Slashdot Mirror


Apple Says "No" To Releasing New Dock Connector Specs

sl4shd0rk writes "According to sources, Apple hasn't offered any specs to developers for the new '9-pin Connector' to be used on the next version of the iPhone. Apple has also said it may use 'licensing agreements and threats of lawsuits' to prevent third-party adapters from hitting the market through at least 2012. There have been suggestions that this tactic is to allow Apple time to leverage competition and reap in revenues of $100 million for every 10 million Dock Connector Adapters it sells for $10. It remains unclear whether Apple will allow third-party developers to release competing alternatives after 2012."

393 comments

  1. Apple is the new Microsoft by Mr.+Wok · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Innovative and good technology company. I wish they just got Xcode on the same level as Visual Studio, as the latter is just fantastic.

    1. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by preaction · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean instead "leveraging their position to unfairly stifle competition," correct?

    2. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Mr.+Wok · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They haven't said or done anything, this is all just speculation. Slow news day on Slashdot.

    3. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Innovative and good technology company

      A. Innovative company might not have good technology

      B. Companies that have good technology might no longer be innovative

      Apple, Inc. used to be in "Category A" when Mr. Jobs were alive

      Now, it's in "Category B" and soon, it might end up be neither

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    4. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innovative and good technology company. I wish they just got Xcode on the same level as Visual Studio, as the latter is just orgasmic.

      There... fixed it for ya!

    5. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So when do you think apple will give it to 3rd parties? It's coming out next week, so they are seriously running out of time to get production up and running. Or do you just blindly defend apple any chance you get, truth staring you in the face or not?

    6. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by skovnymfe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure it's only called that when Microsoft does it.

    7. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Slashdot is the New Fox.

      Take a purely speculative story and give it a headline stating something likely to excite your readership as a simple fact. result page hits.

    8. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They haven't said or done anything, this is all just speculation. Slow news day on Slashdot.

      Hmmmm.... ''According to sources' it sounds like the tired old 'Some people are saying' line on Fox News. Can't fault them for (over)using this tactic in never fails to bring the outraged faithful out in force.

    9. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by sco08y · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's never a slow news day when you can just make shit up.

    10. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by craigminah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since when is "not releasing specs of an unreleased product" considered leveraging their position to unfairly stifle competition? Please explain how this will stifle competition...or is Samsung also coincidentally also redoing their dock connector with an expected release date shortly after Apple's release date? If anything, Apple not releasing dock connector specs might slow down the release of products that support the iPhone/iPod (e.g. speakers, etc.) but that's Apple's business. Let's say they released the specs of their still unreleased product then they decided to change the specs to account for something they omitted...now what?

    11. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by dontclapthrowmoney · · Score: 2

      It's never a slow news day when you can just make shit up.

      Especially if it's about the raspberry pi, bitcoins, iStuff, or a few other old faithfuls.

    12. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is the New Fox.

      Speaking of excitement-inducing stimuli, how's your tingling leg?

    13. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by dj245 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This kind of behavior worked a lot more in the 40 years ago (when the manufacturing cycle took a lot longer) than it does today. I'm not saying it is excusable, but the market for people who need to buy Apple accessories is so large that many companies buy the Apple Thing on day 1, reverse engineer it on day 2, and are receiving Accessories for the Apple Thing within a couple weeks from China. I work with a company that owns a Faro Laser Scanarm (3d scanner) and they frequently have multiple customers send them phones overnight on day 1. Each one of them is trying to get into the market for docks, cases, screen protectors, etc.

      I'm not saying that Apple's tactics are OK, but they are generally futile in this case. You can't stop a flood of Chinese accessories from dozens of manufacturers.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    14. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Visual Studio? Fantastic?
      Newbie developers are so funny.

    15. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Not sure if Apple shill or Microsoft shill...

    16. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple: all your base are belong to us

    17. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even though Apple hasn't released shit about unreleased products to the mass market except in rare exceptions for over a decade, everyone still thinks that it's news that Apple doesn't just up and scream aloud about features of unreleased products.

      Guess what? When they released the 2nd gen iPod that has the dock connector we've been using for 8 years now, they didn't pre-release specs for that either. Yet I'm sure we had the same cynical speculation of "OMG it's not bone-stock FireWire! They're going to squeeze everyone out with proprietary bullshit and sue everyone that tries to use it!"

      Never mind that today's dock connector only carries a few of the signals present in the original - gone is the FireWire and the 12v power, long replaced with USB2 and it's 5V DC. HDMI video has been added. Etc.

      This is likely Apple deciding that it's time to have a change in the connector that coincides with a change of signal, rather than leaving the connector alone for so long to keep compatibility with 3rd party accessories at the cost of engineering simplicity, and reduction of product size.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    18. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by samkass · · Score: 2

      So when do you think apple will give it to 3rd parties? It's coming out next week, so they are seriously running out of time to get production up and running. Or do you just blindly defend apple any chance you get, truth staring you in the face or not?

      My guess is that the 9-pin connector is just a better USB 3.0 port (one where the orientation of the cable doesn't matter) and that anyone will be able to make one. It may not have Apple's Seal of Approval, but I'm guessing cables and accessories will be out within weeks.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    19. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by gsgriffin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      When you grow the 3rd party vendor addons to such a magnitude that they rely upon you telling them what they can expect next.it it's very common to let those around you that are helping your product sell know what to develop next. You obviously are a FanboI and at times must be able to see that Apple is not about products. They're about money and what it takes to make a lot more. Corporate greed hasn't escaped them.

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    20. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2

      So when do you think apple will give it to 3rd parties? It's coming out next week, so they are seriously running out of time to get production up and running. Or do you just blindly defend apple any chance you get, truth staring you in the face or not?

      How do you know they haven't? NDAs have teeth.

    21. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that Apple is going to start making all of its accessories itself without licensing to third parties? Because that's logical.

      Then again anytime someone trots out the "fanboi" argument you can be pretty sure that all sign of rational thought has left the building, so perhaps you just can't help yourself.

    22. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      That's kinda where the "licensing agreements and threat of lawsuits" comes in. You can bet Apple has patents on this proprietary connector and will use the courts to block any large-scale import of 3rd party connectors in the immediate future. Milking out extra money by controlling initial production and sales of the connector is largely why they aren't using something like mini/micro USB. It has proven so with the Samsung lawsuit that Apple would rather deal with judges than competitors.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    23. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      But they have "Sources." And, as we all know, "Sources" are very reliable.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    24. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Informative

      That would be very...un-Apple-like. They currently make money on every device legitimately sold by 3rd party OEMs (iHome, JBL) by requiring an NDA and licensing agreement through their MFi program. I found and interesting read here about the reasoning behind the Square CC reader using the audio port. They cite several valid reasons but one that sticks out in a big way is basically it costs Square US $1 to manufacture the device but it would have cost them $4-$8 per device in licensing if they had gone with the 30 pin dock connector.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    25. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So far it has been speculation that there is a new connector. Now there is speculation on why Apple won't release specs for a connector they haven't announced yet. Maybe the day they announce the connector, they will release specs. Or the connector manufacturers have been sworn to secrecy about it considering the leaked cases of past models.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    26. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the 9-pin connector is just a better USB 3.0 port

      I'll confess that I don't know a lot about USB, but it seems like the existing connector has video out, audio out and signals to control the device (skip / volume etc.). Does the USB 3.0 spec include all that as well?

    27. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Applekid · · Score: 0

      Guess what? When they released the 2nd gen iPod that has the dock connector we've been using for 8 years now, they didn't pre-release specs for that either. Yet I'm sure we had the same cynical speculation of "OMG it's not bone-stock FireWire! They're going to squeeze everyone out with proprietary bullshit and sue everyone that tries to use it!"

      Is that not still the case? You need to be part of Apple's MFi program to make product that use their connector, and they sue those that aren't when the violators get rich enough to get something out of the suit.

      I understand they can't use the same connector forever, but I don't know if that gives Apple a free pass from criticism about changing it and holding those details even from partners until release day, when Apple will (shockingly I'm sure) have a full assortment of accessories.

      The answer is, of course, that Apple doesn't have partners, just private person customers and business customers, and doesn't seem to value the companies making innovative items that interface with their iDevices that only add value to them. I guess it's Apple's prerogative to be a bully, but they would do well to gain some humility and recognize that other companies have been in their shoes, sitting on a pile of cash and having people salivate over the promise of the next new thing, and that IBM and Microsoft were both in that same positions in decades past.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    28. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      You can assign malice to their actions if you want, and that may well be a fair assessment. Nobody truly knows what is going through the senior bosses' heads if they aren't in the room. However, having been in the Apple ecosystem for over about two decades now in various professional capacities, I can say that they got to their current attitude towards product announcements by having those "partners" blab to the press about product features and specs before Apple is ready to announce them.

      You get burnt by that enough times, and you start to just not tell anyone that doesn't need to know beforehand, and those that do get a 5-ton anvil of an NDA dropped on them.

      Something like a dock connector can probably get you a long way towards seeing what features the device supports; much farther than physical dimensions given to prospective case manufacturers and such. I don't find it that surprising that they would NDA the shit out of the manufacturing partners that are making the stuff that absolutely has to be available on day 1, and then publish specs to everyone else on day 1 after the product announcement.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    29. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by DaveGod · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I have a feeling that they might be right with the thing about 10m * $10 = $100m.

    30. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your butthurt is evident. And it makes me laugh.

    31. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      So when do you think apple will give it to 3rd parties? It's coming out next week, so they are seriously running out of time to get production up and running.

      They may have done it already. They may do it at the same time as the launch of the first device to use it. You won't know unless you are an Apple MFi partner. And if you are an MFi partner you'll be under NDA.
      https://developer.apple.com/programs/mfi/

      There is no story here, just speculation from people that don't know.

    32. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Apples only go to those stupid enough to buy a subscription to Apple only, soft and hardware.

      Apple's are particularly popular with scientists. They tend to not be stupid people. So unfortunately for you, it's your post that's stupid.

    33. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Yes, but digitally (as opposed to analogue). Analogue makes the accessory more expensive, but since *everything* on the phone is digital to start with, digital gives you better quality and makes the PHONE cheaper.

    34. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I understand they can't use the same connector forever, but I don't know if that gives Apple a free pass from criticism about changing it and holding those details even from partners until release day, when Apple will (shockingly I'm sure) have a full assortment of accessories.

      Clearly they haven't got such a free pass. There's no shortage of people criticising them, even based on no information. It seems what you're really asking is why there isn't a law against people pointing out the other side; the side where Apple is just a company looking to make a reasonable profit from what they do.

      By the way, what brand of razor and printer do you use? Does the company even allow 3rd parties to manufacture blades or ink cartridges?

    35. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It depends what language you're using. But I certainly know top developers who've been developing C/C++ for decades that day Visual Studio is the best IDE with a fantastic debugger.

      I won't comment myself because it's 10 years since I worked with it.

    36. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps it's not him that's unreasonably attached to a particular platform, but you.

    37. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      (basement dwelling, free WiFi hotspot using, jobless hipsters) != scientists

    38. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Applekid · · Score: 1

      By the way, what brand of razor and printer do you use? Does the company even allow 3rd parties to manufacture blades or ink cartridges?

      I see where you're going, but the availability of 3rd party toner seems to be pretty good, and razors are practically disposable.

      Meanwhile, I enjoy the iPod dock connector in my car that lets me use the head unit to select music. The dock connector started coming on iPods since 2003 but I never saw any kind of control signalling in everyday goods until around 2007. My work around at the time was literally connecting the headphones out to a tape player adapter... as a consumer, it would have been awful nice to get the current 1st class experience back then, and it disappoints me that it's probably going to be another 4 years before I get that kind of control on the new iteration.

      If I even decide to get another iPod. Funny thing is, my current vehicle also has a USB port that I can interface any old flash device or even a portable hard drive.

      And while you bring up shaving, even if we're in disagreement, I'd like to take this opportunity to highly recommend having a professional shave from a skilled wielder of the straight edge. It's well worth the time and money IMHO.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    39. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Actually what Fox does is take actual news and put a correct headline on it but I can see where you might get confused.

    40. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by loufoque · · Score: 1

      It's just that it's got everything integrated. You can get the same amount of debugging help with gdb and an appropriate front-end, and the fact that those tools are command-line is actually an advantage, since it's easier to integrate them in other environments.

      Integrated solutions do not work well because they're inflexible and force you to use their way to do things instead of special dedicated tools that might be better at what they do, can be run on their own, or simply might be more powerful since more specialized.
      In particular, projects in visual studio do not scale at all, so it's impossible to do any sort of large scale software development with it unless you split everything in mini-projects. The file manager is not practical, nor are the search functions, nor is the text editor itself. Its refactoring is severely limited to simplistic things, and its integrated support for team work (vcs) is a joke.
      About the compiler itself, its C++ language support is horrible, the compiler is riddled with bugs, is slow, and isn't even that good at optimizing as soon as you get out of the patterns for which it auto-detects things and cheats.

      Nothing beats a good build system, a good text editor, a good standalone compiler, a good terminal and a good set of tools with adequate scripting.

    41. Re:Apple is the new Microsoft by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I see where you're going, but the availability of 3rd party toner seems to be pretty good, and razors are practically disposable.

      It's good for some printers, not for others. Some you have to refill old cartridges. But the point is that manufacturers aren't helping 3rd parties to supply these parts. They are making it as difficult as possible. Apple on the other hand have a track record of working with 3rd parties to supply items that attach to the dock connector.

      I really don't see why they get such abuse for perfectly reasonable business practices. So perhaps they won't release specs for the dock connector until the first product with the new dock connector is announced. So what?

  2. Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple hasn't said a damn thing. Just speculation.

    1. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by gutnor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The new connector itself is pure rumor. So they don't publish the specs on a rumored connector of a product they haven't even announced or given any clear indication it will exist at all ? Some days it really feel like all Apple Haters and Fanboys are like teenagers gossiping about their favorite star.

    2. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by debilo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The new connector itself is pure rumor.

      Assuming this video is authentic, a side by side comparison does hint at a new, much smaller connector.

    3. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given the fact that nobody has a fucking clue of what's in the video, whether it's authentic or not, who shot it, I'd say it hints at somebody wanting you to believe something, not much more.

      It doesn't say anything about a future Apple product or connector though.

      My bet, if it is worth anything, is that if they change the connector, they will include in every iPhone box a converter allowing old accessories to work with the new iPhone. They'll drop the free converter next year on the iPhone 6 or whatever they decide to call it, giving effectively a year to accessories makers to adapt to the new connector.

      If they don't do they they deprive every single buyer of the shitload of accessories actually on the market and in the homes of so many potential buyers. And this is a definitive advantages of iPhones over competing products.

    4. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. That's such an obvious fake. Did you really not notice how the real phone's black background is not anywhere near as dark as the fake phone's black background once it is placed on the table and the overlaid video starts up? Not to mention the overlaid video's boundaries actually being past the fake phone's screen boundaries.

    5. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by debilo · · Score: 1

      Given the fact that nobody has a fucking clue of what's in the video

      What do you mean? The video clearly shows two devices side by side, the current iPhone and, allegedly, the new one.

      It doesn't say anything about a future Apple product or connector though.

      Have you actually watched the clip? It shows the new device from all angles, including the bottom of the device, revealing a much smaller, thinner connector. This is in line with rumors previously leaked. I don't know if it's the real deal, but device info gets leaked pre-release all the time, so I don't feel the need to get all tinfoily.

    6. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      How does anyone know it's the new iPhone? I mean, they have a history of false leaks that predates the iPhone releases... Last year we kept seeing an iPhone shaped like a MacBookAir (thinner on the front) yet it wasn't at all what the iPhone 4S looks like now.

      What you see is an iPhone 42 and something the author would like you to believe is the next iPhone. Whether it is or not it at best debatable.

      Stop being so gullible. The video being on YouTube doesn't make it right or true.

    7. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The new iphone is also a rumour but 3rd parties are already making all kinds of accessories for it.

    8. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to put your money where you mouth is? I'm willing to bet $1000 that's what the next iphone will look like (little dock and all).

    9. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by debilo · · Score: 1

      Okey dokey.

    10. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Care to put your money where you mouth is? I'm willing to bet $1000 that's what the next iphone will look like (little dock and all).

      My best judgement prevents me from betting $1000 with AC, sorry.

    11. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, do you know what your nick means in French?

    12. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by debilo · · Score: 2

      People tell me it means "Einstein", but maybe I'm just gullible.

    13. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      So I guess you know then.

    14. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is, and this coming from someone who is NOT a fan of Apple and the walled gardens, is that its well known there are a bazillion "iClones" made in China that frankly you'd be hard pressed to tell if you sat them side by side, or even booted up.

