Slashdot Mirror


Flatlining User Base May Spell End of RIM

Meshach writes "There is an article in the Globe and Mail that says that the user base for Blackberry has stopped growing for the first time in the company's history, and speculates that this is the beginning of the end of RIM. The main problem seems to be that RIM's new Blackberry models like the Bold and Torch are selling poorly, and their production costs are much higher than other products manufactured in China. A recent research report says that after BB10 the company will need to sell or drastically change its business model."

180 comments

  1. RIM's Main Problem by AndroidLover · · Score: 0, Troll

    RIM's main problem is that enterprise companies have started moving away from the platform. People don't want to carry around several smart phones and are much more eager to choose either iPhone or WP7 phones. Microsoft is known for being the office centric company and therefore has fantastic support for Exchange server and office apps. RIM lost the audience it had when Windows Phones were introduced (while Windows Mobile also had many work users, WP was a major improvement).

    RIM basically lost all of its advantages to iPhone (home users) and Windows Phone's (work users). The only place I still see some Blackberries is the university students in Bangkok, Thailand (crazy adventures there, let me tell you).

    1. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People don't want to carry around several smart phones and are much more eager to choose either iPhone or WP7 phones.

      WP7? [citation needed]

    2. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's safe to say he's a troll. The combination of the user name "AndroidLover" with the actual post pretending that Android doesn't exist and that WP7, of all things, is a major force in the market is... implausible.

    3. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd speculate there are a lot more iPhone (work users) than Windows Phone...

    4. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Ironhandx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't forget that Android devices are ridiculously easy to lock down and set up with full encryption. There are actually companies out there whose entire business is doing just that for the corporate use scenario.

      Its so stupidly easy to integrate Android with all of their existing email and even internal messaging apps(most of which are written in Java and trivially ported to native) that it beggars belief that they would consider much of anything else.

      iPhone doesn't allow the kind of direct control that Corporate security demands, and WP7 has such a low penetration that no one is asking for it anyways. Android, even though there could definitely be better solutions, is currently the only real choice for corporate america. The worker drones get something that does everything an iPhone does(in some cases does it better, in some cases worse, but the important things are roughly the same, except for the GPS nav on android is much better) and they get their security.

    5. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloody troll. GTFO.

      (no not touchy isheep, you are just a troll)

    6. Re:RIM's Main Problem by teg · · Score: 4, Informative

      RIM's main problem is that enterprise companies have started moving away from the platform. People don't want to carry around several smart phones and are much more eager to choose either iPhone or WP7 phones. Microsoft is known for being the office centric company and therefore has fantastic support for Exchange server and office apps. RIM lost the audience it had when Windows Phones were introduced (while Windows Mobile also had many work users, WP was a major improvement)..

      While you present an interesting theory, reality is that noone is using Windows Phone. They had a market share of 3% of smartphones shipped. iPhone in particular and Android are the ones eating Blackberry's lunch. To make this even worse, this quarter Windows Phone is currently only sold on known obsolete phones. I'm glad I didn't get suckered into buying a phone that obsolete immediately, unlike Nexus Phones and iPhones.

    7. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone give some examples of Win7/8 phones with full keyboards? Im a BB user primarily bec of the full keyboard. If there were good Win phones with similar I would consider them too.

    8. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't knock the iPhones, my grandma has one and says it's the cats ass.

    9. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Servaas · · Score: 1

      That doesn't even make sense!

    10. Re:RIM's Main Problem by mwvdlee · · Score: 0

      >iPhone doesn't allow the kind of direct control that Corporate security demands
      Yes, it does. You just don't know it any better. But don't let facts hit you in your face in your pursuit of iHate.

      I'm guessing by "direct control" he means the ability to actually read and adjust the sourcecode and the ability to guarentee that the OS isn't secretly tracking users despite promises by the OS vendor and disabling all such functionality.
      A closed source product like iOS requires security to be entrusted to it's vendor. This may not be desirable for all levels of security requirements. Governments and big companies may be able to audit closed source code, but if you're $billion company, chances are you won't.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    11. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Windows Phone's (work users)".

      Haha - no. I work for a monstrously large company, and we can choose iPhones or one of several Android phones. Windows phones are not an option.

    12. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, thanks for that instructive and factual retort. The name callingsure does help the cause of you and your ilk.

    13. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your answer is sooooo good and comes in a nice rounded corners package, when you explain what kind of controls you get with iStuff, iSerf

    14. Re:RIM's Main Problem by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Your troll was too subtle, to be funny.
      "RIM's main problem is that enterprise companies have started moving away from the platform." While obvious, usually on par with the average Slashdot informative moderation.

      "People don't want to carry around several smart phones and are much more eager to choose either iPhone or WP7 phones." This statement begins as true (insightful moderation) and if you changed WP7 or added Android. It would complete it. Your troll is based on skipping Android phones which are actually far more popular then WP7.

      "Microsoft is known for being the office centric company and therefore has fantastic support for Exchange server and office apps." Being that Apple Purchased the license from Microsoft to support exchange is one reason why RIM is in trouble on the enterprise market, as a lot of companies do use Exchange (Rightly or Wrongly).

      "RIM lost the audience it had when Windows Phones were introduced (while Windows Mobile also had many work users, WP was a major improvement)." This is pointing out a correlation, however you don't see the numbers showing that Windows Phone is taking over their market, it is more likely due to Microsoft jumping onto to Smart Phone Band Wagon.

      "RIM basically lost all of its advantages to iPhone (home users) and Windows Phone's (work users). The only place I still see some Blackberries is the university students in Bangkok, Thailand (crazy adventures there, let me tell you)."
      I haven't seen that much effort in Microsoft trying to take over the business market with Windows Phone, but trying to attract the consumer market. Apple and Android had already gotten the consumer market and are now working on making it more business friendly.

      While saying anything nice about Microsoft on Slashdot can get some troll moderation, also adding Apple and ignoring Android as a competitive product helps. You just didn't get it right. You had the pieces to make a good troll, but you didn't put it together correctly, It is like a white nerd trying to talk street to look cool. You say all the right words but you end up looking even more out of place.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herpa derp. How is it being 20 and an anecdotal expert on absolutely everything. One day you'll grow up and stop making such sweeping generalizations. And "worker drones"? Nice touch at being out of touch with humanity.

    16. Re:RIM's Main Problem by stokessd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He may or may not be a troll, but I work for a HUGE company, and they dumped all the Crack-Berrys and went all-in on windows phones. I was not surprised that they did that, as we are microsoft to the core (with all the benefits that entails, like blue screens galore). Before the giant black-berry purge, I had not actually seen a windows phone in the wild.

      Apparently our IT folks examined the smart-phone landscape and something (hopefully) smart pushed them to WP7. so the GP may have a point.

      BTW, I hate the cut-off text of WP7, and would not buy one with my money.

      Sheldon

    17. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Tridus · · Score: 1

      There aren't any WP8 phones with full keyboards. None. It's one of the things that Nokia watchers shake their heads at and go "WTF?"

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    18. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Oh look, it's another first post at exactly the same time the article went up, and it's another user with no other posts, and it's another post talking about how Windows Phone shill post.

      Man, Microsoft's PR department really gives us no credit at all.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    19. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they went to WP7 it must be because it doesn't support full device encryption (it only allows apps to encrypt their own data). And the encryption isn't available on their own built in mail client; you have to go with a third party like Good in order to get encryption. Apparently your IT people don't like encryption since everyone else (RIM, Apple, Android) offer it. Now, it is supposedly in WP8, but the comment was about WP7 which doesn't have it.

    20. Re:RIM's Main Problem by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I have a Playbook and the app store is pretty desperate. It's not hugely difficult to port apps to the Playbook - it has an Android runtime, QT, Java, C, HTML APIs etc but not many devs bother and those that do stick a premium on to cover their efforts.

