Slashdot Mirror


Why Worms In the Toilet Might Be a Good Idea

derekmead writes "Billions worldwide still don't have access to proper sanitation, and those that do still require a ton of water and electricity to keep waste flowing. A French company is offering one solution: Use turd-eating worms to compost waste right at the source. Ecosphere Technologies has developed an outhouse that, rather than relying on chemicals like a port-a-john, relies on about a pound of red wiggler worms. A new installation in Quebec uses imported worms, placed inside of a mixture of dung and straw underneath to toilet, to devour feces delivered to them by a conveyor belt system. (When someone uses the toilet, pee filters through sand to wash away, while a pedal allows the user to transport their poo to the worm space.) The whole system uses no water or electricity, and a series of passive vents allegedly keeps the toilet smelling great. The company claims it can be used 10,000 times without servicing, which is far better than what a port-a-potty can boast, although with a current price tag of $40k for the worm system, port-a-potties are still a lot cheaper."

124 comments

  1. first worm! by ehack · · Score: 4, Funny

    first worm!

    --
    This is not a signature.
    1. Re:first worm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Early bird you are.

    2. Re:first worm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A less expensive design from USAID
      http://ebookbrowse.com/usaid-ny-designing-compost-toilets-pdf-d80233262 (link points to the USAID Technical Note SAN 1.D.6 Designing Composting Toilets)

      http://www.sswm.info/category/implementation-tools/water-use/hardware/toilet-systems/composting-toilets

      This is a technology that can be very inexpensive (read local materials and labor) or as classy as you want.

    3. Re:first worm! by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Bale of hay: $3.00
      Bag of potting soil: $2.00
      Pound of earthworms: $10.00

      Stupid hippie crapping in a wormy shitbox:

      PRICELESS!

  2. worm a potty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    worm a potty sounds so gross!

  3. I'd make a joke... by DWMorse · · Score: 1

    But the last thing the world needs is more toilet humor.

    It's a fascinating science idea, but there's no way I can see it marketed to take off. Starting with the fact that people have reasonable levels of phobias of living things where they poo; see prevalent folk tales of squirrels and snakes in toilets, etc.

    It's just simply more economical to dig a hole in the ground, and provide hand sanitizer.

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    1. Re:I'd make a joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the last thing the world needs is more toilet humor.

      Correct, but the first thing the world needs more are more butt jokes
      Hi, I'm butty-mc-butt-in-butt, I comb the interwebs searching for potty posts to add my butt jokes too

      don't worry, I'll post plenty here as AC,...

    2. Re:I'd make a joke... by milkmage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      more toilet humor ... you mean potty talk? /sorry

      "It's just simply more economical to dig a hole in the ground"
      until the next guy digs one up.. seriously. had the same problem in my yard with the dog. burying it worked for a while, but eventually ran out of new places to dig. buried shit stays around for a while. eventually had to get one of these: http://www.energystead.com/doogies-dooley-pet-waste-composter-2000/

      "people have reasonable levels of phobias'
      it's not like they have signs advertising worms. looks like any other campsite throne.
      http://phys.org/news/2012-10-turd-eating-worms-air-canadian-toilets.html

    3. Re:I'd make a joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Potty talk? This looks like Silly Potty to me ...

  4. Ahead of the curve by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

    I already have worms in my poop.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:Ahead of the curve by raydobbs · · Score: 2

      We have to get you dewormed -again-?

    2. Re:Ahead of the curve by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      We'll take care of that next week while we're getting you neutered.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  5. Then who eats all the worm poo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't just vanish, you know?

    1. Re:Then who eats all the worm poo? by dreadlord76 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next week, they will sell you an Aquaponics system, with worm shit eating plant, and worm eating fish, for $60K. The first time you take out a fish and eat it, you complete the cycle. For $100K.

    2. Re:Then who eats all the worm poo? by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Earthworm castings (earthworm shit) are worth about 1.50 a dry pound retail.

      I'd also just point out that earthworms eat the shit in outhouse pits when the uses don't dump a ton of lime into it. All the outhouses need is solar powered positive pit ventilation.

