Slashdot Mirror


Apple iPad Mini Could Complicate Things For Windows 8 Tablets

Nerval's Lobster writes "Current rumor suggests that Apple is gearing up to unveil its iPad Mini Oct. 17, with invitations to media arriving Oct. 10. That's according to Fortune, which obtained the information from an unnamed Apple investor who, in turn, heard those dates from other unnamed sources. While that attribution might prove a bit too vaporous for some people, it does align with earlier reports from AllThingsD that Apple is planning to reveal a smaller iPad sometime in October. If those rumors prove accurate, the unveiling of an iPad Mini in that timeframe could prove very bad news for the upcoming Windows 8 tablets. (Gizmodo offers a pretty complete rumor rundown on the iPad Mini's possible features here.) Unlike the traditional PC market, Microsoft doesn't dominate the market for mobile-device operating systems. Windows 7 tablets never gained much of a toehold among tablet users, who prefer iPads and Android-based devices by wide margins. When it comes to Windows 8 (and Windows RT, the version of next-generation Windows for ARM architecture), Microsoft is starting out as the underdog."

200 comments

  1. so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    so?

    1. Re:so? by busyqth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well I, for one, think it's a pretty big deal.
      After all, it's not every day that Apple releases a new product, especially one with amazing, unheard-of new features like a smaller screen and more pocket-friendly dimensions.
      Apple's best in class innovation wins the day yet again!

    2. Re:so? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm just waiting for Apple to claim that they invented the concept of a ~7" tablet and that all of the ones that have been on the market for years are actually copying their design...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:so? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      every time there is a launch event the share price jumps.

    4. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They won't, but they will have perfected it.

      See tablets pre-iPad, and tablets post-iPad.

    5. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "pocket-friendly dimensions"

      Finally a use for cargo pants!

    6. Re:so? by psergiu · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, just the concept of 7.85" tablets. With a 2 minute-long movie in which Apple executives, on a white background, will describe the magic of those extra 0.85 inches.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    7. Re:so? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      I'm inclined to agree. I can't tell what's less interesting (even to an Apple fanboy), an iPad Mini or a Windows 8 Tablet. I really truly thought the only reason Apple was going this way is so that it'd be a remote for the rumored Apple branded TV.

      I get that, but I don't get a 7inch tablet, especially when most of the iPad owners I know are also smartphone owners.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:so? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for Fandroids to claim that Apple claimed that they invented the concept of a ~7" tablet...

      FTFY.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:so? by antek9 · · Score: 2

      the magic of those extra 0.85 inches.

      That's what she said!

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    10. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids. Today kids all have/want iPods, tomorrow they will all have/want iPad minis.

    11. Re:so? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Your forgetting the rounded rectangles. It's always the rounded rectangles.

      In fact, for a while, it seemed like it was rounded rectangles all the way down.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that Jobs is gone Apple no longer care about perfection, see their craptacular new Maps app they introduced in iOS6, plus a number of other problems the new version of iOS apparently has.

    13. Re:so? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Kind of like how they say 4" is the perfect screen size justified in the same way they said 3.5" was the perfect screen size. It's great to look at articles from last year making claims like:
      'It makes total sense. And that is exactly why we would never see any larger screen iPhone.'
      http://gizmodo.com/5847981/this-is-why-the-iphones-screen-will-always-be-35-inches

    14. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7.85" isn't pocket-friendly, especially if it has a 4:3 aspect ratio. The 7" tablets only just fit in my pockets and that is with the narrower 16:9 aspect ratio. I think the best you could say about the iPad mini is that it is more handbag-friendly (which may be sufficient for some).

    15. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or european man-bag friendly.

    16. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purple lens flaring on photos is the next hipster craze.

    17. Re:so? by devleopard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point is that whether the iPad is any good or not, there was no market before the iPad. List all the Android tablets on the market prior to Spring of 2010.

      --
      The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
    18. Re:so? by harperska · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every time there is a launch event, the share price jumps in the days between the announcement of the event and the event itself as rumors run rampant, and then the price tanks after the event when the newly announced product doesn't have all of the unrealistic features that the analysts and fanboys predicted. The price then goes up slowly but steadily afterwards when the average consumer realizes that it is a pretty good product despite not having all those impossible features and the product sells like hotcakes.

    19. Re:so? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But that brings up an interesting question...would ANY pad have sold if Apple didn't have their legion of fans hyping pads? I mean there were tablets before that but they were called what they were "large cell phones that can't make calls" yet when Apple puts out a large cell phone that can't make calls their fans go totally apeshit, I mean lines like its a fucking rock concert apeshit.

      So the question becomes 'Would ANY tablet, no matter how well designed, have had a chance if it wasn't for the rabid Apple fan base hyping the form?" and I honestly don't think they would. Remember that this is a fanbase that refused to abandon Apple even when what they were putting out was SHHHHHIIITTTT, we are talking overpriced underpowered pizza boxes, yet they stayed. When the first Jobs blessed good products came out, like the candy colored iMacs they went completely apeshit and hyped the living hell out of them. I remember mac head reviewers talking about these things like they were the second coming! And then came the iPod, which I'll be the first to admit previous MP3 players were too damned menu happy but c'mon, the way the fans, especially the fanboys in the press wrote up the thing you'd think it was the greatest invention since the lightbulb!

      And now all are gonna get to see this before their very eyes, as Apple puts out a form factor that Jobs himself said was stupid... I predict it will be a massive hit, because the fanbase will tirelessly blog and review and post and blather on TV about how wonderful a form factor that even Jobs thought was stupid so it'll sell. I mean you had Stewart and Colbert practically dancing with their new iPads, that kind of fanboy loving you just can't buy. While many of the rest of us will still think the same thing when we first saw the tablets...an oversized cell phone that doesn't make phone calls...okay.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    20. Re:so? by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      That is why this cartoon totally nails the "Apple experience" because what they sell is just the perfect everything, size, form factor, screen...until the sales go down then the NEXT version is the perfect everything. Other companies have tried this and failed but this is why I always gave Jobs and his RDF credit, that man could take the same spin that countless others had tried and he could turn it into pure gold. I mean give the man credit, he could sell AC units at the north pole and end up with a waiting list, the man had serious skills.

      Of course it don't look like Cook is gonna be able to keep it up, even reviewers that glossed over the "Ur holding it wrong" iPhone 4 mess were just "meh" about iPhone 5 so we'll have to see if Cook can get a Jobs style buzz going but frankly Steve Jobs was so damned good at his job they can probably coast for the next 5 years and still make a mint, just on the buzz and branding Jobs built. He was THAT good.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    21. Re:so? by Stuarticus · · Score: 2

      What a lot of crap, you really have a bee in your bonnet about fanboys. You know what made them fanboys? Good products. People weren't gagging to buy the Newton. If Microsoft had released a device as well made a the ipod or the iphone or the ipad it still would have sold millions, because they all redefined usability. No, I'm not a fan boy, I use Linux exclusively at home, I have an iPod someone gave me for free and an Android phone, just to pre-empt another fanboy diatribe...

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    22. Re:so? by lengau · · Score: 1

      Not Android, but Nokia's 770, N800, and N810 tablets had a pretty strong following for a while.

      --
      I really wanted to change my sig to something witty, but all I could come up with is this.
    23. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just the concept of 7.85" tablets. With a 2 minute-long movie in which Apple executives, on a white background, will describe the magic of those extra 0.85 inches.

      The magic of those extra 0.85 inches is 26% more screen area (assuming the same aspect ratio)

    24. Re:so? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually there are a ton of fan sites still talking about how the Newton was great but that Jobs HAD to kill the Newton because he already had the idea for the iPod/iPad. If you refuse to believe your lying eyes? that's fine by me but I'd point out there is ONLY ONE OTHER PRODUCT that gets people literally camping out and even hiding in dumpsters trying to get one on release....and that is the Air Jordan.

      Now are you gonna sit there and tell me how the Jordans are insanely good products? Or are you gonna accept its fashion that makes it uncool to be having last year's Jordans on your feet just as its uncool to be carrying last year's iPad?

      What I wouldn't give to be a reporter standing in front of one of those lines on release day, i'd kill to hear a reporter talk to these people and ask them questions like "What makes this product better than the one in your hand? What does the new one do that the one in your hand don't?" because you and i BOTH know they would have NO answer to that, in the end it'd be because its just like this cartoon, kinda sad even the cartoonist can see it but you can't. Still got that little niggler on your shoulder telling you that you paid too much? Don't worry go to some of the fan sites and they'll drown out that little niggler talking about what an incredible device the iFoo 6 is over the iFoo 5 which is inferior in every way.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    25. Re:so? by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Dammit Hairyfeet, if I'd realised it was you I wouldn't even have replied to you. Maybe Windows 8 they'll be cueing outside your shop for at midnight.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    26. Re:so? by hazydave · · Score: 1

      That's 26% less pocket-sizedness, though, when considering a 7"-class tablet. And at least based on the latest rumor mills, less resolution than most current 7"ers as well.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    27. Re:so? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      People camp out for concert tickets & video game releases.

    28. Re:so? by milkmage · · Score: 1

      of all the people who listen to digital music on a portable device, over 50% buy ipods.

      >50% of all the people who listen to digital music are not apple fans

    29. Re:so? by milkmage · · Score: 1

      ipads to shoes? your argument has jumped the shark.

      some Jordans are collectibles (go check ebay) $450!!! http://www.ebay.com/itm/DS-Nike-Air-Jordan-IV-Doernbecher-Sz-7-Men-Cement-Bred-Retro-Lebron-KD-7-5-Wtk-/271072770927?pt=US_Men_s_Shoes&hash=item3f1d323b6f

      collectible means they have value beyond feet protection. So for some, it's an investment of sorts - has NOTHING to do with fashion because YOU DON'T WEAR THEM.

      "Or are you gonna accept its fashion that makes it uncool to be having last year's Jordans on your feet just as its uncool to be carrying last year's iPad?"
      and who's more image conscious? he who wants to be seen with an ipad, or he who DOESN'T?

  2. Doesn't sound likely by ericloewe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From what I've seen, Windows 8 tablets are focused on the 9-12 inch segment. I'd say the real threat posed by the iPad Mini is against the smaller stuff, like the small Kindle Fire (HD or not), Nexus 7 and similar hardware.

    1. Re:Doesn't sound likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The speculated size is 7.85". Which puts it somewhere in-between. Microsoft's biggest tablet problem is that they haven't learned the HP TouchPad lesson... the only way to compete with Apple today is to massively undercut them on price. Microsoft hasn't even announced official Surface prices yet, but the early rumors suggested they might actually cost more than a full-size iPad.