      It's actually a very robust device and barring some annoyances (some of which are very annoying) the OS is attractive, intuitive and the hardware is great. But it's not Android and lack of apps kills it.

      I personally think RIM's future should be on Android. Dump QNX and Playbook OS. Produce a Playbook / BB 10 OS runtime for Android and then move house over to it. Make money by selling security hardened Android devices and value added apps that sit on top.

    21. Re:RIM's Main Problem by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well hello there, Mr. Ballmer! Glad to meet your acquaintence. That was the most blatant shill I've seen in a long time, the shills are really getting thick lately. How fucking stupid do you think we nerds are, anyway?

      iPhone and Win7 when Win7's market share is tiny and Android has three times the sales as iPhones, and you omit Android? Again, Redmond, why do you think we're so damned stupid? Thank you for reminding me how evil MS is and to avoid their poorly designed, user-unfriendly software and OSes.

      Now go tell your boss the slashdot nerds outed you, dumbass.

    22. Re:RIM's Main Problem by rvw · · Score: 1

      I personally think RIM's future should be on Android. Dump QNX and Playbook OS. Produce a Playbook / BB 10 OS runtime for Android and then move house over to it. Make money by selling security hardened Android devices and value added apps that sit on top.

      And they should offer phones with hardware keyboards. I bet there is a market for it. Keep offering services like ping - kids here love it. All kids in high school here (Netherlands) have blackberries. Once they have money or go to university, they buy an iphone or android phone. BB should find a way to keep them instead.

    23. Re:RIM's Main Problem by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      iPhones can be locked down and controlled to some degree. Enough for some corporations to allow confidential email and contact info on personal iPhones. What I'd like to see on the iPhone is a completely separate "work" sandbox. Doesn't BB offer this already?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    24. Re:RIM's Main Problem by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I think Windows Phone will stand a better chance when Windows RT and 8 release.

      While Android is an excellent OS, it really sucks in some ways too. In particular it sucks with mouse and keyboard support. The experience of my Asus TF300 wouldn't hold a candle against a $200 netbook. Stuff like tabbing and cursor navigation / selection is horribly inconsistent and sometimes even missing from some apps (e.g. Polaris Office). I can easily imagine that Windows 8/RT is going to take off in offices because it won't suck with mouse and keyboard. Managers like these things because they're portable but they can be dropped into a cradle / dock / whatever and they act like traditional PCs. On top of that they'll have a proper office suite instead of the crappy offerings seen on Android and iOS at present.

      Windows Phone 8 will get a bounce from that if nothing else.

    25. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the recent crop of premium Android devices support these features. I have a shiny new 2.x Android device which only supports application-level encryption through third-party apps. I'm pretty new to Android, but it's important not to mislead people on this.

      The same is true of iOS. You need the new stuff to have these features. I would argue that features like remote wipe, manditory encryption and whitelisting apps is much easier in iOS 5 than on Android, although I haven't looked at iOS 6 yet though.

      It's not hard to find this information: http://www.apple.com/iphone/business/integration/

    26. Re:RIM's Main Problem by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

      He may or may not be a troll, but I work for a HUGE company, and they dumped all the Crack-Berrys and went all-in on windows phones. I was not surprised that they did that, as we are microsoft to the core

      The problem is that Windows Phones actually aren't any better at integrating with real Windows infrastructure than iPhones, Android devices, or BlackBerries are. If Microsoft had added real domain/GPO features to Windows Phones, they could have made a good business case. But as things are, everyone has ActiveSync (support for Exchange servers) so this is no advantage for WP.

    27. Re:RIM's Main Problem by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Here you go. Hope you're capable of reading.

      http://www.apple.com/iphone/business/integration/

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    28. Re:RIM's Main Problem by PNutts · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't forget that Android devices are ridiculously easy to lock down and set up with full encryption. There are actually companies out there whose entire business is doing just that for the corporate use scenario.

      Its so stupidly easy to integrate Android with all of their existing email and even internal messaging apps(most of which are written in Java and trivially ported to native) that it beggars belief that they would consider much of anything else.

      iPhone doesn't allow the kind of direct control that Corporate security demands, and WP7 has such a low penetration that no one is asking for it anyways. Android, even though there could definitely be better solutions, is currently the only real choice for corporate america. The worker drones get something that does everything an iPhone does(in some cases does it better, in some cases worse, but the important things are roughly the same, except for the GPS nav on android is much better) and they get their security.

      The iPhone Configurator allows corporations to manage iPhones. But even with that, the iPhone's data-at-rest encryption and Activesync compliance hisorically gave them a heads-up over other BYODs. In addition, third party apps for iOS / Android have provided more granular and non-managed security features. For Android it filled in encryption feature gaps which is no longer an issue on the latest devices. On the iPhone the biggest benefit of these apps was to sandbox corporate data from personal, including a remote wipe.

    29. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caldav doesn't work on android.

    30. Re:RIM's Main Problem by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Apparently they dont like a 30 minute server setup process, followed by no-hassle user adds (user needs to enter their email and the activation password) and device wipes.

      Yes, Im sure something smart pushed them to WP7, but darned if I can figure out what it is. Oh wait, Im gonna go with "someone higher up doesnt care about email as much as he cares about 'slick' and 'can watch netflix'".

    31. Re:RIM's Main Problem by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget that Android devices are ridiculously easy to lock down and set up with full encryption....

      is currently the only real choice for corporate america.

      Correct me if I am wrong, but you need to get a third party product to manage that centrally (would be interested to hear how youre doing it if not). Blackberries are STILL a good choice for corp america, if you really care about security.

      You really cant compare Android's email security to BES's; Android can be tricked into disclosing email with ANY legit-signed SSL cert with the proper FQDN-- even if it was issued by the DOD or one of China's authorities. You CANNOT fool BES devices in the same way-- you must either crack the AES encryption on a per-device basis, or grab all the per-device keys from the server.

      I get the whole "Oh noes BES is dying" thing, but they still have superior management, and they still have superior security. Perhaps thats not what is in vogue, and failing to adapt will kill BES, but lets not go overboard by comparing Android security to Blackberry.

    32. Re:RIM's Main Problem by PNutts · · Score: 2

      Only the recent crop of premium Android devices support these features. I have a shiny new 2.x Android device which only supports application-level encryption through third-party apps. I'm pretty new to Android, but it's important not to mislead people on this.

      The same is true of iOS. You need the new stuff to have these features. I would argue that features like remote wipe, manditory encryption and whitelisting apps is much easier in iOS 5 than on Android, although I haven't looked at iOS 6 yet though.

      It's not hard to find this information: http://www.apple.com/iphone/business/integration/

      iOS and iPhone hardware have supported the features you mentioned for a long time. However, only in iOS 4.x have all the features been accurately reported.

    33. Re:RIM's Main Problem by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Android simply isnt designed for hardware keyboard use the way Blackberries were. RIM could try to do something with android, and it would still be a touch device first. It would also lose all of the benefits of BES that make RIM different and desirable.

      Im really not clear why anyone would get a RIMdroid.

    34. Re:RIM's Main Problem by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would you think the IT people had any real input into this decision?

      Last time Microsoft made an aggressive push to counter Apple et. al. in the workplace, they didn't target us lowly peons - they wined and dined presidents and CEOs. I recall several Microsoft-centric directives, a few years ago, coming from the office of our university's president regarding things like setting up a campus-wide Exchange service; they came roughly six months after our central IT department announced we were moving campus mail to Google Apps.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    35. Re:RIM's Main Problem by tepples · · Score: 1

      Stuff like tabbing and cursor navigation / selection is horribly inconsistent and sometimes even missing from some apps (e.g. Polaris Office).

