Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Bay Co-Founder In Solitary Confinement

pigrabbitbear writes "Things aren't looking awesome for Pirate Bay founder Gottfrid Svartholm, who's currently under lock and key in a newly built jail about 15 minutes north of Stockholm. Svartholm's mother Kristina says that her 28-year-old son is being held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day without any human contact other than his interactions with the guards. It's been nearly two months since Svartholm was arrested in Cambodia, where he'd been living for years, and extradited back to Sweden, where he's due to spend a year behind bars and pay a $1.1 million fine for copyright offenses related to his role at the Pirate Bay. But that's not why Sweden's being so tough on him in prison. Authorities believe he may have played a role in the hacking of Logica, a Swedish technology company with ties to the country's tax authorities. They haven't charged him with any crimes yet in that case, however."

24 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Messed up by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because information is more dangerous than violence.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. Re:Messed up by bobthesungeek76036 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you say "sending a message"? Sure, I knew you could...

    --
    Karma: Bad
  3. Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So a man is languishing in solitary confinement for years, not allowed visitors, and is mistreated to a degree that if he were a prisoner of war it would be considered a war crime under the Geneva convention, without being charged, given a trial, or given an opportunity to defend himself... and when this man is finally released, they'll be sending him back to jail because he enabled people to download music and movies... and he's only in that country because of the aforementioned.

    Does that seem right to you?

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Not charged by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's not been there for years yet. However, it seems not unreasonable to think that they're trying to "soften him up" for the Logica case. Plenty of "civilized" governments exploit the fact that the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    2. Re:Not charged by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what if he made millions? Does that warrant solitary confinement? What kind of bootlicking pro-authoritarian are you?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Plenty of "civilized" governments exploit the fact that the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation.

      Yeah, it destroys a person, utterly and completely. A few months of it a person can endure; But a year? Years? When they finally open that door, there won't be anything left but meat. The person will have long ago left. It's disgusting and inhumane. A bullet would be more compassionate.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:Not charged by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, he made millions of dollars allowing other people to download music/movies/games/software that other people made and own the rights to

      Hm...made millions of dollars on creative work that other people made and have copyrights on...where have I heard that before...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting

      Funny how there was no torture^H^H^H^Hsolitary confinement for the people responsible for that.

      Oh, he was a brazen prick while he did it, too

      Otherwise known as a hero:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_jobs

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd think putting a hacker in general population would be worse, with all the rape, beatings and stabbings. Hackers could probably handle being alone a lot better.

      That argument is patently absurd. That's like saying when a woman gets raped, it's not as bad because they can handle it better. It doesn't matter whether someone is better or worse equipped to handle violence and mistreatment -- it's still inhumane, and the person is still damaged after. Solitary confinement is torture; It's something no civilized society should tolerate. How we treat our most vulnerable and disadvantaged citizens is the true measure our own humanity.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  4. Re:hacking of Logica? by shentino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    His booking papers only cite pirate bay activities.

    If it was because of hacking, then his paperwork damn well should say so. The fact that it doesn't means that this is nothing but an attempt to use allegations of hacking as an excuse.

    Until someone puts their ass on the line and signs a piece of paper under oath as to why he's locked up, I'm not going to believe a word they say.

  5. The Library of Alexandria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Torrents are the modern day The Library of Alexandria.

    By law, every book and scroll was copied.

    It was critical for the development of civilization.

    A golden age lasted until the christians and muslims destroyed it.

    Don't let the plutocrats destroy our library!

  6. Assange right not to trust them by Dan667 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hard to believe anything they say after watching how the swedish government acts.

  7. Re:Messed up by Doodlesmcpooh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They can hold him for a year for the Pirate Bay conviction possibly longer if they add on time for non payment of fines. However they think he was involved in hacking Logica but as yet they can't prove it. Most people break eventually in solitary and will say and do anything to get out of it. They probably plan on leaving him there for his whole sentence "for his own safety" unless he confesses.

  8. Re:Messed up by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I get your point: If you want to make money on content, rip-off creators and artists with LAWYERS, not with TECHNOLOGIES.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  9. I wonder if he will succumb to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Stockholm Syndrome.