    2. Re:Doesn't sound likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the concern is that the iPad mini will steal the Slate's thunder and may come in cheaper than an iPad 2 which is $399. It would be a black eye for Microsoft if the flagship Windows 8 tablet fails to gain any traction in the marketplace.

    3. Re:Doesn't sound likely by Locutus · · Score: 1

      and Steve Ballmers comments about the pricing would follow them going for the high end of the market. Don't forget, netbooks dragged Microsoft kicking and screaming into the low end 'laptop' market. Once they sweet talked OEMs into using Microsoft's old and even a limited version for extremely low licensing and including marketing packages which most likely eliminated the OS "expense" for the OEM...Microsoft came out with Windows 7 for netbooks and pretty much killed that cheap netbook market.

      Free or very cheap software is not what Microsoft wants to promote and since the dominant market for tablets is that which the iPad define that's what Microsoft will target. A small tablet by Apple will not complicate the Windows 8 tablet segment because there is no overlap for users. To complicate it, someone would have to be opting for a Windows 8 tablet( >9" size ) at iPad pricing and then opt for a much smaller iPad Mini instead for not much less. For a second there I thought it was a C/net article and just more promotional buzz for Windows 8 tablets.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    4. Re:Doesn't sound likely by Cassini2 · · Score: 2

      With falling hardware prices, Microsoft's ability to charge $200/computer (Windows+Office) for software is not supportable in the long-term. Customers will simply refuse to pay it.

      People will pay a few percent of the unit price for software. After that point, it becomes very tough to sell bundled software. Microsoft has a massive lock-in on the Windows PC, however this lock in is not worth $200/unit * 500 million units/year, especially in expanding non-traditional markets like mobile phones.

    5. Re:Doesn't sound likely by tyrione · · Score: 1

      The speculated size is 7.85". Which puts it somewhere in-between. Microsoft's biggest tablet problem is that they haven't learned the HP TouchPad lesson... the only way to compete with Apple today is to massively undercut them on price. Microsoft hasn't even announced official Surface prices yet, but the early rumors suggested they might actually cost more than a full-size iPad.

      It is impossible to undercut Apple on price as Apple [thankfully] will secure the bulk components 6-12 months in advance barring Microsoft from doing so, not to mention Microsoft can't actually afford to play loss leader with Apple. They will just accelerate their own bankruptcy.

    6. Re:Doesn't sound likely by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      Nooo..what MSFT hasn't fucking learned and what I would just LOVE to dress up in a suit of armor with a large flounder and Monty Python style beat into their thick skulls is THERE IS NO POINT TO HAVING A WINDOWS THAT DOESN'T RUN WINDOWS SOFTWARE!!! Which you think would be so fucking obvious you wouldn't even have to point this out but apparently Steve Ballmer thinks he has the other Steve's product and can sell people on look and feel. No you can't Ballmer as NOBODY wants Windows, what they WANT is to RUN THEIR SOFTWARE which requires your platform moron!

      Why is that so God damned hard to understand? what MSFT should be doing is royally kissing the ass of AMD and Intel and begging on bended knee for them to get the new Atoms and Bobcats out and into tablets, THAT is what people would actually want Windows for. With those you could then have a Transformer style design, where you pop it into a keyboard cradle with an extra battery and tada! You have a 9-12 hour laptop, pop it out the cradle and you have a 3-5 hour tablet and in both forms it will run your Windows software which is the ONLY reason people want Windows for in the first place!

      Sheesh, maybe when WinRT and Win 8 goes the way of WinCE and Vista somebody there will get bitchslapped with the clue bat but until then me and many of the retailers will just sit back shaking their heads and wondering WTF they are thinking. I'm just glad I've switched my customers and family over to Win 7 so I can just avoid the disaster as I have a feeling I'm gonna have a lot of pissed off people bringing me tablets they bought in other stores going "It SAYS its Windows, why won't my software run?" and then having to tell them they got fucked and the only thing it'll run is cell phone crap.

      The only positive? I missed getting a Touchpad and i have a feeling Woot! will have WinPads in 6 months at firesale prices, for $100 I'll take a nice dual core pad to play with,but unlike the public I'll know what ARM is and know that its worthless for anything but browsing and playing Angry Birds.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:Doesn't sound likely by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      You can undercut them on price but only at the expense of quality. When it became sort of common knowledge apple where releasing an OS based on ios, a *lot* of very crappy android tablets rushed to the market to try and beat it, and the quality generally as so damn bad it basically destroyed androids rep on the tablet.

      Those who DID go for high build quality either went for a windows based Tablet that still missed the entire damn point of what made the ipad so good: Fat clumy fingers need simple foolproof OS. The rare few full price android ones just felt like an expensive second rate ipad clone. There was no value equasion in it.

      Its all changed a bit now, the samsung pads are actually reasonably decent quality and the app ecosystem sucks a lot less for pads then it did then, but the momentum behind the ipad is going to be very difficult to circumvent, and ultimately to hit iPad quality you'll end up having to make something with an iPad cost unless your prepared to eat some very big losses for a long enough time to survive a market punchup with apple.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    8. Re:Doesn't sound likely by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      Only Windows RT doesn't run legacy code. Windows 8 on x86 and x64 runs everything since DOS 1.0/Windows 95 (x64 dropped 16-bit executable compatibility).

      Windows 8 might have problems, but backward compatibility sure isn't one of them. Even if Windows RT ran x86 code, I doubt any current or near-future ARM processor could handle it at a decent speed.

    9. Re:Doesn't sound likely by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Uhhh since we were talking about pads and WinRT I thought it would be obvious that is what is being discussed. Sure Win 8 X86 runs X86 code, although I think Metro is gonna bomb on the desktop, but the thing MSFT just seems to refuse to accept is that people don't buy Windows because MSFT gives them a warm fuzzy like Apple does, they buy it to run Windows X86 code which makes WinRT? Totally fucking pointless and beyond retarded to put the Windows name on.

      They should have spun off the Metro division, so they wouldn't have the constant "You gotta tie everything to Windows and Office" PHBs breathing down their necks, and the ONLY connects between them should have been a focus on easy of connectivity between Windows, Metro, Office, and Xbox. As it is it'll be just like I saw a few years back when a local retailer was selling these "Windows tablets" that were WinCE. The average customer doesn't know ARM from leg and got them home and when they found it wouldn't run their Windows software? they were returned en masse. the shop ended up taking a bath on the things and after a few retailers take a bath on winRT the word will get around and these things won't be found anywhere but the MSFT stores, where nobody will buy them after the MSFT floor people explain it won't run their Windows software. Stupid.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:Doesn't sound likely by hazydave · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible to undercut Apple on price. The components market is significantly larger than "just Apple". And Apple has high margins... they're among the most profitable companies anywhere in consumer electronics. Apple's been spending money since the 70s building their reputation as a luxury brand. Same reason they can charge twice as much for a laptop of the same performance and build quality of the top tier PC vendors. Great business if you can get it.

      But that's Apple. Microsoft does have a problem here, potentially. Every company that's gone strictly head-to-head against Apple on tablets has lost. Many consumers are savvy enough to realize that an entry-level tablet just shouldn't cost $500... and in particular, with Apple functioning as the Mercedes or Godiva of the tablet market, it's hard to sell a tablet at the same price (or more) if you're just a Ford or a Hershey. Microsoft is actually better poised to cash in here in the Windows tablet market, because they're not going to have to pay the $50-$100 software licensing fees that every other Windows 8 tablet vendor will have to pay. At the lower end, Windows RT (ARM) tablets are only shipping with Windows and Office bundled, so the cost concerns are pretty real if they want to compete in the sub-$500 range.

      Yes, there are a bunch of super cheap Android tablets on the market... Android makes that possible, given the low-to-zero cost of the software. There are also some, like the Asus Transformer and the Samsung Galaxy Note series, that are comparable to the iPad on fit and finish, and superior in other ways. There's no reason a Windows tablet can't compete here.

      Microsoft is also clearly going higher end on the x86 tablet, if the specs about the "Surface Pro" are true. That's using laptop chips, an i5 Ivy Bridge processor, up to 128GB of flash storage. That's not going to be cheap... and that's actually been one of the problems with Windows tablets ever since they debuted, 15 or so year ago. The same reason compact laptops were a small niche item until the Netbook... people generally don't want to pay more something they perceive to be less. Maybe the notion of a tablet is strong enough to be seen as something on par with a laptop, but for the most part, tablets have been seen as something lesser. After all, Apple priced their iPad at half the price of their entry-level laptop.

      And it's also curious that Microsoft isn't going with the new Atom processor. If Intel's claims are true about Atom Z2760 "Clover Trail" SOC, this will the first x86 for tablets that really gives the ARM a run. It's supposed to match a dual-core ARM Cortex A9 on power consumption and match or ever-so-slightly beat it on performance per clock cycle. This is going into the Lenovo ThinkPad 2, the new HP tablet, and a bunch of other Windows tablets, which will compete more directly with ARM. Given that they're all expected to primarily run WinRT (and existing Windows 7 Phone) apps, the lack of a desktop-class processor may not be an issue. Of course, these will have Netbook-class performance, so they're not ideal for big desktop applications, but then again, tablets in general aren't ideal for big desktop applications... they lack the necessary storage and RAM, too. This series and the ARMs will potentially put serious price pressure on the whole Windows tablet market... assuming that market actually materializes.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    11. Re:Doesn't sound likely by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Most of the forthcoming Windows tablets are going to based on the Atom Z2760, at least until the Bobcats are out to compete. According to Intel anyway, the Z2760 will basically match a dual-core ARM Cortex A9 on power consumption, and maybe even edge it out on performance per clock cycle. Of course, there are plenty of Android tablets with quad core A9, and newer models based on the Krait or A15 core aren't far off.

      The defining feature of a table is all-day performance. If a Windows tablet can't give you 8 hours of sustained use (like the Transformer... you get more once in the keyboard dock, but the basic tablet itself runs long), then it's just a crippled laptop. I'm wondering just what kind of portable life you're getting out of Microsoft's i5 based Surface Pro. The HP tablet, the ThinkPad 2, and others using the Atom will probably deliver dandy battery life. They'll also run those Windows 7 Phone apps fine, and whatever WinRT/Metro apps as show up this fall. And they will run desktop apps, but basically you're talking about Netbook performance levels. Less demanding Win32 programs fine, hardcore ones not to much. Then again, you don' t have the screen, storage, or RAM on a tablet... it's not just the CPU.

