Slashdot Mirror


Mt. Fuji May Be Close To Erupting

SpuriousLogic points out an article at Wired discussing research into pressure levels inside Mt. Fuji's magma chamber, which scientists claim is higher than it was in 1707, the last time it erupted. "The new readings, taken by the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, reveal that the pressure is at 1.6 megapascals, nearly 16 times the 0.1 megapascals it takes to trigger an eruption." A series of earthquakes shook the area around Mt. Fuji a little over a decade ago, and a fault line was discovered underneath it. "Since the March 2011 tsunami and the 6.4 magnitude earthquake that followed four days later, Japan has been on tenterhooks, and in May 2012 a professor from Ryukyu University warned that a massive eruption within three years would be likely because of several major factors: steam and gases are being emitted from the crater, water eruptions are occurring nearby, massive holes emitting hot natural gases are appearing in the vicinity." While the rising pressure within the magma chamber is of concern, it is but one factor among many that lead to eruptions.

269 comments

  1. Another thing to worry about... by redbeardcanada · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am going to Japan in October, so in addition to earthquakes, tsunamis, radiation, ninjas, and godzilla, I now also have to worry about lava??? Damn...

    1. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hahaha.

      Where is your god now?

    2. Re:Another thing to worry about... by ackthpt · · Score: 0

      I am going to Japan in October, so in addition to earthquakes, tsunamis, radiation, ninjas, and godzilla, I now also have to worry about lava??? Damn...

      Don't forget vorpal bunnies

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a matter of time before they get the taste of blood.

    4. Re:Another thing to worry about... by camperdave · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am going to Japan in October, so in addition to earthquakes, tsunamis, radiation, ninjas, and godzilla, I now also have to worry about lava??? Damn...

      Don't forget vorpal bunnies

      Well, that was a waste of time. No vorpalness, no attacks, no fights, nothing at all but a bunch of rabbits scurrying after pellets.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 0
      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    6. Re:Another thing to worry about... by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      And those TV shows that cause seizures

      --
      mod me funny
    7. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not have to worry about lava. The volcanic earthquake may cause an opening in the earth and you may fall in or something may just fall on you. A directed blast may throw material on you and crush you. If you're lucky, your clothes may just be affected from the acid rain from the volcanic gases.

      I suggest you stay near the beaches and let a tsunami sweep you away.

    8. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

      No. You have to be reasonably prepared for it, that's all. It's futile to worry about things you cannot control. Or those you can control, because then you just have to take necessary actions. Worrying is never the right solution.

    9. Re:Another thing to worry about... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's because you didn't see what happens when the bunnies' ravenous, all encompassing hunger isn't sated with tourist's tasty pellets. The horror!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    10. Re:Another thing to worry about... by es330td · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a classic side scroller video game. What are you going to do for power-ups or extra lives?

    11. Re:Another thing to worry about... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      You don't have to worry about ninjas unless you're a pirate.

      Well? Are you?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    12. Re:Another thing to worry about... by inode_buddha · · Score: 2

      You forgot Mothra. They've already found radioactive butterfiles near Fukushima.

      Godzilla vs Mothra wasn't sci-fi after all... it was prophecy!

      --
      C|N>K
    13. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't forget battle mechs and tentacled rapist sea monsters.

    14. Re:Another thing to worry about... by nihilistcanada · · Score: 2

      He said things to look out for, not things to look forward to.

    15. Re:Another thing to worry about... by spongman · · Score: 1

      just get the ninjas on your side, then you'll be fine.

    16. Re:Another thing to worry about... by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      While you're there...BUY UP ALL the hard drive parts! Lol. Wow slashdot doesn't like caps even when appropriate.

    17. Re:Another thing to worry about... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That's Taiwan, not Japan.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    18. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I find it funny to hear all of the worry about things like Fuji. I mean, I know, I get it, it's roughly 100 km from Tokyo, which is a huge super mega-city. But living here in Iceland, hearing other places talking about "active" areas just seems kind of funny. I mean, the ground in parts of the capital region here in Reykjavík is just several hundred years old. On the hill right next to where I work, they drilled a 90 meter pipe into the ground, put a choke on the top, drip in water, and it erupts regularly as a geyser. A quarter of the city's hot water comes right from downtown. I mean, half an hour's drive (plus a bit of a walk) from my house you can walk *inside* a magma chamber. Not a lava tube, the actual magma chamber. It's empty now but there's other active magma chambers in the region.

      And we're not considered one of the more active regions.

      Fuji erupts every few hundred years, the biggest being VEI 5? Yawn. Katla's been threatening to go off any day now for the past couple years, and she's a VEI 6. And she's got an ice cap on top; last time she had a big eruption, she sent down a flood with as high a flow rate as the average outflow of the Amazon, Mississippi, Nile, and Yangtzee combined. That is, as much water flowing by as would fill up a cube over 200 feet on each side (roughly equivalent to a city block of 20-story buildings), every second.

      Japan is volcanically active? As much as a third of the lava on Earth in the past 500 years is estimated to have come from Iceland.

      Fuji's last big eruption was in the early 1700s? In the late 1700s we had Laki go off, most devastating eruption in recorded human history. A fissure opened up 23 kilometers long, up to 200 meters wide in places, with lava fountains as much as 1.5 kilometer in the air, erupting for 8 months straight. Sulfur dioxide was equivalent to a Mt. Pinatubo every three days. But that wasn't the worst, the worst was the anomalously high amounts of hydrofluoric acid. The eruption killed 80% of Iceland's sheep and even directly caused 23,000 human poisoning fatalities in the UK from the deadly blood-red cloud, as well as bizarre weather including tremendous thunderstorms with hailstones large enough to kill cattle.

      So yeah, yeah, I know, Fuji is more of a threat because Japan has such huge coastal populations and economic activity and stuff, I fully understand that, but still... I guess your perception of risk is relative to your environment.

      --
      Alanis, you oughta know: she's older than you, more mature than you, and can show some restraint in a theater
    19. Re:Another thing to worry about... by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

      You sure topped them! Though you probably should have started with "That's nothing!"

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    20. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess your perception of risk is relative to your environment.

      Yes. Perception of risk is relative to the set of things that stand to be lost or damaged if the at-risk event occurs. Why would that not be the case?

    21. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had bothered to read the article instead of being an internet tough guy, you would've had known they're more worried about the earthquake(s) that might trigger a Mt. Fuji eruption rather than the eruption itself. Current worst-case fatality estimates run as high as 323000. Now who's the tough guy?

    22. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Who's the "I know, Fuji is more of a threat because Japan has such huge coastal populations and economic activity and stuff, I fully understand that" person?

      And if the concern is a tectonic earthquake, then why even mention Fuji? Volcanic quakes are generally small.

      --
      Alanis, you oughta know: she's older than you, more mature than you, and can show some restraint in a theater
    23. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're a woman, add tentacles to your list of things to worry about.

    24. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to be reasonably prepared for it, that's all. It's futile to worry about things you cannot control.

      Dude, when you start claiming that traveling halfway across the globe is a thing you cannot control, it's time to let go of that coffee mug and go to sleep. You could, like, not get on the plane? Sheesh.

    25. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Taupo is VEI 8... people often say without irony that if it blows up again that half of the whole island will be vaporised. The last time it erupted, a relatively tiny eruption by its standards, it turned the sky red over Rome and China.
      Taupo and possibly Toba are the only real "global killer" volcanoes, anything else is a minor inconvenience by comparison.

    26. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      You look forward to being raped by a sea monster's tentacle, and then being shot at by a battle mech? To each his own, I guess.

    27. Re:Another thing to worry about... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember, you don't have to run faster than tentacled sea monster / battle mech. You only have to run faster than the guy next to you. And then you can turn around and watch - that's the looked forward to part.

    28. Re:Another thing to worry about... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I can see the headlines now: Mt. Fuji explodes! Godzilla terrorizes Tokyo! Tokyo Tower destroyed. Giant mecha cleans up the mess.

    29. Re:Another thing to worry about... by mrgiles · · Score: 1

      Thankfully I live in the South Island!

      Wait...

    30. Re:Another thing to worry about... by lawnboy5-O · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Krakatoa in 1883 larger than Laki?

