag seems kind of stupid. Pretty much everyone has a cell phone, and number plate rules are fairly strict in terms of policing obscured number plates, so why not just read number plates and send an SMS if funds on the account are low. I'm sure you'll get the occasional person who has cleverly obscured their number plate from the camera angles used, but then those people wouldn't have an e-Tag anyway.

    11. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Because cameras with enough resolution to reliably read license plates in the field are a heck of a lot more expensive than single-channel radios. I can build a receiver that can do the job for under $20 in mass production. I know because I've done it.

    12. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Because cameras with enough resolution to reliably read license plates in the field are a heck of a lot more expensive than single-channel radios. I can build a receiver that can do the job for under $20 in mass production. I know because I've done it.

      Are the cameras more expensive than a million $20 transponders though? What about 10 million?

      The other thing I didn't mention is that they already have the cameras set up to catch infringers, and out-of-towners are allowed to get a "day pass" for their occasional trip to the city, which doesn't require a transponder. If your transponder doesn't respond (eg you left it in the glove box or in another car) then the number plate recognition ensures that you still get billed, plus an extra $1 per toll point for the convenience.

    13. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      We have a system in the UAE called Salik. There is a partial toll road in Dubai... it has 4 gates (that you can go arround if you plan your trip) on a long stretch of road that runs along the coast connecting the western emirates. It works via a passive RFID sticker. If you go through a gate without a working sticker, it is ~$60 fine. Crossing of the gates are ~$1 for the entire trip (ie, if you cross more then one gate, in order, you are not billed more). The gates are crossed at highway speed (120km/h) and are not known to fail even when crossed at high speed. The RFID sticker is available cheaply so EVERY car in the UAE seems to have one. The sticker is linked to the vehicle registration. It appears there are RFID readers various places in the city which are not toll roads. I do not know of anyone getting any speeding tickets calculated from average speed between gates or RFID readers, but I would be surprised if the data isn't used by national security or police. They do not seem to fail.

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    14. Re:Voluntary... when the chip breaks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Brazil and I've had an rfid tag in my windshield for 8 years so far and it is still running ok.
      We have many high skilled engineers around here, and believe it or not, we also have some very high quality schools and universities.
      Just because you were born in a rich country, it doesn't mean that you are more intelligent than the whole population of the developing world.

  3. for what purpose? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why would you want such a thing? Humans can't read it and it sounds like criminals can easily swap tags or fake tags if they want to disguise themselves. License plates at least gave you the option to report a driver that caused an accident. At best, this is useful for statistics about vehicle usage, not for individual tracking, taxing or that sort of thing.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:for what purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A national toll road system can be setup now. Tolls can be made billable to the vehicle OWNER since they have the license plate number..

    2. Re:for what purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A national toll road system with tags that could be easily swapped or faked (as suggested by dutchwhizzman)??? That would be akin to a 50 meter radius wireless credit card with no authentication code. Bad idea.

    3. Re:for what purpose? by Havenwar · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is a government project we're talking about here. Don't expect them to hand you the lube.

    4. Re:for what purpose? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      A national toll road system with tags that could be easily swapped or faked (as suggested by dutchwhizzman)??? That would be akin to a 50 meter radius wireless credit card with no authentication code. Bad idea.

      well, if you're willing to drive around with fake plates. I suppose plenty of people in brazil are doing just that though..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:for what purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but is there any toll system based on plate optical recognition? This is the whole point.

    6. Re:for what purpose? by Morth · · Score: 1

      Stockholm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_congestion_tax (will also be introduced in Gothenburg)

    7. Re:for what purpose? by bky1701 · · Score: 2

      The wonderful state of NC (sarcasm) opened a plate-recognition toll road here about a year ago.

    8. Re:for what purpose? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Why would you want such a thing?

      Maybe you should have read TFA? It contains a section conveniently titled "What are the uses of the system?"

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    9. Re:for what purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A national toll road system can be setup now. Tolls can be made billable to the vehicle OWNER since they have the license plate number..

      If you're going to put tolls on the entire country, just do it in a much cheaper fashion - put a tax on gas. Far cheaper to implement, and doesn't have the privacy implications.