      So until we see an actual Apple product from an Apple store in the Apple box with a new connector? We all really need to treat these rumors as just that, rumors.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    15. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

      But the same thing happened last year for the nonexistent "iPhone 5". http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/29/iphone-5-cases-and-realistic-unibody-dummy-show-off-incredible-s/

    16. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by onyxruby · · Score: 0

      Get real, you are obviously know nothing of the hardware side of the business.

      Apple is trying to cut out the third party manufacturers who will all happily under cut apples overpriced adapters and they are getting called out on it. These manufacturing require lead time for development, shipments to warehouses and distributions to stores.

      These manufacturers are the ones you hear about paying top dollar for smuggled factory prototypes. They consider this necessary so that they can be ready to market with their products, ideally on the very day that Apple releases there shiny new toys. Since Apple is threatening legal action if anyone doesn't let Apple have the accessory market all to itself for a period of time it arbitrarily decided all on it's own, the story has made the news. This is a simple story of Apple being a bully in the market, much like the Microsoft of old.

      Public reveals are for consumers and marketing departments. Are you going to claim to be the one person on earth to be surprised when the iphone 5 is announced on Sept 12th?

    17. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Swampash · · Score: 2

      Slashdot is so desperate to pad out the front page with SEO-whoring stories containing the word "Apple" I'm amazed it's not posting press releases from the fruit industry.

    18. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you really don't want to know what it means in Croatia or Serbia.

    19. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough (hell even if i had used my user name it would be a crazy idea), but you gotta admit i have pretty good odds.

    20. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's true, it just illustrates the problem with Appeal. This mentality is why the PC market is not referred to as the MAC market, and this is also why the smart phone market is slipping through their clenched fists.

    21. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      You know, 5 years ago I might have been incredulous that slashdot would make this up:
      Apple has also said it may use 'licensing agreements and threats of lawsuits'
      Since theres basically no way to twist that-- they either said the quoted words or they didnt. But now? Yea, I can believe that the entire summary would be false.

      The real fun is trying to piece together what the actual story is from the false, misleading, and inflamatory hints in every slashdot story. ONE day, I hope, they will discover what "accuracy" means.

    22. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

      I admit it perfectly. But Apple hasn't acknowledged anything so far, not even the fact that there's a new iPhone. As usual.

      And people expect them to release a spec sheet of the new dock?

      This is so nonsensical that I can't even imagine how it made it to the front page.

    23. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Please, enlighten us !

    24. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by jrroche · · Score: 1

      If they don't do they they deprive every single buyer of the shitload of accessories actually on the market and in the homes of so many potential buyers.

      Because Apple doesn't have a track record of planned obsolescence or anything. And wouldn't stand to gain from users having to buy new accessories and new connector cables.

      And this is a definitive advantages of iPhones over competing products.

      Using a proprietary USB connector when all of your competitors use the same connector is a disadvantage. I can buy a USB-mini cable or accessory and know it will work with any android device practically forever, or at least until a new industry-wide standard is adopted. That means the cables and accessories I bought for my HTC Evo still work with my Samsung Galaxy S3, saving me the trouble of having to buy new ones just because I switched brands.

    25. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      It is common for companies to work with other companies on third party accessories for unreleased, unannounced projects. Non apple companies do know about the connector because apple is not a manufacturer, but a designer. Perhaps the same manufacturer that is making the Apple branded accessories wants to make its own third party ones as well, or possibly contacted its other clients to give them a heads up.

      The complaints aren't that Apple hasn't publicly published specs, but that they won't provide them under any agreement to any other company.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    26. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they change the connector, they will include in every iPhone box a converter

      Just like how they included a mini-DP to DVI adapter when they dropped the DVI port from their macbook (pro) or when they included a VGA to DVI adapter when they dropped the VGA port

      oh wait...

    27. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Buy cables for a new phone? There's a dock to USB cable in the box with every iPhone. What the fuck do you thing your android can connect to that the iPhone can't? Out of the box.

    28. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      An SD Card.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    29. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Apple doesn't have a track record of planned obsolescence or anything.

      Apple's actual track record here is that they shipped the first devices using the 30 pin dock connector in April 2003, replacing the Firewire-400 port used in first and second generation iPods. That connector has lasted nearly 10 years. That's not exactly a lot of planned obsolescence enforced by connector churn, now is it?

      Can you actually name any real Apple "planned obsolescence" or is it just something you typed because you thought it made you sound smart?

      Using a proprietary USB connector when all of your competitors use the same connector is a disadvantage. I can buy a USB-mini cable or accessory and know it will work with any android device practically forever, or at least until a new industry-wide standard is adopted. That means the cables and accessories I bought for my HTC Evo still work with my Samsung Galaxy S3, saving me the trouble of having to buy new ones just because I switched brands.

      I doubt that many people give even a moment's notice to the question of whether cables are compatible while deciding which smartphone to buy. It's a very geeky thing to be concerned with, it's a trivial expense next to the total cost of ownership of a smartphone, and most people don't use anything but the cable bundled with the phone anyways.

      On top of all that, what Apple cares the most about is people's experiences inside Apple's own ecosystem, so what matters to them is that it's a smooth experience upgrading from one iPhone to another. That's why they stuck with the original dock connector so long; this is the first time in the iPhone's entire existence that they're asking any iPhone to iPhone upgraders to change cabling.

    30. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      So nothing related to the dock connector/USB then. Thanks for confirming the point.

    31. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you've already got the huge market share that Apple has. Remember that proprietary connector was also used on the massively successful iPods. All of those accessories that people have bought to work with their iPod/iPhone/iPad has a big impact on people's future purchasing choices, moving away from Apple makes those accessories no longer usable.

      The USB-mini cable for android phones might be a standard, but when you walk into an electronic store and there's 20+ devices with Apple's dock and 2 with a USB-mini connector, you can shout all the want about proprietary being a disadvantage, the reality of the situation says otherwise.

      And that makes the decision to change connector mind-boggling. It makes the choice to move away from Apple easier, all you're accessories aren't going to work as well anyway.

    32. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He answered your question. He did not confirm your point.

    33. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by jrroche · · Score: 1

      Can you actually name any real Apple "planned obsolescence" or is it just something you typed because you thought it made you sound smart?

      iPhones don't have removeable batteries, preventing replacements after the battery dies after a couple years. MacBook Air has its RAM soldered onto the logic board, preventing future upgrades to extend the life of the device. Retina MacBook Pro also has the RAM soldered on. OSX 10.5 eliminated compatibility for all G3 Macs and many G4 Macs. OSX 10.6 eliminated compatibility for all remaining pre-Intel machines, giving it backwards compatibility to models only about 3 years old. OSX 10.7's backwards compatibility is about 4 years. iOS 4 won't run on original iPhones, and iOS 5 won't run on the iPhone 3G, giving them both about two years. To be fair though, Android software updates for older phones is a lot worse.

      I doubt that many people give even a moment's notice to the question of whether cables are compatible while deciding which smartphone to buy. It's a very geeky thing to be concerned with, it's a trivial expense next to the total cost of ownership of a smartphone, and most people don't use anything but the cable bundled with the phone anyways. On top of all that, what Apple cares the most about is people's experiences inside Apple's own ecosystem, so what matters to them is that it's a smooth experience upgrading from one iPhone to another. That's why they stuck with the original dock connector so long; this is the first time in the iPhone's entire existence that they're asking any iPhone to iPhone upgraders to change cabling.

      I agree that the average person doesn't care about cables, but that's beside the point. There is no reason to use a proprietary connector. The iPhone cable is just a run of the mill USB cable with a non-standard connector on the end. The only reason to use a proprietary connector is to keep people locked in to your device and prevent them from easily switching manufacturers. It would be just as smooth of an experience to switch from one iPhone to another if they'd used mini-USB the whole time like everyone else. The problem is that it would also be a smooth experience to switch from one iPhone to a new Android phone.

    34. Re:Putting words in Apples mouth by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Hear!Hear!

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  3. universal connector by mister.woody · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a shame that they do not have a universal connector. Something that would work on any damn phone, like a simple usb. But oh well... it's apple!

    1. Re:universal connector by cheater512 · · Score: 0, Troll

      There is a standard and it is very much like usb. Its called micro usb which you might have heard of.
      Virtually every smart phone these days sold has a micro usb port.

      iPhones and iPads are not phones or tablets. They are purely fashion statements.
      No one would buy them otherwise.

    2. Re:universal connector by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a standard and it is very much like usb. Its called micro usb which you might have heard of.
      Virtually every smart phone these days sold has a micro usb port.

      iPhones and iPads are not phones or tablets. They are purely fashion statements.
      No one would buy them otherwise.

      all other manufacturers agreed to standardize on microusb some 5 years ago(and it's finally starting to be used on pretty much all, non-apple, devices now).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:universal connector by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They are purely fashion statements.

      Well, maybe one data point doesn't disprove your argument, but the way you've framed it, it goes a long way to.

      I am the least fashionable person imaginable. I'm a little bit of a lefty and despise brand worship and the creeping corporatism of our age. I abhor labels and typically buy no-name brand jeans from Target.

      Oddly enough, I do have an iPhone. I find it well designed, very functional and useful as a phone and portable web browser, music player, gps, camera, and very occasional puzzle and games machine. That's why I have one, it's NOTHING to do with fashion.

    4. Re:universal connector by data2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.maclife.com/article/news/microusb_set_european_commission_standard_smartphones
      Brought to you by those commie, over-regulating Europeans.

    5. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Over-regulating? Thanks to them we finally have an universal connector!

    6. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      EU regulations forces them to have a microusb port thats why.
      apple is the only one not to comply. surprise surprise.

    7. Re:universal connector by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      They are purely fashion statements.

      Well, maybe one data point doesn't disprove your argument, but the way you've framed it, it goes a long way to.

      I am the least fashionable person imaginable. I'm a little bit of a lefty and despise brand worship and the creeping corporatism of our age. I abhor labels and typically buy no-name brand jeans from Target.

      Oddly enough, I do have an iPhone. I find it well designed, very functional and useful as a phone and portable web browser, music player, gps, camera, and very occasional puzzle and games machine. That's why I have one, it's NOTHING to do with fashion.

      Ditto on all points... except I also like the iPhone 4 series because these devices are smaller than the Galaxy S3. Apparently that feature will be lost with the iPhone 5 which is unfortunate.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    8. Re:universal connector by Dreadrik · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you can't do analog audio over micro USB. It is not the same thing. Making a sound-dock for USB is much more complex and expensive.

    9. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me that every person that makes this argument forgets that the dock connector does so much more than USB does. It has pins for USB, Firewire, analogue audio and video, component video, whatever it needs to connect a HDMI port on the AV adapter, VGA out via an adapter and probably some other things I've missed!

    10. Re:universal connector by Xenx · · Score: 2

      I know from personal use that Samsung has analog from the micro USB. Cardock with charging passthrough and 3.5mm audio for about $50. So, it can obviously be done and for a reasonable price.

    11. Re:universal connector by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Typical hipster.

    12. Re:universal connector by toruonu · · Score: 2

      Ditto on all points... except I also like the iPhone 4 series because these devices are smaller than the Galaxy S3. Apparently that feature will be lost with the iPhone 5 which is unfortunate.

      Mentioned the exact things somewhere else in this thread however from the mockups it seems the 5 will not be wider, but taller. This way the one handed usage and comfort remains the same while getting a tick bigger screen. But I do hope as well that it won't be a monster 4.x" screen just because people want bigger (just recently heard that someone's planning a 5" screen, HTC?, why the hell would you want a phone that's almost as big as a tablet?)

    13. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet many manufacturers can still achieve all this with micro USB.

    14. Re:universal connector by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Yes, but you can't do analog audio over micro USB.

      Analog audio? That's what the headphone jack is for.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    15. Re:universal connector by profplump · · Score: 1

      Let me know when your USB port has serial, audio, and video connectors.

      You can argue that it's better to have a whole slew of other connectors -- and in many (but not all) cases I'd agree -- but you can't argue that USB is replacement for the dock port (new or old).

    16. Re:universal connector by oldlurker · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that every person that makes this argument forgets that the dock connector does so much more than USB does. It has pins for USB, Firewire, analogue audio and video, component video, whatever it needs to connect a HDMI port on the AV adapter, VGA out via an adapter and probably some other things I've missed!

      According to reports Apple is planning to strip out Firewire and video to get to the new smaller connector and lower pin count. Granted, this is not confirmed by Apple yet, but something has to go when the pins goes. And, as mentioned by others here - Apple's competitors are able to do this with MicroUSB ports, including analogue sound (on Samsungs at least, don't know about others).

    17. Re:universal connector by profplump · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, that's for speaker-level audio after the amp. The port on the bottom puts out line-level audio (with no internal volume control), along with video, status lines to detect/inform the power state, data lines so you can read and control the device, and a whole slew of other things that have come and gone throughout the decade-long life of the 30-pin connector. It is possible to do most of these things with other standard ports (though not all of them, particularly on a thin case), but the replacement is not as simple as power + headphones.

    18. Re:universal connector by profplump · · Score: 0

      No, they can't. They have a port that's shaped like micro USB but has 20 other pins in it and requires adapter cables/docks to use any of the other features, just like Apple does. Many of these "USB" ports even require an adapter to use the USB data lines -- all they can do with a normal USB cord is charge at a low rate (sometimes lower than the in-use power consumption rate).

    19. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isn't that because it's a cool fashion statement when you appear to not care about fashion.

    20. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Micro-USB with MHL does serial, audio and video, way better than analog pins, and does much much more.
      Having analog signals run through dubious-quality cheap connectors is so last century.

    21. Re:universal connector by oldlurker · · Score: 2

      Let me know when your USB port has serial, audio, and video connectors.

      You can argue that it's better to have a whole slew of other connectors -- and in many (but not all) cases I'd agree -- but you can't argue that USB is replacement for the dock port (new or old).

      Ok, I can let you know right away. Many phones have that today, including phones as old as Samsung Galaxy S2. MHL is a standard for exactly this, supported by multiple manufacturers (except Apple). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_High-Definition_Link

    22. Re:universal connector by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      the one handed usage

      *snicker*

    23. Re:universal connector by digitig · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a standard and it is very much like usb.

      Only for charging, not for data. And a manufacturer can be compliant by supplying an adaptor, which only has to charge the device, not carry data. Hardly relevant to docking the device.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    24. Re:universal connector by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 2

      why the hell would you want a phone that's almost as big as a tablet?

      Because the 5.5" Galaxy Note has sold like hotcakes all over the world, so now everyone else is jumping on the bandwagon. Also the 5.8" Note II just got announced.

      Someone keeps buying these phones...

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    25. Re:universal connector by SpooForBrains · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And it sucks.

      You can't (for instance) use MHL at the same time as USB on the go (USB host mode). Or at the same time as USB AT ALL, as far as I know.

        At least, you couldn't, until they released a new INCOMPATIBLE spec for the connector (starting with, I think, the Galaxy S3).

      Also, there's no standard interface for external controls, so you can't have a dock that supports skipping forward/backward/etc.

      There's no line level analogue out (as previously mentioned), so that connector is not useable as a dock connector.

      Apple make questionable choices about some things, but the dock connector is something they got emphatically right, in my opinion.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    26. Re:universal connector by Dreadrik · · Score: 2

      You are of course correct. They use the "device attached" pin of the USB port with a specific resistor to switch the USB data lines into two analog audio outs.
      While this is a cool hack, it still suffers from a few limitations that the apple dock connector doesn't have. It can't do analog in at the same time (think microphone input for a car handsfree), or video, or simultaneous USB data transfer, to name a few things.
      Also, this is not part of the USB standard, which means the cable only works with certain phone models, and can actually make other devices misbehave. Try connecting a Galaxy Nexus to that cable. :-)

    27. Re:universal connector by Eyeball97 · · Score: 1

      Let me know when your USB port has serial, audio, and video connectors.

      Hello. My 2011 Samsung Galaxy S2 (which is currently connected to my TV and Surround amp) called you and would like a word...

    28. Re:universal connector by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "all other manufacturers agreed to standardize on microusb some 5 years ago(and it's finally starting to be used on pretty much all, non-apple, devices now)."

      Apple signed the agreement as well.
      http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/magazine/articles/single-market/article_10942_en.htm

    29. Re:universal connector by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 1

      5 or 11 pins in total to be precise. Whilst it is not a standard micro USB port, the Mobile High-Definition Link is a proposed standard in use by many phones today and supports power, audio, video, remote control and micro USB via a single port. Products that make use of it have been coming out over the last year or so and I suspect all major smartphones (apart from Apple's) will eventually use it.