    31. Re:Another thing to worry about... by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      I don't think you need to worry about Godzilla. Mothra otoh...

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    32. Re:Another thing to worry about... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      worrying is what causes people to take action.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Another thing to worry about... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes. ti's not as active and dangerous as where you ,live, there for lets not worry about it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    34. Re:Another thing to worry about... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      All caps is never appropriate.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    35. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it would be smarter to GET THE HELL OUT OF THERE before it's too late

    36. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Slightly larger in terms of volume of ejected matter (20 km^3 vs. 14 km^3), but nowhere near as devastating. It's the gasses that are the problem, and while Krakatoa emitted 20 million tonnes of sulfur dioxide (considered a huge amount - by comparison, Mount St. Helens was only 1.5), Laki emitted a staggering 120 million tonnes. The really extreme example was hydrogen fluoride, which is normally a minor volcanic gas. At 8 million tonnes, Laki put out almost half as much HF as Krakatoa put out in *sulfur dioxide*. Really extreme, and really devastating.

      --
      Alanis, you oughta know: she's older than you, more mature than you, and can show some restraint in a theater
    37. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Sussurros · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He's an Icelander and they're not like normal people. In 1973 a group of Icelanders stopped a lava flow from engulfing their town with hoses while any township in any other country would have admitted the futility of even trying and walked away to start new lives somewhere else.

      I'm personally quite familiar with living near active volcanoes, occasionally waking to find the city covered with one or two centimetres of volcanic ash - pretty but not fun. I've been able at times to look out of my relatives' windows to see a direct view of Mount Tongariro and its ever changing plume, and I've even spent time in places where people cook food by burying it and letting the natural heat of the ground do the cooking. But nowhere I've been or even heard about matches the Icelanders' strange relationship with their volcanoes.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    38. Re:Another thing to worry about... by lawnboy5-O · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that...

    39. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      According to Wikipedia, the Tokyo metro area is 35 million people. That's 1/10th the population of the US, or almost 5% of the population (and certainly larger than most countries) of Europe. This is on top of a country who is still reeling from a crippled power generation grid and a national disaster in the north. Considering their auto and electronics exports, not to mention financial markets, that's not a small consequence if something blows up.
       
      Then again, it is hard to argue with kilometre+ high lava fountains.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    40. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am going to Japan in October, so in addition to earthquakes, tsunamis, radiation, ninjas, and godzilla, I now also have to worry about lava??? Damn...

      You forgot about those damn tentacles that seem to pop up and randomly rape people all the time! Watch your back, laddie...watch your back!

    41. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fire in the HOLE

    42. Re:Another thing to worry about... by cffrost · · Score: 1

      I am going to Japan in October, so in addition to earthquakes, tsunamis, radiation, ninjas, and godzilla, I now also have to worry about lava??? Damn...

      Don't forget vorpal bunnies

      Well, that was a waste of time. No vorpalness, no attacks, no fights, nothing at all but a bunch of rabbits scurrying after pellets.

      I don't know what video you saw, but I just watched a bunch of ganged-up bunnies intimidating a pair of defenseless humans into handing over all their meal rations.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    43. Re:Another thing to worry about... by bazorg · · Score: 1

      You might worry if they need a slashdot virgin to throw into the volcano.

    44. Re:Another thing to worry about... by ryzvonusef · · Score: 2

      Yeah, well...

      Iceland ain't right :P

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    45. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a New Zealand city which is occasionally covered by volcanic ash? I can't think of one.

    46. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We would express more worry about you guys if:

      (1) you weren't all strong, manly men of 7' heights and beards that can pull large trucks with your gonads; and
      (2) you didn't use a naming scheme that resulted in behemoths such as eyafjollalatlnnalojathurllathlensku or whatnot :)

      I was in Iceland a few months ago. Really wonderful and beautiful country!

    47. Re:Another thing to worry about... by charlieman · · Score: 1

      There's an xkcd for that!

    48. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, I love Scandinavia And The World! :)

      --
      Alanis, you oughta know: she's older than you, more mature than you, and can show some restraint in a theater
    49. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Lol, but we get blizzards too! ;) Hmm, what don't we get... tornadoes, I guess. We don't get hurricanes, but we get their remainders, and we get hurricane-force winds sometimes.

      --
      Alanis, you oughta know: she's older than you, more mature than you, and can show some restraint in a theater
    50. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Haha... you know the long words are just compounds. Just learn some common words used in place names or even just how words piece together and they'll seem a lot more intuitive.

      Glad you liked Iceland!

      --
      Alanis, you oughta know: she's older than you, more mature than you, and can show some restraint in a theater
    51. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Also, icelanders have bigger

    52. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      Hamilton, at least when I lived there. Mount Ruapehu was quite active at that time.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    53. Re:Another thing to worry about... by duhjim · · Score: 1

      Time is a fun house mirror and we are all going to die, so whats the problem?

    54. Re:Another thing to worry about... by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      How long ago was this? I also used to live there and I've never seen the city covered in ash - in my lifetime (since the mid-80's). During the last major eruptions in the 90's it all went north-east over the Bay of Plenty and missed the Waikato basin completely... even Auckland got more fallout than Hamilton did thanks to dispersion in the wind.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    55. Re:Another thing to worry about... by iq145 · · Score: 1

      Add to that: Mercury in your seafood...

    56. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      The early and mid 1970s. Don't feel like you're missing anything though, after the first "oh wow did it snow?' moment it's just a nuisance that fills every outside place and which never melts.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    57. Re:Another thing to worry about... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I thought that it was two wrecked power grids, not one? A 50 Hz standard one and an American- standard one.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    58. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Purchase a Migawari or two. You'll be fine!

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    59. Re:Another thing to worry about... by buddilla · · Score: 0

      Buddhism doesn't have a god(s). Shinto has spirits, still no gods. Next time your gonna troll at least know what your talking about.

      --
      Pitch Forks: check Torches: check Angry People: check - A. LaChasse V for Victory
    60. Re:Another thing to worry about... by buddilla · · Score: 0
      --
      Pitch Forks: check Torches: check Angry People: check - A. LaChasse V for Victory
    61. Re:Another thing to worry about... by gullevek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Islands capital is not a multi million people conglomerate spanning several prefectures.

      If Fuji erupts it will be a big shit storm, because in the last 100 years and more we built shit where we perhaps should not have built shit.

      As usual I will ride this out in front of my TV and complain that I can't get my favorite food stuff. Some parts around Fuji will disappear and some major highways and train lines will be disrupted and probably be for quite some time, which will really fuck up the economy.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    62. Re:Another thing to worry about... by mps01060 · · Score: 1

      You are correct in most of what you are saying, but don't ignore the fact that Icelandic volcanoes are on a divergent boundary, rather than a convergent boundary (subduction zone). Volcanoes near subduction zones are much more explosive because they have gasses like water vapor mixed into their magmas/lavas.

    63. Re:Another thing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John McPhee wrote about this volcano intervention in "The Control of Nature," which was collected in his book by that name. The essay originally appeared in two parts in the February 22 and February 29, 1988 issues of The New Yorker. Great piece of work.

  2. Mt. Strongbadia by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    My mountain asplode!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  3. I feel sorry for the Japanese by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have indeed had more than enough of natural disasters, as well as self-triggered disasters.

  4. Read the summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all I saw was Ryu

  5. "Nearly"? by sacrilicious · · Score: 2

    >the pressure is at 1.6 megapascals, nearly 16 times the 0.1 megapascals it takes to trigger an eruption.

    I'm no mathematician, but I'm pretty sure that 1.6 divided by 0.1 is *EXACTLY* 16.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    1. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My P5 system says 1.6 / 0.1 = 16.000739068902037589.

    2. Re:"Nearly"? by tippe · · Score: 3, Informative

      In their defence, both 1.6 and 0.1 are likely numbers that are rounded from some more precise measurements. The term "nearly" probably applied to the original measurements as opposed to the nicely rounded numbers presented in TFA. Just sayin'...

    3. Re:"Nearly"? by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm curious, do you say, "I'll be there in 58 minutes and 48 seconds," or do you say, "I'll be there in an hour?"