      Did you try reporting the inconsistency to the developers of those applications?

    36. Re:RIM's Main Problem by KiloByte · · Score: 2

      Or rather, "someone higher up got some favours from a Microsoft rep".

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    37. Re:RIM's Main Problem by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Android simply isnt designed for hardware keyboard use the way Blackberries were.

      It isn't? My old HTC Dream had excellent hard keyboard support, as does my current Samsung Captivate Glide. Now, it is quite hard to find a decent hard keyboarded Android phone (I had to import mine from the US), but the software itself supports it fine.

    38. Re:RIM's Main Problem by steeviant · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing by "direct control" he means the ability to actually read and adjust the sourcecode and the ability to guarentee that the OS isn't secretly tracking users despite promises by the OS vendor and disabling all such functionality.
      A closed source product like iOS requires security to be entrusted to it's vendor. This may not be desirable for all levels of security requirements. Governments and big companies may be able to audit closed source code, but if you're $billion company, chances are you won't.

      What a load of bullshit. Corporates are running the software that came on their phone, not cooking up their own roms. They have no idea whether the software on their phones has rapemyassware 2.0 installed or not. An IT dept could audit the source code, but unless they want to compile their own roms and void the warranty on a whole fleet of phones, there's no way to guarantee that the source they're given to audit is the same that was used to build the rom on the phone.

      Only an idiot would be swayed to go with a possibly untrustworthy vendor just because they give them access to something which they claim is the source to the rom on their device, and only an idiot would try to run a whole organization on roms they cooked up themselves, so while there are plenty of things that make Android good for enterprise, the availability of source code is not one of them.

    39. Re:RIM's Main Problem by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Lets see...an account just made and the ONLY post they have is a FP plugging a product...sigh this is just sad.

      For those that scream "You must be teh shill!" because i find faults in the product you love? See THIS FP by "androidlover" which to their credit they tried choosing a UID that would make them sound like they were NOT shilling...only they forgot to even name android, even though its one of the fastest growing market segments and as we saw here recently MSFT pays $500 to get people to sign a $50 contract for a Nokia Lumia and STILL can't get rid of the damned things.

      Sorry folks but I'm not a shill, I have just found your product lacking while THIS^^^^ This right here is a shill.

      As for TFA the problem with RIM is NOT the iPhone and Android, WinPhone isn't even on the radar as Ballmer fucked up and didn't give it good AD and GPO support, its the fact they sat on ass and didn't bother to make any exciting new products or try to grow their product towards other demographics. You see if they would have had exciting new product lines? Wouldn't NEED to grow their product lines into other demographics as their business userbase was a pretty loyal bunch. RIM had decent exchange support, good security features, heck they could brag the POTUS was hooked on their products.

      But instead of using that money to come out with exciting new products and features for that userbase, thus giving them a reason to stick with their product, they basically sat on ass for years just producing the same phone over and over and over. Now if they had a good enough design they might have been able to do that if they would have reached out to new users but again all they did was sat on ass and produced the same design for the same demographic so naturally they got bored and tired of waiting so they went somewhere else. I would argue BYOD is nothing but users getting tired of decent solutions for their problems not being made so they said "fuck it" and try to come up with their own.

      So sorry RIM, you deserve to join Palm, Nokia, and even MSFT mobile in the pile of failed products because like them you sat on ass, didn't listen to the customers or give them exciting products they would want to buy, and now its too late because your potential customers have moved on.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    40. Re:RIM's Main Problem by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      For most IT departments, the security needs aren't sufficient to warrant a source code audit.
      Precious few though, do require source code audits, and do run their own firmware. Doing so is a lot easier if you actually can do so.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    41. Re:RIM's Main Problem by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Blue screens? Seriously? WTF are you running, some 7 year old plus XP installs? Its called let go of the fricking decade old patched all to hell creaky as fuck ancient history and get Windows 7 already! I have YET to see a Win 7 BSOD, I'm sure that they can happen, but its so rare that if I ever did see one I'd be checking for hardware failures, and I work on Windows machines 6 days a week. Hell even Vista for all its pains in the ass was extremely hard to BSOD unless you ran some alpha quality graphics driver and now even that doesn't crash Win 7, it simply restarts the graphics driver, doesn't even make you close any programs.

      As for WP7? Unless the PHBs that do the buying were getting nice lunches with a MS marketer i don't see the selling point. The WP phones that are out don't have either the nicer displays of iPhone nor the nicer features of the Droid phones, has less apps than both of those, and from what I've been reading doesn't even have steller AD and group management which you think if nothing else MSFT would have gotten right, seeing how WinServer is their product and all.

      Of course WinPhone suffers from the same myopic focus that MSFT has had of late, their insane consumer only focus that has them pushing brain dead ideas like Metro on Win 8 Pro, like business users want their workers with a tweeting, twitting, FB shitting social page for a start screen. Yep that will get them working, have constant FB updates and other crap distracting them...sigh. Ballmer makes the Pepsi guy's rein at Apple look like the work of a fricking genius. And if the past is any indication I hope they'll be ready to toss those phones when the next WinPhone version comes out because it probably won't get an update.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    42. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am dumbfounded and amazed that WinPhones don't integrate with ActiveDirectory. Beyond retarded - but so is the ribbon and metro.

    43. Re:RIM's Main Problem by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Riiight, all corporate cares about is source code, because they got that with their BB phones and Windows desktops...oh wait. Nobody cares dude, nobody but the programmers that view having source as a mantra give a rat's ass, all they care about is "does it do the jobs I have" and Android answers that with a big YES by having the same Exchange support as the other guys but having better encryption that can be centrally managed.

      Because if you think fortune 500 companies are paying coders to sit on ass all day reading source code I have an invisible unicorn you might be interested in. Show me ONE, just one mind you, article from a fortune 500 company talking about how they chose Android phones because they could audit source. You won't be able to because like Unicorns and the Easter Bunny they simply don't exist. Again if the corps gave a rat's ass about that then Windows desktops wouldn't be the de facto standard in the corporate world because MSFT sure isn't handing out the source code to Windows.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    44. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you're talking about iOS encryption being hacked in May 2011?

      Android 4.01 with device level encryption was released in October 2011. Prior to that, only 3.x supported it, and that was tablets-only.

    45. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      They do, but the only ones that actually need that level of security generally only need it at either the highest echelons or is someone like the DoD. Sure RIM can survive on those customers but its margins are going to have to go way up and its going to have to restructure its whole business model to target ONLY the enterprise.

      I was also saying this based on RIM going kaput. BES is very obviously the best choice at the moment, but in a world without BES Android becomes your only real remaining option.

    46. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      They do, and I was saying this in regards to a world without RIM.

      Without RIM you could pretty easily see a company that just does security springing up to make a sandbox/remote control suite for Android. I cant see Apple allowing the same.

    47. Re:RIM's Main Problem by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      The other side of the coin is that you *have* to customize your Android install because what you get out of the box is so laughably bad. The email and calendar clients are mediocre. And Android itself doesn't even support caldav or carddav, which completely blows my mind. And heaven forbid you need to keep a lot of apps or a few large apps, because the system partition on most phones is so small that even if you move your apps to SD card (which doesn't actually move the entire app) , it's still all too easy to run out of room.

    48. Re:RIM's Main Problem by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I fail to see any significant difference between IOS and Android from an IT perspective. Both support activesync, both support encryption, both support SSL, and both can be centrally managed to a degree (doesnt IOS have security profiles that can be deployed?)

      Theyre also inferior to BES, but if BES goes kaput I dont see why Android becomes the only option.

    49. Re:RIM's Main Problem by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Theres no way AFAIK to do swipes or many of the commands with the keyboard. There are a LOT of things that simply require taps and jabs. And I havent found the keyboard shortcuts to be terribly good.

