Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Bay Co-Founder In Solitary Confinement

pigrabbitbear writes "Things aren't looking awesome for Pirate Bay founder Gottfrid Svartholm, who's currently under lock and key in a newly built jail about 15 minutes north of Stockholm. Svartholm's mother Kristina says that her 28-year-old son is being held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day without any human contact other than his interactions with the guards. It's been nearly two months since Svartholm was arrested in Cambodia, where he'd been living for years, and extradited back to Sweden, where he's due to spend a year behind bars and pay a $1.1 million fine for copyright offenses related to his role at the Pirate Bay. But that's not why Sweden's being so tough on him in prison. Authorities believe he may have played a role in the hacking of Logica, a Swedish technology company with ties to the country's tax authorities. They haven't charged him with any crimes yet in that case, however."

172 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Take that pixel thief

    1. Re:LOL by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 2

      To the gallows with this barbarous binarian plagiarist beast!

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  2. Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is insane, why is a computer programmer under solitary confinement?

    1. Re:Messed up by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because information is more dangerous than violence.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Messed up by bobthesungeek76036 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can you say "sending a message"? Sure, I knew you could...

      --
      Karma: Bad
    3. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      lol you mad.

    4. Re:Messed up by Doodlesmcpooh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can hold him for a year for the Pirate Bay conviction possibly longer if they add on time for non payment of fines. However they think he was involved in hacking Logica but as yet they can't prove it. Most people break eventually in solitary and will say and do anything to get out of it. They probably plan on leaving him there for his whole sentence "for his own safety" unless he confesses.

    5. Re:Messed up by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I get your point: If you want to make money on content, rip-off creators and artists with LAWYERS, not with TECHNOLOGIES.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re:Messed up by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Assuming the information is used to hack into a secret government computer, and you choose to play "Global Thermonuclear War." If you decide to play chess instead, not really.

    7. Re:Messed up by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is insane, why is a computer programmer under solitary confinement?

      Because they can't find enough evidence to charge him with a real crime, so they just torture him instead.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    8. Re:Messed up by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Shhh... nobodies caught on yet!

    9. Re:Messed up by blippo · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's standard treatment in Sweden. If the crime is non-trivial, the attorney almost always requests solitary confinement. The reason is to prevent the accused from interfering with the criminal investigation, but I think at least partly it's done in order to break the accused, helping the interrogations.

      Sweden has been criticized by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture for this practice, but nothing seems to change.

      I'd say that I am not that proud of our judicial system right now. This practice, the not-so-competent handling of Assange, the recent turn of events relating to a convicted serial killer (Tomas Quick) being found innocent for crime after crime, after withdrawing his own confessions, and the follow-up revelations of a closed boys-club judicial system - these events makes me ashamed and worried.

      It's not necessarily attributed to malice, but it is certainly incompetence combined with the attitude among Swedish bureaucrats that the government is always right, always efficient, and certainly *never* wrong.

    10. Re:Messed up by Synerg1y · · Score: 3

      Then... please stop using netflix, itunes, amazon video & music, etc...

      Piracy was only about stealing to some, to the rest it was a way of saying I'm sick of paying $15 for a cd to hear one song 10x.

    11. Re:Messed up by helix2301 · · Score: 2

      They did the same thing to Kevin Mitnick he spend almost all of his 5 years in jail in solitary be cause "he could launch a nuclear bomb from a phone"

    12. Re:Messed up by r1348 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basically they're giving him the Guantanamo treat.

    13. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Solitary confinement doesn't technically fall under 'torture', so they can leave him there for 20 years if they want, going absolutely insane due to the complete lack of stimulus. But it's not torture, oh no. It will absolutely destroy his mind, and ruin the rest of his life, but it's not torture, so it's all fine and good and legitimate.

      Isn't the legal system wonderful.

    14. Re:Messed up by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2

      It's standard treatment in Sweden. If the crime is non-trivial, the attorney almost always requests solitary confinement. The reason is to prevent the accused from interfering with the criminal investigation, but I think at least partly it's done in order to break the accused, helping the interrogations.

      As is the case with most slashdotters, he should be immune to their tricks. Better than being surrounded by frat boys and jocks (aka general population).

    15. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've known Kevin for years. He did not spend 5 years in solitary. He spent 8 months in solitary and it was over a dispute about whether to sign a document that, among other things, would allow them to restrict his telephone privileges (yes, there was actual concerns that he had the ability to hack the telco system - but not start a nuclear war.) He spent the vast majority of his time in general population awaiting trail.

    16. Re:Messed up by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Bradley Manning in solitary in the US = TORTURE!
      Julian Assange in solitary in Sweden = meh...business as usual.

      I wonder why this is...

    17. Re:Messed up by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      be cause "he could launch a nuclear bomb from a phone"

      If that a quote from the powers-that-be, or from Mitnick?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    18. Re:Messed up by Mike_Theory · · Score: 1

      Once the Criminals in government begin taking into account that "There's no where to hide from [Insert Country] law, irregardless of how wrong it is", their bid for global domination will commence. You can never have enough power. Once the Criminals who break the law begin taking into account that "There's no where to hide from [Insert Country] law, irregardless of how wrong it is", they will adjust their tactics.

      so... Regarding of how wrong it is? (not usually a grammar nazy, but irregardless bugs the shit out of me)

      --
      /endrant
    19. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't likely need to keep a person in solitary confinement to keep them from utilizing or dissemination information which could be a major threat to the world. He should at a minimum get a trail and be able to communicate with lawyers and others whom would not pass on such information. Utilizing this as a punishment is wrong. Particularly before he has been charged let alone convicted or been put in front of a judge with lawyer present.

    20. Re:Messed up by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      My mistake...not Julian, but rather Gottfrid Svartholm

    21. Re:Messed up by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Firstly, it's not stealing. That's logically impossible, and can only be attributed as such due to an emotional reaction to the fictitious loss of one's property arising from ignorance, in some cases willful, about how copyright and intellectual property actually works.

      Secondly, the "getting tired of paying $15" was, and is, a justification for a much larger and more serious problem.... content creators and distributors no longer needed to be compensated directly in order to receive copies, or expressions, of the intellectual property. They no longer needed to be accompanied by the licensing in accordance with the laws, or in other words, be authorized.

      I'm fucking tired of paying so much for water and gas. However, regardless of my feelings, the utility companies continue to charge those rates and I have exactly one entity to receive it from. The expense and challenge of creating my own water and gas sources are considerable.

      Once a content creator adds their contributions to the world, it is far more trivial to distribute that content in a manner in which it can be suitably consumed. MP3's and the emergence of broadband Internet connections made it possible to cheaply distribute all that content. Software which allowed "ripping" of content off CDs enabled legions of younger people to convert intellectual property from a state that required physical distribution, to one that only required the Internet and a hard drive.

      Peer to Peer communications software vastly exacerbated the problem by bringing many orders of magnitude more efficiency to the distribution process.

      There was no great intellectual movement against the content creators and distributors. It was far more simple than that:

      A) You are in a huge bazaar. Merchants are offering their wares and haggling prices. You only have $15, and this allows you to purchase one item, with restrictions on how it can transported and used.

      B) You are in an even bigger bazaar. It's a bit more dangerous, and sometimes that banana is really a penis, hiding inside the skin of a banana. However, everything is free. All it cost was the gas to get there.

      How can content creators and distributors compete with free?

      Therein lies our fundamental problem. It no longer costs nearly as much to create copies of intellectual property and distribute them. The technology and resources are widely available.