    10. Re:for what purpose? by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      A national toll road system with tags that could be easily swapped or faked (as suggested by dutchwhizzman)??? That would be akin to a 50 meter radius wireless credit card with no authentication code. Bad idea.

      well, if you're willing to drive around with fake plates. I suppose plenty of people in brazil are doing just that though..

      Could you provide some explanation of your comment? Maybe it was just me, but it sounded a lot like "they are poor so most of them must be criminals" (or maybe it was "they live south of the border".

      I mean, do you have any data (reports, statistics, even some news article or even anecdotal evidence) to support your sentence? Any explanation of why "plenty of people" are willing to take the effort of swapping plates and risk of getting caught?

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    11. Re:for what purpose? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      I can imagine it would help with driverless or computer-driven cars. It makes collision avoidance easier when moving objects you are likely to hit are broadcasting a signal you can detect. This doesn't have speed or position information, but a computer could at least detect them and then start looking harder for "large truck, diesel powered" using other collision detection methods.

      Its a national standard so you only need 1 radio receiver for all cars. I don't know how the signal is set up, but maybe it could be expanded (like ODB-II) to include other information like position/speed.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    12. Re:for what purpose? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_Highway_407

      Doesn't work 100% of the time, but works pretty well.Only time it's failed to pick up my car was when the license plate was covered in snow after being parked at a hotel for 2 weeks. They use a combination of transponders (for regular travellers), and optical recognition of license plates for one-off uses.

    13. Re:for what purpose? by alexgieg · · Score: 2

      If you're going to put tolls on the entire country, just do it in a much cheaper fashion - put a tax on gas. Far cheaper to implement, and doesn't have the privacy implications.

      Ah, but that's the point: here in Brazil we already have tax on gas: roughly 50% of the end price. And on the vehicles themselves: also about 50% of the end price (yep, if a model is sold here and in the US, ours is priced at roughly twice its US counterpart). And tolls on privately built roads (there was a promise back when those were introduced that it would lead to decreased taxes on gas -- it didn't happen, evidently). Now all that remains is to put tolls on every other street, so it's all covered (there's a promise private road tolls will be replaced by the per distance automatic one -- I'm not holding my breath). But just ask someone who's visited us what they think of our roads, streets etc. To sum it up: that money hasn't gone where it should.

      That's Brazil.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    14. Re:for what purpose? by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      This is a government project we're talking about here. Don't expect them to hand you the lube.

      No, the lube is included, but contains sand.

  4. license plate number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The license plate number is not considered registration data?

  5. License plate /= registration data? by LaZZaR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This means you are trackable.

    --
    I lost me sig.
    1. Re:License plate /= registration data? by gtirloni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not exactly 100% efficient since the _car_ is trackable but I get the point. Same thing with your cellphone though.

      --
      none
    2. Re:License plate /= registration data? by Cornwallis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bingo. All the previous posters are wrong. This is the *only* purpose.

    3. Re:License plate /= registration data? by Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm confused.

            License plate /= registration data

      How do you divide a license plate by registration data? (And you're missing a semicolon, so it won't compile anyways.)

    4. Re:License plate /= registration data? by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 2

      It means that if someone sets a private "listening" station, they will get no more data that they could have get just looking at the car.

      Only the people with access to the vehicles registration database(i.e. the state) could make a match with additional info (owner, address, and so on).

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    5. Re:License plate /= registration data? by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Correct. And it is the same for any typical RFID -many of which raise alarms and whatnot. If you are only able to READ the tag, then you gain no more information than if you physically put eyes on the object and eyeballed the barcode.

      That is pretty much all you can do unless you have access to the database.

      And if you don't, then scanning the barcode or RFID or vehicle RFID is not overly useful or risky to privacy. Maybe you can gather some data about passing traffic or something and key a billboard to flash one kind of add to a Chevy and another ad to a Lexus. But it's nothing that could not also be gained by putting someone on the billboard with a pair of binoculars and a way (laptop, switch, whatever) to change the ads. Except, this way there's nobody peering into the cars and looking down my fictional girlfriend's shirt.