    50. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      Because of the reasons companies are not mass deploying iOS already. Apple won't let them at the nuts and bolts to do their own security audits and never will unless they change course drastically.

      Android on the other hand is very easy to audit. At present its not the best, but Apple won't let you at the nuts and bolts enough to essentially replicate what BES is now like they would be able to on Android.

      RIM gets around this by allowing companies to have their own IT staff participate in penetration testing etc, and RIM will actually train your own staff members to do all of the admin and hardening. While being essentially a closed system the BES is very open.

    51. Re:RIM's Main Problem by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I don't believe the only ones who need that level of security are the highest echelons and the DoD. No serious business can afford the cost of lack of security and secure its data.

      Given that, you scenario where RIM is going kaput is unlikely, they still have a niche market and if they care about it, they can still keep this precious customer base.

      The point being, why should RIM target the mass market and the next door guy who need a smartphone to play some game while commuting and never use his phone for business purpose?

      It may be wiser for RIM to secure its enterprise customer base rather than being after a market that has no recognition for the capabilities of their products and just want some flashy device.

      It is not the first time a hightech company seems to die and at the end rebirth from its ashes. It even happened to Apple.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    52. Re:RIM's Main Problem by not+already+in+use · · Score: 0

      Blue screens? Seriously? WTF are you running, some 7 year old plus XP installs?

      This is fucking slashdot. You simply imply that Microsoft still writes unstable software, it doesn't actually have to be true.

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    53. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      Oh I definitely think RIM should abandon the consumer market altogether. Its not their game, and never was.

      Going after it has cost the company big time and they need to get back to ensuring they keep their core market.

    54. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you think the IT people had any real input into this decision?

      Back in the 80s, the position from IT was "no PCs" when Apples, Commodores, & IBM PCs started pushing into the office. The IT folks had tons of valid reasons why terminals were more robust/maintainable/secure/efficient/cost effective/etc. It's the exact same situation now with Blackberry vs iPhone/Android.

      IT lost. In the long run, the workers that generate the revenue always get their way. Don't ever bet your career against that fact.

    55. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky you, I have seen many BSOD in Windows7, but I only work 5 days a week so balances out.

    56. Re:RIM's Main Problem by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Windows 7 still bluescreens, and sometimes there are bugs that you can do nothing with other than reimage. It is still has that Win 95 codebase in there.

    57. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a new win7 machine at home, and it bluescreens sufficiently often that it's used as a doorstop right now while I'm stuck using my six year old XP laptop. Average uptime is under an hour, and frequently it can't even get to the windows login screen before it goes down.

    58. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only blue screen on Windows 7 I can remember was my screen saver.

      Although you saw it so often you could never tell if you were looking at the screen saver or an actual blue screen.

    59. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackberries are STILL a good choice for corp america, if you really care about security.

      Screw security.

      You know, with my Blackberry, eight years ago, I was able to play loud, annoying alerts - with different alert noises, even - based on inbound e-mail. I could fine-tune if these alerts would happen - eg, is it 3 AM? Do not alert me regarding this e-mail from Low Value Client. Alert me and keep alerting in case of Client You're Giving Me How Much Money and Want to Give Me Even More? And signal didn't even matter, really. I had no problems pulling down e-mail, even if I couldn't make a successful call. (Sprint FTL.)

      I can't do that on my iPhone. Last time I had an Android, I couldn't do that. At least not in a sane manner, without third party shitware that over promises and under delivers.

      The Blackberry, to this day, remains without an equal as a business tool. It's a pity RIM decided to leave its kingdom and attempt to chase after the giggling teen girl market. Yeah, it's a much larger market, but the Blackberry has little to recommend it as a general purpose phone.

      Sad, very sad.

    60. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in real life Android integrates far better with Exchange than either an iPhone or a BlackBerry. I dunno about windows phones, we haven't got any.

      Blackberry needs BES if you are federally regulated (like any public corporation or HIPAA entity) which is a whole nuther server, for crying out loud.

      And of course the iPhone has the stupid timezone calendaring bug which has been known to cause epic mail loops.

    61. Re:RIM's Main Problem by osssmkatz · · Score: 1

      Take it back. Isn't there something wrong with the hardware if a new computer is kernel panicking/BSODs?

    62. Re:RIM's Main Problem by fat_mike · · Score: 1

      Good Mail has full Exchange integration with the added bonus of not locking the user out from installing apps on their phone because security is freaking out. Plus it has the added bonus of allowing access to the company's internal website. We had a party when we turned off our Blackberry Enterprise server.

    63. Re:RIM's Main Problem by Hovsep · · Score: 1

      Only BSOD's I ever got on my Windows 7 laptop were being caused by some bad RAM. It's been so long since I've see a BSOD, I can hardly remember what color they were :-).

      I got a free WP7.5 device (my Treo "lost" the Smoked by Windows Phone challenge), which held some promise, but I've switched to Android for now. If Microsoft decides to give away WP8 phones via a Smoked by Windows Phone type challenge again, I may try one, but I'm not going to spend my money on one anytime soon.

    64. Re:RIM's Main Problem by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Android has keyboard and mouse events, it's just that some apps are very slapdash in their support for them and what the OS provides isn't very refined. E.g. a mouse is treated more like a virtual finger than a mouse which means the pointer doesn't change shape over links, doesn't select text like a mouse, doesn't have context menus etc. Keyboard support is better and a number of devices with hardware keyboards attest to that. I suspect keyboard is adequate for phones with keyboards although I know from experience it's not good enough to emulate a PC keyboard.

  2. rim was the stopgap between pagers and smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    they are just not needed anymore...

  3. Hey if no one else wants it, that's for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like os\2, palM, winmo, kin, winpho, ugly betty, all once mine. Rim is fine until I get one then it's curtains for sure.

  4. Beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    THIS is the beginning of the end of RIM?

    It began a long time ago...

    1. Re:Beginning by gman003 · · Score: 1

      This is the beginning of the end of the end.

    2. Re:Beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or is it the end of the beginning of the end?

  5. Android with BB flavor by Andrio · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Use Android
    2. Enhance security; add exclusive BB apps.
    3. Profit

    No, no ??? needed. Just go straight to profit.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:Android with BB flavor by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      That sounds completely reasonable and obvious. The problem with RIM isn't their product, it's their entire business model being outdated.

      But RIM comes from a (short) history of dominating the smart phone business. I wonder if they can be rational enough to opt for a smaller marketshare of standard commodity smartphones instead of trying to regain that past glory. Perhaps RIM would be best served by simply selling their apps on all phones and get out of hardware alltogether. My guess is they'll keep trying to relive their past for a few more years, then disappear altogether or be bought.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:Android with BB flavor by vlm · · Score: 2

      The problem with RIM isn't their product, it's their entire business model being outdated.

      Get a government contract and hang on forever? I donno thats doing pretty well elsewhere...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Android with BB flavor by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      What company besides Samsung has Android actually been profitable for?

    4. Re:Android with BB flavor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting suggestion, I wonder how adding an Android Flavor to the flatulating user base of RIM will work out.

    5. Re:Android with BB flavor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is "How many cellphone manufacturers would there be *without* Android?". Not many would be my guess. Very cutthroat business with slim margins means not many could afford to roll their own OS stack. Android lets pretty much anyone play the game. How good they play determines how much money they make.

    6. Re:Android with BB flavor by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      1.5: fire 75% of staff.

      staff is making these decisions.
      that's why it doesn't happen.

      though current route might mean fire 98% of staff.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Android with BB flavor by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      " How good they play determines how much money they make."