      Hell most of Africa just needs an adult in the village to enforce outhouse digging. Avoid having the outhouse being the commons.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Then who eats all the worm poo? by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      I think that urine is bad for them as well. That is why this system has the fancy poo-conveyor. So that they can separate out the urine.

    4. Re:Then who eats all the worm poo? by vivian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's bad enough when the waste pump on a boat toilet needs fixing - at least that thing's mostly a small sealed unit with just a couple of hoses clamped on. That's one conveyor belt that you'd want to make sure was damned reliable and never ever needed repairs rr maintenance on - it's going to be one hell of a nasty job if it gets so crusted up it can't move or the bearings go or something like that.

    5. Re:Then who eats all the worm poo? by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      That was actually my first thought as well. Also, from what I understand it is just a composting toilet which are not all that complicated or expensive. The only innovative thing seems to be the poo-conveyor. Maybe that is why it is so expensive... $35k for the super fuckin' reliable conveyor, $5k for the rest.

    6. Re:Then who eats all the worm poo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution to the urine-separating conveyor? Pee in one hole, Poo in another. Problem solved. Yes, I realize this may require some potty re-training.

    7. Re:Then who eats all the worm poo? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ...fancy poo-conveyor.

      iPoo - crap differently

      Legal: iPoo employs patented "pinch" gesture innovations.

  6. A toilet with pedals? by hardie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do the kids get training wheels?

  7. $40K for 10,000 uses? by dreadlord76 · · Score: 0, Troll

    4$ per flush. That's pretty steep!
    And $40K for a pound of warms, sand, and a conveyer system? Must be the new Millionaire tax that France is enacting that is raising the prices.

    1. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by hardie · · Score: 1

      It's a DARPA project.

    2. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      4$ per flush. That's pretty steep!

      Have you ever priced out the cost of your civilized flush?
      If you start with the cost of pipes in the ground and end with water treatment plants, it adds up fairly quickly,
      though the infrastructure can be amortized across tens or hundreds of thousands of users and tens of years.

      Taxes are what we use to buy civilization.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by dreadlord76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      $40K can put in a pretty big septic system, with cistern and rain catchment to provide the liquid for flushing. You can probably get a grey water pond out of it as well if you plan it right. Still, a lot of money for a pound of worms.

    4. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be it would be useful on space missions?

    5. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by MightyYar · · Score: 3

      I'm not trying to be anti-government here, but...

      At least around here, the developer ends up paying for all of the new infrastructure and then the sewer authority or township sanitation department charges you per hookup or based on your water usage. In other words, it's a usage fee that maintains the infrastructure, not a tax.

      On the other hand, it is compulsory, so maybe I'm being pedantic.

      In any event, the sewers should last - at the least - 40 years. So that is amortized over a loooooong time. There is no way I pay anything approaching $4 per flush.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by digitig · · Score: 4, Informative

      10,000 uses was before servicing, not before complete replacement.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    7. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And taxes are what are being used to destroy civilization.

      Funny how that works.

    8. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by khallow · · Score: 2

      Taxes are what we use to buy civilization.

      It doesn't take a lot of taxes to make a sanitation system that works. It does take a lot of taxes to get my cronies a piece of the action.

    9. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, it is compulsory, so maybe I'm being pedantic.

      Only somewhat pedantic.
      The difference is worth being mentioned, but the outcome is exactly the same.

      In any event, the sewers should last - at the least - 40 years. So that is amortized over a loooooong time. There is no way I pay anything approaching $4 per flush.

      It's not really possible to calculate the long term cost of this system without more information.
      If we knew how much the servicing cost and the expected lifespan & replacement cost of components,
      we could compare it to the cost of a normal 20~40 year municipal waste bond.

      There's also an issue of scale.
      Infrastructure is one of those things that, if scaled correctly, can usually be brought down to a reasonable price/person.
      Toilets out in the middle of nowhere do not fit that criteria. So in a sense, it's not an equal comparison.