      The laws and society have simply not kept up, or have been able to adapt to our changes in technology. People, however, adapt extremely quickly. This disparity is the cause for all our strife, and the imminent destruction of free societies.

      Hyperbole? Hardly.

      The response of content creators and their uber rich distributors is not to adapt themselves to the new world and possibilities, but force the world to adapt back to them. Unfortunately, with great consequences, the only way to allow content creators the temporary control over their works (to benefit all of us, not just them) is to destroy freedom. It's the only way to effectively do it.

      That's the real nasty truth of it. People don't want to pay for shit if they don't have to do so . It takes effort, sophistication, and commitment on the part of those that have the ability to not pay, to actually pay.

      Most /.'s that claim they are paying, or are willing to pay, only do so because they understand the consequences of not even attempting to compensate the artists.

      In most cases, claiming some noble truth, or great cause is what compels you to infringe copyright, is just a lie .

    22. Re:Messed up by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      From the AC:
      Because they're not at all the same thing?

      But the particulars seem quite the same. 1 hour a day outside surrounded by high walls, minimal contact (once a week) with family, I guess the difference is the quality and color of the paint on the concrete walls. Oh, and Sweden vs the USA.

      From the link:
      “He is offered one hour ‘outdoors’ each day in some kind of exercise yard with high concrete walls. That is all he is allowed to leave his cell for. No gym, no opportunities to meet other people except for the guards.

      “I have got permission so far from the prosecutor to meet him once a week for an hour each time, together with two policemen who listen to our conversations and stop us if we get close to the ‘case’, which we happened to do in the beginning.

    23. Re:Messed up by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Wait... is this the same country that "life in prison" for murder is 10 years?

    24. Re:Messed up by del_diablo · · Score: 2

      "Life in prison" in Scandinavia means that you are put to a reevaluation each 10 years to see if its "safe" to but you back in society. If there is no reason too, its another 10 years. The difference from life imprisonment is not really present if the case is horrible enough.

    25. Re:Messed up by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Well the first problem is that there is no such thing as intellectual property. It simply does not exist and never will. Selling zeros and ones was always an overly optimistic exercise. Information wants to be free and the only way to prevent that freedom is not to release the information into the world. Once that is done you can't get it back. It is out there. It doesn't matter how many people go to prison. The nature of information will remain unchanged.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    26. Re:Messed up by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

      This makes Sweeden a worse torturer than the U.S. under George Bush!!!!

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    27. Re:Messed up by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

      This makes Sweeden a worse torturer than the U.S. under George Bush!!!

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    28. Re:Messed up by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because TV in his cell, and only being able to buy cigarettes and sweets on Mondays and Wednsdays (as TFA says he can) with an hour outdoors a day is torture. Yeah, totally, that is a perfectly reasonable (although, for some Slashdotters being outside for an hour a day would be painful, I suppose).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    29. Re:Messed up by tqk · · Score: 1

      This makes [Sweden] a worse torturer than the U.S. under George Bush!!!!

      That's sarcasm, yes? If not, then you think a private room with TV and library privileges and access to regular visitors is worse than Abu Graib and waterboarding? Uh huh.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    30. Re:Messed up by unix_core · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your comment is pretty hilarious if you actually read the article or know anything about custody or prison in Sweden. Would it be better if he was thrown in a cage with other, no doubt, rather more hardened criminals?

    31. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "They believe he may have played a role" .

      In other words, they don't have anything on him, but they are still getting a lot of pressure from the US, so they invent an excuse to keep the public quiet.

    32. Re:Messed up by dcollins117 · · Score: 2

      Because information is more dangerous than violence.

      While I don't disagree, I think it is much more likely that he openly mocked and ridiculed his way into solitary confinement. Prison guards aren't really known to enjoy being challenged.

    33. Re:Messed up by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Because information is more dangerous than violence.

      Or in other words: "The Pen is Mightier Than The Sword" which Edward Bulwer-Lytton wrote back in 1839.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    34. Re:Messed up by tsa · · Score: 2

      Information does not want anything.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    35. Re:Messed up by ipwndk · · Score: 2

      "The Swedish prison system is not generally severe. The emphasis is on humanitarian treatment of prisoners and rehabilitation. Sentences are generally short and prisoners enjoy a high material standard." ~ wikipedia

      They are torturing him. They do the same to anarchists in Scandinavia.

      --
      01 REDEFINE REALITY.
    36. Re:Messed up by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 2

      When the utility company sell me gas or water they have less gas and water and have to go and find some more, when the record companies sell me music they still have exactly the same amount of music to sell

      They have found a way of selling the same thing over and over again almost indefinitely, and people of "steal" from them are hard to find because there is nothing missing to trace ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    37. Re:Messed up by TheHonch · · Score: 2

      True, I spent 47 days in solitary confinement at the infamous Kronoberg then they released, no charges, and after about 6 months I got 37000SEK for the "inconvenience". They thought I had something to do with a kidnapping (I really didn't)... But the wardens were actually quite nice, I got an Xbox in my cell, unfortunately a TV remote was required to change the channel to AV, which they didn't have (they said the tweakers broke them)... But it was miserable that I couldn't speak to anyone but the lawyer, couldn't pay any bills, it was even hard to make arrangements for my cats.

    38. Re:Messed up by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      This is insane, why is a computer programmer under solitary confinement?

      Why, should computer programmers have some special exemption from the law?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    39. Re:Messed up by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Well the first problem is that there is no such thing as intellectual property. It simply does not exist and never will.

      Nor does real property, in any sense apart from the trivial. You see that piece of land there? Why does it belong to you? That's right, because you paid for it, and in our legal system that means you own it. No other reason. There is not some magical "propertyness" about physical things. Without a legal system, I could just squat on your land or beat you up and take away your car. Similarly, if we agree that there are intangible things like goodwill, trade names, trademarks and so on that can be bought, they are property.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    40. Re:Messed up by Xest · · Score: 1

      To be fair I think this is just the Swedish way.

      Before Assange was granted bail the Swedes wanted him locked up in solitary until he could be extradited too.

      Thankfully we're a little less backwards than they are in this respect at least.

    41. Re:Messed up by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

      Oh my... this is the only anti-piracy post on slashdot that I can think of that's been modded up :)

      And you are right, musicians & artists can't compete with free (could this be why we barely get anymore good movies or music released or is that just me?) , however think of this situation as a seesaw, pre-piracy: there was a heavy lean towards the RIAA & musicians, pay $15-20 a cd, or don't listen to it period. Want to watch last night's episode of walking dead that you missed... buy the season. A bunch of people got onto the other side of the seesaw saying we won't give you a dime for years of fixed pricing, draconian copyright laws, and an overall disregard for the consumer. The seesaw started leveling and eventually tipped in the pirate's favor, everything was free, available and fast in tracker clouds. You'd have to be stupid to go to the store and buy media. And just as the law started catching up to the new technology, things like netflix & $1/song music came along to tip things to a relative balance. Suddenly it becomes: Why pirate this when it's on netflix, or at redbox, or on amazon... $2 for a movie or the potential of a $$$$ fine, redbox it is. So, in the history & future of media, piracy has and will always have its place.

    42. Re:Messed up by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

      We are content creators and distributors too. We don't compete with free, we contribute to free. We fund ourselves with our dayjobs.

      We can't help that the tools we create and the communities we create don't support your business model. You can't compete wtih what we give away for free, so stop trying to legislate away our freedoms.