      She would like that, if she existed.

      Besides that, a lot of people are actually proud of the car they drive, either because they are proud, or because they are stuck with it. So making a way to broadcast "I own a GD LEXUS! LEXUS!" could be sold as a feature. New from Lexus, automatic bragging!

      --
      Sig for hire.
    6. Re:License plate /= registration data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with cell phones I got a friend from Europe to sign up for a prepaid sim; and bought a smartphone abroad. With this s**t, I guess I'll have to create a company and put cars in its name... Don't laugh too hard, Americans/Europeans. Big Brother is coming.

    7. Re:License plate /= registration data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No really. Here in Brazil government is way more busy trying to get your money than anything else, i don't think they cares about tracking anyone.
      Stop being so paranoid, you should be asking for better transparency than better privacy.

  6. For people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it will not be long before it will be mandatory for persons as well here (Netherlands).
    They are now putting fingerprints and other biometric parameters in your passport and identity card, and it is mandatory to carry it whenever you are outdoors.
    The next step will be to implant the RFID chip.
    It is now being tested with pet animals, next will probably be farm animals, and when this does not cause any obvious health problems you will be required to have a chip implanted with your identifying information.

    All for the sake of the war on terrorism.

    1. Re:For people by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I doubt implants will be common. While it is common to brand cattle you do not see people getting branded even in more autocratic or totalitarian regimes. Same thing applies to these sorts of implants.

    2. Re:For people by aliquis · · Score: 1

      You better let a government agency pick up your kids for you. Because damn if you go pick them up at the kindergarten yourself!

    3. Re:For people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Netherlands). They are now putting fingerprints and other biometric parameters in your passport and identity card, and it is mandatory to carry it whenever you are outdoors.

      Wot? Really?

    4. Re:For people by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the amount of hardware most young people have implanted in various and tender parts of their bodies? If you can stick a stud in your tongue or navel a small RFID in your forearm will be nothing.

    5. Re:For people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems kind of stupid to require people to carry their fingerprint information with them at all times. Don't they do that already? That would be like legalizing pot, but requiring registration first so your health insurance and employer would know about it. Oh wait ...

    6. Re:For people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Europe requires it" is of course the excuse.
      (as always when the politicians have to defend a new rule that seems ridiculous)

    7. Re:For people by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      All for the sake of the war on terrorism.

      Well, even if it were possible for the government to monitor everyone's whereabouts, 24/7/365.249, it still wouldn't prevent terrorism. It would, however, make everyone a criminal and selective enforcement would become the norm, thus creating new classes of citizens; those who can afford to buy their way out of trouble, and those who can't. Russia was ahead of the curve on this... they didn't need a tracking system for that.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    8. Re:For people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, back in the days of the USSR and the Iron-curtain countries (e.g. DDR), the Dutch general opinion (government and people) was that this broad surveillance of the citizen was not OK. The DDR secret service was often mentioned as ridiculous tracking of personal affairs.

      But now, they are doing the same thing and they consider it good. And when other countries (for example USA) ask for even more draconic measures, the government is quick to obey.

      Things can change...

  7. Required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What a CNT of a requirement.

  8. Johnny Mnemonic was right in one area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Johnny Mnemonic: Yeah, the Black Shakes. What causes it?
    Spider: What causes it?
    [points to various pieces of equipment throughout the room]
    Spider: This causes it! This causes it! This causes it! Information overload! All the electronics around you poisoning the airwaves. Technological fucking civilization. But we still have all this shit, because we can't live without it. Let me do my work.
    - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113481/quotes

    1. Re:Johnny Mnemonic was right in one area by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've ever seen anyone seriously quote that film before.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    2. Re:Johnny Mnemonic was right in one area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /Conspiracy Keanu

      What if Johnny Mnemonic was purposely made awful because the Black Shakes are real?

  9. Suspicious Timing for TFA release by betterprimate · · Score: 2

    Bloomberg just released an article relating to car theft in Brazil: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-10/brazil-wonders-why-its-rich-kids-are-so-good-at-stealing-cars.html So who's the manufacturer?