      And I think this is the one thing Microsoft may not get yet -- desktops and tablets are used differently enough, there's not necessarily a good reason to run the same applications on them.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    12. Re:Doesn't sound likely by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Windows RT does actually run the Win32 API... of course, not x86 code. But only Microsoft gets to use it. Third parties can't port their Win32 apps, they can only use WinRT... that's to keep their apps within Microsoft's new walled garden.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    13. Re:Doesn't sound likely by hazydave · · Score: 1

      To OEMs, the Windows RT cost is rumored to run $75-$100. This is only available bundled, Windows and Office. And never to end users, only to OEMs. So you'll only see the final product, no retail software boxes. And yeah, this is going to be an issue in the tablet market, since tablets are expected to cost less than full PCs.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    14. Re:Doesn't sound likely by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      You sound like you believe that tablets must run Windows RT. The really interesting (in other words, useful) tablets are x86, not ARM.

    15. Re:Doesn't sound likely by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Apple's been spending money since the 70s building their reputation as a luxury brand. Same reason they can charge twice as much for a laptop of the same performance and build quality of the top tier PC vendors.

      When were Apple IIs advertised as a luxury brand?

      Also, now you're saying build quality as top tier PC vendors? Like I said in another thread recently, whenever the CNET video podcasts try to match MacBook Airs or Macbook Pros, some are more expensive, and they basically never come close, in their opinion, in all areas. The trackpad is one that comes up commonly, the best ones are "almost as good".

  3. Who fucking cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is absolutely no story here. Nothing to even connect Microsoft and Apple.

    "Competition from X could be bad for Y".

    What a fucking wank fest this site is. Anyways, flame on, dopes.

    1. Re:Who fucking cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But ... but ... it could "complicate 'things' " ..

      By which I assume they mean:

      "" 'Stuff' could happen."
      Clearly, mistakes are being made ...

    2. Re:Who fucking cares? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      This is just more of the same sort of "Apple is inevitable rah rah" kind of nonsense that has been perpetuated since the release of the iPad. Apple appears to be finally acknowledging a use case they tried to ignore. They are being dragged kicking and screaming by the market into releasing a product like what everyone else already has.

      "Apple eats crow" would be a better headline for this situation (assuming it's even true).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Who fucking cares? by schlachter · · Score: 2

      Actually, if you replace the X with "Apple" and the Y with "Microsoft"...they seem pretty connected. You can't throw me off with your skillful use of variables in quotes!

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    4. Re:Who fucking cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Apple is going to dominate this new 'use case' just like they do the rest of the tablet market. Apple may be about to eat crow, but they're going to get paid billions to do it.

      Speaking of eating things, why don't you eat the corn niblets out of my shit.

    5. Re:Who fucking cares? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Just more Apple marketing. Ohh leaks and special information about super special Apple products, really all so lame. Notice Apple never public comments, it always leaks, yet it is the most security conscious employees must STFU or be fired company on the planet. When will this lame arsed marketing tactic end.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  4. Next they'll make an iPad Nano by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 3, Interesting
  5. Why cant i mod the story down? by who_stole_my_kidneys · · Score: 5, Funny

    I should be able to mod down the story so nobody has to read this garbage.

    1. Re:Why cant i mod the story down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed your chance, pay more attention to the pending list.

    2. Re:Why cant i mod the story down? by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      *pfff* we have to have at least three Apple related stories a day so that all the karma whores can get in their Samsung >> Apple, lol round corners, and lawsuit jokes.

      --
      -
  6. how? by zlives · · Score: 0

    imho

    any one who wants an iPad, and can afford one will buy an iPad. Those that don't want an iPad (me included) would have made that decision based on some reason (whatever that might be). people that buy the w8tablet either are getting a good deal (priced) for holidays or know nothing about tablet technology... not because there is or isn;t a new iPad available.

    thats just my thoughts

    1. Re:how? by zlives · · Score: 1

      people that "want" to buy a tablet based on a specific software, i.e. Droid, IOS or win8 not included. Since they will buy what they actually want.

    2. Re:how? by narcc · · Score: 0

      Wait, so the only people who will buy Windows 8 tablets will either be those that are after a bargain tablet or those that don't know anything about tablets?

      What a stupid thing to say. I'm more likely to buy a Windows 8 tablet over the two current leaders as iOS is garbage (really, I don't know how anyone puts up with it), and I don't care for Android (I don't like the clunky UI and hate the pitiful dev tools). I seriously doubt that I'm unique.

      Really, a Windows 8 tablet on x86 is rather compelling for technical users as well as home and business users.

      What's wrong with Windows 8 that you think customers will run screaming from the platform? If iOS, Android, and Windows 8 were the only three options, there's no real reason to go with the current market leaders other than being heavily invested in those other ecosystems.

    3. Re:how? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. And I'd like a computer that can be used as a desktop when it's appropriate, and a tablet or (better, given how big most "serious" tablets are) phone at other times.

      I'm hoping Ubuntu is able to partner with CyanogenMod or some similar group at some point to put out their Ubuntu for Android thing.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:how? by zlives · · Score: 1

      "people that "want" to buy a tablet based on a specific software, i.e. Droid, IOS or win8 not included. Since they will buy what they actually want."
      my original comment was made for general consumer's purchasing stand point, since the article insinuated that win8 buyers will switch to iPad.

      you are entirely correct in saying that "being heavily invested in those other ecosystems" and that is the real issue MS has to deal with, late as they are to the market.

    5. Re:how? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      A lack of apps buggers up the ARM version and a radical interface change isn't going to help sell the x86 desktop version.

    6. Re:how? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1, Funny

      >>>What a stupid thing to say. I'm more likely to buy a Windows 8 tablet over the two current leaders as iOS is garbage (really, I don't know how anyone puts up with it), and I don't care for Android (I don't like the clunky UI and hate the pitiful dev tools). I seriously doubt that I'm unique.

      Probably not unique given your current location (Washington, near Seattle, Microsoft cubicle). ;-)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    7. Re:how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously.

      Who bitches about dev tools on a tablet? STFU and GTFO.

    8. Re:how? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Not on the tablet, for the tablet.

    9. Re:how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not unique given your current location (Washington, near Seattle, Microsoft cubicle). ;-)

      I've noticed a trend on this site lately that the vast majority of criticism leveled at microsoft products is just subjective comments and that anyone who has a different opinion of a subjective nature must be a employee of microsoft. Even more bizarre is the amount of people willing to spend time arguing that someone with a subjective opinion can be wrong.

    10. Re:how? by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Do you know anyone that knows anything about phones who owns a Windows phone?

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    11. Re:how? by thoth · · Score: 1

      What a stupid thing to say. I'm more likely to buy a Windows 8 tablet over the two current leaders as iOS is garbage (really, I don't know how anyone puts up with it), and I don't care for Android (I don't like the clunky UI and hate the pitiful dev tools). I seriously doubt that I'm unique.

      So iOS is garbage and Andoid is lousy too... makes you wonder why Microsoft is a total non-entity in this market space they've been in for 15 years.

      What's wrong with Windows 8 that you think customers will run screaming from the platform? If iOS, Android, and Windows 8 were the only three options, there's no real reason to go with the current market leaders other than being heavily invested in those other ecosystems.

      No compelling reason to pick one up over iOS/Android (yes yes, of course YOU and the 53 other people that agree are sure to cause a day 1 sales boom).
      As for ecosystem investment, well DUH you could have said the same about any previous Microsoft OS versus anything else - discounting the massive advantages of the ecosystem, there's no real reason to go with Windows over BeOS, or Windows of OS/2, or Windows over Linux, etc.

  7. We can only hope... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Would it be poor taste to sneak a large Steve Jobs poster onto the outside of Apple's release venue, with his quotes on 7 inch tablets?

    "If you take an iPad and hold it upright in portrait view and draw an imaginary horizontal line halfway down the screen, the screens on the seven-inch tablets are a bit smaller than the bottom half of the iPad display. This size isn't sufficient to create great tablet apps in our opinion.
    Well, one could increase the resolution of the display to make up for some of the difference. It is meaningless, unless your tablet also includes sandpaper, so that the user can sand down their fingers to around one quarter of the present size. Apple's done extensive user-testing on touch interfaces over many years, and we really understand this stuff. There are clear limits of how close you can physically place elements on a touch screen before users cannot reliably tap, flick, or pinch them. This is one of the key reasons we think the 10-inch screen size is the minimum size required to create great tablet apps."

    1. Re:We can only hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      People have spent quite a bit of time on this already, and if their math is right, the table will actually be 7.85" with a 1024x768 resolution. Why are they so sure of that size? Because it provides the same touch area target sizes as used by the iPhone/iPod. Moving close to 8" also makes a big difference.

    2. Re:We can only hope... by houghi · · Score: 1

      The thing is, they are not interested in creating great apps. They just want to sell the hardware.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:We can only hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The same arrogant doofus who originally said that also produced a 4 inch display phone with touch. So apparently they figured out how to do that as it has been a very successful product. I never understood his problem with something in between the two successful products the iPhone and the iPad. I have an original Kindle Fire and a Nexus 7 and I am very happy with the 7 inch form factor. If I was inclined towards the Apple ecosystem I would certainly consider and probably purchase an iPad mini. I imagine a lot of other people would too.

    4. Re:We can only hope... by BLToday · · Score: 2

      Steve said a lot of things. What he meant was "we're working on something like that but we don't want to show our hand so we're going to be publicly dismissive of it."

    5. Re:We can only hope... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      They may have "created the tablet as we know it" but my local iFan and early adopter has dumped her iPad because the 7 inch form factor suited her better. Also, all of the scare mongering about Android was nonsense.

      It turns out that Apple is not infallible after all.

      So all of your attempts to fellate the designers at Apple are moot.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:We can only hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow, the iPad size wasn't appropriate for one person.

      Fellate yourself.

    7. Re:We can only hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And his best quote yet: 7" tablets are dead on arrival.

    8. Re:We can only hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good is the hardware if there are no apps to run on it?

    9. Re:We can only hope... by smash · · Score: 1

      They were. Anecdotal evidence, but out of all the tablet owners I know (say, 10 of them), only one has a galaxy tab. In 10 inch form.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    10. Re:We can only hope... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      Well said. However, this is not a 7-inch tablet. This is a 7.85-inch tablet. You see, Steve was correct that 7 inches is too small. However, 7.85 inches is the perfect size. It just took Apple several years of research to find out exactly the perfect size.