    30. Re:universal connector by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Oh.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    31. Re:universal connector by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Not having the "connector" doesn't mean it can't do the job.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    32. Re:universal connector by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 0

      They do comply. You just don't know the regulation as well as you think you do, which works out well for your anti Apple whine but doesn't actually make you right.

    33. Re:universal connector by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 1

      Goog luck using that Micro USB on your non fashion statement in the same way Apple uses their connector on the iPad and iPhone. Hint - yours can't do as much.

    34. Re:universal connector by oldlurker · · Score: 1

      And it sucks.

      You can't (for instance) use MHL at the same time as USB on the go (USB host mode). Or at the same time as USB AT ALL, as far as I know.

      At least, you couldn't, until they released a new INCOMPATIBLE spec for the connector (starting with, I think, the Galaxy S3).

      Also, there's no standard interface for external controls, so you can't have a dock that supports skipping forward/backward/etc.

      There's no line level analogue out (as previously mentioned), so that connector is not useable as a dock connector.

      Apple make questionable choices about some things, but the dock connector is something they got emphatically right, in my opinion.

      I know that my Samsung SII do have line level analogue out through the micro usb port, so it is possible. And, the new connector spec they are releasing is to adress exactly the shortcomings of the old you are mentioning. What we are discussing here is that Apple too is in process of introducing a new connector spec, incompatible with everything currently out there. Why couldn't they then join the MHL/MicroUSB standard group, using the new version. I'm sure they would be able to get support for external controls in there if they wanted to.

    35. Re:universal connector by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Hipsters don't shop at target, that would be mainstream.

      Seriously. Hipster isn't just something you can label people you disagree with.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    36. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whoosh*

    37. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The agreement wasn't for micro usb and it only applied to the power block end of the cable, not the device input.

    38. Re:universal connector by GungaDan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hipsters can shop at Target if they do so ironically, or were doing it before it became mainstream.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    39. Re:universal connector by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Give me a break. The iPhone connector is designed specifically to not be compatible with anything else on the market so apple can charge other companies that want to use it for the privilege. You can't even find the positive and negative pins on the phone, hook up alligator clips and charge it. The connector has a resistor and cap across several pins so the phone can detect if it's a real iPhone connector and it will literally reject the cable if it doesn't detect these components in the signal. There is no purpose in those components being there other than to enforce their patents.

      Every point you make can be done with USB. You can transfer streaming audio and video via usb, you can certainly use it to control the volume of an iPod. In fact, the iPods connector is larger, analog and transfers far less data than a modern USB connector could. It is, without question, an inferior connector. If the connector were so superior, why isn't anyone designing their phones to work off the same connection? No one seems bothered about breaching any of apples other patents...

    40. Re:universal connector by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Got a citation?

      The Memorandum of Understanding dated June 5th, 2009 (apparently the original one) allows non-Micro-USB connectors as long as the device can use a "Common EPS" (external power supply) cable: Micro-USB B plug on the device end, 500 mA to 1500 mA current. Annex II to that document mentions that a Common EPS that is supplied with a detachable cable must also have a USB full-size (standard) A socket. Apple's devices do not comply with the MoU.

    41. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a work provided iPhone. I find the phone works as expected. The rest of it is remarkably poor - the Mail Exchange integration is unmanagable, the music player is incredibly bad as a standalone player (requires iTunes to do anything, which is a nightmare on its own too), the myriad of options for "iCloud" and the effect on applications is mysterious at best.

      AC

    42. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try connecting an iPhone 5 to any of the existing iPhone/iPod cables.

    43. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. USB doesn't do Data or Power.

      Dumbass.....

    44. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(just recently heard that someone's planning a 5" screen, HTC?, why the hell would you want a phone that's almost as big as a tablet)". You must ask one of the millions of galaxy note owners. Personally i'm all for it (as long as it still fits in your pocket), i use a smartphone more as a computer than a phone, so the bigger the screen the better.

    45. Re:universal connector by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      An MoU isn't (necessarily) a contract. Are there later contracts?

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    46. Re:universal connector by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      Why Apple doesn't use a standard connector is anybody's guess. The number of people in my office who are constantly asking for an iPhone charger is astounding.

      Without exception, they all mash the living shit out of one or both ends. The path from perfect cable to visible silver braiding to "it's not charging" is about 3 months.

      I'm not sure if this says more about the quality of the cables, the users or the battery life of iDevices (which I understood was meant to be pretty good).

    47. Re:universal connector by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 3, Informative

      The EU are fine with this. http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MD099ZM/A/apple-iphone-micro-usb-adapter?mco=MjU5MjAwODM The directive is there to stop people throwing away chargers, this fixes that problem and the EU is fine with it. Apple is complying, and a quick google search brings up 100s of citations.

    48. Re:universal connector by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      iPhones and iPads are not phones or tablets. They are purely fashion statements. No one would buy them otherwise.

      Can you suggest a different tablet with a screen resolution of 2048x1536 or higher that is priced at or below $499?

    49. Re:universal connector by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I think you've missed an obvious point....

      It connects to a computer via USB. It can be completely controlled via a USB interface already. The Apple dock connector is, essentially, just a custom USB port.

      Oh, and modern USB *CAN* do all of serial, audio, and video.

    50. Re:universal connector by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      The agreement wasn't for micro usb and it only applied to the power block end of the cable, not the device input.

      sure it was for microusb, to use it for power. only other logical choice would have been the nokia small pin at that time. it mattered because at the time no nokias(apart from 1 model) charged from usb.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    51. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      Can you explain why you need a pixel density of that magnitude on such a small device?

    52. Re:universal connector by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      a manufacturer can be compliant by supplying an adaptor, which only has to charge the device

      It's worse. They can actually "make available" an adapter. In my world that means they can sell it.

      "4.2.1 In order that compatibility of as many Mobile Phones as possible with a Common EPS may be enabled, if a manufacturer makes available an Adaptor from the Micro-USB connector of a Common EPS to a specific non-Micro-USB socket in the Mobile Phone, it shall constitute compliance to this article."

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    53. Re:universal connector by soupforare · · Score: 1

      People just don't take care of things. I use my seven year old ipod cable with my touch and it's fine. The current cables are better built still, with sturdier ends. Do they all own rabbits or something?

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    54. Re:universal connector by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not against having line-level audio, but I'd rather have a device which enumerates as a hub and a bunch of other devices. It would be cool if the bluetooth would make itself available when the device is plugged in to my computer. Audio output from the device could appear as a USB-standard audio device. The cameras could appear as USB cameras, etc. Right now they mostly enumerate as a storage device, which I think misses a lot of opportunities. One way to help solve the USB power snaffle would be to include a USB charger profile. Since a really tiny microcontroller is capable of speaking enough USB for that purpose, it's something that could be inexpensively implemented at both ends of a USB cable. Instead of using a dedicated power management IC, you'd use a tinyavr with usb or some similar solution which would handle both communications and the power supply. Since generally the devices which need the most power (aside from storage devices) are already fairly expensive the additional cost ought to go mostly unnoticed; non-handshaking devices would be restricted to 500mA or whatever the current spec is. Unfortunately, they only bothered to define a physical connector for charging. Perhaps something like this will go into USB 4.0.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    55. Re:universal connector by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If only adding touch didn't double the price of something like that, or worse.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    56. Re:universal connector by Karlt1 · · Score: 2

      So how do I control an electronic device over USB via purely analog signals -- i.e. without requiring the connecting component to have a USB host controller and software? I don't think the manufacturer of $20 boombox with a dock connector is going to want to spend the money on the necessary hardware/software.

      The last time I asked this question, people posted a lot of solutions involving proprietary docks and connectors that only work with one brand of phone.

    57. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is the result of Apple signing that agreement:

      http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MD099ZM/A/apple-iphone-micro-usb-adapter

    58. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we do have universal connectors you ignornat sod... ... its called Universal Serial Bus

    59. Re:universal connector by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      iPhones and iPads are not phones or tablets. They are purely fashion statements.
      No one would buy them otherwise.

      Can you suggest a different tablet with a screen resolution of 2048x1536 or higher that is priced at or below $499?

      Apple products have a massive mark-up that is irrefutable. They will never be best value devices...that is not their business model.

      As for there higher DPI, The Nexus has better hardware at a better price point in a better form factor.

    60. Re:universal connector by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Because it looks better? Are you retarded?

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    61. Re:universal connector by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "...except I also like the iPhone 4 series because these devices are smaller than the Galaxy S3. Apparently that feature will be lost with the iPhone 5 which is unfortunate."

      If the rumors hold, it will be the same width, thinner, and about 3/8" taller. I wouldn't worry about the size.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    62. Re:universal connector by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "There is a standard and it is very much like usb. Its called micro usb which you might have heard of. Virtually every smart phone these days sold has a micro usb port."

      Apple is in the process of changing it's dock connector, which has been in place for a decade. Which implies that whatever they replace it with, they're going to be stuck with it for quite some time to come.

      And you want them to use an standard USB 2.0 micro connector???

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    63. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analog i/o allows for really cheap accessories.

    64. Re:universal connector by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Incorrect.

      Some of us like to bypass the lowest-bidder digital amplifier circuit inside the iPhone and use an amplifier that's worth a damn. The 30-pin dock connector allows for just that, if you use an accessory that pulls the analog signal off the line-level audio pins.

      USB doesn't do that.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    65. Re:universal connector by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Did you know that Target is a corporation?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    66. Re:universal connector by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Using USB 2.0 in a connector is so last century....

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    67. Re:universal connector by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      It can't do analog in at the same time (think microphone input for a car handsfree)

      Most I have seen use Bluetooth.

      or video

      HDMI out. You know like the other non-Apple devices have.

      or simultaneous USB data transfer

      Does Apple even have anything which uses this?

    68. Re:universal connector by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Can you connect a working USB mouse, keyboard or pen drive to your craptastic Apple specific port?

    69. Re:universal connector by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      No, it can't do line level audio, or video, or a whole bunch of other stuff the dock connector does.

    70. Re:universal connector by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      You didn't answer your question – can you suggest a different tablet with a screen resolution of 2048x1536 or higher, that is priced at or below $499. The one you mentioned there is barely more than half the resolution of the iPad.

    71. Re:universal connector by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I had an android MP3 player with a 5" screen (Archos 5 IMTw/A) and I loved that thing. So much better than the iPod touch I had before -- and a large part of that was the larger screen. Although the fact that it was a resistive screen helped a ton too. I've always found Apple touch screen devices to be too small and too imprecise for many applications. I can barely even use the virtual keyboard because the keys are too small. I don't even understand why it pops up when you're holding the thing in portrait mode -- it's absolutely unusable at that size. Even landscape is difficult at best. And my fingers aren't small, but they aren't in any way abnormally large.

      Oh, and a 5" screen plus a fairly thick plastic bezel around it was still small enough to fit easily and comfortable in any pocket I tried to stick it in...why _not_ go for a bigger screen?

    72. Re:universal connector by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Yep, and that's why they include a dock connector to micro-USB adapter with every iPhone sold in Europe, last I checked.

    73. Re:universal connector by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Some of us like to bypass the lowest-bidder digital amplifier circuit inside the iPhone and use an amplifier that's worth a damn.

      Using USB would also allow you to bypass the lowest-bidder D/A converter inside the iDevice.

      The only reason to use analog out is when you are plugging the iDevice into something that uses the iDevice screen for display but has buttons to control the playback. This means you are either using a boom-box-like host (which means audio quality doesn't matter), or you've paid extra money for an Apple docking port on a host that can play back with some quality. This would make you doubly stupid, as you would have spent the extra money and still are using the crappy D/A converter in the iDevice.

      Personally, anything that specifically advertises an iDevice dock (car, home stereo equpiment, etc.) goes into my "do not buy" category, as I would rather have the money spent on USB so that any device would work better. Since the vast majority of devices are not made by Apple, wasting money targeting one specific device vendor shows me that price/performance is not a feature of anything with a Apple proprietary connector.

    74. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they follow through and actually ship a microusb port on an iPhone, their signature means squat.

      The iPhone 4s was shipped 10 months after Apple signed the agreement and it didn't have a microusb port.

        It took Apple all of six weeks to switch to a glass face plate when Jobs saw how badly the original iPhone prototype was getting scratched.

    75. Re:universal connector by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      So how do I control an electronic device over USB via purely analog signals -- i.e. without requiring the connecting component to have a USB host controller and software? I don't think the manufacturer of $20 boombox with a dock connector is going to want to spend the money on the necessary hardware/software.

      Why would you need the boom box to directly control the device? The touch screen is right there in front of you. It has to be, as the $20 boom box doesn't have a display.

      There is no real use case where you need external control of the device holding your music and also need to use the device for display. Once you have an external display, you've spent enough that USB host mode isn't much of an extra expense.

    76. Re:universal connector by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      "no use case"?

      I have two portable speaker system with remote controls can control an iPod/iPhone. Change songs, playlist etc.

      What about car systems with integrated iPod controls on the steering wheel?

      Also, one benefit of the iPod dock connector outside of the controlling the device is that you have an analog line out that can send output to any old device just by correcting the right pin

      I once had a $10 cassette adapter for the iPod that connected to the dock connector that would fast forward and rewind songs on the iPod when you pressed the corresponding buttons on the cassette player. It would turn on and turn off the iPod when you started and stopped the cassette player - all via analog signals sent to the correct pins. Do you really think it would be cheaper to create device like that if you had to implement it via USB?

      How do you send video signals over USB? Sure you can send the data and let the host device convert it to video, but since the device already has the technology to convert the signal, doesn't it make more sense to just send the converted video?

      Every USB solution I've seen involves a proprietary adapter that only works with that model phone.

    77. Re:universal connector by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      ...and doesn't specify a connector type. Samsung's SIII uses a non-standard 11-pin connector as well.

    78. Re:universal connector by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      The third option, which is the one I'm using, and that you missed: you are recycling an old iPod third-generation dock that has true line-level outputs, and using it with a headphone amplifier.

      Thus, using the iPod / iPhone DAC, but a quality amplifier and quality high-impedance headphones.

      Your USB port only solution would cost more than what I've done here - as the dock I'm using is a recycled part, it cost me exactly nothing over what I had already paid previous to the existence of the iPhone, where I would have had to purchase something if it was USB only. I guess that combination never occurred to you though.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    79. Re:universal connector by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      There was nothing like the iPod connector on the market when it was released. The fact that it has lived such a long life is why it is odd. There are a lot of legacy products designed around iPods initially that can't support MHL.

      You cannot simultaneously send line-level analog audio, control, and power over a USB link, and MHL doesn't support that on four pins.

    80. Re:universal connector by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Are they all fat fingered or something? I can't say I've ever ruined a cable for an Apple device or any device. Seems pretty hard to break something that just slides in and out of a hole.

    81. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, it's a fashion statement, then. Got it.

    82. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't do analog in at the same time (think microphone input for a car handsfree)

      Most I have seen use Bluetooth.

      Hipster cars don't have bluetooth handsfree

    83. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was nothing like the iPod connector on the market when it was released

      Reality says different. USB 2.0 was released in 2000. The iPod didn't release till 2001. USB 1.0 was out in the 90's. I'm not sure how you could say no universal connector existed then. Sudo mod me up

      USB standard

    84. Re:universal connector by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      So they'd be really old hipsters?

    85. Re:universal connector by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Why do you need to send line-level audio at all. Any sound that is being sent from the device is from a digital source. Just send the audio signal digitally and have the dock do a D/A conversion.

    86. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that now makes the dock more expensive.

    87. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still using the lowest bidder DAC. How can you be so happy about the sound when the first step in it's processing is degrading the sound. You are also transferring the analog audio along a further signal path which may cause some noise.

    88. Re:universal connector by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Those things all sound like data to me.

    89. Re:universal connector by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Dont' forget to add more criteria to ensure that only the iPad matches your bizarre metric of what makes the ultimate tablet. How about " can you suggest a different tablet with a screen resolution of 2048x1536 or higher, that is priced at or below $499, and is made by Apple"? That way there's no way he can name anything else.

    90. Re:universal connector by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And it sucks.

      You can't (for instance) use MHL at the same time as USB on the go (USB host mode). Or at the same time as USB AT ALL, as far as I know.

      And you can on the iPhone?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    91. Re:universal connector by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      The USB interface can be implemented for something like $3-4, versus the $4-8 per device paid to Apple to license their 30 pin connector. The cheap device would either be cheaper, more profitable, or some combination of the two, with USB.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    92. Re:universal connector by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      iPhones and iPads are not phones or tablets.

      Is this say something stupid day?