    1. Re:Suspicious Timing for TFA release by betterprimate · · Score: 1

      Oh, this has everything to do with it: http://www.bloomberg.com/pressroom/bloomberg-hosts-latin-america-investing-conference/ Form your own opinions or continue to connect the dots. Brazil is, however, seeing an influx of foreign investments that are unadulterated and entirely unregulated. This is another unnecessary piece of legislation that infringes upon people's privacy just to sell an investor's product to the masses.

  10. Most people don't care by tmcb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, car thefts are quite frequent in some Brazilian cities, so it's not surprise that most people won't see anything wrong on that apart from paying 5 bucks for the thing themselves. Some people will even see this as a good thing; well, it's an extremely cheap car tracking service!

    There were really few contrary opinions to the resolution. Mr. Raul Jungmann, national representative, filed a request for its suspension, alluding to privacy concerns, but no final solution was given to the matter since 2007. It had no big repercussion on media, too. That's how things work in Brazil: these stuff get approved with enough antecedence, but become news just over the deadline. I can't say if it's intentional, but it really seems so.

    1. Re:Most people don't care by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Of course the car thieves will have no way to just remove that chip on stolen cars ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Most people don't care by tmcb · · Score: 2

      Oh, of course they can't do that in any way! It would be a crime!

    3. Re:Most people don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The police cars will have receivers for those trackers, so, if a policeman sees a car that doesnt emit rf sinal or wich emits the wrong plate number, "bingo, this is a stealed car, lets stop it".

    4. Re:Most people don't care by betterprimate · · Score: 1

      The police cars will have receivers for those trackers, so, if a policeman sees a car that doesnt emit rf sinal or wich emits the wrong plate number, "bingo, this is a stealed car, lets stop it".

      My passport is supposed to give of an rf signal too. That was until my fat ass sat on it.

    5. Re:Most people don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police cars will have receivers for those trackers, so, if a policeman sees a car that doesnt emit rf sinal or wich emits the wrong plate number, "bingo, this is a stealed car, lets stop it".

      My passport is supposed to give of an rf signal too. That was until my fat ass sat on it.

      This is Brazil, no fat asses!

      (Also, it's in a car, they're usually more durable than a passport.)

    6. Re:Most people don't care by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Sensor and camera at every intersection. Car pulls into warehouse, identical car with unregistered chip pulls out, cops pull it over before it goes ten blocks. If a $400 phone can lead police to the robbers house a $20000 car should be able to.

    7. Re:Most people don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police cars will have receivers for those trackers, so, if a policeman sees a car that doesnt emit rf sinal or wich emits the wrong plate number, "bingo, this is a stealed car, lets stop it".

      My passport is supposed to give of an rf signal too. That was until my fat ass sat on it.

      This is Brazil, no fat asses!

      (Also, it's in a car, they're usually more durable than a passport.)

      I thought Brazil was famous for fat asses.

    8. Re:Most people don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police cars will have receivers for those trackers, so, if a policeman sees a car that doesnt emit rf sinal or wich emits the wrong plate number, "bingo, this is a stealed car, lets stop it".

      My passport is supposed to give of an rf signal too. That was until my fat ass sat on it.

      This is Brazil, no fat asses!

      (Also, it's in a car, they're usually more durable than a passport.)

      I thought Brazil was famous for fat asses.

      The police cars will have receivers for those trackers, so, if a policeman sees a car that doesnt emit rf sinal or wich emits the wrong plate number, "bingo, this is a stealed car, lets stop it".

      My passport is supposed to give of an rf signal too. That was until my fat ass sat on it.

      This is Brazil, no fat asses!

      (Also, it's in a car, they're usually more durable than a passport.)

      I thought Brazil was famous for fat asses.

      Plump, not fat. See People of Walmart if you're not clear on the distinction.

    9. Re:Most people don't care by betterprimate · · Score: 1

      The police cars will have receivers for those trackers, so, if a policeman sees a car that doesnt emit rf sinal or wich emits the wrong plate number, "bingo, this is a stealed car, lets stop it".