      I'm pretty sure both the .1 and the 1.6 megapascals is a rough estimate and not a 100% exact, set-in-stone figure.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    4. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I could remember where my Pentium 60 is buried, I would dig it out and check your math.

    5. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :) those numbers are probably rounded, and with a margin of error, I'm guessing saying nearly might be a big safer. Though good catch.

    6. Re:"Nearly"? by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      ... not a 100% exact, set-in-stone figure.

      I saw what you did there. Nice pun.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    7. Re:"Nearly"? by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder how many people here are old enough to get your joke?

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    8. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F00F !

    9. Re:"Nearly"? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      "P5"...?

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sadly not nearly enough.

      FYI
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

    11. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, it was the first in the series, but George Lucas renumbered them all for the prequels.

      Besides, my old Gateway PC clearly has "P5-75" on the front.

    12. Re:"Nearly"? by gman003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Probably more than you think.

      My high school had an Engineering Ethics class, mandatory for all students in a tech-related major. One of the case studies was the Pentium FDIV bug, and how Intel handled it. Other case studies included Tacoma Narrows, Chernobyl, and a bunch of other forgettable ones.

      I graduated HS in '09. So "my generation" may be learning about it in a history class rather than through usage, but we *are* learning about it.

      In other words, "no, YOU get off the lawn, old man!"

    13. Re:"Nearly"? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      I'm curious, do you say, "I'll be there in 58 minutes and 48 seconds," or do you say, "I'll be there in an hour?"

      I say "Google Maps tells me it's going to take 58 minutes, 48 seconds to get there - so I'll see you in an hour and a half".

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    14. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >the pressure is at 1.6 megapascals, nearly 16 times the 0.1 megapascals it takes to trigger an eruption.

      I'm no mathematician, but I'm pretty sure that 1.6 divided by 0.1 is *EXACTLY* 16.

      That's because journalists rounded the pressure to to 1.6 megapascals. It has been reported as 15.8 kg/cm^2, which is 1.549 megapascals. However 15.8 could be rounded as well and I haven't read anything about accuracy of measurements.

    15. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I am a geek, if I know for sure I'll be there in 58 minutes and 48 seconds, then I would say "58 minutes and 48 seconds".

    16. Re:"Nearly"? by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

      Obligatory xkcd link

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    17. Re:"Nearly"? by cusco · · Score: 1

      Cool. They should also teach about the U of M 'Business Ethics' class that taught its students that Ford made the correct decision in building Pintos that they knew would explode and kill their customers, since the profit that would be lost fixing the problem was larger than the award for the lawsuits that they felt they would face. They stopped using that example when a Pinto survivor took the class and was a bit, well, perturbed.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    18. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ethics? Pffft. You young wippersnappers don't know jack about ethics.

      When I was you a man tried to create a monopoly by restricting what programs could run on his OS. We tried him, found him guilty, fined the shit out of him, and prevented him from doing that.

      Lately another self-absorbed putz has tried and succeeded in creating a monopoly where only he controls what you can do with his computers. You young dolts worship him like a god and buy his shiny gadgets for twice what they're worth.

      Ethics my ass. NOW GET OFF MY LAWN!

    19. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make me feel old. You should feel bad. In Soviet Korea, old people bug you.

    20. Re:"Nearly"? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      ...Therac-25, Hyatt Regency walkway collapse...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    21. Re:"Nearly"? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      ...Three Mile Island, Centralia, the Aral Sea...

    22. Re:"Nearly"? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Weird, the Pinto was mentioned in my class as well. Of course, that chapter could be summed up as "it may save you twenty fucking cents per unit totaling to millions over the whole run, but it's still the life of a human fucking being for chrissake! Do the Right Thing, not the Profitable Thing!"

    23. Re:"Nearly"? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      In soviet korea (the north), old people are not allowed to bug the young people and tell them that life wasn't so bad a few decades ago. If they do they get dragged away and are never seen again. At least that's what the people who made it out to the relative freedom of China have to say about it.

    24. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was young at the time and am now 32...so most of your (still producing) tech workforce?

    25. Re:"Nearly"? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      I graduated in '04, and I remember swapping out a CPU because of that bug. My family's previous computer (486, with a whole 2MB of RAM!) had been strictly "do not open."

      --
      Not a sentence!
    26. Re:"Nearly"? by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      >I'm curious, do you say, "I'll be there in 58 minutes and 48 seconds," or do you say, "I'll be there in an hour?"

      Personally I'd say an hour.

      But more to the point, if someone said that an hour was nearly three times 20 minutes, their odd use of "nearly" would still catch my attention. That's just me though. :)

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    27. Re:"Nearly"? by YttriumOxide · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder how many people here are old enough to get your joke?

      At work about 6 months back, I heard a colleague humming "Daisy"; and joined in with the words:

      Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do,
      Getting hazy, can't divide 3 by 2,
      My answers I cannoy get 'em,
      They are stuck in my Pentium,
      I could be fleet, my answers sweet,
      With a workable FPU.

      What was truly awesome however was that another work colleague joined in about half-way through.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    28. Re:"Nearly"? by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah well I was in high school when it happened, so there!

      erm.. uhh...

      ermm...

      We had a similar class in my high school, obviously without the mention of the Pentium bug. One of the best classes I ever took at that level, though at my school it was strictly an elective. I still see the Tacoma Narrows video in my head every time I cross a suspension bridge.

    29. Re:"Nearly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your work place sounds pretty gay

    30. Re:"Nearly"? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I'm no mathematician, but I'm pretty sure that 1.6 divided by 0.1 is *EXACTLY* 16.

      One imagines the numbers given in the summary are rounded off. HTH.HAND.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    31. Re:"Nearly"? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      So, you failed that class then?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  6. Evacuation test run next year ??? by ACK!! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the article: "Regions that would be affected, including Kanagawa, Yamanashi and Shizuoka, plan to hold a test run of an evacuation by 2014, with a meeting of local governments covering progress of the plans and of shelter preparations slated for April 2013." It seems if the pressure is higher than the last time the damn mountain went boom that they would speed up preparations a tad. Wow, laid back disaster relief.

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
    1. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by Alworx · · Score: 1

      Resistance is futile....

    2. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Evacuating that many people would be a gargantuan civil project, its doubtful many countries could even attempt a test run. Its not like everyone can simply form an orderly line and proceed calmly to the nearest exit, transport infrastructure will be swamped, to say nothing of post-incident survivor support. I wonder will they move everyone, or just a few in trial areas.

    3. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by chromas · · Score: 4, Funny

      They don't want to risk premature evacuation.

    4. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by kelfink · · Score: 1

      Are local governments the ones you want running this, anyway? Seems like they're going to be the ones who need the help.

    5. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by magarity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its not like everyone can simply form an orderly line and proceed calmly to the nearest exit

      Apparently you've never been to Japan.

      See some of the pictures from the last earthquake and tsunami; people evacuating the subway stations are stopped and standing to one side in a neat line on the halted escalator to let emergency workers go down past.

    6. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      The point is that there isn't a "nearest exit" when you're trying to move that many people quickly. There are a series of increasingly congested exits, leading ultimately to a triage situation in terms of casualties. Maybe the Japanese will work out a plan to get everyone clear in good time, who knows. I'd be interested to see it anyway.

    7. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Hell, you'd think they would move everyone away and do something to TRIGGER an eruption, when they are ready for it.

      Probably the best way to go about it - you can do it on your terms, or you can do it when the mountain wants to do it.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      I suspect because even their science isn't that good and there's concern about mistakes given that tiny little population center called Tokyo less than 80 miles away.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    9. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Hell, you'd think they would move everyone away and do something to TRIGGER an eruption, when they are ready for it.

      Probably the best way to go about it - you can do it on your terms, or you can do it when the mountain wants to do it.

      When you figure out how to trigger and eruption, write a paper and claim your Nobel, or just use that knowledge to attempt to blackmail the world as an evil genius.

    10. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's the difference between Japan and New Orleans, or the difference between someone with experience and a clue and a horse judge with the right connections.

    11. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Oh is it, really. Can you show me on a map where the road capable of moving a hundred thousand people in the space of five minutes across a hundred kilometers is so. And even if you build that I hope you've got the universe's biggest carp park sitting at the other end. Or are you expecting a schoolgirl in a mecha to save the day here. Infrastructure is designed to only take x amount of people at a time, it won't take any more.