      There are only two Android manufacturers that make any profit whatsoever -- HTC and Samsung and HTC isn't doing so well.

      http://www.zdnet.com/htcs-quarterly-profits-plunge-again-what-can-they-do-to-turn-things-around-7000002275/

    8. Re:Android with BB flavor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better solution:

      1.Fire 100% of the executive staff. As they are responsible for the delivery of the software, which is still in the blue....need more reasons?

      2.Fire all the "networks". The only reason for the "network" model was to make sure that only the best one, and with connections got the job at RIM, and as it is now obvious that it does not work, the obvious solution is to reduce the length of the "networks" to 1-2 people only......Welllll, i know i know, that means firing 100% of all the staff, but anyway, it could be pretty nice news article anyway.

    9. Re:Android with BB flavor by narcc · · Score: 1

      Android is shit compared to their new OS. It's a massive step backward, technically, from what they have with QNX.

  6. RIM is already dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why certain companies don't just die quickly, instead of going through long pains.
    Is there any doubt still, that RIM is dead?
    Heck, it was dead 5 years ago.

    1. Re:RIM is already dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      RIM was hardly dead 5 years ago. Android wasn't out 5 years ago, it didn't come out until 2008. 5 years ago the iPhone was just coming out and it was hardly a business ready device. Do you remember the state of Palm phones and Windows Phone 5 years ago? I doubt it.

      I really enjoyed my BlackBerry 5 years ago, it was an impressive device. Heck I enjoyed my BlackBerry 10 years ago. RIM was on top of the world. Shame its basically the same thing they sell today. Arrogance, ignorance, whatever their failing was. They're done today. Had they done something good 2 years ago, maybe a different story, but 2 years is a long time in this market.

    2. Re:RIM is already dead by Barryke · · Score: 0

      I declared Blackberry dead over 7 years ago.

      Having experience with a SonyEricson and Windows5 phone, i found the Blackberry devices cumbersome and prehistoric, even back then. It was easyer to just carry a laptop around. To me it was clear RIM could not innovate or keep up with the features the market demanded despite their name "research in motion". Their infrastructure design was cool for the beginning of the 90's, but was only a burden afterwards.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    3. Re:RIM is already dead by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      What kind of world is it that a company is "dead" the first quarter they don't grow their user base?

      Here's a prediction: IBM is dead, it's only a matter of time, they're already slipping into obscurity.

      And, while we're at it, how about Linux? I mean, really, with that pitiful market share, how long can they possibly last?

      Just because Palm flamed out spectacularly doesn't mean that every handheld device maker will follow in their image when they lose market share. RIM is no longer going to conquer the whole world, but they probably have a viable customer base and market share for many years to come.

    4. Re:RIM is already dead by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seven years ago was 2005. According to Wikipedia, RIM turned its first profit in 2004. So you appear to be saying that you declared Blackberry dead just when it started taking off. That is certainly possible, but it doesn't mean you are prescient, it means you are an idiot. In addition you comment that you thought their infrastructure was "cool for the beginning of the 90's", considering that the first device using RIM technology shipped in 1998, that means you thought their technology was obsolete when it first shipped. I could go on, but your comment suggests that you know nothing about the history of RIM

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:RIM is already dead by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      He's talking Dog Years.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:RIM is already dead by Stormin · · Score: 2

      From where I sit I saw one of the strengths of RIM turn against them - the BES server and all the administrative control it allows.

      For many years I worked closely with the team that ran the blackberry infrastructure at my company. Whenever a new blackberry came out, users started asking for it. When I asked them about it, the answer could often be summarized as follows:

      "Yes people want them, but that model has X. Our current version of X does not allow us to administratively disable X. On (date) we will be upgrading our BES servers and will be able to disable X, at that point we will allow people to use them here."

      So all the users who got new devices found that they didn't do anything that the old ones didn't. They blamed this on RIM, even though the real culprit was in fact that the company was locking them down. But I've heard this from numerous people at work.

      I still have my company issued BB though, because I don't want them and their remote wipe capability anywhere near my real smart phone. Apart from the keyboard though, there isn't anything special about it.

    7. Re:RIM is already dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw come on...the Playbook is their savior. See, now Apple and others are imitating the mid-sized device. Maybe RIM can sue now.

    8. Re:RIM is already dead by sjames · · Score: 2
      p>That;'s not what makes it dead. What makes it dead is that their market share is shrinking and their latest and greatest product demonstrates that they have no idea where to go from here.

      In some industries, that might not mean much but the smartphone world is moving quickly and it doesn't take ling to go from a bit outdated to buggy whip.

    9. Re:RIM is already dead by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I had a blackberry once, my company gave it to me. As long as that is still happening, they have a market - IT departments don't change their buying habits as quickly as Starbucks patrons do.

    10. Re:RIM is already dead by sjames · · Score: 1

      True they don't change so quickly. The problem for RIM is that they ARE changing right now, and that change is against Blackberry. They won't be so quick to change back even if RIM does get their act together.

      Note, you HAD a Blackberry ONCE.

    11. Re:RIM is already dead by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      True they don't change so quickly. The problem for RIM is that they ARE changing right now, and that change is against Blackberry. They won't be so quick to change back even if RIM does get their act together.

      Note, you HAD a Blackberry ONCE.

      And, I moved from a big company to a small one that does not provide company leashes.

      The big company still gives out crackberries, on a hierarchical graded scheme with the more expensive ones going to the higher ups - they get off on that kind of stuff and will continue to keep their vassals in structured and graded RIM land until such time as Apple comes out with 6 levels of iPhone, each subtly but visibly just a little bit better than the other one.

    12. Re:RIM is already dead by sjames · · Score: 1

      Some companies may well use them as social plumage (much like some 'primitive tribes have the men tying extensions on to their penis), but that's going to weigh against RIM too as their product line edges towards buggy whip. Nobody wants a floppy penis extension.

    13. Re:RIM is already dead by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Dunno, those guys in IT that were so hung up on the feature tables seemed like a floppy extension would be far better than their natural equipment.

  7. Then why are they recruiting? by stevegee58 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was just contacted by a RIM recruiter through a certain job site. (Of course it involves moving to Canada.)

    1. Re:Then why are they recruiting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure anyone who can is bailing out, and some of them will leave behind jobs that still need to be done... for awhile. Don't take that job unless you're prepared to be back out on the street soon.

    2. Re:Then why are they recruiting? by Aqualung812 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the people closest to the situation have decided to leave.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    3. Re:Then why are they recruiting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because everyone likes a good RIM job.

    4. Re:Then why are they recruiting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they can lay you off next month and claim cost saving.

    5. Re:Then why are they recruiting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why are they recruiting is the question I've been furiously asking since MY position was terminated over a year ago. Also, why did they then hire to my team, after they had to take away 2 of our jobs??? I hate this company. Their demise cannot come soon enough.

    6. Re:Then why are they recruiting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're really considering getting a RIM job?

    7. Re:Then why are they recruiting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the people closest to the situation have decided to leave.

      If you're talking about developers, engineers or whoever, then no, they are not the closest to the situation. If the company is actually in any sort of trouble, it will only be very senior management and people in finance who will know.

      Sorry, but all the people on slashdot who think that, because they are good at tech, they are also financial and business experts is just laughable.

  8. ASTROTURFER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "AndroidLover" really needed to insert that Microsoft compliment on an RIM article.. and on your first post ever.. and your the first to reply. nicely done troll.

  9. HP to the Rescue! by seven+of+five · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Buy RIM for $10B
    2. Sit on technologies for 3 years
    3. ???
    4. Sell what's left for 75 million
    5. Profit!

    1. Re:HP to the Rescue! by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      You forgot: Short HP.

      1. Buy RIM for $10B

      2. Sit on technologies for 3 years

      3. ???

      4. Sell what's left for 75 million

      5. Profit!

  10. Alternatively by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alternatively RIM has all but stopped creating new legacy phones, and anyone who *is* interested (at least in the north american market) is pretty much waiting for BB10 devices at this point.