      My passport is supposed to give of an rf signal too. That was until my fat ass sat on it.

      This is Brazil, no fat asses!

      (Also, it's in a car, they're usually more durable than a passport.)

      I thought Brazil was famous for fat asses.

      The police cars will have receivers for those trackers, so, if a policeman sees a car that doesnt emit rf sinal or wich emits the wrong plate number, "bingo, this is a stealed car, lets stop it".

      My passport is supposed to give of an rf signal too. That was until my fat ass sat on it.

      This is Brazil, no fat asses!

      (Also, it's in a car, they're usually more durable than a passport.)

      I thought Brazil was famous for fat asses.

      Plump, not fat. See People of Walmart if you're not clear on the distinction.

      Can I find it on youporn.com?

    10. Re:Most people don't care by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      it's in a car, they're usually more durable than a passport

      You obviously have not seen an American sit on a car!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    11. Re:Most people don't care by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Of course, there's no way to change the plate at the same time as the chip.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    12. Re:Most people don't care by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Of course the car thieves will have no way to just remove that chip on stolen cars ...

      That depends on the type of thief doesn't it? Dumb ass thieves, the same kind that don't change out license plates won't change out chips either. Smarter thieves however, will.

    13. Re:Most people don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course theres no way to encrypt the stream (public key + salt)

      finding a plate that matches the stream being transfered by the device and breaking HMAC at the same time. Good luck.

  11. let me say by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    Boa sorte!

  12. It's a tax and a power grab by roman_mir · · Score: 0

    It's a tax and a power grab. You are going to be taxed, whatever the cost of installation will be (5 bucks? I don't think so) and it's a power grab by the government, that will use the device you'll be paying for to track your ass.

  13. Financial trickery by goldgin · · Score: 1

    I bet a cousin of a curtain politician has a company with thousands of those devices preordered and in stock. I also bet that there are only a few brands of these devices allowed in the brasilian market, those brands already exclusive to curtain cousins of active politicians. And the show must go on...

    1. Re:Financial trickery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Absolutely true, but is there really such a big difference between company-owned-by-the-cousin-of-politician (Brasil) and company-that-promised-cushy-consulting-job-to-politician-after-he-retires (USA)?

      Don't kid yourself. Democracy today is totally corrupt everywhere, it's just that the corruption in the US is on much larger, more industrial scale than the family-oriented nepotism of Latin America.

    2. Re:Financial trickery by goldgin · · Score: 2

      Hmm it seems Brasil needs to upgrade their Corruption v1.1 software to USA's model, Corruption v2.0. It's funny that so few people spot the trick... and so much more want into the deal when they find out about it. It so seems that the only solution for mankind is in evolution, a new breed of mankind that is lacking the ability to lie and cheat their way to success. Thankfully this is already happening, with statistics showing a new generation of humans with Aspergers syndrome and similar disorders on the rise, people that make decisions using common sense and logic. This is of course debatable and fictionary but that's all hope I have left for humanity.

    3. Re:Financial trickery by betterprimate · · Score: 1

      The company is Kapsch.

  14. u r an fag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cars are slaverie

  15. Like Mobile Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can now track where and when your car has been in real time with radio tags all they need to do is set up radio towers in a grid like pattern, even if they only do it in cites that's useful information to them.

    1. Re:Like Mobile Phones by cheros · · Score: 1

      They do this already with ANR (Automatic Number plate Recognition)..

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  16. Are you idiots aware there is some news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    happening right now?

    Romney/Ryan. A great pair to kick Obama's ass.

    And you leftist free software hippies and still asleep after a long night playing D&D I guess.

    Wake up and smell the budget cuts, losers. You might all have to go out and get jobs. Ooes Noes!

    1. Re:Are you idiots aware there is some news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ryan basically guarantees only idiots and fascists will vote Romney. I am afraid you're a member of both groups. Obama just won reelection.

    2. Re:Are you idiots aware there is some news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an athiest free marketeer like Paul Ryan would be better off running for vice president of China! that's just what america needs, some fucking mormon cultist and and a freaky randist pushing jesus out of our nation!