    11. Re:We can only hope... by harperska · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up. I don't know why more people haven't figured out this is how Apple operates. The only thing I can think of that they were publicly dismissive of and didn't ever do a 180 on is flash on mobile. And if Adobe had ever figured out how to make flash on mobile work well and hadn't abandoned the project, you can bet that Apple would have eventually included a flash compatible runtime (either written by Adobe or licensed from Adobe) while conveniently forgetting that they ever hated it.

    12. Re:We can only hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash on iOS exists. It's called "Adobe AIR" . What iOS doesn't have is Flash browser plugin.

      Considering Adobe is now dropping support for Android Flash plugin as well, it doesn't seem like Apple was wrong with this.

    13. Re:We can only hope... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Apple's first tablet, the iPod Touch, had a 3.5" screen. So, it's possible for them to create a great (in their opinion) interface on a 3.5" screen and a 10" screen, but not on a 7" screen? That seems a bit strange to me.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  8. Meh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the rumours are true and judging by the lack of innovation with the iPhone 5 it seems likely that the iPad Mini won't be anything special. Gizmodo seems to be expecting a sub-HD screen, the same as the iPhone, and fairly pedestrian hardware specs. iOS 6 is already out so we know what to expect from that.

    Their competitors are doing things like split screen multitasking at a price point it seems unlikely Apple will be able to match (the iPod Touch is $300).

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Meh by moonwatcher2001 · · Score: 1

      Their competitors are doing things like split screen multitasking at a price point it seems unlikely Apple will be able to match (the iPod Touch is $300).

      That's not a given. Before the original iPad came out people thought it would cost $700-$800 but it was $499. The iPod Touch you refer to is 32GB Making the base iPad mini 16GB would save some money

    2. Re:Meh by MogNuts · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Plus as someone elsewhere posted, anyone who wants an iPad, has one. Besides:

      Win 8 tablet: apps to use, plus a *real* OS when I need it. Tired of using bullshit dataviz office on the go? Fire up MS Office 2010. Don't want to play bullshit touch games? Fire up Dead Space, Mass Effect, etc. (limited to what a intel HD 4000 that can play)

      iPad: iOS apps. Limited feature, buggy, crashes alot apps. Yay.

    3. Re:Meh by Threni · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Agreed. Plus as someone elsewhere posted, anyone who wants an iPad, has one.

      So tomorrow iPad sales will be zero? How about the day after that? Next year?

    4. Re:Meh by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

      If people are concerned about size why would it have to be more innovative than the bigger ipad? it just needs to be the right size for you. I would imagine for a lot of people this isn't a replacement for the larger ipad. It's for people who don't want the large one.

    5. Re:Meh by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      The peanut gallery was expecting a MacOS tablet rather than an over sized iPod. That shocker is over and done with and the market has shifted. Apple doesn't have another rabbit to pull here.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:Meh by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Win 8 tablet: apps to use, plus a *real* OS when I need it. Tired of using bullshit dataviz office on the go? Fire up MS Office 2010. Don't want to play bullshit touch games? Fire up Dead Space, Mass Effect, etc. (limited to what a intel HD 4000 that can play)

      Yeah, that sold well last time around. When they called them WinXP tablets.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re:Meh by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Sure they do. They can make a 7' Tablet that doesn't run iOS, but rather runs MacOS. ;)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Meh by BLToday · · Score: 1

      Hey, I bought one of those and a Vista tablet. It was OK, I was dreaming that I could do quick and easy demo with clients or better Photoshopping. Yeah, that didn't exactly happen. It was stylus was inaccurate and viewing angle was too bad for working with clients across the table.

      So MSFT sold at least two windows licenses to suckers like me.

      Speaking of tablets, had so much hope for the OQO. I might try to buy one to add to my collection of relic computing. I can put it next to my 3dfx Voodoo 5500, Rendition V1000, HP Jornada, HP iPaq, Handspring Visor, SB Live and a SCSI controller.

    9. Re:Meh by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If they also sell it for $200, it sounds like a plan.

      1. Sell it for $200.
      2. Wait for CEOs of all competing companies to die from a heart stroke (shouldn't take more than a day).
      3. PROFIT!

    10. Re:Meh by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that sold well last time around. When they called them WinXP tablets.

      The obvious difference is that those only had the "real OS" (i.e. desktop) stuff. They were fine for that, but sucked as actual touch devices, because classic Windows UI was not designed for touch.

      On the other hand, iPad implemented a good, solid touch experience, but completely dropped the desktop stuff.

      Win8 has both worlds. You can use whichever one you need right now, and ignore the other one.

    11. Re:Meh by sl149q · · Score: 1

      iPads are mobile within an office environment.

      iPad mini's will be more mobile out of doors. They'll sell a higher proportion of LTE versions than the larger iPad.

      iPads are perfect for PDF documents. But a bit big for reading novels in bed.

      iPad mini's are about the right size for recreational reading. And again more portable (fit in purse or backpack better) so more likely to be with you for reading.

      Both sizes will sell well. They solve different problems.

    12. Re:Meh by smash · · Score: 1

      Hi there, it is possible to run real x86 apps on a tablet without having to give up low power consuming ARM hardware. Say hello to VDI.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    13. Re:Meh by smash · · Score: 1

      Except you can't ignore the other one. All the x86 applications currently out there are NOT metro aware. if we need to write new apps, we can just compile them for ARM / android / ios.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    14. Re:Meh by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course, this implies that developers will be bothered to write apps for Metro. And why wouldn't they?

    15. Re:Meh by exomondo · · Score: 1

      The peanut gallery was expecting a MacOS tablet rather than an over sized iPod.

      People were expecting that when Steve Jobs announced the 'iPhone runs OS X' at the iPhone unveiling, only to find out shortly after that in actuality it didn't.

  9. pee on the wall. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or "Win8 on the Surface"

  10. Want bigger, not smaller! by busyqth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where's my ~14" A4/Letter sized tablet? Give me a full sized page of text please.

    1. Re:Want bigger, not smaller! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure Apple's working on it. It will be called the iPad Maxi.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Want bigger, not smaller! by Stickerboy · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Apple's working on it. It will be called the iPad Maxi.

      Too many syllables, not enough flow. I think switching it around and calling it the "Max iPad" is much more elegant.

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:Want bigger, not smaller! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Nah. "iPad EXTREME!"

    4. Re:Want bigger, not smaller! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have one too, please.

      The iPad's the best thing on the market at the moment for looking at PDFs of documents with colour & complex layouts (e-ink readers with tiny screens suck for this), but the screen is still a little bit small for docs which were laid out for A4/Letter size.

    5. Re:Want bigger, not smaller! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      iRex produced an A4 eBook reader, but they only sold a few before the company went bankrupt. I wish someone else would pick the idea up - I'd love to have an A4 eInk device.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Want bigger, not smaller! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can it have wings, too?

  11. Re:Win8 by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Funny

    The[sic] there's that name. Makes me think of urinate every time someone says it.

    Probably best if I not tell you what I think when I hear the word 'pad'. -- Some woman

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  12. Win8 tablets are vapor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The promise of winRT is really MS office on a tablet. And nothing else. Windows 8 brings NOTHING else to the table that iOS or android doesn't already do better.

    So, office.
    Not some BS cloud hybrid, actual fully functional office. Excel, word, access, the whole nine yards.

    Also not some BS psudo-laptop hybrid device that Microsoft has been failing to sell for a literal decade. An actual real tablet with a functional touch interface, long battery life, instant on, app store, all that. You know, like apple sells. Or something running andriod.

    Here is why you will never buy a windows 8 tablet:
    Office on Arm is a lie. Microsoft will never be able to port the full office suite to arm because the codebase is so bloated with decades-old windows specific bloat. You will never see a winRT port of office that you could ever call functional.

    The alternative? One of those new custom "windows only" intel SoCs. - These tablets will never sell well. They'll cost 899, weigh twice as much, have a boatload of carryover pc-isims that will make them useless as actual tablets, and will run maybe an hour and a half before running down their battery. And intel based windows tablet will never be as functional as an arm based one.

    1. Re:Win8 tablets are vapor by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Office on Arm is a lie. Microsoft will never be able to port the full office suite to arm because the codebase is so bloated with decades-old windows specific bloat.

      How do you know?

      And why would "Windows-specific bloat" preclude porting something to ARM? So long as Windows itself runs on ARM, why would the app care about the architecture in the slightest?

      The alternative? One of those new custom "windows only" intel SoCs. - These tablets will never sell well. They'll cost 899, weigh twice as much, have a boatload of carryover pc-isims that will make them useless as actual tablets, and will run maybe an hour and a half before running down their battery. And intel based windows tablet will never be as functional as an arm based one.

      Did you actually look at the published specs? The Clover Field one that Asus has announced weighs 680 grams (for comparison, iPad is 650 g), and they declare 10 hours of battery life, same as for their ARM devices. You can say it's all lies, but we've already seen Intel (Medfield) phones running Android in production, and their battery life is, again, pretty much the same as ARM.

    2. Re:Win8 tablets are vapor by smash · · Score: 1

      Do you think office is written in x86 assembly or something? haha.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    3. Re:Win8 tablets are vapor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And why would "Windows-specific bloat" preclude porting something to ARM? So long as Windows itself runs on ARM, why would the app care about the architecture in the slightest?

      Then you haven't been following this very well. WOA is not full Windows, it does not have all the Win32 API, it does not have all the Windows features, in particular it only has the 'Metro' UI and not the UI of Windows 7*.

      This means that have a program run on WOA (Windows RT) is not a *PORT*, it is a complete *REWRITE*.

      Much of Office is legacy assembler, probably not well understood even by MS. This is why Office RT is a cut down version of the full Office. What will come with Surface RT is a 'Office RT preview' and is Home and Student. Release is next year.

      * There is some residual desktop Windows, enough for Office, but developers will not have access to it.

    4. Re:Win8 tablets are vapor by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Then you haven't been following this very well. WOA is not full Windows, it does not have all the Win32 API, it does not have all the Windows features, in particular it only has the 'Metro' UI and not the UI of Windows 7*.

      I have been following this well enough - certainly closer than you, since I'm well aware that Windows on ARM does have the classic desktop ("UI of Windows 7").

      What it does is specifically preclude third-party programs from running on that desktop, by checking signatures in the binaries. So for you, yes, you cannot just recompile stuff, you have to rewrite them as Windows Store apps. Your claim about Win32 API is the same thing - yes, it is severely restricted, in Store apps. Not on the desktop.

      So, yes, WoA comes with a desktop, complete with a taskbar etc; with Explorer, cmd.exe, PowerShell and desktop IE. And Office.

      Much of Office is legacy assembler, probably not well understood even by MS.