    93. Re:universal connector by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      $3-4 for the USB controller and supporting components, $4-8 per device to license the 30-pin connector. Yes, I do think USB would be cheaper; at worst, it would cost the same.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    94. Re:universal connector by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      So perhaps the connector on the new devices IS micro-usb. Until they are announced we won't know.

    95. Re:universal connector by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      1. You don't know how much Apple charges to license the dock connector.
      2. USB also has fees associated.
      3. You really think it's cheaper to include a usb host controller chip and software involved than soldering a pin that connects to an analog connection?
      4. The iPod/iPhone already has the capability to convert digital media to analog. How do you avoid duplicating the hardware when you have to send and receive digital signals to the device.

    96. Re:universal connector by Karlt1 · · Score: 1
    97. Re:universal connector by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      and, of course, that's the only one on the market... grow up.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    98. Re:universal connector by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I'm oh so sorry, that reply was a bit brash. Here's a controller with a DAC/ADC, on a board, with a USB port, 2 3.5mm jacks, and a case, for $2.80 (single unit pricing).

      http://dx.com/p/5-1-channel-usb-sound-card-adapter-black-59039?item=2

      Are you telling me they paid $4.92 for the USB controller in that?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    99. Re:universal connector by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the original article is gone (though I did read it when it was first published). http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=199763 The dock connector costs $4 to license. I do know this; lots of people know this.

      USB? If your a USB-IF member, free to use; otherwise, it's $2000 every 2 years for a vendor ID, with no per-unit costs. If you're producing more than 500 units, USB is cheaper; and that's assuming the connectors themselves cost the same. Here's a hint: the dock connector itself costs more than a USB port.

      Take a look at this: http://dx.com/p/5-1-channel-usb-sound-card-adapter-black-59039?item=2

      If these guys can sell this thing, shipped from Hong Kong, for $2.80 per unit ($2.02 in quantities of 10 or more), with a USB controller, DAC/ADC, USB port, 2 3.5mm jacks, and a case, how much do you think the USB interface and DAC/ADC added to the cost? Pennies, my friend, pennies. About the price of the resistors and capacitors used to control devices via the dock connector, actually.

      As for your last point, if I give a damn about sound quality, I care less about duplicating hardware; I want that signal transmitted digitally and decoded as close to the amplifier as possible. Maybe I'm putting a higher quality DAC in my accessory than Apple put in my iPod? Or maybe it truly is a cheap accessory with a crappy DAC; but, then, how's the quality of an analog signal over a cheap connector? Do you see my point yet?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    100. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical troll.

    101. Re:universal connector by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      You didn't answer your question – can you suggest a different tablet with a screen resolution of 2048x1536 or higher, that is priced at or below $499. The one you mentioned there is barely more than half the resolution of the iPad.

      Not good enough the magical 7" Nexus tablet $200 or do you want a larger tablet. I'm feeling the Kindle Fire HD tablet, available 8.9in, 1920x1200 resolution display tablet with 16GB of internal storage, powered by a Texas Instruments Omap 4470 processor priced at $299. Amazon are not the only ones launching high resolution tablets.

      Seriously does Google not work on the iPad

    102. Re:universal connector by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      You want analog audio when you are already using USB data transfer?
      What bizarre contraption can do USB, but using USB for audio would make the cost skyrocket?

      The USB port is very flexible. It supports file access, audio access and a whole host of other things.
      The same port easily does HDMI with MHL which is *not* a hack, and it is possible to use MHL and USB at the same time (On the Galaxy S III at least I believe).
      It is cheap, compatible and is relatively easy to implement.

      It even allows you to use USB OTG which I notice the iPhone can't do even with its 30 pin plug.

    103. Re:universal connector by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      There is a standard and it is very much like usb. Its called micro usb which you might have heard of. Virtually every smart phone these days sold has a micro usb port.

      iPhones and iPads are not phones or tablets. They are purely fashion statements. No one would buy them otherwise.

      all other manufacturers agreed to standardize on microusb some 5 years ago(and it's finally starting to be used on pretty much all, non-apple, devices now).

      And as you have been told a hundred times now, nobody uses micro-USB for the things the Apple Dock Connector is used for - apart from hooking up USB peripherals and charging. Actually, the few peripherals for Android that try to be like iDevice peripherals use Bluetooth, not USB.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    104. Re:universal connector by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      Of course but I don't have a prominent label sticking out of my jeans that has a brand-name on it (which effectively tells the world 'I'm the sort of idiot that will pay ten times more than the cost of the jeans just to show off this label'). I need to wear clothes, they have to be bought somewhere.

      My point is that while there probably are a lot of people who use Apple products for the same reason ('I'm the sort of idiot....' etc) it's not the case that ALL Apple users do it for that reason, as the OP stated.

    105. Re:universal connector by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 1

      lol you're kidding? That's your comeback? Oooooh a USB mouse, yeah I'll take that over an all in one single connecting speaker, video out dock. Amazing response, honestly thought you we're joking when I first read your reply. Oh also comically, yes you can connect a keyboard and mouse if you don't mind messing a little, it's also been done with PS2 connectors.

    106. Re:universal connector by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      In that case it seems you can't win. If 'appearing not to care about fashion' is now cool, then I'm accidentally cool. Actually I doubt it - I always look pretty scruffy, no-one would mistake me for any kind of hipster. I've always not cared about fashion, even when maybe I should. Back in the 1970s at school I was bullied for it - having the 'wrong sort of sports bag'. It's just a form of tribalism and as such to me is the same as nationalism, or racism, or white supremacism. Something to be despised. The only tribe I'm prepared to stand up for is the tribe of me (and my immediate family).

    107. Re:universal connector by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Still beats the royalties Apple charges to use its connector.

    108. Re:universal connector by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      The D/A converter in Apple products are terrible. If you go to any of the DIY audio forums, people scream about the lack of a digital out on Apple devices. The line level on Apple devices is also very low, requiring extra amplification to get a decent signal. They make some very good D/A converters now relatively cheap (under $100) but they aren't iPod small... So most people with good HiFi end up having some sort of dedicated Media PC or USB reader hooked up to a decent D/A converter, and then to their amp.

      And before you start in on Tubes and analog... yes yes... there are Analog junkies. But not everyone that's into HiFi is entirely sold on Tubes and analog. Recent innovations in Solid state circuitry have resulted in a lot of amazing solid state amps that are incredibly cheap. I don't think the old school tube guys will every believe it, but I think Tubes raining supreme is on the way out.

    109. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was nothing like the iPod connector on the market when it was released

      Reality says different. USB 2.0 was released in 2000. The iPod didn't release till 2001. USB 1.0 was out in the 90's. I'm not sure how you could say no universal connector existed then. Sudo mod me up

      USB standard

      Reality says you're being a fucktard. USB2 ports have USB2 signals and nothing else. The Apple 30 pin dock connector has pins for USB2, analog audio, analog video, Firewire, remote control functions, and probably a couple other things I'm forgetting.

      Has the need for all those non-USB functions lessened over time? Yes. I wouldn't be surprised if the new docking connector is just USB3, and they're going to require digital interface silicon in every accessory. Would that invalidate Apple choosing to put those non-USB functions into a connector in back in 2003, or suggest they invented it just for Evil (tm)? No.

    110. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, it's a fashion statement, then. Got it.

      If nice high resolution displays are mere fashion statements and you're anti-fashion, what the hell are you doing browsing slashdot? Turn off that hipster computer NOW, fuck right off to your local thrift store, find an Atari 2600 and a TV, and spend all day playing Combat while congratulating yourself on how anti-modern you are. You may post here again when you figure out how to do it from a TTY, and no I don't mean an emulated one presented to you through a pixmap display.

    111. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they can't. They have a port that's shaped like micro USB but has 20 other pins in it and requires adapter cables/docks to use any of the other features, just like Apple does.

      Actually, they have the same pin count as normal micro-USB. They switch pin functions instead of doing a funky custom connector in the same shell.

      When you see all the fandroids proclaim "my phone can do analog audio through micro-USB, ho ho ho look how superior it is to money-grabbing Apple with their EVIL CUSTOM CONNECTOR", what is actually happening is that each Android phone vendor has invented a proprietary system for probing what kind of accessory is plugged in and switching all the pins on the micro-USB connector to that function. There are no guarantees that all manufacturers use the same probe conventions and pin mappings, so you still often need proprietary adapters. None of it's standardized formally anywhere, though there's some de facto standards (e.g. some phones will work with MHL digital AV out cables made by another manufacturer).

      The deficiency relative to the Apple 30 pin dock connector is that there's only three signal pins available in the micro USB connector, so you're almost always going to be limited to one function at a time.

    112. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theorem: gl4ss is an idiot.

      Proof: Suppose gl4ss has never used an iPhone or iPad, or is not really familiar with their design. Then, he doesn't know what he's talking about when he asserts they're not phones or tablets, and yet he speaks. Only an idiot makes assertions about which he knows nothing about, so gl4ss would be an idiot. (This, in my opinion, is the more likely possibility. (Think about this, gl4ss--how did I know you've never even used one? How did I know you're talking out of your ass? What kind of witchcraft did I use to divine this?))

      Suppose gl4ss has used an iPhone or iPad. The devices are functional and well-designed phones or tablets, proof of which is left to the reader by inspecting or using said devices long enough to get a feel for how they work. If gl4ss is unable to verify this, he's an idiot.

      Since gl4ss is an idiot if he's never used an iPhone or iPad or if he has used an iPhone or iPad, gl4ss is an idiot, which was to be proven.

    113. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey buddy I hate to break it to you but you know what you don't need in a minimal and equivalent iDevice audio adapter for the current 30 pin dock connector? Any of the stuff in the $2.80 piece of crap you linked to other than the final amplifier stage.

      Your entire argument boils down to asserting that it would be as cheap or cheaper to implement USB, and pointing at cheap USB things without establishing the cost of the non-USB equivalent. The thing is, that assertion is wrong. Line level analog audio I/O requires no external ADC or DAC. That's a cost savings. The iPod remote control functions use RS232, not analog signals as Karlt1 thought, but you don't even need an intelligent programmable microcontroller to send RS232 formatted serial pulse trains. The amount and sophistication of digital logic required in a simple audio plus remote control accessory for an iPod or iPhone is minimal. That's also a cost savings.

      Engineers who design real world mass produced products care about costs you'd never guess were important. Consider the clock source, for example. USB1 and USB2 chips generally require a relatively high precision 12 MHz reference clock. It has to be a quartz crystal for accuracy and temperature insensitivity. Generating RS232 pulse trains at low bit rates, on the other hand, can probably be done with a resistor-capacitor oscillator circuit. The cost difference between those two clock sources is way less than $1 in mass volume. It's important anyways. Make a few million of anything and it's real money.

    114. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything can only be done with USB if you have a full-blown host device somewhere in the chain. For a phone or tablet, the whole point is NOT to.

    115. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I want line level audio in/out while connecting a USB MIDI controller? A cheap, "dumb" splitter is only needed for this, and the setup is not uncommon or weird in any way.

    116. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lately Apple seem to have been leaking like a sieve, the leaks could be fake, but the leaks it is clear it isn't a micro-USB connector, and it would be very un-Apple-like to not use a custom connector. So while we don't know, we can be pretty sure it isn't micro-USB.

    117. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It even allows you to use USB OTG which I notice the iPhone can't do even with its 30 pin plug.

      It doesn't? Then how does the iPad camera connection kit work?

    118. Re:universal connector by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      Seems pretty hard to break something that just slides in and out of a hole.

      That's what she said...

      I think cable destruction is a combination of not understanding that there are USB ports on the front AND back of computers and that kicking the cable whilst plugged in or running over it with a wheeled chair does in fact reduce longevity.

    119. Re:universal connector by anyGould · · Score: 1

      And it sucks.

      You can't (for instance) use MHL at the same time as USB on the go (USB host mode). Or at the same time as USB AT ALL, as far as I know.

      And you can on the iPhone?

      I've got a connector that has USB, iPhone-dock, and RCA. Might have two, actually - they weren't particularly uncommon.

    120. Re:universal connector by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Got a citation?

      For the EU saying Apple doesn't comply? No of course not.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    121. Re:universal connector by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      True that Apple's DAC isn't nearly as good as what you can get, but at the time it was released, it was considerably better than most. Moreover, the accessory costs if you had to put a DAC in every portable speaker would have been much higher due to component and licensing costs.

      Looking at the dock connector with today's glasses on makes it only somewhat superfluous; at the time it was a visionary solution.

      Hope the newer interface is equally effective.

    122. Re:universal connector by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      I know from personal use that Samsung has analog from the micro USB. Cardock with charging passthrough and 3.5mm audio for about $50. So, it can obviously be done and for a reasonable price.

      "There is a standard and it is very much like usb. Its called micro usb which you might have heard of." - this is not standard micro-USB.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    123. Re:universal connector by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Ok, I can let you know right away. Many phones have that today, including phones as old as Samsung Galaxy S2. MHL is a wannabe-standard for exactly this, supported by a handful manufacturers (except Apple and a lot others). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_High-Definition_Link

      FTFY

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    124. Re:universal connector by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And that's not MHL. MHL *DOES* support simultaneous digital audio/video and data, but the protocol it uses is not USB; when using a micro-USB port for MHL, the port is either in USB mode or MHL mode. The iPhone does not support MHL, which is what I was trying to point out.

      Can your connector handle simultaneous hi-def video and data?

      Hint: I already know the answer.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    125. Re:universal connector by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Your statement changes nothing. The phone is still completely compatible with microUSB. It just gives you additional functionality, without breaking compatibility.

    126. Re:universal connector by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Your statement changes nothing. The phone is still completely compatible with microUSB. It just gives you additional functionality, without breaking compatibility.

      And the iPhone is also "completely compatible" with micro-USB - as well as hundreds of iDevice peripherals that use the Dock connector.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    127. Re:universal connector by Xenx · · Score: 1

      With iPhones, you need an adapter that either converts USB to micro USB or an adapter that converts their POS connector to micro USB. With Samsung, as the example, you don't need anything special to use micro USB. Lets face it, Apple can (and my personal belief is should) switch over to a micro USB compatible plug.

    128. Re:universal connector by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      With iPhones, you need an adapter that either converts USB to micro USB or an adapter that converts their POS connector to micro USB. With Samsung, as the example, you don't need anything special to use micro USB. Lets face it, Apple can (and my personal belief is should) switch over to a micro USB compatible plug.

      Yeah, nothing special but the special adapter that turns USB into something that is neither USB nor can do as much as the Dock Connector.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    129. Re:universal connector by Xenx · · Score: 1

      My point is simply, you can design a plug that is compatible with micro USB and still add all the features of the dock connector. Would you need to use a specialized cable/dock to use the features? Yes. Would you also be able to plug in a micro USB to data transfer/charge? Yes. They chose to be obstinate about it.

    130. Re:universal connector by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      My point is simply, you can design a plug that is compatible with micro USB and still add all the features of the dock connector.

      So why don't you show us that this is possible - because so far you have shown us " a plug that is compatible with micro USB" but only does one thing in addition - but never at the same time. And that is my point - that you don't have one.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    131. Re:universal connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      confirmed for hipster

    132. Re:universal connector by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      I have two portable speaker system with remote controls can control an iPod/iPhone. Change songs, playlist etc.

      You may be able to do the sort of thing you describe with your music collection if you have it memorized, but try doing this from 20 feet away: use the remote to play "Kashmir" off of Led Zeppelin's Physical Grafitti album. Then, see how long the same task takes using the iPod controls (touchscreen or 4-way ring). Basically, you use the remote for play/pause and next/previous and nothing else. Big deal

      What about car systems with integrated iPod controls on the steering wheel?

      Oh, you mean those car companies that screwed up their systems by not providing you with a full display for your playing music, instead forcing you to look at your iPod to navigate to a song? I can take any USB device (including iPods) and plug it into my car and use the 9" touchscreen (or steering wheel controls for minor things like next track) to control and display the music. Even if you don't have a touchscreen, you have a radio that displays text (on any car modern enough to have an Apple dock), and that could be used for display. I guess the iPod dock can transfer that info, too, but why limit the customer to just an Apple product, when the same amount of money put into a USB interface would allow any device to work.

      How do you send video signals over USB?

      Again, since you need to have an external display anyway, you do exactly like you suggest and let the car/TV/whatever do the video playback. My car will play back most videos (although you only hear audio unless the car is in "Park") from a connected USB device. The "play over USB" was a really minor added expense, as it plays back DVDs and already has the display.

      So, like I said, there is no real use case for using the iPod display but also using external navigation features, and once you have an external display and speakers, there's also no need to use anything but USB to get the data out.