  10. Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Solitary confinement isn't same as in US prisons. First of all he isn't in a prison where it would be strange if he was held in solitary confinement. Everyone who gets 'häktad' is held in solitary confinement or the "red" ward until the prosecutor says otherwise or he is officially charged (i.e. "förundersökningssekretess" is released).

    I've been myself confined in solitary for 2 months, where 2 weeks were voluntary. It's good times and way better than sharing a cell with some douche bags and being able to relax because the psycho in your cell is about to get a psychosis and can't take being locked in.

    In solitary confinement you get bed, PRIVACY, tv (if officially charged, or prosecutor allows i.e. after giving your sworn statement), table, toilet, water, foodstuff, books and library visit, paper and pen, access to phone (with permission of prosecutor), training room, shower, and so on. It's not the american "solitary confinement" nor is it to punish you, it's way more costly, and they try to put you into "GREEN" ward asap. After that you'll be sent to prison where there is place for you, and if you are unlucky, you get to be 3 or more in one cell.

    There is a different type of solitary confinement that I doubt Gottfried is put in, and they usually only exist in prisons and people dangerous to themselves.

    BTW, I never been to prison. Just accused of crap. Gottfried should be happy he is put in "häkte" because when he goes to prison he'll love the solitary confinement benefits. Only negative is of course that you only get to meet the wardens and a few people the prosecutor wetted before letting them see you (and they can be friends not necessarily family).

  11. not surprised. by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It isn't that hard to see the reason is pure vindictiveness on the part of (monied) rights holders, exercising their purchased cronies in world government.

    If you followed the press releases surrounding the pirate bay, and bothered to read their "legal threats" page before they were busted, you would know that the founders of the pirate bay frequently and bluntly told the large media companies to go fuck themselves with collapsable metal batons. (And even gave suggestions about which ones were of superior quality.)

    [No seriously. They really did.]

    This tidbit was alluded to discreetly by various media groups covering the trial, since their peers had made open complaints to the court about the group's lack of tact and seeming lack of seriousness, demanding harsher punishments. (Essentially, they didn't like being told to go fuck themselves, and wanted the court system to use 'harsher' punishments, because they were butt-hurt over it, illistrating their own lack of professionalism in the matter.)

    The outright illegal raid on PB servers, followed by the dubious cambodian extradition to sweden, and the endless trail of clearly damning evidence of government corruption in the case pretty clearly sums it up.

    Do I think the guy is a hero? Certainly not. Is he getting unfairly punished in proportion to his crimes? Oh yes, certainly. Is it due to government corruption? The evidence is pretty damning...

    What is he really guilty of that they want to punish him so severely?

    He threatened their hegemony, and was shamelessly unafrad of him. They can't stand that, and want to use him as a poster child to instill fear in people that would be like him, and flaunt their authority.

    More than anything, I'd say he is a political prisoner, on par with what the russians do routinely.

  12. Re:Messed up by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is insane, why is a computer programmer under solitary confinement?

    Because they can't find enough evidence to charge him with a real crime, so they just torture him instead.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  13. Re:Messed up by blippo · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's standard treatment in Sweden. If the crime is non-trivial, the attorney almost always requests solitary confinement. The reason is to prevent the accused from interfering with the criminal investigation, but I think at least partly it's done in order to break the accused, helping the interrogations.

    Sweden has been criticized by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture for this practice, but nothing seems to change.

    I'd say that I am not that proud of our judicial system right now. This practice, the not-so-competent handling of Assange, the recent turn of events relating to a convicted serial killer (Tomas Quick) being found innocent for crime after crime, after withdrawing his own confessions, and the follow-up revelations of a closed boys-club judicial system - these events makes me ashamed and worried.

    It's not necessarily attributed to malice, but it is certainly incompetence combined with the attitude among Swedish bureaucrats that the government is always right, always efficient, and certainly *never* wrong.

  14. Assange's reluctance by revscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And this is exactly the reason why Julian Assange is so (wisely) set against being extradited to Sweden.

  15. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Solitary confinement doesn't technically fall under 'torture', so they can leave him there for 20 years if they want, going absolutely insane due to the complete lack of stimulus. But it's not torture, oh no. It will absolutely destroy his mind, and ruin the rest of his life, but it's not torture, so it's all fine and good and legitimate.