      And your source for that claim would be what, exactly?

      Coincidentally, you might also want to come up with an explanation of how - if "much of Office is legacy assembler" - it has a native x64 version since Office 2010.

    5. Re:Win8 tablets are vapor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft will never be able to port the full office suite to arm because the codebase is so bloated with decades-old windows specific bloat.

      Writing for ARM doesn't preclude use of Windows-specific code and it's not like Office was written in x86 assembly. So looks like your reasoning fails on your lack of basic technical knowledge.

    6. Re:Win8 tablets are vapor by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      Parent has it right, but there's even more to it than that. For one thing, it's bloody obvious that WOA / Windows RT has a full Win32 API; what the hell do you (the GP) think that Explorer and IE10 and cmd.exe and Task Manager and Office RT (or whatever it's called) and all those other hundreds of Win32 binary programs that ship on it are running against? In fact, I'm quite sure there's nothing that actually stops Windows Store apps from using it, except
      A) they run with extremely restricted permissions, so many of the APIs won't do any good
      B) much like the way that Apple rejects apps that call restricted APIs on iOS, the Windows Store app approval process will check the APIs that an app uses.

      Also, aside from the UI, Office these days is pretty much identical between the Windows and OS X versions. That implies that not only is it free of "decades-old windows specific bloat" (as the GGGP claimed) but that much of it isn't even dependent on Win32 (the UI obviously is).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  13. Complicate? by mitchell_pgh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would argue that it does considerably more than simply complicate things. The iPad mini will show that Apple can create and expand upon a range of high quality devices on what is essentially a single platform. It's all about the ecosystem that you can buy today vs. Microsoft's ever persistent promises of a better tomorrow. While that may be an oversimplification, most end users just want something that works, looks great, and makes their lives easier. Currently, I don't see that with Windows outside of the traditional desktop experience.

    1. Re:Complicate? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Windows ecosystem is vast, and a lot of business users in particular will love being able to run MS Office on their tablets. Microsoft's biggest advantage is always software compatibility.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Complicate? by used2win32 · · Score: 1

      Bingo! You are correct.

      --
      Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
    3. Re:Complicate? by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

      Except that the ARM based devices won't be able to tap that ecosystem *at all*, and the x86 based devices are priced so high that the only people that will buy them are the ones that have a very specific need such as a tablet that ties into Active Directory.

    4. Re:Complicate? by schlachter · · Score: 1

      I was with you until the last sentence. Let me help you out.

      I would argue that it does considerably more than simply complicate things. The iPad mini will show that Apple can create and expand upon a range of high quality devices on what is essentially a single platform. It's all about the ecosystem that you can buy today vs. Microsoft's ever persistent promises of a better tomorrow. While that may be an oversimplification, most end users just want something that works, looks great, and makes their lives easier. Currently, I don't see that with Windows.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    5. Re:Complicate? by terjeber · · Score: 1

      The only people who think that Apple can create and expand on a range of high quality devices are the people Jimmy Kimmel interviewed:

      the emperor's new phone

    6. Re:Complicate? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft's biggest advantage to date is simply "Windows". Microsoft is a "windows" company, that is what they sell and support. Everything is built on, around and for windows (including Xbox btw). That is also their Achilles' Heal.

      They cannot or will not support, fully, other devices and OSes. Nobody wants Windows 8 except a few. There is a huge market for Office Support on other products that is being filled by other people, not Microsoft. They will never make that market, because it isn't "Windows".

      Windows 8 is too late, and still nobody has seen it in the wild on a Tablet. Meanwhile iOS is changing (getting smaller) and Android has completely caught up to iPads. I was at Walmart last night (cheap DVDs) and saw the sales guy talking about iPads and Nexus 7" to a lady that bought the Nexus 7". It was a better fit, and a price point that Apple can't match. They are getting eaten alive at the bottom.

      Meanwhile, Microsoft has NOTHING. Not the High End (going away), nor at the low end (Nexus 7") They have no place to go.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:Complicate? by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      No-one loves being able to run MS Office anywhere, everyone gags when it launches. Don't mistake necessity for admiration.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  14. This wont effect Windows RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been 11 years since the first iPod was release and the general public's raging erection for Apple devices has still not been satisfied. Windows RT wouldn't stand a chance even if Apple shutdown tomorrow. Releasing a new device wont make Microsoft fail any harder than they already are.

  15. But Steve said no. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Didn't Steve Jobs say publicly that a tablet any smaller than the iPad is useless as a tablet and if its bigger than the iPhone its useless as a phone, aiming directly at the 7" Android tablets hitting the market?

    1. Re:But Steve said no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes... But you know... This guy is dead (breaking news)

    2. Re:But Steve said no. by busyqth · · Score: 1

      Didn't Steve Jobs say publicly that a tablet any smaller than the iPad is useless as a tablet and if its bigger than the iPhone its useless as a phone, aiming directly at the 7" Android tablets hitting the market?

      Yes, but concurrent with the release of the iPad Mini, Apple will be releasing the $99 iFile fingertip filer accessory so that eager users will be able to use the smaller screen more accurately. For $100 extra, the iFile Pro will include a bluetooth interface and 500MB extra RAM.

    3. Re:But Steve said no. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1
      and the exact quote

      If you take an iPad and hold it upright in portrait view and draw an imaginary horizontal line halfway down the screen, the screens on the seven-inch tablets are a bit smaller than the bottom half of the iPad display. This size isn't sufficient to create great tablet apps in our opinion.

      Well, one could increase the resolution of the display to make up for some of the difference. It is meaningless, unless your tablet also includes sandpaper, so that the user can sand down their fingers to around one quarter of the present size. Apple's done extensive user-testing on touch interfaces over many years, and we really understand this stuff. There are clear limits of how close you can physically place elements on a touch screen before users cannot reliably tap, flick, or pinch them. This is one of the key reasons we think the 10-inch screen size is the minimum size required to create great tablet apps.

      Third, every tablet user is also a smartphone user. No tablet can compete with the mobility of a smartphone, its ease of fitting into your pocket or purse, its unobtrusiveness when used in a crowd. Given that all tablet users will already have a smartphone in their pockets, giving up precious display area to fit a tablet in our pockets is clearly the wrong trade-off. The 7-inch tablets are tweeners, too big to compete with a smartphone and too small to compete with an iPad.

      Fourth, almost all of these new tablets use Android software, but even Google is telling the tablet manufacturers not to use their current release, Froyo, for tablets, and to wait for a special tablet release next year. What does it mean when your software supplier does not (inaudible) to use their software in your tablet? And what does it mean when you ignore them and use it anyway?

      Fifth, iPad now has over 35,000 apps on the App Store. This new crop of tablets will have near zero. And sixth and last, our potential competitors are having a tough time coming close to iPad's pricing, even with their far smaller, far less expensive screens. The iPad incorporates everything we have learned about building high value products from iPhones, iPods, and Macs. We create our own A4 chip, our own software, our own battery chemistry, our own enclosure, our own everything. And this results in an incredible product at a great price. The proof of this will be in the pricing of our competitor's products, which will likely offer less for more.

      These are among the reasons we think the current crop of 7-inch tablets are going to be DOA, dead on arrival. Their manufacturers will learn the painful lesson that their tablets are too small and increase the size next year, thereby abandoning both customers and developers who jumped on the 7-inch bandwagon with an orphan product. Sounds like lots of fun ahead.

    4. Re:But Steve said no. by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      Didn't Steve Jobs say publicly that a tablet any smaller than the iPad is useless as a tablet and if its bigger than the iPhone its useless as a phone, aiming directly at the 7" Android tablets hitting the market?

      Of course he did. It's called misdirection.

    5. Re:But Steve said no. by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      The guy is dead too. I suspect he wouldn't have released the maps app in iOS6 ln its current state and yet that has happened.

    6. Re:But Steve said no. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Yes. Last time Apple was without Steve it nearly went bankrupt.

      I'll just wait for the book titled "How Tim Cook destroyed a $100,000,000,000 company"

    7. Re:But Steve said no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Last time Apple was without Steve it nearly went bankrupt.some 12 years after his removal saved the company.

      I'll just wait for the book titled "How Tim Cook destroyed a $100,000,000,000 company"

      FIFY

    8. Re:But Steve said no. by harperska · · Score: 2

      The last time Apple was without Steve, the board forced Apple out, and instituted policies that were the opposite of what Steve would have done. It was these policies that made Apple nearly go bankrupt. This time, the CEO and top executives were all hand picked by Steve for their ability and willingness to continue his policies in his absence. Remember, Tim Cook was effectively acting-CEO for the last year or so that Steve officially held that post due to Steve's health issues. Apple did perfectly fine during that period, if I recall.

  16. Plant by MogNuts · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Always nice to know that Apple plant's stories (or exposes the media bias). I love how everytime some big iPad killer is announced, *someone* posts a story about the iPad mini. Remember the Nexus 7 launch? One week later there was a iPad mini that proved to be vaporware. At least this time it's BEFORE the launch of Win 8, so we'll see it was just a plant story of vaporware.

    1. Re:Plant by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Always nice to know that Apple plant's stories (or exposes the media bias). I love how everytime some big iPad killer is announced, *someone* posts a story about the iPad mini. Remember the Nexus 7 launch? One week later there was a iPad mini that proved to be vaporware. At least this time it's BEFORE the launch of Win 8, so we'll see it was just a plant story of vaporware.

      So Apple must have planted these stories even though their official stance has been "We don't comment on upcoming products." All the while they are orchestrating some media campaign to discredit competing devices (which they don't really compete against anyways). Or the other plausible explanation is that in the vacuum of real information, many fans endlessly speculate on upcoming products? If you want FUD campaigns, see what MS was doing in the 80s and 90s. The problem for MS is that it doesn't work any more.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:Plant by MogNuts · · Score: 1

      Always nice to know that Apple plant's stories (or exposes the media bias). I love how everytime some big iPad killer is announced, *someone* posts a story about the iPad mini. Remember the Nexus 7 launch? One week later there was a iPad mini that proved to be vaporware. At least this time it's BEFORE the launch of Win 8, so we'll see it was just a plant story of vaporware.

      So Apple must have planted these stories even though their official stance has been "We don't comment on upcoming products." All the while they are orchestrating some media campaign to discredit competing devices (which they don't really compete against anyways). Or the other plausible explanation is that in the vacuum of real information, many fans endlessly speculate on upcoming products? If you want FUD campaigns, see what MS was doing in the 80s and 90s. The problem for MS is that it doesn't work any more.