      My main goal was to point out that your water & sewer bill at the end of the month doesn't begin to reflect all the money that goes into the average person's 7 flushes per day.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    10. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS. Holy hell, $40k is seriously over-priced.

      1) toilet frame (hell, can even be a hole in the ground, essentially free)
      2) anti-sticking slope leading to...
      3) container with the little wrigglies and crap
      4) optional liquid container for flushing the slope every so often for the occasional times where things do stick. (recycle urine for this use, no reason not putting urine separate, it is useful)

      That isn't even $500. Where is my funding to help solve all these problems? Nails, hammers, wood. the worms and the anti-sticking slope are the most expensive things there, everything else is essentially free.
      Then helping them to deal with the containers materials afterwards, creating an infrastructure and go from there.
      This stuff ain't rocket surgery.

    11. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4$ per flush. That's pretty steep!

      Have you ever priced out the cost of your civilized flush?
      If you start with the cost of pipes in the ground and end with water treatment plants, it adds up fairly quickly,
      though the infrastructure can be amortized across tens or hundreds of thousands of users and tens of years.

      Taxes are what we use to buy civilization.

      Can you really put a price on not dying from cholera?

    12. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If we knew how much the servicing cost and the expected lifespan & replacement cost of components,
      we could compare it to the cost of a normal 20~40 year municipal waste bond.

      I can help you out a little there... I pay for a service plan which covers the run from the inside plumbing to the street, and it is under $100/year. Assuming the actuaries did their work, the average servicing cost can be assumed to be under $100.

      Toilets out in the middle of nowhere do not fit that criteria. So in a sense, it's not an equal comparison.

      That's true. But if you have room for a leech field, you can get away with a septic system and don't need a municipal sewer. I think a single acre is more than enough for septic systems. A very nice septic system should cost far, far less than $40,000.

      My main goal was to point out that your water & sewer bill at the end of the month doesn't begin to reflect all the money that goes into the average person's 7 flushes per day.

      That's a good point, but we're still at least an order of magnitude away from a $4 flush :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Obviously, it's number 2.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    14. Re:$40K for 10,000 uses? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In a condo in the middle of a city? Don't think so, Bubba.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. Mutant giant worm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...and it's just a matter of time before mutant giant worms will devour unsuspecting toilet visitors!

    1. Re:Mutant giant worm by haruchai · · Score: 1

      I suspect anyone who's seen Dreamcatcher will be leery of using a worm-based toilet

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  9. Wormholes DO Exist! by Lefo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surprised that wasn't said first. I signed up just for this bad pun. Well, not a lurker any more. :-)

    1. Re:Wormholes DO Exist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Surprised that wasn't said first. I signed up just for this bad pun.

      You must be new here.

  10. Other sanitation applications? by raydobbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps this is too expensive to replace the portable restrooms in developing countries, but perhaps this could be used in larger-scale applications to help deal with the solid waste in waste treatment facilities? Instead of using harsher chemicals, we could augment it with more biological processes such as this to increase the efficiency of the treatment. Just a thought anyway.

    1. Re:Other sanitation applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two major challenges with that are that there is a bunch of toxic shit in the waste stream. People use random shit to clean, and companies use not so random amazing shit to clean. The second is that in many systems, the storm water isn't separated from the sanitary sewer, so rainstorm screw up your shit chemistry.

      On a serious note, though, red wiggler worms, released after fishing trips, have screwed up the soil of a lot of north american forests. They drag the duff underground to consume it, where as north american earthworms live in the duff, and that has significantly affected many forests.

  11. Bubba & Hank -- Worms & Fishing by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Bubba: Hey, where you goin'?
    Hank: I'm goin' fishin'.
    Bubba: Got worms?
    Hank: Yeah, but I'm goin' anyway.

    "...and the worms, ate, in, to, his brain."