    43. Re:Messed up by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Wow, the moment you call out some people as just being cheap and lazy when they infringe copyright... people jump to the conclusion that you must support old business models and toxic laws to support them :)

      I don't support "piracy" because we have to figure out some way to motivate the content creators to continue to contribute to the Public Domain (which is what you meant to say).

      I support copyrights, in theory, because they allow a temporary set of legal entitlements over some works, separating them from the Public Domain (temporarily), with the end goal of nourishing the Public Domain even further.

      I don't support the draconian enforcement laws and perversion of copyrights because they are an extreme danger to freedoms, a functional and fair economy, and represent a slippery slope to actual intellectual property. The very idea of owning an idea, or expression, is abhorrent.

      None of my positions actually contradict each other at all, and much like politics, it seems you just can't talk rationally about it sometimes.

    44. Re:Messed up by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Find an example that doesn't involve an inmate that was arrested for extradition at the request of a the United States and you may convice someone.

    45. Re:Messed up by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

      Would it be better if he was thrown in a cage with other, no doubt, rather more hardened criminals?

      ...said the pimply-faced 40-something basement-dwelling recluse whose prison "experience" is watching reruns of Oz.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    46. Re:Messed up by Xest · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about Swedish examples? If so then this very case is an example in itself- Svartholm isn't wanted in the US. Though if you want an actual factual article about how solitary is endemic in the Swedish justice system, you may want to start here:

      https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/Abstract.aspx?id=201907

      If you're talking about British examples then even Abu Hamza wasn't kept in solitary in the UK, and Richard O'Dwyer is even being allowed to walk free and finish his degree until extradition goes ahead (if it does).

      So I'm not really sure what your point is, or did you not actually have one?

    47. Re:Messed up by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't mean "Public Domain". I meant free. You could look to the various Creative Commons innovations along with Public Domain. These innovations are a necessity when derivatives of Public Domain are privately owned.

      "we have to figure out some way to motivate the content creators"

      Really? Is there a shortage of new content?

    48. Re:Messed up by unix_core · · Score: 1

      The Wire you insensitive clod!

    49. Re:Messed up by unix_core · · Score: 1

      Ask Hans Reiser.

  3. hacking of Logica? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    If so, then that would be crossing the line.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:hacking of Logica? by shentino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      His booking papers only cite pirate bay activities.

      If it was because of hacking, then his paperwork damn well should say so. The fact that it doesn't means that this is nothing but an attempt to use allegations of hacking as an excuse.

      Until someone puts their ass on the line and signs a piece of paper under oath as to why he's locked up, I'm not going to believe a word they say.

    2. Re:hacking of Logica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Until someone puts their ass on the line and signs a piece of paper under oath as to why he's locked up, I'm not going to believe a word they say.

      If you'll believe it afterwards, I have an affidavit stating that I own an over-water property I think you might be interested in purchasing.

    3. Re:hacking of Logica? by Mephistophocles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...a crime worthy of punishment equal to manslaughter.

      Remember, the death penalty for hacking has been seriously discussed. If such a discussion can be considered serious.

      --
      Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
    4. Re:hacking of Logica? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      He should have holed-up in the Ecuadorian embassy.

      http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/4038/fbcmmt.jpg

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:hacking of Logica? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      ...a crime worthy of punishment equal to manslaughter.

      Remember, the death penalty for hacking has been seriously discussed. If such a discussion can be considered serious.

      What the fuck did I just read? John Tierney is a disgusting hack of a writer. Kind of drivel like this belongs on extremist blogs that nobody reads. This is why print media is dying.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    6. Re:hacking of Logica? by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Some may argue that the potential of hacking has only touched the tip of the iceberg.

      W/b hacking the power grid during a heat strike & causing some deaths of the young & elderly?

      Or causing a component at a factory to explode by overriding it's original programming?

      It's no longer about gaining user names / passwords to pron sites and finding out-dated wordpresses. Something like stuxnet has shown the dangers of the next level.

    7. Re:hacking of Logica? by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      It's no longer about gaining user names / passwords to pron sites and finding out-dated wordpresses. Something like stuxnet has shown the dangers of the next level.

      The method used to commit the crime should rarely be a significant issue in determining guilt. If your actions led directly to someone's death or injury, or was the proximate cause of the same, then you're guilty. We don't need new laws, or stiffer punishments based on the involvement of a computer -- if you hurt or killed someone, you should be punished on that basis. Whether it was with a gun or a keyboard, the result was the same... the only question then left for the jury to answer is whether it was accidental, negligent, reckless, or intentional.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    8. Re:hacking of Logica? by tqk · · Score: 1

      Some may argue that the potential of hacking has only touched the tip of the iceberg. W/b hacking the power grid during a heat strike & causing some deaths of the young & elderly? Or causing a component at a factory to explode by overriding it's original programming? It's no longer about gaining user names / passwords to pron sites and finding out-dated wordpresses. Something like stuxnet has shown the dangers of the next level.

      Yeah, about that, ...

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:hacking of Logica? by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      Until someone puts their ass on the line and signs a piece of paper under oath as to why he's locked up

      Absolutely, there's no way Swedish officials would break the law to gain a conviction on someone.

    10. Re:hacking of Logica? by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, there's no way Swedish officials would break the law to gain a conviction on someone.

      I guess that depends on the bribe offered by the MAFIAA?

      A two-week luxury cruise paid for by the MAFIAA was enough to make the Swedish attorney general break a dozen laws by authorizing a raid on The Pirate Bay...

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    11. Re:hacking of Logica? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      If you are the idiot that hooks up the power grid control systems to the internet to save a few dollars in administration costs, then you are the one that deserves to go to prison. Air gaps and parallel networks, is what is required for serious security, don't do it then you should be going to prison for criminal negligence.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  4. Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So a man is languishing in solitary confinement for years, not allowed visitors, and is mistreated to a degree that if he were a prisoner of war it would be considered a war crime under the Geneva convention, without being charged, given a trial, or given an opportunity to defend himself... and when this man is finally released, they'll be sending him back to jail because he enabled people to download music and movies... and he's only in that country because of the aforementioned.

    Does that seem right to you?

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Not charged by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's not been there for years yet. However, it seems not unreasonable to think that they're trying to "soften him up" for the Logica case. Plenty of "civilized" governments exploit the fact that the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    2. Re:Not charged by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what if he made millions? Does that warrant solitary confinement? What kind of bootlicking pro-authoritarian are you?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Plenty of "civilized" governments exploit the fact that the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation.

      Yeah, it destroys a person, utterly and completely. A few months of it a person can endure; But a year? Years? When they finally open that door, there won't be anything left but meat. The person will have long ago left. It's disgusting and inhumane. A bullet would be more compassionate.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:Not charged by pclminion · · Score: 2

      No, he made millions of dollars allowing other people to download music/movies/games/software that other people made and own the rights to. Oh, he was a brazen prick while he did it, too. Karma is a bitch.

      I'll agree with your sentiment when corporate leaders are held to the same standard. Wear a suit, fuck over another company or group of individuals for millions of dollars, you get solitary.

      Until then, please cram your self-righteousness directly into your ass.

    5. Re:Not charged by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, he made millions of dollars allowing other people to download music/movies/games/software that other people made and own the rights to

      Hm...made millions of dollars on creative work that other people made and have copyrights on...where have I heard that before...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting

      Funny how there was no torture^H^H^H^Hsolitary confinement for the people responsible for that.