      Yup. It's classic PR. Just like those "supposed" lost iPhones, that happened *twice* around the time before it was soon released. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. They simply had someone in the company release to the media as a anonymous "trusted" source some BS about the iPad mini. So you're telling me the iPad mini was released when the Nexus 7 was? I haven't heard anything about it.

      Apple is the world's best marketing company. You think they don't practice good marketing and PR?

      And again, they do compete. Their marketing is orchestrated in a way to make you think they don't. That's actually one of the main tenants of their entire campaign. "Think Different." To make you think they don't even try to compete and want to deal with you. Make no mistake, they are shitting their pants about Win 8 tablets. They just want you to think they aren't.

      You are pretty naive. Your nickname really is appropriate for your statement.

    3. Re:Plant by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Yup. It's classic PR. Just like those "supposed" lost iPhones, that happened *twice* around the time before it was soon released. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

      You mean in one case where it really happened and the police had to get involved? Some people here on slashdot still can't see why returning lost property is such a legal issue. Yes that was major PR on Apple's part to make that all happen. Or was a phone simply lost?

      They simply had someone in the company release to the media as a anonymous "trusted" source some BS about the iPad mini. So you're telling me the iPad mini was released when the Nexus 7 was? I haven't heard anything about it.

      Then you're not paying attention. Ever since the original iPad was released, there have been endless speculation on the iPad mini. There's been endless speculation on the iPhone mini but that has died down since the iPad mini rumors. Even on known existing schedules there has been endless and untrue speculation. Case in point: right after the iPad 2 came out (which wasn't much of a refresh to many people) in Spring 2011, there were immediate rumors that the iPad 3 would be out for Christmas with much updated specs. That never happened.

      Apple is the world's best marketing company. You think they don't practice good marketing and PR?

      This is not the type of marketing Apple has ever done since Jobs came back. They don't need to. People will generate these endless rumors without Apple's assistance.

      And again, they do compete. Their marketing is orchestrated in a way to make you think they don't. That's actually one of the main tenants of their entire campaign. "Think Different." To make you think they don't even try to compete and want to deal with you.

      No the "Think Different" campaign was design specifically as a rallying cry for Apple. According to Jobs' biography, the company needed something to announce to the world that they were serious about a comeback. As for their marketing, have you seen their ads? For example the original iPhone ads. They are simple 30 second demos. They don't show any fluff. The latest iPhone 5 ads shows the new screen sizes. None of them are obscure in what they advertise yet you are asserting they are Apple doesn't want you to think that they are. Those were Zune ads.

      Make no mistake, they are shitting their pants about Win 8 tablets. They just want you to think they aren't.

      And your proof of this is? All you are doing is speculating . . . on other people's speculation. About Win 8, let's see: Many, many, many people are predicting doom for it. None of them are associated to Apple. In fact some of them are long time Windows advocates. Win 8 also brings MS as a hardware maker which their last few ventures: Zune, Kin, etc. haven't done so well. Yet Apple is worried about it according to you. Sure.

      You are pretty naive. Your nickname really is appropriate for your statement.

      It seems to me that insults are you making up for your lack of real points.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:Plant by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      This is what sickens me about Walt Mossberg; an unapologetic Apple whore that just *happens* to work for the Wall Street Journal.

    5. Re:Plant by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      So someone who biased for Apple works at the Wall Street Journal. What about people who are biased against Apple who work for, say, PC Magazine? Also whether you like it or not, Apple is a big story these days. Anything they do will get mainstream press coverage. This story however is not news. It is a rumor.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  17. Re:Win8 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Well, if you're going to shorten it, you can borrow W8 from me, that's what I've been calling it.

  18. As a consuming device by thammoud · · Score: 1

    Microsoft and Android will have to fight a serious uphill battle against iPad. I have an iPad and love it to read material but as content creator (Even simple emails), it sucks. The market is wide open to fill the content creation gap.

    1. Re:As a consuming device by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

      "Microsoft and Android will have to fight a serious uphill battle against iPad. I have an iPad and love it to read material but as content creator (Even simple emails), it sucks. The market is wide open to fill the content creation gap."

      I think it's the other way around. Unless it gets the patent courts on its side, Apple will have a serious battle maintaining its marketshare against the CheapPad or CheapTab makers. It might not seem obvious in the upmarket that's the US of A, but in other parts of the world, a person's second computing experience, after his soon-to-be-smartphone, will be on a non-Apple book-sized device.

      Barring some price-PADding because of some adverse IP ruling, the price on tablets will go down to the cost of its parts. Moreover, tablets will be or are already being subsidized by large content or access companies eager to give away the keys to their walled garden: the better to lock up their costumers. At the moment, the darling of these companies is Android OS because it's as "free" as secondhand smoke in a bar. But if Microsoft decides to bite the bullet and "give away" Win 8, they can take a serious bite on the tablet market.

      Unless it becomes too greedy for its onw good, Microsoft has a better chance of succeeding in the tablet and smartphone market than Apple has of maintaining its market share. A few years from now, Apple will be back to its status as the preferred gadget of the fashionable girls and boys.

  19. OMFG!!! New Apple iPad Mini!!! by logicassasin · · Score: 2

    ... quietly, somewhere at the Apple offices all records of and references to the iPod Touch are being destroyed.

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    1. Re:OMFG!!! New Apple iPad Mini!!! by sl149q · · Score: 0

      Which is why they just released a new version of the iPod Touch!

      With a 4" Retina display just likes its big brother iPhone 5!

      Right...........

  20. please, let it be so by swschrad · · Score: 0

    windows 8 is such a silly canard, such a rollup of scraps from under the counters at Microsoft, that a damn good whipping from Apple in all formats availiable is probably the only thing that can shake Microsoft's culture up. I think they're still capable of good stuff, Kinect as an example of taking thousands of dollars technology down to the price point of a really good controller. and it works well.

    problem is, Microsoft is so anal about the DOS and NT userbases that they're trying to badly preserve them in a throwback visually to Presentation Manager. they need to fork their efforts. dying tech, over there... our Shiny New Thing that goes past IOS/Android, over here. arm-wrestle in the market, folks, and winner gets the development funding.

    oh, and a bunch of "we always did it this way" guys would get fired and fade out of the picture.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:please, let it be so by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > oh, and a bunch of "we always did it this way" guys would get fired and fade out of the picture.

      That's what Microsoft needs to be relevant again, but I really don't see it happening. There'd have to be a significant shake-up in upper management to make it happen. And the problem there is, the people doing the shaking are the people who need to be shook.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  21. Why is apple targeting women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the new Mini Pad, the current Maxi Pad, not to mention the Tam Pod.
    I know they tried to market to the elderly with the shuffle.
    Why can't apple make anything that a real man can be seen carrying with out some shame?

    1. Re:Why is apple targeting women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2010 called - they want their stupid jokes back.

    2. Re:Why is apple targeting women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because anyone who knows who he(or she for that matter) is doesn't actually care if they are seen doing something or holding something that doesn't fit the gender/your stereotypes? In short grow a pair and buy an iPad if you want it or save your money for something else.

  22. Re:Win8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess, you think of that cool intown studio apartment you got after moving out of your parents' suburban split level home, where you and your friends could chill out and drop some acid while listening to the grooviest tunes.

  23. Re:Win8 by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

    But I don't want to W8. I want it NOW.

    (I actually installed W8 on a Virtual Machine to try it out. Not too pleased with the Mobile interface on my big monitor.)

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  24. A pox on both their houses by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    Between us, I suspect that whatever Apple chooses to do will wipe the floor with whatever Windows 8 ends up being, but I have a hard time making myself care either way.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  25. Naw, not at all by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    iPad Mini market is clearly for home users looking for an entertainment platform.

    Windows 8 tablets are aimed squarely at the enterprise crowd.

    Simply put, iPad has had a slow adoption into the enterprise world due to a real lack of compatibility with the Microsoft systems STILL IN HEAVY usage in enterprise. People can shit on Microsoft all they want for no longer capturing the consumer market, but Microsoft is still king in enterprise. People bring an iPad into the office expecting a large amount of compromise in functionality, and tolerate it because they are driving to finding a way to make iPad work in the office.

    However it is a far more natural progression for enterprise users to get a Windows tablet the blends seamlessly with their office environment. In fact I suspect that WIndows 8 Tablets will truly mark the end of the "PC" era as enterprise users swap out desktops for tablets. The only reason for PC's to exist today is mostly to support enterprise workstations.

    iPad Mini is not an enterprise product.

    Sure if MIcrosoft is hoping to open up their market share in consumer electronics, Windows 8 will find it hard to compete with any iDevice, but even then there will be more variety and price points of Windows 8 tablets then Apple products, as has been historically for the entire history of Microsoft and Apple. Once again Microsoft is entering a market where Apple makes expensive niche products and Microsoft will focus on more value mainstream products. Just that this time around Apple's "niche" is significantly larger.

    Don't be mistaken, Apple is VERY worried about the release of a Microsoft tablet product, just like they are worried about Android phones. Remember that for every iSheeple that must have everything Apple, there many more people that can't stand Apple or at least want to have more value conscious choices. Microsoft is poised to offer an alternative that is more easily adoptable by enterprise users and more attractive to value conscious consumers in the long run.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:Naw, not at all by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      Yes enterprise users will switch in a heartbeat from 19in dual screen set ups to single 7" screen tablets *rolls eyes*

  26. Isn't an iPad mini kinda redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, the main difference between a iPhone and an iPad is the size... so isn't an iPad Mini really just an iPhone?

    1. Re:Isn't an iPad mini kinda redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      silly AC... it doesn't have the phone bits, so its actually a totally new innovation.

  27. Disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Different market. Windows 8 tablets will be focused on actually being productive with a tablet - a laptop or ultrabook replacement. An ipad mini will be the same as everything else apple has on the market...great to check facebook and look at photos but that's about it.

    1. Re:Disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because Microsoft did so well with that concept the past year they were shoving it down people's throats.

  28. Homework by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Win 8 tablet: apps to use, plus a *real* OS when I need it. Tired of using bullshit dataviz office on the go? Fire up MS Office 2010. Don't want to play bullshit touch games? Fire up Dead Space, Mass Effect, etc.

    Please explain why that approach will suddenly work now when it failed for about a decade straight before Apple introduced the iPad.

    iPad: iOS apps. Limited feature
    It's called "focused" and is why Apple has sold tens of millions to date. Odd how people appreciate well written software that tries to solve a specific problem.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Homework by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Please explain why that approach will suddenly work now when it failed for about a decade straight before Apple introduced the iPad.

      If you mean Tablet PCs, then this approach failed because it was not backed by a solid touch UI. Win8 is obviously different.