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  12. gosh?? by pbjones · · Score: 0

    were is the news? the news is that a small portion of the world flushes their waste away with drinking quality water and that there are billions of others that don't. There are many systems that don't require a 'flushing toilet', the post is about just one, so it's more like an advert than a story, oh, crap.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:gosh?? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Before you come down from your high horse, maybe you could use the view to find a country with potable water that does not use it to flush their toilets? Water - even drinkable water - is very cheap in a lot of places.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:gosh?? by Spaseboy · · Score: 2

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in_Japan

      3.2 Sanitation

      In 2002 about 75 million people were connected to sewers and 35 million people had their waste water treated through small-scale waste water treatment devices called jÅkasÅs. They are common in areas not connected to sewers, but also exist in areas connected to sewers. There is even a specific jÅkasÅ law that regulates their construction, installation, inspection and desludging. JÅkasÅs use different technologies and serve different sizes of buildings from single-family homes to high-rise buildings, public or commercial buildings. Treated water can be easily reused for various purposes such as toilet flushing, watering gardens or car washing. Sludge from jÅkasÅs can be used as fertilizer

      --
      "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
      -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
    3. Re:gosh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other complaint remains. There are many other toilet designs that do not require water or $4/flush worms; why is this newsworthy? It's a novel idea, perhaps, but only a novelty.

    4. Re:gosh?? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      It seems that a Jokaso is a type of septic system with some additional technology. While I'm sure that water from it can be reused, I'm not finding any indication that this is the typical usage. I'm also not finding any common usage of the sludge being used as a fertilizer (at least not by the homeowner). It looks like there are services that haul the sludge away; if you look at these pictures, you'd clearly have to be very brave to retrieve it yourself!

      In other words, it is used the same way that we evil, wasteful Westerners use our water.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  13. And where does worms poop go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they flush

  14. Carnivorous Worms... by Schlopper · · Score: 2

    Just a matter of time before the worms feed on enough blood-infested stool from anal fissures and hemorrhoids to turn carnivorous. Queue real-life Ghoulies II re-enactment..

    1. Re:Carnivorous Worms... by hardie · · Score: 1

      Zombie worms!

    2. Re:Carnivorous Worms... by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      Get a bunch of gorillas. Wait for the gorillas to eat the worms, then when winter comes, the gorillas will all freeze to death. Problem solved.

    3. Re:Carnivorous Worms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue.

  15. Foreign critters by Migraineman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article referenced by TFA says the worms are "... Eisenia fetida or red wiggler worms native to Europe imported from France and raised locally by Helene Beaumont ..." I'm currently being invaded by stink bugs imported from China, so I'm not particularly fond of folks proposing solutions that require importing non-native critters. Can't they find an indigenous turd-eating worm?

    1. Re:Foreign critters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      These worms have been trained in the tur-de-france. They are much better at re-cycling.

    2. Re:Foreign critters by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      "Can't they find an indigenous turd-eating worm?"

      Yes, but he's already got a job...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    3. Re:Foreign critters by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The worms aren't necessary, and neither is the $40k price tag. There are already composting toilets available commercially in the $500-$2000 range. And even that's overpriced because they're relatively new. I've heard of people making their own with a 5 gallon bucket (cheapest way to test for yourself how well they work). All you need is a handful of peat moss or coconut husk, and a spoonful of microbes to get the process started.

      And before you ask, no they don't stink. The stinky smell comes from anerobic bacteria breaking down fecal matter. When you immerse feces in water, it cuts off the oxygen supply which kills the aerobic bacteria, and the stinky anerobic bacteria flourish. Because a composting toilet channels liquids away from the solids reservoir (the 5 gallon bucket works better for men), the aerobic bacteria dominate and break down the feces without causing the stink. Think about how much biomass there is outdoors in wild animals. If all their feces stank that badly as a sewage treatment plant, we'd never want to go outside.

      They're starting to become popular aboard boats, where dumping laws require toilets flush into holding tanks which can to be pumped out back at the harbor. These holding tanks and their plumbing tend to leak and stink up the boat after some years.

    4. Re:Foreign critters by slashmojo · · Score: 2

      Yes exactly, compost toilets have been a fairly common choice amongst boaters for a while now and not much more expensive than the usual boaty alternatives plus they require less holes in the hull which is always a bonus on a boat. Of course you still need somewhere to dump the compost as marinas are not generally very green and tend to frown upon compost heaps springing up around the pontoons.

      http://www.natureshead.net/information.html

  16. Depends on how they got there by Tarlus · · Score: 2

    Worms that are there for the purpose of sanitation? Good idea.