      Oh, he was a brazen prick while he did it, too

      Otherwise known as a hero:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_jobs

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    6. Re:Not charged by Elbereth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When it comes to jail, many people will spontaneously express enthusiastic support for extreme authoritarianism, even when they'd never support it otherwise. Prisoners, by virtue of having been found guilty by a court, are safe to treat as subhuman, as far as they're concerned. It may very well be an outlet for their authoritarian tendencies, but I think it's also equally likely that they're just assholes experiencing shadenfreude.

    7. Re:Not charged by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      He's a member of the 1%. If there's anything I learned from OWS, it's that it's good for laws to be abused as long as the victims are acceptable targets.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Not charged by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      I'd think putting a hacker in general population would be worse, with all the rape, beatings and stabbings.

      Hackers could probably handle being alone a lot better.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    9. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's not been there for years yet. However, it seems not unreasonable to think that they're trying to "soften him up" for the Logica case. Plenty of "civilized" governments exploit the fact that the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation.

      This does not sound like the kind of solitary confinement that produces severe psychological damage. He gets an hour a day in the exercise yard with others; his mother, at least, says that she visits him regularly, and if she can, perhaps others do; he has access to e-mail, books, and television; and he talks to the guards. I'm not saying I would like this, and I have no idea about the justice of his incarceration, but calling this solitary confinement really seems like trying to put the worst spin possible on the prisoner having a room to himself. His mother describes him as being quite entertaining during their talks, which makes some of the comments here sound alarmist.

    10. Re:Not charged by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      "Rodriguez's Sussex albums were issued in South Africa, where they sold upwards of half a million copies, but Rodriguez received no money for those sales."
      http://www.nashvillescene.com/nashville/rediscovered-singer-songwriter-sixto-rodriguez-embraces-newfound-fame-through-the-doc-searching-for-sugar-man/Content?oid=3036007

      Ok, some more solitary cells needed.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    11. Re:Not charged by Nyder · · Score: 1

      So a man is languishing in solitary confinement for years, not allowed visitors, and is mistreated to a degree that if he were a prisoner of war it would be considered a war crime under the Geneva convention, without being charged, given a trial, or given an opportunity to defend himself... and when this man is finally released, they'll be sending him back to jail because he enabled people to download music and movies... and he's only in that country because of the aforementioned.

      Does that seem right to you?

      That would never happen in The United States of America....

      --
      Be seeing you...
    12. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd think putting a hacker in general population would be worse, with all the rape, beatings and stabbings. Hackers could probably handle being alone a lot better.

      That argument is patently absurd. That's like saying when a woman gets raped, it's not as bad because they can handle it better. It doesn't matter whether someone is better or worse equipped to handle violence and mistreatment -- it's still inhumane, and the person is still damaged after. Solitary confinement is torture; It's something no civilized society should tolerate. How we treat our most vulnerable and disadvantaged citizens is the true measure our own humanity.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    13. Re:Not charged by BadgerRush · · Score: 1

      They don't have “rape, beatings and stabbings” in Swedish prisons.

    14. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      He's a member of the 1%. If there's anything I learned from OWS, it's that it's good for laws to be abused as long as the victims are acceptable targets.

      Then you learned some bad lessons, man. "The rule of law does not mean that the protection of the law must be available only to a fortunate few or that the law should be allowed to be prostituted by vested interests for protecting and upholding the status quo under the guise of enforcement of civil and political rights. The poor too have civil and political rights and the rule of law is meant for them also, though today it exists only on paper and not in reality." - Supreme Court of India, PUDR v. Union of India (AIR 1982 SC 1473, 1477),

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    15. Re:Not charged by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Hackers don't usually go into the same jails as violent crime offenders. Not in civilized countries at least. Your inmates would probably be people guilty of fraud or whatever.

    16. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with your sentiment when corporate leaders are held to the same standard.

      I won't. Torture is wrong, no matter whom it is directed against. Whether you're rich or poor, justice is supposed to be fair, impartial, and blind. Punishment should be based on what someone did, not who they are. Nobody should be put in solitary confinement or denied regular socialization for a prolonged duration. It's not a deterrent. It doesn't reform the person. It accomplishes absolutely nothing except the destruction of that person's humanity. If the punishment is to destroy someone, do it with a bullet, quickly... not taking their mind and humanity a piece at a time in some dark, forgotten room.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    17. Re:Not charged by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yet another example of how the U.S. is not a civilized country.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    18. Re:Not charged by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I won't. Torture is wrong, no matter whom it is directed against. Whether you're rich or poor, justice is supposed to be fair, impartial, and blind. Punishment should be based on what someone did, not who they are. Nobody should be put in solitary confinement or denied regular socialization for a prolonged duration. It's not a deterrent. It doesn't reform the person. It accomplishes absolutely nothing except the destruction of that person's humanity. If the punishment is to destroy someone, do it with a bullet, quickly... not taking their mind and humanity a piece at a time in some dark, forgotten room.

      Let's not get melodramatic. The house is burning down and you're worried about a broken window.

    19. Re:Not charged by khallow · · Score: 1

      But a year? Years? When they finally open that door, there won't be anything left but meat.

      From actual prisoner of war stories, it's survivable. For example, US Senator McCain spent something like two years in solitary as a prisoner of war of North Vietnam and was imprisoned in total about five and a half years under hellish conditions. Nor was his ordeal unusual. Similar stories come out of most long wars.

    20. Re:Not charged by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'd think putting a hacker in general population would be worse, with all the rape, beatings and stabbings.

      Hackers could probably handle being alone a lot better.

      Hackers aren't considered "dangerous offenders" they'd end up in min. or medium security in most countries. The fact that they're using solitary is exceptionally underhanded and says they're trying to break him for some reason. Solitary is meant as either punishment or protection. Examples would be paul bernardo who's locked up in solitary 23hrs a day, because he'd be dead in the general population, because he assaulted, murdered, mutilated and raped young women and teenage girls.

      In a general med/min security a hacker is in the middle-high ranks, same with embezzlers. They usually know how to "get things" making them valuable to know or have on your side.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    21. Re:Not charged by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    22. Re:Not charged by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Does that seem right to you?

      He 'stole' from rich people. That's how it works in the 21st century.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    23. Re:Not charged by camperdave · · Score: 1

      They don't have “rape, beatings and stabbings” in Swedish prisons.

      No, they have våldtäkt, misshandel och knivskärning

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    24. Re:Not charged by camperdave · · Score: 2

      But a year? Years? When they finally open that door, there won't be anything left but meat.

      From actual prisoner of war stories, it's survivable. For example, US Senator McCain spent something like two years in solitary as a prisoner of war of North Vietnam and was imprisoned in total about five and a half years under hellish conditions.

      But when he came out he became a US Senator and tried to become President. Obviously severe mental damage and psycho-social derangement occurred.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    25. Re:Not charged by tqk · · Score: 2

      Hackers could probably handle being alone a lot better.

      That's like saying when a woman gets raped, it's not as bad because they can handle it better.

      I usually enjoy your posts and sympathize with your POV, but that's BS. You've ignored the fact that there are many different manifestations of "solitary confinement." Sweden's sounds particularly benign. Read up on Japan's. That sounds like pure torture. I can only imagine Mexico's or Ecuador's or Syria's or Turkey's.

      A room to myself, with TV, access to the library, regular visits with family or friends, shopping for smokes or candy two times a week, ... Hell, that's like living in Mom's basement, and he doesn't even need to leave the premises to shop. Rent free! They probably even do his laundry.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    26. Re:Not charged by russotto · · Score: 1

      Hackers don't usually go into the same jails as violent crime offenders.