    133. Re:universal connector by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm not qualified to deal with your level of stupidity. There doesn't have to be an example to show you. It's a statement of fact that you can design a plug that has all the features you want, but also accepts a micro-USB plug. If the Apple connector can do it, so can another plug with the same pins in a different configuration.

    134. Re:universal connector by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm not qualified to deal with your level of stupidity..

      That's a good one, coming from you, given the utter level of cluelessness you've shown. FU.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  4. Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It may be that they are walking straight into EU regulations with that kind of policy. Vertical monopolies in the supply chain is one of those few things the EU gets extremely aggro about, to the benefit of the market and consumers.

    1. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Mr.+Wok · · Score: 5, Funny

      Aggro?! Do you mean EU is somekind of monster of which somebody is always tanking and getting the aggro while the others shoot?

    2. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      What monopoly? Just buy an Android phone, or for that matter a Windows phone. I have and not only is it better than iPhone but it is a much more effective way to make a company behave than any EU regulations.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    3. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Monopoly on iPhone data cables, I suppose.

    4. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Kergan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It may be that they are walking straight into EU regulations with that kind of policy..

      Not may. Will. Germany in particular (where most patent litigation is taken in the EU) has a long history of allowing cheap clones of periphericals and consumables. Be it nails, screws, coffee recharges, cables, or otherwise. Ianal, but I'd wager Apple doesn't stand a chance in court if they seek to sue cloned cables out of the market -- especially at that price point.

      The most surprising part to me, though, is (assuming the rumors are valid on the new port) that they didn't go for a micro-USB port. The EU directive aimed at getting rid of electronic waste due to redundant and incompatible chargers will shortly make (already makes?) it or an adapter mandatory, so why bother coming up with yet another type of dock connector?

    5. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by toruonu · · Score: 2

      It's fun to see all these discussions and allegations for a phone that's not even launched yet and therefore you have no clue what connector it actually uses. True, it's likely it'll be a proprietary one again, but still, shouldn't we wait until Sept 12th at least before starting the accusations...

    6. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by jonwil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One big reason Apple doesn't use USB is that the dock connector does more than just USB.

    7. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Kergan · · Score: 2

      Yeah. And even more fun are case makers who are mass-producing cases based on rumors and mockups, and the shameless iPhone5-like Android clone that got unveiled recently. I'll be laughing out loud if Apple unveils a tear-drop design on the 12th, or if the clone joint sues apple over "their" design.

    8. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by famebait · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "One big reason Apple doesn't use USB is that the dock connector does more than just USB."

      Does it, now? With airplay and whatnot, the need to transmit analog audio and video is rapidly disappearing, which is probably why the new plug has nine pins in stead of the previous billion. It's been months since I used my cable for anything besides charging, and I really can't see what I'd want from it that USB + wifi + bluetooth can't already offer.

      Let's face it: it's a money-making ploy and nothing more.
      It is of course entirely within their rights to use proprietary designs that way, but harassing people trying to adapt to it is not (or shouldn't be), and it is entirely within my rights to dispise and chastise them for it in any case.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    9. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the one healer who can't get away from the baddies

    10. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by famebait · · Score: 1

      Apple haven't exactly been earning their benefit of the doubt lately...

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    11. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But nothing that you can't do with USB. Android phones have the ability to do audio and video through micro USB after all.

      The only difference is they provide an analog pins for each audio channel, for svideo etc. Micro USB means you just send it as data and convert it in the adapter.

    12. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What monopoly? Just buy an Android phone, or for that matter a Windows phone. I have and not only is it better than iPhone but it is a much more effective way to make a company behave than any EU regulations.

      Oh, the invisible hand of the free market, that really worked with Microsoft on the desktop OS monopoly issue didn't it? The invisible hand of the market has really made MS suffer on that score.

    13. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Aggro short for Aggravation you can look it up in the dictionary

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    14. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gp is obviously british, as aggro used in that sense is british slang.

      surprisingly, the rest of the world mocks british slang.

    15. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      That pretty much describes it.

      Never would have described MS as tank before, but you're basically right..

      --
      bickerdyke
    16. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I don't have the idea that this phone is so small that there is no space left to add a micro USB as well, if they so insist on adding their own connector (for which there may be valid reasons, of course).

    17. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Why would it make Microsoft suffer, they provided the best desktop OS available. You are begging the question.

    18. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they seek to sue cloned cables out of the USA market

    19. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple cables are already USB on the other end of the cable. They plug-in and work just fine with any USB charger out there.

      The other way around works too. I can plug-in my Samsung S3 USB cable into my iPhone charger and it charges just great.

      While this may not be "standardizing on micro-usb" which is arguably preferable, it does eliminate the need for a new charger, which is the primary objective of this EU legislation.

    20. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by profplump · · Score: 1

      So you still need a proprietary, external (and in this case, expensive) adapter to use their ports. How is that different than Apple?

    21. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Like what? What magical feature that is frequently used can not be replicated on USB?

      Before you say audio, all in one usb audio chips complete with i/o and control solutions are in the sub $1 range.

    22. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      There are adapters available already which allow usb ports to charge iPhones. Hard to imagine that a new connector will be much different in that respect.

      What a new port may achieve is stimulate sales of new accessories which can take the new connector and probably ensure Apple gets a royalty from these new accessories. An adapter may work with some existing accessories but it will not be as aesthetically pleasing and may increase the chance of breaking the port or physical restrictions may also apply.

      For Apple it is a good plan in a maturing market. If you look at the downfall of Commodore and the Amiga they had a similar problem Once you had an Amiga you pretty much didn't buy anything from Commodore again.
      people loved their product but when the installed base was huge, sales declined.

      I think Apple may be hitting the peak with the iPhone. Unless I am mistaken most people who have an iPhone are pretty happy with what they have. What is there left to drive current users to upgrade again? What is going to be the next Cool killer must have feature?

      Apple has been pretty good at upgrading it's older phones to a later version of IOS. However hasn't it always been the case that the upgrade has actually made the phone just a little less responsive and the solution is upgrade to the latest model.

      Apples current tactics in fighting competing products in the court room instead of making a better phone sure makes it look like they are running out of idea's.

      In the world of computing we have gone from 8 bit, 16bit, 32 bit and 64bit processors from single core's to multi cores. Recent years have been slow the 32 bit systems still sell along side the 64 bit alternatives. One laptop is pretty much the same as another with minor differences at similar price points and it's hard to justify buying the more expensive models not for most use cases that's for sure. The Smart phone market may be maturing too.

      One thing which could be a killer feature is "throwing" the display you could have a movie stored on your phone and be able to switch it too your large screen tv with 5.1 wirelessly. I think Sony do this with dlna. One things for certain even with the Hdmi out on my android tablet it is still a pain to have to hook up the cable to do it.

      On the other hand using my phone to control my Tablet which is smart enough to feed my TV with the content I have stored on my nas seems like a cool thing to do. It's not going to drain the battery on my phone to do this either.

      Sorry I wandered a bit, I have a few idea's I would like to try out now. My android devices are probably up to the job.

    23. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      The most surprising part to me, though, is (assuming the rumors are valid on the new port) that they didn't go for a micro-USB port. The EU directive aimed at getting rid of electronic waste due to redundant and incompatible chargers will shortly make (already makes?) it or an adapter mandatory, so why bother coming up with yet another type of dock connector?

      Apple worked around this by making the power adapter have a 'USB' socket and keeping their proprietary adapter on a cable has a USB plug that goes into that socket.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    24. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by robmv · · Score: 0

      Standard, not proprietary, same adapter for every works with every compliant device http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_High-Definition_Link

    25. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're confusing the colloquial with the legal.

      A vertical monopoly is one in which the retailer is also the wholesaler is also the producer is also... etc. Definitions vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction but just to give you an idea with two examples:

      Norway had a liqour-monopoly some years ago. The EU forced them to split the institution into retail and an import, thereby making it legal for any other import company to sell alcohol to the liqour -retail- stores. This opened the market and it was, in all honesty, a long overdue process because the monopoly was there for moral and historical reasons.

      HP tried to sue everything under the sun for copying the software on their ink cartridges. The EU found it fishy that one supplier should be able to sell its printers AND force any others to not be able to sell ink. They told HP in so many words to either drop the lawsuits or pick whether they would sell printers OR ink. This (oversimplification) opened the market and benefited consumers.

      This also illustrates the differences between civil and common law systems, I think, though this is a bit specious. Americans would read those two examples and come up with 500 ways to "game" each verdict and poke holes in it. Europeans would accept what the intent was and act accordingly. This is really one of the major differences between corporate culture in our two continents even if there is a gigantic overlap.

    26. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Apple hasn't previously acted in good faith on such matters and does not deserve the benefit of a doubt.

      2. Some of us like to discuss even purely hypothetical issues simply because it is a fun mental exercise and allows us to test statements and conclusions against other minds without it being a gigantic pissing contest.

      When you grow older or less bitter, you will understand.

    27. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Kergan · · Score: 1

      I think Apple may be hitting the peak with the iPhone. Unless I am mistaken most people who have an iPhone are pretty happy with what they have. What is there left to drive current users to upgrade again? What is going to be the next Cool killer must have feature?

      The primary one, I'd wager, is that phone carrier lets their customers run off with a brand new phone when they renew their contract. Since iPhone owners are reportedly more satisfied than other smartphone owners, and neck-deep in the iOS ecosystem, chances are good that they'll pick a newer iPhone.

      Fwiw, Apple's metric for success of late reportedly is for each version to outsell all prior versions combined. Adding to this, dumb phones still outsell smartphones, and customers in developing countries frequently get a smartphone before they get a computer. Bar another dip in the economy (a big if), there's no reason to think the iPhone 5 won't outsell all prior iPhones combined as well.

    28. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2

      Apple: Okay, I've got an offensive patent war chest, standard DD build with some bling thrown in. Who's the tank? Who's on healing duty?
      Samsung: I've... got a DD build, too.
      HTC: Same here.
      Sony: I always play DD.
      Nokia: Microsoft taught me Cannibalize so I put all my skill points into that.
      HTC: How's that working out?
      Nokia: Pretty good, although I can only use it on myself.
      Apple: We're all DDs? We can't all be DDs!
      Nokia: Except me!
      Apple: Okay, we're all DDs except for Nokia who's special. Yeah, that's much better. I can practically feel the boss battle whiz by. In the wrong direction.
      Sony: Now don't be mean. I mean, Nokia still makes decent rubber boots.
      Apple: You know what? Screw this. I'm going to go tank the European Union and you do whatever it is you think you do best.
      Samsung: As much as I enjoy watching you bleed, don't you think that-
      Apple: LEEROY JENKINS!

      And then the entire mobile phone industry was wiped.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    29. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ONLY reason Apple uses their own cable is so they can charge iFuckwits for a special cable. Now they are changing the cable so that iFuckwits have to replace all the cables they purchased over the years.

      Enjoy getting raped by Apple.

    30. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      That's a cop-out. If there's anything the USB connector can't do, put it on a second connector. That's what other phones do if they have HDMI out. The have a micro-USB port for charging and data transfer, and a micro-HDMI port for HDMI. Simple.

    31. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, it does video, but then while USB doesn't do that, the microUSB port does.

      In all seriousness, there's virtually NOTHING that the Apple dock connector provides that cannot be implemented on a micro-USB connector using publically available, widely implemented, standards.

      Audio control? That's HID - you know, keyboards, multimedia keys have been standard for how many years now? Got to be more than a decade.

      Audio in and out? That's also covered by HID. And audio out can also be implemented using MHD.

      Video out? That's where MHD comes in.

      USB and power? It's already USB!

      In general, the usual response when I mention this is for someone to go "Ah, but I want analog video out!" or something similar. To which the obvious response is: why? You're not really going to want to connect it to a 1980s CRT TV using an RCA connector; and just about all the devices I can think of where you'd want something plugged into the USB port rather than the headphones port involve a USB controller in there somewhere anyway. Alarm clock radio with dock? How are you going to have the dock hit "play" on your device at the right time if it doesn't already have the USB circuitry to implement the HID protocol?

      For that genuinely rare occasion where you'd need analog out, is a $5 adapter really going to be a hardship that isn't paid for in droves by the completely 100% standard, low profile, easily licensed, port in your phone?

      There is absolutely no reason for any manufacturer to be offering anything other than microUSB (with a separate 3.5mm headset port, simply because that's so common right now) at the moment. No manufacturer should be implementing anything using proprietary connectors. Period.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    32. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by m.ducharme · · Score: 2

      And then the entire mobile phone industry was wiped.

      Except Apple.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    33. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has a monopoly on iOS devices. Considering that the markeet for iOS devices is IN THE MILLIONS that's a non-competitive market. There should be THOUSANDS of iOS competitors out there.

    34. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      "Aggro?! Do you mean EU is somekind of monster of which somebody is always tanking and getting the aggro while the others shoot?"

      Sounds like a valid description of the current market to me.. just sayin'. Apple is currently the tank but it used to be Nokia.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    35. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      The primary one, I'd wager, is that phone carrier lets their customers run off with a brand new phone when they renew their contract. Since iPhone owners are reportedly more satisfied than other smartphone owners, and neck-deep in the iOS ecosystem, chances are good that they'll pick a newer iPhone.

      Fwiw, Apple's metric for success of late reportedly is for each version to outsell all prior versions combined. Adding to this, dumb phones still outsell smartphones, and customers in developing countries frequently get a smartphone before they get a computer. Bar another dip in the economy (a big if), there's no reason to think the iPhone 5 won't outsell all prior iPhones combined as well.

      ....Apples smartphone market share worldwide is dropping.

    36. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by shmlco · · Score: 1

      As I pointed out above, Apple is redesigning their dock connector for the future. A dock connector, I might add, that's been in place for over a decade.

      So given the above, and the fact that they're probably going to have to live with the consequences of their decision for the NEXT decade, why in the heck would they switch to a microUSB 2.0 connector that's already nearly obsolete?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    37. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I thought that Apple was the boss, and Samsung was Leeroy Jenkins.

    38. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      With airplay and whatnot, the need to transmit analog audio and video is rapidly disappearing, which is probably why the new plug has nine pins in stead of the previous billion. It's been months since I used my cable for anything besides charging, and I really can't see what I'd want from it that USB + wifi + bluetooth can't already offer.

      Apple has only within the last year provided sync'ing capability and software updates over wifi. Previous to that users had to use their charging cord to transmit data as well.

      Let's face it: it's a money-making ploy and nothing more. It is of course entirely within their rights to use proprietary designs that way, but harassing people trying to adapt to it is not (or shouldn't be), and it is entirely within my rights to dispise and chastise them for it in any case.

      It may have been a money-making ploy in the beginning but they have been gradually providing features to minimize the need for using the charging cord. And since they have allowed 3rd parties to develop docks one rarely has to use the charging cord for actual charging while at home/work. Because of wifi and bluetooth being utilized more and more by Apple, it's probably what has made it possible for Apple to reduce the pin count on the connector because it performs fewer functions. Whether they include an adapter for free in the iPhone 5 packaging remains to be seen. They might and if they do that will reduce the amount of money they can make. They can still sell them separately though for people who lose their adapters or who need extra ones. But Apple isn't the only company, they weren't the first, and they won't be the last to try increasing profits by making proprietary technologies. But like with any company who uses that mechanism for increasing profits, they have to be careful they don't go overboard like Sony has in the past with their Memory Sticks because that just alienates consumers. So far, it seems Apple based on their stock price that they found the right amount of proprietaryness to inflict on us.

      By the way, people may complain about Apple charging more for accessories like charging cords but the cheap knockoffs that sell for $5-$10 compared to Apple's costing $20+ end up breaking soon after you buy them, thus necessitating buying another cheap accessory. So you get what you pay for when you buy the more expensive Apple branded products because they are designed a certain way and have higher manufacturing standards to make them last longer than the cheap knockoffs.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    39. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Apple has only within the last year provided sync'ing capability and software updates over wifi. Previous to that users had to use their charging cord to transmit data as well.

      ... over USB. Which means a USB port would work fine for this.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    40. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      As I had crammed down my throat (when I wasn't even making the claim), allow me to point out that MHL is not analog. That said, it costs about as much to implement MHL as it costs to implement and license Apple's dock connector, so all these cries of "the dock connector's analog pins allow for cheap accessories" are bunk, either way.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    41. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      So, then, why not the 11 pin MHL connector that's newly emerging?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    42. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Because it's still USB 2.0-based and as such practically obsolete at birth...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    43. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Uhmm... http://www.mhlconsortium.org/

      Link me to any text on that site that even so much as implies that MHL is based on USB. Please.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_High-Definition_Link

      You might want to, you know, know WTF you're talking about before you talk down to me.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    44. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by shmlco · · Score: 1

      The current implementations dual-purpose the most popular mobile connection (micro USB). The Samsung Galaxy S III 11-pin connector merges USB (2.0) and MHDL so that both can be used at the same time. That said, you're correct in stating that MHDL in and as of itself doesn't specify a specific data connection technology.