    Worms that are there because of something you ate? See a doctor...

    --
    /* No Comment */
  17. Eat the worm! by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    Oops. Wrong worm.

  18. In Soviet Russia by Roachie · · Score: 1

    ... worm poop on YOU!

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  19. Composting toilet by Dhrakar · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are actually several models of these out already. Some of the folks up here have them instead of an outhouse. http://www.envirolet.com/ The funny part is that you have to turn a handle on the toilet to mix the, uh, contents around after you go. I think you can put other wastes in them (like kitchen scraps) and they will be composted as well...

  20. That's slashdot for you! by eudaemon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish this joke was original with me... Slashdot: News for turds, Stuff that splatters. Saw it when we were last fascinated with Japanese toilets.

  21. Poop and pee? by addie · · Score: 2

    Really? Poop and pee?

    Urine and feces. There, I said it. Or excrement if you like. Take your pick, but I don't see why we can't just try to use adult words.

    Imagine a summary talking about "nuts cancer".

    1. Re:Poop and pee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I prefer the term "furry seed-sacks".

  22. Possible Delicacy by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    The Romans loved something called "lickerfish", probably a catfish, that hung out at the Rome sewer outflows into the Tiber river. In other words, these fish got fat eating human shit, and the Romans considered them a delicacy.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Possible Delicacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In other words, these fish got fat eating human shit, and the Romans considered them a delicacy.

      Do you know what manure is? Ever eat any vegetables?

    2. Re:Possible Delicacy by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Romans also put fermented fish guts (guram IIRC) on just about everything. Like American rednecks and Ketchup or Japanese and Soy sauce. Roman's diets were weird.

      Also many third world countries are raising Talapia in their sewer treatment systems. Lack of control on imported Talapia is a good reason to avoid this fish (also it's 'sustainable', screw that, get me some swordfish steaks, Ahi Tuna and an Abalone. And some good prime beef, none of that grass fed crap.)

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Possible Delicacy by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Eating something doesn't mean their made of it... or are you a grease ridden cheeseburger?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    4. Re:Possible Delicacy by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

      You realize that the grass fed beef is actually tastier, right?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    5. Re:Possible Delicacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegetable eat manure?

    6. Re:Possible Delicacy by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      And some good prime beef, none of that grass fed crap.

      You've got to be kidding me, right? Grass fed beef produces a far tastier steak.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    7. Re:Possible Delicacy by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      ...or are you a grease ridden cheeseburger?

      I assume most Slashdotters are. In our cubes and basements. In stained T-shirts emblazoned with some comic book logo. With three computers, one to continuously serve porn up, a dedicated WoW machine, and something for trolling Slashdot.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    8. Re:Possible Delicacy by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Both of you are simply wrong. All beef is grass/hay fed. Good beef is fattened up in it's last two months at the feed lot.

      If you prefer tough, gamey beef, it just leaves more of the good stuff for those of us who understand.

      Next your going to tell me that beef should be years old when slaughtered. We call that 'cow'. It's awful.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  23. Don't we already have good composting toilets? by dov_0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Australia we already use composting toilets on country roads for rest stops etc. They don't smell and are cheap to produce and maintain and the ventilation fan runs off a solar cell on the roof. Why should someone pay 40k for old tech?

    --
    sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    1. Re:Don't we already have good composting toilets? by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Yes, we do. Here in Florida, there is an organic farm where the owner built a standing compost toilet. You're not supposed to piss in it, and if you can manage not to, its idle state is unnoticeable and the output is nearly indistinguishable from normal soil -- no foul odors at all. I've always thought large condominiums could benefit from something similar. I am no engineer, but I can imagine such a system being used for gasification, or fertilizer for landscaping, etc. We already use a wretched product called "Sludge" as a fertilizer, so I guess it would be simply removing the 'middle man'. By "Sludge", I refer to the exquisite results of all that swirls minging downward between the voluptuous basin walls of Florida's commodes, i.e., the actual product "Sludge".
      I am not a fanatic over H2O shortages, but I do suspect the future forbids the continuation of current practices. Innovation shouldn't require critical mass.