    3. Re:Are you idiots aware there is some news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a well reasoned argument. /sarc-of-course "idiots and fascists".

      What, did you miss your DNC talking points memo this morning? Ryan will energize the right - both the Tea Party and the House, leaves the Senate in easier reach and is a damn good pick. You leftists are sooooo predictable.

      See you in November.

      We will keep the House, take the Senate and the executive.

      Learn the Constitution chump because it's going to be re-instituted starting in 162 days.

    4. Re:Are you idiots aware there is some news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, you attack religion, throw in some profanity, attack Ayn Rand and Ryan together, make a nonsensical comparison to China and the free market (are you still high from last night perhaps?) and for all that not a *single* substantive argument or point whatsoever. Pretty impressive for a libtard free software hippie. Isn't this shower day hippie?

      It's going to be so much fun in November to watch you losers cry into your bong water.

      Romney/Ryan/Constitution 2012!

    5. Re:Are you idiots aware there is some news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it funny how right wingers love to complain about people needing to get jobs and the like, yet they seem to have more time to ramble incoherently online than anyone else.

    6. Re:Are you idiots aware there is some news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still waiting for any actual substance.

      Tick tick tick.

      Gonna be a long wait I guess.

      The Left, substance-free since day one.

      All you have is attack, deflect, distract, call names, anything but use reason and logic.

    7. Re:Are you idiots aware there is some news by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      What's a Romney/Ryan?

    8. Re:Are you idiots aware there is some news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the f*ck is wrong with you bro? This is INVERTED TOTALITARISM. Blue team, red team, same crap. Change? Nothing's gonna change besides the fabricated "controversies".

    9. Re:Are you idiots aware there is some news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My time is more valuable than that. I have no obligation to argue with someone as obviously incapable of critical thought as you. Only posting this reply because I left this window open last night.

  17. let's hope it helps the public by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    let's hope they do things like let people store medical information on these radio ID's, not just things that make it easier to collect money.
    If someone were to get in an accident but be able to indicate they're a hemophiliac, for example.

    1. Re:let's hope it helps the public by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the kind of info you don't want on your car. That should be on a bracelet on your person. Putting only info useful for tax and tolls means it never had to be rewritten and it's restricted yo stuff that's already publicly viewable. You have to reference the registration database to come up with private information about the owners.

    2. Re:let's hope it helps the public by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Hrm? If I had relevant medical information that may affect how I need to be treated for emergencies I'd like that information to be posted everywhere possible . I'd rather minimize the chance that I die due to something stupid.

      That's not the same as "I have nothing to hide" but having medical information tied to accident information which can easily be obtained would make sense.

  18. So it's RFID then. by cheros · · Score: 2

    I can see RFID work in such an application, as long as they are write-once. Otherwise I'd give it a week before everyone is Spartacus :).

    RFIDs are actually more practical than ANR - less horsepower required to read, and no games with "accidentally" leaving mud on the plates (however, if they cannot be read very quickly there may be an issue). However, I can only see this work with vehicle attached RFID - license RFID should be separate or you'll have to leave the chip open to reprogramming, which is IMHO where the problems hide here (as above :).

    I was actually waiting for something like this to happen - vehicle ID hasn't seen progress since VINs. However, as always I'd be worried about privacy implications - with ANR there is already enough discussion.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:So it's RFID then. by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      You only have to provide the cops with a reader. At any police control, check if the data from the radio checks the one you can see (after all, all the data will be public/visible, according to TFS). If it does not match, fine/inmovilize the vehicle/whatever.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    2. Re:So it's RFID then. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      It's considerably less hassle than ANPR, because ANPR only tells you the car's registration number. Reading the article, this won't hold the registration (which you probably don't care about) but will hold the VIN and a certain amount of technical data. If you used ANPR you'd have to pull all that down from a database somewhere.

    3. Re:So it's RFID then. by cheros · · Score: 1

      Fine, maybe, but immobilise?

      Such radio signals MUST be read-only. *Any* ability to influence a car from a distance is *extremely* bad news and should not even be considered. It's bad enough that it is already possible today with some vehicles..