      I didn't say they "won't", I said they "can't".

    12. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      !!!

    13. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, in Japan everyone stands on one side of the escalator and the other side is used for people walking on the escalator. What's interesting is that the Tokyo area you stand on a certain side, but in Kyoto you stand on the other side.

    14. Re:Evacuation test run next year ??? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Large enough explosives wouldn't do the job? Something like a bunker buster might well trigger a fault movement, and may cause enough disruption to the rock to trigger a magma chamber breach?

      Eg, I'm sure you could drill down to a point, and plant a suitable device. No need to just deploy an existing munition like my example bunker buster.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  7. In Olde English units by thatseattleguy · · Score: 0

    1.6 MPa = 232 psi (pounds/sq in). High, sure, but within the level you can contain in a soda pop bottle.

    1. Re:In Olde English units by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Fuji is just one large soda bottle then?

      Keep the mentos away from it.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    2. Re:In Olde English units by meekg · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pressure vessels get increasingly difficult to build as their size grows.

      When a 150 PSI compressor tank goes (and they do, even though they are made out of steel, a lot thicker than a soda pop can) they take away the room with them.

      This pressure vessel is probably miles on a side, and the walls don't have good tensile strength - it's just gravity that's holding it down.

      In short converting it to Olde English units doesn't help.

    3. Re:In Olde English units by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2

      How exactly do they measure the magma pressure?

      I looked through this whole page on volcano monitoring techniques, and it never mentions monitoring the pressure.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    4. Re:In Olde English units by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      1.6 MPa = 232 psi (pounds/sq in). High, sure, but within the level you can contain in a soda pop bottle

      Would this explain the Chinese military's program to develop a really big Mentos?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    5. Re:In Olde English units by PIBM · · Score: 2

      Last I had looked it up, they measured height variation, and with an estimation of the size of the magma vessel and the expected overhead mound of rock/dirt they would evaluate what kind of pressure was required to obtain the difference.

    6. Re:In Olde English units by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

      16 atmospheres is a better way of putting the entire discussion. One does have to wonder if the 0.1 MPa = 1 atmosphere (more or less) as an eruption threshold is relative to atmospheric pressure or above it. I'd be a bit surprised to find any pressures below it. It's also the (surplus) pressure at the bottom of 160 meters of water. That's a lot to contain if an earthquake or godzilla creates a defect in the dome that leads to 1 atmosphere air.

      But hey, if the historical record teaches us anything, it is that volcanoes happen, sometimes rather explosively.

      rgb

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    7. Re:In Olde English units by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

      Yes, they good boom very nicely

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bU-I2ZiML0

    8. Re:In Olde English units by Teun · · Score: 1
      You consider this a high pressure, as someone working in an industry that drills holes in the ground I find it very, very low, as someone else already stated this just 16 times atmospheric or the pressure at 160 m. (525 ft.) water depth or equivalent to some 65 m. (200ft.) of granite.
      Now pressure itself doesn't mean squat until you multiply it with a surface area and get a force.
      But again it is rather meaningless until you compare it with what is containing it, in this case it will be the earth surface, possibly in the shape of the volcanic cone. That cone is 3,776 m (12,388 ft) high and dozens of km / mi wide, the magma chamber with a volume of about 1400 km3 (335 cu mi) lies at a depth of around 56 km. (35 mi.)

      So what meaning does this puny 1.6 megapascal have compared to the ~14,000 bar (200,000 psi) in the magma chamber???

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    9. Re:In Olde English units by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Can't they measure seismic as well? The velocity a wave travels through would be effected by the medium's pressure, no?

      There are tons of earthquakes going on all the time that seismometers can pick up. Compare what others receive vs what those that would be occluded by the magma chamber and you might be able to deduce something? (especially in comparison to normal behavior)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:In Olde English units by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      It takes just 100 kPa to trigger an eruption-- that's just under 1 atmosphere (101.325 kPa). Talk about a hair-trigger!

    11. Re:In Olde English units by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Force = Pressure times Area

    12. Re:In Olde English units by PIBM · · Score: 1

      I guess they could, as I had read they used the wave travel speed to estimate the size of the chamber, since it would propagate differently in the magma vs the rocks around. It would definitely be an interesting read if a very knowledgable guy/girl could post about it ;)

  8. Better rescue the coke machine by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    Or leave it there for science. If Fuji-san erupts and buries the park on top in lava and/or ash, how long will the coke inside the cans stay fresh? We could dig it out a hundred years from now to check on the carbonation levels.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Better rescue the coke machine by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had a can of Mellow Yellow that didn't get a pull tab installed, so I kept it as an conversation piece. It got left on it's side for a few years, and the contents ate through the aluminum lid. I think the sides of the can were coated, but not the top. Most can machines keep their cans on the side, so they won't last more than a decade or so if not refridgerated.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    2. Re:Better rescue the coke machine by TheRedSeven · · Score: 5, Informative

      True. Most metal cans (the kind used for packaging, anyway) are coated with a layer of plastic to prevent interaction with the Al/Sn in the metal of the substrate itself. Particularly with acidic contents (tomatoes are the ones that come most readily to mind.) Can *ends* are manufactured separately and joined to the can bodies themselves after filling. Some can ends are coated with plastic over the majority of the surface, but others have perforations and other 'gaps' that allow for proper sealing/seaming between the can and the can end, and for tabs to break through, etc. Any place the plastic coating is missing and an acidic ingredient can come into contact with the metal, corrosion can occur (though slowly).

      Source: I'm a market researcher specializing in food/beverage packaging in the US.

    3. Re:Better rescue the coke machine by guttentag · · Score: 1
      Coke machines are essential in times of national emergency. Haven't you ever seen Dr. Strangelove?

      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Colonel... that Coca-Cola machine. I want you to shoot the lock off it. There may be some change in there.
      Colonel "Bat" Guano: That's private property.
      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Colonel! Can you possibly imagine what is going to happen to you, your frame, outlook, way of life, and everything, when they learn that you have obstructed a telephone call to the President of the United States? Can you imagine? Shoot it off! Shoot! With a gun! That's what the bullets are for, you twit!
      Colonel "Bat" Guano: Okay. I'm gonna get your money for ya. But if you don't get the President of the United States on that phone, you know what's gonna happen to you?
      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: What?
      Colonel "Bat" Guano: You're gonna have to answer to the Coca-Cola company.

    4. Re:Better rescue the coke machine by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Better rescue the coke machine by LaughingRadish · · Score: 1

      A professor of mine worked as an undergrad at a cannery. The boss had an old can of something on his desk as a momento from the previous boss. It was at least fifty years old. One day the can exploded, spraying the office and everyone inside with putrid half-century-old food.

    6. Re:Better rescue the coke machine by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Those plastic coatings for metal cans are also the biggest remaining source of BPA exposure, if I remember correctly.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Better rescue the coke machine by cykros · · Score: 1

      Having drank Coke that was at least a few years old (but definitely no more than 10 at the very most), and felt the ensuing gastrointestinal holocaust, I will assure you that it will stay fresh for far less time than you seem to be assuming. God...I think that just triggered a PTSD flashback response...

    8. Re:Better rescue the coke machine by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      Related to both your post and the submission:

      I live in Japan. I can see Mt. Fuji from my office. I just got home yesterday from a vacation to Kyushuu (which also has some nice volcanoes, just not as iconic as Fuji). At one of the hotels we stayed at, there was a sign that indicated where the vending machines could be located, and also where the "Emergency Vending Machine" could be located. There were two emergency vending machines, and one was full of beer.

      Note: the Japanese on the sign clarified the intent, which was that the emergency vending machines had a backup power supply and would remain operational in an emergency if main power was lost. The english did not mention this at all, so it was quite humorous for me.

      I think the other was a "coke" vending machine, though that tends to mean something completely different here.

    9. Re:Better rescue the coke machine by TheRedSeven · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that they're the biggest source of BPA exposure--there's LOTS of BPA in our every day environment, from heat-printed receipts to dental sealants to toilet paper. See this article for details.