      It's also correct to state the that two current and differing "standards" use USB technology and/or connectors. To tie a new dock connector to either one would be foolish, and supporting yet a third would do little to support the "standard".

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    45. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      The 5 pin MHL specification *works* over a micro-USB connector, but it does not, in any way use USB "technology". The 11 pin specification is as you state, though USB is not technically part of the specification, nor must it be limited to USB 2.0.

      There is nothing foolish about supporting a developing, and already wideliy implemented, standard.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    46. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the proprietary 11-pin USB+MHL connector Samsung uses on some phones? Yeah, that's a great idea, Apple should use Samsung's proprietary connector instead of Apple's. To get a stupid standard like MHL. Makes perfect sense!

      (actually, it doesn't)

      Since I know you'll whine about me calling MHL stupid, here is some support for that opinion. Even though MHL doesn't officially define any connector, it was invented to do one thing: transmit data equivalent to HDMI over the 3 available data pins on a standard 5-pin micro-USB connector. If you put MHL signals on a bigger, proprietary connector, you're dumb, because you could just add enough pins to do HDMI in the first place. Then you wouldn't need active MHL->HDMI bridge silicon on the other end. (As for using MHL over the micro-USB connector, I still think it's stupid. That connector sucks, its only virtue is ubiquity. It especially sucks for a company like Apple which has a long tradition of docks that are able to support the weight of the device through the docking connector... micro USB is not very robust mechanically.)

      If you're Apple what you really want to do is sell people an AppleTV for piping A/V from their phones and computers to the TV over WiFi. Which is something people will pay $99 for because wireless is pretty damn cool.

    47. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      If you put MHL signals on a bigger, proprietary connector, you're dumb, because you could just add enough pins to do HDMI in the first place. Then you wouldn't need active MHL->HDMI bridge silicon on the other end.

      Hmm... Well, there's the issue of trademark infringement (PDF WARNING) if you use HDMI over a non-approved port (and call it HDMI anywhere on the product or in the documentation).

      Say what you want about MicroUSB, but I have a self-made charging dock that has supported my last 3 phones by just the micro-USB connector that sticks out of it. I've never broken a phone or had to replace the cable (though I've had to replace the cradle itself whenever I've gotten a new phone). My last 2 phones have also had car docks, to which the phone attached only by the micro-USB port. Both the previous and current docks were situated such that the port was on top, holding the full weight of the phone; I've not once had the phone fall out of the dock, nor have I broken a connector, and I drive on some bumpy roads.

      Your AppleTV argument is laughable, at best, but I'll give you credit for coming up with something better than the "dock connector's analog connections allow for cheaper accessories" that I've already debunked a few times here (see my comment history, it's not hard to find). If I'm at home and, indeed, am trying to pipe A/V to my AppleTV-connected (using a cable, mind you) TV, then yes, wireless is great, until every one of my neighbors has a wireless router blasting away at full-tilt and I can't get shit for transfer speed. But then, let's assume I'm at a friend's house, or trying to present something at my office, where AppleTV may not be an option. Solution?

      Personally, I prefer separate (but physically adjacent) USB and HDMI ports. I'm waiting for a standard configuration of that, with a specific orientation and distance between the ports, which would allow for a single cable with both connectors on each end. It would also provide the ability to use one or the other, over a standard connection. The connectors have proven themselves sturdy enough if you're not doing stupid things with them and they're damn ubiquitous. You also have the advantage of a trie HDMI connection; as for wireless A/V, there's DLNA, which is supported by PS3, a lot of blu-ray players, most networked media players, a growing number of TVs, and a nontrivial number of Android devices, and it works damn well in my experience.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    48. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, but Apple will be shipping a Lightning to HDMI connector if you really need to use a cable.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    49. Re:Will they attempt this in the EU as well? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      So a $30 adapter and the cable I already have from my Android phone? This is supposed to be better, somehow?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  5. Won't matter...... by Immostlyharmless · · Score: 2

    4 days after release the Chinese will be selling the things on ebay for 4 bucks a pop anyhow, as long as you can wait 2 weeks for it to ship from Honk Kong.

    1. Re:Won't matter...... by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it.

      Anything like this, you buy on ebay or amazon for $3 SHIPPED from Hong Kong.

      Not sure how that's even done, but nonetheless, it is.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    2. Re:Won't matter...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's done that way because the gizmo is already in America on a shipping/storage container, and they ship them from *there*. $3 shipping from Hong Kong? Maybe, but it actually shipped 5 months ago, just not to you.

    3. Re:Won't matter...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's definitely shipped from overseas. Packages come with foreign postage and cancellations and all. The USPS would not handle that package if sent from within the u.s.

  6. a price to pay by azalin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple has never been a fan of cheap. Their products carry the undercurrent message "I can afford this", much like sports cars, suvs, rolexes and the like. They don't want everybody to provide cheap accessories to their products, because it diminishes the brand value.

    1. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And everytime they tried to build something cheap, the results were awful (i.e PowerMac 4400, all the Performas, etc.)

    2. Re:a price to pay by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

      With any luck they will outprice themselves off from the markets soon enough.

    3. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their products carry the undercurrent message "I can afford this", much like sports cars, suvs, rolexes and the like.

      So why did they have a cow over the "I Am Rich" app, since it says much the same thing: "I am a moron with an iPhone or iFad and have more money than brains, and have no idea how best to squander it all"!

      Using non-standard connectors like this, and trying to prevent other people from making them is just one of about a hundred plus reasons now, why I hate Apple so much.

      As always... FUCK APPLE!

    4. Re:a price to pay by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Apple has never been a fan of cheap. Their products carry the undercurrent message "I can afford this", much like sports cars, suvs, rolexes and the like. They don't want everybody to provide cheap accessories to their products, because it diminishes the brand value.

      Youre joking right?

      SUVs are as cheap as expensive hatchbacks (considering the cheap ones are hatchback engines in overweight bodies)

      Same with sports cars. You can get one for the price of a hot hatch.

      Apple devices don't convey an air of money because people get them on cheap contracts. A lot of lower income earners have iphones. They are less like exclusive brands like Ferrari and more like common but overpriced brands suck as Louis Vutton which are the same made in china crap as other bags but have a higher price tag due to the logo.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:a price to pay by toruonu · · Score: 1

      *sigh* people don't buy sports cars because they want to show they can afford it though sure there are some people who do it because of that too, but that doesn't mean we all buy it because of that. I have a sports car and I bought it because I want to enjoy my commute no matter when and where I go. I can't stand the slow progression from point A to B without any excitement in getting there. Even if the excitement is only minimal due to jams or what not. And also I love my sports/rally car during the winter when there is never a dull ride with all the snow etc. Yes, it's a bitch to maintain due to fuel cost and use as well as maintenance and yes I did manage to buy it therefore I could afford it, but none of those are reasons WHY I bought it.

      The same goes for iPhone. Maybe to some people it's a fashion statement, but mostly it's because it's well designed and works. And I don't mean just works as a standalone unit, majority of the added value comes from seamless integration between iDevices, your laptop and your Apple TV (the more devices you have the bigger the advantages you get, clever Apple). The fact that I use iPad majority of the time I'm at home instead of the laptop is because of the comfortable use and the available content and the fact that I can close the book on the iPad and pick it up on the iPhone without having to remember where I was in the book or having to worry if my content is backed up IS worth quite a lot.

      My only hope is that they don't make the iPhone 5 (or what ever it'll be called) as big as the Galaxy S III. A colleague of mine has the SIII and boy it's way too big for one hand usage. If I want a bigger screen I just pop out the iPad and use that. I'd not mind a minor increase in size as well as pulling the display to the full width and height of the phone, but it still has to be comfortable in hand. I used to wear a cover on the iPhone 4 until waiting for some crap to compile I was fiddling with the cover and after about 6 months with the cover tried the phone in my hand without it. Damn that phone felt comfortable in my hand. It may seem like an innocent additional few mm, but it WAS much better without so I've never put the cover back on again.

    6. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their products carry the undercurrent message "I can afford this"

      ...and so can the burger flippers at McDonald's...real exclusive!

    7. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As always... FUCK APPLE!

      I don't want to belittle your sexual orientation but, good luck with that!

    8. Re:a price to pay by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Youre joking right?

      SUVs are as cheap as expensive hatchbacks (considering the cheap ones are hatchback engines in overweight bodies)

      Same with sports cars. You can get one for the price of a hot hatch.

      Apple devices don't convey an air of money because people get them on cheap contracts. A lot of lower income earners have iphones. They are less like exclusive brands like Ferrari and more like common but overpriced brands suck as Louis Vutton which are the same made in china crap as other bags but have a higher price tag due to the logo.

      When was the last time you took a look at the price difference between, say a basic VW golf and the GTI version? Hot hatchbacks cost so much more they are in fact a status symbol, as in: "I can afford to pay twice as much as you for the same car to get a some exta horsepowers". In my neck of the woods a GTI costs almost twice as much as a regular Golf.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    9. Re:a price to pay by fnj · · Score: 1

      I think you and I buying cars because we like the way they look and feel to (and work for) US, not because of the way they look and speak to OTHERS, are actually in the minority.

      The iPhone (and other Apple stuff) appeal is also a very strong snob/fad/peer-pressure thing. Not to us, but to most.

    10. Re:a price to pay by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Youre joking right?

      Why? Exclusivity versus volumen is not exactly a new idea and it's served a lot of companies very well in the past.

      Apple devices don't convey an air of money because people get them on cheap contracts.

      Er, I don't think you understand the meaning of cheap.

      Just looking around, you can get a sim only contract with data for GBP 10.00 per month on a 12 month basis. I think there are cheaper ones on some of the smaller operators. iPhone contracts are around 30 per month on a 24 month basis.

      So sure, if you feel that 3x the price is cheap, then you can get an iPhone cheap. Except that you pay about 60GBP more in total than getting an unlocked one and a sim only contract. Oh and of course you could buy 3 replacement mid range smartphones in that time with the money saved.

      Without drawing any conclusions about the quality of Apple products or the company itself, the iPhone is clearly a high end phone and as such there are much cheaper smartphones readily available.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    11. Re:a price to pay by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      And also I love my sports/rally car during the winter when there is never a dull ride with all the snow etc.

      That's the *wrong* kind of excitement. It's also perfectly possible to have such excitement in a sedan car even with snow chains on. That is an experience that I would not care to repeat.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:a price to pay by toruonu · · Score: 1

      That's the *wrong* kind of excitement. It's also perfectly possible to have such excitement in a sedan car even with snow chains on. That is an experience that I would not care to repeat.

      Well that gets to be a wrong kind of excitement only if it is unexpected :D If you drive a 4-wheel drive car and expect all the drifting and what accompanies driving on slippery surfaces and if you're proficient in it (at the minimum have taken the car to an ice track a number of times and spent hours bringing it to the limit so you know when and how it goes), then it's loads of fun. Noone says you've got to drive the whole distance from A to B with wheels spinning and in (un)controlled slides, but at times it's nice to take some corners at a drift or turn 180 with a small help from handbrake. Though the latter I do in the summer at times, though it requires some more speed and ain't too healthy on the tires, also requires you to be absolutely alone on the road or otherwise the other drivers will just be shocked witless and might do something stupid.

      The usual good difference is that people who can afford to buy a real sports/rally car usually know what they are doing and enjoy the "excitement" in controlled conditions without threatening other people. The idiots who buy a 20 year old beamer and have close to zip experience are the ones who cause most stupid accidents because they want the excitement, but don't choose the conditions.

    13. Re:a price to pay by julesh · · Score: 1

      Just looking around, you can get a sim only contract with data for GBP 10.00 per month on a 12 month basis. I think there are cheaper ones on some of the smaller operators. iPhone contracts are around 30 per month on a 24 month basis.

      Just to put some more accurate figures to what you're saying:
      Giff Gaff will do PAYG calls+data for £7.50/month, no contract. A cheap android phone will set you back £70 and is perfectly functional for most purposes (sure, I can't play the latest and greatest games on my Samsung GT-S5570, but most other things work fine). 2 year cost: £70 + 24*£7.50 = £250
      Cheapest iPhone deal I see is actually £31. 2 year cost: £744.

    14. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He must be joking.

      Apple products state pretty clearly "designed in California, made in china". For all the jokes about China (terrible quality, etc) one thing is for certain. Companies go there to manufacture as cheap as possible. I have often wondered what the true cost delta is, and if the companies pass the savings to the consumer or keep it as profit. Seems Apple is a huge fan of cheap when it comes to manufacturing costs.

      I've seen kids sippy cups in china for less then 10 cents, but oddly enough sell for >$5 here in north america.

    15. Re:a price to pay by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      If you drive a 4-wheel drive car and expect all the drifting and what accompanies driving on slippery surfaces and if you're proficient in it (at the minimum have taken the car to an ice track a number of times and spent hours bringing it to the limit so you know when and how it goes), then it's loads of fun.

      I don't think it would have helped. I've driven on snow and ice for a number of winters, but I wouldn't claim to be an expert, or even a talented ameture. Just not 100% inexperienced.

      I was going along a straight piece of level road on snow with chains on. The car must have hit some evil ice since it did a slow, graceful gentle 180 with no warning whatsoever and during that time, there was not even the slightest response. I ended up exactly in a striaght line from where I was, only facing the opposite direction.

      It it was on a mountain road.

      Still I made it to where I was going, smugly noting that all the cars which had to be rescued from snow banks were SUVs. :)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    16. Re:a price to pay by toruonu · · Score: 1

      Yikes, mountain roads probably are not what I'd prefer overly much during winter. Here in Estonia the biggest elevation difference is 300m and that's from coast to the other border almost. Also, I guess you're from a country that doesn't allow studded tires. I have studded tires and that makes a huge difference on ice. Sure in snow it makes no difference and you can use lamells or chains, but if you get onto ice (what you do at times on tarmac or when you go ice lake driving) the studs really help to keep the car handling at least to a certain level.

    17. Re:a price to pay by toruonu · · Score: 1

      Oh and love also the fact that most of those city SUV's are quite useless in now :P I usually keep both rope and tools readily in car and am usually the person who stops and pulls the cars out. Having decent four wheel drive, studded tires and the excellent drivetrain logic of an Evo X means I usually keep going when most cars stop and can still pull those guys out. Last few winters we've had way more snow than usual and it's a fun pastime just to drive around town and pull cars out of snow :P

    18. Re:a price to pay by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Just looking around, you can get a sim only contract with data for GBP 10.00 per month on a 12 month basis. I think there are cheaper ones on some of the smaller operators. iPhone contracts are around 30 per month on a 24 month basis.

      I dont think you understand the meaning of cheap.

      30 GBP is around A$50 and that's cheap. If you have trouble affording 4 hours at minimum wage per month you have problems. In the US you hardly get SIM only plans and there aren't any savings, same with Australia. SIM only plans end up costing almost as much as getting a phone on a plan.

      In Australia, we have people on welfare who have iphones because the old ones went onto the A$25 caps when the new ones come out.

      the iPhone is clearly a high end phone and as such there are much cheaper smartphones readily available.

      Whilst I don't call the Iphone low end, nor do I disagree that there are cheaper smartphones (I cannot consider the Iphone a "high end" phone simply because it lacks so many basic features) this beside the point.

      The OP was saying that the Iphone was a status symbol and had a high price tag when in fact, the Iphone is common as muck and not any more expensive than any other high end phone. For example, how much does the HTC One X or Samsung Galaxy S cost? More, less or about the same as an Iphone 4S?

      That's really the crux of the argument, is the Iphone rarer and significantly more expensive than it's contemporaries? If not what I said remains true.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    19. Re:a price to pay by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Youre joking right?

      SUVs are as cheap as expensive hatchbacks (considering the cheap ones are hatchback engines in overweight bodies)

      Same with sports cars. You can get one for the price of a hot hatch.

      Apple devices don't convey an air of money because people get them on cheap contracts. A lot of lower income earners have iphones. They are less like exclusive brands like Ferrari and more like common but overpriced brands suck as Louis Vutton which are the same made in china crap as other bags but have a higher price tag due to the logo.

      When was the last time you took a look at the price difference between, say a basic VW golf and the GTI version? Hot hatchbacks cost so much more they are in fact a status symbol, as in: "I can afford to pay twice as much as you for the same car to get a some exta horsepowers". In my neck of the woods a GTI costs almost twice as much as a regular Golf.