      I would not even like to *near* a vehicle that can be remotely shut down, let alone inside it.

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    4. Re:So it's RFID then. by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      Neither me or the post talks about remotely controlling vehicles. I meant "immobilize" in the old sense of having the driver stop, getting the keys, etc., as a way of discouraging tampering with the device (as an alternative to fines).

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    5. Re:So it's RFID then. by cheros · · Score: 1

      Ah, misunderstanding. I obviously have too much blood in my caffeine :).

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  19. I am retard. by betterprimate · · Score: 1

    I am the retard who is telling you to invest in Kapsch who creates the infallible E-Z Pass.

  20. Kapsch it is. by betterprimate · · Score: 2

    Three or four articles and press releases have been released in the past twelve hours. I deduct that Kapsch (the same producer of the failed E-Z Pass) is going to be producing these devices for the Brazilian government. ( See: http://www.kapsch.net/en/KapschGroup/press/articles/files/2012/PR_KTC_First_order_for_delivery_of_on-board_units_from_Brazil_EN.pdf posted 13 hours ago ). Their stock is down in case anyone is interested. Articles are being simultaneously released by Bloomberg. All articles released within a four hour difference.

  21. Workaround. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Clone it, zap the original, leave hidden clone in car for daily tracking.

    Spoof different RFID and keep in Faraday wrap.

    Swap as desired.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  22. Destined for Problems by betterprimate · · Score: 3, Informative

    The chips will be supplied by Kapsch ( http://www.kapsch.net/en/KapschGroup/press/articles/Pages/ktc_120810_pr.aspx ). These chips/devices are similar to the E-Z Pass in the NorthEast U.S. They are notorious for malfunctioning... http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-05-17/toll-poaching-ezpass/55038948/1 http://www.newstribune.com/news/2012/jun/28/e-z-pass-not-always-so-easy/ http://www.wkbw.com/news/local/49044786.html http://consumerist.com/2007/07/e-zpass-charge-you-fee-when-it-malfunctions.html The difference is that these are mandatory. If they do malfunction, how would it affect an innocent individual?

    1. Re:Destined for Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fines and another $5 fee - aka guaranteed revenue stream!

    2. Re:Destined for Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm no they're not. Basically everyone in NY has E-Z Pass and I've never heard a complaint. From what I've seen in your news articles, none of them mention the actual E-Z Pass device failing.

  23. Helpful for kidnappers and terrorists... by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    Identifying people like this, and it does identify people, should be very helpful for kidnappers and terrorists. Now they'll be able to setup automated booby traps.

    1. Re:Helpful for kidnappers and terrorists... by ralphm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's really hard to do with a camera and some OCR. Oh, wait.

  24. Users, there's trouble ahead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Users, there's trouble ahead
    I said users, it is totally sad
    But users, the future lies in your hand
    Cause it's all about surveillance

    Comrades, you don't know what I mean?
    Well comrades, there's new tech on the scene
    Come on comrades, stand up fight for your right
    There's a need for your experience

    It's fun to hack the RFID
    It's fun to hack the RFID
    Technology is just a matter of choice
    You can microwave all their toys

    It's fun to hack the RFID
    It's fun to hack the RFID
    They want to store everything about you
    But there's plenty of things you can do

    Ownage, it's the way to resist,
    I said ownage, let's call it "digital fist"
    Ownage, there's not much time left
    For civil disobedience

    Awesome, there's a lot we can share
    Awesome, let's destroy the nightmare
    I said awesome, a million lines of code
    We just need the right compiler

    It's fun to hack the RFID
    It's fun to hack the RFID
    They use it in passports and cellphones you buy
    but fuck it, it's all a lie

    RFID, you'll find it at the supermarket
    No folks, zap them all by yourself
    Put your pride on the shelf

    Hack it, fuck it, hack it, fuck it
    Hack it, fuck it, hack it, fuck it

  25. Only Impacts the RIch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uncovers hidden assets, secret meetings, clandestine love affairs, business associates. With governments going bankrupt and 'Tax the Rich' being a popular solution, With Dirt and Scandal being a popular theme for Political Campaign Commercials.