      But yeah, as far as food/beverage packaging is concerned, a lot of companies did away with BPA-infused plastic bottles when the 'scare' came through back in 2009/2010. But the metal can manufacturers stayed under the radar and so had very little reason to do away with the BPA in their products.

      IIRC, even the SIGG (and similarly-styled) aluminum water bottles had BPA linings even after Nalgene recalled all their water bottles made with BPA. At the same time, people were buying SIGG instead of Nalgene in an ironically misguided attempt to avoid BPA.

  9. would a buncha drillbots work?? by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    could they maybe drill a set of holes and
    1 steer the lava to someplace NOT populated
    2 prevent the lava camber from going full bore BOOM

    when using Po^HMnt Fuji for your scam always set your clock for Volcano Day

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    1. Re:would a buncha drillbots work?? by hawguy · · Score: 2

      could they maybe drill a set of holes and
      1 steer the lava to someplace NOT populated
      2 prevent the lava camber from going full bore BOOM

      when using Po^HMnt Fuji for your scam always set your clock for Volcano Day

      I say we send Bruce Willis and his team of oil roughnecks to drill the holes and relieve the pressure. He saved the planet once, he may as well do it again.

    2. Re:would a buncha drillbots work?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Only if the drillbots are equipped with drilldos.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:would a buncha drillbots work?? by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2

      According to this http://maps.google.ca/maps?oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&q=mount+fuji+map&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Mt+Fuji&gl=ca&t=p&ll=35.241133,138.952332&spn=1.323484,2.425232&z=9&vpsrc=6

      They should be able to divert it to the water and make Japan bigger.

      I don't know if this has ever been done before.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    4. Re:would a buncha drillbots work?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No can do, dude-- Michael Clarke duncan just died. That means earth is screwed.

    5. Re:would a buncha drillbots work?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for those darn cities that are along the water in the paths that they would take.

    6. Re:would a buncha drillbots work?? by triffid_98 · · Score: 2

      Mt. Fuji lava is not prone to flowing nicely. It just increases in pressure until it's time to blow it's top and spew ash everywhere.

      I would expect something like this to work well in places like Hawaii, but instead they opted to divert building houses to places where the lava doesn't flow.

    7. Re:would a buncha drillbots work?? by Isara · · Score: 1

      to do that, wouldn't you need a drill that was large enough to relieve the pressure, and made of a material that could withstand magma temperatures, AND a pipe to corral the lava, AND hope that the process of drilling doesn't cause additional stress points in the mountain that could blow?

      --
      BOOP!
    8. Re:would a buncha drillbots work?? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      the idea is to use drillbots and have them drill the hole(s) in a safe direction

      so the bot hits the magma chamber gets roasted and the magma shoots out in a safe direction.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    9. Re:would a buncha drillbots work?? by Isara · · Score: 1

      a drilled chamber in rock wouldn't be smooth. The magma would find points of weakness in the hole and blow out the side of the mountain. Assuming it didn't cool before it hit the outside

      --
      BOOP!
  10. WTF is a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...tenterhook?

    1. Re:WTF is a... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      There is an amazing new thing out there called an online dictionary. Perhaps you might consider using one?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:WTF is a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Are you twelve? Or just never read anything?

    3. Re:WTF is a... by margeman2k3 · · Score: 2

      They're hooks used in a device called a tenter.

    4. Re:WTF is a... by Daetrin · · Score: 2

      It's possible they're just confused because a number of people seem to mispronounce it as "tenderhooks".

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    5. Re:WTF is a... by Lashat · · Score: 2

      I love looking up an mid-18th century phrase so I can understand a 21st century article about an active stratovolcano that last erupted at the beginning of that18th century.

      You didn't know what a tenterhook was either unless you were/are a historic actor fuller specialist or a Chris Mars fan. (A what who when?)

      --
      For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
    6. Re:WTF is a... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Heh, I was wondering if anybody was going to bring up the Chris Mars connection to tenterhooks. It was the first thing that sprang to my mind, but I am a huge Replacements fan.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:WTF is a... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      A bent over nail used to hang things, original cloth.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    8. Re:WTF is a... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      not to hand thing from, to prevent cloth drying on a tenter from shrinking.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    Any vulcanologist around that can explain why we can't relieve the pressure in some way.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not a slashdot... More kids here than actual professionals.

    2. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IANAV, but I would guess that a 30cm bore hole wouldn't have much of an effect on a magma chamber that is miles wide.

    3. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to, but Bruce Willis already died in space saving the world from that asteroid.

    4. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drilling likely cause it to go boom. it's like opening a soda can... a tiny hole makes the foam go all over...

    5. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      They want to, but Bruce Willis already died in space saving the world from that asteroid.

      So who inherits his iTunes collection?

    6. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They want to, but Bruce Willis already died in space saving the world from that asteroid.

      So who inherits his iTunes collection?

      Nobody, you can't own an iTunes collection. Ba-da-bing!

      Man, that joke is nowhere near as funny as "Where do they bury the survivors?"

    7. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Any vulcanologist around that can explain why we can't relieve the pressure in some way.

      My god man drilling holes in the vulcanoe is not the answer. We're dealing with medievalism here.

    8. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Hillgiant · · Score: 2

      There would also be the difficulty of keeping the hole from plugging as the magma cooled on its way to the surface. Or what to even drill the hole with... I'm not aware of any drilling equipment that can reliably drill into liquid rock.

      Lastly, even if you do solve the above problems; there is a word for venting magma to atmosphere: Volcano.

      --
      -
    9. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      I guess it would depend on the temperature/pressure/bore hole material. Would some magma burp up, cool, and reseal the hole after destroying the drill bit, or would it blow to the surface and destroy the drilling rig, and continue flowing for days or weeks? Perhaps you could drill almost to the magna, then use an explosive to break the seal.

      If a flow could be established, the pressure would eventually go down, and the hole would tend to melt itself bigger. That might cause earthquakes in itself.

      Crazy plan #2, Drill a hole not to the existing magma, but to intersect with the path it would take to the surface. Then when it's about to blow, it would come out your hole in a more controlled manner.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    10. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      Yeah, everyone knows the proper way to relieve pressure is to sacrifice a virgin.

    11. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      IANAV

      I am not a volcano?

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    12. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The idea is that you need to vent the magma in a slow, controlled way, rather than letting the pressure build up until it explodes. Direct the magma (now "lava" after it's out of the ground) into the sea.

    13. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Some small earthquakes caused by a pressure-relief hole would be far preferable to a giant volcanic eruption. It'd also be best if some kind of path for the lava were built to direct it someplace safe, like into the sea.

    14. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of any drilling equipment that can reliably drill into liquid rock.

      Drilling equipment? They can get one of those big bombs being reserved for Iran.. They go through solid rock. Imagine... using evil technology for something good.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    15. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apt username. IANA volcanologist is, i believe, the more-correct answer.

    16. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and as the GP was explaining, that is a fucking monumental engineering challenge.

      The basic idea is "kid playing with a sand-castle" obvious, but making it happen (and not just taking a metaphorical pin to this magma-filled balloon) on the other hand is hard (likely impossible baring technological advances).

    17. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Hillgiant · · Score: 2

      As far as I am aware, even the nuclear bunker busters can only go a couple hundred feet deep (~50m). The Fuji magma chamber is about 56km below the surface.

      So, hey. Nobody is going to mind if we set off about a thousand nukes, will they?

      --
      -
    18. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      vulcanologist.

    19. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Well, you could nail the side with a bunker-buster or something and just blow it open. Less controlled, but more controlled then just letting it do it when/where it wants.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    20. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I love how no one wants to bother to do anything about these dangerous volcanoes because "it's too hard!!!", so they'd rather just sit around and let them erupt and kill thousands or even millions of people.

    21. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vulvalogist, considering the size of the hole they are mentioning

    22. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your second link is the same as your first.

    23. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

      IANAV but like everyone else on /. I sometimes indulge in armchair quarterbacking... The simple answer is that Japanese science and engineering--which is incomparable on the subjects of seismology and volcanology--isn't up to the task. Japanese scientists suspect that there are at least two magma chambers. A deeper one at around 20km and a shallower one around 8 or 9km. They're still talking about suspicions of what the magma system looks like. Even if you could overcome the engineering hurdles of drilling a hole into the magma system that doesn't seal itself back up right away or worse be faced with the opposite problem and piercing the system would cause it to pop like a balloon you still need to know where to drill. That answer is probably not magma chamber(s) itself anyway.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    24. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They do.
        I'm a vulcanologist , and from what I have learned, Vulcans release pressure every 7 years.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    25. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Just blow a hole in it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    26. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but where are we going to find a virgin around h... oh, wait.