      They do if the hacker failed to play ball with the prosecution and the prosecution wants to send a message... or hell, just if the prosecution wants to send a message. Then the Business Software Alliance gets to start their whispering campaign "violate a software license and get raped in prison" again. Disgusting, all of them. We've got a society where obedience to the law is enforced by the threat of prison rape.

    27. Re:Not charged by tqk · · Score: 1

      Examples would be [Paul Bernardo] [wikipedia.org] who's locked up in solitary 23hrs a day, because he'd be dead in the general population ...

      Bernardo was a piker. Cf. Jeffrey Dahmer. "At his sentencing hearing, Dahmer expressed remorse for his actions, and said that he wished for his own death. " "Dahmer served his time at the Columbia Correctional Institution in Portage, Wisconsin, where he ultimately declared himself a born-again Christian. "

      "While doing janitorial work in the prison gym, Dahmer and another inmate, Jesse Anderson, were severely beaten by fellow inmate Christopher Scarver with a broomstick handle on November 28, 1994.[51] Dahmer died of severe head trauma while on his way to the hospital in an ambulance."

      Nelson: "Ha haaa." He got his wish. Who says prison is cruel?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    28. Re:Not charged by tqk · · Score: 1

      But an introvert? Oh please. If you want to torture an introvert, force them to go to parties and dance with a bunch of people they don't know.

      Hell, just send me to an interview with a potential client. "Yes, I can do miracles. What's with all these stupid questions?!?"

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    29. Re:Not charged by Wandering+Voice · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, is that if a prisoner is a ward of the state, then the state is responsible for that prisoner and also their actions. So when a prisoner gets raped in prison, I see it as no different than if the state had raped that person.

      I also feel that the victim of rape has every right to pursue revenge against the offending party, a state or otherwise.

    30. Re:Not charged by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      OK, not sure what an obscure ruling from a court in India, of all places, has to do with anything, but let me restate my point: Fuck the 1%. Fuck the sons of wealthy rich politician pricks, beat the shit out of them. Fuck the 1%. The rule of law in itself is inherently racist and exists only to serve the 1%.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    31. Re:Not charged by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      So a man is languishing in solitary confinement for years, not allowed visitors, and is mistreated to a degree that if he were a prisoner of war it would be considered a war crime under the Geneva convention, without being charged, given a trial, or given an opportunity to defend himself... and when this man is finally released, they'll be sending him back to jail because he enabled people to download music and movies... and he's only in that country because of the aforementioned.

      Look on the bright side, at least he's not being waterboarded.

    32. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      You missed my point: The fact that some people have better tolerances than others is not license for greater mistreatment of those people.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    33. Re:Not charged by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation

      Well, I guess learning Buddhist meditation can become a quite useful ability for grey hat hackers then. Worst case scenario, time passes faster. In a better one, you'll arrive at some kick ass level of focus and be able to become extremely productive in anything you do once you get out of prison. Best scenario? All the benefits of the better one, plus enlightenment.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    34. Re:Not charged by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      I would extend that to read "Prisoners, by virtue of having been accused". A lot of people start railing against people who have been accused of a crime, regardless of whether or not they have been convicted yet, or even if there is any evidence against them. Once arrested, they are guilty to a lot of people it seems.

      Of course, in this case he pissed off rich people so he *will* be found guilty no matter what happens, and because the offense concerns Big Media's rights, the punishment will be much more severe than is justified.
      There is no longer any justice in the world if your accusers are rich and influential, only the illusion of justice and a system that plays along with the rules to give the suggestion that everything is being done according to the book, but the corruption will out in the end.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    35. Re:Not charged by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      You missed the OP's point: he was claiming that a hacker might fare better in solitary than in the general population (based on the stereotype of the general prison population being largely abusive and dangerous). Combined with the above comment about the solitary confinement not being the deprivation of simulous you would expect, he could have a point. Even so, I doubt he's right unless the general prison population really is as bad to interact with as he suggests.

      He's not claiming solitary is good, he just thinks its better than the alternative (being in the general population).

    36. Re:Not charged by tqk · · Score: 1

      The fact that some people have better tolerances than others is not license for greater mistreatment of those people.

      You're not thinking like a tyrant (to your credit :-). If you were, you'd notice that some of your victims have very little difficulty handling the punishments you're meeting out, so you need to step up your game and come up with really intolerable punishments. Sweden's definition of solitary sounds damned near idyllic compared to some of the environments I've experienced, and I've read and heard about far worse ones (ie. Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, or Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago).

      As for rape, consider the life of a brothel slave of the Romans in Herculaneum, prior to Vesuvius' eruption. Death would have been considered a precious gift from Heaven.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  5. anonymity is the only defense against power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    this guy offended power but didn't stay anonymous, so he was nailed

    unless you are rich and powerful expect the machinery of society to be turned against you if you ever upset the rich and powerful

    what we need is an anonymous, distributed internet

    freenet and tor are both good starts but too hard to use for normal people

    now is the time to start building it, when the regular people rely on the conveniences of the internet but don't yet feel the restrictions on their freedoms
    if there is no alternative built by the time they do feel it and look for one then we will have lost

    learn how to configure and run a freenet and tor node on an old computer in your house, throttle the bandwidth if you want to and don't run an exit node if that is scary

    but run a node, you can be part of the solution

    look at http://project-byzantium.org/ if you are feeling more adventurous

    1. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by alexander_686 · · Score: 2

      Martin Luther King, Jr., Mohandas Gandhi, and Henry David Thoreau would disagree.

      If you want to change an unjust society, somebody has to step forward with pride and dignity to defy the system. If nobody does then we know then digital pirates are just selfish freeloaders who want to watch free movies.

      If you want to be heard, stand up and be counted.

    2. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by fredprado · · Score: 1

      In our cynical world martyrs don't work anymore. It avails not to sacrifice yourself for the cause. Anonymity is the only real defense against governments these days. And we are best served by efforts to make anonymity more impervious to governments than by martyrs.

    3. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Their examples are great, yes, but I have to disagree. In our modern world where everyone is constantly under barrage from all kinds of distractions it is way too easy to just forget what a single person, or even a small group of people, do. Also, the constant barrage of war here, war there, terrorist threat under that, threat of terrorist thread over those makes these things seem too insignificant for the Average Joe to bother his pretty head about. Standing up and making yourself a martyr just doesn't work any longer, there are too many distractions everywhere.

    4. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Really? Because I'm pretty sure martyrs just brought down four Middle Eastern governments, with a fifth on its way.

      Martyrdom doesn't work for little shit that nobody cares about. Martyrdom is the only solution against actual, we-will-kill-you-if-you-resist oppression. People fight for symbols, not for faceless ideals.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    5. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by fredprado · · Score: 1

      You can't possibly be this naive... US interests brought down four Middle Eastern governments with a fifth on the way, which happens more frequently there than you think.

      Martyrdom serves nothing nowadays, because it is too easy to deconstruct martyrs in a World everybody is too eager to think the worst of people, but by all means, keep to your beliefs and be a martyr yourself for all that it is worth.

    6. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In countries where honor is still... honored? Ask anyone younger than 60 in the US about honor these days and you'll get laughed at 19 times out of 20. Honesty, sure. Humility, no problem. Courage, still respected. Honor is the red headed step child.