    NYPD to Launch Expansive For-Profit Surveillance System
    http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/08/09-3

    Joe Normal has nothing to worry about. But Mr. Big and Rich transporting illegal waste does. Mr. Mogul with a substandard workplace does. The rich dude being undertaxed on his swimming pool does.

    'Private Police Force' or Private Army? There is a meme about TPTB wanting to return to medieval times. OK, Let's explore that meme. Back in the day, the rich and powerful had their own Armies. Sometimes one Lord or Baron used his army to attack another Baron. Sometimes all the Baron's ganged up on the King.

    Private Police. Private Surveillance/Data Collection/Street View. For Profit Police. For Profit Surveillance. What could go wrong. Hey, I got no money. But those guys with Mansions on the hill do.

    Drones, Surveillance Cameras. So what do the poor care? For the poor, it is already a police state. For the poor, it has always been a police state. The man has been stomping them down and keeping them in place for 10 thousand years. Only the make and the style of the boot is changing.

    Joe Middle class is already being milked to the maximum with speeding cameras and red light cameras.

    But the rich, ah, the medium is the message, the tool betrays it's purpose.

    And a culture that evolves until kidnapping is a big issue. Only a fool would think these magic chips will be now suddenly be used in a wholesome Christian manner.

  26. And? by yuje · · Score: 1

    So having poor people automatically disqualifies a country in the geographic west, speaking a western language, believing in a western religion, ruled by a western style democratic government, and having a population of mostly white people from being Western? Or does West mean only rich Anglo-Saxon countries? I suppose it's far easier to assert Western superiority by including only the successful countries in the definition.

    1. Re:And? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      no we grudgingly accept the french to. oh and the italians because they have great food.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:And? by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 1

      Do not forget zee Germans! Why do you always forget Germans? You still mad for zis stupid little war half-century ago?

      --
      Absence of proof != proof of absence.
  27. Big brother by fabrica64 · · Score: 1

    Big brother's coming! They already tried two years ago to put this on all cars, then the law vanished... Now they're trying again... let's see if they'll be able to overcome privacy and "distribution" problems...

  28. Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite Terry Gilliam film.

  29. We already lost privacy thanks to our cellphones. by BadgerRush · · Score: 1

    There will be no additional loss of privacy, most Brazilians (like most of the world population) can already be tracked by their cellphones (Brazilians have 1.1 mobiles per person). The fact that we now can be also tracked by our cars does not make a difference.

    Avoiding the implementation of technology will not guaranty privacy, legislating how it can be used will.

  30. Re:We already lost privacy thanks to our cellphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    easier to avoid the cell phone brother: get a prepaid in someone else's name; get a phone abroad; setup call forwarding from "your" cell phone to some skype or other net service, which ends up on the prepaid. Doesn't solve the problem, but makes it harder (and way, way, costlier) for some honcho to find you in 3 mins.

  31. Stalking for fun and profit by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

    I never understood the no personally identifiable information meme. Broadcasting a unique ID becomes quite personal when the data is aggregated and mined. Even if the IDs are themselves encrypted in a way that prevents unique discrimination without a key that same key or group thereof would need to be hidden in hardware in all other vechicles making compromise of all or parts of the system assured. Further since this system is being guarded by secrecy and NDAs, not subject to public scruitny of professionals its security properties will undoubtably suck.

    Two observations:

    Since these devices will be mandatory and everyone will have one and know about the system why would anyone assume a criminal would not immediatly destroy or disable the device upon taking a joyride in your vechicle or otherwise escaping authorities due to prior criminal activity? The standard you would be surprised at how stupid people are defense only goes soo far.

    The second and more serious issue is that some people..unfortunatly way too many live in constant fear of injury or death from crazed x's and assorted stalker psychos. This system puts everyone in this category at unecessary increased risk.

    Further what happens when someone decides to start attaching the receipt of an ID to an explosive trigger?

  32. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commiting a crime in a 2010 yellow 4 door vehicle, but broadcasting a 2005 blue 2 door ID with someone else's plate number. If nobody pays close attention to anything other than "what the computer said", that'll be useful.