    27. Re:Drill a hole, relieve the pressure? by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      I'm not a vulcanologist but here's what I think. Imagine a balloon and trying to release the pressure by poking a hole. 16MPa with a 1 square meter hole is nearly 18000 tons of force. I would think the hole would tear apart and basically be an eruption. If it didn't tear open, it'd still release all the gasses and the area would have to be evacuated.

  12. Not a second to lose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warn Koji to get Mazinger ready...

  13. What triggers an eruption? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    The new readings, taken by the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, reveal that the pressure is at 1.6 megapascals, nearly 16 times the 0.1 megapascals it takes to trigger an eruption

    If that's what it takes to trigger an eruption, why didn't it happen 1.5 megapascals ago?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:What triggers an eruption? by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Because, according to TFS:

      While the rising pressure within the magma chamber is of concern, it is but one factor among many that lead to eruptions.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    2. Re:What triggers an eruption? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The new readings, taken by the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, reveal that the pressure is at 1.6 megapascals, nearly 16 times the 0.1 megapascals it takes to trigger an eruption

      If that's what it takes to trigger an eruption, why didn't it happen 1.5 megapascals ago?

      Probably the same reason why even though a cigarette is enough to trigger a gasoline explosion, people still manage to smoke while fueling their cars without blowing themselves up - a cigarette is sufficient to set it off, but it takes a combination of factors to make it happen.

    3. Re:What triggers an eruption? by geek · · Score: 1

      Cigarettes won't set off gasoline. You need an open flame. A cigarette will just get put out when dipped in liquid fuel.

    4. Re:What triggers an eruption? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Reference?

      While being drawn, a cigarette has a temperature of around 400 - 500 degC, while the auto ignition temperature of gasoline is 280 degC.

      You may be able to throw a lit cigarette in a pool of gasoline and extinguish the cigarette, but I woudn't want to bend down and tie my shoe with my mouth near the gas filler nozzle with gasoline vapor escaping from my gas tank (which admittedly with modern sealed tanks and vapor recovery nozzles is minimal, but I still wouldn't bet my life on it).

      http://wandererh.hubpages.com/hub/Can-The-Tip-Of-A-Lit-Cigarette-Butt-Ignite-Gasoline

      Even those bastions of science, the Mythbusters, say it's partially plausible: http://mythbustersresults.com/special7

      Granted, there's a limited set of conditions where a cigarette could ignite gasoline vapors, but that was my point - a cigarette canignite gasoline, but other conditions have to be just right to make it happen.

    5. Re:What triggers an eruption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A cigarette won't set off liquid gasoline. Gasoline, when a vapor, can certainly be set off by a cigarette (or electrical spark). Heck, if the mix between air and gasoline vapor is correct the mixture can be set off by just heat and pressure.

    6. Re:What triggers an eruption? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Cigarettes won't set off gasoline. You need an open flame. A cigarette will just get put out when dipped in liquid fuel.

      I'm so glad you are not working with flammable materials anywhere near me. Liquid gasoline, yes. Gasoline *vapors*, on the other hand, can go off on just a spark or lit cigarette if conditions are right. Most of the time, the vapors won't be thick enough, particularly if you handle the gasoline properly (but somebody smoking near gasoline *already* isn't handling it properly; how can he be trusted to do anything else right?)--but it can happen. My mother didn't raise me to be a statistic.

    7. Re:What triggers an eruption? by codepigeon · · Score: 1

      The conditions have to be JUST right. Lighting a cigarette around gasoline vapors will ignite, but a lit cigarette needs very specific circumstances.

      http://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae1.cfm

    8. Re:What triggers an eruption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Most of the time, the vapors won't be thick enough, particularly if you handle the gasoline properly (but somebody smoking near gasoline *already* isn't
      > handling it properly

      But you just explained why the conditions are generally not right for a cig to light off gas vapors....

      so what are you basing the idea that smoking around gasoline is not handling it properly, after acknowledging that its a combination of factors, all of which are easily controlled?

    9. Re:What triggers an eruption? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      > Most of the time, the vapors won't be thick enough, particularly if you handle the gasoline properly (but somebody smoking near gasoline *already* isn't
      > handling it properly

      But you just explained why the conditions are generally not right for a cig to light off gas vapors....

      so what are you basing the idea that smoking around gasoline is not handling it properly, after acknowledging that its a combination of factors, all of which are easily controlled?

      Well no, he said that "most" of the time the gasoline won't ignite. Are you willing to bet your life on "most"?

      Not smoking is pretty much at the top of the list of things not to do around gasoline... if there's one other failure then you could easily end up with conditions where the gasoline could ignite.

      Factors are never controlled, instead, risks are mitigated by reducing the chance that there will an environment that allows ignition. For example, you regularly inspect hoses and couplers to prevent failure (well except *you* don't, the 17 year old kid at the gas station does it and checks it off on a checklist, but how carefully did he look?), but there's still that one time out of a thousand when something fails and you end up with a fuel spill and when that happens you don't want to have a cigarette in your mouth at the time. Maybe it's not even your fault, maybe the guy next to you accidentally squeezes the trigger when he swings the nozzle over to his tank and he sprays you down with gasoline. And now your shirt soaked in gasoline with the cigarette dangling in your mouth a few inches away will give you lots of gasoline vapor to ignite.

    10. Re:What triggers an eruption? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with an open flame. It is a race condition between the fuel reaching combustion temperatures before the cigarette has been cooled to below same. Assuming you can evacuate ALL vapor such that the liquid fuel is permitted to cool the lit cigarette below combustion temperatures before itself reaching combustion temperatures sure. But from a practical standpoint that's impossible.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    11. Re:What triggers an eruption? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      desial, yes, Gas? no.

      There are videos of cigarettes causing gas to catch on fire on you tube.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:What triggers an eruption? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      heat air and gas vapor.

      So 'just right' is actual very common.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:What triggers an eruption? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's like the situation of dunking your hand in liquid nitrogen. Apparently if you do it quickly enough you won't get burnt (I've been splashed a few times wiht no burns so that makes sense), don't do it quickly enough and there are severe consequences. In other words - a fucking stupid thing to do. A smouldering item sitting in the vapour coming off the surface of a pool of "gasolene" is more likely to lead to a fire than not given enough time.
      I've seen a fire put out by dunking the burning item into a vat of kerosene (sodium fire), but it was done very quickly. Doing it the other way by spraying kerosene over it is probably just as insane as throwing water into concentrated acid.

  14. Possible Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't we throw more grant money at it? They more we can learn about volcanoes, the more we understand. We can beat this thing.

  15. Happened ~300 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last time Mt. Fuji erupted in 1707, it rained ash as far as Tokyo (Edo) and up to 1m deep over much of the farm land of what is now Kanagawa and Shizuoka. This would be very, very bad... possibly an order of magnitude worse than the tsunami last year.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historic_eruptions_of_Mount_Fuji

  16. Very helpful, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Having it expressed in units familiar to us Yanks is quite useful. Putting it in psi let me see right away that it's about 16 times atmospheric pressure (which I know to be ~14 psi, so x 16 = 224). Hmmmmm, 16x, 16x...where I have seen that number before? Oh, yea - in the summary, where it says, "16 times what it takes to trigger an eruption".

    So after seeing that, it's clear that all the article's breathlessly informative science tells us that what it takes to trigger an eruption is to have pressure inside the volcano is....wait for it....HIGHER THAN THE PRESSURE OUTSIDE. Wow. We couldn't have figured that one out ourselves.

    So, yes, the guy posting the Olde English units not only gave me a better understanding of the forces, it helped me understand the article was more than a little sensationalistic. Which to me is damn helpful.

    1. Re:Very helpful, actually by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Normal atmospheric pressure is about 100kPa, so that was clear to many of us anyway.