      2012 VW Golf VI A$29,500 ish
      2012 Golf GTI VI A$43,000 ish

      Nowehere near twice as much here in Oz where European cars are hideously overpriced. And we aren't talking about a few extra HP here, there's a huge difference between a 1.4L manual and a 2.0L dual clutch auto. A world of difference there sunshine, 118 Kw to 155 Kw.

      But nice try with picking only one model. A few other hot hatches, your Hyundai Veloster starts from A$24,000 which is not expensive considering your Yaris goes up to A$21,000. Your top 10 hot hatches for under A$30,000. Even a used Civic Type-R (one of the best hot hatches) goes just 8,000 GBP (A$12,000) for an 07 with 60,000 miles on it.

      To keep this in perspective, people drop A$90,000+ for a BMW X5 in Australia. He'll, I'm looking at A$18-20,000 for a used Honda Integra that's less than 10 years old, BTW, the Integra is a sports car, not a hot hatch and I'm looking for an Integra not as a status symbol but because they are such fantastic drives (seriously, if you have a manual license go drive one). Compared to this, your hot hatches are cheap as are entry level sports cars.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    20. Re:a price to pay by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Also, I guess you're from a country that doesn't allow studded tires.

      I was in the US, where it varies state to state. Specifically New Mexico. Studded tires are allowed, but most roads are generally snow free.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    21. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sell expensive stuff, but still make it on the cheap. Look at the MagSafe apple support forum thread. Those MacBook Pro and MacBook Air power adaptors are manufactured so poorly that they have multiple points of failure in the last inch of the side that attaches to the laptop. People who treat them with utmost care still have to go out and buy another $80 replacement every year and a half or so.

    22. Re:a price to pay by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      A lot of lower income earners have iphones. They are less like exclusive brands like Ferrari and more like common but overpriced brands suck as Louis Vutton which are the same made in china crap as other bags but have a higher price tag due to the logo.

      lower income earners in countries that have expense hire purchase service contracts as standards to lock customers into them for long periods have iPhones [UK/US] the only places they are popular. In places where people have lower income and have to buy the product outright...like say china [larger market than US] you see people not only not buying iPhones, but Android having 12X its market share, and Apples market share shrivelling away.

    23. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're joking, right? A Jeep Grand Cherokee costs over $60,000 with you put it together with a decent package. And that's not even all that high end of an SUV. What hatchback costs that much which is equally common (sure, a 911 turbo will cost you $150,000, but there's FAR fewer of them on the road).

    24. Re:a price to pay by swb · · Score: 1

      VW GTIs are for stroke artists with too little money to buy at least an Audi S4 and too little skill to hot rod one themselves.

      Anyone buying a GTI has more money than brains.

    25. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. You got a sports car because you are compensating for your tiny pecker.

    26. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone 4S costs significantly more than the Galaxy S3 here in Australia.
      http://www.kogan.com/au/buy/apple-iphone-4s-16gb-unlocked-black/ - $630
      http://www.kogan.com/au/buy/samsung-galaxy-s3-16gb-blue/ - $540

      http://www.kogan.com/au/buy/apple-iphone-4s-32gb-unlocked-black/ - $750
      http://www.kogan.com/au/buy/samsung-galaxy-s3-32gb-blue/ - $600

      Note despite the claim of "on sale" Kogan has had those prices pretty much since launch for the S3.

      A Galaxy S2, which is more likely to be the contemporary of a 4S is even cheaper still.

      And plan wise the iPhones sit on pretty much the same pricing point at the Galaxy S3.

      As for sim only plans matching up to "with handset plans", serisously find me a plan that offers 3-4Gb of data with a handset, and costs less than $50. Because Amaysim and Internode are doing that, and you don't even have to sign up for a contract.

    27. Re:a price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap in costs for Apple, not cheap in costs for the consumer. They manufacture as cheap as possible so they can have as large a margin as possible.

  7. Nice operating profit! by Kergan · · Score: 1

    Manufacture for $.10; sell for $10; sue anyone who copies. Mm...

    1. Re:Nice operating profit! by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Manufacture for $.10; sell for $10; sue anyone who copies. Mm...

      Pro tip: if you think that operating profit = retail price - manufacturing cost then don't try starting a business anytime soon. Packaging, promotion, logistics, processing payments all cost money...

      I'm sure that, at $10 a pop, Apple are making several bucks, but it ain't $9.90.

      One non-evil motive for Apple's (alleged) action is to give the new connector a chance to get established before the flood of 3rd party adapters. There are bound to be issues with the new dock and older equipment anyway, having a plethora of potentially buggy 3rd party adapters available on launch day could cause mass confusion.

      Long term, Apple would be nuts not to license the connector - all those third-party accessories are a major USP of iOS devices. They're taking a risk changing the connector as it is - if I were them I'd act out of character and throw one adapter in with the phone. Of course, since this is all rumour that might be exactly what they do.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    2. Re:Nice operating profit! by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      Packaging, promotion, logistics, processing payments all cost money...

      Your forgot the sales staff if it is sold in an Apple store, and otherwise the staff which sells it to other retailers. In most countries, staff is the biggest part which eats your revenue. ... And no, I'm not talking about assembling here, but about the people which hand you your change.

    3. Re:Nice operating profit! by Kergan · · Score: 1

      You're so right. I so forgot to account for the ubiquitous iPhone cable ads that Apple is running, not to mention the Apple Geniuses who are eagerly pushing them onto me when I walk into a store. "You really WANT this iPhone cable!" :-)

      On a more serious note, take HDMI cables as yard stick. Cursory googling yields prices ranging from a few bucks to 10-20-times-more-hoopla-up-your-ass price points for a 6' cable. Those who are selling cheap cables are, I can only presume, making money. To sell the pricey one, you merely need to have it in store when an impatient end-user walks in with a broken cable on a saturday afternoon -- just like a $10 iPhone cable.

    4. Re:Nice operating profit! by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      Manufacture for $.10; sell for $10; sue anyone who copies. Mm...

      Pro tip: if you think that operating profit = retail price - manufacturing cost then don't try starting a business anytime soon. Packaging, promotion, logistics, processing payments all cost money...

      I'm sure that, at $10 a pop, Apple are making several bucks, but it ain't $9.90.

      I would be shocked if it were anything more than 95% profit on any cable. Apple accountants unlike you are incredible, and are professional. Apple have incredibly low lead times, need zero additional infrastructure for processing payment, and packaging is a sundry expense.

  8. Now be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor old Apple is in a very difficult financial position right now. The big kids keep picking on him and stealing his designs and everything. I bet he really needs that $100 million.

  9. RTFA! The article says nothing of the sort. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple has also said it may use 'licensing agreements and threats of lawsuits' to prevent third-party adapters from hitting the market through at least 2012.

    No, Apple hasn't said anything about licensing. In fact, Apple couldn't possibly have said anything in public about the connector, because it hasn't even been officially announced yet! The submitter is a troll.

    1. Re:RTFA! The article says nothing of the sort. by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Before Apple officially announces something, it "leaks" information about the device. This could be part of the leak. Just because you dont like it, doesnt mean it is not true (infact you should check with your corporate masters, you might even be supposed to assume this as true and sing songs about how great this is)

    2. Re:RTFA! The article says nothing of the sort. by DerPflanz · · Score: 0

      Smart marketing, threatening with law suits a week before the longest anticipated product launch since the iPod.

      My reply: fuck you Apple. Your arrogance is getting bigger and bigger. It may be your downfall. Read the myth about Icarus before you hire a new army of lawyers.

      --
      -- The Internet is a too slow way of doing things, you'd never do without it.
    3. Re:RTFA! The article says nothing of the sort. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the last time, RTFA. Apple hasn't threatened anyone. The article merely quotes some developers who fear that it may happen, and then the submitter took the ball and ran with it.

    4. Re:RTFA! The article says nothing of the sort. by DerPflanz · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

      --
      -- The Internet is a too slow way of doing things, you'd never do without it.
  10. Reverse engineer by hawguy · · Score: 2

    How can they prevent someone from reverse engineering the pinout based on published specs, examining whatever 9 pin adapter comes with the new phone, and trial and error? I don't it would be legal to take apart an Apple adapter and copy it, but if they can figure out how to make an adapter by other means using a cleanroom methodology without ever looking at the official adapter, and come up with their own connector design that fits the phone connector, can Apple stop them?

    1. Re:Reverse engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      They can slap you with a 1bn lawsuit saying you copied their patent covering "copper cables with white plastic wrapping carrying data from a device built in 2012 or later with rounded corners and a company logo". Any claims that other cables carrying data is prior art will be rejected by the jury since those cables didn't in fact carry data from a 2012 or later device with a company logo on it, and they definitely were not white.

      Apple is the evil empire to a higher degree than Standard Oil, IBM or Microsoft ever were.

    2. Re:Reverse engineer by Leinad177 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Apple managed to sue Samsung for a billion dollars over rounded edges. I think that it's more than likely that Apple will try and succeed in suing whoever makes an adapter, regardless of how.

    3. Re:Reverse engineer by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they made it a non-industry standard connector for exactly preventing anyone making a connector that fits and that wouldn't infringe. funny, eh? (the ipod style connector is pretty much a standard connector type.. that's how samsung can use it. it never took hold on mp3 players though apart from apple who didn't use the standard pinout of course).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Reverse engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can they prevent someone from reverse engineering

      They can't. This only harms companies that partner with Apple in good faith, whose existing agreements with Apple will not allow them to disobey the almighty master.

    5. Re:Reverse engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They very well could end up with a much better connector than the one designed by Apple.

    6. Re:Reverse engineer by ejasons · · Score: 1

      This is starting to be as common and stupid as everyone who complains about the McDonald's coffee lawsuit without understanding the specifics.

      Apple is guilty of a number of evils, so it isn't necessary to distort the facts in order to demonize them. That you do feel the need to do so actually undermines your argument...

  11. Apple like Adobe / Microsoft / Oracle / ... by bothandeach · · Score: 1

    My comment Subject says it all. Apple used to have a cachet. Not just because of Steve Jobs, but for a certain ethic and care about the interface. Well, it was all Xerox Parc and F'n Bill Gates. They are now, behold, CORPORATE, and monopoly driven, and doomed for the gates of hell.

    1. Re:Apple like Adobe / Microsoft / Oracle / ... by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, Apple was always walled of and only started to apply shady tactics lately. Microsoft always applied shady tactics and has become walled of lately. Can't say anything about Oracle, but Apple and Microsoft seem to try to imitate each other.

  12. Glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have an iphone.

  13. Its their own damn fault by MassacrE · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Accessory manufacturers (particularly case manufacturers) burnt all their bridges with Apple long ago. Since around when the iphone 3gs came out, nobody has gotten any advance notice of new hardware because of all the leaks.

    Even now, many of the apple rumors come from case manufacturers who are attempting to bribe employees at the manufacturer for information.

    Right now Apple has only even hinted that there may be an iphone 5, and if they are going to deprecate a decade of accessories with a new connector they want to do it on their own terms. There is no way Applw have confirmed or denied the dock connector except perhaps in controlled leaks to the media. Nobody making alarm clock docks is gonna know a damn thing until the rest of us do on the 12th.

    1. Re:Its their own damn fault by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Accessory manufacturers (particularly case manufacturers) burnt all their bridges with Apple long ago.

      Interesting. How so?

      Also I'm not aware of Apple (or any other manufacturer using proprietary connectors) to release them to third-party manufacturers well in advance of releasing their product. It's kinda against the whole idea of using a proprietary connector, instead of some standard (such as micro USB).

    2. Re:Its their own damn fault by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      burnt bridges? you mean Apple burnt their partners?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Its their own damn fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://micgadget.com/29545/ipad-mini-rear-shell-leaked-out-of-foxconn-costs-6000-cases-on-sale-for-80-cents/
      >Apparently, there’s an iPad mini rear shell leaked out of Foxconn factory lately, thanks to a brave Foxconn worker. He/she took the iPad mini rear shell and looked for buyers, and he/she was selling it for 38,000 RMB (about $5988).
      >In fact, the case makers now have a mold of the rumored iPad mini, and they are selling iPad mini cases on China’s largest e-commerce platform, Taobao (similar to eBay and Amazon). Prices start at just 5 Chinese yuan (about $0.79) when you buy in bulk quantities (more than a thousand).

      http://micgadget.com/29451/fully-assembled-iphone-5-mockups-are-everywhere-in-china-prices-start-at-5/
      >The new iPhone mockups are EVERYWHERE in China now, and they are specially made for case makers who are starting full fledged mass production of iPhone 5 cases. Surprisingly, prices start at just 33 Chinese yuan (about $5)

      I would expect that whatever Apple planned to use will be available from China and the imitations will probably be available at launch.

  14. Its all part of US corporate culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember - they have a duty to maximise shareholder profit at all costs. So:

    1. Design an incompatible, proprietary interface. and sell it with an eye-watering markup
    2. Go after anyone who has the temerity to work out how to replicate the functionality of said interface and sell it to the public, and sue them into the ground.
    3. ***
    4. PROFIT!!!

    Sleazy bastards, eh?

    (And as we have seen in past weeks, stage 1 also works well with "Design and patent an oblong with rounded corners"...)

  15. Did the submitter read the article linked? by joeflies · · Score: 1

    the article says - " Some developers fear that Apple will corner the market for both the adapters and cables, much as it did with MagSafe connectors for MacBook laptops, using licensing agreements and threats of lawsuits to prevent less expensive third-party solutions from coming to market.".

    The summary goes on to state that apple said that

    1. Re:Did the submitter read the article linked? by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, what did you expect? It's an Apple article on /., so the title is almost guaranteed to be a lie.

      Or are you pining for the imaginary mythical non-trolling /. of days past? If so, I've got 8 words for you:

      "No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame."

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  16. Proprietary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has always been this way. In terms of vendor lock-in neither Microsoft nor even Sony could hold a candle to Apple, be it PPC architecture without USB ports, Firewire instead of USB, Displayport instead of DVI/HDMI etc. In every case they could have chosen the widely accepted and used standard, but they didn't in order to limit the choice for their gullible customers and charge extra for it. Newest example of this is the new iPhone connector that in terms of size and functionality resembles an MHL enabled Micro-USB plug.

    In fact Apple circumvented the EU directive that tried to standardize cell phone connectors to use Micro-USB by creating a simple adapter. They stake out land that was common ground before and threaten to shoot anyone who tries to enter.

    The only thing that changed over time is that now people are even more gullible than before and Apple now is the top dog.

    1. Re:Proprietary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In every case Apple had a good reason. I’m not sure what you meant by "PPC architecture without USB ports.” The iMac G3 was PPC based, released in 1998 and had USB ports to the exclusion of legacy ports. I’ll leave the whole PPC vs. x86 debate in the 1990s where it belongs, as it’s pretty irrelevant here. Firewire though, was by far a better standard than USB supporting faster consistent data rates vs. USB’s higher peak rates but overall inconsistent speed. I know tons of film professionals who used to swear by Firewire. DisplayPort was capable of carrying an audio signal which DVI to my knowledge can't. Plus it was eventually was merged in to Thunderbolt which is now an industry standard. I am sure that at least two of the pins on the 9-pin connecter will be dedicated audio pins. Apple may not always choose the most common port but their choices are far from frivolous. Furthermore when they do implement standard ports they do so intelligently and in a useful manner. It frustrates me to no end that I have to crawl behind my desktop and look at the red/yellow colour coding to figure out where I should stick my USB3 devices for the highest speed. On my MacBook Pro, all the USB ports support USB3 and I could care less where I plug my gear in.

    2. Re:Proprietary... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > In every case Apple had a good reason.

      I would agree with that sentiment too to *some* degree. It partially seems like Apple has NIH syndrome but they *also* have good reasons to invent new standards because they are interested in solving technical (practical?) problems.

      * Firewire is definitely a dream compared to USB!
      * It is debatable where Macs helped jumpstart the USB market, but they definitely played a part.
      * Now that Thunderbolt is standardized, we'll start seeing more GPUs natively support it.

      Regardless if you love / hate Apple, they seem to be taking the middle road. The left is use only standard connectors (and put up with the hassle of devices not having certain convenience factors), or the right of using only proprietary connectors (which the public has voted against.)

  17. Apple's business model by BuypolarBear · · Score: 1

    1. Design new proprietary connector
    2. Threaten to sue others making said proprietary connector
    3. Manufacture connectors for cheap
    4. Sell connectors at high markup
    5. ??????????
    6. PROFIT!!!!!!!!!!!