    Financials are out this week; it'll be interesting to see if global growth did actually stop.

    1. Re:Alternatively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the correct answer. Right now, it's been over a year since RIM has updated their flagship phones. You can get a bold 9900 or a Torch 2 - and they're still fine to use - but you're paying a premium for old technology. When you add the fact that nothing they're currently selling will get an update for BBOS 10, it's pretty hard to justify a new blackberry purchase right now.

      At work we've been rolling out only iPhones for the last six months. If the next range of blackberry handsets turns out decent we'll probably buy them, but right now they're making it damn difficult to be a customer.

    2. Re:Alternatively by acoustix · · Score: 1

      The parent is correct. They will have an explosion of new users once BB10 devices arrive. I have a 9930 and I can't wait to upgrade.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    3. Re:Alternatively by Tridus · · Score: 2

      People waiting to upgrade are not new users. They're existing users buying new phones.

      That will lead to sales, but not growth in the user base.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    4. Re:Alternatively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM abandons all their old customers by passing the buck to the telcos, so I don't expect them to support my phone anwyay. I'm not sure why you think the 9930 won't be abandoned too.

      I had to upgrade my 9700 with a leak from Bittorrent.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry_OS "While RIM develops and releases updated versions of its operating system to support each device, it is up to the individual carriers to decide if and when a version is released to its users."

    5. Re:Alternatively by acoustix · · Score: 1

      RIM abandons all their old customers by passing the buck to the telcos, so I don't expect them to support my phone anwyay. I'm not sure why you think the 9930 won't be abandoned too.

      I had to upgrade my 9700 with a leak from Bittorrent.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry_OS "While RIM develops and releases updated versions of its operating system to support each device, it is up to the individual carriers to decide if and when a version is released to its users."

      I don't care if they abandon the 9930. They've already told everyone that they will not be updating currently software.

      Also, BB users know that they can download and install updated OS versions anytime they want regardless of carrier. You can usually get the software straight from BB's website. The phones are not locked and do not need to be rooted. Just check BB's forum, BlackBerryforums.com or CrackBerry.com for links to the software.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  11. Restructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    RIM has needed a bit of restructuring for some time. I remember reading an open letter a while back from one of the upper middle unit managers a while back -you may recall it as well. It seems like the corporate culture is directionless and myopic, as well as a bit disorganized. I think RIM and Blackberry can survive but they have to shake the "that's so 2004" shadow. Apple did it after a long slump, but they did it by really innovating, not merely copying too many years too late.

  12. stagnation due to saturation by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    since when is stagnation the beginning of the end? We have saturation and the mobile market become more and more an upgrade game.

    1. Re:stagnation due to saturation by rgbrenner · · Score: 2

      the smartphone market has grown by 38.8% in the past year.

      Even when the US becomes saturated, there are still international markets.

      and finally, even though you are right: stagnation does not necessarily mean the end.. stagnation often does mean exactly that.

      The problem is, when a company does not grow, it is essentially sitting in limbo until one of it's competitors kills it ... either by finding the next big product; or by growing large enough to enable economies of scale that the ungrowing company cannot match; or when tastes of consumers adjust, etc. It is essentially sitting still while the world and its competitors move forward.

      That does not mean the company will fail... RIM could create the next great new product, and everything will be fine for the company.

      Does that sound hard? It should. Which is exactly why stagnation OFTEN means eventual death.

    2. Re:stagnation due to saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. You mean RIM is a failing company because it has stopped making as much money as it used to? A lot of businesses would be happy to be in the black this year, but RIM is dieing because they aren't hemorrhaging cash, but hemorrhaging profit margins. Sounds like they need to release a new product and are a bad stock buy unless dividends are good, but they could be around for another decade or two at this pace.

    3. Re:stagnation due to saturation by CMYKjunkie · · Score: 1

      Agreed. And when one stagnates when your "killer new product" is not going to be out for another 4+ months... it's time to start measuring them for a casket. That timeline is assuming they don't slip again.

    4. Re:stagnation due to saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you believe in unlimited, never-ending growth in biology? In economics? Think about it - always continuing, never-ending, unlimited. Do you believe in unicorns?

    5. Re:stagnation due to saturation by drkich · · Score: 1

      No, I just believe that eventually those that stop growing, adapting and changing will eventually be left behind. It is in a way of never-ending, unlimited growth. Those that replace the stagnate company continue to grow until they themselves are left behind.

      Apple is a classic example of a company that turned that around, dramatically. They were almost left behind, being given money by Microsoft just so Microsoft could claim that they are not a monopoly.

      Now it is RIM's turn to show that either they need to move on or turn it around and convince us why they should stay.

  13. Terrible Phones, Anyways by patchouly · · Score: 0

    Wanting to save some money, I got a Blackberry, instead of an iPhone or Android. It was a stupid mistake. The phone's quality is sub-par (I had to send it off to be repaired after the screen snapped under the pressure of my thumb, from picking it up). The menus are complicated and convoluted; nothing is where you'd think it should be and somethings need to be adjusted from several different locations (and I'm good with menus. I work with computers all day). On top of all of that, the audio, on my phone model anyway, is terrible. It's muffled and hard to hear. As soon as my commitment on this phone runs out, I am ditching this thing and never looking back.

    1. Re:Terrible Phones, Anyways by narcc · · Score: 1

      Liar.

    2. Re:Terrible Phones, Anyways by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Wanting to save some money, I got a Blackberry, instead of an iPhone or Android. It was a stupid mistake. The phone's quality is sub-par (I had to send it off to be repaired after the screen snapped under the pressure of my thumb, from picking it up). The menus are complicated and convoluted; nothing is where you'd think it should be and somethings need to be adjusted from several different locations (and I'm good with menus. I work with computers all day). On top of all of that, the audio, on my phone model anyway, is terrible. It's muffled and hard to hear. As soon as my commitment on this phone runs out, I am ditching this thing and never looking back.

      If you're going to succeed in the "being a stupid shill" industry, you need to remember to plug the product you're being paid to shill. Knocking the competition is only half the job.

      I can only score you "5/10 must try harder". Remember, next time, the final clause should be something along the lines of "I am ditching this thing for an iPhone, with its vastly superior build quality, wide selection of Angry Birds games and easy-to-use virtual keyboard, and never looking back."

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Terrible Phones, Anyways by patchouly · · Score: 1

      I know you are being facetious, but just to defend my statement, the OS on the phone I have (a 9300) is crap. Not sure how the new "touch screen" models are. Maybe they are better? I wanted to turn off all programs that access data, through the network (I don't have a data plan and the constant warnings that I was trying to use data, were getting annoying), and had to not only delete a bunch of programs but also disable the connectivity in several different places. I have programed several pieces of my own software, done a TON of beta testing and know most OSes, inside and out. Lets just say that I am not new to software environments. There are certain expectations about where things should be and how you should be able to access them. The OS on my device is terrible and nothing is where it should be. After a steep learning curve, I was able to find most stuff but even the things that I want to do require far more steps than they really should. It's just a poorly made system. In no way am I promoting any other device or system. Just voicing my hatred toward Blackberry. If you fail to see that, I can't do anything for you...

  14. 3. ??? by xtal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hire Carly?

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:3. ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's the queen of business!

      She's got great business experience! We need politicians like that. It must of been the damned liberals that kept her out of office.

  15. curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason I bought (well it was actually a free upgrade) my curve was it was one of the few remaining phones with a physical keyboard.

    1. Re:curve by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      If I go to verizon's web site there are 4 android phones with slide out physical keyboards, and 4 blackerry phones with physcial keyboards.