    7. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by bug1 · · Score: 1

      US interests brought down four Middle Eastern governments

      If you really believe this, then explain why they didnt do it earlier.

    8. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by del_diablo · · Score: 2

      Neither of these 3 figureheads would have gotten anything done if their opposition decided to just stomp them. And thats the problem with the idealists.

    9. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by fredprado · · Score: 1

      But US did it earlier, and many many times in the last 5 or so decades. Basically all the governments brought down now were put in place by US.

    10. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by bug1 · · Score: 1

      You didnt answer my question.

    11. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by fredprado · · Score: 1

      I certainly did.

    12. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      I am being serious. If you say the vested interests are too power to overcome – guess what – you just granted them that power.

      I have issues with the peace protestors, tea parteries, etc. But I will give them a certain amount of respect because they put forward a cognizant argument, stand up and get organized, and try to move the ball forward. I know I picked martyrs but I don’t think anybody has to die over IP.

      There are times and situations where anonymity is useful.

      However, saying that you can watch the latest Game of Thrones for free so a anonymous bit torrent is the answers is a weak, whiny argument.

      We need to come up with argument and plan of action – or nothing will change.

  6. Solitary Confinement by hutsell · · Score: 1

    Really? Am I missing something about why this is necessary? Otherwise, it seems to be an act of vengeful spite or an unreasonable fear of computer technology?

    --
    Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
    1. Re:Solitary Confinement by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

      nope, it's spite. You can't expect to piss off people giving bags of money to congresscritters without suffering for it.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    2. Re:Solitary Confinement by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      I honestly thought their justice system was more enlightened over the pond. I mean, even the US there are some people that are starting to wake up to the fact that solitary confinement is an extremely cruel and tortuous thing to do to a human being. Fuck, I mean, green peace gets pissed if you keep a whale or ape locked up alone for any length of time; how can anyone think that is an ok thing to do to a human being in any but the most extreme circumstances.

    3. Re:Solitary Confinement by hutsell · · Score: 1

      As others have already posted, this is not the "solitary confinement" that you have in US prisons. [...]

      [...] In solitary confinement you get bed, PRIVACY, tv (if officially charged, or prosecutor allows i.e. after giving your sworn statement), table, toilet, water, foodstuff, books and library visit, paper and pen, access to phone (with permission of prosecutor), training room, shower, and so on. It's not the american "solitary confinement" nor is it to punish you, it's way more costly, and they try to put you into "GREEN" ward asap. After that you'll be sent to prison where there is place for you, and if you are unlucky, you get to be 3 or more in one cell. [...]

      In that case, the initial question about "missing something" as to why solitary confinement was necessary, was answered. The reason makes sense, based on what the AC above is saying, which is confirmed by the second AC being quoted from another post made later in these comments.

      Here in the States, whether the individual deserves it or not, with the exception of some issues involving high profile cases, the tendency is to treat the prisoner in isolation like a caged dog.

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
    4. Re:Solitary Confinement by hutsell · · Score: 1

      Then it's not always the idyllic scenario described in a couple of other comments. The pleasant ambiance would mean little to myself with the additional harassment combined with an indefinite time span -- the results being the same as a prison sentence. However, is this a rarity? Is it also violating a fundamental right for Swedish citizens to force government employees to formally explain themselves to a separate legal entity within a reasonable time?

      Here in the States, they supposedly eliminated this problem with the right of Habeas Corpus. I say supposedly, since it has been suspended on occassion. Otherwise, anything over 5 working days is considered abuse and (in theory) puts the defendant in a strong position to be successful in requesting the charges be dropped. (Ianal.)

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
  7. canadian company by Keruo · · Score: 1

    Logica is owned by CGI, it's canadian company now.

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    1. Re:canadian company by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      And before that it was a UK-based company. I used to work for these guys; not a bad company and in the past they have been involved in some rather cool stuff. They seem to have lost their way somewhat in the late 90s though, going from being a respected tech firm to trying to be a so-so consultancy, and growing by buying several other businesses and doing a poor job of integrating them into the whole.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  8. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In other news, recent financial transcripts show record donations by both the RIAA and MPAA to Swedish re-election campaigns.

  9. Exessive by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

    But that's not why Sweden's being so tough on him in prison. Authorities believe he may have played a role in the hacking of Logica, a Swedish technology company with ties to the country's tax authorities.

    What does it matter if there was another crime? Of course he should be tried and prosecuted if he committed a crime, but to give someone solitary confinement before he's even been charged for a non-violent crime seems completely excessive. If your justice system has people leaving it more dangerous and damaged when they came in, you are doing it wrong.

    I suppose that not every country has an innocent until guilty system though, is this usual in Sweden?

  10. The Library of Alexandria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Torrents are the modern day The Library of Alexandria.

    By law, every book and scroll was copied.

    It was critical for the development of civilization.

    A golden age lasted until the christians and muslims destroyed it.

    Don't let the plutocrats destroy our library!

    1. Re:The Library of Alexandria by jjjiii · · Score: 1

      I actually feel pretty religious about file sharing, and the internet in general. Like, besides friends and family, do I love anything more?

    2. Re:The Library of Alexandria by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      "A golden age lasted until the christians and muslims destroyed it."

      That's a fairly bold assertion. Historians are not at all sure who, or even WHEN, the Library of Alexandria was destroyed.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria

    3. Re:The Library of Alexandria by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      By law, every book and scroll was copied.

      At a time before the printing press, this meant lots of jobs for manual labourers.

      It was critical for the development of civilization.

      Employment for the sake of employment is apparently a good thing. It keeps people off the streets. Copying by computers is bad, because it is too efficient.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  11. Assange right not to trust them by Dan667 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hard to believe anything they say after watching how the swedish government acts.

    1. Re:Assange right not to trust them by sconeu · · Score: 1

      And now, Julian Assange's desire *NOT* to be extradited to Sweden begins to make a bit more sense...

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  12. If so... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    Of course, he has not been charged with any crime, so "if so" would be an overstatement. I might as well say, "nurb432 decapitated a 12 year old girl and drank her blood? If so then that would be crossing the line."

    (But you probably would not face as severe a punishment for that crime as for running something like TBP...)

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:If so... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Except im not in jail currently, and with a suspicion attached to my back. There is a difference.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:If so... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      He is in prison for aiding copyright infringement by running a torrent site. How does that raise suspicion of him hacking into anything?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:If so... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It shows he can use a computer and is willing to break the law... exactly the characteristics needed to black-hat hack.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:If so... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and by using Slashdot, you have shown that you know how to use a computer to view images and web pages. Therefore, I suspect you are downloading child pornography...

      --
      Palm trees and 8
  13. Wow by shemyazaz · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who finds it horrific to use intense psychological tactics like this in such a case? What sort of permanent damage might be caused by long term isolation like this? For what purpose? Is there some loss of life or other high impact event they hope to prevent by sweating information out of this guy? Geez.

  14. Sweden, the USA's 51'st state. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Glad to see your government is doing what it is told. Good dog. Sit, stay.

    Honestly everyone there should be up in arms angry as to how they are handling this. Why are you people doing my country's bidding?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  15. Re:IMHE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    23 hours a day, in a cell by yourself - but with tv, visitors, reading materials, and an hour outside to exercise and get some fresh air... sounds like a pretty standard prison accommodation, except he gets a private cell. (Which, incidentally, is far better than being fresh ass-meat for a prison gang.)