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    2. Re:Don't we already have good composting toilets? by serbanp · · Score: 1

      and the output is nearly indistinguishable from normal soil

      Unfortunately, if used as fertilizer, there's the ever-present risk of infection caused by contamination from insufficiently composted human feces (think E. coli).

    3. Re:Don't we already have good composting toilets? by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      The government does it en masse. However, they treat it through a pretty vicious process. I think we can figure it out. But if done old-school "night soil" style, then I agree.

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    4. Re:Don't we already have good composting toilets? by kermidge · · Score: 2

      And then there's Milorganite.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milorganite

    5. Re:Don't we already have good composting toilets? by bytesex · · Score: 1

      You don't use it as fertilizer over plants that have already sprouted; you plow it into the earth.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    6. Re:Don't we already have good composting toilets? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      What do you do for toilet paper?

  24. WKRP by dtmancom · · Score: 1

    Red wrigglers? They're the Cadillac of worms.

  25. They really exist! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    What do you know: the Cadillac of Worms really exist. Who'd have thunk it?

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  26. obligatory Dune quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stilgar, do we have wormsign? Usul, we have wormsign the likes of which even God has never seen!

  27. Comosting toilets by evilviper · · Score: 1

    The alternative to these worms isn't port-a-pots, it's composting toilets, which you might find in remote cabins. They're expensive, but certainly not 40k.

    And people have worked-out much cheaper DIY options which do the same thing. You just need a seat, a bucket, a vent (preferably with a small electric exhaust fan) and a handful of microbes to throw in to get started. All of the above are very inexpensive in the 1st world. In the 3rd world, local potters could make all of it, except the microbes, and that's surely much easier to transport than live worms...

      http://www.composting-toilet-store.com/Microbe_Mix_p/microbe_mix.htm

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Comosting toilets by Seumas · · Score: 1

      This is why hippies fucking smell so atrocious.

    2. Re:Comosting toilets by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you have sufficient ventilation to dry the sewage quickly, there's almost no smell.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Comosting toilets by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      If you really don't know what you are talking about, please don't post. Composting toilets usually smell of sawdust. So if you use pine or cedar, they smell quite good. Don't use elm, as it smells like piss by itself.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  28. :p by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Why Worms In the Toilet Might Be a Good Idea

    Better out than in, eh?

  29. Fuck just use laser beams, dammit!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  30. We've had a worm toilet for a couple of years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Actually, a worm septic tank. It seems similar in usage to a normal septic tank, but with worms in it. It does require a pump in order to pump the treated water out, into our lawn (which we never need to water). Apparently the treated water is safe enough to drink but we haven't tried. All our grey and black water feeds into it, and we have a normal toilet. Cost about $12,000 installed. Just like other septic tanks, we have it checked twice a year, but maintenance is essentially nil apart from that. Not allowed to use bleach though!

    However, if we go away for a month or two, we would need to ask our neighbours to pop by and feed our worms ... by using the toilet. Easier than feeding the dog I guess.

    1. Re:We've had a worm toilet for a couple of years by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that could be a problem. Whenever I tell my neighbours I'm going on vacation, they say that they couldn't give a shit.

      But seriously: $12K? Couldn't I just flush a few buckets of live bait down the toilet? And, I don't know about yours, but most septic systems get checked every 2-3 years, not twice a year.

  31. Stopped Reading. by Seumas · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I stopped reading the submission at the word "turd-eating".

    If you're not going to take yourself (or your publication) seriously, neither am I. Talk like a grown up; not a four year old.

    1. Re:Stopped Reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, I also stopped reading your comment at the word "turd-eating".