    2. Re:curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (current Stratosphere user here) Yeah, we qwerty lovers are getting the shaft these days... slumming down with RIM. At least the Stratosphere II should FINALLY bring a current gen qwerty phone + removable battery + LTE to VZ.

  16. MAY??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May spell the end of RIM?? MAY??? Seriously, are people not paying attention?? RIM has been in a death spiral for about two years now. Their failure to recognize the impact the iPhone was going to have on the entire smartphone industry and their refusal to adapt to that change once it was undeniable already spelled the end of RIM. We're just now working through any residual momentum they have left before they either completely collapse under their own weight or sell off their assets and effectively vanish. RIM is done and has been for a long while. Anyone who's paid even a hint of attention to the industry has known this for a while.

    And, yes, I know many people love Blackberrys and many people hate virtual keyboards and many people think that RIM is the pinnacle of mobile security and neither iOS nor Android can touch it but, sorry, you're in the minority now and your darling company is dead. Accept it. Everyone else has.

  17. Re-learning the lessons of Atari by concealment · · Score: 1

    Atari computers, back in the early 1980s, showed us the problem of rolling your own hardware, operating system, and software.

    Any change you need to make will be (a) huge (b) require 400 internal departments to agree and (c) baffle users.

    My suggestion for RIM: just go ahead and fire 2/3 of management and consolidate 2/3 of your internal teams. Then focus on using as much open source hardware and software as you can to reduce costs.

    If they start doing this today, they might be able to save themselves from Chapter 11 by Christmas.

    1. Re:Re-learning the lessons of Atari by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      And, Apple is unlearning that lesson, or what?

    2. Re:Re-learning the lessons of Atari by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Atari computers, back in the early 1980s, showed us the problem of rolling your own hardware, operating system, and software.

      They didn't. Atari 8-bit computers used CPUs and interface chips from MOS Technologies (which was actually owned by their competitor Commodore), though they did have some ICs like the POKEY sound chip custom-fabbed. The BASIC interpreter was licensed from Microsoft, just like on Apple and Commodore computers, though all of these companies made their own customizations.

  18. They are still the only ones outside the duopoly?? by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    Well I for one recently bought my very first Blackberry device (a 64-Gb Playbook, when the prices fell) for a very simple and clear reason: I want to stay out of Apple/Google duopoly.
    I have been waiting for a linux tablet for a couple of years; now I feared to really turn too old before they come (I swear, I'll buy one anyhow).
    While I am a bit pissed off by the ultraserious security and obviously definitive user-won't-ever-be-root feature, I find it has some positive side effects (you can lose the machine: nobody will access your data, and just buy another, all your bought applications are back).
    Above all, I discover something I just didn't expect: concerning software availability, it indeed has reached, for me, the minimum level of 'floatability': various browsers of which one features adblocking, honest offline RSS viewers, a port of the Android Eye-fi receiver that does backup all my DSLR photos in the minutes I take them, young but reasonable file managers handling ftp and all your cloudy private equivalents, offline wikipedias...
    So, yes, last year's Blackberry tablet is indeed bearable, for me. And does not belong to a monopoly.
    I fully understand, to devs it's obviously more interesting financially to work for Apple or Android.
    It's just I'm really concerned about monopolies, I suffered from some personally, and it's something I still cannot describe easily, and wouldn't wish to my worst enemy.

    --
    Herve S.
  19. Flatlining sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If sales of blackberries are really flat lining due to market saturation does this mean next week we will be seeing headlines claiming we live in a post-mobile world?

  20. Add me to the RIM refugees list by alphadogg · · Score: 1

    Have stuck it out long enough. I don't even mind the lack of apps, it's the lack of even halfway decent web access that is the killer for me. Contract ends in December, time to move on

    1. Re:Add me to the RIM refugees list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In same boat as you. Don't mind the lack of apps but the web access is horrible. Will be moving to android in December.

  21. The Solution by Murdoch5 · · Score: 2

    1) Meet Deadlines!
    2) Make good software!
    3) Follow trends and don't attempt to set them!

    If Rim just got there act together and started running like a mature company and not a cutting edge start up then they might be able to turn around.

  22. Or maybe... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    ...it's purely down to being that everyone who *wants* a Blackberry *has* a Blackberry.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:Or maybe... by Barryke · · Score: 0

      Replace "a" with "the latest model of" and you have Apple covered as well.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
  23. RIM is already dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIM is already dead and is no longer worth even posting to /.

    The carcas may still have some warmth but there is no hope for revival now. There are reasons why some humans tend to hang on to things during times of mourning but it does not change the cold fact that the world has moved on.

    Please consider posting ropics relevant to 2012.

  24. Retail already knows by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    I've never seen so many Playbooks sold as we have recently. Why? Because the price is rock bottom. This IS the end of RIM in its current guise.

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  25. shippedh != sold by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    That's 3% shipped, not sold. They'll often talk about shipped units to make the numbers bigger, but actual sold units is an even smaller number. It's a phone no one wants.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:shippedh != sold by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Hell its worse than that, as we saw here a few months ago MSFT is paying $500+ in ads for every single user they get to pay $50 to take a Lumia on contract, so not only does John Average not want the phone but they took a bath on the few they lured. And of course thanks to the morons announcing no win 8 update for current phones they made the entire line worthless overnight, they can advertise until hell freezes over but who wants to be locked into a 2 year contract on a phone that has already been labeled EOL by the company that makes the OS? It would be like buying new XP boxes now, totally pointless.

      I have a feeling WP8 is gonna be the final nail in Ballmer's coffin, the shareholders aren't gonna put up with him shitting billions of company money down the crapper on another Vista sized failbomb. he's already blown billions on WP7 and gone nowhere, and now he's gonna crap on the desktop, one of the few money making sacred cows they have left, to try to get app devs for a phone that nobody wants...yeah, not seeing that work too well.

      Final verdict? Android #1 because of all the CCC (Cheapo Chinese Crap) while Apple won't care because they'll be making 40%+ markup on their products and still have lines around the block on launch, WP8 will be right down there with Symbian and RIM and "other" in the "niche products nobody gives a shit about" category. This is what happens when you don't give the customer what they want, they go elsewhere.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:shippedh != sold by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      Hell its worse than that, as we saw here a few months ago MSFT is paying $500+ in ads for every single user they get to pay $50 to take a Lumia on contract

      Not defending what might still be a waste of money by MS, but comparing the supposed "$500+" cost of the ads to the $50 "cost" of the phone doesn't really say much since that $50 is the subsidised cost and can't meaningfully be considered in isolation from the obligatory contract.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  26. May spell the end? lol.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...anyone with a brain could tell you RIM was finished years ago. If you buy a blackberry you are retarded.

  27. RIM has one thing the other manufacturers don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A secure, carrier-independent global network with ridiculously configurable security policies for corporate use (via BES). That's what RIM should be banking on, and let other companies develop RIM-network smartphones for them. But it seems like too little too late though, despite the major internal progress they've made in the past year, they held onto their two stubborn CEO-duo for way too long.

  28. Actually QNX could be the best ever by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    QNX/BB10 has the potential to be the best ever mobile phone OS. Of course that means close to naught in regards market-share in the tech world.

  29. Re:RIM has one thing the other manufacturers don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, a fragile single-point-of-failure. We already know how many times that worked out.

  30. They aren't doing anything to help themselves by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    RIM is doing a terrible job of marketing the bold and torch, which are both really good phones. They don't have them particularly widely available - and perhaps even worse, well advertised - in the US. Ask an average US consumer if they've heard of an iPhone, they'll answer yes. Heard of an android smart phone, they'll answer yes as well. Heard of a blackberry torch, they'll likely say no.