    Isn't the legal system wonderful.

  16. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've known Kevin for years. He did not spend 5 years in solitary. He spent 8 months in solitary and it was over a dispute about whether to sign a document that, among other things, would allow them to restrict his telephone privileges (yes, there was actual concerns that he had the ability to hack the telco system - but not start a nuclear war.) He spent the vast majority of his time in general population awaiting trail.

  17. Re:Messed up by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Firstly, it's not stealing. That's logically impossible, and can only be attributed as such due to an emotional reaction to the fictitious loss of one's property arising from ignorance, in some cases willful, about how copyright and intellectual property actually works.

    Secondly, the "getting tired of paying $15" was, and is, a justification for a much larger and more serious problem.... content creators and distributors no longer needed to be compensated directly in order to receive copies, or expressions, of the intellectual property. They no longer needed to be accompanied by the licensing in accordance with the laws, or in other words, be authorized.

    I'm fucking tired of paying so much for water and gas. However, regardless of my feelings, the utility companies continue to charge those rates and I have exactly one entity to receive it from. The expense and challenge of creating my own water and gas sources are considerable.

    Once a content creator adds their contributions to the world, it is far more trivial to distribute that content in a manner in which it can be suitably consumed. MP3's and the emergence of broadband Internet connections made it possible to cheaply distribute all that content. Software which allowed "ripping" of content off CDs enabled legions of younger people to convert intellectual property from a state that required physical distribution, to one that only required the Internet and a hard drive.

    Peer to Peer communications software vastly exacerbated the problem by bringing many orders of magnitude more efficiency to the distribution process.

    There was no great intellectual movement against the content creators and distributors. It was far more simple than that:

    A) You are in a huge bazaar. Merchants are offering their wares and haggling prices. You only have $15, and this allows you to purchase one item, with restrictions on how it can transported and used.

    B) You are in an even bigger bazaar. It's a bit more dangerous, and sometimes that banana is really a penis, hiding inside the skin of a banana. However, everything is free. All it cost was the gas to get there.

    How can content creators and distributors compete with free?

    Therein lies our fundamental problem. It no longer costs nearly as much to create copies of intellectual property and distribute them. The technology and resources are widely available.

    The laws and society have simply not kept up, or have been able to adapt to our changes in technology. People, however, adapt extremely quickly. This disparity is the cause for all our strife, and the imminent destruction of free societies.

    Hyperbole? Hardly.

    The response of content creators and their uber rich distributors is not to adapt themselves to the new world and possibilities, but force the world to adapt back to them. Unfortunately, with great consequences, the only way to allow content creators the temporary control over their works (to benefit all of us, not just them) is to destroy freedom. It's the only way to effectively do it.

    That's the real nasty truth of it. People don't want to pay for shit if they don't have to do so . It takes effort, sophistication, and commitment on the part of those that have the ability to not pay, to actually pay.

    Most /.'s that claim they are paying, or are willing to pay, only do so because they understand the consequences of not even attempting to compensate the artists.

    In most cases, claiming some noble truth, or great cause is what compels you to infringe copyright, is just a lie .

  18. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by dmbasso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is "they think he might have something to do with whatever", so let's punish him now.

    Due process? Nah, that's for civilized countries. Which there is none on Earth right now, and things only seem to get worse.

    --
    `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
  19. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "moral" of the story is Assange is right, Sweden is the USA's bitch and they jump through the hoops like a good doggie. Think actual Swedish content was even one half of one percent of TPB? Nope but he pissed off the media cartels which along with the other megacorps own the USA so they just told their pitbulls at the state dept "Make sure they fuck him hard" and wadda ya know? that's what they are doing.

    Sigh...I remember when extradition was actually a big deal, when only murderers and organized criminals had to worry about it, but now every. country. on. the. planet. has to follow the USA's rules and jump through the hoops, because God fucking forbid our media cartels have to get with the 21st century and use new models of business, why God that would be horrible!

    Just think, if the cartels would have been in place at the turn of the 20th century you'd be forced to this very day to buy a saddle and buggywhip for every person riding in a vehicle. I mean how dare they have to change when they could just buy the laws?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.