    "Solitary confinement" would suggest that he's not allowed contact with anybody but prison staff, which is demonstrably false because the prisoner's mother reports that she knows exactly where he is, sees him regularly, and that he's doing well - healthy and in good spirits. So, he's in a private cell, he gets an hour of exercise a day (pretty standard), and he has access to reading materials, and visitors. That's NOT solitary confinement.

    The title of this article would be much better as, "Pirate Bay Founder wants pen pals while he's relaxing in a private cell."

  16. I wonder if he will succumb to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Stockholm Syndrome.

  17. Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Solitary confinement isn't same as in US prisons. First of all he isn't in a prison where it would be strange if he was held in solitary confinement. Everyone who gets 'häktad' is held in solitary confinement or the "red" ward until the prosecutor says otherwise or he is officially charged (i.e. "förundersökningssekretess" is released).

    I've been myself confined in solitary for 2 months, where 2 weeks were voluntary. It's good times and way better than sharing a cell with some douche bags and being able to relax because the psycho in your cell is about to get a psychosis and can't take being locked in.

    In solitary confinement you get bed, PRIVACY, tv (if officially charged, or prosecutor allows i.e. after giving your sworn statement), table, toilet, water, foodstuff, books and library visit, paper and pen, access to phone (with permission of prosecutor), training room, shower, and so on. It's not the american "solitary confinement" nor is it to punish you, it's way more costly, and they try to put you into "GREEN" ward asap. After that you'll be sent to prison where there is place for you, and if you are unlucky, you get to be 3 or more in one cell.

    There is a different type of solitary confinement that I doubt Gottfried is put in, and they usually only exist in prisons and people dangerous to themselves.

    BTW, I never been to prison. Just accused of crap. Gottfried should be happy he is put in "häkte" because when he goes to prison he'll love the solitary confinement benefits. Only negative is of course that you only get to meet the wardens and a few people the prosecutor wetted before letting them see you (and they can be friends not necessarily family).

    1. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here are some pictures from the solitary confinement room he is in:

      http://www.kriminalvarden.se/upload/bilder/pressbilder/Bostadsrum_hakte.JPG

      The other rooms are allowed to be accessed during the day when you are in the "GREEN" ward and mingle with the other jailed people. I bet he is feeling way better than when he was jailed in Cambodia.

      http://www.kriminalvarden.se/sv/Medier/Pressbilder/Haktet-Sollentuna/

    2. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Someone mod this guy up, please. An actually-knowledgable reply in a sea of kneejerksmanship? Jiminy Jillikers, Radioactive Man!

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    3. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Only negative is of course that you only get to meet the wardens and a few people the prosecutor wetted before letting them see you

      Always check the door to the prosecutor's office for a bucket of water propped on it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by bug1 · · Score: 2

      I've been myself confined in solitary for 2 months

      ...

      BTW, I never been to prison. Just accused of crap.

      Its really hard for me (as an outsider) to understand how people can get locked up for 2 months just for being accused of something, and how a modern society can consider such a legal system acceptable.

      Did you get compensated for your ordeal ?

      How do you feel about the justice system after being through that ?

    5. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is compensation involved but it's not enough and I rather have stayed free. But they can't really lock you up unless there is some good evidence and they really think they can catch you. Every 1-2 weeks court has to renew the detention. I never said I wasn't guilty they just didn't have enough evidence to find me guilty.

      The important here is whether it was really necessary to keep me locked up for 2 months for such a crime. Some prosecutors take comments and replies way to personal. So a good advice is not to intentionally irritate or make a mockery of their stupid attempts to incriminate yourself. I did, but it was worth it. Anyway, if you keep your mouth shut you need to expect a longer time in jail until they exhaust all their options and pressure on you.

  18. Re:IMHE by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    Exactly. This is being portrayed as some "Cool Hand Luke" scenario where he gets a night in the box "cause that's how he wants it". When you're in prison not getting to mix with other prisoners is a feature, not a problem.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  19. not surprised. by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It isn't that hard to see the reason is pure vindictiveness on the part of (monied) rights holders, exercising their purchased cronies in world government.

    If you followed the press releases surrounding the pirate bay, and bothered to read their "legal threats" page before they were busted, you would know that the founders of the pirate bay frequently and bluntly told the large media companies to go fuck themselves with collapsable metal batons. (And even gave suggestions about which ones were of superior quality.)

    [No seriously. They really did.]

    This tidbit was alluded to discreetly by various media groups covering the trial, since their peers had made open complaints to the court about the group's lack of tact and seeming lack of seriousness, demanding harsher punishments. (Essentially, they didn't like being told to go fuck themselves, and wanted the court system to use 'harsher' punishments, because they were butt-hurt over it, illistrating their own lack of professionalism in the matter.)

    The outright illegal raid on PB servers, followed by the dubious cambodian extradition to sweden, and the endless trail of clearly damning evidence of government corruption in the case pretty clearly sums it up.

    Do I think the guy is a hero? Certainly not. Is he getting unfairly punished in proportion to his crimes? Oh yes, certainly. Is it due to government corruption? The evidence is pretty damning...

    What is he really guilty of that they want to punish him so severely?

    He threatened their hegemony, and was shamelessly unafrad of him. They can't stand that, and want to use him as a poster child to instill fear in people that would be like him, and flaunt their authority.

    More than anything, I'd say he is a political prisoner, on par with what the russians do routinely.

    1. Re:not surprised. by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      I believe you have misinterpreted my tone.

      I don't ascribe "heroic" status (a hero is somebody above the ordinary. Somebody with larger than life characteristics, that others can ascribe noble ambition or cause) to the pirate bay founders. I see them as being ordinary in every respect; the result ordinary people have when confronted with the absurd. (Which is to respond with similarly absurd defiance.)

      I hold absolutely no love for big media. The world really would be a much better place without them. However, like nietche said, "those who fight monsters must be careful to avoid becoming monsters themselves."

      The monied plutocrats behind this farcical miscarriage of justice want us to be terrified of them so we will fall into line.

      Rather than suggest anal auto-eroticism to them, I suggest we ignore their threats, and allow ourselves to be imprisoned. Non-violently. Without contest. Be shameless in admission of guilt.

      The idea is to make their campaign of terror backfire on them, much like the taliban's attempted assasination of Malala has caused serious backlashes.

      Instead of allowing them to paint ordinary people as greedy bastards who want nothing more than to put production people and artists out on the street (nevermind about the hollywood accouting. 'These aren't the crooks you're looking for!'), we need to deny them that ammunition, and let their own insatiable viciousness be their own condemnation.

      Remember when they were sueing little old ladies and 12 year olds? We need that. Lots and lots of that.

      We don't need to give them ammunition.

  20. Real nihilists(tm) say: by hessian · · Score: 1

    If you flout their rules, AND THEY CATCH YOU, expect to find yourself in solitary confinement.

    Moral of the story: don't get caught.

    -or-

    Have sensible rules.

    1. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by dmbasso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is "they think he might have something to do with whatever", so let's punish him now.

      Due process? Nah, that's for civilized countries. Which there is none on Earth right now, and things only seem to get worse.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    2. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself: don't let emotions (such as frustration) cloud your judgments, and make over-generalizations. Some countries such as Iceland and Uruguay still have sane people in government.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    3. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story: don't get caught.

      -or-

      Have sensible rules.

      The latter you can't control, so the first is the only option.