    If they want to expand their user base, they should try selling phones directly to users. It works well for Apple, there is no reason why it couldn't work well for RIM as well. They don't even need to open their own stores, they could sell them through best buy, target, walmart, radio shack, etc. Sell unlocked phones with manufacturer warranties, there is a market for that if they can hit a reasonable price point and free consumers from having to sign 2-year contracts to buy a new phone.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  31. Re:RIM has one thing the other manufacturers don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going on actual history instead of magic pixie dusted history, their network hasn't gone down completely, ever. There have been a few largely-covered outages (largest being one of their primary datacentres in Eurpoe last year), but how many times has your carrier's data network failed this year?

    What sort of corporate security infrastructure does any carrier have available for their devices, other than leaning on the RIM network through BIS? There's a lot more to corporate smartphone policy than being able to run TrueCrypt on your SD card.

    (For the record, I own an Galaxy S3).

  32. RIM Indian Mobiles by unixisc · · Score: 2

    Wasn't there a story not so long back about how India is one of the few markets RIM is still thriving? In India, while people pick up quickly Western technology trends, they are not so fast in leaving it. Right now, Blackberries are one of the leading phones there, and that market's not going away. So if RIM disappears elsewhere, they may end up becoming a purely Indian mobile company, similar to Karbonn or Micromaxx.

  33. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be honest, RIM and Blackberries aren't really that great and RIM has an antiquated and silly setup. The sooner they are gone the better.

  34. To port to PlayBook you have to own a PlayBook by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's not hugely difficult to port apps to the Playbook [...] but not many devs bother

    A developer can't very well port an application to a device that he doesn't have.

    and those that do stick a premium on to cover their efforts.

    How much of that premium is to cover the cost of buying a PlayBook on which to test?

    1. Re:To port to PlayBook you have to own a PlayBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will give you a playbook for free for app porting, along with a license to a porting layer that supports all of the mobile platforms.
      http://www.madewithmarmalade.com/blackberry

      I just signed up for this. The playbook they are shipping me is already discounted to $150 right now, but that is fine. I think they are doing a lot to help developers. They even have an android 2.3 runtime. Just need to repackage it. This program I signed up for requires the app to use the marmalade porting platform, but I am sure they will give anyone a playbook for free who is willing to port. They have several other similar programs going on at the same time that I am sure will cover whatever need a developer has.

    2. Re:To port to PlayBook you have to own a PlayBook by DrXym · · Score: 1

      RIM are always running promotions and draws. I got my Playbook for nothing. I expect if a dev wanted to they could acquire a tablet. Another way to look at it is it doesn't cost anything to list apps on the Blackberry store so a one time cost for a $180 tablet isn't a huge investment, certainly not for some of the larger app development teams. Cost of the hardware is probably the least concern anyway, the cost of porting, testing and supporting an app once it's released on that platform would be considerably more and it's a question of if its viable to do or not. I think it could be but it obviously varies based on a lot of factors.

  35. Old news: RIM analysis from Oct 2010 by mveloso · · Score: 1
  36. Apple may shut down Android by tepples · · Score: 1

    Your troll is based on skipping Android phones which are actually far more popular then WP7.

    Android phones won't stay popular in the home country of Apple, Microsoft, Google, and Slashdot if Apple keeps winning in patent court.

  37. hard keys ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still really liking my bold only as it has hard keys my large hands can use, yet still has a touch screen. Not much more to like tho, even if I am a luddite. Recommendations for the latest android but with hard keys ? any thoughts from others who've switched from bberry keyboard to a touch screen ?

  38. They were growing still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figured they would have been losing huge numbers of users for the last 1-2 years.

  39. Flatenning != Flatlining by fm6 · · Score: 1

    The growth of the user base is flattening, not flatlining. It's RIM itself that is flatlining.

  40. I can only hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that it so. Oh, to get rid of this CrackBerry that I'm saddled with from the company.

  41. G&M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G&M has a consistent history of publishing anti-RIM and anti-BlackBerry stories; try National Post for a more balanced perspective from North of the border. Even if it was true that the RIM user base has plateaud out (which I don't see how G&M could possibly know for certain) it would be consistent with most of the fans waiting for BB10. So basically this is a non-story and a non-issue.

    1. Re:G&M? by devleopard · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, users waiting for BB10 have nothing to do with lack of growth: those users are part of the current userbase, and wouldn't result in growth.

      --
      The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
  42. The victory of patent trolling! by gelfling · · Score: 1

    You can't run a company when every year someone successfully sues you for hundreds of millions of dollars over and over and over. I'm kind of hoping Apple does that no only to Samsung but to everyone everywhere and the whole cell phone market including all the carriers go under and we go back 30 or 40 years in terms of technology.

  43. the fix by NynexNinja · · Score: 1

    they just need to make a 5 inch quad-core android phone and it will take them back to where they need to be

  44. Put some developers BACK on the existing Software by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    Really guys-RIM is not supporting the current users. OSX with Desktop Manager. Updated to 2.4. Suddenly, the machine hangs, won't synch, needs forced restarts. The Desktop MisManager is the only bit of software that has ever hung my Mac, running 10.6. Oh, and the Bluetooth in the Bold 9930 kept dropping out in the car. Are we pissed yet ? Go to Verizon. They replace the Bold, even though I am out of warranty. New Bold still won't synch calendar or contacts. Useless. Search forums. All have this issue. RIM knows. "No Projected Resolution" Are you kidding me ? Business user can't synch, forget music or media.....and you aren't on it...? Forums full of this...OSX can't synch, and prior versions of OSX software are not on the RIM website. I finally found 2.1 from August 2011. A downgrade, along with unchecking every upgrade notifier, fixed the problem. Every person I asked, said the same thing, and had the same suggestion...."Get an iPhone". I prefer the keyboard on the BB, but my Palm under XP had no problems synching, so I don't expect you to, either. Will I care about system 10 when it comes out ? Maybe I'll read about it on my iPhone-and I don't really want one.

  45. Very Simple by Wes+Beckwith · · Score: 1

    All RIM has to do is come out with a smart phone to compete with the iPhone and the Samsung S3... Stop trying to just be a blackberry, it is not as "nifty" as it used to be ... Wes Beckwith

  46. *THIS*? by evel+aka+matt · · Score: 1

    This is the begininng of the end for RIM? Yeah, that might've been poignant what, 4? 5? Years ago. They were like a dinosaur standing on a big block of wood...on top of a tar pit. It was just a matter of time without a miracle, and from the looks of it, they haven't even been praying.

  47. Pity really... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it's fair to say BB is done but I'm sure seeing a lot fewer of them these days. At a place I used to work at I got issued a BB and I've got to say that I really liked it. The battery would last forever it seemed. The phone calls came in loud and clear. It was great for texting and email. It was secure. I really liked the physical keyboard. But they were slow to adopt the touch screen interface and now seem dated compared to the iPhone and Android phones.

  48. Re:rim was the stopgap between pagers and smartpho by davester666 · · Score: 1

    :-(

    No more rim jobs.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  49. Hysterical nonsense by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Since when did the fact that a company's user base stopped growing mean it was the beginning of the end for them?

    In any normal (non-tech) business, as long as you are making decent profits your company is successful. You don't suddenly panic and close down if one year your sales figures don't increase. I've worked for engineering firms that have been going for fifty or more years; they may be smaller than when they were at their peak and outsource a lot of manufacturing to China, but they're still happily profitable.

    The myth that someone like Apple can keep on growing for ever is...a myth.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  50. Just need to release the new phone already by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

    All RIM needs to do is release the BB10 devices already. I'll buy one. I know many people who'll buy one. But there isn't one to buy, and the fact that it's "coming" is the main reason why existing (read - obsolete) models aren't being purchased. Why would I spend $500 on the 9900, if I know there will be a new one in under 6 months? If I wanted to spend $500 on a new phone every 6 months, I would switch to iPhones long time ago.

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.