      This is looking suspiciously like a Candlejack meme, though I don't bel

  32. Pshaw, back in the day... by RKBA · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid we used an outhouse, you could shine a flashlight down into the stench of the toilet (a very small structure with a wooden bench supported above a hole in the ground about 12 feet deep or so). What you saw, was a writhing mass of brown mass of feces being composted at breakneck speed. After looking at it for awhile (we were kids at the time ;) you realized all the writhing was being done by a massive number of maggots just a few feet beneath the toilet bench where you sat, and they were composting those feces as fast as they could eat. Today the soil underneath that outhouse would probably be almost ideal fertilizer.

  33. Naw, forget it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When someone uses the toilet, pee filters through sand to wash away, while a pedal allows the user to transport their poo to the worm space.

    Awwwww, damn. Who forgot to pedal? Would you look at that! There's no TP in there -- They didn't even wipe!


    ( $_ ~= s/pedal/flush/ ) == Actually said this last week.

    The kid is 18 for fuck's sake. Damn SmartPhones & the ADD teens who use them!

  34. Invasive species by caseih · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most people don't realize it, but the humble, ubiquitous earthworm is an invasive species in North America. Though you might think of it as useful and beneficial to the soil, in the forests of north America, the earthworm is causing a lot of damage. So I get a bit concerned when they start talking about throwing in "imported worms."

  35. it can be used 10,000 times without servicing by fisted · · Score: 1

    Who will feed the worms when on vacation? I suppose they starve, and as of that point, the toilet can be used exactly once more, before servicing ;)

    1. Re:it can be used 10,000 times without servicing by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

      Sir, I will!
      Yes. For the very low fee of $50 per dump I will feed those worms for you. If you purchase 3 dumps you get a house watching bundle with it free.
      Prepay with Bitcoin now while this offer is still valid.

      If you want try this yourself you can get the bacteria starter culture from boating supplies. It's a bit pricey at the moment. If you then want to use cleaning fluids there are special ones available from chandlers too.

    2. Re:it can be used 10,000 times without servicing by fisted · · Score: 1

      50 bucks? Are you serious? I'm rather gonna ask RMS, have heard he gives away his crap for free.

  36. Earthworms are invasive species by stuporglue · · Score: 1

    Did you know that Minnesota has 15 non-native species of earthworms in its forest?

    http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/invasives/terrestrialanimals/earthworms/index.html

    "All of the terrestrial earthworms in Minnesota are non-native...at least seven species are invading our hardwood forests and causing the loss of tree seedlings, wildflowers, and ferns."

    I've seen before/after photos of forests where earthworms moved in and the undergrowth just disappeared. I don't think that increasing the use of non-native worms is a good idea.

    --
    https://www.facebook.com/digitizeicm -- Show your support for the digitization of the Iron County Miner newspaper archiv
  37. TFS really has... by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

    ...a strong sense of humus.

  38. Seriously Expensive Shit by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    $40K for a bucket? Wow. Great marketing!

  39. The worms that go in are long and thin, by drumlight · · Score: 1
    The worms that go in are long and thin,
    The worms that come out are fat and stout.

    Not the best place to ask I imagine but... Does anyone know which Pouges song these lyrics were from? (it might have been more of an intro to the song rather than actual lyrics as they have never come up on a search)

    1. Re:The worms that go in are long and thin, by timothy · · Score: 1

      It's just called "Worms." Creepy song -- one I've liked for a long time.

      http://www.lyricstime.com/the-pogues-worms-lyrics.html

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  40. "to compost waste right at the source."` by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

    Errr, the toilet isn't the "source".

    Although that would be an innovation worth posting on Slashdot: parasitic intestinal worms engineered to turn faeces into compost in vivo.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:"to compost waste right at the source."` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or nanobot worms engineered to utilize 100% of food ingested.

    2. Re:"to compost waste right at the source."` by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Or nanobot worms engineered to utilize 100% of food ingested.

      how would that work though?? you'd get bigger and bigger every day??

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:"to compost waste right at the source."` by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Or enable us to digest grass. Solving 3rd world hunger, briefly. For the west, perhaps the opposite, turning excess fats, sugars and highly processed carbs into indigestible starches. Oh, of course, parasitic intestinal worms that turn excess fats, sugars and highly processed carbs into a nutritious paste suitable for export as food aide. Solves western obesity and 3rd world starvation (without us having to actually do anything).