    4. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The "moral" of the story is Assange is right, Sweden is the USA's bitch and they jump through the hoops like a good doggie. Think actual Swedish content was even one half of one percent of TPB? Nope but he pissed off the media cartels which along with the other megacorps own the USA so they just told their pitbulls at the state dept "Make sure they fuck him hard" and wadda ya know? that's what they are doing.

      Sigh...I remember when extradition was actually a big deal, when only murderers and organized criminals had to worry about it, but now every. country. on. the. planet. has to follow the USA's rules and jump through the hoops, because God fucking forbid our media cartels have to get with the 21st century and use new models of business, why God that would be horrible!

      Just think, if the cartels would have been in place at the turn of the 20th century you'd be forced to this very day to buy a saddle and buggywhip for every person riding in a vehicle. I mean how dare they have to change when they could just buy the laws?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by netsentry · · Score: 1

      The disappointing part is I had always looked at Sweden's government model as being efficient and well-balanced in the past, especially in terms of education and health care. I wonder if this type of action is typical of their judicial system.

    6. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by cavreader · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may want to re-evaluate your history of the late 1900's and early 20th century in regards to the existence of cartels and over bearing monopolies. It was during this time period when worker rights were non-existent and monopolies were not restricted in how they conducted their business enterprises. And stop blaming the US and let Sweden take responsibility for their own actions for a change. That is of course unless you have any proof to back up your statement.

    7. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      I remember an ftp server for windows that prohibited it's usage by the military and police as the author felt that they were too corrupt and he was a Norwegian.... it was WarFTPD if I remember correctly

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  21. Progress by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

    It's like people invent computers and then decide to throw out justice in the process...

  22. Cages | Expediting Evolution by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    The act of caging any individual without a high probability of recidivism, is essentially spite. It is a form of archaic, wanton penalization probably not even presumed to have any preventive or rehabilitative effect past its end. More practical would be an imposed condition for a ruled duration that would make repeating the crime wildly unlikely or impossible -- preferably while improving rather than weakening the subject. A cage is an efficient method of preventing people from doing anything that cannot be done in a cage with the limited resources at hand. Under typical conditions beyond basic toiletries and tattered books (if they are so lucky), such resources are their own forms and little more, thus leaving violence, idleness and anticipation of food as the majority of very few options. Solitary confinement might actually be more widely practiced for the betterment of society, but only for the violent or voluntary. Otherwise, it makes little sense unless one thinks like a criminal their self.

    I have never observed any value (beyond monetary) in caging anyone who poses no imminent threat to themselves or society. However, as displayed by the practice, it is not ethics that guide such tyrannical policies; it is often pettiness, laziness, or profit. The cage is the gangrene that handicaps society -- by placing problems out of sight and out of mind, sweeping them under the carpet to fester and haunt us any time but now. But it haunts us now despite.

    Of course the answer to this comes from the very fiends who cultivate this gangrenous rot. In the US especially, prison-labor is on the rise like never before. Next time you eat your potatoes, you might ponder what crime the man who harvested them committed.

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  23. Assange's reluctance by revscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And this is exactly the reason why Julian Assange is so (wisely) set against being extradited to Sweden.

    1. Re:Assange's reluctance by Nyder · · Score: 1

      And this is exactly the reason why Julian Assange is so (wisely) set against being extradited to Sweden.

      Right, to avoid due process. That doesn't make him a hero.

      but it's not about due process, it's about not getting extradited to the USA, which most everyone agrees Sweden will hand him over to the USA if they get their hands on him.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    2. Re:Assange's reluctance by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 1

      The fact that "most everyone" believes something, doesn't make it true. It really bugs me that a lot of causes that I agree with (human rights activists, envionmentalists, and others) are filled with very vocal, very naîve, mostly young pepole who will repeat anyting they percieve to support their cause, weather true or not. This severely hurts the cause, and in a time when a simple Google fact check takes only seconds to do, there is no excuse for repeating untruths. (Unless you consider "being an idiot" an excuse for any kind of behavior.)

      The extradition treaty between Sweden and the UK means that Assange can not be extradited from Sweden to a third country unless the UK agrees. So it would be much easier for the US to request extradition directly from the UK (requres consent only from a UK court) than from Sweden (requires consent from a UK court and a Swedish court.) (Sources are linked from this article wich took me only a few seconds to find on Google.)

  24. Dial it down a notch, MAFIAA, will you? by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I could never imagine how fast will the "content industry" bring upon us a totalitarian, corporatist dystopia. The US is pushing for extradition of people who engaged in copying - not violent attacks, not murder, not kidnapping, not arms or drugs dealing, no, nothing but fucking COPYING copyrighted content.

    The only thing more alarming is the great majority of sheeple, I mean people, watching all this and going "oh well, I guess Bono's got to buy food, too". Pathetic.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  25. The Lesson by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't fuck with big corporations.

    You get thrown in jail and the key thrown away.

    The upside-down world: a co-founder of Pirate Bay is in solitary, but the guys who stole $18 trillion in the 2007-08 economic collapse scam are running around free and using their cash to influence the US election.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:The Lesson by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and despite blowing all that cash trying to get their buddy Obama re-elected, it's looking more and more like they might fail after all.

    2. Re:The Lesson by FuzzyHead · · Score: 1

      You assume that they haven't bought both sides. Last I checked the major players buy the vote both from Republicans and Democrats.

  26. Violation of his human rights by jonfr · · Score: 2

    This treatment is a clear violation of his human rights. Sweden state should be sued over this treatment to ECJ. Since Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is part of Lisbon Treaty that Sweden has agreed to. I am not sure where the first one might be sued to. But that might be European Court of Human Rights.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_Rights
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_of_Fundamental_Rights_of_the_European_Union

    1. Re:Violation of his human rights by jonfr · · Score: 1

      You need to get familiar with CoE stand on this. This treatment is not dignifying or fair at all.

      You can do so here.

      http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/Viewpoints/070305_en.asp

  27. The stainless steel rat ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    would have approved of anyone hacking the tax man!

  28. Sensible Court Opinions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That court decision was made during the socialist autarky period of India. Equality before the law is socialism in/of the judiciary. The world can no longer afford that any more. It's UNSUSTAINABLE!

  29. Cruel and Unusual Punishment by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    23/7 Solitary Confinement is cruel and unusual, and designed with the express purpose of torturing an inmate into submission.

    How any court can hold that "segregation" is compatible with the 8th Amendment is beyond me, and I would think that Europe would be much farther long in eliminating such punishment.

  30. Swedish Prison Industrial Complex: by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    Fuck You.

    But that's not why Sweden's being so tough on him in prison. Authorities believe he may have played a role in the hacking of Logica, a Swedish technology company with ties to the country's tax authorities. They haven't charged him with any crimes yet in that case, however."

    Oh, I see- on the SUSPICION he MIGHT have done something to fuck with your tax system, he deserves solitary confinement. Has he been charged with such? NO. Has he been convicted of such? NO. They just think he did it. ASSHOLES. FUCK YOU. Get off your knees and stop sucking the MPAA and RIAA's dick.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  31. Mystery solved by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

    I wondered why, on waking up thus morning, I felt safer - as if a great threat had been removed from the world. Well done, Sweden, and may I compliment your recent applications of extradition. I know Ben Stiller can rely upon you to execute international justice if anyone should slate his movies.

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  32. Re:How they people in power really feel by Spectrumanalyzer · · Score: 1

    They should fear the ones they dont ever hear about. They are, however our unsung heroes, well never know their names, never truly know their actions, but theyre making our world a better place, you can rest assured of that.

    How do I know? Truth be told - I dont.