      (For some reason they use millibars on the British weather forecasts (here), which is metric but not SI. 1000millibars === 100kPa. The weather today is 1023mb)

    2. Re:Very helpful, actually by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Well, the brits do all sorts of weird things. They measure weight in stone, talk about distance in miles, but they talk about height in meters.

    3. Re:Very helpful, actually by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Jumped in before I could comment that 16 bar (16*10^5 Pa) is indeed around 16 times 1 bar (near as makes no difference to 1 atm.)

    4. Re:Very helpful, actually by adonoman · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's no worse than in Canada where we measure height in feet/inches, distance in KM, people's weight in lbs, deli meat in grams, liquid in liters, dry baking ingredients in cups, indoor temperatures in F, outdoor temperatures in C...

    5. Re:Very helpful, actually by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

      Any nation whose entire system of weights and measures is fundamentally based on the weight and size of the barleycorn can't be all bad. One inch is three barleycorns, one grain is the weight of one barleycorn, and of course all of the volume measurements are related to the mouthful, the volume of barley-brewed beer or whiskey a man can reasonably consume in one gulp. Let's all drink to that!

      rgb

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    6. Re:Very helpful, actually by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      What do you guys do about penis length? I always felt kinda sorry for you...

      --
      C|N>K
    7. Re:Very helpful, actually by Tapewolf · · Score: 1

      Well, the brits do all sorts of weird things. They measure weight in stone, talk about distance in miles, but they talk about height in meters.

      Officially we use grams and kilograms and that's what's taught in school, at least as far back as the '80s. Petrol and most other liquids are sold in litres or millilitres. However we do still use miles, MPH and MPG when talking about distances.

    8. Re:Very helpful, actually by anethema · · Score: 1

      Inches no question.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    9. Re:Very helpful, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Megafurlongs... :P

  17. Earth's Cure? by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1, Troll

    I think this is Mother Earth's way to tell all AGW'ers that, "Hey I can fucking take care of myself."

    Seriously, though, I wonder how much ash this will put in the air and how much it will cool the Earth's warming, if at all? This seems like it could be a major ELE, or it could be a major dud.

    1. Re:Earth's Cure? by cusco · · Score: 1

      The ash cloud (assuming the eruption is the size of previous ones) would cool the Earth temporarily by reflecting more sunlight. Ash falls out of the sky in less than a year though, while the CO2 the volcano also belches out hangs around for about a century. All in all, a net loss for the biosphere.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  18. Obvious connection by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1
    I was watching a documentary about Mt St Hellens and they mentioned that due to the shape of the mountain (pre-incident) it was called "The Mt Fuji of North America". - They went on to describe why the shape of the mountain contributed to the particular way in which St Hellens went.

    Ever since then, I was wondering why Japanese scientist weren't worried about Fuji. - Now I know: They ARE worried.

    --
    ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
    1. Re:Obvious connection by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they've always been worried. Mt. Fuji has been part of Japanese culture for centuries. There is not one single equivalent of national focus in the US. I doubt if its been ignored. Especially since there's been 16 eruptions in recorded history.

      But you're not Japanese, so you wouldn't know about their work, just as much as i think the typical Japanese wouldn't know much about San Andreas fault prep here.

  19. how do they know by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    What the pressure levels were in 1707?

    Inferred? Or some renaissance japanese scientist at work?

    Either way, doesnt sound like a reliable value

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:how do they know by ppanon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They probably figured it out based on the pattern and quantity of ejecta. i.e. to launch boulder of this size this distance and to cover this area with this much ash then, assuming the lava reservoir was roughly the same size as it, the pressure needed to be X.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    2. Re:how do they know by ppanon · · Score: 1

      ...was roughly the same size as today,...

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    3. Re:how do they know by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      assuming rocks were the same size as today. i believe rocks grow an inch in diameter every year, due to the sun's effects on the rate of radioactive decay

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:how do they know by geekoid · · Score: 1

      man doesn't know the science, claims it can't be true. News at 11..on Fox.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:how do they know by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Apparently that can be worked out from the amount of lava from the previous eruption and the conditions (fluidity of lava etc) known now. It's along the lines of there being X amount of lava that ran out so the pressure must have been Y.

    6. Re:how do they know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope not. My driveway is "paved" with loose small pebbles, each less than an inch in diameter and exposed to the elements 24h/365d. If they were all to grow an inch in diameter my driveway would look like the rocky mountains in 3 years.

    7. Re:how do they know by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      don't worry, on december 21st everyone can stop worrying about everything

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  20. Help on the way by jasper160 · · Score: 2

    Godzilla!

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished.
  21. Horrible News for the Locals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I climbed Mt. Fuji about 4 years ago and all I can think about is whats going to happen to all the people who make a living off the mountain? When you get to the top there is actually a small village on top with shops and homemade food for the people who make it, even at the bottom theres tons of base areas for people to stock up on supplies before the trek. Even along the way there are rest stops and marker points with people to provide services if needed and to sell food. Its a shame to think that all the people located anywhere near that area could possibly lose their entire way of life.

    1. Re:Horrible News for the Locals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its a shame to think that all the people located anywhere near that area could possibly lose their entire way of life.

      Not to mention their lives. Period.

      Of course those pyroclastic flows have a way of cramping one's style.

  22. Rainier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes me wonder about Mt. Rainier.

    Tokyo and Seattle are about the same distance from their respective Lords Protectorate.

    1. Re:Rainier by BigT · · Score: 1

      I think Seattle is far enough away to just get ash fall. Tacoma, Puyallup, and Sumner on the other hand, are directly downstream and are going to get BURIED by the lahars coming off the mountain. A few small towns and a lot of recreational area are going to get hammered by the pyroclastic flows.

      --
      Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
    2. Re:Rainier by cusco · · Score: 1

      The reason why Renton is so flat is because the last time Rainier erupted (about 10,000 years ago) the mud slide from the melted glacier reached all the way to the south end of Lake Washington. When a wall of steaming mud hits a lake at 90 miles an hour I'm not sure that even the Gates house is high enough up the hillside to keep from getting wiped off the map.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  23. populated area by schlachter · · Score: 1

    I hiked around Mt Fuji in 2009. It's a beautiful area surrounded by a nice town and tons of hotels and tourist areas. It's pretty scary that it could pop at any moment. There will be lots of lost life and property if it erupts big.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  24. Social Impact of an Eruption of Mount Fuji by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 2

    Here is an excerpt from an article called "Social Impact of an Eruption of Mount Fuji"
    (www.hiroi.iii.u-tokyo.ac.jp/index-katudo-kyodo-kenkyu-hujisan-shakaiteki-eikyo-english.pdf)

    "The current study focuses only on possible damage from ashfall in an eruption of Mt Fuji
    that is comparable to that in the Hoei Eruption. If there are other volcanic disasters such
    as landslides, lava flow and pyroclastic flow, the damage will be even greater. The
    important message sent out by this study is that even ashfall alone can cause severe
    damage: the social and economic impact will likely be felt by the entire nation, not just
    restricted to a local area around the mountain.
    The following topics will be important from a policy science perspective:
    1) socioeconomic impact of interruptions to transportation and logistics including the
    expressways (Chuo, Tomei, Metropolitan), bullet trains, metropolitan and other train
    networks, and domestic as well as international air services;
    2) verification of the primary and secondary types of damage postulated by this study;
    3) closer study of damage to the manufacturing industry caused by the uncertainty
    perceived by suppliers and customers and damage to the tourism industry due to
    cancellations by consumers; and,
    4) study of ash removal methods (based on experiences in past ashfalls) and their
    feasibility.
    The present paper is an interim report of the work to create an eruption scenario based on
    the interview-based surveys. It is our plan to conduct questionnaire studies of
    businesses, survey researches, interviews of local agencies in the areas of past ashfalls,
    and expert surveys in disaster-related fields. The scenario will be refined through
    critiques and discussions as a re sult of these further works.
    As far as the specific effects and implications of ashfall are concerned, the current study
    has based itself on interviews with disaster-prevention practitioners in companies,
    different levels of governments, and lifeline services. The following effects are left for
    future study:
    - implications on sewage-system overflow, flooding of rivers (problems in
    drainage when ashfall is followed by rain );
    - estimated volume of ashfall that will settle on riverbeds (estimating the
    probability of flooding) ;
    - effects of volcanic ash on wireless communications and radio waves;
    - effects of volcanic ash on water quality;
    - effects of volcanic ash on outdoor precision equipment and automobiles
    and other machinery;
    - effects of volcanic ash on boilers and combustion systems (since ash
    affects airplane engines); and,
    - indoor pollution by volcanic ash and its effects on precision equipment
    indoors.
    It is, strictly speaking, important to conduct empirical studies in engineering and physical
    science on these topics, but apparently not too much has been done in this area. When
    more is known about these topics, the present scenario of ashfall damage equivalent to
    that in the Hoei Eruption could be further refined."