    2. Re:Homework by smash · · Score: 1

      All the existing x86 apps you want to run are not metro, and will fall back to the classic UI.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    3. Re:Homework by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Well, that's kinda the point. With iPad, you couldn't run any existing apps - only the ones written specifically for it. With Win8, you can run apps written specifically for it, or desktop Office and (on Intel) any existing third-party software for Windows.

    4. Re:Homework by MogNuts · · Score: 0

      Win 8 tablet: apps to use, plus a *real* OS when I need it. Tired of using bullshit dataviz office on the go? Fire up MS Office 2010. Don't want to play bullshit touch games? Fire up Dead Space, Mass Effect, etc.

      Please explain why that approach will suddenly work now when it failed for about a decade straight before Apple introduced the iPad.

      Because Apple made a new *toy*. iFans would buy shit in a box if it had a fruit logo on it. Regardless, I don't care. Enjoy your shiny toy. I'll be getting real work done. And watch sales numbers of iPads year-over-year decline and lose marketshare to Android and Win 8. It's going to happen. You still free to dream what u want though.

      iPad: iOS apps. Limited feature

      It's called "focused" and is why Apple has sold tens of millions to date. Odd how people appreciate well written software that tries to solve a specific problem.

      We must be using a different iOS then. Just about every app I have used has been buggy, crashed frequently, had almost no features compared to its desktop or web based brethren. Do you really want me to list, app by app, what's on my iPhone and tell you how shitty each one is? I will if you want.

    5. Re:Homework by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Because Apple made a new *toy*. iFans would buy shit in a box if it had a fruit logo on it. Regardless, I don't care. Enjoy your shiny toy.

      Toys are things you treat as toys. They are only toys if you make that choice.

      I use mine as a travel planner or dedicated documentation display or thought collector at conferences. I also use it quite often for review and composing of email. I've also used it to create whole presentations.

      Perhaps you are too set in your ways to use an iPad for real work, but much of the rest of the world is more fortunate.

      But as for Apple succeeding only because Apple made a tablet, that is absurd. They succeeded because Apple built something that wasn't a PC trapped in a touchscreen tablet.

      We must be using a different iOS then. Just about every app I have used has been buggy, crashed frequently, had almost no features compared to its desktop or web based brethren. Do you really want me to list, app by app, what's on my iPhone and tell you how shitty each one is? I will if you want.

      Yes in fact that would be interesting. I use apps that are generally stable and do things that I need. I'm not sure why you would install a bunch of buggy, crashing apps instead of finding better solutions.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re:Homework by MogNuts · · Score: 1

      I use mine as a travel planner or dedicated documentation display or thought collector at conferences. I also use it quite often for review and composing of email. I've also used it to create whole presentations.

      I type 100 WPM. I use my laptop as a thought collector too. I type as fast as I think. Using a touch keyboard is bad enough. To use an iPad without even haptic feedback, oh my god. I've done it--I wanted to kill myself after the first 3 minutes. And for conferences? Seriously? What do you do for a living?

      Me: "Oh that looks interesting, show me the revised PivotTable"
      iPad Dataviz user "oh, my iPad can't do that. But I can play the keyboard on it!"

      Me: delivers my presentation with MS PowerPoint. Uses the standard VGA cable the place has.
      iPad user: "oh sorry guys, my PowerPoint isn't displaying all the proper elements because Keynote is having trouble with the formatting." and "oh shit, I forgot my 30-pin-to-VGA adapter!"

      Don't forget that people who make actual REAL PowerPoint presentations do more than 4 lines of text on a slide.

      Or if you're in IT:

      Me: "Oh you want to see the code? Hang on, I'll fire up Eclipse and show you. Want to see it run? No problem, I'll compile it for you."
      iPad user: "fuck."

      And to solve all these problems, you could always bring a laptop AND a iPad. But then why buy the iPad in the first place? Oh yea--toy. You remind me of The Verge reporters who bring an iPhone, iPad, and MBA with them. I still get a kick out of that.

      Perhaps you are too set in your ways to use an iPad for real work, but much of the rest of the world is more fortunate.

      Uh no, I just actually have to get stuff done. Did you miss the article where the entire school demanded they get their computers back after the department got iPads? Or that one country recently that did the same? No, pretty much the rest of the world doesn't agree. But again, feel free to do what u want. I'll be happily actually not being hindered in my computing experience.

      We must be using a different iOS then. Just about every app I have used has been buggy, crashed frequently, had almost no features compared to its desktop or web based brethren. Do you really want me to list, app by app, what's on my iPhone and tell you how shitty each one is? I will if you want.

      Yes in fact that would be interesting. I use apps that are generally stable and do things that I need. I'm not sure why you would install a bunch of buggy, crashing apps instead of finding better solutions.

      1) Saleforce App: useless. Only let's you access like 1% of your entire database. You have NO way of finding the rest of your data, short of a search if you can remember the main lead or opportunity title. Doesn't even give all calendar data. Ridiculous considering you spend $330/yr on it
      2) Dataviz office: crashes, buggy, poor document compatibility, can't even make headers and footers. Totally useless.
      3) IGN: crashes, poor design, not total access to all site's data
      4) Apple Maps: absolutely fucking awful. period.
      5) Youtube: well now we have access to the google version. prior to that, youtube was a total nightmare. couldn't do a simple thing of playing the HD version on a cell connection, only wi-fi.
      6) Travelocity app: only contains 5% of the ability of its desktop version. Used to be basically a web app. I think they redesigned though. Haven't tried it because it was such a nightmare.
      7) CNET: actually not bad. But displays a video ad after every 2 pageviews. Nightmare.
      8) Fring: crashes *ever* goddamn minute. Atriocious. Also, can barely intergrate with a SIP provider--super buggy with lots of failed connects.
      9) Mapquest: oh my god fucking awful. Slow refreshes and navigation (not driving but pushing the app's buttons), but at least better than fucking iOS maps. At least it's data is correct.
      10) Urbanspoon. Just garbage. Lacks so much of the fun

  29. Microsoft Mythconception by pubwvj · · Score: 0

    "Unlike the traditional PC market, Microsoft doesn't dominate the market for mobile-device operating systems."

    This is a widely promoted mythconception. The reality is Microsoft doesn't really dominate the real PC market anywhere nearly as much as they claim. Most of those Microsoft Windows based PCs are actually doing boring tasks like cash registers, data entry, surveillance, systems control, etc. They aren't being used by people for more creative tasks. The Mac dominates the market for the real people work. Microsoft does the boring stuff. Sadly, Microsoft does it badly.

    1. Re:Microsoft Mythconception by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      And MS doesn't give a shit. License costs are license costs no matter what the OS is doing.

      Not much of the world is particularly 'creative' - but as long as they have a checkbook, then Ballmer is a happy camper.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Microsoft Mythconception by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Most of those Microsoft Windows based PCs are actually doing boring tasks like cash registers, data entry, surveillance, systems control, etc. They aren't being used by people for more creative tasks.

      Y'know, I gotta admit, I wonder about this.

      Apple sold a bunch of iPads to United Airlines to replace a bunch of flight logs, maps, etc. My local sustainable seafood place uses an iPad for a cash register. A local hip tea place has iPads mounted on the wall so you you can sit and drink your tea while surfing the web. I've heard of them being used by wait-people at restaurants, though haven't encountered any.

      So how many iPads are actually being used by consumers and how many of them are being used as one-tricky-pony gadgets in a business. And if it's bad that Windows-based PCs are doing boring tasks like being cash registers, why is it not bad that iPads get used the same way?

      I could also remark on the companies that have iMacs for the receptionist because they look cool...

    3. Re:Microsoft Mythconception by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Don't forget all the developers who need to own all the iOS devices their app is going out on, for testing. Multiples if they want to test multiple versions of iOS.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    4. Re:Microsoft Mythconception by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      why is it not bad that iPads get used the same way?

      Maybe because the users don't hate them as much?

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  30. the tree nobody heard fall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 8 for tablets is a non- event anyway. Whatever apple does or doesn't do, Windows will be ignored in the mobile space.

  31. underdog? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2

    FTA: ...Microsoft is starting out as the underdog."

    That's a strange way to put it.

    More accurate would be "...Microsoft has been unsuccessful in its more than 15 years of attempts at the mobile platform, despite its dominance in other sectors during that time."

  32. Microsoft will accomplish something by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's efforts will at least accomplish something worthwhile: force Apple and Google to recognize the need for real applications like LibreOffice on tablets as opposed to just forcing users to accept a steady diet of media consumption and lightweight apps.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:Microsoft will accomplish something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Microsoft's efforts will at least accomplish something worthwhile: force Apple and Google to recognize the need for real applications like LibreOffice on tablets as opposed to just forcing users to accept a steady diet of media consumption and lightweight apps.

      First see if there really _is_ a need for something as heavy as xxxOffice on an unsuitable form factor. I doubt that using an on-screen keyboard will be adequate and if a real keyboard is needed then you would be better off with a laptop.

    2. Re:Microsoft will accomplish something by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      First see if there really _is_ a need for something as heavy as xxxOffice on an unsuitable form factor.

      Add a bluetooth keyboard, mouse and stand (Xoom portfolio case works great) and there is nothing unsuitable about the form factor. Like a laptop, except: battery lasts 2-4 times times longer; way lighter; more compact even with the add-ons; also has touch screen.

      I've got all that stuff and it's already useful, e.g., text chat 10x faster. Now I want the office suite.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  33. The goal posts are moving by high_rolla · · Score: 1

    If in fact Apple does release a smaller iPad then I think this will actually be quite significant with respect to MS and Win8. Given the popularity of other smaller tablets released recently such as the Kindle and the Nexus it shows that the market is moving (or rather expanding) to accommodate this new form factor. But it doesn't look to me like Win8 will play nice at this scale (just my opinion, I could be wrong). So just as MS finally get's something possibly credible onto the market the market has shifted to something else.

    So it could be that Apple still doesn't believe the smaller form factor is better than the 10" size but is happy to play along as it would quite aggravate MS.
    Regarding Jobs' comments regarding the 7" screens, I believe he may have been right at the time but our UI design skills for tablets have improved now which may mitigate those points. The industry moves so quickly that a lot of comments many people make are true at the time given what was viable then but become less relevant as we learn more.

    --
    Ryans Tutorials - A collection of technology tutorials.
    1. Re:The goal posts are moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we're speaking of a vertical size, it's important to keep in mind that a 7" display is about 45% of the size of the 9.7" iPad, but a 7.85" screen is actually 66% of the size. That's a 21% size increase for less than an inch diagonal.