    1. Re:Apple's business model by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can omit point 5.

    2. Re:Apple's business model by plankrwf · · Score: 1

      I am sorry. According to long standing slashdot tradition, there HAS to be a "?????" step.
      I do agree though, the ??? steps seems to be unnecessary, and normally it stops at '5 Profit!!!!!!!!!!' so perhaps GP needs to amends its version (perhaps letting 3 or 4 out of his (?her?) post.

      --
      Yes, I am kidding ;-0

    3. Re:Apple's business model by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Or
      1. Not confirm existence of new connector.
      2. Not release specs for unconfirmed connector.
      3. Have people make up wild theories about why Apple refused to release specs of unconfirmed connector.
      4. Have people make up stories that Apple has threatened to sue despite Apple saying nothing about unconfirmed connector.
      5. Post rampant speculations on Slashdot for web hits.
      6. Profit!!

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  18. Compares badly to Nokia's adoption of Qi by ItsIllak · · Score: 1

    Just sayin'

    Buy a (relatively cheap) Lumia and you can use the industry standard for wireless charging and also NFC + open data transfer standards (bluetooth to the speaker systems for instance). Buy a (relatively expensive) iPhone and you'll be stuck with even more expensive accessories, with god knows what means of communicating with them.

    1. Re:Compares badly to Nokia's adoption of Qi by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      I don't want to be forced to have to boot into Windows just to make use of it.

    2. Re:Compares badly to Nokia's adoption of Qi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the entire point about Apple products is that it says the owner is rich enough to buy a more expensive product that has less functionality than the cheaper competitor

  19. On a non existent product??? by Grayhand · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Excuse me while I say WTF???? People are fighting mad over an iPhone 5 that no one has admitted exists so far??? I might as well say the iPhone 6 will support Firewire 1600. Prove me wrong! Time people get a life!

    1. Re:On a non existent product??? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

      I might as well say the iPhone 6 will support Firewire 1600.

      Apple has not released detailed technical specifications for the iPhone 6 battery, so it's safe to assume it will be powered by the blood of innocent children. How can Apple get away with powering phones with the blood of innocent children? Those damned hipsters who only buy Apple as a fashion statement have blood on their hands!

    2. Re:On a non existent product??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will be no blood on the hipster's hands.

      The phone's battery wouldn't last very long if the blood is leaking out onto the hipster owner's hands...

  20. Anyone up for a proper ipod dock connector? by hoover · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to find some good schematics for an ipod dock to analog audio in connector for those compact hifi boxes, has anyone been successful in buying or building one him- or herself? All I'd need is to feed analog audio into the system, no fancy play controls and the like. Thanks!

    --
    Ever wondered whats wrong with the world? http://www.ishmael.org/
    1. Re:Anyone up for a proper ipod dock connector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out http://www.trevorshp.com/creations/dock2.htm

  21. Customers say no to next Apple devices by overmoderated · · Score: 0

    Apple melts down. End of story.

  22. Isn't that a micro-USB by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    The video isn't terrible sharp, but googling for better pictures, the new connector looks very much like micro-USB. Might it be that Apple is doing the right thing here?

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Isn't that a micro-USB by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      The video isn't terrible sharp, but googling for better pictures, the new connector looks very much like micro-USB. Might it be that Apple is doing the right thing here?

      it's not, despite apple agreeing on using microusb.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  23. Blah by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1, Informative

    Is it just me or are we getting damn tired of hearing about apple and it's typical BS?

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:Blah by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Speaking just for myself: no. That probably goes for most other /. readers because there's an article about Apple every other day. The reason, I think, is that Slashdot's audience is upset that they won't be able to innovate in their jobs like they want to because Apple has a patent an $POLYGON_SHAPE_X or whatever.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    2. Re:Blah by sco08y · · Score: 1

      It's a tossup whether I'm more tired of articles that present speculation and innuendo as news, or people who complain about reading articles they obviously didn't.

    3. Re:Blah by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. I'm tired of geeks Just not getting it, or getting it wrong every single time.

      I remember the iPhone bashing in 2007, and how could anyone possibly buy an iPhone, it only has two buttons and a touch screen! But in 2012, that design is "obvious."

      How can anyone take nerds seriously anymore?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    4. Re:Blah by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's just you.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Blah by bytesex · · Score: 1

      No the design is a compromise. I have an Android phone now (since a few days) and I find the use of a screen keyboard horrible. Really, really horrible. I love the open model, love the apps, love the touchscreen for functions other than typing, but having to fumble to find keys is a bloody, bloody mess of a design compromise. And I will stand by that.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    6. Re:Blah by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      Yet, you keep reading and replying to these stories...

  24. How is this still dragging on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My impression was that Apple had signed up to use micro-USB (for power at least)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_External_Power_Supply

    I can but hope that at least them messing about again will cause people to re-examine whether they want to purchase another large chunk of kit with a proprietary connector.

    I mean I didn't mind when the ipod first appeared and it was just a cable - but bolting the damn things onto items costing £100s? Everybody else seems to have caught onto the idea. I've spent many gleeful minutes when looking in long-unopened cupboards, gleefully binning the piles of proprietary PSUs and leads I've accumulated over the years. Still at least with Apple stuff you can normally recognize what it's for, my absolute hate were the generic black PSUs that didn't even indicate what you'd be unable to charge/sync if you dared bin it.

  25. BlackBerry Playbook by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    The PB has, in a little section on the base, a micro USB, a micro HDMI, and a magnetic charging port. Except for the charging port (for which a hobbyist could make an adaptor, it is so simple) that's standard connections which provide everything you need.

    And then there's the defunct Palm Pre 3 - with inductive charging and Bluetooth, the only time you ever need to plug anything in is for a system reinstall. That, to my mind, is the way it should be. The ideal mobile device does not require any connectors at all.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  26. A new Apple scam by benjfowler · · Score: 0

    The impending connector ripoff reminds me of those bloody worthless white earbuds.

    They don't last more than a few months for me. I'm on my fifth pair. And they charge me 25 fucking pounds for each replacement. And they sound terrible.

    The white earbuds and cables are a nasty, shitty Apple ripoff designed purely to screw their customers. And it looks like they're about to get a lot better at it -- the iPhone has a terrible battery life, so I needed three charging cables. Guess who's going to have to spring for new cables if (and now it's a BIG 'if'), they upgrade?

    Penises.

    1. Re:A new Apple scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it exactly that prevents you using non-Apple, standard jack earbuds? The included remote control is broken and pretty much useless anyway. And even if you do like it, the sound quality you will gain is worth the change.

    2. Re:A new Apple scam by Dreadrik · · Score: 1

      They don't last more than a few months for me. I'm on my fifth pair. And they charge me 25 fucking pounds for each replacement. And they sound terrible.

      Just out of curiosity, why do you keep buying them?

    3. Re:A new Apple scam by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Because it's a show of wealth. Only the rich buy apple headphones to display their wealth, anyone else with a grain of sense or any desire for audio quality will buy something better like senheiser.

      Then you have the trendy kiddies they wear that "beats" crap.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  27. Re:What's really funny by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    What is it about ageing white conservatives and their fixation on other people's iPads?

    According to retarded right wing thinking, if you own a $600 iDevice, you're rich, and therefore if you sympathise with liberal political causes, you're a hypocrite. These same idiots think that having an income of $120k a year is "rich" too, not realizing just how rich "rich" actually is.

    Probably the same morons who think that if we just didn't buy that iPad, we'd be rich too. Sad.

  28. You could even do analogue by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    If there was a need to, it would be easy to re-purpose the connector. Have a switch internally that can change the connectors form USB over to the analogue outs. Then when it detects that cable is plugged in (could be as simple as a notch on the connector or the like) it switches it.

    That way if you really felt the need you could maintain connections for legacy equipment that doesn't so USB, and still have it on one connector.

    Of course I think it would be easier to just do what most cellphones do: Have an analogue sound I/O port. My cellphone has a 4-pole jack that can hook to to an external mic/headphones, or any other analogue connector, should you wish.

  29. Re:What's really funny by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    Prior to Apple going "thermonuclear", it was just some good-natured ribbing. You like shiny white plastic? Good for you.

    Now, it's different. It's kill or be killed.

    And yeah, protesting corporate excess while contributing to the crazy gross margins of Apple is highly ironic (though totally lost on the protesters who still think they're sticking it to "the man" by buying iStuff).

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  30. Apple doesn't discuss unannounced products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This alleged new connector is not shipping on any current Apple products. If such a thing exists, any vendors providing them to Apple, or preparing compatible products will have signed an NDA. In other words, anyone who KNOWS has a strong financial incentive to STFU.

  31. How do you like that innovation, bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This company sure knows how to be a bully.

    DONT MAKE STUFF or we'll SUE YOU and take YOUR MONEY

  32. I smell by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    A giant anti-trust lawsuit!

  33. A Apple Fan... (Sqore 200,000,000, Jobs-like) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's real; seen it myself.
    N E V E R buy Apple. Between this and the UUID problem. Very Sad.

    1. Re:A Apple Fan... (Sqore 200,000,000, Jobs-like) by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      the UUID problem

      I don't understand how the UUID event is a problem?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  34. Could the new 9 pin connector take a micro usb? by SETY · · Score: 1

    Would it be possible for the 9 pin apple connector to hold an adaptor that is flush with the phone and take a micro-usb? I thought there was some EU directive that wanted phones to all have a micro-usb connector?

  35. Will it have rounded corners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patent lawyers are on tenterhooks waiting to find out

  36. If it's not.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    If apple made a change it had damn well better be a magsafe connector. If it's still a craptastic plug like the current 30 pin their engineers need to be beaten with socks that have doorknobs in them until they cant stand anymore....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  37. iPhone 5 Samsung Galaxy rip-off by loufoque · · Score: 0

    This is clearly apparent from all the videos of leaked models.
    Time to counter-sue?

  38. iphone 5 how does it work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think iphone 5 may be less than iphone 4s
    http://fatlossidiotsreviews.blogspot.com/

  39. I'm not a big fan, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I do own an iPhone, but only because I got it used & cheap from a friend and I'm outside contract. The only other iDevice I have is a 40GB hard disk iPod from 2003, the one with the firewire/1394...

    The thing is that this idea of a connector that will fit in from either direction is actually very simplistic, yet has not been done from a mainstream point of view yet. I can't tell you how many times I've had a half second of frustration over "oops wrong way" when hooking up the cable. This happens with iDevices and with USB.

    All the other vendors, rather than have to balls to apply this very simply concept, have focused on matching mini-USB or whatever other standards are out there... that's great and I'm happy that works for them and keeps their BOM costs low... but Apple is not so focused on BOM that they ignore an obvious improvement in usability!

    I have no clue what will be available at the connector, but I'm guessing that analog audio will be there? That greatly simplifies what needs to be present in speaker docks... yes boo hoo your old dock will no longer work, but have you not learned that this is the nature of things? If it's a decent dock then there will an adapter developed for it.

    Anyone whining about car chargers---seriously? I've been using a USB to iPod cable as my "charging" cable for years, as long as whatever comes with the iPhone has USB on the other side that's basically all I need... Do you hear me whining about all the 1394 to iPod cables I have? Or my Apple branded power bricks w/ 1394 connectors on them? No of course not because when they swapped from 1394 to USB people weren't being whiny bitches about it.

    The people who may be fucked, and I have a degree of sympathy for, are those who have cars with built in iPod specific cables. I'd like to think that Apple has some intelligent solution planned, perhaps a short dongle that will allow you to convert between old and new connectors. They know there are a gazillion of these out there and I have a hard time believing that they are simply throwing their hands up in the air and saying "Too bad!", particularly when they may be able to get a slice of every dongle made to convert, and where NOT having a method to convert invites two things: 1) Sticking it out with older iDevice, 2) Switching brands since you have to switch around a bunch of accessories anyway...

  40. Retro connector . . . by mlosh · · Score: 1

    Shhh, Apple does not want anyone to know yet that the new 9-pin connector is all part of a plan to introduce uber-cool, retro stylings. The connector will be DB-9.

  41. No, they didn't say that. This is FUD. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    Apple has also said it may use 'licensing agreements and threats of lawsuits' to prevent third-party adapters from hitting the market through at least 2012.

    No, they didn't say that. Apple has not said anything (this is an unreleased product), let alone that they will use agreements and lawsuits to stop something. Is all of this stuff really true? Perhaps, but right now it's all "anonymous and unverifiable sources say the following hearsay", and attributing malice to statements Apple never made is silly.

  42. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple being selfish assholes who won't play nice with anyone else, even 3rd party companies who support them? Not news. It's sad to hear they won't be dropping that idiotic connector they use on their stuff and move to a standard connector like the rest of the world. That big ass connector they use seems like it's more prone to breaking compared to a standard connector like micro usb. I know I broke like 2 of them (granted not exactly the same, but they too were much longer than standard like this one is supposed to be) when I had the old black and white screen, hard drive based white ipod with the touch circle(not clickable) on the front. Last Apple thing I bought too. It broke as well not long after it's warranty was up, figures >... screen completely died.

    anyways.

    But I think If it wasn't already clear before with them suing everyone they could think of, that this..., this should show people how fucked up this company is. Google loves people who help with android and help create great devices (hopefully OPEN / UNLOCKED... *cough* verizon *cough*) Hell they might even help with design or finding a manufacturer for you. Not Apple. They sue even the companies that support them. so sad.

  43. What a coincidence! by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I've been saying no to Apple phones and tablets for quite some time now. Proprietary ports and all that comes with them being one of the reasons why. I'm glad we still agree that they do not want me as a customer.

    Meanwhile, to anyone who whishes to enjoy their tablet with an USB port, may I suggest the recent additions to the overall tabletspace, Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10" and 7" (both very nice) or the new Google Nexus 7, also very nice, very cheap, very fast and ... Tadaa! ... also with a micro USB port. I personally am still enjoying my HTC Flyer very much and can asure you that the 7" form factor is a very neat one indeed. More than one would expect before using it every day.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:What a coincidence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, to anyone who whishes to enjoy their tablet with an USB port, may I suggest the recent additions to the overall tabletspace, Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10" and 7" (both very nice)

      So you flame Apple for having a proprietary connector, and then turn around and suggest Samsung tablets which have...wait for this... Samsung proprietary connectors that look just like Apple's (but is electrically incompatible)? Oh, the irony.

      Yeah, I know, the Galaxy Tab specs say it acts as a USB host. In reality, you need a proprietary connector-to-USB dongle to connect USB devices to a Galaxy Tab. So much for specifications. Incidentally, you can buy a similar dongle for an iPad as well.

  44. Re:iphone connector versus micro-usb by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    I happen to like the old big and bulky apple connector as it seems to be way less prone to failure than micro-usb. I have seen people have to buy new cell phones as they've managed to destroy the charging port on their phone due to loose fitting charging cables leading to wedging the plug at an angle to get it to charge.

  45. Shia? by antdude · · Score: 1

    How many times did Apple say no? Is Apple, Shia LaBeouf?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  46. Speculation by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

    Gotta love articles based purely on speculation and random guesses.

  47. Acesssory developer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a MFI (accessory developer). In order to get this status, you need to go through a lengthy approval process. None of the MFI partners get access to this stuff, which sucks.

    Working with Apple is like getting fucked in the ass every day.

  48. mazda3: $16900 mazdaspeed3: $30000 by Chirs · · Score: 1

    That's comparing the two hatchback versions. Fuel economy is 5 L/100km in the first case, 8 L/100km in the second.

  49. Isn't this just simple capitalism? by realsilly · · Score: 1

    Um wait a minute, isn't this just pure capitalism? I mean, they are designing the product to sell, and they will design it to include the ability to charge the units. As far as I see this, it's a part of their product. I'm not a big fan of Apple stuff, but this just sounds like good business logic to me.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  50. Re:What's really funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not very perceptive... It's not about how much money is being spent on the iPad and therefore how rich the protesters must be. It's about the fact that the protesters are giving their money directly to the very companies that their ideals stand against. I guess it's safe to assume you're a consumer, not a citizen... always about the product.

  51. where does apple by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    say they will sue? The article says "Some developers". While Apple is notorious for being pretty closed lets not accuse them of something until they do it THEN we can have the burn a turtleneck day party.

  52. Riiight.. by flygeek · · Score: 1

    Riight. Apple is going out of their way to screw up their ecosystem to increase their revenue by 0.25%. Or maybe they're just being secretive, like they always are.

  53. Icrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another reason why I don't buy Icrap

  54. ADB 2 by issicus · · Score: 1

    FINALLY !

  55. If we were to act insteat of reacting or doing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing and pay them to leave him alone.

  56. "according to sources" by smash · · Score: 1

    If you can't cite the sources, then it is just pure opinion / speculation on the part of the author.

    "according to sources", Steve Ballmer has taken over Steve Jobs' position at apple. With no mention of sources, its just FUD.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.