  25. This answers the Microsoft interview question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait for Mt. Fuji to move itself.

  26. Start Drilling by ironicsky · · Score: 1

    This may sound very ignorant, but when something is pressurized, can't you just open it up and release the pressure? Grab some remote control drilling rigs, plop it down in the crater and let it get to work, release the pressure slowly so that it doesn't come out with a bang at random. This way too, they can tell the surrounding area that they may have to evacuate during the drilling process, just in case, and potentially save lives instead of having a random boom?

    1. Re:Start Drilling by Teun · · Score: 2
      You seem to lack a grasp of the size of this volcano.

      The deepest holes man has drilled were around 12 km. or 40,000 ft. and of a tiny diameter. Drilling near hot magma is going to melt the bit before it gets anywhere near puncturing the wall of rock containing it.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  27. That's what she said by trevc · · Score: 0

    Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject!)

  28. 8th Angel by Saija · · Score: 1

    Quick somebody call Shinji, we might be facing Sandalphon

    --
    Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
  29. World Economic damage. by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Being cold and analytical here about primary effects (I know there would be tremendous deaths and human suffering) if it happened within the next year or so, this would probably put the world into a worldwide recession or depression. The American economy is recovering, but very weakly. Europe is on the skids, and China is slowing fast. If Japan's economy was broken for any extended length of time, it would easily push us over the brink into a worldwide skid, causing tremendous secondary human suffering all around the world.

    Big news for everyone.

  30. don't go to Japan by swschrad · · Score: 1

    wait for Japan to come to you.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:don't go to Japan by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's even worse.

  31. that's P4.987435459273 to you, sir. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    computers never lie. but "idle time" is actually spent figuring how close they can come and still not be lying.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  32. MegaPascals? by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Program Fuji;

    var pressure : longint;

    function Get_Pressure : longint;
    Begin;
        Get_Pressure := 1700000
    End;

    Procedure Blow;
        Writeln("boom");
    End;

    Begin
        pressure := Get_Pressure;
        if pressure > 1600000 Then
            Blow;
    End.

    (* been around 20+ years since I last used Pascal. Does this even compile? *)

  33. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    ...my COCK also is about to erupt....IN YOUR MOM!!!

  34. WWF by hammarlund · · Score: 1

    When I glanced at the headline, I thought it said "Mr. Fuji may be close to erupting", and thought we better call Vince McMahon.

  35. It's not lava... by Passman · · Score: 1

    Sounds about right. Should pop around the end of December.

    Say hi to Ryumyo for me.

    --
    Minne-snow-da: Winter is comming...
  36. Attention all hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attention all hands: abandon island!

    What are they still doing there, trying to prove a point?!? Do they still think the Kamikaze, the divine wind will protect them, and blow the lava, poisonous smoke and corrosive, choking ash away from them and towards China instead? Did the lessons of Fukushima and Godzilla teach them nothing?

  37. And dont forget Jellystone!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops!

    Yellowstone - the magma some under there is causing a lot of worried head-scratching too.

    All we need is for a massive tectonic event to set both that and Mt Fuji off, and let San Andreas go too, and perhaps the "Great Collapsing Hrung" in the Canaries might be persuaded to swamp littoral North Atlantic regions too...

    Are there any more major geological disaster points near their tripping points?

    ScaredyCats would like to know!!!

  38. Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With any luck, the Sony headquarters will be melted away. Hopefully on the week-end, when nobody's at work*.

    * who am I kidding. They're Japanese, they're always at work.

  39. Re:I bet you're really short. by Rei · · Score: 1

    182cm / 6'0", but thanks for playing.

    --
    Alanis, you oughta know: she's older than you, more mature than you, and can show some restraint in a theater
  40. Stupid stupid rat creature typo by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Pressure over Area or divided by area

  41. Unrealistic constraints by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I suggest a little less confusion between fantasy and reality to avoid childish expectations of "moving a hundred thousand people in the space of five minutes across a hundred kilometers". If modern knowledge had been applied to Krakatoa there would have been close to a month of warning before the main eruption. Rabaul was successfully evacuated a few years ago when there was high threat of eruption. Worldwide there are plenty of evacuations when disasters happen, and the common thread when it works is that the people organising it have been through the sort of exercise we are discussing here, even if it's scaled down, they still give it a try and get the bugs out with practice.
    Once again, the difference between childishness (horse judge with no plan or your "too hard" answer inspired by movies) or somebody that has thought about the situation for at least a couple of minutes (I'm sure they've got plenty of experts in civil defence).

    1. Re:Unrealistic constraints by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      I suggest a little less confusion between fantasy and reality to avoid childish expectations of "moving a hundred thousand people in the space of five minutes across a hundred kilometers". If modern knowledge had been applied to Krakatoa there would have been close to a month of warning before the main eruption.

      Good thing they saw that tsunami coming eh. And that modern knowledge was applied to the nuclear reactor safety features. Believe it or not, nature doesn't work to a schedule, and can quite often do things unexpectedly.

      Once again, the difference between childishness (horse judge with no plan or your "too hard" answer inspired by movies) or somebody that has thought about the situation for at least a couple of minutes (I'm sure they've got plenty of experts in civil defence).

      And those experts are taking minimum a year to prepare a plan, which should be a good indication of how non trivial it is. To be honest I've no idea what your point is here, New Orleans was a shambles, Fuji will be very difficult to prepare for.

      Anyway I fear we may be talking at cross purposes here, having mutually taken up the wrong end of the stick. :-D

    2. Re:Unrealistic constraints by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about a difference between people taking things seriously by planning and testing, and a sinecure for an old drinking buddy that just let things slide - which should have been entirely obvious from my post. From the other side of the world I watched the events in New Orleans unfold in horror before it even hit, just like I'm sure people in Florida and other places subject to Hurricanes/Typhoons/Cyclones did. They had many days of warning just as tends to happen with volcanic events (like the two I listed above) - so your "nature doesn't work to a schedule" so it's all tooooo haaaard is just childish bullshit and goalpost shifting that you should be ashamed of.

    3. Re:Unrealistic constraints by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      so your "nature doesn't work to a schedule" so it's all tooooo haaaard is just childish bullshit and goalpost shifting that you should be ashamed of.

      Maybe add reading comprehension to your skillset there champ, the internet will be a happier experience for you. The OP asked why it was taking so long, I pointed out that it was a huge project, and in swings dbill with disconnected observations about NO. If you can show us where "tooooo haaaard" came into play I'd be interested to see it, because its not in any post of mine.

      As for being ashamed, I see that situational awareness isn't the only place you seem to have a disconnect with reality. I mean really, you're talking about predicting natural disasters clockwork-fashion shortly after the country got swamped and left glowing in the dark over large swathes.

      Simples!

    4. Re:Unrealistic constraints by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension is not the problem since "moving a hundred thousand people in the space of five minutes" is right there on the page, so you can take your petty bullying that relies on finding people with low self esteem somewhere else. Shifting the goalposts to a tsunami and then trying to belittle me when I question that petty weasel trick is a particularly thing you should be ashamed of - why are you bothering with the playground antics with such an unimportant discussion? Have I stumbled into some little game or something?

  42. A Thing of Beauty by hicksw · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Japanese are worried about a Mt Fuji eruption because they think the mountain is beautiful now, and change might not improve it.

    I believe they think its appearance is important: it is a symbol of the nation.
    --
    On the other hand there is wabi-sabi.

  43. I can see Fuji from my house. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better than dying of old age...

  44. What if by DanielBMS · · Score: 1

    What if the volcano interrupts?