  34. Woosh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah. iShedEndometriumIntoPaperProducts.

  35. Please turn in your homework by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    or desktop Office and (on Intel) any existing third-party software for Windows.

    Which was the approach with TabletPC's since very little of that software has touch support.

    So how does it work better this time around again?

    There is a correct answer by the way.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Please turn in your homework by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Once again, this wasn't the approach with Tablet PC, because Tablet PC did not have a touch centric UI. Even for third party apps - there was simply no framework they could use, other than doing things completely from scratch, from ground up. What's so hard to understand about that?

      It works better this time around because Win8 does have a touch centric UI. And it comes with a framework (several, actually) to enable developers to write their own apps that work well with touch, and blend into that new UI. Exactly as iPad did - except without completely exorcising all the old stuff.

    2. Re:Please turn in your homework by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      It works better this time around because Win8 does have a touch centric UI. And it comes with a framework (several, actually) to enable developers to write their own apps that work well with touch, and blend into that new UI. Exactly as iPad did - except without completely exorcising all the old stuff.

      So the developers *HAVE TO WRITE NEW APPS*, just like they did/do for iPad/iPhone.

      BTW, you say "except without completely exorcising all the old stuff", but aren't the two IEs (Metro & Windows) completely different apps? I thought reviews have said they are (instead of one app that can accommodate both UIs).. That shows even more that developers have to write new apps⦠so how is having the non-touch-optimized (and often unusable with fingers) apps around going to help?

    3. Re:Please turn in your homework by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      BTW, you say "except without completely exorcising all the old stuff", but aren't the two IEs (Metro & Windows) completely different apps? I thought reviews have said they are (instead of one app that can accommodate both UIs).. That shows even more that developers have to write new apps⦠so how is having the non-touch-optimized (and often unusable with fingers) apps around going to help?

      Non-touch-optimizes apps are not unusable with fingers. They're hard to use, yet, but having an app to do something that's hard to use beats not having an app at all. Also don't forget that most of Win8 devices are convertible - so you use them as a tablet normally, but you dock them to a keyboard (and USB mouse or trackpad or whatever) to work - and then suddenly all those old apps are not only perfectly usable, they're actually more productive. Office would be a prime example of that.

      But, yes, developers have to write new apps if they want them to be usable in touch mode. Which is why success or failure of the platform will be largely determined by how many app authors can be enticed to do so. However, the availability of desktop apps for "productivity mode" or as a temporary workaround (esp. where the equivalent functionality is outright unavailable on iOS - e.g. emulators like DosBox, or old games, some one-off unmantained legacy software), is also a factor. How important it is, naturally, depends on what you are going to use the device for. I would expect Office to be the one that's useful to most people.

      With respect to IE being completely different app, this is actually not the case, and it's trivially seen in Task Manager. It's the same process in both cases, iexplore.exe. However, this is a special arrangement for browsers only - they are the only class of apps that can be a single binary that is context-aware of whether it runs in Metro or not (and is not constrained by the sandbox even in Metro - so that e.g. your desktop and your metro browsers have the same bookmarks, history etc). This mechanism is available to third parties, which is how e.g. Chrome provides both desktop and Metro facets when running on Win8 today. However, on ARM, only Microsoft-signed binaries and packages can run on desktop in the first place, and so this mechanism is only used by IE there (which was the source of complaints from other browser manufacturers that you may have seen a Slashdot story about before). Anyway, since this only applies to browsers, it isn't relevant when discussing apps in general, and you can simplify to "developers have to write a new separate app" in most cases.

    4. Re:Please turn in your homework by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't actually referring to ARM.. I meant ANY app.. if Word for example runs in both (I seem to remember it does), then if one app can handle both UIs in one app _might_ be advantageous to having two separate apps.

      (I can also imagine it might be better having two completely separate binaries with shared libraries instead.. it would require less/no Desktop/Metro mode checks so the version for each UI could be smaller.)

    5. Re:Please turn in your homework by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I was not specifically referring to ARM, either (except for the part where third party apps can't run on the desktop on ARM - and this also applies to hybrid desktop/Metro apps like IE).

      Word does not run on both, it only has a desktop version. Curiously enough, it is actually touch optimized (e.g. you can scroll by swiping, and zoom via pinch-to-zoom or double tapping), and it makes all UI elements - like Ribbon buttons - a tad bigger when you only have touch and no mouse, but it's still a windowed desktop app with all that entails. So it's usable as a viewer even when you only have touch and no mouse, but editing would be a chore until you get keyboard and some more precise pointing device (trackpad, mouse, stylus...). Ditto for all other Office stuff.

      Anyway, in practice even when it's a single app, you still have a lot of different code, because the UI just looks and works completely different, because of different expectations on either side of the divide. After all, Metro is not just a different theme for widgets, it's a very different design philosophy in general, and there are constraints that come with it - for example, only a single window (allways fullscreen) and no other windows, MDI or dialogs (modal or otherwise) except for simple yes/no prompts. So basically, if you have proper model/view separation - MVP or whatever - your model could be shared, but your two views would be completely different, and the only check you'd run would be at process startup when you look at the context and decide which root view to show. So there isn't really a significant difference between having two different apps, and one hybrid app. The real difference is that hybrid apps are not sandboxed as much as Metro-only apps - hence why hybrid mode is restricted to browsers, since you pretty much always want to have your default browser provide both desktop and Metro experience, and share user data between the two.

  36. Well if you aren't going to bother you get an F by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    Tablet PC did not have a touch centric UI.

    NOR DO ALL THE THIRD PARTY WINDOWS APPS.

    I'm done with this conversation, carry on if you like.

    Sorry, you got it wrong.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Well if you aren't going to bother you get an F by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      NOR DO ALL THE THIRD PARTY WINDOWS APPS.

      Really? Have you even looked at what's already in Windows Store, for starters?

      Anyway, when iPhone came out, there were zero third party apps for it, of any kind. Based on your very argument, this should have doomed it as a platform.

    2. Re:Well if you aren't going to bother you get an F by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Maybe the market for apps has changed slightly since the iPhone came out? I can't think of any possible cause this for this but when I do I'll definitely report it back to you.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    3. Re:Well if you aren't going to bother you get an F by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The market has indeed changed a lot since then. It has changed even more since Tablet PC. So did the offering.

  37. O RLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think?

    I'm so glad slashdot is here to slap the cock of obvious in my face and expect me to suck.

    C'mon guys, you're better than that. Saying an iPad mini is a threat to Win 8 tablets is like saying the sun exploding is a threat to a yet-unrealized genetic mutations of the wombat.

  38. One more by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Anyway, when iPhone came out, there were zero third party apps for it, of any kind.

    Since that is utterly irrelevant to Windows 8, why do you even bother to mention that?

    There wasn't that same problem in the mobile space at all. Palm had been successful, Blackberry had been successful. It's not like the PDA and smartphone were not working before.

    But the tablet market no-one before Apple could make work, and Microsoft tried for years.

    The thing that makes your comment really REALLY off-kilter is that if you actually go to apply Apple's start to to the topic at hand, tablets - Apple launched the iPad not just running the iOS library, which really didn't matter that much, but around 3,000 applications built SPECIFICALLY for the iPad.

    THAT matters. A LOT.

    Ok, now I give you the last response but honestly, think about the topic before responding.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:One more by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you don't make any coherent argument, so I really don't know what to say. It's like talking to the wall. I was specifically addressing your objection to the guy who said "Win 8 tablet: apps to use, plus a *real* OS when I need it". So far you have not articulated any reasonable argument against that except for a lot of handwaving, like comparing it to Tablet PC (which is not at all like this - in fact, it makes one think that you either haven't seen those devices or you haven't seen Win8, otherwise you have to be deliberately trolling to even bring it up) and saying "that failed, so this will fail too". I don't really have many options other than repeating the same thing in the hope that you can set aside your blind fanboism and actually, you know, consider the use case that the guy articulated for what it is. If you don't care about it, fine, it's not a device for you. But he does, and I do, and many other people do as well - and when you tell us that we don't matter, you come off really silly.

      Regarding your other (rather offtopic-ish) points. I don't know how many apps will there be in Windows Store by the time Win8 tablets actually get to the user, but I suspect it will be more than 3000. It had around 2500 last time I checked, and we're still 3 weeks away from consumer launch of the product. And they're all, naturally, built SPECIFICALLY for Win8. So?

  39. Re:Win8 by colinrichardday · · Score: 1
  40. Nothing new by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Jobs always talked out of both sides of his face. Him saying 'never will' meant 'absolutely will'.

    The only consistent thing that Jobs did was treat people like dirt. Karma took care of that.

  41. Re:Win8 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I'd rather W8 until at least SP1 (assuming I liked Windows). Historically, early releases of Windows have been buggy and virus-prone. Kind of like you don't want to install a x.0 of anything, whether MS, Apple, or Linux or their apps.

    I do have to say that W7 isn't too bad, it came on the notebook I bought last year and I still haven't installed Linux on it yet.

  42. Mini Pad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cringe every time I hear them use the word 'pad'. Will they make a tampon next/

  43. Microsoft tablets for me for now on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Next tablet would be a windows 7 one or an windows 8 depends on the specs(I prefer 7 though). I have used iOS and android tablets and they are just big screened smartphones. As the smartphones trend is a bigger screen, why would I need to shelve out more bucks just to have the same gadget, but with a slightly bigger screen.

    And windows tablet is really not a new thing either. They are just expensive so no one wants to buy one before, but with the price of new microsoft tablets, there is no reason why you would choose an iOS or android if you are a windows user. Your favorite software? in Windows, Your favorite game? in Windows, Your favorite adobe photoshop? In windows(Please don't argue with the photoshop crap in android/iOS). Instant connection to your home network? Windows even external drives can be used instantly in a windows tablet. Do that with your android and even worse on your iOS. The most used word processor program? In windows. Want to watch videos other than youtube? In windows. How about running flash online without any hassles? In windows(flash games/apps have trouble loading in an android, Check google for "android blue box problem") Even facebook games, in windows.

    I sound like a fanboy but please admit to yourself, what gadget are you using to research, create your papers/assignments, to play complex games, watch videos other than youtube as well as look at P**N, your windows.

    Smartphone market on the other hand is a different matter altogether. What I am just saying is for the tablets.

    1. Re:Microsoft tablets for me for now on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might just also add that people have played DIABLO 3 on their Windows Tablet. Have tried it myself with a "showcase" tablet of one seller before. Hardcore gamers, switch now or you'll be in vain playing all crappy angry birds sequels.