      [Natural parasites and worms already have vastly more capabilities than any likely nanobots.]

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  41. Poo? by Netssansfrontieres · · Score: 1

    We're all grownups, many of us are nerds, technically literate and so are completely used to the idea of using reasonably long words for the precision they offer.

    Can we please ban "pee" and "poo"? Always and forever.

  42. True source by slasho81 · · Score: 1

    Use turd-eating worms to compost waste right at the source.

    So why stop at the toilet? Push those worms up our butts and be done with it.

  43. No wonder... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

    "Billions worldwide still don't have access to proper sanitation"

    No toilets, but they are actively using Facebook?

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  44. Stupid language by dzfoo · · Score: 1

    Was the submission written by a 6 year-old?

    Why is it that in a nerdy site like Slashdot, expressly dedicated to smart people, an article is written with childish words like "pee," "turd," and "poo"?

    I'm in no way offended by the language, but by the lazy, crude, and idiotic way of using it. There are so many more intelligent ways to express oneself than using school-yard slang.

              -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
    1. Re:Stupid language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To all the smug, pedantically self-absorbed motherfuckers that have an issue with the vernacular...

      eat my excrement.

    2. Re:Stupid language by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      But that's the point, when people talk about improving health prospects by implementing new ways of handling waste, they don't go around saying "poo" or "pee."

      It is therefore, not the vernacular.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  45. Very Flintstones by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    The worm looks up and shrugs "Eh, it's a living!"

    .

  46. U-Haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That many people in places with no water, too much poop, and not enough food so that everything they need has to be brought in by non-profits in the interest of "helping" them.... it's time to move to more hospitable places.

    (only slightly joking here)

  47. Seems gratuitiously complicated to me by Immerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This problem has been solved before - In Ye Olden Dayes a common technique was to have your outhouse in the center of a copse of coppiced trees (willow being one of the preferred species due to it's particularly "hungry" roots), which would then convert your waste into firewood while cleaning out the pit for you. Unfortunately then as now mixing liquid and solid wastes produces a fairly toxic mass that's harmful to most life. So what was the solution? Some contrived conveyor system? No - they just put a catchment basin just beneath the front of the seat to catch liquids and redirect them under the trees at the surface. Sure, women had to pay a bit more attention to their aim, but the system was nice and simple with no moving parts to go wrong, and the trees were perfectly capable of dealing with both kinds of waste as long as it wasn't mixed together.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    1. Re:Seems gratuitiously complicated to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we puleeeez stop always trying to move civilization backward. Conventional flush toilet; poop, flush, all gone. Improved idea; move the outhouse indoors, poop, poop and worms now live in your bathroom. Sorry but outhouses smell for a reason and that reason is poop.

  48. French company, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Quebecer, I've always hate when people just call us "french". It just sound too much "France" in my ear.

    Is "French Canadian company" or at worst "Quebec company" that hard to use?

  49. Any idea how to apply this to a pit/vault toilet? by turp182 · · Score: 1

    I camp at a place that has pit/vault toilets, there's a several feet deep concrete circle that someone empties out occasionally (one of the worst jobs in the world if you ask me, the guy wears a full body plastic suit and a respirator).

    I was thinking "venting" at the bottom (to the outside) with a screen of some sort, then a couple of feet of sand. This is the urine path.

    Then a fine mesh layer on top of the sand and some arranged organic material with microbes to get things going.

    How much use is necessary to keep it functional? What happens during the winter, it's cold and usage may drop to zero for months at a time?

    Pros:
    1. Less need for cleaning.
    2. Creates compost, probably acceptable for straw fields for cow feed.

    Cons, big ones
    1. Cleaning it, how to separate compost from recent "droppings".
    2. Is the urine an issue, into the ground, maybe 7-10 feet down?
    3. What if the vent seals up and the urine collects? Nasty.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  50. Done already? by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

    Haven't composting toilets been around for quite a long time now?

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop